1: \documentclass[aps,prd,preprint,floats,superscriptaddress]{revtex4}
2: \usepackage{graphicx}
3:
4: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
5: % DEFINITIONS
6: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
7:
8: \def\etal{{\it et.~al.}}
9: \def\ie{{\it i.e.}}
10: \def\eg{{\it e.g.}}
11: \def\re{{\rm Re}}
12:
13: \def\be{\begin{equation}}
14: \def\ee{\end{equation}}
15: \def\bea{\begin{eqnarray}}
16: \def\eea{\end{eqnarray}}
17: \def\bean{\begin{eqnarray*}}
18: \def\eean{\end{eqnarray*}}
19: \def\bary{\begin{array}}
20: \def\eary{\end{array}}
21: \def\nn{\nonumber}
22:
23: \def\lan{\langle}
24: \def\ran{\rangle}
25: \def\lra{\leftrightarrow}
26: \def\la{\leftarrow}
27: \def\ra{\rightarrow}
28: \def\dash{\mbox{-}}
29: \def\lbar{\overline}
30:
31: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
32:
33: \begin{document}
34:
35: \preprint{
36: \vbox{
37: \hbox{MADPH-04-1380; ANL-HEP-PR-04-39;}
38: \hbox{UPR-1078T; hep-ph/0405108}
39: }}
40:
41:
42: \title{$B_s$-$\lbar B_s$ Mixing in $Z'$ Models with Flavor-Changing Neutral
43: Currents}
44:
45: \author{Vernon Barger}
46: \email[e-mail: ]{barger@oriole.physics.wisc.edu}
47: \affiliation{Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706}
48: \author{Cheng-Wei Chiang}
49: \email[e-mail: ]{chengwei@physics.wisc.edu}
50: \affiliation{Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706}
51: \author{Jing Jiang}
52: \email[e-mail: ]{jiangj@hep.anl.gov}
53: \affiliation{HEP Division, Argonne National Laboratory,
54: 9700 S. Cass Avenue, Argonne, IL 60439}
55: \author{Paul Langacker}
56: \email[e-mail: ]{pgl@electroweak.hep.upenn.edu}
57: \affiliation{Department of Physics and Astronomy,
58: University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6396}
59:
60: \date{\today}
61:
62: \begin{abstract}
63: In models with an extra $U(1)'$ gauge boson family non-universal couplings to
64: the weak eigenstates of the standard model fermions generally induce
65: flavor-changing neutral currents. This phenomenon leads to interesting
66: results in various $B$ meson decays, for which recent data indicate hints of
67: new physics involving significant contributions from $b \to s$ transitions.
68: We analyze the $B_s$ system, emphasizing the effects of a $Z'$ on the mass
69: difference and $CP$ asymmetries.
70: \end{abstract}
71:
72: \pacs{}
73: %11.30.Er Charge conjugation, parity, time reversal, and other discrete
74: % symmetries
75: %11.30.Hv Flavor symmetries
76: %12.15.Hh Determination of Kobayashi-Maskawa matrix elements
77: %13.25.Hw Decays of bottom mesons
78: %14.40.Nd Bottom mesons
79:
80: \maketitle
81:
82: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
83:
84: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
85: \section{Introduction \label{sec:intro}}
86: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
87:
88: The study of $B$ physics and the associated CP violating observables has been
89: suggested as a good means to extract information on new physics at low energy
90: scales \cite{Grossman:1996ke,Fleischer:1996bv,London:1997zk,Fleischer:2001pc,%
91: Hiller:2002ci,Ciuchini:2002pd,Neubert:SuperB}. Since $B$-$\lbar B$ mixing is
92: a loop-mediated process within the standard model (SM), it offers an
93: opportunity to see the footprints of physics beyond the SM. The currently
94: observed $\Delta M_d = 0.489 \pm 0.008$ ps$^{-1}$ \cite{Hagiwara:fs} and its
95: mixing phase $\sin 2\beta = 0.736 \pm 0.049$ extracted from the $B_d \to J/\psi
96: K_S$ mode \cite{Browder:2003ii} agree well with constraints obtained from other
97: experiments \cite{Hocker:2001xe}. However, no such information other than a
98: lower bound $\Delta M_s > 14.5$ ps$^{-1}$ \cite{HFAG} is available for the
99: $B_s$ meson yet.
100:
101: Based upon SM predictions, $\Delta M_{B_s}$ is expected to be about $18$
102: ps$^{-1}$ and its mixing phase $\phi_s$ only a couple of degrees. In contrast
103: to the $B_d$ system, the more than 25 times larger oscillation frequency and a
104: factor of four lower hadronization rate from $b$ quarks pose the primary
105: challenges in the study of $B_s$ oscillation and $CP$ asymmetries. Since the
106: $B_s \to J/\psi \phi$ decay is dominated by a Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa (CKM)
107: favored tree-level process, $b \to c {\bar c} s$, that does not involve a
108: different weak phase in the SM, its asymmetry provides the most reliable
109: information about the mixing phase $\phi_s$.
110:
111: Although new physics contributions may not compete with the SM processes in
112: most of the $b \to c {\bar c} s$ decays, they can play an important role in
113: $B_s$-$\lbar B_s$ mixing because of its loop nature in the SM \cite{NPrefs}.
114: In particular, the mixing can be significantly modified in models in which a
115: tree-level $b\to s$ transition is present. Thus, measurement of the properties
116: of $B_s$ meson mixing is of high interest in future $B$ physics studies as a
117: means to reveal new physics \cite{Grossman:1997pa,Dunietz:2000cr}. Since the
118: current $B$ factories do not run at the $\Upsilon(5S)$ resonance to produce
119: $B_s$ mesons, it is one of the primary objectives of hadronic colliders to
120: study $B_s$ oscillation and decay in the coming years
121: \cite{Anikeev:2001rk,Ball:2000ba}.
122:
123: Flavor changing neutral currents (FCNC) coupled to an extra $U(1)'$ gauge boson
124: arise when the $Z'$ couplings to physical fermion eigenstates are non-diagonal.
125: One way for this to happen is by the introduction of exotic fermions with
126: different $U(1)'$ charges that mix with the SM fermions
127: \cite{Nardi:1992nq,Babu:1996vt,Rizzo:1998ut,Leroux:2001fx,Langacker:2000ju} as
128: occurs in $E_6$ models. In the $E_6$ case, mixing of the right-handed ordinary
129: and exotic quarks, all $SU(2)_L$ singlets, induces FCNC mediated by a heavy
130: $Z'$ or by (small) $Z$-$Z'$ mixing, so the quark mixing can be large. Mixing
131: between ordinary (doublet) and exotic (singlet) left-handed quarks induces FCNC
132: mediated by the SM $Z$ boson \cite{Leroux:2001fx}. We will also allow for this
133: possibility, but in this case the quark mixing must be very small.
134:
135: Another possibility involves family non-universal couplings. It is well-known
136: that string models naturally give extra $U(1)'$ groups, at least one of which
137: has family non-universal couplings to the SM fermions
138: \cite{Chaudhuri:1994cd,Cleaver:1998gc,Cvetic:2001tj,Cvetic:2002qa}.
139: Generically, the physical and gauge eigenstates do not coincide. Here, unlike
140: the above-mentioned $E_6$ case, off-diagonal couplings of fermions to the $Z'$
141: boson can be obtained without mixing with additional fermion states. In these
142: types of models, both left-handed and right-handed fermions can have family
143: non-diagonal couplings with the $Z'$, while couplings to the $Z$ are family
144: diagonal (up to small effects from $Z-Z'$ mixing).
145:
146: The $Z'$ contributions to $B_s$-$\lbar B_s$ mixing are related to those for
147: hadronic, semileptonic, and leptonic $B$ decays in specific models in which the
148: diagonal $Z'$ couplings to $q \bar q$, $\ell^+ \ell^-$, etc. are known, but are
149: independent in general \footnote{$B_s$-$\lbar B_s$ mixing in leptophobic $E_6$
150: models was considered in Ref.~\cite{Leroux:2001fx}. A model with
151: non-universal right-handed couplings was discussed in~\cite{He:2004it}.
152: Mechanisms for flavor change in dynamical symmetry breaking models are
153: described in~\cite{dsb}.}. We have found that in specific models,
154: $B_s$-$\lbar B_s$ mixing effects can be significant while being consistent with
155: the other constraints; these results will be presented elsewhere. In the
156: present paper, we will treat the mixing in a model-independent way.
157:
158: Recently, we have studied the implications of a sizeable off-diagonal $Z'$
159: coupling between the bottom and strange quark in the indirect CP asymmetry of
160: $B \to \phi K_S$ decay \cite{Barger:2003hg}, which appears to show a
161: significant deviation from the SM prediction
162: \cite{Grossman:1997gr,Hiller:2002ci,Ciuchini:2002pd,Chiang:2003jn}. Here we
163: extend our analysis to $B_s$-$\lbar B_s$ mixing where the $Z'$ contributions
164: also enter at the tree level. Applications to the $B \to \pi K$ anomaly are
165: under investigation \cite{BCLL}.
166:
167: The paper is organized as follows. In Section \ref{sec:mixing}, we review the
168: basic formalism of $B_s$-$\lbar B_s$ mixing. In Section \ref{sec:sm}, we
169: evaluate $\Delta M_s$ in the SM. In Section \ref{sec:zpr}, we include the $Z'$
170: contributions, allowing both left-handed and right-handed couplings in the
171: mixing, and study their effects on observables. Our main results are
172: summarized in Section \ref{sec:conclusion}.
173:
174: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
175: \section{$B_s$-$\lbar B_s$ Mixing \label{sec:mixing}}
176: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
177:
178: In the conventional decomposition of the heavy and light eigenstates
179: %
180: \bea
181: |B_s \rangle_L = p |B_s^0 \rangle + q |\lbar B_s^0 \rangle ~, \nn \\
182: |B_s \rangle_H = p |B_s^0 \rangle - q |\lbar B_s^0 \rangle ~,
183: \eea
184: %
185: the mixing factor
186: %
187: \be
188: \label{eq:mix}
189: \left(\frac{q}{p}\right)_{\rm SM}
190: \simeq \sqrt{\frac{M_{12}^{\rm SM*}}{M_{12}^{\rm SM}}} ~,
191: \ee
192: %
193: has a phase
194: %
195: \be
196: \phi_s^{SM}
197: = 2 \arg(V_{tb}V_{ts}^*)
198: = -2\lambda^2{\bar \eta}
199: \simeq -2^{\circ} ~,
200: \qquad \sin2\phi_s^{SM} \simeq -0.07 ~,
201: \label{eq:15}
202: \ee
203: %
204: where the theoretical expectation $\Gamma_{12}^{\rm SM} \ll M_{12}^{\rm SM}$ is
205: used. The approximate formula Eq.~(\ref{eq:mix}) receives a small correction
206: once $\Gamma_{12}^{\rm SM}$ is included. Model independently, this only shifts
207: $\phi_s$ is at the few percent level. With errors on $\lambda$ and ${\bar
208: \eta}$ included, we have the SM expectation that $\sin2\phi_s^{SM} \simeq
209: -0.07 \pm 0.01$.
210:
211: The off-diagonal element of the decay matrix, $\Gamma_{12}^{\rm SM}$, is
212: evaluated by considering decay channels that are common to both $B_s$ and
213: $\lbar B_s$ mesons, and $M_{12}$ is the off-diagonal element of the mass
214: matrix. Due to the CKM enhancement, $\Gamma_{12}^{\rm SM}$ is dominated by the
215: charm-quark contributions over the up-quark contribution in a box diagram.
216: Unlike the Kaon system, $\Gamma_{12}^{\rm SM}$ is much smaller than
217: $M_{12}^{\rm SM}$ for $B$ mesons because the former is related to the $B$ meson
218: decays and set by the scale of its mass, whereas the latter is proportional to
219: $m_t^2$. We can safely assume that $\Gamma_{12}$ is not significantly modified
220: by new physics because $\Gamma_{12}$ receives major contributions from CKM
221: favored $b \to c {\bar c} s$ decays in the SM, and the SM result $\Gamma_{12}
222: \ll M_{12}$ is unlikely to change.
223:
224: The mass difference of the two physical states is
225: %
226: \be
227: \Delta M_s \equiv M_H - M_L
228: \simeq 2 |M_{12}| ~.
229: \ee
230: %
231: The width difference is
232: %
233: \be
234: \label{eq:widthdiff}
235: \Delta \Gamma
236: \equiv \Gamma_H - \Gamma_L
237: = \frac{2 \re(M_{12}^* \Gamma_{12})}{|M_{12}|}
238: = 2 |\Gamma_{12}| \cos\theta ~,
239: \ee
240: %
241: where the relative phase is $\theta = \arg (M_{12} / \Gamma_{12})$. Since
242: $\Gamma_{12}$ is dominated by the contributions from CKM favored $b \to c {\bar
243: c} s$ decays, we have $\theta = \arg \left( (V_{tb} V_{ts}^*) / (V_{cb}
244: V_{cs}^*) \right) \simeq \pi$, and thus $\Delta \Gamma \simeq - 2
245: |\Gamma_{12}|$
246: is negative in the SM. Although $\Gamma_{12}$ is unlikely to be affected by
247: new physics, the width difference always increases as long as the weak phase of
248: $M_{12}$ gets modified \cite{Grossman:1996er}.
249:
250: The observability of $B_s$-$\lbar B_s$ oscillations is often indicated by the
251: parameter
252: \begin{equation}
253: x_s
254: \equiv \frac{\Delta M_s}{\Gamma_s} ~,
255: \end{equation}
256: where $\Gamma_s = (4.51 \pm 0.18) \times 10^{-13}$ GeV, converted from the
257: world average lifetime $\tau_s = 1.461 \pm 0.057$ ps \cite{Hagiwara:fs}. The
258: expected large value of $x_s$ is a challenge for experimental searches.
259: Currently, the result from all ALEPH \cite{Heister:2002gk}, CDF
260: \cite{Abe:1998qj}, DELPHI \cite{Adam:1997pv}, OPAL \cite{Abbiendi:1999gm}, and
261: SLD \cite{Abe:2002ua} studies of $\Delta M_s$ with a combined $95\%$ confidence
262: level (CL) sensitivity on $\Delta M_s$ of $18.3$ ps$^{-1}$ gives \cite{HFAG}
263: %
264: \be
265: \Delta M_s > 14.5 \, {\rm ps}^{-1} ~, \quad {\rm and} \quad
266: x_s > 20.8 ~.
267: \ee
268: %
269: It is also measured that $m_{B_s} = 5369.6 \pm 2.4$ MeV \cite{Hagiwara:fs} and
270: $\Delta \Gamma_s/\Gamma_s = -0.16^{+0.15}_{-0.16} (|\Delta \Gamma_s|/\Gamma_s<
271: 0.54)$ (with the $95\%$ CL upper bound given in parentheses \cite{HFAG})
272: consistent with recent next-to-leading-order (NLO) QCD estimates
273: \cite{Beneke:1998sy}. In comparison, the $B_d$ system has $m_{B_d} = 5279.4
274: \pm 0.5$ MeV, $\Delta M_d = (0.489 \pm 0.008)$ ps$^{-1}$, $x_d = 0.755 \pm
275: 0.015$, and $\tau_{B_d} = 1.542 \pm 0.076$ ps \cite{Hagiwara:fs}.
276:
277: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
278: \section{$\Delta M_s$ in the SM \label{sec:sm}}
279: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
280:
281: The $|\Delta B| = 2$ and $|\Delta S| = 2$ operators relevant for our
282: discussions are:
283: \begin{eqnarray}
284: && O^{LL}
285: = [\bar s \gamma_{\mu} (1 - \gamma_5) b]
286: [\bar s \gamma^{\mu} (1 - \gamma_5) b] ~, \nn \\
287: && O_1^{LR}
288: = [\bar s \gamma_{\mu} (1 - \gamma_5) b]
289: [\bar s \gamma^{\mu} (1 + \gamma_5) b] ~, \nn \\
290: && O_2^{LR}
291: = [\bar s (1 - \gamma_5) b] [\bar s (1 + \gamma_5) b] ~, \nn \\
292: \label{eq:ops}
293: && O^{RR}
294: = [\bar s \gamma_{\mu} (1 + \gamma_5) b]
295: [\bar s \gamma^{\mu} (1 + \gamma_5) b] ~.
296: \end{eqnarray}
297: Because of the $V-A$ structure, only the operator $O^{LL}$ contributes to
298: $B_s$-$\lbar B_s$ mixing in the SM. The other three operators appear in the
299: $Z'$ models because of the right-handed couplings and operator mixing through
300: renormalization, as considered in the next section.
301:
302: In the SM the contributions to
303: %
304: \be
305: M_{12}^{\rm SM} \simeq
306: \frac{1}{2m_{B_s}}
307: \langle B_s^0 | {\cal H}_{\rm eff}^{\rm SM} | \lbar B_s^0 \rangle
308: \ee
309: %
310: are dominated by the top quark loop. The result, accurate to NLO in
311: QCD, is given by \cite{Buchalla:1995vs}
312: \begin{equation}
313: M_{12}^{\rm SM}
314: = \frac{G_F^2}{12\pi^2} M_W^2 m_{B_s} f_{B_s}^2 (V_{tb}V_{ts}^*)^2
315: \eta_{2B} S_0(x_t) [\alpha_s(m_b)]^{-6/23}
316: \left[ 1 + \frac{\alpha_s(m_b)} {4\pi} J_5 \right] B^{LL}(m_b)
317: ~,
318: \label{eq:m12}
319: \end{equation}
320: where $x_t=(m_t(m_t)/M_W)^2$ and
321: \begin{equation}
322: S_0(x)
323: = \frac{4x - 11x^2 + x^3}{4(1-x)^2} - \frac{3x^3\ln x}{2(1 - x)^3} ~.
324: \end{equation}
325: Using $m_t(m_t) = 170 \pm 5$ GeV, we find $S_0(x_t) = 2.463$. The NLO
326: short-distance QCD corrections are encoded in the parameters $\eta_{2B} \simeq
327: 0.551$ and $J_5 \simeq 1.627$ \cite{Buchalla:1995vs}. The bag parameter
328: $B^{LL}(\mu)$ is defined through the relation
329: \begin{equation}
330: \lan \lbar B_s | O^{LL} | B_s \ran
331: \equiv \frac83 m_{B_s}^2 f_{B_s}^2 B^{LL}(\mu) ~.
332: \end{equation}
333: In the following numerical analysis,
334: we will use $G_F = 1.16639 \times 10^{-5} \,\,{\rm GeV}^{-2}$ and $M_W = 80.423
335: \pm 0.039$ GeV \cite{Hagiwara:fs}, and write the SM part of $\Delta M_s$ as
336: \begin{equation}
337: \Delta M_s^{\rm SM}
338: = 1.19 \left| \frac{V_{tb}V_{ts}^*}{0.04} \right|^2
339: \left(\frac{f_{B_s}}{230 \; {\rm MeV}}\right)^2
340: \left(\frac{B^{LL}(m_b)}{0.872}\right) \times 10^{-11}~{\rm GeV} ~.
341: \label{eq:deltam}
342: \end{equation}
343:
344: Current lattice calculations still show quite large errors on the hadronic
345: parameters $f_{B_s} = 230 \pm 30$ MeV and $B^{LL}(m_b) = 0.872 \pm 0.005$
346: \cite{Yamada:2001xp,Becirevic:2001xt,Ryan:2001ej}. However, the ratio
347: \begin{equation}
348: \label{eq:xi}
349: \xi \equiv
350: \frac{f_{B_s} \sqrt{{\hat B}_{B_s}}}{f_{B_d} \sqrt{{\hat B}_{B_d}}}
351: \end{equation}
352: can be determined with a much smaller theoretical error, where ${\hat B}_{B_q}$
353: is the renomalization-independent bag parameter for the $B_q$ meson ($q=d,s$).
354: Therefore, the error on $\Delta M_s$ within the SM can be evaluated by
355: comparing with $\Delta M_d$, \ie,
356: \begin{equation}
357: \Delta M_s^{\rm SM} =
358: \Delta M_d^{\rm SM} \, \xi \,\frac{m_{B_s}}{m_{B_d}}
359: \frac{(1-\lambda^2)^2}{\lambda^2 \left[(1-\lbar\rho)^2 +
360: {\lbar\eta}^2\right]} ~.
361: \end{equation}
362: Using the measured values of the Wolfenstein parameters
363: \cite{Wolfenstein:1983yz} $\lambda = 0.2265 \pm 0.0024$, $A = 0.801 \pm 0.025$,
364: $\lbar\rho = 0.189 \pm 0.079$, and $\lbar\eta = 0.358 \pm 0.044$
365: \cite{Hocker:2001xe}, $\xi = 1.24 \pm 0.07$ \cite{Battaglia:2003in}, and the
366: mass parameters quoted above, we obtain the SM predictions
367: \begin{eqnarray}
368: \Delta M_s^{\rm SM}
369: &=& (1.19 \pm 0.24) \times 10^{-11}~{\rm GeV} \nn \\
370: &=& 18.0 \pm 3.7~{\rm ps}^{-1} ~, \nn \\
371: x_s^{\rm SM} &=& 26.3 \pm 5.5 ~.
372: \end{eqnarray}
373: As noted above, the central value of $x_s$ is slightly larger than the current
374: sensitivity based upon the world average. Recent LHC studies show that with
375: one year of data, $\Delta M_s$ can be explored up to 30 ps$^{-1}$ (ATLAS), 26
376: ps$^{-1}$ (CMS), and 48 ps$^{-1}$ (LHCb) (corresponding to $x_s$ up to 46, 42,
377: and 75); the LHCb result is based on exclusive hadronic decay modes
378: \cite{Ball:2000ba}. The sensitivity of both CDF and BTeV on $x_s$ can also
379: reach up to 75 using the same modes \cite{Anikeev:2001rk}, for a luminosity of
380: 2 fb$^{-1}$. The sensitivity on $\sin2\phi_s$ is correlated with the value of
381: $x_s$, and it becomes worse as $x_s$ increases. A statistical error of a few
382: times $10^{-2}$ can be reached at CMS and LHCb for moderate $x_s \simeq 40$
383: \cite{Ball:2000ba}.
384:
385: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
386: \section{$Z'$ Contributions \label{sec:zpr}}
387: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
388:
389: For simplicity, we assume that there is no mixing between the SM $Z$ and the
390: $Z'$ (small mixing effects can be easily incorporated \cite{Langacker:2000ju}).
391: A purely left-handed off-diagonal $Z'$ coupling to $b$ and $s$ quarks results
392: in an effective $|\Delta B| = 2$, $|\Delta S| = 2$ Hamiltonian at the $M_W$
393: scale of
394: \begin{equation}
395: \label{eq:para}
396: {\cal H_{\rm eff}^{Z'}} = \frac{G_F}{\sqrt{2}} \left( \frac{g_2
397: M_Z}{g_1 M_{Z'}} B_{sb}^L \right)^2 O^{LL}(m_b) \equiv
398: \frac{G_F}{\sqrt{2}} \rho_L^2 e^{2 i \phi_L} O^{LL}(m_b)~,
399: \end{equation}
400: where $g_2$ is the $U(1)'$ gauge coupling, $g_1 = e / (\sin\theta_W
401: \cos\theta_W)$, $M_{Z'}$ is the mass of the $Z'$, and $B_{sb}^L$ is the FCNC
402: $Z'$ coupling to the bottom and strange quarks. The parameters $\rho_L$ and
403: the weak phase $\phi_L$ in the $Z'$ model are defined by the second equality.
404: Generically, we expect that $g_2/g_1 \sim 1$ if both $U(1)$ groups have the
405: same origin from some grand unified theory, and $M_Z/M_{Z'} \sim 0.1$ for a
406: TeV-scale $Z'$. If $|B_{sb}^L| \sim |V_{tb} V_{ts}^*|$, then an
407: order-of-magnitude estimate gives us $\rho_L \sim {\cal O}(10^{-3})$, which is
408: in the ballpark of giving significant contributions to the $B_s$-$\lbar B_s$
409: mixing. The $Z'$ does not contribute to $\Gamma_{12}$ at tree level because
410: the intermediate $Z'$ cannot be on shell. After evolving from the $M_W$ scale
411: to $m_b$, the effective Hamiltonian becomes \cite{Buchalla:1995vs}
412: \begin{equation}
413: {\cal H_{\rm eff}^{Z'}}
414: = \frac{G_F}{\sqrt{2}} \left[ 1 +
415: \frac{\alpha_s(m_b)-\alpha_s(M_W)}{4\pi} J_5\right]
416: R^{6/23} \rho_L^2 e^{2 i \phi_L} O^{LL}(m_b) ~,
417: \label{eq:eHsm}
418: \end{equation}
419: where $R = \alpha_s(M_W) / \alpha_s(m_b)$. Although the above effective
420: Hamiltonian is largely suppressed by the ratio $(g_2 M_Z)/(g_1 M_{Z'})$, it
421: contains only one power of $G_F$ in comparison with the corresponding quadratic
422: dependence in the SM because the $Z'$-mediated process occurs at tree level.
423:
424: The full description of the running of the Wilson coefficient from the $M_W$
425: scale to $m_b$ can be found in \cite{Buchalla:1995vs}. We only repeat the
426: directly relevant steps here. The renormalization group equation for the
427: Wilson coefficients $\vec{C}$,
428: \begin{equation}
429: \frac{d}{d\,\ln\mu} \vec{C} = \gamma^T(g) \vec{C}(\mu) ~,
430: \end{equation}
431: can be solved with the help of the $U$ matrix
432: \begin{equation}
433: \vec{C}(\mu) = U(\mu,M_W) \vec{C}(M_W) ~,
434: \end{equation}
435: in which $\gamma^T(g)$ is the transpose of the anomalous dimension matrix
436: $\gamma(g)$. With the help of $d g/d \ln\mu = \beta(g)$, $U$ obeys the same
437: equation as $\vec{C}(\mu)$. We expand $\gamma(g)$ to the first two terms in
438: the perturbative expansion,
439: \begin{equation}
440: \gamma(\alpha_s)
441: = \gamma^{(0)} \frac{\alpha_s}{4\pi} +
442: \gamma^{(1)}\left(\frac{\alpha_s}{4\pi}\right)^2 ~.
443: \end{equation}
444: To this order the evolution matrix $U(\mu, m)$ is given by
445: \begin{equation}
446: U(\mu,m)=
447: \left(1+{\alpha_s(\mu)\over 4\pi} J\right) U^{(0)}(\mu,m)
448: \left(1-{\alpha_s(m)\over 4\pi} J\right)
449: ~,
450: \end{equation}
451: where $U^{(0)}$ is the evolution matrix in leading logarithmic approximation
452: and the matrix $J$ expresses the next-to-leading corrections. We have
453: \begin{equation}
454: \label{u0vd}
455: U^{(0)}(\mu,m)
456: = V \left(
457: {\left[{\alpha_s(m)\over\alpha_s(\mu)}\right]}^{{\vec\gamma^{(0)}\over
458: 2\beta_0}} \right)_D V^{-1} ~,
459: \end{equation}
460: where $V$ diagonalizes ${\gamma^{(0)T}}$, \ie, $\gamma^{(0)}_D=V^{-1}
461: {\gamma^{(0)T}} V$, and $\vec\gamma^{(0)}$ is the vector containing the
462: diagonal elements of the diagonal matrix $\gamma^{(0)}_D$. In terms of
463: $G=V^{-1} {\gamma^{(1)T}} V$ and a matrix $H$ whose elements are
464: \begin{equation}
465: \label{jvs}
466: H_{ij}
467: = \delta_{ij}\gamma^{(0)}_i{\beta_1\over 2\beta^2_0} -
468: {G_{ij}\over 2\beta_0+\gamma^{(0)}_i-\gamma^{(0)}_j} ~,
469: \end{equation}
470: the matrix $J$ is given by $J=V H V^{-1}$.
471:
472: The operators $O^{LL}$ and $O^{RR}$ do not mix with others under
473: renormalization. Their Wilson coefficients follow exactly the same RGEs, where
474: the above-mentioned matrices are all simple numbers. The factor
475: \begin{equation}
476: \left[ 1 + \frac{\alpha_s(m_b)-\alpha_s(M_W)}{4\pi} J_5\right] R^{6/23}
477: \end{equation}
478: in Eq.~(\ref{eq:eHsm}) reflects the RGE running. On the other hand, $O_1^{LR}$
479: and $O_2^{LR}$ form a sector that is mixed under RG running. Although the $Z'$
480: boson only induces the operator $O_1^{LR}$ at high energy scales, $O_2^{LR}$ is
481: generated after evolution down to low energy scales and, in particular, its
482: Wilson coefficient $C_2^{LR}$ is strongly enhanced by the RG effects
483: \cite{Buras:2000if}.
484:
485: With contributions from both the SM and the $Z'$ boson with only left-handed
486: FCNC couplings included, the $B_s$ mass difference is
487: \begin{eqnarray}
488: \Delta M_s &=& \Delta M_s^{\rm SM} \left( 1 + \frac{\Delta M_s^{Z'}}{\Delta
489: M_s^{\rm SM}} \right)
490: = 18.0 \left| 1 + 3.858 \times 10^5 \rho_L^2 e^{2 i \phi_L}
491: \right| \; {\rm ps}^{-1}~,
492: \end{eqnarray}
493: The corresponding result for the oscillation parameter is
494: \begin{equation}
495: \label{eq:xsL}
496: x_s
497: = 26.3 \left| 1 + 3.858 \times10^5 \rho_L^2 e^{2 i \phi_L} \right| ~.
498: \end{equation}
499: With couplings of only one chirality, the physical observables $\Delta M_s$,
500: $x_s$, and $\sin 2\phi_s$ are periodic functions of the new weak phase $\phi_L$
501: with a period of $180^{\circ}$.
502:
503: %Figure 1
504: \begin{figure}[t]
505: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=8cm]{xsll.eps}
506: \includegraphics[width=8cm]{s2p.eps}}
507: \centerline{(a)\hspace{8cm}(b)}
508: \caption[]{Three-dimensional plot of $x_s$ (a) and $\sin 2\phi_s$ (b)
509: versus $\rho_L$ and $\phi_L$ with a $Z'$-mediated FCNC for
510: left-handed $b$ and $s$ quarks. The color shadings in both plots
511: have no specific physical meaning.
512: \label{fig:ll3d}}
513: \end{figure}
514:
515: Fig.~\ref{fig:ll3d} (a) shows the effects of including a $Z'$ with left-handed
516: coupling. We see that if $\rho_L$ is small, $x_s$ is dominated by the SM
517: contribution and has a value $\sim 26$. For $\phi_L$ around $90^\circ$ and
518: $\rho_L$ between $0.001$ and $0.002$, the $Z'$ contribution tends to cancel
519: that of the SM and reduces $x_s$ to be smaller than the SM value of $26.3$. In
520: Eq.~(\ref{eq:xsL}) and Fig.~\ref{fig:ll3d} (a), we see that the $Z'$ has a
521: comparable contribution to the SM if $\rho_L \agt 0.002$, independent of the
522: actual value of $\phi_L$. The planned resolution of Fermilab Run II and LHCb
523: are both about $x_s \alt 75$ \cite{Anikeev:2001rk,Ball:2000ba}. Thus, a
524: $\rho_L$ greater than about $0.003$ will result in an $x_s$ beyond the planned
525: sensitivity. If $x_s$ is measured to fall within a range, one can read from the
526: plot what the allowed region is for the chiral $Z'$-model parameters. The same
527: discussion can easily be applied to a $Z'$ model with only right-handed
528: couplings. Fig.~\ref{fig:ll3d} (b) shows $\sin 2\phi_s$ as a function of
529: $\rho_L$ and $\phi_L$. As $\rho_L$ increases, $\sin 2\phi_s$ goes through more
530: oscillations when $\phi_L$ varies from $0$ to $\pi$.
531:
532: %FIgure 2
533: \begin{figure}[t]
534: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=13cm]{llnew.eps}}
535: \caption[]{Contour plot of $x_s$ and $\sin 2\phi_s$ with a
536: $Z'$-mediated FCNC for left-handed $b$ and $s$ quarks. The shaded region is
537: for $x_s < 20.6$, which is excluded at $95\%$ CL by experiments. The hatched
538: region corresponds to $1 \sigma$ ranges around the SM value $x_s = 26.3 \pm
539: 5.5$ (black curve). The solid curves open to the left are contours for $x_s
540: = 50$ (red), $70$ (green) and $90$ (blue) from left to right. The curves
541: open to the right are contours for $\sin 2 \phi_s = 0.5$ (dotted), $-0.5$
542: (solid) and the SM value $-0.07 \pm 0.01$ (dashed).
543: \label{fig:contour}}
544: \end{figure}
545:
546: In Fig.~\ref{fig:contour}, we show the overlayed plot of the contours of fixed
547: $x_s$ and those of fixed $\sin 2 \phi_s$. The shaded region in the center
548: shows the experimentally excluded points in the $\phi_L-\rho_L$ plane that
549: induce $x_s$ values smaller than $20.6$. The hatched area corresponds to the
550: parameter space points that produce $x_s$ values falling within the $1 \sigma$
551: range of the SM value of $26.3$. Contours for higher values of $x_s$ are also
552: shown. The SM predicted $\sin2\phi_s \simeq -0.07 \pm 0.01$ would appear as
553: narrow bands around the $\sin 2\phi_s = -0.07$ curves. Note that even if the
554: $x_s$ measurement turns out to be consistent with the SM expectation, it is
555: still possible that the new physics contributions, such as the $Z'$ model
556: considered here, can alter the $\sin 2 \phi_s$ value significantly. It is
557: therefore important to have a clean determination of both quantities
558: simultaneously. Once $x_s$ and $\sin 2\phi_s$ are extracted from $B_s$ decays,
559: one can determine $\rho_L$ up to a two-fold ambiguity and $\phi_L$ up to a
560: four-fold ambiguity, except for the special case with $\sin 2\phi_s \simeq 0$.
561:
562: $\Delta\Gamma_s$ can be determined with a high sensitivity by measuring the
563: lifetime difference between decays into $CP$-specific states and into
564: flavor-specific states. Using the $J/\psi \phi$ mode, simulations determine
565: \cite{Ball:2000ba} that the LHC can measure the ratio $\Delta\Gamma_s /
566: \Gamma_s$ with a relative error $\alt 10\%$ for an actual value around $-0.15$.
567: Tevatron simulations show that $\Delta\Gamma_s / \Gamma_s$ can be measured with
568: a statistical error of $\sim 0.02$. For a sufficiently large $\rho_L$, the
569: $\cos\theta$ factor in Eq.~(\ref{eq:widthdiff}) increases from $-1$ at $\phi_L
570: = 0^\circ$ (mod $180^\circ$) to the maximum $1$ at $\phi_L = 90^\circ$ (mod
571: $180^\circ$). We are left with the phase ranges $0^{\circ} \alt \phi_L \alt
572: 30^{\circ}$, $60^{\circ} \alt \phi_L \alt 120^{\circ}$, and $150^{\circ} \alt
573: \phi_L \alt 180^{\circ}$ (mod $180^\circ$) where a $3\sigma$ determination of
574: $\Delta\Gamma_s$ can be made.
575:
576: Once the right-handed $Z'$ couplings are introduced, we also have to include
577: the new $|\Delta B| = 2$ operators $O_1^{LR}$, $O_2^{LR}$, and $O^{RR}$ defined
578: in Eq.~(\ref{eq:ops}) into the effective Hamiltonian that contributes to the
579: $B_s$-$\lbar B_s$ mixing. The matrix element of $O^{RR}$ is the same as that
580: of $O^{LL}$, while those of $O_1^{LR}$ and $O_2^{LR}$ are
581: \begin{eqnarray}
582: \label{eq:lrme1}
583: &&
584: \lan \lbar B_s | O_1^{LR} | B_s \ran
585: = - \frac{4}{3} \left( \frac{m_{B_s}}{m_b(m_b) + m_s(m_b)} \right)^2
586: m_{B_s}^2 f_{B_s}^2 B_1^{LR}(m_b) \\
587: &&
588: \lan \lbar B_s | O_2^{LR} | B_s \ran
589: = 2 \left( \frac{m_{B_s}}{m_b(m_b) + m_s(m_b)} \right)^2
590: m_{B_s}^2 f_{B_s}^2 B_2^{LR}(m_b)
591: \label{eq:lrme2}
592: \end{eqnarray}
593:
594: For the $Z'$ coupling to right-handed currents, we define new parameters
595: $\rho_R$ and the associated weak phase $\phi_R$:
596: \begin{equation}
597: \rho_R e^{i\phi_R} \equiv \frac{g_2 M_Z}{g_1 M_{Z'}} B_{sb}^R ~.
598: \label{eq:pararight}
599: \end{equation}
600: At the $M_W$ scale, we have additional contributions to the effective
601: Hamiltonian due to the right-handed currents, similar to Eq.~(\ref{eq:para}).
602: The terms due to the left-right mixing are
603: \begin{equation}
604: {\cal H_{\rm eff}^{Z'}} \supset
605: \frac{G_F}{\sqrt{2}} \rho_L \rho_R e^{i(\phi_L+\phi_R)}
606: (O_1^{LR}+O_1^{RL} \; , \; O_2^{LR}+O_2^{RL})
607: \left( \begin{array}{c}
608: 1 \\ 0
609: \end{array} \right ) ~.
610: \end{equation}
611: In the RGE running, the Wilson coefficient of $O_1^{LR}$ mixes with that of
612: $O_2^{LR}$; the relevant anomalous dimension matrices are \cite{Buras:2000if}
613: \begin{eqnarray}
614: \gamma^{(0)} &=& \left( \begin{array}{cc}
615: \frac{6}{N_c}&12 \\
616: 0 & -6 N_c + \frac{6}{N_c}
617: \end{array}
618: \right) ~, \\
619: \gamma^{(1)} &=& \left( \begin{array}{cc}
620: \frac{137}{6}+\frac{15}{2N_c^2}-\frac{22}{3N_c} f & \frac{200}{3} N_c
621: -\frac{6}{N_c} -\frac{44}{3} f \\
622: \frac{71}{4}+\frac{9}{N_c} - 2 f & -\frac{203}{6} N_c^2 +
623: \frac{479}{6} + \frac{15}{2N_c^2} + \frac{10}{3} N_c f - \frac{22}{3
624: N_c} f
625: \end{array} \right) ~,
626: \end{eqnarray}
627: where $N_c$ is the number of colors and $f$ is the number of active quarks. At
628: the scale of the $B$ meson masses, the value of $f$ is $5$.
629:
630: We take $m_b(m_b) = 4.4$ GeV, $m_s(m_b) = 0.2$ GeV, and
631: $\Lambda^{(5)}_{\lbar{MS}} = 225$ MeV. Following Eqs.~(\ref{u0vd}-\ref{jvs}),
632: we find the effective Hamiltonian terms for the operators $O_{1,2}^{LR}$ at
633: $m_b$ to be
634: \begin{equation}
635: {\cal H_{\rm eff}^{Z'}} \supset
636: \frac{G_F}{\sqrt{2}} \rho_R \rho_L e^{i(\phi_L+\phi_R)}
637: (O_1^{LR}+O_1^{RL} \; , \; O_2^{LR}+O_2^{RL})
638: \left( \begin{array}{c}
639: 0.930 \\
640: -0.711
641: \end{array} \right ) ~.
642: \label{eq:hammix}
643: \end{equation}
644: Note that there is no contribution of the operator $O_2^{LR}$ at the $M_W$
645: scale. It is induced through the operator mixing in RGE running and actually
646: has an important effect at the $m_b$ scale, as one can see from its Wilson
647: coefficient in Eq.~(\ref{eq:hammix}).
648:
649: In the numerical analysis, we use the central values of $B_1^{LR}(m_b) = 1.753
650: \pm 0.021$ and $B_2^{LR}(m_b) = 1.162 \pm 0.007$ given in
651: Ref.~\cite{Becirevic:2001xt} with the decay constant $f_{B_s}$ the same as
652: before. The predicted mass difference with all the $Z'$ contributions included
653: is then
654: \begin{eqnarray}
655: \Delta M_s = 18.0 \left| 1 + 3.858 \times 10^5 \left( \rho_L^2 e^{2
656: i \phi_L} + \rho_R^2 e^{2 i \phi_R} \right) - % \nn \\
657: 2.003 \times 10^6 \rho_L \rho_R e^{i (\phi_L + \phi_R)} \right| \;{\rm
658: ps}^{-1}~.
659: \end{eqnarray}
660: The overall contribution to $x_s$ from the SM and $Z'$ is
661: \begin{eqnarray}
662: x_s = 26.3 \left| 1 + 3.858 \times 10^5 \left( \rho_L^2 e^{2 i \phi_L}
663: + \rho_R^2 e^{2 i \phi_R} \right) - % \nn \\
664: 2.003 \times 10^6 \rho_L \rho_R e^{i (\phi_L + \phi_R)} \right| ~.
665: \label{eq:all}
666: \end{eqnarray}
667: To illustrate the interference among different contributions, we set $\rho_L =
668: \rho_R = 0.001$ and plot $x_s$ and $\sin 2\phi_s$ versus the weak phases
669: $\phi_L$ and $\phi_R$ in Fig.~\ref{fig:all} (a) and (b), respectively.
670:
671: %Figure 3
672: \begin{figure}[t]
673: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=8cm]{rho2.eps}
674: \includegraphics[width=8cm]{s2plr.eps}}
675: \centerline{(a)\hspace{8cm}(b)}
676: \caption[]{$x_s$ (a) and $\sin 2\phi_s$ (b) as functions of $\phi_L$
677: and $\phi_R$ for $\rho_L = \rho_R = 0.001$. The color shadings have no
678: specific physical meaning.
679: \label{fig:all}}
680: \end{figure}
681:
682: First, we note that after the RGE running the operators $O_1^{LR}$ and
683: $O_2^{LR}$ interfere constructively. This can be seen from the relative minus
684: sign between the Wilson coefficients in Eq.~(\ref{eq:hammix}) and a
685: corresponding relative minus sign in the hadronic matrix elements given in
686: Eqs.~(\ref{eq:lrme1}) and (\ref{eq:lrme2}). Because of the constructive
687: interference and the fact that the bag parameters $B_1^{LR}$ and $ B_2^{LR}$
688: are twice as large as $B^{LL}$, the LR and RL operators together become the
689: dominant contributions. The interference of all the terms makes $x_s$ reach
690: its maximum when one of the weak phases is $180^\circ$ and the other is
691: $0^\circ$ (mod $360^\circ$). If $\rho_L$ and $\rho_R$ are both much smaller
692: than $10^{-3}$, the variation in $x_s$ in the $\phi_L$-$\phi_R$ space will be
693: indistinguishable from the predicted SM range. Compared to Fig.~\ref{fig:ll3d}
694: (a) for $Z'$ with only $LL$ couplings, Fig.~\ref{fig:all} (a) shows that even
695: for large values of $\rho_L$ and $\rho_R$, $x_s$ can be smaller than $20.6$ due
696: to the interference among all the terms in Eq.~(\ref{eq:all}). The current
697: $x_s \ge 20.6$ bound excludes the regions with $\phi_L + \phi_R \simeq 0^\circ$
698: (mod $360^\circ$). Because of the assumed equal values of $\rho_L$ and
699: $\rho_R$, the parameter space points with the same $\sin 2 \phi$ output lie
700: along directions that are roughly parallel to the $\phi_L + \phi_R = 360^\circ$
701: line. For the more general cases of different $\rho_L$ and $\rho_R$ values,
702: the crests and troughs in Fig.~\ref{fig:all} (b) are no longer parallel to the
703: $\phi_L + \phi_R = 360^\circ$ line.
704:
705: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
706: \section{Conclusions \label{sec:conclusion}}
707: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
708:
709: In this paper we discuss the effects of a $Z'$ gauge boson with FCNC couplings
710: to quarks on the $B_s$-$\lbar B_s$ mixing. We show how the mass difference and
711: $CP$ asymmetry are modified by the left-handed and right-handed $b$-$s$-$Z'$
712: couplings that may involve new weak phases $\phi_L$ and $\phi_R$. In the
713: particular case of a left-chiral (right-chiral) $Z'$ model, one can combine the
714: measurements of $\Delta M_s$ (or $x_s$) and $\sin 2\phi_s$ to determine the
715: coupling strength $\rho_L$ ($\rho_R$) and the weak phase $\phi_L$ ($\phi_R$) up
716: to discrete ambiguities. Once comparable left- and right-chiral couplings are
717: considered at the same time, we find the left-right interference terms dominate
718: over the purely left- or right-handed terms, partly because of the
719: renormalization running effects and partly because of the larger bag
720: parameters.
721:
722: \vspace{0.2cm}
723:
724: {\bf Acknowledgments:} C.-W.~C. would like to thank the hospitality of the high
725: energy theory group at University of Pennsylvania. This work was supported in
726: part by the United States Department of Energy, High Energy Physics Division,
727: through Grant Contract Nos.\ DE-FG02-95ER40896, W-31-109-ENG-38, and
728: EY-76-02-3071.
729:
730: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
731: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
732: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
733:
734: \bibitem{Grossman:1996ke}
735: Y.~Grossman and M.~P.~Worah,
736: %``CP asymmetries in B decays with new physics in decay amplitudes,''
737: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 395}, 241 (1997)
738: [arXiv:hep-ph/9612269].
739: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9612269;%%
740:
741: \bibitem{Fleischer:1996bv}
742: R.~Fleischer,
743: %``CP violation and the role of electroweak penguins in non-leptonic B
744: %decays,''
745: Int.\ J.\ Mod.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 12}, 2459 (1997)
746: [arXiv:hep-ph/9612446].
747: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9612446;%%
748:
749: \bibitem{London:1997zk}
750: D.~London and A.~Soni,
751: %``Measuring the CP angle beta in hadronic b $\to$ s penguin decays,''
752: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 407}, 61 (1997)
753: [arXiv:hep-ph/9704277].
754: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9704277;%%
755:
756: \bibitem{Fleischer:2001pc}
757: R.~Fleischer and T.~Mannel,
758: %``Exploring new physics in the B $\to$ Phi K system,''
759: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 511}, 240 (2001)
760: [arXiv:hep-ph/0103121].
761: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0103121;%%
762:
763: \bibitem{Hiller:2002ci}
764: G.~Hiller,
765: %``First hint of non-standard CP violation from B $\to$ Phi K(S) decay,''
766: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 66}, 071502 (2002)
767: [arXiv:hep-ph/0207356].
768: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0207356;%%
769:
770: \bibitem{Ciuchini:2002pd}
771: M.~Ciuchini and L.~Silvestrini,
772: %``Direct CP violation in B $\to$ Phi K(S) and new physics,''
773: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 89}, 231802 (2002)
774: [arXiv:hep-ph/0208087].
775: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0208087;%%
776:
777: \bibitem{Neubert:SuperB}
778: M.~Neubert, talk given at Super $B$ Factory Workshop, Hawaii, January 19-22,
779: 2004.
780:
781: \bibitem{Hagiwara:fs}
782: K.~Hagiwara {\it et al.} [Particle Data Group Collaboration],
783: %``Review Of Particle Physics,''
784: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 66}, 010001 (2002).
785: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D66,010001;%%
786:
787: \bibitem{Browder:2003ii}
788: T.~E.~Browder,
789: %``Results on the CKM angle phi(1)(beta),''
790: arXiv:hep-ex/0312024.
791: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0312024;%%
792:
793: \bibitem{Hocker:2001xe}
794: A.~Hocker, H.~Lacker, S.~Laplace and F.~Le Diberder,
795: %``A new approach to a global fit of the CKM matrix,''
796: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 21}, 225 (2001) [arXiv:hep-ph/0104062].
797: Updated results may be found on the web site {\tt http://ckmfitter.in2p3.fr/}.
798: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0104062;%%
799:
800: \bibitem{HFAG}
801: Heavy Flavor Averaging Group,
802: results for winter 2004.
803: Updated results may be found on the web site
804: {\tt http://www.slac.stanford.edu/xorg/hfag/rare}.
805:
806: \bibitem{NPrefs}
807: For recent new physics studies, see, for example,
808: %\bibitem{Buras:2001mb}
809: A.~J.~Buras, P.~H.~Chankowski, J.~Rosiek and L.~Slawianowska,
810: %``Delta(M(s))/Delta(M(d)), sin 2beta and the angle gamma in the presence of
811: %new Delta(F) = 2 operators,''
812: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 619}, 434 (2001)
813: [arXiv:hep-ph/0107048];
814: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0107048;%%
815: %\bibitem{Ball:2003se}
816: P.~Ball, S.~Khalil and E.~Kou,
817: %``B/s0 - anti-B/s0 mixing and the B/s $\to$ J/psi Phi asymmetry in
818: %supersymmetric models,''
819: Durham U. IPPP Preprint No. IPPP-03-61,
820: arXiv:hep-ph/0311361;
821: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0311361;%%
822: %\bibitem{Jager:2003xv}
823: S.~Jager and U.~Nierste,
824: %``B/s - anti-B/s mixing in an SO(10) SUSY GUT model,''
825: talk given at International Europhysics Conference on High-Energy Physics (HEP
826: 2003), Aachen, Germany, 17-23 Jul 2003, Fermilab Preprint No.
827: FERMILAB-CONF-03-394-T,
828: arXiv:hep-ph/0312145.
829: %arXiv:hep-ph/0312145;
830: %%%CITATION = HEP-PH 0312145;%%
831: %%\bibitem{He:2004it}
832: %X.~G.~He and G.~Valencia,
833: %%``K+ $\to$ pi+ nu anti-nu and FCNC from non-universal Z' bosons,''
834: %arXiv:hep-ph/0404229.
835: %%%CITATION = HEP-PH 0404229;%%
836:
837: \bibitem{Grossman:1997pa}
838: Y.~Grossman, Y.~Nir and R.~Rattazzi,
839: %``CP violation beyond the standard model,''
840: Adv.\ Ser.\ Direct.\ High Energy Phys.\ {\bf 15}, 755 (1998)
841: [arXiv:hep-ph/9701231].
842: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9701231;%%
843:
844: \bibitem{Dunietz:2000cr}
845: I.~Dunietz, R.~Fleischer and U.~Nierste,
846: %``In pursuit of new physics with B/s decays,''
847: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 63}, 114015 (2001)
848: [arXiv:hep-ph/0012219].
849: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0012219;%%
850:
851: \bibitem{Anikeev:2001rk}
852: K.~Anikeev {\it et al.},
853: %``B physics at the Tevatron: Run II and beyond,''
854: arXiv:hep-ph/0201071;
855: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0201071;%%
856: %\bibitem{Lucchesi:2003ub}
857: D.~Lucchesi [CDF Collaboration],
858: %``B/s physics and prospects at the Tevatron,''
859: eConf {\bf C0304052}, WG207 (2003)
860: [arXiv:hep-ex/0307025].
861: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0307025;%%
862:
863: \bibitem{Ball:2000ba}
864: P.~Ball {\it et al.},
865: %``B decays at the LHC,''
866: CERN Workshop On Standard Model Physics (And More) At The LHC, 14-15 Oct 1999,
867: Geneva, Switzerland; arXiv:hep-ph/0003238.
868: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0003238;%%
869:
870: \bibitem{Langacker:2000ju}
871: P.~Langacker and M.~Plumacher,
872: %``Flavor changing effects in theories with a heavy Z' boson with family
873: %non-universal couplings,''
874: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 62}, 013006 (2000)
875: [arXiv:hep-ph/0001204] and references therein.
876: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0001204;%%
877:
878: \bibitem{Nardi:1992nq}
879: E.~Nardi,
880: %``Z-prime, new fermions and flavor changing processes. Constraints on E(6)
881: %models from mu $\to$ e e e,''
882: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 48}, 1240 (1993)
883: [arXiv:hep-ph/9209223];
884: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9209223;%%
885: %\bibitem{Bernabeu:1993ta}
886: J.~Bernabeu, E.~Nardi and D.~Tommasini,
887: %``mu - e conversion in nuclei and Z-prime physics,''
888: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 409}, 69 (1993)
889: [arXiv:hep-ph/9306251];
890: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9306251;%%
891: %\bibitem{Nir:1990yq}
892: Y.~Nir and D.~J.~Silverman,
893: %``Z Mediated Flavor Changing Neutral Currents And Their Implications For CP
894: %Asymmetries In B0 Decays,''
895: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 42}, 1477 (1990);
896: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D42,1477;%%
897: %\bibitem{Barger:1995dd}
898: V.~D.~Barger, M.~S.~Berger and R.~J.~Phillips,
899: %``Quark singlets: Implications and constraints,''
900: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 52}, 1663 (1995)
901: [arXiv:hep-ph/9503204];
902: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9503204;%%
903: %\bibitem{Popovic:2000dx}
904: M.~B.~Popovic and E.~H.~Simmons,
905: %``Weak-singlet fermions: Models and constraints,''
906: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 62}, 035002 (2000)
907: [arXiv:hep-ph/0001302];
908: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0001302;%%
909: D.~Silverman, talk given at Super $B$ Factory Workshop, Hawaii, January 19-22,
910: 2004.
911:
912: \bibitem{Babu:1996vt}
913: K.~S.~Babu, C.~F.~Kolda and J.~March-Russell,
914: %``Leptophobic U(1)'s and the R_b - R_c Crisis,''
915: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 54}, 4635 (1996)
916: [arXiv:hep-ph/9603212];
917: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9603212;%%
918: %\bibitem{Babu:1997st}
919: %K.~S.~Babu, C.~F.~Kolda and J.~March-Russell,
920: %``Implications of generalized Z Z' mixing,''
921: {\it ibid.} {\bf 57}, 6788 (1998)
922: [arXiv:hep-ph/9710441].
923: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9710441;%%
924:
925: \bibitem{Rizzo:1998ut}
926: T.~G.~Rizzo,
927: %``Gauge kinetic mixing and leptophobic Z' in E(6) and SO(10),''
928: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 59}, 015020 (1999)
929: [arXiv:hep-ph/9806397].
930: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9806397;%%
931:
932: \bibitem{Leroux:2001fx}
933: K.~Leroux and D.~London,
934: %``Flavour-changing neutral currents and leptophobic Z' gauge bosons,''
935: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 526}, 97 (2002)
936: [arXiv:hep-ph/0111246].
937: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0111246;%%
938:
939: \bibitem{He:2004it}
940: X.~G.~He and G.~Valencia,
941: %``K+ $\to$ pi+ nu anti-nu and FCNC from non-universal Z' bosons,''
942: arXiv:hep-ph/0404229.
943: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0404229;%%
944:
945: \bibitem{dsb}
946: G.~Buchalla, G.~Burdman, C.~T.~Hill and D.~Kominis,
947: %``GIM Violation and New Dynamics of the Third Generation,''
948: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 53}, 5185 (1996)
949: [arXiv:hep-ph/9510376];
950: G.~Burdman, K.~D.~Lane and T.~Rador,
951: %``Anti-B B mixing constrains topcolor-assisted technicolor,''
952: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 514}, 41 (2001)
953: [arXiv:hep-ph/0012073];
954: A.~Martin and K.~Lane,
955: %``CP violation and flavor mixing in technicolor models,''
956: arXiv:hep-ph/0404107.
957:
958: \bibitem{Chaudhuri:1994cd}
959: S.~Chaudhuri, S.~W.~Chung, G.~Hockney and J.~Lykken,
960: %``String consistency for unified model building,''
961: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 456}, 89 (1995)
962: [arXiv:hep-ph/9501361].
963: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9501361;%%
964:
965: \bibitem{Cleaver:1998gc}
966: G.~Cleaver, M.~Cvetic, J.~R.~Espinosa, L.~L.~Everett, P.~Langacker and J.~Wang,
967: %``Physics implications of flat directions in free fermionic superstring
968: %models. I: Mass spectrum and couplings,''
969: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 59}, 055005 (1999)
970: [arXiv:hep-ph/9807479].
971: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9807479;%%
972:
973: \bibitem{Cvetic:2001tj}
974: M.~Cvetic, G.~Shiu and A.~M.~Uranga,
975: %``Three-family supersymmetric standard like models from intersecting brane
976: %worlds,''
977: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 87}, 201801 (2001)
978: [arXiv:hep-th/0107143];
979: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0107143;%%
980: %\bibitem{Cvetic:2001nr}
981: %M.~Cvetic, G.~Shiu and A.~M.~Uranga,
982: %``Chiral four-dimensional N = 1 supersymmetric type IIA orientifolds from
983: %intersecting D6-branes,''
984: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 615}, 3 (2001)
985: [arXiv:hep-th/0107166].
986: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0107166;%%
987:
988: \bibitem{Cvetic:2002qa}
989: M.~Cvetic, P.~Langacker and G.~Shiu,
990: %``Phenomenology of a three-family standard-like string model,''
991: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 66}, 066004 (2002)
992: [arXiv:hep-ph/0205252].
993: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0205252;%%
994:
995: \bibitem{Barger:2003hg}
996: V.~Barger, C.~W.~Chiang, P.~Langacker and H.~S.~Lee,
997: %``Z' mediated flavor changing neutral currents in B meson decays,''
998: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 580}, 186 (2004)
999: [arXiv:hep-ph/0310073].
1000: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0310073;%%
1001:
1002: \bibitem{Grossman:1997gr}
1003: Y.~Grossman, G.~Isidori and M.~P.~Worah,
1004: %``CP asymmetry in B/d $\to$ Phi K(S): Standard model pollution,''
1005: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 58}, 057504 (1998)
1006: [arXiv:hep-ph/9708305].
1007: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9708305;%%
1008:
1009: \bibitem{Chiang:2003jn}
1010: C.~W.~Chiang and J.~L.~Rosner,
1011: %``New physics contributions to the B $\to$ Phi K(S) decay,''
1012: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 68}, 014007 (2003)
1013: [arXiv:hep-ph/0302094].
1014: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0302094;%%
1015:
1016: \bibitem{BCLL}
1017: V.~Barger, C.~W.~Chiang, P.~Langacker, and H.~S.~Lee, work in progress.
1018:
1019: \bibitem{Grossman:1996er}
1020: Y.~Grossman,
1021: %``The B/s width difference beyond the standard model,''
1022: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 380}, 99 (1996)
1023: [arXiv:hep-ph/9603244].
1024: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9603244;%%
1025:
1026: \bibitem{Heister:2002gk}
1027: A.~Heister {\it et al.} [ALEPH Collaboration],
1028: %``Improved search for B/s0 anti-B/s0 oscillations,''
1029: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 29} (2003) 143.
1030: %%CITATION = EPHJA,C29,143;%%
1031:
1032: \bibitem{Abe:1998qj}
1033: F.~Abe {\it et al.} [CDF Collaboration],
1034: %``A search for B/s0 anti-B/s0 oscillations using the semileptonic decay B/s0
1035: %$\to$ Phi l+ X nu,''
1036: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 82}, 3576 (1999).
1037: %%CITATION = PRLTA,82,3576;%%
1038:
1039: \bibitem{Adam:1997pv}
1040: W.~Adam {\it et al.} [DELPHI Collaboration],
1041: %``Search for B/s0 anti-B/s0 oscillations,''
1042: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 414}, 382 (1997).
1043: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B414,382;%%
1044:
1045: \bibitem{Abbiendi:1999gm}
1046: G.~Abbiendi {\it et al.} [OPAL Collaboration],
1047: %``A study of B/s0 meson oscillation using hadronic Z0 decays containing
1048: %leptons,''
1049: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 11}, 587 (1999)
1050: [arXiv:hep-ex/9907061].
1051: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 9907061;%%
1052:
1053: \bibitem{Abe:2002ua}
1054: K.~Abe {\it et al.} [SLD Collaboration],
1055: %``Search for time-dependent B/s0 anti-B/s0 oscillations using a vertex charge
1056: %dipole technique. ((B)),''
1057: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 67}, 012006 (2003)
1058: [arXiv:hep-ex/0209002].
1059: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0209002;%%
1060:
1061: \bibitem{Beneke:1998sy}
1062: M.~Beneke, G.~Buchalla, C.~Greub, A.~Lenz and U.~Nierste,
1063: %``Next-to-leading order {QCD} corrections to the lifetime difference of B/s
1064: %mesons,''
1065: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 459}, 631 (1999)
1066: [arXiv:hep-ph/9808385];
1067: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9808385;%%
1068: %\bibitem{Beneke:2000cu}
1069: M.~Beneke and A.~Lenz,
1070: %``Lifetime difference of B/s mesons: Theory status,''
1071: J.\ Phys.\ G {\bf 27}, 1219 (2001)
1072: [arXiv:hep-ph/0012222];
1073: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0012222;%%
1074: %\bibitem{Becirevic:2001fy}
1075: D.~Becirevic,
1076: %``Theoretical progress in describing the B meson lifetimes,''
1077: arXiv:hep-ph/0110124.
1078: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0110124;%%
1079:
1080: \bibitem{Buchalla:1995vs}
1081: G.~Buchalla, A.~J.~Buras and M.~E.~Lautenbacher,
1082: %``Weak Decays Beyond Leading Logarithms,''
1083: Rev.\ Mod.\ Phys.\ {\bf 68}, 1125 (1996)
1084: [arXiv:hep-ph/9512380].
1085: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9512380;%%
1086:
1087: %\cite{Yamada:2001xp}
1088: \bibitem{Yamada:2001xp}
1089: N.~Yamada {\it et al.} [JLQCD Collaboration],
1090: %``B meson B-parameters and the decay constant in two-flavor dynamical
1091: %QCD,''
1092: Nucl.\ Phys.\ Proc.\ Suppl.\ {\bf 106}, 397 (2002)
1093: [arXiv:hep-lat/0110087].
1094: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0110087;%%
1095:
1096: \bibitem{Becirevic:2001xt}
1097: D.~Becirevic, V.~Gimenez, G.~Martinelli, M.~Papinutto and J.~Reyes,
1098: %``B-parameters of the complete set of matrix elements of Delta(B) = 2
1099: %operators from the lattice,''
1100: JHEP {\bf 0204}, 025 (2002)
1101: [arXiv:hep-lat/0110091].
1102: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0110091;%%
1103:
1104: \bibitem{Ryan:2001ej}
1105: S.~M.~Ryan,
1106: %``Heavy quark physics from lattice QCD,''
1107: Nucl.\ Phys.\ Proc.\ Suppl.\ {\bf 106}, 86 (2002)
1108: [arXiv:hep-lat/0111010].
1109: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0111010;%%
1110:
1111: \bibitem{Wolfenstein:1983yz}
1112: L.~Wolfenstein,
1113: %``Parametrization Of The Kobayashi-Maskawa Matrix,''
1114: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 51}, 1945 (1983).
1115: %%CITATION = PRLTA,51,1945;%%
1116:
1117: \bibitem{Battaglia:2003in}
1118: M.~Battaglia {\it et al.},
1119: %``The CKM matrix and the unitarity triangle. Proceedings, Workshop, Geneva,
1120: %Switzerland, February 13-16, 2002,''
1121: arXiv:hep-ph/0304132.
1122: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0304132;%%
1123:
1124: \bibitem{Buras:2000if}
1125: A.~J.~Buras, M.~Misiak and J.~Urban,
1126: %``Two-loop QCD anomalous dimensions of flavour-changing four-quark operators
1127: %within and beyond the standard model,''
1128: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 586}, 397 (2000)
1129: [arXiv:hep-ph/0005183];
1130: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0005183;%%
1131: %\bibitem{Buras:2001ra}
1132: A.~J.~Buras, S.~Jager and J.~Urban,
1133: %``Master formulae for Delta(F) = 2 NLO-QCD factors in the standard model and
1134: %beyond,''
1135: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 605}, 600 (2001)
1136: [arXiv:hep-ph/0102316].
1137: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0102316;%%
1138:
1139: \end{thebibliography}
1140:
1141: \end{document}
1142:
1143:
1144: