1:
2: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
3: % Latex File
4: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
5: %\documentclass[12pt]{article}
6: \documentclass[12pt]{article}
7:
8: \usepackage{amssymb,epsfig}
9: %\usepackage{showkeys}
10:
11: \usepackage{psfrag}
12:
13: %%%%%%%%%%%%% psfrag replacements
14:
15: \psfrag{phi(k)}{{\footnotesize $\phi_+(k,\mu=1$~GeV)}}
16: \psfrag{phi(t)}{{\footnotesize $\varphi_+(\tau,\mu=1$~GeV)}}
17:
18: \psfrag{(a)}{{\footnotesize $(a)$}}
19: \psfrag{(b)}{{\footnotesize $(b)$}}
20: \psfrag{(c)}{{\footnotesize $(c)$}}
21: \psfrag{(d)}{{\footnotesize $(d)$}}
22: \psfrag{(e)}{{\footnotesize $(e)$}}
23: \psfrag{(f)}{{\footnotesize $(f)$}}
24: \psfrag{(g)}{{\footnotesize $(g)$}}
25: \psfrag{(h)}{{\footnotesize $(h)$}}
26:
27: \psfrag{tn}{{\footnotesize $tn$}}
28: %\psfrag{0}{{\footnotesize $0$}}
29: \psfrag{x}{{\footnotesize $x$}}
30:
31: \psfrag{k, GeV}{{\footnotesize $k$, GeV}}
32: \psfrag{t, GeV}{{\footnotesize $\tau$, GeV$^{-1}$}}
33:
34:
35:
36: \psfrag{I2}{{$|{\cal I}|^2$}}
37: \psfrag{zz}{{$z$}}
38: \psfrag{zeta}{{$\zeta$}}
39: \psfrag{TH}{\footnotesize $T_H(z',x_1)$}
40:
41: %%%%%%%%%%%%% OVERALL LAYOUT %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
42:
43:
44:
45: \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{0pt}
46: %\setlength{\textwidth}{15.8cm}
47: \setlength{\textwidth}{16.1cm}
48: \setlength{\topmargin}{-0.5in}
49: \setlength{\textheight}{23.5cm}
50: \addtolength{\jot}{5pt}
51: \addtolength{\arraycolsep}{-3pt}
52: \renewcommand{\textfraction}{0}
53: \renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{1.05}
54: %\renewcommand{\theequation}{\arabic{section}.\arabic{equation}}
55: \renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\fnsymbol{footnote}}
56: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
57:
58: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
59: %
60: \newcommand{\beq}[1]{
61: %\marginpar{\small\textsf{#1}}
62: \begin{equation}\label{#1}}
63: \newcommand{\eeq}{\end{equation}}
64: %
65: \newcommand{\bea}[1]{
66: %\marginpar{\small\textsf{#1}}
67: \begin{eqnarray}\label{#1}}
68: \newcommand{\eea}{\end{eqnarray}}
69: %
70: \newcommand\re[1]{(\ref{#1})}
71: %
72: \def \e {\mathop{\rm e}\nolimits}
73:
74: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
75: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
76: %
77: \newcommand{\insertfig}[2]{\mbox{\epsfxsize=#1cm \epsfbox{#2.ps}}}
78: \newcommand{\inclfig}[2]{\mbox{\epsfxsize=#1cm \epsfbox{#2.eps}}}
79: %\setlength{\unitlength}{1cm}
80:
81: %\renewcommand{\theequation}{\thesection.\arabic{equation}}
82: %\def\eq#1{{Eq.~(\ref{#1})}}
83:
84: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
85: \begin{document}
86:
87: \begin{titlepage}
88:
89: \begin{flushright}
90: \begin{tabular}{l}
91: LPT--Orsay--03--63\\
92: hep-ph/0309330
93: \end{tabular}
94: \end{flushright}
95: \vspace{1.5cm}
96:
97: \begin{center}
98: {\LARGE \bf
99: The B-Meson Distribution Amplitude in QCD
100: }
101: \vspace{1cm}
102:
103:
104: {\sc V.M.~Braun}${}^1$, {\sc D.Yu.~Ivanov}${}^{2}$ and {\sc
105: G.P.~Korchemsky}${}^3$
106: \\[0.5cm]
107: \vspace*{0.1cm} ${}^1${\it
108: Institut f\"ur Theoretische Physik, Universit\"at
109: Regensburg, \\ D-93040 Regensburg, Germany
110: } \\[0.2cm]
111: \vspace*{0.1cm} ${}^2${\it Institute of Mathematics, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia
112: } \\[0.2cm]
113: \vspace*{0.1cm} ${}^3${\it Laboratoire de Physique Th\'eorique%
114: \footnote{Unite Mixte de Recherche du CNRS (UMR 8627)},
115: Universit\'e de Paris XI, \\
116: 91405 Orsay C\'edex, France} \\[1.0cm]
117:
118:
119: \vspace{0.6cm}
120: %\bigskip
121: %\centerline{\large \em \today}
122: %\bigskip
123: %\vfill
124: \vskip1.2cm
125: {\bf Abstract:\\[10pt]} \parbox[t]{\textwidth}{
126: The B-meson distribution amplitude is calculated using QCD sum rules.
127: In particular we obtain an estimate for the integral relevant to
128: exclusive B-decays $\lambda_B = 460\pm 110$~MeV at the scale 1 GeV.
129: A simple QCD-motivated parametrization of the distribution amplitude
130: is suggested.
131: }
132: \vskip1cm
133: %{\em Submitted to Physical Review D }\\[1cm]
134: \end{center}
135:
136: \end{titlepage}
137:
138:
139: %{\tableofcontents}
140:
141: \newpage
142:
143: \section{Introduction}
144: \setcounter{equation}{0}
145:
146: The B-meson distribution amplitude was introduced in \cite{SHB90} as the direct
147: analogue of light-cone distribution amplitudes of light mesons
148: \cite{earlyCZ,earlyBL,earlyER} in an attempt to describe generic exclusive
149: B-decays by the contribution of the hard gluon exchange. Since then,
150: considerable effort has been invested to understand the QCD dynamics of heavy
151: meson decays in the heavy quark limit. The radiative decay $B\to\gamma e\nu$
152: provides one with the simplest example of such processes \cite{KPY}. This form
153: factor can be calculated in terms of the B-meson distribution amplitude to
154: one-loop accuracy \cite{DS03} and arguments have been given that the
155: corresponding factorization formula is valid to all orders in the strong coupling
156: \cite{proofsBgamma}. Similar QCD factorization formulas have also been proposed
157: for the related processes $B\to\gamma\gamma$ and $B\to\gamma\ell^+\ell^-$
158: \cite{BB02,DS03a}. For weak decays involving energetic light hadrons in the final
159: states the QCD factorization is more complex since one must isolate the end-point
160: soft contributions in terms of additive contributions. This is a hot topic, see
161: e.g. \cite{friedhof}, and the results have been encouraging although, as it has
162: been repeatedly pointed out \cite{ABS94,Ball03}, the $1/m_b$ corrections to
163: heavy-to-light exclusive decays are most likely large and require quantitative
164: treatment.
165:
166: The B-meson distribution amplitude plays the central role in all known
167: factorization formulas, but, surprisingly, received relatively little attention
168: in the past. In the present work we use QCD sum rules to present a realistic
169: model for the B-meson distribution amplitude, consistent with all QCD
170: constraints. We also take this opportunity to clarify its theoretical status on
171: which there has been certain confusion. The approach that we take in this paper
172: is
173: %a modification
174: inspired by
175: %of
176: the classical work by Chernyak and Zhitnitsky on the QCD sum rule analysis of
177: the distribution amplitudes of light mesons \cite{CZ}. In particular we argue
178: that the relevant matrix element of a bilocal quark-antiquark operator can be
179: calculated by the QCD-corrected expansion at {\it imaginary} light-cone
180: distances. We find that the nonperturbative corrections remain under control and
181: present quantitative estimates for the distribution amplitude and its first
182: inverse moment which enters decay form factors at tree level. Our results can be
183: considered as an extension of an earlier QCD sum rule calculation by Grozin and
184: Neubert \cite{GN96} (see also \cite{BK03}) with the main difference being that we
185: calculate NLO radiative corrections to the sum rule. This is important since the
186: true analytic structure of the distribution amplitude is only seen at this level.
187:
188: The presentation is organized as follows. Sec.~2 is introductory and contains the
189: necessary definitions. A simple model for the distribution is obtained in Sec.~3
190: using QCD perturbation theory and duality. The complete sum rule is constructed
191: in Sec.~4 where we discuss the structure of nonperturbative corrections. This
192: Section also contains our main results, the summary and conclusions.
193:
194: \section{Definitions}
195:
196: {}Following Ref.~\cite{LN03} we define the B-meson distribution
197: amplitude as the renormalized matrix element of the bilocal operator
198: built of an effective heavy quark field $h_v(0)$ and a light antiquark
199: $\bar q(tn)$ at a light-like separation:
200: \beq{defDA}
201: \langle 0|\Big[\bar q(tn)\!\not\!n
202: [tn,0]\Gamma h_v(0)\Big]_R|\bar B(v)\rangle =
203: -\frac{i}{2}F(\mu)\,\mbox{\rm Tr}\left[\gamma_5\!\not\!n\Gamma
204: P_+\right]\,\Phi_+(t,\mu)\,
205: \eeq
206: with
207: \beq{WL}
208: {}[tn,0] \equiv {\rm Pexp}\left[ig\int_0^t\!du\,n_\mu A^\mu(utn)\right].
209: \eeq
210: Here $v_\mu$ is the heavy quark velocity,
211: $n_\mu$ is the light-like vector, $n^2=0$, such that $n\cdot v=1$,
212: $P_+=\frac12(1+\not\!v)$ is the projector on upper components of the
213: heavy quark spinor, $\Gamma$ stands for an arbitrary Dirac structure,
214: $|\bar B(v)\rangle$ is the $\bar B$-meson state in the heavy quark
215: effective theory (HQET) and $F(\mu)$ is the decay constant in HQET,
216: which is related to the physical B-meson decay constant to one-loop
217: accuracy as
218: \beq{defF}
219: f_B\sqrt{m_B} = F(\mu)\left[1+\frac{C_F\alpha_s}{4\pi}
220: \left(3\ln\frac{m_b}{\mu}-2\right)+\ldots\right].
221: \eeq
222: The notation $[\ldots]_R$ in \re{defDA} stands for the renormalization in a
223: MS-like scheme and $\mu$ here and below refers to the $\overline{\textrm{MS}}$
224: normalization scale.
225:
226: The invariant function $\Phi_+(t,\mu)$ where $t$ is a real number
227: defines what is usually called the leading twist
228: B-meson distribution amplitude in position space, in contrast to the
229: amplitude $\Phi_-(t,\mu)$ which involves a different light-cone projector
230: --- $\not\!\bar n$ instead of $\not\!n$ --- in between the quarks;
231: here $\bar n^2 =0, \bar n \cdot n = 2$. This name is not exact
232: since the translation symmetry of the theory is broken by presence
233: of the effective heavy quark field and hence neither geometrical nor
234: collinear twist are defined. In the present paper we only consider
235: the distribution $\Phi_+(t,\mu)$ and its Fourier transform
236: \bea{Fourier}
237: \phi_+(k,\mu)&=&\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\!dt \, \e^{ikt}\Phi_+(t-i0,\mu)\,,
238: \nonumber\\
239: \Phi_+(t,\mu)&=&\int_0^\infty\!dk \, \e^{-ikt}\phi_+(k,\mu)\,,
240: \eea
241: where in the first equation the integration contour goes below the singularities
242: of $\Phi_+(t,\mu)$ that are located in the upper-half plane.
243: %at negative real axis.
244:
245: The scale dependence of the distribution amplitude is driven by the
246: renormalization of the corresponding nonlocal operator
247: $O_+(t)= \bar q(tn)\not\!\!n\,[tn,0]\Gamma\, h_v(0)$. The corresponding
248: $Z$-factor was computed in \cite{LN03} to one-loop order. In momentum
249: space, the result reads
250: \beq{defZ}
251: O_+^{\rm ren} (k,\mu) = \int dk'\, Z_+(k,k';\mu)\,O_+^{\rm bare}(k')\,,
252: \eeq
253: where
254: \bea{Zmom}
255: Z_+(k,k';\mu) &=& \delta(k-k')+ \frac{\alpha_sC_F}{4\pi}
256: Z^{(1)}_+(k,k';\mu)+\ldots\,,
257: \nonumber\\
258: Z^{(1)}_+(k,k';\mu) &=&\left(\frac{4}{\hat\epsilon^2}
259: +\frac{4}{\hat\epsilon}\ln\frac{\mu}{k}-\frac{5}{\hat\epsilon}\right)
260: \delta(k-k')-\frac{4}{\hat\epsilon}
261: \left[\frac{k}{k'}\frac{\theta(k'-k)}{k'-k}+\frac{\theta(k-k')}{k-k'}
262: \right]_+
263: \eea
264: with $d=4-\epsilon$ and the standard notation
265: $2/\hat\epsilon = 2/\epsilon-\gamma_E+\ln 4\pi$. Here $[\ldots]_+$ is the
266: usual ``plus''-distribution.
267:
268: In order to understand the meaning of this result it is instructive
269: to consider operator renormalization in position space. The
270: corresponding to \re{Zmom} one-loop expression is
271: \bea{Zcoord}
272: O_+^{\rm ren} (t,\mu) &=& O_+^{\rm bare}(t)+
273: \frac{\alpha_sC_F}{4\pi}\left\{\left(\frac{4}{\hat\epsilon^2} +
274: \frac{4}{\hat\epsilon}\ln(i t\mu )\right)O_+^{\rm bare}(t)
275: \right.\nonumber\\&&{}\left.
276: - \frac{4}{\hat\epsilon}\int_0^1\!du\,\frac{u}{1-u}
277: \left[O_+^{\rm bare}(ut)-O_+^{\rm bare}(t)\right]
278: - \frac{1}{\hat\epsilon}O_+^{\rm bare}(t)\right\},
279: \eea
280: %
281: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% FIGURE 1 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
282: \begin{figure}[t]
283: \centerline{\epsfysize3.7cm\epsffile{B-diag.eps}}
284: \caption[]{\small
285: One-loop renormalization of the nonlocal light-cone operator built of
286: one light and one effective heavy quark field (double line).
287: The dashed line indicates the gluon Wilson line insertion
288: in between the quark fields.
289: }
290: \label{fig:1}
291: \end{figure}
292: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
293: %
294: where the first two terms in curly brackets correspond to vertex-type corrections
295: shown in Fig.~1a and Fig.~1b, respectively, (in Feynman gauge) and the third term
296: takes into account the quark field renormalization: $q^{\rm ren} =
297: Z_q^{-1/2}q^{\rm bare}$ and $h_v^{\rm ren} = Z_h^{-1/2}h_v^{\rm bare}$ with $Z_q
298: = 1-(2/\hat\epsilon) (\alpha_sC_F/4\pi)$, $Z_h = 1+(4/\hat\epsilon)
299: (\alpha_sC_F/4\pi)$ \cite{Neubert93}. The exchange diagram in Fig.~1c is
300: UV-finite and does not contribute \cite{GN96,LN03}.
301:
302: Note the following property: renormalization of the nonlocal light-cone operator
303: $O_+(t)$ \re{Zcoord} is quasilocal: it only gets mixed with itself and with
304: operators with smaller light-cone separation. In fact the heavy quark vertex
305: correction in Fig.~1a corresponds to a multiplicative (cusp) renormalization in
306: coordinate space \cite{Korchemskaya} while the light quark vertex correction is
307: identical to the similar contribution to the light-quark-antiquark nonlocal
308: operators \cite{BB89}. For light quarks, this property of quasilocality
309: guarantees existence of the Wilson short distance operator product expansion
310: (OPE) since it implies that the ``size'' of the operator is not altered by the
311: renormalization. In the present case, however, the local OPE does not exist
312: because of the term $\ln(it\mu)$ which is non-analytic at $t\to0$. It is easy to
313: see that this contribution arizes from the term $\sim (\mu
314: t)^\epsilon/\epsilon^2$ in the dimensionally regularized diagram in Fig.~1a so
315: that the answer for this diagram depends on the order of limits $t\to0$ and
316: $4-d=\epsilon\to0$. We conclude that renormalization of the nonlocal light-cone
317: operator built of one light and one effective heavy quark field does not commute
318: with the short-distance expansion. In particular
319: \beq{noOPE}
320: [\bar q(tn)\!\not\!n\,[tn,0]\Gamma\,h_v(0)]_R \,\not=\, \sum_{p=0}^\infty
321: \frac{t^p}{p!}[\bar q(0)(\stackrel{\leftarrow}{D}\cdot n)^p h_v(0)]_R,
322: \eeq
323: and the equality does not hold even as an asymptotic expansion.
324: As a consequence,
325: non-negative moments of the B-meson distribution amplitude $\int\! dk\, k^p
326: \phi_+(k,\mu)$ for $p=0,1,2,\ldots$ are not related to matrix elements of local
327: operators and in fact do not exist: It is easy to see that the logarithmic
328: singularity of the amplitude in position space $\Phi_+(t,\mu)\sim \ln(it)$ for
329: $t\to0$ implies that the Fourier integral \re{Fourier} is logarithmically
330: divergent at $k\to \infty$, that is $\phi_+(k,\mu) \sim 1/k $ for $k\gg\mu$, in
331: agreement with the analysis in \cite{LN03}.
332: The analysis of moments $\int\! dk\,
333: k^p \phi_+(k,\mu)$ in \cite{GN96,KKQT01} tacitly assumes a different definition
334: of the B-meson distribution amplitude, such that the nonlocal
335: light-cone operator is defined as the generating function for
336: renormalized local operators on the r.h.s. of \re{noOPE}. This implies
337: e.g. that power divergences are subtracted.
338: This is a different object which, most likely, does not satisfy any
339: simple renormalization group equation and has no obvious relation
340: to exclusive B-decays.
341:
342: \section{Sum Rules: Perturbation Theory}
343:
344: Aim of the present study is to suggest a realistic model of the B-meson
345: distribution amplitude that would be consistent with all QCD
346: constraints. To this end we evaluate the necessary B-meson matrix
347: elements using the standard QCD sum rule approach \cite{SVZ79}.
348: In this section we set up the framework and present intermediate results
349: that only include perturbation theory contributions and the assumption
350: of duality. The complete treatment including nonperturbative corrections
351: is presented in the next section.
352:
353: To derive the sum rules we consider the following correlation functions in
354: HQET:
355: \beq{Pi}
356: i\int d^4x\, \e^{-i\omega (vx)}\langle0|
357: {\rm T}\{\bar q(0)\Gamma_1h_v(0)\bar h_v(x)\Gamma_2q(x)\}|0\rangle =
358: -\frac12{\rm Tr}\left[\Gamma_1P_+\Gamma_2\right]\Pi(\omega)
359: \eeq
360: and
361: \beq{T}
362: i\int d^4x\, \e^{-i\omega (vx)}\langle0|
363: {\rm T}\{\bar q(tn)\!\not\!n\,\Gamma_1[tn,0]h_v(0)
364: \bar h_v(x)\Gamma_2q(x)\}|0\rangle =
365: -\frac12{\rm Tr}\left[\!\not\!n\,\Gamma_1P_+\Gamma_2\right]T(t,\omega)\,.
366: \eeq
367: The correlation function $\Pi(\omega)$ has a pole at $\omega =
368: \bar\Lambda$ where $\bar\Lambda=m_B-m_b$ is the usual HQET parameter,
369: and the residue at this pole is proportional to the HQET decay constant
370: $F(\mu)$:
371: \beq{lhs2}
372: \Pi(\omega) = \frac12 F^2(\mu)\,\frac{1}{\bar \Lambda-\omega}+
373: \mbox{\rm higher resonances and continuum}.
374: \eeq
375: Similarly,
376: \beq{lhs3}
377: T(t,\omega) = \frac12 F^2(\mu)\,\frac{1}{\bar \Lambda-\omega}
378: \int_0^\infty dk\,\e^{-ikt}\phi_+(k,\mu)
379: +\ldots
380: \eeq
381: On the other hand, both correlation functions can be calculated in QCD
382: at negative values of $\omega$ of the order of 1 GeV in perturbation
383: theory and taking into account nonperturbative effects induced by
384: vacuum condensates \cite{SVZ79}. Matching the two representations
385: one obtains a sum rule. There are two technical details: First, one
386: makes an assumption that contributions of the continuum and of higher
387: resonances can be taken into account by the restriction to the
388: so-called duality region $0<s<\omega_0$ in the dispersion representation
389: for the correlation functions, e.g.
390: \beq{duality}
391: \Pi(w) = \int_0^\infty \frac{ds}{s-\omega}\, \rho_\Pi(s)
392: \to \int_0^{\omega_0} \frac{ds}{s-\omega}\, \rho_\Pi(s)\,,
393: \eeq
394: where $\rho_\Pi(s)$ is the corresponding spectral density. The numerical
395: value for the parameter $\omega_0$ (called continuum threshold) is
396: usually taken to be in the interval $0.8-1.0$~GeV
397: \cite{BBBD92,Neubert92,BB94,Neubert93}. Second, one makes the so-called
398: Borel transformation
399: \beq{Borel}
400: \int_0^{\omega_0} \frac{ds}{s-\omega}\, \rho_\Pi(s) \to
401: \int_0^{\omega_0} {ds}\, \e^{-s/M}\, \rho_\Pi(s)
402: \eeq
403: introducing the variable $M$ (Borel parameter) instead of the energy $\omega$ in
404: order to suppress higher-order nonperturbative corrections and minimize the
405: dependence on the continuum model. The resulting sum rule for the correlation
406: function $\Pi(w)$ is well known \cite{BBBD92,Neubert92}:
407: \bea{SR2}
408: \frac{1}{2}F^2(\mu)\e^{-\bar\Lambda/M} &=&
409: \frac{N_c}{2\pi^2}\int_0^{\omega_0}ds\, s^2\, \e^{-s/M}
410: \left[1+\frac{\alpha_s}{\pi}\left(
411: \frac{17}{3}+\frac{4\pi^2}{9}-2\ln\frac{2s}{\mu}\right)\right]
412: \nonumber\\&&{}
413: -\frac12\langle\bar q q\rangle
414: \left[1+\frac{2\alpha_s}{\pi}-\frac{m_0^2}{16M^2}\right].
415: \eea
416: Here $\alpha_s=\alpha_s(\mu)$, $\langle\bar q q\rangle \simeq -(240$~MeV$)^3$ is
417: the quark condensate and $m_0^2$ is the ratio of the quark-gluon and quark
418: condensates $m_0^2= \langle \bar q g (\sigma G) q\rangle /\langle\bar q q\rangle
419: \simeq 0.8$~GeV$^2$. The given numbers correspond to the renormalization scale
420: $\mu=1$~GeV. With the choice $\bar\Lambda =0.4-0.5$~GeV and $w_0 = 0.8-1.0$~GeV
421: the sum rule in \re{SR2} is satisfied for a wide range of values of the Borel
422: parameter $0.3$~GeV$< M < \infty$ and is used \cite{BBBD92,Neubert92} to
423: determine the B-meson decay constant $F(\mu)$ in the heavy quark limit. In the
424: numerical estimates in this paper we will take the ``window'' $0.3~\textrm{GeV} <
425: M < 0.6~\textrm{GeV}$ in which the matching is done \cite{BB94} and use the value
426: $\alpha_s(1$~GeV$)=0.5$ ($\Lambda_{\rm QCD}^{(3){\rm NLO}}\simeq 360$~MeV) which
427: is consistent with the world average.
428:
429: Our task in this work is to derive the similar sum rule for the
430: correlation function $T(t,\omega)$ defined in \re{T}. The
431: perturbative contributions are shown in Fig.~2.
432: %
433: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% FIGURE 2 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
434: \begin{figure}[t]
435: \centerline{\epsfxsize12.0cm\epsffile{triangle.eps}}
436: \caption[]{\small
437: Correlation function \re{T} in QCD perturbation theory to first order.
438: }
439: \label{fig:2}
440: \end{figure}
441: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
442: %
443: The corresponding sum rule reads, so far without nonperturbative
444: corrections:
445: \bea{SR3a}
446: \frac{1}{2}F^2(\mu)\e^{-\bar\Lambda/M}\,\phi_+(k,\mu) &=&
447: k\theta(2w_0-k)\left[
448: \int_{k/2}^{\omega_0}\!\!ds\e^{-s/M}\rho_<(s,k,\mu)+\!
449: \int_{0}^{k/2}\!\!ds\e^{-s/M}\rho_>(s,k,\mu)\right]
450: \nonumber\\
451: &&{}+k\theta(k-2w_0)\int_{0}^{\omega_0}\!\!ds\,\e^{-s/M}\rho_>(s,k,\mu)
452: \eea
453: where
454: \bea{rho}
455: \rho_<(s,k,\mu) &=& \frac{N_c}{4\pi^2}\left\{
456: 1+\frac{\alpha_s C_F}{2\pi}\left[\frac72+\frac{7\pi^2}{24}-
457: \ln^2\frac{k}{\mu}-\frac52 \ln(x-1)-(x-1)\ln(x-1)\right.\right.
458: \nonumber\\&&{}-\left.\left.
459: \frac12 \ln^2(x-1)-2\ln\frac{k}{\mu}[1+\ln(x-1)]+x\ln x+
460: {\rm Li}_2\left(\frac{1}{1-x}\right)\right]\right\}\,,
461: \nonumber\\
462: \rho_>(s,k,\mu) &=& \frac{\alpha_s C_F N_c}{8\pi^3}
463: \left[-x+\ln(1-x)-2(1-x)\ln(1-x)+2\ln^2(1-x)
464: \right.\nonumber\\
465: &&{}\left.+2\ln\frac{k}{\mu}[x+\ln(1-x)]
466: \right].
467: \eea
468: Here ${\rm Li_2}(x)$ is Euler dilogarithm function and we used a shorthand
469: notation $x= 2s/k$,
470:
471: Neglecting $\alpha_s$ corrections for a moment, one gets a simple expression
472: \beq{SR3LO}
473: \frac{1}{2}F^2(\mu)\e^{-\bar\Lambda/M}\,\phi_+(k,\mu) =
474: \frac{N_c}{4\pi^2}\theta(2w_0-k) \, k
475: \int_{k/2}^{\omega_0}\!\!ds\,\e^{-s/M}\,.
476: \eeq
477: In the local duality limit $M\to\infty$ using the sum rule expression
478: for $F(\mu)$ \re{SR2} with the same accuracy,
479: $1/2F^2(\mu) \simeq (N_c/6\pi^2)\omega_0^3$, one obtains
480: \beq{LOdual}
481: \phi_+(k)^{\rm LD} =
482: \frac{3}{4\omega_0^3}\theta(2\omega_0-k) \, k(2\omega_0-k)
483: \eeq
484: which reminds the asymptotic light-cone distribution amplitude of light mesons if
485: rewritten in terms of the scaling variable $\xi=k/(2\omega_0)$. For finite values
486: of the Borel parameter $M$ the B-meson distribution amplitude gets skewed towards
487: smaller values of the momentum but qualitatively remains the same, see Fig.~3.
488: Note that it has finite support $k<2\omega_0$ and can be interpreted as the
489: probability amplitude to find the light quark (on-shell) in the B-meson with
490: momentum $k$.
491:
492: Beyond the Born approximation this simple parton-model interpretation is lost
493: since the distribution amplitude develops a high-momentum ``tail'' with
494: $k>2\omega_0$ and in this region cannot be thought of as a
495: probability amplitude
496: for the two-particle state on mass shell.
497: The ${\cal O}(\alpha_s)$ radiative correction turns out to be very large
498: ($\sim$100\% of the Born term) but cancels to a large extent against the
499: similar large radiative correction to $F(\mu)$ \cite{BG92,BBBD92}.
500:
501: The numerical results for two values of
502: the Borel parameter $M=0.3$~GeV and $M=0.6$~GeV are shown in Fig.~3.
503: %
504: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% FIGURE 3 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
505: \begin{figure}[t]
506: \centerline{\epsfysize5.0cm\epsffile{pert03.eps}\quad
507: \epsfysize5.0cm\epsffile{pert06.eps}}
508: \caption[]{\small
509: B-meson distribution amplitude $\phi_+(k,\mu=1$~GeV$)$
510: calculated from the sum rule
511: \re{SR3a} in QCD perturbation theory to leading order (dashed curves) and
512: next-to-leading order (solid curves) for the continuum threshold
513: $\omega_0$=1~GeV and two values of the Borel parameter
514: $M=0.3$~GeV (left panel) and $M=0.6$~GeV (right panel).
515: The value of the decay constant $F(\mu)$ appearing on the l.h.s.
516: of the sum rule is substituted by the corresponding sum rule \re{SR2}
517: with the appropriate accuracy (LO or NLO) and neglecting the condensate
518: contributions.
519: }
520: \label{fig:3}
521: \end{figure}
522: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
523: %
524: We choose $w_0=1$~GeV for this plot and substitute
525: the coupling $F^2(\mu)$ appearing on the l.h.s. of the sum rule
526: \re{SR3a} by the sum rule \re{SR2} to the same accuracy, i.e.
527: neglecting nonperturbative corrections. In this way the dependence
528: on $\bar\Lambda$ cancels out and the sensitivity to other parameters
529: ($\omega_0$ and $M$) is strongly reduced.
530: Indeed, it is seen in Fig.~3 that dependence
531: on the Borel parameter is rather mild. Note that for large $k$
532: the distribution amplitude becomes negative.
533: The asymptotic behavior is
534: \beq{asym}
535: \phi_+(k)\sim k~~{\rm for}~~k\to0\,,\qquad
536: \phi_+(k)\sim -\frac1{k}\ln(k/\mu) ~~{\rm for}~~k\gg\mu\,,
537: \eeq
538: in agreement with \cite{LN03}. Also the scale dependence of
539: the distribution amplitude extracted from the sum rule \re{SR3a}
540: agrees with \cite{LN03}. All
541: results are shown for $\mu=1$~GeV.
542:
543: Of particular interest for the QCD description of B-decays is the
544: value of the first negative moment
545: \beq{lambdaB}
546: \lambda_B^{-1}(\mu) = \int_0^\infty\frac{dk}{k}\phi_+(k,\mu)\,.
547: \eeq
548: We obtain from the sum rules:
549: \bea{lB10}
550: \lambda_B^{-1} &=& 1.49-1.83~\mbox{\rm GeV}^{-1}\,
551: \qquad \mbox{\rm for}~\omega_0=1.0~\mbox{GeV}\,,
552: \nonumber\\
553: \lambda_B^{-1} &=& 1.79-2.08~\mbox{\rm GeV}^{-1}\,
554: \qquad \mbox{\rm for}~\omega_0=0.8~\mbox{GeV}\,,
555: \eea
556: where the lower value corresponds to $M=0.6$~GeV and the higher one to
557: $M=0.3$~GeV for each choice of $\omega_0$. Notice that $\lambda_B^{-1}$ decreases
558: as $M$ increases and in the local duality limit we obtain
559: %In the local duality limit we obtain
560: \beq{lB-LD}
561: \lambda_B^{-1}(\mu=2\omega_0)^{\rm LD} = \frac{3}{2\omega_0}
562: \left[1-\frac{\alpha_s(2\omega_0)}{\pi}
563: \left(\frac53+\frac{5\pi^2}{36}
564: %\frac{\pi^2}{4}
565: \right)\right],
566: \eeq
567: where it is taken into account that in the limit $M\to\infty$ the sum rules
568: effectively become normalized at the scale $\mu=2\omega_0$ because of subtraction
569: of the continuum from the running coupling, cf.~\cite{BKY85}. To avoid
570: misunderstanding we remind that all results of this section correspond to the sum
571: rules in QCD perturbation theory and the given numbers will be superseded by
572: those in the next section where we consider the nonperturbative corrections.
573:
574: \section{Sum Rules: Nonperturbative Corrections}
575:
576: The primary source of nonperturbative corrections to the sum rules
577: in HQET is provided by the quark condensate. The corresponding diagrams
578: (leading and next-to-leading order) are shown in Fig.~4.
579: %
580: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% FIGURE 4 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
581: \begin{figure}[t]
582: \centerline{\epsfysize8.0cm\epsffile{Q-condensate.eps}}
583: \caption[]{\small
584: Quark condensate contribution to the correlation function \re{T}.
585: }
586: \label{fig:4}
587: \end{figure}
588: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
589: %
590: The leading-order contribution in Fig.~4a is simply
591: \beq{qqT}
592: T^{\langle\bar q q\rangle}(t,\omega)
593: = \frac{\langle\bar q q\rangle}{2\omega}\,.
594: \eeq
595: It does not depend on the quark-antiquark separation and gives rize to the
596: $\delta$-function type contribution to the r.h.s.\ of the sum rule in \re{SR3a}
597: \beq{qqLO}
598: \ldots -\frac12 \,\langle\bar q q\rangle \delta(k)\,.
599: \eeq
600: Condensates of higher dimension produce even more singular terms, the expansion
601: goes in derivatives of the $\delta$-function at $k=0$. This is a well-known
602: problem which is familiar from the QCD sum rule studies of light-cone
603: distribution amplitudes of light mesons \cite{CZ} and nucleon parton
604: distributions \cite{BI88,BGM95}: The short-distance OPE which is the the basis of
605: the SVZ approach is inadequate for a calculation of distribution functions
606: point-by-point in the momentum fraction space. As a consequence, QCD sum rules
607: cannot be used for a direct calculation of distribution amplitudes (unless they
608: are supplemented by additional assumptions) but rather provide constraints which
609: have to be implemented within QCD-motivated parameterizations (models) of the
610: distributions, consistent with perturbative QCD. For a model to be
611: self-consistent, there are three conditions:
612: \begin{itemize}
613: \item{} The end-point behavior of the distributions has to be consistent
614: with QCD.
615: \item{} The model has to be closed under the QCD evolution,
616: i.e. calculation of the scale dependence has to be possible and not
617: involve nonperturbative parameters other than those specified by the
618: model at the reference scale.
619: \item{} The model has to involve a minimum possible number of
620: nonperturbative parameters.
621: \end{itemize}
622:
623: The Chernyak-Zhitnitsky models of light-cone distribution amplitudes
624: of light mesons give the classical example of such an approach.
625: In this case one expands the distribution amplitude in a series
626: over orthogonal polynomials, e.g. for the pion
627: \beq{phipi}
628: \phi_\pi(x,\mu) = 6x(1-x)\sum_{p=0,2\ldots}^\infty \varphi_p(\mu)
629: C^{3/2}_p(2x-1)\,,
630: \eeq
631: so that coefficients in this expansion correspond to (Gegenbauer) moments of
632: $\phi_\pi(x)$, and defines a {\em model} by truncating this expansion at a
633: certain $p=p_{\rm max}$. The first $p_{\rm max}$ coefficients are then estimated
634: using QCD sum rules. (In practice one takes $p_{\rm max}=2$ since estimates of
635: higher-order coefficients turn out to be unreliable.) The model satisfies all the
636: above criteria since the correct end-point behavior is built in by construction
637: and higher-order coefficients can only get mixed with lower-order coefficients
638: but not vice versa; it follows that the set of coefficients
639: $\{\varphi_0,\varphi_2,\ldots,\varphi_{k_{\rm max}}\}$ is closed under
640: renormalization\footnote{The coefficients in the Gegenbauer expansion are
641: renormalized multiplicatively to leading order because of conformal symmetry;
642: this property is, however, not essential for our argument.} and the distribution
643: amplitude $\phi_\pi(x,\mu)$ can be calculated at arbitrary scale from its model
644: at $\mu=\mu_0$. It indeed involves a minimum number of parameters, each of which
645: has a clear meaning in QCD as the matrix element of a certain local operator and
646: can eventually be calculated e.g. on the lattice.
647:
648: In contrast to \re{phipi}, the B-meson distribution amplitude cannot be written
649: as a {\em sum} of independent terms that have autonomous QCD evolution but rather
650: is given by the {\em integral} in the complex moments plane \cite{LN03}. This
651: feature reminds evolution of parton distributions in the deep-inelastic inclusive
652: lepton-hadron scattering, but in difference to the latter case one cannot obtain
653: complex moments of the B-meson distribution amplitude by analytic continuation
654: from the set of real integers (as we mentioned in Sec.~2, every non-negative
655: moment of $\phi_+(k,\mu)$ diverges). As the result, one necessarily has a
656: continuous rather than discrete set of nonperturbative parameters.
657:
658: One option \cite{BGM95,Grozin,GN96} is to parametrize the B-meson distribution
659: amplitude by the matrix element of the bilocal operator in \re{defDA} at
660: imaginary light-cone separation
661: \beq{tau}
662: t = -i\tau\,,\qquad \varphi_+(\tau,\mu) = \Phi_+(-i\tau,\mu)\,.
663: \eeq
664: Obviously
665: \beq{fur}
666: \varphi_+(\tau,\mu) = \int_0^\infty\! dk\,\e^{-\tau k}\phi_+(k,\mu)
667: \eeq
668: and the parameter $\lambda_B$ is given by the simple integral
669: \beq{lamB}
670: \lambda_B^{-1}(\mu) = \int_0^\infty d\tau\,\varphi_+(\tau,\mu)\,.
671: \eeq
672: The purpose of going over to imaginary light-cone times (distances) is similar to
673: that of the usual Wick rotation: In this way the oscillating exponents
674: corresponding to the light-cone time dependence of intermediate states
675: propagating along the light-cone are converted to falling exponents suppressed by
676: the energy of the state, where the light-cone quantization is implied.
677: Simultaneously, the normalization scale $\mu$ acquires the physical meaning of
678: the cutoff in energy of the intermediate states. Note that the renormalization of
679: $\varphi_+(\tau,\mu)$ only involves the distribution at smaller light-cone
680: separations, cf. \re{Zcoord}. This implies that knowledge of
681: $\varphi_+(\tau,\mu)$ at small distances up to $\tau<\tau_{\rm max}$ is
682: sufficient to calculate its scale dependence in the same distance range, in
683: agreement with the self-consistency criterium formulated above.
684:
685:
686: On the other hand, it is easy to understand that the function
687: $\varphi_+(\tau,\mu)$ can be calculated at small $\tau$ using OPE; expansion in
688: vacuum condensates of increasing dimension corresponds to the Laurent expansion
689: of $\varphi_+(\tau,\mu)$ in powers of $\tau$, which is modified by calculable
690: perturbative corrections. The condensate expansion seems to be under control up
691: to distances of order $\tau\sim 1$~GeV$^{-1}$ (that is, of order 0.2~fm). At
692: larger distances the OPE diverges and one has to either truncate
693: $\varphi_+(\tau,\mu)$ at a certain $\tau_{\rm max}$ or rely on a certain model
694: for the large $\tau$ behaviour. Provided that the nonperturbative corrections
695: decrease sufficiently fast for large $\tau$ one can hope that the model
696: assumptions do not lead to a large uncertainty in the overall result.
697:
698: To illustrate this construction, we have calculated the quark condensate
699: contribution including the $\alpha_s$-correction, see Fig.~4, the
700: contribution of the gluon condensate, Fig.~5, and the contribution
701: %
702: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% FIGURE 5 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
703: \begin{figure}[t]
704: \centerline{\epsfysize4.0cm\epsffile{G-condensate.eps}}
705: \caption[]{\small
706: Gluon condensate contribution to the correlation function \re{T}.
707: Only this diagram contributes in the Fock-Schwinger gauge.}
708: \label{fig:5}
709: \end{figure}
710: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
711: %
712: of the mixed condensate $\langle \bar q \sigma gG q\rangle
713: \simeq m_0^2 \langle\bar q q\rangle $ which is obtained as the
714: expansion of the diagram in Fig.~4a in the background gluon field.
715: The resulting sum rule in which we have also included the perturbative
716: contribution of Fig.~2 reads
717: \bea{SR3bac}
718: \lefteqn{
719: \frac{1}{2}F^2(\mu)\e^{-\bar\Lambda/M}\,\varphi_+(\tau,\mu) \,=}
720: \\&=&
721: \int_{0}^{\omega_0}\!\!ds\,\e^{-s/M}\rho_{\rm pert}(s,\tau,\mu)
722: -\frac12\langle\bar q q\rangle\Bigg\{1+\frac{\alpha_sC_F}{2\pi}
723: \Big[3-\frac{5\pi^2}{24}-\ln^2(\tau\mu \e^{\gamma_E})
724: - \ln(\tau\mu \e^{\gamma_E}) \nonumber\\ &&{} -\ln(1+2\tau M) -{\rm L}_2(-2\tau
725: M)\Big]\Bigg\}
726: +\frac{1}{48}\left\langle\frac{\alpha_s}{\pi}G^2\right\rangle
727: \frac{M\tau^2}{(1+2\tau M)^2}
728: +\frac{1}{32}\frac{m_0^2}{M^2}\langle\bar q q\rangle
729: \left(1+2\tau M\right)\,,
730: \nonumber
731: \eea
732: where the perturbative spectral density can be read off Eq.~\re{SR3a}. The
733: contribution of the gluon condensate turns out to be very small and will be
734: neglected in what follows. We further note that the sum of the diagram in Fig.~4d
735: and one half of the heavy quark self-energy correction in Fig.~4f define the
736: universal renormalization factor of the Wilson line built of the light-like
737: segment of length $-i\tau$ and the time-like segment of length $-i/M$. It can be
738: shown that the corresponding contributions $\sim (\alpha_sC_F)^n$ exponentiate to
739: all orders \cite{Gatheral} and produce a Sudakov-like exponential suppression
740: factor
741: \beq{sud}
742: S(\tau,M,\mu) =
743: \exp\left\{-\frac{\alpha_sC_F}{2\pi}\left[\ln^2(\tau\mu \e^{\gamma_E})
744: + \frac{5\pi^2}{24} -1 -\ln \frac{\mu \e^{\gamma_E}}{2M}+ {\rm L}_2(-2\tau M)
745: \right]\right\}
746: \eeq
747: which is the same for the quark and the quark-gluon condensate.
748: Note that ${\rm L}_2(-2\tau M) \sim -\frac12 \ln^2(2\tau M)$ for
749: $\tau \gg 1/M$.
750: We end up with an improved sum rule
751: \bea{SR3b}
752: \lefteqn{
753: \frac{1}{2}F^2(\mu)\e^{-\bar\Lambda/M}\,\varphi_+(\tau,\mu) \,=}
754: \\&=&
755: \int_{0}^{\omega_0}\!\!ds\,\e^{-s/M}\rho_{\rm pert}(s,\tau,\mu)
756: -\frac12\langle\bar q q\rangle\,S(\tau,M,\mu)\,
757: \Bigg\{1+\frac{\alpha_sC_F}{2\pi}
758: \Big[2
759: - \ln(\tau\mu \e^{\gamma_E}) - \ln \frac{\mu \e^{\gamma_E}}{2M} \nonumber\\ &&{}
760: -\ln(1+2\tau M)\Big]
761: % +\frac{1}{48}\left\langle\frac{\alpha_s}{\pi}G^2\right\rangle
762: %\frac{M\tau^2}{(1+2\tau M)^2}
763: -\frac{1}{16}\frac{m_0^2}{M^2}\left(1+2\tau M\right)\Bigg\}
764: \nonumber
765: \eea
766: in which the double-logarithmic corrections to the quark and
767: quark-gluon chiral condensates are resummed. We do not attempt the
768: similar resummation in the perturbative contribution since its effect
769: is negligible compared to the $1/\tau^2$ falloff inherited from the
770: Born term.
771:
772: %
773: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% FIGURE 6 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
774: \begin{figure}[t]
775: \centerline{\epsfysize4.4cm\epsffile{final03w10.eps}\quad
776: \epsfysize4.4cm\epsffile{final06w10.eps}}
777: \caption[]{\small Perturbative (solid curves) and nonperturbative (long dashes)
778: contributions to the B-meson distribution amplitude $\varphi_+(\tau,\mu=1$~GeV$)$
779: calculated from the sum rule \re{SR3b} to the NLO accuracy. In addition, the
780: nonlocal condensate models \re{model1}, \re{model2} of resummed nonperturbative
781: contributions to the sum rule, cf. \re{nonphi}, are shown by short dashes. The
782: continuum threshold is chosen to be $\omega_0$=1~GeV and two values of the Borel
783: parameter are used: $M=0.3$~GeV (left panel) and $M=0.6$~GeV (right panel). The
784: value of the decay constant $F(\mu)$ appearing on the l.h.s. of \re{SR3b} is
785: substituted by the corresponding sum rule \re{SR2}.
786: }
787: \label{fig:6}
788: \end{figure}
789: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
790: %
791: %
792: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% FIGURE 7 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
793: \begin{figure}[t]
794: \centerline{\epsfysize4.4cm\epsffile{final03w08.eps}\quad
795: \epsfysize4.4cm\epsffile{final06w08.eps}}
796: \caption[]{\small
797: Same as in Fig.~6, with a different value of the
798: continuum threshold $\omega_0=0.8$~GeV.
799: }
800: \label{fig:7}
801: \end{figure}
802: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
803: %
804:
805:
806: The perturbative and the nonperturbative contributions to the sum rule result
807: \re{SR3b} for $\varphi_+(\tau,\mu)$ are shown separately as a function of
808: distance $\tau$ in Fig.~6 ($\omega_0=1$~GeV) and Fig.~7 ($\omega_0=0.8$~GeV) for
809: two different values of the Borel parameter $M=0.3$~GeV and $M=0.6$~GeV. Note
810: that at small distances the nonperturbative corrections are significantly smaller
811: than the perturbative contribution. The nonperturbative correction turns to zero
812: at a certain value of $\tau$ as the result of the cancellation between the quark
813: condensate contribution ($\sim$~{\em const}) and that of the mixed condensate
814: ($\sim \tau$). This cancellation of course cannot be taken seriously and only
815: indicates that the OPE breaks down since the hierarchy of contributions is lost.
816: We conclude that the classical QCD sum rule is only valid up to light-cone
817: distances of order $1-3$~GeV$^{-1}$, depending on the value of the Borel
818: parameter. A rough estimate for the nonperturbative contribution to
819: $\lambda_B^{-1}$ in the strict OPE-based approach is, therefore, given by the
820: integral over the region of small $\tau$ where the correction is still positive,
821: that is up to the crossing point with the zero axis. In order to get an estimate
822: of a possible nonperturbative contribution from large distances we use the
823: concept of a nonlocal quark condensate introduced in \cite{MR88} and later used
824: rather extensively in QCD sum rule calculations of the distribution amplitudes of
825: light mesons by the Dubna group \cite{nonloc1,BM02}. The same approach was taken
826: up in \cite{GN96}.
827:
828: The nonlocal quark condensate presents a model for a partial
829: resummation of the OPE to all orders in terms of the vacuum
830: expectation value of the single nonlocal
831: operator
832: \beq{NLC}
833: \langle 0|\bar q(x)[x,0]q(0)|0\rangle =
834: \langle \bar q q\rangle \int_0^\infty\!d\nu\, \e^{\nu x^2/4} f(\nu)\,.
835: \eeq
836: The first two moments of $f(\nu)$ are fixed by the OPE:
837: \beq{nlcmom}
838: \int_0^\infty\!d\nu\, f(\nu) =1\,,\qquad
839: \int_0^\infty\!d\nu\, \nu f(\nu) = \frac14 m_0^2\,,
840: \eeq
841: and in addition one requires that the correlation function \re{NLC}
842: decreases exponentially at large Euclidian separations $x^2\to-\infty$.
843: The two simplest choices are
844: \beq{model1}
845: \mbox{Model I}:~~f(\nu) = \delta(\nu-m_0^2/4)~~\cite{MR88}
846: \eeq
847: corresponding to the Gaussian large-distance behavior $\sim \exp[-|x^2|m_0^2/16]$
848: and
849: \beq{model2}
850: \mbox{Model II}:~~f(\nu) =
851: \frac{\lambda^{p-2}}{\Gamma(p-2)} \nu^{1-p} \e^{-\lambda/\nu}\,,
852: \quad p= 3+\frac{4\lambda}{m_0^2}~~\cite{BGM95}
853: \eeq
854: corresponding to $\langle 0|\bar q(x)q(0)|0\rangle \sim
855: \exp[-\lambda\sqrt{-x^2}]$. Here $\lambda$ is a parameter with
856: physical meaning of the vacuum quark correlation length.
857: In this work we take $\lambda=400$~MeV as a representative number,
858: cf \cite{BM02,Radyushkin91}.
859: We will see that sensitivity of the sum rules to the shape of
860: $f(\nu)$ is in fact small; the major shortcoming of this approach
861: is rather that other condensates (e.g. the nonlocal
862: quark-antiquark-gluon condensate) are not included and there exists no
863: parameter that would justify such a truncation.
864:
865: Nonlocality of the quark condensate is easy to implement within
866: our sum rules and it amounts to a simple substitution in Eq.~\re{SR3b}
867: (cf. \cite{GN96})
868: \bea{nonphi}
869: && \hspace*{-20mm}-\frac12\langle\bar q q\rangle\,S(\tau,M,\mu) \Bigg\{1+{\cal
870: O}(\alpha_s)- \frac{1}{16}\frac{m_0^2}{M^2}\left(1+2\tau M\right)\Bigg\}
871: \nonumber \\&\to& -\frac12\langle\bar q q\rangle\,S(\tau,M,\mu)
872: \int_0^\infty\!d\nu\, f(\nu)\, \e^{-\nu(1+2\tau M)/(4M^2)}.
873: \eea
874: Note that the mixed condensate contribution is now included as a part of the
875: nonlocal condensate and we neglect the $\alpha_s$-correction to the (local) quark
876: condensate (but retain the Sudakov exponent). The results are shown in Fig.~6 and
877: Fig.~7 by short dashes; the lower and the higher of the curves correspond to the
878: choice in \re{model1} and \re{model2}, respectively. The corresponding results
879: for $\lambda_B^{-1}$ are, for $\mu=1$~GeV:
880: \bea{l10}
881: \omega_0 = 1~\mbox{\rm GeV}\,,\phantom{0.}\quad M= 0.6~\mbox{\rm GeV}:&\qquad&
882: \lambda_B^{-1} = 1.23 +
883: \left\{\begin{array}{c}0.26 \\ 0.60 \\ 0.83\end{array}\right.
884: = 1.95\pm 0.23~\mbox{GeV}^{-1}\,,
885: \nonumber\\
886: \omega_0 = 1~\mbox{\rm GeV}\,,\phantom{0.}\quad M= 0.3~\mbox{\rm GeV}:&\qquad&
887: \lambda_B^{-1} = 1.32 +
888: \left\{\begin{array}{c}0.13 \\ 0.54 \\ 0.88\end{array}\right.
889: = 2.03\pm 0.29~\mbox{GeV}^{-1}\,,
890: \nonumber\\
891: \omega_0 = 0.8~\mbox{\rm GeV}\,,\quad M= 0.6~\mbox{\rm GeV}:&\qquad&
892: \lambda_B^{-1} = 1.36 +
893: \left\{\begin{array}{c}0.35 \\ 0.84 \\ 1.16\end{array}\right.
894: = 2.36\pm 0.33~\mbox{GeV}^{-1}\,,
895: \nonumber\\
896: \omega_0 = 0.8~\mbox{\rm GeV}\,,\quad M= 0.3~\mbox{\rm GeV}:&\qquad&
897: \lambda_B^{-1} = 1.39 +
898: \left\{\begin{array}{c}0.15 \\ 0.64 \\ 1.05\end{array}\right.
899: = 2.24\pm 0.35~\mbox{GeV}^{-1},
900: \eea
901: where the first number gives the perturbative contribution
902: (the difference to \re{lB10} is due to the different value used
903: for $F(\mu)$) and the three numbers under the brace correspond to
904: three different estimates for the nonperturbative contribution: 1) quark and
905: mixed condensate contribution to \re{SR3b} restricted to the positivity region,
906: 2) nonlocal condensate model I \re{model1} and 3) nonlocal condensate model II
907: \re{model2}. The first (upper) number should be considered as an estimate of the
908: nonperturbative correction from below while the difference between the two lower
909: ones characterizes the uncertainty in the choice of the parametrization of the
910: nonlocal condensate. We take the average between the two models as our central
911: value, and one half of the difference between this central value and the first
912: (upper) number, coming from local OPE, as an estimate of the overall uncertainty
913: of the result. In other words, we ascribe 50\% uncertainty to the extrapolation
914: of the nonperturbative contribution to large distances as suggested by the
915: nonlocal condensate model, which is rather conservative, cf.~\cite{nonloc1}. From
916: the numbers in Eq.~\re{l10} we obtain the final result
917: \beq{otvet1}
918: \lambda_B^{-1}(\mu=1~\mbox{\rm GeV}) = 2.15\pm 0.5 ~\mbox{GeV}^{-1}
919: \eeq
920: or
921: \beq{otvet2}
922: \lambda_B(\mu=1~\mbox{\rm GeV}) = 460 \pm 110~ ~\mbox{MeV}\,.
923: \eeq
924: %The given numbers correspond to the renormalization scale 1 GeV.
925: Our value of $\lambda_B$ is somewhat larger than the number accepted in
926: \cite{BBNS,DS03} $\lambda_B=0.35\pm 0.15$~GeV, although consistent with
927: it within errors. It is also consistent with the rough estimate
928: $\lambda_B\simeq 0.6$~GeV derived in \cite{BK03}.
929:
930: As follows from \re{defZ} and \re{Zmom}, the scale dependence of
931: $\lambda_B$ also involves the first logarithmic moment of the
932: distribution amplitude \cite{LN03,Ball03} \beq{renlam}
933: \lambda_B^{-1}(\mu) =
934: \left[1+\frac{\alpha_sC_F}{2\pi}\ln\frac{\mu}{\mu_0}\right]\,
935: \lambda_B^{-1}(\mu_0)
936: -\frac{\alpha_sC_F}{\pi}\ln\frac{\mu}{\mu_0}
937: \int_0^\infty \frac{dk}{k}\ln\frac{\mu_0}{k}\phi_+(k,\mu_0)\,,
938: \eeq
939: where $({\alpha_sC_F}/{\pi})\ln({\mu}/{\mu_0})< 1$. We define
940: \beq{sB}
941: \sigma_B(\mu) =
942: \lambda_B(\mu) \int_0^\infty
943: \frac{dk}{k}\ln\frac{\mu}{k}\,\phi_+(k,\mu)
944: = \lambda_B(\mu) \int_0^\infty\!d\tau\,\ln(\tau \mu \e^{\gamma_E})
945: \,\varphi_+(\tau,\mu)
946: \eeq
947: and calculate $\sigma_B(1~\mbox{\rm GeV})$ from the QCD sum rule
948: \re{SR3b} repeating the same procedure as explained above for
949: $\lambda_B$. Without going into details we simply quote the final result
950: \beq{SBres}
951: \sigma_B(\mu=1~\mbox{\rm GeV}) = 1.4 \pm 0.4\,.
952: \eeq
953: Note that $\sigma_B(\mu)$ defines the average value of $\ln \mu/k$ in
954: the integral for the first inverse moment $\lambda_B^{-1}$,
955: so that the number in \re{SBres} implies that main contribution to
956: $\lambda_B^{-1}$ comes from momenta $\sim 250$~MeV.
957: With this value for $\sigma_B$,
958: the two contributions ${\cal O}(\alpha_s)$ in \re{renlam}
959: tend to cancel each other to a large extent, so that the remaining
960: scale dependence of $\lambda_B^{-1}$ is weak.
961:
962: A simple model of the distribution amplitude $\phi_+(k,\mu)$
963: with given values of the parameters $\lambda_B$ and $\sigma_B$ and
964: correct asymptotic behavior can be chosen as
965: \beq{phimod1}
966: \phi_+(k,\mu=1~\mbox{\rm GeV}) =
967: \frac{4\lambda_B^{-1}}{\pi}\frac{k}{k^2+1}
968: \left[\frac{1}{k^2+1} -\frac{2(\sigma_B-1)}{\pi^2}\ln k\right]
969: \eeq
970: ($k$ in units of GeV).
971: Using the values of $\lambda_B$ and $\sigma_B$ in \re{otvet1},
972: \re{SBres} one obtains the distribution shown in Fig.~8 by the
973: solid curve. For comparison, we also show in this plot a typical
974: distribution amplitude obtained from QCD sum rules in perturbation
975: theory \re{SR3a} in Sec.~3, cf. Fig.~3.
976: The effect of nonperturbative corrections is to shift the distribution
977: towards softer momenta, which is natural.
978: %
979: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% FIGURE 8 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
980: \begin{figure}[t]
981: \centerline{\epsfysize5.0cm\epsffile{model1.eps}
982: }
983: \caption[]{\small A QCD model for the B-meson distribution amplitude \re{phimod1}
984: (solid curve) compared with the perturbative sum rule prediction \re{SR3a}
985: with M=0.45~GeV, $\omega_0=1$~GeV (dashed curve).
986: }
987: \label{fig:8}
988: \end{figure}
989: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
990: %
991: One minor drawback of such a parametrization is that the set of parameters
992: $\lambda_B$ and $\sigma_B$ is not closed under renormalization.
993: In view of a very limited range of scales that are interesting for
994: B-decay phenomenology this seems to be not a problem, however.
995:
996: To summarize, in this paper we have derived QCD sum rules for the
997: B-meson distribution amplitude \re{defDA} and, in particular, obtained
998: an estimate of its first inverse moment $\lambda_B^{-1}$ \re{otvet1}
999: and the parameter $\sigma_B$ \re{sB} that characterizes the shape
1000: of the distribution, see \re{SBres}. A simple model is suggested \re{phimod1}
1001: that incorporates all existing constraints. We believe that our estimates
1002: are interesting for the studies of the heavy quark limit in exclusive
1003: B-decays and can be used in a broad context.
1004: Concrete applications go beyond the task of this work.
1005:
1006:
1007: \section*{Acknowledgements}
1008: V.B. is grateful to the Laboratoire de Physique Th\'eorique,
1009: Universite Paris XI, for hospitality during his sabbatical stay in
1010: Orsay and CNRS for the financial support. Work of D.I. is
1011: partially supported by Alexander von Humboldt Foundation and by
1012: grants RFBR 02-02-17884 and INTAS 00-00679.
1013:
1014:
1015: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
1016:
1017: \bibitem{SHB90}
1018: A.~Szczepaniak, E.~M.~Henley and S.~J.~Brodsky,
1019: %``Perturbative QCD Effects In Heavy Meson Decays,''
1020: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 243} (1990) 287.
1021: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B243,287;%%
1022:
1023: \bibitem{earlyCZ}
1024: V.L.\ Chernyak and A.R.\ Zhitnitsky, JETP Lett.\ {\bf {25}} (1977) 510;
1025: Yad.\ Fiz.\ {\bf 31} (1980) 1053;
1026: V.L.\ Chernyak, V.G.\ Serbo and A.R.\ Zhitnitsky, JETP Lett.\ {\bf
1027: 26} (1977) 594; Sov.\ J.\ Nucl.\ Phys.\ {\bf 31} (1980) 552.
1028:
1029: \bibitem{earlyBL}
1030: G.P.\ Lepage and S.J.\ Brodsky, Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 87} (1979) 359;
1031: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 43} (1979) 545,1625 (E);
1032: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 22} (1980) 2157;
1033: S.J.\ Brodsky, G.P.\ Lepage and A.A.\ Zaidi,
1034: Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf D23} (1981) 1152.
1035:
1036: \bibitem{earlyER}
1037: A.V.\ Efremov and A.V.\ Radyushkin, Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 94} (1980)
1038: 245; Teor.\ Mat.\ Fiz.~{\bf {42}} (1980) 147.
1039:
1040: \bibitem{KPY}
1041: G.~P.~Korchemsky, D.~Pirjol and T.~M.~Yan,
1042: %``Radiative leptonic decays of B mesons in QCD,''
1043: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 61} (2000) 114510.
1044: % [arXiv:hep-ph/9911427].
1045: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9911427;%%
1046:
1047: \bibitem{DS03}
1048: S.~Descotes-Genon and C.~T.~Sachrajda,
1049: %``Factorization, the light-cone distribution amplitude of the B-meson
1050: %and the radiative decay B $\to$ gamma l nu/l. ((V)),''
1051: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 650} (2003) 356.
1052: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0209216;%%
1053:
1054: \bibitem{proofsBgamma}
1055: E.~Lunghi, D.~Pirjol and D.~Wyler,
1056: %``Factorization in leptonic radiative B $\to$ gamma e nu decays,''
1057: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 649} (2003) 349;\\
1058: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0210091;%%
1059: %
1060: S.~W.~Bosch, R.~J.~Hill, B.~O.~Lange and M.~Neubert,
1061: %``Factorization and Sudakov resummation in leptonic radiative B decay,''
1062: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 67} (2003) 094014.
1063: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0301123;%%
1064:
1065: \bibitem{BB02}
1066: S.~W.~Bosch and G.~Buchalla,
1067: %``The double radiative decays B $\to$ gamma gamma in the heavy
1068: %quark limit. ((U)),''
1069: JHEP {\bf 0208} (2002) 054.
1070: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0208202;%%
1071:
1072: \bibitem{DS03a}
1073: S.~Descotes-Genon and C.~T.~Sachrajda,
1074: %``Universality of nonperturbative QCD effects in radiative B decays,''
1075: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 557} (2003) 213.
1076: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0212162;%%
1077:
1078:
1079: \bibitem{friedhof}
1080: E.~Bagan, P.~Ball and V.~M.~Braun,
1081: %``Radiative corrections to the decay B $\to$ pi e nu and
1082: %the heavy quark limit,''
1083: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 417} (1998) 154;
1084: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9709243;%%
1085: %
1086: J.~Charles, A.~Le Yaouanc, L.~Oliver, O.~Pene and J.~C.~Raynal,
1087: %``Heavy-to-light form factors in the heavy mass to
1088: %large energy limit of {QCD},''
1089: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 60} (1999) 014001;
1090: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9812358;%%
1091: %
1092: M.~Beneke and T.~Feldmann,
1093: %``Symmetry-breaking corrections to heavy-to-light B meson form factors at large recoil,''
1094: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 592} (2001) 3;
1095: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0008255;%%
1096: %
1097: M.~Beneke, A.~P.~Chapovsky, M.~Diehl and T.~Feldmann,
1098: %``Soft-collinear effective theory and heavy-to-light currents beyond
1099: %leading power,''
1100: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 643} (2002) 431;
1101: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0206152;%%
1102: %
1103: C.~W.~Bauer, D.~Pirjol and I.~W.~Stewart,
1104: %``Factorization and endpoint singularities in heavy-to-light decays,''
1105: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 67} (2003) 071502;
1106: %
1107: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0211069;%%
1108: M.~Beneke and T.~Feldmann,
1109: %``Spectator interactions and factorization in B -> pi ell nu decay''
1110: arXiv:hep-ph/0308303.
1111:
1112: \bibitem{ABS94}
1113: A.~Ali, V.~M.~Braun and H.~Simma,
1114: %``Exclusive Radiative B Decays In The Light Cone QCD Sum Rule Approach,''
1115: Z.\ Phys.\ C {\bf 63} (1994) 437.
1116: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9401277;%%
1117:
1118: \bibitem{Ball03}
1119: P.~Ball,
1120: %``QCD sum rules on the light-cone, factorisation and SCET,''
1121: arXiv:hep-ph/0308249.
1122: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0308249;%%
1123:
1124: \bibitem{CZ}
1125: V.~L.~Chernyak and A.~R.~Zhitnitsky,
1126: %``Exclusive Decays Of Heavy Mesons,''
1127: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 201} (1982) 492;
1128: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B201,492;%%
1129: %``Asymptotic Behavior Of Exclusive Processes In QCD,''
1130: Phys.\ Rept.\ {\bf 112} (1984) 173.
1131: %%CITATION = PRPLC,112,173;%%
1132:
1133: \bibitem{GN96}
1134: A.~G.~Grozin and M.~Neubert,
1135: %``Asymptotics of heavy-meson form factors,''
1136: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 55} (1997) 272.
1137: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9607366;%%
1138:
1139: \bibitem{BK03}
1140: P.~Ball and E.~Kou,
1141: %``B $\to$ gamma e nu transitions from QCD sum rules on the light-cone,''
1142: JHEP {\bf 0304} (2003) 029.
1143: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0301135;%%
1144:
1145: \bibitem{LN03}
1146: B.~O.~Lange and M.~Neubert,
1147: %``Renormalization-group evolution of the B-meson light-cone
1148: %distribution amplitude,''
1149: arXiv:hep-ph/0303082.
1150: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0303082;%%
1151:
1152: \bibitem{Neubert93}
1153: M.~Neubert,
1154: %``Heavy quark symmetry,''
1155: Phys.\ Rept.\ {\bf 245} (1994) 259.
1156: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9306320;%%
1157:
1158: \bibitem{Korchemskaya}
1159: I.~A.~Korchemskaya and G.~P.~Korchemsky,
1160: %``On lightlike Wilson loops,''
1161: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 287} (1992) 169;\\
1162: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B287,169;%%
1163: G.~P.~Korchemsky and G.~Marchesini,
1164: %``Structure function for large x and renormalization of Wilson loop,''
1165: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 406} (1993) 225.
1166: % [arXiv:hep-ph/9210281].
1167: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9210281;%%
1168:
1169: \bibitem{BB89}
1170: I.~I.~Balitsky and V.~M.~Braun,
1171: %``Evolution Equations For QCD String Operators,''
1172: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 311} (1989) 541.
1173: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B311,541;%%
1174:
1175: \bibitem{KKQT01}
1176: H.~Kawamura, J.~Kodaira, C.~F.~Qiao and K.~Tanaka,
1177: %``B meson light-cone distribution amplitudes in the heavy-quark limit,''
1178: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 523} (2001) 111
1179: [Erratum-ibid.\ B {\bf 536} (2002) 344].
1180: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0109181;%%
1181:
1182: \bibitem{SVZ79}
1183: M.~A.~Shifman, A.~I.~Vainshtein and V.~I.~Zakharov,
1184: %``QCD And Resonance Physics. Sum Rules,''
1185: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 147} (1979) 385;
1186: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B147,385;%%
1187: {\it ibid.}\ B {\bf 147} (1979) 448.
1188: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B147,448;%%
1189:
1190: \bibitem{BBBD92}
1191: E.~Bagan, P.~Ball, V.~M.~Braun and H.~G.~Dosch,
1192: %``QCD Sum Rules In The Effective Heavy Quark Theory,''
1193: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 278} (1992) 457.
1194: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B278,457;%%
1195:
1196: \bibitem{Neubert92}
1197: M.~Neubert,
1198: %``Heavy meson form-factors from QCD sum rules,''
1199: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 45} (1992) 2451.
1200: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D45,2451;%%
1201:
1202: \bibitem{BB94}
1203: P.~Ball and V.~M.~Braun,
1204: %``Next-to-leading order corrections to meson masses
1205: %in the heavy quark effective theory,''
1206: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 49} (1994) 2472.
1207: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9307291;%%
1208:
1209: \bibitem{BG92}
1210: D.~J.~Broadhurst and A.~G.~Grozin,
1211: %``Operator product expansion in static quark effective field theory: Large perturbative correction,''
1212: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 274} (1992) 421.
1213: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9908363;%%
1214:
1215: \bibitem{BKY85}
1216: I.~I.~Balitsky, A.~V.~Kolesnichenko and A.~V.~Yung,
1217: %``On Vector Dominance In Sum Rules For Electromagnetic
1218: %Hadron Characteristics. (In Russian),''
1219: Yad.\ Fiz.\ {\bf 41} (1985) 282.
1220: %%CITATION = YAFIA,41,282;%%
1221:
1222: \bibitem{BI88}
1223: V.~M.~Belyaev and B.~L.~Ioffe,
1224: %``Structure Functions Of Deep Inelastic Lepton - Nucleon Scattering In
1225: %QCD. 1. Calculation Method. Distributions Of Valence Quarks,''
1226: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 310} (1988) 548;
1227: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B310,548;%%
1228: %``Quark Distribution In A Polarized Nucleon In QCD,''
1229: Int.\ J.\ Mod.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 6} (1991) 1533;
1230: %%CITATION = IMPAE,A6,1533;%%
1231: B.~L.~Ioffe and A.~Khodjamirian,
1232: %``Calculation of chirality violating proton structure
1233: %function h-1 (x) in QCD,''
1234: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 51} (1995) 3373.
1235: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9403371;%%
1236:
1237: \bibitem{BGM95}
1238: V.M.~Braun, P.~Gornicki and L.~Mankiewicz,
1239: %``Ioffe - time distributions instead of parton momentum distributions in description of deep inelastic scattering,''
1240: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 51} (1995) 6036.
1241: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9410318;%%
1242:
1243: \bibitem{Grozin}
1244: A.~G.~Grozin and G.~P.~Korchemsky,
1245: %``Renormalized sum rules for structure functions of heavy mesons decays,''
1246: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 53} (1996) 1378.
1247: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9411323].
1248: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9411323;%%
1249:
1250: \bibitem{Gatheral}
1251: J.G.M.Gatheral, Phys. Lett. 133B (1983) 90; J.Frenkel and J.C.Taylor, Nucl. Phys.
1252: B246 (1984) 231.
1253:
1254: \bibitem{MR88}
1255: S.~V.~Mikhailov and A.~V.~Radyushkin,
1256: %``Nonlocal Condensates And QCD Sum Rules For Pion Wave Function,''
1257: JETP Lett.\ {\bf 43} (1986) 712
1258: [Pisma Zh.\ Eksp.\ Teor.\ Fiz.\ {\bf 43} (1986) 551];
1259: %%CITATION = JTPLA,43,712;%%
1260: %``Quark Condensate Nonlocality And Pion Wave Function In QCD:
1261: %General Formalism,''
1262: Sov.\ J.\ Nucl.\ Phys.\ {\bf 49} (1989) 494
1263: [Yad.\ Fiz.\ {\bf 49} (1988) 794].
1264: %%CITATION = SJNCA,49,494;%%
1265:
1266: \bibitem{nonloc1}
1267: A.~P.~Bakulev and A.~V.~Radyushkin,
1268: %``Nonlocal Condensates And QCD Sum Rules For The Pion Form-Factor,''
1269: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 271} (1991) 223;
1270: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B271,223;%%
1271: S.~V.~Mikhailov and A.~V.~Radyushkin,
1272: %``The Pion Wave Function And QCD Sum Rules With Nonlocal Condensates,''
1273: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 45} (1992) 1754;
1274: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D45,1754;%%
1275: A.~P.~Bakulev and S.~V.~Mikhailov,
1276: %``QCD sum rules for pion wave function revisited,''
1277: Z.\ Phys.\ C {\bf 68} (1995) 451;
1278: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9412366;%%
1279: %``The rho meson and related meson wave functions in {QCD} sum rules with nonlocal condensates,''
1280: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 436} (1998) 351.
1281: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9803298;%%
1282:
1283: \bibitem{BM02}
1284: A.~P.~Bakulev and S.~V.~Mikhailov,
1285: %``Lattice measurements of nonlocal quark condensates, vacuum correlation length, and pion distribution amplitude in QCD,''
1286: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 65} (2002) 114511.
1287: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0203046;%%
1288:
1289: \bibitem{Radyushkin91}
1290: A.~V.~Radyushkin,
1291: %``QCD Sum Rule Calculation Of The Isgur-Wise Form-Factor,''
1292: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 271} (1991) 218.
1293: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B271,218;%%
1294:
1295: \bibitem{BBNS}
1296: M.~Beneke, G.~Buchalla, M.~Neubert and C.~T.~Sachrajda,
1297: %``{QCD} factorization for B $\to$ pi pi decays: Strong phases and CP violation in the heavy quark limit,''
1298: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 83} (1999) 1914;
1299: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9905312;%%
1300: %``QCD factorization for exclusive, non-leptonic B meson decays: General arguments and the case of heavy-light final states,''
1301: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 591} (2000) 313.
1302: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0006124;%%
1303:
1304:
1305: %\bibitem{IKR85}
1306: %S.~V.~Ivanov, G.~P.~Korchemsky and A.~V.~Radyushkin,
1307: %%``Infrared Asymptotics Of Perturbative QCD: Contour Gauges,''
1308: %Yad.\ Fiz.\ {\bf 44} (1986) 230
1309: %[Sov.\ J.\ Nucl.\ Phys.\ {\bf 44} (1986) 145];\\
1310: %%%CITATION = YAFIA,44,230;%%
1311: %G.~P.~Korchemsky and A.~V.~Radyushkin,
1312: %%``Loop Space Formalism And Renormalization Group For The Infrared
1313: %%Asymptotics Of QCD,''
1314: %Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 171} (1986) 459.
1315: %%%CITATION = PHLTA,B171,459;%%
1316:
1317:
1318:
1319:
1320:
1321:
1322:
1323: \end{thebibliography}
1324:
1325:
1326:
1327: \end{document}
1328: