1: % Article on photon-photon collisions near threshold
2: % Draft as of June 6, 2004
3: \documentclass[12pt]{article}
4: \usepackage{graphicx}
5: \def \b{{\cal B}}
6: \def \bea{\begin{eqnarray}}
7: \def \beq{\begin{equation}}
8: \def \br{${\cal B}$}
9: \def \bra#1{\langle #1 |}
10: \def \eea{\end{eqnarray}}
11: \def \eeq{\end{equation}}
12: \def \gto{\stackrel{\gamma}{\to}}
13: \def \ket#1{| #1 \rangle}
14: \def \mat#1#2{\langle #1 | #2 \rangle}
15: \def \ob{\overline{B}^0}
16: \def \s{\sqrt{2}}
17: \def \st{\sqrt{3}}
18: \def \sx{\sqrt{6}}
19: \def \ups{\Upsilon}
20: \textwidth 6.2in
21: \hoffset -0.4in
22: \voffset -0.5in
23: \textheight 8.9in
24: \renewcommand{\thesection}{\Roman{section}}
25: \renewcommand{\thetable}{\Roman{table}}
26: \begin{document}
27: \rightline{CLNS 04/1873}
28: \rightline{hep-ph/0404245}
29: \bigskip
30:
31: \centerline{\bf VECTOR MESON PAIR PRODUCTION IN}
32: \centerline{\bf TWO-PHOTON COLLISIONS NEAR THRESHOLD
33: \footnote{Submitted to Phys.\ Rev.\ D.}}
34: \bigskip
35:
36: \centerline{Jonathan L. Rosner~\footnote{rosner@hep.uchicago.edu. On leave
37: from Enrico Fermi Institute and Department of Physics,
38: University of Chicago, 5640 S. Ellis Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637}}
39: \centerline{\it Laboratory of Elementary Particle Physics}
40: \centerline{\it Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850}
41:
42: \begin{quote}
43: The cross sections for several $\gamma \gamma \to VV$ processes exhibit strong
44: enhancements near threshold, where $V$ denotes a vector meson. The
45: pattern of these enhancements is not well understood; for example, $\gamma
46: \gamma \to \rho^0 \rho^0$ shows an appreciable peak, while $\gamma \gamma \to
47: \rho^+ \rho^-$ does not. Some possible mechanisms for this behavior are
48: discussed. Tests are proposed involving production of systems containing
49: heavier quarks, e.g., through the reaction $\gamma \gamma \to J/\psi \rho^0$.
50: The importance of modeling $\ell^+ \ell^- \pi^+ \pi^-$ angular distributions in
51: decays of threshold $J/\psi \rho^0$ enhancements is illustrated
52: by comparing the expected distributions for S-wave decays of scalar particles
53: and P-wave decays of pseudoscalar particles.
54: \end{quote}
55:
56: \noindent
57: PACS Categories: 12.39.Mk, 13.60.Le, 13.66.Bc, 14.40.Cs
58:
59: \bigskip
60:
61: \centerline{\bf I. INTRODUCTION}
62: \bigskip
63:
64: The properties of meson and baryon resonances can be strongly influenced not
65: only by their intrinsic quark content, but also by the final states to which
66: they couple. Recently several resonances have been reported for which these
67: effects may be important. These include $J^P = 0^+$ and $1^+$ charmed-strange
68: mesons several tens of MeV below $DK$ and $D^* K$ threshold, respectively
69: \cite{Aubert:2003fg, Besson:2003cp,Abe:2003jk} and a charmonium resonance
70: $X(3872)$ nearly degenerate with the $D^0 \bar D^{*0}$ threshold
71: \cite{Choi:2003ue,Acosta:2003zx}. Such effects may also be important for the
72: reactions $\gamma \gamma \to V V$, where $V$ is a vector meson. In the
73: present paper I discuss some proposals to account for the curious pattern of
74: threshold enhancements in these processes, note the availability of the $J/\psi
75: \rho$ channel, and calculate angular distributions for two cases of spinless
76: particle decay to $J/\psi \rho$.
77:
78: The cross section for $\gamma \gamma \to \rho^0 \rho^0$ is strongly enhanced
79: near threshold \cite{Brandelik:1980jv,Albrecht:1990cr}, while $\gamma \gamma
80: \to \rho^+ \rho^-$ is not \cite{Albrecht:1991sr}. This difference appears to
81: occur mainly for real or nearly-real photons; when one photon is highly
82: virtual the cross sections for $\gamma \gamma^* \to \rho^0 \rho^0$
83: \cite{Achard:2003qa} and $\gamma \gamma^* \to \rho^+ \rho^-$ \cite{Achard} are
84: much more similar. It will be interesting to see whether a recent calculation
85: of $\gamma \gamma^* \to \rho^0 \rho^0$ \cite{Anikin:2003fr} can reproduce the
86: result for $\gamma \gamma^* \to \rho^+ \rho^-$.
87:
88: Other $\gamma \gamma \to V V$ processes exhibit patterns \cite{Albrecht:1996gr}
89: not all of which can be understood from a single standpoint. A review of
90: $\gamma \gamma$ interactions up to 2001 may be found in Ref.\
91: \cite{Whalley:2001mk}. Additional relevant experimental data
92: comes from a recent search for the $X(3872)$ in photon-photon collisions, in
93: which a sample of $J/\psi \pi^+ \pi^-$ events has been studied \cite{Zweber},
94: and which is the main motivation for the present study.
95:
96: Photon-photon collisions share features with hadron-hadron collisions, but have
97: properties making them easier to interpret. In hadronic processes at low
98: transverse momentum one can regard photons as superpositions of vector mesons
99: $\rho + \omega + \phi$ with relative couplings 3:1:$\sqrt{2}$ \cite{Leith:zd}.
100: SU(3) symmetry is broken through a lower total cross section of $\phi$ mesons
101: with non-strange hadrons. A similar approach describes $J/\psi$ photoproduction
102: through a suppressed $J/\psi$--nucleon cross section \cite{Carlson:1974ev}.
103:
104: This paper is organized as follows. Section II reviews the processes $\gamma
105: \gamma \to VV$. I discuss some possible mechanisms for the threshold
106: enhancement of such processes in Section III. Section IV is devoted to
107: information available from the process $\gamma \gamma \to J/\psi \rho^0$, while
108: Section V concludes.
109: \bigskip
110:
111: \centerline{\bf II. DATA ON $\gamma \gamma \to VV$}
112: \bigskip
113:
114: The cross sections for $\gamma \gamma \to V V$ generally peak not far above
115: threshold. The greatest enhancement occurs for $\rho^0 \rho^0$, for which
116: $\sigma(\gamma \gamma \to \rho^0 \rho^0)$ rises to a maximum of $\sim (57 \pm
117: 6)$ nb in the photon-photon center-of-mass energy range $W = 1.5$ to 1.6 GeV
118: \cite{Albrecht:1990cr} and in the state with $(J=2,J_z = \pm 2)$. No such
119: enhancement is seen in $\gamma \gamma \to \rho^+ \rho^-$. The cross section
120: for the corresponding partial wave shows a dip in this region and never exceeds
121: $\sim (12 \pm 4)$ nb \cite{Albrecht:1991sr}. The peak cross sections
122: $\sigma_{\rm pk}$ and the energy ranges $W$ in which they occur
123: \cite{ARGUS} are summarized in Table I \cite{Albrecht:1990cr,Albrecht:1991sr,%
124: Kriznic:1994me,Albrecht:1995nd,Albrecht:1994hg,Albrecht:1999zu}.
125:
126: \begin{table}
127: \caption{Energy ranges and peak cross sections for $\gamma \gamma
128: \to V V$.
129: \label{tab:pks}}
130: \begin{center}
131: \begin{tabular}{l c c c } \hline \hline
132: $VV$ & $W$ (GeV) & $\sigma_{\rm pk}$ (nb) & Reference \\ \hline
133: $\rho^0 \rho^0$ & 1.5--1.6 & $57 \pm 6^a$ & \cite{Albrecht:1990cr} \\
134: $\rho^+ \rho^-$ & $\sim 1.3$ & $12 \pm 4^a$ & \cite{Albrecht:1991sr} \\
135: $\rho^0 \omega$ & 1.5--1.7 & $17.3 \pm 3.5$ & \cite{Kriznic:1994me} \\
136: $\omega \omega$ & 1.6--1.8 & $4.3 \pm 1.5$ & \cite{Albrecht:1995nd} \\
137: $\rho^0 \phi$ & 1.75--2.00 & $2.2 \pm 1.1$ & \cite{Albrecht:1994hg} \\
138: $\omega \phi$ & 1.9--2.3 & $1.65 \pm 0.86$ & \cite{Albrecht:1994hg} \\
139: $K^{*+}K^{*-}$ & 2.00--2.25 & $36.20 \pm 6.25$ & \cite{Albrecht:1999zu} \\
140: $K^{*0}\bar K^{*0}$ & 1.75--2.00 & $5.97 \pm 0.78$ & \cite{Albrecht:1999zu} \\
141: \hline \hline
142: \end{tabular}
143: \end{center}
144: \leftline{$^a$ In partial wave $J=2,J_z = \pm 2$.}
145: \end{table}
146:
147: An interesting feature of several of the threshold bumps is that in cases
148: in which a partial-wave analysis is possible (such as $\gamma \gamma \to
149: \rho^0 \rho^0$ and $\gamma \gamma \to K^{*0}\bar K^{*0}$) they occur in the
150: $(J=2, J_z = \pm 2)$ state, with little activity in $J=0$ or $J=2, J_z = 0$.
151:
152: \bigskip
153: \centerline{\bf III. MECHANISMS FOR THRESHOLD ENHANCEMENTS}
154: \bigskip
155:
156: The preponderance of $\rho^0 \rho^0$ over $\rho^+ \rho^-$ near threshold could
157: be due \cite{Achasov:1981kh,Li:1981ez} to a superposition of resonances with
158: isospins zero and two near $\rho \rho$ threshold, coupling much more strongly
159: to $\rho^0 \rho^0$ than to $\rho^+ \rho^-$. If there really is a $\rho \rho$
160: resonance near threshold with $I=2$, there should exist states around 1600 MeV
161: decaying to $\rho^\pm \rho^\pm$. While no such states have been seen so far,
162: the relevant final state $\pi^\pm \pi^\pm \pi^0 \pi^0$ has not been carefully
163: examined in a detector with good sensitivity to both charged and neutral
164: particles. Such detectors as CLEO, BaBar, and Belle, constructed to
165: investigate $e^+ e^-$ collisions at energies suitable for studying the decays
166: of $B$ mesons, would be excellent places to pursue such searches
167: \cite{Rosner:2003ia}.
168:
169: It should be possible to construct a set of resonances sufficient to reproduce
170: the pattern of Table \ref{tab:pks}. Some difficulty in this regard was pointed
171: out in Ref.\ \cite{Achasov:1989ky}. A resonance which decays to $K^{*+}
172: K^{*-}$ should, in principle, also be able to decay to $\rho^0 \phi$ unless it
173: has isospin zero. But then it should have the same branching ratio to $K^{*0}
174: \bar K^{*0}$ as to $K^{*+} K^{*-}$, which is certainly not suggested by the
175: pattern of peak cross sections.
176:
177: Another view of the $\rho^0 \rho^0$ enhancement \cite{Bajc:1996ew}
178: is that each photon produces a $\rho^0$ and these vector mesons then interact
179: with one another through the repeated exchange of an $I=0$ meson ``$\sigma$'',
180: leading to an effective potential between the vector mesons. This mechanism
181: is illustrated in Fig.\ 1(a). It does not contribute to $\gamma \gamma \to
182: \rho^+ \rho^-$, accounting for the suppression of that process. But it also
183: does not contribute to $\gamma \gamma \to K^* \bar K^*$, a shortcoming which
184: is particularly acute for the charged pair.
185:
186: \begin{figure}
187: \begin{center}
188: \includegraphics[height=6.5in]{vvmec.ps}
189: \caption{Quark diagrams illustrating possible mechanisms for threshold
190: enhancement of vector meson pair production by two photons. (a) Exchange
191: of $I=0$ mesons (dashed lines); (b) Quark exchange; (c) Quark-antiquark
192: annihilation and pair creation.}
193: \end{center}
194: \end{figure}
195:
196: The presence of the threshold enhancement in $\gamma \gamma \to \rho^0 \rho^0$
197: in the state of total angular momentum $J=2$ and helicity $J_z = \pm 2$
198: \cite{Albrecht:1990cr} can be reproduced in resonance models
199: \cite{Achasov:1981kh,Li:1981ez} by suitable
200: choices of coupling constants. It need not be universal.
201: In the model of Ref.\ \cite{Bajc:1996ew} the dominance of $(J,J_z) = (2,\pm 2)$
202: can be reproduced by spin-dependence in the potential between the vector
203: mesons. If this potential is flavor-independent one would expect all possible
204: $\gamma \gamma \to V_1 V_2$ cross sections involving the diffractive process of
205: Fig.\ 1(a) to exhibit the same behavior as $\gamma \gamma \to \rho^0 \rho^0$:
206: a rapid rise near threshold in the $(J,J_z) =(2,\pm2)$ amplitude and little
207: activity in other partial waves.
208:
209: Flavor-dependent effects which could enhance the $(J,J_z) =(2,\pm2)$ amplitude
210: include exchange of two identical quarks or quark-antiquark annihilation
211: between the two vector mesons, as illustrated in Fig.\ 1(b) and 1(c).
212: I assume that the initial vector mesons are produced only with $J_z = \pm 1$,
213: i.e., with the same polarizations as the incident photons. Similar diagrams
214: were considered in a perturbative QCD calculation of non-diffractive $\gamma
215: \gamma \to V V$ processes \cite{Brodsky:1986ds}.
216:
217: In the case of quark exchange, the quarks trading places in the vector mesons
218: have identical $J_z = \pm 1$ values only for the $J_z = \pm 2$ amplitudes,
219: while for the $J_z = 0$ amplitudes they necessarily have opposite $J_z$ values.
220: If the flavors of the two exchanged quarks do not matter, one can have
221: enhancements in processes $\gamma \gamma \to V_1 V_2$ where $V_1$ and $V_2$
222: are not able to couple directly to photons. The initial process $\gamma \gamma
223: \to \rho^0 \rho^0$ could then lead to a $\rho^+ \rho^-$ final state, while
224: $\gamma \gamma \to \rho^0 \phi$ could lead to $K^{*+} K^{*-}$. The absence of
225: such an enhancement in $\gamma \gamma \to \rho^+ \rho^-$ appears to disfavor
226: this mechanism. One must then stipulate that the exchanged quarks be
227: identical, requiring additional dynamical assumptions.
228:
229: In the case of quark-antiquark annihilation, as long as the annihilation must
230: take place in a state of $J_z = \pm 1$ (as, for example, in $q \bar q \to g$,
231: where $g$ is a transversely polarized gluon), the initial vector mesons must
232: have the same $J_z$ value. The remaining $q' \bar q'$ pair will be left with
233: $J_z = \pm 1$. If the transversely polarized gluon then materializes into a
234: different quark-antiquark pair, one will be left with a pair
235: of transversely polarized vector mesons different in flavor from the
236: previous one, so one should expect a threshold enhancement in $\gamma \gamma
237: \to \rho^+ \rho^-$, $\gamma \gamma \to K^{*+} K^{*-}$, and so on. As in the
238: previous case, the absence of a threshold enhancement in $\gamma \gamma
239: \to \rho^+ \rho^-$ disfavors this alternative.
240:
241: The relative strengths of the threshold enhancements in $\gamma \gamma \to
242: K^{*+} K^{*-}$ and $\gamma \gamma \to K^{*0} \bar K^{*0}$ do argue for some
243: contribution related to quark exchange and/or annihilation. In either case
244: charged $K^*$ production is favored because one or both photons couples to
245: a $u$ quark with charge 2/3, while neutral $K^*$ production involves replacing
246: this quark with a $d$ quark with charge $-1/3$ \cite{Brodsky:1986ds}.
247: But an attempt to use the
248: diagrams of Fig.\ 1 for a unified description within flavor SU(3) founders
249: immediately on the inequality of the $\rho^+ \rho^-$ and $K^{*+} K^{*-}$ cross
250: sections, predicted to be equal within the U-spin subgroup of SU(3) involving
251: the interchange of $d$ and $s$ quarks.
252:
253: A further mechanism which could account for a threshold enhancement in $\gamma
254: \gamma \to \rho^0 \rho^0$ with $J_z = \pm 2$ is the effect of Bose statistics
255: in the final state \cite{Goldhaber:sf}. A transversely polarized photon
256: with helicity $\lambda = \pm 1$ will produce a $\pi^+ \pi^-$ pair with
257: angular wave function proportional to $Y^1_\lambda(\theta,\phi)$, where
258: $(\theta,\phi)$ are the polar angles of the $\pi^+$ with respect to the
259: beam axis in the dipion rest frame. At $\rho^0 \rho^0$ threshold the two
260: dipion rest frames coincide, leading to the possibility of coherent
261: reinforcement of processes in which both dipion systems have the same
262: wave functions $Y^1_\lambda(\theta_i,\phi_i)~(i=1,2)$. As the center-of-mass
263: energy increases above threshold, the dipion wavefunctions refer to
264: individual rest frames which become distinct from one another, reducing the
265: possibility of coherence.
266:
267: The effects of Bose statistics (the ``GGLP effect'' \cite{Goldhaber:sf}) have
268: been observed in $\gamma \gamma \to 3 \pi^+ 3 \pi^-$ as an enchancement
269: in the low-$m(\pi^\pm \pi^\pm)$ distribution \cite{Pust:1991nj}. However,
270: it appears that these effects have been ignored up to now in the
271: simpler process $\gamma \gamma \to 2 \pi^+ 2 \pi^-$.
272:
273: The above realization of the GGLP mechanism implies threshold effects in
274: other cases of $\gamma \gamma \to V_1 V_2$ besides $V_1 = V_2 = \rho^0$, but
275: details may differ. If the decay products of $V_1$ and $V_2$ are not all
276: identical, their overlaps will be reduced. Such is the case, for example
277: in $\gamma \gamma \to \rho^+ \rho^- \to \pi^+ \pi^0 \pi^- \pi^0$, where only
278: the two neutral pions can overlap. It is not even clear that under such
279: circumstances their relative phases would be the same as those of the
280: identical pions in $\gamma \gamma \to \rho^0 \rho^0 \to \pi^+ \pi^- \pi^+
281: \pi^-$.
282:
283: If the decay product of the two vector mesons are identical, one is left
284: with the additional processes $\gamma \gamma \to \omega \omega,~\phi \phi,~
285: J/\psi J/\psi,~\ldots$, where both vector mesons decay to the same final
286: state. Thus, in $\gamma \gamma \to \phi \phi$, a threshold enhancement should
287: be present when both $\phi$ mesons decay to $K^+ K^-$, but not when one decays
288: to $K^+ K^-$ and the other to $K_S K_L$.
289:
290: The width of the decaying vector meson also probably plays a crucial role.
291: The probability of overlap of the decay products of two $\rho^0$ mesons is
292: very high since the $\rho^0$ has an appreciable width of about 150 MeV
293: \cite{PDG}. Each $\rho^0$ thus can decay to $\pi^+ \pi^-$ in the vicinity
294: of the other $\rho^0$ before they move apart from one another. The width
295: of the threshold enhancement (about 300 MeV) could then reflect the range
296: of center-of-mass energies over which this mechanism can occur.
297:
298: The overlap of the decay products of two $\omega$ mesons is reduced for two
299: reasons. First, the $\omega$ is much narrower, with a width of about 8 MeV
300: \cite{PDG}; second, the predominantly three-body decay of each $\omega$ implies
301: a much lower probability for overlap of the two vector mesons' decay products.
302:
303: The process $\gamma \gamma \to \omega \omega$, having isospin $I=0$, cannot
304: benefit from $I=0$ -- $I=2$ interference \cite{Achasov:1981kh,Li:1981ez} to
305: account for the $\rho^0 \rho^0$ threshold enhancement.
306: It nonetheless exhibits a broad threshold enhancement \cite{Albrecht:1995nd},
307: rising to a maximum of about 4 nb near a center-of-mass energy of 2 GeV.
308: This is to be compared with the peak value of nearly 60 nb mentioned earlier
309: for $\gamma \gamma \to \rho^0 \rho^0$. The reduced coupling of the photon to
310: the $\omega$ (1/3 of that to the $\rho$) more than explains this suppression;
311: in a naive vector-dominance model one would have expected 60/3$^4 \simeq
312: 0.75$ nb. Thus some mechanism in addition to the GGLP effect seems to be
313: in operation.
314:
315: For $\gamma \gamma \to \phi \phi$ the $\sim 4$ MeV width of the $\phi$
316: \cite{PDG} implies that the decay products of each $\phi$ will be
317: well-separated from one another except just above threshold, so the GGLP
318: effect would imply {\it a very narrow threshold enhancement}, no more than a
319: few MeV wide, in $\gamma \gamma \to \phi \phi \to 2K^+ 2K^-$.
320: This enhancement should occur, as it does for $\gamma \gamma \to \rho^0
321: \rho^0$, in states with total two-photon helicity $J_Z = \pm 2$. Up to now
322: there has been no reported observation of $\gamma \gamma \to \phi \phi$.
323:
324: The GGLP effect discussed above has very different implications from some
325: other mechanisms for the threshold behavior of $\gamma \gamma \to V_1 V_2$,
326: where $V_1$ and $V_2$ are neutral mesons but $V_1 \ne V_2$. For example,
327: the GGLP mechanism predicts no threshold enhancement in $\gamma \gamma
328: \to \pi^+ \pi^- K^+ K^-$ near $\rho^0 \phi$ threshold, whereas a
329: flavor-independent threshold attraction between vector mesons would imply
330: such an enhancement.
331:
332: In fact, threshold enhancements are seen in {\it several} $\gamma \gamma \to
333: V_1 V_2~(V_1 \ne V_2)$ processes \cite{Kriznic:1994me}. The cross section for
334: $\gamma \gamma \to \rho^0 \omega$ peaks at $17.3 \pm 3.1 \pm 1.7$ nb in the
335: center-of-mass energy range $1.5 < W < 1.7$ GeV. The cross
336: section for $\gamma \gamma \to \rho^0 \phi$ peaks at $2.2 \pm 1.1 \pm 0.3$
337: nb in the range $1.75 < W < 2$ GeV. A cross section
338: $\sigma(\gamma \gamma \to \omega \phi) = 1.65 \pm 0.86$ nb is measured
339: between 1.9 and 2.3 GeV. All these cross sections fall off appreciably as
340: $W$ inceases. The absence of interference between $V_1$ and
341: $V_2$ decay products makes it impossible to distinguish between $J_z = 0$
342: and $J_z = \pm 2$ production.
343:
344: An approach which combines several aspects of the above proposals, known as
345: the ``threshold $t$-channel factorization model,'' is able to account for
346: some features of the data summarized in Table \ref{tab:pks}
347: \cite{Alexander:bv}. It is applied primarily to diffractive processes for
348: which the diagram of Fig.\ 1(a) can contribute, with low-energy contributions
349: from other exchanges as well. The combination of these effects can lead to
350: a peak near threshold. The model has less to say about non-diffractive
351: processes in which only the flavor topologies of Figs.\ 1(b) and 1(c) are
352: relevant.
353:
354: To summarize this section, there are appealing features of several of the
355: proposed models for threshold enhancements of $\gamma \gamma \to VV$, but
356: no obvious regularities in behavior that would permit one model to be
357: selected over others. {\it Ad hoc} resonances, including exotic ones
358: \cite{Achasov:1981kh,Li:1981ez}, appear to require considerable fine-tuning if
359: they are to explain the observed pattern. They nonetheless have the
360: considerable advantage of firmly predicting an $I=2$ resonance around 1600 MeV
361: which should decay to $\rho^\pm \rho^\pm$. There are clearly some aspects of
362: double-diffractive production in the hierarchy $\sigma_{\rm pk}(\rho^0 \rho^0)
363: > \sigma_{\rm pk}(\rho^0 \omega) > \sigma_{\rm pk}(\omega \omega)$, reflecting
364: the hierarchy of photon--vector meson couplings, but SU(3) breaking is needed
365: to account for $\rho^0 \phi$ and $\omega \phi$ suppression, and evidence for
366: the expected hierarchy $\sigma_{\rm pk}(\rho^0 \phi) > \sigma_{\rm pk}(\omega
367: \phi)$ is fairly weak. Altogether the situation calls for some new
368: insight and/or data. The availability of photon-photon collisions
369: in larger samples amassed by the CLEO, BaBar, and Belle Collaborations
370: permits one not only to augment the statistics of the processes just mentioned,
371: but to investigate new ones, such as the process $\gamma \gamma \to J/\psi
372: \pi^+ \pi^-$ to which I now turn.
373: \bigskip
374:
375: \centerline{\bf IV. INFORMATION FROM $\gamma \gamma \to J/\psi \pi^+ \pi^-$}
376: \bigskip
377:
378: The recently-studied process $\gamma \gamma \to J/\psi \pi^+ \pi^-$
379: \cite{Zweber} can provide further information on threshold enhancements in
380: vector meson pair production by two photons. If a flavor-independent
381: interaction between vector mesons is responsible for enhanced production near
382: threshold, this process should exhibit such an effect. The reaction $e^+ e^-
383: \to J/\psi \pi^+ \pi^- + X$ employed to study this process contains also
384: events in which one lepton loses a large amount of energy, $e^+ e^- \to \gamma
385: \psi' \to \gamma J/\psi \pi^+ \pi^-$, but backgrounds from these ``radiative
386: return'' events can be isolated by means of angular correlations of lepton
387: pairs in the $J/\psi$ decays.
388:
389: If $\gamma \gamma \to J/\psi \pi^+ \pi^-$ is proceeding through a threshold
390: enhancement of $J/\psi \rho^0$ production related to the above effects,
391: several key features should be present in the data. The vector mesons
392: should both be transversely polarized. The leptons in $J/\psi \to \ell^+
393: \ell^-$ should then be distributed with probability $W_{\ell^+ \ell^-}
394: \sim 1 + \cos^2 \theta$ with respect to the beam axis, while the pions in
395: $\rho^0 \to \pi^+ \pi^-$ should have a distribution $W_{\pi^+ \pi^-} \sim
396: \sin^2 \theta$. Pions arising from the radiative-return background $\psi'
397: \to \pi^+ \pi^- J/\psi$ should be emitted isotropically in their
398: center-of-mass system. Unfortunately it will be impossible to distinguish
399: production with two-photon helicity $J_z = \pm 2$ from $J_z = 0$ since the
400: $J/\psi$ and $\rho^0$ decay products do not interfere with one another.
401:
402: If a flavor-independent threshold enhancement mechanism is operative, the
403: cross section for $\gamma \gamma \to J/\psi \rho$ can be related to that for
404: (e.g.) $\gamma \gamma \to \phi \rho \sim 2$ nb by the scaling rule
405: \cite{Carlson:1974ev}
406: \begin{equation}
407: \frac{\sigma(\gamma \gamma \to J/\psi \rho)}
408: {\sigma(\gamma \gamma \to \phi \rho)} = \left( \frac{g_{J/\psi}}{g_\phi}
409: \right)^2 \left( \frac{M_\phi}{M_{J/\psi}} \right)^4
410: \left( \frac{\sigma(J/\psi \rho)}{\sigma(\phi \rho)} \right)^2~~,
411: \end{equation}
412: where $g_V$ is the coupling of vector meson $V$ to the photon, while
413: $\sigma(V_1 V_2)$ is the total cross section for scattering of vector mesons
414: $V_1$ and $V_2$ on each other. Neglecting differences in masses and wave
415: functions, the couplings $g_V$ would scale as quark charges, entailing
416: $g_{J/\psi}/ g_\phi = -2$. In fact the ratio of leptonic widths \cite{PDG}
417: implies
418: \begin{equation}
419: \left( \frac{g_{J/\psi}}{g_\phi} \right)^2 \left( \frac{M_\phi}{M_{J/\psi}}
420: \right)^3 = \frac{\Gamma_{ee}(J/\psi)}{\Gamma_{ee}(\phi)}
421: = \frac{(5.26 \pm 0.37)~{\rm keV}}{(1.26 \pm 0.02)~{\rm keV}} = 4.18 \pm 0.30~.
422: \end{equation}
423: The scaling arguments of Ref.\ \cite{Carlson:1974ev} imply that
424: \begin{equation}
425: \frac{\sigma(J/\psi \rho)}{\sigma(\phi \rho)} = \frac{M^2_{\phi}}{M^2_{J/\psi}}
426: \end{equation}
427: so that one predicts
428: \begin{equation} \label{eqn:Jpsirhopk}
429: \sigma(\gamma \gamma \to J/\psi \rho^0) = \sigma(\gamma \gamma \to \phi \rho^0)
430: \frac{M^5_{\phi}}{M^5_{J/\psi}} \frac{\Gamma_{ee}(J/\psi)}{\Gamma_{ee}(\phi)}
431: \simeq (26 \pm 13)~{\rm pb}~~.
432: \end{equation}
433: This estimate for the cross section near threshold is to be compared with a
434: range of 14--20 pb at $W=10$ GeV obtained in Ref.\ \cite{Goncalves:2003qq},
435: growing significantly at higher energies in a model-dependent manner.
436:
437: The result (\ref{eqn:Jpsirhopk}) can be translated into a cross section for
438: $e^+ e^- \to e^+ e^- J/\psi \rho^0$ via two nearly real photons through the
439: relation
440: \cite{Brodsky:1970vk}
441: \begin{equation}
442: \sigma(e^+e^- \to e^+ e^- X) \simeq \left( \frac{2 \alpha}{\pi} \ln \frac{E}
443: {m_e} \right)^2 \int_{W_{th}}^{2E} \frac{dW}{W} f \left( \frac{W}{2E} \right)
444: \sigma_{\gamma \gamma \to X}(W)~~~,
445: \end{equation}
446: where $f(x) \equiv (2+x^2)^2 \ln (1/x) - (1-x^2)(3+x^2)$, $W$ is the
447: photon-photon center-of-mass energy, and $E$ is the electron or positron beam
448: energy (in a symmetric collider configuration). The cross section
449: $\sigma_{\gamma \gamma \to X}(W)$ may be approximated by a Breit-Wigner form
450: \begin{equation}
451: \sigma_{\gamma \gamma \to X}(W) \simeq \frac{\sigma_{\gamma \gamma}^{\rm pk}}
452: {[2(W-W_0)/\Gamma]^2 + 1}~~~,
453: \end{equation}
454: where $W_0$ and $\Gamma$ are the mass and width of the resonance. In the
455: narrow-resonance approximation (crude, but sufficient for our purposes) one
456: then has
457: \begin{equation} \label{eqn:ratio}
458: \sigma(e^+e^- \to e^+ e^- X) \simeq \frac{2 \Gamma}{\pi W_0} \left( \alpha
459: \ln \frac{E}{m_e} \right)^2 f \left( \frac{W_0}{2 E} \right)
460: \sigma_{\gamma \gamma}^{\rm pk}~~~.
461: \end{equation}
462: For $E = 5$ GeV, $\Gamma = 200$ MeV, $W_0 = 3.7$ GeV, one has $f(W_0/[2E])
463: = 1.83$, and Eq.\ (\ref{eqn:ratio}) gives $\sigma(e^+e^- \to e^+ e^- X)/
464: \sigma_{\gamma \gamma}^{\rm pk} \simeq 2.8 \times 10^{-4}$. (Use of a slightly
465: more accurate expression \cite{Zweber} reduces this estimate by about 10\%.)
466: Thus, for a peak cross section given by Eq.\ (\ref{eqn:Jpsirhopk}), one
467: estimates $\sigma(e^+e^- \to e^+ e^- J/\psi \rho^0) \sim 7$ fb, with a 50\%
468: error. Since the data sample reported in Ref.\ \cite{Zweber} consists of
469: 15 fb$^{-1}$, one should see a handful of events in which the $J/\psi$ decays
470: to $\mu^+ \mu^-$ or $e^+ e^-$ in that sample, and considerably more in
471: samples accumulated by BaBar and Belle.
472:
473: In calculating the sensitivity of a detector to $J/\psi \rho^0$ decays of a
474: resonance with definite spin $J$ and parity $P$ one needs the angular
475: distributions of final $\ell^+ \ell^- \pi^+ \pi^-$ systems associated with each
476: $J^P$ value. Angular distributions have been treated in previous work (see,
477: e.g., Ref.\ \cite{Albrecht:1990cr}), but for $\ell^+ \ell^- \pi^+ \pi^-$ final
478: states great simplifications are possible using a {\it transversity basis}
479: \cite{Dunietz:1990cj,Dighe:1995pd}. To illustrate the non-trivial nature of
480: these distributions it is helpful to compare them for the decays of $J^P = 0^+$
481: and $0^-$ particles into the lowest available partial waves, respectively S-
482: and P-waves. One defines coordinate systems and three angles
483: $\psi,\theta,\varphi$ in the following manner \cite{Dighe:1995pd}.
484:
485: In the rest frame of the $\pi^+ \pi^-$ system, the $x$ axis is defined as
486: the negative of the unit vector pointing in the direction of travel of the
487: $J/\psi$. The $\pi^+ \pi^-$ system is assumed to lie in the $x$-$y$ plane,
488: with $\pi^+$ making an angle $\psi$ with the $x$ axis ($0 \le \psi \le \pi$).
489:
490: The $z$ axis is taken in the $J/\psi$ rest frame perpendicular to the plane
491: containing the $\pi^+ \pi^-$ pair, using a right-handed coordinate system. In
492: this frame the unit vector $\hat n(\ell^+)$ along the direction of the
493: positive lepton has coordinates $(n_x,n_y,n_z) = (\sin \theta \cos \varphi,
494: \sin \theta \sin \varphi, \cos \theta)$, thereby defining $\theta$ and $\phi$.
495:
496: Applying the methods of Ref.\ \cite{Dighe:1995pd}, one then finds
497: \begin{equation}
498: \frac{1}{\Gamma} \frac{d^3 \Gamma}{d~\cos \theta d \varphi d~\cos \psi} =
499: \frac{9}{32 \pi} \left\{\begin{array}{l r} 1 - \sin^2 \theta \cos^2 (\psi -
500: \varphi) & (0^+) \cr \sin^2 \theta \sin^2 \psi & (0^-) \end{array} \right.
501: \end{equation}
502: for the differential angular distributions. A clear difference is present.
503: The sensitivity of any detector to this difference will depend upon its
504: angular coverage and whether symmetric or asymmetric $e^+ e^-$ collisions are
505: employed. With sufficient statistics, a distinction between even and odd
506: parity becomes possible. Similar methods can be applied to the decays of
507: $2^{\pm}$ threshold enhancements.
508: \bigskip
509:
510: \centerline{\bf V. CONCLUSIONS}
511: \bigskip
512:
513: The two-photon processes $\gamma \gamma \to V_1 V_2$, where $V_1$ and $V_2$
514: are vector mesons, display threshold enhancements in a variety of cases,
515: notably for $V_1 = V_2 = \rho^0$ but also elsewhere. I have reviewed
516: several proposals for these enhancements and proposed others, such as
517: effects due to Bose statistics in decays of the vector mesons. Tests
518: involving production of $\rho$, $\omega$, and $\phi$ mesons, performed over
519: many years, now can be augmented by the study of such processes as
520: $\gamma \gamma \to J/\psi \rho^0$, for which a simple model based on flavor
521: universality of the threshold enhancement predicts a cross section of
522: $26 \pm 13$ pb. Angular distributions of decay products are illustrated for
523: spinless threshold enhancements and shown to be sensitive to parity.
524: \bigskip
525:
526: \centerline{\bf ACKNOWLEDGMENTS}
527: \bigskip
528:
529: I thank Roy Briere, Shmuel Nussinov, Kam Seth, David Urner, Helmut Vogel,
530: Jim Wiss, and Pete Zweber for discussions, Maury Tigner for extending the
531: hospitality of the Laboratory for Elementary-Particle Physics at Cornell during
532: this research, and Bernard Pire and Magno Machado for calling my attention to
533: Refs.\ \cite{Anikin:2003fr} and \cite{Goncalves:2003qq}. This work
534: was supported in part by the United States Department of Energy through Grant
535: No.\ DE FG02 90ER40560 and in part by the John Simon Guggenheim Memorial
536: Foundation.
537:
538: % Journal and other miscellaneous abbreviations for references
539: % Phys. Rev. D format
540: \def \ajp#1#2#3{Am.\ J. Phys.\ {\bf#1}, #2 (#3)}
541: \def \apny#1#2#3{Ann.\ Phys.\ (N.Y.) {\bf#1}, #2 (#3)}
542: \def \app#1#2#3{Acta Phys.\ Polonica {\bf#1}, #2 (#3)}
543: \def \arnps#1#2#3{Ann.\ Rev.\ Nucl.\ Part.\ Sci.\ {\bf#1}, #2 (#3)}
544: \def \art{and references therein}
545: \def \cmts#1#2#3{Comments on Nucl.\ Part.\ Phys.\ {\bf#1}, #2 (#3)}
546: \def \cn{Collaboration}
547: \def \cp89{{\it CP Violation,} edited by C. Jarlskog (World Scientific,
548: Singapore, 1989)}
549: \def \efi{Enrico Fermi Institute Report No.\ }
550: \def \epjc#1#2#3{Eur.\ Phys.\ J. C {\bf#1}, #2 (#3)}
551: \def \f79{{\it Proceedings of the 1979 International Symposium on Lepton and
552: Photon Interactions at High Energies,} Fermilab, August 23-29, 1979, ed. by
553: T. B. W. Kirk and H. D. I. Abarbanel (Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory,
554: Batavia, IL, 1979}
555: \def \hb87{{\it Proceeding of the 1987 International Symposium on Lepton and
556: Photon Interactions at High Energies,} Hamburg, 1987, ed. by W. Bartel
557: and R. R\"uckl (Nucl.\ Phys.\ B, Proc.\ Suppl., vol.\ 3) (North-Holland,
558: Amsterdam, 1988)}
559: \def \ib{{\it ibid.}~}
560: \def \ibj#1#2#3{~{\bf#1}, #2 (#3)}
561: \def \ichep72{{\it Proceedings of the XVI International Conference on High
562: Energy Physics}, Chicago and Batavia, Illinois, Sept. 6 -- 13, 1972,
563: edited by J. D. Jackson, A. Roberts, and R. Donaldson (Fermilab, Batavia,
564: IL, 1972)}
565: \def \ijmpa#1#2#3{Int.\ J.\ Mod.\ Phys.\ A {\bf#1}, #2 (#3)}
566: \def \ite{{\it et al.}}
567: \def \jhep#1#2#3{JHEP {\bf#1}, #2 (#3)}
568: \def \jpb#1#2#3{J.\ Phys.\ B {\bf#1}, #2 (#3)}
569: \def \lg{{\it Proceedings of the XIXth International Symposium on
570: Lepton and Photon Interactions,} Stanford, California, August 9--14 1999,
571: edited by J. Jaros and M. Peskin (World Scientific, Singapore, 2000)}
572: \def \lkl87{{\it Selected Topics in Electroweak Interactions} (Proceedings of
573: the Second Lake Louise Institute on New Frontiers in Particle Physics, 15 --
574: 21 February, 1987), edited by J. M. Cameron \ite~(World Scientific, Singapore,
575: 1987)}
576: \def \kdvs#1#2#3{{Kong.\ Danske Vid.\ Selsk., Matt-fys.\ Medd.} {\bf #1},
577: No.\ #2 (#3)}
578: \def \ky85{{\it Proceedings of the International Symposium on Lepton and
579: Photon Interactions at High Energy,} Kyoto, Aug.~19-24, 1985, edited by M.
580: Konuma and K. Takahashi (Kyoto Univ., Kyoto, 1985)}
581: \def \mpla#1#2#3{Mod.\ Phys.\ Lett.\ A {\bf#1}, #2 (#3)}
582: \def \nat#1#2#3{Nature {\bf#1}, #2 (#3)}
583: \def \nc#1#2#3{Nuovo Cim.\ {\bf#1}, #2 (#3)}
584: \def \nima#1#2#3{Nucl.\ Instr.\ Meth. A {\bf#1}, #2 (#3)}
585: \def \np#1#2#3{Nucl.\ Phys.\ {\bf#1}, #2 (#3)}
586: \def \npbps#1#2#3{Nucl.\ Phys.\ B Proc.\ Suppl.\ {\bf#1}, #2 (#3)}
587: \def \os{XXX International Conference on High Energy Physics, Osaka, Japan,
588: July 27 -- August 2, 2000}
589: \def \PDG{Particle Data Group, K. Hagiwara \ite, \prd{66}{010001}{2002}}
590: \def \pisma#1#2#3#4{Pis'ma Zh.\ Eksp.\ Teor.\ Fiz.\ {\bf#1}, #2 (#3) [JETP
591: Lett.\ {\bf#1}, #4 (#3)]}
592: \def \pl#1#2#3{Phys.\ Lett.\ {\bf#1}, #2 (#3)}
593: \def \pla#1#2#3{Phys.\ Lett.\ A {\bf#1}, #2 (#3)}
594: \def \plb#1#2#3{Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf#1}, #2 (#3)}
595: \def \pr#1#2#3{Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf#1}, #2 (#3)}
596: \def \prc#1#2#3{Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf#1}, #2 (#3)}
597: \def \prd#1#2#3{Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf#1}, #2 (#3)}
598: \def \prl#1#2#3{Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf#1}, #2 (#3)}
599: \def \prp#1#2#3{Phys.\ Rep.\ {\bf#1}, #2 (#3)}
600: \def \ptp#1#2#3{Prog.\ Theor.\ Phys.\ {\bf#1}, #2 (#3)}
601: \def \rmp#1#2#3{Rev.\ Mod.\ Phys.\ {\bf#1}, #2 (#3)}
602: \def \rp#1{~~~~~\ldots\ldots{\rm rp~}{#1}~~~~~}
603: \def \rpp#1#2#3{Rep.\ Prog.\ Phys.\ {\bf#1}, #2 (#3)}
604: \def \sing{{\it Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on High Energy
605: Physics, Singapore, Aug. 2--8, 1990}, edited by. K. K. Phua and Y. Yamaguchi
606: (Southeast Asia Physics Association, 1991)}
607: \def \slc87{{\it Proceedings of the Salt Lake City Meeting} (Division of
608: Particles and Fields, American Physical Society, Salt Lake City, Utah, 1987),
609: ed. by C. DeTar and J. S. Ball (World Scientific, Singapore, 1987)}
610: \def \slac89{{\it Proceedings of the XIVth International Symposium on
611: Lepton and Photon Interactions,} Stanford, California, 1989, edited by M.
612: Riordan (World Scientific, Singapore, 1990)}
613: \def \smass82{{\it Proceedings of the 1982 DPF Summer Study on Elementary
614: Particle Physics and Future Facilities}, Snowmass, Colorado, edited by R.
615: Donaldson, R. Gustafson, and F. Paige (World Scientific, Singapore, 1982)}
616: \def \smass90{{\it Research Directions for the Decade} (Proceedings of the
617: 1990 Summer Study on High Energy Physics, June 25--July 13, Snowmass, Colorado),
618: edited by E. L. Berger (World Scientific, Singapore, 1992)}
619: \def \tasi{{\it Testing the Standard Model} (Proceedings of the 1990
620: Theoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics, Boulder,
621: Colorado, 3--27 June, 1990), edited by M. Cveti\v{c} and P. Langacker
622: (World Scientific, Singapore, 1991)}
623: \def \yaf#1#2#3#4{Yad.\ Fiz.\ {\bf#1}, #2 (#3) [Sov.\ J.\ Nucl.\ Phys.\
624: {\bf #1}, #4 (#3)]}
625: \def \zhetf#1#2#3#4#5#6{Zh.\ Eksp.\ Teor.\ Fiz.\ {\bf #1}, #2 (#3) [Sov.\
626: Phys.\ - JETP {\bf #4}, #5 (#6)]}
627: \def \zpc#1#2#3{Zeit.\ Phys.\ C {\bf#1}, #2 (#3)}
628: \def \zpd#1#2#3{Zeit.\ Phys.\ D {\bf#1}, #2 (#3)}
629:
630: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
631:
632: %\cite{Aubert:2003fg}
633: \bibitem{Aubert:2003fg}
634: B.~Aubert {\it et al.} [BABAR Collaboration],
635: %``Observation of a narrow meson decaying to D/s+ pi0 at a mass of
636: %2.32-GeV/c**2,''
637: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 90}, 242001 (2003)
638: [arXiv:hep-ex/0304021].
639: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0304021;%%
640:
641: %\cite{Besson:2003cp}
642: \bibitem{Besson:2003cp}
643: D.~Besson {\it et al.} [CLEO Collaboration],
644: %``Observation of a narrow resonance of mass 2.46-GeV/c**2 decaying to D/s*+
645: %pi0 and confirmation of the D/sJ*(2317) state,''
646: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 68}, 032002 (2003)
647: [arXiv:hep-ex/0305100].
648: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0305100;%%
649:
650: %\cite{Abe:2003jk}
651: \bibitem{Abe:2003jk}
652: K.~Abe {\it et al.},
653: %``Measurements of the D/sJ resonance properties,''
654: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 92}, 012002 (2004)
655: [arXiv:hep-ex/0307052].
656: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0307052;%%
657:
658: %\cite{Choi:2003ue}
659: \bibitem{Choi:2003ue}
660: S.~K.~Choi {\it et al.} [Belle Collaboration],
661: %``Observation of a new narrow charmonium state in exclusive B+- $\to$ K+- pi+
662: %pi- J/psi decays,''
663: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 91}, 262001 (2003)
664: [arXiv:hep-ex/0309032].
665: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0309032;%%
666:
667: %\cite{Acosta:2003zx}
668: \bibitem{Acosta:2003zx}
669: D.~Acosta {\it et al.} [CDF II Collaboration],
670: %``Observation of the narrow state X(3872) $\to$ J/psi pi+ pi- in anti-p p
671: %collisions at s**(1/2) = 1.96-TeV,''
672: arXiv:hep-ex/0312021.
673: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0312021;%%
674:
675: %\cite{Brandelik:1980jv}
676: \bibitem{Brandelik:1980jv}
677: R.~Brandelik {\it et al.} [TASSO Collaboration],
678: %``Rho Rho Production By Two Photon Scattering,''
679: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 97}, 448 (1980);
680: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B97,448;%%
681: %\cite{Althoff:1982iu}
682: %\bibitem{Althoff:1982iu}
683: M.~Althoff {\it et al.} [TASSO Collaboration],
684: %``Angular Correlations In Gamma Gamma $\to$ Rho0 Rho0 Near Threshold,''
685: Z.\ Phys.\ C {\bf 16}, 13 (1982);
686: %%CITATION = ZEPYA,C16,13;%%
687: %\cite{Burke:1981nh}
688: %\bibitem{Burke:1981nh}
689: D.~L.~Burke {\it et al.} [Mark II Collaboration],
690: %``A Measurement Of The Cross-Section For Four Pion Production In Gamma Gamma
691: %Collisions At Spear,''
692: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 103}, 153 (1981);
693: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B103,153;%%
694: %\cite{Behrend:1983ji}
695: %\bibitem{Behrend:1983ji}
696: H.~J.~Behrend {\it et al.} [CELLO Collaboration],
697: %``Measurement Of The Reaction Gamma Gamma $\to$ Pi+ Pi+ Pi- Pi- At Petra,''
698: Z.\ Phys.\ C {\bf 21}, 205 (1984);
699: %%CITATION = ZEPYA,C21,205;%%
700: H.~Aihara {\it et al.} [TPC/$2 \gamma$ Collaboration],
701: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 37}, 28 (1988);
702: %\cite{Berger:1987bu}
703: %\bibitem{Berger:1987bu}
704: Ch.~Berger {\it et al.} [PLUTO Collaboration],
705: %``Measurement And Analysis Of The Reaction Gamma Gamma $\to$ Pi+ Pi- Pi+ Pi-,''
706: Z.\ Phys.\ C {\bf 38}, 521 (1988).
707: %%CITATION = ZEPYA,C38,521;%%
708:
709: %\cite{Albrecht:1990cr}
710: \bibitem{Albrecht:1990cr}
711: H.~Albrecht {\it et al.} [ARGUS Collaboration],
712: %``Observation Of Spin Parity 2+ Dominance In The Reaction Gamma Gamma $\to$
713: %Rho0 Rho0 Near Threshold,''
714: Z.\ Phys.\ C {\bf 50}, 1 (1991), and references therein.
715:
716: %\cite{Albrecht:1991sr}
717: \bibitem{Albrecht:1991sr}
718: H.~Albrecht {\it et al.} [ARGUS Collaboration],
719: %``A Spin parity analysis of gamma gamma $\to$ rho+ rho-,''
720: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 267}, 535 (1991), and references therein.
721: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B267,535;%%
722:
723: %\cite{Achard:2003qa}
724: \bibitem{Achard:2003qa}
725: P.~Achard {\it et al.} [L3 Collaboration],
726: %``Measurement of exclusive rho0 rho0 production in two-photon collisions at
727: %high Q**2 at LEP,''
728: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 568}, 11 (2003)
729: [arXiv:hep-ex/0305082], and references therein.
730: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0305082;%%
731:
732: \bibitem{Achard}
733: P.~Achard {\it et al.} [L3 Collaboration], CERN Report No.\
734: CERN-PH-EP/2004-005, March 3, 2004 (unpublished).
735:
736: %\cite{Anikin:2003fr}
737: \bibitem{Anikin:2003fr}
738: I.~V.~Anikin, B.~Pire and O.~V.~Teryaev,
739: %``On gamma gamma* production of two rho0 mesons,''
740: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 69}, 014018 (2004)
741: [arXiv:hep-ph/0307059].
742: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0307059;%%
743:
744: %\cite{Albrecht:1996gr}
745: \bibitem{Albrecht:1996gr}
746: H.~Albrecht {\it et al.} [ARGUS Collaboration],
747: %``Physics with ARGUS,''
748: Phys.\ Rept.\ {\bf 276}, 223 (1996).
749: %%CITATION = PRPLC,276,223;%%
750:
751: %\cite{Whalley:2001mk}
752: \bibitem{Whalley:2001mk}
753: M.~R.~Whalley,
754: %``A compilation of data on two-photon reactions,''
755: J.\ Phys.\ G {\bf 27}, A1 (2001).
756: %%CITATION = JPHGB,G27,A1;%%
757:
758: \bibitem{Zweber} P. Zweber, presented on behalf of the CLEO Collaboration
759: at the Spring Meeting of the American Physical Society, Denver, 2004.
760:
761: %\cite{Leith:zd}
762: \bibitem{Leith:zd}
763: For a review see D.~W.~G.~Leith,
764: %``Photoproduction And Vector Dominance,''
765: SLAC-PUB-1041
766: %\href{http://www.slac.stanford.edu/spires/find/hep/www?r=slac-pub-1041}{SPIRES entry}
767: {\it Lectures presented to Scottish Univ. Summer School in Physics, 26 Jul - 15 Aug l970}
768:
769: %\cite{Carlson:1974ev}
770: \bibitem{Carlson:1974ev}
771: C.~E.~Carlson and P.~G.~O.~Freund,
772: %``Suppressed Psi - Photoproduction: A Test For The Charm Hypothesis,''
773: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 11}, 2453 (1975).
774: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D11,2453;%%
775:
776: \bibitem{ARGUS}
777: I shall quote exclusively results based on the ARGUS data sample, consisting
778: of 455 pb$^{-1}$ taken at beam energies between 4.7 and 5.3 GeV
779: \cite{Albrecht:1996gr}. Although other detectors (e.g., CLEO, BaBar, and
780: Belle) have registered much larger data samples, their results on two-photon
781: vector meson production have not yet appeared in print.
782:
783: %\cite{Kriznic:1994me}
784: \bibitem{Kriznic:1994me}
785: E.~Kri\v{z}ni\v{c}, Ph.\ D. Thesis, University of Ljubljana, 1994, Report No.\
786: %``Production of omega rho0, rho0 phi and omega phi in two photon interactions
787: %at the ARGUS spectrometer,''
788: IJS-DP-6928 (unbpublished).
789: %\href{http://www.slac.stanford.edu/spires/find/hep/www?r=ijs-dp-6928}{SPIRES entry}
790:
791: %\cite{Albrecht:1995nd}
792: \bibitem{Albrecht:1995nd}
793: H.~Albrecht {\it et al.} [ARGUS Collaboration],
794: %``Two photon production of omega pairs,''
795: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 374}, 265 (1996).
796: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B374,265;%%
797:
798: %\cite{Albrecht:1994hg}
799: \bibitem{Albrecht:1994hg}
800: H.~Albrecht {\it et al.} [ARGUS Collaboration],
801: %``Observation of gamma gamma $\to$ phi rho0 and gamma gamma $\to$ phi omega,''
802: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 332}, 451 (1994).
803: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B332,451;%%
804:
805: %\cite{Albrecht:1999zu}
806: \bibitem{Albrecht:1999zu}
807: H.~Albrecht {\it et al.} [ARGUS Collaboration],
808: %``Measurement of K* anti-K* production in two-photon interactions,''
809: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 16}, 435 (2000).
810: %%CITATION = EPHJA,C16,435;%%
811:
812: %\cite{Achasov:1981kh}
813: \bibitem{Achasov:1981kh}
814: N.~N.~Achasov, S.~A.~Devyanin and G.~N.~Shestakov,
815: %``Two Photon Production Of Four Quark States,''
816: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 108}, 134 (1982)
817: [Erratum-ibid.\ B {\bf 108}, 435 (1982)];
818: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B108,134;%%
819: %\cite{Achasov:1982bt}
820: %\bibitem{Achasov:1982bt}
821: %N.~N.~Achasov, S.~A.~Devyanin and G.~N.~Shestakov,
822: %``To Search For Four - Quark States In Gamma Gamma Collisions,''
823: Z.\ Phys.\ C {\bf 16}, 55 (1982);
824: %%CITATION = ZEPYA,C16,55;%%
825: %\cite{Achasov:1984rt}
826: %\bibitem{Achasov:1984rt}
827: %N.~N.~Achasov, S.~A.~Devyanin and G.~N.~Shestakov,
828: %``Once More On Search For Q**2 Anti-Q**2 States In Photon-Photon Collisions,''
829: Z.\ Phys.\ C {\bf 27}, 99 (1985);
830: %%CITATION = ZEPYA,C27,99;%%
831: %\cite{Achasov:pm}
832: %\bibitem{Achasov:pm}
833: N.~N.~Achasov and G.~N.~Shestakov,
834: %``Summary Of The Search For Four Quark States In Gamma Gamma Collisions,''
835: Sov.\ Phys.\ Usp.\ {\bf 34}, No.\ 6, 471 (1991)
836: [Usp.\ Fiz.\ Nauk {\bf 161}, No.\ 6, 53 (1991)].
837: %%CITATION = SOPUA,34,471;%%
838:
839: %\cite{Li:1981ez}
840: \bibitem{Li:1981ez}
841: B.~A.~Li and K.~F.~Liu,
842: %``In Search Of Two - Quark Two - Anti-Quark Mesons In Gamma Gamma Reactions,''
843: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 118}, 435 (1982)
844: [Erratum-ibid.\ B {\bf 124}, 550 (1983)];
845: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B118,435;%%
846: %\cite{Li:ee}
847: %\bibitem{Li:ee}
848: %B.~A.~Li and K.~F.~Liu,
849: %``Possible Evidence Of Q**2 Anti-Q**2 Mesons In Gamma Gamma $\to$ Rho0 Rho0 And
850: %Rho+ Rho- Reactions,''
851: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 51}, 1510 (1983);
852: %%CITATION = PRLTA,51,1510;%%
853: %\cite{Li:ur}
854: %\bibitem{Li:ur}
855: %B.~A.~Li and K.~F.~Liu,
856: %``Are Q**2 Anti-Q**2 States Observable?,''
857: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 30}, 613 (1984);
858: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D30,613;%%
859: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 58}, 2288 (1987);
860: %\cite{Li:1989nf}
861: %\bibitem{Li:1989nf}
862: %B.~A.~Li and K.~F.~Liu,
863: %``K* Anti-K* Mesonium Production In Gamma Gamma Reactions And Hadronic
864: %Collisions,''
865: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 40}, 2856 (1989).
866: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D40,2856;%%
867:
868: %\cite{Rosner:2003ia}
869: \bibitem{Rosner:2003ia}
870: J.~L.~Rosner,
871: %``Exotic states of matter in heavy meson decays,''
872: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 69}, 094014 (2004)
873: [arXiv:hep-ph/0312269].
874: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0312269;%%
875:
876: %\cite{Achasov:1989ky}
877: \bibitem{Achasov:1989ky}
878: N.~N.~Achasov, V.~A.~Karnakov and G.~N.~Shestakov,
879: %``About The Latest Results On The Vector Meson Pair Production In Gamma Gamma
880: %Collisions,''
881: Int.\ J.\ Mod.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 5}, 2705 (1990).
882: %%CITATION = IMPAE,A5,2705;%%
883:
884: %\cite{Bajc:1996ew}
885: \bibitem{Bajc:1996ew}
886: B.~Bajc, S.~Prelovsek and M.~Rosina,
887: %``The controversy in the gamma gamma $\to$ rho rho process: Potential
888: %scattering or q q anti-q anti-q resonance?,''
889: Z.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 356}, 187 (1996)
890: [arXiv:hep-ph/9606243].
891: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9606243;%%
892:
893: %\cite{Brodsky:1986ds}
894: \bibitem{Brodsky:1986ds}
895: S.~J.~Brodsky, G.~Kopp and P.~M.~Zerwas,
896: %``Hadron Production Near Threshold In Photon-Photon Collisions,''
897: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 58}, 443 (1987).
898: %%CITATION = PRLTA,58,443;%%
899:
900: %\cite{Goldhaber:sf}
901: \bibitem{Goldhaber:sf}
902: G.~Goldhaber, S.~Goldhaber, W.~Y.~Lee and A.~Pais,
903: %``Influence Of Bose-Einstein Statistics On The Antiproton Proton Annihilation
904: %Process,''
905: Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf 120}, 300 (1960).
906: %%CITATION = PHRVA,120,300;%%
907:
908: %\cite{Pust:1991nj}
909: \bibitem{Pust:1991nj}
910: R.~Pust {\it et al.} [JADE Collaboration],
911: %``Measurement and analysis of the reaction gamma gamma $\to$ 3 pi+ 3 pi-,''
912: Z.\ Phys.\ C {\bf 51}, 531 (1991).
913: %%CITATION = ZEPYA,C51,531;%%
914:
915: \bibitem{PDG} \PDG
916:
917: %\cite{Alexander:bv}
918: \bibitem{Alexander:bv}
919: G.~Alexander, U.~Maor and P.~G.~Williams,
920: %``A Low-Energy Vdm Description Of Gamma Gamma Reactions,''
921: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 26}, 1198 (1982);
922: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D26,1198;%%
923: %\cite{Alexander:1985zr}
924: %\bibitem{Alexander:1985zr}
925: G.~Alexander, A.~Levy and U.~Maor,
926: %``T Channel Factorization Description Of Gamma Gamma $\to$ V(1) V(2),''
927: Z.\ Phys.\ C {\bf 30}, 65 (1986);
928: %%CITATION = ZEPYA,C30,65;%%
929: %\cite{Alexander:1987rp}
930: %\bibitem{Alexander:1987rp}
931: G.~Alexander, A.~Levy, S.~Nussinov and J.~Grunhaus,
932: %``Diffractive And Nondiffractive Gamma Gamma Processes,''
933: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 37}, 1328 (1988);
934: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D37,1328;%%
935: %\cite{Alexander:bn}
936: %\bibitem{Alexander:bn}
937: G.~Alexander, A.~Levy and U.~Maor,
938: %``The Threshold T Channel Factorization Model And Its Application To Gamma
939: %Gamma Reactions,''
940: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 46}, 2882 (1992).
941: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D46,2882;%%
942:
943: %\cite{Goncalves:2003qq}
944: \bibitem{Goncalves:2003qq}
945: V.~P.~Gon\c{c}alves and M.~V.~T.~Machado,
946: %``Double meson production in ultraperipheral heavy ion collisions,''
947: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 29}, 271 (2003)
948: [arXiv:hep-ph/0303172].
949: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0303172;%%
950:
951: %\cite{Brodsky:1970vk}
952: \bibitem{Brodsky:1970vk}
953: S.~J.~Brodsky, T.~Kinoshita and H.~Terazawa,
954: %``Dominant Colliding Beam Cross-Sections At High-Energies,''
955: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 25}, 972 (1970);
956: %%CITATION = PRLTA,25,972
957: %\cite{Brodsky:1971ud}
958: %\bibitem{Brodsky:1971ud}
959: %S.~J.~Brodsky, T.~Kinoshita and H.~Terazawa,
960: %``Two Photon Mechanism Of Particle Production By High-Energy Colliding Beams,''
961: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 4}, 1532 (1971).
962: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D4,1532;%%
963:
964: %\cite{Dunietz:1990cj}
965: \bibitem{Dunietz:1990cj}
966: I.~Dunietz, H.~R.~Quinn, A.~Snyder, W.~Toki and H.~J.~Lipkin,
967: %``How To Extract CP Violating Asymmetries From Angular Correlations,''
968: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 43}, 2193 (1991).
969: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D43,2193;%%
970:
971: %\cite{Dighe:1995pd}
972: \bibitem{Dighe:1995pd}
973: A.~S.~Dighe, I.~Dunietz, H.~J.~Lipkin and J.~L.~Rosner,
974: %``Angular distributions and lifetime differences in $B_s \to J/\psi \phi$
975: %decays,''
976: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 369}, 144 (1996)
977: [arXiv:hep-ph/9511363].
978: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9511363;%%
979:
980: \end{thebibliography}
981: \end{document}
982: