1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% author.tex %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2: %
3: % sample file for your contribution to a
4: %
5: % Proc. of 9th Adriatic Meeting, Dubrovnik 2003
6: %
7: % Use this file as a template for your own input.
8: % Please, rename it into yourname.tex.
9: %
10: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Springer-Verlag %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
11:
12: \documentclass{svmult}
13:
14: \usepackage{axodraw}
15: \usepackage{graphicx}
16: \usepackage{enumerate}
17:
18:
19:
20: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
21: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
22: % PLEASE, DO NOT USE YOUR OWN DEFINITIONS AND STYLES. I HAVE COMPILED
23: % THE LIST OF THE MOST COMMON DEFINITIONS, SEE THE FOLLOWING LINES.
24: % USE THOSE OR SIMPLY WRITE THE FULL COMMAND.
25: %
26: % TNX LARISA
27: %
28: % PS
29: % If you absolutely must use your own definitions,
30: % make it very exotic and mark them clearly,
31: % and DO NOT, under any circumstances, change existing ones.
32: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
33: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
34:
35: % equations
36: \def\beq{\begin{equation}}
37: \def\eeq{\end{equation}}
38: \def\nn{\nonumber}
39: \def\bea{\begin{eqnarray}}
40: \def\eea{\end{eqnarray}}
41: \def\ba{\begin{array}} %array
42: \def\ea{\end{array}}
43: \newcommand{\q}{\quad}
44: \newcommand{\qq}{\qquad}
45: % hermitian conjugate
46: \def\dg{\dagger}
47: % double dagger
48: \def\ddg{\ddagger}
49: % partial der.
50: \newcommand{\pa}{\partial}
51: \newcommand{\pax}{\partial_x}
52: \newcommand{\pay}{\partial_y}
53: \newcommand{\paz}{\partial_z}
54: \newcommand{\pai}{\partial_i}
55: \newcommand{\paj}{\partial_j}
56: \newcommand{\pak}{\partial_k}
57: \newcommand{\pam}{\partial_\mu}
58: \newcommand{\pan}{\partial_\nu}
59: \newcommand{\parh}{\partial_\rho}
60: % ket & bra
61: \def\ket{\rangle}
62: \def\bra{\langle}
63: % greek letters
64: \def\ve{\varepsilon}
65: \def\vf{\varphi}
66: \def\vr{\varrho}
67: \def\vs{\varsigma}
68: \def\vt{\vartheta}
69: \def\a{\alpha}
70: \def\b{\beta}
71: \def\c{\chi}
72: \def\e{\epsilon}
73: \def\f{\phi}
74: \def\F{\Phi}
75: \def\g{\gamma}
76: \def\G{\Gamma}
77: \def\h{\eta}
78: \def\j{\psi}
79: \def\J{\Psi}
80: \def\k{\kappa}
81: \def\l{\lambda}
82: \def\L{\Lambda}
83: \def\m{\mu}
84: \def\n{\nu}
85: \def\o{\omega}
86: \def\O{\Omega}
87: \def\p{\pi}
88: \def\th{\theta}
89: \def\Th{\Theta}
90: \def\r{\rho}
91: \def\s{\sigma}
92: \def\S{\Sigma}
93: \def\t{\tau}
94: \def\u{\upsilon}
95: \def\x{\xi}
96: \def\z{\zeta}
97: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
98: \begin{document}
99:
100: \title*{Lepton flavor violation in the SUSY seesaw model: an update}
101: % Use \titlerunning{Short Title} for an abbreviated version of
102: % your contribution title if the original one is too long
103: %\author{Name of Author\inst{1}\and
104: %Name of Author\inst{2}}
105: \author{Frank~Deppisch, Heinrich~P\"as, Andreas~Redelbach \and
106: Reinhold~R\"uckl}
107: % Please full name, not just initials!
108: % Use \authorrunning{Short Title} for an abbreviated version of
109: % your contribution title if the original one is too long
110: %\institute{Name and Address of your Institute
111: %\texttt{name@email.address}
112: %\and Name and Address of your Institute \texttt{name@email.address}}
113: \institute{Institut f\"ur Theoretische Physik und Astrophysik\\
114: Universit\"at W\"urzburg\\ D-97074 W\"urzburg\\ Germany}
115: %
116: % Use the package "url.sty" to avoid
117: % problems with special characters
118: % used in your e-mail or web address
119: %
120: \maketitle
121:
122: We present an update of previous work on charged lepton flavor violation
123: (LFV) in the seesaw model.
124: The most recent neutrino data fits and post WMAP mSUGRA benchmark
125: scenarios are used as input.
126: In this framework we compare the sensitivity of rare
127: radiative decays on the right-handed
128: Majorana mass scale \(M_R\) with the reach in slepton-pair production
129: at a future linear collider.
130:
131: \section{Introduction}
132:
133: The evidence for flavor violating neutrino oscillations
134: provides strong motivation to
135: search for LFV also in the charged lepton sector.
136: While charged lepton-flavor violating processes are suppressed
137: in the Standard Model with right-handed neutrinos \cite{petcov}
138: due to
139: the light neutrino masses,
140: in supersymmetric models new sources of lepton flavor
141: violation exist. For example, the massive neutrinos
142: affect the renormalization group equations of the slepton masses and
143: the trilinear couplings, and give rise to non-diagonal matrix elements
144: inducing LFV \cite{Borzumati:1986qx}. This finding
145: has initiated a prospering research activity both on
146: LFV in rare decays \cite{rare,Casas:2001sr,Hisano:1999fj} as well as
147: on lepton-flavor violating
148: processes at future colliders \cite{coll}.
149: Recently, we performed a comparative study of
150: the sensitivity of rare
151: radiative decays on the right-handed
152: Majorana mass scale \(M_R\) \cite{Deppisch:2002vz}
153: and the reach in slepton-pair production
154: at a future linear collider \cite{Deppisch:2003wt}
155: in the context of the SUSY seesaw model. We
156: used mSUGRA benchmark scenarios \cite{Battaglia:2001zp}
157: designed for linear collider
158: studies and paid particular attention
159: to the uncertainties in the neutrino input parameters.
160: Here we present an update of these works, implementing
161: the most recent neutrino data fits and refined
162: post WMAP mSUGRA benchmark scenarios.
163:
164: \section{Neutrino parameters}
165:
166: In the last decade a rather unique picture of neutrino
167: mixing has emerged. As can be seen in
168: Fig.~\ref{fig:sum}, large to maximal mixing has been established for
169: solar and atmospheric neutrinos, while
170: the third angle is strongly constrained by reactor measurements.
171: Recently, this picture of neutrino mixing has been refined further.
172: The results of the KamLAND reactor experiment confirmed the disappearance of
173: solar electron neutrinos, while the SNO experiment allowed for the first time
174: to study both solar neutrino appearance and disappearance via the separate
175: measurement of charged current, elastic scattering and neutral current
176: interactions. Moreover, the first data of the K2K long baseline accelerator
177: experiment indicate a confirmation of atmospheric neutrino oscillations.
178: At the time when a linear collider will
179: be in operation, even more precise measurements of the
180: neutrino parameters will be available than today.
181: In order to simulate the expected improvement,
182: we take the central values of the mass squared
183: differences $\Delta m^2_{ij}=|m_i^2-m_j^2|$
184: and mixing angles $\theta_{ij}$ from the most recent global fit to existing
185: data \cite{Maltoni:2003da} with errors that indicate
186: the anticipated $2\sigma$ intervals of running and proposed
187: experiments as further explained in \cite{Deppisch:2002vz}:
188: \begin{eqnarray}
189: &&\tan^2\theta_{23}=1.10^{+1.39}_{-0.60},~~
190: \tan^2\theta_{13}=0.006^{+0.001}_{-0.006},~~
191: \tan^2\theta_{12}=0.43^{+0.47}_{-0.22}, \label{nupar1}\\
192: &&\Delta m_{12}^2=6.9^{+0.36}_{-0.36}\cdot 10^{-5}\textrm{ eV}^2 ,~~
193: \Delta m_{13}^2=2.6^{+1.2}_{-1.2}\cdot 10^{-3}\textrm{ eV}^2.
194: \end{eqnarray}
195: Furthermore, for the lightest neutrino mass we assume
196: \(m_1 \leq 0.03\)~eV, where \(m_1 \simeq 0\)~eV corresponds to
197: the case of a hierarchical spectrum, while \(m_1 \simeq 0.03\)~eV
198: approaches the degenerate case.
199:
200: %---------------
201: \begin{figure}[t!]
202: \begin{center}
203: \setlength{\unitlength}{1cm}
204: %\begin{minipage}[t!]{7.5cm}
205: \includegraphics[clip,scale=1]{PDG2004.eps}
206: \end{center}
207: \caption{Summary of evidences for neutrino oscillations \cite{murayama}.}
208: \label{fig:sum}
209: %\end{minipage}\hfill
210: %\vspace*{-0.7cm}
211: \end{figure}
212: %--------------
213: %\vspace*{2cm}
214:
215:
216:
217: \section{mSUGRA benchmark scenarios}
218:
219: For our numerical investigations we
220: focus on the mSUGRA benchmark scenarios proposed in
221: \cite{Battaglia:2003ab} for linear collider studies.
222: These models are consistent with direct SUSY searches, Higgs searches,
223: $b \to s \gamma$, and astrophysical constraints.
224: Recently, the precision measurement of the cosmic microwave background
225: by the WMAP experiment combined with previously available data provided a
226: refined estimate of the density of cold dark matter in the universe.
227: Assuming that most of the dark matter is composed of neutralino LSPs,
228: the smaller neutralino relic density
229: led to a shift of previous benchmark points
230: \cite{Battaglia:2001zp}
231: towards lower values
232: of the universal scalar mass $m_0$.
233: In table \ref{mSUGRAscen} we specify the mSUGRA parameters of the
234: benchmark scenarios B', C', G', and
235: I'. These are the only models of \cite{Battaglia:2003ab} with
236: left-handed sleptons which are light
237: enough to be pair-produced
238: at \(e^+e^-\) colliders with c.m. energies \(\sqrt{s}=500\div800\)~GeV.
239:
240:
241: \begin{table}[h!]
242: \begin{center}
243: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c||c|c|c|}\hline
244: Scenario & $m_{1/2}$/GeV & $m_{0}$/GeV & $\tan\beta$ &
245: ${\tilde m}_{6}$/GeV &
246: $m_{\tilde{\chi}_1^0}$/GeV \\ \hline\hline
247: B' & 250 & 60 & 10 & 192 & 98 \\ \hline
248: C' & 400 & 85 & 10 & 291 & 163 \\ \hline
249: G' & 375 & 115 & 20 & 291 & 153 \\ \hline
250: I' & 350 & 175 & 35 & 310 & 143 \\ \hline
251: \end{tabular}
252: \end{center}
253: \caption{\label{mSUGRAscen} Parameters of selected
254: mSUGRA post WMAP benchmark scenarios \protect{\cite{Battaglia:2003ab}}.
255: The sign of \(\mu\) is chosen to be positive and \(A_0\) is set to
256: zero. Given are also the masses of the heaviest
257: charged slepton and the lightest neutralino, that is the LSP.}
258: \end{table}
259:
260: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
261:
262: \section{SUSY seesaw mechanism and slepton mass matrix}
263:
264: %In the following we review shortly LFV in the SUSY seesaw model.
265: If three right-handed neutrino singlet fields $\nu_R$
266: are added to the MSSM particle
267: content, one gets the following additional terms in the superpotential \cite{Casas:2001sr}:
268: \begin{equation}
269: W_\nu = -\frac{1}{2}\nu_R^{cT} M \nu_R^c + \nu_R^{cT} Y_\nu L \cdot H_2.
270: \label{suppot4}
271: \end{equation}
272: Here, \(Y_\nu\) is the matrix of neutrino Yukawa couplings,
273: $M$ is the right-handed neutrino Majorana mass matrix, and
274: $L$ and $H_2$ denote the left-handed
275: lepton and hypercharge +1/2 Higgs doublets, respectively.
276: At energies much below the mass scale of the right-handed neutrinos,
277: $W_{\nu}$ leads to the
278: mass matrix
279: \beq\label{eqn:SeeSawFormula}
280: M_\nu = m_D^T M^{-1} m_D = Y_\nu^T M^{-1} Y_\nu (v \sin\beta )^2,
281: \eeq
282: for the left-handed neutrinos.
283: Thus, light neutrino masses are
284: naturally obtained if the typical scale of the
285: Majorana mass matrix \(M\) is much larger than the scale of the Dirac mass
286: matrix \(m_D=Y_\nu \langle H_2^0 \rangle\), where
287: \(\langle H_2^0 \rangle = v\sin\beta\) is the appropriate Higgs v.e.v. with
288: \(v=174\)~GeV and
289: \(\tan\beta =\frac{\langle H_2^0\rangle}{\langle H_1^0\rangle}\).
290: Diagonalization of
291: $M_{\nu}$ by the unitary MNS matrix
292: \begin{eqnarray}
293: U &=& \textrm{diag}(e^{i\phi_1}, e^{i\phi_2},1)V(\theta_{12},
294: \theta_{13}, \theta_{23}, \delta),
295: \end{eqnarray}
296: where \(\phi_{1,2}\) and \(\delta\) are the Majorana and Dirac phases,
297: respectively, and $\theta_{ij}$ are the mixing angles,
298: leads to the
299: light neutrino mass eigenvalues $m_i$:
300: \begin{eqnarray}\label{eqn:NeutrinoDiag}
301: U^T M_\nu U &=& \textrm{diag}(m_1, m_2, m_3).
302: \end{eqnarray}
303:
304: The other neutrino mass eigenstates
305: are too heavy to be observed directly. However, they
306: give rise to virtual corrections
307: to the slepton mass matrices
308: that can be responsible for observable lepton-flavor violating effects.
309: In particular, the $6\times 6$ mass matrix of the charged sleptons is given by
310: \begin{eqnarray}
311: m_{\tilde l}^2=\left(
312: \begin{array}{cc}
313: m_{\tilde l_L}^2 & (m_{\tilde l_{LR}}^{2})^\dagger \\
314: m_{\tilde l_{LR}}^2 & m_{\tilde l_R}^2
315: \end{array}
316: \right)
317: \end{eqnarray}
318: with
319: \begin{eqnarray}
320: (m^2_{\tilde{l}_L})_{ab} &=& (m_{L}^2)_{ab}
321: + \delta_{ab}\bigg(m_{l_a}^2
322: + m_Z^2
323: \cos 2\beta \left(-\frac{1}{2}+\sin^2\theta_W \right)\bigg)
324: \label{mlcharged} \\
325: (m^2_{\tilde{l}_{R}})_{ab}
326: &=& (m_{R}^2)_{ab}
327: + \delta_{ab}(m_{l_a}^2 - m_Z^2 \cos 2\beta
328: \sin^2\theta_W) \label{mrcharged} \\
329: (m^{2}_{\tilde{l}_{LR}})_{ab}
330: &=& A_{ab}v\cos\beta-\delta_{ab}m_{l_a}\mu\tan\beta.
331: \end{eqnarray}
332: When $m^2_{\tilde{l}}$
333: is renormalized from the GUT scale \(M_X\) to the electroweak scale
334: one obtains, in mSUGRA,
335: \begin{eqnarray}
336: m_{L}^2 &=& m_0^2\mathbf{1} + (\delta m_{L}^2)_{\textrm{\tiny MSSM}} + \delta m_{L}^2 \label{left_handed_SSB} \\
337: m_{R}^2 &=& m_0^2\mathbf{1} + (\delta m_{R}^2)_{\textrm{\tiny MSSM}} + \delta m_{R}^2 \label{right_handed_SSB}\\
338: A &=& A_0 Y_l+\delta A_{\textrm{\tiny MSSM}}+\delta A \label{A_SSB},
339: \end{eqnarray}
340: where $m_{0}$ is the common soft SUSY-breaking scalar mass and $A_{0}$ the
341: common trilinear coupling. The terms
342: \((\delta m_{L,R}^2)_{\textrm{\tiny MSSM}}\) and
343: \(\delta A_{\textrm{\tiny MSSM}}\) are well-known flavor-diagonal corrections.
344: In addition, the evolution generates off-diagonal terms
345: in $\delta m_{L,R}^2$ and $\delta A^2$
346: which
347: in leading-log approximation are given by \cite{Hisano:1999fj}
348: \begin{eqnarray}\label{eq:rnrges}
349: \delta m_{L}^2 &=& -\frac{1}{8 \pi^2}(3m_0^2+A_0^2)(Y_\nu^\dagger L Y_\nu)
350: \label{left_handed_SSB2}\\
351: \delta m_{R}^2 &=& 0 \\
352: \delta A &=& -\frac{3 A_0}{16\pi^2}(Y_l Y_\nu^\dagger L Y_\nu)
353: \end{eqnarray}
354: with
355: \beq
356: L_{ij}=\ln\left(\frac{M_X}{M_{i}}\right)\delta_{ij},
357: \eeq
358: and $M_i,~i=1,2,3$ being the eigenvalues of the Majorana mass matrix $M$.
359: In the above, we have chosen a basis in which
360: the charged lepton Yukawa couplings and $M$ are diagonal.
361:
362:
363: %------------------------------------
364: \begin{figure*}[!t]
365: \begin{center}
366: \begin{picture}(400,100)(-190,-25)
367: \ArrowLine(-190,0)(-150,0)
368: \Text(-170,-10)[]{$l_{i}$}
369: \DashLine(-150,0)(-80,0){5}
370: \Text(-135,-10)[]{$\tilde{l}$}
371: \Photon(-115,0)(-115,-45){3}{5}
372: \Text(-100,-30)[]{$\gamma$}
373: \ArrowLine(-80,0)(-40,0)
374: \Text(-60,-10)[]{$l_{j}$}
375: \CArc(-115,0)(35,0,180)
376: \Text(-115,46)[]{$\tilde{\chi}^{0}$}
377: \ArrowLine(-20,0)(20,0)
378: \DashLine(20,0)(90,0){5}
379: \ArrowLine(90,0)(130,0)
380: \Text(00,-10)[]{$l_{i}$}
381: \Text(55,-10)[]{$\tilde{\nu}$}
382: \Photon(55,35)(55,74){3}{5}
383: \Text(70,55)[]{$\gamma$}
384: \Text(110,-10)[]{$l_{j}$}
385: \CArc(55,0)(35,-360,-180)
386: \Text(28,34)[]{$\tilde{\chi}^{-}$}
387: \end{picture}
388: \vspace*{1cm}
389: \caption{\label{lfv_lowenergydiagrams} Diagrams for $l_{i}^{-}\rightarrow l_{j}^{-}\gamma$ in the MSSM}
390: \end{center}
391: %\vspace*{-0.5cm}
392: \end{figure*}
393: The product of the neutrino Yukawa couplings
394: $Y_\nu^\dagger L Y_\nu$ entering these corrections can be
395: determined as follows \cite{Casas:2001sr}.
396: By inverting (\ref{eqn:NeutrinoDiag}), one obtains
397: \begin{eqnarray}\label{eqn:yy}
398: Y_\nu=\frac{1}{v\sin\beta}\textrm{diag}\left(\sqrt{M_1}, \sqrt{M_2}, \sqrt{M_3}\right) R \;
399: \textrm{diag}\left(\sqrt{m_1}, \sqrt{m_2}, \sqrt{m_3}\right)U^\dagger,
400: \label{eq:yukawa}
401: \end{eqnarray}
402: where $R$ is an unknown complex orthogonal matrix.
403: For real $R$ and degenerate right-handed Majorana masses, $R$ as well as
404: $\phi_1$ and $\phi_2$ drop out
405: from the product $Y_\nu^\dagger L Y_\nu$.
406: Using then the neutrino data sketched in section~2
407: as input the result is evolved
408: to the unification scale $M_X$.
409: In what follows we refer to
410: this illustrative case which suffices for the present discussion.
411: For small neutrino masses, \(m^2_i \ll \Delta m_{ij}^2\), the above procedure
412: yields
413: \begin{eqnarray}
414: \left(Y_{\nu}^{\dagger}L Y_{\nu}\right)_{ab}
415: & \approx & \frac{M_{R}}{v^{2}\sin^{2}\beta}
416: \left(\sqrt{\Delta m^{2}_{12}} U_{a2}U_{b2}^{*}
417: + \sqrt{\Delta m_{23}^2}U_{a3}U_{b3}^{*}\right)
418: \ln\frac{M_X}{M_{R}}.
419: \label{llcorrectionhier}
420: \end{eqnarray}
421: Upon diagonalization, the flavor off-diagonal corrections in
422: (\ref{left_handed_SSB})-(\ref{A_SSB}) generate flavor-violating couplings
423: of the slepton mass eigenstates.
424:
425: \begin{center}
426: \begin{figure*}[!t]
427: %--------------------
428: \vspace*{0.5cm}
429: \hspace*{-0.5cm}
430: \( \quad\quad\sum_{a,b} \)
431: \hspace*{1cm}
432: \begin{picture}(220,50)(60,48)
433: \ArrowLine(50,50)(10,90) \Text(10,95)[r]{$e^{+}$}
434: \ArrowLine(10,10)(50,50) \Text(10,5)[r]{$e^{-}$} \Vertex(50,50){2}
435: \Photon(50,50)(100,50){3}{5} \Text(75,54)[b]{\(\gamma,Z\)} \Vertex(100,50){2}
436: \DashArrowLine(130,80)(100,50){5}\Text(113,70)[b]{\(\tilde{l}^{+}_{b}\)} \Vertex(130,80){2}
437: \ArrowLine(160,100)(130,80) \Text(162,100)[l]{\(l_{j}^{+}\)}
438: \ArrowLine(130,80)(160,60) \Text(162,60)[l]{\(\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{\beta}\)}
439: \DashArrowLine(100,50)(130,20){5}\Text(113,30)[t]{\(\tilde{l}_{a}^{-}\)} \Vertex(130,20){2}
440: \ArrowLine(130,20)(160,40) \Text(162,40)[l]{\(l^{-}_{i}\)}
441: \ArrowLine(160,0)(130,20) \Text(162,0)[l]{\(\tilde{\chi}_{\alpha}^{0}\)}
442: \end{picture}
443: \hspace*{-3.4cm}
444: \(+~~\sum_{\gamma,a,b}\)
445: \hspace*{-0.6cm}
446: \begin{picture}(90,50)(-10,48)
447: \ArrowLine(20,80)(0,100) \Text(0,105)[r]{$e^{+}$}
448: \ArrowLine(0,0)(20,20) \Text(0,-5)[r]{$e^{-}$}
449: \ArrowLine(20,20)(20,80) \Text(22,50)[l]{\(\tilde\chi_\gamma^{0}\)} \Vertex(20,20){2} \Vertex(20,80){2}
450: \DashArrowLine(40,100)(20,80){5} \Text(28,93.5)[b]{\(\tilde{l}_{b}^{+}\)} \Vertex(40,100){2}
451: \ArrowLine(70,100)(40,100) \Text(72,100)[l]{\(l_{j}^{+}\)}
452: \ArrowLine(40,100)(70,70) \Text(70,70)[l]{\(\tilde{\chi}_{\beta}^{0}\)}
453: \DashArrowLine(20,20)(40,0){5} \Text(28,5)[t]{\(\tilde{l}^{-}_{a}\)} \Vertex(40,0){2}
454: \ArrowLine(40,0)(70,30) \Text(70,0)[l]{\(\tilde{\chi}_{\alpha}^{0}\)}
455: \ArrowLine(70,0)(40,0) \Text(70,30)[l]{\(l^{-}_{i}\)}
456: \end{picture}
457: \vspace{2cm}
458: \\
459: \caption{Diagrams for $e^+e^-\to \tilde{l}_b^+\tilde{l}^-_a \to
460: l_j^+ l^-_i \tilde{\chi}^0_\alpha\tilde{\chi}^0_\beta$}\label{e+e-_diags}
461: \end{figure*}
462: \end{center}
463: %---------------------------------------------
464:
465:
466:
467:
468:
469: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
470: \section{Charged lepton flavor violation}
471:
472: At low energies, the flavor off-diagonal correction
473: (\ref{left_handed_SSB2}) induces
474: the radiative decays
475: \(l_i\rightarrow l_j \gamma\).
476: From the photon penguin diagrams shown in
477: Fig.~\ref{lfv_lowenergydiagrams} with
478: charginos/sneutrinos or neutralinos/charged sleptons in the loop, one
479: derives the decay rates \cite{Casas:2001sr,Hisano:1999fj}
480: \begin{equation}
481: \Gamma(l_i \rightarrow l_j \gamma)
482: \propto \alpha^3 m_{l_i}^5 \frac{|(\delta m_L)^2_{ij}|^2}{\tilde{m}^8}
483: \tan^2 \beta,
484: \end{equation}
485: where $\tilde m$ characterizes the sparticle masses in the loop.
486: Because of the dominance of the penguin contributions, the process
487: \(\mu\to 3e\), and also \(\mu\)-\(e\)
488: conversion in nuclei
489: is directly related to \(\mu\to e \gamma\), e.g.,
490: \begin{equation}
491: \frac{Br(\mu\rightarrow 3e)}{Br(\mu\rightarrow e \gamma)}
492: \approx \frac{\alpha}{8\pi}\frac{8}{3}
493: \left(\ln\frac{m_{\mu}^{2}}{m_{e}^{2}}-\frac{11}{4}\right). \label{mu3erel}
494: \end{equation}
495:
496: At high energies, a feasible test of LFV is provided
497: by the process
498: $e^+e^- \to \tilde{l}_b^+\tilde{l}^-_a\to
499: l_j^+ l^-_i\tilde{\chi}^0_\alpha\tilde{\chi}^0_\beta$.
500: From the Feynman graphs displayed in Fig.~\ref{e+e-_diags}, one can see that
501: LFV can occur in
502: production and decay vertices.
503: For sufficiently narrow slepton
504: widths $\Gamma_{\tilde{l}}$ and degenerate masses, the
505: cross-section can be approximated by
506: \begin{eqnarray}
507: \sigma^{\rm pair}_{i \neq j}\propto
508: \frac{|(\delta{m}_L)^2_{ij}|^2}{
509: \tilde{m}^2 \Gamma_{\tilde{l}}^2} \;
510: \sigma(e^+ e^-\to \tilde{l}^+_j \,
511: \tilde{l}^-_i)
512: Br(\tilde{l}^+_j \to l^+_j \, \tilde{\chi}_0)
513: Br(\tilde{l}^-_i \to l^-_i\, \tilde{\chi}_0)
514: \label{full_M_squared}.
515: \end{eqnarray}
516: where \(\sigma(e^+e^-\to \tilde{l}^+_j \,
517: \tilde{l}^-_i)\) can be replaced by the
518: flavor-diagonal cross-section for slepton pair production. The flavor change
519: is described by the factor in front of the r.h.s. of (\ref{full_M_squared})
520: resulting in a single mass insertion.
521:
522: In the following numerical study we have not assumed
523: slepton degeneracy
524: and have summed the amplitudes
525: for the complete \(2 \to 4\) processes
526: coherently over the intermediate
527: slepton mass eigenstates.
528:
529: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
530:
531: \section{Numerical Results}
532:
533:
534: %---------------
535: \begin{figure}[t!]
536: \begin{center}
537: \setlength{\unitlength}{1cm}
538: %\begin{minipage}[t!]{7.5cm}
539: \includegraphics[clip,scale=0.65]{low_prime.eps}
540: \end{center}
541: \caption{Branching ratio of \(\tau \rightarrow \mu\gamma\) (upper band)
542: and \(\mu \rightarrow e\gamma\) (lower band) in the mSUGRA scenario B'.}
543: \label{fig:emu_hier_fut}
544: %\end{minipage}\hfill
545: \end{figure}
546: %------------
547: \begin{figure}[!t]
548: \begin{center}
549: \setlength{\unitlength}{1cm}
550: %\begin{minipage}{7.5cm}
551: \includegraphics[clip,scale=0.65]{ep500_prime.eps}
552: \end{center}
553: \caption{Cross-sections for \(e^+e^- \to \mu^+ e^- +2\tilde\chi_1^0\)
554: (upper band) and
555: \(e^+e^- \to \tau^+ \mu^- +2\tilde\chi_1^0\) (lower band) at
556: \(\sqrt{s}=500\) GeV
557: for the mSUGRA scenario B'.
558: \label{fig:ep}}
559: %\end{minipage}\hfill
560: \end{figure}
561: %-----------
562:
563:
564:
565: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
566: Fig.~\ref{fig:emu_hier_fut} illustrates
567: the dependence of \(Br(\mu\rightarrow e\gamma)\)
568: and \(Br(\tau\rightarrow \mu\gamma)\) on the Majorana mass \(M_R\).
569: The spread of the predictions reflects the uncertainties in the neutrino
570: data. The update of neutrino and SUSY parameters leads to only a slight
571: decrease of \(Br(\mu \to e \gamma)\) as compared to the previous results
572: published in \cite{Deppisch:2002vz}.
573: One sees that
574: a branching ratio in the range
575: between the present bound and the sensitivity limit of
576: the new PSI experiment, that is
577: \(10^{-11}
578: \mathrel{\vcenter{\hbox{$>$}\nointerlineskip\hbox{$\sim$}}}
579: Br(\mu \to e \gamma)
580: \mathrel{\vcenter{\hbox{$>$}\nointerlineskip\hbox{$\sim$}}} 10^{-13}\),
581: would point at a value of
582: $M_R$ between $5\cdot 10^{12}$~GeV and $5 \cdot 10^{14}$~GeV.
583: On the other hand,
584: \(Br(\tau \to \mu \gamma)\) is more strongly affected by
585: the smaller value of $m_0$ in the new benchmark models
586: \cite{Battaglia:2003ab}, resulting in a
587: reduction by a factor
588: of about 5 as compared to the results in \cite{Deppisch:2002vz}.
589: Even if \(Br(\tau\to\mu\gamma)=10^{-8}\) is reached, the goal
590: of SUPERKEKB and LHC \cite{superkekb},
591: one would only probe $M_R
592: \mathrel{\vcenter{\hbox{$>$}\nointerlineskip\hbox{$\sim$}}}
593: 10^{15}$~GeV
594: \cite{Deppisch:2002vz}. Nevertheless it is interesting to note
595: that $\tau \to \mu \gamma$ is much less
596: affected by the neutrino uncertainties than $\mu \to e \gamma$.
597:
598:
599: %-----------
600: \begin{figure}[!t]
601: \begin{center}
602: %\begin{minipage}{7.5cm}
603: \includegraphics[clip,scale=0.65]{ep_highlow_prime.eps}
604: \end{center}
605: \caption{Correlation between \(Br(\mu\to e\gamma)\) and
606: \(\sigma(e^+e^- \to \mu^+ e^- +
607: 2\tilde\chi_1^0)\) at \(\sqrt{s}=800\) GeV for the mSUGRA
608: scenarios (from left to right) C', G', B'
609: and I'. \label{fig:emu_lowhigh}}
610: %\end{minipage}
611: \end{figure}
612: %-----------
613: %-----------
614: \begin{figure}[!t]
615: \begin{center}
616: %\begin{minipage}{7.5cm}
617: \includegraphics[clip,scale=0.65]{mutau_highlow_800_prime.eps}
618: \end{center}
619: \caption{Correlation between \(Br(\tau\to \mu\gamma)\) and
620: \(\sigma(e^+e^- \to \tau^+ \mu^- +
621: 2\tilde\chi_1^0)\) at \(\sqrt{s}=800\) GeV for the mSUGRA
622: scenarios (from left to right)
623: C', B', G'
624: and I'. \label{fig:taumu_lowhigh}}
625: %\end{minipage}
626: \end{figure}
627: %-----------
628:
629:
630: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
631: Analogously,
632: Fig.~\ref{fig:ep} shows the \(M_R\) dependence of the
633: cross-sections for
634: \(e^+e^-\rightarrow \mu^+ e^- +2\tilde{\chi}^0_1\) and
635: \(e^+e^-\rightarrow \tau^+ \mu^- +2\tilde{\chi}^0_1\).
636: In this case, the
637: \(\mu e\) channel is enhanced by both the larger $\Delta m_{12}^2$
638: and the smaller $m_0$ in the new parameter set, resulting in a
639: cross-section one order of magnitude larger than what was found in
640: \cite{Deppisch:2003wt}.
641: For the \(\tau \mu\) final state, on the other hand, the effect of the
642: smaller $\Delta m^2_{23}$ is compensated by the enhancement due to
643: the smaller value of $m_0$, so that the net effect is negligible.
644: As can be seen, for a sufficiently large Majorana mass $M_R$
645: the LFV cross-sections can reach several fb.
646: The
647: \(\tau e\) channel is strongly suppressed by the small mixing angle
648: \(\theta_{13}\), and therefore more difficult to observe.
649:
650: %%%%%%%%%%%Background%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
651: The Standard Model background mainly comes from $W$-pair production,
652: $W$ production via $t$-channel photon exchange, and $\tau$-pair production.
653: A 10 degree beam pipe cut and
654: cuts on the lepton energy and missing energy reduce the SM background
655: cross-sections to less than 30~fb for \(\mu e\) final states and less
656: than 10~fb for \(\tau \mu\) final states. If one requires a signal
657: to background ratio $S/\sqrt{S+ B} = 3$,
658: and assumes an integrated luminosity of 1000~fb$^{-1}$,
659: a signal cross-section
660: of 0.1~fb could only afford a background of about 1~fb.
661: Whether or not such a low background can be achieved by applying
662: selectron selection cuts, for example, on the acoplanarity,
663: lepton polar angle and missing transverse momentum has to be studied in a
664: dedicated simulation.
665: For lepton flavor conserving processes one has found
666: that the SM background
667: to slepton pair production can be reduced to about 2-3~fb
668: at $\sqrt{s}=500$~GeV \cite{Becker:1993fw}.
669:
670: The MSSM background is dominated by
671: chargino/slepton production with
672: a total cross-section of
673: 0.2-5~fb and 2-7~fb for \(\mu e \)
674: and \(\tau \mu\) final states,
675: respectively, depending on the SUSY scenario
676: and the collider energy. Here, only the direct processes are accounted for.
677: However,
678: the MSSM
679: background in the $\tau e$ channel can also
680: contribute to the \(\mu e\)
681: channel via the decay $\tau \rightarrow \mu \nu_{\mu} {\nu}_{\tau}$.
682: If $\tilde{\tau}_1$ and $\tilde{\chi}^+_1$ are very light, like in scenarios
683: B'
684: and I', this background can be as large as 20~fb.
685: On the other hand,
686: such events typically contain two neutrinos in addition to the
687: two LSPs which are also present in the signal events. Thus, after $\tau$ decay
688: one has altogether
689: six invisible particles instead of two, which may allow to eliminate also
690: this particularly
691: dangerous MSSM background
692: by cutting on various distributions.
693: But also here this needs to be studied in a careful simulation.
694:
695:
696: Particularly
697: interesting and useful are the
698: correlations between LFV in radiative decays and
699: slepton pair production. Such a correlation is illustrated in
700: Fig.~\ref{fig:emu_lowhigh} for
701: \(e^+e^-\rightarrow \mu^+ e^- +2\tilde{\chi}_1^0\)
702: and \(Br(\mu\to e \gamma)\).
703: One sees that the neutrino uncertainties
704: drop out,
705: while the sensitivity to the mSUGRA parameters remains.
706: Furthermore, while models C', G' and I' are barely affected by the
707: change in the new parameter set as compared to the set used in
708: \cite{Deppisch:2003wt},
709: in model B' \(\sigma(e^+e^-\rightarrow \mu^+ e^- +2\tilde{\chi}_1^0)\)
710: for a given \(Br(\mu \to e \gamma)\)
711: is by a factor
712: 10 larger than in the previous benchmark point B.
713: An observation of $\mu \to e \gamma$ with a branching ratio
714: smaller than $10^{-11}$ would thus be compatible
715: with a cross-section as large as 1~fb for
716: $e^+e^- \to \sum_{b,a}\tilde{l}_b^+\tilde{l}^-_a\to
717: \mu^+ e^- +2\tilde{\chi}^0_1$, at least in model C', G' and B'.
718: On the other hand, no signal at the
719: future PSI sensitivity of $10^{-13}$
720: would constrain this channel to less than 0.1~fb.
721: The correlation of \(Br(\tau \to \mu \gamma)\) and
722: \(\sigma(e^+e^-\rightarrow \tau^+ \mu^- +2\tilde{\chi}_1^0)\)
723: is shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:taumu_lowhigh}.
724: \(Br(\tau \to \mu \gamma)<3 \cdot 10^{-7}\) does not rule out cross-sections
725: in the $\tau\mu$ channel of 1~fb and larger.
726: However, one has to keep in mind that these correlations
727: depend very much on the SUSY scenario.
728:
729:
730: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
731: \section{Conclusions}
732: SUSY seesaw models leading to the observed
733: neutrino masses and mixings
734: can be tested by lepton-flavor violating
735: processes involving charged leptons.
736: We have presented an updated analysis of the prospects for
737: radiative rare decays
738: $l_{i}\rightarrow l_{j}\gamma$ and slepton pair production and decay
739: \(e^+e^-\rightarrow \tilde{l}_b^+ \tilde{l}^-_a \rightarrow
740: l^+_j l^-_i + /\!\!\!\!E\).
741: Assuming the most recent
742: global fits to neutrino oscillation experiments \cite{Maltoni:2003da}
743: we have illustrated the impact of the uncertainties in the
744: neutrino parameters.
745: Furthermore, using post-WMAP mSUGRA scenarios \cite{Battaglia:2003ab}
746: we have investigated the
747: dependence of LFV signals
748: on the mSUGRA parameters.
749: For scenario B' our results can be summarized as follows.
750: A measurement
751: of
752: $Br(\mu\rightarrow e\gamma)\approx
753: 10^{-13}$
754: would probe $M_{R}$ in the range $5 \cdot 10^{12}\div
755: 5 \cdot 10^{13}$~GeV, while
756: a measurement of $Br(\tau\rightarrow \mu\gamma)
757: \approx 10^{-8}$
758: would allow to determine \(M_R \simeq 10^{15}\)~GeV
759: within a factor of
760: 2.
761: Furthermore,
762: \(Br(\mu\rightarrow e \gamma)=10^{-13} \div 10^{-11}\)
763: implies
764: \(\sigma(e^+e^-\to \mu^+ e^- +2\tilde{\chi}_1^0)=0.02\div 2\)~fb
765: at $\sqrt{s}=800$~GeV, while
766: \(Br(\tau\rightarrow \mu \gamma)=10^{-8} \div 3 \cdot 10^{-7}\)
767: predicts
768: \(\sigma(e^+e^-\to \tau^+ \mu^- +2\tilde{\chi}_1^0)=1\div 10\)~fb, again
769: at $\sqrt{s}=800$~GeV.
770: Hence, linear collider searches are nicely complementary to searches for
771: rare decays at low energies and at the LHC.
772:
773: %Finally, the change in the input parameters relative to
774: %\cite{Battaglia:2001zp}, tends to improve the prospects of searches for LFV
775: %at a future linear collider.
776:
777: \section*{Acknowledgements}
778: This work was supported by the Bundesministerium f\"ur Bildung und
779: Forschung (BMBF, Bonn, Germany) under
780: the contract number 05HT4WWA2.
781:
782: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
783:
784: \bibitem{petcov}
785: %\cite{Petcov:1976ff}
786: %\bibitem{Petcov:1976ff}
787: S.~T.~Petcov,
788: %``The Processes Mu $\to$ E Gamma, Mu $\to$ E E Anti-E, Neutrino' $\to$
789: %Neutrino Gamma In The Weinberg-Salam Model With Neutrino Mixing,''
790: Sov.\ J.\ Nucl.\ Phys.\ {\bf 25}, 340 (1977)
791: [Yad.\ Fiz.\ {\bf 25}, 641 (1977\ ERRAT,25,698.1977\ ERRAT,25,1336.1977)].
792: %%CITATION = SJNCA,25,340;%%
793: %\cite{Bilenkii:1977du}
794: S.~M.~Bilenkii, S.~T.~Petcov and B.~Pontecorvo,
795: %``Lepton mixing, mu --> e + gamma decay and neutrino oscillations,''
796: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 67}, 309 (1977).
797: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B67,309;%%
798:
799: %\cite{Borzumati:1986qx}
800: \bibitem{Borzumati:1986qx}
801: F.~Borzumati and A.~Masiero,
802: %``Large Muon And Electron Number Violations In Supergravity Theories,''
803: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 57}, 961 (1986).
804: %%CITATION = PRLTA,57,961;%%
805:
806: \bibitem{rare}
807: %\cite{Hisano:1996cp}
808: %\bibitem{Hisano:1996cp}
809: J.~Hisano, T.~Moroi, K.~Tobe and M.~Yamaguchi,
810: %``Lepton-Flavor Violation via Right-Handed Neutrino Yukawa Couplings in Supersymmetric Standard Model,''
811: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 53}, 2442 (1996)
812: [arXiv:hep-ph/9510309].
813: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9510309;%%
814: %\bibitem{topdown}
815: R.~Barbieri, L.~Hall and A.~Strumia,
816: %``Violations of lepton flavor and CP in supersymmetric unified theories,''
817: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 445}, 219 (1995);
818: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9501334;%%
819: %\cite{Leontaris:1998ue}
820: G.~K.~Leontaris and N.~D.~Tracas,
821: %``Lepton flavour violation in unified models with U(1)-family symmetries,''
822: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 431}, 90 (1998);
823: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9803320;%%
824: %\cite{Buchmuller:1999gd}
825: W.~Buchmuller, D.~Delepine and F.~Vissani,
826: %``Neutrino mixing and the pattern of supersymmetry breaking,''
827: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 459}, 171 (1999);
828: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9904219;%%
829: %\cite{Gomez:1999wj}
830: M.~E.~Gomez, G.~K.~Leontaris, S.~Lola and J.~D.~Vergados,
831: %``U(1)-textures and lepton flavor violation,''
832: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 59}, 116009 (1999);
833: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9810291;%%
834: %\cite{King:1999nv}
835: S.~F.~King and M.~Oliveira,
836: %``Lepton flavor violation in string inspired models,''
837: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 60}, 035003 (1999);
838: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9804283;%%
839: %\cite{Buchmuller:2000yg}
840: W.~Buchmuller, D.~Delepine and L.~T.~Handoko,
841: %``Neutrino mixing and flavor changing processes,''
842: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 576}, 445 (2000);
843: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9912317;%%
844: %\cite{Ellis:2000uq}
845: J.~Ellis, M.~E.~Gomez, G.~K.~Leontaris, S.~Lola and D.~V.~Nanopoulos,
846: %``Charged lepton flavour violation in the light of the Super-Kamiokande data,''
847: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 14}, 319 (2000);
848: %\cite{Feng:2000wt}
849: J.~L.~Feng, Y.~Nir and Y.~Shadmi,
850: %``Neutrino parameters, Abelian flavor symmetries, and charged lepton flavor violation,''
851: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 61}, 113005 (2000);
852: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9911370;%%
853: %\cite{Sato:2000ff}
854: J.~Sato and K.~Tobe,
855: %``Neutrino masses and lepton-flavor violation in supersymmetric models with lopsided Froggatt-Nielsen charges,''
856: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 63}, 116010 (2001);
857: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0012333;%%
858: %\cite{Carvalho:2000xg}
859: D.~F.~Carvalho, M.~E.~Gomez and S.~Khalil,
860: %``Lepton-flavor violation with non-universal soft terms,''
861: JHEP {\bf 0107}, 001 (2001).
862: %\bibitem{bottomup}
863: %\cite{Sato:2001zh}
864: J.~Sato, K.~Tobe and T.~Yanagida,
865: %``A constraint on Yukawa-coupling unification from lepton-flavor violating processes,''
866: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 498}, 189 (2001);
867: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0010348;%%;
868: %\cite{Davidson:2001zk}
869: S.~Davidson and A.~Ibarra,
870: %``Determining see-saw parameters from weak scale measurements?,''
871: JHEP {\bf 0109}, 013 (2001).
872: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0104076;%%
873: %\bibitem{other}
874: %\cite{Ciafaloni:1996ad}
875: P.~Ciafaloni, A.~Romanino and A.~Strumia,
876: %``Lepton flavor violations in SO(10) with large tan beta,''
877: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 458}, 3 (1996);
878: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9507379;%%
879: %\cite{Hisano:1997qq}
880: J.~Hisano, T.~Moroi, K.~Tobe and M.~Yamaguchi,
881: %``Exact event rates of lepton flavor violating processes in supersymmetric SU(5) model,''
882: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 391}, 341 (1997);
883: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9605296;%%
884: %\cite{Hisano:1998cx}
885: J.~Hisano, D.~Nomura, Y.~Okada, Y.~Shimizu and M.~Tanaka,
886: %``Enhancement of mu --> e gamma in the supersymmetric SU(5) GUT at large tan(beta),''
887: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 58}, 116010 (1998);
888: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9805367;%%
889: %\cite{Hisano:1998tc}
890: J.~Hisano, D.~Nomura and T.~Yanagida,
891: %``Atmospheric neutrino oscillation and large lepton flavour violation in the SUSY SU(5) GUT,''
892: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 437}, 351 (1998);
893: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9711348;%%
894: %\cite{Baek:2001kh}
895: S.~W.~Baek, N.~G.~Deshpande, X.~G.~He and P.~Ko,
896: %``Muon anomalous g-2 and gauged L(mu) - L(tau) models,''
897: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 64}, 055006 (2001);
898: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0104141;%%
899: %\cite{Barenboim:2001ev}
900: G.~Barenboim, K.~Huitu and M.~Raidal,
901: %``Flavour violation in SUSY SU(5) GUT at large tan(beta),''
902: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 63}, 055006 (2001);
903: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0005159;%%
904: %\cite{Bi:2001tb}
905: X.~J.~Bi and Y.~B.~Dai;
906: %``Lepton flavor violation and its constraints on the neutrino mass models,''
907: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0112077;%%
908: %\cite{Lavignac:2001vp}
909: S.~Lavignac, I.~Masina and C.~A.~Savoy,
910: %``tau $\to$ mu gamma and mu $\to$ e gamma as probes of neutrino mass models,''
911: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 520}, 269 (2001).
912: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0106245;%%
913: %\cite{Kageyama:2001tn}
914: %\bibitem{Kageyama:2001tn}
915: A.~Kageyama, S.~Kaneko, N.~Shimoyama and M.~Tanimoto,
916: %``Lepton flavor violating processes in bi-maximal texture of neutrino mixings,''
917: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 65} 096010 (2002)
918: [arXiv:hep-ph/0112359];
919: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0112359;%%
920: %\cite{Babu:2002tb}
921: %\bibitem{Babu:2002tb}
922: K.~S.~Babu, B.~Dutta and R.~N.~Mohapatra,
923: %``Lepton flavor violation and the origin of the seesaw mechanism,''
924: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 67}, 076006 (2003)
925: [arXiv:hep-ph/0211068];
926: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0211068;%%
927: %\cite{Dutta:2003ps}
928: %\bibitem{Dutta:2003ps}
929: B.~Dutta and R.~N.~Mohapatra,
930: %``Lepton flavor violation and neutrino mixings in a 3 x 2 seesaw model,''
931: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 68}, 056006 (2003)
932: [arXiv:hep-ph/0305059].
933: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0305059;%%
934:
935:
936:
937: %\cite{Casas:2001sr}
938: \bibitem{Casas:2001sr}
939: J.~A.~Casas and A.~Ibarra,
940: %``Oscillating neutrinos and mu $\to$ e, gamma,''
941: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 618}, 171 (2001)
942: [arXiv:hep-ph/0103065].
943: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0103065;%%
944:
945: %\cite{Hisano:1999fj}
946: \bibitem{Hisano:1999fj}
947: J.~Hisano and D.~Nomura,
948: %``Solar and atmospheric neutrino oscillations and lepton flavor violation in supersymmetric models with the right-handed neutrinos,''
949: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 59}, 116005 (1999)
950: [arXiv:hep-ph/9810479].
951: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9810479;%%
952:
953:
954: %\cite{Arkani-Hamed:1996au}
955: \bibitem{coll}
956: N.~Arkani-Hamed, H.~C.~Cheng, J.~L.~Feng and L.~J.~Hall,
957: %``Probing Lepton Flavor Violation at Future Colliders,''
958: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 77}, 1937 (1996)
959: [arXiv:hep-ph/9603431];
960: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9603431;%%
961: %\cite{Arkani-Hamed:1997km}
962: %\bibitem{Arkani-Hamed:1997km}
963: N.~Arkani-Hamed, J.~L.~Feng, L.~J.~Hall and H.~C.~Cheng,
964: %``CP violation from slepton oscillations at the LHC and NLC,''
965: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 505}, 3 (1997)
966: [arXiv:hep-ph/9704205];
967: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9704205;%%
968: %\cite{Cheng:1997nd}
969: %\bibitem{Cheng:1997nd}
970: H.~C.~Cheng,
971: %``Flavor and CP violations from sleptons at the muon collider,''
972: arXiv:hep-ph/9712427;
973: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9712427;%%
974: %\cite{Hirouchi:1997cy}
975: %\bibitem{Hirouchi:1997cy}
976: M.~Hirouchi and M.~Tanaka,
977: %``Lepton flavor violation at linear collider experiments in supersymmetric grand unified theories,''
978: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 58}, 032004 (1998)
979: [arXiv:hep-ph/9712532];
980: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9712532;%%
981: %\cite{Feng:1998ud}
982: %\bibitem{Feng:1998ud}
983: J.~L.~Feng,
984: %``Supersymmetry at linear colliders: The importance of being e- e-,''
985: Int.\ J.\ Mod.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 13}, 2319 (1998)
986: [arXiv:hep-ph/9803319];
987: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9803319;%%
988: %
989: %\cite{Hisano:1998wn}
990: %\bibitem{Hisano:1998wn}
991: J.~Hisano, M.~M.~Nojiri, Y.~Shimizu and M.~Tanaka,
992: %``Lepton flavor violation in the left-handed slepton production at future lepton colliders,''
993: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 60}, 055008 (1999)
994: [arXiv:hep-ph/9808410];
995: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9808410;%%
996: %
997: %\cite{Nomura:2000zb}
998: %\bibitem{Nomura:2000zb}
999: D.~Nomura,
1000: %``Probing left-handed slepton flavor mixing at future lepton colliders,''
1001: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 64}, 075001 (2001)
1002: [arXiv:hep-ph/0004256];
1003: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0004256;%%
1004: %\cite{Dine:2001cf}
1005: %\bibitem{Dine:2001cf}
1006: M.~Dine, Y.~Grossman and S.~Thomas,
1007: %``Slepton flavor physics at linear colliders,''
1008: eConf {\bf C010630}, P332 (2001)
1009: [Int.\ J.\ Mod.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 18}, 2757 (2003)]
1010: [arXiv:hep-ph/0111154].
1011: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0111154;%%
1012: %\bibitem{ACFH205}
1013: N.~Arkani-Hamed, J.~L.~Feng, L.~J.~Hall and H.~Cheng,
1014: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 505} (1997) 3
1015: [hep-ph/9704205].
1016: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9704205;%%
1017: %\bibitem{nojiri}
1018: J.~Hisano, M.~M.~Nojiri, Y.~Shimizu and M.~Tanaka,
1019: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 60} (1999) 055008
1020: [hep-ph/9808410].
1021: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9808410;%%
1022: %\bibitem{GKR}
1023: M.~Guchait, J.~Kalinowski and P.~Roy,
1024: %``Supersymmetric lepton flavor violation in a linear collider: The
1025: %role of charginos,''
1026: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 21} (2001) 163
1027: [arXiv:hep-ph/0103161].
1028: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0103161;%%
1029: %\bibitem{PM} W.~Porod and W.~Majerotto,
1030: %``Large lepton flavor violating signals in supersymmetric particle
1031: %decays at future e+ e- colliders,''
1032: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 66} (2002) 015003
1033: [arXiv:hep-ph/0201284].
1034: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0201284;%%
1035: %\bibitem{jk01} J.~Kalinowski,
1036: %``Supersymmetric Lepton Flavor Violation At E+ E- Linear Colliders,''
1037: Acta Phys.\ Polon.\ B {\bf 32} (2001) 3755.
1038: %%CITATION = APPOA,B32,3755;%%
1039: %\bibitem{jk02} J.~Kalinowski,
1040: %``Slepton flavour violation at colliders,''
1041: Acta Phys.\ Polon.\ B {\bf 33} (2002) 2613
1042: [arXiv:hep-ph/0207051].
1043: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0207051;%%
1044: %%\cite{Carvalho:2001ex}
1045: %\bibitem{Carvalho:2001ex}
1046: %D.~F.~Carvalho, J.~R.~Ellis, M.~E.~Gomez and S.~Lola,
1047: %%``Charged-lepton-flavour violation in the CMSSM in view of the muon anomalous magnetic moment,''
1048: %Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 515}, 323 (2001)
1049: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0103256].
1050: %%%CITATION = HEP-PH 0103256;%%
1051: %\cite{Cao:1998kh}
1052: %\bibitem{Cao:1998kh}
1053: J.~J.~Cao, T.~Han, X.~Zhang and G.~R.~Lu,
1054: %``Slepton oscillation at e gamma colliders,''
1055: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 59}, 095001 (1999)
1056: [arXiv:hep-ph/9808466].
1057: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9808466;%%
1058: %\cite{Cao:2003zv}
1059: %\bibitem{Cao:2003zv}
1060: J.~Cao, Z.~Xiong and J.~M.~Yang,
1061: %``Lepton flavor violating Z decays in supersymmetric see-saw model,''
1062: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 32}, 245 (2004)
1063: [arXiv:hep-ph/0307126].
1064: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0307126;%%
1065: %\cite{Cannoni:2003my}
1066: %\bibitem{Cannoni:2003my}
1067: M.~Cannoni, S.~Kolb and O.~Panella,
1068: %``Lepton flavour violation in e+- e- $\to$ l+- e- (l = mu, tau) induced by
1069: %R-conserving supersymmetry,''
1070: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 68}, 096002 (2003)
1071: [arXiv:hep-ph/0306170].
1072: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0306170;%%
1073:
1074: %\cite{Deppisch:2002vz}
1075: \bibitem{Deppisch:2002vz}
1076: F.~Deppisch, H.~P\"as, A.~Redelbach, R.~Ruckl and Y.~Shimizu,
1077: %``Probing the Majorana mass scale of right-handed neutrinos in mSUGRA,''
1078: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 28}, 365 (2003)
1079: [arXiv:hep-ph/0206122].
1080: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0206122;%%
1081:
1082: \bibitem{Deppisch:2003wt}
1083: F.~Deppisch, H.~P\"as, A.~Redelbach, R.~R\"uckl and Y.~Shimizu,
1084: %``The SUSY seesaw model and lepton-flavor violation at a future
1085: %electron positron linear collider,''
1086: accepted for publication in Phys. Rev. D,
1087: arXiv:hep-ph/0310053.
1088: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0310053;%%
1089:
1090:
1091: \bibitem{murayama}
1092: Homepage Hitoshi Murayama,
1093: http://hitoshi.berkeley.edu/neutrino/.
1094:
1095: %\cite{Maltoni:2003da}
1096: \bibitem{Maltoni:2003da}
1097: M.~Maltoni, T.~Schwetz, M.~A.~Tortola and J.~W.~F.~Valle,
1098: %``Status of three-neutrino oscillations after the SNO-salt data,''
1099: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 68}, 113010 (2003)
1100: [arXiv:hep-ph/0309130].
1101: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0309130;%%
1102:
1103:
1104: %\cite{Battaglia:2003ab}
1105: \bibitem{Battaglia:2003ab}
1106: M.~Battaglia, A.~De Roeck, J.~R.~Ellis, F.~Gianotti, K.~A.~Olive and L.~Pape,
1107: %``Updated post-WMAP benchmarks for supersymmetry,''
1108: arXiv:hep-ph/0306219.
1109: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0306219;%%
1110:
1111: %\cite{Battaglia:2001zp}
1112: \bibitem{Battaglia:2001zp}
1113: M.~Battaglia {\it et al.},
1114: %``Proposed post-LEP benchmarks for supersymmetry,''
1115: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 22} (2001) 535
1116: [arXiv:hep-ph/0106204].
1117: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0106204;%%
1118:
1119:
1120: \bibitem{superkekb}
1121: L. Serin and R. Stroynowski, ATLAS Internal Note (1997);
1122: T. Ohshima, talk at the 3rd Workshop on Neutrino Oscillations and their
1123: Origin (NOON2001), 2001, ICRR, Univ. of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Japan;
1124: D. Denegri, private communication.
1125:
1126: %\cite{Becker:1993fw}
1127: \bibitem{Becker:1993fw}
1128: R.~Becker and C.~Vander Velde,
1129: %``Aspects of scalar lepton search,''
1130: IIHE-93-08
1131: %\href{http://www.slac.stanford.edu/spires/find/hep/www?r=iihe-93-08}{SPIRES
1132: %entry}
1133: {\it Prepared for Working Group on e+ e- Collisions at 500-GeV: The
1134: Physics Potential, Munich, Germany, 20 Nov 1992}.
1135:
1136: \end{thebibliography}
1137:
1138:
1139:
1140: \end{document}
1141:
1142:
1143: