1: \documentclass{appolb}
2: \usepackage{epsfig}
3: \unitlength1.0mm
4:
5: \title{TRUNCATED MOMENTS OF NONSINGLET PARTON DISTRIBUTIONS IN THE DOUBLE
6: LOGARITHMIC $ln^2x$ APPROXIMATION.}
7:
8: \author{Dorota Kotlorz $^1$, Andrzej Kotlorz $^2$
9: \address{$^1$Department of Physics Ozimska 75, $^2$Department of
10: Mathematics Luboszycka 3, Technical University of Opole,
11: 45-370 Opole, Poland, e-mail $^1$: {\tt dstrozik@po.opole.pl}}}
12:
13: \begin{document}
14: \pagestyle{plain}
15: \eqsec
16: \maketitle
17:
18: \begin{abstract}
19: The method of truncated Mellin moments in a solving QCD evolution equations
20: of the nonsinglet structure functions $F_2^{NS}(x,Q^2)$ and $g_1^{NS}(x,Q^2)$
21: is presented. All calculations are performed within double logarithmic $ln^2x$
22: approximation. An equation for truncated moments which incorporates $ln^2x$
23: effects is formulated and solved for the unintegrated structure function
24: $f^{NS}(x,Q^2)$. The contribution to the Bjorken sum rule coming from the
25: region of very small $x$ is quantified. Further possible improvement of this
26: approach is also discussed.
27: \end{abstract}
28:
29: \PACS{12.38 Bx}
30:
31: \section{Introduction}
32:
33: Structure functions play a central role in the perturbative QCD.
34: Experimental measurements of the spin dependent and unpolarized structure
35: functions of the nucleon allow verification of sum rules and determination
36: of free parameters of the input parton distributions. From the other side,
37: theoretical analysis within perturbative methods investigates the available
38: experimentally region of the variables $x$ and $Q^2$ and the interesting
39: very small $x$ region (still unmeasurable) as well. In this low $x$ region
40: QCD predicts a strong growth of structure functions with decreasing $x$ -
41: the longitudinal momentum fraction of a hadron carried by a parton. Small
42: $x$ behaviour of the singlet unpolarized structure functions, driven by
43: gluons, is governed by BFKL \cite{b1} or CCFM \cite{b2}, \cite{b3} equations which
44: generate the steep $x^{-\lambda}$ ($\lambda\sim 0.3$) shape of
45: $F_2^S(x,Q^2)$ \cite{b4}. For the nonsinglet unpolarized $F_2^{NS}(x,Q^2)$
46: the driving term at small $x$ is a nonperturbative contribution of the
47: $A_2$ Regge pole $F_2^{NS}\sim x^{0.5}$ \cite{b4} which dominates even over the
48: $\alpha_s ln^2x$ effects. These double logarithmic terms control however
49: the small $x$ behaviour of both nonsinglet and singlet spin dependent
50: structure function $g_1(x,Q^2)$ \cite{b4}, \cite{b5}. Knowledge about structure
51: functions at very low $x$ is very important. The sum rules, which can be
52: verified by experiments, concern moments of structure functions
53: $\int\limits_{0}^{1} dx x^{n-1} g_1(x,Q^2)$ and $\int\limits_{0}^{1} dx x^{n-1}
54: F_2(x,Q^2)$ and hence require knowledge of $g_1$ and $F_2$ over the entire
55: region of $x\in (0;1)$. The lowest limit of $x$ in present experiments is
56: about $x\sim 10^{-5}$ so in theoretical analysis one should extrapolate
57: results to $x=0$ and $x=1$. More important is however the extrapolation to
58: $x\rightarrow 0$, where structure functions grow strongly than the
59: extrapolation to $x=1$, where structure functions are equal to 0. The limit
60: $x\rightarrow 0$ which implies that the invariant energy $W^2$ of the
61: inelastic lepton-hadron scattering becomes infinite
62: ($W^2=Q^2(\frac{1}{x}-1)$) will never be attained experimentally. So we will
63: really never know "what it happens" with structure functions at
64: $x\rightarrow 0$. This situation is however not quite hopeless. One can
65: combine the QCD perturbative analysis in the very interesting small $x$
66: region with experimental data without uncertainty from the region where
67: $x\rightarrow 0$. It could be achieved through dealing with truncated
68: moments of the structure functions, where one takes an integral over
69: $x_0\leq x \leq 1$ instead over the whole region $0\leq x \leq 1$. In usually
70: used method of solving evolution equations in QCD one takes Mellin (full)
71: transforms of these equations what gives possibility of analytical
72: solutions. Then after inverse Mellin transform (performed numerically) one
73: can obtain suitable solutions of original equations in $x$ space. In this
74: way e.g. in a case of DGLAP approximation, the differentio-integral
75: equations for parton distributions $q(x,Q^2)$ after Mellin transform change
76: into simple differential and diagonalized ones in moment space $n$. The only
77: problem is knowledge of input parametrizations for the whole region
78: $0\leq x \leq 1$ what is necessary in the determination of moments of
79: distribution functions. Using truncated moments approach one can avoid
80: uncertainty from the unmeasurable $x\rightarrow 0$ region and also obtain
81: important theoretical results incorporating perturbative QCD effects at
82: small $x$, which could be verified experimentally. Truncated moments of
83: parton distributions in solving DGLAP equations have been presented in
84: \cite{b6}. Authors have shown that the evolution equations for truncated
85: moments though not diagonal can be solved with good precision. This is
86: because each $n$-th truncated moment couples only with $n+j$ -th ($j\geq 0$)
87: truncated moments. In our paper we adopt the truncated moments method to
88: double logarithmic $ln^2x$ resummation. However a technique we use in this
89: approach is quite different because suitable integral equations which
90: correspond to $ln^2x$ terms are of course different from the DGLAP ones. As
91: a result we obtain the equations for truncated moments of the unintegrated
92: structure function $f^{NS}(x,Q^2)$, where each $n$-th moment ($n\neq 0$)
93: couples only with itself and with $0$-th moment. For fixed coupling constant
94: $\alpha_s$ the result for $n$-th truncated moment can be found analytically.
95: The purpose of this paper is to start the truncated moments method in the case
96: of perturbative QCD formalism, describing double logarithmic $ln^2x$ terms
97: in the nonsinglet structure functions $F_2^{NS}$ and $g_1^{NS}$. In the next
98: section we recall the approach which resums the double logarithmic terms.
99: The integral equation for the nonsinglet unintegrated quark distributions
100: $f^{NS}(x,Q^2)$ is presented. In point 3 the equation for truncated moments
101: of $f^{NS}(x,Q^2)$ within $ln^2x$ approach is derived. This equation is
102: solved analytically for fixed $\alpha_s$. Agreement for the limit case
103: $x_0\rightarrow 0$ (full moments) of our results is shown. Results for
104: truncated moments of $F_2^{NS}$ and $g_1^{NS}$ for simple Regge-type input
105: parametrizations and different $x_0$ are presented in section 4. We
106: calculate also the contribution to the Bjorken sum rule coming from the
107: region of very small $x$. Finally in section 5 we summarize our results and
108: discuss further possible improvement of our treatment.
109:
110: \section{Idea of double logarithmic $ln^2x$ resummation for the nonsinglet
111: unpolarized and polarized structure functions of the nucleon.}
112:
113: It has been noticed \cite{b4}, \cite{b5} that the nonsinglet structure
114: functions of the nucleon in the small $x$ region are governed by double
115: logarithmic terms i.e. powers of $\alpha_s ln^2x$ at each order of the
116: perturbative expansion. This contribution to the $ln^2x$ resummation comes
117: from the ladder diagram with quark and gluon exchanges along the chain -
118: cf. Fig.1.
119: %***************************Fig.1************************************
120: \begin{figure}[ht]
121: \begin{center}
122: \includegraphics[width=70mm]{fig1.eps}
123: \caption{A ladder diagram generating double logarithmic $\ln^2(1/x)$
124: terms in the nonsinglet spin structure functions.}
125: \end{center}
126: \end{figure}
127: In contrast to the singlet spin dependent structure function, for the
128: nonsinglet one the "bremsstrahlung" nonladder corrections vanish for the
129: unpolarized structure function and are negligible for the spin dependent one
130: \cite{b5}, \cite{b7}. In this way we do not need to take into account the
131: nonladder diagrams in the case of nonsinglet (both polarized and unpolarized)
132: structure functions. The Regge theory \cite{b8}, which concerns the Regge
133: limit: $x\rightarrow 0$ predicts singular behaviour of nonsinglet,
134: unpolarized distributions and nonsingular (flat) shape of nonsinglet
135: polarized ones:
136: \begin{equation}\label{r2.1}
137: q^{NS}\sim x^{-0.5}
138: \end{equation}
139: \begin{equation}\label{r2.2}
140: \Delta q^{NS}\sim x^{0} \div x^{-0.5}
141: \end{equation}
142: where $q^{NS}$ denotes nonsinglet unpolarized and $\Delta q^{NS}$ nonsinglet
143: polarized quark distributions. The nonsinglet part of the unpolarized
144: structure function has the form:
145: \begin{equation}\label{r2.3}
146: F_2^{NS}(x,Q^2) = F_2^{p}(x,Q^2)-F_2^{n}(x,Q^2)
147: \end{equation}
148: where
149: \begin{equation}\label{r2.4}
150: F_2(x,Q^2) = \sum\limits_{i=u,d,s,...} e_i^2 [xq_i(x,Q^2) +
151: x\bar{q_i}(x,Q^2)]
152: \end{equation}
153: The spin dependent structure function is:
154: \begin{equation}\label{r2.5}
155: g_1^{NS}(x,Q^2) = g_1^{p}(x,Q^2)-g_1^{n}(x,Q^2)
156: \end{equation}
157: and
158: \begin{equation}\label{r2.6}
159: g_1(x,Q^2) = \frac{1}{2}\sum\limits_{i=u,d,s,...} e_i^2 \Delta q_i(x,Q^2)
160: \end{equation}
161: $p$ and $n$ in above formulae denote proton and neutron respectively, $e_i$
162: is a charge of the $i$-flavour quark. Hence finally we get:
163: \begin{equation}\label{r2.7}
164: xq^{NS}=F_2^{NS}(x,Q^2) = \frac{x}{3}(u_{val}-d_{val})(x,Q^2)
165: \end{equation}
166: and
167: \begin{equation}\label{r2.8}
168: \Delta q^{NS}=g_1^{NS}(x,Q^2) = \frac{1}{6}(\Delta u_{val}-
169: \Delta d_{val})(x,Q^2)
170: \end{equation}
171: where $u_{val}$, $d_{val}$, $\Delta u_{val}$, $\Delta d_{val}$ are
172: respectively spin and nonspin valence quark distributions in the proton.
173: In the double logarithmic approximation the unintegrated nonsinglet quark
174: distribution function $f^{NS}(x,k^2)$ satisfies the following integral
175: equation \cite{b4}:
176: \begin{equation}\label{r2.9}
177: f^{NS}(x,k^2)=f_0^{NS}(x)+\bar{\alpha_s}
178: \int\limits_x^1\frac{dz}{z}\int\limits_{k_0^2}^{k^2/z}
179: \frac{dk'^2}{k'^2}f^{NS}(\frac{x}{z},k'^2)
180: \end{equation}
181: where
182: \begin{equation}\label{r2.10}
183: \bar{\alpha_s}=\frac{2\alpha_s}{3\pi}
184: \end{equation}
185: and $f_0^{NS}(x)$ is a nonperturbative contribution which has a form:
186: \begin{equation}\label{r2.11}
187: f_0^{NS}(x)=\bar{\alpha_s}\int\limits_x^1\frac{dz}{z}
188: q^{NS}(z)\sim \bar{\alpha_s} x^{-0.5}
189: \end{equation}
190: for nonspin distributions or
191: \begin{equation}\label{r2.12}
192: f_0^{NS}(x)=\bar{\alpha_s}\int\limits_x^1\frac{dz}{z}
193: \Delta q^{NS}(z)\sim \bar{\alpha_s} \ln\frac{1}{x}
194: \end{equation}
195: for spin dependent distributions. The driving terms of these nonperturbative
196: contributions $q^{NS}$ and $\Delta q^{NS}$ are shown in (\ref{r2.1}) and
197: (\ref{r2.2}). The unintegrated distribution $f^{NS}(x,k^2)$ is related to
198: the quark distributions $q^{NS}$ ($\Delta q^{NS}$) via:
199: \begin{equation}\label{r2.13}
200: f^{NS}(x,k^2)=\frac{\partial\frac{1}{x} F_2^{NS}(x,k^2)}{\partial\ln k^2}
201: \end{equation}
202: in the unpolarized case and
203: \begin{equation}\label{r2.14}
204: f^{NS}(x,k^2)=\frac{\partial g_1^{NS}(x,k^2)}{\partial\ln k^2}
205: \end{equation}
206: in the polarized one. Using a method of the Mellin moment functions one can
207: obtain from (\ref{r2.9}) the following equation:
208: \begin{equation}\label{r2.15}
209: \bar{f}^{NS}(n,k^2)=\bar{f_0}^{NS}(n)+\frac {\bar{\alpha_s}}{n}
210: \left[\int\limits_{k_0^2}^{k^2}\frac{dk'^2}{k'^2}\bar{f}^{NS}(n,k'^2)+
211: \int\limits_{k^2}^{\infty}\frac{dk'^2}{k'^2} \left(\frac{k^2}{k'^2}\right)^n
212: \bar{f}^{NS}(n,k'^2)\right]
213: \end{equation}
214: where the full Mellin moment of a function $f(x)$ is defined as:
215: \begin{equation}\label{r2.16}
216: {\it M}(n)\equiv\int\limits_0^1 dx x^{n-1} f(x)
217: \end{equation}
218: and in our case:
219: \begin{equation}\label{r2.17}
220: \bar{f}^{NS}(n,k^2)=\int\limits_0^1 dx x^{n-1} f^{NS}(x,k^2)
221: \end{equation}
222: As it was shown in \cite{b4}, equation (\ref{r2.15}) for fixed coupling
223: $\bar{\alpha_s}$ can be solved analytically. Because we would like later to
224: compare full-moments approach with the truncated moments one, let us recall
225: the way to obtain the analytical solution of (\ref{r2.15}). A short
226: explanation of this is given in Appendix A. Thus we get the solution of
227: (\ref{r2.15}) in the form:
228: \begin{equation}\label{r2.18}
229: \bar{f}^{NS}(n,k^2) =
230: \bar{f_0}^{NS}(n)\frac{n\gamma}{\bar{\alpha_s}}
231: \left(\frac{k^2}{k_0^2}\right)^{\gamma}
232: \end{equation}
233: where
234: \begin{equation}\label{r2.19}
235: \gamma = \frac{n}{2}\left[1-\sqrt{1 - (\frac{n_0}{n})^2}\right]
236: \end{equation}
237: and
238: \begin{equation}\label{r2.20}
239: n_0 = 2\sqrt{\bar{\alpha_s}}
240: \end{equation}
241: The inhomogeneous term $\bar{f_0}^{NS}(n)$ in (\ref{r2.15}) and
242: (\ref{r2.18}) according to (\ref{r2.16}), (\ref{r2.11})-(\ref{r2.12}) and
243: (\ref{r2.1})-(\ref{r2.2}) behaves as:
244: \begin{equation}\label{r2.21}
245: \bar{f_0}^{NS}(n) \sim \frac{\bar{\alpha_s}}{n(n-0.5)}
246: \end{equation}
247: for unpolarized structure functions and
248: \begin{equation}\label{r2.22}
249: \bar{f_0}^{NS}(n) \sim \frac{\bar{\alpha_s}}{n^2}
250: \end{equation}
251: for the spin dependent ones. The anomalous dimension of the moment of the
252: nonsinglet structure function $\gamma$ from (\ref{r2.19}) has a (square
253: root) branch point singularity at $n=n_0$. This gives the following
254: behaviour of the nonsinglet structure functions at small $x$:
255: \begin{equation}\label{r2.23}
256: f^{NS}(x,k^2) \sim x^{-n_0} \left(\frac{k^2}{k_0^2}\right)^{n_0/2}
257: \end{equation}
258: and hence also
259: \begin{equation}\label{r2.24}
260: \frac{1}{x} F_2^{NS}(x,k^2) \sim g_1^{NS}(x,k^2)
261: \sim x^{-n_0} \left(\frac{k^2}{k_0^2}\right)^{n_0/2}
262: \end{equation}
263: This low $x$ shape $\sim x^{-n_0}$, where $n_0$ given in (\ref{r2.20}) is
264: equal to 0.39 for $\bar{\alpha_s} = 0.038$ ($\alpha_s = 0.18$), remains
265: nonleading in the case of the nonsinglet unpolarized structure function in
266: comparison to the contribution of the nonperturbative $A_2$ Regge pole
267: (\ref{r2.1}). In this way QCD perturbative singularity at small $x$
268: generated by the double logarithmic $ln^2x$ resummation for nonsinglet
269: unpolarized quark distributions is hidden behind the leading Regge
270: contribution:
271: \begin{equation}\label{r2.25}
272: q^{NS}(x,Q^2)\sim x^{-n_0} < x^{-\alpha_{A_2}(0)}~~~\alpha_{A_2}(0) = 0.5
273: \end{equation}
274: Quite different situation occurs for the nonsinglet spin dependent
275: functions, where the double logarithmic contribution becomes important:
276: \begin{equation}\label{r2.26}
277: \Delta q^{NS}(x,Q^2)\sim x^{-n_0} > x^{-\alpha_{A_1}(0)}~~~\alpha_{A_1}(0)
278: \leq 0
279: \end{equation}
280: This takes place because the nonperturbative Regge part for spin dependent
281: quark distributions involves a very low intercept $\alpha_{A_1}(0)\leq 0$.
282: Small $x$ behaviour $\sim x^{-2\sqrt{\bar{\alpha_s}}}$ of the nonsinglet
283: structure functions originating from double logarithmic $ln^2x$ resummation
284: is a very interesting feature. Particularly for the polarized structure
285: functions, where the double logarithmic analysis enable estimation of parton
286: parametrizations at low $x$. In the next section we introduce the truncated
287: moments method and combine it with the $ln^2x$ approach. This technique will
288: give a novel advantage in the QCD perturbative analysis: enable to avoid
289: dealing with the unmeasurable $x\rightarrow 0$ region.
290:
291: \section{Truncated moments method within double logarithmic $ln^2x$ resummation
292: for the nonsinglet structure functions.}
293:
294: Truncated moments of parton distributions have been lately used in the LO
295: and NLO DGLAP analysis \cite{b6}. Authors avoid in this way an
296: extrapolation of well known quark distributions behaviour to the
297: unmeasurable so unknown $x\rightarrow 0$ region. Apart from they receive
298: evolution equations for the truncated moments, in which $n$-th truncated
299: moment couples only with $n+j$-th ($j\geq 0$) moments and that the series of
300: couplings is convergent, what ensures a good accuracy. In our double
301: logarithmic analysis we use truncated moments of the unintegrated function
302: $f^{NS}(x,k^2)$ and for fixed coupling $\bar{\alpha_s}$ we can solve the
303: suitable equation analytically. Let us shortly explain this treatment. The
304: truncated $n$-th Mellin moment of the function $f^{NS}(x,k^2)$ from
305: (\ref{r2.13})-(\ref{r2.14}) is defined as:
306: \begin{equation}\label{r3.1}
307: \bar{f}^{NS}(x_0,n,k^2) \equiv \int\limits_{x_0}^1 dx x^{n-1} f^{NS}(x,k^2)
308: \end{equation}
309: The evolution equation (\ref{r2.9}), generating double logarithmic terms
310: $ln^2x$ in the truncated Mellin moment space takes a form:
311: \begin{eqnarray}\label{r3.2}
312: \bar{f}^{NS}(x_0,n,k^2) = \bar{f_0}^{NS}(x_0,n) + \bar{\alpha_s}
313: \int\limits_{k_0^2}^{k^2/x_0} \frac{dk'^2}{k'^2}
314: \nonumber \\
315: \times\int\limits_{x_0}^{1}dy y^{n-1} f^{NS}(y,k'^2)
316: \int\limits_{x_0/y}^{1} dz z^{n-1}\Theta \left(\frac{k^2}{k'^2}-z\right)
317: \nonumber \\
318: \end{eqnarray}
319: where $\Theta (t)$ is Heaviside's function:
320: \begin{equation}\label{r3.3}
321: \Theta(t)=\cases{1 & for~~ $t>0$ \cr 0 & for~~ $t\leq 0$ \cr}
322: \end{equation}
323: and we deal with the $x$-Bjorken region, where
324: \begin{equation}\label{r3.4}
325: x\geq x_0
326: \end{equation}
327: After taking into account the relations:
328: \begin{equation}\label{r3.5}
329: \int\limits_{x_0/y}^{1} dz z^{n-1}\Theta \left(\frac{k^2}{k'^2}-z\right) =
330: \frac{1}{n} \left[\Theta (k^2-k'^2) + \Theta
331: (k'^2-k^2)\left(\frac{k^2}{k'^2}\right)^n -\frac{x_0^n}{y^n}\right];
332: ~~~~~n\neq 0
333: \end{equation}
334: \begin{equation}\label{r3.6}
335: \int\limits_{x_0/y}^{1} dz z^{n-1}\Theta \left(\frac{k^2}{k'^2}-z\right) =
336: \ln{\frac{y}{x_0}} + \Theta (k'^2-k^2)\ln{\frac{k^2}{k'^2}};~~~~~n=0
337: \end{equation}
338: one can obtain from (\ref{r3.2}):
339: \begin{eqnarray}\label{r3.7}
340: \bar{f}^{NS}(x_0,0,k^2) = \bar{f_0}^{NS}(x_0,0) + \bar{\alpha_s}
341: [\int\limits_{k^2}^{k^2/x_0} \frac{dk'^2}{k'^2} \ln{\frac{k^2}{k'^2}}
342: \bar{f}^{NS}(x_0,0,k'^2)
343: \nonumber \\
344: + \int\limits_{k_0^2}^{k^2/x_0}\frac{dk'^2}{k'^2}
345: \int\limits_{x_0}^{1} \frac{dy}{y} \ln{y} f^{NS}(y,k'^2)-\ln{x_0}\int
346: \limits_{k_0^2}^{k^2/x_0}\frac{dk'^2}{k'^2}\bar{f}^{NS}(x_0,0,k'^2)]
347: \nonumber \\
348: \end{eqnarray}
349: and
350: \begin{eqnarray}\label{r3.8}
351: \bar{f}^{NS}(x_0,n,k^2) = \bar{f_0}^{NS}(x_0,n) + \frac{\bar{\alpha_s}}{n}
352: [\int\limits_{k_0^2}^{k^2} \frac{dk'^2}{k'^2}\bar{f}^{NS}(x_0,n,k'^2)
353: \nonumber \\
354: + \int\limits_{k^2}^{k^2/x_0} \frac{dk'^2}{k'^2}\left(\frac{k^2}{k'^2}\right)^n
355: \bar{f}^{NS}(x_0,n,k'^2)- x_0^n\int\limits_{k_0^2}^{k^2/x_0}\frac{dk'^2}{k'^2}
356: \bar{f}^{NS}(x_0,0,k'^2)];~~~~~n\neq 0
357: \nonumber \\
358: \end{eqnarray}
359: For $n\neq 0$ we get the following solution (for details see Appendix B):
360: \begin{equation}\label{r3.9}
361: \bar{f}^{NS}(x_0,n,k^2) =
362: \bar{f_0}^{NS}(x_0,n)\left(\frac{k^2}{k_0^2}\right)^{\gamma}\frac{R}{1+(R-1)x_0^n}
363: \end{equation}
364: where
365: \begin{equation}\label{r3.10}
366: R\equiv R(n,\bar{\alpha_s}) = \frac{n\gamma}{\bar{\alpha_s}}
367: \end{equation}
368: $\gamma$ is given in (\ref{r2.19}) and $\bar{f_0}^{NS}(x_0,n)$ is the
369: inhomogeneous term, independent on $k^2$:
370: \begin{equation}\label{r3.11}
371: \bar{f_0}^{NS}(x_0,n) = \int\limits_{x_0}^1 dx x^{n-1} f_0^{NS}(x)=
372: \frac{\bar{\alpha_s}}{n}\int\limits_{x_0}^1 \frac{dx}{x} (x^n-x_0^n) p_0(x)
373: \end{equation}
374: The input parton distribution $p_0(x)$ in the above formula denotes
375: $q_0^{NS}(x)$ for the unpolarized case or $\Delta q_0^{NS}(x)$ for the
376: polarized one, respectively. From (\ref{r3.9}) one can read that our
377: solution for the truncated moment $\bar{f}^{NS}(x_0,n,k^2)$ reduces to
378: (\ref{r2.18}) when $x_0=0$ what must be of course fulfilled.
379:
380: \section{Some results for truncated moments $\bar{f}^{NS}(x_0,n,k^2)$,
381: $\bar{F_2}^{NS}(x_0,n,k^2)$, $\bar{g_1}^{NS}(x_0,n,k^2)$ in the double
382: logarithmic $ln^2x$ approximation.}
383:
384: The truncated $n$-th moment of the unintegrated nonsinglet function
385: $f^{NS}(x,k^2)$ is given by eqs. (\ref{r3.9})-(\ref{r3.11}). In Figs.2-3 we
386: plot the moments of $f^{NS}(x,k^2)$ for different $n$ as a function of $x_0$
387: at $k^2=10 {\rm GeV}^2$. One can see that the ratio $p_f(x_0,n)$ defined as
388: \begin{equation}\label{r4.1}
389: p_f(x_0,n)\equiv\frac{\bar{f}^{NS}(x_0,n,k^2)}{\bar{f}^{NS}(0,n,k^2)}
390: \end{equation}
391: becomes very large ($\simeq 1$) at $x_0\approx 10^{-4}$
392: ($p_f(x_0=10^{-4},n=1)=0.997$). This could be an advice that the truncated
393: moments method is useful in the region $x\geq x_0\sim 10^{-4}$ because at lower
394: $x$ the results for the full and the truncated moments are practically the same
395: (at least for the Regge input). From the other side double logarithmic $ln^2x$
396: terms from our approach become important in the small $x$ region $x\leq
397: 10^{-2}$ \cite{b7}, \cite{b9}. So taking into account both above facts one should
398: choose the limit point $x_0$ in the truncated moments of $f^{NS}$, $g_1^{NS}$
399: or $F_2^{NS}$ as
400: \begin{equation}\label{r4.2}
401: 10^{-2}\geq x_0 \geq 10^{-4}
402: \end{equation}
403: %******************Figs. 2-3 ************************************************
404: \begin{figure}[ht]
405: \begin{center}
406: \includegraphics[width=70mm]{fig2.eps}
407: \caption{Truncated Mellin moments $\bar{f}^{NS}(x_0,n,k^2)=
408: \int\limits_{x_0}^1 dx x^{n-1} f^{NS}(x,k^2)$ as a function of $x_0$ for
409: different $n$ at $k^2=10 {\rm GeV}^2$ in $ln^2x$ approach.}
410: \end{center}
411: \end{figure}
412: \begin{figure}[ht]
413: \begin{center}
414: \includegraphics[width=70mm]{fig3.eps}
415: \caption{The truncated Mellin moment $\bar{f}^{NS}
416: (x_0,n=1,k^2=10 {\rm GeV}^2)$, similarly as in Fig.2 but in a linear scale.}
417: \end{center}
418: \end{figure}
419: Truncated moments of the nonsinglet quark distributions are related to the
420: moments of $f^{NS}$ via:
421: \begin{equation}\label{r4.3}
422: \int\limits_{x_0}^1 dx x^{n-1} g_1^{NS}(x,k ^2)=
423: \int\limits_{x_0}^1 dx x^{n-1} g_1^{0NS}(x)+
424: \int\limits_{k_0^2}^{k^2/x_0} \frac{dk'^2}{k'^2(1+\frac{k'^2}{k^2})}
425: \bar{f}^{NS}(x_0,n,k'^2)
426: \end{equation}
427: for the spin dependent structure function and via:
428: \begin{equation}\label{r4.4}
429: \int\limits_{x_0}^1 dx x^{n-2} F_2^{NS}(x,k ^2)=
430: \int\limits_{x_0}^1 dx x^{n-2} F_2^{0NS}(x)+
431: \int\limits_{k_0^2}^{k^2/x_0} \frac{dk'^2}{k'^2(1+\frac{k'^2}{k^2})}
432: \bar{f}^{NS}(x_0,n,k'^2)
433: \end{equation}
434: for the unpolarized case. This together with (\ref{r3.9})-(\ref{r3.11})
435: gives the following formulae:
436: \begin{eqnarray}\label{r4.5}
437: I_1(x_0,n,k^2)\equiv\int\limits_{x_0}^1 dx x^{n-1} g_1^{NS}(x,k ^2)=
438: \bar{g_1}^{0NS}(x_0,n)
439: \nonumber \\
440: + B(x_0,n,k^2)[\bar{g_1}^{0NS}(x_0,n)-x_0^n\bar{g_1}^{0NS}(x_0,0)]
441: \nonumber\\
442: \end{eqnarray}
443: \begin{eqnarray}\label{r4.6}
444: I_2(x_0,n,k^2)\equiv\int\limits_{x_0}^1 dx x^{n-1} F_2^{NS}(x,k ^2)=
445: \bar{F_2}^{0NS}(x_0,n)
446: \nonumber\\
447: + B(x_0,n+1,k^2)[\bar{F_2}^{0NS}(x_0,n)-x_0^{n+1}\bar{F_2}^{0NS}(x_0,0)]
448: \nonumber\\
449: \end{eqnarray}
450: where
451: \begin{equation}\label{r4.7}
452: B(x_0,n,k^2) = \frac{\gamma (\frac{k^2}{k_0^2})^{\gamma}}{1+(R-1)x_0^n}
453: \int\limits_{\ln \frac{k_0^2}{k^2}}^{\ln \frac{1}{x_0}} dt
454: \frac {e^{\gamma t}}{1+e^t}
455: \end{equation}
456: In Table I we collect results for different $n$-th moments of
457: $F_2^{NS}(x,k^2)$ and $g_1^{NS}(x,k^2)$ functions obtained from
458: (\ref{r4.5})-(\ref{r4.6}). The moments are truncated at $x_0 = 10^{-1},
459: 10^{-2}, 10^{-3}$ and $10^{-4}$.
460: %***Table I***
461: \begin{table}[ht]
462: \begin{center}
463: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|}
464: \hline\hline
465: $x_0$ & $n$ & $I_1(x_0,n,k^2)$ & $I_2(x_0,n,k^2)$ \\ \hline\hline
466: & 1 & 0.144631 & 0.031977 \\
467: & 2 & 0.039952 & 0.010018 \\
468: $10 ^{-1}$ & 3 & 0.014137 & 0.003945 \\
469: & 4 & 0.006101 & 0.001843 \\ \hline
470: & 1 & 0.219244 & 0.038540 \\
471: & 2 & 0.043831 & 0.010413 \\
472: $10 ^{-2}$ & 3 & 0.014400 & 0.003975 \\
473: & 4 & 0.006124 & 0.001846 \\ \hline
474: & 1 & 0.229486 & 0.038791 \\
475: & 2 & 0.043892 & 0.010416 \\
476: $10 ^{-3}$ & 3 & 0.014402 & 0.003975 \\
477: & 4 & 0.006125 & 0.001847 \\ \hline
478: & 1 & 0.230692 & 0.038801 \\
479: & 2 & 0.043894 & 0.010416 \\
480: $10 ^{-4}$ & 3 & 0.014402 & 0.003975 \\
481: & 4 & 0.006125 & 0.001847 \\
482: \hline\hline
483: \end{tabular}
484: \caption{\label{tab:par}Truncated moments $I_1(x_0,n,k^2)\equiv\int
485: \limits_{x_0}^1 dx x^{n-1} g_1^{NS}(x,k ^2)$ and $I_2(x_0,n,k^2)\equiv\int
486: \limits_{x_0}^1 dx x^{n-1} F_2^{NS}(x,k ^2)$ for different $x_0$ and $n$ in the
487: $ln^2x$ approach.}
488: \end{center}
489: \end{table}
490: For all moments in Table I $k^2=10 {\rm GeV}^2$, $\alpha_s = 0.18$ and
491: \begin{equation}\label{r4.8}
492: \bar{F_2}^{0NS}(x_0,n)\equiv \int\limits_{x_0}^1 dx x^{n-1} F_2^{0NS}(x)
493: \end{equation}
494: \begin{equation}\label{r4.9}
495: \bar{g_1}^{0NS}(x_0,n)\equiv \int\limits_{x_0}^1 dx x^{n-1} g_1^{0NS}(x)
496: \end{equation}
497: Input parametrizations $g_1^{0NS}(x)$ and $F_2^{0NS}(x)$ are chosen at
498: $k_0^2=1 {\rm GeV}^2$ in the simple Regge form:
499: \begin{equation}\label{r4.10}
500: F_2^{0NS}(x) = \frac {35}{96} \sqrt{x} (1-x)^3
501: \end{equation}
502: \begin{equation}\label{r4.11}
503: g_1^{0NS}(x) = 0.838 (1-x)^3
504: \end{equation}
505: which satisfy the sea flavour symmetric Gottfried \cite{b10} and Bjorken
506: \cite{b11} sum rules:
507: \begin{equation}\label{r4.12}
508: I_{GSR} = \int\limits_{0}^{1} \frac {dx}{x} F_2^{NS}(x,k ^2)= \frac {1}{3}
509: \end{equation}
510: \begin{equation}\label{r4.13}
511: I_{BSR} = \int\limits_{0}^{1} dx g_1^{NS}(x,k ^2)= \frac {1}{6}g_A = 0.21
512: \end{equation}
513: where $g_A=1.257$ is the axial vector coupling.
514: In order to determine the moment integrals we need knowledge of structure
515: functions over the entire region of $x$. The small $x$ behaviour of
516: structure functions is driven by the double logarithmic $ln^2x$ terms. This
517: $ln^2x$ approximation is however inaccurate in describing the $Q^2$
518: evolution for large values of $x$. Therefore double logarithmic $ln^2x$
519: approach should be completed by LO DGLAP $Q^2$ evolution. Dealing with
520: truncated moments of $f^{NS}$ within unified $ln^2x+$LO resummation one
521: encounters difficulties because suitable evolution equations are of course more
522: complicated than in the pure double logarithmic approach here presented.
523: Probably the only successful method to solve the evolution equations for
524: truncated moments in $ln^2x+$LO treatment is the numerical calculus. We will
525: discuss this in detail in the forthcoming paper.
526: Now we are able to employ the truncated moment method in calculation of the
527: contribution to moment integrals coming from the region of very small $x$.
528: Using the definition of the truncated moment (\ref{r3.1}) we can in a very
529: easy way find the double truncated moments of $f^{NS}$, $g_1^{NS}$ or
530: $F_2^{NS}$:
531: \begin{equation}\label{r4.14}
532: \int\limits_{x_1}^{x_2} dx x^{n-1} f^{NS}(x,k^2) =
533: \int\limits_{x_1}^{1} dx x^{n-1} f^{NS}(x,k^2) -
534: \int\limits_{x_2}^{1} dx x^{n-1} f^{NS}(x,k^2)
535: \end{equation}
536: etc. In this way for the partial Bjorken sum rule, according to (\ref{r4.5}),
537: we have:
538: \begin{equation}\label{r4.15}
539: \int\limits_{x_1}^{x_2} dx g_1^{NS}(x,k^2=10) = I_1(x_1,1,10) - I_1(x_2,1,10)
540: \end{equation}
541: where $x_1$ and $x_2$ are both very small:
542: \begin{equation}\label{r4.16}
543: x_1 \leq x_2 \leq 10^{-2}
544: \end{equation}
545: We have thus estimated a contribution:
546: \begin{equation}\label{r4.17}
547: \Delta I_{BSR}(x_1,x_2,k^2) = \int\limits_{x_1}^{x_2} dx g_1^{NS}(x,k^2)
548: \end{equation}
549: and found that $\Delta I_{BSR}(10^{-4},10^{-2},10) = 0.011$,
550: $\Delta I_{BSR}(10^{-5},10^{-3},10) = 0.0013$ what is equal to around $5\%$
551: and $0.6\%$ respectively of the value of the full sum (\ref{r4.13}). In our
552: above estimation we have assumed the simple Regge input parametrization of
553: $g_1^{0NS}$ (\ref{r4.11}).
554:
555: \section{Summary and conclusions.}
556:
557: In our paper we have derived the integral equation for truncated moments of
558: the unintegrated nonsinglet structure function $f^{NS}(x,Q^2)$ in the case of
559: double logarithmic $ln^2x$ approximation. Analytical results at fixed
560: $\alpha_s$ for truncated moments of $F_2^{NS}$ and $g_1^{NS}$ have been
561: presented. We have received the clear, new solutions and what is important,
562: in the limit $x_0\rightarrow 0$ our calculations confirm the well
563: known analytical result for full moments of $f^{NS}(x,Q^2)$. The resummation of
564: $ln^2x$ terms at small $x$ goes beyond the standard LO (and even NLO) QCD
565: evolution of spin dependent parton densities. In the case of unpolarized
566: structure functions, the Regge behaviour, originating from the nonperturbative
567: contribution is the leading one at small $x$. Therefore the double
568: logarithmic approximation is very important particularly for the polarized
569: structure function $g_1$, which at low $x$ is dominated just by $ln^2x$
570: terms. In our paper we have obtained analytical solutions for truncated
571: Mellin moments of $g_1^{NS}$ (and $F_2^{NS}$ too). Dealing with truncated
572: moments at $x_0$: $\int\limits_{x_0}^{1} dx x^{n-1} g_1(x,Q^2)$ one can
573: avoid uncertainty from the unmeasurable very small $x\rightarrow 0$ region.
574: In this way the theoretical predictions of QCD analysis for structure
575: functions at small $x$ can be compared with experimental data without
576: necessity to extrapolate results into nonavailable $x<x_0$ range. In our
577: analysis for nonsinglet structure functions $g_1^{NS}$ and $F_2^{NS}$ we
578: have found their truncated at $x_0$ moments, what could be helpful in the
579: estimation of Bjorken ($g_1^{NS}$) and Gottfried ($F_2^{NS}$) sum rules. We
580: have estimated the contribution to the Bjorken sum rule from the very
581: small $x$ region ($10^{-4}<x<10^{-2}$) and found it to be around $5\%$ of the
582: value of the sum. Evolution equations, we have derived for truncated Mellin
583: moments of $f^{NS}(x,Q^2)$ generate correctly the leading small $x$ behaviour
584: but do not describe $Q^2$ evolution at large values of $x$. In the integrals
585: for moments of structure functions one need to have values of $g_1$ or $F_2$
586: from the entire range of $x$: $x_0\leq x \leq 1$ so for large $x$ one should
587: include in the formalism LO Altarelli-Parisi (DGLAP) evolution. The aim of our
588: paper was to focus attention on the truncated moments technique within $ln^2x$
589: approach itself. We found an analytical solution for the truncated moments
590: of structure functions within $ln^2x$ approximation. This is an important
591: stage before further investigations. The next step in the improvement of our
592: analysis will be including LO DGLAP evolution into equations generating double
593: logarithmic terms $ln^2x$ for truncated moments of the nonsinglet structure
594: functions. This should give a proper determination of truncated and thus
595: experimentally verifiable sum rules.
596:
597: \section*{Acknowledgements}
598:
599: The work presented here is the result of discussions of one of the
600: authors (D.K.) with Jan
601: Kwieci\'nski. He was, as usual, very helpful, patient
602: and stimulating. We are greatly indebted to him for many
603: years of teaching us QCD. It is painful to us to express
604: our appreciation of the help we received from Jan Kwieci\'nski after he is
605: gone.
606:
607: \appendix
608: \section{Analytical solution of the evolution equation for the full moments
609: of the function $f^{NS}(x,k^2)$ generating double logarithmic $\ln^2x$ effects
610: at small $x$.}
611:
612: After double differentiation of (\ref{r2.15}) with respect to $lnk^2$ one
613: obtains:
614: \begin{equation}\label{rA.1}
615: \frac{\partial^2 \bar{f}^{NS}(n,k^2)}{\partial t^2} =
616: n \frac{\partial \bar{f}^{NS}(n,k^2)}{\partial t} -
617: \bar{\alpha_s} \bar{f}^{NS}(n,k^2)
618: \end{equation}
619: with
620: \begin{equation}\label{rA.2}
621: t = \ln k^2
622: \end{equation}
623: Hence function $\bar{f}^{NS}(n,k^2)$ has a form:
624: \begin{equation}\label{rA.3}
625: \bar{f}^{NS}(n,k^2) = \left(\frac{k^2}{k_0^2}\right)^{\gamma}
626: H(n,\bar{\alpha_s})
627: \end{equation}
628: where $H(n,\bar{\alpha_s})$ from initial conditions should be:
629: \begin{equation}\label{rA.4}
630: H(n,\bar{\alpha_s}) = \bar{f_0}^{NS}(n) R(n,\bar{\alpha_s})
631: \end{equation}
632: and $\gamma$ is given by (\ref{r2.19})-(\ref{r2.20}). After inserting the
633: solution (\ref{rA.3})-(\ref{rA.4}) into (\ref{r2.15}) one finds that $R$ is
634: connected with $\bar{\alpha_s}$, $n$ and $\gamma$ via:
635: \begin{equation}\label{rA.5}
636: R(n,\bar{\alpha_s}) = \frac{n\gamma}{\bar{\alpha_s}}
637: \end{equation}
638: Finally, the solutions (\ref{rA.3})-(\ref{rA.5}) for $n$-th moment
639: $\bar{f}^{NS}(n,k^2)$ giving (\ref{r2.18}), imply via inverse Mellin
640: transform
641: \begin{equation}\label{rA.6}
642: f^{NS}(x,k^2) = \frac{1}{2\pi i}\int\limits_{c-i\infty}^{c+i\infty}
643: dn x^{-n} \bar{f}^{NS}(n,k^2)
644: \end{equation}
645: the following small $x$ behaviour for $f^{NS}(x,k^2)$:
646: \begin{equation}\label{rA.7}
647: f^{NS}(x,\tau) \sim \frac{\sqrt{2n_0}}{4\bar{\alpha_s}\sqrt{\pi}}
648: (n_0 \ln\tau + 1) (\frac{\tau}{x})^{n_0}(\ln\frac{\tau}{x})^{-3/2}
649: \end{equation}
650: where
651: \begin{equation}\label{rA.8}
652: \tau = \left(\frac{k^2}{k_0^2}\right)^{1/2}
653: \end{equation}
654: and $n_0$ defined in (\ref{r2.20}) denotes branch point singularity of the
655: anomalous dimension $\gamma$.
656:
657: \section{Analytical solution of the evolution equation for truncated
658: moments of the function $f^{NS}(x,k^2)$ generating double logarithmic $\ln^2x$
659: effects at small $x$.}
660:
661: From the definition of the $n$-th ($n\neq 0$) truncated moment of $f(x,k^2)$
662: (\ref{r3.1}) one can read the following relation:
663: \begin{equation}\label{rB.1}
664: \frac{\partial \bar{f}^{NS}(x_0,n,k^2)}{\partial x_0} =
665: x_0^n \frac{\partial \bar{f}^{NS}(x_0,0,k^2)}{\partial x_0}
666: \end{equation}
667: On the strength of this above relation we can replace $\bar{f}^{NS}(x_0,0,k'^2)$
668: in (\ref{r3.8}) via:
669: \begin{equation}\label{rB.2}
670: \bar{f}^{NS}(x_0,0,k'^2) = x_0^{-n} \bar{f}^{NS}(x_0,n,k'^2) -
671: n\int\limits_{x_0}^{1}\frac{dy}{y^{n+1}}\bar{f}^{NS}(y,n,k'^2)
672: \end{equation}
673: and hence we get for (\ref{r3.8}):
674: \begin{eqnarray}\label{rB.3}
675: \bar{f}^{NS}(x_0,n,k^2) = \bar{f_0}^{NS}(x_0,n) + \frac{\bar{\alpha_s}}{n}
676: \int\limits_{k^2}^{k^2/x_0}
677: \frac{dk'^2}{k'^2}\left[\left(\frac{k^2}{k'^2}\right)^n - 1\right]
678: \bar{f}^{NS}(x_0,n,k'^2)
679: \nonumber \\
680: + \bar{\alpha_s}x_0^{n}\int\limits_{k^2}^{k^2/x_0} \frac{dk'^2}{k'^2}
681: \int\limits_{x_0}^{1}\frac{dy}{y^{n+1}}\bar{f}^{NS}(y,n,k'^2)
682: \nonumber \\
683: \end{eqnarray}
684: Now we "guess" the solution of (\ref{r3.8}) in the form:
685: \begin{equation}\label{rB.4}
686: \bar{f}^{NS}(x_0,n,k^2) =
687: \bar{f_0}^{NS}(x_0,n)\left(\frac{k^2}{k_0^2}\right)^{\gamma}
688: g(x_0,n,\bar{\alpha_s})
689: \end{equation}
690: where we postulate the same anomalous dimension $\gamma$ to be in agreement
691: with the result for the full moment:
692: \begin{equation}\label{rB.5}
693: \bar{f}^{NS}(x_0=0,n,k^2) = \bar{f}^{NS}(n,k^2)
694: \end{equation}
695: After insertion (\ref{rB.4}) into (\ref{rB.3}) we can find a simple form of
696: the auxiliary function $g(x_0,n,\bar{\alpha_s})$:
697: \begin{equation}\label{rB.6}
698: g(x_0,n,\bar{\alpha_s}) = \frac{n}{n-\gamma + \gamma x_0^n}
699: \end{equation}
700: or equivalently:
701: \begin{equation}\label{rB.7}
702: g(x_0,n,\bar{\alpha_s}) = \frac{R}{1+(R-1)x_0^n}
703: \end{equation}
704: with $R=R(n,\bar{\alpha_s})$ given by (\ref{r3.10}).
705:
706: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
707:
708: \bibitem{b1} E.A.Kuraev, L.N.Lipatov, V.Fadin, {\it Zh. Eksp. Teor.
709: Fiz.} {\bf 72}, 373 (1977) {\it Sov. Phys. JETP} {\bf 45}, 199 (1977));
710: Ya.Ya.Balitzkij, L.N.Lipatov, {\it Yad. Fiz.} {\bf 28}, 1597 (1978)
711: {\it Sov. J. Nucl. Phys.} {\bf 28}, 822 (1978)); L.N.Lipatov, in
712: {\it Perturbative QCD}, edited by A.H.Mueller, World Scientific,
713: Singapore 1989, p.441; J.B.Bronzan, R.L.Sugar, {\it Phys. Rev.}
714: {\bf D17}, 585 (1978); T.Jaroszewicz, {\it Acta Phys. Pol.} {\bf B11},
715: 965 (1980).
716: \bibitem{b2} M.Ciafaloni, {\it Nucl. Phys.} {\bf B296}, 49 (1988);
717: S.Catani, F.Fiorani, G.Marchesini, {\it Phys. Lett.} {\bf B234},,339(1990);
718: {\it Nucl. Phys.} {\bf B336}, 18 (1990); G.Marchesini, {\it Nucl. Phys.}
719: {\bf B445}, 49 (1995).
720: \bibitem{b3} J.Kwieci\'nski, A.D,Martin, P.J.Sutton, {\it Phys. Rev.} {\bf D52},
721: 1455 (1995).
722: \bibitem{b4} J.Kwieci\'nski, {\it Acta Phys. Pol.} {\bf B27}, 893 (1996).
723: \bibitem{b5} J.Bartels, B.I.Ermolaev, M.G.Ryskin, {\it Z. Phys.}
724: {\bf C70}, 273 (1996); J.Bartels, B.I.Ermolaev, M.G.Ryskin,
725: {\it Z. Phys.} {\bf C72}, 627 (1996).
726: \bibitem{b6} S.Forte, L.Magnea, {\it Phys. Lett.} {\bf B448}, 295 (1999).
727: \bibitem{b7} B.Bade\l{}ek, J.Kwieci\'nski, {\it Phys. Lett.} {\bf B418}, 229 (1998).
728: \bibitem{b8} P.D.B.Collins, {\it An Introduction to Regge Theory and
729: High Energy Physics}, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1977.
730: \bibitem{b9} D.Kotlorz, {\it Acta Phys. Pol.} {\bf B31}, 1721 (2000).
731: \bibitem{b10} K.Gottfried, {\it Phys. Rev. Lett.} {\bf 18}, 1174 (1967).
732: \bibitem{b11} J.D.Bjorken, {\it Phys. Rev.} {\bf 148}, 1467 (1966);
733: {\it Phys. Rev.} {\bf D1}, 1376 (1970).
734:
735: \end{thebibliography}
736:
737: \end{document}
738: