1: \documentclass[12pt,a4paper]{article}
2: \usepackage{epsfig}
3: \pagestyle{plain} \topmargin=-0.8in \hoffset=-1.0cm \voffset=1cm
4: \textwidth=160mm \textheight=220mm
5: \def\baselinestretch{1.5}
6:
7:
8: \begin{document}
9: \title{Detecting the non-universal gauge boson $Z^{'}$ at high-energy $e^{+}e^{-}$ collider}
10: \author{Chongxing Yue and Dongqi Yu \\
11: %\address{
12: {\small Department of Physics, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian
13: 116029, China}\thanks{E-mail:cxyue@lnnu.edu.cn}\\}
14: \date{\today}
15: \maketitle
16:
17: \begin{abstract}
18: \hspace{5mm}In the context of topcolor-assisted techicolor($TC2$)
19: models, we investigate the feasibility of detecting the
20: non-universal gauge boson $Z^{'}$ in the future high-energy linear
21: $e^{+}e^{-}$ collider($LC$) experiments by performing $\chi^{2}$
22: analysis via studying its virtual effects on the processes
23: $e^{+}e^{-}\rightarrow f\overline{f}$ with $f=\tau$, $\mu$, b, and
24: c. We find that the non-universal gauge boson $Z^{'}$ is most
25: sensitive to the process $e^{+}e^{-}\rightarrow
26: \tau\overline{\tau}$. Discovery limits of the $Z^{'}$ mass
27: $M_{Z^{'}}$ can be enhanced by the suitably polarized beams. If we
28: assume that polarization of electron beam and positron beam are
29: $80\%$ and $60\%$, the $LC$ experiment with $\sqrt{s}=500GeV$ and
30: $\pounds_{int}=340fb^{-1}$ can explore $M_{Z^{'}}$ up to 8$TeV$
31: for the coupling parameter $K_{1}\leq$0.8 at $95\%$ $CL$.
32: \end {abstract}
33:
34: \vspace{2.0cm} \noindent
35: {\bf PACS number(s)}:12.60Fr, 14.80.Mz, 12.15.Lk
36:
37:
38: \newpage
39:
40: Although the standard model($SM$) has been successful in
41: describing the physics of electroweak interaction, it is only
42: considered as the low energy limit of a more fundamental theory
43: which is characterized by a large energy scale $\Lambda$. New
44: Physics(NP) should exist at energy scales around $TeV$. Many
45: models of NP beyond the $SM$, such as string theory[1], grand
46: unified theory[2], strong top dynamical models[3], predict the
47: presence of massive $Z^{'}$ gauge bosons. If these new particles
48: are discovered, they would represent irrefutable proof of NP, most
49: likely that the $SM$ gauge groups must be extended[4]. Thus,
50: search for extra neutral gauge bosons $Z^{'}$ provides a common
51: tool in quest for NP at high energy colliders.
52:
53: The hadron colliders, such as Tevatron and future $LHC$, are
54: expected to directly probe possible NP beyond the $SM$ up to a
55: scale of a few $TeV$, while a high-energy linear $e^{+}e^{-}$
56: collider($LC$) is required to complement the probe of the new
57: particles with detailed measurement. Even if their masses exceed
58: the center-of-mass(c.m.) energy $\sqrt{s}$, the $LC$ experiments
59: also retain all indirect sensitivity through a precision study of
60: their virtual corrections to observables. Thus, a $LC$ has a large
61: potential for discovery of new particles.
62:
63: Now the interesting possibility is to investigate the feasibility
64: of a $Z^{'}$ discovery at the future $LC$ experiments. The
65: possible signals of extra gauge bosons $Z^{'}$ at $LC$ can arise
66: from the indirect effects of $Z^{'}$ exchange via the process
67: $e^{+}e^{-}\rightarrow f\overline{f}$. Through their interference
68: with the $SM$ $\gamma$ exchange and $Z$ exchange, significant
69: deviations from the $SM$ predictions can occur even when the
70: $Z^{'}$ mass $M_{Z^{'}}$ is much larger than the c.m. energy
71: $\sqrt{s}$[5]. The $LC$ observables, such as the cross section for
72: $f\overline{f}$ final state, forward-backward asymmetry
73: $A^{f}_{FB}$, and the left-right asymmetry $A^{f}_{LR}$, can give
74: information on the $Z^{'}$ parameters. Even if there is no
75: observed signal within the experimental accuracy, limits on the
76: free parameters of extra gauge boson $Z^{'}$ at a conventionally
77: defined confidence level($CL$) can be derived.
78:
79: Ref.[6] has studied the virtual effects of extra gauge bosons
80: $Z^{'}$ on the process $e^{+}e^{-}\rightarrow f\overline{f}$ in
81: the context of the $\chi$ model occurring in the breaking
82: $SO(10)\rightarrow SU(5)\times U(1)_{\chi}$, the $\psi$ model
83: originating in $E_{6}\rightarrow SO(10)\times U(1)_{\psi}$, the
84: $\eta$ model, and the left-right model. The search limits for
85: these new neutral gauge bosons $Z^{'}$ at the present and future
86: $LC$ experiments with initial beam polarization are given by
87: studying some observables deviations from the $SM$ predictions. In
88: this paper, we discuss the possibility of detecting extra neutral
89: gauge bosons $Z^{'}$, predicted by topcolor-assisted
90: technicolor($TC2$) models[7] and flavor-universal $TC2$ models[8],
91: via the processes $e^{+}e^{-}\rightarrow f\overline{f}$ with
92: $f=\tau$, $\mu$, b, and c at the future $LC$ experiments with
93: $\sqrt{s}=500GeV$ and both beams polarized. We find that the value
94: of the $Z^{'}$ mass $M_{Z^{'}}$ for a $Z^{'}$ discovery at the
95: future $LC$ experiments is most sensitive to the process
96: $e^{+}e^{-}\rightarrow \tau\overline{\tau}$. In most of the
97: parameter space, the $M_{Z^{'}}$ can be explored up to 6$TeV$ via
98: this process at the $LC$ experiments with the c.m. energy
99: $\sqrt{s}=500GeV$ and the integrated luminosity
100: $\pounds_{int}=340fb^{-1}$.
101:
102: To completely avoid the problems, such as triviality and
103: unnaturaless arising from the elementary Higgs in the $SM$,
104: various kinds of dynamical models are proposed and among which
105: $TC2$ models and flavor-universal $TC2$ models are very
106: interesting because they can explain the large top quark mass and
107: provide possible dynamics of elecroweak symmetry
108: breaking(EWSB)[3]. A common feature of these models is that the
109: $SM$ gauge groups are extended at energy well above the weak
110: scale. Breaking of the extended groups to their diagonal
111: sub-groups produces non-universal massive gauge bosons $Z^{'}$[9].
112: These new particles treat the third generation fermions
113: differently from those in the first and second generations and
114: couple primarily to the third generation fermions.
115:
116: The flavor-diagonal couplings of the non-universal gauge boson
117: $Z^{'}$ to fermions, which are related our calculation, can be
118: written as[3,7]:
119: \begin{eqnarray}
120: \hspace{-5cm}\pounds_{Z^{'}}&=&g_{1}cot\theta^{'}Z^{'}\cdot
121: (J^{1}_{Z^{'}}+J^{2}_{Z^{'}}+J^{3}_{Z^{'}})\nonumber\\
122: &=&g_{1}cot\theta^{'}Z^{'}_{\mu}\cdot(\frac{1}{6}\overline{b}_{L}
123: \gamma^{\mu}b_{L}-\frac{1}{3}\overline{b}_{R}\gamma^{\mu}
124: {b}_{R}-\frac{1}{2}\overline{\tau}_{L}\gamma^{\mu}
125: \tau_{L}-\overline{\tau}_{R}\gamma^{\mu}\tau_{R})-g_{1}tan
126: \theta^{'}Z^{'}_{\mu}\cdot\nonumber\\&&(\frac{1}{6}
127: \overline{c}_{L}\gamma^{\mu}c_{L}+\frac{2}{3}\overline{c}_{R}
128: \gamma^{\mu}c_{R}-\frac{1}{2}\overline{\mu}_{L}\gamma^{\mu}\mu_{L}
129: -\overline{\mu}_{R}\gamma^{\mu}\mu_{R}-\frac{1}{2}\overline{e}_{L}
130: \gamma^{\mu}e_{L}-\overline{e}_{R}\gamma^{\mu}e_{R}).
131: \end{eqnarray}
132: Where $g_{1}$ is the ordinary hypercharge gauge coupling constant,
133: $\theta^{'}$ is the mixing angle with
134: $tan\theta^{'}=\frac{g_{1}}{\sqrt{4\pi K_{1}}}$. To obtain the top
135: quark condensation and not form a $b\overline{b}$ condensation,
136: there must be $tan\theta^{'}\ll1$[7,8]. The currents
137: $J^{1}_{Z^{'}}$, $J^{2}_{Z^{'}}$, and $J^{3}_{Z^{'}}$ involve the
138: first, second, and third generation fermions, respectively.
139:
140: Integrating out the heavy gauge boson $Z^{'}$, the above couplings
141: give rise to effective low-energy four fermions interactions,
142: which can in general be written as:
143: \begin{equation}
144: \pounds_{eff,Z^{'}}=-\frac{2\pi
145: K_{1}}{M^{2}_{Z^{'}}}(J^{1}_{Z^{'}}+J^{2}_{Z^{'}}+J^{3}_{Z^{'}})^{2},
146: \end{equation}
147: which can generate virtual corrections to the process
148: $e^{+}e^{-}\rightarrow f\overline{f}$. $M_{Z^{'}}$ is the mass of
149: the non-universal gauge boson $Z^{'}$. If we take $f=\tau, \mu, b$
150: and c, then the differential cross sections for these processes
151: are given in Born approximation by the s-channel $\gamma$, $Z$,
152: and $Z^{'}$ exchange. Neglecting fermion mass $m_{f}$ with respect
153: to the c.m. energy $\sqrt{s}$, they have the form[6,10]:
154: \begin{equation}
155: \frac{d\sigma(f\overline{f})}{dcos\theta}=\frac{3}{8}[(1+cos\theta)^{2}
156: \sigma_{+}(f\overline{f})+(1-cos\theta)^{2}\sigma_{-}(f\overline{f})],
157: \end{equation}
158: where $\theta$ is the angle between the incoming electron and the
159: outgoing fermion in the c.m. frame. The
160: $\sigma_{+}(f\overline{f})$ and $\sigma_{-}(f\overline{f})$ can be
161: expressed in terms of the helicity cross sections
162: $\sigma_{\alpha\beta}$ with $\alpha,\beta=L, R$:
163: \begin{equation}
164: \sigma_{+}(f\overline{f})=\frac{D}{4}[(1-P_{eff})\sigma_{LL}(f\overline{f})+
165: (1+P_{eff})\sigma_{RR}(f\overline{f})],
166: \end{equation}
167: \begin{equation}
168: \sigma_{-}(f\overline{f})=\frac{D}{4}[(1-P_{eff})\sigma_{LR}(f\overline{f})+
169: (1+P_{eff})\sigma_{RL}(f\overline{f})]
170: \end{equation}
171: with
172: \begin{equation}
173: P_{eff}=\frac{P_{e}-P_{\overline{e}}}{1-P_{e}P_{\overline{e}}},\hspace{1.5cm}
174: D=1-P_{e}P_{\overline{e}}.
175: \end{equation}
176: Where $P_{e}$ and $P_{\overline{e}}$ are the degrees of
177: longitudinal electron and positron polarization.
178:
179: The helicity cross sections $\sigma_{\alpha\beta}(f\overline{f})$
180: can be written as:
181: \begin{equation}
182: \sigma_{\alpha\beta}(f\overline{f})=\frac{N_{C}A}{e^{4}}\mid
183: M_{\alpha\beta}(f\overline{f})\mid^{2},
184: \end{equation}
185: where $N_{C}\simeq3(1+\frac{\alpha_{s}}{\pi})$ for quarks,
186: $N_{C}=1$ for leptons, and $A=\frac{4\pi\alpha_{e}^{2}}{3s}$. The
187: helicity amplitudes $M_{\alpha\beta}(f\overline{f})$ can be
188: written as :
189: \begin{equation}
190: M_{\alpha\beta}=Q_{e}Q_{f}+g_{\alpha}^{e}g_{\beta}^{f}\chi_{Z}+
191: g_{\alpha}^{'e}g_{\beta}^{'f}\chi_{Z^{'}},
192: \end{equation}
193: where $\chi_{i}=\frac{s}{s-M^{2}_{i}+iM_{i}\Gamma_{i}}$ represent
194: the gauge boson $Z$ and $Z^{'}$ propagators,
195: $g_{L}^{f}=\frac{e}{S_{W}C_{W}}(I^{f}_{3L}-Q_{f}S^{2}_{W})$ and
196: $g^{f}_{R}=-\frac{e}{S_{W}C_{W}}Q_{f}S^{2}_{W}$ are the left-hand
197: and right-hand coupling constants of the $SM$ gauge boson $Z$ to
198: fermions, $ I^{f}_{3L}$ is the third component of isospin, and
199: $Q_{f}$ is the fermion electricharge.
200: $S^{2}_{W}=sin^{2}\theta_{W}$, $\theta_{W}$ is the Weinberg angle.
201: The coupling constants $g^{'e}_{\alpha}$ and $g^{'f}_{\beta}$ can
202: be easily extracted from Eq.(1) for the non-universal gauge boson
203: $Z^{'}$ predicted by $TC2$ models or flavor-universal $TC2$
204: models.
205:
206: The cross sections $\sigma^{exp}(f\overline{f})$, which can be
207: directly detected at the $LC$ experiments, can be written as:
208: \begin{equation}
209: \sigma^{exp}(f\overline{f})=\frac{1}{4}[\sigma_{LL}(f\overline{f})+
210: \sigma_{LR}(f\overline{f})+\sigma_{RR}(f\overline{f})+\sigma_{RL}
211: (f\overline{f})]=\frac{N_{tot}^{exp}}{D\pounds_{int}\varepsilon}.
212: \end{equation}
213: $N^{exp}_{tot}=N_{L,F}+N_{R,F}+N_{L,B}+N_{R,B}$ is the total
214: number of events observed at the $LC$ experiments with polarized
215: beams, which has been defined in Ref.[6,10]. The parameter
216: $\varepsilon$ is the experimental efficiency for detecting the
217: final state fermions. In the following calculation, we will take
218: the commonly used reference values of the identification
219: efficiencies: $\varepsilon=95\%$ for $l\overline{l}$;
220: $\varepsilon=60\%$ for $b\overline{b}$; $\varepsilon=35\%$ for
221: $c\overline{c}$.
222:
223: The virtual effects of extra gauge bosons $Z^{'}$ on the process
224: $e^{+}e^{-}\rightarrow f\overline{f}$ can be detected via
225: considering deviations of the measured observables from the $SM$
226: predictions induced by these new particles. The experimental
227: constraints on the $Z^{'}$ parameters, such as the mass and the
228: coupling constants, can be estimated by performing $\chi^{2}$
229: analysis, i.e. by comparing the mentioned deviations with the
230: expected experimental uncertainty including the statistical and
231: the systematic one.
232:
233: For the cross sections $\sigma(f\overline{f})$, the $\chi^{2}$
234: function is defined as:
235: \begin{equation}
236: \chi^{2}=[\frac{\Delta\sigma(f\overline{f})}{\delta\sigma
237: (f\overline{f})}]^{2},
238: \end{equation}
239: where $\Delta\sigma(f\overline{f})=\sigma^{TC2}(f\overline{f})-
240: \sigma^{SM}(f\overline{f})$ and $\delta\sigma(f\overline{f})$ is
241: the expected experimental uncertainty about the cross section
242: $\sigma(f\overline{f})$ both including the statistical and
243: systematic uncertainties. The allowed values of the $Z^{'}$
244: parameters by observation of the deviation
245: $\Delta\sigma(f\overline{f})$ out of the expected experimental
246: uncertainty $\delta\sigma(f\overline{f})$ can be estimated by
247: imposing $\chi^{2}>\chi^{2}_{CL}$, where the actual value of
248: $\chi^{2}_{CL}$ specifies the desired $'$confidence$'$ level. In
249: this paper, we take the value $\chi^{2}_{CL}=3.84$ for $95\%CL$
250: for a one-parameter fit and give the observability bound on the
251: $Z^{'}$ mass $M_{Z^{'}}$ for the fixed value of the coupling
252: parameter $K_{1}$.
253:
254: From Eq.(8), one can see that the contributions of the gauge boson
255: $Z^{'}$ to the amplitudes $M_{\alpha\beta}$ can be represented by
256: the combination of the product of couplings
257: $g^{'e}_{\alpha}$$g^{'f}_{\beta}$ with the propagator
258: $\chi_{Z^{'}}$. If we assume $\sqrt{s}=500GeV$, there is
259: $\sqrt{s}\ll M_{Z^{'}}$. In this case, only the interference of
260: the $SM$ term with the $Z^{'}$ exchange is important and
261: $\Delta\sigma(ff)$ with $f=\tau,$ $\mu$, $b$, and $c$ contributed
262: by $Z'$ exchange can be written as:
263: \begin{eqnarray}
264: \Delta\sigma(\tau\overline{\tau})&=&\frac{A}{2C^{2}_{W}}Re\{[9+
265: \frac{4\chi_{Z}}{C^{2}_{W}}[S^{2}_{W}+(-\frac{1}{2}+S^{2}_{W})
266: +\frac{1}{4S^{2}_{W}}(-\frac{1}{2}+S^{2}_{W})^{2}]]\chi_{Z^{'}}\},\\
267: \Delta\sigma(\mu\overline{\mu})&=&\frac{A\alpha_{e}}{2K_{1}C^{4}_{W}}
268: Re\{[9+\frac{4\chi_{Z}}{C^{2}_{W}}[S^{2}_{W}+(-\frac{1}{2}+S^{2}_{W})
269: +\frac{1}{4S^{2}_{W}}(-\frac{1}{2}+S^{2}_{W})^{2}]]\chi_{Z^{'}}\},\\
270: \Delta\sigma(b\overline{b})&=&\frac{N_{C}A}{6C^{2}_{W}}
271: Re\{[-3+\frac{\chi_{Z}}{C^{2}_{W}}[\frac{4S^{2}_{W}}{3}+\frac{2}{3}
272: (-\frac{1}{2}+S^{2}_{W})+2(-\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{3}S^{2}_{W})
273: \nonumber\\&&+\frac{1}{S^{2}_{W}}(-\frac{1}{2}+S^{2}_{W})(-\frac{1}{2}+
274: \frac{1}{3}S^{2}_{W})]]\chi_{Z^{'}}\},\\
275: \Delta\sigma(c\overline{c})&=&\frac{N_{C}A\alpha_{e}}{6K_{1}C^{4}_{W}}
276: Re\{[10+\frac{\chi_{Z}}{C^{2}_{W}}[-\frac{16S^{2}_{W}}{3}+2(\frac{1}{2}-
277: \frac{2}{3}S^{2}_{W})-\frac{8}{3}(-\frac{1}{2}+S^{2}_{W})\nonumber\\&&
278: +\frac{1}{S^{2}_{W}}(-\frac{1}{2}+S^{2}_{W})(\frac{1}{2}-\frac{2}{3}
279: S^{2}_{W})]]\chi_{Z^{'}}\}.
280: \end{eqnarray}
281:
282: The square of the expected uncertainty about the cross section
283: $\sigma(f\overline{f})$ can be written as[10]:
284: \begin{equation}
285: [\delta\sigma(f\overline{f})]^{2}=\frac{[\sigma^{exp}(f\overline{f})
286: ]^{2}}{N_{tot}^{exp}}+[\sigma^{exp}(f\overline{f})]^{2}
287: [\frac{P^{2}_{e}P^{2}_{\overline{e}}}{D^{2}}(\varepsilon^{2}_{e}
288: +\varepsilon^{2}_{\overline{e}})+\varepsilon^{2}_{\pounds}].
289: \end{equation}
290: The first term of Eq.(15) arises from the statistical uncertainty
291: and the second term represents the systematic uncertainty. In our
292: numerical estimation, we will take
293: $\varepsilon_{e}=\varepsilon_{\overline{e}}=\frac{\delta
294: P_{e}}{P_{e}}=\frac{\delta
295: P_{\overline{e}}}{P_{\overline{e}}}=0.5\%$,
296: $\varepsilon_{\pounds}=\frac{\delta\pounds_{int}}{\pounds_{int}}=0.5\%$.
297:
298: It has been shown that, if the Landau pole of strong $U(1)$
299: interaction is to lie at least an order of magnitude above the
300: symmetry breaking scale $\Lambda$, the coupling parameter $K_{1}$
301: should satisfy certain constraint, i.e., $K_{1}\leq1$[8]. The
302: lower limits on the $Z^{'}$ mass $M_{Z^{'}}$ can be obtained via
303: studying its effects on various observables, which has been
304: precisely measured at the present collider experiments[3]. For
305: example, Ref.[9] has shown that to fit the electroweak measurement
306: data, the $Z^{'}$ mass $M_{Z^{'}}$ must be larger than 1$TeV$. The
307: lower bounds on $M_{Z^{'}}$ can also be obtained from dijet and
308: dilepton production at the Tevatron experiments[11], or from
309: $B\overline{B}$ mixing[12]. However, these bounds are significant
310: weaker than those from precision electroweak data. Ref.[8] has
311: simply considered the possible of detecting $Z'$ in the future
312: $LC$ experiments. They find that, for $M_{Z'}\leq2.7TeV$,
313: $K_{1}\leq1$, the signals of $Z'$ can be detected in the $LC$
314: experiments with $\sqrt{s}=500GeV$ and $\pounds=50fb^{-1}$. In
315: this paper, we Use above equations to investigate the upper limits
316: on the $Z^{'}$ parameters in the case of a $Z^{'}$ discovery in
317: the future $LC$ experiments with $\sqrt{s}=500GeV$ and obtain
318: $\pounds_{int}=340fb^{-1}$[5] and the range of the $Z'$ mass
319: $M_{Z'}$ which would be visible in the future $LC$ experiments for
320: the fixed value of the coupling parameter $K_{1}$.
321:
322: \begin{figure}[htb]
323: \vspace{-0.5cm}
324: \begin{center}
325: \epsfig{file=fig1.eps,width=300pt,height=250pt} \vspace{-1.0cm}
326: \hspace{5mm} \caption{Searching limits of the $Z^{'}$ mass
327: $M_{Z^{'}}$ at 95$\%CL$ as function of the parameter
328: \hspace*{2.0cm}$K_{1}$ for
329: $\pounds_{int}=340fb^{-1}$,$(P_{e},P_{\overline{e}})=(0.8,0.6)$
330: and the processes $e^{+}e^{-}\rightarrow l\overline{l}$ with
331: \hspace*{2.0cm}$l=\tau,$ $\mu$, $b$, and c.} \label{ee}
332: \end{center}
333: \end{figure}
334:
335: In our numerical estimation, we take the $SM$ parameters
336: $\alpha_{e}=\frac{1}{128.8}$, $M_{Z}=91.187GeV$,
337: $S^{2}_{W}=0.2315$, and $\Gamma_{Z}=2.495GeV$[13]. The total decay
338: width $\Gamma_{Z^{'}}$ of the gauge boson $Z^{'}$ is dominated by
339: $t\overline{t}$ and $b\overline{b}$, which can be written as:
340: $\Gamma_{Z^{'}}\approx\frac{K_{1}M_{Z^{'}}}{3}$[3].
341:
342: Searching limits of the $Z^{'}$ mass $M_{Z^{'}}$ at $95\%CL$ are
343: plotted in Fig.1 as function of the coupling parameter $K_{1}$ for
344: the processes $e^{+}e^{-}\rightarrow l\overline{l}$ with $l=\tau,$
345: $\mu$, $b$, and $c$, in which we have assume $P_{e}=0.8$,
346: $P_{\overline{e}}=0.6$ and the integrated luminosity
347: $\pounds_{int}=340fb^{-1}$. From Fig.1, we can see that the ranges
348: of $M_{Z'}$ which would be visible in the $LC$ experiments are not
349: sensitive the parameter $K_{1}$. Discovery limits of $M_{Z'}$ for
350: the processes $e^{+}e^{-}\rightarrow\tau\overline{\tau}$ and
351: $e^{+}e^{-}\rightarrow b\overline{b}$ are larger than those
352: arising from the process $e^{+}e^{-}\rightarrow \mu\overline{\mu}$
353: or $e^{+}e^{-}\rightarrow c\overline{c}$. This is because the
354: gauge boson $Z^{'}$ couples primarily to the third generation
355: fermions. For $K_{1}=0.8$, the maximal values of the $Z^{'}$ mass
356: $M_{Z^{'}}$, which can be explored, are $6.3TeV$, $0.87TeV$,
357: $3.2TeV$, and $0.77TeV$ for the processes $e^{+}e^{-}\rightarrow
358: \tau\overline{\tau}$, $\mu\overline{\mu}$, $b\overline{b}$, and
359: $c\overline{c}$, respectively. Thus, the non-universal gauge boson
360: $Z^{'}$ is most sensitive to the process $e^{+}e^{-}\rightarrow
361: \tau\overline{\tau}$. The possible signals of $Z'$ might be more
362: easy detected via this process than via other processes in the
363: future $LC$ experiments. Certainly, if an new gauge boson $Z'$ is
364: indeed discovered in the future high energy experiments, we should
365: consider all of the possible processes to study in detail what
366: kind of $Z'$ one has found.
367:
368: \begin{figure}[htb]
369: \vspace{-0.5cm}
370: \begin{center}
371: \epsfig{file=fig2.eps,width=300pt,height=250pt} \vspace{-1.0cm}
372: \hspace{5mm} \caption{Searching limits of the $Z'$ mass $M_{Z'}$
373: at $95\%$CL as function of the coupling \hspace*{2.0cm}parameter
374: $K_{1}$ for $\pounds_{int}=340fb^{-1}$ and different beam
375: polarization.} \label{ee}
376: \end{center}
377: \end{figure}
378:
379: A strong longitudinal polarization programme in the future $LC$
380: experiments with considerable polarization of the electron beam
381: and the positron beam is planned[14]. Beam polarization is not
382: only useful for a possible reduction of the background, but might
383: also serve as a possible tool to disentangle different
384: contributions to the signal. Beam polarization of the electron and
385: positron beams would lead to a substantial enhancement of the
386: cress section of some processes and thus enhance the $LC$
387: potential in the search for a new gauge boson $Z'$. To see the
388: effects of beam polarization on the searching limits of the $Z'$
389: mass $M_{Z'}$, we plot $M_{Z'}$ as a function of the coupling
390: parameter $K_{1}$ in Fig.2 for the process
391: $e^{+}e^{-}\rightarrow\tau\overline{\tau}$ for
392: $\pounds_{int}=340fb^{-1}$ and different beam polarization, in
393: which the solid line, dashed line, and dotted line represent
394: ($P_{e},P_{\overline{e}}$)=(0.8,0.6), (0.8,-0.6), and (0,0),
395: respectively. From Eq.(15), we can see that the value of
396: $[\delta\sigma(f\overline{f})]^{2}$ for
397: $(P_{e},P_{\overline{e}})=(0.8,0.6)$ is same as that of
398: $(P_{e},P_{\overline{e}})=(-0.8,-0.6)$. Thus, we have not plotted
399: the curve line for $(P_{e},P_{\overline{e}})=(-0.8,-0.6)$ in
400: Fig.2. One can see from Fig.2 that the searching limits of the
401: $Z'$ mass $M_{Z'}$ are indeed sensitive to the polarization of
402: electron and positron beam. For $K_{1}=0.5$, the maximal values of
403: $M_{Z'}$ which can be detected in the $LC$ experiments via the
404: process $e^{+}e^{-}\rightarrow\tau\overline{\tau}$ are $7.84TeV$,
405: $7.67TeV$, and $6.22TeV$ for $(P_{e},P_{\overline{e}})=(0.8,0.6)$,
406: $(0.8,-0.6)$, and $(0,0)$, respectively.
407:
408: From above formulas, we can see that discovery limits of the $Z'$
409: mass $M_{Z'}$ vary as the integrated luminosity $\pounds_{int}$
410: varying. For example, if we assume that the value of the
411: $\pounds_{int}$ increase from $100fb^{-1}$ to $350fb^{-1}$, the
412: discovery limits can increase from $7.15TeV$ to $7.67$ for
413: $K_{1}=0.5$, $(P_{e},P_{\overline{e}})=(0.8,0.6)$ and the process
414: $e^{+}e^{-}\rightarrow\tau\overline{\tau}$. Certainly, the change
415: in the LC reach with increasing luminosity is extremely small.
416:
417: Strong top dynamical models, such as $TC2$ models and
418: flavor-universal $TC2$ models, predict the presence of the
419: non-universal gauge bosons $Z^{'}$, which couple preferentially to
420: the third generation fermions. These new particles can generate
421: significantly contributions to some observables. The lower bounds
422: on the mass or the coupling parameters of the gauge boson $Z^{'}$
423: have been derived from data taken at $LEP$ and Tevatron
424: experiments. In this paper, we investigate the feasibility of
425: $Z^{'}$ discovery in the future $LC$ experiments by performing
426: $\chi^{2}$ analysis. We focus our attention to the processes
427: $e^{+}e^{-}\rightarrow f\overline{f}$ with $f=\tau, \mu, b$ and c
428: in the context of $TC2$ models. We find that the non-universal
429: gauge boson $Z^{'}$ is most sensitive to the process
430: $e^{+}e^{-}\rightarrow \tau\overline{\tau}$. The $Z^{'}$ mass
431: $M_{Z^{'}}$ can be explored up to $7.7(7.8)TeV$ for the coupling
432: parameter $K_{1}=0.5(0.8)$ and ($P_{e},P_{\overline{e}}$)=(0.8,
433: -0.6) at the future $LC$ experiment with $\sqrt{s}=500GeV$ and
434: $\pounds=340fb^{-1}$. The observation upper limits of $M_{Z^{'}}$
435: can be further enhanced by the suitably polarized beams.
436:
437: \vspace{1.5cm} \noindent{\bf Acknowledgments}
438:
439: We thank the referee for carefully reading the manuscript. This
440: work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of
441: China (90203005) and the Natural Science Foundation of the
442: Liaoning Scientific Committee(20032101).
443:
444: \vspace{1.5cm}
445:
446: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
447: \bibitem{y1}M. Cveti\v{c} and P. Langacker, {\em Phys. Rev. D}{\bf
448: 54}(1996)3570 and Mod. {\em Phys. Lett. A} {\bf 11}(1996)1247.
449: \bibitem{y2}For a review, see, M. Cveti\v{c} and P. Langacker,
450: in Perspectives on supersymmetry, ed. G. L. Kane (World, Singapore, 1998), P. 312.
451: \bibitem{y3}G. Buchalla, G. Burdman, C. T. Hill, D. Kominis, {\em Phys. Rev. D}
452: {\bf 53}(1996)5185; C. T. Hill and E. H. Simmons, {\em Phys. Rept.} {\bf
453: 381}(2003)235, [Erratum -ibid, {\bf 390}(2004)553].
454: \bibitem{y4}J. Erler and P. Langacker, {\em Phys. Lett. B}{\bf 456}(1999)68;
455: {\em Phys. Rev. Lett.} {\bf 84}(2000)212.
456: \bibitem{y5}American Linear Collider Working Group, hep-ex/0106057; J. A.
457: Aguilar-Saavedra at al. (ECFAL DESY Physics Working
458: Group), hep-ph/0106315.
459: \bibitem{y6}A. Djouadi, A. LeiKe, T. Riemann, D. Schaile, C.
460: Verzegnassi, {\em Z. Phys. C}{\bf 56}(1992)289;
461: G. Godfrey. {\em Phys. Rev. D}{\bf51}(1995)1402;
462: S. Riemann, hep-ph/9610513; A. Leike,
463: S. Riemann, {\em Z. Phys. C}{\bf 75}(1997)341; D. G. Cassel, L.
464: T. Gennari, R. H. Siemann, hep-ph/9704291; A. Leike,
465: {\em Phys. Rep.} {\bf 317}(1999)143; R. Casalbuoni,
466: S. De Curtis, D. Dominici, R. Gatto, S. Riemann,
467: hep-ph/0001215.
468: \bibitem{y7}C. T. Hill, {\em Phys. Lett. B}{\bf 345}(1995)483;
469: K. Lane and E. Eichten, {\em Phys. Lett. B}{\bf 352}(1995)383;
470: K. Lane, {\em Phys. Lett. B}{\bf 433}(1998)96 G. Cvetic,
471: {\em Rev. Mod. Phys.} {\bf 71}(1999)513.
472: \bibitem{y8}M. B. Popovic and E. H. Simmons, {\em Phys. Rev. D}{\bf
473: 58}(1998)095007; G. Burdman and N. Evans, {\em Phys. Rev. D}{\bf
474: 59}(1999)115005.
475: \bibitem{y9}R. S. Chivukula and E. H. Simmons, {\em Phys. Rev. D}{\bf 66}(2002)015006.
476: \bibitem{y10}A. A. Babich et al., {\em Phys. Lett. B}{\bf
477: 518}(2001)128; A. A. Pankov and N. Paver, {\em Eur. Phys. J. C}
478: {\bf 29}(2003)313; A. V. Tsytrinov and A. A. Pankov,
479: hep-ph/0401020.
480: \bibitem{y11}A. A. Andrianov et al., {\em Phys. Rev. D}{\bf
481: 58}(1998)075001; K. R. Lynch et al., {\em Phys. Rev. D}{\bf
482: 63}(2001)035006.
483: \bibitem{y12}E. H. Simmons, {\em Phys. Lett. B}{\bf 526}(2002)365.
484: \bibitem{y13}D. E. Groom et al. [Particle Data Group], {\em Eur. Phys. J.
485: C}{\bf 15}(2001)1; K. Hagiwara et al., {\em Phys.
486: Rev. D}{\bf 66}(2002)01001.
487: \bibitem{y12}G. Moortgat-Pick and H. M. Steiner, {\em Eur. Phys. J. direct C}{\bf
488: 6}(2002)1; S. D. Rindani, hep-ph/0105318.
489:
490: \end{thebibliography}
491:
492:
493:
494:
495:
496:
497: \end{document}
498: