1: \documentclass[12pt]{article}
2: \usepackage{fullpage}
3: \usepackage{here}
4: \usepackage{amssymb}
5: \usepackage{amsfonts}
6: \usepackage{epsf}
7: \usepackage[colorlinks]{hyperref}
8:
9: \begin{document}
10:
11: \title{\bf Hadronic Part of the Muon {\boldmath $g-2$} \\
12: Estimated on the
13: {\boldmath $\sigma_{\rm total}^{2003}(e^+e^-\to hadrons)$}\\
14: Evaluated Data Compilation}
15:
16: \author{V.\ V.\ Ezhela, S.\ B.\ Lugovsky\ and\ O.\ V.\ Zenin\\
17: {\it Institute for High Energy Physics, Protvino, Russia}}
18: \date{}
19: \maketitle
20:
21: {
22: \abstract{
23: \noindent
24: A comprehensive as of November 2003 and evaluated data
25: compilation on $\sigma_{\mathrm tot}(e^+e^-\to hadrons)$
26: was used to estimate the lowest order hadronic contribution
27: to the muon anomalous magnetic moment. The preliminary result is
28: $$
29: a_\mu(\mathrm{had}, \mathrm{\footnotesize LO}) =
30: (699.6 \pm 1.9_{\mathrm{rad}} \pm 2.0_{\mathrm{proc}} \pm 8.5_{e^+e^-})
31: \times 10^{-10}
32: $$
33: \noindent
34: The Standard Model value of the muon magnetic
35: anomaly calculated by updated SM formulae published or {\tt e}-printed by
36: November 2003 then reads
37: $$
38: a_\mu = 1.165\,918\,35(87_{\mathrm{had}})(40_{\mathrm{LbL}})(03_{\mathrm{QED}})
39: (02_{\mathrm{EW}}) \times 10^{-3}
40: $$
41: }
42: }
43:
44: \section*{Introduction}
45: Recent progress in refining the experimental and theoretical knowledge on
46: the muon magnetic moment anomaly, which is one of the
47: most sensitive to possible new effects in particle physics
48: (beyond the Standard Model) quantities,
49: is summarized in the Table \ref{summary}.
50:
51:
52: \begin{table}[h]
53: \caption{
54: In the column ``Experiment'' the 1998 entry is the CODATA recommended value,
55: 1999-2002 entries are the world averaged values quoted in the cited
56: experimental papers. In the column ``Theory'' the successive theoretical values
57: calculated in the SM framework are presented.
58: Asterisk marks the corrected result for the second 1998 and the 1999
59: theoretical entries.}
60: \begin{center}
61: \begin{tabular}{|c|lc|lc|}
62: \hline
63: Year & \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{Experiment (BNL-821 et al.)} & \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{Theoretical
64: estimates in SM} \\
65: \hline
66: & & & & \\[-2mm]
67: 1998 &$1.165\,916\,02(64)\times10^{-3}$ &\cite{Mohr:2000ie}&
68: $1.165\,916\,45(156)\times10^{-3}$& \cite{Alemany:1997tn}\\
69: & & &
70: $1.165\,916\,87(96)\times10^{-3}$ & \cite{Hayakawa:1997rq}\\
71: 1999 &$1.165\,923\,5(73)\times10^{-3}$ & \cite{Carey:dd}&
72: $1.165\,916\,3(8)\times10^{-3}$ & \cite{Hughes:fp}\\
73: 2000 &$1.165\,920\,5(46)\times10^{-3}$ & \cite{Brown:2000sj}&
74: $1.165\,915\,97(67)\times10^{-3}$ &\cite{Czarnecki:2000id} \\
75: 2001 &$1.165\,920\,3(15)\times10^{-3}$ & \cite{Brown:2001mg}&
76: $1.165\,918\,49(69)\times10^{-3}$ & \cite{DeTroconiz:2001wt}\\
77: & &
78: &$1.165\,918\,56(96)\times10^{-3}$\hfill *&\cite{Hayakawa:2001bb} \\
79: 2002 &$1.165\,920\,3(8)\times10^{-3}$ & \cite{Bennett:2002jb}&
80: $1.165\,916\,93(70)(35)(04)\times10^{-3}$&\cite{Davier:2002dy} \\
81: \hline
82: \end{tabular}
83: \label{summary}
84: \end{center}
85: \end{table}
86: %\vspace*{-0.5cm}
87:
88: \noindent
89: It is seen that experiment is already stable and is evolving to the
90: more accurate value whereas the theoretical estimates,
91: in spite of intense activity, are far from being stable.
92:
93: The bottleneck in the theoretical
94: evaluation of $g-2$ is the hadronic contributions, especially
95: the lowest order one. It cannot be found within the perturbative approach.
96:
97: The problem is traditionally treated phenomenologically:
98: the imaginary part of the hadronic vacuum polarization operator
99: $\Pi^{\mathrm{had}}$, through the real analyticity and asymptotic
100: boundedness property can be related to the total cross section
101: of the process $e^+e^- \to hadrons$ and the
102: $\Pi^{\mathrm{had}}$ can be reconstructed from the experimental data
103: using a dispersion relation technique.
104:
105: This requires on the one hand a complete (to date) and accurate
106: database of evaluated data on $\sigma_{tot}(e^+e^- \to hadrons)$
107: extracted from the original publications, and on the other hand
108: a stable (traceable) and reproducible in further refinements
109: method of integration of the experimental data.
110:
111:
112: The Standard Model value of the muon anomalous magnetic moment
113: can be conventionally broken into following parts:
114:
115: \begin{equation}
116: a_\mu({\scriptsize \mathrm{SM}}) = a_\mu({\scriptsize \mathrm{QED}}) +
117: a_\mu({\scriptsize \mathrm{EW}}) + a_\mu({\scriptsize \mathrm{had}})
118: \nonumber
119: \end{equation}
120: %
121: with
122: %
123: \begin{equation}
124: a_\mu(\mathrm{had}) =
125: a_\mu(\mathrm{had}, {\scriptsize \mathrm{LO}}) +
126: a_\mu(\mathrm{had}, {\scriptsize \mathrm{HO}}) +
127: a_\mu(\mathrm{had}, {\scriptsize \mathrm{LbL}})~.
128: \label{eq:breakdown}
129: \end{equation} \\
130:
131: \noindent
132: In the breakdown of the hadronic contribution (\ref{eq:breakdown})
133: the terms are as follows:
134: \begin{itemize}
135: \item
136: $a_\mu({\scriptsize\mathrm{QED}}) = (11\,658\,470.6 \pm 0.3)\times 10^{-10}$
137: arises from the diagrams including only photon and
138: charged lepton lines and calculated
139: up to four loops (see a recent review~\cite{Knecht:2003kc} and references therein)
140: \item
141: $a_\mu({\scriptsize \mathrm{EW}}) =
142: (15.4 \pm 0.1_{\mathrm{hadronic~loops}} \pm 0.2_{M_{\mathrm{Higgs}}})
143: \times 10^{-10}$
144: arises from one- and two-loop diagrams with $W$, $Z$
145: and Higgs internal lines \cite{Czarnecki:2002nt};
146: \item
147: $a_\mu(\mathrm{had})$ includes:
148: %\subitem{\hspace*{-5.5ex}}
149: the lowest order hadronic contribution (Fig.~\ref{F1}a)
150: of a typical size
151: $$a_\mu(\mathrm{had}, {\scriptsize \mathrm{LO}}) \simeq 700 \times 10^{-10};$$
152: %\subitem{\hspace*{-5.5ex}}
153: higher order hadronic contributions (Fig.~\ref{F1}b) \cite{Krause:1996rf}
154: $$a_\mu(\mathrm{had}, {\scriptsize \mathrm{HO}}) =
155: (-10.1 \pm 0.6)\times 10^{-10};$$
156: %\subitem{\hspace*{-5.5ex}}
157: light-by-light scattering contribution
158: (Fig.~\ref{F1}c) (\cite{Knecht:2001qf} and references therein)
159: $$a_\mu(\mathrm{had}, {\scriptsize \mathrm{LbL}}) =
160: (8 \pm 4) \times 10^{-10}.$$
161: \end{itemize}
162: %\vspace*{-0.5cm}
163: Current situation in theoretical estimates of the muon anomaly
164: is illustrated in the Table \ref{2003sum}.
165: \vspace*{-0.5cm}
166: \begin{table}[h]
167: \caption{Recent SM calculations using different methods and different strategies
168: in treatment of experimental data on $\sigma_{tot}(e^+ e^- \to hadrons)$}
169: \label{2003sum}
170: \begin{center}
171: {%\small
172: \begin{tabular}{|c|lc|}
173: \hline
174: & & \\[-4mm]
175: Year &\multicolumn{2}{|c|}{ Theoretical estimates in SM }\\
176: \hline
177: & & \\[-4mm]
178: 2002 &$1.165\,916\,93(70_{\mathrm{had}})(35_{\mathrm{LbL}})(04_{\mathrm{QED}+EW})\times10^{-3}$&
179: \cite{Davier:2002dy}\\
180: 2002 &$1.165\,918\,89(78)\times10^{-3} $&
181: \cite{Bartos:2001pg}\\
182: 2002 &$1.165\,916\,69(74)\times10^{-3} $&\cite{Hagiwara:2002ma}\\
183: 2002 &$1.165\,917\,26(77)\times10^{-3} $&\cite{Hagiwara:2002ma}\\
184: 2003 &$1.165\,916\,96(94)\times10^{-3} $&\cite{Jegerlehner:2003qp}\\
185: 2003 &$1.165\,916\,75(75_{\mathrm{had}})(40_{\mathrm{LbL}})(04_{\mathrm{QED}+EW})(\times10^{-3}$
186: &\cite{Nyffeler:2003vb} \\
187: 2003 &$1.165\,918\,12(127)\times10^{-3} $&
188: \cite{Narison:2003ur}\\
189: 2003 &$1.165\,918\,09(72_{\mathrm{had}})(35_{\mathrm{LbL}})(04_{\mathrm{QED}+EW})\times10^{-3}$&
190: \cite{Davier:2003pw}\\
191: 2003 &$1.165\,918\,56(64_{\mathrm{had}})(35_{\mathrm{LbL}})(04_{\mathrm{QED}+EW})\times10^{-3}$&
192: \cite{Groote:2003kg}\\
193: 2003 &$1.165\,918\,35(87_{\mathrm{had}})(40_{\mathrm{LbL}})(03_{\mathrm{QED}})
194: (02_{\mathrm{EW}}) \times 10^{-3}$&
195: [{\bf this work}] \\
196: \hline
197: \end{tabular}
198: }
199: \end{center}
200: \end{table}
201:
202: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
203: \begin{figure}[h]
204: {\epsfxsize=150mm \epsfbox[-100 0 1487 510]{f1.eps}}
205: %\vspace*{-3ex}
206: \caption{
207: Lowest {\tt (a)}, and higher order {\tt (b),(c)}
208: hadronic contributions to $a_\mu$.
209: Shaded and empty circles on the graphs {\tt (a),(b)}
210: denote hadronic and leptonic vacuum polarization
211: operators, respectively.
212: A shaded circle on the graph {\tt (c)} denotes an effective
213: four photon vertex dominated by the pion pole.
214: }\label{F1}
215: \end{figure}
216: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
217:
218:
219: \section*{Details of the calculation}
220: In this Letter we concentrate on the lowest order hadronic contribution to
221: $a_\mu$.
222: An evaluation of the Fig.~\ref{F1}a diagram leads due to dispersion relation
223: to a computationally convenient representation
224: of $a_\mu({\scriptsize \mathrm{had,LO}})$ \cite{K_peterman}:
225: %
226: \begin{equation}\label{eq:a_mu_had_disp}
227: a_\mu({\scriptsize \mathrm{had, LO}}) =
228: 4\alpha_0^2 \int^{\infty}_{m_\pi^2}
229: \frac{ds}{s} K(s)\, \frac{1}{\pi}\, \mathrm{Im}\, \Pi^{\mathrm{had}}(s) =
230: \frac{\alpha_0^2}{3\pi^2} \int^{\infty}_{m_\pi^2}
231: \frac{ds}{s} K(s) R^{\mathrm{had}} (s)~,
232: \end{equation}
233: %
234: where
235: %
236: \begin{equation}\label{eq:R}
237: R^{\mathrm{had}}(s) =
238: \sigma_{\mathrm{tot}} (e^+e^- \to hadrons, \mathrm{lowest~order~in}~\alpha) \,
239: \left/ \,
240: \frac{4\pi\alpha_0^2}{3s}
241: \right.
242: \end{equation}
243: %
244: is the well known hadronic $R$-ratio,
245: and the integration kernel is~\cite{K_peterman}
246: \begin{equation}\label{eq:K}
247: K(s) = \int^1_0 dx \frac{x^2 (1-x)}{x^2 + (1-x) (s/m_\mu^2)}~.
248: \end{equation}
249: %
250: An explicit expression for the kernel at $\sqrt{s} > 2m_\mu$ reads
251: %
252: \begin{equation}\label{eq:K}
253: K(s) =
254: %&=&
255: x^2 \left( 1-\frac{x^2}{2} \right) +
256: (1+x)^2 \left(1 + \frac{1}{x^2} \right)
257: \left(\mathrm{ln}(1+x) - x + \frac{x^2}{2} \right)
258: %\nonumber\\
259: %&+&
260: + \frac{1+x}{1-x} x^2 \, \mathrm{ln} x~
261: \end{equation}
262: %
263: with
264: $x = \left.\left(1 - \sqrt{1 - 4m_\mu^2/s}\right)\right/
265: \left(1 + \sqrt{1 - 4m_\mu^2/s}\right)$,
266: and at $\sqrt{s} < 2m_\mu$
267: %
268: \begin{eqnarray}\label{eq:K}
269: K(s) &=& \left[ -4 \left( \left(\frac{4m_\mu^2}{s} - 1 \right)^2
270: - 6 \left(\frac{4m_\mu^2}{s} - 1\right) + 1
271: \right) \mathrm{arctan}\sqrt{\frac{4m_\mu^2}{s} - 1}
272: \right.
273: \nonumber\\
274: & & + \sqrt{\frac{4m_\mu^2}{s} - 1}
275: \left( \left(\frac{4m_\mu^2}{s} - 1 \right)^2
276: - (3+8\mathrm{ln}2) \left(\frac{4m_\mu^2}{s} - 1 \right)
277: \right)
278: \nonumber\\
279: & & \left. \left.
280: + 16 \sqrt{\frac{4m_\mu^2}{s} - 1}
281: \left(\frac{2m_\mu^2}{s} - 1 \right)\,
282: \mathrm{ln} \frac{4m_\mu^2}{s}
283: \right] \,\,
284: \right/ \,\,
285: \left[ 2\,\, \sqrt{\frac{4m_\mu^2}{s} - 1}
286: \left( \frac{4m_\mu^2}{s} \right)^2
287: \right]~.
288: \nonumber
289: \end{eqnarray}
290: %
291:
292: \subsection*{Experimental input}
293: Experimental data on the total cross section
294: of $e^+e^- \to hadrons$
295: were used to evaluate $R(s)$ in the range
296: $0.36~\mathrm{GeV} < \sqrt{s} < (12 \div 40)~\mathrm{GeV}$.
297: An indexed list of references to the publications related to our
298: evaluated data compilation of the total hadronic cross sections used
299: in our analysis is given in the Appendix and can be accessed in the machine
300: readable form via {\tt http://wwwppds.ihep.su:8001/eehadron.html}.
301: We excluded all preliminary or withdrawn by their authors data.
302: An overall view of the compilation is shown on the Fig.~\ref{F_R}
303:
304: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
305: \begin{figure}[h]
306: \hspace*{-5mm}{\epsfxsize=180mm \epsfbox[0 0 567 283]{r.eps}}
307: \caption{\footnotesize
308: The compilation of data on $\sigma_{\mathrm{tot}}(e^+e^-\to hadrons)$
309: rescaled to the hadronic $R$ ratio.}\label{F_R}
310: \end{figure}
311:
312: \addtocounter{figure}{-1}
313:
314: \begin{figure}
315: {\epsfxsize=140mm \epsfbox[-80 0 1592 850]{r_low.eps}}
316: {\epsfxsize=140mm \epsfbox[-80 0 1621 850]{r_cc.eps}}
317: {\epsfxsize=140mm \epsfbox[-80 0 1621 850]{r_bb.eps}}
318: \caption{(continued)
319: \footnotesize
320: Threshold regions in the $e^+e^-$ hadroproduction:
321: $u,d,s$-, $c$- and $b$-flavour onset.
322: Note the consistency between the exclusive and inclusive data
323: at $\sqrt{2} \sim 2$~GeV.}
324: \end{figure}
325: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
326:
327:
328:
329: \noindent
330: {\bf Exclusive measurements.}\\[1.2ex]
331: %
332: {\bf At {\boldmath $\sqrt{s} < 2$}~GeV} the cross sections for
333: exclusive hadronic final states were measured by
334: Novosibirsk, Orsay and Frascati experiments (Tab.~\ref{Tab_excl}).
335: Each measurement was rescaled first to the cross section in the improved Born
336: approximation $\sigma^{\mathrm{IBA}}$,
337: i.e. to a visible cross section corrected for ISR plus electronic vertex loops.
338: The latter correction is always applied in the published data, therefore
339: the only things left to us were to remove partial~\cite{Bonneau:1971mk}
340: or full
341: vacuum polarization correction if applied by the data authors
342: and account corrections for the photons radiated from the final state.
343:
344: The partial correction for the electron vacuum polarization
345: usually applied in earlier publications (before 1985)
346: can be removed by factor
347: %
348: \begin{eqnarray}\label{eq:rad_BM}
349: C^{\mathrm{\sf b/m}}(s) &=& C^{\mathrm{\sf b/m}}_s(s) \times
350: C^{\mathrm{\sf b/m}}_{\mathrm{Bhabha}}(s)~,
351: \nonumber\\
352: C^{\mathrm{\sf b/m}}_s(s) &=& \frac{1}{1 - 2\mathrm{Re}\Delta\alpha_e(s)}~,
353: \nonumber\\
354: C^{\mathrm{\sf b/m}}_{\mathrm{Bhabha}}(s) &=&
355: \frac{~\vspace*{10ex}
356: \int_{t_1}^{t_2} dt\,\, \sigma_{\mathrm{Bhabha}}
357: \left. (s, t)
358: \right\vert_{\alpha(q^2) = \frac{\alpha_0}{1-\Delta\alpha(q^2)}}
359: }
360: {~
361: \int_{t_1}^{t_2} dt\,\, \sigma_{\mathrm{Bhabha}}
362: \left. \left. (s, t)
363: \right. \right\vert_{\alpha(q^2) = \frac{\alpha_0}{1-\Delta\alpha_e(q^2)}}
364: }
365: \end{eqnarray}
366: %
367: Here $C^{\mathrm{\sf b/m}}_s(s)$ removes the correction for
368: the electronic vacuum polarization in the $s$-channel and
369: $C^{\mathrm{\sf b/m}}_{\mathrm{Bhabha}}(s)$
370: properly corrects the
371: large angle Bhabha scattering cross section
372: used as a luminosity monitor in the low energy experiments.
373: The squared momentum transfer range $[t_1,t_2]$ is individual for each
374: detector~\cite{Swartz:1995hc}.
375: Finally, $\Delta\alpha_e(s)$ and $\Delta\alpha(s)$ are
376: related to the electronic and full vacuum polarization operators as
377: %
378: \begin{equation}
379: \Delta\alpha_e(s) = \Pi_{e}(s)/s~~,~~
380: \Delta\alpha(s) = \Pi(s)/s~,
381: \end{equation}
382: %
383: respectively.
384: An expression for the one loop electronic (generally leptonic)
385: vacuum polarization operator $\Pi_{\ell}(s)$ can be found
386: elsewhere (see, e.g.~\cite{Landau_Lifshitz}).
387: The hadronic part of vacuum polarization cannot be calculated perturbatively
388: and is related to the experimental hadronic $R$ ratio as
389: %
390: \begin{equation}\label{eq:da_had}
391: \Delta\alpha_{\mathrm{had}}(s) = -\frac{\alpha_0}{3\pi}\, s\,
392: \int_{m_\pi^2}^\infty \frac{R(s')\, ds'}{s'(s' - s - i0)}~.
393: \end{equation}
394: %
395:
396: The full vacuum polarization correction applied by some later
397: experiments is removed by the factor
398: %
399: \begin{equation}\label{eq:rad_full}
400: C^{\mathrm{full}}(s) = \frac{1}{1 - 2\mathrm{Re}\Delta\alpha(s)}~,
401: \end{equation}
402: %
403: where
404: %
405: \begin{equation}
406: \Delta\alpha(s) = \sum_{\ell = e,\mu,\tau} \Delta\alpha_{\ell}(s) +
407: \Delta\alpha_{\mathrm{had}}(s)
408: \end{equation}
409: %
410: with $\Delta\alpha_{\mathrm{had}}(s)$ calculated
411: according to~(\ref{eq:da_had}).
412:
413: Turning off doubtful radiative corrections allows to estimate
414: the ``radiative'' uncertainty
415: of~$a_\mu(\mathrm{had}, {\scriptsize \mathrm{LO}})$.
416:
417: After rescaling the data to $\sigma^{\mathrm{IBA}}$
418: their weighed average $\overline{\sigma}^{\mathrm{IBA}}(s)$
419: for each exclusive hadronic channel is found by the inimization
420: of the bilinear form
421: %
422: \begin{equation}\label{eq:chi2_excl}
423: Q = \sum_{(k)} (C^{(k)})^{-1}_{ij}
424: \left( \overline{\sigma}^{\mathrm{IBA}}(s^{(k)}_i) -
425: {\sigma^{\mathrm{IBA}}}^{(k)}_i
426: \right)
427: \left( \overline{\sigma}^{\mathrm{IBA}}(s^{(k)}_j) -
428: {\sigma^{\mathrm{IBA}}}^{(k)}_j
429: \right)~.
430: \end{equation}
431: %
432: Here an index $k$ runs over the experiments measured the given channel,
433: indices $i$ and $j$ enumerate the data points within the $k$-th experiment
434: and $C^{(k)}$ is the error matrix of the $k$-th experiment.
435: We conservatively
436: assumed no correlations between systematic uncertainties of data coming
437: from different publications even if the measurements were performed at
438: the same facility.
439: Unfortunately, publications (especially older ones)
440: do not provide enough information to
441: split a total systematic uncertainty into separate sources
442: which is necessary to find correlations between the experiments.
443: Indeed, 100\% correlation might be among
444: uncertainties coming from a machine luminosity determination,
445: radiative corrections, {\it etc.}, i.e. from the procedures common for all
446: experiments.
447: {\it Post factum} crude estimates~\cite{Davier:2002dy}
448: based on expert judgements
449: are also questionable because the lack of descriptions of the
450: systematic error sources can easily lead to double counting.
451: These considerations justify our refusal (for the moment)
452: to take into account the correlations between experiments
453: despite a possible overestimate of the $e^+e^-$ uncertainty
454: of $a_\mu$. This point requires further investigation.
455:
456: Next, the averaged cross sections of each exclusive final state
457: are summed up to give the total cross section
458: $\sigma_{\mathrm{tot}}^{\mathrm{IBA}}(e^+e^- \to hadrons)$.
459: The latter divided by $4\pi\alpha^2(s)/3s$ gives the desired hadronic
460: ratio $R(s)$ entering the integral~(\ref{eq:a_mu_had_disp}).
461:
462: Summing the contributions of exclusive hadronic final states
463: is not always straightforward.
464: To account for the missing hadronic final states
465: the isospin symmetry relations are exploited where possible (see
466: the discussion in~\cite{Davier:2002dy}).
467:
468: %To account for the missing channels
469: %$K^0\overline{K}^0\pi^0$,
470: %$K^0{}K^+\pi^-\pi^0$, $\overline{K}^0{}K^-\pi^+\pi^0$,
471: %$K^0\overline{K}^0\pi^0\pi^0$ and $K^0\overline{K}^0\pi^+\pi^-$
472: %a procedure similar to the one described in~\cite{Davier:2002dy}
473: %was applied. The contribution of these channels in the range
474: %$\sqrt{s} = 1.4$~--~$2.0$~GeV
475: %can be estimated using the isospin symmetry relation
476: %
477: %\begin{eqnarray}\label{eq:iso_k}
478: %2 \left[
479: % \sigma(K_S+X) - \sigma (K_S K^+\pi^-) - \sigma (K_S K^-\pi^+)
480: % -\sigma(K_S K_L)
481: % \right] =
482: %\nonubmer\\
483: %= \sigma(K^0 \overline{K}^0\pi^0) +
484: % \sigma(\overline{K}^0 K^+\pi^-\pi^0) +
485: % \sigma(\overline{K}^0 K^-\pi^+\pi^0) +
486: % \frac{1}{2}
487: % (\sigma(K^0\overline{K}^0\pi^0\pi^0) + \sigma(K^+K^-\pi^0\pi^0) \,\, .
488: %\end{eqnarray}
489: %
490: %As a half of $K^0\overline{K}^0\pi^0\pi^0)$ plus
491: %$K^+K^-\pi^0\pi^0$ contribution is still missing in Eq.~\ref{eq:iso_k}
492: %the corresponding
493: %$K^+K^-\pi^0$ and $K^+K^-\pi^+\pi^-$ are present in our compilation
494: %and accounted for directly.
495:
496: Note that determination of $\Delta\alpha(s)$ in
497: Eqs.~(\ref{eq:rad_BM}),~(\ref{eq:rad_full})
498: in turn requires to evaluate the dispersion relation integral~(\ref{eq:da_had})
499: also containing the $R$ ratio.
500: For this reason an iterative procedure was applied:
501: at zero iteration $\Delta\alpha(s)$ was calculated in the naive approximation
502: including one loop QED contributions from all quarks and charged leptons
503: plus contributions from $\phi(1020)$, $J/\psi$, $\psi(2S)$ and
504: $\Upsilon(1S)\dots\Upsilon(4S)$ resonances;
505: then the obtained naive $\Delta\alpha(s)$ was used to properly rescale
506: the experimental data to the $R$ ratio which in turn
507: was used for the evaluation of $\Delta\alpha(s)$
508: to be utilized at the next iteration.
509: This process proved to be well convergent even in the vicinities of
510: narrow resonances which contribution to $\Delta\alpha(s)$ was
511: obtained analytically as will be explained later.
512: It turns out that two iterations are enough with the current level of
513: accuracy.\\
514:
515: \noindent
516: {\bf {\boldmath $\pi^+\pi^-$, $\pi^0\gamma$} threshold regions.}\\
517:
518: \noindent
519: The lowest experimental point of our compilation
520: lies at $\sqrt{s} = 0.36$~GeV, well
521: above $\pi^+\pi^-$ and $\pi^0\gamma$ production thresholds.
522: The hadronic cross section in the $2m_\pi < \sqrt{s} < 0.36$~GeV
523: range can be evaluated using the chiral perturbation theory (ChPT)
524: parametrization of the pionic formfactor
525: %
526: \begin{equation}\label{eq:F_ChPT}
527: F^{\mathrm{ChPT}}_\pi(s) = 1 + \frac{{\scriptsize<}r^2{\scriptsize>}_\pi}{6} s + c_1 s^2 + c_2 s^3
528: + {\cal O}(s^4)~,
529: \end{equation}
530: %
531: where the squared pionic charge radius
532: $<r^2>_\pi = (11.27 \pm 0.21)$~GeV$^{-2}$ follows from the fit of
533: space-like data~\cite{Amendolia:1986wj} and the parameters $c_1$, $c_2$
534: are fitted to the time-like data in the range
535: $2m_\pi < \sqrt{s} < 0.6$~GeV~\cite{Davier:2002dy}.
536:
537: The two pion production cross section above the threshold then reads
538: %
539: \begin{equation}\label{eq:sig_ChPT}
540: \sigma_{\pi^+\pi^-} = \frac{\pi|\, \alpha(s)|^2}{3s}\, (1 - 4m_\pi^2/s)^{3/2}\,
541: |F^{\mathrm{ChPT}}_\pi (s)|^2 \,\, .
542: \end{equation}
543: %
544: The $\pi^0\gamma$ cross section in the range $m_\pi < \sqrt{s} < 0.6$~GeV is
545: much smaller and parametrized using the $\pi^0-\gamma^*\gamma$ transition
546: formfactor~\cite{Knecht:2001qf}.
547: The phenomenological parametrization of the low energy hadronic cross section
548: can be reliably used up to $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{ChPT}}} = 0.5$~GeV.
549: The uncertainty due to the variation of $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{ChPT}}}$
550: in the range
551: 0.36~--~0.6~GeV is folded to the procedural error
552: of~$a_\mu(\mathrm{had}, {\scriptsize \mathrm{LO}})$. \\
553:
554:
555: \noindent
556: {\bf Inclusive measurements.}\\
557:
558: \noindent
559: At $\sqrt{s} \ge 2$~GeV the $e^+e^-$
560: experiments mostly measure the total cross section
561: of an inclusive production of hadrons (Tab.~\ref{Tab_incl}).
562: Data published after 1978 seem to be fully corrected for ISR,
563: electronic vertex loops and vacuum polarization.
564: Earlier data with only electronic vacuum polarization correction need to be
565: properly rescaled as mentioned above (Eq.~\ref{eq:rad_BM}).
566: Data rescaled to the correct $R$ ratio were weighed in the
567: Eq.~(\ref{eq:chi2_excl}) manner to give the averaged $R$ ratio entering
568: into dispersion relation integrals~(\ref{eq:a_mu_had_disp}) and (\ref{eq:da_had}).\\
569:
570: \noindent
571: {\bf Resonances.} \\[1.2ex]
572: %
573: The contributions of
574: $\omega(782)$, $\phi(1020)$, $\psi(3770)$, $\psi(4040)$ and $\psi(4160)$
575: resonances are already contained in the cross section data
576: as their widths are larger than a typical machine energy spread.
577: Although, in this preliminary work
578: we account for
579: the contribution of a relatively broad $\phi(1020)$ meson
580: using the relativistic Breit-Wigner parametrization
581: %
582: \begin{equation}\label{eq:R_res}
583: R_{res} (s) \, = \, \sigma_{\mathrm{BW}}(s)
584: \, \left/\, \frac{4\pi|\alpha(s)|^2}{3s} \right. \,
585: = \, \frac{9}{|\alpha(s)|^2} \,
586: \frac{s\, \Gamma_{ee}\Gamma \, \frac{s}{M^2}}
587: {(s-M)^2 + s\, \Gamma^2} \,\, ,
588: \end{equation}
589: %
590: where $\Gamma_{ee}$ and $\Gamma$ are physical electronic and total widths
591: of the resonance given by PDG~\cite{Hagiwara:fs}.
592: Narrow $J/\psi$, $\psi(2S)$ and
593: $\Upsilon(nS), n=1..4$ resonances were treated in the same way.
594:
595: Note that a dispersion relation in the form~(\ref{eq:da_had})
596: should not be used
597: to find the contribution of a narrow resonance to the running
598: $\alpha(s)$ as the $R$ ratio~(\ref{eq:R_res}) in turn
599: contains $\alpha(s)$ rapidly varying in the vicinity of a resonance.
600: Instead, we use another form of the dispersion integral relating
601: the values of $\alpha(s)$ with and without
602: the contribution of the resonance:
603: %
604: \begin{eqnarray}\label{eq:res_disp}
605: \alpha(s)\, - \, \alpha_{\mathrm{without}}(s)
606: &=& -\frac{s}{4\pi^2} \int \frac{\sigma_{\mathrm{BW}}(s')\,\, ds'}{s' - s - i0}
607: \nonumber \\
608: &=& -\frac{s}{\pi}
609: \int \frac{3\, \Gamma_{ee}\Gamma \, \frac{s'}{M^2}}
610: {(s'-M^2)^2 +s'\Gamma^2} \,
611: \frac{ds'}{s' - s - i0}\,\,.
612: \end{eqnarray}
613: %
614: This expression can be easily obtained
615: from the analytic properties of the re-summed photon propagator.\\
616:
617: \noindent
618: {\bf High energy tail}\\
619:
620: \noindent
621: The $R$ ratio at $\sqrt{s} > 12$~GeV
622: can be reliably evaluated using the perturbative QCD.
623: We used a three loop pQCD approximation
624: taking into account the effect of quark masses~\cite{Zenin:2001yx}.
625: A variation of the lower boundary of pQCD usage
626: in the range 12~--~40~GeV results in a negligible additional uncertainty of
627: $a_\mu(\mathrm{had,LO})$.
628:
629:
630: \section*{Discussion}
631:
632: To cross-check the obtained value of the lowest order hadronic contribution
633: to the muon magnetic anomaly
634: %
635: \begin{equation}\label{eq:this}
636: a_\mu(\mathrm{had}, \mathrm{\footnotesize LO}) =
637: (699.6 \pm 1.9_{\mathrm{rad}} \pm 2.0_{\mathrm{proc}} \pm 8.5_{e^+e^-})
638: \times 10^{-10}\,\, ,
639: \end{equation}
640: %
641: we repeated the procedure on the subset
642: of our compilation of $\sigma_{\mathrm{tot}}(e^+e^-\to hadrons)$ data
643: used in recent papers~\cite{Davier:2002dy,Davier:2003pw}.
644: The result
645: %
646: \begin{equation}\label{eq:cross_eidelman}
647: a_\mu(\mathrm{had}, \mathrm{\footnotesize LO}, \mathrm{\footnotesize subset}) =
648: (694.5 \pm 1.9_{\mathrm{rad}} \pm 2.0_{\mathrm{proc}} \pm 8.8_{e^+e^-})
649: \times 10^{-10}~,
650: \end{equation}
651: %
652: is consistent with
653: the corrected~\cite{Davier:2003pw} $e^+e^-$ based result of the
654: paper~\cite{Davier:2002dy}
655: %
656: \begin{equation}\label{eq:eidelman}
657: a_\mu(\mathrm{had }, \mathrm{\footnotesize LO}, \cite{Davier:2003pw}) =
658: (696.3 \pm 3.6_{\mathrm{rad+proc}} \pm 6.2_{e^+e^-})\times 10^{-10} \,\, .
659: \end{equation}
660: The uncertainty induced by the $e^+e^-$ data is larger in our work
661: because of significant differences in the data treatment:
662: \begin{description}
663: %
664: \item[different integration procedures:]
665: we obtain the total $R$ ratio first
666: and then integrate it without averaging within small energy bins each
667: including several experimental points;
668: on the other hand, in~\cite{Davier:2002dy,Davier:2003pw}
669: the contributions of each hadronic final state
670: were added separately and the aforementioned energy averaging was applied;
671: %
672: \item[different treatment of systematic errors:]
673: no correlations
674: between different experiments in this work versus significant correlations
675: nominated in~\cite{Davier:2002dy,Davier:2003pw}.
676: \end{description}
677: These items will be clarified in the forthcoming publication.
678:
679:
680: \section*{Conclusion}
681: A new estimate of the lowest order hadronic contribution to the muon
682: anomalous magnetic moment was obtained using a comprehensive (as of
683: November 2003) compilation of evaluated data on total hadronic cross
684: sections in $e^+e^-$ collisions.
685: The preliminary result that is free of any extra admissions on the data
686: not documented in the original experimental publications reads
687:
688: $$
689: a_\mu(\mathrm{had}, \mathrm{\footnotesize LO}) =
690: (699.6 \pm 1.9_{\mathrm{rad}} \pm 2.0_{\mathrm{proc}} \pm 8.5_{e^+e^-})
691: \times 10^{-10}\,\, ,
692: $$
693: where the first error is due to the uncertainty in the radiative corrections
694: to the $e^+e^-$ data, the second one is procedural and the last one
695: is due to the experimental errors of the $e^+e^-$ data.
696: The value of the muon magnetic anomaly then reads as
697: $$
698: a_\mu = (11 659 183.5
699: \pm 8.7_{\mathrm{had}}
700: \pm 4.0_{\mathrm{LbL}}
701: \pm 0.3_{\mathrm{QED}}
702: \pm 0.2_{\mathrm{EW}}
703: ) \times 10^{-10}
704: \,\, ,
705: $$
706: where the errors are from the hadronic, light-by-light scattering,
707: pure QED and electroweak contributions, respectively.
708: This result deviates from
709: the experimental ``world average'' of~$a_\mu$~\cite{Sichtermann:2003cc}~by
710: $$
711: (-19.5 \pm 9.6_{\mathrm{theor}} \pm 8.0_{\mathrm{exp}}) \times 10^{-10}\,\, ,
712: $$
713: i.e.\ at $\sim 1.5\sigma$ level.
714:
715: As it can be seen from the Table \ref{2003sum} our estimate is well matched with all other 2002-2003 estimates based on the $e^+\, e^- \to hadrons$ data. The differences are due to slightly different databases used
716: and different methods of incorporating experimental data into final estimates.
717: It seems that to make a further progress in the refinement of these
718: estimates it will be useful to standardize the database to meet all
719: aspects of the scientific database quality: completeness, accuracy and
720: traceability of the data transference from original publications to
721: the evaluated data compilations, transparency of the data evaluation
722: procedures, and easy access to the evaluated database in computer
723: readable form
724: for physics and education communities. Some steps towards
725: such compilations were undertaken by the COMPAS and HEPDATA groups
726: under auspices of the PDG
727: collaboration~\cite{Hagiwara:fs,Zenin:2001yx,Whalley:2003qr}.
728:
729:
730: The standardized and maintained evaluated data compilation will allow
731: to join efforts and find most stable and reliable method of incorporating
732: experimental data into the theoretical estimates of the hadronic
733: contributions to the high precision observables and to trace the
734: consistency of the different experimental evidences with the
735: theoretical estimates in the Standard Model.
736:
737:
738: \vspace*{2ex}
739: \paragraph*{Acknowledgments.}
740: This work was supported in part by the Russian Foundation of Basic
741: Research under grant RFBR-01-07-90392.
742: The authors are grateful to M.\ R.\ Whalley
743: for his contributions to the IHEP\ {\tt PPDS(ReacData)}\ and
744: {\tt PPDS(CrossSections)} databases. We thank our colleagues
745: R.~M.~Barnett, D.~E.~Groom, R.~Miquel, and A.~M.~Zaitsev for fruitful
746: discussions and encouragements. We also thank Z.~G.~Zhao and Y.~S.~Zhu
747: for providing us with the BES numerical data.
748:
749:
750:
751: %
752:
753:
754: \begin{thebibliography}{**}
755:
756: %\cite{Mohr:2000ie}
757: \bibitem{Mohr:2000ie}
758: P.~J.~Mohr and B.~N.~Taylor,
759: %``CODATA recommended values of the fundamental physical constants: 1998,''
760: Rev.\ Mod.\ Phys.\ {\bf 72} (2000) 351.
761: %%CITATION = RMPHA,72,351;%%
762:
763: %\cite{Alemany:1997tn}
764: \bibitem{Alemany:1997tn}
765: R.~Alemany, M.~Davier and A.~Hocker,
766: %``Improved determination of the hadronic contribution to the muon (g-2) % and to alpha(M(Z)**2) using new data from hadronic tau decays,''
767: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 2} (1998) 123
768: [arXiv:hep-ph/9703220].
769: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9703220;%%
770:
771: %\cite{Hayakawa:1997rq}
772: \bibitem{Hayakawa:1997rq}
773: M.~Hayakawa and T.~Kinoshita,
774: %``Pseudoscalar pole terms in the hadronic light-by-light scattering contribution %to muon g-2,''
775: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 57} (1998) 465
776: [Erratum-ibid.\ D {\bf 66} (2002) 019902]
777: [arXiv:hep-ph/9708227].
778: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9708227;%%
779:
780: %\cite{Hughes:fp}
781: \bibitem{Hughes:fp}
782: V.~W.~Hughes and T.~Kinoshita,
783: %``Anomalous G Values Of The Electron And Muon,''
784: Rev.\ Mod.\ Phys.\ {\bf 71} (1999) S133.
785: %%CITATION = RMPHA,71,S133;%%
786:
787: %\cite{Carey:dd}
788: \bibitem{Carey:dd}
789: R.~M.~Carey {\it et al.},
790: %``New Measurement Of The Anomalous Magnetic Moment Of The Positive Muon,''
791: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 82} (1999) 1632.
792: %%CITATION = PRLTA,82,1632;%%
793:
794: %\cite{Brown:2000sj}
795: \bibitem{Brown:2000sj}
796: H.~N.~Brown {\it et al.} [Muon (g-2) Collaboration],
797: %``Improved measurement of the positive muon anomalous magnetic moment,''
798: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 62} (2000) 091101
799: [arXiv:hep-ex/0009029].
800: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0009029;%%
801:
802: %\cite{Czarnecki:2000id}
803: \bibitem{Czarnecki:2000id}
804: A.~Czarnecki and W.~J.~Marciano,
805: %``The muon anomalous magnetic moment: Standard model theory and beyond,''
806: %in {\it Proc. of the 5th International Symposium on Radiative Corrections (RADCOR 2000) } ed. Howard E. Haber,
807: arXiv:hep-ph/0010194.
808: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0010194;%%
809:
810:
811: %\cite{Brown:2001mg}
812: \bibitem{Brown:2001mg}
813: H.~N.~Brown {\it et al.} [Muon g-2 Collaboration],
814: %``Precise measurement of the positive muon anomalous magnetic moment,''
815: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 86} (2001) 2227
816: [arXiv:hep-ex/0102017].
817: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0102017;%%
818:
819: %\cite{DeTroconiz:2001wt}
820: \bibitem{DeTroconiz:2001wt}
821: J.~F.~De Troconiz and F.~J.~Yndurain,
822: %``Precision determination of the pion form factor and calculation of the muon g-2,''
823: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 65} (2002) 093001
824: [arXiv:hep-ph/0106025].
825: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0106025;%%
826:
827:
828: %\cite{Hayakawa:2001bb}
829: \bibitem{Hayakawa:2001bb}
830: M.~Hayakawa and T.~Kinoshita,
831: %``Comment on the sign of the pseudoscalar pole contribution to the muon g-2,''
832: arXiv:hep-ph/0112102.
833: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0112102;%%
834:
835: %\cite{Bennett:2002jb}
836: \bibitem{Bennett:2002jb}
837: G.~W.~Bennett {\it et al.} [Muon g-2 Collaboration],
838: %``Measurement of the positive muon anomalous magnetic moment to 0.7-ppm,''
839: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 89} (2002) 101804
840: [Erratum-ibid.\ {\bf 89} (2002) 129903]
841: [arXiv:hep-ex/0208001].
842: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0208001;%%
843:
844: %\cite{Davier:2002dy}
845: \bibitem{Davier:2002dy}
846: M.~Davier, S.~Eidelman, A.~Hocker and Z.~Zhang,
847: %``Confronting spectral functions from e+ e- annihilation and tau decays: % Consequences for the muon magnetic moment,''
848: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 27} (2003) 497, Erratum
849: [arXiv:hep-ph/0208177].
850: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0208177;%%
851:
852: %\cite{Bartos:2001pg}
853: \bibitem{Bartos:2001pg}
854: E.~Bartos, A.~Z.~Dubnickova, S.~Dubnicka, E.~A.~Kuraev and E.~Zemlyanaya,
855: %``Scalar and pseudoscalar meson pole terms in the hadronic light-by-light contributions to a(mu)(had),''
856: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 632} (2002) 330
857: [arXiv:hep-ph/0106084].
858: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0106084;%%
859:
860:
861: %\cite{Hagiwara:2002ma}
862: \bibitem{Hagiwara:2002ma}
863: K.~Hagiwara, A.~D.~Martin, D.~Nomura and T.~Teubner,
864: %``The SM prediction of g-2 of the muon,''
865: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 557} (2003) 69
866: [arXiv:hep-ph/0209187].
867: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0209187;%%
868:
869: %\cite{Jegerlehner:2003qp}
870: \bibitem{Jegerlehner:2003qp}
871: F.~Jegerlehner,
872: %``Theoretical precision in estimates of the hadronic contributions to (g-2)mu and alpha(QED)(M(Z)),''
873: arXiv:hep-ph/0310234.
874: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0310234;%%
875:
876: %\cite{Nyffeler:2003vb}
877: \bibitem{Nyffeler:2003vb}
878: A.~Nyffeler,
879: %``Theoretical status of the muon g-2,''
880: arXiv:hep-ph/0305135.
881: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0305135;%%
882:
883: %\cite{Narison:2003ur}
884: \bibitem{Narison:2003ur}
885: S.~Narison,
886: %``Scalar mesons and the muon anomaly,''
887: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 568} (2003) 231
888: [arXiv:hep-ph/0303004].
889: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0303004;%%
890:
891: %\cite{Davier:2003pw}
892: \bibitem{Davier:2003pw}
893: M.~Davier, S.~Eidelman, A.~Hocker and Z.~Zhang,
894: %``Updated estimate of the muon magnetic moment using revised results from e+ e- annihilation,''
895: arXiv:hep-ph/0308213.
896: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0308213;%%
897:
898: %\cite{Groote:2003kg}
899: \bibitem{Groote:2003kg}
900: S.~Groote, J.~G.~Korner and J.~Maul,
901: %``QCD improved determination of the hadronic contribution to the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon,''
902: arXiv:hep-ph/0309226.
903: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0309226;%%
904:
905: %\cite{Knecht:2003kc}
906: \bibitem{Knecht:2003kc}
907: M.~Knecht,
908: %``The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon: A theoretical introduction,''
909: arXiv:hep-ph/0307239.
910: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0307239;%%
911:
912: %\cite{Czarnecki:2002nt}
913: \bibitem{Czarnecki:2002nt}
914: A.~Czarnecki, W.~J.~Marciano and A.~Vainshtein,
915: %``Refinements in electroweak contributions to the muon anomalous magnetic moment,''
916: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 67} (2003) 073006
917: [arXiv:hep-ph/0212229].
918: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0212229;%%
919:
920: %\cite{Krause:1996rf}
921: \bibitem{Krause:1996rf}
922: B.~Krause,
923: %``Higher-order hadronic contributions to the anomalous magnetic moment of leptons,''
924: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 390} (1997) 392
925: [arXiv:hep-ph/9607259].
926: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9607259;%%
927:
928:
929: \bibitem{K_peterman}
930: H.\ Suura\ and E.\ Wichmann, Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf 105} (1957) 1930;\\
931: A.\ Peterman, Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf 105} (1957) 1931.
932:
933:
934: %%\cite{Jegerlehner:2001wq}
935: %\bibitem{Jegerlehner:2001wq}
936: %F.~Jegerlehner,
937: %%``Hadronic contributions to the photon vacuum polarization and their role in precision physics,''
938: %J.\ Phys.\ G {\bf 29} (2003) 101
939: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0104304].
940: %%%CITATION = HEP-PH 0104304;%%
941:
942: %\cite{Hagiwara:2002ma}
943: %\bibitem{Hagiwara:2002ma}
944: %.~Hagiwara, A.~D.~Martin, D.~Nomura and T.~Teubner,
945: %``The SM prediction of g-2 of the muon,''
946: %hys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 557} (2003) 69
947: %arXiv:hep-ph/0209187].
948: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0209187;%%
949:
950: %\cite{Bonneau:1971mk}
951: \bibitem{Bonneau:1971mk}
952: G.~Bonneau and F.~Martin,
953: %``Hard Photon Emission In E+ E- Reactions,''
954: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 27} (1971) 381.
955: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B27,381;%%
956:
957:
958: \bibitem{Landau_Lifshitz}
959: V.\ B.\ Berestetsky, E.\ M.\ Lifshitz\ and\ L.P.\ Pitaevsky,
960: {\it Quantum Electrodynamics}, Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK (1982).
961:
962: %\cite{Swartz:1995hc}
963: \bibitem{Swartz:1995hc}
964: M.~L.~Swartz,
965: %``Reevaluation of the Hadronic Contribution to $\alpha(M_Z~2)$,''
966: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 53} (1996) 5268
967: [arXiv:hep-ph/9509248].
968: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9509248;%%
969:
970: %\cite{Amendolia:1986wj}
971: \bibitem{Amendolia:1986wj}
972: S.~R.~Amendolia {\it et al.} [NA7 Collaboration],
973: %``A Measurement Of The Space - Like Pion Electromagnetic Form-Factor,''
974: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 277} (1986) 168.
975: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B277,168;%%
976:
977: %\cite{Knecht:2001qf}
978: \bibitem{Knecht:2001qf}
979: M.~Knecht and A.~Nyffeler,
980: %``Hadronic light-by-light corrections to the muon g-2: The pion-pole contribution,''
981: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 65} (2002) 073034
982: [arXiv:hep-ph/0111058].
983: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0111058;%%
984:
985:
986: %\cite{Hagiwara:fs}
987: \bibitem{Hagiwara:fs}
988: K.~Hagiwara {\it et al.} [Particle Data Group Collaboration],
989: %``Review Of Particle Physics,''
990: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 66} (2002) 010001.
991: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D66,010001;%%
992:
993: %\cite{Zenin:2001yx}
994: \bibitem{Zenin:2001yx}
995: O.~V.~Zenin {\it et al.}, Preprint IHEP~2001-25 (2001),
996: %``A compilation of total cross section data on e+ e- $\to$ hadrons and pQCD tests,''
997: [arXiv:hep-ph/0110176].
998: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0110176;%%
999:
1000: %\cite{Sichtermann:2003cc}
1001: \bibitem{Sichtermann:2003cc}
1002: E.~Sichtermann [g-2 Collaboration],
1003: ``Muon g-2'', {\it Invited talk at the XXIII Physics in Collision Conference (PIC03)},
1004: Zeuthen, Germany, 26-28~June~2003,\\
1005: $[$arXiv:hep-ex/0309008$]$.
1006: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0309008;%%
1007:
1008:
1009: %\cite{Whalley:2003qr}
1010: \bibitem{Whalley:2003qr}
1011: M.~R.~Whalley,
1012: %``A Compilation of data on hadronic total cross-sections in e+ e- interactions,''
1013: J.\ Phys.\ G {\bf 29} (2003) A1.
1014: %%CITATION = JPHGB,G29,A1;%%
1015:
1016: \end{thebibliography}
1017:
1018: %%%%%%%%%%%%% APPENDIX %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1019:
1020: \def\cs{$\sigma$}
1021: \def\bm{\sf \sf b/m}
1022: \def\ful{\sf full}
1023: \def\isr{\sf ISR}
1024: %
1025: \def\aco{ACO}
1026: \def\bcf{ADONE-BCF}
1027: \def\cmddva{VEPP-2M-CMD-2}
1028: \def\cmd{VEPP-2M-CMD}
1029: \def\acodmraz{ACO-DM1}
1030: \def\dmraz{DCI-DM1}
1031: \def\dmdva{DCI-DM2}
1032: \def\fen{ADONE-FENICE}
1033: \def\gg{ADONE-$\gamma\gamma{}2$}
1034: \def\mtrin{DCI-M3N}
1035: \def\mea{ADONE-MEA}
1036: \def\mupi{ADONE-$\mu\pi$}
1037: \def\nd{VEPP-2M-ND}
1038: \def\olya{VEPP-2M-OLYA}
1039: \def\snd{VEPP-2M-SND}
1040: \def\tof{VEPP-2M-TOF}
1041: \def\vepp{VEPP-2}
1042: %
1043: %%%
1044: %
1045: \def\pip{$\pi^+$}
1046: \def\pim{$\pi^-$}
1047: \def\piz{$\pi^0$}
1048: \def\kp{$K^+$}
1049: \def\km{$K^-$}
1050: \def\ks{$K_S$}
1051: \def\kl{$K_L$}
1052: \def\pbar{$\bar{p}$}
1053: \def\nbar{$\bar{n}$}
1054: %
1055: %%%
1056: %
1057: \def\EPJ#1#2#3#4{Eur. Phys. J. {\bf #1} (#3) #2 & #4}
1058: \def\LNC#1#2#3#4{Nuovo Cim. Lett. {\bf #1} (#3) #2 & #4}
1059: \def\NC#1#2#3#4{Nuovo Cim. {\bf #1} (#3) #2 & #4}
1060: \def\NP#1#2#3#4{Nucl. Phys. {\bf #1} (#3) #2 & #4}
1061: \def\NPPS#1#2#3#4{Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. {\bf #1} (#3) #2 & #4}
1062: \def\PL#1#2#3#4{Phys. Lett. {\bf #1{}B} (#3) #2 & #4}
1063: \def\PR#1#2#3#4{Phys. Rev. {\bf #1} (#3) #2 & #4}
1064: \def\PRPL#1#2#3#4{Phys. Rep. {\bf #1} (#3) #2 & #4}
1065: \def\SJNP#1#2#3#4{Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. {\bf #1} (#3) #2 & #4}
1066: \def\YF#1#2#3#4{Yad. Fiz. {\bf #1} (#3) #2 & #4}
1067: \def\ZETFP#1#2#3#4{Zh. Exp. Th. Fiz. Pisma {\bf #1} (#3) #2 & #4}
1068: \def\ZP#1#2#3#4{Z. Phys. {\bf #1} (#3) #2 & #4}
1069: \def\PREP#1#2#3{#1 (#2) & #3}
1070: %%%
1071: %
1072: \def\EX#1#2#3#4{#1 & #4 & #2 & #3}
1073: %
1074:
1075: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%55
1076:
1077:
1078:
1079:
1080: \vspace*{5ex}
1081:
1082:
1083: \section*{Appendix}
1084: %
1085:
1086: Column titles in Tabs.~\ref{Tab_excl},~\ref{Tab_incl}
1087: are self-explaining.
1088: $R$ and $\sigma$ in the ``Obs.'' column denote the types of observables
1089: in the original papers: $R$ ratio and cross section, respectively.
1090: The abbreviations in the last column of Tab.~\ref{Tab_excl} and in the fifth
1091: column of Tab.~\ref{Tab_incl}
1092: denote the types of radiative corrections (RC)
1093: applied in the original publications:
1094: \begin{description}
1095: \item[{\sf b/m}] -- data corrected for the initial state radiation (ISR),
1096: $e^+e^-$ vertex loops and electronic vacuum
1097: polarization~~\cite{Bonneau:1971mk};
1098: \item[{\sf full}] -- data corrected for ISR,
1099: $e^+e^-$ vertex loops and full vacuum polarization;
1100: \item[{\sf ISR}] -- data corrected for ISR and $e^+e^-$ vertex loops only.
1101: \end{description}
1102: Data not used in the calculations are marked by an asterisk
1103: (to compare, see the recent papers~\cite{Davier:2002dy,Davier:2003pw,Whalley:2003qr}
1104: where the extended experimental bibliography is also presented).
1105:
1106:
1107:
1108:
1109: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Exclusive table %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1110:
1111:
1112: \def\flg{\hspace*{-2.ex}$^*$\ }
1113:
1114:
1115: \begin{table}[h]
1116: \boldmath
1117: \small
1118: %
1119: \caption{Exclusive hadronic cross section measurements.}\label{Tab_excl}
1120: \vspace*{2ex}
1121: \footnotesize
1122: \begin{tabular}{ l % EXP
1123: l % J. ref.
1124: l % Auth.
1125: c % sigma, R
1126: c % rad. corr
1127: }
1128: \cline{1-5}
1129: \\[-1ex]
1130: Experiment & Reference & Author {\it et al.} & Obs. & RC
1131: \\[1ex]
1132: \cline{1-5}
1133:
1134: \\[1.5ex]\multicolumn{5}{c}{ \pip \pim ($\gamma$)}
1135:
1136: \\[1.5ex] \EX{\vepp }{ \cs }{ \bm }{ \flg \PL{41}{205}{1972}{Balakin, V.E.} }
1137: \\[1ex] \EX{ \olya }{ \cs }{ \bm }{ \NP{B256}{365}{1985}{Barkov, L.M.} }
1138: \\[1ex] \EX{ \tof }{ \cs }{ \bm }{ \SJNP{33}{368}{1980}{Vasserman, I.B.} } %%\YF{33}{709}{1981}{Vasserman, I.B.} }
1139: \\[1ex] \EX{ \cmd }{ \cs }{ \bm }{ \NP{B256}{365}{1985}{Barkov, L.M.} }
1140: \\[1ex] \EX{ \aco }{ \cs }{ \bm }{ \flg \PL{39}{289}{1972}{Benaksas, D.} }
1141: \\[1ex] \EX{ \dmraz }{ \cs }{ \bm }{ \PL{76}{512}{1978}{Quenzer, A.} }
1142: \\[1ex] \EX{ \dmdva }{ \cs }{ \ful }{ \PL{220}{321}{1989}{Bisello, D.} }
1143: \\[1ex] \EX{ \mea }{ \cs }{ \bm }{ \LNC{28}{337}{1980}{Esposito, B.} }
1144: \\[1ex] \EX{ \bcf }{ \cs }{ \bm }{ \LNC{15}{393}{1976}{Bollini, D.} }
1145: \\[1ex] \EX{ \cmddva }{ \cs }{ \ful }{ \PL{527}{161}{2002}{Akhmetshin, R.R.} }
1146: \\[1ex] \EX{ }{ }{ }{ Erratum \PREP{\flg hep-ex/0308008}{2003}{Akhmetshin, R.R.} }
1147:
1148: \\[2ex]\multicolumn{5}{c}{ \pip \pim \piz }
1149:
1150: \\[1.5ex] \EX{\cmddva }{ \cs }{\isr }{ \PL{476}{33}{2000}{Akhmetshin, R.R.} } %\PREP{hep-ex/0002017}{2000}{Akhmetshin, R.R.} }
1151: \\[1ex] \EX{ }{ }{ }{ Erratum \PREP{\flg hep-ex/0308008}{2003}{Akhmetshin, R.R.} }
1152: \\[1ex] \EX{ }{ \cs }{\isr }{ \PL{364}{199}{1995}{Akhmetshin, R.R.} } % \PREP{Budker~INP 95-35}{1995}{Akhmetshin, R.R.} }
1153: \\[1ex] \EX{ }{ \cs }{\isr }{ \PL{434}{426}{1998}{Akhmetshin, R.R.} } % \PREP{Budker~INP 98-30}{1998}{Akhmetshin, R.R.} }
1154: \\[1ex] \EX{ \snd }{ \cs }{\isr }{ \PR{D66}{032001}{2002}{Achasov, M.N.} } %\PREP{hep-ex/0201040}{2002}{Achasov, M.N.} }
1155: \\[1ex] \EX{ }{ \cs }{\isr }{ \PR{D63}{072002}{2001}{Achasov, M.N.} }
1156: \\[1ex] \EX{ }{ \cs }{\isr }{ \PR{D68}{052006}{2003}{Achasov, M.N.} } % hep-ex/0305049
1157: \\[1ex] \EX{ \nd }{ \cs }{\isr }{ \PRPL{202}{99}{1991}{Dolinsky, S.I.} } %ty = rvue
1158: \\[1ex] \EX{ \cmd }{ \cs }{\isr }{ \PREP{Novosibirsk 89-15}{1989}{Barkov, L.M.} }
1159: \\[1ex] \EX{ \dmraz }{ \cs }{\isr }{ \NP{B172}{13}{1980}{Cordier, A.} }
1160: \\[1ex] \EX{ \dmdva }{ \cs }{\isr }{ \ZP{C56}{15}{1992}{Antonelli, A.} }
1161: \\[1ex] \EX{ \aco }{ \cs }{ \bm }{ \flg \PL{28}{513}{1968}{Augustin, J.E.} }
1162: \\[1ex] \EX{ }{ \cs }{ \bm }{ \flg \PL{42}{507}{1972}{Benaksas, D.} }
1163: \\[1ex] \EX{ \gg }{ \cs }{ \bm }{ \NP{B184}{31}{1981}{Bacci, C.} }
1164: \\[1ex] \EX{ \mea }{ \cs }{ \bm }{ \LNC{28}{195}{1980}{Esposito, B.} }
1165:
1166: \\[2ex] \cline{1-5} \end{tabular}
1167: \end{table}
1168:
1169:
1170: \addtocounter{table}{-1}
1171:
1172: %\newpage
1173:
1174: \begin{table}
1175: \boldmath
1176: \small
1177: \caption{(continued) Exclusive hadronic cross section measurements.}
1178: \vspace*{2ex}
1179: \footnotesize
1180: \begin{tabular}{ l % EXP
1181: l % J. ref.
1182: l % Auth.
1183: c % sigma, R
1184: c % rad. corr
1185: }
1186: \cline{1-5}
1187: \\[-1ex]
1188: Experiment & Reference & Author {\it et al.} & Obs. & RC
1189: \\[1ex]
1190: \cline{1-5}
1191:
1192: \\[2ex]\multicolumn{5}{c}{ \piz $\gamma$ }
1193:
1194: \\[1.5ex] \EX{\snd }{ \cs }{\isr }{ \EPJ{C12}{25}{2000}{Achasov, M.N.} }
1195: \\[1ex] \EX{ }{ \cs }{\isr }{ \PL{559}{171}{2003}{Achasov, M.N.} }
1196: \\[1ex] \EX{ \aco }{ \cs }{\isr }{ \PL{63}{352}{1976}{Cosme, G.} }
1197:
1198: \\[1.5ex]\multicolumn{5}{c}{ $\eta$ $\gamma$ }
1199:
1200: \\[1.5ex] \EX{\cmddva }{ \cs }{\isr }{ \PL{364}{199}{1995}{Akhmetshin, R.R.} } % \PREP{Budker~INP 95-35}{1995}{Akhmetshin, R.R.} }
1201: \\[1ex] \EX{ }{ \cs }{\isr }{ \PL{509}{217}{2001}{Akhmetshin, R.R.} } %%\PREP{hep-ex/0103043}{2001}{Akhmetshin, R.R.} }
1202: \\[1ex] \EX{ \snd }{ \cs }{\isr }{ \EPJ{C12}{25}{2000}{Achasov, M.N.} }
1203: \\[1ex] \EX{ \aco }{ \cs }{\isr ?}{ \PL{63}{352}{1976}{Cosme, G.} }
1204:
1205: \\[1.5ex] \multicolumn{5}{c}{ $\omega$ $<$ \piz $\gamma$ $>$ \piz }
1206:
1207: \\[1.5ex] \EX{\snd }{ \cs }{\isr }{ \PL{486}{29}{2000}{Achasov, M.N.} } %\PREP{hep-ex/0005032}{2000}{Achasov, M.N.} } \PREP{Budker~INP 2000-35}{2000}{Aulchenko, V.M.} }
1208: \\[1ex] \EX{ }{ \cs }{\isr }{ \NP{B569}{158}{2000}{Achasov, M.N.} }
1209: \\[1ex] \EX{ \cmddva }{ \cs }{\isr }{ \PL{562}{173}{2003}{Akhmetshin, R.R.} } %\PREP{hep-ex/0304009}{2003}{Akhmetshin, R.R.} }
1210: \\[1ex] \EX{ \nd }{ \cs }{\isr }{ \PL{174}{453}{1986}{Dolinsky, S.I.} }
1211: \\[1ex] \EX{ \dmdva }{ \cs }{\isr }{ \PREP{LAL-90-35}{1990}{Bisello, D.} }
1212:
1213: \\[2ex]\multicolumn{5}{c}{ \pip \pim $2$\piz }
1214:
1215: \\[1.5ex] \EX{\olya }{ \cs }{\isr }{ \ZETFP{43}{497}{1986}{Kurdadze, L.M.} }
1216: \\[1ex] \EX{ \nd }{ \cs }{\isr }{ \PRPL{202}{99}{1991}{Dolinsky, S.I.} }
1217: \\[1ex] \EX{ \cmddva }{ \cs }{\isr }{ \PL{466}{392}{1999}{Akhmetshin, R.R.} }
1218: \\[1ex] \EX{ \snd }{ \cs }{\isr }{ \PREP{Budker~INP 2001-34}{2001}{Achasov, M.N.} }
1219: \\[1ex] \EX{ \mtrin }{ \cs }{ \bm }{ \NP{B152}{215}{1979}{Cosme, G.} }
1220: \\[1ex] \EX{ \gg }{ \cs }{ \bm }{ \NP{B184}{31}{1981}{Bacci, C.} }
1221: \\[1ex] \EX{ \aco }{ \cs }{ \bm }{ \PL{63}{349}{1976}{Cosme, G.} }
1222: \\[1ex] \EX{ \dmdva }{ \cs }{\isr }{ \PREP{LAL-90-35}{1990}{Bisello, D.} }
1223: \\[1ex] \EX{ \mea }{ \cs }{ \bm }{ \LNC{31}{445}{1981}{Esposito, B.} }
1224:
1225:
1226: \\[2ex] \cline{1-5} \end{tabular}
1227: \end{table}
1228:
1229:
1230: \addtocounter{table}{-1}
1231:
1232: \newpage
1233:
1234: \begin{table}
1235: \boldmath
1236: \small
1237: \caption{(continued) Exclusive hadronic cross section measurements.}
1238: \vspace*{2ex}
1239: \footnotesize
1240: \begin{tabular}{ l % EXP
1241: l % J. ref.
1242: l % Auth.
1243: c % sigma, R
1244: c % rad. corr
1245: }
1246: \cline{1-5}
1247: \\[-1ex]
1248: Experiment & Reference & Author {\it et al.} & Obs. & RC
1249: \\[1ex]
1250: \cline{1-5}
1251:
1252:
1253: \\[2ex]\multicolumn{5}{c}{ $2$\pip $2$\pim }
1254:
1255: \\[1.5ex] \EX{\olya }{ \cs }{\isr }{ \ZETFP{47}{432}{1988}{Kurdadze, L.M.} }
1256: \\[1ex] \EX{ \cmd }{ \cs }{\isr }{ \SJNP{47}{248}{1988}{Barkov, L.M.} }
1257: \\[1ex] \EX{ \cmddva }{ \cs }{\isr }{ \PL{475}{190}{2000}{Akhmetshin, R.R.} }
1258: \\[1ex] \EX{ }{ \cs }{\isr }{ \PL{491}{81}{2000}{Akhmetshin, R.R.} }
1259: \\[1ex] \EX{ }{ \cs }{\isr }{ \PL{466}{392}{1999}{Akhmetshin, R.R.} }
1260: \\[1ex] \EX{ \snd }{ \cs }{\isr }{ \PREP{Budker~INP 2001-34}{2001}{Achasov, M.N.} }
1261: \\[1ex] \EX{ \nd }{ \cs }{\isr }{ \PRPL{202}{99}{1991}{Dolinsky, S.I.} }
1262: \\[1ex] \EX{ \mtrin }{ \cs }{ \bm }{ \NP{B152}{215}{1979}{Cosme, G.} }
1263: \\[1ex] \EX{ \dmraz }{ \cs }{ \bm }{ \PL{81}{389}{1979}{Cordier, A.} }
1264: \\[1ex] \EX{ }{ \cs }{ \bm }{ \PL{109}{129}{1982}{Cordier, A.} }
1265: \\[1ex] \EX{ \dmdva }{ \cs }{\isr }{ \PREP{LAL-90-35}{1990}{Bisello, D.} }
1266: \\[1ex] \EX{ \mea }{ \cs }{ \bm }{ \LNC{28}{195}{1980}{Esposito, B.} }
1267: \\[1ex] \EX{ \mupi }{ \cs }{ \bm }{ \NC{13A}{593}{1973}{Grilli, M.} }
1268: \\[1ex] \EX{ \gg }{ \cs }{ \bm }{ \PL{95}{139}{1980}{Bacci, C.} }
1269: \\[1ex] \EX{ \aco }{ \cs }{ \bm }{ \PL{63}{349}{1976}{Cosme, G.} }
1270:
1271:
1272: \\[1.5ex] \multicolumn{5}{c}{ $2$\pip $2$\pim \piz }
1273:
1274: \\[1.5ex] \EX{\cmd }{ \cs }{\isr }{ \SJNP{47}{248}{1988}{Barkov, L.M.} }
1275: \\[1ex] \EX{ \mtrin }{ \cs }{ \bm }{ \NP{B152}{215}{1979}{Cosme, G.} }
1276: \\[1ex] \EX{ \gg }{ \cs }{ \bm }{ \NP{B184}{31}{1981}{Bacci, C.} }
1277: \\[1ex] \EX{ \mea }{ \cs }{ \bm }{ \LNC{31}{445}{1981}{Esposito, B.} }
1278: \\[1ex] \EX{ \mupi }{ \cs }{ \bm }{ \NC{13A}{593}{1973}{Grilli, M.} }
1279:
1280: \\[1.5ex]\multicolumn{5}{c}{ $\omega$ $<$ \pip \pim \piz $>$ \pip \pim }
1281:
1282: \\[1.5ex] \EX{\dmraz }{ \cs }{ \bm }{ \PL{106}{155}{1981}{Cordier, A.} }
1283: \\[1ex] \EX{ \dmdva }{ \cs }{ \bm }{ \ZP{C56}{15}{1992}{Antonelli, A.} }
1284: \\[1ex] \EX{ \cmddva }{ \cs }{\isr }{ \PL{489}{125}{2000}{Akhmetshin, R.R.} }
1285:
1286: \\[2ex] \multicolumn{5}{c}{ $\eta$ \pip \pim }
1287:
1288: \\[1.5ex] \EX{\cmddva }{ \cs }{\isr }{ \PL{489}{125}{2000}{Akhmetshin, R.R.} }
1289: \\[1ex] \EX{ \nd }{ \cs }{\isr }{ \PRPL{202}{99}{1991}{Dolinsky, S.I.} }
1290:
1291: \\[2ex]\multicolumn{5}{c}{ \pip \pim $3$\piz }
1292:
1293: \\[1.5ex] \EX{\mtrin }{ \cs }{ \bm }{ \NP{B152}{215}{1979}{Cosme, G.} }
1294: \\[1ex] \EX{ \mea }{ \cs }{ \bm }{ \LNC{25}{5}{1979}{Esposito, B.} }
1295:
1296:
1297: \\[2ex] \cline{1-5} \end{tabular}
1298: \end{table}
1299:
1300:
1301: \addtocounter{table}{-1}
1302:
1303: \newpage
1304:
1305: \begin{table}
1306: \boldmath
1307: \small
1308: \caption{(continued) Exclusive hadronic cross section measurements.}
1309: \vspace*{2ex}
1310: \footnotesize
1311: \begin{tabular}{ l % EXP
1312: l % J. ref.
1313: l % Auth.
1314: c % sigma, R
1315: c % rad. corr
1316: }
1317: \cline{1-5}
1318: \\[-1ex]
1319: Experiment & Reference & Author {\it et al.} & Obs. & RC
1320: \\[1ex]
1321: \cline{1-5}
1322:
1323:
1324: \\[2ex]\multicolumn{5}{c}{ $3$\pip $3$\pim }
1325:
1326: \\[1.5ex] \EX{\cmd }{ \cs }{\isr }{ \SJNP{47}{248}{1988}{Barkov, L.M.} }
1327: \\[1ex] \EX{ \dmraz }{ \cs }{ \bm }{ \PL{107}{145}{1981}{Bisello, D.} }
1328: \\[1ex] \EX{ \dmdva }{ \cs }{\isr }{ \PREP{Roma U. thesis}{1986}{Schioppa, M.} }
1329: \\[1ex] \EX{ \mtrin }{ \cs }{ \bm }{ \NP{B152}{215}{1979}{Cosme, G.} }
1330: \\[1ex] \EX{ \mupi }{ \cs }{ \bm }{ \NC{13A}{593}{1973}{Grilli, M.} }
1331:
1332: \\[2ex]\multicolumn{5}{c}{ $2$\pip $2$\piz $2$\pim }
1333:
1334: \\[1.5ex] \EX{\cmd }{ \cs }{\isr }{ \SJNP{47}{248}{1988}{Barkov, L.M.} }
1335: \\[1ex] \EX{ \mea }{ \cs }{ \bm }{ \LNC{31}{445}{1981}{Esposito, B.} }
1336: \\[1ex] \EX{ \mtrin }{ \cs }{ \bm }{ \NP{B152}{215}{1979}{Cosme, G.} }
1337: \\[1ex] \EX{ \gg }{ \cs }{ \bm }{ \NP{B184}{31}{1981}{Bacci, C.} }
1338: \\[1ex] \EX{ \mupi }{ \cs }{ \bm }{ \NC{13A}{593}{1973}{Grilli, M.} }
1339: \\[1ex] \EX{ \dmdva }{ \cs }{\isr }{ \PREP{Roma U. thesis}{1986}{Schioppa, M.} }
1340:
1341:
1342: \\[1.5ex] \multicolumn{5}{c}{ \kp \km }
1343:
1344: \\[1.5ex] \EX{\vepp }{ \cs }{ \bm }{\PL{41}{205}{1972}{Balakin, V.E.} }
1345: \\[1ex] \EX{ \olya }{ \cs }{\isr }{ \PL{107}{297}{1981}{Ivanov, P.M.} }
1346: \\[1ex] \EX{ \bcf }{ \cs }{ \bm }{ \PL{46}{261}{1973}{Bernardini, M.} }
1347: \\[1ex] \EX{ \acodmraz}{ \cs }{ \bm }{ \PREP{LAL-80-35}{1980}{Grosdidier, G.} }
1348: \\[1ex] \EX{ }{ \cs }{ \bm }{ \PL{99}{257}{1981}{Delcourt, B.} }
1349: \\[1ex] \EX{ \dmdva }{ \cs }{\isr }{ \ZP{C39}{13}{1988}{Bisello, D.} }
1350: \\[1ex] \EX{ \mea }{ \cs }{ \bm }{ \LNC{28}{337}{1980}{Esposito, B.} }
1351: \\[1ex] \EX{ \cmd }{ \cs }{\isr }{ \PREP{Novosibirsk 83-85}{1983}{Anikin, G.V.} }
1352: \\[1ex] \EX{ \cmddva }{ \cs }{\isr }{ \PL{364}{199}{1995}{Akhmetshin, R.R.} } %% \PREP{Budker~INP 95-35}{1995}{Akhmetshin, R.R.} }
1353: \\[1ex] \EX{ \snd }{ \cs }{\isr }{\PR{D63}{072002}{2001}{Achasov, M.N.} } %%\PREP{hep-ex/0009036}{2000}{Achasov, M.N.} }
1354:
1355: \\[2ex] \cline{1-5} \end{tabular}
1356: \end{table}
1357:
1358:
1359: \addtocounter{table}{-1}
1360:
1361: \newpage
1362:
1363: \begin{table}
1364: \boldmath
1365: \small
1366: \caption{(continued) Exclusive hadronic cross section measurements.}
1367: \vspace*{2ex}
1368: \footnotesize
1369: \begin{tabular}{ l % EXP
1370: l % J. ref.
1371: l % Auth.
1372: c % sigma, R
1373: c % rad. corr
1374: }
1375: \cline{1-5}
1376: \\[-1ex]
1377: Experiment & Reference & Author {\it et al.} & Obs. & RC
1378: \\[1ex]
1379: \cline{1-5}
1380:
1381:
1382: \\[2ex] \multicolumn{5}{c}{ \ks \kl }
1383:
1384: \\[1.5ex] \EX{\dmraz }{ \cs }{ \bm }{ \PL{99}{261}{1981}{Mane, F.} }
1385: \\[1ex] \EX{ \olya }{ \cs }{ \bm }{ \ZETFP{36}{91}{1982}{Ivanov, P.M.} }
1386: \\[1ex] \EX{ \cmd }{ \cs }{ \bm }{ \PREP{Novosibirsk 83-85}{1983}{Anikin, G.V.} }
1387: \\[1ex] \EX{ \cmddva }{ \cs }{\isr }{ \PL{364}{199}{1995}{Akhmetshin, R.R.} } %% \PREP{Budker~INP 95-35}{1995}{Akhmetshin, R.R.} }
1388: \\[1ex] \EX{ }{ \cs }{\isr }{ \PL{551}{27}{2003}{Akhmetshin, R.R.} }
1389: \\[1ex] \EX{ }{ \cs }{\isr }{ \PL{466}{385,}{1999}{Akhmetshin, R.R. } }
1390: \\[1ex] \EX{ }{ }{ }{ Errata {\it ibid.} {\bf 508B} (2001) 217,}
1391: \\[1ex] \EX{ }{ }{ }{ ~~~~~~~~~~ hep-ex/0308008 (2003) }
1392: \\[1ex] \EX{ \snd }{ \cs }{\isr }{\PR{D63}{072002}{2001}{Achasov, M.N.} } %%\PREP{hep-ex/0009036}{2000}{Achasov, M.N.} }
1393:
1394:
1395:
1396: \\[1.5ex]\multicolumn{5}{c}{ \kp \km \piz }
1397:
1398: \\[1.5ex] \EX{\dmdva }{ \cs }{\isr }{ \NPPS{21}{111}{1991}{Bisello, D.} }
1399: %\\[1ex] \EX{ }{ }{ }{ \PREP{LAL-90-71}{1990}{Bisello, D.} }
1400: \\[1ex] \EX{ }{ \cs }{\isr }{ \ZP{C52}{227}{1991}{Bisello, D.} }
1401:
1402: \\[2ex]\multicolumn{5}{c}{ \ks \kp \pim $+$ \ks \km \pip }
1403:
1404: \\[1.5ex] \EX{\dmraz }{ \cs }{ \bm }{ \PL{112}{178}{1982}{Mane, F.} }
1405: \\[1ex] \EX{ \dmdva }{ \cs }{\isr }{ \ZP{C52}{227}{1991}{Bisello, D.} }
1406:
1407: \\[1.5ex]\multicolumn{5}{c}{ \kp \km \pip \pim }
1408:
1409: \\[1.5ex] \EX{\dmraz }{ \cs }{ \bm }{ \PL{110}{335}{1982}{Cordier, A.} }
1410: \\[1ex] \EX{ \dmdva }{ \cs }{\isr }{ \NPPS{21}{111}{1991}{Bisello, D.} }
1411: %\\ \EX{ }{ }{ }{ \PREP{LAL-90-71}{1990}{Bisello, D.} }
1412:
1413: \\[2ex] \multicolumn{5}{c}{ \ks$+X$ }
1414: \\[1.5ex] \EX{\dmraz }{ \cs }{ \bm }{ \PREP{LAL-82-46}{1982}{Mane, F.} }
1415:
1416: \\[2ex]\multicolumn{5}{c}{ $p$ \pbar}
1417:
1418: \\[1.5ex] \EX{\dmraz }{ \cs }{ \bm }{ \PL{86}{395}{1979}{Delcourt, B.} }
1419: \\[1ex] \EX{ \dmdva }{ \cs }{ \bm }{ \NP{B224}{379}{1983}{Bisello, D.} }
1420: \\[1ex] \EX{ \fen }{ \cs }{ \ful}{ \NP{B517}{3}{1998}{Antonelli, A.} }
1421:
1422: \\[2ex]\multicolumn{5}{c}{ $n$ \nbar }
1423:
1424: \\[1.5ex] \EX{ \fen }{ \cs }{ \ful}{ \NP{B517}{3}{1998}{Antonelli, A.} }
1425:
1426: \\[2ex] \cline{1-5} \end{tabular}
1427: \end{table}
1428:
1429:
1430: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Inclusive table %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1431:
1432: \def\ful{\sf full}
1433: \def\bm{\sf b/m}
1434: \def\cs{$\sigma$}
1435:
1436: \def\EX#1#2#3#4{#4 & #1 & #2 & #3 \\}
1437: %%
1438: \def\JO#1#2#3#4#5{#4-#5 & #1~(#2) & #3 }
1439: \def\PL#1#2#3#4#5#6{#5-#6 & Phys.~Lett.~{\bf #1{}B} (#3) #2 & #4 }
1440: \def\PR#1#2#3#4#5#6{#5-#6 & Phys.~Rev.~{\bf #1} (#3) #2 & #4 }
1441: \def\PRL#1#2#3#4#5#6{#5-#6 & Phys.~Rev.~Lett.~{\bf #1} (#3) #2 & #4 }
1442: \def\PRPL#1#2#3#4#5#6{#5-#6 & Phys.~Rep.~{\bf #1} (#3) #2 & #4 }
1443: \def\ZP#1#2#3#4#5#6{#5-#6 & Z.~Phys.~{\bf #1} (#3) #2 & #4 }
1444: %%
1445:
1446: \begin{table}
1447: \caption{Inclusive hadronic cross section measurements.}\label{Tab_incl}
1448: \vspace*{3ex}
1449: \scriptsize
1450: \begin{tabular}{ l % EXP
1451: l % J. ref.
1452: l % 1st author
1453: c % R,sig
1454: c % Rad.corr
1455: l % E_{cm} range
1456: }
1457: \cline{1-6}
1458: \\[-0.7ex]
1459: Experiment &
1460: Reference &
1461: Author {\it et al.} &
1462: Obs. &
1463: RC &
1464: ${\mathrm E}_{\mathrm{cm}}$ $[$GeV$]$
1465: \\[1ex]
1466: \cline{1-6}
1467: \\[1ex]
1468: \EX{\cs }{\bm }{2.23 }{\flg \PL{58}{478}{1975}{Bartoli, B.}{ADONE}{MEA} }
1469: \EX{R }{\ful }{2.0 - 4.8 }{\PRL{88}{101802}{2002}{Bai, J.Z.}{BEPC}{BES} }%COL = BES Collaboration} }
1470: \EX{R }{\ful }{2.6 - 5.0 }{\PRL{84}{594}{2000}{Bai, J.Z.}{BEPC}{BES} }%COL = BES Collaboration} }
1471: \EX{\cs }{\bm }{2.4 - 5.0 }{\flg \PRL{34}{764}{1975}{Augustin, J.E.}{SPEAR}{SMAG~$^{\dagger}$} }
1472: \EX{R }{\ful }{3.598 - 3.886 }{\flg \PRL{39}{526}{1977}{Rapidis, P.A.}{SPEAR}{SMAG+LGW} }
1473: \EX{R }{\ful }{3.670 - 4.496 }{\JO{SLAC-PUB-4160}{1986}{Osterheld, A.}{SPEAR}{Crystal Ball} }
1474: \EX{R }{\ful }{5.0 - 7.4 }{\JO{SLAC-PUB-5160}{1989}{Edwards, C.}{SPEAR}{Crystal Ball} }
1475: \EX{R }{\ful }{3.670 - 3.872 }{\JO{SLAC-219}{1979}{Schindler, R.H.}{SLAC}{MARK-II} }
1476:
1477: \EX{R }{\bm }{3.6025 - 5.1950 }{\PL{76}{361}{1978}{Brandelik, R.}{DORIS}{DASP}}
1478:
1479: \EX{R }{\ful }{7.440 - 9.415 }{\ZP{C15}{299}{1982}{Niczyporuk, B.}{DORIS-II}{LENA} }%COL = LENA Collaboration} }
1480: \EX{R }{\ful }{9.360 }{\flg \ZP{C54}{13}{1992}{Albrecht, H.}{DORIS-II}{ARGUS} }%COL = ARGUS Collaboration} }
1481: \EX{R }{\ful }{9.39 - 9.46 }{\ZP{C40}{49}{1988}{Jakubowski, Z.}{DORIS-II}{Crystal Ball} }%COL = CRYSTALL BALL Collaboration} }
1482: \EX{R }{\ful }{9.45 - 10.04 }{\flg \ZP{C6}{125}{1980}{Bock, P.}{DORIS-II}{DHHM} }%COL = Hamburg-Heidelberg-MPI Collaboration} }
1483: \EX{R }{\ful }{9.51 }{\PL{116}{383}{1982}{Albrecht, H.}{DORIS-II}{DASP} }
1484:
1485: \EX{R }{\ful }{7.30 - 10.29 }{\ZP{C70}{31}{1996}{Blinov, A.E.}{VEPP-4}{MD1} }
1486:
1487: \EX{R }{\ful }{10.43 - 11.09 }{\PRL{48}{906}{1982}{Rice, E.}{CESR}{CUSB} }
1488: \EX{R }{\ful }{10.49 }{\PR{D29}{1285}{1984}{Giles, R.}{CESR}{CLEO} } %COL = CLEO Collaboration} }
1489: \EX{R }{NO }{10.60 - 11.20 }{\PRL{54}{381}{1985}{Besson, D.}{CESR}{CLEO~$^{\dagger\dagger}$} } %COL = CLEO Collaboration}
1490: \EX{R }{\ful }{10.52 }{\PR{D57}{1350}{1998}{Ammar, R.}{CESR}{CLEO~II} } %COL = CLEO Collaboration} }
1491:
1492:
1493: \EX{R }{\ful }{3.6 - 30.8 }{\PRPL{83}{151}{1982}{Criegee, L.}{DORIS/PETRA}{PLUTO} }
1494: \EX{R }{\ful }{12.0 - 41.4 }{\flg \ZP{C22}{307}{1984}{Althoff, M.}{PETRA}{TASSO} }%COL = TASSO Collaboration} }
1495:
1496: \EX{R }{\ful }{12.00 - 31.25 }{\flg \ZP{C4}{87}{1980}{Brandelik, R.}{PETRA}{TASSO} }%COL = TASSO Collaboration} }
1497: \EX{R }{\ful }{14.03 - 43.70 }{\flg \ZP{C47}{187}{1990}{Braunschweig, W.}{PETRA}{TASSO} }%COL = TASSO Collaboration} }
1498: \EX{R }{\ful }{41.45 - 44.20 }{\PL{138}{441}{1984}{Althoff, M.}{PETRA}{TASSO} }%COL = TASSO Collaboration} }
1499:
1500: \EX{R }{\ful }{12.00 - 46.47 }{\PRPL{148}{67}{1987}{Naroska, B.}{PETRA}{JADE}}
1501: \EX{R }{\ful }{12.00 - 46.47 }{\PR{D34}{681}{1986}{Adeva, B.}{PETRA}{MARK-J} }%COL = MARK-J Collaboration} }
1502: \EX{R }{\ful }{31.57 }{\flg \PL{85}{463}{1979}{Barber, D.P.}{PETRA}{MARK-J} }%COL = Aachen-LAPP-MIT-NIKHEF-Beijing Collaboration} }
1503: \EX{R }{\ful }{34.85 }{\flg \PL{108}{63}{1982}{Barber, D.P.}{PETRA}{MARK-J} }
1504:
1505: \EX{R }{\ful }{14.0 - 46.6 }{\PL{183}{400}{1987}{Behrend, H.J.}{PETRA}{CELLO} }%COL = CELLO Collaboration} }
1506:
1507: \EX{R }{\ful }{29.0 }{\PR{D31}{1537}{1985}{Fernandez, E.}{PEP}{MAC} }
1508: \EX{R }{\ful }{29.0 }{\flg \PR{D43}{34}{1991}{von Zanthier, C.}{PEP}{MARK-II} }%COL = MARK-II Collaboration} }
1509:
1510: \EX{R }{\ful }{50.0 - 61.4 }{\flg \PR{D42}{1339}{1990}{Kumita, T.}{TRISTAN}{AMY} }%COL = AMY Collaboration} }
1511: \EX{R }{\ful }{50.0 - 61.4 }{\flg \PL{234}{525}{1990}{Adachi, I.}{TRISTAN}{TOPAZ} }%COL = TOPAZ Collaboration} }
1512: \EX{\cs }{\ful }{57.77 }{\flg \PL{347}{171}{1995}{Miyabayashi, K.}{TRISTAN}{TOPAZ} }%COL = TOPAZ Collaboration} }
1513: \EX{\cs }{\ful }{57.37 - 59.84 }{\flg \PL{304}{373}{1993}{Abe, T.}{TRISTAN}{TOPAZ} }%COL = TOPAZ Collaboration} }
1514: \EX{R }{\ful }{50.0 - 52.0 }{\flg \PL{198}{570}{1987}{Yoshida, H.}{TRISTAN}{VENUS} }%COL = VENUS Collaboration} }
1515: \EX{R }{\ful }{63.6 - 64.0 }{\flg \PL{246}{297}{1990}{Abe, K.}{TRISTAN}{VENUS} }%COL = VENUS Collaboration} }
1516: \\[-0.5ex]
1517: \cline{1-6}
1518: \end{tabular}
1519: ~\\[2ex]
1520: $^{\dagger}$ \footnotesize{The measured cross section
1521: excludes all-neutral final states and not used in our analysis.
1522: }\\[0.5ex]
1523: $^{\dagger\dagger}$ \footnotesize{Data were not corrected for ISR and
1524: thus not used in our analysis.}\\[1ex]
1525:
1526: All preliminary data are excluded.
1527: Data covering $J/\psi$, $\Psi(2S)$ and $\Upsilon(1S)..\Upsilon(4S)$
1528: are also omitted as they are
1529: distorted by machine energy spread and
1530: cannot be directly used for the evaluation of
1531: $\Delta\alpha_{\mathrm{QED}}^{\mathrm{had}}(s)$ and
1532: $a_\mu(\mathrm{had},\mathrm{LO})$.
1533:
1534: Data from the SPEAR-DELCO experiment
1535: $[$Phys.~Rev.~Lett.~{\bf 40}~(1978)~671$]$ are excluded as they were
1536: not corrected for the $\tau^+\tau^-$ contamination of the hadronic sample.
1537: \end{table}
1538:
1539: \end{document}
1540: