1: \documentclass{article}

2: \usepackage{epsfig,subequation,graphics}

3: \oddsidemargin -1.1cm \evensidemargin -1.1cm

4: \topmargin -3.2cm  \textwidth 18cm  \textheight 25.5cm

5: \def\baselinestretch{0.95}

6: \catcode`\@=11

7: \newcommand{\Lvet}{\mbox{\boldmath $L$}}

8: \newcommand{\lvet}{\mbox{\boldmath $l$}}

9: \newcommand{\mb}{M}\newcommand{\mi}{m_i}\newcommand{\mo}{m_o}

10: \newcommand{\Eb}{\omega}\newcommand{\Ei}{E}

11: \newcommand{\dl}{L_W}

12: \newcommand{\tvet}{\mbox{\boldmath $T$}}

13: \newcommand{\Ttot}{\mbox{\boldmath T}_{{\rm t}}}

14: \newcommand{\ov}{{\cal O}}

15: \newcommand{\den}{(k^2-m^2)}

16: \newcommand{\dd}{\stackrel{\leftrightarrow}{\de_\mu}}

17: \newcommand{\psl}{p\hspace{-4.2pt}{\scriptstyle/}}

18: \newcommand{\qsl}{q\hspace{-4.9pt}{\scriptstyle /}}

19: \newcommand{\ksl}{k\hspace{-4.9pt}{\scriptstyle /}}

20: \newcommand{\desl}{\partial\hspace{-4.9pt}{\scriptstyle /}}

21: \newcommand{\Asl}{A\hspace{-4.9pt}{\scriptstyle /}}

22: \newcommand{\sss}{{\rm s}^2}

23: \newcommand{\ccc}{{\rm c}^2}

24: %\newcommand{\kt}{\mbox{\boldmath $k$}_{\perp }}

25: \newcommand{\vgreca}{\nu}

26: \newcommand{\et}{\tilde{e}}

27: \newcommand  \f  \varphi

28: \newcommand \bra {\langle}

29: \newcommand \ket {\rangle}

30: \newcommand{\be}{\begin{equation}}

31: \newcommand{\ee}{\end{equation}}

32: \newcommand{\ben}{\begin{displaymath}}

33: \newcommand{\een}{\end{displaymath}}         

34: \newcommand{\ba}{\begin{eqnarray}}

35: \newcommand{\ea}{\end{eqnarray}}

36: \newcommand{\ban}{\begin{eqnarray*}}

37: \newcommand{\ean}{\end{eqnarray*}}

38: \newcommand{\cro}{\dagger}

39: \newcommand{\tr}{{\rm Tr}}

40: \newcommand{\de}{\partial}

41: \newcommand{\fvet}{\bar{\f}}

42: \newcommand{\gvet}{\bar{\gamma}}

43: \newcommand{\xv}{{\bf x}}

44: \newcommand{\pv}{{\bf p}}

45: \newcommand{\GeV}{\,{\rm GeV}}

46: \newcommand{\TeV}{\,{\rm TeV}}

47: \newcommand{\MeV}{\,{\rm MeV}}

48: \newcommand{\Pl}{p\hspace{-4.2pt}{\scriptstyle/}}

49: \newcommand{\eps}{\varepsilon}

50: \newcommand{\g}{\gamma}

51: \newcommand{\OLI}{S^L_{\tilde{f} i}}

52: \newcommand{\ORI}{S^R_{\tilde{f} i}}

53: \newcommand{\OLJ}{S^L_{\tilde{f} j}}

54: \newcommand{\ORJ}{S^R_{\tilde{f} j}}

55: \newcommand{\h}{\hbar}

56: % \sopra{A}{B} sovrappone A e B

57: \newlength{\www}

58: \newcommand{\sopra}[2]{\settowidth{\www}{#1}#1\hspace{-\www}#2

59: \settowidth{\www}{#2}\hspace{-\www}\settowidth{\www}{#1}\hspace{\www}}

60: \newcommand{\xvet}{\mbox{\boldmath $x$}}

61: \newcommand{\yvet}{\mbox{\boldmath $y$}}

62: \newcommand{\zvet}{\mbox{\boldmath $z$}}

63: \newcommand{\pvet}{\mbox{\boldmath $p$}}

64: \newcommand{\kvet}{\mbox{\boldmath $k$}}

65: \newcommand{\vet}[1]{\mbox{\boldmath $#1$}}

66: \newcommand{\sigmavet}{\mbox{\boldmath $\sigma$}}

67: \renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\fnsymbol{footnote}}

68: \newcommand{\kt}{\mbox{\boldmath $k$}_{\perp }}

69: \newcommand{\Fvet}{\mbox{\boldmath $F$}}

70: \newcommand{\Bvet}{\mbox{\boldmath $B$}}

71: \newcommand{\Dvet}{\mbox{\boldmath $D$}}

72: \newcommand{\Phivet}{\mbox{\boldmath $\Phi$}}

73: \newcommand{\barra}[1]{{#1}^*}

74: 

75: \def\NPB#1#2#3{{\it Nucl.~Phys.} {\bf{B#1}} (19#2) #3}

76: \def\PLB#1#2#3{{\it Phys.~Lett.} {\bf{B#1}} (19#2) #3}

77: \def\PRD#1#2#3{{\it Phys.~Rev.} {\bf{D#1}} (19#2) #3}

78: \def\PRL#1#2#3{{\it Phys.~Rev.~Lett.} {\bf{#1}} (19#2) #3}

79: \def\ZPC#1#2#3{{\it Z.~Phys.} {\bf C#1} (19#2) #3}

80: \def\PTP#1#2#3{{\it Prog.~Theor.~Phys.} {\bf#1}  (19#2) #3}

81: \def\MPLA#1#2#3{{\it Mod.~Phys.~Lett.} {\bf#1} (19#2) #3}

82: \def\PR#1#2#3{{\it Phys.~Rep.} {\bf#1} (19#2) #3}

83: \def\AP#1#2#3{{\it Ann.~Phys.} {\bf#1} (19#2) #3}

84: \def\RMP#1#2#3{{\it Rev.~Mod.~Phys.} {\bf#1} (19#2) #3}

85: \def\HPA#1#2#3{{\it Helv.~Phys.~Acta} {\bf#1} (19#2) #3}

86: \def\JETPL#1#2#3{{\it JETP~Lett.} {\bf#1} (19#2) #3}

87: 

88: 

89: \def\lesssim{\mathrel{\mathop

90:   {\hbox{\lower0.5ex\hbox{$\sim$}\kern-0.8em\lower-0.7ex\hbox{$<$}}}}}

91: \def\greatsim{\mathrel{\mathop

92:   {\hbox{\lower0.5ex\hbox{$\sim$}\kern-0.8em\lower-0.7ex\hbox{$>$}}}}}

93: \relax

94: 

95: 

96: \begin{document}\vspace{1cm}

97: 

98: 

99: 

100: 

101: 

102: 

103: \vskip .7cm

104: 

105: \begin{center}

106: {\Large \bf 

107: Sudakov Electroweak effects in transversely  polarized beams

108: }

109: \vskip .7cm

110: 

111: 

112: 

113: {\large Paolo Ciafaloni}

114: 

115: {\it INFN - Sezione di Lecce,

116: \\Via per Arnesano, I-73100 Lecce, Italy

117: \\ E-mail: Paolo.Ciafaloni@le.infn.it}

118: 

119: \vskip.5cm

120: 

121: {\large Denis Comelli}

122: 

123: {\it INFN - Sezione di Ferrara,

124: \\Via Paradiso 12, I-35131 Ferrara, Italy\\

125: E-mail: comelli@fe.infn.it}

126: 

127: 

128: \vskip.5cm

129: {\large Antonio Vergine}

130: 

131: {\it INFN - Sezione di Ferrara,

132: \\Via Paradiso 12, I-35131 Ferrara, Italy\\

133: E-mail: vergine@fe.infn.it}

134: 

135: \end{center}

136: 

137: \vskip .5cm

138: 

139: \begin{abstract}

140: We study Standard Model electroweak radiative corrections for fully

141: inclusive observables with polarized 

142: fermionic beams. Our calculations are relevant in view of the possibility

143: for Next Generation Linear colliders of having 

144: transversely and/or longitudinally polarized beams.

145: The case of initial transverse polarization is particularly interesting

146: because of the interplay of infrared/collinear logarithms 

147: of different origins, related both to the nonabelian SU(2) and abelian U(1)

148: sectors.

149: The Standard model effects turn out to be in the 10\% range at the TeV

150: scale,

151:  therefore

152: particularly relevant in order to disentangle possible New Physics effects.  

153: \end{abstract}

154: 

155: 

156: 

157: \setcounter{footnote}{0}

158: \setcounter{page}{0}

159: 

160: 

161: 

162: \section{Introduction}

163: 

164: Energy-growing electroweak corrections in the Standard Model have received

165: recently a lot of 

166:  attention in the literature, being relevant for LHC physics \cite{acco},

167: for Next generation of Linear Colliders (NLCs) \cite{nlc}

168:  and for ultrahigh energy cosmic

169: rays \cite{berez}. The presence of double logs   

170: ($\log^2\frac{s}{M^2}$ where $M$ is the weak scale)

171: in one loop electroweak corrections

172: has been noticed in \cite{first}.

173: One loop  effects are

174: typically of the order of 10-20 \%  at the  energy  scale of 1

175: TeV,  so that the subject of higher orders and/or resummation of large

176: logarithms has to be addressed. Since two of us \cite{cc} 

177: made the observation that

178: double and single logs

179: that appear in the 1 loop expressions are tied to the infrared structure of

180: the theory, 

181: all order resummation has been considered at various levels:

182: Leading Log (LL) \cite{LL}, Next to Leading Log (NLL) \cite{NLL} and so on.

183: Moreover many fixed order analyses at the one \cite{oneloop} and two loop

184: \cite{twoloop} level have been performed.

185: Although logarithms of infrared-collinear origin also emerge in unbroken

186: theories like QCD and QED, the presence of symmetry breaking in the

187: electroweak sector produces large  differences with respect to the 

188: unbroken gauge theories. For

189: instance, large double logs of infrared origin are present even in fully

190: inclusive observables, in contrast to what happens in QED and QCD \cite{ccc}.

191:  This

192: in turn implies that the hierarchy of log series is no longer the same as in

193: QCD, and splitting functions of new kind have to be defined when studying

194: the analogous of DGLAP equations for EW corrections \cite{cccAP}.

195: 

196: In this paper we consider electro-weak corrections to inclusive observables in the

197: case of a transverse polarized electron beam. We have in mind in particular

198: the possibility of having transversely polarized electron beams at NLC

199: \cite{nlcpol}.

200: We find that Standard Model

201: corrections are big enough that one should take them into account when

202: considering possible New Physics effect in transversely polarized beams

203: \cite{Rizzo}. 

204: The analysis of the electroweak IR singularities for the fermionic 

205: sector in presence of polarized initial states 

206: is interesting since the final result comes from the interplay of two

207: distinct effects. On one hand, left fermions are free nonabelian charges

208: and this produces uncanceled double logs in inclusive quantities; this

209: phenomenon, related to the SU(2) sector, has been called ``Bloch-Nordsieck

210: violation'' \cite{ccc}. On the other hand, 

211: a transversely polarized fermion

212: is a coherent superposition of  left and right fermions, which have different 

213: gauge charges; this produces a different but related effect which is

214: present also in a purely abelian U(1) theory \cite{abelian}.

215: The interplay between SU(2) and U(1) effects is analyzed in detail in

216: section 3.

217: 

218: The paper is organized as follows: in next

219: section we set up the basic formalism for longitudinally and/or

220: transversely polarized initial beams; this formalism is borrowed largely from

221:  \cite{transv1,transv2,long}.

222: In section 3 we analyze the above cross section with

223:  the formalism of the overlap matrix

224:  which  give us the rules \cite{ctotal} 

225: to resum in a straightforward way the double log IR series. 

226: In section 4 we analyze the phenomenological implications 

227: related  to initial beams polarization in the

228: process  $e^+ e^-\to q \bar{q}+X$ at high energy.

229: 

230: \section{Cross section with polarized initial beams}

231: We consider the inclusive 

232: process $e^+ e^-\to q \bar{q}+X$, where $X$ includes  $\gamma,Z,W^\pm$

233: radiation

234: and where we sum over final quark flavors

235:  (all the fermions are supposed massless). The initial electron momentum is

236: along the positive $z$ axis. The

237: initial beam is transversely polarized, the initial electron 

238: being polarized along the positive $x$ axis and the positron in the

239: opposite direction. $\theta$ and $\phi$ are the usual polar and azimuthal

240: angles of the outgoing quark momentum  in this frame.

241:  To describe the initial spin

242:  states in $e^{+}\,e^{-}$ we choose the helicity states as basis which is 

243: convenient at high energies.

244: We indicate the helicity

245: amplitudes with $M^{f_1f_2}_{i_1i_2}$, where $i_1(i_2)$ is the helicity of 

246: the initial electron (positron), while

247: $f_1(f_2)$  corresponds to the final   quark (antiquark).

248: \begin{figure}

249:       \centering

250:       \includegraphics[height=90mm]

251:                   {LR.eps}

252:  \caption{\label{overlap} 

253: The overlap matrix for initial L fermions and in the mixed L-R case,

254: relevant for transverse polarization.

255: %Diagrammatic picture of the  contributions 

256: %to Overlap function

257: }

258:      \end{figure}

259: 

260: Let us now consider the process $e^+e^-\to q\bar{q}+X$. We denote the

261: longitudinal and transverse components of the $e^-(e^+)$ polarizations by 

262: $P_L(\bar{P}_L)$ and $P_T(\bar{P}_T)$ and we assume that the two transverse

263: polarization vectors are parallel up to a sign\footnote{for a pure initial

264:   state $|P_L|^2+|P_T|^2=1$, while for a partially polarized beam

265:  $|P_L|^2+|P_T|^2<1$; see \cite{transv1}}. For instance for a

266: ``natural'' transverse polarization, where the electron and positron

267: polarizations are opposite, we have $P_T=1,\bar{P}_T=-1$.

268: For unpolarized beams we have $P_{L}=\bar{P}_L=P_{T}=\bar{P}_{T}=0$.

269: Finally, if both beams are polarized left, we have $P_{L}=\bar{P}_L=1$.

270: Then we obtain 

271: the averaged squared amplitude\cite{transv1,Rizzo}:

272: \be\bar{|M|^2}=\label{dpewq}

273: \sum_{f_1f_2}\left\{

274: \frac{(1-P_L)(1-\bar{P}_{ L})}{4}

275: |M^{f_1f_2}_{+-}|^2+\frac{(1+P_L)(1+ \bar{P}_{ L} )}{4}|M^{f_1f_2}_{-+}|^2

276: +\frac{P_T\;  \bar{P}_{ T}}{2}

277: Re\{e^{2i\phi}M^{f_1f_2}_{+-}M^{f_1f_2*}_{-+}\} \right\}

278: \ee

279: 

280: 

281: \section{Overlap formulation}

282: 

283: 

284: Let us now rewrite eqn. (\ref{dpewq}) in the language of the overlap

285: matrix, $\hat {\ov}={\cal S}{\cal S}^\cro$, ${\cal S}$ being the

286:   S-matrix. We define $\hat{\ov}$ (see fig. \ref{overlap}) 

287: as an operator with four isospin indices (see \cite{ccc} for details). All the

288: final phase space factors that are  relevant for cross section calculations

289: are included, so that:

290: \ba\nonumber

291: \hat \ov_{i_1i_2}^{j_1j_2}(s,\theta,\phi)=

292: \sum_{t,Y}

293:  O^{(t,Y)}(\theta,\phi) \;\hat{{\cal P}}^{(t)\,j_1j_2}_{i_1i_2}\qquad

294: \ea

295: Here $\hat{{\cal P}}^{(t)}$ are 

296: 4 indices operators in isospin space, whose expressions

297:  are given in

298: our previous works\cite{ctotal} and \cite{abelian}, 

299: while $ O^{(t,Y)}(\theta,\phi)$ are the

300: coefficients  of the overlap with

301: defined total t-channel isospin $t$ and total t-channel hypercharge $Y$.

302: We can then rewrite eqn. (\ref{dpewq}) in the form

303: \be

304: \frac{d\sigma}{d\phi d\cos\theta}=\frac{N_cN_f}{256\pi^2s}\left\{

305: (1-P_{L})(1-\bar{P}_L)O_{RR}^{(0,0)}+

306: (1+P_{L})(1+\bar{P}_L)

307: (O_{LL}^{(0,0)}\pm O_{LL}^{(1,0)})

308: +(1\pm 1) P_T \bar{P}_{T}O_{LR}^{(\frac{1}{2},y_L^e-y_R^e)}

309: \cos2\phi\right\}

310: \ee

311: where  $N_f$ is the number of families, $N_c$ the number of colors

312: and the + (-) sign is relative to $\sigma_{e^-e^+}$ ($\sigma_{e^-\bar{\nu}}$)

313: where we have explicitly written the cross section dependence on the

314: initial beam polarization.

315: %factorized out the spin density structure of the 

316: %cross section.

317: \begin{figure}

318: %\begin{minipage}[b]{0.5\linewidth}

319:       \centering

320:       \includegraphics[height=80mm]{pol1.eps}

321:  \caption{\label{theta} Resummed double log corrections 

322: to the $\theta$-integrated cross

323:  section for transversely polarized beams and for various values of $\phi$

324: as a function of the c.m. energy; the $\phi=\pi/4$ case correspond to the

325: unpolarized cross section case, while the QCD line is

326:  relative to the one loop $\alpha_S(\sqrt{s})/\pi$ 

327: contribution. }

328: %\end{minipage}

329: \end{figure}

330: By inserting the Standard Model weak couplings, we find the following

331: tree level values of the various coefficients:

332: \begin{subequations}\begin{eqalignno}

333: O_{LL}^{(t=0,Y=0)}&=\left(

334: \frac{3}{16}g^4+\frac{1}{2}g'^4 y_{iL}^2\sum_f y_{fL}^2\right)

335: (1+\cos\theta)^2+\frac{1}{2}\; g'^4 y_{iL}^2\sum_f y_{fR}^2 (1-\cos\theta)^2

336: \\

337: O_{LL}^{(t=1,Y=0)}&=\left(-\frac{1}{16}g^4+\frac{1}{2}g'^4 

338: y_{iL}^2\sum_f y_{fL}^2\right)(1+\cos\theta)^2

339: +\frac{1}{2}g'^4 y_{iL}^2\sum_f y_{fR}^2(1-\cos\theta)^2

340: \\

341: O_{LR}^{(t=\frac{1}{2},Y=y^e_L-y^e_R)}&= g'^4

342:   y_{iL}\;y_{iR}\sum_f(y_{fR}^2+y_{fL}^2)\;

343: {\sin^2\theta}

344: \\

345: O_{RR}^{(t=0,Y=0)}&= g'^4\;y_{iR}^2\sum_f y_{fR}^2(1+\cos\theta)^2

346: +g'^4\; y_{iR}^2\sum_f y_{fL}^2(1-\cos\theta)^2

347: \end{eqalignno}\end{subequations}

348: 

349: The evolution in double log approximation is given by the weights 

350:  $\;e^{-{\bf L}_W(t(t+1)+\tan^2\theta_W \;Y^2)}\;$

351: where $\;{\bf L}_W=\frac{g^2}{16 \pi^2}\log^2\frac{s}{M_W^2}$ and where 

352: $t$ and $Y$ are respectively the total isospin and the total

353:  hypercharge in the t channel. The effect of all orders resummation is

354:  therefore given by the following substitutions \cite{ctotal}:

355: \be

356: O^{(t,Y)}(\theta,\phi)\to e^{-{\bf L}_W

357: \left(t(t+1)+

358: \tan^2\theta_W Y^2 \right)}\; \; O^{(t,Y)}(\theta,\phi)

359: \ee

360: so that the full improved leading double logs $e^+e^-$ cross section

361: is:

362: \ba\label{vacca}

363: \frac{d\sigma_{e^+e^- }}{d\phi d\cos\theta}&=&\frac{N_cN_f}{256\pi^2s}\left\{

364: (1-P_{L})(1-\bar{P}_L)O_{RR}^{(0,0)}+

365: (1+P_{L})(1+\bar{P}_L)

366: (O_{LL}^{(0,0)}+

367: e^{-2{\bf L}_W}O_{LL}^{(1,0)})\right.

368: \\

369: &+& \left.  2 P_T \bar{P}_{ T}e^{-{\bf L}_W(\frac{3}{4}+

370: \tan^2\theta_W (y_L^e-y_R^e)^2)}O_{LR}^{(\frac{1}{2},y_L^e-y_R^e)}

371: \cos2\phi \right \} \nonumber

372: \ea

373: This expression features an interesting effect in the mixed L-R channel

374: $O_{LR}$

375: where both SU(2)($\sim \frac{3}{4}{\bf L}_W$) and U(1)

376: ($\sim{\bf L}_W \tan^2\theta_W (y_L^e-y_R^e)^2$) 

377: related effects are present. In fact this channel is characterized both by

378: a nonzero t-channel isospin ($T=\frac{1}{2}$) and a nonzero hypercharge

379: $y_L^e-y_R^e$. 

380: Overall, the analysis of the electroweak mass singularities for the fermionic 

381: sector in presence of polarized initial states turns out to be  quite 

382: interesting, not only for the presence 

383: of IR singularities generated by the existence of free non abelian 

384: asymptotic states, but also for the fact that

385: the  asymptotic states can be a coherent superposition of different

386: gauge eigenstates: in this case, a transverse polarized fermion

387: is a coherent superposition of  left and right fermionic 

388: gauge charges.

389: Such a mixing phenomenon is quite common in the EW theory: 

390: in the bosonic sector the Z and the photon are a superposition of

391: the $B_{\mu}$ and the $W^3_{\mu}$ gauge fields, giving rise to a peculiar

392: pattern of EW double log corrections \cite{ccclong}.

393:  In the scalar sector the  higgs and the longitudinals goldstone bosons 

394: are a superposition of  the gauge doublets $\Phi$ and 

395: $\Phi^*$ (having opposite U(1) charges), and Block-Nordsieck violation is

396: present even in abelian theories \cite{abelian}.

397: 

398: \begin{figure}

399: %\begin{minipage}[b]{0.5\linewidth}

400:        \centering

401: \includegraphics[height=80mm] {pol2.eps}

402:  \caption{\label{phi} Resummed double log corrections 

403: to the differential cross section  for transversely polarized beams

404: at $\sqrt{s}$= 1 TeV for various values of $\phi$.}

405: %\end{minipage}

406:      \end{figure}

407: In figs. \ref{theta},\ref{phi},\ref{asimm} various combinations of the

408: resummed differential cross section  (\ref{vacca}) are plotted

409: in the case of   transversely polarized beams

410: ($ P_{L}= \bar{P}_{L}=0,P_{T}=1,\bar{P}_T=1$).

411: Namely, in fig. 2  the percent corrections 

412: for the integrated cross section

413:  $\int^1_{-1}  d\cos \theta\frac{d\sigma}{d\phi d\cos\theta}$ 

414: are plotted at different values of the $\phi$ angle as function of the

415: c.m. energy.   In fig.3 corrections to the 

416: the differential cross section 

417: $\frac{d\sigma}{d\phi d\cos\theta} $ at one TeV

418:  is plotted for different values of the azimuthal  angle.

419: 

420: An interesting observable that singles out the transverse $\phi$ dependent

421: piece of the cross section is the asymmetry

422: \be\label{ass}

423: A(\cos \theta,s)=\frac{\int^{\pi/4}_0 d\phi\;\sigma\;- 

424: \int^{\pi/2}_{\pi/4} d\phi\;\sigma\; }{\int^{\pi/2}_{0} d\phi\;\sigma\; }

425: \ee

426: which results particularly sensitive to the EW IR corrections. A plot of

427: this quantity is given in fig. \ref{asimm}.

428: 

429: Overall, we see that EW double log resummed corrections for transversely

430: polarized initial beams are well into the 10 \% range, so that this kind of

431: corrections have to be taken into account when considering possible New

432: Physics effects \cite{Rizzo}.

433: 

434: The full approach to such a kind of phenomena requires the introduction of 

435: ``anomalous'' structure functions which doesn't have 

436: a clear  probabilistic interpretation.

437: As it is easy to see in fig.1, the ``diagonal'' overlap matrix

438: $\hat{\ov}_{LL}$ can be 

439: rephrased in terms of the convolution of structure functions for

440: left  handed fermions, 

441: the ``mixed'' one $\hat{\ov}_{LR}$ 

442:  requires the introduction of a third king of mixed

443: structure function with two different legs (left and right).

444: Clearly the naive classical probabilistic interpretation

445: fails to explain such a structure being 

446: generated by the

447: quantum phenomenon of the coherent superposition of

448: the wave functions.

449: The full set of evolution eqs of the SM

450:  taking into account such a phenomena will be given soon in \cite{2c}.

451: 

452: \vspace{1.cm}

453: {\rm \bf Acknowledgements}: We are grateful to Marcello Ciafaloni

454:  for discussions and  participation to the first part 

455: of our  results.

456: 

457: \begin{figure}[t]

458:       \centering

459:       \includegraphics[height=80mm]

460:                   {pol3.eps}

461:  \caption{\label{asimm}EW corrections as a function of the $\theta$ angle

462:  to the Asymmetry of eq.\ref{ass} when the beam energy is 1 TeV. }

463:      \end{figure}

464: \begin{thebibliography}{99}

465: 

466: \bibitem{acco} E. Accomando, A. Denner and  S. Pozzorini,

467: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 65} 073003 (2002);

468: E. Maina, S. Moretti, M.R. Nolten and  D.A. Ross,

469: Phys. Lett. B {\bf 570} 205 (2003). 

470: 

471: \bibitem{nlc}TESLA: The Superconducting Electron Positron Linear Collider

472:   with an integrated X-ray laser laboratory. Technical Design Report. Part

473:   3. Physics at an e+ e- linear collider.

474: 

475: \bibitem{berez}

476: V. Berezinsky, M. Kachelriess, 

477: S. Ostapchenko Phys.Rev.Lett. {\bf 89} 171802 (2002);

478: C. Barbot, M. Drees, Astropart.\ Phys.\  {\bf 20}, 5 (2003).

479: 

480: \bibitem{first}

481: M.~Kuroda, G.~Moultaka and D.~Schildknecht,

482: %``Direct One Loop Renormalization Of SU(2)-L X U(1)-Y Four Fermion Processes And Running Coupling Constants,''

483: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 350} (1991) 25;

484: G.~Degrassi and A.~Sirlin,

485: %``Gauge invariant selfenergies and vertex parts of the Standard Model in the pinch technique framework,''

486: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 46}, 3104 (1992);

487: A.~Denner, S.~Dittmaier and R.~Schuster,

488: %``Radiative corrections to gamma gamma $\to$ W+ W- in the electroweak standard model,''

489: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 452}, 80 (1995);

490: A.~Denner, S.~Dittmaier and T.~Hahn,

491: %``Radiative corrections to Z Z $\to$ Z Z in the electroweak standard model,''

492: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 56}, 117 (1997),

493: %A.~Denner and T.~Hahn,

494: %``Radiative corrections to W+ W- $\to$ W+ W- in the electroweak standard  model,''

495: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 525}, 27 (1998);

496: W.~Beenakker, A.~Denner, S.~Dittmaier, R.~Mertig and T.~Sack,

497: %``High-energy approximation for on-shell W pair production,''

498: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 410}, 245 (1993);

499: W.~Beenakker, A.~Denner, S.~Dittmaier and R.~Mertig,

500: %``On shell W pair production in the TeV range,''

501: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 317}, 622 (1993).

502: 

503: 

504: \bibitem{cc}P.~Ciafaloni, D.~Comelli,

505: %``Sudakov enhancement of electroweak corrections,''

506: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 446}, 278 (1999).

507: 

508: 

509: \bibitem{LL}

510: V.~S.~Fadin, L.~N.~Lipatov, A.~D.~Martin and M.~Melles,

511: %``Resummation of double logarithms in electroweak high energy processes,''

512: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 61} (2000) 094002;

513: P.~Ciafaloni, D.~Comelli,

514: %``Electroweak Sudakov form factors and nonfactorizable soft QED effects  at NLC energies,''

515: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 476} (2000) 49.

516: M.~Melles,

517: %``Subleading Sudakov logarithms in electroweak high energy processes to  all orders,''

518: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 63}, 034003 (2001);

519: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 64}, 014011 (2001);

520: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 64}, 054003 (2001);

521: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 24}, 193 (2002);

522: Phys.\ Rept.\  {\bf 375}, 219 (2003); 

523: \bibitem{NLL}

524: J.~H.~Kuhn, A.~A.~Penin and V.~A.~Smirnov,

525: %``Summing up subleading Sudakov logarithms,''

526: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 17}, 97 (2000);

527: J.~H.~Kuhn, S.~Moch, A.~A.~Penin, V.~A.~Smirnov,

528: %``Next-to-next-to-leading logarithms in four-fermion electroweak  processes at high energy,''

529: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 616}, 286 (2001)

530: [Erratum-ibid.\ B {\bf 648}, 455 (2003)]

531: 

532: \bibitem{oneloop}

533: M.~Beccaria, P.~Ciafaloni, D.~Comelli, F.~M.~Renard, C.~Verzegnassi,

534: %``Logarithmic expansion of electroweak corrections to four-fermion  processes in the TeV region,''

535: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 61} (2000) 073005;

536: %M.~Beccaria, P.~Ciafaloni, D.~Comelli, F.~M.~Renard and C.~Verzegnassi,

537: %``The role of the top mass in b production at future lepton colliders,''

538: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 61} (2000) 011301;

539: M.~Beccaria, F.~M.~Renard, C.~Verzegnassi,

540: %``Logarithmic SUSY electroweak effects on four-fermion processes at TeV  energies,''

541: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 63} (2001) 095010;

542: %M.~Beccaria, F.~M.~Renard and C.~Verzegnassi,

543: %``Top quark production at future lepton colliders in the asymptotic  regime,''

544: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 63} (2001) 053013;

545: %M.~Beccaria, F.~M.~Renard and C.~Verzegnassi,

546: %``The role of universal and non universal Sudakov logarithms in four

547: %fermion processes at TeV energies: The one-loop approximation revisited,''

548: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 64}, 073008 (2001); 

549: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 663}, 394 (2003);

550: M.~Beccaria, S.~Prelovsek, F.~M.~Renard, C.~Verzegnassi,

551: %``Top quark production at TeV energies as a potential SUSY detector,''

552: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 64}, 053016 (2001);

553: M.~Beccaria, M.~Melles, F.~M.~Renard, C.~Verzegnassi,

554: %``SUSY scalar production in the electroweak Sudakov regime of lepton  colliders,''

555: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 65} (2002) 093007;

556: M.~Beccaria, M.~Melles, F.~M.~Renard, S.~Trimarchi, C.~Verzegnassi,

557: %``Sudakov expansions at one loop and beyond for charged scalar and  fermion pair production in SUSY models at future linear colliders,''

558: Int.\ J.\ Mod.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 18}, 5069 (2003);

559: M.~Beccaria, F.~M.~Renard, S.~Trimarchi, C.~Verzegnassi,

560: %``Charged Higgs production in the 1-TeV domain as a probe of  supersymmetric models,''

561: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 68} (2003) 035014;

562: %M.~Beccaria, F.~M.~Renard and C.~Verzegnassi,

563: %``Reliability of a high energy one-loop expansion of e+ e- $\to$ W+ W- in  the SM and in the MSSM,''

564: %Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 663}, 394 (2003);

565: A.~Denner and S.~Pozzorini,

566: %``One-loop leading logarithms in electroweak radiative corrections. I:  Results,''

567: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 18}, 461 (2001) and  

568: Eur. Phys. J. C {\bf 21}, 63 (2001).

569: 

570: \bibitem{twoloop}

571: ~Hori, H.~Kawamura, J.~Kodaira,

572: %``Electroweak Sudakov at two loop level,''

573: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 491} (2000) 275;

574: W.~Beenakker, A.~Werthenbach,

575: %``New insights into the perturbative structure of electroweak Sudakov  logarithms: Breakdown of conventional exponentiation,''

576: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 489}, 148 (2000);

577: %W.~Beenakker and A.~Werthenbach,

578: %``Electroweak two-loop Sudakov logarithms for on-shell fermions and  bosons,''

579: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 630} (2002) 3;

580: A.~Denner, M.~Melles, S.~Pozzorini,

581: %``Two-loop electroweak angular-dependent logarithms at high energies,''

582: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 662}, 299 (2003);

583: U.~Aglietti, R.~Bonciani,

584: %``Master integrals with one massive propagator for the two-loop  electroweak form factor,''

585: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 668}, 3 (2003).

586: See also S.~Pozzorini,

587: %``Electroweak Radiative Corrections At High Energies,''

588: arXiv:hep-ph/0201077 and references therein

589: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0201077;%%;

590: 

591: \bibitem{ccc}M.~Ciafaloni, P.~Ciafaloni, D.~Comelli,

592: %``Bloch-Nordsieck violating electroweak corrections to inclusive TeV  scale hard processes,''

593: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 84}, 4810 (2000) and 

594: %``Electroweak Bloch-Nordsieck violation at the TeV scale: 'Strong' weak  interactions?,''

595: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 589} (2000) 359

596: 

597: \bibitem{cccAP}

598: M.~Ciafaloni, P.~Ciafaloni, D.~Comelli,

599: %``Towards collinear evolution equations in electroweak theory,''

600: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 88}, 102001 (2002)

601: \bibitem{nlcpol}

602: G.~Moortgat-Pick, H.~M.~Steiner,

603: %``Physics opportunities with polarized e- and e+ beams at TESLA,''

604: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ directC {\bf 3}, 6 (2001);

605: S.~Hesselbach, O.~Kittel, G.~Moortgat-Pick, W.~Oeller,

606: %``New Ideas on SUSY Searches at Future Linear Colliders,''

607: arXiv:hep-ph/0310367.

608: 

609: \bibitem{Rizzo}T.~G.~Rizzo,

610: %``More transverse polarization signatures of extra dimensions at linear  colliders,''

611: JHEP {\bf 0308}, 051 (2003) and 

612: JHEP {\bf 0302}, 008 (2003);

613: B.~Ananthanarayan, S.~D.~Rindani,

614: %``CP violation at a linear collider with transverse polarization,''

615: arXiv:hep-ph/0309260.

616: 

617: \bibitem{transv1}

618: K. Hikasa, Phys.Rev.{\bf D33}, 3203 (1986); Phys.Rev.{\bf D38}, 1439 (1988)

619: 

620: \bibitem{transv2}

621: F.M. Renard Z.Phys.{\bf C45}:75,1989;

622: J. Fleischer, K. Kolodziej, F. Jegerlehner Phys.Rev. {\bf D49} 2187 (1994) 

623: 

624: \bibitem{long}

625: B.W. Lynn, C. Verzegnassi

626: Phys.Rev.{\bf D35} 3326 (1987)

627:  

628: \bibitem{ctotal}

629: M.~Ciafaloni, P.~Ciafaloni, D.~Comelli,

630: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 501}, 216 (2001)

631: 

632: \bibitem{abelian}

633: M.~Ciafaloni, P.~Ciafaloni, D.~Comelli,

634: %``Bloch-Nordsieck violation in spontaneously broken Abelian theories,''

635: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 87}, 211802 (2001)

636: 

637: \bibitem{ccclong}

638: M.~Ciafaloni, P.~Ciafaloni, D.~Comelli

639: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 613}, 382 (2001)

640: 

641: \bibitem{2c}

642: P.~Ciafaloni and D.~Comelli, to appear.

643: \end{thebibliography}

644: 

645:  

646: 

647: 

648: 

649: \end{document}