1: \documentstyle[prd,aps,preprint,epsfig,floats]{revtex}
2: \tightenlines
3:
4:
5:
6: \newcommand{\m}{m_e}
7: \newcommand{\En}{E_{\nu}}
8: %
9: %******************DEFINITIONS FOR FIGURES******************
10: % These should work on Mac's and Unix machines. You need epsf.def.
11: %\input epsf.tex
12: \def\DESepsf(#1 width #2){\epsfxsize=#2 \epsfbox{#1}}
13: % Null macro in case the ones above don't work.
14: %\def \DESepsf(#1 width #2){\bf #1 here: just uncomment the macro.}
15: %\renewcommand {\be}{\begin{eqnarray}}
16: %\renewcommand {\ee}{\end{eqnarray}}
17:
18:
19:
20: %******************END DEFINITIONS*************************
21: \begin{document}
22:
23: \draft
24:
25: %\twocolumn[\hsize\textwidth\columnwidth\hsize\csname
26: %@twocolumnfalse\endcsname
27: \preprint{\vbox{
28: \hbox{UMD-PP-04-041}
29: }}
30:
31: \title{{\Large\bf Reactor Searches for Neutrino Magnetic Moment as a Probe
32: of Extra Dimensions}}
33: \author{\bf R. N. Mohapatra, Siew-Phang Ng and Haibo Yu}
34:
35: \address{ Department of Physics, University of Maryland, College Park,
36: MD 20742, USA}
37: \date{April, 2004}
38: \maketitle
39:
40:
41: \begin{abstract}
42: We present calculations of the magnetic moment contribution to
43: neutrino electron scattering in large extra dimension brane-bulk
44: models (LED) with three bulk neutrinos. We discuss the cases with
45: two and three large extra dimensions of sizes $R$. The calculations are
46: done using reactor flux from
47: Uranium, $^{235}U$ as the neutrino source. We find that if the
48: electron neutrino mass is chosen to be in the range of one eV, the
49: differential cross section for $\bar{\nu}-e$ scattering for low electron
50: recoil energy can be of the same order as the
51: presently explored values in reactor experiments. Furthermore the
52: spectral shape for the LED models is different from the four
53: dimensional case. Future higher precision reactor
54: experiments can therefore be used to provide new constraints on a
55: class of large extra dimension theories.
56: \end{abstract}
57:
58: \vskip1.0in
59: \newpage
60:
61: \section{Introduction}
62: The possibility that there may be extra hidden small-sized space
63: dimensions has been the subject of a great deal of attention in
64: recent years, mostly motivated by string theories as well as
65: phenomenological considerations having to do with understanding
66: the gauge hierarchy problem. A specially interesting subclass of
67: these theories are the ones where the extra space dimensions have
68: sizes ranging from several micrometers to a millimeter\cite{add}.
69: They have the attractive phenomenological property that
70: they can be tested in laboratory experiments searching
71: for deviations from inverse square law of gravity. In this note we discuss
72: one way to test these models using neutrino experiments.
73:
74: One of the ways to explain the observed neutrino masses and
75: mixings in large extra dimension (LED) models is to postulate the
76: existence of a singlet neutrino in the bulk\cite{addm} and couple
77: it to the known neutrinos on the brane. Since such a particle from
78: a four dimensional point of view is equivalent to a tower of
79: Kaluza-Klein(KK) states, it tends to manifest itself in many
80: experiments even though it has no conventional weak interaction.
81: One such dramatic manifestation is in the effective magnetic
82: moment interaction in $\bar{\nu} e$ and $\bar{\nu} N$ elastic
83: scattering\cite{ng}. The reason for this is that the magnetic
84: moment couples the left handed neutrino to the full tower of
85: states. This means that in the magnetic part of $\bar{\nu} e$ scattering
86: one
87: can produce all the states in the KK tower
88: $m_{\nu_R, KK}\leq \En$. All these final states will add
89: incoherently to the magnetic moment part of the cross section and
90: will in general lead to considerable enhancement. One can
91: therefore use reactor neutrino experiments searching for magnetic
92: moment\cite{before,future} to constrain the size of the extra
93: dimensions in the LED models.
94:
95: In this brief note, we present a
96: calculation of the magnetic moment contribution to $\bar{\nu}-e$
97: scattering by reactor neutrinos. We calculate the flux averaged
98: $\frac{d\sigma}{dT}$ for a $^{235}U$ neutrino source where $T$ is the
99: electron recoil energy. We find that for the case of two large
100: extra dimensions, the $\frac{d\sigma}{dT}$ can be comparable to the
101: corresponding one for the case where there are no extra dimensions
102: and the $\mu_\nu\sim 10^{-10}\mu_B$, which was calculated in
103: \cite{vogel}.The value for $\mu_\nu$ chosen is the present upper
104: bound from the previous experiments\cite{before}.
105: For the case of three extra dimensions, the value is
106: lower. We further
107: point out that for the LED models, the spectral shape of
108: $d\sigma/dT$ is different from the case with a single right
109: handed neutrino with an appropriate magnetic moment. This can therefore
110: be a distinguishing signature of the LED models.
111:
112: \section{Neutrino magnetic moment in $\delta$ large extra dimensions}
113: For the case of $D$ large extra dimensions and $\delta$ small
114: dimensions, the size and the fundamental scale are related by the formula:
115: \begin{eqnarray}
116: M^2_{P}~=~M^{2+D+\delta}_{*D} (\pi R)^{D} (\pi r)^{\delta}
117: \end{eqnarray}
118: where we have assumed all large dimensions to have the same size $R$ and
119: all small ones to have the same size $r$. If we take the $M_{*D}$ to be a
120: TeV, we find that for $D=2$ and $M_{*D}\pi r=1$, $R\sim 2$ mm and for
121: $D=3$ and
122: $M_{*D}\pi r=1$, $R=0.02$ $\mu$m. Below, we will present our calculations
123: for both these cases.
124:
125: Let us now briefly discuss the minimal neutrino mass scenario for
126: these models where one introduces three singlet neutrinos in the
127: bulk\cite{addm,others}. The standard model particles in this
128: picture reside on the brane whereas the singlet neutrinos $N$ are in
129: the bulk. One introduces a brane bulk coupling in the form:
130: \begin{eqnarray}
131: {\cal L}_N~=~\frac{h_{\alpha\beta}}{(2\pi R)^{D/2}} \int d^Dy
132: \delta^D(y) \bar{\psi}_{L,\alpha}H
133: N_{\beta} + h.c.
134: \end{eqnarray}
135: where $R$ is the size of each of the extra space dimensions on which the
136: theory is compactified. The extra dimensions are compactified on an
137: $\left(\frac{S_1}{Z_2}\right)^D$ space. We can expand the bulk
138: neutrinos $N_\beta$ into their Fourier modes as $N_\beta~=~\Sigma
139: N^{n}_{\beta}(x)\frac{e^{\frac{in.y}{R}}}{\sqrt{(2\pi R)^D}}$ to get
140: the neutrino mass of the form
141: \begin{eqnarray}
142: {\cal M}_{\alpha \beta}~=~ \Sigma _n h_{\alpha\beta}\frac{v_{wk}
143: M_{*D}}{M_P}\bar{\nu}_{L,\alpha}N^{(n)}_{R,\beta}
144: \end{eqnarray}
145: This matrix can be diagonalized by a common $3\times 3$ rotation
146: for all the KK modes for the bulk modes i.e.
147: $N^n_\beta=V^n_{\beta j} N^n_j$ and a rotation on the lefthanded
148: brane neutrinos $\nu_\alpha~=~U_{i\alpha}\nu_i$. The latter leads
149: to the PMNS matrix measured in neutrino oscillation experiments.
150: In this diagonal basis, the mixing of the brane neutrinos to the
151: $n$th KK mode of the bulk singlets are given by a common factor
152: $\xi_i~=~\sqrt{2} m_i R/n$. The neutrinos in this model are Dirac
153: neutrinos.
154:
155:
156: Let us now discuss the magnetic moment predictions of this model. As
157: already noted, the magnetic moment will connect the brane neutrino to all
158: the KK excitations of the bulk singlets equally. For example for the one
159: neutrino case, the magnetic moment interaction will be given by\cite{fs}:
160: \begin{eqnarray}
161: {\cal L}_{\mu_{\nu}}~=~\mu_l\mu_B
162: \Sigma_n\bar{\nu}_L\sigma^{\mu\nu}N^{(n)}F_{\mu\nu}
163: \end{eqnarray}
164: where $\mu_l~=~\frac{3G_F m_e
165: m_\nu}{4\sqrt{2}\pi^2}~=~ 3.2\times
166: 10^{-19}\left[\frac{m_\nu}{1~eV}\right]$; $\mu_B$ is the Bohr
167: magneton. The symbol $n$ goes over a square or cubic lattice depending
168: on whether $D=2$ or $D=3$. Because of this, when we calculate $\bar{\nu}
169: e$ scattering using this formula, the
170: phase space as well as parameters such as the size $R$ will be very
171: different for the two cases leading to different final results.
172:
173: \section{Magnetic moment contribution to $\bar{\nu} e$ scattering cross
174: section}
175: In this section we calculate the differential cross section as a
176: function of the electron recoil energy $T\equiv E'-m_e$ ($E'$ is
177: the final state electron energy). The techniques used are
178: standard. The only point that need careful treatment is the phase
179: space and implementation of the energy momentum conservation. For
180: instance, a naive estimate of the $\frac{d\sigma}{dT}$ for the
181: case one extra D is to take the four dimensional result and
182: multiply it by $(\En R)$, where $E_\nu$ is the incident neutrino
183: energy. That this is not correct can be seen by noting that the
184: above estimate assumes that all KK states up to $E_\nu$
185: contribute; however energy momentum conservation allows only modes
186: $\ll \En $ to contribute. Furthermore, energy momentum conservation
187: imposes other constraints.
188:
189: The calculated cross-section for $\bar{\nu_e}+e\rightarrow e+\bar{N}$
190: where N is a right handed neutrino of mass M is,
191: \begin{equation} \frac{d \sigma}{d T}= \frac{\pi \alpha^2 \mu_l
192: ^2}{8 \m ^4 \En^2 T^2} \left[ M^4 T- 2 \m^2 T(M^2+4\En T-
193: 4\En^2)-\m M^2 (M^2 +4 \En T- 2T^2)
194: \right]\end{equation}
195: where $\mu_l$ is the neutrino magnetic moment in units of $\mu_B$ (see
196: equation (4)).
197: It can easily be checked that in the limit of $M \rightarrow 0$, we get
198: the equation for a massless right handed neutrino as found in
199: \cite{vogel}.
200:
201: To obtain the differential cross section for LED models, one
202: needs to take into account the tower of KK final states allowed
203: by kinematic considerations. Furthermore to compare experiments,
204: we need to take into into account the flux of incoming neutrinos
205: with different energies. For this purpose, we choose the
206: $^{235}U$ reactor flux in the parameterization given in
207: \cite{vogel}. Folding all these effects in, we get
208: \begin{equation} \left\langle \frac{d \sigma}{d T} \right\rangle
209: =\sum_{\mathrm{all M}} \int_ {\En^{\mathrm{min}} (T, M)} ^\infty
210: \frac{d N_{\nu}}{d \En} \frac{d \sigma(\En, \mathrm{M, T})}{d T}
211: d\En\end{equation} where $\frac{d N_{\nu}}{d \En}$ is the reactor
212: spectrum which can be approximated by
213: \begin{equation}
214: \frac{d N_{\nu}}{d \En}= \exp(a_0+a_1 \En+ a_2 \En^2).
215: \end{equation}
216: We will be considering the case of the $^{235} U$ reactor, which
217: has the parameters, $a_0=0.870$, $a_1=-0.160$ and $a_2=-0.0910$.
218:
219: A few comments are in order here. Although we have a spectrum of
220: all possible incoming neutrino energies, not all of them will
221: contribute to the scattering at recoil energy, T, and KK mass, M.
222: This is because energy momentum has to be conserved. For
223: this reason we do not integrate $\En$ from $0$ to $\infty$.
224: The lower limit on our integration is
225: \begin{equation}
226: \En^{\mathrm{min}} (T, M)=\frac{M^2 + 2\m T}{2(\sqrt{T^2+ 2\m
227: T}-T)}.
228: \end{equation}
229:
230: As for the actual increments in M, we took
231: \begin{equation}
232: M=\frac{\sqrt{\sum_{i=1,..,D}n_i ^2 }}{R}, \quad n_i=0,1,2,....
233: \end{equation}
234: where $D$ is the number of extra dimensions and the radius of the
235: extra dimension(s) $R$ is obtained from
236: \begin{equation}
237: R=\frac{1}{\pi}\left(\frac{M_{\mathrm{Planck}} ^2}{M_{*D}
238: ^{D+2}}\right)^{1/D}
239: \end{equation}
240: and $M_{*D}$ is the $D+2$ dimensional Planck mass and is taken to
241: be 1 TeV.
242:
243: The cross section is sensitive to the mass of the neutrinos since that
244: determines the value of the magnetic moment $\mu_l$ (see Eq. (4)). In
245: our calculation presented below, we have chosen
246: the electron neutrino mass to be $0.6$ eV so as to be compatible with the
247: oscillation data and the current cosmological limits from WMAP
248: and SDSS observations. This corresponds to the case where all the
249: neutrinos are quasi-degenerate in mass. If instead we chose the
250: normal or the inverted hierarchy, $m_\nu$ would be much smaller
251: and as a consequence our final results will need to be appropriately
252: scaled down.
253:
254: Figures 1,2 and 3 show our results for the case of $D=2$ and $D=3$
255: as compared to the phenomenological 4D case as well as the purely
256: weak interaction.
257:
258:
259: \begin{figure}[h!]
260: \begin{center}
261: \epsfxsize15cm\epsffile{ynmD2.eps}
262:
263: \caption{The figure shows the folded differential cross section,
264: $\frac{d\sigma}{dT}$, for the magnetic moment contribution to $\bar{\nu}
265: e$ scattering for the case of $D=2$ and the standard weak
266: contribution. The 6D Planck mass is taken to be 1 TeV.
267: \label{fig1}} \end{center} \end{figure}
268:
269: \begin{figure}[h!]
270: \begin{center}
271: \epsfxsize15cm\epsffile{ynmD3.eps}
272:
273: \caption{The figure shows the folded differential cross section,
274: $\frac{d\sigma}{dT}$, for the magnetic moment contribution to $\bar{\nu}
275: e$ scattering for the case of $D=3$ and the standard weak
276: contribution. The 7D Planck mass is taken to be 1 TeV.
277: \label{fig2}} \end{center} \end{figure}
278:
279:
280:
281:
282: \begin{figure}[h!]
283: \begin{center}
284: \epsfxsize15cm\epsffile{ynmCombo.eps}
285:
286: \caption{The figure presents the folded differential cross section
287: $\frac{d\sigma}{dT}$ for the magnetic moment contribution to $\bar{\nu}
288: e$ scattering for the cases of $D=0$, $D=2$, $D=3$ and the
289: standard weak contribution. The case $D=0$ corresponds to the
290: standard model extended by the inclusion of on e right handed
291: neutrino per family.
292: \label{fig3}} \end{center} \end{figure}
293:
294: We see from the above figures that the spectral shape of the
295: $d\sigma/dT$ for the case of large extra dimensions is different
296: from the single right hended neutrino case. If the spectral shape
297: was same as the single RH neutrino case, it would be hard to
298: search for extra dimensions using the magnetic moment
299: contribution to $\bar{\nu} e$ scattering. Our results can be used to
300: put limits on the size of extra dimensions in LED type theories.
301: This requires a detailed fitting analysis of the theory versus the
302: observations. It is probably a bit premature to do that since for
303: our choice of parameters, the predictions are roughly at the same
304: level as the current experiments. However the proposed reactor
305: experiments \cite{future} will improve the precision of the data
306: and can help to constrain the size of the extra dimensions
307: further. We also point out that even though we have described our
308: calculation for a model with three bulk neutrinos and Dirac
309: neutrino masses, it is also valid for LED models which have
310: Majorana masses for neutrinos\cite{maj}.
311:
312: In conclusion, we have presented calculations of the magnetic
313: moment contribution to the $\bar{\nu} e$ scattering cross section for
314: realistic reactor fluxes for models with large extra dimensions.
315: We find that for the case of two large extra dimensions, the
316: predictions of these models is at the level of current
317: experimental limit on the neutrino magnetic moment. Furthermore,
318: the spectral shape for the case of LED models is different from
319: the case of a single right handed neutrino. This can be used to
320: distinguish the LED case from the pure four dimensional case.
321: Improvement of the precision of the
322: reactor measurements of $\bar{\nu}-e$ scattering can therefore provide
323: useful constraints on the size of extra hidden space dimensions.
324:
325: This work is supported by the National Science Foundation Grant
326: No. PHY-0099544.
327:
328:
329: \newpage
330:
331: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
332:
333: \bibitem{add}
334: N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos and G. Dvali,
335: \pl {\bf B 429}, 263 (1998); \prd {\bf 59}, 086004 (1999);
336: I. Antoniadis, N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos and G. Dvali, Nucl. Phys.
337: {\bf B 516}, 70 (1998);
338:
339: \bibitem{addm} K. Dienes, E. Dudas and T. Gherghetta, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B
340: 557}, 25 (1999); N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos, G. Dvali and
341: J. March-Russell, hep-ph/9811428.
342:
343: \bibitem{ng} G.~C.~McLaughlin and J.~N.~Ng,
344: %``Astrophysical implications of the induced neutrino magnetic moment from
345: %large extra dimensions,''
346: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 470}, 157 (1999)
347: [arXiv:hep-ph/9909558].
348:
349: \bibitem{before} The TEXONO collaboration (H. B. Li et al),
350: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 90}, 131802 (2003); MUNU collaboration (C. Amsler et
351: al), Phys. Lett. {\bf B545}, 57 (2002).
352:
353: \bibitem{future} For planned reactor experiments which can probe the
354: magnetic moment, see K. Anderson et al. hep-ex/0402041 and also the white
355: paper in the web at http://www.hep.anl.gov/minos/reactor13/white.html.
356:
357: \bibitem{vogel} J. Engel and P. Vogel, Phys. Rev. {\bf D 39}, 3378 (1989);
358: J.~F.~Beacom and P.~Vogel,
359: %``Neutrino magnetic moments, flavor mixing, and the superKamiokande solar
360: %data,''
361: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 83}, 5222 (1999)
362: [arXiv:hep-ph/9907383].
363:
364: \bibitem{others} G. Dvali and A. Y. Smirnov, Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf
365: 563}, 63 (1999) [arXiv:hep-ph/9904211]; R.~N.~Mohapatra and
366: A.~Perez-Lorenzana,
367: %``Sterile neutrino as a bulk neutrino,''
368: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 576}, 466 (2000)
369: [arXiv:hep-ph/9910474]; R.~Barbieri, P.~Creminelli and A.~Strumia,
370: %``Neutrino oscillations from large extra dimensions,''
371: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 585}, 28 (2000)
372: [arXiv:hep-ph/0002199];
373: A.~Lukas, P.~Ramond, A.~Romanino and G.~G.~Ross,
374: %``Neutrino masses and mixing in brane-world theories,''
375: JHEP {\bf 0104}, 010 (2001)
376: [arXiv:hep-ph/0011295]; H.~Davoudiasl, P.~Langacker and M.~Perelstein,
377: %``Constraints on large extra dimensions from neutrino oscillation
378: %experiments,''
379: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 65}, 105015 (2002)
380: [arXiv:hep-ph/0201128]; Q. H. Cao, S. Gopalakrishna and C. P. Yuan,
381: hep-ph/0312339.
382:
383: \bibitem{fs} K. Fijikawa and R. Shrock, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 45}, 963
384: (1980); for a recent discussion, see M. Dvornikov and A. Studenikin,
385: Phys. Rev. {\bf 69}, 073001 (2004).
386:
387: \bibitem{maj} D. O. Caldwell, R. N. Mohapatra and S. Yellin,
388: Phys. Rev. {\bf D64}, 073001 (2001); K. Dienes and I. Sarcevic,
389: Phys. Lett. {\bf B500}, 133 (2001); J. L. Hewett, P. Roy and S. Roy,
390: hep-ph/0404174; C. S. lam and J. N. Ng, Phys. Rev. {\bf D64}, 113006
391: (2001).
392:
393:
394: \end{thebibliography}
395: \end{document}
396: