1: \documentclass[aps,prd,twocolumn,superscriptaddress,
2: nofootinbib,showpacs,balancelastpage,nobibnotes]{revtex4}
3: \usepackage{graphicx}
4: \usepackage{amsmath}
5:
6: \begin{document}
7:
8: \title{Sensitivity to $\theta_{13}$ and $\delta$ in the Decaying
9: Astrophysical Neutrino Scenario}
10:
11: \author{John F. Beacom}
12: %\email{beacom@fnal.gov}
13:
14: \author{Nicole F. Bell}
15: %\email{nfb@fnal.gov}
16: \affiliation{NASA/Fermilab Astrophysics Center, Fermi National Accelerator
17: Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510-0500}
18:
19: \author{Dan Hooper}
20: %\email{hooper@pheno.physics.wisc.edu}
21: \affiliation{Denys Wilkinson Laboratory, Astrophysics Department,
22: OX1 3RH Oxford, England UK}
23:
24: \author{Sandip Pakvasa}
25: %\email{pakvasa@phys.hawaii.edu}
26: \affiliation{Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Hawaii,
27: Honolulu, Hawaii 96822}
28:
29: \author{Thomas J. Weiler}
30: %\email{tom.weiler@vanderbilt.edu}
31: \affiliation{Department of Physics and Astronomy, Vanderbilt University,
32: Nashville, Tennessee 37235}
33:
34: \date{23 September 2003}
35:
36: \begin{abstract}
37: We have previously shown that the decay of high-energy neutrinos from
38: distant astrophysical sources would be revealed by flavor ratios that
39: deviate strongly from the $\phi_{\nu_e}:\phi_{\nu_\mu}:\phi_{\nu_\tau}
40: = 1:1:1$ expected from oscillations alone. Here we show that the
41: deviations are significantly larger when the mixing angle
42: $\theta_{13}$ and the CP phase $\delta$ are allowed to be nonzero. If
43: neutrinos decay, this could allow measurement of $\theta_{13}$ and
44: $\delta$ in IceCube and other near-term neutrino telescopes.
45: \end{abstract}
46:
47: \pacs{95.85.Ry, 96.40.Tv, 14.60.Pq \hspace{4.5cm}
48: FERMILAB-Pub-03/292-A}
49:
50: % 95.85.Ry Neutrino, muon, pion, and other elementary particles; cosmic rays
51: % 96.40.Tv Neutrinos and muons
52: % 14.60.Pq Neutrino mass and mixing
53:
54: \maketitle
55:
56: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
57: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
58:
59: Traveling over cosmological distances, neutrino wave packets decohere
60: into mass eigenstates. The probability to measure a neutrino flavor
61: $\beta$ at Earth is therefore
62: %
63: \begin{equation}
64: \label{eq:one}
65: P_\beta = \sum_\alpha w_\alpha\,
66: \sum_j |U_{\alpha j}|^2 \,|U_{\beta j}|^2 \,,
67: \end{equation}
68: %
69: where $U_{\alpha j}$ are elements of the neutrino mixing matrix, and
70: $w_\alpha$ are the weights of the flavors produced in the
71: astrophysical source. As is well-known, the weights from a pion-muon
72: decay chain, $w_e:w_\mu:w_\tau = 1:2:0$, lead to flavor ratios at
73: Earth of $\phi_{\nu_e}:\phi_{\nu_\mu}:\phi_{\nu_\tau} =
74: 1:1:1$~\cite{111}. Variation of the mixing angles from the assumed
75: $\nu_\mu - \nu_\tau$ symmetry limit ($\theta_{23}=45^\circ$ and
76: $\theta_{13}=0$) leads to only small ($\lesssim 20\%$) deviations.
77:
78: We have recently shown that the expected flavor ratios would be
79: dramatically altered if neutrinos decay~\cite{cosmicDK}. The
80: strongest lifetime limits, from solar neutrinos, are too weak to
81: restrict the possibility of astrophysical neutrino decay by a factor
82: of about $10^7$~\cite{solarDK,cosmicDK}. Other scenarios,
83: small-$\delta m^2$ active-sterile mixing in pseudo-Dirac~\cite{pDirac}
84: or mirror models~\cite{steriles}, or CPT violation~\cite{Barenboim},
85: produce more subtle deviations from the expected $1:1:1$. While
86: neutrino decay can be tested with IceCube~\cite{IceCube} and other
87: near-term detectors, the latter scenarios may require future
88: detectors~\cite{flavors}.
89:
90: The most interesting decay scenario is that in which $\nu_3$ and
91: $\nu_2$ decay (either into active $\nu_1$ or sterile states), but the
92: lightest neutrino $\nu_1$ is stable. In this case, the beam contains
93: just the single mass eigenstate $\nu_1$, and the flavor ratios at
94: Earth are simply
95: %
96: \begin{equation}
97: \label{eq:two}
98: \phi_e:\phi_\mu:\phi_\tau = |U_{e1}|^2:|U_{\mu 1}|^2:|U_{\tau 1}|^2\,.
99: \end{equation}
100: %
101: We present here further analysis of this scenario, taking into account
102: the broken $\nu_\mu - \nu_\tau$ symmetry that arises when $U_{e3} =
103: \sin\theta_{13} e^{-i\delta} \neq 0$. Even for small $\theta_{13}$, we
104: find that the flavor ratios are very sensitive to the CP phase
105: $\delta$, which was set to zero for simplicity in our earlier
106: work~\cite{cosmicDK}.
107:
108: We assume a normal neutrino mass hierarchy. For the case of an
109: inverted hierarchy (or no decay), varying $\theta_{13}$ has little
110: effect. Note that in this decay scenario, there is no dependence on
111: the initial astrophysical flux ratios, and hence on the production
112: mechanism of the ultra high energy neutrinos, since the flux reaching
113: Earth consists only of the lightest neutrino $\nu_1$.
114:
115: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
116: \begin{figure}
117: \includegraphics[width=3.25in]{taumu.eps}
118: \caption{\label{fig:taumu} Variation of the ratio $\phi_\tau/\phi_\mu$
119: with $|U_{e3}|^2 = s_{13}^2$ in the allowed range~\cite{reactors}.
120: From bottom to top, the solid curves correspond to $\delta = (0,
121: \pi/4, \pi/2, 3\pi/4, \pi)$, with the hatched region showing the full
122: allowed range. The atmospheric angle is $\theta_{23} =
123: 45^\circ$~\cite{atm} and the solar angle is $\theta_{12} =
124: 32.5^\circ$~\cite{solar}.}
125: \end{figure}
126: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
127:
128: Expressing the flavor ratios in Eq.~(\ref{eq:two}) in terms of the
129: mixing parameters (using the conventions of Ref.~\cite{RPP} and
130: $c_{ij} \equiv \cos \theta_{ij}$, $s_{ij} \equiv \sin \theta_{ij}$),
131: \begin{equation}
132: \label{taumu}
133: \frac{\phi_\tau}{\phi_\mu} =
134: \frac{s_{12}^2 (1 - \cos2\theta_{23}) +
135: s_{13}^2 c_{12}^2 (1 + \cos2\theta_{23}) - 4\hat{J}}
136: {s_{12}^2 (1 + \cos 2\theta_{23}) +
137: s_{13}^2 c_{12}^2 (1 - \cos2\theta_{23}) + 4\hat{J}}\,.
138: \end{equation}
139: We have defined
140: %
141: \begin{equation}
142: \label{jhat}
143: \hat{J} \equiv
144: \frac{1}{4}\sin2\theta_{12}\,\sin2\theta_{23}\,(s_{13} \cos\delta)\,,
145: \end{equation}
146: %
147: which is related to the Jarlskog invariant $J$ according to $J =
148: \hat{J} c_{13}^2 \tan \delta$. It is known, and is evident in
149: Eq.~(\ref{taumu}), that either a nonzero $\cos 2\theta_{23}$ or
150: $s_{13}$ breaks $\nu_\mu - \nu_\tau$ symmetry. In
151: Fig.~\ref{fig:taumu}, we show the ratio $\phi_{\tau}/\phi_{\mu}$ as a
152: function of $|U_{e3}|^2$ (within the range allowed by reactor
153: experiments~\cite{reactors}), with $\theta_{23}= \pi/4$ fixed. Even a
154: small $\theta_{13}$ has a relatively large effect, particularly when
155: the CP phase $\delta$ is allowed to be nonzero. However, direct
156: measurement of the ratio $\phi_\tau/\phi_\mu$ is very difficult, since
157: events which are unique to $\nu_\tau$ (double-bang and lollipop
158: events) have much lower detection probabilities~\cite{flavors}.
159:
160: In contrast, the $\phi_e/\phi_\mu$ ratio can be directly probed in a
161: detector like IceCube by comparing the rate of shower events to muon
162: events~\cite{flavors}. This flavor ratio is
163: %
164: \begin{equation}
165: \label{emu}
166: \frac{\phi_e}{\phi_\mu} =
167: \left(\frac{|U_{e1}|^2}{1 - |U_{e1}|^2}\right)
168: \left(1 + \frac{\phi_\tau}{\phi_\mu}\right)\,.
169: \end{equation}
170: %
171: The $\nu_e$ fraction in the $\nu_1$ mass eigenstate is insensitive to
172: values of $\theta_{13}$ in the allowed range, shown by the first
173: factor in Eq.~(\ref{emu}), where $|U_{e1}| \equiv (c_{12}c_{13})^2$.
174: However, the broken $\nu_\mu - \nu_\tau$ symmetry affects the
175: $\phi_e/\phi_{\mu}$ ratio through the second factor in
176: Eq.~(\ref{emu}), and this is a large effect. When $\cos \delta$ is
177: negative (positive) it decreases (increases) the $\nu_\mu$ fraction of
178: $\nu_1$ with respect to the $\nu_\tau$ fraction, resulting in an
179: enhanced (suppressed) $\nu_e/\nu_\mu$ ratio. This is shown in
180: Fig.~\ref{fig:emu}. The curve with $\delta = 0$ is as in
181: Ref.~\cite{cosmicDK}, though we have updated the solar angle
182: $\theta_{12}$. For nonzero $\delta$, new to this work, the flavor
183: ratio is significantly farther from the no-decay value of 1.
184:
185: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
186: \begin{figure}
187: \includegraphics[width=3.25in]{emu.eps}
188: \caption{\label{fig:emu} Same as Fig.~\ref{fig:taumu}, except for the
189: ratio $\phi_e/\phi_\mu$. As in Fig.~\ref{fig:taumu}, the value
190: expected in the no-decay case is 1; here the effects of decay are
191: always pronounced.}
192: \end{figure}
193: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
194:
195: Note that the dependence of Eqs.~(\ref{taumu}) and (\ref{emu}) on the
196: CP phase $\delta$ occurs only through $\cos\delta$, since this is a
197: CP-conserving observable. Therefore, it is not necessary to separate
198: astrophysical neutrinos and antineutrinos, which would be very
199: difficult. The phase $\delta$ is of crucial importance in terrestrial
200: long-baseline oscillation experiments since CP-violating observables,
201: based on the comparison of neutrino and antineutrino oscillation
202: probabilities, are proportional to $\sin\delta$~\cite{LB}. Farzan and
203: Smirnov have shown that a nonzero $\sin\delta$ may in principle also
204: be inferred by direct construction of the leptonic unitarity
205: triangle~\cite{Farzan}. A key distinction is that the terrestrial
206: experiments use a beam of flavor eigenstates, whereas neutrino decay
207: can produce a pure mass eigenstate, allowing for very large variation
208: with $\delta$. Since measurement of $\delta$ in terrestrial
209: experiments will be an extremely challenging task, it is intriguing to
210: find an example where the effect of varying $\delta$ is huge.
211: Finally, the flavor ratios are sensitive only to the ``Dirac'' phase
212: $\delta$, and not the ``Majorana'' phases; Majorana phases are
213: relative phases between mass eigenstates, and the beam consists of the
214: single mass eigenstate $\nu_1$.
215:
216: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
217: \begin{figure}
218: \includegraphics[width=3.25in]{emuvar.eps}
219: \caption{\label{fig:emuvar} Upper panel: varying the solar angle, with
220: $\theta_{12} = 30^\circ$ (dashed), $32.5^\circ$ (solid) and $35^\circ$
221: (dotted). Lower panel: varying the atmospheric angle, with
222: $\theta_{23} = 40^\circ$ (dashed), $45^\circ$ (solid) and $50^\circ$
223: (dotted). The bottom and top curves correspond to $\delta = (0,
224: \pi)$. As before, the region between the curves is the allowed range,
225: obtained for different values of $\delta$.}
226: \end{figure}
227: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
228:
229: Variation of the atmospheric mixing angle $\theta_{23}$ away from
230: $45^\circ$ also breaks the $\nu_\mu - \nu_\tau$ symmetry, as shown in
231: Eq.~(\ref{taumu}), and has a similar effect on the flavor ratios.
232: Variation of the solar mixing angle changes the $\phi_e/\phi_\mu$
233: ratio as it alters the $\nu_e$ fraction of $\nu_1$. In
234: Fig.~\ref{fig:emuvar}, we show how the variations of these angles
235: within their one-sigma allowed ranges affects $\phi_e/\phi_\mu$. Note
236: that the size of the variation due to uncertainties in the solar and
237: atmospheric angles are quite similar. These uncertainties will be
238: reduced by existing or planned solar and long-baseline experiments.
239: The angle $\theta_{13}$ may be measured by future long
240: baseline~\cite{LB} or reactor~\cite{reactor13} experiments, and
241: measuring $\delta$ may require a neutrino factory.
242:
243: To conclude, IceCube and other detectors have an excellent chance of
244: detecting astrophysical neutrinos and measuring their flavor ratios in
245: the next several years. If neutrinos decay, the flavor ratio
246: $\phi_e/\phi_\mu$ will be much larger than its no-decay value of 1,
247: and this effect is significantly enhanced by nonzero $\theta_{13}$ and
248: $\delta$. Thus there may be a new opportunity to measure the last
249: unknown values in the neutrino mixing matrix.
250:
251: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
252: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
253:
254: {\bf Acknowledgments.---}
255: %
256: We thank Stephen Parke for illuminating discussions. J.F.B. and
257: N.F.B. were supported by Fermilab (operated by URA under DOE contract
258: DE-AC02-76CH03000) and NASA grant NAG5-10842; S.P. by DOE grant
259: DE-FG03-94ER40833; and T.J.W. by DOE grant DE-FG05-85ER40226, NASA
260: grant NAG5-13399, and a Vanderbilt Discovery Award. T.J.W. also
261: thanks the U. Wisconsin Phenomenology Group for hospitality.
262:
263: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
264: % Bibliography %
265: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
266:
267: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
268:
269: \bibitem{111}
270: J.~G.~Learned and S.~Pakvasa,
271: %``Detecting tau-neutrino oscillations at PeV energies,''
272: Astropart.\ Phys.\ {\bf 3}, 267 (1995);
273: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9405296;%%
274: H.~Athar, M.~Jezabek and O.~Yasuda,
275: %``Effects of neutrino mixing on high-energy cosmic neutrino flux,''
276: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 62}, 103007 (2000);
277: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0005104;%%
278: L.~Bento, P.~Keranen and J.~Maalampi,
279: %``Neutrino mixing scenarios and AGN,''
280: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 476}, 205 (2000).
281: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9912240;%%
282:
283: \bibitem{cosmicDK}
284: J.~F.~Beacom, N.~F.~Bell, D.~Hooper, S.~Pakvasa and T.~J.~Weiler,
285: %``Decay of high-energy astrophysical neutrinos,''
286: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 90}, 181301 (2003).
287: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0211305;%%
288:
289: \bibitem{solarDK}
290: J.~F.~Beacom and N.~F.~Bell,
291: %``Do solar neutrinos decay?,''
292: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 65}, 113009 (2002).
293: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0204111;%%
294:
295: \bibitem{pDirac}
296: J.~F.~Beacom, N.~F.~Bell, D.~Hooper, J.~G.~Learned, S.~Pakvasa and
297: T.~J.~Weiler,
298: %``Pseudo-Dirac neutrinos, a challenge for neutrino telescopes,''
299: hep-ph/0307151.
300: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0307151;%%
301:
302: \bibitem{steriles}
303: R.~M.~Crocker, F.~Melia and R.~R.~Volkas,
304: %``Oscillating neutrinos from the galactic center,''
305: Astrophys.\ J.\ Suppl.\ {\bf 130}, 339 (2000);
306: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 9911292;%%
307: %``Discovering long wavelength neutrino oscillations in the distorted
308: %neutrino spectrum of galactic supernova remnants,''
309: Astrophys.\ J.\ Suppl.\ {\bf 141}, 147 (2002);
310: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0106090;%
311: V.~Berezinsky, M.~Narayan and F.~Vissani,
312: %``Mirror model for sterile neutrinos,''
313: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 658}, 254 (2003);
314: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0210204;%%
315: P.~Keranen, J.~Maalampi, M.~Myyrylainen and J.~Riittinen,
316: %``Effects of sterile neutrinos on the ultrahigh-energy cosmic
317: %neutrino flux,''
318: hep-ph/0307041.
319: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0307041;%%
320:
321: \bibitem{Barenboim}
322: G.~Barenboim and C.~Quigg,
323: %``Neutrino observatories can characterize cosmic sources and
324: %neutrino properties,''
325: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 67}, 073024 (2003).
326: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0301220;%%
327:
328: \bibitem{IceCube}
329: J.~Ahrens {\it et al.}, % [IceCube Collaboration],
330: %``Sensitivity of the IceCube detector to astrophysical sources of
331: %high energy muon neutrinos,''
332: astro-ph/0305196.
333: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0305196;%%
334:
335: \bibitem{flavors}
336: J.~F.~Beacom, N.~F.~Bell, D.~Hooper, S.~Pakvasa and T.~J.~Weiler,
337: %``Measuring flavor ratios of high-energy astrophysical neutrinos,''
338: Phys. Rev. {\bf D}, in press, hep-ph/0307025.
339: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0307025;%%
340:
341: \bibitem{reactors}
342: M.~Apollonio {\it et al.},
343: %``Limits on neutrino oscillations from the CHOOZ experiment,''
344: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 466}, 415 (1999);
345: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 9907037;%%
346: %M.~Apollonio {\it et al.},
347: %``Search for neutrino oscillations on a long base-line at the CHOOZ
348: %nuclear power station,''
349: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 27}, 331 (2003);
350: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0301017;%%
351: F.~Boehm {\it et al.},
352: %``Results from the Palo Verde neutrino oscillation experiment,''
353: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 62}, 072002 (2000);
354: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0003022;%%
355: %F.~Boehm {\it et al.},
356: %``Final results from the Palo Verde neutrino oscillation experiment,''
357: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 64}, 112001 (2001).
358: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0107009;%%
359:
360: \bibitem{atm}
361: K. Nishikawa, talk at Lepton-Photon 2003 Conference, August 2003,
362: http://conferences.fnal.gov/lp2003/.
363:
364: \bibitem{solar}
365: S.~N.~Ahmed {\it et al.}, % [SNO Collaboration],
366: %``Measurement of the total active B-8 solar neutrino flux at the
367: %Sudbury Neutrino Observatory with enhanced neutral current sensitivity,''
368: nucl-ex/0309004.
369: %%CITATION = NUCL-EX 0309004;%%
370:
371: \bibitem{RPP}
372: K.~Hagiwara {\it et al.}, % [Particle Data Group Collaboration],
373: %``Review Of Particle Physics,''
374: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 66}, 010001 (2002).
375: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D66,010001;%%
376:
377: \bibitem{LB}
378: J.~Burguet-Castell, M.~B.~Gavela, J.~J.~Gomez-Cadenas, P.~Hernandez
379: and O.~Mena,
380: %``On the measurement of leptonic CP violation,''
381: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 608}, 301 (2001);
382: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0103258;%%
383: H.~Minakata, H.~Nunokawa and S.~Parke,
384: %``CP and T trajectory diagrams for a unified graphical representation
385: %of neutrino oscillations,''
386: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 537}, 249 (2002);
387: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0204171;%%
388: %H.~Minakata, H.~Nunokawa and S.~Parke,
389: %``Parameter degeneracies in neutrino oscillation measurement
390: %of leptonic CP and T violation,''
391: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 66}, 093012 (2002);
392: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0208163;%%
393: V.~Barger, D.~Marfatia and K.~Whisnant,
394: %``How two neutrino superbeam experiments do better than one,''
395: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 560}, 75 (2003);
396: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0210428;%%
397: P.~Huber, M.~Lindner and W.~Winter,
398: %``Synergies between the first-generation JHF-SK and NuMI superbeam
399: % experiments,''
400: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 654}, 3 (2003);
401: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0211300;%%
402:
403: \bibitem{Farzan}
404: Y.~Farzan and A.~Y.~Smirnov,
405: %``Leptonic unitarity triangle and CP-violation,''
406: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 65}, 113001 (2002).
407: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0201105;%%
408:
409: \bibitem{reactor13}
410: L.~Mikaelyan,
411: %``Future reactor neutrino oscillation experiments at Krasnoyarsk,''
412: Nucl.\ Phys.\ Proc.\ Suppl.\ {\bf 91}, 120 (2001);
413: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0008046;%%
414: V.~Martemyanov, L.~Mikaelyan, V.~Sinev, V.~Kopeikin and Y.~Kozlov,
415: %``The Kr2Det project: Search for mass-3 state contribution $|$U(e3)$|$**2
416: %to the electron neutrino using a one reactor - two detector
417: %oscillation experiment at Krasnoyarsk underground site,''
418: hep-ex/0211070;
419: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0211070;%%
420: H.~Minakata, H.~Sugiyama, O.~Yasuda, K.~Inoue and F.~Suekane,
421: %``Reactor measurement of Theta(13) and its complementarity to
422: %long-baseline experiments,''
423: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 68}, 033017 (2003);
424: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0211111;%%
425: P.~Huber, M.~Lindner, T.~Schwetz and W.~Winter,
426: %``Reactor neutrino experiments compared to superbeams,''
427: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 665}, 487 (2003);
428: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0303232;%%
429: M.~H.~Shaevitz and J.~M.~Link,
430: %``Using reactors to measure theta(13),''
431: hep-ex/0306031.
432: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0306031;%%
433:
434: \end{thebibliography}
435:
436: \end{document}
437:
438: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
439: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
440:
441: