1: \documentclass[12pt]{article}
2: \usepackage{epsfig}
3: %\usepackage{rotating}
4: \textwidth6.5in \textheight9in \evensidemargin0pt \oddsidemargin0pt
5: %The following command is needed for papers submitted to the archive
6: \topmargin-1.1cm
7:
8: %\newcommand{\gtap}{{\raise.3ex\hbox{$>$\kern-.75em\lower1ex\hbox{$\sim$}}}}
9: %\newcommand{\ltap}{{\raise.3ex\hbox{$<$\kern-.75em\lower1ex\hbox{$\sim$}}}}
10: \def\br(#1,#2){\left\langle#1#2\right\rangle}
11: \def\sq(#1,#2){\left[#1#2\right]}
12: \def\s(#1,#2){s_{#1 #2}}
13: \def\t(#1,#2,#3){s_{#1 #2 #3}}
14:
15: \begin{document}
16: \begin{titlepage}
17:
18: \hspace*{\fill}\parbox[t]{5cm}
19: {hep-ph/0312024 \\
20: ANL-HEP-PR-03-104 \\
21: FERMILAB-Pub-03/378-T \\
22: RM3-TH/03-17 \\
23: ILL-(TH)-03-10 \\
24: NSF-KITP-03-98 \\ \\
25: \today} \vskip2cm
26: \begin{center}
27: {\Large \bf Associated Production of a $Z$ Boson and a \\
28: \bigskip Single Heavy-Quark Jet} \\
29: \medskip
30: \bigskip\bigskip\bigskip\bigskip
31: {\large {\bf J.~Campbell}$^1$,
32: {\bf R.~K.~Ellis}$^2$,
33: {\bf F.~Maltoni}$^3$,
34: and {\bf S.~Willenbrock}$^{4,5}$} \\
35: \bigskip\bigskip\medskip
36: $^{1}$High Energy Physics Division,
37: Argonne National Laboratory \\
38: Argonne, IL\ \ 60439 \\ \bigskip
39: $^{2}$Theoretical Physics Department, Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory \\
40: P.~O.~Box 500, Batavia, IL\ \ 60510 \\ \bigskip
41: $^{3}$Centro Studi e Ricerche ``Enrico Fermi'' \\
42: via Panisperna 89/A, 00184 Rome, Italy \footnote{Mail address: Dipartimento di
43: Fisica, Terza Universit\`a di Roma, via della Vasca Navale 84, 00146 Rome,
44: Italy}\\ \bigskip
45: $^{4}$Department of Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign \\
46: 1110 West Green Street, Urbana, IL\ \ 61801 \\ \bigskip
47: $^{5}$Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of California \\
48: Santa Barbara, CA\ \ 93106 \\ \bigskip
49: \end{center}
50:
51: \bigskip\bigskip\bigskip
52:
53: \begin{abstract}
54: The leading-order process for the production of a $Z$ boson and a heavy-quark
55: jet at hadron colliders is $gQ\to ZQ$ ($Q=c,b$). We calculate this cross
56: section at next-to-leading order at the Tevatron and the LHC, and compare it
57: with other sources of $ZQ$ events. This process is a background to new
58: physics, and can be used to measure the heavy-quark distribution function.
59: \end{abstract}
60:
61: \end{titlepage}
62:
63: \section{Introduction}%
64: \label{sec:intro}
65:
66: Many signals for new physics at hadron colliders involve electroweak gauge
67: bosons ($W^\pm,Z,\gamma$) and jets containing heavy quarks ($c,b$). The prime
68: example is $W+4$ jets, with one or more jets containing a $b$ tag, which led to
69: the discovery of the top quark \cite{Abe:1995hr,Abachi:1995iq,Acosta:2001ct}.
70: Other examples include signals for the Higgs boson and the superpartners of
71: the known particles \cite{Carena:2003yi,unknown:1999fr}. It is therefore
72: crucial to understand the standard-model background from the production of
73: electroweak bosons and heavy-quark jets with good accuracy.
74:
75: The simplest processes of this type are the production of a single electroweak
76: gauge boson and one heavy-quark jet. In the case of the $W$ boson, the
77: leading-order process is $gs\to W^-c$ \cite{Baur:1993zd}, which has been
78: calculated at next-to-leading order (with $m_c$ nonzero) \cite{Giele:1995kr}.
79: For a photon, the leading-order process is $gQ\to \gamma Q$ ($Q=c,b$), which
80: has also been calculated at next-to-leading order (with $m_Q=0$)
81: \cite{Berger:1995qe,Bailey:1996px}. In this paper we consider the analogous
82: leading-order process for the $Z$ boson, $gQ\to ZQ$, shown in
83: Fig.~\ref{fig:gQZQ}, which we calculate at next-to-leading order (with
84: $m_Q=0$).
85:
86: \begin{figure}[ht]
87: \begin{center}
88: \vspace*{0cm} \hspace*{0cm} \epsfxsize=10cm \epsfbox{fig1.eps}
89: %\vspace*{-.8cm}
90: \end{center}
91: \caption{Associated production of a $Z$ boson and a single high-$p_T$ heavy
92: quark ($Q=c,b$).} \label{fig:gQZQ}
93: \end{figure}
94:
95: An alternative calculational scheme is to regard $gg\to ZQ\overline Q$ as the
96: leading-order process (with $m_Q$ nonzero), and to allow one heavy quark to be
97: emitted collinear to the beam, yielding a $ZQ$ final state. This approach has
98: two drawbacks. First, the expansion parameter of this calculation is
99: $\alpha_S\ln(M_Z/m_Q)$ rather than $\alpha_S$, so perturbation theory is less
100: convergent. Using a heavy-quark distribution function sums these collinear
101: logarithms to all orders, resulting in a perturbative expansion in $\alpha_S$
102: and $1/\ln(M_Z/m_Q)$ \cite{Aivazis:1993pi,Collins:1998rz,Stelzer:1997ns}.
103: Second, it is much more difficult to obtain the next-to-leading-order
104: correction to $gg\to ZQ\overline Q$ than to $gQ\to ZQ$, both because there is
105: one more particle in the final state, and because the heavy-quark mass must be
106: maintained in the calculation of $gg\to ZQ\overline Q$ to regulate the
107: collinear region (one may set $m_Q=0$ in $gQ\to ZQ$, provided that the
108: heavy-quark transverse momentum is much larger than its mass). At present,
109: $gg\to ZQ\overline Q$ is known at next-to-leading order only for $m_Q=0$
110: \cite{Campbell:2000bg,Campbell:2002tg,Campbell:2003hd}. In contrast, the
111: next-to-leading-order calculation of $gQ\to ZQ$ (with $m_Q=0$) that we perform
112: in this paper is sufficiently straightforward that the
113: next-to-next-to-leading-order calculation may be available in the foreseeable
114: future \cite{Glover:2002gz}.
115:
116: The process $gQ\to ZQ$ is a background to $gb\to hb$, where the $Z$ boson and
117: the Higgs boson decay to the same final state ($b\bar b$, $\tau^+\tau^-$, or
118: $\mu^+\mu^-$) \cite{Choudhury:1998kr,Huang:1998vu,Campbell:2002zm}. In
119: addition, $gQ\to ZQ$ could potentially be used to measure the $Q$ distribution
120: function. The $b$ distribution function is needed for the above-mentioned
121: Higgs-production process as well as for inclusive Higgs production, $b\bar
122: b\to h$ \cite{Dicus:1998hs,Balazs:1998sb,Maltoni:2003pn}. It is also needed
123: for the single-top production processes $qb\to q't$
124: \cite{Stelzer:1997ns,Stelzer:1998ni} and $gb\to W^-t$
125: \cite{Heinson:1996zm,Zhu:uj}, and the charged-Higgs production process $gb\to
126: H^-t$ \cite{Barger:1993th,Zhu:2001nt,Plehn:2002vy}. The process $gQ\to \gamma
127: Q$ is much more sensitive to the charm distribution function than to that of
128: bottom, due to the greater electric charge of the charm quark
129: \cite{Abe:1998jc,Affolder:2001yp}.
130:
131: At present, the $b$ distribution function is derived perturbatively from the
132: gluon distribution function
133: \cite{Aivazis:1993pi,Collins:1998rz,Pumplin:2002vw} and there is no direct
134: measurement of it. The $c$ distribution function is similarly derived from
135: the gluon distribution function, and it agrees well with direct measurements.
136: Thus we expect the same to be true of the $b$ distribution function. The
137: uncertainty in the $b$ distribution function derives from the uncertainty in
138: the gluon distribution function.
139:
140: Another source of $ZQ$ events is $q\bar q\to ZQ\overline Q$, shown in
141: Fig.~\ref{fig:qqZQQ}, where either one $Q$ is missed, or the two $Q$'s coalesce
142: into a single jet. We show that this process is much more significant at the
143: Tevatron than at the LHC, since light-quark distribution functions are
144: relatively more important at large values of Bjorken $x$. This calculation is
145: carried out at leading order with a non-zero $Q$ mass.
146:
147: \begin{figure}[ht]
148: \begin{center}
149: \vspace*{0cm} \hspace*{0cm} \epsfxsize=10cm \epsfbox{fig2.eps}
150: %\vspace*{-.8cm}
151: \end{center}
152: \caption{Representative Feynman diagrams for $q\bar q\to ZQ\overline Q$. The
153: $Z$ boson may be radiated off (a) the initial-state quarks or (b) the
154: final-state quarks.} \label{fig:qqZQQ}
155: \end{figure}
156:
157: In addition, we also calculate $Zj$ production at next-to-leading order, where
158: $j$ denotes a light-quark or gluon jet, as shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:Zj}
159: \cite{Arnold:1989dp,Gonsalves:1989ar,Giele:dj}. Using a silicon vertex detector
160: to tag heavy quarks, the probability that such a jet fakes a heavy-quark jet is
161: around $1\%$. Taking this probability into account, we show that this source
162: of fake $ZQ$ events is comparable to genuine $ZQ$ events at the Tevatron, but
163: is relatively less important at the LHC.
164:
165: \begin{figure}[ht]
166: \begin{center}
167: \vspace*{0cm} \hspace*{0cm} \epsfxsize=10cm \epsfbox{fig3.eps}
168: %\vspace*{-.8cm}
169: \end{center}
170: \caption{Representative Feynman diagrams for $Zj$ production via (a) $gq\to
171: Zq$ and (b) $q\bar q\to Zg$.} \label{fig:Zj}
172: \end{figure}
173:
174: All of the above processes can also lead to final states with two jets, with
175: varying numbers of heavy quarks. For completeness, we also calculate these
176: cross sections (at leading order). When combined with the
177: next-to-leading-order cross section for $ZQ$, one obtains the inclusive cross
178: section for $Z$ plus at least one heavy-quark jet (at next-to-leading order).
179:
180: The next-to-leading-order calculations in this paper were performed with the
181: Monte-Carlo code MCFM \cite{Ellis:1999ec}. The leading-order calculations
182: were performed both with this code and with MadEvent \cite{Maltoni:2002qb}.
183:
184:
185: \section{$gQ\to ZQ$ at NLO}%
186: \label{sec:gQZQ}
187:
188: The next-to-leading-order (NLO) calculation of $gQ\to ZQ$ parallels our NLO
189: calculation of $gb\to hb$ \cite{Campbell:2002zm}, and we refer the reader to
190: that work for a detailed discussion of the calculational scheme. The
191: contributing subprocesses are
192: \begin{itemize}
193: \item $gQ\to ZQ$ (one loop)
194: \item $qQ\to ZQq$
195: \item $gQ\to ZQg$
196: \item $gg\to ZQ\overline Q$
197: \end{itemize}
198: The subprocess $q\bar q\to ZQ\overline Q$ is considered separately in the
199: following section, and is not regarded as a correction to $gQ\to ZQ$.
200:
201: We work in the simplified ACOT scheme \cite{Aivazis:1993pi,Collins:1998rz},
202: which allows one to neglect the $Q$ mass throughout. This is a good
203: approximation, and simplifies the calculation. The error made by this
204: approximation is proportional to $1/\ln(M_Z/m_Q)\times m_Q^2/p_T^2$
205: \cite{Campbell:2002zm}. We use the dipole-subtraction method
206: \cite{Ellis:1980wv} as formulated in Ref.~\cite{Catani:1996vz} to isolate and
207: subtract collinear divergences.
208:
209: In our NLO calculation of $gQ\to ZQ$, we demand one and only one jet with
210: transverse momentum $p_T>15$ GeV within a rapidity range $|\eta|<2$ at the
211: Fermilab Tevatron. This jet must contain a heavy quark. At the CERN Large
212: Hadron Collider (LHC), the heavy-quark jet must have $p_T>15$ GeV and
213: $|\eta|<2.5$.
214:
215: If two partons lie within a cone of radius $\Delta R<0.7$, we merge them into
216: a single jet with four-momentum equal to the sum of the two partons'
217: four-momenta. This is done before the cuts described above are applied to the
218: jets. The NLO process $gg\to ZQ\overline Q$ yields two heavy quarks in the
219: final state. If they are merged into a single jet, we record it as a
220: double-heavy-quark jet. This is only about 1\% of the $ZQ$ cross section.
221:
222: Similarly, the NLO process $QQ'\to QQ'Z$, and processes related by crossing,
223: yield two heavy quarks in the final state. However, these processes amount to
224: a correction of less than 1\%, so we neglect them \cite{Campbell:2002zm}.
225:
226: We list in the first column of Tables~\ref{tab:tev} and \ref{tab:lhc} the LO
227: (in parentheses) and NLO cross sections for $gb\to Zb$ and $gc\to Zc$ at the
228: Tevatron and the LHC. The $Zc$ cross section exceeds that of $Zb$ by 70\% at
229: the Tevatron and 35\% at the LHC because the charm distribution function is
230: larger than that of bottom. This is partially compensated by the fact that the
231: $Z$ has stronger coupling to bottom than to charm. The ratio of the $Zb$ and
232: $Zc$ partonic cross sections is proportional to
233: \begin{displaymath}
234: \frac{V_b^2+A_b^2}{V_c^2+A_c^2}=\frac{1+(1-{4\over 3}\sin^2\theta_W)^2}
235: {1+(1-{8\over 3}\sin^2\theta_W)^2}\approx 13/10\;.
236: \end{displaymath}
237: More importantly, a silicon vertex detector (SVX) can tag a $b$ jet with an
238: efficiency around 60\%, and a $c$ jet with an efficiency of about 15\%. Thus
239: the majority of $ZQ$ events tagged with an SVX come from $Zb$.
240:
241: The NLO processes that contribute to $ZQ$ also give rise to final states with
242: more than one jet, and we list these cross sections in the remaining columns.
243: These events are grouped in three classes. The second column, labeled
244: $Z(Q\overline Q)$, corresponds to events with a single jet that contains two
245: heavy quarks. As mentioned earlier, this is only about 1\% of the $ZQ$ cross
246: section. The third column, labeled $ZQj$, corresponds to events with two
247: jets, one of which contains a heavy quark. This is about $1/5$ of the $ZQ$
248: cross section at the Tevatron, and about $1/2$ at the LHC (for $p_T>15$ GeV).
249: The fourth column, labeled $ZQ\overline Q$, corresponds to events with two
250: jets, both of which contain heavy quarks. This is significantly less than
251: $ZQj$. The $ZQ\overline Q$ events arise from the NLO process $gg\to
252: ZQ\overline Q$ (as do the $Z(Q\overline Q)$ events). The final column sums
253: these various processes, to give the inclusive cross section for $Z$ plus at
254: least one heavy-quark jet at next-to-leading order.
255:
256: We show in Figs.~\ref{fig:mudep_tevb}--\ref{fig:mudep_lhcc_lolum} the scale
257: dependence of the inclusive cross section for $Zb$ and $Zc$ production at the
258: Tevatron and the LHC at leading order (LO) and next-to-leading order (NLO). The
259: dependence on the renormalization and factorization scales are shown
260: separately. Both scale dependencies are reduced at NLO in comparison with
261: LO. We use $\mu_R=M_Z$, $\mu_F=M_Z$ as our default value of the
262: renormalization and factorization scales.
263:
264: We also estimate the uncertainty in the NLO inclusive cross section. The
265: first uncertainty is due to varying the renormalization scale between half and
266: twice its default value of $\mu_R=M_Z$. The second uncertainty, obtained in
267: the same manner, is due to the factorization scale. The third uncertainty is
268: from the parton distribution functions \cite{Pumplin:2002vw}. There is also an
269: additional uncertainty of 4\% due to $\delta\alpha_S(M_Z)=0.002$.
270: \cite{Hagiwara:fs}
271:
272: We show in Figs.~\ref{fig:pt_b_tev}--\ref{fig:pt_b_lhc} the transverse-momentum
273: distributions of both the $Z$ and the highest-$p_T$ $b$ jet at the Tevatron and
274: the LHC . At leading order these distributions are identical, since the $Z$
275: recoils against the $b$ jet. At next-to-leading order the distributions for
276: the inclusive cross section are slightly different, since the $Z$ can recoil
277: against two jets. The distributions for $Zc$ production are qualitatively
278: similar.
279:
280: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
281: %%%%%%%%%% TABLES %%%%%%%%%%%%
282: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
283:
284: \begin{table}[t]
285: \caption{Cross sections (pb) for $Z$-boson production in association with
286: heavy-quark jets at the Tevatron ($\sqrt{s}=1.96$ TeV $p\bar p$). A jet lies
287: in the range $p_T>15$ GeV and $|\eta|<2$. Two final-state partons are merged
288: into a single jet if $R_{jj}<0.7$. No branching ratios or tagging
289: efficiencies are included. The labels on the columns have the following
290: meaning: $ZQ=$ exactly one jet, which contains a heavy quark; $Z(Q\overline
291: Q)=$ exactly one jet, which contains two heavy quarks; $ZQj=$ exactly two
292: jets, one of which contains a heavy quark; $ZQ\overline Q=$ exactly two jets,
293: both of which contain a heavy quark. For the last set of processes, the
294: labels mean: $Zj=$ exactly one jet, which does not contain a heavy quark;
295: $Zjj=$ exactly two jets, neither of which contain a heavy quark. For $ZQ$ and
296: $Zj$, both the leading-order (in parentheses) and next-to-leading-order cross
297: sections are given. The last column is the next-to-leading-order inclusive
298: cross section, which is the sum of four previous columns. The CTEQ6M parton
299: distribution functions are used throughout, except for the LO cross sections in
300: parentheses, where CTEQ6L1 is used \cite{Pumplin:2002vw}. The factorization
301: and renormalization scales are chosen as $\mu_F=\mu_R=M_Z$. The uncertainties
302: are from the variation of the renormalization scale, the factorization scale,
303: and the parton distribution functions, respectively.}
304:
305: \addtolength{\arraycolsep}{0.2cm}
306: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.5}
307: \medskip
308: \begin{center}
309: \begin{tabular}[4]{|c|cccc|c|}
310: \hline \hline \multicolumn{1}{|c|}{Cross sections (pb)} &
311: \multicolumn{5}{c|}{Tevatron}\\[1pt]
312: \hline
313: & $ZQ$ & $Z(Q\overline Q)$ & $ZQj$ & $ZQ\overline Q$ &
314: $ZQ$ inclusive
315: \\
316: \hline
317: $g b \to Z b $ & (8.23) 10.4& 0.169 & 2.19 & 0.631&
318: $13.4\pm 0.9\pm 0.8\pm 0.8$
319: \\
320: $ q\bar q \to Z b\bar b$ & 3.32 & 1.92 & -- & 1.59 & 6.83
321: \\
322: \hline
323: $g c \to Z c $ & (11.3) 16.5& 0.130 & 3.22 & 0.49 &
324: $20.3\,^{+1.8}_{-1.5}\pm 0.1^{+1.3}_{-1.2}$ \\
325: $ q\bar q \to Z c\bar c$ & 5.66 & 6.45 & -- & 1.70 &
326: 13.8\\
327: \hline & \multicolumn{2}{|c}{$Zj$} & \multicolumn{2}{c|}{$Zjj$} & $Zj$
328: inclusive
329: \\
330: \hline $ q\bar q \to Z g,
331: gq \to Z q $ & \multicolumn{2}{|c}{(876) 870} & \multicolumn{2}{c|}{ 137}
332: & $1010\,^{+44}_{-40}\,^{+9}_{-2}\,^{+7}_{-12}$
333: \\
334: \hline
335: \end{tabular}
336: \end{center}
337: \label{tab:tev}
338: \end{table}
339:
340: \begin{table}[t]
341: \caption{Same as Table~\ref{tab:tev}, except at the LHC ($\sqrt{s}=14$ TeV
342: $pp$). A jet lies in the range $p_T>15$ GeV and $|\eta|<2.5$.}
343: \addtolength{\arraycolsep}{0.2cm}
344: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.5}
345: \medskip
346: \begin{center}
347: \begin{tabular}[4]{|c|cccc|c|}
348: \hline \hline \multicolumn{1}{|c|}{Cross sections (pb)} &
349: \multicolumn{5}{c|}{LHC}\\[1pt]
350: \hline
351: & $ZQ$ & $Z(Q\overline Q)$& $ZQj$ & $ZQ\overline Q$ & $ZQ$ inclusive \\
352: \hline
353: $g b \to Z b $ &(826) 649& 11.3 & 304 & 78.1 & $1040\,^{+70}_{-60}\,^{+70}_{-100}\,^{+30}_{-50}$ \\
354: $ q\bar q \to Z b\bar b$ & 24.3 & 13.5 & -- & 11.4 & 49.2 \\
355: \hline
356: $g c \to Z c $ &(989) 921& 8.8 & 396 & 61.5 & $1390\pm 100^{+60}_{-70}\,^{+40}_{-80}$ \\
357: $ q\bar q \to Z c\bar c$ & 36.7 & 41.7 & -- & 11.3 & 89.7
358: \\
359: \hline
360: & \multicolumn{2}{|c}{$Zj$} & \multicolumn{2}{c|}{$Zjj$} & $Zj$ inclusive\\
361: \hline $ q\bar q \to Z g,
362: gq \to Z q $ &
363: \multicolumn{2}{|c}{(13500) 11600} & \multicolumn{2}{c|}{4270} &
364: $15870\,^{+900}_{-600}\,^{+60}_{-300}\,^{+300}_{-500}$
365: \\
366: \hline
367: \end{tabular}
368: \end{center}
369: \label{tab:lhc}
370: \end{table}
371:
372: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
373:
374: \section{$q\bar q\to ZQ\overline Q$ at LO}%
375: \label{sec:qqZQQ}
376:
377: Another contribution to $ZQ$ production comes from $q\bar q\to ZQ\overline Q$
378: ($q=u,d,s$), shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:qqZQQ}, where one $Q$ is outside the
379: coverage of the detector. The dominant contribution to the cross section comes
380: from diagrams in which the $Z$ is radiated from the initial-state quarks while
381: the heavy quarks arise from gluon splitting, as shown in
382: Fig.~\ref{fig:qqZQQ}(a). We maintain the heavy-quark mass throughout the
383: calculation in order to regulate the singularity that would arise from a gluon
384: splitting to massless collinear quarks. Although the NLO cross section for
385: this process with massless quarks is available
386: \cite{Campbell:2000bg,Campbell:2002tg,Campbell:2003hd}, the cross section with
387: massive quarks is known only at LO.
388:
389: The LO cross section for $ZQ$ production via $q\bar q\to ZQ\overline Q$ is
390: given in the first column of Tables~\ref{tab:tev} and \ref{tab:lhc}. At the
391: Tevatron, the cross section is about $1/3$ of $gQ\to ZQ$. At the LHC, the
392: contribution from $q\bar q\to ZQ\overline Q$ is relatively much less, only
393: about $1/30$ of $gQ\to ZQ$. This reflects the fact that this process is
394: initiated by a $q\bar q$ collision. At the Tevatron, where the typical values
395: of Bjorken $x$ are relatively large, the valence quark distribution functions
396: are significant. In contrast, the typical values of $x$ are relatively small
397: at the LHC, so the valence quark distribution functions are less important.
398:
399: The second column in Tables~\ref{tab:tev} and \ref{tab:lhc} lists the
400: contribution from $q\bar q\to ZQ\overline Q$ when the $Q$ and $\overline Q$
401: merge into a single jet. This is comparable in size to the contribution of
402: this process to $ZQ$ production. This is due to the aforementioned enhancement
403: that arises when the heavy quarks are collinear. This process is the dominant
404: source of events where the $Z$ is accompanied by a single jet that contains
405: two heavy quarks.
406:
407: The last column gives the contribution of $q\bar q\to ZQ\overline Q$ when both
408: jets are within the coverage of the detector. The $Zb\bar b$ cross section is
409: about 1/2 of the $Zb$ cross section from this process at both machines, and
410: the $Zc\bar c$ cross section is about 1/3 of the $Zc$ cross section. This is
411: in contrast with the $gQ\to ZQ$ process, where the $ZQ\overline Q$ final state
412: (that arises at NLO) is much less than $ZQ$.
413:
414: \section{$q\bar q\to Zg$, $gq\to Zq$ at NLO}%
415: \label{sec:Zj}
416:
417: A light-quark or gluon jet can fake a heavy-quark jet. With a silicon vertex
418: detector, the mistagging rate is typically around 1\%. Since the cross section
419: for $Zj$ production is much greater than that for $ZQ$, it is potentially a
420: large source of fake $ZQ$ events.
421:
422: We list in Tables~\ref{tab:tev} and \ref{tab:lhc} the LO (in parentheses) and
423: NLO cross sections for $Zj$ production. The LO processes are $q\bar q\to Zg$
424: ($q=u,d,s,c,b$) and $gq\to Zq$ ($q=u,d,s$), as shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:Zj}. The
425: NLO processes also contribute to the $Zjj$ final state, and we list that cross
426: section in the Tables as well. The $Zj$ cross section is almost two orders of
427: magnitude greater than that of $gQ\to ZQ$ at the Tevatron. Taking into
428: account the 1\% mistagging rate, we see that $Zj$ is a significant source of
429: fake $ZQ$ events at the Tevatron. In contrast, at the LHC the $Zj$ cross
430: section is not nearly as significant. Thus there will be relatively fewer
431: mistagged events at the LHC. Qualitatively similar results are obtained for
432: the ratio of $Zjj$ to $ZQj$.
433:
434: \section{Conclusions}%
435: \label{sec:conclusions}
436:
437: The dominant contribution to $Zb$ production is $gb\to Zb$. At the Tevatron,
438: $q\bar q\to Zb\bar b$ also makes a significant contribution. Combining these
439: two contributions, the total inclusive cross section for $Zb$ production at the
440: Tevatron is about 20 pb. Thus there are about 2000 inclusive $Zb$ events
441: produced within the coverage of the detector at the Tevatron for every 100
442: pb$^{-1}$ of integrated luminosity delivered. The cleanest decay mode of the
443: $Z$ boson is to leptons ($\ell=e,\mu$), with a branching ratio of 6.7\%.
444: Including a $b$-tagging efficiency of 60\% yields about 80 tagged $(Z\to
445: \ell^+\ell^-)b$ events for every 100 pb$^{-1}$. There are slightly more tagged
446: events when one accounts for the fact that some events contain two heavy
447: quarks, either within the same jet or in separate jets. With data sets
448: between 4000 and 8000 pb$^{-1}$ expected in Run II at the Tevatron, there will
449: be between 3200 and 6400 tagged $(Z\to \ell^+\ell^-)b$ events.
450:
451: At the LHC, the contribution from $q\bar q\to Zb\bar b$ is much less
452: significant, so most of the cross section comes from $gb\to Zb$. The total
453: inclusive cross section for $Zb$ production is about 1090 pb, a factor of about
454: 50 larger than at the Tevatron. Thus there will be an enormous number of $Zb$
455: events at the LHC.
456:
457: The total inclusive cross section for $Zc$ production at the Tevatron is about
458: 70\% greater than that of $Zb$, while at the LHC, $Zc$ is about 35\% greater
459: than $Zb$. However, the SVX tagging efficiency for charm is about 1/4 of the
460: $b$-tagging efficiency, so there will be fewer tagged $Zc$ events than tagged
461: $Zb$ events. In contrast, the number of $\gamma c$ events far outweighs the
462: number of $\gamma b$ events at both machines, since charm has twice the
463: electric charge of bottom and the charm distribution function is larger than
464: that of bottom. Even taking the greater tagging efficiency of bottom into
465: account, the number of tagged $\gamma c$ events is larger than the number of
466: tagged $\gamma b$ events \cite{Abe:1998jc,Affolder:2001yp}.
467:
468: $Zj$ events, where the jet is mistagged as a heavy quark, are a significant
469: source of fake $ZQ$ events at the Tevatron, but much less so at the LHC. Thus
470: a larger fraction of the tagged $ZQ$ events at the LHC will be from genuine
471: heavy-quark production. For this reason, and also due to the relatively
472: smaller contribution from $q\bar q\to ZQ\overline Q$, the LHC provides a
473: cleaner environment for the extraction of the heavy-quark distribution
474: functions via $gQ\to ZQ$.
475:
476: In addition to the decay $Z\to \ell^+\ell^-$, there will be many $Z\to
477: \nu\bar\nu$ events ($BR=20\%$), which will yield heavy-quark monojets. This
478: will also yield dijet events with large missing transverse momentum, with one
479: or both jets containing heavy quarks.
480:
481: Regardless of the $Z$ decay mode, the majority of $Z+2$ jet events with a
482: single heavy-quark tag at the LHC come from $ZQj$, not $ZQ\overline Q$. At the
483: Tevatron, where $q\bar q\to ZQ\overline Q$ is relatively more important, the
484: $ZQj$ and $ZQ\overline Q$ final states are comparable in size.
485:
486: \section*{Acknowledgments}
487:
488: \indent\indent We are grateful for conversations and correspondence with
489: L.~Christofek, T.~Junk, T.~Liss, K.~Pitts, D.~Stuart, M.~Whalley, and
490: J.~Womersley. F.~M. warmly thanks the Department of Physics of the ``Terza
491: Universit\`a di Roma'' for the kind hospitality and support. S.~W.~thanks the
492: Aspen Center for Physics for hospitality. This work was supported in part by
493: the U.~S.~Department of Energy under contracts Nos.~DE-AC02-76CH03000 and
494: DE-FG02-91ER40677 and by the National Science Foundation under Grant
495: No.~PHY99-07949.
496:
497: \begin{thebibliography}{99}%
498:
499: \bibitem{Abe:1995hr}
500: F.~Abe {\it et al.} [CDF Collaboration],
501: %``Observation of top quark production in anti-p p collisions,''
502: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 74}, 2626 (1995) [arXiv:hep-ex/9503002].
503: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 9503002;%%
504:
505: \bibitem{Abachi:1995iq}
506: S.~Abachi {\it et al.} [D0 Collaboration],
507: %``Observation of the top quark,''
508: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 74}, 2632 (1995) [arXiv:hep-ex/9503003].
509: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 9503003;%%
510:
511: \bibitem{Acosta:2001ct}
512: D.~Acosta {\it et al.} [CDF Collaboration],
513: %``Study of the heavy flavor content of jets produced in association with
514: %W bosons in p anti-p collisions at s**(1/2) = 1.8-TeV,''
515: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 65}, 052007 (2002) [arXiv:hep-ex/0109012].
516: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0109012;%%
517:
518: \bibitem{Carena:2003yi}
519: M.~Carena and J.~Lykken, ``Physics at Run II: Supersymmetry/Higgs Workshop,''
520: FERMILAB-PUB-00-349
521: %\href{http://www.slac.stanford.edu/spires/find/hep/www?r=fermilab-pub-00-349}{SPIRES entry}
522: {\it Prepared for Physics at Run II: Workshop on Supersymmetry / Higgs: 1st
523: General Meeting, Batavia, Illinois, 14-16 May 1998.}
524:
525: \bibitem{unknown:1999fr}
526: %``ATLAS detector and physics performance. Technical design report. Vol. 2,''
527: ATLAS Collaboration, Technical Design Report, CERN-LHCC-99-15.
528:
529: \bibitem{Baur:1993zd}
530: U.~Baur, F.~Halzen, S.~Keller, M.~L.~Mangano and K.~Riesselmann,
531: %``The Charm content of W + 1 jet events as a probe of the strange
532: %quark distribution function,''
533: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 318}, 544 (1993) [arXiv:hep-ph/9308370].
534: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9308370;%%
535:
536: \bibitem{Giele:1995kr}
537: W.~T.~Giele, S.~Keller and E.~Laenen,
538: %``QCD Corrections to W Boson plus Heavy Quark Production at the Tevatron,''
539: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 372}, 141 (1996) [arXiv:hep-ph/9511449].
540: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9511449;%%
541:
542: \bibitem{Berger:1995qe}
543: E.~L.~Berger and L.~E.~Gordon,
544: %``Analytic Calculation of Prompt Photon plus Associated Heavy Flavor at Next-to-Leading Order in QCD,''
545: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 54}, 2279 (1996) [arXiv:hep-ph/9512343].
546: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9512343;%%
547:
548: \bibitem{Bailey:1996px}
549: B.~Bailey, E.~L.~Berger and L.~E.~Gordon,
550: %``Production of a Prompt Photon in Association with Charm at
551: %Next-to-Leading Order in QCD,''
552: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 54}, 1896 (1996)
553: [arXiv:hep-ph/9602373].
554: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9602373;%%
555:
556: \bibitem{Aivazis:1993pi}
557: M.~A.~Aivazis, J.~C.~Collins, F.~I.~Olness and W.~K.~Tung,
558: %``Leptoproduction of heavy quarks. 2. A Unified QCD formulation of charged
559: %and neutral current processes from fixed target to collider energies,''
560: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 50}, 3102 (1994) [arXiv:hep-ph/9312319].
561: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9312319;%%
562:
563: \bibitem{Collins:1998rz}
564: J.~C.~Collins,
565: %``Hard-scattering factorization with heavy quarks: A general treatment,''
566: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 58}, 094002 (1998) [arXiv:hep-ph/9806259].
567: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9806259;%%
568:
569: \bibitem{Stelzer:1997ns}
570: T.~Stelzer, Z.~Sullivan and S.~Willenbrock,
571: %``Single-top-quark production via W-gluon fusion at next-to-leading order,''
572: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 56}, 5919 (1997) [arXiv:hep-ph/9705398].
573: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9705398;%%
574:
575: \bibitem{Campbell:2000bg}
576: J.~M.~Campbell and R.~K.~Ellis,
577: %``Radiative corrections to Z b anti-b production,''
578: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 62}, 114012 (2000) [arXiv:hep-ph/0006304].
579: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0006304;%%
580:
581: \bibitem{Campbell:2002tg}
582: J.~Campbell and R.~K.~Ellis,
583: %``Next-to-leading order corrections to W + 2jet and Z + 2jet production at hadron colliders,''
584: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 65}, 113007 (2002) [arXiv:hep-ph/0202176].
585: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0202176;%%
586:
587: \bibitem{Campbell:2003hd}
588: J.~Campbell, R.~K.~Ellis and D.~Rainwater,
589: %``Next-to-leading order QCD predictions for W + 2jet and Z + 2jet production at the CERN LHC,''
590: arXiv:hep-ph/0308195.
591: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0308195;%%
592:
593: \bibitem{Glover:2002gz}
594: E.~W.~N.~Glover,
595: %``Progress in NNLO calculations for scattering processes,''
596: Nucl.\ Phys.\ Proc.\ Suppl.\ {\bf 116}, 3 (2003) [arXiv:hep-ph/0211412].
597: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0211412;%%
598:
599: \bibitem{Choudhury:1998kr}
600: D.~Choudhury, A.~Datta and S.~Raychaudhuri,
601: %``Higgs boson signals in three b-jet final states at the Fermilab Tevatron,''
602: arXiv:hep-ph/9809552.
603: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9809552;%%
604:
605: \bibitem{Huang:1998vu}
606: C.~S.~Huang and S.~H.~Zhu,
607: %``Supersymmetric Higgs bosons discovery potential at hadron colliders
608: %through b g channel,''
609: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 60}, 075012 (1999) [arXiv:hep-ph/9812201].
610: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9812201;%%
611:
612: \bibitem{Campbell:2002zm}
613: J.~Campbell, R.~K.~Ellis, F.~Maltoni and S.~Willenbrock,
614: %``Higgs boson production in association with a single bottom quark,''
615: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 67}, 095002 (2003) [arXiv:hep-ph/0204093].
616: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0204093;%%
617:
618: \bibitem{Dicus:1998hs}
619: D.~Dicus, T.~Stelzer, Z.~Sullivan and S.~Willenbrock,
620: %``Higgs boson production in association with bottom quarks at
621: %next-to-leading order,''
622: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 59}, 094016 (1999) [arXiv:hep-ph/9811492].
623: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9811492;%%
624:
625: \bibitem{Balazs:1998sb}
626: C.~Balazs, H.~J.~He and C.~P.~Yuan,
627: %``{QCD} corrections to scalar production via heavy quark fusion at hadron
628: %colliders,''
629: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 60}, 114001 (1999) [arXiv:hep-ph/9812263].
630: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9812263;%%
631:
632: \bibitem{Maltoni:2003pn}
633: F.~Maltoni, Z.~Sullivan and S.~Willenbrock,
634: %``Higgs-boson production via bottom-quark fusion,''
635: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 67}, 093005 (2003) [arXiv:hep-ph/0301033].
636: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0301033;%%
637:
638: \bibitem{Stelzer:1998ni}
639: T.~Stelzer, Z.~Sullivan and S.~Willenbrock,
640: %``Single top quark production at hadron colliders,''
641: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 58}, 094021 (1998) [arXiv:hep-ph/9807340].
642: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9807340;%%
643:
644: \bibitem{Heinson:1996zm}
645: A.~P.~Heinson, A.~S.~Belyaev and E.~E.~Boos,
646: %``Single top quarks at the Fermilab Tevatron,''
647: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 56}, 3114 (1997) [arXiv:hep-ph/9612424].
648: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9612424;%%
649:
650: \bibitem{Zhu:uj}
651: S.~Zhu,
652: %``Next-To-Leading Order QCD Corrections To B G $\to$ T W- At The Cern Large Hadron Collider,''
653: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 524} (2002) 283 [Erratum-ibid.\ B {\bf 537} (2002) 351].
654: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B524,283;%%
655:
656: \bibitem{Barger:1993th}
657: V.~D.~Barger, R.~J.~N.~Phillips and D.~P.~Roy,
658: %``Heavy charged Higgs signals at the LHC,''
659: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 324}, 236 (1994) [arXiv:hep-ph/9311372].
660: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9311372;%%
661:
662: \bibitem{Zhu:2001nt}
663: S.~h.~Zhu,
664: %``Complete next-to-leading order QCD corrections to charged Higgs boson
665: %associated production with top quark at the CERN Large Hadron
666: %Collider,''
667: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 67}, 075006 (2003) [arXiv:hep-ph/0112109].
668: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0112109;%%
669:
670: \bibitem{Plehn:2002vy}
671: T.~Plehn,
672: %``Charged Higgs boson production in bottom gluon fusion,''
673: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 67}, 014018 (2003) [arXiv:hep-ph/0206121].
674: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0206121;%%
675:
676: \bibitem{Pumplin:2002vw}
677: J.~Pumplin, D.~R.~Stump, J.~Huston, H.~L.~Lai, P.~Nadolsky and W.~K.~Tung,
678: %``New generation of parton distributions with uncertainties from global QCD analysis,''
679: JHEP {\bf 0207}, 012 (2002) [arXiv:hep-ph/0201195].
680: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0201195;%%
681:
682: \bibitem{Abe:1998jc}
683: F.~Abe {\it et al.} [CDF Collaboration],
684: %``Search for a technicolor omega(T) particle in events with a photon and a b quark jet at CDF,''
685: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 83}, 3124 (1999) [arXiv:hep-ex/9810031].
686: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 9810031;%%
687:
688: \bibitem{Affolder:2001yp}
689: T.~Affolder {\it et al.} [CDF Collaboration],
690: %``Searches for new physics in events with a photon and b-quark jet at CDF,''
691: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 65}, 052006 (2002) [arXiv:hep-ex/0106012].
692: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0106012;%%
693:
694: \bibitem{Arnold:1989dp}
695: P.~B.~Arnold and M.~H.~Reno,
696: %``The Complete Computation Of High P(T) W And Z Production In 2nd Order
697: %QCD,''
698: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 319}, 37 (1989) [Erratum-ibid.\ B {\bf 330}, 284
699: (1990)].
700: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B319,37;%%
701:
702: \bibitem{Gonsalves:1989ar}
703: R.~J.~Gonsalves, J.~Pawlowski and C.~F.~Wai,
704: %``QCD Radiative Corrections To Electroweak Boson Production At Large
705: %Transverse Momentum In Hadron Collisions,''
706: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 40}, 2245
707: (1989).
708: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D40,2245;%%
709:
710: \bibitem{Giele:dj}
711: W.~T.~Giele, E.~W.~Glover and D.~A.~Kosower,
712: %``Higher Order Corrections To Jet Cross-Sections In Hadron Colliders,''
713: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 403}, 633 (1993) [arXiv:hep-ph/9302225].
714: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9302225;%%
715:
716: \bibitem{Ellis:1999ec}
717: R.~K.~Ellis {\it et al.} [QCD Tools Working Group Collaboration],
718: %``Report of the QCD tools working group,''
719: arXiv:hep-ph/0011122.
720: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0011122;%%
721:
722: \bibitem{Maltoni:2002qb}
723: F.~Maltoni and T.~Stelzer,
724: %``MadEvent: Automatic event generation with MadGraph,''
725: JHEP {\bf 0302}, 027 (2003) [arXiv:hep-ph/0208156].
726: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0208156;%%
727:
728: \bibitem{Ellis:1980wv}
729: R.~K.~Ellis, D.~A.~Ross and A.~E.~Terrano,
730: %``The Perturbative Calculation Of Jet Structure In E+ E- Annihilation,''
731: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 178}, 421 (1981).
732: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B178,421;%%
733:
734: \bibitem{Catani:1996vz}
735: S.~Catani and M.~H.~Seymour,
736: %``A general algorithm for calculating jet cross sections in NLO QCD,''
737: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 485}, 291 (1997) [Erratum-ibid.\ B {\bf 510}, 503 (1997)]
738: [arXiv:hep-ph/9605323].
739: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9605323;%%
740:
741: \bibitem{Hagiwara:fs}
742: K.~Hagiwara {\it et al.} [Particle Data Group Collaboration],
743: %``Review Of Particle Physics,''
744: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 66}, 010001 (2002).
745: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D66,010001;%%.
746:
747: \end{thebibliography}%
748:
749: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
750: %%%%%%%%%% FIGURES %%%%%%%%%%%%
751: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
752:
753: \begin{figure}[p]
754: \begin{center}
755: \hspace*{-.5cm}
756: \epsfig{figure=mudep_tevb.ps,width=14cm,angle=90}
757: \vspace*{0cm} \caption{Cross section for $gb\to Zb$ at the Tevatron {\it vs}.\
758: the renormalization scale (solid curves) and factorization scale (dashed
759: curves). The ratio of the cross section at scale $\mu$ to the cross section at
760: scale $\mu=M_Z$ is plotted {\it vs}.\ the ratio of the scales. The
761: next-to-leading-order (NLO) inclusive cross section (bold) is less sensitive to
762: the scales than the leading-order (LO) cross section (regular). }
763: \label{fig:mudep_tevb}
764: \end{center}
765: \end{figure}
766:
767: \begin{figure}[p]
768: \begin{center}
769: \hspace*{-.5cm}
770: \epsfig{figure=mudep_lhcb_lolum.ps,width=14cm,angle=90}
771: \vspace*{0cm} \caption{Same as Fig.~\ref{fig:mudep_tevb}, but at the LHC.}
772: \label{fig:mudep_lhcb_lolum}
773: \end{center}
774: \end{figure}
775:
776: \begin{figure}[p]
777: \begin{center}
778: \hspace*{-.5cm}
779: \epsfig{figure=mudep_tevc.ps,width=14cm,angle=90}
780: \vspace*{0cm} \caption{Same as Fig.~\ref{fig:mudep_tevb}, but for $Zc$
781: production.} \label{fig:mudep_tevc}
782: \end{center}
783: \end{figure}
784:
785: \begin{figure}[p]
786: \begin{center}
787: \hspace*{-.5cm} \epsfig{figure=mudep_lhcc_lolum.ps,width=14cm,angle=90}
788: \vspace*{0cm} \caption{Same as Fig.~\ref{fig:mudep_tevc}, but at the LHC.}
789: \label{fig:mudep_lhcc_lolum}
790: \end{center}
791: \end{figure}
792:
793: \begin{figure}[p]
794: \begin{center}
795: \epsfig{figure=pt_b_tev.ps,width=12cm,angle=-90}
796: \caption{The transverse-momentum distribution of $gb\to Zb$ at the Tevatron.
797: Qualitatively similar results are obtained for $gc\to Zc$. The LO curve is
798: the $p_T$ of either the $Z$ or the $b$ jet. At NLO, the distributions of both
799: the $Z$ and the highest-$p_T$ $b$ jet are shown for the inclusive cross
800: section.} \label{fig:pt_b_tev}
801: \end{center}
802: \end{figure}
803:
804: \begin{figure}[p]
805: \begin{center}
806: \epsfig{figure=pt_b_lhc.ps,width=12cm,angle=-90}
807: \caption{Same as Fig.~\ref{fig:pt_b_tev}, but at the LHC.} \label{fig:pt_b_lhc}
808: \end{center}
809: \end{figure}
810:
811: \end{document}
812:
813: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
814: