1: \documentclass[11pt]{cernrep}

2: \usepackage{graphicx,epsfig,epsf,psfig,amssymb,

3: rotating,colordvi,helvet,color,subfigure}

4: \bibliographystyle{unsrt}

5: \def\s#1{{\small#1}}

6: \def\lsim{\:\raisebox{-0.5ex}{$\stackrel{\textstyle<}{\sim}$}\:}

7: \def\gsim{\:\raisebox{-0.5ex}{$\stackrel{\textstyle>}{\sim}$}\:}

8: \def\PD{\s{PDG}}

9: \def\TA{{\small TAUOLA}}

10: \def\HW{\s{HERWIG}}

11: \def\JS{\s{JETSET}}

12: \def\PY{\s{PYTHIA}}

13: \def\IS{\s{ISAJET}}

14: \def\IW{\s{ISAWIG}}

15: \def\SM{\s{SM}}

16: \def\MSSM{{MSSM}}

17: \def\SY{\s{SUSY}}

18: \def\QCD{\s{QCD}}

19: \def\QED{\s{QED}}

20: \def\DIS{\s{DIS}}

21: \def\LEP{\s{LEP}}

22: \def\LHC{\s{LHC}}

23: \def\OPAL{\s{OPAL}}

24: \def\PDF{\s{PDFLIB}}

25: \def\CERN{\s{CERN}}

26: \def\RPV{\rlap{/}{R}$_{\mbox{\scriptsize p}}$}

27: \def\BNV{\rlap{/}{B}}

28: \def\Ord{\buildrel{\scriptscriptstyle <}\over{\scriptscriptstyle\sim}}

29: \def\OOrd{\buildrel{\scriptscriptstyle >}\over{\scriptscriptstyle\sim}}

30: \def\gh{\Gamma_{\scriptscriptstyle \rm H}}

31: \def\gtap{\raisebox{-.4ex}{\rlap{$\sim$}} \raisebox{.4ex}{$>$}}

32: \def\ltap{\raisebox{-.4ex}{\rlap{$\sim$}} \raisebox{.4ex}{$<$}}

33: \def\ycut{$y_{\mbox{\tiny cut}}$}

34: \def\mw{m_{\scriptscriptstyle \rm W}}

35: \def\mh{m_{\scriptscriptstyle \rm H}}

36: %                  Define Lambda MS bar

37: \def\lms{\Lambda_{\overline{\rm MS}}}

38: %

39: \def\half{\mbox{\small $\frac{1}{2}$}}

40: \def\thlf{\mbox{\small $\frac{3}{2}$}}

41: \def\as{\alpha_{\mbox{\tiny S}}}

42: \def\ee{e^+e^-}

43: \def\MC{Monte Carlo}

44: \def\VEV#1{\langle{#1}\rangle}

45: %                  Define antiparticles

46: \def\qbar{\bar{q}}

47: \def\Qbar{\bar{Q}}

48: \def\dbar{\bar{d}}

49: \def\ubar{\bar{u}}

50: \def\sbar{\bar{s}}

51: \def\cbar{\bar{c}}

52: \def\bbar{\bar{b}}

53: \def\tbar{\bar{t}}

54: \def\pbar{\bar{p}}

55: \def\B0bar{\overline{B^0}}

56: \def\lbar{\bar{\l}}

57: \def\l{\ell}

58: \begin{document}

59: %\begin{flushright}

60: %CERN-PH-TH-2004-014\\

61: %MPP-2004-11

62: %SHEP-04-01

63: %\end{flushright}

64: \title{Matrix-element corrections to {\boldmath$gg/q\bar q\to$} 

65: Higgs in HERWIG}

66: \author{G. Corcella$^{1,2}$ and S. Moretti$^3$}

67: \institute{$^1$CERN-TH, Switzerland; $^2$MPI f\"ur Physik, 

68: M\"unchen, Germany; $^3$Southampton University, UK}

69: \maketitle

70: \begin{abstract}

71: We describe the HERWIG implementation of real matrix-element corrections

72: to direct Higgs hadroproduction at Tevatron

73: and Large Hadron Collider (LHC) and compare it to other approaches

74: existing in literature and

75: describing the transverse momentum distribution of the Higgs boson.

76: \end{abstract}

77: 

78: 

79: \section{THE HIGGS TRANSVERSE MOMENTUM}

80: 

81: In order to investigate Higgs boson production

82: via $gg\to$ Higgs (see Ref.~\cite{Kunszt:1996yp}), 

83: one needs to account for multi-parton radiation

84: for the sake of performing trustworthy phenomenological analyses

85: \cite{Cavalli:2002vs,Djouadi:2000gu,Balazs:2000sz}. 

86: Standard Monte Carlo (MC) algorithms 

87: \cite{Corcella:2000bw}--\cite{Sjostrand:2003wg} describe parton

88: radiation in the soft and/or collinear approximation

89: of the parton shower (PS), but can have regions

90: of phase space, so-called `dead zones', where no radiation is allowed.

91: Here, one can however 

92: rely on higher-order tree-level results, as in this region

93: the radiation is neither softly nor collinearly enhanced. 

94: Several methods have been recently suggested in order to match PS

95: and fixed-order matrix elements (MEs) \cite{Seymour:1994df,Norrbin:2000uu}, 

96: also including the virtual one-loop terms 

97: \cite{Frixione:2002ik}--\cite{Dobbs:2001gb}. 

98: 

99: \section{THE HERWIG IMPLEMENTATION}

100: 

101: In this note, we briefly mention that the

102: same strategy which has already been used to

103: implement real ME corrections to 

104: $e^+e^-$ annihilation into quark pairs \cite{Seymour:1992xa}, 

105: Deep Inelastic Scattering (DIS) \cite{Seymour:1994ti},

106: top quark decay \cite{Corcella:1998rs} and vector boson hadroproduction 

107: \cite{Corcella:1999gs} has now also been

108: adopted for the case of Higgs hadroproduction via gluon-gluon fusion

109: and quark-antiquark annihilation \cite{cormor},

110: in the context of the HERWIG event generator 

111: \cite{Corcella:2000bw,Corcella:2002jc}. That is, the dead zone is here

112: populated by using the exact next-to-leading order (NLO)

113: tree-level ME result and the

114: PS in the already-populated region is corrected using the exact

115: amplitude any time an emission is capable of being the

116: {\sl hardest so far}.

117: 

118: \section{NUMERICAL RESULTS AND COMPARISONS}

119: 

120: The MEs squared for the real 

121: corrections to $gg\to H$ that we have used can be found in

122: \cite{Baur:1989cm}, where top mass effects are fully included.

123: The real NLO corrections to $q\bar q\to H$ are instead rather straightforward:

124: the formulae we used can be read from Eq.~(3.62) of \cite{Moretti:2002eu}

125: with appropriate Yukawa couplings and crossing.

126: In the new HERWIG default version, in line with \cite{Corcella:1999gs}, 

127: ME corrections use

128: the Higgs transverse mass $m_T^2=q_T^2+m_H^2$ as the scale for 

129: $\alpha_S$ and for the Parton Distribution Functions (PDFs)

130: while the $gg,q\bar q\to H$ contributions use $m_H^2$.

131: We shall also assume that the intrinsic transverse momentum of the

132: initial-state partons is equal to

133: $q_{T,\mathrm{int}}=0$, the HERWIG default value.

134: 

135: \begin{figure}

136: \hspace*{2.5truecm}

137: {\epsfig{file=tev.ps,width=5.0cm,angle=0}}

138: {\epsfig{file=lhc.ps,width=5.0cm,angle=0}}

139: \caption{\small Higgs transverse momentum distribution according to

140: HERWIG with (solid) and without (dotted) ME corrections,

141: at Tevatron (left, $\sqrt s_{p\bar p}=2$ TeV) and LHC

142:  (right, $\sqrt s_{pp}=14$ TeV).

143: We have set the Higgs mass to $m_H=115$~GeV.}

144: \label{HW}

145: \end{figure}

146: 

147: \begin{figure}

148: {\epsfig{file=lhc1.ps,width=5.0cm,angle=0}}

149: {\epsfig{file=higres2.ps,width=5.0cm,angle=0}}

150: {\epsfig{file=higmc.ps,width=5.0cm,angle=0}}

151: \caption{\small Left: comparison of ME-corrected HERWIG

152: predictions (solid) to the `$H$ + jets' result from [\ref{bauglo}]

153: (dotted). Centre: comparison of ME-corrected HERWIG

154: predictions (solid) to the NLO and resummed calculation of [\ref{bozzi}]

155: (dotted).

156: Right: comparison of ME-corrected HERWIG predictions

157: (solid) to the MC@NLO results from the code described

158: in Ref.~[\ref{frix}] (dotted). Here,

159: $q\bar q\to H$ processes have been turned off.}

160: \label{comparisons}

161: \end{figure}

162: 

163: By adopting the HERWIG defaults,

164: we first consider Higgs production at the Tevatron and the LHC within the

165: MC itself, by plotting the $q_T$ distribution  with (solid histogram) and 

166: without (dotted) ME corrections: see Fig.~\ref{HW}. 

167: Beyond $q_T\simeq m_H/2$ the ME-corrected 

168: version allows for many more events. In fact, one can prove 

169: that, within the standard algorithm, $q_T$ is constrained to be

170: $q_T<m_H$. At small $q_T$ the prediction which includes ME

171: corrections displays a suppression. By default, after the

172: latter are put in place,

173: the total normalization still equals

174: the LO rates. Hence, it is obvious that the enhancement

175: at large $q_T$ implies a reduction of the number of

176: events which are generated at small $q_T$ values.

177: 

178: In Fig.~\ref{comparisons} (left plot) 

179: we present the improved HERWIG spectrum (solid) for the LHC,

180: along with the result obtained running the so-called

181: `$H$ + jets' process (dotted), where the hard process is always 

182: one of the corrections to $gg\to H$. 

183: In order to perform such a comparison, we have turned 

184: the $q\bar q\to H$ hard process off, as `$H$ + jets' in HERWIG

185: does not currently

186: implement the corrections to quark-antiquark annihilation.

187: Furthermore, we have chosen $q_{T\mathrm{min}}=30$~GeV for the 

188: `$H$ + jets' generation.

189: As expected, at small $q_T$ the two predictions are

190: fairly different but at large transverse momentum they agree well.

191: 

192: In Fig.~\ref{comparisons} (centre plot) 

193: we compare the new HERWIG version with the

194: resummed calculation of Ref.~\cite{Bozzi:2003jy}. For the

195: sake of comparison with HERWIG, which includes leading logarithms and

196: only some subleading terms, we use the results

197: of \cite{Bozzi:2003jy} in the NLL approximation (rather than the default

198: NNLL one), matched to the NLO prediction. In order for such a comparison to be

199: trustworthy, we have to make parameter choices similar to \cite{Bozzi:2003jy}:

200: namely, we adopt a top quark with infinite mass in the

201: loop and $m_H=125$~GeV, with $\alpha_S$ and PDFs (both from HERWIG

202: defaults) evaluated at $m_H^2$. While

203: the normalization (LO in HERWIG, NLO in Ref.~\cite{Bozzi:2003jy}) and

204: the small-$q_T$ behaviour of the two curves are clearly different, 

205: the large transverse momentum predictions are in  good agreement, as

206: in both approaches it is the real NLO ME that

207: dominates the event generation at large $q_T$.

208: 

209: Finally, in Fig.~\ref{comparisons} (right plot), 

210: we compare the results of standard HERWIG after ME

211: corrections with the so-called `MC@NLO' event generator 

212: (version 2.2) of Ref. \cite{Frixione:2003vm}, the latter 

213: implementing both real

214: and virtual corrections to the hard-scattering process, in such

215: a way that predicted observables (including normalization) 

216: are correct to NLO accuracy. As version 2.2 of the MC@NLO

217: includes only the corrections

218: to Higgs production in the gluon-fusion channel, we  again have

219: turned the quark-annihilation process off in our routines. 

220: As observed in the comparison with the resummed calculation, the two spectra 

221: differ in normalization and at small $q_T$, but agree in the 

222: large-transverse-momentum region.

223: 

224: \section{CONCLUSIONS}

225: 

226: Between the described implementation and the one available within the 

227: MC@NLO option,

228: we believe that HERWIG is presently a reliable event generator for (direct)

229: Higgs production from parton fusion at hadron colliders both at small and 

230: large transverse

231: momentum. In fact, all currently available

232: ME corrections will play an important role to perform any

233: analysis on Higgs searches at present and future colliders. In particular,

234: the option described here may be the most convenient choice for when the

235: phase space is limited to transverse momentum values such that $q_T\gsim m_H$.

236: 

237: \section*{ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS}

238: 

239: SM would like to thank the 2003 Les Houches workshop organisers

240: for their kind invitation and the Royal Society (London, UK) for financial

241: support.

242: 

243: \begin{thebibliography}{99}

244: 

245: %\cite{Kunszt:1996yp}

246: \bibitem{Kunszt:1996yp}

247: Z.~Kunszt, S.~Moretti and W.~J.~Stirling,

248: %``Higgs production at the LHC: An update on cross sections and branching  ratios,''

249: Z.\ Phys.\ C {\bf 74} (1997) 479

250: [arXiv:hep-ph/9611397].

251: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9611397;%%

252: 

253: %\cite{Cavalli:2002vs}

254: \bibitem{Cavalli:2002vs}

255: D.~Cavalli {\it et al.},

256: %``The Higgs working group: Summary report,''

257: arXiv:hep-ph/0203056.

258: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0203056;%%

259: 

260: %\cite{Djouadi:2000gu}

261: \bibitem{Djouadi:2000gu}

262: A.~Djouadi {\it et al.},

263: %``The Higgs working group: Summary report,''

264: arXiv:hep-ph/0002258.

265: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0002258;%%

266: 

267: %\cite{Balazs:2000sz}

268: \bibitem{Balazs:2000sz}

269: C.~Balazs, J.~Huston and I.~Puljak,

270: %``Higgs production: A comparison of parton showers and resummation,''

271: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 63}, 014021 (2001)

272: [arXiv:hep-ph/0002032].

273: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0002032;%%

274: 

275: %\cite{Corcella:2000bw}

276: \bibitem{Corcella:2000bw}

277: G.~Corcella {\it et al.},

278:  %``HERWIG 6: An event generator for hadron emission reactions with  interfering

279: %gluons (including supersymmetric processes),''

280: JHEP {\bf 0101} (2001) 010

281: [arXiv:hep-ph/0011363].

282: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0011363;%%

283: 

284: %\cite{Corcella:2002jc}

285: \bibitem{Corcella:2002jc}

286: G.~Corcella {\it et al.},

287: %``HERWIG 6.5 release note,''

288: arXiv:hep-ph/0210213.

289: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0210213

290: 

291: %\cite{Sjostrand:2003wg}

292: \bibitem{Sjostrand:2003wg}

293: T.~Sjostrand, L.~Lonnblad, S.~Mrenna and P.~Skands,

294: %``PYTHIA 6.3 physics and manual,''

295: arXiv:hep-ph/0308153.

296: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0308153;%%

297: 

298: %\cite{Seymour:1994df}

299: \bibitem{Seymour:1994df}

300: M.~H.~Seymour,

301: %``Matrix element corrections to parton shower algorithms,''

302: Comput.\ Phys.\ Commun.\  {\bf 90} (1995) 95

303: [arXiv:hep-ph/9410414].

304: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9410414;%%

305: 

306: %\cite{Norrbin:2000uu}

307: \bibitem{Norrbin:2000uu}

308: E.~Norrbin and T.~Sjostrand,

309: %``QCD radiation off heavy particles,''

310: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 603} (2001) 297

311: [arXiv:hep-ph/0010012].

312: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0010012;%%

313: 

314: %\cite{Frixione:2002ik}

315: \bibitem{Frixione:2002ik}

316: S.~Frixione and B.~R.~Webber,

317: %``Matching NLO QCD computations and parton shower simulations,''

318: JHEP {\bf 0206} (2002) 029

319: [arXiv:hep-ph/0204244].

320: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0204244;%%

321: 

322: %\cite{Frixione:2003ei}

323: \bibitem{Frixione:2003ei}

324: S.~Frixione, P.~Nason and B.~R.~Webber,

325: %``Matching NLO QCD and parton showers in heavy flavour production,''

326: JHEP {\bf 0308} (2003) 007

327: [arXiv:hep-ph/0305252].

328: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0305252;%%

329: 

330: %\cite{Dobbs:2001gb}

331: \bibitem{Dobbs:2001gb}

332: M.~Dobbs,

333:  %``Incorporating next-to-leading order matrix elements for hadronic  di-boson

334: %production in showering event generators,''

335: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 64} (2001) 034016

336: [arXiv:hep-ph/0103174].

337: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0103174;%%

338: 

339: %\cite{Seymour:1992xa}

340: \bibitem{Seymour:1992xa}

341: M.~H.~Seymour,

342:  %``Photon radiation in final state parton showering,''

343: Z.\  Phys.\  C {\bf 56} (1992) 161.

344: 

345: %\cite{Seymour:1994ti}

346: \bibitem{Seymour:1994ti}

347: M.~H.~Seymour,

348:  %``Matrix element corrections to parton shower simulation of deep inelastic

349: %scattering,''

350: LU-TP-94-12

351: %\href{http://www.slac.stanford.edu/spires/find/hep/www?r=lu-tp-94-12}{SPIRES entry}

352: {\it Contributed to 27th International Conference on High Energy Physics (ICHEP), Glasgow, Scotland, 20-27 Jul 1994}

353: 

354: %\cite{Corcella:1998rs}

355: \bibitem{Corcella:1998rs}

356: G.~Corcella and M.~H.~Seymour,

357:  %``Matrix element corrections to parton shower simulations of heavy quark

358: %decay,''

359: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 442} (1998) 417 

360: [arXiv:hep-ph/9809451].

361: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9809451;%%

362: 

363: %\cite{Corcella:1999gs}

364: \bibitem{Corcella:1999gs}

365: G.~Corcella and M.~H.~Seymour,

366:  %``Initial state radiation in simulations of vector boson production at  hadron

367: %colliders,''

368: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 565} (2000) 227

369: [arXiv:hep-ph/9908388].

370: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9908388;%%

371: 

372: \bibitem{cormor}

373: G.~Corcella and S.~Moretti, 

374: %``Matrix-element corrections to parton shower simulations for Higgs

375: %hadroproduction''

376: arXiv:hep-ph/0402146.

377: 

378: %\cite{Baur:1989cm}

379: \bibitem{Baur:1989cm}\label{bauglo}

380: U.~Baur and E.~W.~N.~Glover,

381:  %``Higgs Boson Production At Large Transverse Momentum In Hadronic

382: %Collisions,''

383: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 339} (1990) 38.

384: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B339,38;%%

385: 

386: %\cite{Moretti:2002eu}

387: \bibitem{Moretti:2002eu}

388: S.~Moretti, K.~Odagiri, P.~Richardson, M.~H.~Seymour and B.~R.~Webber,

389: %``Implementation of supersymmetric processes in the HERWIG event  generator,''

390: JHEP {\bf 0204}, 028 (2002)

391: [arXiv:hep-ph/0204123].

392: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0204123;%%

393: 

394: %\cite{Bozzi:2003jy}

395: \bibitem{Bozzi:2003jy}\label{bozzi}

396: G.~Bozzi, S.~Catani, D.~de Florian and M.~Grazzini,

397:  %``The q(T) spectrum of the Higgs boson at the LHC in QCD perturbation

398: %theory,''

399: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 564} (2003) 65

400: [arXiv:hep-ph/0302104].

401: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0302104;%%

402: 

403: %\cite{Frixione:2003vm}

404: \bibitem{Frixione:2003vm}\label{frix}

405: S.~Frixione and B.~R.~Webber,

406: %``The MC@NLO 2.2 event generator,''

407: arXiv:hep-ph/0309186.

408: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0309186;%%

409: 

410: 

411: %\bibliography{higLC}

412: 

413: \end{thebibliography}

414: 

415: \end{document}

416: