1: % Template article for preprint document class `elsart'
2: % SP 2001/01/05
3:
4: \documentclass{elsart}
5:
6: % Use the option doublespacing or reviewcopy to obtain double line spacing
7: % \documentclass[doublespacing]{elsart}
8:
9: % if you use PostScript figures in your article
10: % use the graphics package for simple commands
11: % \usepackage{graphics}
12: % or use the graphicx package for more complicated commands
13: % \usepackage{graphicx}
14: % or use the epsfig package if you prefer to use the old commands
15: % \usepackage{epsfig}
16:
17: % The amssymb package provides various useful mathematical symbols
18: \usepackage{amssymb}
19:
20: \usepackage[dvips,final]{graphicx}
21: \usepackage{epsfig}
22: \usepackage{amsmath}
23:
24:
25: \begin{document}
26:
27: \begin{frontmatter}
28:
29: % Title, authors and addresses
30:
31: % use the thanksref command within \title, \author or \address for footnotes;
32: % use the corauthref command within \author for corresponding author footnotes;
33: % use the ead command for the email address,
34: % and the form \ead[url] for the home page:
35: % \title{Title\thanksref{label1}}
36: % \thanks[label1]{}
37: % \author{Name\corauthref{cor1}\thanksref{label2}}
38: % \ead{email address}
39: % \ead[url]{home page}
40: % \thanks[label2]{}
41: % \corauth[cor1]{}
42: % \address{Address\thanksref{label3}}
43: % \thanks[label3]{}
44:
45: \title{LCSR analysis of exclusive two-body $B$ decay into charmonium}
46:
47: % use optional labels to link authors explicitly to addresses:
48: % \author[label1,label2]{}
49: % \address[label1]{}
50: % \address[label2]{}
51:
52: \author{Bla\v zenka Meli\'c}
53: \ead{melic@thphys.irb.hr}
54:
55: \address{Rudjer Bo\v skovi\'c Institute, Theoretical Physics Division,
56: HR--10002, Zagreb, Croatia
57: }
58:
59: \begin{abstract}
60: We analyze $B \to K H_c$ (where $H_c = \eta_c, J/\psi, \chi_{cJ(J=0,1)}$) decays
61: estimating nonfactorizable contributions from the light-cone sum rules (LCSR).
62: Nonfactorizable contributions are sizable for $B \to K J/\psi$ and
63: particularly for $B \to K \chi_{c1}$ decay. For the $B$ decays into a
64: (pseudo)scalar charmonia we find small nonfactorizable contributions which
65: cannot accommodate relatively large branching ratios obtained by measurements.
66: This specially concerns the puzzling $B \to K \chi_{c0}$ decay.
67: \end{abstract}
68:
69: \begin{keyword}
70: % keywords here, in the form: keyword \sep keyword
71:
72: % PACS codes here, in the form: \PACS code \sep code
73: \PACS 13.25.Hw, 12.39.St, 12.38.Lg
74: \end{keyword}
75: \end{frontmatter}
76:
77: % main text
78: \section{Introduction}
79: \label{Intro}
80: Last years there was a considerable progress in the
81: measurements of $B$ decays into diverse charmonium final states.
82: These decays governed by a color-suppressed $b \to c$ transition
83: could provide a valuable information on the factorization properties of $B$-meson
84: decays.
85:
86: The first observation of $B^- \to K^- \chi_{c0}$ decay a year ago by Belle
87: collaboration \cite{exp1}, Table \ref{tab:exp}, clearly shows the breakdown of the naive
88: factorization assumption in the color-suppressed $B$ decays into charmonium. Namely,
89: this decay, and the corresponding $B^- \to K^-\chi_{c2}$ decay are
90: forbidden in the factorization approach
91: \cite{BaBar}, due to the V-A structure of the weak vertex, i.e.
92: \begin{eqnarray}
93: %\[
94: \langle \chi_{c0} | (\overline{c} c)_{V\mp A} | 0 \rangle =
95: \langle \chi_{c2} | (\overline{c} c)_{V\mp A} | 0 \rangle = 0 \, .
96: %\]
97: \label{eq:fact}
98: \end{eqnarray}
99: More surprisingly the branching ratio of $B^- \to K^- \chi_{c0} $ is
100: comparable with the branching ratios of the decays $B^- \to K^- J/\psi $ and
101: $B^- \to K^-\chi_{c1} $, which posses the nonvanishing factorizable amplitudes.
102: Another nonfactorizable $B$ decay into $\chi_{c2}$ charmonium was observed
103: inclusively with a large branching fraction
104: \begin{eqnarray}
105: {\mathcal{B}}(B \to X \chi_{c2}) = (1.80 ^{\textstyle +0.23}_{\textstyle -0.28}
106: \pm 0.26) \cdot 10^{-3} \, ,
107: \label{eq:exp}
108: \end{eqnarray}
109: which is of the order of the branching fraction of the factorizable
110: $B \to X \chi_{c1} $ decay.
111:
112: However, even for the $B$ decays into charmonium states which can be calculated by
113: the factorization assumption
114: there is a problem of theoretically too low predictions which cannot accommodate the experimental
115: data. Therefore, for all $B$ decays into charmonium states one expects large nonfactorizable effects.
116:
117: \begin{table}
118: \label{tab:exp}
119: \caption{Experimental summary on branching ratios of $B$ decays into charmonium \protect{\cite{exp1}}.
120: The first result for a particular decay mode is Belle
121: result, the second one is from BaBar Collaboration, and the third one (when exists) is from the
122: CLEO experiment.}
123: \begin{tabular}{c|c} \hline
124: \rule[-3mm]{0mm}{8mm}
125: decay mode & $\mathcal{B} (10^{-4}$)\\
126: \hline\hline
127: \raisebox{-2.5ex}[0pt]{$B^- \to K^- \eta_c$}
128: & $12.5 \pm 1.4 ^{+1.0}_{-1.2} \pm 3.8 $ \\
129: & $15.0 \pm 1.9 \pm 1.5 \pm 4.6 $ \\
130: & $6.9 ^{+2.6}_{-2.1} \pm 0.8 \pm 2.0 $ \\
131: \hline
132: \raisebox{-1.5ex}[0pt]{
133: $B^- \to K^- J/\psi$}
134: & $10.1 \pm 0.3 \pm 0.8$\\
135: & $10.1 \pm 0.3 \pm 0.5$\\
136: \hline
137: $B^- \to K^- \chi_{c0}$
138: & $6.0 ^{+2.1}_{-1.8} \pm 1.1$\\
139: & $2.7 \pm 0.7$\\
140: \hline
141: \raisebox{-1.5ex}[0pt]{
142: $B^- \to K^- \chi_{c1}$}
143: & $ 6.1 \pm 0.6 \pm 0.6$ \\
144: & $ 7.5 \pm 0.8 \pm 0.8$\\
145: \hline
146: \hline
147: \rule[-3mm]{0mm}{8mm}
148: $\frac{\textstyle {\mathcal{B}}(B^- \to K^- \chi_{c0})}{ \textstyle {\mathcal{B}}(B^- \to K^- J/\psi )}$
149: & $0.60 ^{\textstyle +0.21}_{\textstyle -0.18} \pm 0.05 \pm 0.08$
150: \\
151: \hline
152: \end{tabular}
153: \end{table}
154:
155: In this letter we would like to approach the calculation of the nonfactorizable
156: contributions to the $B$ decay branching ratios into charmonium from the LCSR point of view.
157: The method was developed for the calculation of the soft nonfactorizable
158: corrections in $B \to \pi\pi$ \cite{khodja} and was later extended
159: on the $B \to K J/\psi$ decay \cite{melic}. Here we will made a short
160: presentation of the method, and the interested reader should have a look
161: in the above references for the further details.
162:
163: \begin{table}
164: \label{tab:proper}
165: \caption{Charmonium states considered in the paper and their properties.}
166: \begin{tabular}{c||c|c|ccc} \hline
167: \rule[-3mm]{0mm}{8mm}
168: $H_c(J^{PC})$ & $j_{H_c}$ & $\langle 0| j_{H_c} | H_c \rangle $ &
169: $m_{H_c}$[GeV]\protect{\cite{PDG}} & $f_{H_c}$[MeV] & $\sqrt{s_{H_c}}$[GeV]\protect{\cite{reinders}}\\
170: \hline\hline
171: %$\eta_c(0^{-+})$ & $ \overline{c} \gamma_{\mu}\gamma_{5} c$ & $ i f_{\eta_{c}} p_{\eta_c \, \mu}$ & 3.0 & $420 \pm 50$
172: $\eta_c(0^{-+})$ & $i \overline{c} \gamma_{5} c$ & $ f_{\eta_{c}} m_{\eta_{c}}$ & 3.0 & $420 \pm 50$
173: \protect{\cite{hwangkim}} & $3.8 \pm 0.2$\\
174: \hline
175: $J/\psi(1^{--})$ & $\overline{c} \gamma_{\mu} c$ & $f_{J/\psi} m_{J/\psi} \epsilon_{\mu}$
176: & 3.1 & 405 $\pm$ 14 \protect{\cite{melic}} & $3.8 \pm 0.2$ \\
177: \hline
178: $\chi_{c0}(0^{++})$ & $\overline{c} c$ & $ f_{\chi_{c0}} m_{\chi_{c0}}$ & 3.4 & 360 \protect{\cite{novikov}}
179: & $4.0 \pm 0.2$ \\
180: \hline
181: $\chi_{c1}(1^{++})$ & $ \overline{c} \gamma_{\mu} \gamma_5 c$ & $i f_{\chi_{c1}} m_{\chi_{c1}} \epsilon_{\mu}$
182: & 3.5 & 335 \protect{\cite{novikov}} & $4.0 \pm 0.2$ \\
183: \hline
184: \end{tabular}
185: \end{table}
186:
187: The effective weak Hamiltonian relevant for our discussion on the $b \to c \overline{c} s $ transition
188: \begin{eqnarray}
189: H_W = \frac{G_F}{\sqrt{2}} \Big \{ V_{cb} V_{cs}^{\ast} [C_1(\mu) \mathcal{O}_1 + C_1(\mu) \mathcal{O}_1 ]
190: - V_{tb} V_{ts}^{\ast} \sum_i C_i(\mu) \mathcal{O}_i \Big \} + h.c.
191: \end{eqnarray}
192: contain the current-current operators
193: \begin{eqnarray}
194: \mathcal{O}_1 = (\overline{c} b)_{V-A} (\overline{s} c)_{V-A} \; , \quad
195: \mathcal{O}_2 = (\overline{c} c)_{V-A} (\overline{s} b)_{V-A} \, ,
196: \end{eqnarray}
197: and the QCD penguin operators $\mathcal{O}_{3-6}$, see the review \cite{review} for precise
198: definitions. For the considerations in this paper, one can safely neglect contributions of the penguin operators and
199: consider only contributions of the leading $\mathcal{O}_{1,2}$ operators.
200: The $\mathcal{O}_1$ operator can be projected to a color-singlet state as
201: \begin{eqnarray}
202: \mathcal{O}_1 = \frac{1}{N_c} \mathcal{O}_2 + 2 \tilde{\mathcal{O}}_2
203: \end{eqnarray}
204: where $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}_2 = (\overline{c} T^a \gamma_{\mu} (1- \gamma_5) c)(\overline{s} T^a \gamma^{\mu}
205: (1- \gamma_5) b)$.
206:
207: For $H_c = \eta_c, J/\psi, \chi_{c0}, \chi_{c1}$, the decay rate can then be written as
208: \begin{eqnarray}
209: \Gamma(B \to K H_c) = \frac{G_F^2}{32 \pi} |V_{cb}|^2 |V_{cs}^{\ast}|^2 \frac{1}{m_B}\left ( 1 -
210: \frac{m_{H_c}^2}{m_B^2} \right ) \, |\mathcal{M}_{H_c} |^2
211: \end{eqnarray}
212: and
213: \begin{eqnarray}
214: \mathcal{M}_{H_c} &=& \mathcal{M}_{H_c}^{nonfact} + \mathcal{M}_{H_c}^{fact}
215: \nonumber \\
216: &=& \left ( C_2(\mu) + \frac{C_1(\mu)}{3} \right )
217: \langle H_c K | \mathcal{O}_2 | B \rangle +
218: 2 C_1(\mu) \langle H_c K | \tilde{\mathcal{O}}_2 | B \rangle \, .
219: \label{eq:M}
220: \end{eqnarray}
221: The first part of (\ref{eq:M}) can be calculated by factorizing the matrix element of the
222: $\mathcal{O}_2$ operator as
223: \begin{eqnarray}
224: \langle H_c K | \mathcal{O}_2 | B \rangle = \langle H_c | (\overline{c}c)_{V-A} | 0 \rangle
225: \langle K | (\overline{s}b)_{V-A} | B \rangle \, ,
226: \label{eq:fact2}
227: \end{eqnarray}
228: and using the corresponding expressions for the $\langle H_c |(\overline{c}c)_{V-A}| 0 \rangle$ from
229: Table 2.
230: %\ref{tab:proper}.
231: Note that due to the reason stated in introduction, Eq.(\ref{eq:fact}), there is no factorizable
232: contribution to the $B \to K \chi_{c0}$ decay.
233: The $B \to K$ matrix element from (\ref{eq:fact2}) is defined by the decomposition
234: \begin{eqnarray}
235: \langle K(q)|\overline{s}\gamma_{\mu} b |B(p+q) \rangle &=& \nonumber \\
236: & & \hspace{-4cm}
237: (2 q + p)_{\mu} F_{BK}^+(p^2) + \frac{m_B^2 - m_K^2}{p^2}
238: p_{\mu}\, \left( - F_{BK}^+(p^2) + F_{BK}^0(p^2) \right ) \, ,
239: \label{eq:form}
240: \end{eqnarray}
241: while the estimation of the form factors $F_{BK}^+$ and $F_{BK}^0$ in the LCSR approach
242: \cite{ball} gives the following values needed in our calculation:
243: \begin{eqnarray}
244: F_{BK}^+(m_{J/\psi}^2) = 0.60 \, , \quad F_{BK}^+(m_{\chi_{c1}}^2) = 0.74 \, ,
245: \quad F_{BK}^0(m_{\eta_{c}}^2) = 0.42 \, ,
246: \end{eqnarray}
247: with the theoretical uncertainty of $15 \%$.
248:
249: For a particular charmonium considered, the expression (\ref{eq:M}) can be then brought into the following
250: form:
251: \begin{eqnarray}
252: & & \hspace*{-0.7cm}\mathcal{M}_{J/\psi} =
253: \nonumber \\
254: & & \hspace*{-0.2cm} 2 \epsilon \cdot p_{K} \, f_{J/\psi} m_{J/\psi} F^+_{BK}(m_{J/\psi}^2)
255: \left [ \left (C_2(\mu) + \frac{C_1(\mu)}{3} \right ) +
256: 2 C_1(\mu) \frac{\tilde{F}_{J/\psi}(\mu)}{F^+_{BK}(m_{J/\psi}^2)} \right ] \,,
257: \nonumber \\
258: & & \hspace*{-0.7cm}\mathcal{M}_{\chi_{c1}} =
259: \nonumber \\
260: & & \hspace*{-0.2cm} i\, 2 \epsilon \cdot p_{K} \, f_{\chi_{c1}} m_{\chi_{c1}} F^+_{BK}(m_{\chi_{c1}}^2)
261: \left [ \left (C_2(\mu) + \frac{C_1(\mu)}{3} \right ) +
262: 2 C_1(\mu) \frac{\tilde{F}_{\chi_{c1}}(\mu)}{F^+_{BK}(m_{\chi_{c1}}^2)} \right ] \, ,
263: \nonumber \\
264: & & \hspace*{-0.7cm} \mathcal{M}_{\eta_{c}} = i\, m_{B}^2 f_{\eta_{c}} F^0_{BK}(m_{\eta_{c}}^2)
265: \left [ \left (C_2(\mu) + \frac{C_1(\mu)}{3} \right ) +
266: 2 C_1(\mu) \frac{\tilde{F}_{\eta_c}(\mu)}{F^0_{BK}(m_{\eta_c}^2)} \right ] \, ,
267: \nonumber \\
268: & & \hspace*{-0.7cm}\mathcal{M}_{\chi_{c0}} = 2 C_1(\mu) m_{B}^2 f_{\chi_{c0}} \tilde{F}_{\chi_{c0}}(\mu) \, .
269: \end{eqnarray}
270: $\tilde{F}_{H_c = (\eta_c, J/\psi, \chi_{c0}, \chi_{c1})}$
271: represents the nonfactorizable part directly proportional to the contribution of
272: the $\tilde{O}_2$ operator in (\ref{eq:M}). This contribution vanishes under the factorization assumption.
273: Below we present the calculation of the nonfactorizable soft contributions in the LCSR approach.
274:
275: \section{Nonfactorizable contributions in $B \to K H_c$ ($H_c = \eta_c, J/\psi, \chi_{cJ(J=0,1)}$)
276: decays from LCSR}
277:
278: The starting point of the calculation using the LCSR method is the
279: correlation function, defined as
280: \begin{eqnarray}
281: \mathcal{F} = i^2 \int dx^4 \int dy^4 e^{-i p_{B} x + i (p_{H_c}-k) y}
282: \langle K(p_K)| j_{H_c}(y) \tilde{\mathcal{O}}_2(0) j_B(x) | 0 \rangle \, ,
283: \label{eq:corr}
284: \end{eqnarray}
285: where $p_K^2 = m_K^2 = 0$, $k^2=0$ and $p_B^2 = m_B^2\, , p_{H_c}^2 = m_{H_c}^2$.
286: The interpolating current of a $B^-$ meson is given as $j_B = i m_b
287: \overline{b} \gamma_5 u$, whereas
288: the choice of the interpolating
289: charmonium current has to be done according to the definite $J$, $P$, and
290: $C$ quantum numbers of a particular meson $H_c$. The considered charmonium
291: currents, together with some properties of charmonium needed in the
292: sum rule analysis are summarized in Table 2.
293: %\ref{tab:proper}.
294: % considered here are classified as
295: %$J^{PC} = 1^{--} (J/\psi), 1^{++}(\chi_{c1}), 0^{++}(\chi_{c0)},
296: %0^{-+}(\eta_c)$ and are given in Tab. 2. There we sumarize
297: For the consistency,
298: we also include discussion on the $B \to K J/\psi$ decay which was already extensively
299: presented in \cite{melic} and
300: will only quote here the numerical result.
301: For the rest of the $B$ decays into charmonium, the calculation closely
302: follows the LCSR approach developed in \cite{khodja} and \cite{melic} and we refer to these references
303: for all details.
304: Including the twist-3 and twist-4 nonfactorizable contributions, we can write first the nonfactorizable
305: contribution to the $B \to K \chi_{c1}$ decay analogously to the result for $B \to K J/\psi$, Eq.(65) in
306: \cite{melic}:
307: \begin{eqnarray}
308: \tilde{F}_{\chi_{c1}}(\mu_b) &=&
309: \frac{1}{ 4 \pi^2 f_{\chi_{c1}}^2}
310: \int_{4 m_c^2}^{s_0^{\chi_{c1}}} ds
311: \frac{(m_{\chi_{c1}}^2 + Q_0^2)^{n+1}}{(s + Q_0^2)^{n+1}}
312: \nonumber \\
313: & & \hspace*{-1.5cm}
314: \frac{1}{2 m_{B}^2 f_{B}} \int_{u_0^B}^1 \frac{du}{u} e^{(m_B^2-(m_b^2 - m_{\chi_{c1}}^2(1-u))/u)/M^2}
315: \int_0^{1-\frac{4 m_c^2}{s}} \frac{dy}{2 \sqrt{y}} \, \frac{m_b}{m_B^2 -m_{\chi_{c1}}^2}
316: \nonumber \\
317: & & \hspace*{-1.5cm} \Bigg \{
318: \frac{f_{3K}}{2} \Bigg [
319: \int_0^u
320: \frac{dv}{v^2} \phi_{3K}(1 -u, u-v, v)
321: \left ( \frac{m_b^2 - m_{\chi_{c1}}^2}{u} ( 2 v - X )
322: + s - \frac{4 m_c^2}{1-y} \right ) \nonumber \\
323: & & \hspace*{-0.5cm} - \left ( s - \frac{4 m_c^2}{1-y} \right )
324: \left ( \frac{1}{v^2} \phi_{3K}(1 -u, u-v, v) \right )_{v=0}
325: X \Bigg ]
326: \nonumber \\
327: & & \hspace*{-1cm} +
328: m_b f_K \int_0^u
329: \frac{dv}{v} \tilde{\phi}_{\perp}(1 -u, u-v, v)
330: \left [ 3 - \frac{2}{v} X \right ]
331: \Bigg \} \, ,
332: \label{eq:FtildeCHI1}
333: \end{eqnarray}
334: where $s_0^{H_c}$ and $s_0^B$ are the effective threshold parameters of the perturbative
335: continuum in the $H_c$ and $B$ channel, respectively, and $u_0^B = (m_b^2 - m_{H_c}^2)/(s_0^B - m_{H_c}^2)$,
336: here specified for $H_c = \chi_{c1}$ charmonium.
337: $M$, the Borel parameter in the $B$ channel, and the parameter $n =1,2,...$ in the charmonium
338: channel have to be chosen in such a way that a reliable perturbative
339: calculation is possible, but on the other hand that excited and continuum states in a
340: given channel are suppressed.
341: The function $X$ appearing above is $X = x(s,y,m_B^2) = (s - 4 m_c^2/(1-y) )/(s - m_B^2)$ and the
342: expansion up to $O(X^2)$ is performed.
343: The twist-3, $\phi_{3K}$, and the twist-4, $\tilde{\phi}_{\perp}$, three-particle kaon distribution amplitudes
344: are defined as
345: usual \cite{BF}. The scale at which $\tilde{F}_{H_c}$'s are calculated is $\mu_b \sim m_b/2 \sim 2.4$ GeV.
346:
347: As for the $B$ decays into the scalar and pseudoscalar charmonium the calculation yields
348: \begin{eqnarray}
349: \tilde{F}_{\eta_{c}}(\mu_b) &=& \frac{1}{f_{\eta_c} m_B^2}
350: \frac{1}{ 4 \pi^2 f_{\eta_{c}}}
351: \int_{4 m_c^2}^{s_0^{\eta_{c}}} ds
352: \frac{(m_{\eta_{c}}^2 + Q_0^2)^{n+1}}{(s + Q_0^2)^{n+1}}
353: \nonumber \\
354: & & \hspace*{-1.5cm}
355: \frac{1}{2 m_{B}^2 f_{B}} \int_{u_0^B}^1 \frac{du}{u} e^{(m_B^2-(m_b^2 - m_{\eta_{c}}^2(1-u))/u)/M^2}
356: \int_0^{1-\frac{4 m_c^2}{s}} \frac{dy}{(1-y) \sqrt{y}} \, \frac{m_b m_c}{m_{\eta_{c}}}
357: \nonumber \\
358: & & \hspace*{-1.5cm}
359: \Bigg \{
360: f_{3K} \Bigg [
361: \int_0^u
362: \frac{dv}{v} \phi_{3K}(1 -u, u-v, v)
363: \left ( - \frac{m_b^2 - m_{\eta_{c}}^2}{u} \right ) \Bigg ]
364: \nonumber \\
365: & & \hspace*{-1cm} +
366: 3 m_b f_K \int_0^u
367: \frac{dv}{v} \tilde{\phi}_{\perp}(1 -u, u-v, v)
368: \Bigg \} \, ,
369: \label{eq:FtildeETA}
370: \end{eqnarray}
371: and
372: \begin{eqnarray}
373: \tilde{F}_{\chi_{c0}}(\mu_b) &=& \frac{1}{f_{\chi_{c0}} m_B^2}
374: \frac{1}{ 4 \pi^2 f_{\chi_{c0}}}
375: \int_{4 m_c^2}^{s_0^{\chi_{c0}}} ds
376: \frac{(m_{\chi_{c0}}^2 + Q_0^2)^{n+1}}{(s + Q_0^2)^{n+1}}
377: \nonumber \\
378: & & \hspace*{-1.5cm}
379: \frac{1}{2 m_{B}^2 f_{B}} \int_{u_0^B}^1 \frac{du}{u} e^{(m_B^2-(m_b^2 - m_{\chi_{c0}}^2(1-u))/u)/M^2}
380: \int_0^{1-\frac{4 m_c^2}{s}} \frac{dy}{(1-y) \sqrt{y}} \, \frac{m_b m_c}{m_{\chi_{c0}}}
381: \nonumber \\
382: & & \hspace*{-1.5cm} \times
383: \Bigg \{
384: f_{3K} \Bigg [
385: \int_0^u
386: \frac{dv}{v} \phi_{3K}(1 -u, u-v, v)
387: \left (\frac{m_b^2 - m_{\chi_{c0}}^2}{u} \right )
388: \left ( y + (1-y) \frac{X}{v} \right ) \Bigg ]
389: \nonumber \\
390: & & \hspace*{-1cm} +
391: 3 m_b f_K \int_0^u
392: \frac{dv}{v} \tilde{\phi}_{\perp}(1 -u, u-v, v)
393: \left ( y + (1-y) \frac{X}{v} \right )
394: \Bigg \} \, .
395: \label{eq:FtildeCHI0}
396: \end{eqnarray}
397: %
398: \section{Numerical predictions and discussions}
399:
400: Let us first specify the numerical values of the needed parameters.
401: For parameters in the $B$ channel we use $m_B = 5.28$ GeV and the values taken from \cite{BKR}:
402: $f_B = 180 \pm 30 $ MeV, $m_b = 4.7 \pm 0.1$ GeV, and $s^{B}_0 = 35 \pm 2\, {\rm GeV}^2$.
403: For the charmonium states
404: we use the parameters from Table 2
405: %\ref{tab:proper}
406: and $m_c = 1.25 \pm 0.10$.
407: The $K$ meson decay constant is taken
408: as $f_K = 0.16$ GeV. For parameters which enter the coefficients of the twist-3 and
409: twist-4 kaon wave functions we suppose that $f_{3 \pi} \simeq f_{3 K}$ and
410: $\delta^2_K \simeq \delta_{\pi}^2$,
411: and take $f_{3 K} = 0.0026$ GeV, $\delta^2(\mu_b) = 0.17$ GeV \cite{BF}.
412: The stability region for the Borel parameter is found in the interval $M^2 = 10 \pm 2\, {\rm GeV}^2$,
413: known also from other LCSR calculations of $B$ meson properties. Concerning the sum rules in the
414: charmonium channels, the calculation is rather stable on the change of $n$ in
415: the interval $n = 4 - 7$. $Q_0^2$ is parameterized by $Q_0^2 = 4 m_c^2 \xi$,
416: where in order that the lowest resonances dominate $\xi$ takes values from 0.5 to 1 for the $B$ decays
417: into $s$-wave charmonia, while
418: $\xi$ is between 1 and 2.5 in the decays into $p$-wave charmonia \cite{reinders}.
419:
420: \begin{table}
421: \label{tab:th}
422: \caption{Theoretical results for the $B \to K H_c$ decays calculated in this paper.
423: $\tilde{F}_{H_c}(\mu_b)$ is the nonfactorizable contribution, $\mathcal{M}_{H_c}^{nonfact}
424: /\mathcal{M}_{H_c}^{fact}$, Eq.(\ref{eq:M}),
425: is the ratio of the nonfactorizable and factorizable amplitudes for a particular mode $B \to K H_c$, whereas
426: $\mathcal{B}$ is the branching
427: ratio, all calculated at $\mu = \mu_b$.
428: Large scale-dependent uncertainties pertinent to the factorizable amplitude are not included.
429: }
430: \begin{tabular}{c|c|c|c} \hline
431: \rule[-3mm]{0mm}{8mm}
432: decay mode & $\tilde{F}_{H_c}(\mu_b)$ & $\mathcal{M}_{H_c}^{nonfact}/\mathcal{M}_{H_c}^{fact}$
433: & $\mathcal{B} (10^{-4})$\\
434: \hline\hline
435: $B^- \to K^- \eta_c$
436: & 0.0015-0.0019 & 0.08-0.10 & $2.0 \pm 0.1 $ \\
437: \hline
438: $B^- \to K^- J\psi$
439: & 0.011-0.018 \protect{\cite{melic}}& 0.40-0.70 \protect{\cite{melic}} & $ 3.3 \pm 0.6$\\
440: \hline
441: $B^- \to K^- \chi_{c0}$
442: & -(0.0007-0.0008) & - & $ 0.0017 \pm 0.0002 $ \\
443: \hline
444: $B^- \to K^- \chi_{c1}$
445: & 0.044 - 0.052 & 1.30-1.50 & $ 5.1 \pm 0.5$\\
446: \hline
447: \end{tabular}
448: \end{table}
449:
450: The results of our calculation are summarized in Table \ref{tab:th}.
451: Comparing the numbers from Table \ref{tab:exp} and Table \ref{tab:th}, it is important to note that in general
452: the calculated branching ratios are still too low to accommodate the data, except maybe for
453: the $B \to K \chi_{c1}$ decay. The nonfactorizable correction to $B \to K J/\psi$ and
454: particularly to $B \to K \chi_{c1}$ is large, for the $B \to K \chi_{c1}$ decay this
455: correction is even larger than the factorizable contribution, Table \ref{tab:th}. On the other hand, in
456: $B$ decays into (pseudo)scalar charmonia the nonfactorizable contributions are small. The
457: reason is the cancellation of the twist-3 and twist-4 contributions in these decays.
458: However, even without this cancellation, the nonfactorizable effects produced by the exchange
459: of a soft gluon between a kaon and $\chi_{c0}$ as calculated here, could not be able to
460: account for such a large branching ratio of $B \to K \chi_{c0}$ as measured experimentally. These
461: would demand contributions which have to be at least an order of magnitude larger than those typically
462: occurring in a $B$ decay into charmonium state as estimated by the LCSR method.
463: Therefore it is very unlikely that the mechanism of the nonfactorizable soft gluon exchange is the
464: reason for a relatively large branching ratio of the $B \to K \chi_{c0}$ decay.
465: A possible speculative explanation for large discrepancies between the theoretical
466: results for the B decays into (pseudo)scalar
467: charmonia and the experimental data
468: one could find in the nonperturbative effects
469: of the instanton type. They could appear due to the light quark admixtures in the
470: $\eta_c$ and $\chi_{c0}$ mesons,
471: yet it would be hard to account for such contributions reliably.
472:
473: The $B \to K \chi_{c0}$ decay was also analyzed within QCD factorization method \cite{BBNS} and
474: it was observed \cite{songchao} that there is a problem of logarithmic
475: divergences of the decay amplitude already at the leading-twist order.
476: In another approach, by studying the mechanism of the rescattering of charmed
477: intermediate states in $B \to K \chi_{c0}$, the authors of Ref.\cite{col} show that
478: the rescattering effects
479: could provide the large part of the $B \to K \chi_{c0}$ amplitude.
480:
481:
482: To summarize, we have studied the soft nonfactorizable contributions to $B \to K H_c
483: (H_c = \eta_c, J/\psi, \chi_{c0}, \chi_{c1})$ decays by using the LCSR approach.
484: Inspite of the expected large
485: contributions which could explain large discrepancy between the factorizable predictions and the
486: experimental data, we were not able to confirm these expectations, except for the $B \to K \chi_{c1}$
487: decay, for which large nonfactorizable corrections are found. The other predicted $B$ decays into charmonium
488: receive nonfactorizable soft contributions too small to accommodate the data. Unfortunately,
489: this is particularly true for the puzzling $B \to K \chi_{c0}$ decay that factorized amplitude vanishes and
490: the LCSR mechanism considered in this paper cannot explain its relatively large branching ratio.
491:
492:
493: {\it Note added:}
494: \\
495: While this work has been prepared, Ref. \cite{wang} appeared, where the authors discuss
496: nonfactorizable soft contributions in the $B \to K \eta_c$ and $B \to K \chi_{c0}$ decays
497: within the LCSR approach.
498: There are some differences observed in the approach as well as in the results between \cite{wang}
499: and our paper. As for
500: the $B \to K \eta_c$ decay, the authors of \cite{wang} choose the pseudovector current for
501: $\eta_c$. In that case, the result can be easily derived from Eq.(\ref{eq:FtildeCHI1})
502: according to the approach taken from \cite{melic}. The differences show in the twist-4 part.
503: Apart from this, by taking the pseudovector current to describe $\eta_c$ one has also to include
504: the mixing with the $\chi_{c1}(1^{++})$ state explicitly \cite{AK}
505: which was not considered in \cite{wang}.
506: More importantly, for the problematic $B \to K \chi_{c0}$ decay, apart from the superfluous
507: factor $x$ in Eq.(49) of \cite{wang}, we agree analytically in the twist-3 part.
508: In the second version of \cite{wang}, the authors have corrected numerical errors and have
509: included the twist-4 contribution to their result for the nonfactorizable $B \to K \chi_{c0}$ amplitude.
510: Although we now agree that the soft nonfactorizable contribution in the $B \to K \chi_{c0}$ decay is
511: small and cannot accommodate the experimental data, we still disagree in the twist-4 part of
512: the nonfactorizable contributions, which renders the numerical results from this paper
513: somewhat different from those obtained in \cite{wang}.
514:
515: \ack
516: I am grateful to D. Be\v cirevi\'c, F. De Fazio, A. Khodjamirian, A.A. Petrov, K. Passek-Kumeri\v cki for stimulating
517: discussions and to A. Khodjamirian also for carefully reading the manuscript.
518: This work is supported by the Ministry of Science, Education and Sport of the Republic of Croatia
519: under the contract 0098002 and by the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation.
520:
521:
522: \begin{thebibliography}{00}
523:
524: % \bibitem{label}
525: % Text of bibliographic item
526:
527: % notes:
528: % \bibitem{label} \note
529:
530: % subbibitems:
531: % \begin{subbibitems}{label}
532: % \bibitem{label1}
533: % \bibitem{label2}
534: % If there is a note, it should come last:
535: % \bibitem{label3} \note
536: % \end{subbibitems}
537:
538: \bibitem{exp1}
539: %\cite{Fang:2002yq}
540: %\bibitem{Fang:2002yq}
541: F.~Fang, ``B to charmonium: Mini-summary,'' in Proc. of the Flavor Physics and CP Violation (FPCP), Philadelphia,
542: Pennsylvania, 16-18 May 2002, Ed. R.G.C. Oldeman, eConf C020516,
543: [arXiv:hep-ex/0207004].
544: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0207004;%%
545:
546:
547: \bibitem{BaBar}
548: %\cite{Harrison:1998yr}
549: P.~F.~Harrison and H.~R.~Quinn [BABAR Collaboration],
550: ``The BaBar physics book: Physics at an asymmetric B factory,''
551: SLAC-R-0504.
552: %\href{http://www.slac.stanford.edu/spires/find/hep/www?r=slac-r-0504}{SPIRES entry}
553: %{\it Papers from Workshop on Physics at an Asymmetric B Factory (BaBar Collaboration Meeting), Rome, Italy, 11-14 Nov 1996, Princeton, NJ, 17-20
554: %Mar 1997, Orsay, France, 16-19 Jun 1997 and Pasadena, CA, 22-24 Sep 1997}.
555:
556:
557: \bibitem{khodja}
558: %\cite{Khodjamirian:2000mi}
559: A.~Khodjamirian,
560: %``B $\to$ pi pi decay in QCD,''
561: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 605} (2001) 558
562: [arXiv:hep-ph/0012271].
563: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0012271;%%
564:
565: \bibitem{melic}
566: %\cite{Melic:2003bw}
567: B.~Meli\'c,
568: %``Nonfactorizable corrections to B $\to$ J/psi K,''
569: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 68} (2003) 034004
570: [arXiv:hep-ph/0303250].
571: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0303250;%%
572:
573: \bibitem{review}
574: %\cite{Buchalla:1995vs}
575: G.~Buchalla, A.~J.~Buras and M.~E.~Lautenbacher,
576: %``Weak Decays Beyond Leading Logarithms,''
577: Rev.\ Mod.\ Phys.\ {\bf 68} (1996) 1125
578: [arXiv:hep-ph/9512380].
579: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9512380;%%
580:
581:
582:
583: \bibitem{PDG}
584: %\cite{Hagiwara:fs}
585: K.~Hagiwara {\it et al.} [Particle Data Group Collaboration],
586: %``Review Of Particle Physics,''
587: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 66} (2002) 010001.
588: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D66,010001;%%
589:
590: \bibitem{reinders}
591: %\cite{Reinders:1984sr}
592: L.~J.~Reinders, H.~Rubinstein and S.~Yazaki,
593: %``Hadron Properties From QCD Sum Rules,''
594: Phys.\ Rept.\ {\bf 127} (1985) 1.
595: %%CITATION = PRPLC,127,1;%%
596:
597: \bibitem{hwangkim}
598: %\cite{Hwang:1997ie}
599: D.~S.~Hwang and G.~H.~Kim,
600: %``Decay constant ratios f(eta/c)/f(J/psi) and f(eta/b)/f(Upsilon),''
601: Z.\ Phys.\ C {\bf 76} (1997) 107
602: [arXiv:hep-ph/9703364].
603: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9703364;%%
604:
605: \bibitem{novikov}
606: %\cite{Novikov:dq}
607: V.~A.~Novikov, L.~B.~Okun, M.~A.~Shifman, A.~I.~Vainshtein, M.~B.~Voloshin and V.~I.~Zakharov,
608: %``Charmonium And Gluons: Basic Experimental Facts And Theoretical
609: %Introduction,''
610: Phys.\ Rept.\ {\bf 41} (1978) 1.
611: %%CITATION = PRPLC,41,1;%%
612:
613: \bibitem{ball}
614: P.~Ball,
615: %``B $\to$ pi and B $\to$ K transitions from {QCD} sum rules on the
616: %light-cone,''
617: JHEP {\bf 9809} (1998) 005
618: [arXiv:hep-ph/9802394];
619: %\cite{Khodjamirian:2000ds}
620: A.~Khodjamirian, R.~Ruckl, S.~Weinzierl, C.~W.~Winhart and O.~I.~Yakovlev,
621: %``Predictions on B $\to$ pi anti-l nu/l, D $\to$ pi anti-l nu/l and D $\to$ K
622: %anti-l nu/l from QCD light-cone sum rules,''
623: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 62} (2000) 114002
624: [arXiv:hep-ph/0001297].
625: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0001297;%%
626: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9802394;%%
627:
628: \bibitem{BF}
629: %\cite{Braun:1989iv}
630: V.~M.~Braun and I.~E.~Filyanov,
631: %``Conformal Invariance And Pion Wave Functions Of Nonleading Twist,''
632: Z.\ Phys.\ C {\bf 48} (1990) 239.
633: %%CITATION = ZEPYA,C48,239;%%
634:
635:
636: \bibitem{BKR}
637: %\cite{Belyaev:1993wp}
638: V.~M.~Belyaev, A.~Khodjamirian and R.~Ruckl,
639: %``QCD calculation of the B $\to$ pi, K form-factors,''
640: Z.\ Phys.\ C {\bf 60} (1993) 349
641: [arXiv:hep-ph/9305348].
642: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9305348;%%
643:
644:
645: \bibitem{BBNS}
646: %\cite{Beneke:2000ry}
647: M.~Beneke, G.~Buchalla, M.~Neubert and C.~T.~Sachrajda,
648: %``QCD factorization for exclusive, non-leptonic B meson decays: General
649: %arguments and the case of heavy-light final states,''
650: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 591} (2000) 313
651: [arXiv:hep-ph/0006124].
652: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0006124;%%
653:
654: \bibitem{songchao}
655: %\cite{Song:2002mh}
656: Z.~Z.~Song and K.~T.~Chao,
657: %``Problems of QCD factorization in exclusive decays of B meson to
658: %charmonium,''
659: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 568} (2003) 127
660: [arXiv:hep-ph/0206253].
661: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0206253;%%
662:
663: \bibitem{col}
664: %\cite{Colangelo:2002mj}
665: P.~Colangelo, F.~De Fazio and T.~N.~Pham,
666: %``B- $\to$ K- chi/c0 decay from charmed meson rescattering,''
667: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 542} (2002) 71
668: [arXiv:hep-ph/0207061].
669: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0207061;%%
670:
671:
672: \bibitem{wang}
673: Z.~G.~Wang, L.~Li and T.~Huang,
674: ``Nonfactorizable soft contributions in the $B \to \eta_c K, \chi_{c0} K$ decays
675: with the light-cone sum rules approach,''
676: arXiv:hep-ph/0311296.
677: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0311296;%%
678:
679:
680: \bibitem{AK}
681: A. Khodjamirian, private communication.
682:
683:
684:
685:
686:
687:
688:
689: \end{thebibliography}
690:
691: \end{document}
692:
693: