1: \documentclass{appolb}
2: \usepackage{bm}
3: \usepackage{epsfig}
4: % epsfig package included for placing EPS figures in the text
5: %------------------------------------------------------
6:
7: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
8: % %
9: % BEGINNING OF TEXT %
10: % %
11: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
12:
13: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
14: %Graphics definition
15: \newif\ifpdf
16: \ifx\pdfoutput\undefined
17: \pdffalse % we are not running PDFLaTeX
18: \else
19: \pdfoutput=1 % we are running PDFLaTeX
20: \pdftrue
21: \fi
22:
23: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
24: %Put your definitions here
25:
26: \def\bsigma{\mbox{\boldmath $\sigma$}}
27: \def\bl{\mbox{\scriptsize\boldmath $\ell$}}
28: \def\bll{\mbox{\boldmath $\ell$}}
29:
30: \def\Slash#1{{#1\!\!\!\!\!\slash}}
31: \def\Dslash{D\!\!\!\!\slash}
32: \def\SppP{{\cal {P\!\!\!\!\hspace{0.04cm}\slash}}_\perp}
33: \def\ppslash{p^{\,\prime}\!\!\!\!\!\slash}
34: \def\nslash{n\!\!\!\slash}
35: \def\bnslash{\bar n\!\!\!\slash}
36: \def\pslash{p\!\!\!\slash}
37: \def\qslash{q\!\!\!\slash}
38: \def\lslash{l\!\!\!\slash}
39: \def\dslash{\partial\!\!\!\slash}
40: \def\Aslash{A\!\!\!\slash}
41: \def\OMIT#1{}
42:
43: \newcommand{\CH}[2]{\chi_{#1,#2}}
44: \newcommand{\CHp}[3]{\chi_{#1,#2}^{#3}}
45: \newcommand{\bCH}[2]{\overline\chi_{#1,#2}}
46: \newcommand{\bCHp}[3]{\overline\chi_{#1,#2}^{#3}}
47:
48: \newcommand{\nn}{\nonumber}
49: \newcommand{\lc}{\lowercase}
50: \newcommand{\bn}{{\bar n}}
51: \newcommand{\bea}{\begin{eqnarray}}
52: \newcommand{\eea}{\end{eqnarray}}
53: \newcommand{\nb}{\bar n}
54: \newcommand{\bnp}{\bar n \!\cdot\! p}
55: \newcommand{\bnP}{\bar {\cal P}}
56: \newcommand{\ppP}{{\cal P}_\perp}
57: \newcommand{\bnPd}{\bar {\cal P}^{\raisebox{0.8mm}{\scriptsize$\dagger$}} }
58: \newcommand{\cP}{{\cal P}}
59: \newcommand{\cPslash}{ {\cal P}\!\!\!\!\slash}
60: \newcommand{\bs}{\!\hspace{0.05cm}}
61: \newcommand{\mcdot}{\!\cdot\!}
62: \newcommand{\Ub}{{\cal U}}
63: \newcommand{\cD}{{\cal D}}
64: \newcommand{\LQCD}{{\Lambda_{\rm QCD}}}
65: \newcommand{\np}{n \!\cdot\! p}
66:
67: \newcommand{\mpsi}{M_\psi}
68: \newcommand{\qsqr}{Q^2}
69: \newcommand{\jpsi}{J/\psi}
70: \newcommand{\emax}{E_{max}}
71:
72:
73:
74:
75:
76:
77: \begin{document}
78: \date{\today}
79: \pagestyle{plain}
80: %% uncomment the following line to get equations numbered by (sec.num)
81: %\eqsec
82: \newcount\eLiNe\eLiNe=\inputlineno\advance\eLiNe by -1
83:
84: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
85: %Some more stuff to get graphics to work
86: \ifpdf
87: \DeclareGraphicsExtensions{.pdf, .jpg}
88: \newcommand{\picspace}{\vspace{-2.5in}}
89: \newcommand{\picspacehalf}{\vspace{-1.75in}}
90: \else
91: \DeclareGraphicsExtensions{.eps, .jpg,.ps}
92: \newcommand{\picspace}{\vspace{0in}}
93: \newcommand{\picspacehalf}{\vspace{0in}}
94: \fi
95: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
96:
97:
98:
99: %\eqsec % uncomment this line to get equations numbered by (sec.num)
100: \title{Recent Developments in Heavy Quark and Quarkonium Production%
101: \thanks{Presented at the XXXIII International Symposium on Multiparticle
102: Dynamics, September 5-11, 2003, Krakow, Poland}%
103: % you can use '\\' to break lines
104: }
105: \author{Thomas Mehen
106: \address{Duke University}
107: }
108: \maketitle
109: \begin{abstract}
110:
111: Recent measurements of $\jpsi$ production in $e^+e^-$ colliders pose a challenge to the NRQCD factorization theorem for
112: quarkonium production. Discrepancies between leading order calculations of color-octet contributions and the momentum
113: distribution of $\jpsi$ observed by Belle and BaBar are resolved by resumming large perturbative and nonperturbative
114: corrections that are enhanced near the kinematic endpoint. The large cross sections for $\jpsi c \bar c $ and double
115: quarkonium production remain poorly understood. Nonperturbative effects in fixed-target hadroproduction of open charm
116: are also discussed. Large asymmetries in the production of charm mesons and baryons probe nonperturbative corrections
117: to the QCD factorization theorem. A power correction called heavy-quark recombination can economically explain these
118: asymmetries with a few universal parameters.
119:
120: \end{abstract}
121:
122: \PACS{13.66.Bc, 13.85.Ni, 14.40.Gx, 14.65.Dw}
123:
124: \section{Introduction}
125:
126: In the last couple of years there have been a number of interesting experimental results in the production of heavy
127: particles, including measurements of $J/\psi$ production in $e^+e^-$ collisions at the $\Upsilon(4S)$
128: resonance~\cite{Abe:2002rb,babar,belle} and charm meson production at the Tevatron~\cite{Acosta:2003ax}. This talk
129: focuses on how these results impact theoretical understanding of heavy particle production. The spectrum of $J/\psi$
130: observed in $e^+e^-$ colliders disagrees with leading order calculations based on Non-Relativistic QCD (NRQCD)
131: factorization theorems~\cite{nrqcd}. Better agreement is obtained in calculations which resum the large
132: nonperturbative and perturbative corrections that arise near the kinematic endpoint~\cite{flm}. However, large cross
133: sections for $J/\psi c \bar c$ and exclusive double quarkonium production remain poorly understood. I also discuss
134: heavy quark production. Calculations of charm and bottom production which resum large logarithms of $p_\perp/m_Q$
135: provide a consistent description of the production of these particles at the
136: Tevatron~\cite{Binnewies:1998vm,Cacciari:2002pa,Cacciari:2003zu}. Finally, I explain how the large asymmetries observed
137: in fixed-target hadroproduction experiments can be explained by a power correction to the QCD factorization theorem
138: called heavy-quark recombination~\cite{bjm,Braaten:2003vy}.
139:
140: \section{$J/\psi$ Production at the $\Upsilon(4S)$}
141:
142: The current theoretical framework for understanding the production of heavy quarkonia is NRQCD~\cite{nrqcd}. NRQCD
143: solves important theoretical and phenomenological problems in quarkonium theory. Color-singlet model calculations of
144: $\chi_c$ decay suffer from infrared divergences \cite{Barbieri:1976fp}. NRQCD provides a generalized factorization
145: theorem that includes nonperturbative corrections to the color-singlet model, including color-octet decay and
146: production mechanisms. Infrared divergences are factored into nonperturbative matrix elements, so calculations of
147: inclusive production and decay rates are infrared safe~\cite{Bodwin:1992ye}. Color-octet production mechanisms are
148: necessary for understanding the production of $J/\psi$ at large transverse momentum, $p_\perp$, at the Tevatron
149: \cite{tevatron}. Convincing evidence for color-octet mechanisms has recently been seen in $\gamma \gamma$ collisions,
150: where color-singlet mechanisms underestimate the cross section by an order of magnitude while calculations including
151: color-octet mechanisms describe the data well~\cite{Klasen:2001cu}.
152:
153: However, there are many unsolved problems in quarkonium physics~\cite{Bodwin:2002mr}. Perhaps the most puzzling is the
154: polarization of $J/\psi$ and $\psi^\prime$, which is predicted to be transverse at very large $p_\perp$ in hadron
155: colliders~\cite{psipol}. The theoretical prediction is consistent with the data at intermediate $p_\perp$ but at the
156: largest $p_\perp$ measured the $J/\psi$ and $\psi^\prime$ are observed to be slightly longitudinally
157: polarized.
158:
159: This talk focuses on new puzzles arising from recent measurements of $J/\psi$ production in $e^+e^-$
160: colliders~\cite{Abe:2002rb,babar,belle}.
161: The leading color-octet contribution to this process
162: was expected to dramatically enhance the cross section for maximally energetic $\jpsi$
163: as well as modify their angular distribution~\cite{bc}.
164: If $\cos \theta$ is the angle of the $\jpsi$ relative to the axis defined by the $e^+e^-$ beams and
165: $z= E_{J/\psi}/E^{\rm
166: max}_{J/\psi}$, then the differential cross section is
167: \bea
168: \frac{d \sigma}{d z \, d \cos \theta} = S(z)(1+A(z)\cos^2 \theta) \, .
169: \eea
170: The function $A(z)$ tends to -1 as $z \to 1$ for color-singlet
171: production. The leading color-octet diagram contributes only at $z =1$
172: and gives $A(1) \approx 1$. The total color-singlet
173: cross section is predicted to be 0.4-0.9 pb~\cite{cs}, while the total cross section from the leading
174: color-octet mechanism is expected to be $\approx 1$ pb. A substantial rise in the cross section
175: near the kinematic endpoint accompanied by a change in angular distribution was predicted to be a robust signal of the
176: color-octet mechanism~\cite{bc}.
177:
178: Experimental data does not agree with these expectations~\cite{Abe:2002rb,babar,belle}. One problem is that a sharp
179: rise in the cross section near the kinematic endpoint is not observed. On the other hand, the cross section is larger
180: than predicted by the color-singlet model and $A(z) \approx 1$ for $0.7 < z < 1$. Another puzzle is the production of
181: open charm with $J/\psi$. Belle observes that a large fraction of $J/\psi$ are produced with
182: an additional $c \bar{c}$~\cite{Abe:2002rb}:
183: \bea
184: \frac{\sigma (e^+e^- \rightarrow J/\psi \, c \bar{c})}{\sigma (e^+e^- \rightarrow J/\psi \,X)}
185: =0.59^{+0.15}_{-0.13}\pm 0.12.
186: \eea
187: (Preliminary results described by P. Pakhlov in this conference
188: suggest that the ratio is even larger~\cite{pp}.) Leading order color-singlet model calculations predict the ratio to be $\approx
189: 0.2$~\cite{cs} and a large color-octet contribution will make the ratio even smaller.
190:
191: The resolution of the first problem lies in a careful analysis of the perturbative and nonperturbative corrections that appear
192: near the kinematic endpoint of quarkonia production \cite{flm,brw}. The
193: $J/\psi$ production cross section in NRQCD is
194: \begin{equation} \label{NRQCDprod}
195: \frac{d \sigma}{dz} (e^+ e^- \rightarrow \jpsi + X) = \sum_n \frac{d \hat \sigma}{dz} (e^+ e^- \rightarrow c
196: \bar{c}[n]+ X)
197: \langle {\cal O}^{\jpsi}_n \rangle \,,
198: \end{equation}
199: where $\langle {\cal O}^{\jpsi}_n \rangle$ are NRQCD matrix elements and $d\hat{\sigma} (e^+ e^- \rightarrow c\bar{c}[n]+ X)$
200: are perturbatively calculable short-distance cross sections. The label $n$ denotes the angular momentum and
201: color quantum numbers of the $c \bar c$. The NRQCD scaling rules show that $\langle {\cal O}^{\jpsi}_n \rangle$
202: scales as some power of $v$, where $v$ is the typical velocity of the heavy quarks inside the bound state.
203:
204: The leading Feynman diagrams which contribute to color-octet production give $d\hat{\sigma} (e^+ e^- \rightarrow c
205: \bar{c}[n]+ X)/dz$ proportional to $\delta(1-z)$. This is the first in an infinite series of terms that are singular at $z = 1$.
206: There are higher order nonperturbative corrections that scale as $v^{2n}/(1-z)^n$ \cite{brw} as well as
207: perturbative corrections that go like $\alpha_s^n {\rm ln}^m(1-z)/(1-z)$, $m \leq 2 n-1$. For charmonium, $v^2 \sim \alpha_s
208: \sim 0.3$ so for $z \geq 0.7$ perturbation theory and the NRQCD $v$ expansion both break down.
209:
210: Near the kinematic endpoint, the final state consists of two kinds of quanta: energetic collinear particles with
211: light-like momenta in the jet against which the $J/\psi$ is recoiling and particles which are soft as
212: viewed from the rest frame of the $J/\psi$. NRQCD breaks down because the theory does not explicitly include these
213: degrees of freedom. The problem can be fixed by using the Soft-Collinear Effective Theory (SCET)~\cite{scet}
214: which explicitly includes both collinear and soft degrees of freedom. By combining SCET and NRQCD one finds that in the
215: endpoint region Eq.~(\ref{NRQCDprod}) is replaced with the following factorization theorem:~\cite{flm}
216: \begin{equation}\label{factformula}
217: \frac{d\sigma^{[n]}}{dz} = \sigma_0^{[n]}
218: \int_z^{1} d\xi \, S^{[n]}(\xi) \, J(\xi-z)\, .
219: \end{equation}
220: Here $\sigma_0^{[n]}$ is a short distance cross section which is perturbatively calculable. The shape
221: function $S^{[n]}(\xi)$ is a universal
222: nonperturbative distribution that resums the large nonperturbative corrections. $J(\xi-z)$ is a
223: calculable function that describes the propagation of the collinear particles in the energetic gluon jet. Large perturbative
224: corrections can be resummed by solving the SCET renormalization group equations for $\sigma_0^{[n]}, S^{[n]}(\xi)$ and
225: $J(\xi-z)$.
226: %
227: \begin{figure}
228: \begin{center}
229: \includegraphics[width=5 in]{comp}
230: \end{center}
231: \caption{\it The sum of the resummed color-octet and leading order color-singlet contributions are plotted as the upper line.
232: The lower line is the leading order color-singlet contribution only, and the data are from the BaBar collaboration ~\cite{babar} (left)
233: and Belle collaboration~\cite{belle} (right).}
234: \label{comp}
235: \end{figure}
236: %
237:
238: Comparison of this calculation with data from BaBar~\cite{babar} and Belle~\cite{belle} is shown in
239: Fig.~\ref{comp}~\cite{flm}. The number of events is plotted as a function of the $J/\psi$ momentum,
240: $p_\psi$. The lower line in both plots is the leading color-singlet contribution which falls well
241: below data. The upper line includes the resummed color-octet cross section. The leading order
242: calculation of the color-octet contribution (not shown) gives an integrated cross section comparable
243: to that of the resummed calculation shown here, but the entire cross section is located in the very
244: last bin of $p_\psi$. This also does not agree with data. Fig.~\ref{comp} demonstrates that when
245: large perturbative and nonperturbative corrections are included the momentum spectrum of the
246: $J/\psi$ produced by the color-octet mechanism is significantly broadened. The agreement with data
247: is good in the endpoint region where the calculation is most reliable. The calculation is not
248: predictive because the shape function is fitted to available data. However, the moments of the shape
249: function can be estimated using the NRQCD scaling rules and the shape function used in
250: Ref.~\cite{flm} satisfies these constraints. The universality of the shape function can be tested by
251: applying the methods of Ref.~\cite{flm} to other $J/\psi$ production processes.
252:
253: While resolving the discrepancy between leading order color-octet calculations and the observed $p_\psi$ distribution,
254: the calculation does not help explain the large cross section for $\jpsi c \bar c$ observed by the Belle collaboration.
255: The Belle collaboration also observes a large cross section for exclusive $J/\psi + \eta_c$ and $J/\psi +
256: \chi_c$~\cite{belle}. An NRQCD analysis of exclusive cross sections appears in Ref.~\cite{Braaten:2002fi}.
257: Because the helicity conservation rules for exclusive QCD processes suppress the leading QCD contribution, the purely
258: QED contributions are surprisingly large ($\approx$ 20\%). The leading relativistic corrections give large corrections which
259: unfortunately are difficult to estimate reliably. For instance, Ref.~\cite{Braaten:2002fi} quotes
260: $\sigma(J/\psi+\eta_c) = 5.5^{+10.6}_{-3.5}$ fb, with the uncertainty dominated by relativistic corrections. For
261: comparison Belle measures $\sigma(J/\psi+\eta_c) \times{\rm Br}[\eta_c \to {\rm 4 \,charged \,
262: particles}] = 33^{+7}_{-6}\pm 9$ fb. Clearly a mechanism for enhancing the $J/\psi c \bar c$ and double charmonium
263: cross sections is needed. Proposals for nonperturbative mechanisms responsible for this enhancement appear in
264: Ref.~\cite{spec}.
265:
266:
267: \section{Open Charm and Bottom Production}
268:
269: The QCD factorization theorem states that the production cross
270: section for a heavy particle $H$ containing a heavy quark $Q$ is \cite{css}
271: \begin{eqnarray}\label{fact}
272: d \sigma [A B &\rightarrow & H X] = \sum_{i,j} f_{i/A} \otimes f_{j/B} \otimes d\hat{\sigma}[ij \rightarrow Q \bar Q X] \otimes
273: D_{Q \rightarrow H} + ... \, .
274: \end{eqnarray}
275: Here $f_{i/A}$ is a parton distribution function, $D_{Q \rightarrow H}$ is a fragmentation function, $d\hat{\sigma}[ij
276: \rightarrow Q\bar Q X]$ is a short-distance cross section and the ellipsis represents corrections which are
277: suppressed by $\Lambda_{\rm QCD}/m_Q$ or $\Lambda_{\rm QCD}/p_\perp$.
278:
279: Perturbative aspects of Eq.~(\ref{fact}) are tested by measurements of charm and bottom production at
280: collider experiments. Experimental reviews of heavy quark production at LEP, HERA and the Tevatron are described in the talks of
281: A.~Sciaba~\cite{Sciaba}, B.~Olivier~\cite{Olivier} and K.~Rinnert~\cite{Rinnert}, respectively.
282: At the Tevatron, discrepancies between NLO calculations of bottom production and experimental cross sections have been
283: known for a long time~\cite{Acosta:2001rz}. Recently CDF has extended measurements to include charm as well
284: as bottom~\cite{Acosta:2003ax}. Resummation of large logarithms of $p_\perp/m_Q$ is needed to obtain better agreement
285: with both charm and bottom cross sections~\cite{Binnewies:1998vm,Cacciari:2002pa,Cacciari:2003zu}. It is also important
286: to treat fragmentation functions carefully as the total cross section is sensitive to the fragmentation function
287: used~\cite{Cacciari:2003zu}. Though the existing calculations differ in how finite mass corrections are handled they
288: are consistent numerically and agree with data within the theoretical uncertainties estimated by varying factorization
289: and renormalization scales.
290:
291: Nonperturbative power corrections to Eq.~(\ref{fact}) are probed in lower energy fixed-target experiments. Production asymmetries are an
292: incisive test of these corrections. At leading order in perturbation theory, charm particles and antiparticles are produced symmetrically
293: because the partonic processes $gg\rightarrow c\bar c$ and $q \bar q \rightarrow c \bar c$ produce charm and anticharm symmetrically and
294: $D_{c\rightarrow H} = D_{\overline c \rightarrow \overline H}$ due to charge conjugation invariance. At next-to-leading order, the asymmetry,
295: $\alpha[H] = (\sigma[H] - \sigma[\,\overline H \,])/ (\sigma[H] + \sigma[\,\overline H \,])$, is only a few percent~\cite{nlo}. Fixed-target
296: hadroproduction \cite{hadro,Aitala:2000rd,E791,selex} and photoproduction \cite{photo,focus:2003xh} experiments observe much larger
297: asymmetries. In hadroproduction the asymmetries are known as the ``Leading Particle Effect''. Cross sections for charm particles sharing a
298: valence quark with the beam hadron are enhanced in the forward direction of the beam. Hadroproduction asymmetries can be quite large. For
299: example, in the most forward region measured in $\pi^- N$ collisions, the ratio of $D^-$ to $D^+$ is $\approx 6$.
300:
301: Charm asymmetries are conventionally explained by nonperturbative models of hadronization \cite{models}. These models suffer
302: from a lack of predictive power, since they depend on a number of nonperturbative functions, such as the distribution of
303: spectator quarks in hadron remnants. The most commonly used model is the Lund string fragmentation
304: model~\cite{Sjostrand:1986ys} which can be implemented using PYTHIA~\cite{Sjostrand:2001yu}. The PYTHIA Monte Carlo with
305: default parameters rarely predicts the asymmetries correctly~\cite{hadro} and in the case of $\Lambda_c$ asymmetries in $\pi
306: N$ collisions~\cite{Aitala:2000rd} and $\gamma N$ collisions \cite{focus:2003xh} gets the sign of the asymmetry wrong.
307:
308: A novel mechanism for generating charm hadron asymmetries called heavy-quark recombination has recently been introduced in
309: Ref.~\cite{bjm}. Similar mechanisms for production of light hadrons were considered in Ref. \cite{recom}. An important
310: difference between the production of heavy hadrons and light hadrons is that in the former case heavy quark symmetry \cite{iw}
311: can be used to simplify the structure of nonperturbative factors appearing in the calculation. Heavy-quark recombination is an
312: $O(\Lambda_{\rm QCD}/m_c)$ suppressed power correction to the factorization theorem of Eq.~(\ref{fact}). In this process, a
313: light anti-quark, $\overline{q}$, from the incident hadron participates in a hard-scattering process which produces a $c$ and
314: $\overline{c}$ quark. Following the hard scattering the $\overline{q}$ and the $c$ recombine to form a $D$ meson. A similar
315: mechanism in which a light quark recombines with the $c$ quark is the dominant recombination contribution
316: to charm baryon production \cite{Braaten:2003vy}. Heavy-quark recombination differs from previous nonperturbative models in
317: that the asymmetry is generated in the short-distance process so cross sections are calculable up to an overall normalization
318: that is set by a few universal parameters. The short-distance cross section is strongly peaked in the forward direction of
319: the light quark or antiquark, naturally leading to an asymmetric cross section.
320: %
321: \begin{figure}
322: \begin{center}
323: \includegraphics[width=5 in]{univ}
324: \end{center}
325: \caption{\it Asymmetry as a function of $x_F$ for $D^+$ mesons (top left) and $D^{*+}$ mesons (top right)
326: produced in 500 GeV $\pi N$ collisions \cite{E791} and
327: $D_s^+$ mesons produced in 600 GeV $\Sigma^- N$ collisions \cite{selex} (bottom). Theory curves are
328: explained in text.}
329: \label{univ}
330: \end{figure}
331:
332: Heavy-quark recombination accounts for the $D$ meson asymmetries observed in photoproduction and hadroproduction experiments.
333: Fig.~\ref{univ} shows asymmetries for $D^+$ and $D^{*+}$ mesons produced in 500 GeV $\pi N$ collisions \cite{E791} and asymmetries for
334: $D_s$ mesons produced in 600 GeV $\Sigma^- N$ collisions \cite{selex}. There are four universal parameters in the theory. The theory
335: curves in Fig.~\ref{univ} correspond to fits with one, two and three of these parameters. (A four parameter fit yields identical results
336: as the three parameter fit.) The heavy-quark recombination mechanism correctly describes asymmetries for different types of $D$ mesons in
337: experiments with different beams with a minimal set of universal parameters. The heavy-quark recombination
338: also correctly describes $\Lambda_c$ asymmetries in both $\pi N$ and $p N$ collisions~\cite{Braaten:2003vy}.
339:
340:
341:
342:
343: \begin{thebibliography}{5}
344:
345: %\cite{Abe:2002rb}
346: \bibitem{Abe:2002rb}
347: K.~Abe {\it et al.} [Belle Collaboration],
348: %``Observation of double c anti-c production in e+ e- annihilation at s**(1/2) approx. 10.6-GeV,''
349: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 89}, 142001 (2002)
350: %[arXiv:hep-ex/0205104].
351: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0205104;%%
352:
353:
354: \bibitem{babar}
355: B.~Aubert {\it et al.} [BABAR Collaboration], Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 87}, 162002 (2001).
356:
357: \bibitem{belle}
358: K.~Abe {\it et al.} [BELLE Collaboration], Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 88}, 052001 (2002).
359:
360: %\cite{Acosta:2003ax}
361: \bibitem{Acosta:2003ax}
362: D.~Acosta {\it et al.} [CDF Collaboration],
363: %``Measurement of prompt charm meson production cross sections in p anti-p collisions at s**(1/2) = 1.96-TeV,''
364: hep-ex/0307080.
365: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0307080;%%
366:
367: \bibitem{nrqcd}
368: W.~E.~Caswell and G.~P.~Lepage, Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 167}, 437 (1986);
369: %\bibitem{bbl}
370: G.~T.~Bodwin, E.~Braaten and G.~P.~Lepage,
371: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 51}, 1125 (1995); {\it ibid.}\ D {\bf 55}, 5853 (1997);
372: %\bibitem{Luke:2000kz}
373: M.~E.~Luke, A.~V.~Manohar and I.~Z.~Rothstein,
374: %``Renormalization group scaling in nonrelativistic QCD,''
375: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 61}, 074025 (2000).
376: %[hep-ph/9910209].
377: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9910209;%%
378:
379: \bibitem{flm}
380: %\cite{Fleming:2003gt}
381: %\bibitem{Fleming:2003gt}
382: S.~Fleming, A.~K.~Leibovich and T.~Mehen,
383: %``Resumming the color-octet contribution to e+ e- $\to$ J/psi + X,''
384: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 68}, 094011 (2003).
385: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0306139].
386: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0306139;%%
387:
388: %\cite{Binnewies:1998vm}
389: \bibitem{Binnewies:1998vm}
390: J.~Binnewies, B.~A.~Kniehl and G.~Kramer,
391: %``Inclusive B meson production in e+ e- and p anti-p collisions,''
392: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 58}, 034016 (1998).
393: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9802231].
394: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9802231;%%
395: %\cite{Tung:2001mv}
396:
397: %\cite{Cacciari:2002pa}
398: \bibitem{Cacciari:2002pa}
399: M.~Cacciari and P.~Nason,
400: %``Is there a significant excess in bottom hadroproduction at the Tevatron?,''
401: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 89}, 122003 (2002).
402: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0204025].
403: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0204025;%%
404:
405: %\cite{Cacciari:2003zu}
406: \bibitem{Cacciari:2003zu}
407: M.~Cacciari and P.~Nason,
408: %``Charm cross sections for the Tevatron RunII,''
409: JHEP {\bf 0309}, 006 (2003).
410: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0306212].
411: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0306212;%%
412:
413: \bibitem{bjm}
414: E.~Braaten, Y.~Jia and T.~Mehen,
415: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 89}, 122002 (2002); Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 66}, 034003 (2002).
416: {\it ibid.}, 014003 (2002).
417:
418: %\cite{Braaten:2003vy}
419: \bibitem{Braaten:2003vy}
420: E.~Braaten, M.~Kusunoki, Y.~Jia and T.~Mehen,
421: %``Lambda/c+ / Lambda/c- asymmetry in hadroproduction from heavy-quark recombination,''
422: hep-ph/0304280.
423: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0304280;%%
424:
425: %\cite{Barbieri:1976fp}
426: \bibitem{Barbieri:1976fp}
427: R.~Barbieri, R.~Gatto and E.~Remiddi,
428: %``Singular Binding Dependence In The Hadronic Widths Of 1++ And 1+- Heavy Quark Anti-Quark Bound States,''
429: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 61}, 465 (1976); Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 106}, 497 (1981);
430: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B106,497;%%
431: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B61,465;%%
432: R.~Barbieri, M.~Caffo, R.~Gatto and E.~Remiddi,
433: %``QCD Corrections To P Wave Quarkonium Decays,''
434: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 192}, 61 (1981).
435: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B192,61;%%
436:
437: %\cite{Bodwin:1992ye}
438: \bibitem{Bodwin:1992ye}
439: G.~T.~Bodwin, E.~Braaten and G.~P.~Lepage,
440: %``Rigorous QCD predictions for decays of P wave quarkonia,''
441: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 46}, 1914 (1992).
442: %[arXiv:hep-lat/9205006].
443: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 9205006;%%
444:
445: \bibitem{tevatron}
446: E.~Braaten and S.~Fleming,
447: %``Color octet fragmentation and the psi-prime surplus at the Tevatron,''
448: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 74}, 3327 (1995);
449: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9411365];
450: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9411365;%%
451: P.~L.~Cho and A.~K.~Leibovich,
452: %``Color octet quarkonia production,''
453: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 53}, 150 (1996);
454: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9505329];
455: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9505329;%%
456: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 53}, 6203 (1996).
457: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9511315].
458: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9511315;%%
459:
460: \bibitem{Klasen:2001cu}
461: M.~Klasen, B.~A.~Kniehl, L.~N.~Mihaila and M.~Steinhauser,
462: %``Evidence for colour-octet mechanism from CERN LEP2 gamma gamma $\to$ J/psi + X data,''
463: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 89}, 032001 (2002).
464: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0112259].
465: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0112259;%%
466:
467:
468: %\cite{Bodwin:2002mr}
469: \bibitem{Bodwin:2002mr}
470: G.~T.~Bodwin,
471: %``Recent results on quarkonium production and decay,''
472: hep-ph/0212203.
473:
474: \bibitem{psipol}
475: P.~L.~Cho and M.~B.~Wise,
476: %``Spin symmetry predictions for heavy quarkonia alignment,''
477: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 346}, 129 (1995);
478: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9411303];
479: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9411303;%%
480: A.~K.~Leibovich,
481: %``Psi' polarization due to color-octet quarkonia production,''
482: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 56}, 4412 (1997);
483: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9610381];
484: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9610381;%%
485: M.~Beneke and M.~Kramer,
486: %``Direct J/psi and psi' polarization and cross-sections at the Tevatron,''
487: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 55}, 5269 (1997);
488: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9611218];
489: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9611218;%%
490: E.~Braaten, B.~A.~Kniehl and J.~Lee,
491: %``Polarization of prompt J/psi at the Tevatron,''
492: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 62}, 094005 (2000).
493: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9911436].
494: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9911436;%%
495:
496: \bibitem{bc}
497: E.~Braaten and Y.~Q.~Chen, Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 76}, 730 (1996).
498:
499: \bibitem{cs}
500: P.~L.~Cho and A.~K.~Leibovich,
501: %``Color-singlet psi(Q) production at e+ e- colliders,''
502: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 54}, 6690 (1996);
503: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9606229;%%
504: %\cite{Yuan:1996ep}
505: %\bibitem{Yuan:1996ep}
506: F.~Yuan, C.~F.~Qiao and K.~T.~Chao,
507: %``Prompt J/psi production at e+ e- colliders,''
508: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 56}, 321 (1997).
509: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9703438].
510: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9703438;%%
511: S.~Baek, P.~Ko, J.~Lee and H.~S.~Song,
512: %``Polarized J/psi production at CLEO,''
513: J.\ Korean Phys.\ Soc.\ {\bf 33}, 97 (1998).
514: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9804455].
515: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9804455;%%
516: %\cite{Schuler:1998az}
517: %\bibitem{Schuler:1998az}
518: G.~A.~Schuler,
519: %``Testing factorization of charmonium production,''
520: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 8}, 273 (1999).
521: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9804349].
522: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9804349;%%
523: J.~H.~Kuhn and H.~Schneider,
524: %``Inclusive J / Psi's In E+ E- Annihilations,''
525: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 24}, 2996 (1981);
526: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D24,2996;%%
527: %``Testing QCD Through Inclusive J / Psi Production In E+ E- Annihilations,''
528: Z.\ Phys.\ C {\bf 11}, 263 (1981);
529: %%CITATION = ZEPYA,C11,263;%%
530: V.~M.~Driesen, J.~H.~Kuhn and E.~Mirkes,
531: %``Testing J / psi production and decay properties in e+ e- annihilation,''
532: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 49}, 3197 (1994).
533: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D49,3197;%%
534:
535: \bibitem{pp}
536: P. Pakhlov, proceedings of this conference.
537:
538: \bibitem{brw}
539: M.~Beneke, I.~Z.~Rothstein and M.~B.~Wise, Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 408}, 373 (1997).
540:
541:
542: \bibitem{scet}
543: C.~W.~Bauer, S.~Fleming and M.~E.~Luke, Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 63}, 014006 (2001).
544: %\bibitem{bfps}
545: C.~W.~Bauer, S.~Fleming, D.~Pirjol and I.~W.~Stewart, Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 63}, 114020 (2001).
546: %\bibitem{bs}
547: C.~W.~Bauer and I.~W.~Stewart, Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 516}, 134 (2001).
548: %\bibitem{bps}
549: C.~W.~Bauer, D.~Pirjol and I.~W.~Stewart, Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 87}, 201806 (2001);
550: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 65}, 054022 (2002); Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 66}, 054005 (2002).
551:
552:
553:
554: \bibitem{Braaten:2002fi}
555: E.~Braaten and J.~Lee,
556: %``Exclusive double-charmonium production in e+ e- annihilation,''
557: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 67}, 054007 (2003).
558: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0211085].
559: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0211085;%%
560:
561: \bibitem{spec}
562: %\bibitem{Ioffe:2003ru}
563: B.~L.~Ioffe and D.~E.~Kharzeev,
564: %``On recent puzzles in the production of heavy quarkonia,''
565: hep-ph/0306062.
566: %\cite{Kaidalov:2003wp}
567: %\bibitem{Kaidalov:2003wp}
568: A.~B.~Kaidalov,
569: %``J/psi c anti-c production in e+ e- and hadronic interactions,''
570: JETP Lett.\ {\bf 77}, 349 (2003)
571: [Pisma Zh.\ Eksp.\ Teor.\ Fiz.\ {\bf 77}, 417 (2003)].
572: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0301246].
573: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0301246;%%
574:
575: \bibitem{css}
576: J.~C.~Collins, D.~E.~Soper and G.~Sterman, Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 263}, 37 (1986).
577:
578: \bibitem{Sciaba}
579: A. Sciaba, proceedings of this conference.
580:
581: \bibitem{Olivier}
582: B. Olivier, proceedings of this conference.
583:
584: \bibitem{Rinnert}
585: K. Rinnert, proceedings of this conference.
586:
587: %\cite{Acosta:2001rz}
588: \bibitem{Acosta:2001rz}
589: D.~Acosta {\it et al.} [CDF Collaboration],
590: %``Measurement of the B+ total cross section and B+ differential cross section dsigma/dp(T) in p anti-p collisions at s**(1/2) = 1.8-TeV,''
591: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 65}, 052005 (2002).
592: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0111359].
593: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0111359;%%
594:
595: \bibitem{nlo}
596: P.~Nason, S.~Dawson and R.~K.~Ellis, Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 327}, 49 (1989) ;
597: W.~Beenakker, H.~Kuijf, W.~L.~van Neerven and J.~Smith, Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 40}, 54 (1989);
598: W.~Beenakker, W.~L.~van Neerven, R.~Meng, G.~A.~Schuler and J.~Smith,
599: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 351}, 507 (1991).
600:
601: \bibitem{hadro}
602: M.~Adamovich {\it et al.} [WA82 Collaboration], Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 305}, 402 (1993);
603:
604: G.~A.~Alves {\it et al.} [E769 Collaboration], Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 72}, 812 (1994);
605: {\it ibid}. {\bf 77}, 2392 (1996);
606: E.~M.~Aitala {\it et al.} [E791 Collaboration], Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 411}, 230 (1997);
607: M.~Adamovich {\it et al.} [BEATRICE Collaboration], Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 495}, 3 (1997);
608: M.~I.~Adamovich {\it et al.} [WA89 Collaboration], Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 8}, 593 (1999);
609: F.~G.~Garcia {\it et al.} [SELEX Collaboration], Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 528}, 49 (2002).
610:
611: %\cite{Aitala:2000rd}
612: \bibitem{Aitala:2000rd}
613: E.~M.~Aitala {\it et al.} [E791 Collaboration],
614: %``Asymmetries in the production of Lambda/c+ and Lambda/c- baryons in 500-GeV/c pi- nucleon interactions,''
615: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 495}, 42 (2000).
616: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0008029;%%
617:
618: \bibitem{E791}
619: E.~M.~Aitala {\it et al.} [E791 Collaboration], Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 539}, 218 (2002);
620: {\it ibid}. {\bf 371}, 157 (1996);
621:
622: \bibitem{selex}
623: M.~Kaya {\it et al.} [SELEX Collaboration],
624: %``Production asymmetry of D/s from 600-GeV/c Sigma- and pi- beam,''
625: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 558}, 34 (2003),
626: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0302039;%%
627:
628: \bibitem{photo}
629: J.~.C.~Anjos {\it et. al.} [Tagged Photon Spectrometer Collaboration], Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 62}, 513 (1989);
630: M.P. Alvarez {\it et. al.} [NA14/2 Collaboration], Z.\ Phys.\ C {\bf 60}, 53 (1993);
631: P.~L.~ Frabetti {\it et. al.} [E687 Collaboration], Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 370}, 222 (1996);
632: J.~C.~Anjos and E.~Cuautle [FOCUS Collaboration], AIP Conf.\ Proc.\ {\bf 531}, 172 (2000).
633:
634: %\cite{focus:2003xh}
635: \bibitem{focus:2003xh}
636: J.~M.~ Link {\it et. al.} [FOCUS Collaboration],
637: %``Charm-anticharm baryon production asymmetries in photon-nucleon interactions,''
638: hep-ex/0311022.
639: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0311022;%%
640:
641: \bibitem{models}
642: R.~Vogt and S.~J.~Brodsky, Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 478}, 311 (1996);
643: E.~Norrbin and T.~Sj\"{o}strand, Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 442}, 407 (1998);
644: A.~K.~Likhoded and S.~R.~Slabospitsky, Phys.\ Atom.\ Nucl.\ {\bf 62}, 693 (1999)
645: [Yad.\ Fiz.\ {\bf 62}, 742 (1999)].
646: O.~I.~Piskounova, hep-ph/0202005.
647: R.~C.~Hwa, Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 51}, 85 (1995).
648: R.~Rapp and E.~V.~Shuryak, Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 67}, 074036 (2003).
649: T.~Tashiro, S.~Nakariki, H.~Noda and K.~Kinoshita, Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 24}, 573 (2002).
650: E.~Cuautle, G.~Herrera and J.~Magnin, Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 2}, 473 (1998).
651:
652: %\cite{Herrera:1997qh}
653: \bibitem{Herrera:1997qh}
654: G.~Herrera and J.~Magnin,
655: %``Lambda/c Antilambda/c production asymmetries in p p and pi- p collisions,''
656: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 2}, 477 (1998)
657: \bibitem{Sjostrand:1986ys}
658: H.-U.~Bengtsson and T.~Sj\"{o}strand, Comput.\ Phys.\ Commun.\ {\bf 46}, 43 (1987).
659:
660: %\cite{Sjostrand:2001yu}
661: \bibitem{Sjostrand:2001yu}
662: T.~Sjostrand, L.~Lonnblad and S.~Mrenna,
663: %``PYTHIA 6.2: Physics and manual,''
664: hep-ph/0108264.
665: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0108264;%%
666:
667: \bibitem{recom}
668: K.~P.~Das and R.~C.~Hwa, Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 68}, 459 (1977) [Erratum-ibid.\ {\bf 73B}, 504 (1978)];
669: E.~L.~Berger, T.~Gottschalk and D.~W.~Sivers, Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 23}, 99 (1981).
670:
671: \bibitem{iw}
672: N.~Isgur and M.~B.~Wise, Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 232}, 113 (1989); {\it ibid.} {\bf 237}, 527 (1990).
673:
674:
675: \end{thebibliography}
676: \end{document}
677:
678: