1: \documentclass{JAC2003}
2:
3: %%
4: %% Use \documentclass[boxit]{JAC2003}
5: %% to draw a frame with the correct margins on the output.
6: %%
7: %% Use \documentclass[acus]{JAC2003}
8: %% for US letter paper layout
9: %%
10: \input{definitions}
11:
12: \usepackage{graphicx}
13:
14: %%
15: %% VARIABLE HEIGHT FOR THE TITLE BOX (default 35mm)
16: %%
17:
18: \setlength{\titleblockheight}{25mm}
19:
20: \begin{document}
21:
22: \begin{titlepage}
23: \vspace*{1cm}
24: \begin{center}
25:
26: \boldmath
27: {\Large \bf Electroweak Gauge Theories and Alternative Theories\\
28: at a Future Linear $\ee$ Collider}
29: \unboldmath
30:
31: \vspace*{1cm}
32:
33: {\sc K. M\"onig}
34:
35: \vspace*{.5cm}
36:
37: {\normalsize \it
38: DESY-Zeuthen \\
39: Platanenallee 6, D-15738 Zeuthen\\
40: email: moenig@ifh.de}
41: \par
42: \end{center}
43: \vskip 1cm
44: \begin{center}
45: \bf Abstract
46: \end{center}
47: {%\it
48: The measurement of Standard Model processes tests the validity of the
49: model at a given scale and is simultaneously sensitive to new
50: physics through loop effects or interference with the Standard Model
51: amplitudes. A variety of studies has been done to see what
52: a linear collider in the energy range $\MZ < \sqrt{s} < 1 \TeV$ can offer.
53: The work that has been done within the ECFA/DESY workshop on
54: linear colliders is reviewed, especially what was not included in
55: the TESLA TDR.
56: }
57: \vfill
58: \begin{center}
59: {\it Invited talk presented at the Linear Collider Workshop,
60: Amsterdam, April 2003}
61: \end{center}
62: \end{titlepage}
63: \pagestyle{plain}
64:
65:
66:
67: \title{ELECTROWEAK GAUGE THEORIES AND ALTERNATIVE THEORIES}
68:
69: \author{K. M\"onig\thanks{
70: The work reported in this talk was done by the members
71: of the ``Electroweak Gauge Theories and Alternative Theories''
72: working group of the Extended ECFA/DESY Study;
73: B. Ananthanarayan (Bangalore),
74: D. Anipko (Nowosibirsk),
75: D. Bardin (Dubna),
76: I. Bozovic (VINCA Belgrade),
77: A. Datta (Helsinki),
78: A. Denner (PSI Villingen),
79: M. Diehl (DESY Hamburg),
80: S. Dittmaier (MPI Munich),
81: J. Fleischer (Uni Bielefeld),
82: I. Ginzburg (Nowosibirsk),
83: J. Gluza (DESY Zeuthen),
84: T. Hahn (MPI Munich),
85: S. Heinemeyer (LMU Munich),
86: J. Hewett (SLAC),
87: W. Kilian (DESY Hamburg),
88: A. Leike (LMU Munich),
89: A. Lorca (DESY Zeuthen),
90: V. Makarenko (NC PHEP Minsk),
91: I. Marfin (NC PHEP Minsk),
92: M. Maul (Lund),
93: W. Menges (DESY Hamburg),
94: O. Nachtmann (Uni Heidelberg),
95: F. Nagel (Uni Heidelberg),
96: T. Ohl (Uni W\"urzburg),
97: P. Osland (Bergen),
98: A. Pankov (Gomel),
99: N. Paver (Trieste),
100: F. Piccinini (Pavia),
101: W. Placzek (Krakow),
102: P. Poulose (RWTH Aachen),
103: F. Richard (Orsay),
104: S. Riemann (DESY Zeuthen),
105: T. Riemann (DESY Zeuthen),
106: S. Rindani (Ahmedabad),
107: T. Rizzo (SLAC),
108: M. Ronan (LBL Berkeley),
109: M. Roth (Karlsruhe),
110: M. Schumacher (Uni Bonn),
111: J. Sekaric (DESY Zeuthen),
112: T. Shishkina (NC PHEP Minsk),
113: M. Spira (PSI Villingen),
114: A. Stahl (DESY Zeuthen),
115: D. Wackerroth (Buffalo),
116: A. Werthenbach (CERN),
117: G. Weiglein (Durham),
118: G. Wilson (Kansas)
119: },
120: DESY Zeuthen, Germany}
121:
122: \maketitle
123:
124: \begin{abstract}
125: The measurement of Standard Model processes tests the validity of the
126: model at a given scale and is simultaneously sensitive to new
127: physics through loop effects or interference with the Standard Model
128: amplitudes. A variety of studies has been done to see what
129: a linear collider in the energy range $\MZ < \sqrt{s} < 1 \TeV$ can offer.
130: The work that has been done within the ECFA/DESY workshop on
131: linear colliders is reviewed, especially what was not included in
132: the TESLA TDR.
133: \end{abstract}
134:
135: \section{INTRODUCTION}
136: It is a common belief that the Standard Model of electroweak interactions is
137: not the final theory valid up to very high scales. Nevertheless the
138: model is able to describe all experimental data up to now with a
139: typical precision around one per mille \cite{jenspdg}.
140: At a linear $\ee$ collider that can run at centre of mass energies, $\sqrt{s}$,
141: between the Z-pole and around $1 \TeV$ one expects to see finally deviations
142: from the Standard Model predictions.
143: These deviations in precision measurements occur typically for two
144: reasons. If the new physics occurs in loop diagrams their effect is
145: usually suppressed by a loop factor $\alpha / 4 \pi$ and
146: very high precision is required to see it. If the new physics occurs
147: already on the Born level but at very high masses, the effects are
148: suppressed by a propagator factor
149: $\frac{s}{(s-m_{NP}^2) + im_{NP}\Gamma} $ so that it is important
150: to work at the highest possible energies.
151: Both effects have already been used successfully in the past. PEP,
152: PETRA and TRISTAN have been able to measure the fermion couplings to
153: the Z although they were running at energies roughly a factor two below
154: the resonance pole \cite{fujii}. Ten years ago LEP could predict the
155: mass of the top from its loop effects \cite{leptop}, exactly
156: where it was found at the TEVATRON later \cite{tevtop}. Today we are
157: able to limit the Higgs mass to roughly
158: $200\GeV$ from loop effects at LEP, SLD and the TEVATRON (figure
159: \ref{fig:blueband}) or to set
160: limits of about $500 \GeV$ on the mass of a hypothetical Z' boson
161: from two fermion production
162: at LEP II (figure \ref{fig:zplep}) \cite{lepew}.
163: In the same way we expect that in ten years from now a linear
164: collider will estimate, depending on the physics scenario nature has
165: chosen, model parameters in a supersymmetric theory from
166: high statistics running at the Z resonance or the mass of a
167: techni-$\rho$ resonance from
168: W-pair production at high energies \cite{phystdr}.
169:
170: \begin{figure}[htb]
171: \centering
172: \includegraphics[width=\linewidth,bb=18 38 561 565]{w03_blueband.eps}
173: \caption{Prediction of the Higgs mass from the electroweak precision data.}
174: \label{fig:blueband}
175: \end{figure}
176: \begin{figure}[htb]
177: \centering
178: \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{zp_excl.eps}
179: \caption{Exclusion of Z' within E(6) models from LEP.}
180: \label{fig:zplep}
181: \end{figure}
182:
183:
184: There are several types of reactions to test the
185: Standard Model or to investigate alternative theories. With
186: two fermion or four fermion production on the Z-pole or close to the
187: W-pair production threshold one can improve on the measurements done at
188: LEP and SLD by an order of magnitude.
189: Two fermion production at high energies is sensitive to contact
190: interactions in general or more specific to heavy Z'-bosons or models with
191: extra space dimensions.
192: Four or six fermion production at high energy has a large contribution
193: from multi gauge boson production which is sensitive to gauge boson couplings.
194: This is especially interesting if no elementary Higgs boson exists and the
195: electroweak symmetry is broken by a new strong interaction at a high scale.
196:
197: In the following sections the results of the
198: ``Electroweak Gauge Theories and Alternative Theories'' group of the
199: ECFA/DESY linear collider workshop will be discussed
200: with particular emphasis on the progress since the TESLA TDR
201: \cite{phystdr} in March 2001.
202:
203: An essential ingredient for all
204: precision measurements are accurate Standard Model calculations which
205: are needed to one or two loop precision. Quite some progress has been made in
206: the last years and many more calculations are still under way.
207: This work is summarised in a special contribution to these
208: proceedings \cite{stefan_lv}.
209:
210: \section{THE GIGA-Z SCENARIO}
211:
212: The main physics goals of the Giga-Z scenario are a measurement of the
213: effective leptonic weak mixing angle with a precision of
214: $\Delta \stl = 0.000013$ from the left-right asymmetry, which would be
215: an improvement of a factor 13 from LEP/SLD and a measurement of the
216: W-mass with an experimental accuracy of $\Delta \MW = 6 \MeV$,
217: improving the present LEP/TEVATRON
218: result by a factor six \cite{phystdr}. While the $\stl$ measurement has no
219: competition at any other machine the LHC has the goal to measure the
220: W-mass with a precision of $15 \MeV$ \cite{lhcprec}.
221: The anticipated Giga-Z accuracy is shown in figure \ref{fig:gigaz} \cite{sven}
222: compared to the present and LHC precision and to the predictions of
223: the Standard Model and the MSSM.
224:
225: \begin{figure}[htb]
226: \centering
227: \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{SWMW03.cl.eps}
228: \caption{Expected precision for $\MW$ and $\stl$ at Giga-Z compared to
229: the present situation and to the LHC expectation.
230: LHC/LC denotes LC high energy running only.
231: }
232: \label{fig:gigaz}
233: \end{figure}
234:
235:
236: The experimental requirements for this measurement are a luminosity of
237: ${\cal L} \approx 5 \cdot 10^{33} \lunit$ at $\sqrt{s} \sim \MZ$ which
238: allows to record $10^9$ Z-decays in less than a year, electron and
239: positron polarisation to measure polarisation mainly from data, a beam
240: energy measurement of $\Delta \sqrt{s} = 1 \MeV$ relative to $\MZ$
241: close to the Z-peak and an extrapolation from $\MZ$ to
242: $2 \MW$ with $\Delta \sqrt{s} / \sqrt{s} < 5 \cdot 10^{-5}$
243: and control of the beamstrahlung on
244: the few \% level. If also the Z-partial width measurements shall
245: be improved, an absolute measurement of the luminosity with a
246: precision of $\Delta {\cal L} / {\cal L} = 10^{-4}$ is needed
247: \cite{kmh,marc,graham}.
248:
249: Excellent polarimeters are needed for relative
250: measurements like time dependencies or the polarisation difference between
251: positive and negative helicities of the beam particles.
252: Detailed design studies for polarimetry, beam energy
253: measurement, measurement of the beamstrahlung and of the luminosity
254: are currently under way \cite{usbeam, lumprc}.
255:
256: Significant progress was achieved on the theoretical side. The largest
257: parametric uncertainty for the measurement of $\stl$ is the
258: uncertainty in the hadronic contribution to the running of the fine
259: structure constant up to the Z-mass, $\alpha( \MZ^2)$. Not to be
260: limited too much by the knowledge of $\alpha( \MZ^2)$ the hadronic
261: cross section $\sigma( \ee \rightarrow \qq)$ needs to be known with
262: 1\% precision up to the $\Upsilon$ region \cite{fred}.
263: CMD II basically achieved this goal in the $\rho$ region \cite{cmd,cmd2},
264: however there are some discrepancies with the $\tau$ spectral
265: functions \cite{davier,davier2}. In the region $2\GeV < \sqrt{s} < 5 \GeV$
266: BES II improved the data recently from 20\% to 7\% accuracy \cite{bess}
267: and further
268: progress is possible. In addition precise results from radiative
269: return experiments at DA$\Phi$NE, CESR and the b-factories can be
270: expected in the near future.
271:
272: Significant progress has been achieved also in the prediction of the
273: W-mass. The calculation of $\MW$ from the Fermi constant and $\MZ$ is
274: now complete to second order plus the $\MT$ dependent 3-loop
275: corrections \cite{stefan_lv}. This results in an uncertainty in
276: the $\MW$ prediction of around $3-4 \MeV$.
277: For $\stl$ some 2-loop contributions are still missing and the
278: theoretical uncertainty is estimated to be $\Delta \stl = 0.00006$
279: much larger than the experimental goal \cite{stlerr}.
280: Also some other complicated
281: calculations that are necessary for Giga-Z are not yet done and there
282: is still a long way to go.
283:
284: \boldmath
285: \section{$\ee \rightarrow \ff$ AT HIGH ENERGY}
286: \unboldmath
287: The most general parameterisation for new physics at high scales are
288: contact interactions. For very large masses of the exchange particles
289: the propagator goes like
290: \[
291: \left| \frac{1}{s-M^2} \right| \, \approx \,
292: \left| \frac{1}{t-M^2} \right| \, \approx \, \frac{1}{M^2}
293: \]
294: so that the new interaction can be parameterised in a contact term
295: $\frac{1}{\Lambda^2}$ which is equal to $\frac{g^2}{16 \pi M^2}$ in
296: gauge theories.
297: %In this normalisation the contact term in $\mu$ decay
298: %is $\Lambda = \sqrt{ 4 \pi \sqrt{2}/ G_\mu } \sim 1.2 \TeV$ compared
299: %to the real mass of the exchange particle of $\MW = 80 \GeV$
300:
301: Since the
302: experimental sensitivity to the contact term comes mostly from the
303: interference with the Standard Model amplitude the helicity structure
304: is important. TDR studies at $\sqrt{s} = 800 \GeV$
305: gave typical limits around $50 \TeV$
306: for $\ee \rightarrow \mumu$ and $\ee \rightarrow \bb$. The LHC reaches
307: similar limits, however mainly for the coupling between leptons and
308: light quarks.
309: Figure \ref{fig:contact} shows the linear collider reach in $\Lambda$
310: for $\ee \rightarrow \mumu$, $\sqrt{s} = 500 \GeV$ and
311: ${\cal P}_e = 0.8$ as a function of the integrated luminosity \cite{pcont}.
312: In a recent study the sensitivity of Bhabha and M{\/o}ller scattering to
313: contact interactions has been studied \cite{paver}. It was found
314: that the limits can be improved by typically 20\% compared to muons.
315: Due to the lower luminosity in ${\rm e^- e^-}$ running compared to
316: $\ee$ the sensitivities in Bhabha and M{\/o}ller scattering are about
317: the same.
318: \begin{figure}[htb]
319: \centering
320: \includegraphics[width=\linewidth,bb=13 21 472 392]{paver.eps}
321: \caption{Contact interaction reach of the linear collider
322: for $\ee \rightarrow \mumu$, $\sqrt{s} = 500 \GeV$ and
323: ${\cal P}_e = 0.8$ as a function of the integrated luminosity.}
324: \label{fig:contact}
325: \end{figure}
326:
327: \subsection{Models with Z'}
328:
329: There are two approaches to study models with a Z' at a linear
330: collider. In a model dependent study one assumes that one knows the
331: model so that the Z'-mass is the only free parameter. In this case all
332: couplings are fixed and any
333: deviation of a measurement from the Standard Model value translates
334: directly into a value of the Z'-mass. All final states can be
335: used in this case.
336: As for the contact terms there is a large difference between the
337: models since the main sensitivity comes from the interference
338: term. Figure \ref{fig:zpmod} compares the reachable Z' masses for
339: different models at the linear collider and the LHC \cite{sabine}.
340: On average the reachable masses are similar for both machines and
341: around $4 \TeV$.
342:
343: \begin{figure}[htb]
344: \centering
345: \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{zpmin2.eps}
346: \caption{Mass reach for a Z' in different models for LHC and LC. The
347: solid bars correspond to a $5 \sigma$ discovery, while the dashed
348: ones correspond to a $2 \sigma$ exclusion.}
349: \label{fig:zpmod}
350: \end{figure}
351:
352: In a model independent approach the Z' mass and the Z' couplings are
353: considered simultaneously as free parameters. Any observable is given
354: as the product of initial state and final state couplings, so that a Z'
355: remains invisible in $\ee$ if it does not couple to leptons. For this
356: reason hadronic events can be used only when non-zero Z'-lepton
357: couplings are already established.
358: At a given centre of mass energy a linear collider is sensitive to the
359: normalised couplings
360:
361: \begin{eqnarray*}
362: a_f^N & = & a_f' \sqrt{\frac{s}{m_{Z'}^2-s}}\\
363: v_f^N & = & v_f' \sqrt{\frac{s}{m_{Z'}^2-s}}
364: \end{eqnarray*}
365: which can be measured for leptons in a model independent way using
366: cross sections and asymmetries. A Z' model is then defined as a line
367: in the $a_f^N-v_f^N$ plane where the exact position is given by the Z'
368: mass.
369: Figure \ref{fig:zpind} shows the sensitivity of the linear collider
370: assuming for the central value a $\chi$-model with
371: $m_{\rm Z'} = 6 \TeV$, which is outside the LHC sensitivity \cite{sabine}.
372: Also shown is the prediction for several E(6) models, where
373: $\chi,\,\psi,\,\eta$ stands for different mixing angles between the
374: gauge bosons from the ${\rm U}(1)_\chi$ and ${\rm U}(1)_\psi$
375: gauge group \cite{Cho:1998nr}.
376: The different models can be clearly separated with high luminosity.
377:
378: In the ideal case the LHC finds a Z' and measures
379: its mass so the linear collider can measure the couplings. Figure
380: \ref{fig:zpcmass} shows the LC sensitivity in this case
381: for different models and
382: different assumptions on $\sqrt{s}$ and $m_{\rm Z'}$ \cite{phystdr}.
383: In general the
384: couplings can be measured with a precision of a few percent.
385: \begin{figure}[htb]
386: \centering
387: \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{lc-l-mav.eps}
388: \caption{Measurement of normalised Z' couplings at TESLA. The
389: $\chi$-model with $m_{\rm Z'} = 6 \TeV$ is assumed for the central value.}
390: \label{fig:zpind}
391: \end{figure}
392:
393: \begin{figure}[htb]
394: \centering
395: \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{tdr-lcoupcol.eps}
396: \caption{Measurement of the Z' couplings at a linear collider for different Z'
397: masses and centre of mass energies.}
398: \label{fig:zpcmass}
399: \end{figure}
400:
401: For the left-right symmetric model an analysis on the one loop level
402: has been performed \cite{gluza}. In this model the quadratic top mass
403: dependence of $\Delta \rho$ is suppressed by a term
404: $\frac{M_{W_1}^2}{M_{W_2}^2-M_{W_1}^2}$ where $W_1$ is the observed
405: W-boson and $M_{W_2} > 500 \GeV$. The successful prediction of $\MT$ at LEP
406: was therefore a pure accident and the heavy Higgs and right handed
407: neutrino masses need to be fine tuned to fit the LEP/SLD precision
408: data.
409:
410: Another study analysed the sensitivity to Z--Z' mixing one can get
411: from the Z-data and the W mass \cite{richard}. As an example figure
412: \ref{fig:zzpmix} shows the current measurements and the Giga-Z
413: expectation compared to several Z' models assuming that a $115 \GeV$
414: Higgs has been found. It can be seen that apart from $\stl$ and $\MW$
415: an accurate measurement of the leptonic decay width of the Z,
416: $\Gamma_l$, is useful as well.
417: \begin{figure}[htb]
418: \centering
419: \includegraphics[width=\linewidth,bb=17 0 641 698]{zpr115.eps}
420: \caption{Predictions of several models with a Z' compared to the
421: present and predicted Giga-Z precision data. The ellipse around the
422: crossing point indicates the uncertainty from the present day error
423: on $\MT$ and $\alpha(\MZ)$.}
424: \label{fig:zzpmix}
425: \end{figure}
426:
427: \subsection{Extra space dimensions}
428:
429: The linear collider and the LHC are sensitive to the presence of
430: extra space dimensions via
431: effects from Kaluza Klein tower graviton ($G^*$) exchange.
432: In the TDR it has been shown that there are visible effects from
433: $\ee \rightarrow \gamma G^*$ and $\ee \rightarrow G^* \rightarrow \ff$
434: for an extra dimension scale of $M_H < 8 \TeV$ and $\sqrt{s} = 800
435: \GeV$. The reach of LHC is similar.
436: Recently the emphasis has been put on the question how one can
437: distinguish an extra dimensions signal from a Z' in case a deviation
438: from the Standard Model is seen. Here one can use the fact that the
439: Graviton is a tensor particle.
440:
441: If one defines the moments
442: $\langle P_n \rangle = \int dz \frac{1}{\sigma} \frac{d \sigma}{dz} P_n(z)$,
443: where
444: the $P_n$ are the Legendre polynomials and $z = \cos \theta$ is the
445: cosine of the polar angle, one can show that for vector or scalar
446: particle s-channel exchange $\langle P_n \rangle=0$ for $n>2$ while for tensor
447: particle exchange $\langle P_{3,4} \rangle \ne 0$ \cite{tom_mom}.
448: A unique identification of tensor particle exchange can be achieved up
449: to around $5 \TeV$ with $\sqrt{s}=800\GeV$, ${\cal L} = 1 \abi$ and
450: electron (positron) polarisation of 80\% (60\%). Similar results can
451: be obtained with specially constructed asymmetries \cite{Osland:2003fn}.
452:
453: If transverse beam polarisation is available for both beams one can
454: measure the azimuthal asymmetry as a function of the polar
455: angle \cite{tom_pt}.
456: Figure \ref{fig:ptasy} shows this asymmetry for leptons b- and
457: c-quarks for the Standard Model and for $M_H = 1.5 \TeV$.
458: Using this asymmetry extra dimensions can be excluded up to
459: $M_H< 10 (22) \TeV$ for $\sqrt{s} = 0.5 (1) \TeV$, which is the highest
460: reach at a next generation collider.
461: For vector and scalar particle exchange the azimuthal asymmetry is
462: symmetric in $\cos \theta$, while it is asymmetric if also tensor
463: particle exchange is
464: present. This allows to distinguish extra dimensions from Z' exchange
465: up to $M_H < 10 \sqrt{s}$.
466:
467: \begin{figure}[htb]
468: \centering
469: \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{edim_pt.eps}
470: \caption{Azimuthal asymmetry with transverse beam polarisation
471: as a function of the polar angle for
472: leptons b- and c-quarks for the Standard Model and for $M_H = 1.5 \TeV$.}
473: \label{fig:ptasy}
474: \end{figure}
475:
476: \subsection{CP violation in $\tau$ production}
477: In the Standard Model the CP-violating dipole moment of the $\tau$
478: lepton is extremely small ($\sim 10^{-34}\,{\rm e \, cm}$). However for
479: example in models with Majorana neutrinos or in CP violating two Higgs
480: doublet models these moments can be of order $10^{-19}\,{\rm e \, cm}$.
481:
482: It has been studied how well the electric and weak dipole moment can
483: be measured in $\tau$ pair production at TESLA using spin correlations
484: and polarised beams \cite{Ananthanarayan:2002fh}.
485: For this analysis $\tau \rightarrow \pi \nu$ and
486: $\tau \rightarrow \rho \nu$ decays have been used and CP-odd vector
487: correlations between the two $\tau$s have been constructed. At
488: $\sqrt{s}=800\GeV$ the real parts of the weak and the electromagnetic
489: dipole moment can be measured with a precision of
490: $3-4 \cdot 10^{-19}\,{\rm e \, cm}$ which touches the
491: interesting region. For the imaginary parts the precision is about
492: three orders of magnitude worse.
493:
494: \section{GAUGE BOSON PRODUCTION}
495:
496: High precision measurements of gauge boson production are interesting
497: in several aspects. The interactions amongst gauge bosons are directly
498: given by the structure of the gauge group. The longitudinal gauge
499: bosons are connected to the mechanism of electroweak symmetry breaking
500: so that their interactions can teach us about this mechanism in case
501: no elementary Higgs boson exists.
502: In a strongly interacting theory the longitudinal components of
503: the gauge bosons are expected to have similar interactions at very
504: high energies as the pions in QCD at low energy.
505:
506: In a weakly interacting theory including an elementary Higgs boson
507: gauge boson self-interactions should
508: receive loop corrections of
509: ${\cal O}(\frac{g^2}{16 \pi^2}) \sim 3 \cdot 10^{-3}$. If the
510: experimental precision is larger than this number gauge boson
511: interactions should be able to test the then Standard Model in the
512: same way as $\stl$ and $\MW$ do it now.
513:
514: For the TDR a detailed study including full detector simulation has
515: been done for $\ee \rightarrow \WW$ \cite{menges}. It has been found
516: than the C, P conserving couplings can be measured with a precision of
517: $3-15 \cdot 10^{-4}$ at $\sqrt{s} = 500 \GeV$ and around a factor two
518: better at $\sqrt{s} = 800 \GeV$. This is much better than the
519: expected effects from radiative corrections so that W-pair production
520: will become a new precision observable. In a strongly interacting
521: scenario this precision translates into a new physics scale of $\Lambda > 10
522: \TeV$ which is also significantly above the $\Lambda \le 3 \TeV$ limit
523: from unitarity. The C or P violating couplings can be measured roughly
524: one order of magnitude worse than the C, P conserving ones.
525:
526: Recently a study using optimal observables has been done
527: \cite{diehl}. This work is on parton level only up to now, but it has
528: shown that the imaginary parts of the couplings can be measured
529: simultaneously with the real parts with about the same precision and
530: without degrading the precision of the real parts. Only one
531: combination of couplings $({\rm Im}(g^R_1+ \kappa_R))$ cannot be
532: measured with longitudinal beam polarisation.
533: If transverse beam polarisation is available this coupling can be measured.
534: In this case, however, the precision of the other coupling is degraded by
535: roughly a factor of two \cite{diehl2}.
536:
537: Also the measurement of the triple gauge couplings at a photon collider in
538: $\gamma \gamma \rightarrow WW$ and $e \gamma \rightarrow W \nu$ has
539: been studied, using hadronic W decays only.
540: The study of $e \gamma \rightarrow W \nu$ is reasonably
541: complete \cite{jadranka}, while in $\gamma \gamma \rightarrow WW$ the
542: azimuthal decay angle, $\phi$, which is sensitive to the interference
543: of the different helicity amplitudes is still missing \cite{ivanka}.
544: Both reactions can be selected cleanly with an overall efficiency
545: around 80\%. Figure \ref{fig:egwn} shows the polar angle distribution
546: for $e \gamma \rightarrow W \nu$ and the background after cuts on the
547: visible energy and the invariant mass. In the real $e \gamma$ mode,
548: where only one beam is converted, only some background in the extreme
549: forward and backward regions is left from $e \gamma \rightarrow Ze$
550: and from $\gamma \gamma$ induced hadron production which can easily
551: be rejected by an angular cut. In the parasitic mode, where the
552: $e \gamma$ luminosity during $\gamma \gamma$ running is used, some
553: additional background from $\gamma \gamma \rightarrow WW$ where one W
554: decays leptonically is left.
555:
556: \begin{figure}[htb]
557: \centering
558: \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{egacc.eps}
559: \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{egacc_par.eps}
560: \caption{Signal and background for $e \gamma \rightarrow W \nu$ in the
561: real $e \gamma$ mode (a) and from the parasitic $\gamma \gamma$ running (b).
562: The white area represents the signal. In a) the hatched contribution
563: on the left is from $\gamma \gamma$ induced processes and the one on
564: the right from $e \gamma \rightarrow eZ$. The additional cross-hatched
565: (green) contribution in b) is from
566: $\gamma \gamma \rightarrow q \bar{q}$ and the singly hatched (red) from
567: $\gamma \gamma \rightarrow WW$.
568: }
569: \label{fig:egwn}
570: \end{figure}
571:
572: The cross sections in these two channels are much larger than in
573: $\ee$. However there are no large gauge cancellations so that the
574: final precision is comparable in all cases.
575: Figure \ref{fig:tgc} compares the expected precision for
576: $\kappa_\gamma$ and $\lambda_\gamma$ at the different machines. For
577: $\gamma \gamma$ and $e \gamma$ a 0.1\% error on the luminosity is assumed.
578: It should be noted that $\kappa_\gamma$ is very sensitive to the
579: luminosity error and to uncertainties in the polarisation while
580: $\lambda_\gamma$ is basically insensitive to these effects. For
581: $e \gamma$ the improvement using the $\phi$ angle in the fit is a
582: factor seven for $\lambda_\gamma$, a similar factor can be expected for
583: $\gamma \gamma$ as well. In summary $\kappa_\gamma$ will be measured
584: significantly worse in $e \gamma$ and $\gamma \gamma$ than in $\ee$,
585: however still good enough for cross checks in case deviations from the
586: Standard Model are found. For $\lambda_\gamma$ the photon collider
587: could give the best result.
588:
589: \begin{figure}[htb]
590: \centering
591: \includegraphics[width=\linewidth,bb=33 0 491 468]{kg.eps}
592: \includegraphics[width=\linewidth,bb=33 0 491 468]{lg.eps}
593: \caption{The expected precision for $\kappa_\gamma$ and
594: $\lambda_\gamma$ at different machines.}
595: \label{fig:tgc}
596: \end{figure}
597:
598: In an alternative study the leptonic W decays in $e \gamma \rightarrow W \nu$
599: have been considered \cite{anipko}. In these events only a single lepton is
600: seen in the detector. The couplings have been measured from the cross section
601: in an optimised phase space region where background and the variable photon
602: energy has been taken into account. Assuming no error on the normalisation,
603: the error in $\kappa_\gamma$ is similar for the two analyses taking the
604: lower leptonic branching ratio of the W into account. For $\lambda_\gamma$
605: the error in the leptonic analysis is significantly larger because of the
606: missing information due to the second missing neutrino.
607:
608: It is known since long that $\ee \rightarrow \WW$ is sensitive to
609: technicolour vector resonances in the same way as the $\rho$ is seen
610: in $\ee \rightarrow \pi^+ \pi^-$ \cite{tim}.
611: It has been shown now, that
612: $\gamma \gamma \rightarrow \WW$ is sensitive to rescattering effects
613: from a scalar or a tensor resonance \cite{poulose}. Figure
614: \ref{fig:ggre} compares the cross section for longitudinal gauge boson
615: production in the central region for the Standard Model and for a
616: tensor resonance with a mass of $2.5 \TeV$. An experimental study, if
617: these effects are measurable at TESLA, is planned.
618:
619: These studies underline
620: the importance to measure the gauge couplings in several different
621: channels.
622: For example a vector resonance would result in anomalous gauges
623: couplings in $\ee$ while in $\gamma \gamma$ and $e \gamma$ one might
624: still measure the Standard Model values.
625:
626: \begin{figure}[htb]
627: \centering
628: \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{gg_resc.eps}
629: \caption{Cross section for longitudinal W-pair production in $\gamma
630: \gamma$ scattering for the Standard Model and in presence of a
631: tensor resonance with $2.5 \TeV$ mass. $J_z$ denotes the spin of
632: the $\gamma \gamma$ system.}
633: \label{fig:ggre}
634: \end{figure}
635:
636: The reaction $\gamma \gamma \rightarrow \WW$ is also the ideal place
637: to test for anomalous $\gamma \gamma \WW$ quartic couplings.
638: These couplings have been first studied in $\ee \rightarrow \WW \gamma$
639: and limits of the coupling parameters of ${\cal O}(1)$ at $\sqrt{s}=500\GeV$
640: have been found \cite{anja,stefan}.
641: The cross section
642: dependence of $\gamma \gamma \rightarrow \WW$ on these couplings has
643: been studied and limits on these couplings have been derived \cite{wwgg}.
644: Figure \ref{fig:wwgg} shows the cross section dependence on these
645: couplings for $\sqrt{s} = 1 \TeV$. Without systematic uncertainties
646: limits between $10^{-4}$ and $10^{-2}$ can be achieved. This is about
647: three orders of magnitude better than the $\ee$ result.
648:
649: \begin{figure}[htb]
650: \centering
651: \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{ggww.eps}
652: \caption{Dependence of $\sigma(\gamma \gamma \rightarrow \WW)$ for
653: $\sqrt{s} = 1 \TeV$ on the $\gamma \gamma \WW$ couplings. The exact
654: definition of the couplings can be found in \cite{stefan,wwgg}.}
655: \label{fig:wwgg}
656: \end{figure}
657:
658: \section{CONCLUSIONS}
659: It has been shown that electroweak precision tests contribute
660: significantly to the physics of a linear collider.
661: Precision measurements on the Z pole can test model parameters inside or
662: beyond the Standard Model.
663: Two-fermion production at high energy tests a wide class of models
664: like those containing additional Z' bosons or extra space dimensions.
665: The limits are often comparable or better than those at the LHC.
666: W-pair production provides new precision observables on the same level
667: as $\stl$ or $\MW$. If no light Higgs exists, gauge boson production
668: offers a window to strong electroweak symmetry breaking.
669:
670: In summary it is the combination of the direct studies of the probable
671: extensions of the
672: Standard Model, like Higgs and SUSY, with the potential of the precision tests
673: that makes the Linear Collider a unique tool to understand the physics of
674: electroweak symmetry breaking.
675:
676: \begin{thebibliography}{99} % Use for 10-99 references
677: \bibitem{jenspdg}
678: J. Erler, P. Langacker in K. Hagiwara et al., Phys. Rev. D 66,
679: 010001 (2002).
680: %
681: \bibitem{fujii}
682: K. Fujii, Nucl.\ Phys.\ Proc.\ Suppl.\ {\bf 16} (1990) 92.
683: %
684: \bibitem{leptop}
685: The LEP Collaboratons and the LEP Electroweak Working Group,
686: CERN-PPE/93-157.
687: %
688: \bibitem{tevtop}
689: CDF Collaboration, F. Abe et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 2626 (1995);\\
690: D0 Collaboration, S. Abachi et al., Phys. Rev. Letters {74} 2632
691: (1995) .
692: %
693: \bibitem{lepew}
694: The LEP collaborations, CERN-EP/2002-091, hep-ex/0212036.
695: %
696: \bibitem{phystdr}
697: J.~A. Aguilar-Saavedra {\em et~al.}, {\it {TESLA Technical Design Report Part
698: {III}: Physics at an $\ee$ Linear Collider}}, DESY-01-011C,
699: hep-ph/0106315.
700: %
701: \bibitem{stefan_lv}
702: S. Dittmaier, these proceedings and hep-ph/0308079.
703: %
704: \bibitem{lhcprec}
705: S. Haywood et al. {\it Electroweak Physics}, CERN-2000-004, 117,
706: hep-ph/0003275.
707: %
708: \bibitem{sven}
709: S.~Heinemeyer and G.~Weiglein,
710: JHEP {\bf 0210} (2002) 072
711: [arXiv:hep-ph/0209305].
712: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0209305;%%
713: %
714: \bibitem{kmh}
715: R. Hawkings, K. M{\"o}nig, EPJdirect {\bf C8} (1999) 1.
716: %
717: \bibitem{marc}
718: M. Winter, {\it Determination of the strong coupling constant at GigaZ},
719: LC-PHSM-2001-016.
720: %
721: \bibitem{graham}
722: G.W.~Wilson,
723: {\it Precision Measurement of the W Mass with a Polarised
724: Threshold Scan at a Linear Collider},
725: LC-PHSM-2001-009.
726: %
727: \bibitem{usbeam}
728: D. Cinabro, E. Torrence, M. Woods, {\it Status of Linear Collider
729: Beam Instrumentation Design},\\
730: http://www.slac.stanford.edu/xorg/lcd/ipbi/notes/white.pdf.
731: %
732: \bibitem{lumprc}
733: The forward Calorimeter Group, DESY-PRC R\&D 02/01.
734: %
735: \bibitem{fred}
736: F.~Jegerlehner,
737: % {\it The effective fine structure constant at TESLA energies},
738: hep-ph/0105283.
739: %
740: \bibitem{cmd}
741: R.~R.~Akhmetshin {\it et al.} [CMD-2 Collaboration],
742: %``Measurement of e+ e- $\to$ pi+ pi- cross section with CMD-2 around rho meson,''
743: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 527}, 161 (2002)
744: [arXiv:hep-ex/0112031].
745: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0112031;%%
746: %
747: \bibitem{cmd2}
748: R.~R.~Akhmetshin {\it et al.} [the CMD-2 Collaboration],
749: %``Reanalysis of hadronic cross section measurements at CMD-2,''
750: arXiv:hep-ex/0308008.
751: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0308008;%%
752: %
753: \bibitem{davier}
754: M.~Davier, S.~Eidelman, A.~Hocker and Z.~Zhang,
755: %``Confronting spectral functions from e+ e- annihilation and tau decays: Consequences for the muon magnetic moment,''
756: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 27} (2003) 497
757: [arXiv:hep-ph/0208177].
758: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0208177;%%
759: %
760: \bibitem{davier2}
761: M.~Davier, S.~Eidelman, A.~Hocker and Z.~Zhang,
762: %``Updated Estimate of the Muon Magnetic Moment Using Revised Results from e+e- Annihilation,''
763: arXiv:hep-ph/0308213.
764: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0308213;%%
765: %
766: \bibitem{bess}
767: J.~Z.~Bai {\it et al.} [BES Collaboration],
768: %``Measurements of the cross section for e+ e $\to$ hadrons at center-of-mass energies from 2-GeV to 5-GeV,''
769: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 88}, 101802 (2002)
770: [arXiv:hep-ex/0102003].
771: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0102003;%%
772: %
773: \bibitem{stlerr}
774: U.~Baur et al.,
775: %``Theoretical and experimental status of the indirect Higgs boson mass
776: % determination in the standard model,''
777: in {\it Proc. of the APS/DPF/DPB Summer Study on the Future of Particle
778: Physics (Snowmass 2001) } ed. N.~Graf,
779: eConf {\bf C010630} (2001) P122
780: [arXiv:hep-ph/0111314].
781: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0111314;%%
782: %
783: \bibitem{pcont}
784: A.A. Babich, P. Osland, A.A. Pankov and N. Paver,
785: Phys. Lett. B {\bf 518} (2001) 128 [hep-ph/0107159].
786: %
787: \bibitem{paver}
788: A.A. Pankov and N. Paver, arXiv:hep-ph/0209058, to appear in
789: Eur. Phys. J. C.
790: %
791: \bibitem{sabine}
792: S. Riemann, {\it Identification of New Physics with Fermion-Pair Production
793: at a Linear Collider}, LC-PHSM-2003-076
794: %
795: \bibitem{Cho:1998nr}
796: G.~C.~Cho, K.~Hagiwara and Y.~Umeda,
797: %``Z' bosons in supersymmetric E(6) models confront electroweak data,''
798: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 531} (1998) 65
799: [Erratum-ibid.\ B {\bf 555} (1999) 651]
800: [arXiv:hep-ph/9805448].
801: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9805448;%%
802: %
803: \bibitem{gluza}
804: M.~Czakon, J.~Gluza and J.~Hejczyk,
805: %``Muon decay to one loop order in the left-right symmetric model,''
806: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 642} (2002) 157 [arXiv:hep-ph/0205303];\\
807: %
808: M.~Czakon, J.~Gluza, F.~Jegerlehner and M.~Zralek,
809: %``Confronting electroweak precision measurements with new physics models,''
810: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 13} (2000) 275
811: [arXiv:hep-ph/9909242];\\
812: %
813: M.~Czakon, M.~Zralek and J.~Gluza,
814: %``Left-right symmetry and heavy particle quantum effects,''
815: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 573} (2000) 57
816: [arXiv:hep-ph/9906356].
817: %
818: \bibitem{richard}
819: F.~Richard,
820: %``Present and future sensitivity to a Z-prime,''
821: arXiv:hep-ph/0303107.
822: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0303107;%%
823: %
824: \bibitem{tom_mom}
825: T.~G.~Rizzo,
826: %``Unique identification of graviton exchange effects in e+ e- collisions,''
827: JHEP {\bf 0210} (2002) 013
828: [arXiv:hep-ph/0208027].
829: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0208027;%%
830: %
831: \bibitem{Osland:2003fn}
832: P.~Osland, A.~A.~Pankov and N.~Paver,
833: %``Discriminating graviton exchange effects from other new physics scenarios in e+ e- collisions,''
834: arXiv:hep-ph/0304123, PREL-LC-TH-2003-009, to appear in Phys. Rev. D.
835: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0304123;%%
836: %
837: \bibitem{tom_pt}
838: T.~G.~Rizzo,
839: %``Transverse polarization signatures of extra dimensions at linear colliders,''
840: JHEP {\bf 0302} (2003) 008
841: [arXiv:hep-ph/0211374].
842: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0211374;%%
843: %
844: \bibitem{Ananthanarayan:2002fh}
845: B.~Ananthanarayan, S.~D.~Rindani and A.~Stahl,
846: %``CP violation in the production of tau leptons at TESLA with beam polarization,''
847: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 27} (2003) 33
848: [arXiv:hep-ph/0204233].
849: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0204233;%%
850: %
851: \bibitem{menges}
852: W. Menges, {\it A Study of Charged Current Triple Gauge Couplings at TESLA,}
853: LC-PHSM-2001-022.
854: %
855: \bibitem{diehl}
856: M.~Diehl, O.~Nachtmann and F.~Nagel,
857: %``Triple gauge couplings in polarised e- e+ $\to$ W- W+ and their measurement using optimal observables,''
858: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 27} (2003) 375
859: [arXiv:hep-ph/0209229].
860: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0209229;%%
861: %
862: \bibitem{diehl2}
863: M.~Diehl, O.~Nachtmann and F.~Nagel,
864: arXiv:hep-ph/0306247.
865: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0306247;%%
866: %
867: \bibitem{jadranka}
868: K. M\"onig, J. Sekaric,
869: {\it A Study of Charged Current Triple Gauge Couplings at an
870: $e\gamma$ - collider},
871: LC-PHSM-2003-072
872: %
873: \bibitem{ivanka}
874: I.~Bozovic-Jelisavcic, K.~M\"onig and J.~Sekaric,
875: %``Measurement of trilinear gauge couplings at a gamma gamma and e gamma collider,''
876: arXiv:hep-ph/0210308.
877: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0210308;%%
878: %
879: \bibitem{anipko}
880: D. Anipko, I. Ginzburg, A. Pak,
881: % Natural cuts in search of New Physics phenomena. Example:
882: % $e\gamma \to W \nu \to \mu \bar{\nu}\nu$.
883: Proc. Suppl. of ACAT'2002 Workshop (Moscow, Russia; June, 2002)
884: Nucl. Instr. and Meth. {\bf A502} (2003), 752.
885: %
886: \bibitem{tim}
887: T.~L.~Barklow,
888: % {\it Strong symmetry breaking at e+ e- linear colliders}, in
889: % Proc. of the APS/DPF/DPB Summer Study on the Future of Particle Physics
890: % (Snowmass 2001) ed. R.~Davidson and C.~Quigg,
891: hep-ph/0112286.
892: %
893: \bibitem{poulose}
894: P.~Poulose and L.~M.~Sehgal,
895: %``Strong final state interactions in gamma gamma $\to$ W W,''
896: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 552} (2003) 57
897: [arXiv:hep-ph/0211179].
898: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0211179;%%
899: %
900: \bibitem{anja}
901: W.~J.~Stirling and A.~Werthenbach,
902: %``Anomalous quartic couplings in W+ W- gamma, Z0 Z0 gamma and Z0 gamma gamma production at present and future e+ e- colliders,''
903: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 14} (2000) 103
904: [arXiv:hep-ph/9903315].
905: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9903315;%%
906: %
907: \bibitem{stefan}
908: A.~Denner, S.~Dittmaier, M.~Roth and D.~Wackeroth,
909: %``Probing anomalous quartic gauge-boson couplings via e+ e- $\to$
910: %4fermions + gamma,''
911: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 20} (2001) 201
912: [arXiv:hep-ph/0104057].
913: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0104057;%%
914: %
915: \bibitem{wwgg}
916: I. Marfin et al., LC note in preparation
917: \end{thebibliography}
918:
919: \end{document}
920: