1: \documentclass[proceedings]{JHEP3} % 10pt is ignored!
2:
3: \PrHEP{AHEP2003}
4: %\usepackage{showkeys}
5:
6: \def\np#1#2#3{ {\sl Nucl. Phys. }{\bf #1}, #2 (#3)}
7: \def\pl#1#2#3{ {\sl Phys. Lett. }{\bf #1}, #2 (#3)}
8: \def\pr#1#2#3{ {\sl Phys. Rev. }{\bf #1}, #2 (#3)}
9: \def\prep#1#2#3{ {\sl Phys. Rep. }{\bf #1}, #2 (#3)}
10: \def\prl#1#2#3{ {\sl Phys. Rev. Lett. }{\bf #1}, #2 (#3)}
11: \def\jetp#1#2#3{ {\sl JETP Lett. }{\bf #1}, #2 (#3)}
12: \def\nc#1#2#3{ {\sl Nuovo Cimento }{\bf #1}, #2 (#3)}
13: \def\sc#1#2#3{ {\sl Science }{\bf #1}, #2 (#3)}
14: \def\sa#1#2#3{ {\sl Scientific American }{\bf #1}, #2 (#3)}
15: \def\pn #1#2#3{ {\sl Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S. }{\bf #1}, #2 (#3)}
16: \def\aj #1#2#3{ {\sl Astrophysical Journal }{\bf #1}, #2 (#3)}
17: \def\mpl #1#2#3{ {\sl Mod.~Phys.~Lett. }{\bf #1}, #2 (#3)}
18: \def\etal{\hbox{\it et al.}}
19: \def\beq{\begin{equation}}
20: \def\eeq{\end{equation}}
21: \def\bc{\begin{center}}
22: \def\ec{\end{center}}
23: \def\matriz#1{\left( \begin{array}{ccc} #1 \end{array} \right)}
24:
25: \def \lsim{\mathrel{\vcenter
26: {\hbox{$<$}\nointerlineskip\hbox{$\sim$}}}}
27: \def \gsim{\mathrel{\vcenter
28: {\hbox{$>$}\nointerlineskip\hbox{$\sim$}}}}
29:
30: \conference{International Workshop on Astroparticle and High Energy Physics}
31:
32:
33:
34: \title{Neutrino masses and GUT baryogenesis}
35:
36:
37: \author{\speaker{Juan A. Lopez-Perez}, Nuria Rius\\
38: IFIC Valencia\\
39: E-mail: \email{juanlope@ific.uv.es}, \email{nuria@ific.uv.es}}
40:
41:
42: %\thanks{A footnote may follow the name of the speaker to indicate other collaborators.}
43: \abstract{We reconsider the GUT-baryogenesis mechanism for generating the
44: baryon asymmetry of the Universe. The baryon asymmetry is produced
45: by the out of equilibrium decay of coloured Higgs bosons at the GUT scale,
46: conserving B-L.
47: If neutrinos are Majorana particles, lepton number violating interactions
48: erase the lepton number excess, but part of the baryon asymmetry may be
49: preserved, provided those interactions are not in thermal equilibrium
50: when the sphaleron processes become effective, at $T \sim 10^{12}~ GeV$.
51: We analyse whether this mechanism for baryogenesis is feasible in a
52: variety of GUT models of fermion masses proposed in the literature,
53: based on horizontal symmetries.}
54:
55: \begin{document}
56:
57:
58: {\flushright IFIC/04-14,FTUV/04-0404}
59:
60: \section{Introduction}
61:
62: In the GUT-baryogenesis mechanism \cite{gut-baryo}
63: the baryon asymmetry is generated during the out of
64: equilibrium decay of coloured Higgs bosons,
65: because those decays violate $B$ and $L$.
66: The problem is that in $SU(5)$ grand unification,
67: and in any grand unified model
68: containing $U(1)_{B-L}$ as a subgroup, the dominant Higgs decays
69: %satisfy $\Delta B = \Delta L$.
70: conserve $(B-L)$.
71: Below $10^{12}~ GeV$ the sphaleron configurations \cite{sph} are
72: in thermal equilibrium \cite{spheq} and violate also $B$ and $L$, but
73: conserve $(B-L)$, relating these quantities as
74: \beq
75: B=c~(B-L)=\frac{c}{c-1}~L
76: \eeq
77: where c is a constant. As a result the baryon asymmetry generated
78: in the Higgs decays is erased, since $(B-L)=0$.
79: %
80: However, recently it has been proposed a modified GUT baryogenesis
81: mechanism which may produce the observed baryon asymmetry, provided neutrinos
82: are Majorana particles \cite{resurrection}.
83:
84:
85: It is now confirmed that
86: the deficits in atmospheric muon neutrinos \cite{fukuda, k2k} and
87: in solar electron neutrinos \cite{sksolar,sno}, as well as the
88: KamLAND observation \cite{kamland} of
89: electron antineutrino disappearance, are mainly due to neutrino
90: oscillations
91: and therefore neutrinos are massive.
92: One of the simplest ways to generate the small neutrino masses
93: required is the seesaw mechanism \cite{seesaw}, in which three heavy singlet
94: right-handed neutrinos, $\nu_R$, are added to the Standard Model (SM)
95: particle content. The Lagrangian giving rise to fermion masses is:
96: \beq
97: \mathcal{L} = \mathcal{L}_{SM} + Y_\nu \bar{l}_L H \nu_R +
98: \frac 1 2 \bar{\nu}_R m_R \nu_R^c + {\rm h.c.},
99: \eeq
100: where $\mathcal{L}_{SM}$ stands for the usual SM Yukawa terms,
101: $l_L$ are the left-handed lepton doublets (we have suppressed family
102: indices), $H$ is the Higgs doublet, $Y_\nu$ are the new Yukawa
103: couplings that generate the neutrino Dirac masses after electroweak
104: symmetry breaking
105: and $m_R$ is a 3 x 3 Majorana mass matrix.
106:
107: We expect the overall scale of $m_R$ to be much larger than the electroweak
108: scale, because $\nu_R$ Majorana masses are
109: $SU(3) x SU(2) x U(1)$ invariant and therefore naturally of the order of the
110: cutoff of the low energy theory. Thus, we can integrate the $\nu_R$ away
111: and we get an effective Lagrangian which contains a Majorana mass term
112: for the left-handed neutrinos,
113: \beq
114: \mathcal{L}_{eff} = \frac 1 2 \bar{\nu}_L m_\nu \nu_L^c + {\rm h.c.},
115: \eeq
116: with
117: \beq
118: m_\nu \simeq m_D~m_R^{-1}~m_D^T
119: \label{seesaw}
120: \eeq
121: where $m_D=Y_\nu~v$ and $v$ is the VEV of the Higgs doublet.
122: If there is no quasi-degeneracy in the light neutrino masses, we can
123: estimate the heaviest neutrino mass as
124: \beq
125: m_h \sim \sqrt{\Delta m^2_{atm}} \simeq 5\times 10^{-2}\ eV \ ,
126: \eeq
127: so for $v \lsim O(100 ~GeV)$ and $Y_\nu \sim O(1)$
128: the $\nu_R$ mass scale is $\Lambda \lsim 10^{15}~ GeV$,
129: remarkably close to $M_{GUT}$.
130:
131: As a consequence of this high scale, lepton number violating
132: scattering processes mediated by the heavy right-handed neutrinos
133: \beq
134: l_L+H \to \nu_R \to \bar{l}_L+\bar{H}
135: \label{scat}
136: \eeq
137: are in thermal equilibrium above the temperature $T \sim 10^{14}~ GeV$,
138: when the sphaleron interactions are not yet effective.
139: In this new GUT baryogenesis scenario \cite{resurrection} the delayed
140: decay of coloured Higgs bosons produces baryon and lepton asymmetries,
141: conserving $B-L$, but the Majorana interactions erase the lepton
142: number excess before the sphaleron interactions come into thermal
143: equilibrium, at $T_{sph} \sim 10^{12}~ GeV$.
144: At lower temperatures, although the SM $B+L$ violating processes convert
145: baryon number into lepton number, part of the original baryon
146: asymmetry survives, because now $B-L \neq 0$.
147:
148: In general, for this GUT baryogenesis mechanism to work we should
149: require that $\Gamma_{\Delta L = 2}(T_{sph}) < H(T_{sph})$, where
150: \beq
151: \Gamma_{\Delta L = 2}(T) = \frac{T^3}{4 \pi^3 v^4}\sum_{i=1}^{3}
152: m_{i}^2
153: \eeq
154: is the rate of the scattering processes
155: (\ref{scat}) and $H(T) \sim 17 T^2/M_{Plank}$ is the Hubble
156: parameter at the temperature $T$.
157: Thus, if the light left-handed neutrinos are degenerate,
158: since the rate of the lepton number violating scattering (\ref{scat})
159: is proportional to the sum of the squared neutrino masses,
160: the condition that it is out of equilibrium at $T \lsim 10^{12}~ GeV$
161: directly translates into an upper bound on the neutrino masses,
162: namely $m_{i} \lsim 0.2~eV$ for $v \sim 174~GeV$.
163:
164: Even if the lepton number violating scattering is out of equilibrium,
165: for right-handed neutrinos lighter than $\sim 10^{12}~ GeV$
166: we should also require that their lepton number violating decays
167: \beq
168: \nu_R \to \bar{l}_L+\bar{H}
169: \label{decay}
170: \eeq
171: are out of equilibrium at $T \lsim 10^{12}~ GeV$, otherwise
172: these interactions together with the sphalerons would wash out
173: the baryon asymmetry produced in the Higgs decays.
174: For each heavy neutrino, this decay rate is proportional to the mass parameter
175: \beq
176: {\tilde m}_i = \frac{(Y^\dagger_\nu Y_\nu)_{ii}}{m_{\nu_{R_i}}}~ v^2
177: \ ,\qquad i=1,2,3
178: \eeq
179: where $m_{\nu_{R_i}}$ are the eigenvalues of the Majorana mass matrix $m_R$.
180: Notice that while the $\Delta L = 2$ scattering rate depends only on the
181: light neutrino masses, the decay rate is model dependent.
182:
183: Two comments are in order.
184: First, the constraint that the coloured Higgs should decay before the
185: sphaleron processes enter into thermal equilibrium implies that
186: $m_{H_c} > 10^{12}~ GeV$, which is in agreement with the limits
187: from proton decay.
188: Second, in principle this GUT
189: baryogenesis mechanism is also valid for
190: supersymmetric models, however the high temperature at
191: which the baryon asymmetry is produced ($T > 10^{12}~ GeV$)
192: may be a problem in inflationary cosmology, since it is well above
193: the upper bound on the reheat temperature of the Universe from gravitino
194: production.
195:
196: We have addressed the question of whether this scenario for baryogenesis
197: can be realised in several Grand Unified models of fermion masses
198: proposed in the literature. More precisely, we focus on models with
199: horizontal symmetries in which neutrino masses are generated
200: via the seesaw mechanism.
201: Our estimates are also applicable to the supersymmetric versions
202: of these models, with the caveat of the gravitino problem.
203: For a more complete analysis and details, see \cite{us}.
204: %
205:
206:
207:
208: %--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
209: \section{Models of Fermion Masses}
210:
211: Atmospheric and solar neutrino oscillations can be fitted with two small
212: neutrino mass differences,
213: $\Delta m^2_{atm} = 2.5 \times 10^{-3}~eV^2$ and
214: $\Delta m^2_{sol} = 6.9 \times 10^{-5}~eV^2$.
215: It is also known from experiment that the atmospheric mixing angle
216: is nearly maximal, $c_{23} \sim s_{23} \sim 1/\sqrt{2}$,
217: $s_{13} < 0.2$ according to CHOOZ \cite{chooz} and the solar
218: angle is large.
219:
220: These observations are consistent with three patterns
221: of neutrino masses:
222: hierarchical ($\Delta m^2_{atm} \sim m_3^2$,
223: $\Delta m^2_{sol} \sim m_2^2$),
224: inverted hierarchical or quasi-Dirac
225: ($\Delta m^2_{atm} \sim m_3^2 \sim m_2^2$,
226: $\Delta m^2_{sol} \sim m_3^2 - m_2^2$)
227: and degenerate ($m_3^2 \sim m_2^2 \sim m_1^2 \gg \Delta m^2_{atm}$).
228: The absolute scale is unknown, though, since neutrino oscillations are
229: only sensitive to mass differences.
230: In this respect, the search for neutrinoless double beta decay is
231: crucial because it would provide information about the
232: absolute spectrum and, moreover, discriminate between Majorana and
233: Dirac neutrinos.
234:
235:
236: We assume three light Majorana neutrinos, whose masses arise from the
237: minimal seesaw mechanism. As we have seen, in this context the
238: scale $\Lambda$ for $L$ non-conservation is suggestively close to
239: $M_{GUT}$, so we consider Grand Unified models for all
240: fermion masses.
241: Horizontal (or family) symmetries have been proposed with the aim of
242: explaining the hierarchical pattern of quark and charged lepton masses
243: \cite{U1}.
244: For simplicity, we have analysed models with abelian $U(1)_H$
245: family symmetry.
246:
247: The horizontal symmetry allows only third family (or just top quark) Yukawa
248: couplings, however it is spontaneously broken
249: by the vev's $v_f$ of some ``flavon'' fields $\Phi$, which are singlets
250: under the grand unified gauge group but charged under the flavour symmetry.
251: Then smaller couplings
252: are generated effectively from higher dimension non-renormalisable operators
253: but are suppressed by powers of the parameter $v_f / \Lambda_c$, where
254: $\Lambda_c$ is the cut-off of the theory. We expect
255: $v_f \gtrsim M_{GUT}$ and $\Lambda_c \lsim M_{Plank}$, so the
256: ratio $v_f / \Lambda_c$ can be identified with the
257: Wolfenstein parameter, $\lambda \sim 0.22$.
258: The number of powers of the expansion parameter is controlled by the
259: flavor charge of the particular operator.
260:
261:
262: Notice that in all the models considered (and in most of this kind existent
263: in the literature) the light neutrino masses are hierarchical, since it
264: is difficult to obtain a degenerate spectrum in the context of GUT
265: models of fermion masses.
266: Then, as we explained before, $\Delta L = 2$ scattering processes are
267: always out of equilibrium at $T_{sph} \sim 10^{12}~ GeV$, when
268: the $B-L$ conserving interactions become active.
269: So what we require for the modified GUT baryogenesis to work is that
270: either the right-handed neutrinos are heavier than $10^{12}~ GeV$,
271: and thus they are not present in the thermal bath when the sphalerons
272: enter into thermal equilibrium or, if they are lighter, their
273: $\Delta L = 1$ decays are out equilibrium at $T \leq T_{sph}$,
274: i.e.,
275: $\Gamma_{\Delta L = 1}(T=M_i) < H(T=M_i)$ for $M_i \leq 10^{12}~ GeV$
276: \footnote{Note that this condition ensures that
277: $\Gamma_{\Delta L = 1}(T) < H(T)$ at any $T>M_i$, so it is enough to
278: consider $T=M_i$.}.
279:
280: %--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
281: \subsection{$SU(5)\times U(1)_H$ models}
282: \label{su5}
283:
284:
285:
286: In Grand Unified $SU(5)$ models the SM quarks and leptons
287: are grouped in the multiplets ${\bf 10}=(q_L,u_R^c,e_R^c)$ and
288: ${\bf 5^*}=(d_R^c,l_L)$ and the right-handed neutrinos are added in the singlet
289: representation ${\bf 1}=\nu_R^c$.
290: The Higgs multiplets transform as a ${\bf 5}$, and
291: contain the coloured triplets whose
292: decays generate the baryon asymmetry in the proposed mechanism.
293: We assume that there are two Higgs multiplets because it has been shown that
294: with just one the baryon asymmetry generated is too small
295: \cite{nanwei-barr}.
296:
297:
298:
299: \subsubsection{Q(fermions) $\geq 0$}
300:
301:
302: First we consider a model in which the $U(1)_H$ symmetry is broken
303: by one singlet field $\Phi$ with charge $Q = - 1$, and all fermions with
304: non-negative charges \cite{buchyan}. The expansion parameter
305: in this model is chosen to be
306: $\epsilon = \langle \Phi \rangle / \Lambda_c \simeq 0.06$ i.e.,
307: $\epsilon \simeq \lambda^2$.
308: From the observed hierarchy of quark and charged lepton masses one can
309: deduce that the
310: allowed $U(1)_H$ charges are
311: \beq
312: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.5}
313: \begin{array}{|ccc|ccc|ccc|}
314: \hline
315: {\bf 10_3}&{\bf 10_2}&{\bf 10_1}&
316: {\bf 5_3^*}&{\bf 5_2^*}&{\bf 5_1^*}&{\bf 1_3}&{\bf 1_2}&{\bf 1_1}\cr
317: \hline
318: \hline
319: 0&1&2&a&a&a+1&b&c&d\cr
320: \hline
321: \end{array}
322: \eeq
323: where the value of the b quark mass allows $a=0,1$ \cite{vala}
324: and $0\le b\le c \le d$.
325:
326:
327:
328: With those charges one can readily calculate the Dirac neutrino
329: mass matrix and the Majorana mass matrix of the right-handed neutrinos,
330: up to order one coefficients \cite{buchyan}.
331: Then,
332: using the seesaw formula (\ref{seesaw}) one obtains the effective Majorana
333: mass matrix for the light neutrinos:
334: \beq
335: m_\nu=\epsilon^{2a}~\matriz{
336: \epsilon^2&\epsilon&\epsilon\\
337: \epsilon&1&1\\
338: \epsilon&1&1}~\frac{v^2}{\Lambda}
339: \label{mnu1}
340: \eeq
341:
342: Notice that in this kind of models with one single flavon field and all
343: fermions with non-negative charges the dependence on the $U(1)_H$ charges of
344: the right-handed neutrinos drops out, and the light neutrino
345: Majorana mass matrix depends only on the charges of the
346: {\bf 5} fermions.
347: Thus it has always the hierarchy structure of (\ref{mnu1}), that
348: has been proposed (among others that we will discussed later)
349: to generate naturally the large atmospheric mixing angle.
350: The hierarchy between $m_2$ and $m_3$ is then considered accidental,
351: since the sub-determinant 23 of $m_\nu$ is in general $O(1)$,
352: but this is not unlikely for the LMA solution of the solar neutrino
353: problem: $m_2/m_3 \sim 0.1$ is not particularly small and could
354: easily arise from a combination of order one terms.
355:
356:
357: We have analysed different values of the $U(1)_H$ charges $a,b,c,d$.
358: Clearly, the modified GUT baryogensis scenario requires heavy right-handed
359: neutrinos so the most favourable case is $a=b=c=d=0$,
360: which corresponds to almost degenerate right-handed neutrinos
361: with masses of order $\Lambda \sim 10^{14}~ GeV$. Therefore
362: for these $U(1)_H$ charges the mechanism is feasible.
363:
364: The cases $a=1, b=c=d=0$
365: and $a=b=c=0, d=1$
366: are somehow in the limit because the lightest right-handed neutrino masses
367: are $M_i \sim 10^{12}~ GeV$ and we have found that
368: $\Gamma_{\Delta L = 1}(T=M_i) \gsim H(T=M_i)$. Thus a more detailed
369: analysis would be needed to elucidate these cases.
370:
371: For all other values of the $U(1)_H$ charges, the
372: lightest right-handed neutrino mass is well bellow $10^{12}~ GeV$
373: and its $\Delta L = 1$ decays are in equilibrium at $T \lsim T_{sph}$
374: so GUT baryogenesis is not possible.
375:
376:
377: \subsubsection{Q(fermions) of both signs}
378:
379: One can also consider that the $U(1)_H$ family symmetry is broken by a
380: pair of $SU(5)$ singlets $\Phi$ and $\bar{\Phi}$ with charges $Q=1$ and
381: $Q=-1$, respectively \cite{AF}. Taking
382: $\lambda = \langle \Phi \rangle / \Lambda_c \sim
383: \lambda' = \langle \bar{\Phi} \rangle / \Lambda_c \sim 0.22$,
384: the fermion masses can be described by the following set of charges:
385: %
386: \beq
387: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.5}
388: \begin{array}{|ccc|ccc|ccc|}
389: \hline
390: {\bf 10_3}&{\bf 10_2}&{\bf 10_1}&
391: {\bf 5_3^*}&{\bf 5_2^*}&{\bf 5_1^*}&{\bf 1_3}&{\bf 1_2}&{\bf 1_1}\cr
392: \hline
393: \hline
394: 0&2&3&0&0&b&0&-a&a\cr
395: \hline
396: \end{array}
397: \eeq
398: where $b \ge 2 a >0$. If $b$ = 2 or 3, the up, down and charged lepton sectors
399: are not essentially different from the previous case. In the neutrino
400: sector, the Dirac and Majorana mass matrices are given by
401: \beq
402: m_D=\matriz{
403: \lambda^{a+b}&\lambda^{b-a}&\lambda^{b}\\
404: \lambda^{a}& \lambda'^{a}& 1 \\
405: \lambda^{a}& \lambda'^{a}& 1}~v
406: \qquad \qquad
407: m_R=\matriz{
408: \lambda^{2a}&1&\lambda^{a}\\
409: 1&\lambda'^{2a}&\lambda'^{a}\\
410: \lambda^{a}&\lambda'^{a}&1}~\Lambda
411: \eeq
412: The $O(1)$ off-diagonal entry of $m_D$ is typical of the so-called
413: lopsided models, which have been proposed to obtain simultaneously
414: the large atmospheric neutrino mixing and the observed mass splitting
415: between the solar and atmospheric frequencies.
416: After diagonalising the charged lepton sector and integrating out the
417: heavy right-handed neutrinos, one obtains the effective Majorana
418: mass matrix for the light neutrinos:
419: \beq
420: m_\nu=\matriz{
421: \lambda^{2b}&\lambda^b&\lambda^b\\
422: \lambda^b& 1+ \lambda^a \lambda'^a& 1 + \lambda^a \lambda'^a\\
423: \lambda^b &1+\lambda^a \lambda'^a&1+\lambda^a \lambda'^a}
424: ~\frac{v^2}{\Lambda}
425: \label{mnu2}
426: \eeq
427:
428: The important property of $m_\nu$ is that, as a result of the seesaw
429: mechanism and the $U(1)_H$ charge assignments, the determinant of the
430: 23 block is automatically of $O(\lambda^a \lambda'^a)$, while
431: the $O(1)$ elements lead to large atmospheric mixing angle.
432: This property is entirely due to the specific lopsided form of the Dirac
433: neutrino mass matrix $m_D$, for any generic Majorana matrix
434: $m_R$, with the only condition that the 33 entry is non vanishing,
435: and that no new $O(1)$ terms are generated in $m_\nu$ by a
436: compensation between small terms in $m_D$ and large terms in
437: $m_R^{-1}$.
438:
439: For $\lambda \sim \lambda'$, it is easy to verify that the
440: eigenvalues of $m_\nu$ satisfy the relation
441: $m_1 : m_2 : m_3 = \lambda^{2(b-a)}:\lambda^{2a}:1$
442: and that the solar mixing angle is
443: $\theta_{12} \sim \lambda^{b-2a}$. Thus, it is possible to reproduce the MSW
444: large mixing angle solution for $b=2$ and $a=1$.
445:
446: Again, in this type of models the three right-handed neutrinos are
447: heavy, with masses of order $\Lambda \sim 10^{14}~ GeV$, and
448: the GUT baryogenesis seems viable.
449:
450:
451:
452:
453:
454:
455: %--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
456: \subsection{$SO(10)$ models}
457:
458: It is well known that the three SM families of quarks and leptons
459: together with the extra right-handed neutrinos fit neatly
460: into three copies of the $SO(10)$ spinor representation {\bf 16}.
461: This feature has made $SO(10)$ one of the most attractive
462: unification groups.
463: %
464: Regarding $SO(10)$ Grand Unified models we first consider a detailed
465: top-down model, that fits all fermion masses and mixings, and then we follow a
466: bottom-up approach, which aims to reconstruct the
467: right-handed neutrino Majorana matrix $m_R$ from the low energy
468: effective mass matrix $m_\nu$, in the framework of a $SO(10)$ inspired pattern
469: for the Dirac neutrino mass matrix, $m_D$.
470: In both cases, neutrino masses are generated via the minimal seesaw,
471: without additional Majorana mass terms due to small vevs of $SU(2)$ triplets,
472: which are possible in $SO(10)$ models \cite{triplets}.
473:
474: \subsubsection{Albright-Barr model}
475:
476: This model, developed in
477: \cite{albright-barr}, is based on a $SO(10)$ gauge group supplemented by a
478: horizontal symmetry $U(1)_H \times Z_2 \times Z_2$.
479: It is an attempt to construct a realistic $SO(10)$ model with the minimal
480: Higgs content.
481: The Dirac mass matrices for the neutrinos and
482: charged leptons are
483: \beq \label{matrSO10}
484: m_D=Y_\nu~M_U = \matriz{\eta&0&0\\0&0&-\epsilon\\0&\epsilon&1}~M_U
485: \qquad \qquad
486: m_l=Y_l~M_D=\matriz{\eta&\delta&\delta'e^{i\phi}\\
487: \delta&0&-\epsilon\\\delta'e^{i\phi}&\sigma+\epsilon&1}~M_D
488: \eeq
489: The zeroes arise from restrictions because of the
490: $U(1) \times Z_2 \times Z_2$ flavour symmetry, which forbids
491: any Froggatt-Nielsen diagram.
492: The antisymmetric $\epsilon$ terms arise from diagrams involving the
493: adjoint $\langle \bf{45}_H \rangle$ Higgs vev pointing in the
494: $B-L$ direction.
495: The Dirac mass matrices for the quarks can be found in
496: \cite{albright-barr}.
497:
498: The model fits all nine quark and charged lepton masses plus the three CKM
499: angles and CP phase with the eight input parameters
500: \beq
501: \begin{array}{ccc}
502: M_U \simeq 113~GeV &&M_D \simeq 1~GeV\\
503: \sigma = 1.78 && \epsilon = 0.145\\
504: \delta = 0.0086 && \delta' = 0.0079\\
505: \phi = 54^o && \eta = 8 \times 10^{-6}
506: \end{array}
507: \label{inputs}
508: \eeq
509:
510: As a consequence of the lopsided nature of the large
511: $\sigma$ term in the matrix $m_l$, the hermitian matrix $m_l^\dagger m_l$
512: is diagonalised by a large left-handed rotation, which accounts for
513: the near maximal atmospheric neutrino mixing for any reasonable
514: neutrino Majorana mass matrix $m_R$.
515:
516: The type of solar neutrino mixing is determined
517: by the texture of $m_R$, which is rather independent of the Dirac mass
518: matrices (\ref{matrSO10}) because it arises from
519: completely different operators \cite{albright-barr}.
520: In particular, the LMA solution of the solar neutrino
521: problem requires a nearly hierarchical texture, namely
522: %
523: \beq
524: m_R=\matriz{c^2\eta^2&-b\epsilon\eta&a\eta\\
525: -b\epsilon\eta&d^2\epsilon^2&-d \epsilon\\
526: a\eta&-d \epsilon&1\\}~\Lambda
527: \eeq
528: where $\epsilon$ and $\eta$ are specified in eq. (\ref{inputs})
529: and $a, b, c, d$ are order 1 parameters restricted by neutrino data.
530: The fact that the same $d$ appears in the 22, 23 and 32 elements
531: of $m_R$ is due to the factorised structure of the diagrams leading to
532: the right-handed neutrino masses, and
533: therefore is not fine-tuning. However this coefficient is
534: strongly constrained by the CHOOZ bound,
535: $s_{13} \lsim 0.2$, which requires
536: $0.85 \leq d \leq 1.15$ \cite{albright-barr}.
537:
538: Using the seesaw formula with $d=1$ one obtains the
539: effective left-handed neutrino Majorana mass matrix
540: \beq
541: m_\nu=\matriz{0&\epsilon/(a-b)&0\\
542: \epsilon/(a-b)&-\epsilon^2(c^2-b^2)/(a-b)^2&-b \epsilon/(a-b)\\
543: 0&-b \epsilon/(a-b)&1\\}~M_U^2/\Lambda \ ,
544: \label{mnu4}
545: \eeq
546: which leads to a normal hierarchical spectrum for the light neutrinos.
547:
548: One of the simplest cases allowed is $a=1$, $b=c=2$ and
549: $\Lambda=10^{14}~GeV$.
550: Then, the two lightest right-handed neutrinos have masses of order
551: $m_{\nu_{R_1}}\sim m_{\nu_{R_2}} \sim 10^8~GeV$ and we have found that
552: their $\Delta L \neq 0$ decays are in equilibrium below $10^{11}~GeV$,
553: so together with the sphaleron processes they will wash out
554: the baryon asymmetry generated during the Higgs decays.
555: Given the strong hierarchy of $m_R$, we expect that this result is
556: generic for any value of the free parameters of the model.
557:
558:
559: %--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
560: \subsubsection{Branco \etal~ approach}
561:
562: The bottom-up approach used in \cite{branco}
563: predicts the $\nu_R$ masses from $\nu_L$ parameters.
564: The $m_\nu$ matrix can be written as
565: $m_\nu = U_{MNS}~d_\nu~U_{MNS}^T$,
566: where we know the mass squared differences and the mixing angles.
567: In the basis where the charged lepton mass matrix $m_l$ is real and
568: diagonal, the Dirac neutrino mass matrix can be written as
569: $m_D=V_L^\dag~d_D~U_R$, with $d_D$ diagonal and $V_L, U_R$
570: unitary matrices.
571: Then, using the seesaw formula
572: \beq
573: m_\nu=m_D~m_R^{-1}~m_D^T=-V_L^\dag~d_D~U_R~m_R^{-1}~U_R^T~d_D~V_L^*
574: \eeq
575: The $V_L$ matrix is taken to be the identity
576: in the analytic approach of \cite{branco}; this is a reasonable
577: approximation in a minimal $SO(10)$ scenario, where one expects $V_L$ to be
578: of the order of the CKM matrix, although it may not be the case
579: in more realistic models.
580: Defining
581: $M\equiv U_R~m_R^{-1}~U_R^T$ so
582: \beq
583: m_\nu \simeq -d_D~M~d_D
584: \eeq
585: one gets
586: \beq
587: M \simeq -d_D^{-1}~m_\nu~d_D^{-1}
588: \eeq
589: Note that $M$ is $m_R^{-1}$
590: in the basis where the Dirac mass matrix $m_D$ is diagonal.
591: Now, using the $SO(10)$ motivated relation $m_D \sim m_u$
592: and taking into account the up-quark mass hierarchy at the
593: GUT scale, one has
594: \beq
595: d_D \sim \matriz{m_u&0&0\\0&m_c&0\\0&0&m_t} \simeq
596: \matriz{\epsilon^2&0&0\\0&\epsilon&0\\0&0&1\\}~m_t
597: \eeq
598: where $\epsilon \sim \lambda^4 \simeq 3 \times 10^{-3}$.
599:
600: The matrix $M$ can be analytically diagonalised at leading order in
601: $\epsilon$ (see ref. \cite{branco} for details), and the right-handed
602: neutrino masses are just the inverse of these eigenvalues.
603: %
604: As in the previous $SO(10)$ model, the $\nu_R$ have a strong hierarchy:
605: $m_{\nu_{R_1}}:m_{\nu_{R_2}}:m_{\nu_{R_3}} \sim \epsilon^4:\epsilon^2: 1$,
606: so we expect at least one of the right-handed neutrinos to be lighter
607: than $T_{sph} \sim 10^{12}~ GeV$ and, as a consequence, it is unlikely
608: that the GUT baryogenesis works within this framework.
609:
610:
611: For instance, assuming a hierarchical spectrum of the light left-handed
612: neutrinos, $m_{1} \ll m_{2} \ll m_{3}$,
613: we found
614: \beq
615: m_{\nu_{R_1}} \sim \frac{m_t^2~\epsilon^4}{m_2~\sin^2 \theta_{12}}
616: \sim 10^5~GeV
617: \qquad
618: m_{\nu_{R_2}} \sim \frac{2~m_t^2~\epsilon^2}{m_3} \sim 10^9~GeV\qquad
619: m_{\nu_{R_3}} \sim \frac{m_t^2~\sin^2 \theta_{12}}{2~m_1}
620: \eeq
621: where we have neglected $s_{13}$ and we have taken $\theta_{12}\sim \pi/4$,
622: $m_3 = \sqrt{\Delta m^2_{atm}}\simeq 5\times 10^{-2}~eV$ and
623: $m_2 =\sqrt{\Delta m^2_{sol}} \simeq 8\times 10^{-3}~eV$.
624:
625: We have calculated that the $\Delta L =1$
626: decays of the lightest right-handed neutrinos
627: $\nu_{R_{1,2}}$ are in equilibrium around $10^6~GeV$ and $10^9~GeV$
628: respectively,
629: so those decays continue destroying lepton number at $T\lsim 10^{12}~GeV$
630: when the sphaleron configurations are also in equilibrium.
631: Then, the baryon asymmetry generated in the coloured Higgs decays
632: is completely washed out.
633: Similar results are obtained if we assume an inverted-hierarchical
634: spectrum of the left-handed neutrinos.
635:
636:
637: %--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
638: \subsection{Pati-Salam}
639: \label{ps}
640:
641: In this section we analyse a supersymmetric string-inspired model of
642: all fermion masses and mixing angles based on the Pati-Salam
643: $SU(4)\times SU(2)_L \times SU(2)_R$ gauge group \cite{patisalam} supplemented
644: by a $U(1)_H$ flavour symmetry \cite{kingps}.
645: It provides an example of a realistic grand unified model in which both the
646: large atmospheric mixing angle and the hierarchical neutrino masses arise
647: naturally, due to
648: the so-called single right-handed neutrino dominance (SRHND) mechanism,
649: that we will discuss in the next section.
650: Here we are just concerned about the neutrino sector, see ref.\cite{kingps}
651: for details of the full model.
652:
653: An attractive feature of grand unified models based on the Pati-Salam
654: group is that the presence of the gauged $SU(2)_R$ subgroup
655: predicts the existence of the right-handed neutrinos, much as in $SO(10)$.
656: The SM fermions, together with the right-handed neutrinos, are
657: accommodated in the $F=(4,2,1)$ and the $F^c=(\bar{4},1,\bar{2})$
658: representations,
659: \beq
660: F_A = \left( \begin{array}{cccc}
661: u&u&u&\nu\\d&d&d&e\end{array} \right)_A \qquad \qquad
662: F_B^c = \left( \begin{array}{cccc}
663: d^c&d^c&d^c&e^c\\u^c&u^c&u^c&\nu^c \end{array} \right)_B
664: \eeq
665: and the SM Higgs boson is contained in $h=(1,\bar{2},2)$.
666: In order to obtain a realistic SM fermion spectrum,
667: the mass matrices are generated by non-renormalisable operators of the
668: form
669: \beq
670: F_A F_B^c h
671: \left(\frac{H \bar{H}}{\Lambda_c^2}\right)^n
672: \left(\frac{\theta}{\Lambda_c} \right)^{p_{AB}}
673: \qquad {\rm and} \qquad
674: F_A F_B^c h
675: \left(\frac{H \bar{H}}{\Lambda_c^2}\right)^n
676: \left(\frac{\bar{\theta}}{\Lambda_c} \right)^{p_{AB}}
677: \eeq
678: where $H=(4,1,2)$ and $\bar{H}=(\bar{4},1,\bar{2})$
679: are the heavy Higgs fields that break the
680: $SU(4)\times SU(2)_L \times SU(2)_R$ symmetry
681: to the SM group at $M_{GUT}$,
682: $\theta, \bar{\theta}$
683: are the Pati-Salam singlets which carry $U(1)_H$ charges $\pm 1$
684: and break the flavour symmetry, and $\Lambda_c > M_{GUT}$ denotes the mass
685: of extra matter that has been integrated out.
686: When the $H$ and $\theta$ fields develop their vev's, those
687: operators reduce to effective Yukawa couplings with powers of the
688: small coefficients
689: \beq
690: \delta = \frac{\langle H \rangle \langle \bar{H} \rangle}{\Lambda_c^2}
691: \simeq 0.22
692: \qquad \qquad \epsilon = \frac{\langle \theta \rangle }{\Lambda_c} \simeq 0.22
693: \eeq
694: Then one can identify $\delta$ with mass splitting within generations
695: and $\epsilon$ with splitting between generations.
696: On the other hand, the right-handed neutrinos $\nu^c$ acquire a large mass,
697: $(m_R)_{ij} \sim \delta^m \epsilon^{q_{ij}} \langle H H \rangle/\Lambda_c$.
698:
699: This model predicts the following mass matrices
700: \beq
701: m_D
702: %=m_D^\delta~m_D^\epsilon
703: \sim
704: \matriz{\delta^3 \epsilon^5&\delta \epsilon^3&\delta \epsilon\\
705: \delta^3 \epsilon^4&\delta^2 \epsilon^2&\delta\\
706: \delta^3 \epsilon^4&\delta^2 \epsilon^2&1\\}~ v \sim
707: \matriz{ {\lambda}^8&{\lambda}^4& {\lambda}^2\\
708: {\lambda}^7& {\lambda}^4& {\lambda}\\ {\lambda}^7& {\lambda}^4&1\\}~ v
709: \eeq\\
710: \beq
711: m_R
712: %=m_R^\delta~m_R^\epsilon
713: \sim
714: \matriz{\delta \epsilon^8&\delta \epsilon^6&\delta \epsilon^4\\
715: \delta \epsilon^6&\delta \epsilon^4&\delta \epsilon^2\\
716: \delta \epsilon^4&\delta \epsilon^2&1\\}~ \Lambda \sim
717: \matriz{ {\lambda}^9& {\lambda}^7& {\lambda}^5\\
718: {\lambda}^7& {\lambda}^5& {\lambda}^3\\ {\lambda}^5& {\lambda}^3&1\\}~ \Lambda
719: \eeq\\
720:
721: Then, using the seesaw mechanism (\ref{seesaw}) one can calculate
722: the effective Majorana mass matrix $m_\nu$,
723: \beq
724: m_\nu \sim \matriz{ {\lambda}^2& {\lambda}^{3/2}& {\lambda}^{3/2}\\
725: {\lambda}^{3/2}&1&1\\
726: {\lambda}^{3/2}&1&1\\}~ \frac{v^2}{\Lambda} \ ,
727: \label{mnu6}
728: \eeq
729: %
730: which is dominated by the third right-handed neutrino.
731:
732: Requiring that the heaviest mass eigenvalue is
733: $m_3 = \sqrt{\Delta m^2_{atm}} \simeq 5\times 10^{-2}\ eV$,
734: the mass scale of the right-handed neutrinos results to be
735: $\Lambda \lsim 6 \times 10^{14}~GeV$ so the two lightest $\nu_R$'s have
736: masses $m_{\nu_{R_1}} \lsim 7 \times 10^{8}~GeV$,
737: $m_{\nu_{R_2}} \lsim 3 \times 10^{11}~GeV$.
738: Moreover, we have calculated that their $\Delta L =1$ decays are in
739: equilibrium around $10^{9}~GeV$ for $\nu_{R_1}$
740: and $7 \times 10^{11}~GeV$ for $\nu_{R_2}$, so these decays continue
741: destroying lepton number at $T\lsim 10^{12}~GeV$, with the sphaleron
742: configurations in equilibrium, and the baryon asymmetry
743: that could be generated in the heavy Higgs decays disappears.
744: Therefore the GUT baryogenesis mechanism does not work within this model.
745:
746:
747: \subsection{SRHND}
748:
749: \label{srhnd}
750:
751:
752: The single right-handed neutrino dominance (SRHND) \cite{king}
753: is an alternative mechanism proposed in the literature to generate
754: simultaneously a large atmospheric mixing angle, $\theta_{23}$, and
755: hierarchical left-handed neutrino masses.
756: The idea is that the dominant contributions to the 23 block of the
757: light effective Majorana mass matrix $m_\nu$ come from only one of the
758: right-handed neutrinos, leading to an approximately vanishing
759: 23 sub-determinant.
760: Next to leading contributions from the other
761: right-handed neutrinos are required to generate the mass splitting
762: and large 12 mixing angle corresponding to the LMA solution
763: of the solar neutrino puzzle.
764:
765: This mechanism can be realised in many different models, in particular
766: it has been thoroughly studied in the framework of $U(1)_H$
767: flavor symmetry models.
768: These can be embedded in grand unified theories by imposing the
769: corresponding constraints on the quark and lepton $U(1)_H$ charges,
770: although usually the minimal models are difficult to reconcile with
771: the data. Therefore in order to analyse if GUT baryogenesis is
772: possible when SRHND takes place,
773: we shall just study different charge assignments
774: to the leptonic sector which reproduce the measured neutrino mass splittings
775: and mixing angles, without specifying the quark charges
776: corresponding to a particular grand unified group.
777:
778:
779:
780: If we take $\nu_{R_3}$, of mass $Y$, to be the dominant right-handed
781: neutrino, there are three possible textures of the heavy Majorana mass matrix
782: $m_R$ that maintain its isolation from the other right-handed
783: neutrinos, namely the diagonal, democratic and off-diagonal
784: textures \cite{king}
785: \beq \label{mR}
786: \begin{array}{c}
787: m_R^{diag}=\matriz{
788: X'&0&0\\
789: 0&X&0\\
790: 0&0&Y}
791: \qquad
792: m_R^{dem}=\matriz{
793: X&X&0\\
794: X&X&0\\
795: 0&0&Y}
796: \qquad
797: m_R^{off-diag}=\matriz{
798: 0&X&0\\
799: X&0&0\\
800: 0&0&Y}
801: \end{array}
802: \eeq
803: In the democratic and off-diagonal textures, the Majorana masses of the upper
804: block, $X$, are of the same order but not exactly equal.
805:
806: Denoting the Dirac neutrino mass matrix $m_D$ as
807: \beq \label{mD}
808: m_D=\matriz{
809: a'&a&d\\
810: b'&b&e\\
811: c'&c&f}\ v
812: \eeq
813: and using the seesaw formula, one obtains the effective light neutrino
814: Majorana mass matrix, $m_\nu$.
815: The conditions for SRHND are that the $1/Y$ terms in the 23 sub-matrix
816: dominate over the $1/X, 1/X'$ terms in the full matrix,
817: \beq
818: \frac{e^2}{Y} \sim \frac{e f}{Y} \sim \frac{f^2}{Y} \gg
819: \mathcal{O}\left(\frac{1}{X}\right), \mathcal{O}\left(\frac{1}{X'}\right)
820: \eeq
821:
822: %
823: At order $\mathcal{O}\left(\frac{1}{Y}\right)$
824: the matrix $m_\nu$ is the same for the three textures, leading to
825: the heaviest neutrino mass
826: \beq
827: m_{\nu_3}=\frac{d^2+e^2+f^2}{Y}v^2
828: \eeq
829: and the mixing angles \cite{king}
830: \beq
831: \tan \theta_{23}=\frac{e}{f}
832: \qquad \qquad
833: \tan \theta_{13}=\frac{d}{\sqrt{e^2+f^2}}
834: \eeq
835: %
836: Taking into account that $\tan \theta_{23} \approx 1$ from Super-Kamiokande
837: and $\tan \theta_{13} \lsim 0.2$ from CHOOZ
838: \cite{chooz}, it is necessary that $d\ll e\approx f$ \cite{king}.
839:
840: The masses of the two remaining neutrinos as well as the solar mixing
841: angle $\theta_{12}$ appear at subleading order, and their
842: analytic expressions depend on the particular texture of $m_R$.
843: In the diagonal case, if $|x y|/X \gg |x' y'|/X'$
844: ($x,y =a,b,c$ and $x',y' =a',b',c'$),
845: we have $m_{\nu_1} \ll m_{\nu_2}$, while
846: the diagonal texture when both $|x y|/X$ and $|x' y'|/X'$ terms are
847: important, as well as the other two textures, lead to
848: $m_{\nu_1} \sim m_{\nu_2}$.
849:
850:
851: In \cite{king}
852: it has been shown that the conditions for SRHND and LMA solution
853: of the solar neutrino deficit can be fulfilled in
854: the framework of models with $U(1)_H$ family symmetries,
855: with appropriate charge assignments, and a
856: systematic search of the simplest examples has been performed.
857: They assume that the $U(1)_H$ is broken by the equal vevs of two
858: singlets, $\Phi,~\bar{\Phi}$, which have charges $\pm 1$,
859: so both signs for the charges of the leptons are allowed.
860: Then, omitting order one coefficients as usual, the Dirac neutrino
861: mass matrix and the heavy Majorana matrix are
862: \beq
863: m_D=\matriz{
864: {\lambda}^{|n_1+l_1|}& {\lambda}^{|n_2+l_1|}& {\lambda}^{|n_3+l_1|}\\
865: {\lambda}^{|n_1+l_2|}& {\lambda}^{|n_2+l_2|}& {\lambda}^{|n_3+l_2|}\\
866: {\lambda}^{|n_1+l_3|}& {\lambda}^{|n_2+l_3|}& {\lambda}^{|n_3+l_3|}\\}~v
867: \eeq
868: \beq
869: m_R=\matriz{
870: {\lambda}^{|2 n_1+\sigma|}& {\lambda}^{|n_2+n_1+\sigma|}&
871: {\lambda}^{|n_3+n_1+\sigma|}\\
872: {\lambda}^{|n_1+n_2+\sigma|}& {\lambda}^{|2 n_2+\sigma|}&
873: {\lambda}^{|n_3+n_2+\sigma|}\\
874: {\lambda}^{|n_1+n_3+\sigma|}& {\lambda}^{|n_2+n_3+\sigma|}&
875: {\lambda}^{|2 n_3+\sigma|}\\} \Lambda
876: \eeq
877: %
878: where the charges $l_i,~n_i,~\sigma$ correspond to the $l_L,~\nu_R$ and $S$
879: fields,
880: being $S$ the one whose vev generates the heavy Majorana neutrino masses,
881: and $\lambda\sim 0.22$ is the Wolfenstein parameter, given by the
882: ratio $\langle \Phi \rangle /\Lambda_c = \langle \bar{\Phi}\rangle /\Lambda_c$.
883: It is important for SRHND that at least some of the combinations
884: $l_i + n_p$ and $n_p + n_q + \sigma$ take negative values; otherwise,
885: the modulus signs could be dropped and the right-handed neutrino charges
886: $n_p$ would cancel in $m_\nu$, as constructed using the seesaw
887: formula (\ref{seesaw}). Therefore the choice of right-handed neutrino charges
888: plays an important role in determining $m_\nu$ and each particular
889: choice must be analysed separately.
890:
891:
892: We have studied several of the $U(1)_H$ charge assignments found in
893: \cite{king}, which provide a natural account of the atmospheric and
894: solar neutrinos via the LMA MSW effect. We have focused on choices
895: that lead to all right-handed neutrino masses $m_{\nu_{R_i}}>10^{12}~GeV$,
896: so they are not present in the thermal bath when the sphaleron
897: processes enter into thermal equilibrium and GUT baryogenesis is
898: in principle feasible
899: \footnote{The possibility of lighter right-handed neutrinos but with
900: $\Delta L =1$ decays out of equilibrium at $T \lsim 10^{12}~ GeV$
901: will be considered in \cite{us}.}.
902: For example, for diagonal textures we found that in the following cases
903: GUT baryogenesis is viable
904: \begin{equation}
905: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.3}
906: \begin{array}{|ccc|ccc|c|}\hline
907: l_1 & l_2 & l_3 & n_1 & n_2 & n_3 & \sigma \\ \hline\hline
908: -1 & 1 & 1 & 0 & \frac{1}{2} & -\frac{1}{2} & -1 \\ \hline
909: -1 & 1 & 1 & \frac{1}{2} & 0 & -\frac{1}{2} & -1 \\ \hline
910: -\frac{1}{2} & \frac{1}{2} & \frac{1}{2} & \frac{1}{2} & 0 & -1 & -1 \\ \hline
911: \end{array} \ ,
912: \end{equation}
913: and as working examples of the democratic and the off-diagonal textures we have
914: \footnote{Note that the third example of off-diagonal textures can be readily
915: embedded in a grand unified $SU(5)$ theory, like the second one we considered
916: in section \ref{su5}.}
917: \begin{equation}
918: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.3}
919: \begin{array}{|ccc|ccc|c|}\hline
920: l_1 & l_2 & l_3 & n_1 & n_2 & n_3 & \sigma \\ \hline\hline
921: -1 & 0 & 0 & \frac{1}{2} & \frac{1}{2} & -1 & -1 \\ \hline
922: -1 & 0 & 0 & \frac{1}{2} & \frac{1}{2} & -\frac{1}{2} & -1 \\ \hline
923: -1 & 0 & 0 & \frac{1}{2} & \frac{1}{2} & 0 & -1 \\ \hline
924: \end{array}
925: \qquad \qquad
926: \begin{array}{|ccc|ccc|c|}\hline
927: l_1 & l_2 & l_3 & n_1 & n_2 & n_3 & \sigma \\ \hline\hline
928: -2 & 0 & 0 & -2 & 1 & -1 & 1 \\ \hline
929: -2 & 0 & 0 & -2 & -2 & 0 & 0 \\ \hline
930: -2 & 0 & 0 & -1 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\ \hline
931: \end{array}
932: \end{equation}
933:
934:
935:
936:
937: %--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
938: \subsection{Inverted hierarchy models}
939:
940: This kind of models have been studied in \cite{inverted} and
941: are based on a mechanism similar to SRHND, but with dominance of two heavy
942: right-handed neutrinos. A reversal of the SRHND conditions leads to an
943: inverted hierarchical spectrum of the left-handed neutrinos,
944: $m_{\nu_3} \ll m_{\nu_2}\sim m_{\nu_1}$, and bi-maximal mixing.
945: As in the case of SRHND, the mechanism can naturally take place in
946: models with a $U(1)_H$ family symmetry broken by two vector-like singlets
947: with charges $\pm 1$.
948: We shall only be concerned about the leptonic sector, although
949: these models could be extended to describe the quark masses
950: as well, in a GUT scenario.
951:
952: The only texture of the heavy Majorana neutrino matrix, $m_R$, that
953: can lead to an inverted mass hierarchy
954: is the off-diagonal one in eq. (\ref{mR}) \cite{inverted}.
955: Using for the Dirac neutrino mass matrix $m_D$ the same notation as in
956: section \ref{srhnd} (see eq. (\ref{mD})), the seesaw formula (\ref{seesaw})
957: implies
958: \beq
959: m_\nu=\matriz{
960: \frac{d^2}{Y} + \frac{2 a a'}{X}&\frac{d e}{Y}+\frac{a'b+ab'}{X}&
961: \frac{d f}{Y}+\frac{a'c+ac'}{X}\\
962: \frac{d e}{Y}+\frac{a'b+ab'}{X}&\frac{e^2}{Y}+\frac{2bb'}{X}&
963: \frac{e f}{Y}+\frac{b'c+cb'}{X}\\
964: \frac{d f}{Y}+\frac{a'c+ac'}{X}&\frac{e f}{Y}+\frac{b'c+cb'}{X}&
965: \frac{f^2}{Y}+\frac{2cc'}{X}\\}\ v^2
966: \label{mnu8}
967: \eeq
968: In order to achieve an inverted hierarchy one should
969: require that
970: the $\mathcal{O}\left(\frac{1}{X}\right)$ terms dominate
971: over the $\mathcal{O}\left(\frac{1}{Y}\right)$ ones
972: (which is the opposite of the SRHND condition), and that either
973: $a',b,c \gg a,b',c$ or $a',b,c \ll a,b',c'$.
974: In the first case one finds the following $\nu_L$ masses
975: \beq
976: \begin{array}{c}
977: {\displaystyle
978: m_{\nu_3} \approx\frac{(b-c)^2}{b^2+c^2}\ \frac{1}{Y}\ v^2 \qquad \qquad
979: m_{\nu_1} \approx m_{\nu_2} \approx \frac{a'\sqrt{b^2+c^2}}{X}\ v^2 }
980: \end{array} \ .
981: \eeq
982:
983: Introducing a $U(1)_H$ flavour symmetry, the conditions for
984: achieving the required off-diagonal texture of $m_R$ and an inverted
985: hierarchical spectrum of the left-handed neutrinos
986: translate into conditions of the $U(1)_H$ charges for the different fields.
987: Many working examples can be found in \cite{inverted}, of which we have
988: analysed some. In particular, we have obtained that the three right-handed
989: neutrinos are heavier than $10^{12}~ GeV$ and therefore GUT baryogensis
990: is viable for the following choices
991: of the $U(1)_H$ charges
992: %
993: \begin{equation}
994: \begin{array}{|ccc|ccc|c|}\hline
995: l_1 & l_2 & l_3 & n_1 & n_2 & n_3 & \sigma \\ \hline\hline
996: -2 & 3 & 3 & 2 & -2 & 0 & 0 \\ \hline
997: -3 & 1 & 1 & 3 & -2 & 1 & -2 \\ \hline
998: -3 & 3 & 3 & 3 &-3 & -1 & 1 \\ \hline
999: \end{array}
1000: \end{equation}
1001: where the charges $l_i,~n_i,~\sigma$ correspond to the $l_L,~\nu_R,~S$ fields,
1002: as in the case of SRHND.
1003:
1004:
1005: %--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1006:
1007:
1008: \section{Conclusions}
1009:
1010:
1011: We have found that the GUT-baryogenesis mechanism
1012: proposed in \cite{resurrection} works in $SU(5)\times U(1)_H$
1013: grand unified models, with appropriate choices of the
1014: $U(1)_H$ charges such that the right-handed neutrinos are not very
1015: hierarchical, and all of them heavier than $10^{12}~ GeV$.
1016:
1017:
1018: In models with grand unified gauge group
1019: $SO(10)$ and Pati-Salam, the mechanism does not work, since
1020: $\Delta L = 1$ right-handed neutrino
1021: decays are in equilibrium below $10^{12}~ GeV$, together with
1022: the $B+L$ violating sphaleron interactions.
1023: This is because in those models the Dirac neutrino mass matrix is
1024: somehow related to the up quark mass matrix, and thus it is
1025: very hierarchical. Since the observed hierarchy in the light
1026: neutrino masses is not so strong,
1027: $\sqrt{\Delta m^2_{atm}}/ \sqrt{\Delta m^2_{sol}} \sim 0.1$,
1028: this implies a hierarchy on the right-handed neutrinos,
1029: so one ore more of them result with a small mass, lighter than
1030: $10^{12}~ GeV$, and their lepton number violating decays are
1031: in thermal equilibrium.
1032: Although we have only analysed some particular models, this feature
1033: seems generic for such gauge groups, independently of the flavour
1034: symmetry, as far as neutrino masses are generated via the minimal
1035: seesaw mechanism, i.e., neglecting $SU(2)$ triplet vevs.
1036:
1037:
1038: From a more phenomenological perspective, we have also found
1039: that GUT baryogensis works for many choices of the $U(1)_H$
1040: charges in models with single right-handed neutrino dominance, and in models
1041: where two right-handed neutrinos dominate an lead to an inverted hierarchy
1042: of the left-handed neutrinos. Again, these models allow all heavy
1043: right-handed neutrinos with masses larger than $10^{12}~ GeV$.
1044:
1045: \vskip 0.15in
1046:
1047: {\bf Acknowledgements}
1048: \vskip 0.15in
1049: We are specially grateful to Sacha Davidson for many interesting
1050: comments and a careful reading of the manuscript.
1051: We also thank Martin Hirsch for discussions, and all the organisers for
1052: a very interesting workshop. This work was partially
1053: supported by the Spanish MCyT grants BFM2002-00345 and
1054: FPA2001-3031, by the TMR network contract HPRN-CT-2000-00148 of the
1055: European Union and by the Generalitat Valenciana grant CTIDIB/2002/24.
1056:
1057:
1058:
1059: %--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1060: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
1061:
1062: \bibitem{gut-baryo}
1063: A.D. Sakharov, {\sl Pis'ma\ Zh.\ Eksp.\ Teor.\ Fiz. }{\bf 5}, 32 (1967)
1064: English translate: [A.D. Sakharov, \jetp5{24}{1967}];
1065: S. Weinberg, \prl{42}{850}{1979};
1066: A.Y. Ignatev, N.V. Krasnikov, V.A. Kuzmin and A.N. Tavkhelidze,
1067: \pl{B 76}{436}{1978};
1068: M. Yoshi\-mu\-ra, \prl{41}{281}{1978} [Erratum: {\bf 43}, 746 (1979)]
1069:
1070: \bibitem{sph}
1071: V.A. Kuzmin, V.A. Rubakov, M.E. Shaposhnikov, \pl{B 155}{36}{1985};
1072: N.S. Manton, \pr{D 28}{2019}{1983};
1073: F.R. Klinkhammer, N.S. Manton \pr{D 30}{2212}{1984};
1074: E.W. Kolb, M.S. Turner, {\sl The early Universe} (Addison-Wesley, 1990)
1075:
1076: \bibitem{spheq}
1077: P. Arnold, L. McLerran, \pr{D 36}{581}{87}; {\bf D 37}, 1020 (1988);
1078: A. Bochkarev, M.E. Shaposhnikov, {\sl Mod.\ Phys.\ Lett.\ },
1079: {\bf A 2}, 417 (1987); {\bf A 2}, 921 (1987);
1080: S.Yu. Khlebnikov, M.E. Shaposhnikov, \np{B 308}{885}{1988};
1081: D. B\"odeker, G.D. Moore, K. Rummukainen,
1082: {\sl Phys.~ Rev. } {\bf D 61}, 056003 (2000)
1083:
1084: \bibitem{resurrection}
1085: M. Fukugita, T. Yanagida, {\sl Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett. }{\bf 89}, 131602 (2002)
1086: [arXiv:hep-ph/0203194]
1087:
1088: \bibitem{fukuda}
1089: Super-Kamiokande Collaboration (Y. Fukuda \etal), \prl{81}{1562}{1998}
1090: [arXiv:hep-ex/9807003]
1091:
1092: \bibitem{k2k}
1093: K2K Collaboration, (S.H. Ahn \etal) \prl{90}{041801}{2003}
1094: [arXiv:hep-ex/0212007]
1095:
1096: \bibitem{sksolar}
1097: Super-Kamiokande Collaboration (S. Fukuda et al.), \pl{B 539}{179}{2002}
1098: [arXiv:hep-ex/0205075]
1099:
1100: \bibitem{sno}
1101: SNO Collaboration (Q.R. Ahmad \etal) \prl{89}{011302}{2002}
1102: [arXiv:nucl-ex/0204009]
1103:
1104: \bibitem{kamland}
1105: KamLAND Collaboration (K. Eguchi \etal) \prl{90}{021802}{2003}
1106: [arXiv:hep-ex/0212021]
1107:
1108:
1109: \bibitem{seesaw}
1110: M. Gell-Mann, P. Ramond, and R. Slansky,
1111: {\sl Supergravity} (North Holland,1979)];
1112: T. Ya\-na\-gi\-da, {\sl Prog.\ Theor.\ Phys.}, {\bf 64}, 1103 (1980)];
1113: R.N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanovi$\acute{c}$, \prl{44}{912}{1980}
1114:
1115: \bibitem{us}
1116: S. Davidson, J.A. Lopez-Perez, N. Rius, in preparation.
1117:
1118:
1119: \bibitem{chooz}
1120: CHOOZ Collaboration (M. Apollonio \etal),
1121: \pl{B 466}{415}{1999} [arXiv:hep-ex/9907037]
1122:
1123:
1124: \bibitem{U1}
1125: H. Fritzsh, \pl{B 70}{436}{1977};
1126: C.D. Froggatt, H.B. Nilsen, \np{B147}{277}{1979};
1127: J. Harvey, P. Ramond, D. Reiss, \pl{B 92}{309}{1980};
1128: C. Wetterich, \np{B 261}{461}{1985};
1129: P. Kaus, S. Meshkov, \mpl{A 3}{1251}{1988};
1130: L. Ib\'a\~nez, G.G. Ross, \pl{B 332}{100}{1994};
1131: P. Binetruy, P. Ramond, \pl{B 350}{49}{1995} [arXiv:hep-ph/9412385]
1132:
1133: \bibitem{nanwei-barr}
1134: D.V. Nanopoulos, S. Weinberg, \pr{D 20}{2484}{1979};
1135: S.M. Barr, G. Segre, H.A. Weldon, \pr{D 20}{2494}{1979}
1136:
1137: \bibitem{buchyan}
1138: W. Buchm\"uller, T. Yanagida, \pl{445}{339-402}{1999};
1139: W. Buchm\"uller, M. Pl\"umacher, {\sl Int.\ J.\ Mod.\ Phys.}, {\bf A 15},
1140: 5047-5086 (2000) [arXiv:hep-ph/0007176], and references therein.
1141:
1142:
1143: \bibitem{vala}
1144: J. Sato, T. Yanagida, {\sl Nucl.~Phys.~Proc.~Suppl. }{\bf 77}, 293 (1999)
1145: [arXiv:hep-ph/9809307]
1146:
1147: \bibitem{AF}
1148: G. Altarelli, F. Feruglio,
1149: in {\sl Neutrino Mass}, Springer Tracts in Modern Physics,
1150: and references therein.
1151:
1152:
1153: %\bibitem{LR}
1154: %S. Lola, G.G. Ross, \np{B 553}{81}{1999}
1155: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9902283]
1156:
1157:
1158: \bibitem{triplets}
1159: B. Bajc, G. Senjanovic and F. Vissani,
1160: [arXiv:hep-ph/0210207]
1161: y Hirsch ,Valle ...
1162:
1163:
1164: \bibitem{albright-barr}
1165: S.M. Barr, S. Raby, \prl{79}{4748}{1997};
1166: C.H. Albright, S.M. Barr, \pr{D 58}{013002}{1998};
1167: C.H. Albright, K.S. Babu, S.M. Barr, \prl{81}{1167}{1998};
1168: C.H. Albright, S.M. Barr, \prl{85}{244}{2000}; \pr{D 62}{093008}{2000};
1169: \pr{D 64}{073010}{2001};
1170: C.H. Albright, talk presented at Neutrinos and Implications for Physics Beyond
1171: the Standard Model, Stony Brook, New York, 11-13 Oct 2002
1172: [arXiv:hep-ph/0212090]
1173:
1174:
1175:
1176: \bibitem{branco}
1177: G.C. Branco, R. Gonzalez Felipe, F.R. Joaquim, M.N. Rebelo,
1178: \np{B 640}{202}{2002} [arXiv:hep-ph/0202030]
1179:
1180: \bibitem{patisalam}
1181: J.C. Pati, A. Salam, \pr{D 10}{275}{1974}
1182:
1183: \bibitem{kingps}
1184: S.F. King, M. Oliveira, \pr{D 63}{095004}{2001} [arXiv:hep-ph/0009287];
1185: T. Blazek, S.F. King, J.K. Parry, {\sl JHEP } {\bf 0305} 016 (2003)
1186: [arXiv:hep-ph/0303192]
1187:
1188: \bibitem{king}
1189: S.F. King, \np{B 576}{85-105}{2000} [arXiv:hep-ph/9912492], and
1190: references therein.
1191:
1192: \bibitem{inverted}
1193: S.F. King, N. Nimai Singh, \np{B 596}{81}{2001} [arXiv:hep-ph/0007243]
1194:
1195:
1196: \end{thebibliography}
1197:
1198: \end{document}
1199:
1200:
1201:
1202: