1: \documentclass[twocolumn,eqsecnum,showpacs,showkeys,amsmath,amssymb,aps]{revtex4}

2: 

3: \usepackage{epsfig}

4: \usepackage{graphicx}

5: \usepackage{bm} 

6:  

7: % \usepackage{showkeys}

8: 

9: \def\vec#1{\mathchoice{\mbox{\boldmath$\displaystyle#1$}}

10: {\mbox{\boldmath$\textstyle#1$}}

11: {\mbox{\boldmath$\scriptstyle#1$}}

12: {\mbox{\boldmath$\scriptscriptstyle#1$}}}

13: \makeatletter

14: \newcommand\erfc{\mathop{\operator@font erfc}\nolimits}

15: \def\slashchar#1{\setbox0=\hbox{$#1$}

16:    \dimen0=\wd0 \setbox1=\hbox{/} \dimen1=\wd1

17:    \ifdim\dimen0>\dimen1 \rlap{\hbox to \dimen0{\hfil/\hfil}} #1

18:    \else  \rlap{\hbox to \dimen1{\hfil$#1$\hfil}} / \fi}

19: \def\p{\slashchar{p}}

20: \def\w{\omega} 

21: 

22: \makeatother

23: 

24: \begin{document}

25:  

26: \title{Solution of the Kwieci\'nski evolution equations for 

27: unintegrated parton distributions using the Mellin transform\footnote{Dedicated to the

28: memory of Jan Kwieci\'nski}}

29: 

30: \author{Enrique Ruiz Arriola}

31: \email{earriola@ugr.es}

32: \affiliation{Departamento de F\'{\i}sica Moderna, Universidad de

33: Granada, E-18071 Granada, Spain}

34: \author{Wojciech Broniowski} 

35: \email{Wojciech.Broniowski@ifj.edu.pl} 

36: %

37: \affiliation{The H. Niewodnicza\'nski Institute of Nuclear Physics,

38: Polish Academy of Sciences, PL-31342 Krak\'ow, Poland}

39: %

40: \date{March 31, 2004}

41: 

42: \begin{abstract}

43: The Kwieci\'nski equations for the QCD evolution of the unintegrated

44: parton distributions in the transverse-coordinate space ($b$) are

45: analyzed with the help of the Mellin-transform method. The

46: equations are solved numerically in the general case, as well as in a

47: small-$b$ expansion which converges fast for $b \Lambda_{\rm QCD}$

48: sufficiently small. We also discuss the asymptotic limit of large $bQ$

49: and show that the distributions generated by the evolution decrease

50: with $b$ according to a power law. Numerical results are presented for the pion

51: distributions with a simple valence-like initial condition at the low

52: scale, following from chiral large-$N_c$ quark models. We use two models: the

53: Spectral Quark Model and the Nambu--Jona-Lasinio model. Formal aspects

54: of the equations, such as the analytic form of the $b$-dependent

55: anomalous dimensions, their analytic structure, as well as the limits

56: of unintegrated parton densities at $x \to 0$, $x \to 1$, and at large $b$, are

57: discussed in detail. The effect of spreading of the transverse

58: momentum with the increasing scale is confirmed, with $\langle

59: k_\perp^2 \rangle$ growing asymptotically as $Q^2

60: \alpha(Q^2)$. Approximate formulas for $\langle k_\perp^2 \rangle$ for

61: each parton species is given, which may be used in practical

62: applications.

63: \end{abstract}

64: 

65: \pacs{12.38.-t,12.38.Aw,12.38.Bx,14.40.Aq}

66:  

67: \keywords{unintegrated parton distributions,

68: QCD evolution, Mellin transform, structure of the pion, chiral quark models}

69: 

70: \maketitle 

71:  

72: \section{Introduction\label{intro}}

73: 

74: The {\em unintegrated} parton distributions (UPD's) have been considered in 

75: numerous works on applications of 

76: perturbative QCD \cite{DDT,naka,sterman,kimb1,KMKS1,kimb2,MR,KHMR,WMR,MIU,collins,AS1,MarRys,JK1,JK2,JK3}. 

77: These distributions are generalizations of the 

78: usual integrated parton distributions (PD), and in some sense 

79: more basic objects, as PD's are obtained from UPD's by integration over the

80: transverse momentum of the parton. The notion of UPD's relies on the 

81: $k_\perp$-factorization, and, in the spirit of the 

82: CCFM equations \cite{CCFM1,CCFM2,CCFM3,CCFM4}, introduces two

83: scales: the probing scale, $Q$, and the transverse-momentum scale, $k_\perp$. 

84: Recently, the UPD gained substantial attention, since they enter many

85: exclusive physical processes, such as the production of the Higgs boson \cite{Jung,Gawron}, the 

86: $W$ boson \cite{JKAS}, 

87: heavy flavors \cite{Jung,Hansson,Motyka,Zotov,LipZot}, the

88: jet production \cite{Jung,Watt}, particle production \cite{AS}, or 

89: hadron production in relativistic heavy-ion collisions \cite{Biro,Levai}. The unintegrated distributions 

90: were also used in studies of the longitudinal \cite{Kotl}, charmed \cite{Kot}, and spin 

91: \cite{spin1,spin2} structure functions

92: of the nucleon, as well as analyzed in the dipole picture of QCD \cite{Shoshi}.

93: 

94: The UPD's, similarly to other entities in QCD, undergo evolution with the change of the probing scale $Q$. 

95: The philosophy adopted here is similar to the case of the integrated PD. At some initial scale $Q_0$

96: we need to know the non-perturbative 

97: quantity from measurements, models, or lattice calculations, and 

98: then we can evolve it to a different scale $Q$ with the help of suitable QCD evolution

99: equations. In the case of integrated PD we need to assume the dependence of PD on the 

100: Bjorken $x$ variable at the initial scale 

101: $Q_0$. For the UPD we need to know in addition the dependence on 

102: the transverse momentum, $k_\perp$, or, equivalently, the transverse coordinate $b$, which 

103: is the variable Fourier-conjugated to $k_\perp$. 

104: Knowing this, we compute, with no extra physical input apart for the assumptions

105: entering the QCD evolution, the unintegrated distribution at the final scale $Q$.

106:  

107: Important physics questions may be answered. In particular, the UPD 

108: evolve in such a way that the average transverse-momentum increases 

109: in a specified way with the scale \cite{JK1,JK2,JK3,Jung}. 

110: This spreading can be studied quantitatively within the approach. This constrains the freedom 

111: in phenomenological analyses of processes involving the UPD's. 

112: 

113: In his studies of the problem, Kwieci\'nski started from the CCFM formalism 

114: \cite{CCFM1,CCFM2,CCFM3,CCFM4},  which explicitly involves two separate scales: the probing scale, $Q$, and 

115: the transverse momentum of the parton, $k_\perp$. The CCFM equations were subsequently extended to include the quarks, 

116: as well as reduced to the single-loop approximation. In addition, the non-Sudakov

117: form factor was dropped. Kwieci\'nski found that 

118: in this approximation the 

119: equations diagonalize in the space Fourier-conjugated to the transverse 

120: momentum, where they assume a particularly simple and elegant form 

121: in a close resemblance of the DGLAP \cite{DGLAP1,DGLAP2,DGLAP3,DGLAP4} equations for the integrated PD. 

122: The only, but most important, difference is the appearance of the Bessel function $J_0(Q b)$ 

123: in the evolution kernel. 

124: Thus, the evolution depends on the transverse coordinate $b$.

125: In the original work of Ref.~\cite{JK3}

126: these equations were called ``the CCFM equations for the UPD in the transverse-coordinate

127: space in the single-loop approximation''. Due to numerous steps leading away from the original CCFM, 

128: we find it more appropriate to call the equations of Refs.~\cite{JK3} {\em the Kwieci\'nski 

129: equations for the UPD evolution}.  

130: Since in the case of integrated PD these equations reduce to the usual LO DGLAP,

131: the range of applicability of the Kwieci\'nski equations is not larger as for the LO DGLAP, with 

132: not too small and not too large values of the Bjorken $x$ variable.  

133: 

134: Formally, the Kwieci\'nski equations are integro-differential equations with the kernel depending on 

135: the transverse coordinate $b$  ({\em cf.} Sec. \ref{sec:keq}). 

136: As such, they are not trivial to solve 

137: numerically. The method of the original works \cite{JK1,JK2,JK3} involved the Chebyshev interpolation

138: in the $x$ and $Q$ spaces for each value of $b$. In this paper we offer an alternative method,

139: based on the evolution of the $x$-moments of UPD. In the moment (Mellin) space, the 

140: evolution equations become a set of ordinary differential equations, which can be solved 

141: numerically in a very efficient way (see Sec.~\ref{sec:keqmel}). We derive analytic expressions for the $b$-dependent

142: anomalous dimensions, which can be written in terms of hypergeometric 

143: functions. Then, the inverse Mellin transform to the original $x$-space is performed 

144: via numerical integration with oscillatory functions. We show that the procedure 

145: is fast and stable, providing a useful numerical tool for evolving the UPD.  

146: 

147: The Mellin-transform method allows us to carry  

148: analytic considerations, such as studies of certain limits of the

149: equations, specifically the cases of low and and large $b$, and $x$ approaching the endpoints.

150: We pursue these considerations, which can be done since the form of the $b$-dependent anomalous dimensions is 

151: analytic. 

152: 

153: In addition to developing a different numerical method

154: (Sec.~\ref{sec:keqmel}), our study differs from Ref.~\cite{JK3} in two

155: physical aspects. Firstly, rather than guessing the initial shape in

156: $b$, we use the results of low-energy chiral quark models

157: (Sec.~\ref{sec:init}).  We consider two models: the recently proposed

158: Spectral Quark Model of Ref.~\cite{SQM01,SQM,SQM03} and the

159: Nambu--Jona-Lasinio model with the Pauli Villars regularization

160: \cite{NJL}.  These models were used before to describe the

161: integrated PD \cite{DavArr1,DavArr2,Weigel,ERAZak}, and were shown to

162: do a surprisingly good job, in particular for the valence distribution

163: in the pion. They were also used to describe successfully other aspect

164: of high-energy processes, such as the pion distribution amplitude

165: \cite{PDA} and generalized (off-forward) PD of the pion

166: \cite{GPD,vento}.  The models give the initial condition at the model

167: scale $Q_0$ in a particularly simple, factorized form. The valence

168: quarks are distributed uniformly in $x$, while the gluons and the sea

169: quarks vanish. The $b$-dependence is a simple, analytic function with

170: exponential fall-off at large $b$.  We stress that the $b$ dependence

171: is a prediction of the model, rather than a mere guess, as is

172: frequently made.  Secondly, our implementation of the evolution

173: switches from three to four flavors above the charm-production

174: threshold, customarily taken at $Q^2= 4~{\rm GeV}^2$. Our numerical

175: results are presented in Sec.~\ref{sec:num}, where we show the

176: dependence of the UPD's on $x$ and $b$.

177: 

178: Since the analytic forms of the anomalous dimensions involve generalized 

179: hypergeometric functions, 

180: which may be cumbersome to program, we have developed a low-$b$ expansion (Sec.~\ref{sec:lowb}), 

181: which makes the calculations simpler when $b$ is not too large. 

182: The expansion is in powers of $b \Lambda_{\rm QCD}$, and is fast and stable.

183: For the opposite problem, where $Q b$ is large, we have obtained asymptotic expansions (Sec.~\ref{largeb}),

184: which allow to deal numerically with the generalized hypergeometric functions. 

185:   

186: Our method of solving the equations in the Mellin space carries additional bonuses. 

187: In particular, it allows us for analytic considerations in the investigation of formal limits

188: at $x \to 1$ (Sec.~\ref{sec:x1}) and $x \to 0$ (Sec.~\ref{sec:x0}).  

189: At $x \to 1$ we show that the $b$-dependent non-singlet 

190: distribution approaches very fast the 

191: integrated non-singlet distrtibution. At $x \to 0$  we find 

192: generalizations of the double-leading-logarithm (DLLA) 

193: formulas of Ref.~\cite{DLLA}. Finally, we examine the large-$b$ behavior, where we show

194: that the evolution-generated UPD's from the Kwieci\'nski equations 

195: exhibit power-law behavior at large $b$. The fall-off is much faster for the gluons than for the 

196: quarks. 

197: 

198: Widening in the transverse momentum of all partonic distributions is confirmed. 

199: We show that $\langle k_\perp^2 \rangle$ grows with the probing scale as $Q^2 \alpha(Q^2)$. 

200: We write an approximating formula for the width for each partonic species, which may be useful

201: in practical applications with the pion (Sec.~\ref{sec:kt}). 

202: The widening effect becomes stronger and stronger as $Q$ increases or $x$ decreases, and it is 

203: bigger

204: for the gluons than for the non-singlet and singlet quarks (see Sec.~\ref{sec:kt}).

205: 

206: The numerical method of this paper, which is easy to program and numerically fast and efficient, can be used for

207: other initial conditions as well, for instance for the GRS \cite{GRS} parameterization of the pion 

208: or the GRV parameterization \cite{GRV}, of the nucleon, supplied with a profile in the transverse coordinate, 

209: as originally studied in Ref.~\cite{JK3}. The only difference is in the form of the initial Mellin moments,

210: which acquire the dependence on $b$. General prediction of the method in formal limits are listed in

211: Sec.~\ref{sec:general}.

212: 

213: Appendices contain many technical details, such as the perturbative QCD parameters and splitting

214: functions (App.~\ref{pQCD}), the analytic form of 

215: the $b$-dependent anomalous dimensions which 

216: enter the evolution in the Mellin space (App.~\ref{anomdim}), their low-$b$ 

217: (App.~\ref{app:lowb}) and high-$b$ expansion (App.~\ref{app:largeb}), as well as the pole-residue 

218: expansion (App.~\ref{sec:polres}). The latter is useful in analytic considerations near $x=0$.

219: 

220: 

221: \section{The Kwieci\'nski equations\label{sec:keq}}

222: 

223: In his studies of the UPD's, Kwieci\'nski \cite{JK1,JK2,JK3,Gawron} started from the CCFM formalism 

224: \cite{CCFM1,CCFM2,CCFM3,CCFM4} explicitly involving two separate scales: the probing scale, $Q$, and 

225: the transverse momentum of the parton, $k_\perp$. Then, the original CCFM equations were supplemented with the quarks, 

226: as well as reduced to the single-loop approximation. The latter approximation replaces the angular ordering of 

227: the emitted gluons with the ordering of their transverse momenta. 

228: In addition, the non-Sudakov form factor was dropped. 

229: Kwieci\'nski realized that the evolution equations for the 

230: UPD's acquire a particularly simple form in the transverse-coordinate space, $b$, 

231: conjugated to the transverse momentum $k_\perp$.

232: For each distribution one introduces

233: \begin{equation}

234: f_{j}(x,b,Q)\,=\,\int_0^{\infty}2 \pi dk_\perp \,k_\perp\, J_0(b k_\perp)\, f_{j}(x,k_\perp,Q),

235: \label{fb2}

236: \end{equation}

237: where $j=NS$ (non-singlet quarks), $S$ (singlet quarks), or $G$ (gluons),  and $J_0$ is the Bessel function. 

238: In order to avoid confusion, we stress 

239: that the transverse coordinate $b$, conjugated to the parton's transverse momentum,

240: is not the impact parameter, appearing in the analysis of the generalized PD. The latter 

241: quantity is conjugated the the transverse momentum transfer in off-forward 

242: scattering processes. 

243: 

244: At $b=0$ the functions $f_{j}$ are related to the integrated parton distributions, $p_j(x,Q)$,

245: as follows: 

246: \begin{equation}

247: f_{j}(x,0,Q)=\frac{x}{2} p_j(x,Q). \label{deff}

248: \end{equation}

249: More explicitly, for the case of the pion studied in this paper 

250: (we take $\pi^+$ for definiteness) we have

251: \begin{eqnarray}

252: p_{\rm NS}&=&\bar u - u + d -\bar d, \nonumber \\

253: p_{S}&=&\bar u + u + d +\bar d +\bar s + s + ... , \label{partpi}\\

254: p_{\rm sea}&\equiv& p_S - p_{\rm NS} = 2 \bar d + 2 u +\bar s + s + ... , \nonumber \\

255: p_G &=& g, \nonumber

256: \end{eqnarray}

257: where $\dots$ stand for higher flavors.

258: 

259: The Kwieci\'nski equations read \cite{JK3}:

260: \begin{widetext}

261: \begin{eqnarray}

262: Q^2{\partial f_{\rm NS}(x,b,Q)\over \partial Q^2} &=&

263: {\alpha_s(Q^2)\over 2\pi}  \int_0^1dz  \,P_{qq}(z)

264: \bigg [ \Theta(z-x)\,J_0((1-z)Qb)\, f_{\rm NS}\left({x\over z},b,Q\right)

265: - f_{\rm NS}(x,b,Q) \bigg ] \nonumber \\ 

266: Q^2{\partial f_{S}(x,b,Q)\over \partial Q^2}

267: &=&

268: {\alpha_s(Q^2)\over 2\pi} \int_0^1 dz

269: \bigg\{\Theta(z-x)\,J_0((1-z)Qb)\bigg[P_{qq}(z)\, f_{S}\left({x\over z},b,Q\right)

270: + P_{qG}(z)\, f_{G}\left({x\over z},b,Q\right)\bigg]

271: \nonumber \\ &-& [zP_{qq}(z)+zP_{Gq}(z)]\, f_{S}(x,b,Q)\bigg\}

272: \nonumber \\

273: Q^2{ \partial  f_{G}(x,b,Q)\over \partial Q^2}&=&

274: {\alpha_s(Q^2)\over 2\pi} \int_0^1 dz

275: \bigg\{\Theta(z-x)\,J_0((1-z)Qb)\bigg[P_{Gq}(z)\, f_{S}\left({x\over z},b,Q\right)

276: + P_{GG}(z)\, f_{G}\left({x\over z},b,Q\right)\bigg]

277: \nonumber \\ 

278: &-& [zP_{GG}(z)+zP_{qG}(z)]\, f_{G}(x,b,Q)\bigg\}

279: \label{Keq}

280: \end{eqnarray}

281: \end{widetext}

282: The splitting functions $P_{ab}(z)$ are listed in Eq.~(\ref{split}). 

283: 

284: Following Ref. \cite{JK3},  a factorized form 

285: of the distribution functions at the initial scale $Q_0$ is assumed, 

286: \begin{equation}

287:  f_j(x,b,Q_0)=F^{\rm NP}(b)\frac{x}{2}p_j(x,Q_0), 

288: \label{bcondf}

289: \end{equation}

290: with the profile function $F^{\rm NP}(b)$ taken to be universal for all species

291: of partons.  The factorization assumption (\ref{bcondf}) is technical and one can easily depart

292: from this limitation in numerical studies.  

293: We note, however, that the models of Ref. \cite{SQM,NJL},

294: studied in Sec.~\ref{sec:init}, do predict a factorized initial

295: condition of the form (\ref{bcondf}).  The input profile function, $F^{\rm NP}(b)$, is linked through the

296: Fourier-Bessel transform to the $k_\perp$ distribution at the scale

297: $Q_0$.  At $b=0$ the normalization is $F^{\rm NP}(0)=1$.  The profile function

298: factorizes from the evolution equations. This is clear, since 

299: any solution of Eq.~(\ref{Keq}) remains a solution when multiplied by an arbitrary function of $b$. 

300: Due to evolution, at higher scales $Q$ we have

301: \begin{eqnarray}

302: f_j(x,b,Q)=F^{\rm NP}(b) f_j^{\rm evol}(x,b,Q), \label{factor}

303: \end{eqnarray}

304: with $f_j^{\rm evol}(x,b,Q)$ satisfying equations {\em identical} to (\ref{Keq}).

305: 

306: We should stress again an important physical difference between $F^{\rm NP}(b)$ and $f_j^{\rm evol}(x,b,Q)$. 

307: While $F^{\rm NP}(b)$ originates entirely from low-energy, 

308: {\em non-perturbative} physics, $f_j^{\rm evol}(x,b,Q)$ 

309: is given by the {\em perturbative QCD evolution} with Eq.~(\ref{Keq}) from the initial condition

310: \begin{equation}

311:  f_j^{\rm evol}(x,b,Q_0)=\frac{x}{2}p_j(x,Q_0). 

312: \label{bcondfevol}

313: \end{equation}

314: Throughout this paper, except for Sec.~\ref{sec:init}, we focus on the perturbative evolution and the functions

315: $f_j^{\rm evol}(x,b,Q)$. The function $F^{\rm NP}(b)$ is referred to as {\em the initial profile} and 

316: $f_j^{\rm evol}(x,b,Q)$ as {\em the evolution-generated UPD}.

317: 

318: 

319: %Due to the mentioned factorization, the evolution equations for $f_j^{\rm evol}(x,b,Q)$

320: %also take the form (\ref{Keq}) \cite{JK3}. We focus on the evolution part of 

321: %the UPD, $f_j^{\rm evol}$. In order to simplify notation, however, 

322: %we drop the superscript {\em evol} in the following of the paper.

323: 

324: 

325: \section{The Kwieci\'nski equation in the Mellin space\label{sec:keqmel}}

326: 

327: We define the $x$-moments of an unintegrated parton distribution in the impact

328: parameter space as (we retain the same symbol for the function and its Mellin 

329: transform, hoping the distinction made by the argument prevents any confusion)  

330: \begin{equation}

331: f_j(n, b, Q) = \int_0^1 dx \,x^{n-1} f_j(x, b, Q). \label{momdef}

332: \end{equation}

333: In the Mellin space, the evolution

334: equations for the UPD are very simple, as they become diagonal both in $b$ and $n$. 

335: They involve $b$-dependent anomalous dimensions, equal to

336: \begin{eqnarray}

337: && \gamma_{n,ab}( Q b ) = 

338: 4 \int_0^1 dz \, \left[ z^n J_0 \left( (1-z) Q b \right) -1 \right] P_{ab} (z)  \nonumber \\

339: && = \gamma_{n,ab}^{(0)} \label{gamdef} 

340: - 4 \int_0^1 dz \, z^n \left[ J_0 \left( (1-z) Q b \right) -1 \right] P_{ab} (z),  \nonumber \\

341: \label{gammadef}

342: \end{eqnarray}

343: where the values at $b=0$ are

344: \begin{eqnarray}

345: \gamma_{n,NS}^{(0)} &=& 

346: - 4 \int_0^1 dz (z^n -1) P_{qq} (z), \nonumber \\

347: \gamma_{n,qq}^{(0)} &=& 

348: - 4 \int_0^1 dz \left [ (z^n -z)P_{qq}-z P_{Gq} \right], \nonumber \\

349: \gamma_{n,qG}^{(0)} &=& - 4 \int_0^1 dz z^n P_{qG},  \\

350: \gamma_{n,Gq}^{(0)} &=& - 4 \int_0^1 dz z^n P_{Gq}, \nonumber \\

351: \gamma_{n,GG}^{(0)} &=& - 4 \int_0^1 dz \left [ (z^n-z) P_{GG} -z P_{qG} \right ]. \nonumber

352: \label{gamdef0}

353: \end{eqnarray} 

354: Their explicit form for various channels is listed in

355: Eq.~(\ref{anombNS},\ref{anomb}).  The fact that we can write the

356: analytic form of the integrals in Eq. (\ref{gammadef}) (see

357: App.~\ref{anomdim}) allows for efficient numerical calculations and

358: analytic considerations.

359: 

360: The integration of both sides of Eq.~(\ref{Keq}) with $\int_0^1 dx

361: x^{n-1}$ yields for the non-singlet case the equation

362: \begin{equation}

363: \frac{ d f_{\rm NS}(n, b, Q )}{ dQ^2 } = -\frac{\alpha_S(Q^2)}{8 \pi Q^2}

364: \gamma_{n,NS}(Q b ) f_{\rm NS}(n, b,Q). 

365: \label{eqNS}

366: \end{equation} 

367: The formal solution of Eq.~(\ref{eqNS}) can be readily obtained as

368: \begin{equation}

369: \frac{ f_{\rm NS}(n, b, Q)}{f_{\rm NS}(n, b, Q_0) } = {\rm exp} \left[

370: -\int_{Q_0^2}^{Q^2} \frac{d{Q'}^2 \alpha({Q'}^2)}{8\pi {Q'}^2}

371: \gamma_{\rm NS}(n, b, Q') \right].

372: \label{nschan}

373: \end{equation}

374: In the singlet channel we find the coupled set of equations, 

375: \begin{eqnarray}

376: && \!\!\!\!\! \frac{ d f_{S}(n, b, Q )}{ dQ^2 } =

377: -\frac{\alpha_S(Q^2)}{8 \pi Q^2} \nonumber \\ && \times \left [

378: \gamma_{n,qq}(Q b ) f_{S}(n, b,Q) + \gamma_{n,qG}(Q b ) f_{G}(n, b,Q)

379: \right ], \nonumber \\ && \!\!\!\!\! \frac{ d f_{G}(n, b, Q )}{ dQ^2 }

380: = -\frac{\alpha_S(Q^2)}{8 \pi Q^2} \nonumber \\ && \times \left [

381: \gamma_{n,Gq}(Q b ) f_{S}(n, b,Q) + \gamma_{n,GG}(Q b ) f_{G}(n, b,Q)

382: \right ], \nonumber \\

383: \label{eqS}

384: \end{eqnarray} 

385: which has the formal solution

386: \begin{eqnarray}

387: &&\left ( \begin{array}{c} f_S(n,b,Q) \\f_G(n,b,Q) \end{array} \right ) = \label{eqSformal} \\

388: && {\cal P} \exp \left [ {-\int_{Q_0^2}^{Q^2} \frac{dQ'^2 \alpha(Q'^2)}{8 \pi Q'^2} 

389: \Gamma_n(Qb)} \right] \left ( \begin{array}{c} f_S(n,b,Q_0) \\f_G(n,b,Q_0) \end{array} \right ), \nonumber \\

390: && \Gamma_n(Qb)=\left ( \begin{array}{cc} \gamma_{n,qq}(Qb) & \gamma_{n,qG}(Qb) \\ 

391: \gamma_{n,Gq}(Qb) & \gamma_{n,GG}(Qb) \end{array} \right ). \nonumber

392: \end{eqnarray}

393: The symbol ${\cal P}$ indicates that powers of $\Gamma_n$ are ordered along the integration path.

394: The qualitative difference between Eq.~(\ref{eqSformal}) and the LO DGLAP equations is the fact that 

395: $\Gamma_n$ depends on the evolution variable $Q$. This makes the singlet sector more difficult

396: to analyze analytically. Equations~(\ref{eqS}) can be solved numerically for any value of $n$ real or

397: complex~\cite{ERANLO}. For the case of integrated PD ($b=0$)

398: Eq.~(\ref{eqNS}) and (\ref{eqS}) reduce to the well-known LO DGLAP

399: equation in the Mellin space.

400: 

401: The corresponding UPD in the $x$ space can be reconstructed using

402: the inverse Mellin transform, 

403: \begin{equation}

404: f_j(x, b, Q) = \int_{n_0-i\infty}^{n_0+i\infty}\frac{{\rm d} n}{2\pi{i}}

405: x^{-n} f_j(n, b, Q), \label{invmel}

406: \end{equation}

407: where $n_0$ has to be chosen in such a way as to leave all the

408: singularities on the left-hand-side of the contour. It turns out that

409: for $ b \neq 0 $ the analytic structure of the $b-$dependent anomalous

410: dimension remains the same as for the $b=0$ case. This can be inferred

411: directly by studying the analytic structure of the formulas

412: (\ref{anombNS},\ref{anomb}) or the pole-residue expansion of

413: Eq.~(\ref{eq:pole_res}). Thus, we have the result that that

414: $\gamma_{n,NS}(Q b)$, $\gamma_{n,qq}(Q b)$, and $\gamma_{n,qG}(Q b)$

415: have poles at $n=-1, -2, -3, ...$, while $\gamma_{n,GG}(Q b)$ and

416: $\gamma_{n,Gq}(Q b)$ have poles at $n=0, -1, -2, ...$. Parameterizing

417: the contour in Eq.~(\ref{invmel}) as $n=n_0+i t$, we arrive at the

418: inversion formula

419: \begin{eqnarray}

420: f_j(x, b, Q) \!\!&=& \!\! x^{-n_0} \!\! \int_0^{\infty} \!\! \frac{{\rm d} t}{\pi}

421:  \left ( \cos(t \log x) {\rm Re}[f_j(n_0+i t, b, Q)]\nonumber \right . \\ 

422: &+& \left . \sin(t \log x) {\rm Im}[f_j(n_0+i t, b, Q)] \right ).  \label{invmel2}

423: \end{eqnarray}

424: For the non-singlet case we take $n_0=0$, while for the singlet case

425: $n_0=1$. As an additional check we have also verified that a bended

426: integration path $ n = c + r e^{i\pi /4} $ with $0 \le r < \infty$, as

427: used in \cite{ERANLO}, also works nicely. 

428: 

429: \section{The initial condition for the UPD of the pion\label{sec:init}} 

430: 

431: As an illustration of our method, we consider the UPD's of the pion with

432: the initial condition at $Q_0$ provided by two large-$N_c$ low-energy chiral quark

433: models. The original work of Ref.~\cite{JK3} tested the GRS

434: parameterization for the pion \cite{GRS} and the GRV parameterization

435: for the nucleon \cite{GRV}, supplied with a Gaussian profile $F^{\rm NP}(b)$.

436: The considered models generate the functions $F^{\rm NP}(b)$ as genuine model

437: predictions of low-energy non-perturbative physics, with no freedom

438: involved.  Our first model is the recently proposed Spectral

439: Quark Model (SQM)\cite{SQM01,SQM,SQM03}, and the second one is the

440: popular Nambu--Jona Lasinio model (NJL) with the Pauli-Villars

441: regularization \cite{NJL}, treated for simplicity in the strict chiral

442: limit.  

443: 

444: Firstly, since the chiral quark models have no gluon degrees of freedom, 

445: we have at the model scale 

446: \begin{eqnarray}

447: g(x,Q_0)=0 ,  \label{noglue}

448: \end{eqnarray}

449: or 

450: \begin{eqnarray}

451: f_{G}^{\rm evol}(x,b,Q_0)= 0 . \label{noglue2}

452: \end{eqnarray}

453: For the integrated valence quark PD both models predict, in the chiral

454: limit and at the model scale $Q_0$, that

455: \begin{eqnarray}

456: q(x,Q_0)=\theta(x) \theta(1-x), \label{thetas}

457: \end{eqnarray}

458: {\em i.e.} a constant value with the proper normalization and support.

459: Thus the corresponding $f^{\rm evol}$ functions of Eq.~(\ref{deff}) are linear in $x$, 

460: \begin{eqnarray}

461: f_{NS,S}^{\rm evol}(x,b,Q_0)=x \theta(x) \theta(1-x), \label{initx}

462: \end{eqnarray}

463: The scale of the model, as found from the momentum sum-rule, is rather

464: low: $Q_0=313$~MeV.  Although this is admittedly a very low scale, one

465: may hope that the typical expansion parameter, $\alpha(Q_0^2)/(2 \pi)

466: \sim 0.3$, is low enough to make the perturbation theory sensible.

467: This claim gains support from the next-too-leading analysis of the

468: integrated PD \cite{DavArr1}, where the corrections are found to be

469: small.

470: 

471: The QCD evolution is crucial for the phenomenological success of the

472: considered low-energy chiral quark models.  In

473: Refs. \cite{DavArr1,DavArr2,Weigel} it has been found that the

474: non-singlet distribution, when evolved to the scale of 2~GeV, agrees

475: very well with the SMRS parameterization of the pion data

476: \cite{SMRS92}, while in \cite{WBDur} it has been very favorably

477: compared to the old E615 data at 4~GeV \cite{e615} (see the discussion in

478: Sec.~\ref{sec:num} and Fig.~\ref{fig:e615}).

479:   

480: In the SQM, the valence UPD of the pion at the scale $Q_0$ is

481: \cite{SQM}

482: \begin{eqnarray}

483: q(x,k_\perp,Q_0)&=&\overline{q}(1-x,k_\perp) \label{qqmod} \\

484: &=&\frac{6M_V^3}{\pi(k_\perp^2+M_V^2/4)^{5/2}}

485:  \theta(x)\theta(1-x), \nonumber

486: \end{eqnarray}

487: where $M_V=770~{\rm MeV}$ is the mass of the $\rho$ meson.

488: Passing to the impact-parameter space with the Fourier-Bessel transform yields

489: \begin{eqnarray}

490: q(x,b,Q_0)& \equiv & 2 \pi \int_0^\infty k_\perp d k_\perp q (x,k_\perp) J_0(k_\perp b) \label{sqmb} \\

491: &=& \left (1+\frac{b M_V}{2} \right )

492:  \exp\left ( - \frac{M_V b}{2} \right ) 

493:  \theta(x)\theta(1-x). \nonumber

494: \end{eqnarray}

495: The expansion at small $b$ gives

496: \begin{eqnarray}

497:  q(x,b,Q_0)&=& \left( 1-\frac{M_V^2 b^2}{8}+\frac{M_V^3 b^3}{24}+\dots

498: \right) \nonumber \\ && \times \theta(x)\theta(1-x), 

499: \label{Psibexp}

500: \end{eqnarray}

501: and average transverse momentum squared is equal to  

502: \begin{eqnarray}

503: \langle k_\perp^2 \rangle_{\rm NP}^{\rm SQM} &\equiv& \frac{\int d^2 k_\perp \, k_\perp^2 q(x,k_\perp)}

504: {\int d^2 k_\perp q(x,k_\perp)}=-\frac{4}{q(x,b)}\left.\frac{d q(x,b)}{db^2}\right|_{b=0} \nonumber \\

505: &=& \frac{M_V^2}{2}, \label{kperp2}

506: \end{eqnarray}

507: which numerically gives $\langle k_\perp^2 \rangle_{\rm NP}^{\rm SQM}=(544~{\rm MeV})^2$ (all at the model working scale

508: $Q_0$). The subscript {\em NP} reminds 

509: us that the quantity comes entirely from the non-perturbative physics, 

510: entering profile function $F^{\rm NP}(b)$ (see the discussion at the end of Sec.~\ref{sec:keq}).

511: 

512: In the NJL model with the PV regularization \cite{NJL} the analogous

513: formulas read~\cite{ERAZak} 

514: \begin{eqnarray}

515: && q(x,k_\perp,Q_0)=\overline{q}(1-x,k_\perp) \label{qqNJL} \\

516: && =\frac{\Lambda^4 M^2 N_c}

517:   {4 f_\pi^2 \pi^3 \left( k_\perp^2 + M^2 \right) \left( k_\perp^2 + \Lambda^2 + M^2 \right)^2} 

518: \theta(x)\theta(1-x), \nonumber

519: \end{eqnarray}

520: \begin{eqnarray}

521: q(x,b,Q_0)&=& \frac{M^2 N_c}{4 f_\pi^2 \pi^2} \left( 2 K_0(b M) - \label{qqNJLb}

522:         2 K_0(b \sqrt{\Lambda^2 + M^2}) \nonumber \right . \\ &-& \left . 

523:         \frac{b \Lambda^2 K_1(b \sqrt{\Lambda^2 + M^2})}

524: {\sqrt{\Lambda^2 + M^2}} \right ) \theta(x)\theta(1-x), \nonumber \\

525: \end{eqnarray}

526: where the pion decay constant is given by

527: \begin{eqnarray}

528: f_\pi^2=\frac{ M^2 N_c \left( \Lambda^2 + 

529:         \left( \Lambda^2 + M^2 \right)  \log \frac{\Lambda^2 + M^2}{M^2}  

530: \right)}{4 \pi^2 \left( \Lambda^2 + M^2 \right) }. \label{fpi2}

531: \end{eqnarray}

532: The parameters of the model are adjusted in such a way that $f_\pi=93$~MeV, namely 

533: $M=280$~MeV and $\Lambda=871$~MeV.

534: The expansion at small $b$ yields

535: \begin{eqnarray}

536: && q(x,b,Q_0) = \\ && \left( 1- \frac{M^2 N_c \left( \Lambda^2 - 

537: M^2 \log \frac{\Lambda^2 + M^2}{M^2}  \right) b^2

538:       }{16 \pi^2 f_\pi^2 } + \dots \right) \nonumber \\

539: && \times 

540: \theta(x)\theta(1-x), \nonumber

541: \label{PsibexpNJL}

542: \end{eqnarray}

543: and average transverse momentum squared is equal to  

544: \begin{eqnarray}

545: \langle k_\perp^2 \rangle_{\rm NP}^{\rm NJL} = \frac{M^2 N_c \left( \Lambda^2  - 

546: M^2 \log \frac{\Lambda^2 + M^2}{M^2} \right) }

547:   {4 \pi^2 f_\pi^2}, \label{kperp2NJL}

548: \end{eqnarray}

549: which numerically gives $\langle k_\perp^2 \rangle_{\rm NP}^{NJL}=(626~{\rm MeV})^2$ (at the scale

550: $Q_0$), which is similar to the number from the SQM.

551: 

552: Finally, in the notation of Eq.~(\ref{factor}) we can write that the initial profile function is 

553: \begin{eqnarray}

554: F^{\rm NP}_{\rm SQM}(b)&=&\left (1+\frac{b M_V}{2} \right ) \exp\left ( - \frac{M_V b}{2} \right ), \label{qqSQMb}\\

555: F^{\rm NP}_{\rm NJL}(b)&=&\frac{M^2 N_c}{4 f_\pi^2 \pi^2} \left( 2 K_0(b M) - \label{qqNJLb2}

556:         2 K_0(b \sqrt{\Lambda^2 + M^2}) \nonumber \right . \\ &-& \left . 

557:         \frac{b \Lambda^2 K_1(b \sqrt{\Lambda^2 + M^2})}{\sqrt{\Lambda^2 + M^2}} \right ).

558: \end{eqnarray}

559: Both initial profile functions are displayed in Fig.~\ref{fig:F}.

560: Note that the profiles, although have a $b^2$ correction at small $b$,

561: are not Gaussian, and at large $b$ display an exponential fall-off.

562: \begin{figure}[tb]

563: \begin{center}

564: \epsfig{figure=profile.eps,width=8.5cm}

565: \end{center}

566: \caption{

567: The initial profile functions $F_{\rm NP}$ for the SQM and NJL models, plotted as functions of the transverse coordinate $b$.

568: The fall-off is exponential, according to Eq.~(\ref{qqSQMb}) and (\ref{qqNJLb}).}

569: \label{fig:F}

570: \end{figure}

571: 

572: As discussed in Sec. \ref{sec:keq}, the form of $F^{\rm NP}(b)$ factorizes from the evolution.

573: In both models there is no dependence of UPD on $x$ at the initial scale $Q_0$. As a results, we get the 

574: following set of initial moments:

575: \begin{eqnarray}

576: f_{\rm NS}^{\rm evol}(n,b,Q_0)&=&\frac{1}{n+1}, \nonumber \\

577: f_{S}^{\rm evol}(n,b,Q_0)&=&\frac{1}{n+1}, \nonumber \\

578: f_{G}^{\rm evol}(n,b,Q_0)&=&0. \label{initmom}

579: \end{eqnarray} 

580: 

581: We remark that away from the chiral limit the separability of the

582: dependence on $x$ and $b$ no longer holds.  In this case the initial

583: conditions for the evolution are more complicated (they depend on $b$), but the analysis

584: can be easily generalized to account for this case as well. 

585: %Simply, in that case the initial condition depends on $b$.

586: 

587: \section{Numerical results\label{sec:num}}

588: 

589: In Fig. \ref{Q2} we present the results of our numerical calculation

590: with the method using the Mellin transform. The initial conditions are

591: for the pion in the chiral limit (\ref{initmom}), holding at

592: $Q_0=313$~MeV, and the evolution is carried up to the scale of

593: $Q=2$~GeV. The differential equations for the moments,

594: (\ref{eqNS},\ref{eqS}), are solved numerically for complex $n-$values

595: along the Mellin contour, and subsequently the inverse Mellin

596: transform (\ref{invmel2}) is carried out.  The figure contains three

597: families of curves, solid for the gluon, dashed for the valence

598: quarks, and dotted for the sea quarks. In each family $b$ assumes the

599: values 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 10. Naturally, increasing $b$ results in

600: a decrease of the distribution, with the effect strongest at low

601: $x$. At $x$ close to 1 this effect disappears, which is explained in

602: Sec.~\ref{sec:x1}. We also note that at high values of $b$ the

603: distributions for the gluons become negative, reflecting the change of

604: sign of the Bessel function in the evolution kernel of

605: Eq.~(\ref{Keq}).  As already discussed in Ref.~\cite{JK3}, this poses

606: no immediate physical problems, as the distributions in $k_\perp$

607: remain positive as primary objects, and so are the physical cross sections.

608: 

609: \begin{figure}[tb]

610: \begin{center}

611: \epsfig{figure=q4gev.eps,width=8.6cm}

612: \vspace{-10mm}

613: \end{center}

614: \caption{The evolution-generated UPD's for the pion for various values of the transverse

615: coordinate (from top to bottom $b=0$, $1$, $2$, $3$, $4$, $5$ and

616: $10~{\rm GeV}^{-1}$), plotted as functions of the Bjorken $x$.  The evolution is

617: made with the initial condition (\ref{initx}) at $Q_0=313$~MeV up to

618: $Q=2~{\rm GeV}$.  Solid lines -- gluons, dashed lines -- valence

619: quarks, dotted lines -- sea quarks.}

620: \label{Q2}

621: \end{figure}

622: 

623: The results of Fig.~\ref{Q2} are consistent with the findings 

624: of Ref. \cite{JK3}, where a different numerical method was used, as

625: well as a different initial condition tested. 

626: 

627: In Fig.~\ref{fig:b} we show the dependence of the evolution-generated UPD's on $b$ at

628: $Q=2$~GeV and $x=0.1$.  The

629: results are represented by squares for the non-singlet quarks, diamonds for

630: the singlet quarks, and stars for the gluons. We note the 

631: much faster fall-off with $b$ for the gluons than for the quarks, as expected from Eq.~(\ref{powG}).

632: The quarks exhibit a long-range tail, according to the power-law formula (\ref{fnsas3}). 

633: The solid line

634: shows the asymptotic form for the case of non-singlet quarks from Eq.~(\ref{fnsas3},\ref{fnsas4}) (see

635: Sec.~\ref{largeb}), which becomes accurate for $b \ge 10~{\rm GeV}^{-1}$. 

636: As $Q$ is increased further, or $x$ decreased, the distributions in $b$ become narrower, leading to 

637: larger spreading in $k_\perp$. For more details and plots concerning other numerical results see Ref.~\cite{JK3}. 

638: %

639: \begin{figure}[tb]

640: \begin{center}

641: \epsfig{figure=bdep.eps,width=8.6cm}

642: \vspace{-10mm}

643: \end{center}

644: \caption{Evolution-generated UPD's for the pion for $Q=2$~GeV

645: and $x=0.1$, plotted as functions of $b$. The evolution is made with

646: the initial condition (\ref{initx}) at $Q_0=313$~MeV.  The numerical

647: results are represented by squares for the non-singlet quarks, diamond for

648: the singlet quarks, and stars for the gluons, while the solid line shows the

649: asymptotic formula (\ref{fnsas3} for the case of non-singlet quarks. We note the 

650: much faster fall-of for the gluons than for the quarks, as expected from Eq.~(\ref{powG}).

651: The quarks exhibit a long-range tail, according to the power-law formula (\ref{fnsas3}). 

652: As $Q$ is increased or $x$ decreased, the distributions in $b$ become narrower, leading to 

653: spreading in $k_\perp$. }

654: \label{fig:b}

655: \end{figure}

656: 

657: 

658: \section{Low-$b$ expansion\label{sec:lowb}}

659: 

660: Since the anomalous dimensions (\ref{anombNS},\ref{anomb}) involve 

661: generalized hypergeometric functions, they are not 

662: easy to use in numerical calculations. For that reason we consider the small-$b$ expansion, as well

663: as the asymptotic forms at large $b Q$, presented in the next section.

664: It is convenient to introduce the notation

665: \begin{eqnarray} 

666: r_k=r_k(Q_0^2,Q^2)=\int_{Q_0^2}^{Q^2} \frac{d{Q'}^2 \alpha({Q'}^2)}{8

667: \pi {Q'}^2} {Q'}^{2k}. \nonumber \\ \label{rk}

668: \end{eqnarray}

669: The explicit form of functions $r_k$ is given in Appendix \ref{pQCD}.

670: Next, we apply Eq.~(\ref{ge}) and find the following expansion in the non-singlet channel:

671: \begin{eqnarray}

672: &&\frac{ f(n, b, Q)}{f(n,b,Q_0) } = e^{\gamma_{n,NS}^{(0)} r_0} 

673: \exp \left[- C_F \sum_{k=1}^\infty \frac{(- b^2)^{k} 4^{1-k}}{k!^2} \right . \nonumber  \\

674: && \left . \times \left[ {\sf B} (2k,n+1) + {\sf B}

675: (2k,n+3) \right] r_k \right] \label{fbf0},

676: \end{eqnarray}

677: where ${\sf B}$ is the Euler beta function. 

678: We note that although at the

679: level of the differential equation our expansion is formally in $Q b$,

680: the result (\ref{fbf0}), together with the fact that $r_k$ is proportional to 

681: $\Lambda_{\rm QCD}^{2k}$ ({\em cf.} (\ref{rkap})), show that the expansion 

682: parameter is actually $b \Lambda_{\rm QCD}$.

683: %The convergence radius of the series is infinite, and the convergence is fast. 

684: The rate of convergence of the

685: method can be deduced from Fig.~(\ref{fig:convergence}). As we can see, the

686: number of terms needed increases for increasing $b$ and decreasing

687: $x$. For $x > 0.01$ eight terms in the expansion seems more than sufficient.

688: 

689: \begin{figure}[]

690: \begin{center}

691: \epsfig{figure=lowb.eps,width=8.6cm}

692: \end{center}

693: \caption{The low-$b$ expansion for the evolution-generated UPD's of the pion

694: at $b=5~{\rm GeV}^{-1}$ and $Q=2~{\rm GeV}^2$, plotted as a function of the 

695: Bjorken $x$. 

696: Solid lines -- gluons, dashed lines -- valence quarks, dotted lines -- sea quarks.

697: For each kind of parton the curves from top to bottom correspond to 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 16

698: terms in the small $b$-expansion. The initial condition for the evolution is provided 

699: by Eq.~(\ref{initx}).}

700: \label{fig:convergence}

701: \end{figure}

702: 

703: \section{Large-$b$ expansion\label{largeb}}

704: 

705: Appendix \ref{app:largeb} contains asymptotic forms of the generalized hypergeometric

706: functions and of the $b$-dependent anomalous dimensions. These expressions hold

707: in the limit of large $Q b$ at $n$ kept fixed. The formulas are of 

708: great practical importance in the present study, since they are much 

709: simpler to implement in numerical calculations than the generalized hypergeometric 

710: functions appearing in Eq.~(\ref{anombNS},\ref{anomb}). Actually, Eq.~(\ref{asqq}-\ref{asGG}) 

711: should be used whenever $Q b$ is larger than about $10 |n|$. Since in practical problems the scale $Q$ 

712: may be as large as the mass of the $W$-boson, there is a frequent need to use the asymptotic 

713: expressions (\ref{asqq}-\ref{asGG}). Also, if the UPD's in the 

714: transverse momentum are needed, one has to carry back the Fourier transform from the $b$-space to

715: the $k_\perp$-space, which involves all values of $b$. 

716: 

717: We start with the non-singlet case of Eq.~(\ref{eqNS}).

718: With the help of Eq.~(\ref{asqq}), where at the leading order in $1/(Qb)$ we drop the oscillatory parts, 

719: we may write (\ref{nschan}) at large $Q b$: 

720: \begin{eqnarray}

721: \frac{f^{\rm evol}_{\rm NS}(n,b,Q)}{f^{\rm evol}_{\rm NS}(n,b,Q_0)}&=&e^{y_0+y_1 n}, \label{fasy}

722: \end{eqnarray}

723: where

724: \begin{eqnarray}

725: y_1&=& -4C_F \left ( \frac{2 \Lambda_{\rm QCD}^2}{b}-\frac{1}{b^3} \right ) r_{-3/2}(Q_0^2,Q^2) , \nonumber \\

726: y_0&=& -4C_F \left ( \frac{2 \Lambda_{\rm QCD}^2}{b} r_{-3/2}(Q_0^2,Q^2) 

727: +\frac{1}{\beta_0^{(3)}} \log \frac{Q}{Q_0} \right . \nonumber \\

728: &+& \left . 2 \left [ \log \frac{b \Lambda_{\rm QCD}}{2} +\gamma -\frac{3}{4} \right ] r_0(Q_0^2,Q^2)    \right ) ,

729: \nonumber \\

730: && \hspace{4cm}  {\rm for} \;\; Q^2 < \mu_c^2, \label{y0y13}

731: \end{eqnarray}  

732: and 

733: \begin{eqnarray}

734: y_1&=& -4C_F \left ( \frac{2 \Lambda_{\rm QCD }^2}{b}r_{-3/2}(Q_0^2,\mu_c^2) \right . \nonumber \\

735: &+& \left . \frac{2 \Lambda_{4}^2}{b}r_{-3/2}(\mu_c^2,Q^2)-\frac{1}{b^3} r_{-3/2}(Q_0^2,Q^2) \right ) , \nonumber \\

736: y_0&=& -4C_F \left ( \frac{2 \Lambda_{\rm QCD}^2}{b} r_{-3/2}(Q_0^2,\mu_c^2) 

737: \right . \nonumber \\ &+& \left . \frac{2 \Lambda_{4}^2}{b} r_{-3/2}(\mu_c^2,Q^2)

738: +\frac{1}{\beta_0^{(3)}} \log \frac{\mu_c}{Q_0} + \frac{1}{\beta_0^{(4)}} \log \frac{Q}{\mu_c}  \right . \nonumber \\

739: &+& \left . 2 \left [ \log \frac{b \Lambda_{\rm QCD}}{2} \right ] r_0(Q_0^2,\mu_c^2) \right .  \nonumber \\ &+& \left . 

740: 2 \left [ \log \frac{b \Lambda_{4}}{2} \right ] r_0(\mu_c^2,Q^2) 

741:  + \left [ \gamma -\frac{3}{4} \right ]   r_0(Q_0^2,Q^2)  \right ) ,

742: \nonumber \\

743: &&  \hspace{4cm}  {\rm for} \;\; Q^2 \ge \mu_c^2. \label{y0y14}

744: \end{eqnarray}  

745: Next, we take our initial condition (\ref{initmom}) and use the inverse Mellin transform 

746: \begin{eqnarray}

747: \int_C \frac{dn}{2\pi i} x^{-n} \frac{e^{y_0+y_1 n}}{n+1} = x e^{y_0-y_1} \Theta \left (y_1+\log \frac{1}{x} \right ).

748: \label{lapy}

749: \end{eqnarray}

750: The condition provided by the theta function means that the formula can be used for $x < \exp(y_1)$. For 

751: negative $y_1$ this means that the validity is limited for $x$ not too close to 1. This, however, has been 

752: already tacitly assumed, since the asymptotic expansion holds for fixed values of $n$, hence cannot describe

753: $x$ in the vicinity of $1$. 

754: The above formulas lead to the following large-$b$ form of $f^{\rm evol}_{\rm NS}$ in the $x$ space:

755: \begin{eqnarray}

756: && f^{\rm evol}_{\rm NS}(x,b,Q)=x \left ( \frac{b \Lambda_{\rm QCD}}{2} \right )^{-8C_F r_0(Q_0^2,Q^2)}

757:  \left ( \frac{Q}{Q_0}\right )^{-\frac{4C_F}{\beta_0^{(3)}}} \nonumber \\ &&\times

758: \exp \left ( \left [ 2 \gamma-\frac{3}{2} \right ] r_0(Q_0^2,Q^2) + \frac{1}{b^3} r_{-3/2}(Q_0^2,Q^2) \right ) 

759: \nonumber \\

760: &&  \hspace{4cm}  {\rm for} \;\; Q^2 < \mu_c^2, \label{fnsas3}

761: \end{eqnarray}

762: and 

763: \begin{eqnarray}

764: &&f^{\rm evol}_{\rm NS}(x,b,Q)=x \left ( \frac{b}{2} \right )^{-8C_F r_0(Q_0^2,Q^2)} 

765: \Lambda_{\rm QCD}^{-8C_F r_0(Q_0^2,\mu_c^2)} \nonumber \\ &\times& 

766: \Lambda_4^{-8C_F r_0(\mu_c^2,Q^2)} \left ( \frac{\mu_c}{Q_0}\right )^{-4C_F/\beta_0^{(3)}} 

767:  \left ( \frac{Q}{\mu_c}\right )^{-4C_F/\beta_0^{(4)}} \nonumber \\ &\times&

768: \exp \left ( \left [ 2 \gamma-\frac{3}{2} \right ] r_0(Q_0^2,Q^2) 

769: + \frac{1}{b^3} r_{-3/2}(Q_0^2,Q^2) \right ) 

770: \nonumber \\

771: &&  \hspace{4cm}  {\rm for} \;\; Q^2 \ge \mu_c^2, \label{fnsas4}

772: \end{eqnarray}

773: We note a few facts: the non-singlet UPD of the pion is for large $Q b$ linear in $x$ for $x$ not too

774: close to 1, with the slope decreasing 

775: with $b$ as a power law (we can neglect here the small correction due to the last term 

776: in Eq.~(\ref{fnsas3},\ref{fnsas4}). The exponent of $b$ is $-8C_F r_0(Q_0^2,Q^2)$. The overall constant 

777: is also determined. Note that linearity with $x$ at not-too-large $x$  

778: is seen in Fig.~\ref{Q2} for the valence quarks (dashed lines) 

779: at $b=10$~GeV$^{-1}$. Numerically, at $Q=2~{\rm GeV}$ we find for low $x$ that 

780: \mbox{$f_{\rm NS}(x, b=5~{\rm GeV}^{-1}, Q=2~{\rm GeV})=0.73 x$} and 

781: \mbox{$f_{\rm NS}(x, b=10~{\rm GeV}^{-1}, Q=2~{\rm GeV})=0.35 x$}, in accordance with the exact calculation of Fig.~\ref{Q2}.

782: 

783: The asymptotic form (\ref{fnsas3},\ref{fnsas4}) works very efficiently in practice. For the case of 

784: the non-singlet quarks this can be seen 

785: from Fig.~\ref{fig:b}, where for $Q=2$~GeV and $b > 5~{\rm GeV}^{-1}$ there is virtually no difference

786: between the exact numerical calculation and the asymptotic formula. 

787: 

788: The power-law behavior in $b$ shows that the evolution generates a rather weak behavior at large $b$. 

789: Numerically, at $Q=2$, $4$, and $100$~GeV, the power of $b$ is, respectively, -1.12, -1.29, and -1.75. 

790: This means that the large-$b$ behavior for the non-singlet quarks 

791: is controlled by the initial profile $F^{\rm NP}(b)$, which in chiral

792: quark models of the pion has an exponential fall-off, rather than by the QCD evolution. 

793: 

794: Now we pass to the discussion of the singlet case of Eq.~(\ref{eqS}). In the large-$Qb$ limit the leading 

795: part of the matrix $\Gamma_n$ of Eq.~(\ref{eqSformal}) becomes 

796: \begin{eqnarray}

797: \Gamma_n(Qb) \to \left ( \begin{array}{cc} 4C_F \log \frac{Q^2b^2}{4} & 0 \\ 

798: 0 & 4N_c \log \frac{Q^2b^2}{4} \end{array}\right ) .

799: \end{eqnarray}

800: From this form, using methods as for the non-singlet case above, we infer that the dependence on $b$ is 

801: asymptotically 

802: \begin{eqnarray}

803: f_{\rm S}(x,b,Q) &\sim& b^{-8C_F r_0(Q_0^2,Q^2)}, \nonumber \\

804: f_{\rm G}(x,b,Q) &\sim& b^{-8N_c r_0(Q_0^2,Q^2)}. \label{powG}

805: \end{eqnarray}

806: Thus the singlet quarks fall off at the same rate as the non-singlet quarks of Eq.~(\ref{fnsas3},\ref{fnsas4}), while

807: the gluons drop significantly faster, as $C_f=4/3$ and $N_c=3$. 

808: This behavior is clearly seen in Fig.~\ref{fig:b}.

809: We note that due to the complications of Eq.~(\ref{eqSformal}) a more detailed analysis

810: yielding pre-factors, such as the one 

811: for the non-singlet case presented above, is more difficult in the present case,

812: %. Also, since this 

813: %analysis is specific to the form 

814: %of the initial condition, 

815: hence we do not pursue it further here. 

816: 

817: We end this section with a couple of remarks concerning the observed long-range nature of the tails in $b$. 

818: Our initial non-perturbative profiles $F^{\rm NP}(b)$ drop exponentially, therefore suppress the tails 

819: generated by the evolution. This means that the large-$b$, or low-$k_\perp$ behavior is controlled 

820: by non-perturbative effects. 

821: The larger negative power in $f_G$, Eq.~(\ref{powG}), explains the the faster shrinkage of gluon

822: distributions in the $b$-space, or faster spreading in the $k_\perp$-space.

823:  

824: 

825: \section{Behavior of $f_{\rm NS}$ at $x \to 1$\label{sec:x1}}

826: 

827: According to standard properties of the Mellin

828: transform, the limit $x \to 1 $ is obtained form the large-$n$

829: behaviour of the anomalous dimensions. Using the asymptotic form

830: $B(n,m) \to \frac{\Gamma(m)}{n^m}$

831: in Eq.~(\ref{Beta}),

832: or the explicit form of the anomalous dimensions (\ref{anombNS},\ref{anomb}),

833: one obtains that 

834: \begin{eqnarray}

835: \gamma_{n,NS} (Q b) - \gamma_{n,NS}^{(0)} = 2 C_F \frac{b^2 Q^2}{n^2} +{\cal O}(1/n^3).

836: \label{gnsas}

837: \end{eqnarray}

838: We also need the large-$n$ expansion of $\gamma_{n,NS}^{(0)}$, which is

839: \begin{eqnarray}

840: \gamma_{n,NS}^{(0)}=8C_F  \left ( \log n + \gamma-3/4 +R(n) \right), \label{gnsas2}

841: \end{eqnarray} 

842: where $R(n)=\sum_{k=1}^\infty c_k n^{-k}$. Thus, according to Eq.~(\ref{nschan}), we have

843: the asymptotic form

844: \begin{eqnarray}

845: &&\!\!\!\!\! \frac{f^{\rm evol}_{\rm NS}(n,b,Q^2)}{f^{\rm evol}_{\rm NS}(n,b,Q_0^2)} = n^{- 8C_F r_0(Q^2,Q_0^2)} \label{fbf03} \\

846: &\times&  e^{- 8C_F r_0(  \gamma-3/4 +R(n)  )}  e^{2C_F b^2 r_1/n^2+{\cal O}(1/n^3)}.

847: \nonumber

848: \end{eqnarray} 

849: Using the initial moments (\ref{initmom}) and expanding the exponentials in Eq. (\ref{fbf03}) we 

850: obtain

851: \begin{eqnarray}

852: f^{\rm evol}_{\rm NS}(n,b,Q^2)&=& \frac{1}{n+1}n^{- 8C_F r_0} \left ( 1+\sum_{k=1}^\infty c'_k n^{-k} \right ) \nonumber \\ 

853: &\times&  \left ( 1+ 2C_F b^2 r_1/n^2+{\cal O}(1/n^3) \right ). \nonumber \\ \label{fns4}

854: \end{eqnarray} 

855: Next, we use the formula for the inverse Mellin transform 

856: \begin{eqnarray}

857: \int_C dn x^{-n} \frac{n^{-A}}{n+w} &=& (-w)^{-A} x^w \left ( 1 - \frac{\Gamma(A,-w \log \frac{1}{x}}{\Gamma(A)}\right )

858: \nonumber \\

859: & \to & \frac{x^w (\log \frac{1}{x})^{A}}{A \Gamma(A)}, \label{melex}

860: \end{eqnarray}

861: which after a straightforward algebra leads to the equation

862: \begin{eqnarray}

863: \frac{f^{\rm evol}_{\rm NS}(x,b,Q^2)}{f^{\rm evol}_{\rm NS}(x,0,Q^2)} &=& 1 - \frac{2C_F b^2 r_1 (1-x)^2}

864: {(1+8C_F r_0)(2+8C_F r_0)} \nonumber \\ &+& {\cal O}((1-x)^3). \label{x1}

865: \end{eqnarray} 

866: The terms with coefficients $c'_k$ do not enter at the leading order in $(1-x)$.

867: The behavior of Eq.~(\ref{x1}) agrees with the behaviour of Fig.~\ref{Q2},

868: where close to $x=1$ the departure of the curves with finite $b$ from the curve with $b=0$

869: becomes very slow, as it is suppressed by $(1-x)^2$.

870: 

871: We also obtain that at $x \to 1$ the integrated non-singlet distribution behaves as

872: \begin{eqnarray}

873: f_{\rm NS}(x,0,Q^2) \to \frac{e^{2 C_F (3-4\gamma)r_0}}{\Gamma(1+8C_F r_0)} (1-x)^{8 C_F r_0}. \label{fNSx1} 

874: \end{eqnarray}

875: This agrees with the fact that

876: a function which

877: originally behaves at $x \to 1$ as \mbox{$f_{\rm NS}(x,0,Q_0) \to (1-x)^p$} evolves

878: into \cite{Peterman}

879: \begin{eqnarray} 

880: f_{\rm NS}(x,0,Q^2) \to (1-x)^{p - \frac{4 C_F }{\beta_0} \log \frac{\alpha(Q)}{ \alpha(Q_0) }}. 

881: \label{endpoint}

882: \end{eqnarray} 

883: In our approach the integrated function at $Q=Q_0$ has $p=0$. Numerically, we find that

884: \begin{eqnarray}

885: f_{\rm NS}(x,0,(2~{\rm GeV})^2)&\to&1.15 (1-x)^{1.13}, \nonumber \\

886: f_{\rm NS}(x,0,(4~{\rm GeV})^2)&\to&1.08 (1-x)^{1.29}. \label{endnum}

887: \end{eqnarray}

888: Note that although with the DGLAP evolution 

889: the Brodsky-Lepage counting rules for the behavior at $x \to 1$ are clearly disobeyed,

890: our numerical predictions agree within experimental uncertainties with 

891: the experimental data, including the region very close to $x=1$. 

892: Fig.~\ref{fig:e615} confronts our results evolved to the scale of $Q=4~{\rm GeV}$ to the

893: E615 experimental Drell-Yan data \cite{e615} which cover the large-$x$ region. 

894: In view of the simplicity of the present model, the quality of this comparison is impressive.

895: %

896: \begin{figure}[tb]

897: \begin{center}

898: \includegraphics[width=8.6cm]{e615b.eps}

899: \end{center} 

900: \caption{Model prediction for the {\em integrated} valence quark distribution

901: of the pion, evolved to from the initial condition (\ref{initmom}) to the scale of $Q=4~{\rm GeV}$, 

902: confronted with the E615 Drell-Yan data \cite{e615}.

903: The behavior at $x \to 1$ is $(1-x)^{1.29}$.}

904: \label{fig:e615}

905: \end{figure}

906: %

907: 

908: \section{Behavior at $x \to 0$\label{sec:x0}}

909: 

910: The low-$x$ behaviour of the inverse

911: Mellin transform is encoded in the closest singularities to the

912: integration line. We start with the non-singlet case of Eq.~(\ref{eqNS}).

913: Using the pole-residue expansion of Appendix \ref{sec:polres} we find that the 

914: the closest singularity is at $n=-1$, with the residue $-4C_F J_0(Q b)$.

915: With the help of the expression for the inverse Mellin transform,

916: \begin{eqnarray}

917: \int_{-i \infty}^{i \infty} \frac{dn}{2 \pi i} \frac{x^{-n} }{n+1} e^{\frac{a}{n+1}} = 

918: \left \{ \begin{array}{ll}

919:       x I_0(2 \sqrt{a \log \frac{1}{x}}),\;\ a \ge 0 \\

920:       x J_0(2 \sqrt{a \log \frac{1}{x}}),\;\ a<0     \end{array} \right . , \nonumber \\

921: \label{mel2}

922: \end{eqnarray}

923: we find that 

924: \begin{eqnarray}

925: f^{\rm evol}_{\rm NS}(x,b,Q^2) \to \left \{ \begin{array}{ll} 

926:   x I_0(2 \sqrt{C_F A \log \frac{1}{x}}),\;\ A \ge 0 \\

927:   x J_0(2 \sqrt{C_F A \log \frac{1}{x}}),\;\ A<0     \end{array} \right .  \nonumber \\ \label{fnsx0}

928: \end{eqnarray}

929: where 

930: \begin{eqnarray}

931: A=\int_{Q_0^2}^{Q^2}\frac{dQ^2}{2 \pi Q^2}\alpha(Q^2) J_0(Q b).

932: \label{Adef}

933: \end{eqnarray}

934: 

935: For the singlet case we retain the closest singularity at $n=0$ and rewrite Eq.~(\ref{eqSformal})

936: in the form

937: \begin{eqnarray}

938: &&\left ( \begin{array}{c} f_S(n,b,Q) \\f_G(n,b,Q) \end{array} \right ) = \label{eqSformal2} \\

939: && \exp \left [ {\int_{Q_0^2}^{Q^2} \frac{dQ'^2 \alpha(Q'^2)J_0(Q'b)}{\pi Q'^2} 

940: \left ( \begin{array}{cc} 0 & 0 \\ 

941: \frac{C_F}{n} & \frac{N_c}{n} \end{array} \right )} \right] \nonumber \\ && \times 

942: \left ( \begin{array}{c} f_S(n,b,Q_0) \\ f_G(n,b,Q_0) \end{array} \right ), \nonumber

943: \end{eqnarray}

944: where we have used Eq.~(\ref{prS}), and could drop the ${\cal P}$ symbol since 

945: in the present approximation the matrix in the 

946: exponent does not depend on $Q'$. After some straightforward

947: algebra we obtain

948: \begin{eqnarray}

949: f_S(n,b,Q) &=& f_S(n,b,Q_0) , \nonumber \\

950: f_G(n,b,Q) &=&  f_S(n,b,Q_0) \frac{C_F}{N_c} \left ( e^{\frac{2N_cA}{n}} -1 \right ) \nonumber \\

951: &+& f_G(n,b,Q_0)  e^{\frac{2N_cA}{n}}.  

952: \end{eqnarray}

953: The equation for $f_S$ shows the inadequacy of retaining for this case the singularity at $n=0$ only, as

954: in the considered limit of $x \to 0$ the singlet quarks are controlled by the singularity at $n=-1$.  

955: For the case of gluons we use the initial condition (\ref{initmom}). We need the 

956: inverse Mellin transform

957: \begin{eqnarray}

958: &&\int_C dn x^{-n} \frac{1}{n+1} \exp \left ( {\frac{a}{n}} \right ) \nonumber \\

959: &=& \sum_{k=0}^\infty (-1)^k 

960: \left ( \frac{\log \frac{1}{x}}{a}\right )^{k/2} I_k(2 \sqrt{a \log \frac{1}{x}}) \nonumber \\

961: &\sim& \frac{\exp \left ( 2 \sqrt{a \log \frac{1}{x}} \right ) }{\sqrt{4 \pi \sqrt{a \log \frac{1}{x}}}

962: \left ( 1+\sqrt{\frac{\log \frac{1}{x}}{a}}\right ) }, \;\;\;\;\; a >0,

963: \label{invmeln1}

964: \end{eqnarray}

965: where in the last line we have used the asymptotic form of the Bessel functions. With this result

966: we find that the unintegrated 

967: gluon distribution at $x \to 0$ behaves as

968: \begin{eqnarray}

969: f_G(n,b,Q) \sim  \exp \left ( 2 \sqrt{2N_c A \log \frac{1}{x}} \right ), \;\; A>0, \label{DLLAg}

970: \end{eqnarray}

971: with $A$ provided in Eq.~(\ref{Adef}). If $a<0$ in Eq.~(\ref{invmeln1}), 

972: then the $I_k$ functions above are replaced with the $J_k$ 

973: functions, and the asymptotics changes the character from exponential to oscillatory:

974: \begin{eqnarray}

975: && f_G(n,b,Q) \sim \left [ \left ( 1+\sqrt{\frac{\log \frac{1}{x}}{-A}} \right )

976: \cos \left (2 \sqrt{-A \log \frac{1}{x}} \right ) 

977: \nonumber \right . \\ && + \left .     

978: \left ( 1-\sqrt{\frac{\log \frac{1}{x}}{-A}} \right )

979: \sin \left ( 2 \sqrt{-A \log \frac{1}{x}} \right ) \right ]  \nonumber \\

980: && \times \frac{1}{

981: \sqrt{\pi \sqrt{-A \log \frac{1}{x}}}\left ( 1-\frac{\log \frac{1}{x}}{A} \right )} , \;\;\;\; A <0 .

982: \label{DLLAgosc}

983: \end{eqnarray}

984: 

985: 

986: For $b=0$ the result (\ref{DLLAg}) is consistent with the double-leading-logarithmic  approximation (DLLA) 

987: for the DGLAP equation \cite{DLLA}, where one obtains, with constant $\alpha$,

988: \begin{eqnarray}

989: x g(x,Q)\sim \exp \left ( 2 \sqrt{ \frac{N_c}{\pi} 

990: \alpha \log \frac{Q^2}{Q_0^2} \log \frac{1}{x}} \right ) . \label{eq:gol}

991: \end{eqnarray} 

992: See, {\em e.g.}, the review in 

993: Ref.~\cite{golec}. Our formulas (\ref{fnsx0}) and (\ref{DLLAg}) are

994: generalizations of this behavior for the unintegrated distributions evolved with Eq.~(\ref{Keq}). 

995: 

996: 

997: The pole-residue expansion of Appendix \ref{sec:polres} is good for

998: not-too-large $Q b$.  This limitation, at any fixed $x$, carries over

999: to Eq.~(\ref{fnsx0}) Numerically, we find that at $x=0.1$

1000: Eq.~(\ref{fnsx0}) is valid for $Q b \leq 5$. For higher values

1001: corrections from further residues should be included. 

1002: 

1003: 

1004: \section{Evolution of $\langle k_\perp^2 \rangle$\label{sec:kt}}

1005: 

1006: The average transverse momentum squared is a convenient measure of the

1007: width of the UPD's.  Due to the factorization of the initial profile, Eq.~(\ref{factor}), $\langle

1008: k_\perp^2 \rangle$ decomposes into two terms: the contribution from

1009: the initial profile $F^{\rm NP}$, gives the width at the initial scale $Q=Q_0$,

1010: and the piece $\langle k_T^2 \rangle_{\rm evol}$, entirely to the

1011: evolution and independent of the profile $F^{\rm NP}$,

1012: \begin{eqnarray}

1013: \langle k_\perp^2 \rangle&=&\langle k_\perp^2 \rangle_{\rm NP}+\langle k_\perp^2 \rangle_{\rm evol}, \label{kperp} \\

1014: \langle k_\perp^2 \rangle_{\rm NP}&=&-4 \left . \frac{d F^{\rm NP}(b)/db^2}{F^{\rm NP}(b)} \right |_{b=0}, \nonumber \\

1015: \langle k_\perp^2 \rangle_{\rm evol}&=&-4 \left . \frac{d f^{\rm evol}(b,x,Q)/db^2}{f^{\rm evol}(b,x,Q)} \right |_{b=0}. 

1016: \nonumber

1017: \end{eqnarray}

1018: The contribution $\langle k_T^2 \rangle_{\rm NP}$ has already been discussed in Sec. \ref{sec:init}, hence

1019: here we analyze the term generated by the evolution.

1020: 

1021: Let us denote 

1022: \begin{equation}

1023: f_j^{(1)}(x,Q) \equiv \left . \frac{df^{\rm evol}_j(b,x,Q)}{db^2} \right | _{b=0}. \label{f1Q}

1024: \end{equation}

1025: In the Mellin space, the equations obtained by expanding Eq. (\ref{gamdef0}) up to first order in $b^2$

1026: around $b=0$ read 

1027: \begin{eqnarray}

1028: \frac{df^{(1)}_{\rm NS}(n,Q )}{dQ^2 } & =&  -\frac{\alpha_S(Q^2)}{8 \pi Q^2}

1029: \left ( \gamma_{n,NS}^{(0)} f^{(1)}_{\rm NS}(n,Q) \right . \nonumber \\

1030: &+& \left . Q^2 \gamma_{n,NS}^{(1)} f_{\rm NS}(n,0,Q) \right ) , \label{df1}

1031: \end{eqnarray}

1032: and

1033: \begin{eqnarray}

1034: \frac{ d f^{(1)}_{S}(n,Q )}{dQ^2 } &=& -\frac{\alpha_S(Q^2)}{8 \pi Q^2}

1035: \left ( \gamma_{n,qq}^{(0)} f_{S}^{(1)}(n,Q)

1036: \right . \nonumber \\ &+& \left . \gamma_{n,qG}^{(0)} f_{G}^{(1)}(n,Q) + \right . \\ 

1037: && \!\!\!\!\!\! \left .  Q^2 [ \gamma_{n,qq}^{(1)} f_{S}(n,0,Q)+ \gamma_{n,qG}^{(1)} f_{G}(n,0,Q) ]  \right ), \nonumber \\

1038: \frac{ d f^{(1)}_{G}(n,Q )}{dQ^2 } &=& -\frac{\alpha_S(Q^2)}{8 \pi Q^2}

1039: \left ( \gamma_{n,Gq}^{(0)} f_{S}^{(1)}(n,Q) \right . \\ &+& \left .

1040:  \gamma_{n,GG}^{(0)} f_{G}^{(1)}(n,Q)  \right . + \nonumber \\ 

1041: && \!\!\!\!\!\!\! \left .  Q^2  [ \gamma_{n,Gq}^{(1)} f_{S}(n,0,Q)+ \gamma_{n,GG}^{(1)} f_{G}(n,0,Q) ]  \right ) \nonumber, 

1042: \label{eqSprim}

1043: \end{eqnarray} 

1044: which form a set of ordinary inhomogeneous differential equations. 

1045: Since at the scale $Q_0$ all the width is by construction generated by the initial profile $F$, the 

1046: initial conditions for Eq. (\ref{df1},\ref{eqSprim}) are 

1047: \begin{equation}

1048: f^{(1)}_{j}(n,Q_0)=0. \label{f1cond}

1049: \end{equation}

1050: For the non-singlet case we have the solution

1051: \begin{eqnarray}

1052: f^{(1)}_{\rm NS}(n,Q )&=& -

1053: \gamma_{n,NS}^{(1)} f_{\rm NS}(n,0,Q) r_1(Q_0^2,Q^2).\nonumber \\

1054: \label{momNS}

1055: \end{eqnarray}

1056: In the singlet channel we carry the analysis numerically.

1057: 

1058: Next, we pass to the $x$-space via the numerical inverse Mellin transform. The results for 

1059: the dynamically-generated root mean squared radius of the pion

1060: are shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:ktx} for various values of $x$. 

1061: In confirmation of the results of Ref.~\cite{JK3}, we note that the $k_\perp$ width 

1062: increases with $Q$ for all parton species. The width for the gluons (solid lines) is larger than the width of 

1063: the non-singlet (valence) quarks (dashed lines), and the singlet quarks (dotted lines).

1064: With the log-log scales of Fig.~\ref{fig:ktx} the slopes of the plotted lines become to a good approximation equal to

1065: one another at large $Q^2$.

1066: 

1067: With the help of previously-derived expressions for the behaviour of $f_{\rm NS}$ 

1068: near $x=0$ and $x=1$ we may obtain the following expressions $\langle k_\perp^2 \rangle_{\rm NS}^{\rm evol}$ 

1069: near the end-points. From Eq.~(\ref{endpoint}) we have at $x \to 0$

1070: \begin{eqnarray}

1071: \langle k_\perp^2 \rangle^{\rm evol}_{\rm NS} &\to& \frac{I_1(\sqrt{-4C_F r_0 \log x})}{I_0(\sqrt{-4C_F r_0 \log x})}

1072: \sqrt{-\frac{C_F \log x}{r_0}}r_1 \nonumber \\

1073: &\sim& \sqrt{-\frac{C_F \log x}{r_0}}r_1. \label{kperp1}  

1074: \end{eqnarray}

1075: At large $Q^2$ the leading behavior is

1076: \begin{eqnarray}

1077: \langle k_\perp^2 \rangle^{\rm evol}_{\rm NS} &\to& \sqrt{\frac{2 \beta_0^{(4)} 

1078: C_F \log \frac{1}{x}}{\log \frac{\alpha(\mu_c^2)}{\alpha(Q^2)}}}

1079: \frac{\alpha(Q^2)}{8 \pi} Q^2, \label{kperpas}

1080: \end{eqnarray} 

1081: {\em i.e.} up to the $\log \log Q^2$ corrections the spreading proceeds with $\alpha(Q^2) Q^2$.

1082: At $x \to 1$ we find from Eq.~(\ref{x1}) that 

1083: \begin{eqnarray}

1084: \langle k_\perp^2 \rangle^{\rm evol}_{\rm NS} &\to& 

1085: \frac{2C_F (1-x)^2 r_1}{(1+8C_F r_0)(2+8C_F r_0)} \label{kx1}

1086: \end{eqnarray}

1087: At large $Q^2$ the leading behavior is

1088: \begin{eqnarray}

1089: \langle k_\perp^2 \rangle^{\rm evol}_{\rm NS} &\to& 

1090: \frac{\beta_0^{(4)2} (1-x)^2 \alpha(Q^2)}{64 \pi C_F \left [ \log \frac{\alpha(\mu_c^2)}{\alpha{Q^2}}

1091: \right ]^2}Q^2.

1092: \label{kx1as}

1093: \end{eqnarray}

1094: Again, the growth is, up to the $\log \log Q^2$ corrections, proportional to $\alpha(Q^2) Q^2$.

1095: 

1096: For the gluons the same asymptotic behavior of 

1097: $\langle k_\perp^2 \rangle^{\rm evol}_{\rm G}$  follows from Eq.~(\ref{invmeln1}). Thus, to summarize, all 

1098: UPD's grow at large $Q$ as $Q^2 \alpha(Q^2)$, in accordance to the behavior in Fig.~\ref{fig:ktx}.  

1099: 

1100: Interestingly, it can be noticed from Fig.~\ref{fig:ktx} that at $Q \to Q_0^+$ the $k_\perp$ width for the gluons

1101: does not vanish. In this limit both $f^{\rm evol}_G(x,0,Q)$ and $f^{(1)}_G(x,Q)$

1102: vanish, as is obvious from Eq.~(\ref{noglue2},\ref{f1cond}).

1103: Thus one has a 0/0 limit. From Eq.~(\ref{Keq},\ref{df1})

1104: with the initial condition (\ref{thetas},\ref{eqSprim}) one can easily obtain that

1105: \begin{eqnarray}

1106: && \lim_{Q \to Q_0}\langle  k_\perp^2 \rangle_G^{\rm evol}=Q_0 \frac

1107: {\int_x^1 dz\, P_{Gq}(z)\frac{(1-z)^2}{z}}{\int_x^1 dz\, P_{Gq}(z)\frac{1}{z}} \label{limG}\\

1108: &&=Q_0 \frac{x^4-6x^3+21x^2-18 x \log x-10x-6}{3(x^2-2x \log x +x -2)}, \nonumber

1109: \end{eqnarray}  

1110: which is positive for $x \in [0,1)$ and equal 0 for $x=1$.

1111: On the other hand, since for the quarks $f^{\rm evol}_{NS,S}(x,0,Q) \neq 0$ 

1112: $\langle k_\perp^2 \rangle^{\rm evol}_{NS,S}$ vanish at $Q_0$.

1113: 

1114: \begin{figure}[tb]

1115: \begin{center}

1116: \epsfig{figure=ktx.eps,width=8.5cm}

1117: \end{center}

1118: \caption{ The rms transverse momenta of UPD's of the pion for

1119: $x=0.01$, $0.1$, and $0.5$, plotted as functions of the

1120: renormalization scale $Q^2$. Solid lines -- gluons, dashed lines --

1121: non-singlet quarks, dotted lines -- singlet quarks.}

1122: \label{fig:ktx}

1123: \end{figure}

1124: 

1125: In phenomenological applications it is sometimes useful to have a

1126: simple formula characterizing the discussed behavior.  In the range

1127: $2~{\rm GeV}^2 < Q^2 < 10000~{\rm GeV}^2$ and $0.005 < x < 0.8$ the

1128: following simple-minded interpolating formula works to within a few per cent:

1129: \begin{eqnarray}

1130: \left ( \langle k_\perp^2 \rangle_i^{\rm evol} \right )^{1/2} \!\!\!=

1131: A_i(\log \frac{1}{x}) \left( \frac{Q^2}{\Lambda_{\rm QCD}^2} \right )^

1132: {0.35+0.004 \log \frac{Q^2}{\Lambda_{\rm QCD}^2} } \!\!\!\!\! ,

1133: \nonumber \\ \label{approx}

1134: \end{eqnarray}

1135: where $i=$NS, S, or G, and

1136: \begin{eqnarray}

1137: A_{\rm NS}(y)&=&-0.017 y^{1/2}+0.113 y -0.057 y^{3/2}+ 0.010 y^2, \nonumber \\

1138: A_{S} (y)&=&-0.021 y^{1/2}+0.120 y -0.059 y^{3/2}+ 0.009 y^2, \nonumber \\

1139: A_{G} (y)&=&-0.016 y^{1/2}+0.150 y -0.075 y^{3/2}+ 0.011 y^2. \nonumber \\

1140: \label{Apar}

1141: \end{eqnarray}

1142: The power of $Q^2$ of 0.35 in Eq.~(\ref{approx}), rather than

1143: $1/2$ corresponding to  $\langle k_\perp^2 \rangle_i^{\rm evol} \sim Q^2 \alpha(Q^2)$, 

1144: compensates, in the chosen range for $Q$, for the logarithmic corrections.

1145: We note that Eq.~(\ref{approx}) holds for the pion with the initial conditions (\ref{initmom}) provided

1146: by the chiral quark models.  

1147: 

1148: \section{Formal limits for other initial conditions\label{sec:general}}

1149: 

1150: Certain formal results listed in this paper, such as the formulas for the 

1151: non-singlet quarks, (\ref{fnsas3}, \ref{fnsas4}, \ref{fNSx1}, \ref{endpoint}, \ref{fnsx0}, \ref{kperp1},%

1152: \ref{kperpas}), are specific to the

1153: evolution with the

1154: initial condition following from the chiral quark models, Eq.~(\ref{initx}, \ref{initmom}). 

1155: However, these results can be easily generalized. Note that most of the popular   

1156: parameterizations of initial conditions, such as those of Refs.~\cite{GRS,GRV}, involve

1157: linear combinations of $x^\alpha (1-x)^\beta$. It is understood that the factorization

1158: in the initial condition between $x$ and $b$ variable holds, as assumed in Ref.~\cite{JK3}.

1159: 

1160: For the case of large-$b$ asymptotics, the relevant

1161: formula is (\ref{lapy}). With the initial condition $x^\alpha (1-x)^\beta$ it becomes

1162: \begin{eqnarray}

1163: \int_C \frac{dn}{2\pi i} x^{-n} \frac{e^{y_0+y_1 n}}{n+\alpha} = x^\alpha e^{y_0-\alpha y_1} 

1164: \Theta \left (y_1+\log \frac{1}{x} \right ),

1165: \label{lapygen}

1166: \end{eqnarray}

1167: and expressions (\ref{fnsas3},\ref{fnsas4}) are modified accordingly, with $x$ replaced by 

1168: $x^\alpha$, and $y_1$ in the exponent multiplied by $\alpha$. The formulas 

1169: (\ref{powG}) remain valid. Therefore the power-law behavior at large $b$ is independent of the 

1170: initial condition, and is $b^{-8C_F r_0(Q^2_0,Q^2)}$ for the quarks and $b^{-8N_c r_0(Q^2_0,Q^2)}$ 

1171: for the gluons. 

1172: 

1173: In the limit of $x \to 1$ the only difference is the appearance of the extra power of $\beta$ in the 

1174: in Eq.~(\ref{fNSx1}). Thus, the UPD's for finite $b$ approach the $b=0$ case of the integrated distributions 

1175: as $(1-x)^2$.  

1176: 

1177: In the limit of $x \to 0$ we need generalizations of the Mellin transforms of Eq.~(\ref{mel2},\ref{invmeln1}) 

1178: for $\alpha \neq 1$. These are

1179: \begin{eqnarray}

1180: &&\int_C dn x^{-n} \frac{1}{n+\alpha} \exp \left ( {\frac{a}{n+1}} \right ) \\

1181: &=& x \sum_{k=0}^\infty (-1)^k (\alpha-1)^k

1182: \left ( \frac{\log \frac{1}{x}}{a}\right )^{k/2} I_k(2 \sqrt{a \log \frac{1}{x}}) \nonumber \\

1183: &\sim&  \frac{ x \exp \left ( 2 \sqrt{a \log \frac{1}{x}} \right ) }{(\alpha-1)\sqrt{4 \pi \sqrt{a \log \frac{1}{x}}}

1184: \sqrt{\frac{\log \frac{1}{x}}{a}}}, \;\;\;\; \alpha \neq 1, \;a>0, \nonumber

1185: \label{invmeln2}

1186: \end{eqnarray}

1187: and

1188: \begin{eqnarray}

1189: &&\int_C dn x^{-n} \frac{1}{n+\alpha} \exp \left ( {\frac{a}{n}} \right ) \\

1190: &=& \sum_{k=0}^\infty (-1)^k \alpha^k

1191: \left ( \frac{\log \frac{1}{x}}{a}\right )^{k/2} I_k(2 \sqrt{a \log \frac{1}{x}}) \nonumber \\

1192: &\sim& \frac{\exp \left ( 2 \sqrt{a \log \frac{1}{x}} \right ) }{\alpha \sqrt{4 \pi \sqrt{a \log \frac{1}{x}}}

1193: \sqrt{\frac{\log \frac{1}{x}}{a}}}, \;\;\;\; \alpha \neq 0,\; a>0 . \nonumber

1194: \label{invmeln3}

1195: \end{eqnarray}

1196: The analogs of Eq.~(\ref{fnsx0},\ref{DLLAg},\ref{kperp1},\ref{kperpas}) follow straightforwardly. 

1197: In particular, the $Q^2 \alpha(Q^2)$ large-$Q$ behavior for all parton distributions is preserved. 

1198: 

1199: 

1200: \section{Conclusions\label{sec:con}}

1201: 

1202: We have presented a new method of solving the Kwieci\'nski equations for the 

1203: leading-order QCD evolution of  

1204: unintegrated parton distributions. The method is based on the Mellin transform

1205: and parallels the standard analysis of the DGLAP equations. 

1206: Our main results are as follows:

1207: 

1208: \begin{enumerate}

1209: \item We have found analytic forms of the $b$-dependent anomalous dimensions, expressed 

1210: through hypergeometric functions, which allowed us 

1211: to study formal aspects of the equations and their solutions, {\em e.g.} the 

1212: asymptotic forms of the evolution-generated UPD's at large $b$, or at $x\to 0$ and $x \to 1$.

1213: We have also demonstrated that the proposed numerical method is fast and stable. 

1214: 

1215: \item The numerical work can be simplified if low-$b$ or large-$b$ expansions are used.

1216: 

1217: \item At large $b$ the evolution-generated $b$-dependent UPD's exhibit power-law fall-off, with the 

1218: magnitude of the exponents 

1219: growing with the probing scale 

1220: $Q$, {\em cf.} Eq.~(\ref{fnsas3},\ref{powG}). The fall-off is steeper for the gluons than for the quarks.

1221: 

1222: \item At $x \to 0$ we have found generalizations of the DLLA behavior, {\em cf.} Eq.~(\ref{fnsx0},\ref{DLLAg}.) 

1223: We have also shown that for large $b$ the solution for the valence UPD of the pion

1224: grows linearly with $x$ for not too large $x$, and the slope decreases with $b$ as a power law. 

1225: 

1226: \item At $x \to 1$ the evolution-generated $b$-dependent UPD's approach the integrated distributions as $(1-x)^2$.

1227: 

1228: \item Our numerical results fully confirm the finding of Ref.~\cite{JK3},

1229: where a different numerical method was used. We find the spreading of

1230: the $k_\perp$ distributions with the probing scale $Q$, with the

1231: effect strongest for gluons and increasing with decreasing $x$. We

1232: have also shown that the widths $\langle k_\perp^2 \rangle_i^{\rm evol}$ in all

1233: channels $i$ increase at large $Q^2$ as $Q^2 \alpha(Q^2)$. 

1234: 

1235: \item For practical purposes in possible phenomenological applications, we have

1236: parameterized $\langle k_\perp^2 \rangle_i^{evol}$ with a simple formula

1237: which works with accuracy of a few percent.

1238: 

1239: \end{enumerate}

1240: 

1241: Although the specific study of this paper was devoted to the pion with

1242: the initial condition following from the chiral models, and several of

1243: the more detailed analytic formulas were specific to this case, the developed method

1244: is general and can be applied to any initial form of the data. In

1245: particular, it can be used with the GRS \cite{GRS} or GRV \cite{GRV}

1246: parameterization supplied by a profile in $b$, such as already studied

1247: in Ref.~\cite{JK3}. The formal results of Sec.~\ref{sec:general} are general for 

1248: a wide class of initial conditions, suitable for both the pion and the nucleon. 

1249: 

1250: 

1251: \begin{acknowledgments}

1252: We thank Krzysztof Golec-Biernat and Antoni Szczurek for useful

1253: discussions.  One of us (WB) is grateful to Andrzej Horzela for

1254: pointing out the impressive collection of practical mathematical

1255: knowledge at {\tt http://www.mathworld.com}~\cite{mathworld}.  Support

1256: from DGI and FEDER funds, under contract BFM2002-03218 and by the

1257: Junta de Andaluc\'\i a grant no. FM-225 and EURIDICE grant number

1258: HPRN-CT-2003-00311 is acknowledged.  Partial support from the Spanish

1259: Ministerio de Asuntos Exteriores and the Polish State Committee for

1260: Scientific Research, grant number 07/2001-2002 is also gratefully

1261: acknowledged.

1262: \end{acknowledgments}

1263: 

1264: \appendix

1265: \section{Elements of the perturbative QCD evolution\label{pQCD}}

1266: We use the LO QCD evolution with three active flavors up to the scale $\mu_c^2=4~{\rm GeV}^2$ 

1267: and four active flavors above. Therefore $\alpha=g^2 / (4\pi)$ is given by

1268: \begin{eqnarray} 

1269: \alpha (Q^2) &=& \frac{4\pi}{\beta_0^{(3)}\log \left(\frac{Q^2}{\Lambda_{QCD}^2}\right) }, \;\;\;\;\;\; Q^2 \leq \mu_c^2,

1270: \nonumber \\

1271: \alpha (Q^2) &=& \frac{4\pi}{\beta_0^{(4)}\log \left(\frac{Q^2}{\Lambda_{4}^2}\right) }, \;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\; Q^2 > \mu_c^2,

1272: \nonumber \\

1273: \Lambda_4 &=& \mu_c 

1274: \left ( \frac{\Lambda_{QCD}}{\mu_c} \right )^{\frac{\beta_0^{(3)}}{\beta_0^{(4)}}}, 

1275: \label{eq:alpha}

1276: \end{eqnarray}

1277: with $\beta_0^{(N_f)}=11-2 N_f/3$ for $N_c=3$, 

1278: where $N_f$ and $N_c$ denote the number of flavors and colors, respectively. 

1279: Along this paper we take 

1280: \begin{eqnarray}

1281: \Lambda_{\rm QCD}=226~{\rm MeV},

1282: \end{eqnarray}

1283: as was done

1284: in Refs.~\cite{DavArr1,DavArr2,Weigel,SQM}.

1285: The value of the scale $\Lambda_4$ ensures matching at $Q^2=\mu_c^2$. Numerically, $\beta_0^{(3)}=9$, 

1286: $\beta_0^{(4)}=25/3$, and $\Lambda_4=189~{\rm MeV}$.

1287: 

1288: The functions $r_k$, defined in Eq.~(\ref{pQCD}), have the explicit form 

1289: \begin{eqnarray}

1290: r_0(Q_0^2,Q^2)  &=&

1291: \frac{1}{2 \beta_0^{(3)}} % \\ &\times&  

1292: \log \left ( \frac{\log(Q^2/\Lambda_{\rm QCD}^2)}{\log(Q_0^2/\Lambda_{\rm QCD}^2)} \right ) 

1293: \nonumber \\ &=& \frac{1}{2 \beta_0^{(3)}} % \\ &\times&  

1294: \log \frac{\alpha(Q_0^2)}{\alpha(Q^2)}

1295:  ,\;\;\;\;\;\;Q^2 \leq \mu_c^2,

1296: \nonumber

1297: \end{eqnarray}

1298: %

1299: \begin{eqnarray}

1300: r_0(Q_0^2,Q^2)  &=& r_0(Q_0^2,\mu_c^2)+  

1301: \frac{1}{2 \beta_0^{(4)}} % \\ &\times&  

1302: \log \left ( \frac{\log(Q^2/\Lambda_4^2)}{\log(\mu_c^2/\Lambda_4^2)}\right )

1303: \nonumber \\ &=& r_0(Q_0^2,\mu_c^2) + \frac{1}{2 \beta_0^{(4)}} % \\ &\times&  

1304: \log   \frac{\alpha(\mu_c^2)}{\alpha(Q^2)}, \label{r0ap}\\

1305: && \hspace{42mm} Q^2 > \mu_c^2, \nonumber

1306: \end{eqnarray}

1307: and for $k \neq 0$

1308: \begin{eqnarray}

1309: r_k(Q_0^2,Q^2)  &=&

1310: \frac{\Lambda_{\rm QCD}^{2k}}{2 \beta_0^{(3)}} % \\ &\times&  

1311: \left [ {\rm Li}\left ( \frac{Q^{2k}}{\Lambda_{\rm QCD}^{2k}} \right ) - 

1312: {\rm Li}\left ( \frac{Q_0^2}{\Lambda_{\rm QCD}^2} \right ) \right ], 

1313: \nonumber \\ && \hspace{30mm} Q^2 \leq \mu_c^2, \nonumber 

1314: \end{eqnarray}

1315: %

1316: \begin{eqnarray}

1317: r_k(Q_0^2,Q^2)  &=& r_k(Q_0^2,\mu_c^2)   +  

1318: \frac{\Lambda_4^{2k}}{2 \beta_0^{(4)}}  \label{rkap} \\ &\times&  

1319: \left [ {\rm Li}\left ( \frac{Q^{2k}}{\Lambda_4^{2k}} \right ) - 

1320: {\rm Li}\left ( \frac{\mu_c^2}{\Lambda_4^2} \right ) \right ], \;\;\;\;\;\;Q^2 > \mu_c^2. 

1321: \nonumber

1322: \end{eqnarray}

1323: %

1324: Above we have used the indefinite integral

1325: \begin{eqnarray}

1326: \int \frac{d Q^2 Q^{2k}}{Q^2 \log(Q^2/\Lambda^2)} &=& 

1327: \Lambda^{2k} {\rm Li} \left( \frac{Q^{2k}}{\Lambda^{2k}} \right), \;\; k=1,2,\dots, \nonumber \\

1328: \label{lieq}

1329: \end{eqnarray} 

1330: where the logarithmic integral is 

1331: \begin{eqnarray}

1332: {\rm Li} (x) = \int_0^x dt / \log t. \label{lidef}

1333: \end{eqnarray}

1334: At large $Q^2$ 

1335: \begin{eqnarray}

1336: \Lambda^{2k} {\rm Li} \left( \frac{Q^{2k}}{\Lambda^{2k}} \right)=

1337: Q^{2k} \left ( \frac{1}{k \log \frac{Q^2}{\Lambda^2}} + \frac{1}{k^2 \log^2 \frac{Q^2}{\Lambda^2}}+ \dots   \right ).

1338: \nonumber \\ \label{lamas}

1339: \end{eqnarray} 

1340: 

1341: The functions $P_{ab}(z)$ are the LO splitting functions corresponding to real 

1342: emission, {\em i.e.}:

1343: \begin{eqnarray}

1344: P_{qq}(z)&=&C_F{1+z^2\over 1-z} , \label{Psplit} \\

1345: P_{qG}(z)&=&N_f[z^2+(1-z)^2] ,\nonumber \\

1346: P_{Gq}(z)&=&C_F{1+(1-z)^2\over z} , \nonumber \\

1347: P_{GG}(z)&=&2N_c\left[{z\over 1-z}+{1-z\over z} + z(1-z)\right] , \nonumber

1348: \label{split}

1349: \end{eqnarray}

1350: with $C_F=(N_c^2-1)/(2N_c)=4/3$.

1351: 

1352: \section{$b$-dependent anomalous dimensions\label{anomdim}}

1353: 

1354: We introduce 

1355: \begin{equation}

1356: u=\frac{Q^2 b^2}{4},

1357: \end{equation}

1358: as well as the anomalous dimensions for the $b=0$ case of the DGLAP equations, where for the non-singlet

1359: we have

1360: \begin{eqnarray}

1361: \gamma_{n,NS}^{(0)} &=& 2C_F \left( -3 + \frac{2}{1 + n} + 

1362: \frac{2}{2 + n} + 4\,H_n \right) , \label{anom0NS}

1363: \end{eqnarray}

1364: while for the singlet

1365: \begin{eqnarray}

1366: \gamma_{n,qq}^{(0)} &=& \gamma_{n,NS}{(0)} , \label{gam0} \\

1367: \gamma_{n,qG}^{(0)} &=& - 4 N_f \,\left( \frac{1}{1 + n} - \frac{2}{2 + n} + \frac{2}{3 + n} \right),

1368: \nonumber \\

1369: \gamma_{n,Gq}^{(0)} &=& -4 C_F \left( \frac{2}{n} - \frac{2}{1 + n} + 

1370: \frac{1}{2 + n} \right), \label{anom0} \nonumber \\

1371: \gamma_{n,GG}^{(0)} &=& 2 N_c\,\left( -3 - \frac{4}{n} + \frac{8}{1 + n} - 

1372: \frac{4}{2 + n} + \frac{4}{3 + n} \right . \nonumber \\

1373: &+& \left . 4\,H_n \right ) . \nonumber

1374: \end{eqnarray}

1375: The symbol $H_n$ denotes the harmonic number 

1376: \begin{equation}

1377: H_n=\sum_{k=1}^n \frac{1}{k} = \frac{\Gamma' (n+1)}{\Gamma(n+1)} + \gamma, \label{Hn}

1378: \end{equation} 

1379: which is a meromorphic function in the complex $n$ 

1380: variable, with poles located at negative

1381: integers $n= -1, -2, -3, ...$ and residues equal to $-1$.

1382: 

1383: Below we list the  anomalous dimensions for the moments of the unintegrated parton distributions in the $b$ space,

1384: defined in Eq. (\ref{gammadef}). The formulas follow from the basic analytic integral

1385: \begin{eqnarray}

1386: && \frac{\Gamma(2 + \mu + \nu)} {\Gamma(1 + \mu)\,\Gamma(1 + \nu)} 

1387: \int_0^1 dy y^\mu (1-y)^\nu J_0\left ( 2 \sqrt{u} y  \right ) )= \nonumber \\  && 

1388:    {}_2F_3(\frac{1+\mu}{2},\frac{2+\mu}{2};

1389:      1,\frac{2+\mu + \nu}{2},\frac{3+\mu+\nu}{2};-u)

1390: \nonumber \\ \label{basint}

1391: \end{eqnarray}

1392: and relations among the generalized hypergeometric functions. For the non-singlet case we have 

1393: \begin{widetext}

1394: \begin{eqnarray}

1395: \gamma_{n,NS}(Q b)&=&\gamma_{n, NS}^{(0)}+

1396: \frac{4 C_F}{\left( 1 + n \right) \,\left( 2 + n \right) }

1397: \left [ -3 - 2\,n + 2\,\left( 2 + n \right) \,

1398: {}_1F_2(\frac{1}{2};\frac{2 + n}{2},\frac{3 + n}{2};-u) \right .\nonumber \\

1399: &-& \left . 

1400:   {}_1F_2(\frac{3}{2}; \frac{3 + n}{2},\frac{4 + n}{2};-u) +

1401:  2u\,{}_3F_4(1,1,\frac{3}{2}; 2,2,\frac{3 + n}{2},\frac{4 + n}{2}; -u)\right ],

1402: \label{anombNS}

1403: \end{eqnarray}

1404: whereas for the singlet case

1405: \begin{eqnarray}

1406: \gamma_{n,qq}(Q b)&=&\gamma_{n,NS}(Q b),

1407: \nonumber 

1408: \end{eqnarray}

1409: \begin{eqnarray}

1410: \gamma_{n,qG}(Q b)&=&\gamma_{n,qG}^{(0)}+

1411: \frac{4 N_f}{\left( 1 + n \right) \left( 2 + n \right) 

1412: \left( 3 + n \right) \left( 4 + n \right)  \left( 5 + n \right) }

1413: \left [ -\left( \left( 4 + n \right) \,\left( 5 + n \right) \,

1414:      \left( -4 - n\,\left( 3 + n \right)  

1415: \nonumber \right . \right . \right . \\ &+&

1416: \left . \left . \left . \left( 2 + n \right) \,\left( 3 + n \right) \,  

1417:       {}_2F_1( \frac{1}{2}; \frac{2 + n}{2},\frac{3 + n}{2};-u) - 

1418:        2\,\left( 3 + n \right) \,{}_1F_2(\frac{3}{2}; \frac{3 + n}{2},\frac{4 + n}{2}; -u)

1419: \nonumber \right . \right . \right . \\ &+& \left . \left . \left .

1420:        4\,{}_1F_2(\frac{3}{2}; \frac{4 + n}{2},\frac{5 + n}{2};-u) \right)  \right)  + 

1421:   24\,u\,{}_1F_2(\frac{5}{2}; \frac{6 + n}{2},\frac{7 + n}{2};-u)\right ],

1422: \nonumber 

1423: \end{eqnarray}

1424: \begin{eqnarray}

1425: \gamma_{n,Gq}(Q b)&=&\gamma_{n,Gq}^{(0)}+ \frac{4 C_F}{n\,\left( 1 + n \right) \,\left( 2 + n \right) 

1426: \,\left( 3 + n \right) \,\left( 4 + n \right) }

1427: \nonumber \\ &\times& \left [   -\left( \left( 1 + n \right) \,\left( 2 + n \right) \,\left( 3 + n \right) 

1428: \,\left( 4 + n \right) \,

1429:      {}_1F_2(\frac{1}{2}; \frac{1 + n}{2},\frac{2 + n}{2}; -u) \right) 

1430: \right .  \nonumber \\ &+& \left . 

1431:   \left( 3 + n \right) \,\left( 4 + n \right) \,\left( 4 + n\,\left( 3 + n \right)  - 

1432:      2\, {}_1F_2(\frac{3}{2};\frac{3 + n}{2},\frac{4 + n}{2};-u) \right)  + 

1433:   12\,u\,{}_1F_2(\frac{5}{2};\frac{5 + n}{2},\frac{6 + n}{2};-u)       \right ] ,

1434: \nonumber 

1435: \end{eqnarray}

1436: \begin{eqnarray}

1437: \gamma_{n,GG}(Q b)&=&\gamma_{n,GG}^{(0)}+ 

1438: 8 N_c \left [ \frac{1}{n} - \frac{2}{1 + n} + \frac{1}{2 + n} - \frac{1}{3 + n} + 

1439:   \frac{{}_1F_2(\frac{1}{2}; 1 + \frac{n}{2},\frac{3}{2} + \frac{n}{2};-u)}{1 + n} - 

1440:   \frac{{}_1F_2(\frac{3}{2};1 + \frac{n}{2},\frac{3}{2} + \frac{n}{2};-u)}{n + n^2} 

1441: \nonumber \right . \\ &-& \left . 

1442:   \frac{{}_1F_2(\frac{3}{2};\frac{3}{2} + \frac{n}{2},2 + \frac{n}{2};-u)}

1443: {\left( 1 + n \right) \,\left( 2 + n \right) } + 

1444:   \frac{2\,{}_1F_2(\frac{3}{2};2 + \frac{n}{2},\frac{5}{2} + \frac{n}{2};-u)}

1445:    {\left( 1 + n \right) \,\left( 2 + n \right) \,\left( 3 + n \right) } - 

1446:   \frac{12\,u\,{}_1F_2(\frac{5}{2}; 3 + \frac{n}{2},\frac{7}{2} + \frac{n}{2};-u)}

1447:    {\left( 1 + n \right) \,\left( 2 + n \right) \,\left( 3 + n \right) 

1448: \,\left( 4 + n \right) \,\left( 5 + n \right) } \right . \nonumber \\ &+& \left . 

1449:   \frac{u\,{}_3F_4(1,1,\frac{3}{2};2,2,\frac{3}{2} + \frac{n}{2},2 + \frac{n}{2};-u)}

1450:    {\left( 1 + n \right) \,\left( 2 + n \right) }  \right ] . \label{anomb}

1451: \end{eqnarray}

1452: \end{widetext}

1453: One may verify that the analyticity properties in $n$ of the anomalous dimensions (\ref{anombNS},\ref{anomb})

1454: are the same as for the $b=0$ case of (\ref{anom0NS},\ref{anom0}).

1455: 

1456: \section{Expansion of anomalous dimensions at low $b Q$\label{app:lowb}}

1457: 

1458: We may expand in the anomalous dimensions in powers of $Q^2 b^2$, 

1459: \begin{eqnarray}

1460: \gamma_{n,j}(Q b) =\gamma_{n,j}^{(0)}+\gamma_{n,j}^{(1)} Q^2 b^2 + \dots, \label{gambexp}

1461: \end{eqnarray}

1462: which yields

1463: \begin{eqnarray}

1464: \gamma_{n,NS}^{(1)} &=&  \gamma_{n,qq}^{(1)} = \frac{2 C_F(n^2+5n+7)}{(n+1)(n+2)(n+3)(n+4)}, \nonumber \\

1465: \gamma_{n,qG}^{(1)} &=& \frac{2 N_f (n^2+3n+14)}{(n+1)(n+2)(n+3)(n+4)}, \nonumber \\

1466: \gamma_{n,Gq}^{(1)} &=& \frac{2 C_F(n^2+7n+24)}{(n+1)(n+2)(n+3)(n+4)}, \nonumber \\

1467: \gamma_{n,GG}^{(1)} &=& \frac{2N_c [n(n+5)(n^2+5n+16)+120]}{n(n+1)n+2)(n+3)(n+4)(n+5)}. \label{g1}

1468: \end{eqnarray}

1469: More generally, introducing the Euler Beta function, 

1470: ${\sf B}(x,y)= \Gamma(x) \Gamma(y) / \Gamma(x+y)$, and applying 

1471: the series expansion of the Bessel function, 

1472: \begin{equation}

1473: J_0 (x) = \sum_{k=0}^\infty \frac{(-x^2)^k}{2^k k!^2},  \label{besexp}

1474: \end{equation}

1475: we arrive at the expansion formulas

1476: \begin{eqnarray}

1477: &&\!\!\!\!\!\! \gamma_{n,NS} ( Q b ) = \gamma_{n,qq}( Q b) =\gamma_{n,qq}^{(0)} \nonumber \\

1478: &&-C_F\sum_{k=1}^\infty \frac{(-Q^2 b^2 )^k 4^{1-k}}{k!^2 } \left[ {\sf B} (2k,n+1) + {\sf B}

1479:  (2k,n+3) \right] \nonumber

1480: \end{eqnarray}

1481: \begin{eqnarray}

1482: &&\!\!\!\!\!\! \gamma_{n,qG} ( Q b ) = \gamma_{n,qG}^{(0)}

1483:  -N_f \sum_{k=1}^\infty \frac{(-Q^2 b^2 )^k \, 4^{1-k}}{k!^2 } \nonumber \\

1484: &&\times \left[ {\sf

1485:  B} (2k+1,n+1) -2 {\sf B} (2k+1,n+2) \right . \nonumber \\

1486: && \;\; \left . + 2 {\sf B} (2k+1,n+3) \right] \nonumber 

1487: \end{eqnarray}

1488: \begin{eqnarray}

1489: &&\!\!\!\!\!\! \gamma_{n,Gq} ( Q b ) = \gamma_{n,Gq}^{(0)} -C_F\sum_{k=1}^\infty

1490: \frac{(-Q^2 b^2 )^k 4^{1-k}}{k!^2 } \nonumber \\

1491: && \times  \left[ 2 {\sf B} (2k+1,n) -2 {\sf

1492: B} (2k+1,n+1) \right . \nonumber \\

1493: && \;\; \left . + {\sf B} (2k+1,n+2) \right] \label{Beta}

1494: \end{eqnarray}

1495: \begin{eqnarray}

1496: &&\!\!\!\!\!\! \gamma_{n,GG} ( Q b ) = \gamma_{n,GG}^{(0)}

1497:  -2 N_c\sum_{k=1}^\infty \frac{(-Q^2 b^2 )^k 4^{1-k}}{ k!^2 } \nonumber \\

1498: && \times \left[ {\sf

1499:  B} (2k,n+2) + {\sf B} (2k+2,n) +  {\sf B} (2k+2,n+2) \right] . \nonumber 

1500: \label{ge}

1501: \end{eqnarray} 

1502: 

1503: %The Euler Beta functions become rational functions in the index $n$,

1504: %making the numerical calculation somewhat simpler.  

1505: 

1506: \section{Asymptotics of the anomalous dimensions at large $b Q$ \label{app:largeb}}

1507: 

1508: We may use the asymptotic forms of the generalized hypergeometric functions appearing in

1509: Eq.~(\ref{anombNS},\ref{anomb}). One has \cite{hyp12} 

1510: \begin{eqnarray}

1511: && \!\!\!\!\!\!\! {}_1F_2(a_1;b_1,b_2;-\frac{Q^2 b^2}{4})=\frac{\Gamma(b_1)\Gamma(b_2)}

1512: {\Gamma(b_1-a_1) \Gamma(b_2-a_1)} \left ( \frac{4}{Q^2 b^2} \right )^{a_1} \nonumber \\

1513: && + \frac{\Gamma(b_1) \Gamma(b_2)}{\sqrt{\pi}\Gamma(a_1)} 

1514: \left \{ \cos(Q b -\pi c_1) \right . \nonumber \\ && 

1515: \left . \hspace{2cm} +\frac{c_2}{Q b} \sin(Q b-\pi c_1) \right \}

1516: \left ( \frac

1517: {4}{Q^2 b^2} \right )^{c_1}+\dots , \nonumber \\

1518: &&c_1=\frac{1}{2} \left ( b_1+b_2-a_1-\frac{1}{2} \right ), \label{1F2} \\

1519: &&c_2=\frac{1}{8} \left ( 12 a_1^2-8(b_1+b_2+1)a_1 

1520: -4(b_1-b_2)^2 \right . \nonumber \\ &&

1521: \left . \hspace{2cm} +8(b_1+b_2)-3 \right ), \nonumber

1522: \end{eqnarray}

1523: and \cite{hyppq}

1524: \begin{eqnarray}

1525: &&{}_3F_4 \left ( 1,1,\frac{3}{2};2,2,\frac{n+3}{2},\frac{n+4}{2};-\frac{Q^2 b^2}{4} \right ) =

1526: \nonumber \\

1527: && \frac{4(n+1)(n+2)}{n Q^3 b^3} \left ( Q b [ n \log \frac{Q b}{2} - n\psi^{0}(n) -1 ]+n^2 

1528: \right ) \nonumber \\

1529: && + \frac{8 \Gamma(n+3)}{\sqrt{2\pi}} \cos \left ( Q b -

1530: \frac{2n+3}{4}\pi \right ) (Q b)^{-\frac{n}{2} -\frac{7}{2}} +\dots  

1531: \nonumber \\ \label{3F4}

1532: \end{eqnarray} 

1533: Then the following asymptotic expansions for the $b$-dependent anomalous dimensions hold:

1534: \begin{eqnarray}

1535: && \gamma_{\rm NS}(n,Q b)=\gamma_{qq}(n,Q b)=4 C_F \left ( \log \frac{Q^2 b^2}{4}+ 2 \gamma - \frac{3}{2} \right .\nonumber \\

1536: && \left . + \frac{2n+2}{Q b} + \frac{\Gamma(n+1)(Q b)^{-n-\frac{5}{2}}}{4 \sqrt{2\pi}} \right . \nonumber \\

1537: && \left . \times \left [ 24 b Q \cos (\frac{2n+3}{4}\pi - Q b) \right . \right . \nonumber \\

1538: && \left . \left . - (12n+13) \sin (\frac{2n+3}{4}\pi - Q b) \right ] \right )+\dots \label{asqq}

1539: \end{eqnarray}

1540: %

1541: \begin{eqnarray}

1542: && \gamma_{qG}(n,Q b)=4N_f \left ( - \frac{1}{Q b} + \frac{\Gamma(n+1)(Qb)^{-n-\frac{5}{2}}}{8 \sqrt{\pi}} 

1543: \right . \nonumber \\ 

1544: && \left . \times \left [ (-12n+8Qb-11)\cos(\frac{n\pi}{2}-Qb) \right . \right . \nonumber \\

1545: && \left . \left . +

1546:  (12n+8Qb+11)\sin(\frac{n\pi}{2}-Qb) \right ] \right ) + \dots \label{asqG}

1547: \end{eqnarray}

1548: %

1549: \begin{eqnarray}

1550: && \gamma_{Gq}(n,Q b)=4C_F \left ( - \frac{1}{Q b} + \frac{\Gamma(n)(Qb)^{-n-\frac{3}{2}}}{4 \sqrt{\pi}} 

1551: \right . \nonumber \\ 

1552: && \left . \times \left [ (4n+8Qb-1)\cos(\frac{n\pi}{2}-Qb) \right . \right . \nonumber \\

1553: && \left . \left . +

1554:  (4n-8Qb-1)\sin(\frac{n\pi}{2}-Qb) \right ] \right ) + \dots \label{asGq}

1555: \end{eqnarray}

1556: %

1557: \begin{eqnarray}

1558: && \gamma_{GG}(n,Q b)=\frac{4N_f}{3} + 4N_c 

1559: \left ( \log \frac{Q^2 b^2}{4} + 2 \gamma - \frac{11}{6} \right . \nonumber \\

1560: && \left . + \frac{2n+2}{Q b} -\frac{4 \Gamma(n) (Qb)^{-n -\frac{1}{2}}}{\sqrt{2\pi}} 

1561: \cos (\frac{2n+1}{4}\pi-Qb) \right. \nonumber \\ 

1562: && \left . + \frac{[\Gamma(n)-20\Gamma(n+1)] (Qb)^{-n -\frac{3}{2}}}{4\sqrt{\pi}}

1563: \right . \nonumber \\

1564: && \left . \times  

1565: [\cos (\frac{n}{2}\pi-Qb)+\sin (\frac{n}{2}\pi-Qb)]   \right )+\dots \label{asGG}

1566: \end{eqnarray}

1567: The ellipses denote terms subleading in $\frac{1}{Q b}$. The above

1568: formulas assume that $n$ is kept fixed. In actual applications, such

1569: as numerical programming of the generalized hypergeometric functions,

1570: it is practical to switch from the general formulas

1571: (\ref{anombNS},\ref{anomb}) to the asymptotic expressions

1572: (\ref{asqq},\ref{asGG}) when $Q b \ge 10 |n|$.

1573: 

1574: 

1575: \section{Pole-residue expansion of the anomalous dimensions\label{sec:polres}}

1576: 

1577: For $ b \neq 0 $ the analytic

1578: structure of the $b-$dependent anomalous dimensions remains the

1579: same as for $b=0$.

1580: This can be seen by expanding the Bessel function in the

1581: integrand of Eq.~(\ref{gammadef}) as a power series around $z=0$, which yields

1582: \begin{eqnarray}

1583: && \gamma_{n,ab} (Q b ) = \label{pow} \\ && - 4 \int_0^1

1584: d z  \sum_{k=0}^\infty \frac1{k!} \left [ J_0^{(k)} (Qb) (-Qb)^{k} z^{n+k} -1 \right ] P_{ab}(z). \nonumber

1585: \end{eqnarray} 

1586: Applying the trick

1587: \begin{eqnarray}

1588: 1 = J_0(0) = -4

1589: \sum_{k=0}^\infty \frac1{k!} J_0^{(k)} (Qb) (-Qb)^k, \label{sumJ}

1590: \end{eqnarray} 

1591: we find the expansion involving index-shifted anomalous dimensions at $b=0$, namely 

1592: \begin{eqnarray}

1593: \gamma_{n,ab} ( Q b ) &=& 

1594: \sum_{k=0}^\infty  \frac{(-Qb)^k}{k!} J_0^{(k)} (Qb) 

1595: \gamma_{n+k,ab} ( 0) . \nonumber \\ \label{gaJ}

1596: \end{eqnarray} 

1597: Using the explicit expression for the anomalous dimension this series

1598: may be rewritten as a pole-residue expansion

1599: \begin{eqnarray}

1600: \gamma_{n,ab} ( Q b )  = 

1601: \sum_{k=0}^\infty \frac{R_k^{ab} (Qb)}{n+k}  .

1602: \label{eq:pole_res}

1603: \end{eqnarray} 

1604: In practice this means that the Mellin contour used in the case of $b=0$

1605: can be used in the $b\neq 0$ case as well. 

1606: In the non-singlet case the first few residues read 

1607: \begin{eqnarray}

1608: %R_0^{\rm NS} (A) &=& 0, \nonumber \\

1609: R_1^{\rm NS} (A) &=& -4C_F J_0(A), \label{prNS} \\

1610: R_2^{\rm NS} (A) &=& -4C_F (J_0(A)+AJ_1(A)), \nonumber  \\

1611: R_3^{\rm NS} (A) &=& -2C_F (-(A^2-4) J_0(A)+3A J_1(A) ), \nonumber 

1612: \label{eq:res}

1613: \end{eqnarray}

1614: while in the singlet channel $R_i^{qq}=R_i^{\rm NS}$ and

1615: \begin{eqnarray}

1616: R_1^{qG} (A) &=& -4N_F J_0(A), \nonumber \\

1617: R_2^{qG} (A) &=& -4N_F (-2J_0(A)+AJ_1(A)), \nonumber \\ 

1618: \dots \nonumber \\

1619: R_0^{Gq} (A) &=& -8C_F J_0(A), \nonumber \\

1620: R_1^{Gq} (A) &=& -8C_F (-J_0(A)+AJ_1(A)), \nonumber \\ 

1621: \dots \nonumber \\

1622: R_0^{GG} (A) &=& -8N_c J_0(A), \nonumber \\

1623: R_1^{GG} (A) &=& -8N_c (-J_0(A)+AJ_1(A)). \label{prS} 

1624: \label{eq:ressing}

1625: \end{eqnarray}

1626: The pole-residue expansion controls the behavior of the solutions of

1627: Eq.~(\ref{Keq}) at low $x$.  Since the subsequent residues carry

1628: powers of $A^n=(Q b)^n$, the expansion cannot be used for $Q b$ too

1629: large.

1630: 

1631: \begin{thebibliography}{99}

1632: 

1633: \bibitem{DDT} Yu. L. Dokshitzer, D. I. Dyakonov and S. I. Troyan,

1634: Phys. Rep. {\bf 58} (1980) 269.

1635: 

1636: \bibitem{naka} N. Nakamura, G. Pancheri and Y.N. Srivastava, Z. Phys. {\bf C21} (1984)

1637: 243; A. Corsetti, A. Grau, G. Pancheri, Y.N. Srivastava Phys. Lett. {\bf B382} (1996)

1638: 282; A. Grau, G. Pancheri, Y.N. Srivastava, Phys. Rev. {\bf D60} (1999) 114020.

1639: 

1640: \bibitem{sterman} G. Sterman, {\it Partons, factorization and resummation TASI 95}, based

1641: on seven lectures at the Theoretical Advanced Study Intitute, {\it QCD and beyond}, 

1642: Boulder, Colorado, June 1995,  hep-ph/9606312.

1643: 

1644: %\cite{Kimber:1999xc}

1645: \bibitem{kimb1}

1646: M.~A.~Kimber, A.~D.~Martin and M.~G.~Ryskin,

1647: %``Unintegrated parton distributions and prompt photon hadroproduction,''

1648: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 12}, 655 (2000).

1649: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9911379;%%

1650: 

1651: \bibitem{KMKS1}M. A. Kimber, A. D. Martin, J. Kwieci\'nski and A.~M.~Sta\'sto,

1652: Phys. Rev. {\bf D62} (2000) 094006.

1653: 

1654: %\cite{Kimber:2001sc}

1655: \bibitem{kimb2}

1656: M.~A.~Kimber, A.~D.~Martin and M.~G.~Ryskin,

1657: %``Unintegrated parton distributions,''

1658: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 63}, 114027 (2001).

1659: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0101348;%%

1660: 

1661: \bibitem{MR}A. D. Martin and M. G. Ryskin, Phys. Rev. {\bf D64} (2001) 094017.

1662: 

1663: \bibitem{KHMR} V. A. Khoze, A. D. Martin and M. G. Ryskin, Eur. Phys. J. {\bf C14} (2000) 525;

1664: {\it ibid.} {\bf C19} (2001) 477; Erratum - {\it ibid.} {\bf C20} (2001) 599.

1665: 

1666: \bibitem{WMR} G. Watt, A. D. Martin and M. G. Ryskin, hep-ph/0306169.

1667: 

1668: \bibitem{MIU} G. Gustafson, L. L\"onnblad and G. Miu, JHEP {\bf 0209} (2002)005.

1669: 

1670: \bibitem{collins} J. C. Collins, Acta Phys. Polon. {\bf B34} (2003) 3103.

1671: 

1672: \bibitem{AS1} A. Szczurek, Acta Phys. Polon. {\bf B34} (2003) 3191.

1673: 

1674: %\cite{Martin:2001ms}

1675: \bibitem{MarRys}

1676: A.~D.~Martin and M.~G.~Ryskin,

1677: %``Unintegrated generalised parton distributions,''

1678: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 64}, 094017 (2001).

1679: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0107149;%%

1680: 

1681: %\cite{Kwiecinski:2002bx}

1682: \bibitem{JK1}

1683: J.~Kwieci\'nski,

1684: %``Unintegrated gluon distributions from the transverse coordinate  representation of the CCFM equation in the single loop approximation,''

1685: Acta Phys.\ Polon.\ B {\bf 33}, 1809 (2002).

1686: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0203172;%%

1687: 

1688: %\cite{Gawron:2002kc}

1689: \bibitem{JK2}

1690: A.~Gawron and J.~Kwieci\'nski,

1691:  %``Unintegrated gluon distributions in a photon from the CCFM equation in  the

1692: %single loop approximation,''

1693: Acta Phys.\ Polon.\ B {\bf 34} (2003) 133.

1694: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0207299;%%

1695: 

1696: %\cite{Gawron:2003qG}

1697: \bibitem{JK3}

1698: A.~Gawron, J.~Kwieci\'nski and W.~Broniowski,

1699:  %``Unintegrated parton distributions of pions and nucleons from the CCFM

1700: %equations in the single-loop approximation,''

1701: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 68}, 054001 (2003).

1702: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0305219;%%

1703: 

1704: \bibitem{CCFM1}

1705: M.~Ciafaloni, {\em Nucl. Phys. {\bf B}} {\bf 296}(1988) 49.

1706: 

1707: \bibitem{CCFM2}

1708: S.~Catani, F.~Fiorani, G.~Marchesini, {\em Phys. Lett. {\bf B}} {\bf 234}(1990)339.

1709: 

1710: \bibitem{CCFM3}

1711: S.~Catani, F.~Fiorani, G.~Marchesini, {\em Nucl. Phys. {\bf B}} {\bf  336}(1990)18.

1712: 

1713: \bibitem{CCFM4}

1714: G.~Marchesini, {\em Nucl. Phys. {\bf B}} {\bf 445}(1995) 49.

1715: 

1716: %\cite{Jung:2003wu}

1717: \bibitem{Jung}

1718: H.~Jung,

1719:  %``k(t)-factorization and CCFM: The solution for describing the hadronic final

1720: %states - everywhere?,''

1721: Mod.\ Phys.\ Lett.\ A {\bf 19}, 1 (2004).

1722: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0311249;%%

1723: 

1724: %\cite{Gawron:2003np}

1725: \bibitem{Gawron}

1726: A.~Gawron and J.~Kwiecinski,

1727:  %``Resummation effects in Higgs boson transverse momentum distribution within

1728: %the framework of unintegrated parton distributions,''

1729: arXiv:hep-ph/0309303.

1730: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0309303;%%

1731: %\cite{Biro:2003vz}

1732: 

1733: %\cite{JKAS}

1734: \bibitem{JKAS}

1735: J.~Kwieci\'nski and A.~Szczurek,

1736:  %``Unintegrated CCFM parton distributions and transverse momentum of gauge

1737: %bosons,''

1738: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 680}, 164 (2004).

1739: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0311290;%%

1740: 

1741: %\cite{Hansson:2004uw}

1742: \bibitem{Hansson}

1743: M.~Hansson, H.~Jung and L.~Jonsson,

1744: %``The unintegrated gluon density in the photon and heavy quark production,''

1745: arXiv:hep-ph/0402019.

1746: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0402019;%%

1747: 

1748: %\cite{Motyka:2002ww}

1749: \bibitem{Motyka}

1750: L.~Motyka and N.~Timneanu,

1751: %``Unintegrated gluon in the photon and heavy quark production. ((V)),''

1752: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 27} (2003) 73.

1753: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0209029;%%

1754: 

1755: %\cite{Zotov:cb}

1756: \bibitem{Zotov}

1757: N.~P.~Zotov, A.~V.~Lipatov and V.~A.~Saleev,

1758:  %``Heavy-Quark Production In P Anti-P Collisions And Unintegrated Gluon

1759: %Distributions,''

1760: Phys.\ Atom.\ Nucl.\  {\bf 66}, 755 (2003)

1761: [Yad.\ Fiz.\  {\bf 66}, 786 (2003)].

1762: %%CITATION = PANUE,66,755;%%

1763: 

1764: %\cite{Lipatov:2003es}

1765: \bibitem{LipZot}

1766: A.~V.~Lipatov and N.~P.~Zotov,

1767:  %``Study of the colour singlet model with k(T)-factorization in inclusive

1768: %J/psi production at CERN LEP2,''

1769: arXiv:hep-ph/0304181.

1770: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0304181;%%

1771: 

1772: %\cite{Watt:2003mx}

1773: \bibitem{Watt}

1774: G.~Watt, A.~D.~Martin and M.~G.~Ryskin,

1775: %``Unintegrated parton distributions and inclusive jet production at HERA,''

1776: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 31}, 73 (2003).

1777: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0306169;%%

1778: 

1779: %\cite{Szczurek:2003vq}

1780: \bibitem{AS}

1781: A.~Szczurek,

1782:  %``Unintegrated parton distributions and particle production in hadronic

1783: %collisions,''

1784: arXiv:hep-ph/0311175.

1785: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0311175;%%

1786: 

1787: \bibitem{Biro}

1788: T.~S.~Biro and B.~Muller,

1789: %``Almost exponential transverse spectra from power law spectra,''

1790: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 578}, 78 (2004).

1791: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0309052;%%

1792: 

1793: %\cite{Levai:2003at}

1794: \bibitem{Levai}

1795: P.~Levai, G.~Papp, G.~G.~Barnafoldi and G.~Fai,

1796: %``Pion production in d + Au collisions at RHIC energy,''.

1797: arXiv:nucl-th/0306019.

1798: 

1799: %\cite{Kotikov:2004uf}

1800: \bibitem{Kotl}

1801: A.~V.~Kotikov, A.~V.~Lipatov and N.~P.~Zotov,

1802:  %``The longitudinal structure function F(L): Perturbative QCD and

1803: %k(T)-factorization versus experimental data at fixed W,''

1804: arXiv:hep-ph/0403135.

1805: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0403135;%%

1806: 

1807: %\cite{Kotikov:2001ct}

1808: \bibitem{Kot}

1809: A.~V.~Kotikov, A.~V.~Lipatov, G.~Parente and N.~P.~Zotov,

1810:  %``The contribution of off-shell gluons to the structure functions F2(c)  and

1811: %F(L)(c) and the unintegrated gluon distributions,''

1812: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 26}, 51 (2002).

1813: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0107135;%%

1814: 

1815: %\cite{Kwiecinski:1999sk}

1816: \bibitem{spin1}

1817: J.~Kwieci\'nski and B.~Ziaja,

1818: %``QCD expectations for the spin structure function g1 in the low x  region,''

1819: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 60}, 054004 (1999)

1820: % [arXiv:hep-ph/9902440].

1821: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9902440;%%

1822: 

1823: %\cite{Kwiecinski:2000yk}

1824: \bibitem{spin2}

1825: J.~Kwieci\,nski and B.~Ziaja,

1826:  %``QCD predictions for spin dependent photonic structure function

1827: %g1(gamma)(x,Q**2) in the low x region of future linear colliders,''

1828: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 63}, 054022 (2001)

1829: % [arXiv:hep-ph/0006292].

1830: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0006292;%%

1831: 

1832: \bibitem{Shoshi}

1833: A.~I.~Shoshi, F.~D.~Steffen, H.~G.~Dosch and H.~J.~Pirner,

1834:  %``Decomposition of the QCD string into dipoles and unintegrated gluon

1835: %distributions,''

1836: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 66}, 094019 (2002).

1837: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0207287;%%

1838: 

1839: \bibitem{DGLAP1}

1840: V.~Gribov, L.~Lipatov, {\em Sov. J. Nucl. Phys.} {\bf 15}(1972)438; {\em ibid.} 675.

1841: 

1842: \bibitem{DGLAP2}

1843: L.~Lipatov, {\em Sov. J. Nucl. Phys.} {\bf 20}(1975)94.

1844: 

1845: \bibitem{DGLAP3}

1846: G.~Altarelli, G.~Parisi, {\em Nucl. Phys. {\bf B}} {\bf 126}(1977)298.

1847: 

1848: \bibitem{DGLAP4}

1849: Y.~Dokshitser, {\em Sov. Phys. JETP} {\bf 46}(1977)641.

1850: 

1851: \bibitem{SQM01} E. Ruiz Arriola, proc. of Workshop on {\em Lepton

1852: Scattering, Hadrons and QCD}, Adelaide (Australia), 26 March -- 6 April

1853: 2001. Eds. W.~Melnitchouk, A.~W.~Schreiber, A.~W.~Thomas,

1854: P.~C.~Tandy, Singapore, World Scientific, 2001, hep-ph/0107087.

1855: 

1856: %\cite{RuizArriola:2003bs}

1857: \bibitem{SQM}

1858: E.~Ruiz Arriola and W.~Broniowski,

1859: %``Spectral quark model and low-energy hadron phenomenology,''

1860: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 67}, 074021 (2003).

1861: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0301202;%%

1862: 

1863: %\cite{RuizArriola:2003wi}

1864: \bibitem{SQM03} 

1865: E.~Ruiz Arriola and W.~Broniowski,

1866: %``The spectral quark model and light cone phenomenology,''

1867: proc. of {\em Light

1868: cone physics: Hadrons and beyond}, IPPP, University of Durham, UK, 5-9

1869: August 2003, ed. S. Dalley, p.~166,

1870: arXiv:hep-ph/0310044.

1871: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0310044;%%

1872: 

1873: 

1874: \bibitem{NJL} {For reviews see, e.g., U. Vogl and W. Weise, {\it

1875: Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics} vol. {\bf 27}, 195 (1991);

1876: S. P. Klevansky, Rev. Mod. Phys. {\bf 64}, 649 (1992); M. K. Volkov,

1877: Part. and Nuclei B 24, 1 (1993); T. Hatsuda and T. Kunihiro,

1878: Phys. Rep. {\bf 247}, 221 (1994); Chr. V. Christov, A. Blotz, H.-C. Kim,

1879: P. Pobylitsa, T. Watabe, T. Meissner, E. Ruiz Arriola, and K. Goeke,

1880: Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. {\bf 37}, 91 (1996); R. Alkofer, H. Reinhardt,

1881: and H. Weigel, Phys. Rept. {\bf 265}, 139 (1996);  G. Ripka, {\it

1882: Quarks Bound by Chiral Fields} Oxford Science Publications, 1997, and

1883: references therein. }

1884: 

1885: %\cite{Davidson:2001cc}

1886: \bibitem{DavArr1}

1887: R.~M.~Davidson and E.~Ruiz Arriola,

1888: %``Parton distributions functions of pion, kaon and eta pseudoscalar  mesons in the NJL model,''

1889: Acta Phys.\ Polon.\ B {\bf 33}, 1791 (2002).

1890: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0110291;%%

1891: 

1892: %\cite{Davidson:1994uv}

1893: \bibitem{DavArr2}

1894: R.~M.~Davidson and E.~Ruiz Arriola,

1895: %``Structure functions of pseudoscalar mesons in the SU(3) NJL model,''

1896: Phys. Lett. B {\bf 348}, 163 (1995).

1897: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B348,163;%%

1898: 

1899: %\cite{Weigel:1999pc}

1900: \bibitem{Weigel}

1901: H.~Weigel, E.~Ruiz Arriola and L.~P.~Gamberg,

1902: %``Hadron structure functions in a chiral quark model: Regularization,  scaling and sum rules,''

1903: Nucl. Phys. B {\bf 560}, 383 (1999).

1904: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9905329;%%

1905: 

1906: %\cite{RuizArriola:2002wr}

1907: \bibitem{ERAZak}

1908: E.~Ruiz Arriola,

1909: %``Pion structure at high and low energies in chiral quark models,''

1910: Acta Phys.\ Polon.\ B {\bf 33}, 4443 (2002).

1911: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0210007;%%

1912: 

1913: \bibitem{PDA} 

1914: E.~Ruiz Arriola and W.~Broniowski,

1915:  %``Pion light-cone wave function and pion distribution amplitude in the

1916: %Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model,''

1917: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 66}, 094016 (2002).

1918: 

1919: \bibitem{GPD}

1920: W.~Broniowski and E.~Ruiz Arriola,

1921:  %``Impact-parameter dependence of the generalized parton distribution of the

1922: %pion in chiral quark models,''

1923: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 574}, 57 (2003).

1924: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0307198;%%

1925: 

1926: \bibitem{vento} L.~Theu{\ss}el, S. Noguera, and V. Vento, arXiv:nucl-th/0211036.

1927: 

1928: \bibitem{GRS}M. Gl\"uck, E. Reya, I. Schienbein, Eur. Phys. J. {\bf C10}, 313 (1999).

1929: 

1930: \bibitem{GRV} M. Gl\"uck, E. Reya, A. Vogt, Eur. Phys. J. {\bf C5}, 461 (1998). 

1931: 

1932: %\cite{DeRujula:rf}

1933: \bibitem{DLLA}

1934: A.~De Rujula, S.~L.~Glashow, H.~D.~Politzer, S.~B.~Treiman, F.~Wilczek and A.~Zee,

1935: %``Possible Nonregge Behavior Of Electroproduction Structure Functions,''

1936: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 10}, 1649 (1974).

1937: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D10,1649;%%

1938: 

1939: %\cite{RuizArriola:er}

1940: \bibitem{ERANLO}

1941: E.~Ruiz Arriola,

1942: %``Nlo Evolution For Large Scale Distances, Positivity Constraints And The  Low-Energy Model Of The Nucleon,''

1943: Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 641}, 461 (1998).

1944: %%CITATION = NUPHA,A641,461;%%

1945: 

1946: \bibitem{SMRS92} P. J. Sutton, A. D. Martin, R. G. Roberts, and W. J. Stirling, Phys. Rev. {\bf D 45}, 2349 (1992).

1947: 

1948: \bibitem{WBDur} W. Broniowski and E. Ruiz Arriola, proc. of {\em Light

1949: cone physics: Hadrons and beyond}, IPPP, University of Durham, UK, 5-9

1950: August 2003, ed. S. Dalley, p.~166, arXiv:hep-ph/0310048.

1951: 

1952: \bibitem{e615} J. S. Conway {\em et al.}, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 39}, 92 (1989).

1953: 

1954: \bibitem{Peterman}

1955: A.~Peterman, Phys. Rept.  {\bf 53}, 157 (1979).

1956: 

1957: \bibitem{golec} K. Golec-Biernat, {\em  Deep inelastic scattering at small values of the 

1958: Bjorken variable $x$}, habilitation thesis, INP Cracow report 1877/PH, August 2001, 

1959: http://www.ifj.edu.pl\-/reports/1877.pdf.

1960: 

1961: \bibitem{mathworld} {\tt http://www.mathworld.com}

1962: 

1963: \bibitem{hyp12}http://functions.wolfram.com/\\ HypergeometricFunctions/Hypergeometric1F2/06/02/04

1964: 

1965: \bibitem{hyppq}http://functions.wolfram.com/\\ HypergeometricFunctions/HypergeometricPFQ/06/04

1966: 

1967: \end{thebibliography}

1968: 

1969: \end{document}

1970: 

1971: 

1972: