1: %

2: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

3: %

4: \documentclass[12pt]{iopart}

5: % Uncomment next line if AMS fonts required

6: %\usepackage{iopams}  

7: \usepackage{amssymb}

8: \usepackage{epsf}  

9: 

10: \begin{document}

11: 

12: \title{Medium Modification of the Jet

13: Properties}

14: 

15: \author{Carlos A. Salgado}

16: 

17: \address{Department of Physics, CERN, Theory Division CH-1211 Geneva 23}

18: 

19: 

20: \begin{abstract}

21: In the case that a dense medium is created in a heavy ions collision,

22: high-$E_t$ jets are expected to be broadened by

23: medium-modified gluon emission. This broadening is directly related, 

24: through geometry, to the

25: energy loss measured in inclusive high-$p_t$ particle suppression.

26: We present here the modifications of jet observables due to the

27: presence of a medium for the case of azimuthal jet energy distributions and

28: $k_t$-differential multiplicities inside the jets.

29: \end{abstract}

30: 

31: %Uncomment for PACS numbers title message

32: %\pacs{00.00, 20.00, 42.10}

33: 

34: % Uncomment for Submitted to journal title message

35: %\submitto{\JPA}

36: 

37: % Comment out if separate title page not required

38: %\maketitle

39: 

40: Recent data from RHIC on inclusive particle production at high-$p_t$

41: are well described in terms of radiative parton energy loss~\cite{vitev}. 

42: Associated to this energy loss, theory predicts

43: a broadening of the radiated gluon spectrum when compared with the 

44: vacuum case \cite{baier,nosjet}. Indeed, the average transverse momentum

45: of the radiated gluons is given by $\langle k_t^2\rangle \sim

46: \omega_c/L$, where $\omega_c$ is the critical energy above which the 

47: medium-induced gluon radiation is suppressed by formation time effects (see

48: below). 

49: 

50: The general expression for the radiation of a gluon with energy $\omega$ and

51: transverse momentum $k_t$ in the limit of large quark energy takes the form

52: ~\cite{Wiedemann:2000za}

53: \begin{eqnarray}

54:   \omega\frac{dI}{d\omega\, d{\bf k}}

55:   &=& {\alpha_s\,  C_R\over (2\pi)^2\, \omega^2}\,

56:     2{\rm Re} \int_{0}^{\infty}\hspace{-0.3cm} dy_l

57:   \int_{y_l}^{\infty} \hspace{-0.3cm} d\bar{y}_l\,

58:    \int d^2{\bf u}\,

59:   e^{-i{\bf k}_t\cdot{\bf u}}   \,

60:   e^{ -\frac{1}{2} \int_{\bar{y}_l}^{\infty} d\xi\, n(\xi)\, \sigma({\bf u})}\,

61:   \times

62: \nonumber\\

63:   &\times&{\partial \over \partial {\bf y}}\cdot

64:   {\partial \over \partial {\bf u}}\,

65:   \int_{{\bf y}={\bf r}(y_l)}^{{\bf u}={\bf r}(\bar{y}_l)}

66:   \hspace{-0.5cm} {\cal D}{\bf r}

67:    \exp\left[ i \int_{y_l}^{\bar{y}_l} \hspace{-0.2cm} d\xi

68:         \frac{\omega}{2} \left(\dot{\bf r}^2

69:           - \frac{n(\xi)\, \sigma({\bf r})}{i\,2\, \omega} \right)

70:                       \right]\, .

71:     \label{eqspec}

72: \end{eqnarray}

73: 

74: We have studied this formula in two approximations. First, 

75: in the saddle point approximation, $\sigma({\bf r})=C{\bf r}^2$, 

76: the path integral of (\ref{eqspec}) is that of a 

77: harmonic oscillator of imaginary frequency. This approximation

78: corresponds to multiple soft scatterings, and neglects the high-$p_t$ tails

79: of single scattering centers. Second, in the opacity expansion, the integrand

80: of (\ref{eqspec}) is expanded in powers of 

81: $(n(\xi)\, \sigma({\bf r}))^N$. This corresponds to a fixed

82: number of $N$ scattering centers. In the following, the label

83: {\it single hard scattering} denotes the first

84: term ($N=1$) in this expansion.

85: 

86: The medium-induced gluon radiation spectrum can be written in terms of

87: two scaling variables \cite{nosjet},

88: 

89: \begin{equation}

90: \kappa^2=\frac{k_t^2}{\hat qL} \ , \ \omega_c=\frac{1}{2} \hat qL^2

91: \hspace{0.5cm} \Bigg[

92: \kappa^2=\frac{k_t^2}{\mu^2} \ , \ \omega_c=\frac{1}{2} \mu^2L

93: \ \ {\rm for\ single\ hard}\Bigg]\ ,

94: %\hat q\rightarrow \frac{\mu^2}{L}

95: \label{eqvar}

96: \end{equation}

97: 

98: \noindent

99: In the multiple soft scattering approximation, the only parameter is

100: the transport coefficient, $\hat q$. This quantity parametrizes the 

101: average momentum transfer squared and is proportional to the density 

102: of the medium. In the single hard scattering, the Debye screening mass 

103: $\mu$ denotes the average momentum transfer per scattering center.

104: In Fig. \ref{salgfig1} 

105: we present the double differential spectrum (\ref{eqspec}) in $\omega$ and 

106: $k_t^2$.

107: 

108: \begin{figure}

109: \begin{center}

110: \epsfxsize=9cm

111: \epsfbox{fig1kt.epsi}

112: \end{center}

113: \caption{\label{salgfig1}

114: The energy distribution of gluons radiated by a quark

115: as a function of the rescaled gluon energy

116: $\omega/\omega_c$ and the rescaled gluon transverse momentum

117: $\kappa$, see eq. (\ref{eqvar}), with $\alpha_s$=1/3.}

118: \end{figure}

119: 

120: Qualitative properties of the

121: medium-induced gluon radiation spectrum can be understood by

122: coherence arguments \cite{meu,nosohq}. The relevant phase for gluon emission is

123: %

124: \begin{equation}

125:   \varphi = \Bigg\langle \frac{k_t^2}{2\omega}\, \Delta z \Bigg\rangle

126: %\Longrightarrow

127: %l_{coh}\sim\frac{2\omega}{k_t^2}

128: \hskip 0.5cm 

129: \Longrightarrow\hskip 0.5cm 

130: \varphi\sim\frac{L}{l_{coh}}

131: \sim \frac{\kappa^2}{\omega/\omega_c}\ \ {\rm for}\ \   \Delta z\sim L.

132: \end{equation}

133: %

134: \noindent

135: Gluon radiation occurs if the accumulated phase $\varphi\gtrsim 1$.

136: Thus, the radiation is suppressed for $\kappa^2\lesssim\omega_c/\omega$ and

137: for $\omega\gtrsim \omega_c$ (as $\kappa\lesssim 1$). 

138: These features are observed in the numerical

139: calculations presented in Fig. \ref{salgfig1}. The presence of a

140: limiting energy $\omega_c$ implies that the average energy loss

141: $\Delta E\sim\omega_c\propto L^2$, as first pointed out in 

142: \cite{bdmps}.

143: 

144: The $k_t$-integrated spectrum (see Refs. \cite{nos2,nosjet})

145: is also suppressed for small

146: values of $\omega$. This fact can also be understood by formation

147: time arguments:  the integration limit $k_t < \omega$ cuts the 

148: gluon energies $\omega^2\lesssim k_t^2$, on the other hand, the

149: spectrum is suppressed for $k_t\lesssim \hat q L$ due to formation

150: time effects. This suppresses the spectra for $\omega/\omega_c\lesssim 

151: \sqrt{2/\omega_cL}$. 

152: In this way,

153: formation time effects make the spectrum stable in the infrared region

154: \cite{nos2}. 

155: % This

156: % has important consequences for the experimental observables as we will see.

157: 

158: Based on this formalism of medium-induced parton energy loss, 

159: we have computed the medium-modification of two jet observables,

160: namely the fraction $\rho(R)$ of jet energy inside a cone $R$ and

161: the gluon multiplicity distribution~\cite{nosjet}.

162: 

163: The fraction of the jet energy inside a cone of radius

164: $R=\sqrt{(\Delta \eta)^2 + (\Delta \Phi)^2}$ is

165: %

166: \begin{equation}

167:   \rho_{\rm vac}(R) = \frac{1}{N_{\rm jets}} \sum_{\rm jets}

168:   \frac{E_t(R)}{E_t(R=1)}\, .

169:   \label{eq5}

170: \end{equation}

171: %

172: \noindent

173: In the presence of the medium, this energy is shifted by~\cite{nosjet}

174: \begin{equation}

175:   \rho_{\rm med}(R) =

176:     \rho_{\rm vac}(R) - \frac{\Delta E_t(R)}{E_t}

177:         + \frac{\Delta E}{E_t} \left( 1 - \rho_{\rm vac}(R)\right)\, .

178:       \label{eq9}

179: \end{equation}

180: %

181: Here, $\Delta E_t(R)$ is the additional (medium) energy radiated

182: outside a cone $\Theta=R$,

183: $\Delta E(\Theta)=\int \epsilon P(\epsilon,\Theta)d\epsilon$. It

184: is determined by the probability $P(\epsilon,\Theta)$ that an energy

185: fraction $\epsilon$ is radiated outside $\Theta$, which can be calculated

186: from eq.~(\ref{eqspec}) \cite{nos2}.

187: In Fig.~\ref{figfig2} we plot the medium-shifted distribution (\ref{eq9}). 

188: The shaded area corresponds to the uncertainty in finite quark-energy 

189: effects: in the eikonal approximation

190: $P(\epsilon)$ has support in the unphysical region $\epsilon > 1$.

191: To estimate this effect  we take

192: $P(\epsilon)\,\rightarrow\, P(\epsilon)/\int_0^1 d\epsilon P(\epsilon)$.

193: %

194: \begin{figure}[h]\epsfxsize=8.5cm

195: \centerline{\epsfbox{fig2bw.epsi}}

196: %\vspace{0.5cm}

197: \caption{LHS: The jet shape (\protect\ref{eq5}) for a 50 GeV and

198: 100 GeV quark-lead jet which fragments in the vacuum (dashed curve) or

199: in a dense QCD medium (solid curve)

200: characterized by $\omega_c = 62$ GeV and $\omega_c\, L = 2000$.

201: RHS: the corresponding

202: average medium-induced energy loss for $E_t = 100$ GeV

203: outside a jet cone $R$ radiated

204: away by gluons of energy larger than $E_{\rm cut}$. Shaded regions

205: indicate theoretical uncertainties discussed in the text.

206: }\label{figfig2}

207: \end{figure}

208: 

209: 

210: %\noindent

211: The effect of the medium is very small (at $R$=0.3, $\sim$ 5\% for

212: a 50 GeV jet and $\sim$ 3\% for a 100 GeV jet). The smalleness of this effect

213: could allow for a calibration of the total energy of the jet

214: without tagging a recoiling hard photon or Z-boson. It also implies

215: that the jet $E_t$ cross section scale with the number of binary collisions.

216: In order to check the sensitivity of our results to the small-energy region,

217: we impose low momentum cut-offs which remove gluon emission below 5 GeV. 

218: As anticipated, the

219: transverse broadening is very weakly affected by these cuts. This is due to

220: the infrared behavior of the spectrum for small values of $\omega$.

221: A proper subtraction of the large background present

222: in heavy ion collisions would benefit from this result.

223: 

224: $k_t$-differential measurements are expected to be more sensitive to

225: medium effects. We studied the intrajet multiplicity of produced gluons as

226: a function of the transverse (with respect to the jet axis) momentum.

227: The medium-induced additional number of gluons

228: with transverse momentum $k_t = \vert {\bf k}\vert$, produced

229: within a subcone of opening angle $\theta_c$ is

230: \begin{eqnarray}

231:  \frac{dN_{\rm med}}{dk_t} =  \int_{k_t/\sin\theta_c}^{E_t} d\omega\,

232:                \frac{dI_{\rm med}}{d\omega\, dk_t}\, .

233:   \label{eq8}

234: \end{eqnarray}

235: %

236: For the vacuum we simply assume

237: $dN_{\rm vac}/dk_t\sim 1/k_t\log(E_t\sin\theta_c/k_t)$.

238: The total multiplicity is the sum of the two.

239: Fig. \ref{figglmult} shows that this multiplicity distribution is 

240: very sensitive to medium-effects since it broadens significantly. 

241: Moreover, the high-$k_t$ tail of the distribution is unaffected by

242: the soft background since only high-$p_t$ particles can have a large

243: $k_t$ {\it inside} the jet cone.

244: 

245: %The effect is now rather large for transverse momemta of

246: %the order of several GeV. So, we expect that this observable could give

247: %very valuable experimental information about the dynamics of the

248: %medium--induced gluon radiation and, hence, about the medium.

249: %A more realistic analysis, however,

250: %would need to include the whole fragmentation, etc...

251: %Nevertheless, the origin of the shift to larger transverse momentum is mainly

252: %kinematic, understandable by qualitative arguments. In this

253: %way, we expect this conclusion to be very robust and not depending on the

254: %actual realization of the model.

255: 

256: The first results on 'jet-like' particle production associated to high-$p_t$

257: trigger particles have been presented at this conference \cite{jetsqm}. The 

258: results are in rough qualitative agreement with the ones shown 

259: here for much larger jet energies. A more refined analysis of finite energy

260: corrections is, however, needed for a direct comparison with data.

261: 

262: \begin{figure}[t!]\epsfxsize=8cm

263: \centerline{\epsfbox{fig3.epsi}}

264: \caption{Comparison of the vacuum and medium-induced part of the

265: gluon multiplicity distribution

266: (\protect\ref{eq8}) inside a cone size $R=\Theta_c$, measured as a

267: function of $k_t$ with respect to the jet axis. 

268: %Removing gluons with

269: %energy smaller than $E_{\rm cut}$ from the distribution (dashed and dotted

270: %lines) does not affect the high-$k_t$ tails.

271: }\label{figglmult}

272: \end{figure}

273: 

274: \begin{thebibliography}{0}

275: 

276: \bibitem{vitev} I. Vitev, these proceedings [hep-ph/0403089]

277: and references therein

278: 

279: \bibitem{baier}

280: R.~Baier, Y.~L.~Dokshitzer, A.~H.~Mueller, S.~Peigne and D.~Schiff,

281: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 484} (1997) 265.

282: 

283: \bibitem{nosjet}

284: C.~A.~Salgado and U.~A.~Wiedemann,

285: hep-ph/0310079.

286: 

287: \bibitem{Wiedemann:2000za}

288: U.~A.~Wiedemann,

289: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 588} (2000) 303;

290: Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 690} (2001) 731.

291: 

292: \bibitem{meu} C.~A. Salgado, Mod. Phys. Lett {\bf A19} (2004) 271.

293: 

294: \bibitem{nosohq} N.~Armesto, C.~A.~Salgado and U.~A.~Wiedemann, hep-ph/0312016

295: 

296: \bibitem{nos2} 

297: C.~A.~Salgado and U.~A.~Wiedemann,

298: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 68} (2003) 014008.

299: 

300: \bibitem{bdmps}

301:     R.~Baier, {\it et al.}

302:     Phys. Lett. {\bf B345} (1995) 277;

303:     Nucl. Phys. {\bf B483} (1997) 291.

304: 

305: \bibitem{jetsqm} F. Wang,these proceedings;  M. Miller, these proceedings.

306: 

307: \end{thebibliography}

308: 

309: 

310: 

311: 

312: 

313: \end{document}

314: 

315: