1: \documentclass[epj]{svjour}

2: 

3: \usepackage[centertags]{amsmath}

4: \allowdisplaybreaks[1]

5: 

6: \usepackage{amsbsy}

7: \usepackage{amsfonts}

8: \usepackage{amssymb}

9: \usepackage[dvips]{graphicx}

10: \usepackage{url}

11: 

12: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

13: %% FRONTMATTER

14: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

15: 

16: \begin{document}

17: 

18: \title{Status of Neutrino Masses and Mixing}

19: 

20: \author{Carlo Giunti}

21: 

22: \institute{INFN, Sezione di Torino, and Dipartimento di Fisica Teorica,

23: Universit\`a di Torino,

24: Via P. Giuria 1, I--10125 Torino, Italy}

25: 

26: \date{Talk presennted at

27: HEP2003, 17--23 July 2003, Aachen, Germany}

28: 

29: \abstract{The experimental evidences in favor

30: of oscillations of solar (and KamLAND)

31: and atmospheric (and K2K)

32: neutrinos are briefly reviewed

33: and accommodated in the framework of three-neutrino mixing.

34: The implications for the values of neutrino masses are discussed

35: and

36: the bounds on the absolute scale of neutrino masses from Tritium $\beta$-decay

37: and cosmological data are reviewed.

38: Finally, we discuss

39: the implications of three-neutrino mixing for neutrinoless

40: double-$\beta$ decay.

41: %

42: \PACS{ {14.60.Lm}{} \and {14.60.Pq}{} \and {26.65.+t}{} \and {95.85.Ry}{} }

43: }

44: 

45: \maketitle

46: 

47: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

48: %% MAINMATTER

49: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

50: 

51: %\section{Three-Neutrino Mixing}

52: 

53: About one year ago,

54: the observation of solar neutrinos

55: through neutral-current and charged-current

56: reactions

57: allowed the SNO experiment \cite{Ahmad:2002jz}

58: to solve the long-standing solar neutrino problem

59: in favor of the existence of $\nu_e \to \nu_\mu, \nu_\tau$

60: transitions.

61: The global analysis of all solar neutrino data

62: in terms of the most natural hypothesis of neutrino oscillations

63: favored the so-called Large Mixing Angle (LMA)

64: region

65: with

66: a squared-mass difference

67: $

68: 2 \times 10^{-5}

69: \lesssim

70: \Delta{m}^2_{\mathrm{SUN}}

71: \lesssim

72: 4 \times 10^{-4}

73: $

74: (we measure squared-mass differences in units of eV$^2$)

75: and a large effective mixing angle

76: $ 0.2 \lesssim \tan^2\vartheta \lesssim 0.9 $

77: (see Ref.~\cite{hep-ph/0301276}).

78: A spectacular proof of the correctness of the LMA region

79: has been obtained at the end of last year in

80: the KamLAND long-baseline $\bar\nu_e$ disappearance experiment

81: \cite{hep-ex/0212021},

82: in which a suppression of

83: $ 0.611 \pm 0.085 \pm 0.041 $

84: of the $\bar\nu_e$ flux

85: produced by nuclear reactors at an average distance of about 180 km

86: was observed.

87: The allowed regions of the effective neutrino oscillation parameters

88: obtained from the global analysis of solar and KamLAND neutrino data

89: are shown in Fig.~\ref{deholanda-0212270-f04}

90: \cite{hep-ph/0212270}.

91: The effective squared-mass difference

92: $\Delta{m}^2_{\mathrm{SUN}}$

93: is constrained in one of the two ranges

94: \cite{hep-ph/0212129}

95: \begin{subequations}

96: \label{001}

97: \begin{align}

98: \text{LMA-I:}

99: \quad

100: \null & \null

101: 5.1 \times 10^{-5}

102: <

103: \Delta{m}^2_{\mathrm{SUN}}

104: <

105: 9.7 \times 10^{-5}

106: \,,

107: \label{001a}

108: \\

109: \text{LMA-II:}

110: \quad

111: \null & \null

112: 1.2 \times 10^{-4}

113: <

114: \Delta{m}^2_{\mathrm{SUN}}

115: <

116: 1.9 \times 10^{-4}

117: \,,

118: \label{001b}

119: \end{align}

120: \end{subequations}

121: at 99.73\% C.L.,

122: with best-fit value

123: $ \Delta{m}^{2\,\mathrm{bf}}_{\mathrm{SUN}} \simeq 6.9 \times 10^{-5} $

124: in the LMA-I region

125: (see also Ref.~\cite{hep-ph/0301276} and references therein).

126: The effective solar mixing angle $\vartheta_{\mathrm{SUN}}$

127: is constrained at 99.73\% C.L. in the interval

128: \cite{hep-ph/0212129}

129: \begin{equation}

130: 0.29 < \tan^2 \vartheta_{\mathrm{SUN}} < 0.86

131: \,,

132: \label{002}

133: \end{equation}

134: with best-fit value

135: $ \tan^2 \vartheta_{\mathrm{SUN}}^{\mathrm{bf}} \simeq 0.46 $.

136: 

137: \begin{figure}

138: \begin{center}

139: \begin{minipage}[t]{0.50\textwidth}

140: \begin{center}

141: \includegraphics*[bb=22 81 513 676, width=0.60\textwidth]{fig/deholanda-0212270-f04.eps}

142: \end{center}

143: \end{minipage}

144: \end{center}

145: \caption{ \label{deholanda-0212270-f04}

146: Allowed

147: 68.3\%,

148: 90\%,

149: 95\%,

150: 99\%,

151: 99.73\%

152: C.L.

153: regions

154: obtained from the global analysis of

155: solar and KamLAND data.

156: The best-fit point is marked by a star.

157: Figure from Ref.~\protect\cite{hep-ph/0212270}.

158: }

159: \end{figure}

160: 

161: \begin{figure}

162: \begin{center}

163: \begin{minipage}[t]{0.50\textwidth}

164: \begin{center}

165: \includegraphics*[bb=18 254 278 550, width=0.60\textwidth]{fig/bahcall-0212147-f06.eps}

166: \end{center}

167: \end{minipage}

168: \end{center}

169: \caption{ \label{bahcall-0212147-f06}

170: Allowed

171: 90\%, 95\%, 99\%, 99.73\% C.L.

172: regions obtained from the global analysis of

173: solar and KamLAND data.

174: The best-fit point is marked by a star.

175: Figure from Ref.~\protect\cite{hep-ph/0212147}.

176: }

177: \end{figure}

178: 

179: Transitions of solar $\nu_e$'s into sterile states are disfavored by

180: the data.

181: Figure~\ref{bahcall-0212147-f06}

182: \cite{hep-ph/0212147}

183: shows the allowed regions in the

184: $\mathrm{f_{B,total}}$--$\sin^2\eta$ plane,

185: where

186: $\mathrm{f_{B,total}}=\Phi_{^8\mathrm{B}}/\Phi_{^8\mathrm{B}}^{\mathrm{SSM}}$

187: is the ratio of the $^8\mathrm{B}$ solar neutrino flux

188: and its value predicted by the Standard Solar Model (SSM)

189: \cite{Bahcall:2000nu}.

190: The parameter $\sin^2\eta$ quantifies the fraction of

191: solar $\nu_e$'s that transform into sterile $\nu_s$:

192: $\nu_e \to \cos\eta \, \nu_a + \sin\eta \, \nu_s $,

193: where $\nu_a$ are active neutrinos.

194: From Fig.~\ref{bahcall-0212147-f06}

195: it is clear that there is a correlation between

196: $\mathrm{f_{B,total}}$

197: and

198: $\sin^2\eta$,

199: which is due to the constraint on the total flux of

200: $^8\mathrm{B}$ active neutrinos given by the SNO neutral-current measurement:

201: disappearance into sterile states is possible only if the

202: $^8\mathrm{B}$ solar neutrino flux

203: is larger than the SSM prediction.

204: The allowed ranges for

205: $\Phi_{^8\mathrm{B}}$

206: and

207: $\sin^2\eta$

208: are

209: \cite{hep-ph/0212147}

210: \begin{equation}

211: \Phi_{^8\mathrm{B}} = 1.00 \pm 0.06 \, \Phi_{^8\mathrm{B}}^{\mathrm{SSM}}

212: \,,

213: \quad

214: \sin^2\eta < 0.52

215: \,.

216: \label{014}

217: \end{equation}

218: The allowed interval for

219: $\Phi_{^8\mathrm{B}}$

220: shows a remarkable agreement of the

221: data with the SSM,

222: independently from possible $\nu_e\to\nu_s$ transitions.

223: 

224: In the future it is expected that

225: the KamLAND experiment will allow to distinguish between

226: the LMA-I and LMA-II regions,

227: reaching a relatively high accuracy in the determination of

228: $\Delta{m}^2_{\mathrm{SUN}}$

229: \cite{Inoue:2003qs},

230: whereas new low-energy solar neutrino experiments

231: or a new dedicated reactor neutrino experiment

232: are needed in order to improve significantly our knowledge

233: of the solar effective mixing angle $\vartheta_{\mathrm{SUN}}$

234: \cite{hep-ph/0302243,Bahcall:2003ce,hep-ph/0306017}.

235: 

236: \begin{figure}

237: \begin{center}

238: \begin{minipage}[t]{0.50\textwidth}

239: \begin{center}

240: \includegraphics*[bb=42 299 86 509, scale=0.75]{fig/fogli-0303064-f01.eps.pdf.eps}

241: \includegraphics*[bb=398 299 536 509, scale=0.75]{fig/fogli-0303064-f01.eps.pdf.eps}

242: \end{center}

243: \end{minipage}

244: \end{center}

245: \caption{ \label{fogli-0303064-f01}

246: Allowed region

247: obtained from the analysis of

248: Super-Kamiokande atmospheric and K2K data

249: in terms of

250: $\nu_\mu\to\nu_\tau$

251: oscillations.

252: Figure from Ref.~\protect\cite{hep-ph/0303064}.

253: }

254: \end{figure}

255: 

256: In 1998 the Super-Kamiokande Collaboration

257: \cite{Fukuda:1998mi}

258: discovered

259: the up-down asymmetry of high-energy events generated

260: by atmospheric $\nu_\mu$'s,

261: providing a model independent proof

262: of atmospheric $\nu_\mu$ disappearance.

263: At the end of 2002

264: the long-baseline K2K experiment

265: \cite{Ahn:2002up}

266: confirmed the neutrino oscillation

267: interpretation of the atmospheric neutrino anomaly

268: observing the disappearance of accelerator $\nu_\mu$'s

269: at a distance of 250 km from the source.

270: The data of atmospheric and K2K experiments

271: are well fitted by

272: $\nu_\mu \to \nu_\tau$

273: transitions generated by

274: the squared-mass difference

275: $\Delta{m}^2_{\mathrm{ATM}}$

276: in the 99.73\% C.L. range

277: \cite{hep-ph/0303064}

278: \begin{equation}

279: 1.4 \times 10^{-3}

280: <

281: \Delta{m}^2_{\mathrm{ATM}}

282: <

283: 5.1 \times 10^{-3}

284: \,,

285: \label{003}

286: \end{equation}

287: with best-fit value

288: $

289: \Delta{m}^{2\,\mathrm{bf}}_{\mathrm{ATM}}

290: \simeq

291: 2.6 \times 10^{-3}

292: $.

293: The best-fit effective atmospheric mixing

294: is maximal,

295: $

296: \sin^2 2 \vartheta_{\mathrm{ATM}}^{\mathrm{bf}} \simeq 1

297: $,

298: with the 99.73\% C.L. lower bound

299: \cite{hep-ph/0303064}

300: \begin{equation}

301: \sin^2 2 \vartheta_{\mathrm{ATM}} > 0.86

302: \,.

303: \label{004}

304: \end{equation}

305: Figure~\ref{fogli-0303064-f01}

306: \cite{hep-ph/0303064}

307: shows the

308: allowed region

309: obtained from the analysis of

310: Super-Kamiokande atmospheric and K2K data.

311: 

312: Transitions of

313: atmospheric $\nu_\mu$'s into $\nu_e$'s

314: or sterile states

315: are disfavored.

316: The fraction

317: $\sin^2\xi$ of atmospheric $\nu_\mu$'s

318: that transform into sterile $\nu_s$

319: ($\nu_\mu \to \cos\xi \, \nu_\tau + \sin\xi \, \nu_s $)

320: is limited by \cite{Nakaya:2002ki}

321: \begin{equation}

322: \sin^2\xi < 0.19

323: \quad

324: \text{(90\% C.L.)}

325: \,.

326: \label{0041}

327: \end{equation}

328: 

329: \begin{figure}

330: \begin{center}

331: \begin{minipage}[t]{0.50\textwidth}

332: \setlength{\tabcolsep}{0cm}

333: \begin{tabular}{lr}

334: \includegraphics*[bb=181 466 428 775, width=0.49\linewidth]{fig/3nun.eps}

335: &

336: \includegraphics*[bb=183 466 432 775, width=0.49\linewidth]{fig/3nui.eps}

337: \\

338: \textsf{normal}

339: &

340: \textsf{inverted}

341: \end{tabular}

342: \end{minipage}

343: \end{center}

344: \caption{ \label{3nu}

345: The two three-neutrino schemes allowed by the hierarchy

346: $\Delta{m}^2_{\mathrm{SUN}} \ll \Delta{m}^2_{\mathrm{ATM}}$.

347: }

348: \end{figure}

349: 

350: The solar and atmospheric evidences of neutrino oscillations

351: are nicely accommodated in the minimal framework of three-neutrino mixing,

352: in which the three flavor neutrinos

353: $\nu_e$,

354: $\nu_\mu$,

355: $\nu_\tau$

356: are unitary linear combinations of

357: three neutrinos

358: $\nu_1$,

359: $\nu_2$,

360: $\nu_3$

361: with masses

362: $m_1$,

363: $m_2$,

364: $m_3$,

365: respectively

366: (see Ref.~\cite{BGG-review-98}).

367: Figure~\ref{3nu}

368: shows the two three-neutrino schemes

369: allowed by the observed hierarchy

370: of squared-mass differences,

371: $\Delta{m}^2_{\mathrm{SUN}} \ll \Delta{m}^2_{\mathrm{ATM}}$,

372: with

373: the massive neutrinos labeled in order to have

374: \begin{equation}

375: \Delta{m}^2_{\mathrm{SUN}}

376: =

377: \Delta{m}^2_{21}

378: \,,

379: \quad

380: \Delta{m}^2_{\mathrm{ATM}}

381: \simeq

382: |\Delta{m}^2_{31}|

383: \simeq

384: |\Delta{m}^2_{32}|

385: \,.

386: \label{006}

387: \end{equation}

388: The two schemes

389: in Fig.~\ref{3nu} are usually called

390: ``normal''

391: and

392: ``inverted'',

393: because in the normal scheme the smallest

394: squared-mass difference is generated by the two lightest neutrinos

395: and a natural neutrino mass hierarchy can be realized if

396: $m_1 \ll m_2$,

397: whereas in the inverted scheme the smallest

398: squared-mass difference is generated

399: by the two heaviest neutrinos,

400: which are almost degenerate for any value of the lightest neutrino mass $m_3$.

401: 

402: \begin{figure*}

403: \begin{minipage}[t]{0.47\textwidth}

404: \begin{center}

405: \includegraphics*[bb=118 377 465 702, width=0.99\textwidth]{fig/3man.eps}

406: \end{center}

407: \end{minipage}

408: \hfill

409: \begin{minipage}[t]{0.47\textwidth}

410: \begin{center}

411: \includegraphics*[bb=118 427 465 753, width=0.99\textwidth]{fig/3mai.eps}

412: \end{center}

413: \end{minipage}

414: \caption{ \label{3ma}

415: Allowed ranges for the neutrino masses as functions

416: of the lightest mass $m_1$ and $m_3$ in the normal and inverted

417: three-neutrino scheme, respectively.

418: }

419: \end{figure*}

420: 

421: In the case of three-neutrino mixing there are no

422: sterile neutrinos,

423: in agreement with the absence of any indication in favor

424: of active--sterile transitions in

425: both solar and atmospheric neutrino experiments.

426: Let us however emphasize

427: that three-neutrino mixing cannot explain the

428: indications in favor of short-baseline

429: $\bar\nu_\mu\to\bar\nu_e$

430: transitions observed in the LSND experiment

431: \cite{LSND},

432: which are presently under investigation in the

433: MiniBooNE experiment

434: \cite{hep-ex/0210020}.

435: 

436: Let us now discuss the current information on

437: the three-neutrino mixing matrix $U$.

438: In solar neutrino experiments

439: $\nu_\mu$ and $\nu_\tau$ are

440: indistinguishable,

441: because the energy is well below $\mu$ and $\tau$ production

442: and $\nu_\mu$, $\nu_\tau$ can be detected only through flavor-blind

443: neutral-current interactions.

444: Hence,

445: solar neutrino oscillations,

446: as well as the oscillations in the KamLAND experiment,

447: depend only on the first row

448: $U_{e1}$,

449: $U_{e2}$,

450: $U_{e3}$

451: of the mixing matrix,

452: which regulates $\nu_e$ and $\bar\nu_e$ disappearance.

453: The hierarchy $\Delta{m}^2_{\mathrm{SUN}} \ll \Delta{m}^2_{\mathrm{ATM}}$

454: implies that neutrino oscillations generated by

455: $\Delta{m}^2_{\mathrm{ATM}}$ in Eq.~(\ref{006})

456: depend only on the last column

457: $U_{e3}$,

458: $U_{\mu3}$,

459: $U_{\tau3}$

460: of the mixing matrix,

461: because $m_1$ and $m_2$ are indistinguishable.

462: The only connection between

463: solar and atmospheric oscillations

464: is due to the element

465: $U_{e3}$.

466: The negative result of the CHOOZ long-baseline

467: $\bar\nu_e$ disappearance experiment

468: \cite{Apollonio:2003gd}

469: implies that electron neutrinos do not oscillate

470: at the atmospheric scale,

471: in agreement with the above mentioned disfavoring

472: of $\nu_\mu\to\nu_e$

473: transitions in atmospheric experiments.

474: The CHOOZ bound on

475: the effective mixing angle

476: $

477: \sin^2 2\vartheta_{\mathrm{CHOOZ}}

478: =

479: 4 \, |U_{e3}|^2 \left( 1 - |U_{e3}|^2 \right)

480: $

481: implies that

482: $|U_{e3}|$

483: is small:

484: $ |U_{e3}|^2 < 5 \times 10^{-2} $

485: (99.73\% C.L.)

486: \cite{Fogli:2002pb}.

487: Therefore,

488: solar and atmospheric neutrino oscillations are practically decoupled

489: \cite{Bilenky:1998tw}

490: and the effective mixing angles in

491: solar, atmospheric and CHOOZ experiments

492: can be related to the elements of the three-neutrino mixing matrix by

493: (see also Ref.~\cite{hep-ph/0212142})

494: \begin{equation}

495: \sin^2\vartheta_{\mathrm{SUN}}

496: =

497: \frac{|U_{e2}|^2}{1-|U_{e3}|^2}

498: \qquad

499: \sin^2\vartheta_{\mathrm{ATM}}

500: =

501: |U_{\mu3}|^2

502: \,,

503: \label{011}

504: \end{equation}

505: and

506: $

507: \sin^2\vartheta_{\mathrm{CHOOZ}}

508: =

509: |U_{e3}|^2

510: $

511: Taking into account all the above experimental constraints,

512: the best-fit value for the mixing matrix $U$ is

513: \begin{equation}

514: U_{\mathrm{bf}}

515: \simeq

516: \left( \begin{smallmatrix}

517: -0.83 & 0.56 &  0.00 \\

518:  0.40 & 0.59 &  0.71 \\

519:  0.40 & 0.59 & -0.71

520: \end{smallmatrix} \right)

521: \,.

522: \label{012}

523: \end{equation}

524: We have also reconstructed the allowed ranges for the

525: elements of the mixing matrix

526: (see Ref.~\cite{hep-ph/0306001}

527: for a more precise reconstruction

528: taking into account the correlations

529: among the mixing parameters):

530: \begin{equation}

531: |U|

532: \simeq

533: \left( \begin{smallmatrix}

534: 0.71-0.88 & 0.46-0.68 & 0.00-0.22 \\

535: 0.08-0.66 & 0.26-0.79 & 0.55-0.85 \\

536: 0.10-0.66 & 0.28-0.80 & 0.51-0.83

537: \end{smallmatrix} \right)

538: \,.

539: \label{013}

540: \end{equation}

541: Such mixing matrix,

542: with all elements large except $U_{e3}$,

543: is called ``bilarge''.

544: It is very different from the quark mixing matrix,

545: in which mixing is very small.

546: Such difference is an important

547: piece of information for our understanding

548: of the physics beyond the Standard Model,

549: which presumably involves some sort of quark-lepton unification.

550: 

551: \begin{figure*}

552: \begin{minipage}[t]{0.47\textwidth}

553: \begin{center}

554: \includegraphics*[bb=121 376 465 702, width=0.99\textwidth]{fig/mbn.eps}

555: \end{center}

556: \end{minipage}

557: \hfill

558: \begin{minipage}[t]{0.47\textwidth}

559: \begin{center}

560: \includegraphics*[bb=121 376 465 702, width=0.99\textwidth]{fig/mbi.eps}

561: \end{center}

562: \end{minipage}

563: \caption{ \label{mb}

564: Effective neutrino mass $m_\beta$

565: in Tritium $\beta$-decay experiments as a function

566: of the lightest mass $m_1$ and $m_3$ in the normal and inverted

567: three-neutrino scheme, respectively.

568: }

569: \end{figure*}

570: 

571: The absolute scale of neutrino masses

572: is not determined by the observation of

573: neutrino oscillations,

574: which

575: depend

576: only on the differences of the squares of neutrino masses.

577: Figure~\ref{3ma} shows the allowed ranges

578: (between the dashed and dotted lines)

579: for the neutrino masses

580: obtained from the allowed values of the oscillation parameters

581: in Eqs.~(\ref{001}), (\ref{002}), (\ref{003}), (\ref{004}),

582: as functions of the lightest mass

583: in the normal and inverted three-neutrino schemes.

584: The solid lines correspond to the best fit values of the oscillation parameters.

585: One can see that at least two neutrinos have masses

586: larger than about

587: $7 \times 10^{-3} \, \mathrm{eV}$.

588: 

589: The most sensitive known ways to probe the

590: absolute values of neutrino masses

591: are

592: the observation of the end-point part of

593: the electron spectrum in Tritium $\beta$-decay,

594: the observation of large-scale structures

595: in the early universe

596: and

597: the search for neutrinoless double-$\beta$ decay,

598: if neutrinos are Majorana particles

599: (see Ref.~\cite{Bilenky:2002aw};

600: we do not consider here the interesting possibility

601: to determine neutrino masses through the

602: observation of supernova neutrinos).

603: 

604: %\section{Tritium $\beta$-Decay}

605: 

606: Up to now,

607: no indication of a neutrino mass has been found in

608: Tritium $\beta$-decay experiments,

609: leading to an upper limit on the effective mass

610: \begin{equation}

611: m_\beta = \sqrt{ \sum_k |U_{ek}|^2 m_k^2 }

612: \label{007}

613: \end{equation}

614: of $2.2 \, \mathrm{eV}$

615: at 95\% C.L.

616: \cite{hep-ex/0210050},

617: obtained in the Mainz and Troitsk experiments.

618: After 2007, the KATRIN experiment

619: \cite{hep-ex/0109033}

620: will explore $m_\beta$ down to about

621: $0.2-0.3 \, \mathrm{eV}$.

622: Figure~\ref{mb} shows the allowed range (between the dashed lines)

623: for $m_\beta$

624: obtained from the allowed values of the oscillation parameters

625: in Eqs.~(\ref{001}), (\ref{002}), (\ref{003}), (\ref{004}),

626: as a function of the lightest mass

627: in the normal and inverted three-neutrino schemes.

628: The solid line corresponds to the best fit values of the oscillation parameters.

629: One can see that in the normal scheme with a mass hierarchy

630: $m_\beta$

631: has a value between about

632: $3 \times 10^{-3} \, \mathrm{eV}$

633: and

634: $2 \times 10^{-2} \, \mathrm{eV}$,

635: whereas in the inverted scheme

636: $m_\beta$

637: is larger than about

638: $3 \times 10^{-2} \, \mathrm{eV}$.

639: Therefore,

640: if in the future it will be possible to constraint

641: $m_\beta$

642: to be smaller than about

643: $3 \times 10^{-2} \, \mathrm{eV}$,

644: a normal hierarchy of neutrino masses will be established.

645: 

646: %\section{Cosmological Bounds on Neutrino Masses}

647: 

648: The analysis of recent data on cosmic microwave background radiation

649: and

650: large scale structure in the universe

651: in the framework of the standard cosmological model

652: has allowed to establish an upper bound of

653: about 1 eV for the sum of neutrino masses,

654: which implies an upper limit of about 0.3 eV

655: for the individual masses

656: \cite{Spergel:2003cb,astro-ph/0303076}.

657: %(see also the contribution of G.~Raffelt in these Proceedings)..

658: This limit is already at the same level as the sensitivity of the

659: future KATRIN experiment.

660: Let us emphasize,

661: however,

662: that the KATRIN experiment is important in order to probe

663: the neutrino masses in a model-independent way,

664: 

665: \begin{figure*}

666: \begin{minipage}[t]{0.47\textwidth}

667: \begin{center}

668: \includegraphics*[bb=121 376 465 702, width=0.99\textwidth]{fig/dbn.eps}

669: \end{center}

670: \end{minipage}

671: \hfill

672: \begin{minipage}[t]{0.47\textwidth}

673: \begin{center}

674: \includegraphics*[bb=121 376 465 702, width=0.99\textwidth]{fig/dbi.eps}

675: \end{center}

676: \end{minipage}

677: \caption{ \label{db}

678: Effective Majorana mass $|\langle{m}\rangle|$

679: in neutrinoless double-$\beta$ decay experiments as a function

680: of the lightest mass $m_1$ and $m_3$ in the normal and inverted

681: three-neutrino scheme, respectively.

682: }

683: \end{figure*}

684: 

685: %\section{Neutrinoless Double-$\beta$ Decay}

686: 

687: A very important open problem in neutrino physics

688: is the Dirac or Majorana nature of neutrinos.

689: From the theoretical point of view it

690: is expected that neutrinos are Majorana particles,

691: with masses generated by effective Lagrangian terms

692: in which heavy degrees of freedom have been integrated out

693: (see Ref.~\cite{Altarelli:2003vk}).

694: In this case the smallness of neutrino masses

695: is naturally explained by the suppression due to the

696: ratio of the electroweak symmetry breaking scale

697: and

698: a high energy scale associated with the violation of the total lepton number

699: and new physics beyond the Standard Model.

700: 

701: The best known way to search for Majorana neutrino masses

702: is neutrinoless double-$\beta$ decay,

703: whose amplitude is proportional to the effective Majorana mass

704: \begin{equation}

705: |\langle{m}\rangle|

706: =

707: \bigg|

708: \sum_k

709: U_{ek}^2 \, m_k

710: \bigg|

711: \,.

712: \label{021}

713: \end{equation}

714: The present experimental upper limit on $|\langle{m}\rangle|$

715: between about 0.3 eV and 1.3 eV has been

716: obtained in the Hei\-del\-berg-Moscow and IGEX experiments.

717: The large uncertainty is due to the difficulty

718: of calculating the nuclear matrix element in the decay.

719: Figure~\ref{db} shows the allowed range for $|\langle{m}\rangle|$

720: obtained from the allowed values of the oscillation parameters

721: in Eqs.~(\ref{001}), (\ref{002}), (\ref{003}), (\ref{004}),

722: as a function of the lightest mass

723: in the normal and inverted three-neutrino schemes

724: (see also Ref.~\cite{Pascoli:2002qm}).

725: If CP is conserved,

726: $|\langle{m}\rangle|$

727: is constrained to lie in the shadowed region.

728: Finding $|\langle{m}\rangle|$ in an unshaded strip

729: would signal CP violation.

730: One can see that in the normal scheme large cancellations

731: between the three mass contributions are possible

732: and

733: $|\langle{m}\rangle|$

734: can be arbitrarily small.

735: On the other hand,

736: the cancellations in the inverted scheme are limited,

737: because $\nu_1$ and $\nu_2$,

738: with which the electron neutrino has large mixing,

739: are almost degenerate and much heavier than $\nu_3$.

740: Since the solar mixing angle is less than maximal,

741: a complete cancellation between the contributions of $\nu_1$ and $\nu_2$

742: is excluded,

743: leading to a lower bound of about

744: $1 \times 10^{-3} \, \mathrm{eV}$

745: for $|\langle{m}\rangle|$

746: in the inverted scheme.

747: If in the future

748: $|\langle{m}\rangle|$

749: will be found to be smaller than

750: about

751: $1 \times 10^{-3} \, \mathrm{eV}$,

752: it will be established that either neutrinos have a mass hierarchy

753: or they are Dirac particles.

754: Many neutrinoless double-$\beta$ decay experiments are planned for the future,

755: but they will unfortunately not be able to probe such small

756: values of $|\langle{m}\rangle|$,

757: extending their sensitivity at most in the

758: $10^{-2} \, \mathrm{eV}$ range

759: (see Ref.~\cite{Bilenky:2002aw}).

760: 

761: %\section{Conclusions}

762: 

763: In conclusion,

764: the recent years have been extraordinarily fruitful

765: for neutrino physics,

766: yielding model-independent proofs

767: of solar and atmospheric neutrino oscillations,

768: which have provided

769: important information on the neutrino mixing parameters.

770: Neglecting the controversial

771: indications in favor of short-baseline

772: $\bar\nu_\mu\to\bar\nu_e$

773: transitions observed in the LSND experiment

774: \cite{LSND},

775: three-neutrino mixing

776: nicely explains all data.

777: Let us emphasize however that

778: still several fundamental characteristics of neutrinos

779: are unknown.

780: Among them,

781: the Dirac or Majorana nature of neutrinos,

782: the absolute scale of neutrino masses,

783: the distinction between the normal and inverted schemes,

784: the value of $|U_{e3}|$

785: and

786: the existence of CP violation in the lepton sector

787: are very important for our understanding

788: of the new physics beyond the Standard Model.

789: 

790: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

791: %% BACKMATTER

792: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

793: 

794: %\bibliographystyle{h-elsevier2}%{physrev3}

795: %\input{bibtex/bib.tex}

796: 

797: \begin{thebibliography}{10}

798: 

799: \bibitem{Ahmad:2002jz}

800: Q.R. Ahmad et~al.,

801: Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 (2002) 011301.%, nucl-ex/0204008.

802: 

803: \bibitem{hep-ph/0301276}

804: C. Giunti and M. Laveder,

805: hep-ph/0301276.

806: 

807: \bibitem{hep-ex/0212021}

808: K. Eguchi et~al.,

809: Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 (2003) 021802, hep-ex/0212021.

810: 

811: \bibitem{hep-ph/0212270}

812: P.C. de~Holanda and A.Y. Smirnov,

813: JCAP 0302 (2003) 001, hep-ph/0212270.

814: 

815: \bibitem{hep-ph/0212129}

816: M. Maltoni, T. Schwetz and J. Valle,

817: Phys. Rev. D67 (2003) 093003, hep-ph/0212129.

818: 

819: \bibitem{hep-ph/0212147}

820: J.N. Bahcall, M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia and C. Pena-Garay,

821: JHEP 0302 (2003) 009, hep-ph/0212147.

822: 

823: \bibitem{Bahcall:2000nu}

824: J.N. Bahcall, M.H. Pinsonneault and S. Basu,

825: Astrophys. J. 555 (2001) 990, astro-ph/0010346.

826: 

827: \bibitem{Inoue:2003qs}

828: K. Inoue,

829: hep-ex/0307030.

830: 

831: \bibitem{hep-ph/0302243}

832: A. Bandyopadhyay, S. Choubey and S. Goswami,

833: Phys. Rev. D67 (2003) 113011, hep-ph/0302243.

834: 

835: \bibitem{Bahcall:2003ce}

836: J.N. Bahcall and C. Pena-Garay,

837: hep-ph/0305159.

838: 

839: \bibitem{hep-ph/0306017}

840: S. Choubey, S. Petcov and M. Piai,

841: hep-ph/0306017.

842: 

843: \bibitem{hep-ph/0303064}

844: G. Fogli et~al.,

845: Phys. Rev. D67 (2003) 093006, hep-ph/0303064.

846: 

847: \bibitem{Fukuda:1998mi}

848: Y. Fukuda et~al.,

849: Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 (1998) 1562, hep-ex/9807003.

850: 

851: \bibitem{Ahn:2002up}

852: M.H. Ahn et~al.,

853: Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 (2003) 041801, hep-ex/0212007.

854: 

855: \bibitem{Nakaya:2002ki}

856: T. Nakaya,

857: hep-ex/0209036.

858: 

859: \bibitem{BGG-review-98}

860: S.M. Bilenky, C. Giunti and W. Grimus,

861: Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 43 (1999) 1, hep-ph/9812360.

862: 

863: \bibitem{LSND}

864: A. Aguilar et~al.,

865: Phys. Rev. D64 (2001) 112007, hep-ex/0104049.

866: 

867: \bibitem{hep-ex/0210020}

868: A. Bazarko,

869: hep-ex/0210020.

870: 

871: \bibitem{Apollonio:2003gd}

872: M. Apollonio et~al.,

873: Eur. Phys. J. C27 (2003) 331, hep-ex/0301017.

874: 

875: \bibitem{Fogli:2002pb}

876: G.L. Fogli et~al.,

877: Phys. Rev. D66 (2002) 093008, hep-ph/0208026.

878: 

879: \bibitem{Bilenky:1998tw}

880: S.M. Bilenky and C. Giunti,

881: Phys. Lett. B444 (1998) 379, hep-ph/9802201.

882: 

883: \bibitem{hep-ph/0212142}

884: W.L. Guo and Z.Z. Xing,

885: Phys. Rev. D67 (2003) 053002, hep-ph/0212142.

886: 

887: \bibitem{hep-ph/0306001}

888: M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia and C. Pena-Garay,

889: hep-ph/0306001.

890: 

891: \bibitem{Bilenky:2002aw}

892: S.M. Bilenky et~al.,

893: Phys. Rept. 379 (2003) 69, hep-ph/0211462.

894: 

895: \bibitem{hep-ex/0210050}

896: C. Weinheimer,

897: hep-ex/0210050.

898: 

899: \bibitem{hep-ex/0109033}

900: A. Osipowicz et~al.,

901: hep-ex/0109033.

902: 

903: \bibitem{Spergel:2003cb}

904: D.N. Spergel et~al.,

905: astro-ph/0302209.

906: 

907: \bibitem{astro-ph/0303076}

908: S. Hannestad,

909: astro-ph/0303076.

910: 

911: \bibitem{Altarelli:2003vk}

912: G. Altarelli and F. Feruglio,

913: hep-ph/0306265.

914: 

915: \bibitem{Pascoli:2002qm}

916: S. Pascoli, S.T. Petcov and W. Rodejohann,

917: Phys. Lett. B549 (2002) 177, hep-ph/0209059.

918: 

919: \end{thebibliography}

920: 

921: \end{document}

922: