1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
3: %%% %%%
4: %%% Production of same sign tt pairs at the LHC %%%
5: %%% %%%
6: %%% F. Larios and F. Penunuri %%%
7: %%% %%%
8: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
9: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
10:
11:
12: \documentclass[twocolumn,showpacs,preprintnumbers]{revtex4}
13: %\documentstyle[twocolumn,prl,aps,epsfig,amssymb,floats]{revtex}
14: %\documentstyle[twocolumn,prl,aps,epsfig,amssymb]{revtex}
15: %\documentstyle[prl,aps,epsfig]{revtex}
16: %\documentstyle[twocolumn,prl,aps,epsf,draftstamp]{revtex}
17:
18: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
19: \usepackage{graphicx}% Include figure files
20: \usepackage{dcolumn}% Align table columns on decimal point
21: \usepackage{bm}% bold math
22: \usepackage{amssymb}
23: \usepackage{epsfig}
24: %%%%%%%%%%%%
25:
26:
27: %\relax
28: %%%%%%%%%%%
29: \def\beq{\begin{equation}}
30: \def\eeq{\end{equation}}
31: \def\bea{\begin{array}}
32: \def\eea{\end{array}}
33: \def\be{\begin{equation}}
34: \def\ee{\end{equation}}
35: \def\ba{\begin{eqnarray}}
36: \def\ea{\end{eqnarray}}
37: %\def\bea{\begin{eqnarray}}
38: %\def\eea{\end{eqnarray}}
39: \def\pbarp{ \bar{{\rm p}} {\rm p} }
40: \def\pp{ {\rm p} {\rm p} }
41: \def\ifb{ {\rm fb}^{-1} }
42: \def\del{\partial }
43: \def\to{\rightarrow}
44: \def\To{\Rightarrow}
45: \def\tolr{\leftrightarrow}
46: \def\dis{\displaystyle}
47: \def\f{\frac}
48: \def\[{\left[}
49: \def\]{\right]}
50: \def\({\left(}
51: \def\){\right)}
52: \def\LL{{\left\lgroup}}
53: \def\RR{{\right\rgroup}}
54: %\def\nn{{\not\hspace*{-0.001mm}}}
55: \def\nn{{/\hspace*{-1.83mm}}}
56: %%%%%
57: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
58: \def\gn{\tilde {\rm n}}
59: \def\ov{\overline}
60: \def\LL{{\cal L}}
61: \def\to{\rightarrow}
62: \def\To{\Rightarrow}
63: \def\ppbar{p\bar p}
64: \def\cbar{\bar c}
65: \def\bbar{\bar b}
66: \def\tbar{\bar t}
67: \def\ttbar{{t\bar{t}}}
68: \def\sq2{\sqrt{2}}
69: \def\fbinv{fb$^{-1}$}
70: \def\lumi{\int\!{\cal L}}
71: \def\End{\end{document}}
72: %%%
73: %%% math-def:
74: \newcommand{\lae}{\stackrel{<}{\sim}}
75: \newcommand{\gae}{\stackrel{>}{\sim}}
76:
77:
78: \def\thisday{Oct, 2003 ~and~ hep-ph/0310000~~}
79:
80: \topmargin -0.2truein
81:
82: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
83: \begin{document}
84:
85:
86:
87: \title{ FCNC production of same sign Top quark pairs \\
88: at the LHC. }
89: \author{%
90: { F. Larios} and { F. Pe$\gn$u$\gn$uri}
91: }
92: \affiliation{%
93: %\address{\vspace*{5mm}
94: \vspace*{2mm}
95: Departamento de F\'{\i}sica Aplicada,
96: CINVESTAV-M\'erida, AP 73 Cordemex, 97310
97: M\'erida, Yucat\'an, M\'exico
98: }
99:
100:
101: %\vspace*{5mm}
102: \begin{abstract}
103: \hspace*{-0.35cm}
104: We study the possibility of same sign top quark pair
105: production at the LHC (and the VLHC) as a direct probe of
106: FCNC processes. Besides the SM neutral Z boson, two other
107: neutral bosons are considered, a top-Higgs type scalar and a
108: Z' boson that appear in Topcolor assisted Technicolor models.
109: We find that the FCNC couplings tqV (q=u,c ; V=H,Z,Z')
110: may produce an interesting signal of same sign top quark
111: pairs that could be observed at the LHC (VLHC).
112: % check pacs, larios
113: \pacs{\,12.60.-i,\,12.15.-y,\,11.15.Ex
114: \hfill ~~ [ November 5, 2003 ] }
115:
116: \end{abstract}
117: %\vskip 1pc]
118:
119: \maketitle
120:
121: \setcounter{footnote}{0}
122: \renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\arabic{footnote}}
123:
124: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
125:
126: \section{Introduction}
127:
128:
129:
130:
131:
132: With an integrated luminosity of about 100 fb$^{-1}$ the CERN LHC
133: is expected to produce several tens of millions of $t\bar t$
134: pairs for each of the detectors, ATLAS and CMS per
135: year\cite{konisberg}.
136: Such a high rate of production will allow the LHC to look for
137: new physics effects involving the top quark. In particular,
138: Flavor Changing Neutral Current (FCNC) effects are a well
139: known way to look for physics beyond the Standard Model (SM).
140: The standard way to measure FCNC couplings is
141: by searching for rare top quark decays like $t\to q\gamma, qZ$
142: ($q=u,c$)\cite{raretopdec}. Also, the FCNC couplings $Vtq$, with
143: $V=\gamma,\, Z,\, H$ and gluon can be probed via the associated
144: $tZ$, $t\gamma$ and $tH$ production at the
145: LHC\cite{multilepton,branco}, or at lepton colliders\cite{eetop}.
146:
147:
148:
149: The appearance of FCNC in the quark sector occurs at the one
150: loop level in the SM and is very suppresed by the GIM mechanism.
151: However, some extensions of the SM can generate these couplings
152: at tree level,
153: like Topcolor assisted Technicolor\cite{hill,theories}.
154: At the LHC one can think of a process in which two incoming
155: up type quarks exchange a neutral boson and then change to
156: a pair of (same sign) top quarks\cite{slabospitsky},
157: see Fig.~(\ref{diagram}).
158: As expected from the fact that the anomalous coupling
159: appears twice in the Feynman diagram, the rates predicted
160: can become negligible for not very small coupling values.
161: In this sense, the usual production process that involves only
162: one anomalous coupling is usually a better probe. However,
163: we believe that the production of same sign top quark pairs
164: is an interesting way to confirm the existence of a FCNC
165: with the top quark, and it should be considered in future
166: runnings of the LHC. Apart from the standard backgrounds
167: associated with a top quark pair there is no other SM process
168: that can hide this signal. The SM process $pp\to bbW^+W^+$ is
169: negligible. Unfortunately, the only way to separate the $tt$
170: from the $t\bar t$ signal is by identification of same charges
171: in the dilepton mode -a mode with very low efficiency.
172: However, the size of the FCNC couplings could be large and as
173: we shall see, the LHC could find many pairs of tops even during
174: the first few years of running. Another interesting feature of
175: this signal is that higher center-of-mass energies of the
176: colliding beams would boost the production rates, which makes
177: this process a very good possibility at a future VLHC.
178:
179:
180: Below, we will discuss separately this process via three
181: intermediary bosons for the FCNC: the SM Z boson, a Z' boson
182: and a scalar boson that couples strongly with the top quark.
183: Then we will make a comment on the detection mode required
184: to separate the $tt$ signal from the $t\bar t$ signal.
185:
186:
187: \begin{figure}
188: \includegraphics[width=6.1cm,height=3cm]{diagram.eps}
189: \vspace*{0mm}
190: \caption{There are 2 Feynman diagrams, t-chanel and u-channel
191: for same sign tt production process.
192: The t-channel diagram is shown.
193: }
194: \label{diagram}
195: \end{figure}
196:
197:
198:
199: \vspace*{-3mm}
200: \section{FCNC for the top quark.}
201: %
202: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% regresar
203:
204: We will consider the two possibilities for the Flavor
205: transition of the top quark with the two lighter up and
206: charm quarks.
207: We parameterize the FCNC couplings of the top quark with
208: the following Lagrangian:
209: \ba
210: \L &=& \bar t ( y^R_{tq} P_R + y^L_{tq} P_L ) q\; H
211: \nonumber \\
212: &+& \; \bar t \,
213: \gamma_\mu \,(a^L_{tq} P_L + a^R_{tq} P_R)\,
214: q \, Z^\mu \nonumber \\
215: &+& g_2 \bar t \gamma_\mu \,(B^L_{tq} P_L +
216: B^R_{tq} P_R)\, q \, {Z'}^\mu
217: \ea
218: where, $q=u,c$.
219: Similar parameterizations have appeared in the literature;
220: for instance, the couplings $a^{L,R}_{tq}$ are defined as
221: $a^{L,R}_{tq}\,\equiv\,\f{g_W}{2c_W} X^{L,R}_{tq}$ in
222: Ref.~\cite{multilepton, slabospitsky}, and
223: $y^{L,R}_{tq}\,\equiv\,\f{g_W}{2} g^{L,R}_{tq}$ with
224: $c_{a,v}=1/{\sq2}$ in Ref.~\cite{branco}. In general, there
225: can be dimension 5 (and higher) operators that generate
226: transition magnetic dipole couplings $tq\gamma$, $tqZ$ and
227: $tq$-gluon\cite{multilepton,tcgluon, slabospitsky}.
228: In this work we are only considering dimension 4 interactions.
229:
230:
231:
232: \subsection{FCNC with the Z boson.}
233:
234: There are three top quark FCNC couplings that involve existing
235: gauge bosons $\gamma$, $Z$ and the gluon and that are
236: currently considered at the Tevatron Run II\cite{wwagner}. Here,
237: we want to take the case of the Z boson. Similar results will
238: hold for the other two bosons, as we shall see later.
239: At LEP all the FCNC couplings of the Z boson with the fermions
240: have been strongly constrained for all the charged leptons and
241: the light quarks. However, the top quark cannot be a decay
242: product of Z, and the only direct constraint of a
243: $Ztq$~($q=u,c$) coupling comes from the Tevatron\cite{abe}:
244: \ba
245: \sqrt{|X^{R}_{tq}|^2 + |X^{L}_{tq}|^2} \leq 0.8 \, ,
246: \ea
247: which translates to $|a_{tq}|\leq 0.3$ for the couplings
248: defined here. The weakness of
249: this bound is also evident from the associated upper bound
250: on the branching ratio $Br(t\to cZ) \leq 33\%$\cite{abe}.
251: However, Run II of the Tevatron is expected to reach a level
252: of $1.5\%$, which would be translated in a much stronger
253: bound on $X^R_{tq} \leq 0.04$\cite{wwagner}.
254: Actually, it has been shown that this coupling can be
255: tested down to values of order $10^{-2}$ at the LHC
256: via the associated production of a top and a Z or $\gamma$
257: \cite{multilepton}.
258: On the other hand, even the present weak bound can
259: be made stronger by considering more specific models. In
260: Ref.~\cite{extraquarks} an extension of the SM with extra
261: quark singlets or doublets was considered; it was found that
262: present stringent constraints on the diagonal couplings
263: imply an $X_{tq} \leq 0.2$ ($a_{tq} \leq 0.07$) bound that
264: is one fourth the size of the direct limit.
265:
266:
267: We show in Fig.~\ref{prodz} the production cross section
268: for $pp\to tt$ for values of the $a^R_{tq}$ couplings below
269: 0.15 ($X_{tq} \leq 0.4$). With an expected 100 fb$^{-1}$ of
270: luminosity there could be a few hundreds pairs of same sign
271: tops coming from this coupling. Notice
272: that the scale of the plot Fig.~(\ref{prodz}) is logarithmic
273: to accomodate the $a_{tq}^4$ dependence of the cross section.
274: Because of the larger parton luminosity from the $u$ quark
275: the process
276: $uu\to tt$ is more sensitive to the size of the FCNC couplings.
277: However, it is usually assumed that the top-charm transition
278: coupling should be the larger one (as it turns out with the
279: hierarchy of the CKM matrix elements). We could have run
280: the values of $a^R_{tc}$ up to 0.3 but we have only considered
281: values up to 0.14 to prove that indeed the production rate
282: could be large enough. In fact, in Ref.~\cite{slabospitsky}
283: the authors have used $a^R_{tu}$ of the order 0.4 and have
284: obtained a huge rate of a couple tens of pb for the LHC.
285:
286:
287:
288: To bear in mind, for the $cc\to tt$ process there is also
289: the equivalent $\bar c\bar c\to \bar t\bar t$ like sign
290: anti-top production process, because the parton luminosity of
291: $c$ and $\bar c$ coincide. According to Fig.~(\ref{prodz})
292: if the bounds of Ref.~\cite{extraquarks} apply for this
293: case the production from charm quarks could be not higher than
294: of order 1 fb. As we shall discuss later a rate of only a few
295: fb's may be too small to ever be identified at the LHC. We
296: should consider rates of order 10 fb and higher the ones to
297: look for to make the search of this signal feasible.
298: In this sense, the production of same sign top quark pairs
299: is not the best way to probe these FCNC couplings, in fact
300: the associated production of a single top with a neutral boson
301: like Z or $\gamma$ is considerably more sensitive. However,
302: $tt$ production is an interesting signal that clearly
303: indicates the presence of significant FCNC.
304:
305:
306: \begin{figure}
307: \includegraphics[width=8.1cm,height=6cm]{xz.eps}
308: \vspace*{0mm}
309: \caption{LHC production due to Ztc and Ztu FCNC couplings.
310: }
311: \label{prodz}
312: \end{figure}
313:
314:
315:
316: To be consistent with the usual experimental limitations,
317: in this work we have imposed the following cuts on the
318: rapidity, transverse momentum and invariant mass of the
319: top quarks:
320: \ba
321: |y_t| &&\leq 2 \nonumber \\
322: Pt_t &&\geq 40 \rm{GeV} \nonumber \\
323: M_{tt} &&\geq 380 \rm{GeV} \nonumber
324: \ea
325: These cuts reduce the total rate in about $40\%$.
326:
327:
328: We have taken the factorization scale equal to the
329: invariant mass of the $tt$ pair $\mu = M_{tt}$.
330: The top quark mass we have used is $m_t = 175$GeV.
331: The Parton Distribution Function (PDF) used was the recent
332: CTEQ6M\cite{lai}. Our calculations are at tree level,
333: obtained with the aid of the CompHEP program\cite{pukhov}.
334:
335:
336: Please notice that for the process $uc\to tt$ it is
337: understood that the other possibility $cu\to tt$
338: is already included in the figures shown.
339:
340: \subsection{FCNC with the Z' boson}
341:
342: Now we want to consider a heavy Z' boson, such as the one
343: that appears in Topcolor assisted technicolor (TC2)
344: models\cite{chivukula}. In these models the heavy Z' couples
345: strongly with the third family of quarks and may induce FCNC.
346: The coupling strength is given by
347: $g_2\, =\, e/c_W s_\phi c_\phi$ where $c_W$ is the cosine of
348: the SM $SU(2)_L \times U(1)_Y$ mixing angle and $\phi$ is
349: the mixing angle for the $Z_1$ and $Z_2$ neutral bosons
350: of the TC2 model. As shown in Ref.~\cite{chivukula}
351: electroweak data requires the mass of Z' to be higher than
352: 1-4 TeV for values of $\sin^2 \phi$ between 0.05 and 0.5
353: (this range of values implies the diagonal coupling strength
354: $g_2$ to be of order between 0.7 and 1.2).
355: We show in Fig.~(\ref{prodzp}) the production cross section
356: of $pp \to tt$ for different values of $M_{Z'}$.
357: We have chosen high values of the coupling $B_{tc}$
358: (between 0.5 and 0.7) but we have also assumed only the
359: right handed current term $B^R_{tc}$ as different from zero.
360: Given the assumption that the cross section
361: must be at least of order 10 fb to become detectable we
362: can see that $B^R_{tc}$ must be higher than 0.5 to yield
363: this production rate. Again, other processes where the
364: anomalous coupling appears only once in the Feynman diagram
365: are more sensitive. For instance, from Ref.~\cite{yue}
366: a loop level induced rare top decay $t\to cV$
367: ($V=\gamma, Z$ or gluon) would require a smaller coupling
368: size $B_{tc} = g_1 K_{tc} \sim 0.2$ to become of order $10^{-5}$
369: (for gluon) or $10^{-6}$ (for $\gamma$) for its branching ratio,
370: which is already at expected detectable levels at the LHC.
371: However, the rare top quark decay would be an indirect way
372: to test the existence of Z'.
373:
374:
375: \begin{figure}
376: \includegraphics[width=8.1cm,height=6cm]{zp.eps}
377: \vspace*{0mm}
378: \caption{LHC production due to Z'tc and Z'tu FCNC couplings.
379: }
380: \label{prodzp}
381: \end{figure}
382:
383:
384: Finding a Z', or any heavy resonance, that couples preferentially
385: to the third family is possible via $\tau$ lepton pair
386: production\cite{mrenna}, but it may not be possible at all at any
387: future hadron collider (including the LHC) searching in the
388: $t\bar t$ mode\cite{valencia}. This is because of the
389: overwhelming QCD production of $t\bar t$, which in contrast makes
390: no background for a $tt$ signal. Therefore, either the single
391: top production mode or the same sign $tt$ pair mode could be the
392: way to test this kind of physics at the LHC.
393:
394:
395:
396: \subsection{Scalar FCNC}
397:
398:
399:
400: Next we want to consider a FCNC scalar coupling of the
401: type $Htq$\cite{hill}.
402: This coupling was also studied in Ref.~\cite{branco, tcatlhc}.
403: It is not expected that the $y^L_{tc}$ coupling could be
404: very large, maybe of order $\lambda^2 m_t/f_{\pi}$ with
405: $\lambda = 0.22$ in relation
406: to the CKM mixing parameter (the Cabibbo angle). Also,
407: $y^L_{tu}$ would be less than $\lambda^3 m_t/f_{\pi}$
408: \cite{kanemura, burdman}.
409: However, there is no reason to believe the right handed
410: $y^R_{tq}$ coupling couldn't be much larger. In fact,
411: the dynamical Top-color (TopC) model generally predicts
412: $0.2\leq y^R_{tc}\leq 0.7$\cite{kanemura, burdman}.
413: For this size of the FCNC coupling the production of top
414: pairs can be significant, see Fig.~(\ref{smh}).
415:
416: \begin{figure}
417: \includegraphics[width=8.1cm,height=6cm]{smh.eps}
418: \vspace*{0mm}
419: \caption{LHC production due to Htc and Htu FCNC couplings.
420: }
421: \label{smh}
422: \end{figure}
423:
424:
425: If the scalar Higgs mass is not very high,
426: between 100 and 200 GeV, a coupling somewhat higher
427: than $y^R_{tc}=0.3$ could give enough rate to
428: be observed at the LHC.
429:
430:
431: \subsubsection{Scalar FCNC production at a VLHC}
432:
433: At this point it is interesting to compare with what
434: would be expected at a VLHC machine with a center of
435: mass (CM) energy of $\sqrt{s} = 100$TeV
436: for this same scalar coupling. In Figure~(\ref{vsmh})
437: we show the much higher rates for even smaller values
438: of the coupling size and for a heavier scalar boson.
439:
440:
441:
442:
443:
444: \begin{figure}
445: \vspace*{10mm}
446: \includegraphics[width=8.1cm,height=6cm]{vsmh.eps}
447: \vspace*{0mm}
448: \caption{VLHC production due to Htc and Htu FCNC couplings.
449: The CM energy of the collider is taken as $\sqrt{s} = 100$TeV.
450: }
451: \label{vsmh}
452: \end{figure}
453:
454:
455: \subsection{Dependence on PDF set and factorization scale.}
456:
457:
458: Throughout this work we have used CTEQ6M. We have checked
459: the uncertainty due to the PDF by computing the production
460: of tt pairs with all the 41 sets of ctq6l PDFs
461: provided by the CTEQ group\cite{lai}. The variation
462: amounts to only about 10$\%$, we show our results in
463: Figure~(\ref{pdfuu}).
464: We have only shown the computations that are farther apart
465: from each other, i.e. the results of any other PDF set will
466: fall between the curves shown. Figure~(\ref{pdfuu}) applies
467: to the $uu\to tt$ process; a similar graph would apply to
468: the $cc\to tt$ process, except that the highest (lowest)
469: curve would come from ctq6l.09 (ctq6l.10) instead of the
470: ctq6l.18 (ctq6l.17) PDF set.
471:
472:
473: \begin{figure}
474: \includegraphics[width=8.1cm,height=6cm]{pdfuu.eps}
475: \vspace*{0mm}
476: \caption{LHC production of tt via $uu\to tt$,
477: varying the PDF used. The factorization scale $\mu$ is taken
478: constant at 380 GeV.
479: }
480: \label{pdfuu}
481: \end{figure}
482:
483: To compare different values of the factorization scale we
484: have tried some fixed scale values, it turns out that the
485: fixed value of $380$ GeV yields almost the same cross
486: section as the running $\mu = M_{tt}$ value. Also,
487: there is some mild dependence on the (fixed) factorization
488: scale, we have found about less than $20\%$ variation
489: going from $\mu = 190$GeV to $\mu = 760$GeV.
490:
491:
492:
493:
494:
495: \section{Identification of tt pairs at LHC}
496:
497: Compared with the number of $t\bar t$ pairs that
498: are expected every year at the LHC, of the order of
499: 10 million, our $tt$ signal is overwhelmed by many
500: orders of magnitude. There are 3 modes of detecting
501: a pair of top quarks depending on the decay products
502: of the $W$ bosons: dilepton, lepton plus jets and all
503: jets mode. Separating these signals can only happen via
504: the dilepton mode, in which the two same sign tops
505: produce two same sign leptons.
506: Unfortunately, this mode is associated with a small
507: branching ratio, approximately $5\%$. Considering a
508: $50\%$ b-tagging efficiency, this mode will let us
509: observe only a small $2\%$ (or less) fraction of all
510: the top quark pairs produced\cite{abe,topd0}.
511: Our assumption here is that it will
512: be possible to identify the sign of top quark pairs
513: via the dilepton mode with an overall efficiency of
514: order $1\%$ at the LHC. Then, we can expect to observe
515: from a few to up to several tens of same sign top events
516: every year for the parameters used in this paper.
517:
518:
519:
520: \subsection{SM background for $tt$ production.}
521:
522: The SM background we have considered here is production
523: of $pp\to bbW^+W^+$.
524: In the SM there are 45 diagrams for the $uu\to bbW^+W^+$
525: process (49 for $cc\to bbW^+W^+$), of which two give the
526: most important contributions, see Figure (\ref{background}).
527: By taking only one diagram at a time we have found that the
528: greatest contribution is less than of order
529: $6\times 10^{-6}$ fb. So, we can safely conclude that the
530: total contribution must be well below the $10^{-4}$ fb level.
531: This is a negligible background.
532:
533:
534: \begin{figure}
535: \includegraphics[width=5.1cm,height=3cm]{back.eps}
536: \vspace*{0mm}
537: \caption{The two most important diagrams for the SM
538: production of $bbW^+W^+$ which is the background signal
539: for $tt$ production.
540: }
541: \label{background}
542: \end{figure}
543:
544:
545: \section{Conclusion}
546:
547: In this work we have shown that FCNC couplings of the top
548: quark with either the SM gauge bosons or new bosons like the
549: ones that appear in Top color assisted technicolor theories,
550: could give rise to significant production of same sign top
551: quark pairs at the LHC. Such a signal could be searched for
552: in the dilepton mode. We have found that for FCNC top quark
553: couplings, well within the present experimental constraints,
554: we could have production cross sections of order several tens
555: or a few hundred femtobarns at the LHC. In terms of
556: sensitivity, the cross section is proportional to the fourth
557: power of the FCNC coupling. In particular, a coupling size
558: of order 0.05 (0.1) for tuZ (tcZ) would give rise to
559: a few tt pairs detected in the dilepton mode at the LHC.
560: In addition, in the case of a heavy resonance like Z' or
561: a scalar H, a coupling size of 0.15 (0.5) for tuZ'
562: (tcZ') along with a Z' mass between 1 and 1.6 TeV would
563: be required for the same yield. A coupling size higher than
564: 0.1 (0.3) for tuH (tcH) along with a 100-300 GeV mass
565: range in the case of the scalar FCNC; in comparison, for
566: even slightly smaller couplings a twice as large mass range
567: of 100-600 GeV of the scalar boson could be probed in a
568: VLHC with CM energy $\sqrt{s}=100$TeV.
569:
570:
571:
572: \vspace{2cm}
573:
574:
575: Upon the completion of this article, another work on the
576: production of top quarks via the FCNC anomalous dimension 5
577: tq$\gamma$ and tqZ couplings has appeared. They have
578: computed the cross section for $p\bar p\to tt$ at the
579: Tevatron with NLO-NLL and NNLO-NLL corrections. They
580: obtain a cross section of order a few femtobarns at the
581: Born level with a $25\%$ increase due to the higher order
582: corrections\cite{kidonakis}. To compare with their analysis
583: we show in Figure~(\ref{kido}) the production of $tt$ at
584: both the Tevatron and the LHC from either, the combination
585: of dimension 5 tu$\gamma$ and tuZ couplings used by them
586: ($\kappa^\gamma = \kappa^Z$) or the dimension 4 tuZ used
587: by us ($a_{tu}$).
588:
589: \begin{figure}
590: \includegraphics[width=8.1cm,height=6cm]{kido.eps}
591: \vspace*{0mm}
592: \caption{Tevatron and LHC production via $uu\to tt$ from
593: dimension 5 tuZ, tu$\gamma$ couplings. The factorization
594: scale used is $\mu=M_{tt}$ the invariant mass of $tt$. The
595: couplings $\kappa^\gamma$ and $\kappa^Z$ are defined in
596: Ref.~\cite{kidonakis}. No cuts on the $tt$ signal are
597: applied in this case. The production rate from the dimension
598: 4 couplings used by us is shown for comparison.
599: }
600: \label{kido}
601: \end{figure}
602:
603: Instead of the fixed value for the factorization
604: scale $\mu = m_t = 175$GeV, we have used $\mu = M_{tt}$.
605: That is why we have a somewhat lower (about $20\%$ less)
606: value for the Born level cross section. Otherwise, if we
607: use $\mu =m_t$ we obtain the same rates. To be consistent
608: with their calculations, we have applied no cuts in this figure.
609: The dimension 5 operator requires a mass scale factor $1/\Lambda$
610: for which they have used a rather small value $\Lambda = m_t$.
611: If we use the same scale $\Lambda = m_t$ for the LHC we
612: would obtain a huge rate of order $10^4$fb, and we could as
613: well be violating unitarity constraints.
614: For these operators, we think a higher mass scale
615: $\Lambda = 1$TeV is more realistic; we have used it for the
616: LHC production in Figure~(\ref{kido}).
617: Notice that the dimension 4 tuZ coupling
618: could yield even higher production rates than the dim 5
619: coupling. However, due to the much smaller range of
620: luminosity of the Tevatron, as compared with the LHC, these
621: rates may be too low to be detectable.
622:
623:
624:
625: \vspace*{3mm}
626: \noindent
627: {\bf Acknowledgments}~~~
628: We want to thank C.-P. Yuan for numerous suggestions for
629: this work. We also thank Conacyt for support.
630:
631:
632: \vspace*{-4mm}
633:
634: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
635:
636: \begin{thebibliography}{1}
637:
638:
639: \bibitem{konisberg}
640: Chakraborty, D., Konigsberg, J. and Rainwater, D.,
641: hep-ph/0303092, to appear in the
642: Annual Review of Particle Science {\bf 53};
643: M. Beneke, I. Efthymiopoulos, M.L. Mangano, J. Womersley,
644: et al., {\it Top Quark Physics},
645: 1999 CERN Workshop on the SM Physics (and more) at the LHC,
646: hep-ph/0003033.
647:
648:
649:
650: \bibitem{raretopdec}
651: T. Han, R.D. Peccei and X. Zhang,
652: Nucl. Phys. {\bf B454}, 527 (1995);
653: T. Tait and C.-P. Yuan,
654: Phys. Rev. D{\bf 55}, 7300 (1997);
655: J.L. Diaz-Cruz, M.A. P\'erez, G. Tavares-Velasco and
656: J.J. Toscano, Phys. Rev. D{\bf 41}, 891 (1990); ibid,
657: Phys. Rev. D{\bf 60}, 115014 (1999);
658: E. Jenkins, Phys. Rev. D{\bf 56}, (1997) 458;
659: B. Mele, hpe-ph/0003064;
660: C. Yue, G. Liu and Q. Xu,
661: Phys. Lett. B{\bf 508}, 290 (2001);
662: T. Han, M. Hosch, K. Whisnant, B.L. Young and X. Zhang,
663: Phys. Rev. D{\bf 58}, 073008 (1998);
664: R. Diaz, R. Martinez, J. Alexis-Rodriguez, hep-ph/0103307.
665:
666:
667:
668: \bibitem{multilepton}
669: F. del Aguila and J. Aguilar-Saavedra,
670: Nucl. Phys. {\bf B576}, 56 (2000).
671:
672: \bibitem{branco}
673: J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra and G. C. Branco,
674: Phys. Lett. B{\bf 495}, 347 (2000).
675:
676:
677: \bibitem{eetop}
678: J.A. Hewett, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A13 (1998) 2389;
679: D. Atwood, L. Reina and A. Soni,
680: Phys. Rev. D{\bf 53}, 1199 (1996);
681: S. Bar-Shalom and J. Wudka,
682: Phys. Rev. D{\bf 60}, 094016 (1999);
683: C.-S. Li, X.-M. Zhang and S.-H. Zhu,
684: Phys. Rev. D{\bf 60}, 077702 (1999);
685: G. Couture, Phys. Rev. D{\bf 62}, 097503 (2000);
686: C.-X. Yue, Y.-B. Dai, Q.-J. Xu and G.-L. Liu,
687: Phys. Lett. B{\bf 525}, 301 (2002);
688: C.-S. Huang, X.-H. Wu and S.-H Zhu,
689: Phys. Lett. B{\bf 452}, 143 (1999);
690:
691:
692: \bibitem{hill}
693: C.T. Hill, Phys. Lett. B{\bf 345}, 483 (1995).
694:
695: \bibitem{theories}
696: R.S. Chivukula, E.H. Simmons and J. Terning,
697: Phys. Lett. B{\bf 331}, 383 (1984);
698: D.J. Muller and S. Nandi,
699: Phys. Lett. B{\bf 383}, 345 (1996);
700: E. Malkawi, T. Tait and C.-P. Yuan,
701: Phys. Lett. B{\bf 385}, 304 (1996);
702: K. Lane and E. Eichten,
703: Phys. Lett. B{\bf 433}, 96 (1998);
704: R.S. Chivukula, B.A. Dobrescu, H. Georgi and C.T. Hill,
705: Phys. Rev. D{\bf 59}, 075003 (1999);
706: H. Georgi and A.K. Grant,
707: Phys. Rev. D{\bf 63}, 015001 (2001).
708:
709:
710: \bibitem{slabospitsky}
711: Y.P. Gouz and S.R. Slabospitsky,
712: Phys. Lett. B{\bf 457}, 177 (1999).
713:
714:
715: \bibitem{tcgluon}
716: T. Han, K. Whisnant, B.L. Young and X. Zhang,
717: Phys. Lett. B{\bf 385}, 311 (1996).
718: E. Malkawi and Tim Tait,
719: Phys. Rev. D{\bf 54}, 5758 (1996).
720: H. Fritzsch, Phys. Lett.{\bf 224}, 423 (1989).
721:
722:
723: \bibitem{wwagner}
724: W. Wagner, by the CDF collaboration, {\it Top Quark Physics
725: with CDF}, Presented at 14th Topical Conference on Hadron Collider
726: Physics (HCP2002) Karlsruhe, Germany, Sep/29 - Oct/4, 2002.
727: FERMILAB-Conf-02/317-E.
728:
729:
730: \bibitem{abe}
731: F. Abe, et. al.
732: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 80}, 2525 (1998);
733: See also S. Cabrera, hep-ex/0305066 for a recent report of
734: the D0 and CDF collaborations.
735:
736: \bibitem{extraquarks}
737: F. del Aguila, J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra and J. Miquel,
738: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 82}, 1628 (1999).
739:
740:
741: \bibitem{lai} J. Pumplin, D.R. Stump, J. Huston, H.L. Lai,
742: P. Nadolsky and W.K. Tung. JHEP 0207 (2002) 012. Also see,
743: hep-ph/0307022.
744:
745: \bibitem{pukhov} A. Pukhov, E. Boos, M. Dubinin, V. Edneral,
746: V. Ilyin, D. Kovalenko, A. Kryukov, V. Savrin, S. Shichanin,
747: A. Semenov, CompHEP -a package for evaluation of Feynman
748: diagrams and integration over multiparticle phase space,
749: hep-ph/9908288.
750:
751:
752: \bibitem{chivukula}
753: R.S. Chivukula and E.H. Simmons,
754: Phys. Rev. D{\bf 66}, 015006 (2002).
755:
756:
757: \bibitem{yue}
758: C.-X. Yue, H. Zong and G.-L. Liu, hep-ph/0309255.
759:
760:
761: \bibitem{mrenna}
762: K. Lynch, S. Mrenna, M. Narain and E.H. Simmons,
763: Phys. Rev. D{\bf 63}, 035006 (2001).
764:
765: \bibitem{valencia}
766: T. Han, D. Rainwater and G. Valencia,
767: Phys. Rev. D{\bf 68}, 015003 (2003).
768:
769:
770: \bibitem{tcatlhc}
771: J. Cao, Z. Xiong and J.M. Yang,
772: Phys. Rev. D{\bf 67}, 071701 (2003).
773:
774:
775: \bibitem{kanemura}
776: H.-J. He, S. Kanemura and C.-P. Yuan,
777: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 89}, 101803 (2002);
778: H.-J. He, and C.-P. Yuan,
779: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 83}, 28 (1999).
780:
781: \bibitem{burdman}
782: G. Burdman,
783: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 83}, 2888 (1999);
784:
785:
786: \bibitem{topd0} The D0 Collaboration,
787: Phys. Rev. D{\bf 67}, 012004 (2003).
788:
789:
790: \bibitem{kidonakis}
791: N. Kidonakis and A. Belyaev, hep-ph/0310299.
792:
793:
794:
795: \end{thebibliography}
796:
797:
798:
799: \end{document}
800: \end
801:
802:
803:
804:
805:
806:
807:
808:
809:
810:
811:
812:
813:
814:
815:
816:
817:
818:
819:
820:
821:
822:
823:
824:
825:
826:
827:
828:
829:
830:
831:
832:
833:
834:
835:
836:
837:
838:
839:
840:
841:
842:
843:
844: