1: %\documentclass[prd,showpacs,preprintnumbers,eqsecnum,amsmath,amssymb,nofootinbib]{revtex4}
2: \documentclass[preprintnumbers,eqsecnum,amsmath,amssymb,nofootinbib]{revtex4}
3: \usepackage{graphicx}% Include figure files
4: \usepackage{dcolumn}% Align table columns on decimal point
5: \usepackage{bm}% bold math
6: \usepackage{epsfig}
7: \renewcommand{\thesection}{\arabic{section}}
8: \renewcommand{\thetable}{\arabic{table}}
9: \renewcommand{\thefigure}{\arabic{figure}}
10: \renewcommand{\tablename}{Table}
11: \renewcommand{\figurename}{Fig.}
12: \renewcommand{\theequation}{\thesection.\arabic{equation}}
13: \begin{document}
14: %\preprint{HD-THEP-04-20}
15: %\preprint{RM3-TH/04-7}
16: \title{Width of the $\bm{ J^P={\frac{1}{2}}^+}$ pentaquark in the quark-diquark model}
17: %Meson decay constants and form factors: Quark Models vs QCD Sum Rules}
18: \author{D.~Melikhov$^{a,b}$, S.~Simula$^c$, and B.~Stech$^{a}$}
19: \affiliation{
20: $^a$ Institut f\"ur Theoretische Physik,
21: Universit\"at Heidelberg,
22: Philosophenweg 16, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany\\
23: $^b$ Nuclear Physics Institute, Moscow State University, 119991, Moscow, Russia\\
24: $^c$ INFN, Sezione di Roma Tre, Via della Vasca Navale 84, 00146, Roma, Italy}
25: \begin{abstract}
26: %\noindent
27: We analyse the width of the $\theta(\frac12^+)$ pentaquark assuming that it is a bound state
28: of two extended spin-zero $ud$-diquarks and the $\bar s$ antiquark (the Jaffe-Wilczek scenario).
29: The width obtained when the size parameters of the pentaquark wave function are taken close to
30: the parameters of the nucleon is found to be $\simeq 150$ MeV, i.e. it has a normal value for
31: a $P$-wave hadron decay with the corresponding energy release.
32: However, we found a strong dynamical suppression of the decay width
33: if the pentaquark has an asymmetric "peanut" structure with the strange
34: antiquark in the center and the two diquarks rotating around. In this case a decay width
35: of $\simeq$ 1 MeV is a natural possibility.
36: \end{abstract}
37: %\pacs{}
38: \maketitle
39: \section{Introduction}
40: A narrow hadron of the suspected quark content $udud\bar s$,
41: the Pentaquark $\theta(1540)$, has been reported by several experiments \cite{signal}.
42: In addition, a narrow charmed exotic state with the presumed content $udud\bar c$ has been
43: observed \cite{hera}. Nevertheless, there still remain doubts because of the negative
44: results from some other experiments \cite{nosignal} and problems with the identification of
45: pentaquark states with different flavours \cite{nussinov,glozman}.
46: A striking feature of the pentaquark is its width of only several MeV \cite{trilling}.
47: The pentaquark has most likely spin 1/2 and isospin 0. Its parity is not yet known.
48:
49: Several interpretations of this state have been discussed in the literature
50: (see \cite{nussinov,close} and refs therein).
51: Most likely it is the narrow exotic state predicted by Diakonov, Petrov and Polyakov \cite{soliton}
52: using a chiral soliton model. For a discussion of the width obtained in this model
53: and of earlier suggestions \cite{mp} we refer to \cite{jaffe}.
54:
55: Our goal is to study the width of the new state in a quark model. To this end we follow the
56: suggestion of Jaffe and Wilczek \cite{jw} that the correlation between two quarks in a $0^+$ color
57: antitriplet state is of particular importance. Their
58: pentaquark model consists therefore of two scalar isospin
59: zero diquarks in a relative angular momentum $L=1$ state and the strange antiquark. The
60: parity of this state is even. In our view this configuration is very likely since the
61: correlation between two quarks in a
62: color antitriplet state forming scalar diquarks is as strong as the corresponding $\bar qq$
63: correlation in a $\pi$ meson. This is known from QCD sum rules
64: \cite{stech} and from instanton calculations \cite{shuryak}. The most dramatic effect of
65: diquark formation manifests itself in strangeness changing weak
66: decays at low energies: It causes the huge $\Delta I = 1/2$ enhancement
67: present in these processes \cite{huge}.
68: %These results imply an effective size of the scalar diquark similar to the size of the pion.
69:
70: The $\theta\to NK$ decay amplitude can be obtained from the single constant $g_A$, the
71: $\theta\to N$ axial vector form factor at $q^2=m_K^2$.
72: In the analogous nucleon-to-nucleon transition one has $g_A^N(q^2=0)\simeq 1.25$. For a $P$-wave
73: resonance with a mass of 1540 MeV the value $g_A=0.8$ would lead to the
74: width $\Gamma(\theta)=\Gamma(\theta\to p K^0)+\Gamma(\theta\to n K^+)= 160$ MeV.
75: To have $\Gamma(\theta)\le 10$ MeV one needs a strong suppression $g_A\le 0.2$.
76: Several recent papers have discussed possible reasons for a suppression of the
77: $\theta\to NK$ transition amplitude by describing the spin-flavour and color factors in
78: the $\langle NK|\theta\rangle $ overlap amplitude \cite{close,lipkin,zahed,carlson,buccella}.
79: But a complete model calculation has so far not been performed.
80:
81: We calculate the width of the pentaquark in a non-relativistic Fock space description
82: using three and five constituent quarks for the proton and the pentaquark, respectively.
83: A non-relativistic treatment seems
84: appropriate since the spatial momentum of the final nucleon (in the rest
85: system of the pentaquark) is not large. We use the quark-diquark picture for the
86: proton and the pentaquark taking the size of the diquarks similar to the pion size.
87: This appears to be justified from the near equality of the
88: decay constants of pion and diquark and from the agreement of the proton
89: decay constant using a spatially extended diquark with other determinations \cite{stech,huge}.
90: The essential ingredients in our calculation are the size parameters of the pentaquark
91: wave function for the diquark-diquark-antiquark configuration.
92: If all size parameters of the $\frac{1}{2}^+$ pentaquark wave function are taken to
93: be close to the size parameters of the nucleon, we obtain the width $\Gamma(\theta)\simeq 150$ MeV.
94: On the other hand, the width is found to be very strongly suppressed when
95: the pentaquark has a significantly asymmetric structure ("peanut"-like), in which the strange
96: antiquark remains near to the center and the two diquarks are rotating around it. A width of $\simeq$
97: 1 MeV is then easily obtainable.
98:
99: We can also conclude from our investigation that any strong suppression of the transition
100: amplitude must have a dynamical origin in the spatial part of the pentaquark wave function.
101: We did not find a sizeable suppression of the decay amplitude due to the color-flavour structure of the
102: pentaquark.
103:
104: The paper is organized as follows:
105: In the next section we discuss the relationship between the $\theta\to NK$ amplitude and the
106: form factor $g_A$ obtained from the axial-vector matrix element
107: $\langle N|\bar s\gamma_\mu\gamma_5 d|\theta\rangle$.
108: In section 3 we describe the nucleon and the pentaquark in terms of quark creation operators
109: and calculate $g_A$ in terms of the corresponding wave functions according to the quark diquark
110: picture. Section 4 contains the numerical study of $g_A$ and the width for various choices of
111: the parameters for the pentaquark wave function. Section 5 presents our conclusions.
112:
113:
114: %\newpage
115: \section{The $\theta\to KN$ decay and the form factor $g_A$}
116: The formula for the two-body decay width of the $\theta$ resonance has the form
117: \begin{eqnarray}
118: \label{width1}
119: \Gamma(\theta\to KN)=\frac{1}{8\pi}
120: \frac{|\vec q|}{M_\theta^2}\sum_{\rm final\; spins}{|T(\theta\to KN)|^2},
121: \end{eqnarray}
122: where the sum runs over nucleon polarizations and $|\,\vec q\,|$ denotes the momentum of the
123: outgoing nucleon in the $\theta$ rest frame
124: \begin{eqnarray}
125: |\,\vec q\,|=\frac{1}{2M_\theta}{\sqrt{(M_\theta^2-M_N^2-M_K^2)^2-4 M_N^2 M_K^2}}.
126: \end{eqnarray}
127: The decay amplitude $T(\theta\to KN)$ is related to the $S$-matrix according to
128: \begin{eqnarray}
129: \langle N(p')K(q)|S|\theta(p\rangle=
130: i(2\pi)^4\delta(p-p'-q)T(\theta\to NK)
131: \end{eqnarray}
132: for the standard relativistic normalization of states
133: $\langle \vec p|\vec p\,'\rangle=2p^0(2\pi)^3\delta(\vec p-\vec p\,')$.
134: The amplitude may be expressed by the
135: $\theta\to N$ matrix element of an interpolating field $\phi_K$ of the kaon
136: \begin{eqnarray}
137: T(\theta\to NK)=\lim_{q^2\to M_K^2}(M_K^2-q^2)\langle N|\phi_K(0)|\theta\rangle.
138: \end{eqnarray}
139: Without loss of generality, $\phi_K$ can be taken to be the divergence of the strangeness-changing axial-vector
140: current $A_\mu$:
141: \begin{eqnarray}
142: A_\mu=\bar s^a\gamma_\mu\gamma_5 d^a, \qquad
143: \phi_K=\frac{1}{f_KM_K^2}\partial^\mu A_\mu,
144: \end{eqnarray}
145: where $f_K$ denotes the kaon decay constant ($f_K=0.160$ GeV).
146: The matrix element of the axial current between the $\theta$ and the nucleon can be decomposed
147: in terms of invariant form factors
148: \begin{eqnarray}
149: \label{2.7}
150: \langle N(p')|\bar s\gamma_\mu \gamma_5 d|\theta(p)\rangle =
151: g_A(q^2) \bar u_N(p')\gamma_\mu\gamma_5 u_\theta(p)
152: +
153: g_P(q^2) q_\mu \bar u_N(p')\gamma_5 u_\theta(p)
154: +
155: g_T(q^2) \bar u_N(p')\sigma_{\mu\nu}q^\nu \gamma_5 u_\theta(p)
156: \end{eqnarray}
157: with $q=p-p'$. The spinor amplitudes for both $\theta$ and $N$ are normalized according to relation $\bar u_i(p) u_i(p)=2M_i$,
158: $i=N,\theta$. The form factors $g_i$ contain poles at $q^2>0$ due to strange meson resonances
159: with the appropriate quantum numbers: e.g. $g_P$ contains the $K$-meson pole and
160: $g_A$ the $K^*_A$ pole.
161:
162: In the chiral limit $m_s=m_d=M_K=0$, the axial current is conserved $\partial_\mu A^\mu=0$ and the form factors
163: $g_A$ and $g_P$ are related to each other. The form factor $g_P(q^2)$ has a pole at $q^2=0$
164: corresponding to the massless kaon
165: \begin{eqnarray}
166: \label{chiral}
167: g_P(q^2)=\frac{M_\theta+M_N}{q^2} g_A(q^2).
168: \end{eqnarray}
169: For $m_s\ne 0$ and $M_K\ne 0$, the pole in the form factor $g_P$ is shifted to $M_K^2$, and
170: the form factors $g_A$ and $g_P$ are no longer related to each other by (\ref{chiral}). However,
171: due to the smallness of the strange-quark mass the main effect of its nonzero value
172: results in the shift of the location of the pole in $q^2$. We then have the approximate relation
173: \begin{eqnarray}
174: g_P(q^2)=-\frac{M_\theta+M_N}{M_K^2-q^2} g_A(q^2),
175: \end{eqnarray}
176: and in particular the PCAC result
177: \begin{eqnarray}
178: \label{2.8}
179: \langle N(p')|\partial_\mu A^\mu|\theta(p)\rangle=
180: \bar u_N(p')i\gamma_5 u_\theta(p)(M_\theta+M_N)g_A(q^2) \frac{M_K^2}{M_K^2-q^2}.
181: \end{eqnarray}
182: Therefore, the decay amplitude is known if we know $g_A=g_A(M_K^2)$:
183: \begin{eqnarray}
184: \label{2.11}
185: T(\theta\to NK)=\frac{M_\theta+M_N}{f_K}g_A\cdot \bar u_N(p')i\gamma_5 u_\theta(p).
186: \end{eqnarray}
187: The decay width (\ref{width1}) takes the simple form
188: \begin{eqnarray}
189: \label{2.12}
190: \Gamma(\theta\to K^+n)=\Gamma(\theta\to K^0p)
191: =\frac{1}{2\pi}\frac{|\vec q|^3}{f_K^2}\frac{(M_\theta +M_N)^2}{(M_\theta +M_N)^2-M_K^2}g_A^2\simeq
192: \frac{1}{2\pi}\frac{|\vec q|^3}{f_K^2}g_A^2.
193: \end{eqnarray}
194: For $M_\theta=1540$ MeV one finds $|\vec q|=270$ MeV. The corresponding width is
195: $\Gamma(\theta)=\Gamma(\theta\to K^+n)+\Gamma(\theta\to K^0p) \simeq 240\; g_A^2$ MeV.
196: Typically, for transitions between hadrons of the same quark structure one has $g_A\simeq 1$
197: (e.g. for the nucleon $g_A\simeq 1.23$), such that for a normal resonance with mass $M=1540$ MeV
198: one would expect $\Gamma(\theta(1540)\to KN)\simeq 120\div 180$ MeV \cite{jaffe}.
199: To obtain a width of $\le$ 10 MeV one needs a strongly suppressed value $g_A\le 0.2$.
200:
201: We shall obtain the form factor $g_A$ by calculating different components of the l.h.s.~of
202: (\ref{2.7}) for different polarizations of the initial $\theta$, working in
203: the $\theta$ rest frame $p=(M_\theta, \vec{0})$ and
204: choosing $q=(q_0,0,0,|\vec q|)$. It is convenient to use now the following normalization of states
205: \begin{eqnarray}
206: \label{nrnorma}
207: \langle \vec p|\vec p\,'\rangle=(2\pi)^3\delta(\vec p-\vec p\,').
208: \end{eqnarray}
209: Then $g_A$ can be obtained from the equation
210: \begin{eqnarray}
211: \label{ga}
212: g_A(q^2)&=&(M_N-M_\theta)\frac{(M_\theta+M_N)^2-q^2}{4 M^2_\theta} F_0
213: +\frac{M_N+M_\theta}{2M_\theta}A_L -\frac{q^2(A_T-A_L)}
214: {(M_N-M_\theta)^2-q^2}
215: \end{eqnarray}
216: with
217: \begin{eqnarray}
218: \label{components}
219: F_0=\frac{1}{|\vec q|}\langle N^\uparrow(\vec p')| \bar s\gamma_0\gamma_5 d|\theta^\uparrow\rangle, \qquad
220: A_L=\langle N^\uparrow(\vec p')| \bar s\gamma_3\gamma_5 d|\theta^\uparrow\rangle, \qquad
221: A_T=i\langle N^\uparrow(\vec p')|\bar s\gamma_2\gamma_5 d|\theta^\downarrow\rangle.
222: \end{eqnarray}
223: $\vec p'=-\vec q$ lies in the negative $z$-direction, $|\vec q|=\sqrt{(M_\theta^2-M_N^2-q^2)^2-4 M_N^2 q^2}/(2M_\theta)$.
224: Note that $A_L=A_T$ for $\vec q=0$.
225:
226: In a model calculation of the left-hand side of (\ref{2.7})
227: one cannot expect to obtain the $K$-meson pole. This means that not all the
228: components of the current, and therefore not all form factors
229: can be calculated in a quark model for the nucleon and the pentaquark.
230: However one can expect that the linear combination of the current components relevant for the form factor
231: $g_A$, which does not have a pole in the physical $\theta\to N$ decay region
232: (the $K^*_A$ resonance which leads to the pole in $g_A$ lies at a much higher scale),
233: can be calculated reliably within the quark model.
234:
235:
236:
237:
238:
239:
240: %***********************************************************************************************
241:
242: \section{The $\theta\to pK^0$ amplitude from a nonrelativistic quark model}
243:
244: In this section we calculate the amplitudes
245: $\langle N(-\vec q)|\bar s \gamma_\mu \gamma_5 d|\theta\rangle$
246: and the form factor $g_A(q^2)$ using a non-relativistic equal-time Fock space representation.
247: To do so we replace the strange quark field $s$ by its charge conjugate field
248: $s_c=C(\bar s)^T$ which annihilates the strange antiquark in $\theta$.
249: $C=i\gamma_2\gamma_0$ is the charge conjugation matrix.
250:
251: To make notations simpler we imply that the operator $\hat s$ creates the $\bar s$-quark from the vacuum,
252: and the operators $u$ and $d$ create $u$ and $d$ quarks, respectively.
253:
254: Let us describe now the states involved in the decay, specifically for the process $\theta\to pK^0$.
255:
256: \subsection{The nucleon}
257: %\vspace{.4 cm}
258: %\noindent {\bf The nucleon.}
259: In terms of three constituent quarks the proton state can be
260: written in the form \cite{stech}
261: \begin{eqnarray}
262: \label{nucleon}
263: |N^{\uparrow}(\vec p)\rangle&=&
264: \int d\vec r_1 d\vec r_2 d\vec r_3
265: e^{i\vec p\,\vec R}\;\Psi_N(\vec r_1|\vec r_2,\vec r_3)\;
266: u^{a\uparrow}(\vec r_1)D^a(\vec r_2, \vec r_3)|\,0\rangle,
267: \end{eqnarray}
268: where we have introduced a bilocal creation operator $D$ for two quarks in a color-antitriplet state:
269: \begin{eqnarray}
270: D^a(\vec r_2, \vec r_3)&=&\epsilon^{aa_2a_3}
271: \left[u^{a_2\uparrow}(\vec r_2)d^{a_3\downarrow}(\vec r_3)
272: -
273: u^{a_2\downarrow}(\vec r_2)d^{a_3\uparrow}(\vec r_3)\right]
274: \end{eqnarray}
275: and
276: \begin{eqnarray}
277: \label{3.6}
278: \vec R=\frac{1}{3}(\vec r_1+\vec r_2+\vec r_3).
279: \end{eqnarray}
280: The radial wave function $\Psi_N(r_1|r_2,r_3)$ must be symmetric under $2\leftrightarrow 3$ to
281: guarantee that the nucleon has spin and isospin 1/2.
282: It depends on the relative coordinates
283: $\rho$ and $\lambda$
284: \begin{eqnarray}
285: \label{3.6b}
286: \vec\rho=\vec r_2-\vec r_3,\qquad
287: \vec\lambda=\frac1{2}(\vec r_2+\vec r_3)-\vec r_1.
288: \end{eqnarray}
289: i.e.
290: \begin{eqnarray}
291: \label{psin}
292: \Psi_N(r_1|r_2,r_3)=\Psi_N(\vec{\rho},\vec{\lambda}).
293: \end{eqnarray}
294: The state normalization (\ref{nrnorma}) leads to the following
295: condition for the proton radial wave function \cite{stech}
296: \begin{eqnarray}
297: \label{nucleonnorma}
298: 6\int d\vec\rho \, d\vec \lambda \, \Psi_N\left(\vec\rho,\vec\lambda\right)
299: \left[
300: 2\Psi_N\left(\vec\rho,\vec\lambda\right)+
301: \Psi_N\left(\frac12\vec\rho-\vec\lambda,-\frac34\vec\rho-\frac12\vec\lambda\right)\right]=1.
302: \end{eqnarray}
303: We parametrize the wave function by harmonic oscillator functions in $\rho^2$ and $\lambda^2$ which correspond
304: to assuming harmonic forces between the constituents:
305: \begin{eqnarray}
306: \label{nucleonwf}
307: \Psi_N(\rho,\lambda)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{N_p}}\exp\left(-\frac{1}{2\alpha^2_{\rho N}}\vec\rho^2
308: -\frac{2}{3\alpha^2_{\lambda N}}\vec\lambda^2\right).
309: \end{eqnarray}
310: The normalization factor $N_p$ is determined by (\ref{nucleonnorma}).
311: A fully symmetric function under coordinate exchanges corresponds to
312: $\alpha_{\rho N}=\alpha_{\lambda N}$.\footnote{We emphasize that for the symmetric case
313: the nucleon wave function (\ref{nucleonwf}) is fully equivalent to the standard SU(6)
314: symmetric 56-plet wave function. By reordering it describes
315: along with the spinless $ud$ diquark made of quarks 2 and 3, the spin-1
316: $ud$ "diquark" made of particles 1 and 3. The quark-diquark form of the nucleon wave function
317: becomes more than just a notation if the correlation between the $u$ and $d$ quarks
318: in the scalar state is stronger than that in the relative spin-1 state.}
319: If $\alpha_{\rho N} \neq \alpha_{\lambda N}$, a mixed-symmetry component is generated in the nucleon, but
320: existing quark potential models do not support such a contribution of a probability larger than
321: $1 \div 2 \%$ \cite{fabio}. As can be seen from Eqs. (\ref{nucleon}) and (\ref{3.6}),
322: $\alpha_{\rho N}$ is the size parameter of the diquark for which we will use
323: the notation $\alpha_D$.
324:
325: The wave function (\ref{nucleonwf}) leads to the following expression for the
326: proton electromagnetic form factor
327: \begin{eqnarray}
328: \label{protonff}
329: F_p(Q^2)=\frac23\exp\left(-\frac{Q^2 \alpha^2_{\lambda N}}{12}\right)
330: +\frac13 \exp\left(
331: -\frac{Q^2}{48} (\alpha^2_{\lambda N}+3\alpha^2_{\rho N})
332: \right), \qquad Q^2=\vec q^2.
333: \end{eqnarray}
334: The derivative of the form factor at $Q^2=0$ is experimentally known to be close
335: to $1/{M_\rho^2}$, with $M_\rho$ denoting the $\rho$-meson mass. Thus we get a constraint on
336: the parameters $\alpha_{\rho N}$ and $\alpha_{\lambda N}$
337: \begin{eqnarray}
338: \label{radius}
339: -F'_p(0)=\frac{\alpha^2_{\lambda N}}{16}+\frac{\alpha^2_{\rho N}}{48}\simeq \frac1 {M_\rho^2}.
340: \end{eqnarray}
341: For the fully symmetric wave function one gets $\alpha_{\rho N}=\alpha_{\lambda N}=2\sqrt{3}/M_\rho=0.9$ fm.
342: The nonrelativistic formula (\ref{protonff}) gives a good description of the proton form factor
343: in the region $Q^2=0\div 0.3$ GeV$^2$, relevant for our analysis.
344:
345:
346:
347:
348:
349:
350:
351:
352: \subsection{The pentaquark}
353:
354: %\vspace{.4cm}
355: %\noindent
356: %{\bf The pentaquark.}
357: As described in the introduction, we consider the pentaquark as consisting of two
358: spin and isospin zero diquarks in a relative $L=1$ angular momentum, and a strange antiquark $\bar s$.
359: Thus we take the following form for the $J=1/2$ pentaquark state
360: \begin{eqnarray}
361: |\theta^{\uparrow}(\vec p)\rangle&=&\int d\vec r_1 d\vec r_2 d\vec r_3 d\vec r_4 d\vec r_5
362: \exp\left(i\vec p\;\frac{m_s\vec r_1+m \vec r_2+m\vec r_3+m \vec r_4+m \vec r_3 }{m_s+4m}\right)
363: \nonumber\\
364: &&\times\epsilon^{abc}
365: \left[
366: \sqrt{\frac{2}{3}}\hat s^{a\downarrow}(\vec r_1) \Psi_{1,1}
367: -
368: {\frac{1}{\sqrt3}} \hat s^{a\uparrow}(\vec r_1) \Psi_{1,0}
369: \right]D^{b}(\vec r_2, \vec r_3) D^{c}(\vec r_4, \vec r_5)
370: \,|0\rangle.
371: \end{eqnarray}
372: Here we introduced again the creation operator $D^a(\vec r_i, \vec r_j)$ of two correlated quarks.
373: The radial wave functions $\Psi_{1,i}$ are angular momentum 1 eigenstates with projection $i$
374: to the $z$-axis. The function $\Psi_{1,i}$ should be symmetric under
375: $2\leftrightarrow 3$ and under $4\leftrightarrow 5$ to provide zero values for the diquark spin
376: and isospin, and antisymmetric under $\{23\}\leftrightarrow\{45\}$ (i.e. in diquark space coordinates).
377: Let us now introduce the variables
378: \begin{eqnarray}
379: \label{3.11}
380: \vec{r}_{23}=\vec{r}_2-\vec{r}_3, \qquad
381: \vec{R}_{23}=\frac{1}{2}(\vec{r}_2+\vec{r}_3), \qquad
382: \vec{r}_{45}=\vec{r}_4-\vec{r}_5, \qquad
383: \vec{R}_{45}=\frac{1}{2}(\vec{r}_4+\vec{r}_5), \nonumber\\
384: \vec{\rho}_\theta=\vec{R}_{23}-\vec{R}_{45}, \qquad \vec\lambda_\theta=\frac{1}{2}(\vec{R}_{23}+\vec{R}_{45})-\vec{r}_1 ~,
385: \end{eqnarray}
386: where $\vec r_1$ is the position of the strange particle, $\vec R_{23}$ and $\vec R_{45}$ are the
387: positions of the two diquarks. Taking into account the above symmetry requirements,
388: the $P$-wave radial wave function of the pentaquark can be written as follows
389: \begin{eqnarray}
390: \Psi_{1,1}(r_1,r_2,r_3,r_4,r_5)&=&i\frac{\rho_{x+iy}}{\sqrt{2}}\Psi_\theta(r_1|r_2,r_3|r_4,r_5),\nonumber\\
391: \Psi_{1,0}(r_1,r_2,r_3,r_4,r_5)&=&-i\rho_{z}\Psi_\theta(r_1|r_2,r_3|r_4,r_5),
392: \end{eqnarray}
393: where $\Psi_\theta$ is the radial-symmetric part of the pentaquark wave function.
394: The diquark picture then amounts to the following form for the latter
395: \begin{eqnarray}
396: \label{psitheta}
397: \Psi_\theta(r_1|r_2,r_3|r_4,r_5)=
398: \Phi_\theta(\rho_\theta,\lambda_\theta)\Phi_D(r_{23})\Phi_D(r_{45}),
399: \end{eqnarray}
400: Eq. (\ref{nrnorma}) requires the normalization
401: \begin{eqnarray}
402: \label{pqnorma}
403: \int |\Phi_D(r)|^2\;d\vec r=1, \qquad
404: 64\int \vec{\rho}_\theta^2 |\Phi_\theta(\rho_\theta,\lambda_\theta)|^2\;d\vec \rho_\theta\, d\vec \lambda_\theta=1,
405: \end{eqnarray}
406: Again, we take a Gaussian parameterizations for the wave function
407: \begin{eqnarray}
408: \label{pqwf}
409: \Psi_\theta(r_1|r_2,r_3|r_4,r_5)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{N_\theta}}
410: \exp\left(-\frac{1}{2\alpha^2_{\rho \theta}}\vec{\rho}_\theta^2
411: -\frac{2}{3\alpha^2_{\lambda \theta}}\vec{\lambda}_\theta^2\right)
412: \exp\left(-\frac{\vec{r}^2_{23}}{2\alpha_D^2}\right)
413: \exp\left(-\frac{\vec{r}^2_{45}}{2\alpha_D^2}\right),
414: \end{eqnarray}
415: and determine the normalization factor $N_\theta$ from (\ref{pqnorma}).
416:
417:
418:
419:
420:
421: %\newpage
422:
423:
424:
425:
426: \subsection{The transition amplitude}
427: %\vspace{.4cm}
428: %\noindent
429: %{\bf The transition amplitude.}
430: In the non-relativistic approximation the quark current
431: operators take the following form (summation over color indices is implied)
432: \begin{eqnarray}
433: \bar s(\vec x_s)\gamma_0\gamma_5 d(\vec x_d)&\to&
434: -\hat s^{\uparrow}(\vec x_s)d^{\downarrow}(\vec x_d)+\dots,
435: %-\hat s^{\downarrow}(\vec x_s)d^{a\uparrow}(\vec x_d)\right),
436: \nonumber\\
437: \bar s(\vec x_s)\gamma_3\gamma_5 d(\vec x_d)&\to&
438: \left(\frac{k_x-ik_y}{2m_d}-\frac{k'_x-ik'_y}{2m_s}\right)\hat s^{\downarrow}(\vec x_s)d^{\downarrow}(\vec x_d)
439: -\left(\frac{k'_z}{2m_s}+\frac{k_z}{2m_d}\right)\hat s^{\uparrow}(\vec x_s)d^{\downarrow}(\vec x_d)+\dots,
440: \nonumber\\
441: i\bar s(\vec x_s)\gamma_2\gamma_5 d(\vec x_d)&\to&
442: \left(\frac{k_x-ik_y}{2m_d}-\frac{k'_x+ik'_y}{2m_s}\right)\hat s^{\uparrow}(\vec x_s)d^{\downarrow}(\vec x_d)
443: +\left(\frac{k'_z}{2m_s}-\frac{k_z}{2m_d}\right)\hat s^{\downarrow}(\vec x_s)d^{\downarrow}(\vec x_d)+\dots.
444: \end{eqnarray}
445: Here $\vec k'$ is the momentum operator of the $s$-quark,
446: $\vec k'=-i\vec \nabla^{(s)} $;
447: $\vec k$ is the momentum operator of the $d$-quark,
448: $\vec k=-i\vec \nabla^{(d)}$. The dots stand for structures which contain the operators $s^\uparrow d^\uparrow$ or
449: $s^\downarrow d^\uparrow$. Their contributions to the $\theta\to N^\uparrow$
450: transition amplitudes vanish: $\langle N^\uparrow|s^\uparrow d^\uparrow|\theta\rangle=0$ and
451: $\langle N^\uparrow|s^\downarrow d^\uparrow|\theta\rangle=0$.
452:
453: The $\theta\to N^\uparrow$ transition amplitudes of the quark currents above may be expressed through
454: \begin{eqnarray}
455: \vec {\cal A}&=&
456: \frac{24}{\sqrt{3}}\int d\vec r_2 d\vec r_4 d\vec r_5
457: \exp\left(i\vec q\,\frac{\vec r_2+\vec r_4+\vec r_5}{3}\right)\;
458: \vec \rho_\theta\;\Psi_\theta(r_s|r_2,r_d|r_4,r_5)\left\{2\Psi_N(r_2|r_4,r_5)+\Psi_N(r_4|r_2,r_5)\right\},
459: \end{eqnarray}
460: with $\vec \rho_\theta=\frac12(\vec r_2+\vec r_d-\vec r_4-\vec r_5)$ as in (\ref{3.11}). The
461: functions $\Psi_N$ and $\Psi_\theta$ are given by Eqs. (\ref{psin}) and (\ref{psitheta}).
462: The quantity $\vec {\cal A}$ follows after the sum over color and flavour is performed.
463: The two terms in the curly brackets have the following origin: the first (with the factor 2)
464: arises from the processes in which one of the diquarks is a spectator.
465: The second term is due to the formation of the diquark in the proton by two quarks from
466: different diquarks of the pentaquark.
467:
468: The final result reads:
469: \begin{eqnarray}
470: |\vec q| F_0=\langle N^\uparrow|\bar s\gamma_0\gamma_5d|\theta^\uparrow\rangle&=&
471: -i{\cal A}_z|_{\vec r_s\to 0,\; \vec r_d\to 0}
472: \nonumber
473: \\
474: A_L=\langle N^\uparrow|\bar s\gamma_3\gamma_5d|\theta^\uparrow\rangle&=&
475: \frac{1}{2m_s}\left\{
476: \frac{\partial}{\partial x_s}{\cal A}_x
477: +\frac{\partial}{\partial y_s}{\cal A}_y
478: +\frac{\partial}{\partial z_s}{\cal A}_z
479: \right\}
480: \nonumber\\
481: &+&
482: \frac{1}{2m_d}\left\{
483: -\frac{\partial}{\partial x_d}{\cal A}_x
484: -\frac{\partial}{\partial y_d}{\cal A}_y
485: +\frac{\partial}{\partial z_d}{\cal A}_z
486: \right\}|_{\vec r_s\to 0,\; \vec r_d\to 0}
487: \nonumber
488: \\
489: \label{3.20}
490: A_T=i\langle N^\uparrow|\bar s\,\gamma_2\gamma_5d|\theta^\downarrow\rangle&=&
491: \frac{1}{2m_s}\left\{
492: \frac{\partial}{\partial x_s}{\cal A}_x
493: +\frac{\partial}{\partial y_s}{\cal A}_y
494: +\frac{\partial}{\partial z_s}{\cal A}_z
495: \right\}
496: \nonumber\\
497: &+&
498: \frac{1}{2m_d}\left\{
499: -\frac{\partial}{\partial x_d}{\cal A}_x
500: +\frac{\partial}{\partial y_d}{\cal A}_y
501: -\frac{\partial}{\partial z_d}{\cal A}_z
502: \right\}|_{\vec r_s\to 0,\; \vec r_d\to 0}.
503: \end{eqnarray}
504: \section{Numerical estimates}
505: We can give now our numerical results for the pentaquark width using (\ref{ga}) and (\ref{3.20}).
506: Two assumptions reduce the number of parameters:
507:
508: 1. The structure of the diquark in the nucleon and in the pentaquark coincide, i.e. we take
509: the size-parameter $\alpha_D$ of the diquark wave function $\Phi_D$ to be equal to the parameter
510: $\alpha_{\rho N}$ of the nucleon wave function
511: \begin{eqnarray}
512: \alpha_D=\alpha_{\rho N}.
513: \end{eqnarray}
514:
515: 2. The parameters of the nucleon wave function are chosen such that the experimental
516: nucleon electromagnetic form factor is reproduced for small momentum transfers,
517: \begin{eqnarray}
518: \label{nucleonparam}
519: \frac{\alpha^2_{\lambda N}}{16}+\frac{\alpha^2_D}{48} = \frac1{M_\rho^2}.
520: \end{eqnarray}
521: We first take a symmetric wave function $\alpha_{\lambda N}=\alpha_D$.
522: As explained above, the diquark size parameter is then given by the relation
523: $\alpha_D=\alpha_{\rho N}=0.9$ fm, a number also compatible with
524: the size of the pion. Now only the two free parameters of the pentaquark wave function
525: remain to be fixed, namely, $\alpha_{\theta \rho}$ and $\alpha_{\theta \lambda}$.
526: We study the dependence of
527: $g_A$ and of the width on these parameters. We recall that the average distance between the
528: two diquarks is determined by $\alpha_{\theta\rho}$, and the average distance between
529: the $s$-antiquark and the center-of-mass of the two diquarks is determined by $\alpha_{\theta\lambda}$.
530:
531:
532: The decay width involves the constituent quark masses $m_s$ and $m_u=m_d$.
533: We use the values $m_s\simeq 500$ MeV and $m_d\simeq 350$ MeV
534: relevant for a nonrelativistic description. We have checked that
535: the values $m_s\simeq 350$ MeV and $m_d\simeq 220$ obtained in a relativistic quark model
536: \cite{m} essentially lead to the same results, since the $d$
537: and $s$ quark contributions to the amplitudes partially compensate each other.
538:
539: Little is known about the details of the pentaquark structure. We allow therefore the parameters
540: $\alpha_{\theta\lambda}$ and $\alpha_{\theta\rho}$ to vary in a broad range
541: \begin{eqnarray}
542: 0.6\; fm<\alpha_{\theta\lambda},\;\alpha_{\theta\rho} < 1.6\; fm.
543: \end{eqnarray}
544: If both parameters would be 1 fm, then $g_A\simeq 0.8$ and the corresponding width is $150$ MeV.
545: No suppression due to a possible mismatch of color and flavour quantum numbers in the
546: initial and final states takes place.
547:
548: However, a strong dynamical suppression occurs if the structure of the pentaquark is asymmetric.
549: Figure 1 exhibits the dependence of $g_A$ on the pentaquark size parameters. For instance, for
550: \begin{eqnarray}
551: \label{ppp}
552: \alpha_{\theta\lambda}=0.6 \; fm,\qquad \alpha_{\rho\lambda}=1.4 \; fm,
553: \end{eqnarray}
554: we get $g_A=0.05$ and $\Gamma(\theta)=1$ MeV.
555: We note that a somewhat small $\alpha_{\theta\lambda}$ and a large $\alpha_{\theta\rho}$
556: imply an interesting "peanut" structure of the pentaquark:
557: the two extended diquark balls overlap only partially, while the antiquark remains close to the center.
558:
559:
560:
561: Figure 2 presents the form factor $g_A(q^2)$ for these values of the parameters. We observe that
562: the form factor is a rather flat function of $q^2$ as expected from the location of
563: the $K^*_A$ resonance.
564:
565: It is also of interest to see the influence of an extreme $qq$ correlation (i.e. of a very small diquark size)
566: on the pentaquark decay width.
567: Figure 3 illustrates the pentaquark width vs the diquark size $\alpha_D$
568: for fixed values of the pentaquark size-parameters. It is seen that
569: a sizeable reduction of the pentaquark width occurs only for a very small diquark size,
570: which corresponds to an implausible large deviation from an SU(6)-symmetric nucleon wave
571: function.
572: The successful description of the nucleon using a symmetric nucleon wave function does
573: not support such small-size diquarks. The diquark should be an extended object which
574: dissolves into smaller partons in higher momentum transfer processes.
575: \begin{figure}[ht]
576: \begin{center}
577: \begin{tabular}{cc}
578: \includegraphics[totalheight=5cm]{pq4.ps}
579: &
580: \hspace{1cm}\includegraphics[totalheight=5cm]{pq5.ps}\\
581: \end{tabular}
582: \caption{\label{fig:1}
583: The axial-vector coupling $g_A$ and the decay width
584: $\Gamma(\theta)$ vs
585: the pentaquark size parameter $\alpha_{\theta\rho}$ for different values of $\alpha_{\theta\lambda}$.}
586: \end{center}
587: \end{figure}
588: \begin{figure}[ht]
589: \begin{center}
590: \begin{tabular}{c}
591: \includegraphics[totalheight=5cm]{pq6.ps}
592: \end{tabular}
593: \caption{\label{fig:2}
594: The axial-vector form factor $g_A$ vs $q^2$ for the pentaquark size parameters
595: $\alpha_{\theta\rho}=1.4$ fm and $\alpha_{\theta\lambda}=0.6$ fm. The dotted line corresponds to $q^2=M_K^2$.}
596: \end{center}
597: \end{figure}
598: \begin{figure}[ht]
599: \begin{center}
600: \begin{tabular}{c}
601: \includegraphics[totalheight=5cm]{pq7.ps}
602: \end{tabular}
603: \caption{\label{fig:3}
604: The axial-vector coupling $g_A$ vs the diquark size parameter $\alpha_D=\alpha_{N\rho}$.
605: The parameter $\alpha_{N\lambda}$ of the nucleon wave function is calculated from
606: $\alpha_{N\rho}$ using Eq. (\ref{radius}).
607: The values of the pentaquark size parameters are fixed to be
608: $\alpha_{\theta\rho}=1.2$ fm and $\alpha_{\theta\lambda}=1.0$ fm.}
609: \end{center}
610: \end{figure}
611: \section{Conclusions}
612: We studied the $\theta({\frac12}^+)$ pentaquark decay into $NK$ final states,
613: assuming that the pentaquark consists of two extended color-triplet $ud$ diquarks with spin and isospin zero
614: in a relative $P$-wave state, and a strange antiquark.
615: The pentaquark and the nucleon were described in terms of non-relativistic Fock states with Gaussian
616: spatial wave functions.
617:
618: The pentaquark decay width $\Gamma(\theta)$ is found to depend strongly on the pentaquark configuration:
619: when all size-parameters of the pentaquark wave function are close to 1 fm, one obtains a width of
620: about $100 - 150$ MeV, i.e. a typical hadronic value. The color-flavour structure of the pentaquark causes no suppression.
621:
622: However, a strong dynamical suppression of the amplitude occurs for a "peanut"-shaped
623: pentaquark, i.e. when it has an asymmetric structure with
624: $\alpha_{\theta \lambda}\ll \alpha_{\theta \rho}$.
625: For instance, $\alpha_{\theta \lambda}=0.6$ fm and $\alpha_{\theta \rho}=1.4$ fm
626: brings the width down to 1 MeV.
627:
628: Because of the specific details of our analysis (non-relativistic treatment,
629: Gaussian wave functions) the accuracy of our calculation is presumably only about 50\%.
630: Nevertheless, the proposed mechanisms for a strong suppression of the amplitude
631: by a specific peanut-like structure of the pentaquark remains valid.
632:
633: We conclude therefore that if the pentaquark can be described as a quark-diquark system,
634: the small width requires a rather asymmetric structure with two
635: extended diquarks rotating about the strange antiquark near the center.
636:
637: %\vspace{.2cm}
638:
639: {\it Acknowledgments.} We thank Dieter Gromes and Otto Nachtmann for useful discussions.
640: The work was supported by Bundesministerium f\"ur Bildung und Forschung
641: (BMBF) under project 05 HT 1VHA/0.
642:
643: %\newpage
644: \begin{thebibliography}{30}
645: \bibitem{signal}
646: LEPS Collaboration, %(T.~Nakano et al),
647: %{\it Evidence For A Narrow $S = +1$ Baryon Resonance In Photoproduction From The Neutron},
648: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 91}, 012002 (2003). %[hep-ex/0301020].
649: V.~V.~Barmin et al,
650: %{\it Observation Of A Baryon Resonance With Positive
651: %Strangeness In $K^+$ Collisions With $Xe$ Nuclei},
652: Phys. Atom. Nucl. {\bf 66} (2003) 1715. % [hep-ex/0304040].
653: CLAS collaboration, %(S.~Stepanyan et al),
654: %{\it Observation Of An Exotic $S = +1$ Baryon In Exclusive Photoproduction From The Deuteron},
655: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 91}, 252001 (2003), % [hep-ex/0307018].
656: %CLAS Collaboration (V.~Kubarovsky et al)
657: %{\it Observation of an Exotic Baryon with $S=+1$ in Photoproduction from the Proton},
658: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 92} 032001 (2004), % [hep-ex/0311046]
659: Erratum - Ibid. {92} 049902 (2004).
660: SAPHIR Collaboration, %(J. Barth et al),
661: %{\it Evidence for the positive-strangeness pentaquark $\theta^+$ in photoproduction
662: %with the SAPHIR detector at ELSA},
663: Phys.~Lett.~{\bf B572}, 127 (2003).
664: %hep-ex/0307083.
665: A.~E.~Asratyan et al,
666: %{\it Evidence For Formation Of A Narrow $pK_s$ Resonance With Mass
667: %Near 1533-{\rm Mev} In Neutrino Interactions},
668: hep-ex/0309042.
669: HERMES Collaboration, % (A. Airapetian et al.),
670: %{\it Evidence For A Narrow $|S| = 1$ Baryon State At A Mass Of 1528-{\rm Mev} In Quasireal Photoproduction},
671: Phys. Lett. {\bf B585}, 213 (2004). % [hep-ex/0401024].
672: SVD Collaboration,
673: %{\it Observation of narrow baryon resonance decaying into $pK^0_s$ in pA-interactions at $70$ {\rm GeV}/c with SVD-2 setup},
674: hep-ex/0401024.
675: M. Abdel-Bary et al,
676: %{\it Evidence For A Narrow Resonance At 1530 {\rm Mev}/$c^2$ In The $K^0p$ - System
677: %Of The Reaction $pp \to\Sigma^+ K^0 p$ From The Cosy-Tof Experiment},
678: hep-ex/0403011.
679: ZEUS Collaboration,
680: %{\it Evidence for a narrow baryonic state decaying to K0s-p and K0s-pbar in deep inelastic scattering at HERA},
681: hep-ex/0403051.
682: \bibitem{hera}H1 Collaboration, %{\it Evidence for a narrow anti-charmed baryon state},
683: hep-ex/0403017.
684: \bibitem{nosignal}
685: BES Collaboration, % (J.Z. Bai et al.),
686: {\it Search for the pentaquark state in $\Psi(2s)$ and $J/\Psi$ decays to
687: $K^0_s pK^-\bar N$ and $K^0_s \bar pK^-n$}, hep-ex/0402012.
688: HERA-b Collaboration, %(K.T.~Kn\"opfle et al.),
689: hep-ex/0403020.
690: PHENIX Colaboration, % C. Pinkenberg et al,
691: nucl-ex/0404001.
692: \bibitem{nussinov} S.~Nussinov,
693: {\it Some further comments on the $\theta(1540)$ pentaquark},
694: hep-ph/0403028.
695: \bibitem{glozman}
696: L.~Glozman, {\it Can low lying Roper states be explained as anti-decuplet members?}
697: hep-ph/0309092.
698: \bibitem{trilling}
699: R.~Cahn, G.~Trilling, Phys. Rev. {\bf D69}, 011501 (2004);
700: A. Sibirtsev et al, {\it New results on the limit for the width of the exotic $\theta^+$
701: resonance}, hep-ph/0405099.
702: \bibitem{close}
703: F.E. Close, J.J. Dudek, Phys.Lett. {\bf B586}, 75 (2004).
704: \bibitem{soliton}
705: D.~Diakonov, V.~Petrov, M.~Polyakov,
706: %{\it Exotic anti-decuplet of baryons: prediction from chiral solitons},
707: Z. Phys. {\bf A359}, 305 (1997).
708: \bibitem{mp}M. Praszalowisz, in {\it Skirmions and Anomalies},
709: M. Jezabek and M. Praszalowisz, eds, World Scientific, 1987, p. 112.
710: \bibitem{jaffe} R.~L.~Jaffe,
711: {\it The width of the $\theta^+$ exotic baryon in the chiral soliton model},
712: hep-ph/0401187.
713: D.~Diakonov, V.~Petrov, M.~Polyakov,
714: {\it Comment on the $\theta^+$ width and mass},
715: hep-ph/0404212.
716: \bibitem{jw} R.~Jaffe, F.~Wilczek, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 91}, 232003 (2003).
717: \bibitem{stech}G.~Dosch, M.~Jamin, B.~Stech, Z.~Phys. {\bf C42}, 167 (1989);
718: M.~Jamin, M.~Neubert, Phys. Lett. {\bf B238}, 387 (1990).
719: \bibitem{shuryak} E.~V.~Shuryak, Nucl.~Phys.~{\bf B203}, 93 (1982);
720: T.~Sch\"afer, E.V.~Shuryak, Mod.~Phys.~{\bf 70}, 323 (1998).
721: \bibitem{huge}B. Stech, Phys. Rev. {\bf D36}, 975 (1987);
722: M. Neubert, B. Stech, Phys. Rev. {\bf D44}, 775 (1991);
723: B. Stech, Q. P. Xu, Z. Phys. {\bf C49}, 491 (1991);
724: B. Stech, Mod. Phys. Lett. {\bf A6}, 3113 (1991).
725: \bibitem{lipkin} M.~Karliner, H.~Lipkin, Phys. Lett. {\bf B586}, 303 (2004).
726: \bibitem{zahed} E.V.~Shuryak, I.~Zahed, {\it A schematic model for pentaquarks based on diquarks},
727: hep-ph/0310270.
728: \bibitem{carlson}C.~Carlson et al, {\it A naturally narrow positive parity $\theta^+$}, hep-ph/0312325.
729: \bibitem{buccella} F.~Buccella, P.~Sorba, {\it Narrow width pentaquarks}, hep-ph/0401083.
730: %\bibitem{quarkmasses}S.~Chen et al, EPJC {\bf 22}, 32 (2001).
731: %\bibitem{gi} S.~Godfrey and N.~Isgur, Phys. Rev. {\bf D32}, 189 (1985).
732: %\bibitem{anisovich} V.~V.~Anisovich et al, {\it Quark model and high-energy collisions}, Singapore, World Scientific, 1985.
733: %\bibitem{mel-sim}D.~Melikhov, S.~Simula, Phys. Rev. {\bf D65}, 094043 (2002).
734: \bibitem{fabio} F.~Cardarelli, S.~Simula, Phys.~Rev.~{\bf C62}, 065201 (2000). F. Cardarelli et al.,
735: Few-Body Syst.~Suppl.~{\bf 11}, 66 (1999).
736: \bibitem{m}
737: D.~Melikhov, Phys. Rev. {\bf D53}, 2460 (1996);
738: D.~Melikhov, N.~Nikitin, S.~Simula, Phys. Rev. {\bf D57}, 6814 (1998);
739: D.~Melikhov, B.~Stech, Phys. Rev. {\bf D62}, 014006 (2000);
740: D.~Melikhov, S.~Simula, %{\it Correspondence between QCD sum rules and constituent quark models},
741: hep-ph/0402009.
742: \end{thebibliography}
743: \end{document}
744:
745: