1: \documentclass[prd,aps,superscriptaddress]{revtex4}
2: %\documentclass[twocolumn,prd,aps]{revtex4}
3: % D0* decays corrected (again)
4:
5: \usepackage{graphicx}% Include figure files
6: \usepackage{dcolumn}% Align table columns on decimal point
7: \usepackage{bm}% bold math
8:
9: \def\A{{\bf A}}
10: \def\B{{\bf B}}
11: \def\x{{\bf x}}
12: \def\r{{\bf r}}
13: \def\y{{\bf y}}
14: \def\k{{\bf k}}
15: \def\s{{\bf s}}
16: \def\l{{\bf l}}
17: \def\q{{\bf q}}
18: \def\z{{\bf z}}
19: \def\D{{\bf D}}
20: \def\P{{\bf P}}
21: \def\p{{\bf p}}
22: \def\E{{\bf E}}
23: \newcommand{\bdel} {{\mbox{\boldmath $\nabla$}}}
24:
25:
26: \begin{document}
27: \voffset = 0.3 true in
28: \topmargin = -1 true in % for Mac tetex
29:
30: \title{Short Range Structure in the $X(3872)$}
31:
32: \author{Eric S. Swanson}
33: \affiliation{
34: Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pittsburgh,
35: Pittsburgh PA 15260}
36: \affiliation{
37: Jefferson Lab, 12000 Jefferson Ave,
38: Newport News, VA 23606}
39:
40:
41: \vskip .5 true cm
42: \begin{abstract}
43: It is proposed that the newly discovered $X(3872)$ is a $J^{PC} = 1^{++}$
44: $D^0\bar D^{0*}$ hadronic resonance stabilized by admixtures of $\omega J/\psi$ and
45: $\rho J/\psi$. A specific model of the state is constructed and tests
46: of its internal structure are suggested via the predicted decay modes $D^0\bar D^0\pi^0$,
47: $D^0\bar D^0\gamma$, $\pi^+\pi^- J/\psi$, and $\pi^+\pi^-\pi^0 J/\psi$.
48: \end{abstract}
49:
50:
51: %\pacs{}
52: \maketitle
53:
54: \section{Introduction}
55:
56: The Belle collaboration has recently announced\cite{B} the discovery of a
57: resonance, $X(3872)$, in the $\pi^+\pi^-J/\psi$ subsystem of the process
58:
59: \begin{equation}
60: B^\pm \to K^\pm \pi^+\pi^- J/\psi
61: \end{equation}
62: at a mass of $3872.0 \pm 0.6 \pm 0.5$ MeV and with a width
63:
64: \begin{equation}
65: \Gamma < 2.3 {\rm MeV} \ \ (95\% {\rm C.L.}).
66: \end{equation}
67: This state, which has been
68: confirmed by the CDF collaboration\cite{CDF}, has attracted some attention
69: because of its unusual properties. Specifically, the state appears to be too heavy to be
70: a 1D charmonium state and too light to be 2P charmonium or a $c\bar c$ hybrid.
71: See Ref. \cite{BG} for a detailed assessment of possible charmonium assignments and decay modes.
72:
73: Alternatively, the proximity of the state to $D \bar D^*$ threshold
74: strongly suggests that the $X$ may be a weakly bound $D\bar D^*$
75: resonance\cite{NAT2,CP,BK,CYW,PS}, sometimes
76: called a mesonic `molecule' or a `deuson'\cite{general}. This is an old idea which
77: has been
78: applied to a variety of mesons with unusual characteristics such as the
79: $\psi(4040)$\cite{psi}, $f_1(1420)$\cite{E,ess}, $\eta(1440)$\cite{NAT},
80: $f_J(1720)$\cite{DSB}, $a_0(980)$, and $f_0(975)$\cite{scalars,ess}.
81:
82:
83: In this note I assume that the $X(3872)$ is indeed a $D\bar D^*$ resonance and
84: present a detailed analysis of its expected properties based on a simple model
85: of quark interactions. This model incorporates the nonrelativistic quark model with
86: additional dynamics due to pion exchange. The idea is to capture the predictive
87: power of a microscopic formalism of short range quark dynamics along with the important long
88: range dynamics mediated by pion exchange processes.
89: Versions of this idea have been applied
90: to baryon-baryon interactions since the 1980's\cite{RGM}, where, of course,
91: pion exchange is
92: of fundamental importance; another variant
93: has recently enjoyed some vogue in baryon physics\cite{GR}.
94:
95:
96: It is natural to expect that the putative $D\bar D^*$ bound state is in a relative
97: S-wave since this is typically where inter-hadron forces are strongest.
98: In this case pion-mediated interactions (see below) favour
99: the isoscalar channel, which in turn implies a $J^{PC}= 1^{++}$ state. I will
100: therefore henceforth refer to the bound state interpretation of the $X(3872)$
101: as the $\hat\chi_{c1}(3872)$.
102: The remainder of this paper focusses on the properties of this state.
103:
104: Although pion exchange forces dominate the structure of the $\hat\chi_{c1}$ (in analogy to
105: the deuteron), short range quark dynamics are present and assist in binding the
106: $\hat \chi_{c1}$ via mixing to hidden charm vector-$J/\psi$ states. Indeed, $\omega J/\psi$ and
107: $\rho J/\psi$ are very nearly degenerate with $D\bar D^*$ and one must expect
108: some admixture of these states -- an effect which will be strongly enhanced by the
109: near-zero energy denominator. Such mixing is also important in driving possible
110: decay modes of the $\hat\chi_{c1}$ and is therefore central to determining its properties.
111: Finally, the binding energy of the $\hat\chi_{c1}$ is comparable to mass differences in
112: the available charge channels and one can expect strong isospin violating effects
113: in this resonance.
114: This heretofore unexplored dynamics is thoroughly examined in the following.
115: Detailed predictions of binding energies and branching fractions are
116: presented along with possible experimental tests of $\hat\chi_{c1}$ structure.
117:
118:
119: \section{$D\bar D^*$ Dynamics}
120:
121:
122: Long range pion exchange effects are expected to dominate the physics of a
123: weakly bound state
124: such as the $\hat\chi_{c1}$. Nevertheless, as discussed above, short range quark interactions
125: can give rise to important mixing effects. We therefore consider a model which
126: appends pion exchange dynamics to the nonrelativistic quark model. The model is used
127: to extract effective interactions for $D\bar D^*-D\bar D^*$, $D\bar D^*-\omega J/\psi$, and
128: $D\bar D^*-\omega J/\psi$ scattering. These interactions are then employed in a
129: nonrelativistic coupled channel Schr\"odinger equation to extract bound
130: state properties (one expects the nonrelativistic
131: formalism to be accurate for weakly bound states of relatively massive components
132: as is the case with the $\hat\chi_{c1}$).
133:
134:
135: \subsection{Quark Exchange Induced Effective Interaction}
136:
137: The quark model employed here assumes nonrelativistic quark dynamics mediated
138: by an instantaneous confining interaction and a short range spin-dependent interaction
139: motivated by one gluon exchange. The colour structure is taken to be the
140: quadratic form of perturbation theory. This is an important assumption for
141: multiquark dynamics which has received support from recent lattice
142: computations for both confinement\cite{Bali} and multiquark interactions\cite{BB}.
143: The final form of the interaction is thus taken to be
144:
145:
146: \begin{equation}
147: \label{Vij}
148: \sum_{i<j}{\bm{\lambda}(i) \over 2}\cdot {\bm{\lambda}(j) \over 2} \left \{
149: {\alpha_s \over r_{ij}} - {3\over 4} br_{ij}
150: - {8 \pi \alpha_s \over
151: 3 m_i m_j } \bm{S}_i \cdot \bm{S} _j \left ( {\sigma^3 \over
152: \pi^{3/2} } \right ) e^{-\sigma^2 r_{ij}^2}
153: \right \},
154: \end{equation}
155: where ${\bm{\lambda}}$ is a colour Gell-Mann matrix, $\alpha_s$ is
156: the strong coupling constant, $b$ is the string tension, $m_i$ and
157: $m_j$ are the interacting quark or antiquark masses, and $\sigma$ is a
158: range parameter in a regulated spin-spin hyperfine
159: interaction. The parameters used were $\alpha_s = 0.59$, $b = 0.162$ GeV$^2$,
160: $\sigma = 0.9$ GeV, and $0.335$, $0.55$, and $1.6$ GeV for up, strange, and
161: charm quark masses respectively. Relevant meson masses obtained from this model are
162: $\rho = 0.773$ GeV,
163: $J/\psi = 3.076$ GeV, $D = 1.869$ GeV, and $D^* = 2.018$ GeV, in good agreement
164: with experiment.
165:
166:
167: Meson-meson interactions are obtained by computing the Born order scattering amplitude
168: for a given process\cite{ess,BS}. Because of the colour factors in Eq. \ref{Vij} this amplitude
169: necessarily involves an exchange of quarks between the interacting mesons. Thus the
170: leading order $D\bar D^*$ interaction couples $D\bar D^*$ with hidden charm states
171: such as $\rho J/\psi$ and $\omega J/\psi$. This amplitude may be unitarized by
172: extracting an effective potential and iterating it in a Schr\"odinger equation\cite{ess}.
173: The method has been successfully applied to a variety of processes such
174: as $KN$ scattering\cite{KN}
175: and $J/\psi$ reactions relevant to RHIC physics\cite{WSB}. It has even
176: proven surprisingly useful for relativistic (and chiral) reactions such as
177: $\pi\pi$ scattering\cite{BS,ess}.
178:
179:
180:
181: %\begin{figure}[h]
182: %\includegraphics[angle=0,width=10cm]{qex1.ps}
183: %\caption{\label{qex} Quark Exchange Amplitudes}
184: %\end{figure}
185:
186: The S-wave Born order scattering amplitude for $D\bar D^* - \omega J/\psi$ scattering
187: is shown in Fig. \ref{TC}. Here $D \bar D^*$ refers to the isoscalar positive charge parity state $1/\sqrt{2}(D\bar D^* + \bar D D^*)^0_S$. The scattering amplitude is
188: dominated by the confinement interaction of Eq. \ref{Vij} (this is in contrast to
189: light meson scattering which is dominated by the hyperfine interaction). An effective
190: potential is extracted by equating the scattering amplitude to that obtained for
191: point-like mesons interacting via an arbitrary S-wave potential. It is convenient
192: to parameterize this potential as a sum of gaussians:
193:
194: \begin{equation}
195: V_q = \sum_i a_i {\rm e}^{-r^2/2b_i^2}.
196: \label{Vq}
197: \end{equation}
198:
199: The fit to the quark level
200: amplitude is illustrated in Fig. \ref{TC} (left panel) and the resulting potential
201: is shown in Fig. \ref{TC} (right panel). The distinctive
202: ``mermaid potential''
203: seen here is due to destructive interference between diagrams in the quark level
204: amplitude. Thus details of the potential are sensitive to the assumed microscopic
205: interaction, however, its general shape and strength are quite robust\cite{ess}.
206:
207:
208:
209: \begin{figure}[h]
210: \includegraphics[angle=270,width=8cm]{T0.ps}
211: \includegraphics[angle=270,width=8cm]{Veff2.ps}
212: \caption{\label{TC} (left) S-Wave Scattering Amplitude for $D\bar D^* \to \omega J/\psi$.
213: (right) Effective Potential for $D\bar D^* \to \omega J/\psi$ }
214: \end{figure}
215:
216: The derived parameters of Eq. \ref{Vq} were $a_1 = 6.35$ GeV, $b_1 = 1.166$ GeV$^{-1}$ and
217: $a_2 = -6.82$ GeV, $b_2 = 1.096$ GeV$^{-1}$. These parameters were obtained for
218: the confinement portion of the ``prior'' form of the scattering amplitude. The ``post''
219: form yields $a_1 = 3.82$ GeV, $b_1 = 1.20$ GeV$^{-1}$, $a_2 = -4.21$ GeV, and $b_2 = 1.125$ GeV$^{-1}$. Post and prior forms of a scattering amplitude refer to different schemes for
220: constructing the time evolution operator which exist in the scattering of composite
221: systems. In principle these
222: give rise to the same scattering amplitude, but approximations and inaccurate
223: wavefunctions can cause slight differences as indicated in the figure.
224: We employ the average potential indicated by the solid line of Fig. \ref{TC} (right)
225: in the following.
226: Finally, the isovector $D\bar D^*$- $\rho J/\psi$ effective potential is identical to its
227: isoscalar analogue.
228:
229:
230: The mermaid form of the effective potential implies that quark exchange effects
231: can cause binding in the coupled $D\bar D^*$, $\omega J/\psi$ or $\rho J/\psi$
232: systems; however, direct computations indicate that the potential depth is not
233: sufficient to form a resonance. We therefore turn to an examination of pion
234: exchange induced dynamics in the $D\bar D^*$ system.
235:
236:
237: \subsection{Pion Exchange Induced Effective Interaction}
238:
239: I choose to follow the method of T\"ornqvist\cite{NAT} in constructing an effective
240: pion-induced interaction. This is based on a microscopic quark-pion interaction
241: familiar from nuclear physics:
242:
243: \begin{equation}
244: {\cal L} = {g\over \sqrt{2} f_\pi} \int d^4x \bar\psi(x) \gamma^\mu \gamma_5 \tau^a \psi(x) \partial_\mu \pi^a(x).
245: \label{piq}
246: \end{equation}
247: Here $f_\pi = 92$ MeV is the pion decay constant, $\tau$ is an SU(2) flavour generator,
248: and $g$ is a coupling to be determined. The effective potential is derived by projecting
249: the quark level interactions onto hadronic states in the nonrelativistic limit. In
250: the case of pseudoscalar-vector states one obtains\cite{NAT}
251:
252: %\begin{equation}
253: %V_{\pi qq} = -{g \over \sqrt{2} f_\pi} \int d^3x (\sigma\cdot\nabla) (\tau\cdot \pi)
254: %\end{equation}
255:
256: \begin{equation}
257: V_{\pi} = - \gamma V_0 \left[ \pmatrix{1 & 0 \cr 0 & 1}C(r) + \pmatrix{0 & -\sqrt{2} \cr
258: -\sqrt{2} & 1 } T(r) \right]
259: \label{Vpi}
260: \end{equation}
261: where
262:
263: \begin{equation}
264: C(r) = {\mu^2\over m_\pi^2} {{\rm e}^{-\mu r} \over m_\pi r},
265: \label{C}
266: \end{equation}
267: \begin{equation}
268: T(r) = C(r)\left( 1 + {3\over \mu r} + {3\over (\mu r)^2} \right),
269: \label{T}
270: \end{equation}
271: and
272: \begin{equation}
273: V_0 \equiv {m_\pi^3\over 24 \pi}{g^2 \over f_\pi^2} \approx 1.3 {\rm MeV}.
274: \end{equation}
275: The matrix elements refer to S- and D-wave components of the pseudoscalar-vector
276: state in analogy with the deuteron.
277: The strength of the interaction has been fixed by comparing to the $\pi NN$ coupling
278: constant via the
279: relationship $g_{\pi NN}^2/4\pi = 25/18\cdot m_\pi^2 g^2/f_\pi^2$. This allows a
280: prediction of the $D^*$ decay width which is in good agreement with experiment\cite{NAT}.
281: The parameter $\mu$ is typically the pion mass, however, one can incorporate recoil
282: effects in the potential by setting $\mu^2 = m_\pi^2 - (m_V-m_{pS})^2$. The results
283: presented here are insensitive to the value of $\mu$ and I take $\mu = 130$ MeV in the
284: following.
285: Finally, the coupling $\gamma$ is a spin-flavour matrix element which takes on the
286: following values: $\gamma = 3$ for $I=0$, $C=+$; $\gamma = 1$ for $I=1$, $C=-$;
287: $\gamma = -1$ for $I=1$, $C=+$; and $\gamma = -3$ for $I=0$, $C=-$. Thus the isoscalar
288: positive charge parity channel is the most likely to form bound states and subsequent
289: discussion focusses on it.
290:
291:
292: The potential of Eq. \ref{T} is an illegal quantum mechanical operator and
293: must be regulated, typically with a dipole form factor. The regulator scale, $\Lambda$
294: may be fixed by comparison with nuclear physics; for example $NN$ interactions
295: yield preferred values for $\Lambda$ in the range 0.8 GeV to 1.5 GeV depending on model
296: details. Alternatively,
297: reproducing the deuteron binding energy requires $\Lambda \approx 0.8$ GeV.
298: T\"ornqvist has employed an intermediate value of $\Lambda = 1.2$ GeV which is
299: appropriate for $D$ mesons and this is taken as the
300: canonical cutoff in the following.
301:
302:
303: Integrating the coupled S/D wave system for the $1^{++}$ $B\bar B^*$ system yields a
304: bound state of mass 10562 MeV, in agreement with Ref. \cite{NAT}. Similarly a $0^{-+}$
305: $B\bar B^*$ bound state of mass 10545 MeV arises from this formalism.
306: Unfortunately,
307: $D$ mesons are sufficiently light that the $D\bar D^*$ system does not
308: bind with canonical parameters. However, the combined pion and quark
309: induced effective interactions are sufficient to cause binding. The properties
310: of this bound state are explored in the next section.
311:
312:
313:
314: \section{Properties of the $\hat \chi_{c1}(3872)$}
315:
316: The proceeding considerations indicate that the isoscalar positive charge conjugation
317: sector is the most likely to bind in the $D\bar D^*$ system. Furthermore the small
318: branching fraction of the $\hat\chi_{c1}$ to $\pi\pi J/\psi$ implies a small isovector $\rho J/\psi$
319: component in the $\hat \chi_{c1}$ wavefunction. Thus a good initial study is provided by the coupled
320: channel
321: $1/\sqrt{2}(D \bar D^* + \bar D D^*)^0_S$, $1/\sqrt{2}(D \bar D^* + \bar D D^*)^0_D$,
322: and $\omega J/\psi$ system. Utilizing the potentials of Eqs. \ref{Vq} and \ref{Vpi}
323: and meson masses of $D = 1.869$ GeV, $D^* = 2.01$ GeV, $\omega = 0.78$ GeV, and
324: $J/\psi = 3.1$ GeV yields a single bound state of mass 3.872 GeV without adjusting
325: any parameters, in remarkable agreement with the mass of the $X$. The $\hat\chi_{c1}$ wavefunction
326: is plotted in Fig. \ref{wf} (left panel); one sees typical deuteron-like wavefunctions with
327: strong D-wave and $\omega J/\psi$ components. All three components are required to
328: achieve binding for this state.
329:
330: Although encouraging, this result must not be taken too seriously because the binding energy
331: is comparable to the difference in energies of the various relevant charge channels.
332: Thus isospin breaking effects are expected to be important and must be incorporated
333: in the formalism. This is achieved by including isovector channels and allowing for
334: differing thresholds. Restricting attention to nearby vector meson - $J/\psi$ states
335: and neglecting the coupling to charmonium states\footnote{Coupling of the $\hat\chi_{c1}$
336: to charmonium
337: states is negligible because the wavefunction squared at the origin scales as
338: $\sqrt{\mu_{D\bar D^*} E_B}$
339: thereby suppressing quark annihilation transitions. Annihilation is further suppressed
340: because
341: the $\hat\chi_{c1}$ should be dominated by S-wave quark pairs and possible
342: charmonium states are all orbital excitations.}
343: yields six possible channels:
344:
345: \begin{list}{$\bullet\ $}{}
346: \item{$\rho J/\psi$ at 3.8679 GeV}
347: \item{${1\over \sqrt{2}}(D^0 \bar D^{0*} + \bar D^0 D^{0*})_S$ at 3.8712 GeV}
348: \item{${1\over \sqrt{2}}(D^0 \bar D^{0*} + \bar D^0 D^{0*})_D$ at 3.8712 GeV}
349: \item{${1\over\sqrt{2}}(D^+D^{-*} + D^- D^{+*})_S$ at 3.8793 GeV}
350: \item{${1\over\sqrt{2}}(D^+D^{-*} + D^- D^{+*})_D$ at 3.8793 GeV}
351: \item{$\omega J/\psi$ at 3.8795 GeV}.
352: \end{list}
353:
354: One sees an immediate problem: the threshold for $\rho J/\psi$ is too low
355: to allow a resonance at $3.872\pm 1$ GeV. However, the mass of the $\rho$ is rather
356: poorly defined due to its large width and some leeway in fixing
357: threshold for this channel is permissible. I therefore adopt the simple
358: prescription of setting the $\rho$ mass equal to that of the $\omega$ at $0.7826$ GeV.
359: Varying this prescription made negligible changes to the following results.
360: The quark level coupling of $(D\bar D^*)_D$ states to S-wave $\rho$- or $\omega$-$J/\psi$
361: states is small and is neglected. The final step is to form effective interactions
362: from appropriate combinations of isospin basis interactions. For example the
363: $D^0\bar D^{0*} - D^0\bar D^{0*}$ interaction is given by
364: Eq. \ref{Vpi} with $\gamma = 1$.
365: The resulting numerical six channel problem must be studied with some care because
366: the binding energies are small relative to the natural scales of the system.
367:
368: It is of interest to study the properties of possible bound states as a function of
369: their binding energy. This has been achieved by allowing the regulator scale to
370: vary between 1.2 and 2.3 GeV. Binding is seen to occur for $\Lambda$ larger
371: than approximately 1.45 GeV.
372: Wavefunction coefficients (defined as $\int |\varphi_\alpha|^2$ where $\alpha$
373: is a channel index)
374: are shown as a function of binding energy in Fig. \ref{wf} (right panel). It is clear
375: that the $D^0\bar D^{0*}$ component dominates the wavefunction, especially near
376: threshold. However, the $D^+D^{-*}$ component rises rapidly in strength with
377: isospin symmetry being recovered at surprisingly small binding energies (on the order of
378: 30 MeV). Alternatively, the $\omega J/\psi$ component peaks at roughly 17\% at $E_B \approx
379: 9$ MeV.
380: The contribution of the $\rho J/\psi$
381: wavefunction remains small, peaking at less than 1\% very close to threshold.
382:
383:
384:
385:
386: \begin{figure}[h]
387: \includegraphics[angle=270,width=8cm]{wavefcns1.ps}
388: \includegraphics[angle=270,width=8cm]{wfcomp.ps}
389: \caption{ \label{wf} (left) Three Channel Isoscalar Wavefunction Components. (right) Component Strength vs. Binding Energy.}
390: \end{figure}
391:
392: %\begin{figure}[h]
393: %\includegraphics[angle=270,width=12cm]{r.ps}
394: %\caption{ \label{r} RMS radius vs. Binding Energy.}
395: %\end{figure}
396:
397: It is possible to estimate decay rates in a simple fashion once an explicit wavefunction
398: is known. This is because the small binding energy of the $\hat\chi_{c1}$ implies that its
399: constituent particles are nearly on-shell and therefore $\hat \chi_{c1}$ decay amplitudes
400: are well approximated by constituent decay amplitudes. Thus, for example, the
401: $\pi^+\pi^-J/\psi$ decay mode arises predominantly from the $\rho J/\psi$ wavefunction
402: component. The channel strengths of Fig. \ref{wf} therefore allow simple estimates
403: of a variety of branching fractions based on the widths of the $D^*$, $\omega$, and
404: $\rho$ (decays of the $D$ and $J/\psi$ mesons are neglected here but can be computed
405: easily). The results for a variety of modes are presented in Table I as a
406: function of the binding energy.
407:
408: The broadest particle in the $\hat\chi_{c1}$ system is the $\rho$ with a width of 150 MeV and it
409: is the $\rho J/\psi$ component which has the largest branching fraction, even though
410: it is strongly suppressed in the wavefunction.
411: The next strongest mode is provided by the
412: $\pi^+\pi^-\pi^0$ decay of the $\omega$ which is enhanced relative to other modes due
413: to strong mixing with $\omega J/\psi$.
414: Unfortunately, only a very rough upper limit on the total width of the $D^{0*}$ exists\cite{PDG}
415: so estimates of the $D^0\bar D^0 \pi^0$ and $D^0\bar D^0 \gamma$ decay widths are essentially
416: useless. The figures in the table have been obtained by assuming that
417: $\Gamma(D^{0*}\to D^0\gamma) \approx 25$ keV and
418: $\Gamma(D^{0*} \to D^0\pi^0) \approx 43$ keV; both of these estimates are
419: anchored in $D^{\pm*}$ decays and should be reliable. Notice that the $D^\pm \pi^\mp$ mode
420: is closed.
421: All other possible decay modes of the $\hat\chi_{c1}$ are relatively small, although the
422: $\pi^0\gamma J/\psi$ mode may be of interest if it is detectable.
423:
424:
425:
426: \begin{table}[h]
427: \caption{Some Decay Modes of the $\hat\chi_{c1}(3872)$ (keV).}
428: \begin{tabular}{cccccccccc}
429: \hline
430: $B_E$ (MeV)$^{\phantom{X}^{\phantom{X}}}$ & $D^0\bar D^0 \pi^0 \ \ $ & $D^0\bar D^0\gamma \ \ $ & $D^+D^-\pi^0 \ \ $ & $(D^+\bar D^0\pi^-$+c.c)$/\sqrt{2}$ & $D^+D^-\gamma \ \ $ & $\pi^+\pi^-J/\psi \ \ $ & $\pi^+\pi^-\gamma J/\psi \ $ & $\pi^+\pi^-\pi^0J/\psi \ \ $ & $\pi^0\gamma J/\psi \ \ $ \\
431: \hline
432: 0.7 & 67 & 38 & 5.1 & 4.7 & 0.2 & 1290 & 12.9 & 720 & 70 \\
433: 1.0 & 66 & 36 & 6.4 & 5.8 & 0.3 & 1215 & 12.1 & 820 & 80 \\
434: 2.0 & 57 & 32 & 9.5 & 8.6 & 0.4 & 975 & 9.8 & 1040 & 100 \\
435: 3.8 & 52 & 28 & 12.5 & 11.4 & 0.6 & 690 & 6.9 & 1190 & 115 \\
436: 6.1 & 46 & 26 & 15.0 & 13.6 & 0.7 & 450 & 4.5 & 1270 & 120 \\
437: 9.0 & 43 & 24 & 16.9 & 15.3 & 0.8 & 285 & 2.9 & 1280 & 125 \\
438: 12.7 & 38 & 22 & 18.5 & 16.7 & 0.9 & 180 & 1.8 & 1240 & 120 \\
439: \hline
440: \end{tabular}
441: \end{table}
442:
443: \section{Conclusions}
444:
445: I have argued that the $X(3872)$ is a $J^{PC}=1^{++}$ $D\bar D^*$ hadronic resonance
446: with important admixtures of $\rho J/\psi$ and $\omega J/\psi$ states, dubbed the $\hat\chi_{c1}$.
447: This assertion
448: is supported by detailed computations in a microscopic model which incorporates
449: pion and quark exchange interactions. The model has been heavily tested on nuclear
450: physics and meson-meson scattering data and can be regarded as reasonably reliable.
451: The $1^{++}$ $\hat\chi_{c1}$ is the only $D\bar D^*$ state which binds; no other $J^{PC}$
452: or charge modes exist in this model. Furthermore, no $D\bar D$ molecules are expected.
453: It is likely, however, that a rich
454: $D^*\bar D^*$, $B\bar B^*$ and $B^*\bar B^*$ spectrum exists.
455: Thus the discovery of the $X(3872)$ may be the entree into a new regime of hadronic
456: physics which will offer important insight into the workings of strong QCD and
457: should help clarify many open issues in light quark spectroscopy. Indeed, the experimental
458: and theoretical analysis of heavy molecules is simplified because of their
459: hidden flavour components.
460:
461:
462: It is clear that further experimental studies of the $X(3872)$ are of great importance.
463: For example, determining its spin and parity are of immediate concern. The fact that the
464: $X$ is polarized in $B\to KX$ will help greatly in this. Furthermore, detecting a
465: $\pi^0\pi^0J/\psi$ decay mode would immediately eliminate the $\hat\chi_{c1}$
466: interpretation of the $X$.
467:
468: It is also
469: important to gather enough events to reconstruct the invariant mass of various
470: subsystems such as $\pi^+\pi^-$ in $\pi^+\pi^-J/\psi$ (which should peak at the
471: $\rho$ mass). Perhaps a more interesting test would be the invariant mass distribution
472: of the $\pi^+\pi^-\pi^0$ subsystem in the $\pi^+\pi^-\pi^0J/\psi$ decay mode, which
473: should have all of its events near the edge of phase space due to the narrow width
474: of the virtual $\omega$. It is therefore encouraging that the $3\pi J/\psi$ decay mode is
475: roughly 1/2 the strength of the $2\pi J/\psi$ mode. Although some events will be lost
476: due to the decreased efficiency in detecting neutral pions, this deficit should be
477: made up by the new data being collected at Belle and BaBar.
478:
479:
480: Lastly, determining branching fractions, especially those arising from
481: different wavefunction
482: components such as $D^0\bar D^0 \pi^0$, $\pi^+\pi^- J/\psi$, and $\pi^+\pi^-\pi^0 J/\psi$,
483: would help greatly in pinning down the internal structure of the $X$ and provide an
484: intriguing glimpse into a new realm of hadronic physics.
485:
486:
487:
488: \begin{acknowledgments}
489: I thank Jim Mueller for a fruitful conversation.
490: This work was supported by the DOE under contracts DE-FG02-00ER41135 and
491: DE-AC05-84ER40150.
492: \end{acknowledgments}
493:
494:
495: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
496:
497: \bibitem{B}
498: S.~K.~Choi {\it et al.} [Belle Collaboration],
499: ``Observation of a new narrow charmonium state in exclusive $B^\pm \to K^\pm \pi^+ \pi^- J/\psi$ decays'',
500: arXiv:hep-ex/0309032.
501: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0309032;%%
502:
503: \bibitem{CDF}
504: G. Bauer [CDF Collaboration], presentation at the Second International Workshop
505: on Heavy Quarkonium (Sept 20-22, 2003, FNAL). A mass of $3871.4 \pm 0.7 \pm 0.04$ MeV
506: is reported.
507:
508: \bibitem{BG}
509: T. Barnes and S. Godfrey, ``Charmonium Options for the $X(3872)$'', arXiv:hep-ph/0311162.
510:
511:
512: \bibitem{NAT2}
513: N.~A.~T\"ornqvist,
514: ``Comment on the narrow charmonium state of Belle at 3871.8 MeV as a deuson'',
515: arXiv:hep-ph/0308277.
516: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0308277;%%
517:
518:
519: \bibitem{CP}
520: F.~E.~Close and P.~R.~Page,
521: ``The D*0 anti-D0 threshold resonance'',
522: arXiv:hep-ph/0309253.
523: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0309253;%%
524:
525: \bibitem{BK}
526: E.~Braaten and M.~Kusunoki,
527: ``Low-energy universality and the new charmonium resonance at 3870 MeV'',
528: arXiv:hep-ph/0311147.
529: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0311147;%%
530:
531: \bibitem{CYW}
532: C.~Y.~Wong,
533: ``Molecular states of heavy quark mesons'',
534: arXiv:hep-ph/0311088.
535: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0311088;%%
536:
537: \bibitem{PS}
538: S.~Pakvasa and M.~Suzuki,
539: ``On the hidden charm state at 3872 MeV'',
540: arXiv:hep-ph/0309294.
541: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0309294;%%
542:
543: \bibitem{general}
544: A. de Rujula, H. Georgi, and S.L. Glashow, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 38}, 317 (1977);
545: T.~E.~O.~Ericson and G.~Karl,
546: %``Strength of pion exchange in hadronic molecules,''
547: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 309}, 426 (1993);
548: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B309,426;%%
549: N.A. T\"ornqvist, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 67}, 556 (1991);
550:
551: \bibitem{psi}
552: M.B. Voloshin and L.B. Okun, JETP Lett. {\bf 23}, 333 (1976);
553:
554: \bibitem{E}
555: D.G. Caldwell, Mod. Phys. Lett. {\bf A2}, 771 (1987); R.S. Longacre, Phys. Rev. {\bf D42}, 874 (1990).
556:
557: \bibitem{ess}
558: E.~S.~Swanson,
559: %``Intermeson potentials from the constituent quark model,''
560: Annals Phys.\ {\bf 220}, 73 (1992);
561: %%CITATION = APNYA,220,73;%%
562:
563: \bibitem{NAT}
564: N.~A.~Tornqvist,
565: %``From The Deuteron To Deusons, An Analysis Of Deuteron - Like Meson Meson Bound States''
566: Z.\ Phys.\ C {\bf 61}, 525 (1994).
567: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9310247].
568: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9310247;%%
569:
570:
571: \bibitem{DSB}
572: K.~Dooley, E.~S.~Swanson and T.~Barnes,
573: %``A Prediction of spin 0 and 2 vector meson molecules: A New model of the f2 (1720),''
574: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 275}, 478 (1992).
575: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B275,478;%%
576:
577: \bibitem{scalars}
578: J. Weinstein and N. Isgur, Phys. Rev. {\bf D41}, 2236 (1990); R.L. Jaffe, Phys. Rev. {\bf D15}, 267, 281 (1977); K.L. Au, D. Morgan, and M.R. Pennington, Phys. Rev. {\bf D35}, 1633 (1987).
579:
580: \bibitem{RGM}
581: K. Shimizu, Rep. Prog. Phys. {\bf 52}, 1 (1989); M. Oka and K. Yazaki, Prog. Theor. Phys.
582: {\bf 66}, 556 (1981); Y. Fukiwara and K.T. Hecht, Phys. Lett. {\bf B171}, 17 (1986).
583:
584: \bibitem{GR}
585: L. Glozman and D.0. Riska, Phys. Rep. {\bf 28}, 263 (1996).
586:
587: \bibitem{Bali}
588: G.S. Bali, Phys. Rev. {\bf D62}, 114503 (2000).
589:
590: \bibitem{BB}
591: A.M. Green, J. Koponen, and P. Pennanen, Phys. Rev. {\bf D61}, 014014 (2000).
592:
593:
594: \bibitem{BS}
595: T.~Barnes and E.~S.~Swanson,
596: %``A Diagrammatic approach to meson meson scattering in the nonrelativistic quark potential model,''
597: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 46}, 131 (1992);
598: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D46,131;%%
599: E.~S.~Swanson,
600: ``Hadron hadron interactions in the constituent quark model: results and extensions'',
601: arXiv:hep-ph/0102267.
602: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0102267;%%
603:
604:
605: \bibitem{KN}
606: T.~Barnes and E.~S.~Swanson,
607: %``Kaon - nucleon scattering amplitudes and Z* enhancements from quark Born diagrams,''
608: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 49}, 1166 (1994);
609: %%CITATION = PHRVA,C49,1166;%%
610:
611:
612: \bibitem{WSB}
613: C.~Y.~Wong, E.~S.~Swanson and T.~Barnes,
614: %``Heavy quarkonium dissociation cross sections in relativistic heavy-ion collisions,''
615: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 65}, 014903 (2002)
616: [Erratum-ibid.\ C {\bf 66}, 029901 (2002)];
617: %[arXiv:nucl-th/0106067].
618: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0106067;%%
619: C.~Y.~Wong, E.~S.~Swanson and T.~Barnes,
620: %``Cross sections for pi and rho induced dissociation of J/psi and psi',''
621: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 62}, 045201 (2000).
622: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9912431].
623: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9912431;%%
624:
625: \bibitem{PDG}
626: Review of Particle Properties, K. Hagiwara {\it et al.}, Phys. Rev. {\bf D66}, 010001
627: (2002).
628:
629:
630:
631: \end{thebibliography}
632:
633: \end{document}
634: