1: %
2: %
3: %
4: %\documentclass[aps,preprint,epsfig]{revtex4}
5: \documentstyle[preprint,epsfig,aps]{revtex}
6: \tighten
7: %
8: %\pagestyle{plain}
9: %
10: \oddsidemargin=0.1cm
11: \evensidemargin=0.1cm
12: \textwidth=16.5cm
13: \topmargin=-1.5cm
14: \textheight=23cm
15: %
16: \def\bea{\begin{eqnarray}}
17: \def\beann{\begin{eqnarray*}}
18: \def\beq{\begin{equation}}
19: \def\eea{\end{eqnarray}}
20: \def\eeann{\end{eqnarray*}}
21: \def\eeq{\end{equation}}
22: \def\nn{\nonumber}
23: \def\aq{\bar{q}}
24: \def\ft{\rm FT}
25: \def\rgm{\rm RGM}
26: \def\nup{\nu \prime}
27: \def\rhop{\rho \prime}
28: \def\sigp{\sigma \prime}
29: \newcommand{\bb}{\bbox{b}}
30: \newcommand{\bzer}{\bbox{0}}
31: \newcommand{\bI}{\bbox{I}}
32: \newcommand{\br}{\bbox{r}}
33: \newcommand{\bx}{\bbox{x}}
34: \newcommand{\by}{\bbox{y}}
35: \newcommand{\bz}{\bbox{z}}
36: \newcommand{\bcdot}{\bbox{\cdot}}
37: \newcommand{\bcdots}{\bbox{\cdots}}
38: \newcommand{\bk}{\bbox{k}}
39: \newcommand{\bp}{\bbox{p}}
40: \newcommand{\bq}{\bbox{q}}
41: \newcommand{\bK}{\bbox{K}}
42: \newcommand{\bL}{\bbox{L}}
43: \newcommand{\bQ}{\bbox{Q}}
44: \newcommand{\bP}{\bbox{P}}
45: \newcommand{\bR}{\bbox{R}}
46: \newcommand{\bS}{\bbox{S}}
47: \newcommand{\bt}{\bbox{t}}
48: \newcommand{\bG}{\bbox{G}}
49: \newcommand{\bxi}{\bbox{\xi}}
50: \newcommand{\balpha}{\bbox{\alpha}}
51: \newcommand{\bgamma}{\bbox{\gamma}}
52: \newcommand{\brho}{\bbox{\rho}}
53: \newcommand{\bsigma}{\bbox{\sigma}}
54: \newcommand{\bnabla}{\bbox{\nabla}}
55: \newcommand{\blambda}{\bbox{\lambda}}
56: \newcommand{\btau}{\bbox{\tau}}
57: \newcommand{\bpi}{\bbox{\pi}}
58: \newcommand{\la}{<\!}
59: \newcommand{\ra}{\!>}
60: \def\eps{\epsilon}
61: \def\ll#1{\leftline{#1}}
62: \def\rl#1{\rightline{#1}}
63: %
64: \begin{document}
65: %
66: \draft
67: \title{Influence of a $Z^+$(1540) resonance on $K^+N$ scattering}
68: %
69: \author{
70: J. Haidenbauer$^{1}$, and G. Krein$^{2}$ \\
71: {\small $^1$ Forschungszentrum J\"ulich, Institut f\"ur Kernphysik,
72: D-52425 J\"ulich, Germany} \\
73: {\small $^2$ Instituto de F\'{\i}sica Te\'{o}rica, Universidade Estadual
74: Paulista } \\
75: {\small Rua Pamplona, 145 - 01405-900 S\~{a}o Paulo, SP, Brazil}
76: }
77: %
78: \maketitle
79: \begin{abstract}
80: The impact of a ($I=0$, $J^P={\frac{1}{2}}^+$) $Z^+$(1540) resonance with
81: a width of 5 MeV or more on the $K^+N$ (I=0) elastic cross section and
82: on the $P_{01}$ phase shift is examined within the $KN$ meson-exchange
83: model of the J\"ulich group. It is shown that the rather
84: strong enhancement of the cross section caused by the presence of a
85: $Z^+$ with the above properties is not compatible with the
86: existing empirical information on $KN$ scattering.
87: Only a much narrower $Z^+$ state could be reconciled with
88: the existing data -- or, alternatively, the $Z^+$ state must
89: lie at an energy much closer to the $KN$ threshold.
90: \end{abstract}
91: %
92: \vspace{2.5cm}
93: \noindent{PACS NUMBERS: 13.75.Jz, 12.39.Pn, 14.20.Jn, 21.30.-x, 12.40.-y}
94:
95: \vspace{1.0cm}
96: \noindent{KEYWORDS: Pentaquark, Strangeness, Meson-exchange Models}
97:
98: %
99: \newpage
100: %
101:
102: %\section{The J\"ulich $KN$ model}
103:
104: Recently
105: the LEPS collaboration at Spring-8 presented evidence for the existence
106: of a narrow baryon resonance with strangeness $S=+1$ \cite{spring}.
107: In the following four other collaborations from different laboratories announced
108: the observation of a similar structure in their experiments
109: \cite{itep,jlab,elsa,itep2}.
110: The observed structure was immediately brought into connection
111: with an exotic pentaquark state called
112: $Z^+$ whose existence had been proposed since long time in the context
113: of different quark models~\footnote{We follow the historical
114: nomenclature adopted in the particle data tables. More recently the
115: resonance is being called $\Theta^+$.}.
116: Specifically, the resonance parameters with a peak position
117: around $1540$~MeV and a width around $20$~MeV,
118: extracted from these experiments, lie convincingly close to
119: a theoretical prediction based on the chiral quark-soliton model of
120: Diakonov et al.~\cite{dpp}, who had proposed the existence of a $Z^+$ state
121: with a mass around $1530$~MeV and a width of around $15$ MeV. Due to its
122: quantum numbers, $S=+1$, $I=0$, and $J^P={\frac{1}{2}}^+$, their $Z^+$ state
123: can only decay (hadronically) into the $K^+n$ or $K^0p$ channels.
124:
125: First cautious words about this interpretation were, however, raised by
126: S. Nussinov \cite{nussinov} soon after the experimental result \cite{spring}
127: was published. He pointed out that the existence
128: of such a $Z^+$ state at around 1540 MeV should also be seen in the
129: available $K^+d$ scattering data. Though some ``intriguing
130: fluctuations'' exist in the total $K^+d$ cross section in the energy range
131: which corresponds to $KN$ cms energies of 1500-1600 MeV \cite{nussinov}
132: Nussinov's conclusion
133: was that the lack of a prominent $Z^+$ signature in $K^+d$ collisions
134: restricts the width of the $Z^+$ to be smaller than 6 MeV.
135: %
136: Similar but even more restrictive conclusions were drawn not long afterwards
137: by Arndt and collaborators~\cite{Arndt}. These authors reexamined
138: the available $K^+N$ scattering data basis with the aim of exploring the
139: possibility of accommodating a $Z^+$-like resonance structure in their
140: partial wave analysis. In an earlier
141: analysis of the same data by the VPI group~\cite{vpi} this resonance has not
142: been explicitly considered.
143: The work of Ref.~\cite{Arndt} confirmed that the existing $K^+N$ data
144: excludes $Z^+$ widths beyond the few-MeV level. Indeed their results
145: even suggest that a $Z^+$ around 1540 MeV should have a width of
146: $\Gamma$ = 1 MeV or even less in order to be compatible with the
147: $K^+N$ and $K^+d$ data basis.
148:
149: In the present note we use the J\"ulich meson-exchange model for the $KN$
150: interaction to investigate the effect of including in the model a $Z^+$-like
151: resonance structure on the description of the experimental data.
152: Within a realistic potential model the open
153: parameters are fixed by a simultaneous fit to all
154: $KN$ partial waves and therefore the contributions to the $P_{01}$
155: channel (we use the standard spectral notation $L_{I \ 2J}$),
156: which provide the background for the $Z^+$(1540) resonance,
157: are strongly constrained by the empirical information in the other
158: partial waves and that means also from the other isospin channel.
159: Furthermore, the use of a model allows one to produce a resonance structure
160: from a bare pole interaction by dressing the bare baryon-meson vertex, with a
161: width generated from self-energy loops, i.e. the non-pole and the pole part
162: of the reaction amplitude can be treated consistently.
163:
164: A detailed description of the J\"ulich $KN$
165: model can be found in Refs.~\cite{Juel1,Juel2}. The model was constructed along
166: the lines of the (full) Bonn $NN$ model \cite{MHE} and its extension
167: to the hyperon-nucleon ($YN$) system \cite{Holz}.
168: Specifically, this means that one
169: has used the same scheme (time-ordered perturbation theory), the same
170: type of processes, and vertex parameters (coupling constants, cut-off
171: masses of the vertex form-factors) fixed already by the study of
172: these other reactions.
173:
174: The diagrams considered for the $KN$ interaction are shown in
175: Fig.~\ref{Juel_mod}. Obviously the J\"ulich model contains not only
176: single-meson (and baryon) exchanges (Fig.~\ref{Juel_mod}a), but also
177: higher-order box diagrams involving $NK^*$, $\Delta K$ and $\Delta K^*$
178: intermediate states (Fig.~\ref{Juel_mod}b).
179: %
180: Based on these diagrams a $KN$ potential $V$ is
181: derived, and the corresponding reaction amplitude
182: $T$ is then obtained by solving a Lippmann-Schwinger type
183: equation defined by time-ordered perturbation theory:
184: \begin{equation}
185: T = V + V G_0 T \ .
186: \label{LSE}
187: \end{equation}
188: From the reaction amplitude $T$ phase shifts and observables (cross sections,
189: polarizations) can be obtained in the usual way.
190:
191: In the present investigation we use the $KN$ model I described
192: in Ref. \cite{Juel2}. (Note that we have performed also exploratory
193: calculations with the other models in Refs. \cite{Juel2,HHK}
194: and we obtained essentially the same results.)
195: Results for phase shifts and also for cross sections and polarizations
196: can be found, e.g., in Ref. \cite{Juel2}.
197: Evidently this model yields a good overall reproduction of all
198: presently available empirical information on $KN$ scattering.
199: Specifically, it describes the data up to beam momenta of $p_{lab}
200: \ \approx$ 1 GeV/c, i.e. well beyond the region of the observed
201: $Z^+$(1540) resonance structure which corresponds to the momentum $p_{lab}$ =
202: 0.44 GeV/c. Thus, this model provides a solid basis for studying the
203: influence of the $Z^+$(1540) resonance on the $KN$ observables.
204: As already emphasized above
205: the parameters of the model are fixed by a simultaneous fit to all
206: $KN$ partial waves and therefore the contributions to the $P_{01}$
207: channel, where the $Z^+$ pentaquark state is supposed to occur \cite{dpp},
208: are constrained by the empirical information in the other
209: partial waves.
210:
211: The $Z^+$(1540) resonance is included in the model by
212: adding a pole diagram, as depicted in Fig. \ref{Juel_mod}c,
213: with a bare mass $M^{(0)}_{Z^+}$ and a bare coupling constant
214: $g^{(0)}_{KNZ^+}$ to the other diagrams that contribute to $V$. When
215: this interaction is then iterated in the Lippmann-Schwinger equation (\ref{LSE})
216: the ${KNZ^+}$ vertex gets dressed by the non-pole part of the interaction
217: and the $Z^+$ acquires a width and also its physical mass via self-energy
218: loops. For the present investigation we prepared two different models,
219: one with a width of 20 MeV, as found in the experiment
220: \cite{jlab}, and one
221: with a width of just 5 MeV, that was given in Ref. \cite{Pol00} as
222: the most favorable width of the chiral quark-solition model,
223: and which corresponds roughly to the upper limit given in the paper
224: by Nussinov \cite{nussinov}. The width of the $Z^+$ and also the
225: resonance mass are calculated from a speed plot,
226: but we must say that for such a narrow structure the
227: resonance position basically coincides with the energy where the phase
228: passes through 90 degrees. Note that the bare mass and bare coupling constant
229: are free parameters that
230: are used to adjust the desired physical mass and width of the $Z^+$. The cutoff
231: mass occurring in the vertex form factor, cf. Eq. (2.23) of Ref. \cite{Mueller},
232: was fixed to 2 GeV.
233:
234: The elastic cross sections (for the isospin channels $I=0,1$) predicted by
235: the two models with a $Z^+$ are shown in Fig. \ref{XS} together with the
236: results of the original J\"ulich model I and the available experimental
237: information \cite{Bow70,Coo70,Car73,Bow73}.
238: The $I=1$ channel is shown here only to demonstrate the quality
239: of the J\"ulich model. The $Z^+$ is, of course, assumed to be a $I=0$
240: resonance and therefore it does not change the results in the $I=1$ channel.
241:
242: The J\"ulich model provides also a decent description of the data in
243: the $I=0$ channel. Its prediction might lie slightly too low at higher energies,
244: however, one has to take into account that the data scatter also somewhat.
245: In any case, it is obvious that the deviation of the J\"ulich model and
246: also the variations between the different data sets are by no means
247: comparable to the impact of the $Z^+$ on the $KN$ ($I=0$) cross section.
248: It is also clear that the $Z^+$ as predicted by \cite{dpp} and as
249: supposedly seen in the experiments \cite{spring,itep,jlab,elsa,itep2} lies
250: well within the energy range covered by $KN$ data. Indeed there are
251: even data points from two independent experiments \cite{Bow70,Car73}.
252:
253: There is no way to reconcile the present $KN$ ($I=0$) cross section
254: data with the existence of a $Z^+$(1540) with a width of 5 MeV or more.
255: In view of the curves shown in Fig. \ref{XS} it is clear why
256: Arndt and collaborators saw such a strong increase of the $\chi^2$
257: in their partial wave analysis once the $Z^+$ (with $\Gamma$ = 5 MeV
258: or more) was included \cite{Arndt}. One of their conclusions was
259: that the $Z^+$ could have a width of order 1 MeV or less. We did not
260: consider such a small width within our model. However, it is clear
261: that reducing the width significantly would eventually lead to
262: results that coincide with the ones of the J\"ulich model -- besides
263: an isolated narrow peak somewhere. Since there are no data below
264: $p_{lab}$ = 0.336 GeV/c there is indeed also room for the $Z^+$
265: at energies much closer to the $KN$ threshold. However, then one
266: would need to find a dynamical explanation why the structure seen
267: in the experiments \cite{spring,itep,jlab,elsa,itep2} appears at a
268: significantly higher $KN$ invariant mass there -- provided, of
269: course, that it has something to do with the pentaquark
270: state predicted in Ref. \cite{dpp}.
271:
272: Results for the $P_{01}$ phase shift are shown in Fig. \ref{phase}.
273: Note that the phases for the models with the $Z^+$ resonance pass
274: through 90 degrees around $p_{lab}$ = 0.44 GeV/c and then continue
275: to rise beyond 180 degrees. Therefore we show them here modulo $\pi$
276: so that they fit on the same graph and approach the J\"ulich model
277: and the results of the phase shifts analyses again at higher energies.
278: Also here it is clear that the existence of a $Z^+$ with a width of
279: 5 MeV or more would lead to a tremendous change.
280:
281: In summary, we have demonstrated the impact of a $Z^+$(1540) with
282: a width of 5 MeV or more on the $KN$ (I=0) elastic cross section and
283: on the $P_{01}$ phase shift. Even though the $KN$ data in the relevant
284: energy range show sizeable uncertainties it is evident that the rather
285: strong enhancement of the cross section caused by the presence of a
286: $Z^+$(1540) would be in clear contradiction to the experiments.
287: Only a much narrower $Z^+$(1540) state could be reconciled with
288: the existing empirical information on $KN$ scattering
289: \cite{nussinov,Arndt} -- or the predicted pentaquark state must
290: occur at an energy much closer to the $KN$ threshold. In any case
291: it would be desirable to re-measure $KN$ scattering around the
292: energy of the suspected $Z^+$(1540) resonance using present-days
293: much more advanced accelerators and detector systems.
294:
295: \acknowledgements{Work partially financed by CNPq and FAPESP.}
296:
297: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
298: %
299:
300: \bibitem{spring}T.~Nakano {et al.}, Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\
301: \textbf{91}, 012002 (2003).
302:
303: \bibitem{itep} V.~V.~Barmin {et al.},
304: Yad. Fiz. {\bf 66}, 1763 (2003)
305: [Phys. At. Nucl. {\bf 66}, 1715 (2003)]; hep-ex/0304040.
306:
307: \bibitem{jlab} S.~Stepanyan {et al.}, hep-ex/0307018;
308: V.~Koubarovsky and S.~Stepanyan, hep-ex/0307088;
309: R.A. Schumacher, hep-ex/03090006.
310:
311: \bibitem{elsa} J.~Barth {et al.}, hep-ex/0307083.
312:
313: \bibitem{itep2} A.E. Asratyan, A.G. Dolgolenko, and M.A. Kubantsev,
314: hep-ex/0309042.
315:
316: \bibitem{dpp} D.~Diakonov, V.~Petrov, and M.~Polyakov, Z.\
317: Phys.\ A\ \textbf{359}, 305 (1997).
318:
319: \bibitem{nussinov} S.~Nussinov, hep-ph/0307357.
320:
321: \bibitem{Arndt} R.A. Arndt, I.I. Strakovsky, and R.L. Workman,
322: nucl-th/0308012.
323:
324: \bibitem{vpi} J.~S.~Hyslop, R.~A.~Arndt, L.~D.~Roper, and
325: R.~L.~Workman, Phys.\ Rev.\ D\ \textbf{46}, 961
326: (1992).
327:
328: \bibitem{Juel1} R. B{\"u}ttgen, K. Holinde, A. M{\"u}ller--Groeling,
329: J. Speth, and P. Wyborny, Nucl. Phys. {\bf A506}, 586 (1990).
330: %
331: \bibitem{Juel2} M. Hoffmann, J.W. Durso, K. Holinde, B.C. Pearce,
332: and J. Speth, Nucl. Phys. {\bf A593}, 341 (1995).
333: %
334: \bibitem{MHE} R. Machleidt, K. Holinde, Ch. Elster,
335: Phys. Rep. {\bf 149}, 1 (1987).
336: %
337: \bibitem{Holz} B. Holzenkamp, K. Holinde, and J. Speth, Nucl. Phys.
338: {\bf A500}, 485 (1989).
339: %
340:
341: \bibitem{HHK} D. Hadjimichef, J. Haidenbauer, and G. Krein,
342: Phys. Rev. C {\bf 66}, 055214 (2002).
343: %
344:
345: \bibitem{Pol00} M. Polyakov, A. Sibirtsev, K. Tsushima, W. Cassing,
346: and K. Goeke, Eur. Phys. J. A {\bf 9}, 115 (2000).
347:
348:
349:
350: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
351:
352:
353:
354: \bibitem{Mueller} A. M{\"u}ller--Groeling, K. Holinde, and J. Speth,
355: Nucl. Phys. {\bf A513}, 557 (1990).
356: %
357: \bibitem{Bow70} T. Bowen et al.,
358: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 2}, 2599 (1970).
359: %
360: \bibitem{Coo70} R.L. Cool et al.,
361: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 1}, 1887 (1970).
362: %
363: \bibitem{Car73} A.S. Carroll, et al.,
364: Phys. Lett. {\bf 45B}, 531 (1973).
365: %
366: \bibitem{Bow73} T. Bowen et al.,
367: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 7}, 22 (1973).
368: %
369: \bibitem{Exp1} S.J. Watts, D.V. Bugg, and W.R. Gibbs,
370: Phys. Lett. {\bf 95B}, 323 (1980).
371: %
372: \bibitem{Exp2} K. Hashimoto,
373: Phys. Rev. C {\bf 29}, 1377 (1984).
374: %
375: \bibitem{Exp3} J.~S.~Hyslop, R.~A.~Arndt, L.~D.~Roper, and
376: R.~L.~Workman, Phys.\ Rev.\ D\ \textbf{46}, 961
377: (1992); CNS DAC Services
378: (http://gwdac.phys.gwu.edu).
379: %
380:
381: \end{thebibliography}
382:
383:
384: \newpage
385:
386: \begin{figure}
387: \caption{Meson-exchange contributions to the $KN$ interaction.
388: Diagrams (a) and (b) define the original J\"ulich model I
389: \protect\cite{Juel1,Juel2} that we use in the present investigations.
390: Diagram (c) represents the considered $Z^+$(1540) contribution.
391: }
392: \label{Juel_mod}
393: \end{figure}
394:
395: \begin{figure}
396: \caption{$KN$ elastic cross section in the isospin channels I=0,1.
397: The solid line is the
398: result of the original J\"ulich model I from Ref.~\protect\cite{Juel2}.
399: The dashed (dash-dotted) line shows results where a $Z^+$ resonance with a
400: dynamically generated width of 5 (20) MeV is included.
401: Experimental data are taken from Ref. \protect\cite{Bow70} (filled circles),
402: Ref. \protect\cite{Coo70} (open squares),
403: Ref. \protect\cite{Car73} (open circles),
404: and Ref. \protect\cite{Bow73} (crosses).}
405: \label{XS}
406: \end{figure}
407:
408: \begin{figure}
409: \caption{
410: $KN$ phase shifts in the $P_{01}$ partial wave.
411: The solid line is the
412: result of the original J\"ulich model I from Ref.~\protect\cite{Juel2}.
413: The dashed (dash-dotted) line shows results where a $Z^+$ resonance with a
414: dynamically generated width of 5 (20) MeV is included.
415: Experimental phase shifts are
416: taken from Ref.~\protect\cite{Exp1} (open circles),
417: Ref.~\protect\cite{Exp2} (open squares), and
418: Ref.~\protect\cite{Exp3} (filled circles and pluses)
419: .}
420: \label{phase}
421: \end{figure}
422:
423: \newpage
424:
425: \begin{figure}
426: \centerline{\epsfxsize=12.0cm\epsfysize=15.0cm\epsfbox{fig1Z.eps} }
427: \end{figure}
428: %\vskip 1cm
429: \center{Fig. 1}
430:
431: % ------------------------------------------------
432: \newpage
433:
434: \vglue 1cm
435: \begin{center}
436: \begin{figure}
437: \epsfig{file=sig1.eps, width=11.0cm}
438: \epsfig{file=sig0.eps, width=11.0cm}
439: \end{figure}
440: \end{center}
441: %\vskip 1cm
442: \center{Fig. 2}
443:
444: % ------------------------------------------------
445: \newpage
446:
447: \vglue 1cm
448: \begin{center}
449: \begin{figure}
450: \epsfig{file=ph01.eps, width=11.0cm}
451: \end{figure}
452: \end{center}
453: %\vskip 1cm
454: \center{Fig. 3}
455:
456: \end{document}
457: