hep-ph0403087/proc.tex
1: %%%%%   SUSY 2003 version of World Scientific template file
2: 
3: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
4: %% ws-procs9x6.tex   :   10 October 2003
5: %% Text file to use with ws-procs9x6.cls written in Latex2E.
6: %% The content, structure, format and layout of this style file is the 
7: %% property of World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd. 
8: %% Copyright 1995, 2002 by World Scientific Publishing Co. 
9: %% All rights are reserved.
10: %%
11: %% Proceedings Trim Size: 9in x 6in
12: %% Text Area: 7.35in (include runningheads) x 4.5in
13: %% Main Text is 10/13pt					  
14: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
15: 
16: \documentclass{ws-procs9x6}
17: 
18: \newcommand{\ee}{\mbox{$ \mathrm{e^+e^-}$}}
19: \newcommand{\cal}{\mbox{}}
20: 
21: \begin{document}
22: \thispagestyle{empty}
23: 
24: %\begin{titlepage}
25: \def\thefootnote{\fnsymbol{footnote}}       % symbols for footnotes
26: 
27: \begin{center}
28: \mbox{ } 
29: \vspace{-3cm}
30: 
31: \end{center}
32: \begin{flushright}
33: \Large
34: \mbox{\hspace{10.2cm} hep-ph/0403087} \\
35: \mbox{\hspace{11.1cm} March 2004}
36: \end{flushright}
37: \begin{center}
38: \vskip 1.0cm
39: {\Huge\bf
40: Exploring Supersymmetry at a Future Global \boldmath$\rm e^+e^-$\unboldmath
41: 
42: \vskip 0.4cm
43:  Linear Collider}
44: \vskip 1cm
45: 
46: {\LARGE\bf Andr\'e Sopczak}\\
47: \smallskip
48: \Large Lancaster University
49: 
50: \vskip 2.5cm
51: \centerline{\Large \bf Abstract}
52: \end{center}
53: 
54: \vskip 0.5cm
55: \hspace*{-1cm}
56: \begin{picture}(0.001,0.001)(0,0)
57: \put(,0){
58: \begin{minipage}{13cm}
59: \Large
60: \renewcommand{\baselinestretch} {1.2}
61: This review illustrates by means of sample reactions the potential 
62: of a future global $\rm e^+e^-$ Linear Collider (LC) for precision 
63: measurements of Supersymmetric particles 
64: with emphasis on recent studies and addressing major research directions.
65: \renewcommand{\baselinestretch} {1.}
66: 
67: \normalsize
68: \vspace{3cm}
69: \begin{center}
70: {\sl \large
71: \uppercase{P}resented at {\it \uppercase{SUSY} 2003:
72: \uppercase{S}upersymmetry in the \uppercase{D}esert}\/, 
73: held at the \uppercase{U}niversity of \uppercase{A}rizona,
74: \uppercase{T}ucson, \uppercase{AZ}, \uppercase{J}une 5-10, 2003. \\
75: \uppercase{T}o appear in the \uppercase{P}roceedings.
76: \vspace{-6cm}
77: }
78: \end{center}
79: \end{minipage}
80: }
81: \end{picture}
82: \vfill
83: 
84: %\end{titlepage}
85: 
86: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
87: 
88: \newpage
89: \thispagestyle{empty}
90: \mbox{ }
91: \newpage
92: \setcounter{page}{1}
93: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% AS end %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
94: 
95: 
96: \title{Exploring Supersymmetry at a Future Global 
97:        $\rm e^+e^-$ Linear Collider}
98: %\footnote{\uppercase{T}alk presented by \uppercase{A.B.C.}
99: %at {\it \uppercase{SUSY} 2003:
100: %\uppercase{S}upersymmetry in the \uppercase{D}esert}\/, 
101: %held at the \uppercase{U}niversity of \uppercase{A}rizona,
102: %\uppercase{T}ucson, \uppercase{AZ}, \uppercase{J}une 5-10, 2003.
103: %\uppercase{T}o appear in the \uppercase{P}roceedings.}}
104: %%  PLEASE USE THE ABOVE FOOTNOTE FOR ALL ARXIV POSTINGS,
105: %%   (SUBSTITUTING SPEAKER NAME, OF COURSE;  NO SPEAKER NAME NEEDED
106: %%      FOR SINGLE-AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS). 
107: %%  NOT NECESSARY TO HAVE FOOTNOTE FOR VERSIONS THAT ARE SENT TO 
108: %%  SUSY 2003 CONFERENCE FOR PUBLICATION
109: 
110: \author{ANDRE SOPCZAK}
111: 
112: \address{Department of Physics \\
113: Lancaster University\\ 
114: Lancaster LA1 4YW, United Kingdom\\ 
115: E-mail: Andre.Sopczak@cern.ch}
116: 
117: \maketitle
118: 
119: \abstracts{
120: \vspace*{-0.8cm}
121: This review illustrates by means of sample reactions the potential 
122: of a future global $\rm e^+e^-$ Linear Collider (LC) for precision 
123: measurements of Supersymmetric particles 
124: with emphasis on recent studies and addressing major research directions.
125: \vspace*{-0.8cm}
126: }
127: 
128: \section{Introduction}
129: \vspace*{-0.2cm}
130: 
131: Many searches for Supersymmetric particles and stringent limits which guide
132: future searches have been set by the LEP experiments
133: in an almost background-free experimental environment.
134: Currently, the Tevatron $\rm p\bar p$ collider, taking data at $\sqrt s =2$~TeV,
135: gives important search sensitivity with larger kinematic threshold.
136: When the LHC $\rm pp$ collider starts to operate at $\sqrt s =14$~TeV 
137: the kinematic reach will be increased significantly.
138: About 13 years of $\rm e^+e^-$ Linear Collider SUSY studies have been
139: performed with the focus changing from discovery to high-precision analyses.  
140: Recent milestones are 
141: the TESLA Technical Design Report 2001, 
142: the Snowmass 2001 meeting, and
143: the Linear Collider Workshops in Korea (2002) and Amsterdam (2003).
144: This review focuses on new developments for a 500 GeV to 3~TeV LC 
145: and includes preliminary results.
146: 
147: \vspace*{-0.3cm}
148: \section{The Linear Collider Project}
149: 
150: \subsection{Accelerator}
151: \vspace*{-0.2cm}
152: Important accelerator parameters are summarized in 
153: Table~\ref{tab:acc}.\,A future LC is 
154: characterized by 
155: high luminosity,
156: tunable centre-of-mass energy,
157: low beamstrahlung,
158: beam polarization,
159: additional options for $\gamma\gamma$ and $\rm e^-e^-$ collisions.
160: 
161: \begin{table}[htp]
162: \vspace*{-0.2cm}
163: \tbl{Accelerator parameters.}
164: {\footnotesize
165: \begin{tabular}{@{}c|cc|cc|c@{}}
166: \hline
167: Parameter  &  \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{TESLA} 
168:                  &  \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{ NLC/JLC} & CLIC \\
169: \hline
170: $\sqrt s$ (GeV)  & 500 &800    & 500 &1000     & 3000  \\
171: Gradient (MV/m)  & 23  &35     & 48  &48       & 150   \\
172: ${\cal L}_{\rm cur}$ ($10^{34}{\rm cm}^{-2}{\rm s}^{-1}$)
173:                  & 3.4 &5.8    & 2.0 &3.4      & 10    \\
174: ${\cal L}_{\rm int}/10^7$s (fb$^{-1}$)
175:                  & 340 &580    & 200 &340      & 1000  \\
176: Beamstrahlung spread (\%)
177:                  & 3.2 &4.3    & 4.7 &10.2     & 31    \\
178: \hline
179: \end{tabular}\label{tab:acc} }
180: 
181: \vspace*{-0.2cm}
182: \end{table}
183: 
184: \vspace*{-0.2cm}
185: \subsection{Detector}
186: \vspace*{-0.2cm}
187: Extensive and increasing R\&D for all sub-detectors is being performed.
188: An example is the development of CCD vertex detectors in the 
189: LC Flavour Identification (LCFI) collaboration\cite{lcfi}.
190: \vspace*{-0.1cm}
191: 
192: \section{Scalar Top Simulation with c-Quark Tagging}
193: \vspace*{-0.2cm}
194: 
195: In particular, hadronic background can be reduced with c-quark tagging
196: in the reaction 
197: $\rm \ee\rightarrow \tilde t_1\bar{\tilde t}_1 
198:         \rightarrow \tilde\chi^0_1c \tilde\chi^0_1\bar c$\cite{finch}.
199: The expected signal and background rates and resulting sensitivities for 
200: the scalar top mass and mixing angle determination
201: are shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:massmixing} for benchmark parameters SPS-5 
202: (mSUGRA)
203: $m_0=150$~GeV, $m_{1/2}=300$~GeV, $A_0=-1000$~GeV, 
204: $\tan\beta=5$, $\mu>0$, leading to
205: $m_{\rm \tilde t_1}=220.7\pm0.6$~GeV and 
206: $\cos\theta_{\rm \tilde t_1}=0.537\pm0.012$.
207: 
208: \begin{figure}[htb]
209: \vspace*{-1.7cm}
210: \includegraphics[scale=0.27]{perf_curve_charm_stop_221.eps}\hfill
211: \includegraphics[scale=0.3]{stop500_col_220_ct.eps}
212: \vspace*{-0.7cm}
213: \caption[]{\label{fig:massmixing}
214: Scalar top quark studies for SPS-5 parameters.
215: Left: expected number of signal and background events with c-quark tagging
216: for unpolarized beams. 
217: Right: sensitivity for mass and mixing angle from production cross section
218: precision determinations for 
219: $\sqrt{s}=500$~GeV and a total luminosity of $L=2\times500$~fb$^{-1}$
220: with ${\cal P}_{\rm e^-}=-0.80$, ${\cal P}_{\rm e^+}=0.60$ (left-polarization)
221: and
222: ${\cal P}_{\rm e^-}=0.80$, ${\cal P}_{\rm e^+}=-0.60$ (right-polarization).
223: }
224: \vspace*{-0.4cm}
225: \end{figure}
226: 
227: \vspace*{-0.35cm}
228: \section{Complex~Phases~on~Scalar~Top~and~Scalar~Bottom~Decays}
229: \vspace*{-0.2cm}
230: 
231: Complex phases in the Higgs potential and soft SUSY breaking terms
232: change the scalar top decay width and branching ratios\cite{bartl},
233: as shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:complex} 
234: for the example of a SPS-4 inspired scenario with 
235: $m_{\rm \tilde t_1}=531$~GeV.
236: \begin{figure}[htb]
237: \vspace*{-0.2cm}
238: \includegraphics[scale=0.3]{gamma.eps}\hfill
239: \includegraphics[scale=0.3]{br.eps}
240: \vspace*{-0.2cm}
241: \caption[]{\label{fig:complex}
242: Scalar top decay width and branching ratios as a function of the 
243: complex phase of the trilinear coupling of scalar fermion $A_f$.
244: }
245: \vspace*{-0.3cm}
246: \end{figure}
247: 
248: \vspace*{-0.35cm}
249: \section{Scalar Muon Simulation}
250: \vspace*{-0.2cm}
251: 
252: The reaction
253: $\rm \ee\rightarrow\tilde \mu^+_{\rm R}\tilde\mu^-_{\rm R}
254:         \rightarrow\mu^+\tilde\chi^0_1\mu^-\tilde\chi^0_1$
255: has been re-investigated\cite{hanna}~for
256: benchmark\,parameters\,(SPS-1a)\,with\,$m_{\tilde\mu_{\rm R}}$=145.9\,GeV and
257: \mbox{$m_{\tilde\chi^0_1}$=100\,GeV.}
258: The isotropic scalar muon decay leads to a flat energy spectrum.
259: From a fit of this spectrum (end-point method)
260: the following precisions are obtained
261: \mbox{$m_{\tilde\mu_{\rm R}}=146.25\pm0.15$} GeV and $m_{\tilde\chi^0_1}=99.98\pm0.09$ GeV
262: for $\sqrt{s}=500$~GeV and $L=400$~fb$^{-1}$.
263: 
264: \vspace*{-0.2cm}
265: \section{$\tan\beta$ Sensitivity from Scalar Taus}
266: \vspace*{-0.2cm}
267: 
268: The polarization of $\tau$ leptons from the decay of scalar taus
269: $\tilde\tau_1$ depends on $\tan\beta$.
270: The $\tau$ polarization 
271: can be measured from the shape of the energy spectrum of hadronic 
272: $\tau$ decays, for example in the reaction
273: $\rm \ee\rightarrow\tilde \tau^+_1\tilde\tau^-_1
274:         \rightarrow\tilde\tau^+_1\tau^-\tilde\chi^0_1
275:         \rightarrow \tilde\tau^+_1\nu_\tau\pi^-\tilde\chi^0_1$,
276: as illustrated in Fig.~\ref{fig:lepton_tanb}\cite{boos}.
277: 
278: \begin{figure}[htb]
279: \vspace*{-0.4cm}
280: \includegraphics[scale=0.3]{stau_sim.eps}\hfill
281: \includegraphics[scale=0.45]{stau.eps}
282: \vspace*{-0.2cm}
283: \caption[]{\label{fig:lepton_tanb}
284: Left: $\pi$ energy spectrum fit ($y_\pi=2E_\pi/\sqrt{s}$) 
285:       determines $\tau$ polarization $P=0.57\pm 0.03$.
286: Right:\,resulting\,sensitivity\,$\tan\beta$$=$$40\pm2$\,for\,$\sqrt{s}=$500~GeV and $L=$500~fb$^{-1}$.
287: }
288: \vspace*{-0.7cm}
289: \end{figure}
290: 
291: \vspace*{-0.2cm}
292: \section{$\tan\beta$ Sensitivity from Higgs Boson Reactions}
293: \vspace*{-0.2cm}
294: 
295: Several Higgs boson reactions are particularly sensitive to 
296: $\tan\beta$ and excellent sensitivity on $\tan\beta$ 
297: from Higgs boson production rate and decay width measurements can be 
298: obtained (Fig.~\ref{fig:higgs_tanb})\cite{jack}.
299: 
300: \begin{figure}[htb]
301: \begin{minipage}{0.48\textwidth}
302: \includegraphics[scale=0.28,angle=90]{tanb_error_totalonly_bw.ps}
303: \end{minipage}\hfill
304: \begin{minipage}{0.44\textwidth}
305: \caption[]{\label{fig:higgs_tanb}
306: Combined sensitivity on $\tan\beta$ from 
307: 1) $\rm e^+e^- \rightarrow b\bar b \rightarrow b\bar b A\rightarrow
308:           b\bar b b\bar b$ rate;
309: 2) $\rm e^+e^- \rightarrow HA \rightarrow b\bar b b\bar b$ rate;
310: 3) H,A decay width;
311: 4) $\rm e^+e^- \rightarrow H^+H^- \rightarrow t\bar b b\bar t$ rate;
312: 5) $\rm H^+$ decay width.
313: Scenario I: no Supersymmetric particle decays, 
314: scenario II: Supersymmetric particle decays.
315: }
316: \end{minipage}
317: \vspace*{-0.4cm}
318: \end{figure}
319: 
320: \vspace*{-0.2cm}
321: \section{Theoretical and Experimental Precision}
322: \vspace*{-0.2cm}
323: 
324: As an example for the parameters of SPS-1a (mSUGRA) theoretical
325: precision\cite{kraml}, and expected experimental precision
326: a) from estimates of combined end-point and centre-of-mass scan 
327: methods\cite{grannis} 
328: and b) from detailed simulations\cite{martyn,nauenberg}
329: are summarized in Table~\ref{tab:precision}.
330: Some current theoretical uncertainties are much larger than the 
331: expected experimental precision.
332: 
333: \begin{table}[htp]
334: \vspace*{-0.1cm}
335: \tbl{Expected theoretical and experimental precision of 
336:      Supersymmetric particle masses for SPS-1a (mSUGRA) parameters.
337:      $\Delta_{\rm th}$:
338:      Gaussian error from
339:      Isajet 7.64, Softsusy 1.71, Spheno 2.0 and Suspect 2.101 
340:      studies.
341:      $ \Delta_{\rm exp}^{\rm a}$:
342:      estimated error for a 500~GeV $\rm e^+e^-$ LC 
343:      with ${\cal L}=1000$ fb$^{-1}$. 
344:      $\Delta_{\rm exp}^{\rm b}$:
345:      detailed simulations for a 400~GeV $\rm e^+e^-$ LC 
346:      with ${\cal L}=200$~fb$^{-1}$ ($\tilde \ell$ and $\tilde\chi^0_1$) and 
347:      for a 500~GeV $\rm e^+e^-$ LC 
348:      with ${\cal L}=500$ fb$^{-1}$ ($\tilde \nu_{\rm e}$).
349: }
350: {\footnotesize
351: \begin{tabular}{@{}c|ccccccccccc@{}}
352: \hline
353: [GeV]  & 
354: $m_{\tilde\chi_1^0}$ & $m_{\tilde\chi_2^0}$ &
355: $m_{\tilde\chi_1^\pm}$  & 
356: $m_{\tilde e_{\rm R}}$ & $m_{\tilde e_{\rm L}}$ &
357: $m_{\tilde \mu_{\rm R}}$ & $m_{\tilde \mu_{\rm L}}$ &
358: $m_{\tilde\tau_1}$  & $m_{\tilde\tau_2}$ &
359: $m_{\tilde \nu_{\rm e}}$ & $m_{\tilde\nu_{\rm\tau}}$ \\
360: \hline
361: $\Delta_{\rm th}$  & 0.3 & 1.5 & 1.2 & 0.6 & 1.1 & & & 1.1& 1.1 & 0.8 & 1.0 \\
362: $\Delta_{\rm exp}^{\rm a}$
363:                    & 0.07&0.12 & 0.18&0.02 & 0.2 &0.07 &0.51 &0.64& 1.1 & $\sim 1$ & ---\\
364: $\Delta_{\rm exp}^{\rm b}$
365:                    &0.10 &     &     &0.08 &     &0.17 &     &0.30&     & 0.7      &    \\
366: \hline
367: \end{tabular}\label{tab:precision}
368: }
369: \vspace*{-0.4cm}
370: \end{table}
371: 
372: \vspace*{-0.2cm}
373: \section{Synergy between the LHC and a LC}
374: \vspace*{-0.2cm}
375: 
376: For the benchmark parameters of SPS-1a all scalar leptons are in the 
377: kinematic reach of a 500 GeV LC and the scalar top quark masses are 
378: inaccessible at a LC,
379: but in reach of the LHC sensitivity.
380: Figure~\ref{fig:synergy} shows examples of the potential for combined LC 
381: and LHC studies\cite{lhclc_nojiri,lhclc_sven}.
382: 
383: \begin{figure}[htb]
384: \vspace*{-0.5cm}
385: \includegraphics[scale=0.4]{nojiri_lhclc.eps}\hfill
386: \includegraphics[scale=0.27]{georg_mhAt02.cl.eps}
387: \vspace*{-0.2cm}
388: \caption[]{\label{fig:synergy}
389: Left: scalar top from LHC and light Supersymmetric particles from LC.
390: LC\&LHC give $\Delta m_{\tilde t_1}=\pm 7$~GeV and
391: $\Delta \theta_{\tilde t}=\pm 0.3$, but 
392: no mass and mixing sensitivity can be obtained from the LHC alone.
393: Right:
394: trilinear coupling precision $\Delta A_{\rm t} = \pm20$~GeV when
395: in addition to the LHC measurements (light-shaded band), 
396: precise top mass measurements from a LC (dark-shaded band) are used.
397: }
398: \vspace*{-0.5cm}
399: \end{figure}
400: 
401: \clearpage
402: \section{Distinguishing Supersymmetry Breaking Models}
403: \vspace*{-0.2cm}
404: 
405: At a future LC different Supersymmetry breaking models could be 
406: distinguished by their characteristic signatures.
407: For example in Anomaly Mediated Supersymmetry Breaking (AMSB)
408: models, which predict small
409: $\Delta m = m_{\tilde\chi^+_1} - m_{\tilde\chi^0_1}$ values,
410: the reaction $\ee\rightarrow\tilde\chi_1^+\tilde\chi_1^-(\gamma_{\rm ISR})$
411: has been studied\cite{hensel}.
412: In the decay mode $\tilde\chi^+_1 \rightarrow \tilde\chi^0_1\pi^+$ 
413: this analysis is based on tagging of initial-state
414: radiation photons $\gamma_{\rm ISR}$.
415: A fit of the $\pi$ spectrum 
416: $E_\pi \approx \Delta m$ gives $\Delta m = 0.413\pm0.017$~GeV
417: for $\sqrt{s}=500$~GeV and $L=500$~fb$^{-1}$.
418: 
419: Another example is the Gauge Mediated Symmetry
420: Breaking (GMSB) model with the reaction 
421:       $\rm e^-\gamma\rightarrow\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde e_{\rm R}^-
422:        \rightarrow \tilde e_{\rm R}^- e^- \tilde e_{\rm R}^-
423:        \rightarrow e^-e^-e^-\tilde G\tilde G$\cite{ghosal},
424: where a triple electron and missing energy signature is expected
425: in an $\rm e^-\gamma$ collider.
426: In this model the lightest Supersymmetric particle is the gravitino
427: $\tilde G$.
428: 
429: \vspace*{-0.2cm}
430: \section{$\gamma\gamma$ Collider and R-Parity Violation}
431: \vspace*{-0.2cm}
432: 
433: The option in the LC project of photon collisions opens new fields
434: of research. For example, 
435: in a photon--photon collider, scalar neutrinos could be produced
436: via the reaction
437: $\rm \gamma\gamma\rightarrow f\bar f \tilde \nu\rightarrow f\bar f f\bar f$
438: which is almost free of Standard Model background in the
439: $\mu^+\mu^-\tau^+\tau^-$ final state\cite{moretti}.
440: The Feynman graphs and expected production cross sections are shown in 
441: Fig.~\ref{fig:gammagamma}.
442: 
443: \begin{figure}[htb]
444: \vspace*{-0.3cm}
445: \begin{minipage}{0.53\textwidth}
446: \includegraphics[scale=0.4, bbllx=1pt,bblly=1pt,bburx=428pt,bbury=200pt,clip=]{graph_gg.eps}
447: \end{minipage} \hfill
448: \begin{minipage}{0.45\textwidth}
449: \includegraphics[scale=0.7, bbllx=210pt,bblly=312pt,bburx=423pt,bbury=527pt,clip=]{0112288.fig4.ps}
450: \end{minipage}
451: \caption[]{\label{fig:gammagamma}
452: Left: $\rm \gamma\gamma\rightarrow f\bar f \tilde \nu$
453:       graphs, $\tilde \nu$ (dotted line).
454: Right: $\sigma\times BR( \tilde \nu \rightarrow f\bar f)$
455:        for different beam polarization states.
456: }
457: \vspace*{-0.6cm}
458: \end{figure}
459: 
460: \vspace*{-0.2cm}
461: \section{$\rm e^-e^-$ Collider}{
462: \vspace*{-0.2cm}
463: 
464: Another option in the LC project, $\rm e^-e^-$ collisions,
465: allows precision measurements beyond the sensitivity of an
466: $\rm e^+e^-$ LC.
467: Figure~\ref{fig:emem} shows as an example 
468: the production cross section for
469: $\rm e^-e^-\rightarrow \tilde e^-_{\rm R}\tilde e^-_{\rm R}
470:        \rightarrow e^- e^-\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1$
471: and the precision of the mass determination of scalar electrons.
472: With a luminosity of only 10~fb$^{-1}$ the expected precision is 
473: about 20 MeV\cite{feng}.
474:  
475: \begin{figure}[htb]
476: \vspace*{-0.2cm}
477: \includegraphics[scale=0.36]{feng_plot1.eps}\hspace{-0.7cm}
478: \includegraphics[scale=0.36]{feng_plot2.eps}
479: \vspace*{-1cm}
480: \caption[]{\label{fig:emem}
481: Left:  $\rm e^-e^-\rightarrow \tilde e^-_{\rm R}\tilde e^-_{\rm R}
482:        \rightarrow e^- e^-\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1$ 
483: production cross section.
484: Right: precision of the mass determination of scalar electrons
485: for $\sqrt{s}=300$~GeV and $P_{\rm e^-}=0.8$.
486: }
487: \vspace*{-0.2cm}
488: \end{figure}
489: 
490: \vspace*{-0.2cm}
491: \section{CLIC 3 TeV}
492: \vspace*{-0.2cm}
493: 
494: The CLIC project aims at higher centre-of-mass energies.
495: An example of the expected precision on the masses
496: of scalar muons, and neutralinos $\tilde\chi^0_1$ and $\tilde\chi^0_2$ 
497: from the reaction 
498: $\rm \ee\rightarrow \tilde\chi^0_2\tilde\chi^0_2 
499:  \rightarrow\mu^-\tilde \mu^+_{\rm R} \mu^+\tilde\mu^-_{\rm R}
500:  \rightarrow\mu^-\mu^+\tilde\chi^0_1 \mu^+\mu^-\tilde\chi^0_1$}
501: is given in Fig.~\ref{fig:clic}\cite{battaglia}.
502: 
503: \begin{figure}[htb]
504: \vspace*{-0.8cm}
505: \includegraphics[scale=0.3]{clic_2d_fit.eps}\hspace*{-0.5cm}
506: \includegraphics[scale=0.3]{clic_scan_chi20.eps}
507: \vspace*{-0.7cm}
508: \caption[]{\label{fig:clic}
509: Left:  reconstructed scalar muon 
510:        and neutralino $\tilde\chi^0_1$ masses.
511: Right: $\tilde\chi^0_2$ mass from the muon mass spectrum
512:        in one hemisphere 
513:        $\Delta m_{\tilde\chi_2^0} /  m_{\tilde\chi_2^0} = 1.7\%$.
514: }
515: \vspace*{-0.7cm}
516: \end{figure}
517: 
518: \vspace*{-0.2cm}
519: \section{Conclusions}
520: \vspace*{-0.2cm}
521: 
522: Exploring Supersymmetry at a future linear collider is a 
523: very active field of research with many new ideas and new directions.
524: These studies also contribute to the detector design, for example with
525: c-quark tagging as a benchmark for vertex detectors.
526: 
527: After a first discovery at the Tevatron or the LHC and initial
528: precision measurements, the production and decay modes of many 
529: Supersymmetric particles will be measured with very high precision 
530: in the first phase of a LC.
531: The Linear Collider will probe the underlying production and decay mechanisms.
532: Detailed studies of several benchmark scenarios have been performed and 
533: Supersymmetry breaking models like mSUGRA, AMSM, or GMSB will be 
534: distinguished for a wide range of parameters.
535: Combined LC and LHC physics will expand the precision measurements and allow
536: for important consistency checks of the model.
537: The physics case for a future LC is established and the 
538: High-Energy-Physics community is 
539: ready to embark on the construction of the future global LC.
540: 
541: \vspace*{-0.3cm}
542: \section*{Acknowledgments}
543: \vspace*{-0.2cm}
544: 
545: I would like to thank the organizers of the SUSY03 conference for their 
546: kind hospitality, my colleagues from the Asian, European and 
547: US Supersymmetry working groups for help with the preparation of the
548: presentation, and 
549: Alex Finch,
550: Jan Kalinowski, 
551: Uli Martyn
552: and 
553: Hanna Nowak
554: for comments on the manuscript.
555: 
556: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
557: 
558: \vspace*{-0.35cm}
559: \begin{thebibliography}{0}
560: \vspace*{-0.2cm}
561: 
562: \bibitem{lcfi} LCFI Collaboration, C. Damerell et al,
563: {\tt http://hepwww.rl.ac.uk/lcfi}.
564: 
565: \bibitem{finch} A.~Finch, H.~Nowak, A.~Sopczak, LC-PHSM-2003-75 (2003)
566: ``A Scalar Top Study with c-Quark Tagging at a Linear $\rm e^+e^-$
567:   Collider''.
568: 
569: \bibitem{bartl} A. Bartl, S. Hesselbach, K. Hidaka, T. Kernreiter, 
570:                 W. Porod, hep-ph/0311338.
571: 
572: \bibitem{hanna} H.\,Nieto-Chaupis,\,LC-PHSM-2003-074\,(2003)\,``Smuon\,Production\,at\,TESLA''.
573: 
574: \bibitem{boos} E. Boos, H.U. Martyn, G. Moortgat-Pick, M. Sachwitz, 
575:             A. Sherstnev, P.M. Zerwas, Eur. Phys. J. {\bf C 30} (2003) 395.
576: 
577: \bibitem{jack} J.~Gunion, T.~Han, J.~Jiang, A.~Sopczak,
578:                Phys. Lett. {\bf B 565} (2003) 42.
579: 
580: \bibitem{kraml} B.C. Allanach, S. Kraml, W. Porod, JHEP {\bf 303} (2003) 16.
581: 
582: \bibitem{grannis} P.D.~Grannis, Int. Workshop on Linear Collider, Korea 2002, 
583:        Proc. Sorim Press, p.\,680 
584:                   ``A Run Scenario for the Linear Collider''.
585: 
586: \bibitem{martyn} U.~Martyn, LC-PHSM-2003-071 ``Study of Sleptons -- 
587:                                                Supersymmetry Scenario SPS 1''.
588: 
589: \bibitem{nauenberg} U.~Nauenberg et. al, Talk at the Int. Workshop on Linear Collider, Prague 2002 
590:       ``Status of SPS 1 Analysis at Colorado''.
591: 
592: \bibitem{lhclc_nojiri} K.~Desch, J.~Kalinowski, G.~Moortgat-Pick, M.M.~Nojiri,                       G.~Polesello, hep-ph/0312069 
593:                        and private communications.
594: 
595: \bibitem{lhclc_sven} S. Heinemeyer, S. Kraml, W. Porod, G. Weiglein, 
596:                      JHEP {\bf 309} (2003) 75.
597: 
598: \bibitem{hensel} C. Hensel, DESY-THESIS-2002-047 (2002)
599:                  ``Search for nearly mass degenerate charginos and neutralinos
600:                   in $\rm e^+ e^-$ collisions''.
601: 
602: \bibitem{ghosal} A. Ghosal, A. Kundu, B. Mukhopadhyaya,
603:                  Phys. Rev. {\bf D 57} (1998) 1972.
604: 
605: \bibitem{moretti} D.K. Ghosh, S. Moretti, 
606:                   LC-TH-2003-063 (2003)
607:                   ``Associated production of single sneutrino and fermion pairs
608:                     at  polarised photon colliders''.
609: 
610: \bibitem{feng}  J.L. Feng, M.E. Peskin, Phys. Rev. {\bf D 64} (2001) 115002.
611: 
612: \bibitem{battaglia} M. Battaglia, hep-ph/0103338 
613:                     and private communications.
614: 
615: \vspace*{-0.8cm}
616: \mbox{ } 
617: \end{thebibliography}
618: 
619: \end{document}
620: 
621: