1: \documentclass[aps,prc,nofootinbib,showpacs]{revtex4}
2: %\documentclass[preprint,aps,prc,nofootinbib,showpacs]{revtex4}
3:
4: \def\btt#1{\tt$\backslash$#1}
5: \def\BibTeX{\rm B{\sc ib}\TeX}
6: \usepackage{epsfig}
7: \usepackage{graphicx}
8:
9: \begin{document}
10: \title{Possible methods for the determination of the $P$-parity of the $\Theta^+$-pentaquark in NN-collisions.}
11: \author{Michail P. Rekalo }
12: \affiliation{National Science Centre - Kharkov Institute of
13: Physics and Technology,\\ Akademicheskaya 1, 61108 Kharkov,
14: Ukraine}
15: \author{Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson}
16: \affiliation{\it DAPNIA/SPhN, CEA/Saclay, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette Cedex,
17: France}
18: \date{\today}
19:
20: \pacs{13.75.Cs,21.10.Hw,13.88.+e,14.20.Jn}
21:
22: \begin{abstract}
23: We present two possibilities to determine the P-parity of the pentaquark $\Theta^+$, in a model independent way, via the measurement of polarization observables in $p+p\to \Theta^+ +\Sigma^+$, or $n+p\to \Theta^+ +\Lambda^0$,
24: in the near threshold region. Besides the measurement of the spin correlation coefficient, $A_{xx}=A_{yy}$, (in collisions of transversally polarized nucleons), the coefficient $D_{xx}$ of polarization transfer from the initial proton to the final $ \Sigma^+(\Lambda^0)$ hyperon is also unambiguously related to the $\Theta^+$ parity.
25: \end{abstract}
26: \maketitle
27: %\section{Introduction}
28: In 1999, N. K. Pak and M. Rekalo proposed \cite{Pa99} two new methods for the determination of the P-parity of the $K$-meson, through the measurement of different polarization observables in $K$-meson production in proton proton collisions near threshold, $p+p\to K^++Y^0+p$ ($Y^0=\Lambda$ or $\Sigma$-hyperon). One method is based on the measurement of the sign of the spin correlation coefficient $A_{yy}$, for collisions of transversally polarized protons. The second one is based on the measurement of the polarization transfer coefficient from the initial proton to the produced hyperon, $D_{nn}$. Both methods apply in threshold conditions, where all final particles are in S-state. Note, in this respect, that the DISTO collaboration showed the feasibility of the second method, by measuring the $D_{nn}$ coefficient at proton momentum of 3.67 GeV/c, which showed that {\it "$D_{nn}$ is large and negative ($\simeq -0.4$) over most of the kinematic region"} \cite{DISTO}. It was mentioned in \cite{Pa99} that a nonzero value of $D_{nn}$, in the threshold region, can be considered as the experimental confirmation of the pseudoscalar nature of the $K^+$ meson.
29:
30: It is straightforward to adapt these methods to the determination of the P-parity of the $\Theta^+$-hyperon, which is presently object of an intensive theoretical discussion.
31:
32: The simplest reactions of $NN$-collisions, which can be considered for this aim are the following:
33: \begin{eqnarray}
34: p +n &\to &\Lambda^0 +\Theta^+,\label{eq:reac1} \\
35: p+ p &\to &\Sigma ^+ +\Theta^+, \label{eq:reac2} \\
36: p+ p &\to &\pi^+ +\Lambda^0 +\Theta^+,\label{eq:reac3}
37: \end{eqnarray}
38: in threshold conditions (S-wave production). It is important to note that the $\Lambda^0$ or the $\Sigma ^+$ hyperons, produced in these reactions, are self analyzing particles, therefore the polarization transfer method - with measurement of the polarization transfer coefficient $D_{nn}$ seems more preferable, from the experimental point of view.
39:
40: The following analysis of reactions (1-3) is based on general symmetry properties of the strong interaction, such as the P-invariance, the conservation of the total angular momentum, the Pauli principle, for the $pp$-system, and the generalized Pauli principle for the $np$ system, which holds at the level of the isotopic invariance of the strong interaction.
41:
42: These symmetry properties, being applied to S-wave production in the processes (1-3) allow to establish the spin structure of the corresponding matrix elements, for both cases of the considered P-parity.
43:
44: We consider here, for simplicity, the case of spin 1/2 $\Theta^+$ hyperon, but this formalism can be extended to any $\Theta^+$ spin.
45:
46: Firstly, let us establish the general spin structure of double polarization observables for the processes (1-3) at threshold.
47:
48: The dependence of the cross section, total or differential, on the polarizations $\vec P_1$ and $\vec P_2$ of the colliding nucleons can be written as:
49: \begin{equation}
50: \sigma(\vec P_1,\vec P_2)=\sigma_0(1+{\cal A}_1\vec P_1\cdot\vec P_2+{\cal A}_2\hat{\vec k}\vec P_1\cdot\hat{\vec k}\vec P_2),
51: \label{eq:eqp}
52: \end{equation}
53: where $\sigma_0$ is the cross section for the collision of unpolarized nucleons, $\hat{\vec k}$ is the unit vector along the three momentum of the colliding nucleons, in the reaction CM system. The real coefficients ${\cal A}_1$ and
54: ${\cal A}_2$, which are different for different reactions, depend on the parity of the $\Theta^+$ hyperon. Taking the $z$-axis along $\hat{\vec k}$, one can find the following expression for the spin correlation coefficients ${\cal A}_{ab}$, in terms of ${\cal A}_1$ and ${\cal A}_2$:\
55: \begin{equation}
56: {\cal A}_{xx}={\cal A}_{yy}={\cal A}_1,~{\cal A}_{zz}={\cal A}_1+{\cal A}_2.
57: \label{eq:eq5}
58: \end{equation}
59: The dependence of the polarization $\vec P_Y$ of the produced hyperon, $\Lambda$ or $\Sigma^+$, on the polarization $\vec P$ of the initial nucleon (beam or target) can be written as:
60: \begin{equation}
61: \vec P_Y=p_1\vec P + p_2\hat{\vec k}~\hat{\vec k}\cdot\vec P,
62: \label{eq:eq6}
63: \end{equation}
64: where $ p_{1,2}$ are real coefficients, which depend on the $\Theta^+$ parity, so that for the non-zero polarization transfer coefficients, $D_{ab}$ one can write:
65: \begin{equation}
66: {\cal D}_{xx}={\cal D}_{yy}=p_1,~{\cal D}_{zz}=p_1+p_2.
67: \label{eq:eq7}
68: \end{equation}
69:
70: Let us calculate these coefficients for the reactions (1-3), it terms of S-wave partial amplitudes, considering both values of the $\Theta^+$ parity.
71:
72: \noindent\underline{\bf $n+p\to \Lambda+\Theta^+$}. This reaction has the lowest threshold, and seems very interesting for the measurement of the ${\cal D}_{nn}$ coefficient, due to the large asymmetry and branching ratio of the decay $\Lambda\to p+\pi^-$ ($\alpha=0.642\pm 0.013$ and Br=$(63.9\pm 0.5)$\% \cite{PDG}).
73:
74: The spin structure of the threshold matrix element depends on the discussed P-parity (assuming that the isotopic spin of $\Theta^+$ is zero):
75: \begin{equation}
76: {\cal M}^{(-)}_{\Lambda}=f^{(-)}(\Lambda) {\cal I}\bigotimes \vec\sigma\cdot\hat{\vec k},~\mbox{~if~}P(\Theta^+)=-1,
77: \label{eq:eq8}
78: \end{equation}
79: \begin{equation}
80: {\cal M}_{\Lambda}^{(+)}=f_1^{(+)}(\Lambda) \vec\sigma\cdot\hat{\vec k}\bigotimes \vec\sigma\cdot\hat{\vec k}+f_2^{(+)}(\Lambda)(\sigma_m-\hat k_m
81: \sigma\cdot\hat{\vec k})\bigotimes \sigma_m,~\mbox{~if~}P(\Theta^+)=+1
82: \label{eq:eq9}
83: \end{equation}
84: where the upper index $(\pm)$ for the partial amplitudes $f(\Lambda)$ corresponds to $P(\Theta^+)=\pm 1$. Henceforward we use the following abbreviation
85: \begin{equation}
86: A\bigotimes B =(\tilde \chi_2 \sigma_yA\chi_1)( \chi_4^{\dagger} B\sigma_y\tilde \chi_3^{\dagger}),
87: \label{eq:eq10}
88: \end{equation}
89: where $\chi_1$ and $\chi_2$ ($\chi_3$ and $\chi_4)$ are the two-component spinors of the initial (final) baryons.
90:
91: Using Eqs. (\ref{eq:eq8}) and (\ref{eq:eq9}) one can find the following formulas for double spin polarization observables:
92: \begin{equation}
93: {\cal A}_{xx}^{(-)}(\Lambda)={\cal A}_{yy}^{(-)}(\Lambda)=
94: {\cal A}_{zz}^{(-)}(\Lambda)=-1,~
95: {\cal D}_{ab}^{(-)}=0,~\mbox{~if~}P(\Theta^+)=-1,
96: \label{eq:eq12}
97: \end{equation}
98: and
99: \begin{equation}
100: D_{\Lambda}^{(+)}{\cal A}_{xx}^{(+)}(\Lambda)=
101: D_{\Lambda}^{(+)}{\cal A}_{yy}^{(+)}(\Lambda)=
102: |f_{1\Lambda}^{(+)}|^2,~
103: D_{\Lambda}^{(+)}{\cal A}_{zz}^{(+)}(\Lambda)=
104: 2\left (-|f_1^{(+)}(\Lambda)|^2+|f_2^{(+)}(\Lambda)|^2\right)
105: \label{eq:eq13}
106: \end{equation}
107: \begin{equation}
108: D_{\Lambda}^{(+)}{\cal D}_{xx}^{(+)}(\Lambda)=
109: D_{\Lambda}^{(+)}{\cal D}_{yy}^{(+)}(\Lambda)=
110: 2 Re f_{1\Lambda}^{(+)}f_{2\Lambda}^{(+)*},~
111: D_{\Lambda}^{(+)}{\cal D}_{zz}^{(+)}(\Lambda)=
112: 2|f_2^{(+)}(\Lambda)|^2,
113: \label{eq:eq14}
114: \end{equation}
115: with
116: $$
117: ~D_{\Lambda}^{(+)}=|f_1^{(+)}(\Lambda)|^2+2|f_2^{(+)}(\Lambda)|^2,
118: ~\mbox{~if~}P(\Theta^+)=+1,
119: $$
120: So, comparing the two possibilities for the P-parity, one can predict, in model independent way:
121: $$
122: {\cal A}_{xx}^{(-)}(\Lambda)={\cal A}_{yy}^{(-)}(\Lambda)=-1,~
123: {\cal D}_{yy}^{(-)}(\Lambda)=0,\mbox{~if~} P(\Theta^+)=-1,
124: $$
125: \begin{equation}
126: {\cal A}_{yy}^{(+)}(\Lambda)\ge 0, ~{\cal D}_{yy}^{(-)}(\Lambda)\ne 0,
127: \mbox{~if~} P(\Theta^+)=+1
128: \label{eq:eq15}
129: \end{equation}
130: with evident sensitivity of these observables to the parity of the $\Theta^+$ hyperon.
131:
132: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
133:
134: \noindent\underline{\bf $p+p\to \Sigma^++\Theta^+$}\footnote{The collisions of polarized protons in this reaction have been considered in \protect\cite{Th03}.}.
135: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
136: The spin structure of the threshold matrix element is different from $\Lambda$ production ( due to the difference in the value of the total isotopic spin for the colliding nucleons) and depends on $P(\Theta^+)$:
137: \begin{equation}
138: {\cal M}_{\Sigma}^{(+)}=f^{(+)}(\Sigma) {\cal I}\bigotimes {\cal I},~\mbox{~if~}P(\Theta^+)=+1
139: \label{eq:eq17}
140: \end{equation}
141: \begin{equation}
142: {\cal M}_{\Sigma}^{(-)}=f_1^{(-)}(\Sigma) \vec\sigma\hat{\vec k}\bigotimes {\cal I}
143: +if_2^{(-)}(\Sigma)(\vec\sigma\times\hat{\vec k})_m) \bigotimes \sigma_m,~\mbox{~if~}P(\Theta^+)=-1
144: \label{eq:eq16}
145: \end{equation}
146: where $f^{(\pm)}(\Sigma)$ are the corresponding partial amplitudes for $P(\Theta^+)=\pm 1$, in case of
147: $\Sigma$ production.
148:
149: Using these matrix elements, one can find the following form for the corresponding double polarization observables:
150: $$D_{\Sigma }^{(-)}{\cal A}_{xx}^{(-)}(\Sigma )=
151: D_{\Sigma }^{(-)}{\cal A}_{yy}^{(-)}(\Sigma )=|f_1^{(-)}(\Sigma)|^2,$$
152: $$D_{\Sigma }^{(-)}{\cal A}_{zz}^{(-)}
153: (\Sigma )=-|f_1^{(-)}(\Sigma)|^2+2|f_2^{(-)}(\Sigma)|^2,$$
154: \begin{equation}
155: D_{\Sigma }^{(-)}{\cal D}_{xx}^{(-)}(\Sigma )=
156: D_{\Sigma }^{(-)}{\cal D}_{yy}^{(-)}(\Sigma )=2Re f_1^{(-)}(\Sigma)f_2^{(-)*}(\Sigma),
157: \label{eq:eq18}
158: \end{equation}
159: $$D_{\Sigma }^{(-)}{\cal D}_{zz}^{(-)}(\Sigma )=2|f_1^{(-)}(\Sigma)|^2,$$
160: with $D_{\Sigma }^{(-)}=|f_1^{(-)}(\Sigma)|^2+2|f_1^{(-)}(\Sigma)|^2$, in case of negative parity of the $\Theta^+$, and
161: \begin{equation}
162: {\cal A}_{xx}^{(+)}(\Sigma )={\cal A}_{yy}^{(+)}(\Sigma )={\cal A}_{zz}^{(+)}(\Sigma )=-1,~
163: {\cal D}_{ab}^{(+)}(\Sigma )=0
164: \label{eq:eq19a}
165: \end{equation}
166: in case of positive parity.
167:
168: Therefore, the measurement of the quantities ${\cal A}_{yy}(\Sigma )$ and ${\cal D}_{yy}(\Sigma )$ allows to determine the P-parity:
169: $${\cal A}_{yy}^{(-)}(\Sigma )\ge 0,~{\cal D}_{yy}^{(-)}(\Sigma )\ne 0~\mbox{~if~}P(\Theta^+)=-1
170: $$
171: \begin{equation}
172: {\cal A}_{yy}^{(+)}(\Sigma )=-1,~{\cal D}_{yy}^{(+)}(\Sigma )=0 ~\mbox{~if~}P(\Theta^+)=+1.
173: \label{eq:eq19}
174: \end{equation}
175:
176: Comparing Eqs. (\ref{eq:eq15}) and (\ref{eq:eq19}), one can see that the reactions of $\Theta^+$ production in $NN$-collisions, $ p+p \to \Sigma ^+ +\Theta^+$ and $ n+p \to \Lambda^0 +\Theta^+$, which look similar at first sight, show a very different dependence of the
177: ${\cal A}_{yy}$ and ${\cal D}_{yy}$ observables on the P-parity of the $\Theta^+$ hyperon. For example, the signs of ${\cal A}_{yy}(\Sigma )$ and ${\cal A}_{yy}(\Lambda)$ asymmetries are different, independently on $P(\Theta^+)$. A large difference is also present in the ${\cal D}_{yy}(\Sigma )$ and ${\cal D}_{yy}(\Lambda)$ observables.
178: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
179: \noindent\underline{\bf $p+p+\to \pi^+ +\Lambda+\Theta^+$.} The spin structure of the corresponding matrix elements can be written as follows:
180: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
181: $$
182: {\cal M}^{(-)}=f^{(-)} {\cal I}\bigotimes{\cal I},~\mbox{~if~}P(\Theta^+)=-1
183: $$
184:
185: \begin{equation}
186: {\cal M}^{(+)}=f_1^{(+)} \vec\sigma\cdot\hat{\vec k}\bigotimes
187: {\cal I}+if_2^{(+)}(\vec\sigma\times\hat{\vec k})_m \bigotimes \sigma_m,~\mbox{~if~}P(\Theta^+)=+1,
188: \label{eq:eq20}
189: \end{equation}
190: i.e. similar to the reaction $ p+p \to \Sigma ^+ +\Theta^+$, but with opposite parity. So, for $p+p\to\pi^+ +\Lambda+\Theta^+$, the necessary polarization observables can be described by Eqs.(\ref{eq:eq18}) and (\ref{eq:eq19a}), taking care to interchange the P-parities.
191:
192: This analysis shows that all the reactions (1-3) are well adapted to the determination of $P(\Theta^+)$. In all these reactions two polarization observables, namely ${\cal A}_{yy}$ and ${\cal D}_{yy}$ are sensitive to this parity. The signature of the parity of $(\Theta^+)$ is the sign of the asymmetry ${\cal A}_{yy}$, or a a value of the transfer polarization tensor, different from zero. These statements are model independent.
193:
194: \begin{figure}
195: \mbox{\epsfxsize=15.cm\leavevmode \epsffile{fig1.ps}}
196: \caption{ $K$-exchange for the reaction $ p+p \to \Sigma ^+ +\Theta^+$.
197: }
198: \label{fig:fig1}
199: \end{figure}
200: Let us briefly discuss the expected values of the polarization observables, in the reactions (1-3), which depend on two amplitudes, $f_1$ and $f_2$. For this aim, we will take, as an example, a model of $K$-meson exchange, which has been applied to the $\Lambda$ and $\Sigma^0$ production in $pp$-collisions \cite{Mo02}, and reproduces quite well the sign and the absolute value of $D_{nn}$ in $\vec p+p\to \vec\Lambda+K^++p$. Considering the contribution of both diagrams in Fig. 1, one can find:
201: \begin{equation}
202: f_1^{(-)}(\Sigma)=-f_2^{(-)}(\Sigma)
203: \label{eq:eq21}
204: \end{equation}
205: This relation does not depend on many details of the reaction mechanism, such as the values of the two coupling constants, $g_{p\Theta K}$ and $g_{p\Sigma K}$, on the width of $\Theta^+ $ and on the form of the phenomenological form factors, which has to be taken into account in such considerations.
206:
207: The relation (\ref{eq:eq21}) allows to predict:
208: \begin{equation}
209: {\cal A}_{yy}^{(-)}(\Sigma )=+1/3,~{\cal D}_{yy}^{(-)}(\Sigma )=-2/3.
210: \label{eq:eq22}
211: \end{equation}
212: Let us note that $|{\cal D}_{yy}^{(-)}(\Sigma )|$ is different from zero and large. This will make easier to discriminate the value of the P-parity.
213:
214: The same relation holds also for the amplitudes $f_{1,2}^{(+)}(\Lambda)$ for the process
215: $n+p\to\Lambda+\Theta^+$ (for $K$-exchange), with corresponding predictions for polarization effects.
216:
217: Note, however, that final state $\Sigma\Theta$- interaction, which is different, generally, in singlet and triplet states, can affect the relation (\ref{eq:eq21}). There are arguments which show that these effects can not be large \cite{Th03}. In any case we considered here $K$-exchange only for illustrative purposes, for a quick estimation of polarization phenomena, without any claim that this is a realistic model for these reactions \cite{Na04}: the main result of this paper does not depend on model considerations.
218:
219: The experimental study of all three reactions (1-3) will give a non ambiguous signature of the $\Theta^+$ parity.
220:
221:
222: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
223:
224: \begin{thebibliography}{}
225: \bibitem{Pa99} N. K. Pak and M. P. Rekalo, Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 59}, 077501 (1999).
226: \bibitem{DISTO}
227: F. Balestra {\it et al.}, Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett. {\bf 83}, 1534 (1999).
228: \bibitem{PDG} K. Hagiwara {\it et al.}, Phys. Rev. {\bf D 66}, 010001 (2002).
229: \bibitem{Th03}
230: %\cite{Thomas:2003ak}
231: %\bibitem{Thomas:2003ak}
232: A.~W.~Thomas, K.~Hicks and A.~Hosaka,
233: %``A method to unambiguously determine the parity of the Theta+ pentaquark,''
234: arXiv:hep-ph/0312083;
235: C. Hanhart {\it et al.}, arXiv:hep-ph/0312236.
236: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0312083;%%
237:
238: \bibitem{Mo02} P.~Moskal, M.~Wolke, A.~Khoukaz and W.~Oelert,
239: %``Close-to-threshold meson production in hadronic interactions,''
240: Prog.\ Part.\ Nucl.\ Phys.\ {\bf 49}, 1 (2002).
241: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0208002].
242: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0208002;%%
243:
244: %\cite{Nam:2004qy}
245: \bibitem{Na04}
246: S.~I.~Nam, A.~Hosaka and H.~C.~Kim,
247: %``Threshold production of the Theta+ in a polarized proton reaction,''
248: arXiv:hep-ph/0401074.
249: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0401074;%%
250:
251:
252: \end{thebibliography}{}
253:
254:
255:
256: \end{document}
257:
258:
259:
260:
261: