1: \documentclass[prd,aps,floats,tabularx,preprintnumbers,twocolumn]{revtex4}
2: \usepackage{graphicx, epsfig}
3:
4: \textwidth 170mm
5: \textheight240mm
6: \oddsidemargin -1.2mm
7: \evensidemargin 5mm
8: \topmargin -48pt
9:
10: \begin{document}
11:
12: \baselineskip 12 pt
13:
14: \title{Does the Low CMB Quadrupole Provide a New Cosmic Coincidence
15: Problem ?}
16:
17: \author{ Alessandro Melchiorri$^*$, Laura Mersini-Houghton$^\ast$}
18:
19: \affiliation
20: {$^\ast$ Department of Physics and Astronomy, UNC-Chapel Hill, CB 3255 Phillips Hall, Chapel hill, NC 25599-3255, USA\\
21: $^*$ Physics Department and INFN, University of Rome
22: ``La Sapienza'', Ple Aldo Moro 2, 00185, Rome, Italy\\}
23:
24: \begin{abstract}
25: We point out that the recent WMAP findings of a suppressed large scale
26: power in the Cosmic Microwave Background anisotropy power spectrum, if of cosmological
27: origin, make the case for a new cosmic coincidence problem.The observed suppression of anisotropies at large angles requires an explanation for why this suppression is occuring {\it only} for perturbation wavelengths of the order
28: of our present Hubble horizon. This is a very challenging task since a consistent model for the emerging picture of the universe has to address both cosmic coincidences and thus may reveal a deeper
29: inter-relation with the dark energy problem.
30: \end{abstract}
31:
32: \maketitle
33:
34:
35:
36: Recent developments in precision cosmology have presented theoretical
37: physicists with a tantalizing picture of the universe. By a combination of
38: all data, there is indisputable evidence that our universe is
39: accelerating\cite{spergel}. This means that about $70\%$ of the energy
40: density in the universe is made up by a mysterious component,
41: coined dark energy, with an equation of state $-1.38 \leq w_X \leq -0.82$
42: at $95\%$ confidence level (see e.g. \cite{melchiorri}).
43:
44: Cosmic microwave background (CMB) measurements have provided valuable data that have proven a powerful tool
45: in lending support to a concordance $\Lambda CDM$ picture in cosmology. Nevertheless
46: we still lack an understanding of the origin and nature of DE and dark
47: matter which together make for about $95\%$ of the energy density in the
48: universe's budget.
49:
50: It is well known that the dark energy (DE) mystery is a notoriously difficult problem,
51: mainly due to the following two fundamental questions which need to be addressed simultaneously:
52: why is DE magnitude $\rho_{X} \simeq 10^{-122} M_P^4$, 122 orders less than the
53: expected value $M_P^4$. This is known as the fine-tuning problem; why is DE domination
54: over matter energy density in driving the expansion of the universe occurring around redshifts
55: $z\simeq 0-1$ i.e at scales of the order the present value of the Hubble radius $H_0 \simeq
56: 10^{-33} eV$. The latter is known as the coincidence problem of DE\cite{desean} and
57: hereafter we refer to it as {\it the first cosmic coincidence}.
58:
59: In this work we discuss the possibility that the CMB data accumulated recently, reveals a
60: {\it second cosmic coincidence} stemming from the suppressed perturbation modes
61: crossing the horizon only recently, and at the same energy scale as the DE coincidence.
62: The recent results from the WMAP satellite experiment on the Cosmic Microwave Background
63: anisotropy power spectrum have been an extraordinary success for the standard model
64: of structure formation based on dark matter, inflation and dark energy (see e.g.
65: \cite{wmap}). These results have not only confirmed (with a sensible reduction of the
66: error bars!) the previous cosmological picture as defined by several ground-based
67: and balloon-borne experiments (see e.g. \cite{netterfield}) but also presented
68: indications for several intriguing discrepancies.
69: Between the most surprising findings, WMAP measured a
70: suppression of power at large angles, (low multipoles $l$), for
71: temperature auto-correlations $C_l^{TT}$ in the CMB anisotropy spectrum\cite{wmap}.
72: The indication for a quadrupole suppression was already reported a decade ago by the $COBE/DMR$
73: experiment but with much lower signal-to-noise and frequency coverage.
74: The higher frequency coverage of the WMAP experiment has, for example, excluded an
75: explanation of the effect as a systematic related to known galactic foregrounds.
76:
77: Moreover, recent analysis \cite{costa} of the WMAP maps
78: have reported that the cosmic quadrupole ($l=2$) on its
79: own is anomalous at the $1$-in-$20$ level by being low, the cosmic octopole ($l=3$)
80: on its own is anomalous at the $1$-in-$20$ level by being very planar and that the
81: alignment between the quadrupole and octopole is anomalous at the $1$-in-$60$ level.
82: While the large scale temperature power spectrum clearly shows
83: discrepancies, other large scale CMB measurements are providing interesting clues.
84: For example, the measured level of large angle cross temperature-polarization
85: $C_l^{TE}$ is higher than what expected in the most common scenario of
86: reionized intergalactic medium (see e.g. \cite{kogut}).
87: Furthermore, recent works \cite{nongaus} have presented evidence for large scale
88: non gaussian-signals in the WMAP maps which again, if of cosmological origin,
89: would present a problem for the standard scenario.
90:
91:
92: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%5555
93:
94: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%555
95:
96:
97: \begin{figure}[thb]
98: \begin{center}
99: \includegraphics[scale=0.4]{mog.eps}
100: \end{center}
101: \caption{The CMB power spectra from the 1st year WMAP data release for
102: temperature (top panel) and cross temperature-polarization
103: (bottom panel) compared with the expectations of a standard $\Lambda$-CDM
104: model. The lack of power at large scales (small $\ell$)
105: in the temperature maps can be interpreted as a signature for new physics.
106: The high power at large scale in the $TE$ spectrum is in tension with
107: the expected values (based on numerical simulations) of $\tau \sim 0.05-0.10$.It might suggest an higher
108: value for the optical depth of the universe ($\tau \sim 0.2$)}
109: \label{mmog}
110: \end{figure}
111:
112:
113: These findings cannot be considered as conclusive evidence yet because of the
114: limitations set by cosmic variance or by possible systematics
115: (see e.g. \cite{efstathiou}). Statistical ``flukes'' are indeed present
116: at several multipoles. Furthermore, the correlations with the local
117: dipole and ecliptic may suggest presence of systematics due, for example,
118: to unknown foregrounds or present during the in-flight dipole calibration
119: (see e.g. \cite{schwarz}).
120:
121: However they are intriguing enough to
122: motivate further effort in circumventing cosmic variance. This can be
123: achieved by means of complimentary data like cosmic shear from weak
124: lensing\cite{shear} and cross-correlations with the polarization
125: spectra that are lending support to $WMAP$ findings, (see e.g. \cite{cross}, \cite{cosmicvar}).
126:
127: Thus, taking the origin of the large scale CMB suppression as cosmological,
128: presents a new cosmic coincidence because it requires that we address two questions with
129: respect to the observed suppression of low 'l' CMB modes: 1) Why are these modes suppressed and,
130: 2) Why is the suppression
131: occuring only for perturbation wavelengths of the order of our present Hubble horizon
132: $\lambda_0 \simeq H_0^{-1} \simeq 10^4 Mpc, k_0\simeq H_0\simeq 10^{-33}eV $.
133: Analogous with the DE issues, let us refer to the first puzzle as the low 'l' tuning problem of
134: CMB and to the second puzzle as the cosmic coincidence of CMB.
135: (Notice that by tracing the CMB modes back in time the suppression of anisotropies at
136: large angular scales may introduce a tuning in the number of inflationary efodings by
137: imposing a cuttoff in their maximum number, \cite{linde}.
138: This motivates the name 'tuning' for the first CMB puzzle).
139:
140: A lot of effort has recently been focused in trying to address the first puzzle namely, to
141: explain the reason why the CMB low 'l' modes are suppressed. But the second question about the
142: observed CMB suppression at low ' l' namely, the {\it 'why now'} puzzle, which reveals a new
143: cosmic coincidence in our present universe, has not been investigated until now.
144: The fact that we have both cosmic coincidences, DE and CMB occuring at the same energy scale
145: remains also to be addressed. Finding a mechanism that would suppress the large scale modes
146: is not enough because, for a consistent picture of the present universe, we also have
147: to address why the suppression occurs at the DE scale, $H_0 \simeq 10^{-33} eV$.
148:
149: It is reasonable to expect that both phenomena may originate from processes
150: occurring in the very early universe, despite that these coincidences associated with the
151: two currently observed phenomena namely, DE domination and CMB power suppression at
152: present-horizon sized wavelengths,
153: are dominantly displayed at low energies, for the following reasons:
154: Recall that in an inflationary universe perturbations produced near the end of inflation
155: leave the horizon whenever their wavelength becomes larger than
156: the inflationary horizon $H_i$ due to 'superluminal' propagation. These
157: modes re-enter the horizon at later times when the Hubble parameter once
158: again becomes equal to their wavelength. This is known as the horizon crossing
159: condition $k = a(t) H(t)$. Thus the largest wavelengths are the first ones
160: to leave the horizon and the last ones to re-enter. Modes currently
161: re-entering $k_0 =a_0 H_0$ have wavelengths horizon size,which means they
162: have been outside of the Hubble horizon for most of the history of the universe.
163: Thus they have not been contaminated by the internal evolution and
164: nonlinearities of the cosmic fluid inside the Hubble radius. These modes
165: carry the pristine information of the unknown physics which sets the Initial
166: Conditions of the universe\cite{katie}.
167:
168:
169: The possibility of a late-time effect that DE may have on the suppression of
170: large angle anisotropies still remains open\cite{alesilklm} although it does not
171: look like a promising direction at the moment . So far there has been no succesful
172: attempt that can accomodate and relate both
173: coincidences within the framework of low energy or late time physics.
174: Perhaps this is because, based on the inflationary paradigm, we expect a vacuum energy
175: component to enhance power of long wavelengths due to the integrated Sachs Wolfe effect (ISW).
176:
177:
178:
179: What kind of physics could give rise to a consistent picture ? Two coincidences in our present universe can not be accidental.Perhaps this bizarre picture of the present universe emerging from precision cosmology is providing clues of new physics.
180: String theory and quantum gravity are possible candidates of the unknown
181: physics of the early universe. There are current models in literature that
182: offer an explanation for the CMB power suppression, by having the
183: Initial Conditions set within the framework
184: of string theory\cite{katie,dvali}, loop quantum
185: gravity\cite{marteens}, or an unknown hard cutof\cite{linde}.
186: However none of these models can address the issue as to why the suppresion of anisotropies
187: in the visible spectrum should occur at exactly {\it only} those wavelengths of order our present Hubble
188: radius and not for any other modes that crossed the horizon earlier,
189: (shorter wavelengths), although we have an infinite range of shorter wavelength modes.
190:
191: There is also an ongoing search for a possible $UV/IR$
192: mixing of gravitational scales\cite{banks}. The motivation comes from the fact that both
193: observed cosmic coincidences occurring at present low energy scales, namely the DE coincidence
194: and CMB coincidence, independently suggest constraints imposed on the number of efoldings,
195: (about $60 efoldings$ for GUT scale inflation), during the early times when the universe underwent
196: an inflationary episode \cite{banks,katie}. However a theoretical model that can successfully
197: accommodate all observed cosmic coincidences around the scale $H_0 \simeq 10^{-33}eV$ is yet
198: to be found.
199:
200:
201: A single solution to the DE and low CMB quadrupole problems will have to address both
202: cosmic coincidences and also reveal a deeper inter -relation between the two, a very challenging task.
203:
204: It is worth mentioning that recent works have presented evidence for correlations between the large-scale WMAP
205: data and radio sources distributions \cite{nolta} which certainly provide hints that the suppressed
206: power may be connected to the recent DE domination.
207:
208:
209:
210: An important implication of having two cosmic coincidences at the same scale is the possibility that this energy scale is
211: {\it special}, possibly indicating that our present Hubble
212: parameter may turn out to be a {\it new scale of physics at very low energies}.
213: Or perhaps a new scale of low energies derived from a fundamental scale of high
214: energy physics through a possible $UV/IR$ mixing.
215: This radical possibility, although very intriguing, is not yet realized in a concrete model.
216:
217: At the moment, our theoretical knowledge of the relation between
218: the low CMB quadrupole and the dark energy lies in the realm of speculations
219: while pushing forward the discovery of new physics.
220: Future investigation of the {\it new cosmic coincidence} puzzle discussed here, may
221: independently aid us to a better understanding of the emerging picture of the present universe.
222:
223:
224:
225: Acknowledgement: LM is very grateful to the hospitality of Perimeter Institute for
226: Theoretical Physics, Waterloo, ON Canada N2J 2W9, during her visit there where part of this work
227: was done and especially to many stimulating discussions with L.Smolin.
228:
229: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
230:
231: \bibitem{spergel} Knop, R.A.et al.(2003), {\it astro-ph/0309368}; Spergel, D.N. et al.(2003), ApJS148, 175; Verde, L. et al., MNRAS335, 432.
232:
233: \bibitem{melchiorri} Melchiorri, A., Mersini, L., Odman, C., Trodden, M. (2003), Phys.Rev.D68,43509,{\it astro-ph/0211522}.
234:
235: \bibitem{desean} Carroll, M.S., {\it astro-ph/0310342}, (2003), and references therein.
236:
237: \bibitem{wmap} Bennett,et al., {\it astro-ph/0302207} Astrophys.J.Suppl. 148 (2003); Hinshaw, et al., {\it astro-ph/0302217}, Astrophys.J.Suppl. 148 (2003); Tegmark et al, {\it astro-ph/0302496}.
238:
239: \bibitem{netterfield}
240: C.~B.~Netterfield {\it et al.} [Boomerang Collaboration],
241: %``A measurement by BOOMERANG of multiple peaks in the angular power spectrum
242: %of the cosmic microwave background,''
243: Astrophys.\ J.\ {\bf 571} (2002) 604
244: {\it astro-ph/0104460};
245: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0104460;%%
246: W.~H.~Kinney, E.~W.~Kolb, A.~Melchiorri and A.~Riotto,
247: %``WMAPping inflationary physics,''
248: arXiv:hep-ph/0305130.
249: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0305130;%%
250:
251:
252:
253:
254: \bibitem{alesilklm} L.~Conversi, A.~Melchiorri, L.~Mersini and J.~Silk,
255: %``Are domain walls ruled out?,''
256: {\it astro-ph/0402529}.
257: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0402529;%%
258:
259: \bibitem{costa}
260: A.~de Oliveira-Costa, M.~Tegmark, M.~Zaldarriaga and A.~Hamilton,
261: %``The significance of the largest scale CMB fluctuations in WMAP,''
262: {\it astro-ph/0307282}.
263: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0307282;%%
264:
265: \bibitem{kogut}
266: A.~Kogut {\it et al.},
267: %``Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) First Year Observations: TE
268: %Polarization,''
269: Astrophys.\ J.\ Suppl.\ {\bf 148} (2003) 161
270: {\it astro-ph/0302213}.
271: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0302213;%%
272:
273:
274:
275: \bibitem{nongaus}
276: H.~K.~Eriksen, F.~K.~Hansen, A.~J.~Banday, K.~M.~Gorski and P.~B.~Lilje,
277: %``Asymmetries in the CMB anisotropy field,''
278: {\it astro-ph/0307507};
279: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0307507;%%
280: P.~D.~Naselsky, A.~G.~Doroshkevich and O.~V.~Verkhodanov,
281: %``Phase cross-correlation of the WMAP ILC map and foregrounds,''
282: Astrophys.\ J.\ {\bf 599} (2003) L53
283: {\it astro-ph/0310542};
284: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0310542;%%
285: P.~Vielva, E.~Martinez-Gonzalez, R.~B.~Barreiro, J.~L.~Sanz and L.~Cayon,
286: %``Detection of non-Gaussianity in the WMAP 1-year data using spherical
287: %wavelets,'' {\it astro-ph/0310273};
288: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0310273;%%
289: P.~Coles, P.~Dineen, J.~Earl and D.~Wright,
290: %``Phase Correlations in Cosmic Microwave Background Temperature Maps,''
291: {\it astro-ph/0310252}.
292: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0310252;%%
293:
294:
295:
296: \bibitem{efstathiou} G.~Efstathiou,
297: %``A Maximum Likelihood Analysis of the Low CMB Multipoles from WMAP,''
298: {\it astro-ph/0310207}.
299: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0310207;%%
300:
301: \bibitem{schwarz} D. J. Schwarz et al., astro-ph/0403353, 2004.
302:
303: \bibitem{shear} Kesden, M., Kamionkowski, M., Cooray, A., {\it astro-ph/0306597}, (2003).
304: \bibitem{cross} Dore, O., Holder, G.P., Loeb, A., {\it astro-ph/0309281}, (2003).
305: \bibitem{cosmicvar} C. Skordis, J.Silk {\it astro-ph/0402474}, (2004) ; M. Kamionkowski and A.Loeb, Phys.Rev.D {\bf 56}, 4511 (1997)
306: {\it astro-ph/9703118}; N.Seto and M.Sasaki,Phys.Rev.D {\bf 62}, 123004 (2000), {\it astro-ph/0009222}; A.R.Cooray and D.Baumann, Phys.Rev.D {\bf 67}, 063505 (2003)
307: {\it astro-ph/0211095}; J.Portsmouth,{\it astro-ph/0402173}; O.Dore, G.P.Holder and A.Loeb, {\it astro-ph/0309281}.
308:
309: \bibitem{katie} Bastero-Gil,M., Freese, K., Mersini-Houghton,L., {\it hep-ph/0306289}, (2003), and references therein.
310:
311: \bibitem{dvali} Dvali, G., Kachru, S., {\it hep-th/0309095}, (2003).
312:
313: \bibitem{marteens} Tsujikawa,S., Singh, P., Maartens, R.,
314: {\it astro-ph/0311015}, (2003).
315:
316: \bibitem{nolta} M.~R.~Nolta {\it et al.},
317: %``First Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Dark
318: %Energy Induced Correlation with Radio Sources,''
319: {\it astro-ph/0305097}.
320: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0305097;%%
321:
322: \bibitem{linde} Contaldi, C.R., Peloso, M., Kofman, L., Linde, A., JCAP 0307:002,(2003), {\it astro-ph/0303636}.
323:
324: \bibitem{banks} Banks, T., Fischler, W., {\it astro-ph/0307459} and references therein; also see Banks, T., {\it hep-th/0310288}, (2003).
325:
326: \end{thebibliography}
327:
328:
329: \end{document}
330:
331:
332:
333:
334:
335:
336:
337:
338:
339: