1: %% ****** Start of file template.aps ****** %
2: %%
3: %%
4: %% This file is part of the APS files in the REVTeX 4 distribution.
5: %% Version 4.0 of REVTeX, August 2001
6: %%
7: %%
8: %% Copyright (c) 2001 The American Physical Society.
9: %%
10: %% See the REVTeX 4 README file for restrictions and more information.
11: %%
12:
13: \documentclass[prc,preprint,showpacs,preprintnumbers,amsmath,amssymb]{revtex4}
14:
15: % You should use BibTeX and apsrev.bst for references
16: % Choosing a journal automatically selects the correct APS
17: % BibTeX style file (bast file), so only uncommented the line
18: % below if necessary.
19: %\bibliographystyle{apsrev}
20: \usepackage[mathscr]{eucal}
21: \usepackage{graphicx}
22: \def\slr#1{\setbox0=\hbox{$#1$} % set a box for #1
23: \dimen0=\wd0 % and get its size
24: \setbox1=\hbox{/} \dimen1=\wd1 % get size of /
25: \ifdim\dimen0>\dimen1 % #1 is bigger
26: \rlap{\hbox to \dimen0{\hfil/\hfil}} % so center / in box
27: #1 % and print #1
28: \else % / is bigger
29: \rlap{\hbox to \dimen1{\hfil$#1$\hfil}} % so center #1
30: / % and print /
31: \fi}
32:
33: \def\kp{k^{\,\prime}}
34: \def\kpsq{k^{\,\prime\,2}}
35: \def\ksq{k^2}
36: \def\kdp{k^{\,\prime\prime}}
37: \def\myint#1{\!\int\!\!\frac{d^4\!{#1}}{(2\pi)^4}\,}
38: \def\mytint#1{\!\int\!\!\frac{d^3\!{#1}}{(2\pi)^3}\,}
39: \def\gev#1{ GeV${}^{#1}$}
40: \def\be{\begin{eqnarray}}
41: \def\ee{\end{eqnarray}}
42: \def\qmm{$m^0=\mbox{diag}\,(m_u^0,
43: m_d^0, m_s^0)$}
44: \def\cond#1{\langle\bar #1\rangle}
45:
46:
47: \renewcommand{\theequation}%
48: {\arabic{section}.\arabic{equation}}
49: \makeatletter \@addtoreset{equation}{section} \makeatother
50:
51: \begin{document}
52:
53: % Use the \preprint command to place your local institutional report
54: % number in the upper righthand corner of the title page in preprint mode.
55: % Multiple \preprint commands are allowed.
56: % Use the 'proprietresses' class option to override journal defaults
57: % to display numbers if necessary
58: \preprint{BCCNT: 04/03/322}
59:
60: %Title of paper
61: \title{Quark Propagation in the Quark-Gluon Plasma}
62:
63:
64: \author{Xiangdong Li}
65: \affiliation{%
66: Department of Computer System Technology\\
67: New York City College of Technology of the City University of New
68: York\\
69: Brooklyn, New York 11201 }%
70:
71: \author{Hu Li}
72: \author{C. M. Shakin}
73: \email[email:]{casbc@cunyvm.cuny.edu}
74: \author{Qing Sun}
75:
76: \affiliation{%
77: Department of Physics and Center for Nuclear Theory\\
78: Brooklyn College of the City University of New York\\
79: Brooklyn, New York 11210
80: }%
81:
82: \date{March, 2004}
83:
84: \begin{abstract}
85: It has recently been suggested that the quark-gluon plasma formed
86: in heavy-ion collisions behaves as a nearly ideal fluid. That
87: behavior may be understood if the quark and antiquark mean-free-
88: paths are very small in the system, leading to a ``sticky
89: molasses" description of the plasma, as advocated by the Stony
90: Brook group. This behavior may be traced to the fact that there
91: are relatively low-energy $q\overline{q}$ resonance states in the
92: plasma leading to very large scattering lengths for the quarks.
93: These resonances have been found in lattice simulation of QCD
94: using the maximum entropy method (MEM). We have used a chiral
95: quark model, which provides a simple representation of effects due
96: to instanton dynamics, to study the resonances obtained using the
97: MEM scheme. In the present work we use our model to study the
98: optical potential of a quark in the quark-gluon plasma and
99: calculate the quark mean-free-path. Our results represent a
100: specific example of the dynamics of the plasma as described by the
101: Stony Brook group.
102: \end{abstract}
103:
104: % insert suggested PACS numbers in braces on next line
105: \pacs{12.39.Fe, 12.38.Aw, 14.65.Bt}
106: % insert suggested keywords - APS authors don't need to do this
107: %\keywords{}
108:
109: %\maketitle must follow title, authors, abstract, \pacs, and \keywords
110: \maketitle
111:
112: % body of paper here - Use proper section commands
113: % References should be done using the \cite, \ref, and \label commands
114: \section{INTRODUCTION}
115: The description of the quark-gluon plasma in terms of
116: hydrodynamics has been advocated by the Stony Brook group
117: [\,1-3\,]. That description appears to be in accord with the
118: experimental data. In such a description the motion of the quarks
119: is characterized by an extremely short mean-free-path. The origin
120: of that behavior is thought to be due to the relatively low-energy
121: resonances in the $q\overline{q}$ system leading to very large
122: scattering lengths. These resonances have been found in lattice
123: studies of QCD which make use of the maximum entropy method (MEM)
124: [\,4-9\,]. Similar resonances are found in the scalar,
125: pseudoscalar, vector and axial-vector $q\overline{q}$ channels
126: [\,10\,]. Recently, an extensive exploration of charmonium studies
127: in the confined and deconfined regions using lattice methods has
128: been reported in Ref. [11]. In that work results are given for the
129: dependence of the resonance excitation on the total momentum of
130: the $q\overline{q}$ pair. We have studied that dependence for
131: light quark systems in Ref.[12] and have found similar behavior to
132: that reported in Ref. [11]. (We will make use of the results
133: presented in Ref. [12] in the present work in which we calculate
134: the imaginary part of the optical potential and the mean-free-path
135: for a quark in the quark-gluon plasma.) We use a chiral model with
136: rather large momentum cutoff. That model is meant to provide an
137: approximate description of the instanton dynamics advocated by the
138: Stony Brook group [1-3]. Earlier work using our model may be found
139: in Refs. [13-15].
140:
141: In our studies of meson spectra at $T=0$ and at $T<T_c$ we have
142: made use of the Nambu--Jona-Lasinio (NJL) model. The Lagrangian of
143: the generalized NJL model we have used in our studies is
144:
145: \begin{flushleft}
146: \be \mathcal L&=&\overline{q}(i\slr\gamma-m^0)q+\frac{\overline
147: G_S}{2}\sum_{i=0}^8 [(\overline{q} \lambda^{i} q)^2+(\overline{q}
148: i \gamma_5 \lambda^{i} q)^2]\\\nonumber &-&\frac{\overline
149: G_V}{2}\sum_{i=0}^{8}[(\overline{q} \lambda^{i}\gamma_\mu
150: q)^2+(\overline{q} \lambda^{i}\gamma_5\gamma_\mu q)^2]\\\nonumber
151: &+&\frac{G_D}{2} \lbrace
152: \det[\overline{q}(1+\lambda_5)q]+\det[\overline{q}(1-\lambda_5)q]\rbrace
153: +\mathcal L_{conf} \ee
154: \end{flushleft}
155:
156: Here, $m^0$ is a current quark mass matrix, $m^0=diag(m_u^0,
157: m_d^0, m_s^0)$. The $\lambda_i$ are the Gell-Mann (flavor)
158: matrices and $\lambda^0=\sqrt{2/3}\mathbf{1}$, with $\mathbf{1}$
159: being the unit matrix. The fourth term is the 't Hooft interaction
160: and $\mathcal L_{conf}$ represents the model of confinement used
161: in our studies of meson properties.
162:
163: In the study of hadronic current correlators [13-15] it is
164: important to use a model which respects chiral symmetry when
165: $m^0=0$. Therefore, we make use of the Lagrangian of Eq. (1.1),
166: while neglecting the 't Hooft interaction and $\mathcal L_{conf}$.
167: In order to make contact with the results of lattice simulations
168: we use the model with the number of flavors $N_f=1$. Therefore,
169: the $\lambda^i$ matrices in Eq. (1.1) may be replaced by unity. We
170: then use \be \mathcal
171: L&=&\overline{q}(i\slr\gamma-m^0)q+\frac{G_S}{2}[(\overline{q}q)^2+(\overline{q}
172: i \gamma_5 q)^2]\\\nonumber &-&\frac{G_V}{2}[(\overline{q}
173: \gamma_\mu q)^2+(\overline{q}\gamma_5\gamma_\mu q)^2] \ee in order
174: to calculate the hadronic current correlation functions. Thus,
175: there are essentially three parameters to consider, $G_S$, $G_V$
176: and a Gaussian cutoff parameter $\alpha$, which restricts the
177: momentum integrals through a factor
178: $\exp[-\overrightarrow{k}^2/\alpha^2]$. As suggested by the Stony
179: Brook group, we consider the NJL model and the associated chiral
180: Lagrangian of Eq. (1.2) as providing a simplified representation
181: of the instanton dynamics important for the problems considered in
182: this work. Since the results obtained for the hadronic current
183: correlation functions are similar in the scalar, pseudoscalar,
184: vector and axial-vector channels, we carry out our calculations
185: for the scalar $q\overline{q}$ states and multiple our results for
186: the optical potential by 4. The parameters \emph{G} and $\alpha$
187: were fixed in our earlier studies [12]. We take \emph{G} =1.0
188: GeV$^{-2}$ and $\alpha$ = 4.4 GeV. These values provide good fits
189: [12] to the hadronic current correlation functions found in the
190: lattice studies [10]. In order to calculate the optical potential
191: for a quark we consider the quark moving in an antiquark
192: distribution characterized by a temperature-dependent occupation
193: factor $n(\overrightarrow{p_{1}})$ which depends upon the chemical
194: potential $\mu$. The energy of a quark is given by
195: $E(\overrightarrow{p})=[\overrightarrow{p}^{2}+m^{2}]^{1/2}$. We
196: follow the work of Shuryak [1], for example, and put $m$ = 1 GeV.
197: In Shuryak's work this mass is not the current quark mass, but is
198: called the ``chiral mass". (We would prefer to call the 1 GeV
199: mass, the ``thermal mass", however, the terminology used is not
200: important for this work.) The quark thermal mass is given in Ref.
201: [16], with $C_{F}=4/3$, as \be m^{2} =
202: \frac{1}{8}g^{2}C_{F}(T^{2}+\frac{\mu^{2}}{\pi^{2}}), \ee for the
203: case of a finite chemical potential. The thermal gluon mass is \be
204: m_{g}^{2} = \frac{1}{6}g^{2}T^{2}(C_{A}+\frac{1}{2}N_{f}). \ee
205: (The relation between thermal masses in QED and QCD is given on
206: p.146 of Ref. [\,16\,].) In studies of baryon matter, the chemical
207: potentials used are often about 300 MeV or less. However, once we
208: introduce a thermal mass of about 1 GeV, we need to determine the
209: chemical potential for the quarks. In this work we will consider a
210: chemical potential of about 1 GeV, although the calculations are
211: easily made for other values. Once we put $m$ = 1 GeV, the
212: chemical potential is the only parameter which is varied in our
213: study. The organization of our work is as follows. In Section II
214: we discuss the calculation of the imaginary part of the quark
215: optical potential and the quark mean-free-path. Section III
216: contains some further discussion and conclusions. (Appendixes A
217: and B provide a description of the calculation of correlators in
218: our model. That description is readily taken over to obtain a
219: representation of the $q\overline{q}$ scattering matrix. The
220: calculation of the vacuum polarization function
221: $J(P^{0},\overrightarrow{P}$) which appears in Section II is
222: described in the appendices.)
223:
224:
225:
226: \section{calculation of the quark optical potential}
227:
228: It is useful to contrast the calculation of the quark optical
229: potential with the calculation of the nucleon optical potential
230: that is to be used in the Dirac equation. The latter calculation
231: is discussed in detail in Ref. [17]. In that calculation of the
232: nucleon-nucleus potential one calculates the \emph{T}-matrix for
233: nucleon-nucleon scattering using the one-boson-exchange (OBE)
234: model. In that case the mesons of the OBE model undergo
235: \emph{t}-channel and \emph{u}-channel exchange between the
236: nucleons. The result is that the imaginary part of the optical
237: potential has a magnitude of about 10 MeV [17]. That in turn leads
238: to a mean-free-path of about 10 fm for a 500 MeV nucleon. Many
239: years ago, the relatively large value for the nucleon
240: mean-free-path lead to the characterization of the optical model
241: for nucleon-nucleus scattering as the ``cloudy crystal ball"
242: model. When we study quark propagation in the quark-gluon plasma
243: we may consider a similar calculation of the optical potential at
244: finite temperature. In the case of the quark-antiquark interaction
245: the \emph{T} matrix is dominated by \emph{s}-channel resonances of
246: the type found in the MEM studies. As we will see, the interaction
247: in this case is quite strong, leading to a small mean-free-path.
248: The resulting model is called the ``sticky molasses" model [1-3]
249: as opposed to the ``cloudy crystal ball" model used to describe
250: nucleon-nucleus scattering. We now consider the potential seen by
251: a quark of momentum $\overrightarrow{p_{2}}$ and average over the
252: quark spin $s_{2}$. (We will consider quarks of a single flavor,
253: since that was done in the MEM studies that we have used to fix
254: the parameters of our model.) In Ref. [17] the relativistic
255: optical potential was denoted as $\Sigma(\overrightarrow{p},s)$
256: and, for this work, we consider \be
257: \Sigma^{++}(\overrightarrow{p_{2}}) =
258: \frac{1}{2}\sum_{s_2}\overline{u}(\overrightarrow{p_{2}},s_{2})\Sigma(\overrightarrow{p_{2}},s_{2})u(\overrightarrow{p_{2}},s_{2}).
259: \ee
260:
261: It is useful to introduce [14] \be U(\overrightarrow{p_{2}}) = N
262: \sqrt{\frac{m}{E(\overrightarrow{p_{2}})}}\Sigma^{++}(\overrightarrow{p_{2}})\sqrt{\frac{m}{E(\overrightarrow{p_{2}})}}.
263: \ee
264:
265: Here the factor of \emph{N} = 4 takes into account the sum of the
266: interactions in the scalar, pseudoscalar, vector and axial-vector
267: channels which are taken to be equal for the purposes of this
268: work. The approximate equality of the interactions in these
269: channels may be seen in Ref. [10]. (Note that values of
270: $U(\overrightarrow{p})$ are given in Ref. [17] for the case of
271: nucleon-nucleus scattering.)
272:
273: If $p_{1}$ is the momentum of the antiquark in the medium, we may
274: introduce the four-vector \be P^{\mu} = (p_{1} + p_{2})^{\mu}. \ee
275: Now \be P^{2} &=& P_{0}^{2} - \overrightarrow{P}^{2} \\
276: &=&(E(\overrightarrow{p_{1}})+E(\overrightarrow{p_{2}}))^{2} -
277: (\overrightarrow{p_{1}}^{2}+\overrightarrow{p_{2}}^{2}+2p_{1}p_{2}\cos\theta).
278: \ee
279:
280: Here, we take $\overrightarrow{p_{2}}$ along the $z$ axis. We
281: define \be t(\overrightarrow{p_{1}},\overrightarrow{p_{2}}) =
282: \frac{1}{\pi P^{2}}
283: \left[\frac{G}{1-GJ(\overrightarrow{p_{1}},\overrightarrow{p_{2}})}\right],
284: \ee where $J(\overrightarrow{p_{1}},\overrightarrow{p_{2}})$ is
285: the $q\overline{q}$ vacuum polarization function defined in
286: Appendix B. (We remark that we may also use the notation
287: $t(P^{2},p_{2})$ for the quantity defined in Eq. (2.6).)
288:
289: It is also useful to introduce the occupation factor
290: $n(\overrightarrow{p_{1}})$: \be n(\overrightarrow{p_{1}}) =
291: \frac{1}{\exp\beta[E(\overrightarrow{p_{1}})-\mu]+1}, \ee with
292: $\beta=1/T$ and
293: $E(\overrightarrow{p_{1}})=\left[\overrightarrow{p_{1}}^{2}+m^{2}\right]^{1/2}$.
294: We recall \be \sum_{s_2} u(p_{2},s_{2})\overline{u}(p_{2},s_{2}) =
295: \left(\frac{\slr p_{2} + m}{2m}\right), \ee \be \sum_{s_1}
296: v(p_{1},s_{1})\overline{v}(p_{1},s_{1}) = \left(\frac{\slr p_{1} -
297: m}{2m}\right), \ee and note that
298:
299: \be \mbox{Tr}\left(\frac{\slr p_{2}+m}{2m}\right)\left(\frac{\slr
300: p_{1}-m}{2m}\right) =
301: \left[\frac{(E_{1}E_{2}-\overrightarrow{p_{1}}\cdot\overrightarrow{p_{2}})-m^{2}}{m^{2}}\right].
302: \ee
303:
304: Thus, \be \mbox{Im}\Sigma^{++}(p_{2}) = -\frac{1}{2}\int
305: \frac{d\overrightarrow{p_{1}}}{(2\pi)^{3}}\frac{m}{E(\overrightarrow{p_{1}})}
306: \mbox{Im}\left[\frac{G}{1-GJ(\overrightarrow{p_{1}},\overrightarrow{p_{2}})}\right]
307: \\\nonumber
308: \times\left[\frac{E_{1}E_{2}-\overrightarrow{p_{1}}\cdot\overrightarrow{p_{2}}-m^{2}}{m^{2}}\right]n(\overrightarrow{p_{1}}),
309: \ee and \be U(\overrightarrow{p_{2}}) =
310: -\frac{N}{2}\frac{m}{E(\overrightarrow{p_{2}})}\int\frac{d\overrightarrow{p_{1}}}{(2\pi)^{3}}\frac{m}{E(\overrightarrow{p_{1}})}\pi
311: P^{2}t(\overrightarrow{p_{1}},\overrightarrow{p_{2}})\\\nonumber
312: \times
313: \left[\frac{E_{1}E_{2}-\overrightarrow{p_{1}}\cdot\overrightarrow{p_{2}}-m^{2}}{m^{2}}\right]n(\overrightarrow{p_{1}}).
314: \ee
315:
316: Here $E_{1}=E(\overrightarrow{p_{1}})$,
317: $E_{2}=E(\overrightarrow{p_{2}})$ and we have made use of Eqs.
318: (2.2) and (2.6). Values of $t(P^{2},p_{2})$ are shown in Fig. 1
319: for values of $|\overrightarrow{p_{2}}|$ ranging from 0.01 GeV to
320: 0.31 GeV. In Fig. 2 we show the values of
321: $n(\overrightarrow{p_{1}})$ for the three values of $\mu$
322: considered here and in Fig. 3 we present values of
323: Im$U(\overrightarrow{p_{2}})$ for those values of $\mu$. In Fig. 4
324: we show the values for the mean-free-path \be \lambda =
325: \frac{|\overrightarrow{p_{2}}|}{m}\frac{1}{\mbox{Im}
326: U(\overrightarrow{p_{2}})}. \ee
327:
328: \begin{figure}
329: \includegraphics[bb=0 0 280 235, angle=0, scale=1]{fig1.eps}%
330: \caption{Values of $t(P^2, p_2)$ are shown for various values of
331: the quark momentum $|\vec{p}_2|$. Starting with the uppermost
332: curve, the $|\vec{p}_2|$ values in GeV units are 0.01, 0.03, 0.05,
333: 0.07, 0.09, 0.11, 0.13, 0.15, 0.17, 0.19, 0.21, 0.23, 0.25, 0.27,
334: 0.29 and 0.31. (For large $P^2$, we have $t(P^2, p_2)\simeq(1/\pi
335: P^2)G$.) Here $P^2=(p_1+p_2)^2$, where $p_1$ is the antiquark
336: momentum.}
337: \end{figure}
338:
339: \begin{figure}
340: \includegraphics[bb=0 0 280 235, angle=0, scale=1]{fig2.eps}%
341: \caption{Values of $n(p_1)$ are shown for $\mu=1.1$\,GeV (dotted
342: curve), $\mu=1.3$\,GeV (dashed curve) and $\mu=1.5$\,GeV (solid
343: curve). Here $T=1.5\,T_c$ with $T_c=270$\,MeV.}
344: \end{figure}
345:
346: \begin{figure}
347: \includegraphics[bb=0 0 280 235, angle=0, scale=1]{fig3.eps}%
348: \caption{The imaginary part of the quark optical potential is
349: shown for $\mu=1.1$\,GeV (dotted curve), $\mu=1.3$\,GeV (dashed
350: curve) and $\mu=1.5$\,GeV (solid curve). (We recall that the
351: nucleon-nucleus imaginary optical potential is about 0.01\,GeV in
352: magnitude [17].)}
353: \end{figure}
354:
355: \begin{figure}
356: \includegraphics[bb=0 0 280 235, angle=0, scale=1]{fig4.eps}%
357: \caption{Values of $\lambda(p_2)$ are shown for $\mu=1.1$\,GeV
358: (dotted curve), $\mu=1.3$\,GeV (dashed curve) and $\mu=1.5$\,GeV
359: (solid curve).}
360: \end{figure}
361:
362: \section{discussion}
363: Information is available concerning the \emph{baryon} chemical
364: potential. That chemical potential is parameterized in Ref. [18]
365: as \be \mu_{B} =
366: \frac{1270\,\mbox{MeV}}{(1+\frac{\sqrt{S_{NN}}}{4.3})}, \ee and
367: varies strongly with $\sqrt{S_{NN}}$, which is in GeV units in Eq.
368: (3.1). For $\sqrt{S_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV, we have $\mu_{B}$ = 26.7
369: MeV.
370:
371: Of particular significance for our results is the choice of the
372: chemical potential for the quarks. We have taken $\mu \sim$ 1 GeV.
373: In the case of the quarks, the choice of $\mu \simeq$ 1 GeV leads
374: to small mean-free-paths consistent with the suggestion of Shuryak
375: that the resonances seen in the MEM analysis of the lattice
376: results are responsible for the small mean-free-paths of the
377: ``sticky molasses" model.
378:
379: We remark that in nuclear matter the baryon density is 0.17
380: fm$^{-3}$ or 0.51 quarks/fm$^{3}$ if we consider the nucleon to be
381: composed of three quarks. For the values of
382: $n(\overrightarrow{p_{1}})$ shown in Fig. 2 for the case $\mu$ =
383: 1.3 GeV, we may calculate the density of antiquarks to be 5.91
384: fm$^{-3}$, so that the density of quarks and antiquarks is about
385: 12 fm$^{-3}$ in our model. We remark that the energy density at
386: RHIC for $\sqrt{S_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV is 4.1 GeV/fm$^{3}$ [18], which
387: is about 26 times the energy density of nuclear matter, which is
388: approximately 0.16 GeV/fm$^{3}$.
389:
390: In this work we have attempted to provide a quantitative analysis
391: of the suggestion [1] that the large $q\overline{q}$ resonant
392: scattering cross sections are responsible for the small quark
393: mean-free-paths, with the associated relevance of the hydrodynamic
394: description of the system that is created in high-energy
395: nucleus-nucleus collisions. We have considered the interaction in
396: the scalar, pseudoscalar, vector and axial-vector channels of the
397: $q\overline{q}$ system. It is possible that there are important
398: resonances of $qq$ character, as well as the $q\overline{q}$
399: resonances considered here. Such $qq$ states are depicted in Fig.
400: 8a of Ref. [1]. It would be of interest to see if such states are
401: found in lattice studies using the MEM scheme.
402:
403: \appendix
404: \renewcommand{\theequation}{A\arabic{equation}}
405: % redefine the command that creates the equation no.
406: \setcounter{equation}{0} % reset counter
407: \section{} % use *-form to suppress numbering
408:
409: For ease of reference, we present a discussion of our calculation
410: of hadronic current correlators taken from Ref.\,[\,15\,]. The
411: procedure we adopt is based upon the real-time finite-temperature
412: formalism, in which the imaginary part of the polarization
413: function may be calculated. Then, the real part of the function is
414: obtained using a dispersion relation. The result we need for this
415: work has been already given in the work of Kobes and Semenoff
416: [\,19\,]. (In Ref.\,[\,19\,] the quark momentum is $k^\mu$ and the
417: antiquark momentum is $k^\mu-P^\mu$. We will adopt that notation
418: in this section for ease of reference to the results presented in
419: Ref.\,[\,19\,].) With reference to Eq.\,(5.4) of Ref.\,[\,19\,],
420: we write the imaginary part of the scalar polarization function as
421: \be \mbox{Im}\,J_S(\textit{P}\,{}^2,
422: T)=\frac12N_c\beta_S\,\epsilon(\textit{P}\,{}^0)\mytint ke^{-\vec
423: k\,{}^2/\alpha^2}\left(\frac{2\pi}{2E_1(k)2E_2(k)}\right)\\\nonumber
424: \times\{[1-n_1(k)-n_2(k)]
425: \delta(\textit{P}\,{}^0-E_1(k)-E_2(k))\\\nonumber-[n_1(k)-n_2(k)]
426: \delta(\textit{P}\,{}^0+E_1(k)-E_2(k))\\\nonumber-[n_2(k)-n_1(k)]
427: \delta(\textit{P}\,{}^0-E_1(k)+E_2(k))\\\nonumber-[1-n_1(k)-n_2(k)]
428: \delta(\textit{P}\,{}^0+E_1(k)+E_2(k))\}\,.\ee Here,
429: $E_1(k)=[\,\vec k\,{}^2+m_1^2(T)\,]^{1/2}$. Relative to Eq.\,(5.4)
430: of Ref.\,[\,19\,], we have changed the sign, removed a factor of
431: $g^2$ and have included a statistical factor of $N_c$. In
432: addition, we have included a Gaussian regulator, $\exp[\,-\vec
433: k\,{}^2/\alpha^2\,]$. The value $\alpha=0.605$ GeV was used in our
434: applications of the NJL model in the calculation of meson
435: properties at $T=0$. We also note that \be
436: n_1(k)=\frac1{e^{\,\beta E_1(k)}+1}\,,\ee and \be
437: n_2(k)=\frac1{e^{\,\beta E_2(k)}+1}\,.\ee For the calculation of
438: the imaginary part of the polarization function, we may put
439: $\ksq=m_1^2(T)$ and $(k-P)^2=m_2^2(T)$, since in that calculation
440: the quark and antiquark are on-mass-shell. In Eq.\,(A1) the factor
441: $\beta_S$ arises from a trace involving Dirac matrices, such that
442: \be \beta_S&=&-\mbox{Tr}[\,(\slr k+m_1)(\slr k-\slr P+m_2)\,]\\
443: &=&2P^2-2(m_1+m_2)^2\,,\ee where $m_1$ and $m_2$ depend upon
444: temperature. In the frame where $\vec P=0$, and in the case
445: $m_1=m_2$, we have $\beta_S=2P_0^2(1-{4m^2}/{P_0^2})$. For the
446: scalar case, with $m_1=m_2$, we find \be \mbox{Im}\,J_S(P^2,
447: T)=\frac{N_cP_0^2}{8\pi}\left(1-\frac{4m^2(T)}{P_0^2}\right)^{3/2}
448: e^{-\vec k\,{}^2/\alpha^2}[\,1-2n_1(k)\,]\,,\ee where \be \vec
449: k\,{}^2=\frac{P_0^2}4-m^2(T)\,.\ee
450:
451: For pseudoscalar mesons, we replace $\beta_S$ by
452: \be \beta_P&=&-\mbox{Tr}[\,i\gamma_5(\slr k+m_1)i\gamma_5(\slr k-\slr
453: P+m_2)\,]\\
454: &=&2P^2-2(m_1-m_2)^2\,,\ee which for $m_1=m_2$ is $\beta_P=2P_0^2$
455: in the frame where $\vec P=0$. We find, for the $\pi$ mesons, \be
456: \mbox{Im}\,J_P(P^2,T)=\frac{N_cP_0^2}{8\pi}\left(1-\frac{4m^2(T)}{P_0^2}\right)^{1/2}
457: e^{-\vec k\,{}^2/\alpha^2}[\,1-2n_1(k)\,]\,,\ee where $ \vec
458: k\,{}^2={P_0^2}/4-m_u^2(T)$, as above. Thus, we see that the phase
459: space factor has an exponent of 1/2 corresponding to a
460: \textit{s}-wave amplitude. For the scalars, the exponent of the
461: phase-space factor is 3/2, as seen in Eq.\,(A6).
462:
463: For a study of vector mesons we consider \be
464: \beta_{\mu\nu}^V=\mbox{Tr}[\,\gamma_\mu(\slr k+m_1)\gamma_\nu(\slr
465: k-\slr P+m_2)\,]\,,\ee and calculate \be
466: g^{\mu\nu}\beta_{\mu\nu}^V=4[\,P^2-m_1^2-m_2^2+4m_1m_2\,]\,,\ee
467: which, in the equal-mass case, is equal to $4P_0^2+8m^2(T)$, when
468: $\vec P=0$. This result is needed when we calculate the correlator
469: of vector currents. Note that, for the elevated temperatures
470: considered in this work, $m_u(T)=m_d(T)$ is quite small, so that
471: $4P_0^2+8m_u^2(T)$ can be approximated by $4P_0^2$, when we
472: consider the vector current correlation functions. In that case,
473: we have \be \mbox{Im}\,J_V(P^2,T) \simeq
474: \frac{2}{3}\mbox{Im}\,J_P(P^2,T)\,.\ee At this point it is useful
475: to define functions that do not contain that Gaussian regulator:
476: \be\mbox{Im}\,\tilde{J}_P(P^2,T)=\frac{N_cP_0^2}{8\pi}\left(1-\frac{4m^2(T)}{P_0^2}\right)^{1/2}[\,1-2n_1(k)\,]\,,\ee
477: and
478: \be\mbox{Im}\,\tilde{J}_V(P^2,T)=\frac{2}{3}\frac{N_cP_0^2}{8\pi}\left(1-\frac{4m^2(T)}{P_0^2}\right)^{1/2}[\,1-2n_1(k)\,]\,,\ee
479: For the functions defined in Eq.\,(A14) and (A15) we need to use a
480: twice-subtracted dispersion relation to obtain
481: $\mbox{Re}\,\tilde{J}_P(P^2,T)$, or
482: $\mbox{Re}\,\tilde{J}_V(P^2,T)$. For example,
483: \be\mbox{Re}\,\tilde{J}_P(P^2,T)=\mbox{Re}\,\tilde{J}_P(0,T)+
484: \frac{P^2}{P_0^2}[\,\mbox{Re}\,\tilde{J}_P(P_0^2,T)-\mbox{Re}\,\tilde{J}_P(0,T)\,]\\\nonumber
485: +\frac{P^2(P^2-P_0^2)}{\pi}\int_{4m^2(T)}^{\tilde{\Lambda}^{2}}
486: ds\frac{\mbox{Im}\,\tilde{J}_P(s,T)}{s(P^2-s)(P_0^2-s)}\,,\ee
487: where $\tilde{\Lambda}^{2}$ can be quite large, since the integral
488: over the imaginary part of the polarization function is now
489: convergent. We may introduce $\tilde{J}_P(P^2,T)$ and
490: $\tilde{J}_V(P^2,T)$ as complex functions, since we now have both
491: the real and imaginary parts of these functions. We note that the
492: construction of either $\mbox{Re}\,J_P(P^2,T)$, or
493: $\mbox{Re}\,J_V(P^2,T)$, by means of a dispersion relation does
494: not require a subtraction. We use these functions to define the
495: complex functions $J_P(P^2,T)$ and $J_V(P^2,T)$.
496:
497: In order to make use of Eq.\,(A16), we need to specify
498: $\tilde{J}_P(0)$ and $\tilde{J}_P(P_0^2)$. We found it useful to
499: take $P_0^2=-1.0$ \gev2 and to put $\tilde{J}_P(0)=J_P(0)$ and
500: $\tilde{J}_P(P_0^2)=J_P(P_0^2)$. The quantities $\tilde{J}_V(0)$
501: and $\tilde{J}_V(P_0^2)$ are determined in an analogous function.
502: This procedure in which we fix the behavior of a function such as
503: $\mbox{Re}\tilde{J}_V(P^2)$ or $\mbox{Re}\tilde{J}_V(P^2)$ is
504: quite analogous to the procedure used in Ref.\,[\,20\,]. In that
505: work we made use of dispersion relations to construct a continuous
506: vector-isovector current correlation function which had the
507: correct perturbative behavior for large $P^2\rightarrow-\infty$
508: and also described the low-energy resonance present in the
509: correlator due to the excitation of the $\rho$ meson. In
510: Ref.\,[\,20\,] the NJL model was shown to provide a quite
511: satisfactory description of the low-energy resonant behavior of
512: the vector-isovector correlation function.
513:
514: We now consider the calculation of temperature-dependent hadronic
515: current correlation functions. The general form of the correlator
516: is a transform of a time-ordered product of currents, \be iC(P^2,
517: T)=\int d^4xe^{iP\cdot x}<\!\!<T(j(x)j(0))>\!\!>\,,\ee where the
518: double bracket is a reminder that we are considering the finite
519: temperature case.
520:
521: For the study of pseudoscalar states, we may consider currents of
522: the form $j_{P,i}(x)=\tilde{q}(x)i\gamma_5\lambda^iq(x)$, where,
523: in the case of the $\pi$ mesons, $i=1,2$ and $3$. For the study of
524: scalar-isoscalar mesons, we introduce
525: $j_{S,i}(x)=\tilde{q}(x)\lambda^i q(x)$, where $i=0$ for the
526: flavor-singlet current and $i=8$ for the flavor-octet current.
527:
528: In the case of the pseudoscalar-isovector mesons, the correlator
529: may be expressed in terms of the basic vacuum polarization
530: function of the NJL model, $J_P(P^2, T)$. Thus, \be C_P(P^2,
531: T)=J_P(P^2, T)\frac{1}{1-G_{P}(T)J_P(P^2, T)}\,,\ee where $G_P(T)$
532: is the coupling constant appropriate for our study of $\pi$
533: mesons. We have found $G_P(T)=13.49$\gev{-2} by fitting the pion
534: mass in a calculation made at $T=0$, with $m_u = m_d =0.364$ GeV.
535: The result given in Eq.\,(A18) is only expected to be useful for
536: small $P^2$, since the Gaussian regulator strongly modifies the
537: large $P^2$ behavior. Therefore, we suggest that the following
538: form is useful, if we are to consider the larger values of $P^2$.
539: \be \frac{C_{P}(P^2, T)}{P^2}=\left[\frac{\tilde{J}_P(P^2,
540: T)}{P^2}\right] \frac{1}{1-G_P(T)J_P(P^2, T)}\,.\ee (As usual, we
541: put $\vec{P}=0$.) This form has two important features. At large
542: $P_0^2$, ${\mbox{Im}\,C_{P}(P_0, T)}/{P_0^2}$ is a constant, since
543: ${\mbox{Im}\,\tilde{J}_{P}(P_0^2, T)}$ is proportional to $P_0^2$.
544: Further, the denominator of Eq.\,(A19) goes to 1 for large
545: $P_0^2$. On the other hand, at small $P_0^2$, the denominator is
546: capable of describing resonant enhancement of the correlation
547: function. As we have seen, the results obtained when Eq.\,(A19) is
548: used appear quite satisfactory. (\,We may again refer to
549: Ref.\,[\,20\,], in which a similar approximation is described.)
550:
551: For a study of the vector-isovector correlators, we introduce
552: conserved vector currents $j_{\mu,
553: i}(x)=\tilde{q}(x)\gamma_{\mu}\lambda_i q(x)$ with i=1, 2 and 3.
554: In this case we define \be J_V^{\mu\nu}(P^2,
555: T)=\left(g\,{}^{\mu\nu}-\frac{P\,{}^\mu
556: P\,{}^\nu}{P^2}\right)J_V(P^2, T)\ee and \be C_V^{\mu\nu}(P^2,
557: T)=\left(g\,{}^{\mu\nu}-\frac{P\,{}^\mu
558: P\,{}^\nu}{P^2}\right)C_V(P^2, T)\,,\ee taking into account the
559: fact that the current $j_{\mu,\,i}(x)$ is conserved. We may then
560: use the fact that \be J_V(P^2,T) =
561: \frac13g_{\mu\nu}J_V^{\mu\nu}(P^2,T)\ee and
562: \be\mbox{Im}\,J_V(P^2,T)&=&
563: \frac23\left[\frac{P_0^2+2m_u^2(T)}{8\pi}\right]
564: \left(1-\frac{4m_u^2(T)}{P_0^2}\right)^{1/2}e^{-\vec
565: k\,{}^2/\alpha^2}[\,1-2n_1(k)\,]\\
566: &\simeq& \frac{2}{3}\mbox{Im}J_P(P^2,T)\,.\ee (See Eq.\,(A7) for
567: the specification of $k=|\vec k|$.) We then have \be
568: C_V(P^2,T)=\tilde{J}_V(P^2,T)\frac1{1-G_V(T)J_V(P^2,T)}\,,\ee
569: where we have introduced \be\mbox{Im}\tilde{J}_V(P^2,T)&=&
570: \frac23\left[\frac{P_0^2+2m_u^2(T)}{8\pi}\right]
571: \left(1-\frac{4m_u^2(T)}{P_0^2}\right)^{1/2}[\,1-2n_1(k)\,]\\
572: &\simeq& \frac{2}{3}\mbox{Im}\tilde{J}_P(P^2,T)\,. \ee
573: In the literature, $\omega$ is used instead
574: of $P_0$ [\,4-6\,]. We may define the spectral functions \be\sigma_V(\omega,
575: T)=\frac{1}{\pi}\,\mbox{Im}\,C_V(\omega, T)\,,\ee and \be\sigma_P(\omega,
576: T)=\frac{1}{\pi}\,\mbox{Im}\,C_P(\omega, T)\,,\ee
577:
578: Since different conventions are used in the literature [\,4-6\,],
579: we may use the notation $\overline{\sigma}_P(\omega, T)$ and
580: $\overline{\sigma}_V(\omega, T)$ for the spectral functions given
581: there. We have the following relations: \be
582: \overline{\sigma}_P(\omega, T)=\sigma_P(\omega, T)\,,\ee and
583: \be\frac{\overline{\sigma}_V(\omega,
584: T)}{2}=\frac{3}{4}\sigma_V(\omega, T)\,,\ee where the factor 3/4
585: arises because, in Refs. [\,4-6\,], there is a division by 4,
586: while we have divided by 3, as in Eq.\,(A22).
587:
588: \section{}
589: \renewcommand{\theequation}{B\arabic{equation}}
590:
591: Here we extend the work of Appendix A to consider case of finite
592: three-momentum, $\vec{P}$. We consider the calculation of
593: $\mbox{Im}J_P(P^0,\vec{P},T)$. The momenta $P^0$ and $\vec{P}$ are
594: the values external to the loop diagram. Internal to the diagram,
595: we have a quark of momentum $k^\mu+P^\mu/2$ leaving the left-hand
596: vertex and an antiquark of momentum $k^\mu-P^\mu/2$ entering the
597: left-hand vertex. It is useful to define \be
598: E_1(k)&=&\left|\vec{k}+\vec{P}/2\right|\\
599: &=&\left(k^2+\frac{P^2}4+kP\cos\theta\right)^{1/2}\ee and
600: \be E_2(k)&=&\left|\vec{k}-\vec{P}/2\right|\\
601: &=&\left(k^2+\frac{P^2}4-kP\cos\theta\right)^{1/2}\,.\ee Here
602: $k=|\vec{k}|$ and $P=|\vec{P}|$.
603:
604: We have \be \mbox{Im}\,J_P(P^0,\vec{P},
605: T)=\frac12N_c\beta_P\,\epsilon(P^0)\mytint ke^{-\vec
606: k\,{}^2/\alpha^2}\left(\frac{2\pi}{2E_1(k)2E_2(k)}\right)\\\nonumber
607: \times\{[1-n_1(k)-n_2(k)]
608: \delta(P\,{}^0-E_1(k)-E_2(k))\\\nonumber-[n_1(k)-n_2(k)]
609: \delta(P\,{}^0+E_1(k)-E_2(k))\\\nonumber-[n_2(k)-n_1(k)]
610: \delta(P\,{}^0-E_1(k)+E_2(k))\\\nonumber-[1-n_1(k)-n_2(k)]
611: \delta(P\,{}^0+E_1(k)+E_2(k))\}\,.\ee Here, \be
612: n_1(k)=\frac1{e^{\,\beta E_1(k)}+1}\,,\ee and \be
613: n_2(k)=\frac1{e^{\,\beta E_2(k)}+1}\,.\ee In Eq. (B5), the second
614: and third terms cancel and the fourth term does not contribute. It
615: is useful to rewrite $\delta(P^0-E_1(k)-E_2(k))$ using \be
616: \delta[f(\cos\theta)]=\frac2{\left|\frac{\partial f}{\partial \cos
617: \theta}\right|_x}\delta(\cos\theta-x)\,,\ee where \be
618: x^2&=&\cos^2\theta\\&=&\frac{4P_0^2(k^2+P^2/4)-P_0^4}{4k^2P^2}\nonumber\,.\ee
619: We find \be \left|\frac{\partial f}{\partial \cos
620: \theta}\right|=\frac12kP\left|\frac{E_1(k)-E_2(k)}{E_1(k)E_2(k)}\right|\,,\ee
621: and obtain \be \mbox{Im}\,J_P(P^0,\vec{P},
622: T)=\frac12N_c\beta_P\,\epsilon(P^0)(2\pi)^2\int
623: \frac{k^2dk}{(2\pi)^3}e^{-k\,{}^2/\alpha^2}\\\nonumber
624: \int\frac1{2E_1(k)E_2(k)}[1-n_1(k)-n_2(k)]
625: \left|\frac{\partial{f(\cos\theta)}}{\partial{
626: \cos\theta}}\right|\\\nonumber
627: \times\delta(\cos\theta-x)d(\cos\theta)\,.\ee We note there is a
628: singularity when $E_1(k)=E_2(k)$. That occurs when $\cos\theta=0$
629: or $\theta=\pi/2$. For our calculations we eliminate the point
630: with $\theta=\pi/2$ when evaluating the angular integral over
631: $d(\cos\theta)\delta(\cos\theta-x)$ in the last expression. We
632: obtain \be \mbox{Im}\,J_P(P^0,\vec{P},
633: T)=N_c\beta_P\,\epsilon(P^0)\frac{4\pi^2}{(2\pi)^3}\int^{k_{max}}
634: k^2dk\,e^{-k\,{}^2/\alpha^2}\\\nonumber
635: \times\left.\frac{[1-n_1(k)-n_2(k)]}{kP|E_1(k)-E_2(k)|}\right|_x\,,\ee
636: where \emph{x} is obtained from Eq. (B9), \be
637: x=\frac{P^0}{kP}\left[k^2+\frac{P^2}4-\frac{P_0^2}4\right]^{1/2}\ee
638:
639: For the calculations reported in this work we have
640: $P^{0}=E(\overrightarrow{p_{1}})+E(\overrightarrow{p_{2}})$ and
641: $\overrightarrow{P}=\overrightarrow{p_{1}}+\overrightarrow{p_{2}}$,
642: where $\overrightarrow{p_{2}}$ is the quark momentum and
643: $\overrightarrow{p_{1}}$ is the antiquark momentum. Thus, we may
644: also use the notation
645: $J(\overrightarrow{p_{1}},\overrightarrow{p_{2}})$ as we have done
646: in the main text.
647:
648: %\newpage
649: \vspace{1.5cm}
650: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
651: \bibitem{B1}E. Shuryak, hep-ph/0312227.
652: \bibitem{B2}G. E. Brown, C. H. Lee, M. Rho, and E. Shuryak,
653: hep-ph/0312175
654: \bibitem{B3}G. E. Brown, C. H. Lee, M. Rho, and E. Shuryak,
655: hep-ph/0202068;
656: G. E. Brown, C. H. Lee, and M. Rho, hep-ph/0402207
657: \bibitem{B4}I. Wetzorke, F. Karsch, E. Laermann, P. Petreczky, and S.
658: Stickan, Nucl. Phys. B (Proc. Suppl.) \textbf{106}, 510 (2002)
659: \bibitem{B5}F. Karsch, S. Datta, E. Laermann, P. Petreczky, and S.
660: Stickan, and I. Wetzorke, Nucl. Phys. A \textbf{715}, 701c (2003)
661: \bibitem{B6}F. Karsch, E.Laermann, P. Petreczky, S. Stickan, and I.
662: Wetzorke, Phys. Lett. B \textbf{530}, 147 (2002).
663: \bibitem{B7}M. Asakawa, T. Hatsuda and Y. Nakahara, Nucl. Phys. A
664: \textbf{715}, 863 (2003)
665: \bibitem{B8}T. Umeda, K. Nomura and H. Matsufuru, hep-ph/0211003.
666: \bibitem{B9}I. Wetzorke, hep-ph/0305012.
667: (Invited talk at the 'Seventh Workshop on Quantum Chromodunamics',
668: Villefranche-sur-mer, France, Jan. 6-10, 2003)
669: \bibitem{B10}P. Petreczky, hep-ph/0305189.
670: \bibitem{B11}S. Datta, F. Karsch, P. Petreczky and I. Wetzorke, hep-lat/0312037.
671: \bibitem{B12}Xiangdong Li, Hu Li, C.M. Shakin, Qing Sun, and Huangsheng Wang, hep-ph/0402073.
672: \bibitem{B13}Bing He, Hu Li, C. M. Shakin, and Qing Sun, Phys. Rev. D \textbf{67}, 014022 (2003).
673: \bibitem{B14}Bing He, Hu Li, C. M. Shakin, and Qing Sun, Phys. Rev. D \textbf{67}, 114012 (2003).
674: \bibitem{B15}Bing He, Hu Li, C. M. Shakin, and Qing Sun, Phys. Rev. C \textbf{67}, 065203 (2003).
675: \bibitem{B16}M. Le Bellac, \emph{Thermal Field Theory} (Cambridge, Cambridge, U. K., 1996).
676: \bibitem{B17}L.S. Celenza and C.M. Shakin, \emph{Relativistic Nuclear Physics:
677: Theories of Structure and Scattering} (World Scientific, Singapore, 1986).
678: \bibitem{B18}A. Andronic and P. Braun-Munzinger, hep-ph/0402291.
679: \bibitem{B19}R. L. Kobes and G. W. Semenoff, Nucl. Phys. B \textbf{260},714 (1985).
680: \bibitem{B20}C. M. Shakin, Wei-Dong Sun, and J. Szweda, Ann. of Phys. (NY) \textbf{241}, 37 (1995).
681:
682:
683: \end{thebibliography}
684: % Create the reference section using BibTeX:
685: %\bibliography{basename of .bib file}
686:
687: \end{document}
688: %
689: % ****** End of file template.aps ******
690: