1: \documentstyle[epsf,aps]{revtex}
2: %\documentclass[aps]{revtex4}
3: %\usepackage{epsf}
4: \textwidth 16.5cm
5: \oddsidemargin 0cm
6: \topmargin -1 cm
7: \textheight 22.4cm
8: \renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\fnsymbol{footnote}}
9:
10: \begin{document}
11: \newcommand{\be}{\begin{eqnarray}}
12: \newcommand{\dlq}{\lq\lq}
13: \newcommand{\ee}{\end{eqnarray}}
14: \newcommand{\ben}{\begin{eqnarray*}}
15: \newcommand{\een}{\end{eqnarray*}}
16: \newcommand{\stackeven}[2]{{{}_{\displaystyle{#1}}\atop\displaystyle{#2}}}
17: \newcommand{\lsim}{\stackeven{<}{\sim}}
18: \newcommand{\gsim}{\stackeven{>}{\sim}}
19: \newcommand{\bas}{\overline{\alpha}_s}
20: \newcommand{\un}[1]{\underline{#1}}
21: \renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{1.0}
22: \newcommand{\as}{\alpha_s}
23:
24: \newcommand{\sll}{\raise.15ex\hbox{$/$}\kern-.43em\hbox{$l$}}
25: \newcommand{\slepsilon}{\raise.15ex\hbox{$/$}\kern-.53em\hbox{$\epsilon$}}
26: \newcommand{\slp}{\raise.1ex\hbox{$/$}\kern-.63em\hbox{$p$}}
27: \newcommand{\slq}{\raise.1ex\hbox{$/$}\kern-.53em\hbox{$q$}}
28: \newcommand{\slv}{\raise.1ex\hbox{$/$}\kern-.63em\hbox{$v$}}
29: \newcommand{\slk}{\raise.15ex\hbox{$/$}\kern-.53em\hbox{$k$}}
30: \newcommand{\slpartial}{\raise.15ex\hbox{$/$}\kern-.53em\hbox{$\partial$}}
31:
32:
33: \def\eq#1{{Eq.~(\ref{#1})}}
34: \def\fig#1{{Fig.~\ref{#1}}}
35: \begin{flushright}
36: NT@UW--04--013 \\
37: INT--PUB--04--15
38: \end{flushright}
39: \vspace*{1cm}
40: \setcounter{footnote}{1}
41: \begin{center}
42: {\Large\bf Inclusive Two--Gluon and Valence
43: Quark--Gluon~\\[5mm] Production in DIS and pA}
44: \\[1cm]
45: Jamal Jalilian-Marian $^{1}$ and Yuri V.\ Kovchegov $^{2}$ \\ ~~ \\
46: {\it $^1$ Institute for Nuclear
47: Theory, University of Washington, Box 351550 } \\ {\it Seattle, WA
48: 98195 } \\ ~~ \\
49: {\it $^{2}$ Department of Physics, University of Washington,
50: Box 351560} \\ {\it Seattle, WA 98195 } \\ ~~ \\ ~~ \\
51: \end{center}
52: \begin{abstract}
53: \noindent We calculate production cross sections of a forward
54: quark--gluon pair and of two gluons at mid-rapidity in Deep Inelastic
55: Scattering and in high energy proton--nucleus collisions. The
56: calculation is performed in the framework of the Color Glass
57: Condensate formalism. We first calculate the cross sections in the
58: quasi-classical approximation, which includes multiple rescatterings
59: in the target. We then proceed to include the effects of non-linear
60: small-$x$ evolution in the production cross sections. It is
61: interesting to note that our result for the two-gluon production cross
62: section appears to be in direct violation of AGK cutting rules, which
63: is the first example of such violation in QCD. The calculated
64: quark--gluon and gluon--gluon production cross sections can be used to
65: construct theoretical predictions for two-particle azimuthal
66: correlations at RHIC and LHC ($I^{p(d)A}$) as well as for Deep
67: Inelastic Scattering experiments at HERA and eRHIC.
68: \end{abstract}
69: %\maketitle
70: \renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\arabic{footnote}}
71: \setcounter{footnote}{0}
72:
73:
74: \section{Introduction}
75:
76: Recent prediction of high-$p_T$ suppression in the nuclear
77: modification factor $R^{dA}$ at forward rapidity RHIC $dAu$
78: collisions \cite{klm,kkt1,aaksw} based on the physics of parton
79: saturation/Color Glass Condensate
80: \cite{glr,mq,bm,mv,kjkmw,bk,jimwlk,GM} has been confirmed by the
81: experimental data in \cite{brahms-1,brahms-2,phenix,phobos,star}. The
82: prediction of \cite{kkt1} was based on the calculation of inclusive
83: gluon production cross section in DIS and $pA$ collisions. The
84: calculation was first done in the quasi-classical framework of
85: McLerran-Venugopalan model including all multiple rescatterings
86: \cite{km} (see also \cite{kst,dmc,yuri1,kw}). The effects of
87: non-linear small-$x$ evolution \cite{bk,jimwlk,Braun} were included in
88: the obtained formula in \cite{kt} (see also \cite{braun}). In
89: \cite{kkt1,aaksw} it was argued that at lower energies/rapidities,
90: where the particle production is given by the quasi-classical formula
91: from \cite{km}, the nuclear modification factor $R^{pA}$ should
92: exhibit low-$p_T$ suppression together with a strong enhancement at
93: high-$p_T$, known as Cronin effect \cite{cronin} (see also
94: \cite{knst,ag,bkw,jmnv} for similar conclusions). However, at higher
95: energies/rapidities, when quantum evolution becomes important, one
96: should expect suppression of $R^{pA}$ at all $p_T$
97: \cite{klm,kkt1,aaksw} due to the onset of BFKL anomalous dimension for
98: gluon distributions \cite{bfkl}. (It had been earlier suggested in
99: \cite{adjjm} that the forward rapidity region would be most sensitive
100: to small-$x$ evolution effects.) Similar argument about enhancement
101: and suppression can be carried through for valence quark production
102: cross section calculated in \cite{adjjm}. The suppression has been
103: confirmed experimentally in \cite{brahms-1,brahms-2}. The centrality
104: dependence of the observed suppression was also in agreement with the
105: predictions of the Color Glass Condensate formalism
106: \cite{kkt1}. Further developments in the area included an analysis of
107: running coupling corrections \cite{iit} and a study of similar
108: suppression in di-lepton production \cite{jjm1} (see also
109: \cite{boris}). Recently, a more quantitative analyses \cite{jjm2,kkt2}
110: based on the Color Glass Condensate formalism have been performed
111: which show good agreement with the data \cite{brahms-1,brahms-2}.
112:
113: Another distinctive prediction of the Color Glass Condensate (CGC)
114: \cite{glr,mq,bm,mv,kjkmw,bk,jimwlk} is the disappearance of
115: back-to-back jets in the low $p_T < Q_s$ and intermediate $p_T \gsim
116: Q_s$ transverse momentum regions. While the single particle spectra in
117: $dAu$ collisions at RHIC have been successfully described by
118: CGC-inspired models \cite{jjm2,kkt2}, it is important to go beyond
119: single particle spectra and probe other observables, such as two
120: particle correlations, in order to map out the region of phase space
121: where CGC is the dominant physics. The inclusive two particle (gluon)
122: cross section at high energy is given by the $k_T$-factorization
123: \cite{lr} in the high $p_T$ region ($p_T \gg Q_s$) with the gluon distribution
124: function evolving via the BFKL evolution equation
125: \cite{bfkl}. Models based on $k_T$ factorization have been applied to
126: many different processes, such as the non-flow contribution to the
127: elliptic flow observable $v_2$ in heavy ion collisions \cite{ktflow}.
128: Recently a similar model of two-particle correlations in $dA$ was used
129: in \cite{klm2} to predict broadening and disappearance of back-to-back
130: correlations in $pA$ (or $dA$) collisions. The predictions of
131: \cite{klm2} appear to be confirmed by the preliminary data reported in
132: \cite{star2}, thus strengthening the case for saturation/Color Glass
133: Condensate in $dAu$ data at RHIC.
134:
135: Nevertheless, a theoretically rigorous treatment of inclusive
136: two-particle production in DIS and proton-nucleus collisions in the
137: low $p_T$ region ($p_T \lsim Q_s$) has not been performed yet. It is
138: clearly needed in order to provide reliable predictions in the $p_T
139: \lsim Q_s$ momentum region, which is the region where the new physics of
140: CGC is expected to be most pronounced. (Very recently, there has been
141: a series of articles investigating quark--antiquark production in $pA$
142: collisions using the quasi-classical approximation in the CGC
143: formalism \cite{bgv}.)
144:
145: Our goal in this work is to derive inclusive two-particle production
146: cross sections using the Color Glass Condensate formalism. We start by
147: considering production of two gluons. We assume that the two gluons
148: are separated by a large rapidity interval so that their respective
149: rapidities are ordered, $y_2 \gg y_1$. This kinematics is, for
150: instance, relevant to the case of two particle production in $p(d)A$
151: collisions (for example at RHIC or LHC) when one of the produced
152: particles is in the mid-rapidity region while the second particle is
153: closer to the forward rapidity region. In Sect. II, we derive an
154: expression for two-gluon inclusive cross section in Deep Inelastic
155: Scattering (DIS), using the quasi-classical approximation (the
156: McLerran-Venugopalan model) in the Color Glass Condensate formalism
157: and making the large-$N_c$ approximation to simplify the calculations.
158: (The quasi-classical approximation employed here is identical to the
159: one used in \cite{km,kst,dmc} to describe single gluon production.)
160: The result for two-gluon production cross section in the
161: quasi-classical approximation is given by Eqs. (\ref{disincl}) and
162: (\ref{2Gcl}). We note that a similar expression for two-quark
163: production cross section was obtained previously for DIS in
164: \cite{nszz}. In Sect. III, we include the effects of nonlinear
165: small-$x$ evolution \cite{bk} in the two-gluon inclusive cross section
166: obtained in Sect. II. The final answer for the two-gluon inclusive
167: cross section for DIS is given in \eq{2Gincl}. This result can be
168: easily generalized to $pA$ collisions.
169:
170: An ansatz for two gluon inclusive cross section including saturation
171: effects was written in \cite{braun} inspired by $k_T$-factorization
172: together with AGK cutting rules \cite{agk}. We note that the
173: diagrammatic structure of our answer in \eq{2Gincl} does not seem to
174: adhere to AGK cutting rules' expectation for two-gluon inclusive cross
175: section. Furthermore, we are unable to cast the expression
176: (\ref{2Gincl}) into $k_T$-factorized form used in
177: \cite{braun}. However, the leading twist $k_T$-factorization
178: expression \cite{lr,kt} can be reproduced exactly from \eq{2Gincl}, as
179: will be discussed at the end of Sect. III.
180:
181: In Sect. IV we calculate the inclusive production of a valence quark
182: and a gluon in $pA$ collisions both in the quasi-classical
183: approximation and including the quantum evolution in the target. The
184: rapidities of the valence quark and the gluon are assumed to be
185: comparable and large (both quark and gluon are produced in the forward
186: rapidity region). The result is given by Eqs. (\ref{eq:m_12}- \ref{eq:m_34}).
187: These expressions together
188: with \eq{2Gincl} can be used to describe the nuclear modification
189: factor for azimuthal correlations $I^{dAu}$ at any rapidity between
190: mid-rapidity and the deuteron beam at RHIC. In particular,
191: Eq. (\ref{2Gincl}) provides the theoretical basis for the correlation
192: analysis carried out in \cite{klm2}.
193:
194:
195: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
196:
197:
198: \section{Two-Gluon Production in the Quasi-Classical Approximation}
199:
200: In this Section we are going to derive an expression for inclusive
201: two-gluon production cross section in DIS including all multiple
202: rescatterings of the two produced gluons and the quark-antiquark pair
203: on the nucleons in the target nucleus \cite{Mueller1,mv,kjkmw}. A
204: typical diagram contributing to the process is shown in
205: \fig{lodis}. The two produced gluons have transverse momenta ${\un k}_1$
206: and ${\un k}_2$ and rapidities $y_1$ and $y_2$ correspondingly. To
207: simplify the calculations we will consider the case when $y_2 \gg
208: y_1$. A more general case of $y_2 \sim y_1$ was considered in
209: \cite{LO} for two-gluon production at the leading twist level given by
210: $k_T$-factorization. Our goal here is to include the saturation
211: effects in the two-gluon production cross section, which means summing
212: all twists. We will achieve this difficult task only for a simpler
213: case of $y_2 \gg y_1$, though, in principle, the more general case
214: $y_2 \sim y_1$ presents no new conceptual difficulties and is only
215: technically more complicated.
216:
217: As shown in \fig{lodis} the gluon production process in DIS in the
218: quasi-classical approximation \cite{Mueller1,mv,kjkmw} consists of two
219: factorisable stages. First the incoming virtual photon splits into a
220: quark-antiquark pair, which emits two gluons in the incoming wave
221: function. (The time scale for this splitting and gluon emissions is
222: much longer than the time of interaction with the target.) The whole
223: system multiply rescatters on the nuclear target. (In general the
224: gluon emissions can happen after the interaction with the target, as
225: will be discussed shortly.) In the quasi-classical approximation
226: considered here the interactions with the nucleons are limited to no
227: more than two exchanged gluons per nucleon (see the second reference
228: in \cite{kjkmw}). Single gluon production in the same approximation
229: was calculated for $pA$ collisions in \cite{km} and for DIS in
230: \cite{yuri1}.
231:
232: Let us assume that the virtual photon has a large ``$+$'' component of
233: the momentum and the nucleus had a large ``$-$'' component of its
234: momentum. Than the diagram of the process shown in \fig{lodis} is
235: dominant in $A^+ = 0$ gauge. In this Section we will perform all the
236: calculations in the framework of the light cone perturbation theory in
237: $A^+ = 0$ gauge \cite{BL}. First of all let us explicitly factor out
238: the wave function $\Phi^{\gamma^* \rightarrow q\bar q} ({\underline
239: x}_{0{\tilde 0}}, \alpha)$ of the virtual photon splitting in a
240: quark-antiquark pair of transverse size ${\un x}_{0{\tilde 0}} = {\un
241: x}_0 - {\un x}_{\tilde 0}$ with the quark carrying a fraction $\alpha$
242: of the virtual photon's light cone momentum. The wave function
243: $\Phi^{\gamma^* \rightarrow q\bar q} ({\underline x}_{0{\tilde 0}},
244: \alpha)$ is a well-known function and can be found, for example, in
245: \cite{NZ,KMc}. The two-gluon inclusive production cross section can be
246: written as
247: \be\label{disincl}
248: \frac{d \sigma^{\gamma^* A \rightarrow q{\bar q}GGX}}{d^2 k_1 \,
249: dy_1 \, d^2 k_2 \, dy_2} \, = \, \frac{1}{2 \pi^2} \, \int \, d^2
250: x_{0{\tilde 0}} \, \int_0^1 d \alpha \,
251: \Phi^{\gamma^* \rightarrow q\bar q} ({\underline x}_{0{\tilde 0}}, \alpha) \,
252: \frac{d {\hat \sigma}^{q{\bar q}A\rightarrow q{\bar q}GGX}}{d^2 k_1 \,
253: dy_1 \, d^2 k_2 \, dy_2}({\underline x}_{0{\tilde 0}}).
254: \ee
255: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
256: \begin{figure}
257: \begin{center}
258: \epsfxsize=10cm
259: \leavevmode
260: \hbox{\epsffile{sample.eps}}
261: \end{center}
262: \caption{Two-gluon production in DIS on a nucleus including multiple
263: rescatterings. }
264: \label{lodis}
265: \end{figure}
266: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
267:
268:
269: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
270:
271: \subsection{Time-Ordering Rules}
272:
273: To calculate two-gluon production cross section for a quarkonium
274: scattering on a nucleus, similarly to \cite{km,yuri1} one has to
275: consider various possible ordering of the emissions of the two gluons
276: by the $q\bar q$ pair. The interaction with the nucleus target can be
277: considered instantaneous compared to long lifetimes of emitted
278: gluons. Thus we will denote the moment of interaction with the target
279: by the light cone time $\tau \equiv x^+ = 0$. If $\tau_1$ and $\tau_2$
280: are the times of the emission of the two gluons, the possible emission
281: ordering in the amplitude reduces to three cases: (i) both gluons are
282: emitted before the interaction, $\tau_1 , \tau_2 <0$; (ii) one gluon
283: is emitted before the interaction and the other one is emitted after
284: the interaction, $\tau_1 < 0 < \tau_2$ or $\tau_2 < 0 < \tau_1$; (iii)
285: both gluons are emitted after the interaction, $\tau_1, \tau_2
286: >0$.
287:
288: The three cases are represented in \fig{order} for a particular
289: coupling of the two gluons to the $q\bar q$ pair. There the dashed
290: line in the middle denotes the (instantaneous) interaction with the
291: target. The dashed line comprises {\sl all} the multiple rescatterings
292: like the ones shown in \fig{lodis}. The dotted lines represent
293: intermediate states, which will give energy denominators in light cone
294: perturbation theory \cite{BL}. Even though \fig{order} shows a
295: particular way of the gluons' coupling to the $q\bar q$ pair, the
296: conclusions we will draw below about which diagrams dominate will be
297: applicable to other couplings of the gluons.
298:
299: Let us define the light cone energy of a gluon or a quark line
300: carrying momentum (${\un k}$, $k^+$) as \cite{BL}
301: \be
302: E_k \, \equiv \, k^- \, = \, \frac{{\un k}^2}{2 \, k^+}.
303: \ee
304: In Regge kinematics that we consider here the light cone momenta of
305: the gluons are ordered, such that $k_2^+ \gg k_1^+$ and $E_{k_2} \ll
306: E_{k_1}$. First we consider case (i) in \fig{order}. The diagrams (i)A
307: and (i)B (top and bottom) are different only by energy
308: denominators. Therefore, forgetting the rest of the diagram for now,
309: we write
310: \be\label{iA}
311: (i)A \, \sim \, \frac{1}{E_{k_2}} \, \frac{1}{E_{k_1} + E_{k_2}} \,
312: \approx \, \frac{1}{E_{k_2}} \, \frac{1}{E_{k_1}}
313: \ee
314: and
315: \be\label{iB}
316: (i)B \, \sim \, \frac{1}{E_{k_1}} \, \frac{1}{E_{k_1} + E_{k_2}} \,
317: \approx \, \frac{1}{E_{k_1}^2}.
318: \ee
319: The intermediate states giving the energy denominators in
320: Eqs. (\ref{iA}) and (\ref{iB}) are shown by dotted lines in
321: \fig{order}. Since $E_{k_2} \ll E_{k_1}$, Eqs. (\ref{iA}) and
322: (\ref{iB}) imply that $(i)A \gg (i)B$. Therefore the diagram (i)B can
323: be safely neglected. The conclusion we draw from this analysis is that
324: for gluon emissions before the interaction ($\tau_1, \tau_2 < 0$) the
325: (longitudinally) harder gluon has to be emitted first, as pictured in
326: the diagram (i)A in \fig{order}.
327:
328: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
329: \begin{figure}
330: \begin{center}
331: \epsfxsize=10cm
332: \leavevmode
333: \hbox{\epsffile{order.eps}}
334: \end{center}
335: \caption{Possible orderings of the emission of the two gluons by the
336: quark-antiquark pair.}
337: \label{order}
338: \end{figure}
339: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
340:
341: In calculating the diagrams (i)A and (i)B we have neglected the
342: ``$-$'' component of the momenta of the $q\bar q$ pair, because they
343: are negligibly small. The quark and the antiquark carry a very large
344: ``$+$'' component of the momentum, of the order of $p^+ \gg k_2^+ \gg
345: k_1^+$, which leads to negligibly small light cone energy $E_p$. We
346: have also neglected the change in the ``$-$'' component of the target
347: momentum, since the interaction with the target took place after the
348: intermediate states which gave the energy denominators in case (i) in
349: \fig{order}. This is not the case in the rest of the diagrams in
350: \fig{order}. The ``$-$'' momentum/light cone energy of the target
351: changes due to the interaction (dashed line). However, since the light
352: cone energy is conserved in the final state ($\tau = + \infty$), the
353: change of the target's ``$-$'' momentum is compensated by the change
354: of the ``$-$'' momentum of the projectile, which is mostly due to
355: appearance of two extra gluons leading to an addition of extra
356: $E_{k_1} + E_{k_2}$ to the $q\bar q$ wave function's light cone
357: energy. Therefore, the target's light cone energy decreases by
358: $E_{k_1} + E_{k_2}$ after the interaction. Thus, when calculating the
359: energy denominators of the intermediate states after the interaction
360: one has to add the change in the light cone energy of the target to
361: the energies of the lines shown in \fig{order}. This is equivalent to
362: subtracting $E_{k_1} + E_{k_2}$ in the corresponding energy
363: denominators. (This rule is worked out in more detail in Sect. IIIA of
364: \cite{kt}.)
365:
366: Guided by the rule we just derived we write for the energy
367: denominators of the diagrams in the case (ii) in \fig{order}
368: \be\label{iiA}
369: (ii)A \, \sim \, \frac{1}{E_{k_1}} \, \frac{1}{E_{k_1} - (E_{k_1} +
370: E_{k_2})} \, = \, - \frac{1}{E_{k_1}} \, \frac{1}{E_{k_2}},
371: \ee
372: \be\label{iiB}
373: (ii)B \, \sim \, \frac{1}{E_{k_2}} \, \frac{1}{E_{k_2} - (E_{k_1} +
374: E_{k_2})} \, = \, - \frac{1}{E_{k_2}} \, \frac{1}{E_{k_1}}.
375: \ee
376: As we see from Eqs. (\ref{iiA}) and (\ref{iiB}) the two diagrams are
377: of the same order, $(ii)A \sim (ii)B \ [\sim (i)A]$, and neither of
378: them can be neglected. (As we will see below diagrams $(ii)A$ and
379: $(ii)B$ are different in the parts responsible for the interaction
380: with the target, so while being parametrically of the same order, they
381: are not identically equal.)
382:
383: Finally, calculating the graphs in the case (iii) of \fig{order} one
384: arrives at
385: \be\label{iiiA}
386: (iii)A \, \sim \, \frac{1}{E_{k_1} + E_{k_2}} \, \frac{1}{E_{k_1}} \,
387: \approx \, \frac{1}{E_{k_1}^2},
388: \ee
389: and
390: \be\label{iiiB}
391: (iii)B \, \sim \, \frac{1}{E_{k_1} + E_{k_2}} \, \frac{1}{E_{k_2}} \,
392: \approx \, \frac{1}{E_{k_1}} \, \frac{1}{E_{k_2}}.
393: \ee
394: Since $E_{k_1} \gg E_{k_2}$ we conclude that $(iii)A \ll (iii)B$. The
395: diagram (iii)A should be neglected. Therefore, we derive a rule for
396: late-time emissions, which take place after the interaction ($\tau_1,
397: \tau_2 >0$): the harder gluon has to be emitted {\sl after} the softer
398: gluon. It is interesting to note that this ordering is the exact
399: inverse of the ordering giving the leading contribution at early times
400: before the interaction. The rule can also be generalized to any number
401: of gluon emissions contributing to the BFKL \cite{bfkl} or,
402: equivalently, dipole evolution \cite{dip,bk}: in the evolution at
403: early times preceding the interaction the gluons are ordered so that
404: the harder gluons are emitted before the softer ones \cite{dip}. The
405: ordering is reversed for late times following the interaction, where
406: the harder gluons should be emitted after the softer gluons to pick up
407: the leading logarithmic contribution. This observation was made
408: previously in \cite{kt}.
409:
410:
411: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
412:
413: \subsection{Two-Gluon Inclusive Cross Section in the Quasi-Classical
414: Approximation}
415:
416: The diagrams contributing to emission of the harder gluon with
417: momentum (${\un k}_2, y_2$) are shown in \fig{em2}. (In the following
418: we will refer to this gluon as gluon $\# 2$ and to the other (softer)
419: produced gluon as gluon $\# 1$.) To simplify the color algebra we will
420: continue the calculation in 't Hooft's large-$N_c$ limit. Only planar
421: diagrams will contribute for gluon emission. Using the notation from
422: Mueller's dipole model \cite{dip,CM} we denote the gluon in the
423: large-$N_c$ limit by a double quark line and leave the ends of the
424: gluon line disconnected from the quark lines. The latter notation
425: indicates a sum over all possible connections of the gluon to the
426: $q\bar q$ pair.
427:
428: As in \fig{order}, the dashed lines in \fig{em2} denote the $\tau = 0$
429: moment of the interaction of the system with the target
430: nucleus. However, unlike \fig{order}, in \fig{em2} we depict the
431: squares of the amplitude contributing to the total production cross
432: section. Therefore each diagram has two dashed lines corresponding to
433: interaction with the target in the amplitude and in the complex
434: conjugate amplitude. The solid vertical lines denote the final state
435: at $\tau = + \infty$.
436:
437: Similar to Mueller's dipole model \cite{dip} the emitted gluon $\# 2$
438: in \fig{em2}A splits the dipole $0{\tilde 0}$ into two color
439: dipoles. The emission of the softer gluon $\# 1$ can happen in any of
440: these two dipoles. However, the original dipole model \cite{dip} was
441: written for the calculation of the total cross sections, where one
442: only has to calculate the forward scattering amplitude of the
443: quarkonium. In that quantity all the final state emissions ($\tau >
444: 0$) cancel, as was shown in \cite{CM}. This is not the case for the
445: inclusive production cross section that we want to calculate here. All
446: final state emissions has to be taken into account, as shown in
447: \fig{em2}. Also, since we are interested in gluon production, the
448: momentum of gluon $\# 2$ is fixed. Therefore, since we are going to
449: perform our calculations in transverse coordinate space, we have to
450: keep the transverse coordinates of the gluon $\# 2$ different on both
451: sides of the cut. (To obtain the cross section we will afterwards
452: perform a Fourier transform into transverse momentum space.) Thus, the
453: gluon's transverse coordinate is denoted by ${\un x}_2$ to the left of
454: the cut and ${\un x}_{2'}$ to the right of the cut. Then the color
455: ``dipole'' formed by, say, the lines $2$, $2'$ and ${\tilde 0}$ in
456: \fig{em2}A would not be literally a dipole since one needs more than
457: two transverse coordinates to describe it, but it would still have the
458: color topology of a dipole and we will refer to it as a ``dipole''
459: below.
460:
461: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
462: \begin{figure}
463: \begin{center}
464: \epsfxsize=15cm
465: \leavevmode
466: \hbox{\epsffile{em2.eps}}
467: \end{center}
468: \caption{All possible emission of the harder gluon $\# 2$ by the
469: $q\bar q$ pair.}
470: \label{em2}
471: \end{figure}
472: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
473:
474: Let us start by analyzing the gluon production in \fig{em2}A. As was
475: mentioned before, the softer gluon $\# 1$ can be emitted either off
476: the color ``dipole'' formed by lines $0$, $2$ and $2'$ or off the
477: ``dipole'' $2,2',{\tilde 0}$. In the following analysis we will
478: concentrate on the latter case of emission of gluon $\# 1$ in
479: ``dipole'' $2,2',{\tilde 0}$. (A generalization to emission in
480: ``dipole'' $0$, $2$ and $2'$ is straightforward.) We will denote by
481: $M_0 ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{2'}, {\un x}_{\tilde 0}; {\un k}_1)$ the
482: cross section of emission of a softer gluon $\# 1$ in the ``dipole''
483: $2,2',{\tilde 0}$. Than the ``dipole'' $0,2,2'$ would not have gluon
484: emissions in it, but it would still be able to interact with the
485: target. Interactions of the target with the line $0$ would cancel due
486: to real-virtual cancellations \cite{km,KMc,kt}. Interactions with the
487: lines $2$ and $2'$ do not cancel: instead they are given by the
488: S-matrix of a $22'$ quark dipole interacting with the target
489: \cite{kt,BDMS}. The S-matrix is given by
490: \be\label{S0}
491: S_0 ({\un x}_{2}, {\un x}_{2'}) = 1 - N_0 ({\un x}_{2}, {\un x}_{2'}),
492: \ee
493: where, in the Glauber-Mueller approximation, the forward scattering
494: amplitude $N_0$ is \cite{Mueller1}
495: \be
496: \label{N0}
497: N_0 ({\un x}_{2}, {\un x}_{2'}) \, = \, 1 - e^{- {x}_{22'}^2
498: Q_{s0}^2 \, \ln (1/{x}_{22'} \Lambda )/4},
499: \ee
500: where ${x}_{22'} = |{\un x}_{2} - {\un x}_{2'}|$ and the quark
501: saturation scale in the McLerran-Venugopalan model $Q_{s0}$
502: \cite{mv,kjkmw} is given by (in the large-$N_c$ limit)
503: \be\label{sat}
504: Q_{s0}^2({\un b})\,=\, 2 \, \pi\, \as^2\,\rho\, T(\un b),
505: \ee
506: with $\rho$ the atomic number density in the nucleus with atomic
507: number $A$, $T(\un b)$ the nuclear profile function with ${\un b} =
508: ({\un x}_{2} + {\un x}_{2'})/2$ and $\Lambda$ some infrared cutoff.
509:
510: In the diagram in \fig{em2}B the softer gluon $\# 1$ can not be
511: emitted off gluon $2'$ in the complex conjugate amplitude: that would
512: be suppressed due to the inverse ordering rule we derived in
513: Sect. IIA. Furthermore, if the gluon $2'$ is emitted off the quark
514: line $0$ the gluon $\# 1$ can not be emitted in the dipole formed by
515: lines $0$ and $2'$ due to the same inverse ordering rule. Therefore,
516: if the gluon $2'$ is emitted off the quark line $0$, the gluon $\# 1$
517: can only be emitted by the dipole $0{\tilde 0}$ in the complex
518: conjugate amplitude. Therefore, the diagram \fig{em2}B would bring in
519: a factor of $M_0 ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_0, {\un x}_{\tilde 0}; {\un
520: k}_1)$ if the gluon $\# 1$ is emitted in the lower ``dipole''. In the
521: same case, in the upper ``dipole'', only the dipole $02$ would
522: interact with the target bringing in a factor of $S_0 ({\un x}_0, {\un
523: x}_2)$. The diagram in \fig{em2}C can be obtained from \ref{em2}B by
524: horizontal reflection which can be accomplished by interchanging ${\un
525: x}_2
526: \leftrightarrow {\un x}_{2'}$. Finally, a similar line of arguments
527: shows that the diagram in \fig{em2}D brings in a factor of $M_0 ({\un
528: x}_0, {\un x}_0, {\un x}_{\tilde 0}; {\un k}_1)$ if the gluon is
529: emitted in the lower ``dipole''.
530:
531: Combining the diagrams A-D in \fig{em2} and defining
532: \be
533: \bas \, \equiv \, \frac{\as \, N_c}{\pi}
534: \ee
535: we write
536: \ben
537: \frac{d {\hat \sigma}^{q{\bar q}A\rightarrow q{\bar q}GGX}}{d^2 k_1 \,
538: dy_1 \, d^2 k_2 \, dy_2}({\underline x}_{0{\tilde 0}}) \bigg|_{y_2 \gg
539: y_1} \, = \,
540: \frac{\bas}{(2 \pi)^3}
541: \, \int \, d^2 B \, d^2 x_2 \, d^2 x_{2'} \,
542: e^{- i {\underline k}_2 \cdot {\underline x}_{22'}} \,
543: \bigg[ \left( \frac{{\un x}_{20}}{x_{20}^2} -
544: \frac{{\un x}_{2{\tilde 0}}}{x_{2{\tilde 0}}^2} \right) \cdot
545: \left( \frac{{\un x}_{2'0}}{x_{2'0}^2} -
546: \frac{{\un x}_{2'{\tilde 0}}}{x_{2'{\tilde 0}}^2} \right)
547: \een
548: \ben
549: \times \, M_0 ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{2'}, {\un x}_{\tilde 0}; {\un k}_1)
550: \, S_0 ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{2'}) - \left( \frac{{\un
551: x}_{20}}{x_{20}^2} -
552: \frac{{\un x}_{2{\tilde 0}}}{x_{2{\tilde 0}}^2} \right) \cdot
553: \frac{{\un x}_{2'0}}{x_{2'0}^2} \,
554: M_0 ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_0, {\un x}_{\tilde 0}; {\un k}_1) \ S_0({\un
555: x}_0, {\un x}_2) -
556: \een
557: \be\label{2Gcl}
558: - \left( \frac{{\un x}_{2'0}}{x_{2'0}^2} -
559: \frac{{\un x}_{2'{\tilde 0}}}{x_{2'{\tilde 0}}^2} \right) \cdot
560: \frac{{\un x}_{20}}{x_{20}^2}
561: \, M_0 ({\un x}_0, {\un x}_{2'}, {\un x}_{\tilde 0}; {\un k}_1) \
562: S_0 ({\un x}_0, {\un x}_{2'}) + \frac{{\un x}_{20}}{x_{20}^2} \cdot
563: \frac{{\un x}_{2'0}}{x_{2'0}^2}
564: \, M_0 ({\un x}_0, {\un x}_0, {\un x}_{\tilde 0}; {\un k}_1)
565: + (0 \leftrightarrow {\tilde 0}) \bigg] \bigg\},
566: \ee
567: where ${\un B} = ({\un x}_0 + {\un x}_{\tilde 0})/2$ is the impact
568: parameter of the original dipole $0{\tilde 0}$. The term $(0
569: \leftrightarrow {\tilde 0})$ implies that we have to add the whole
570: expression again interchanging $0$ and ${\tilde 0}$ to account for the
571: emission of gluon $\# 1$ from the top ``dipole''.
572: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
573: \begin{figure}
574: \begin{center}
575: \epsfxsize=15cm
576: \leavevmode
577: \hbox{\epsffile{em1.eps}}
578: \end{center}
579: \caption{All possible emissions of the softer gluon $\# 1$ by the
580: ``dipole'' $2,2',{\tilde 0}$.}
581: \label{em1}
582: \end{figure}
583: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
584: Now we have to calculate $M_0 ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{2'}, {\un
585: x}_{\tilde 0}; {\un k}_1)$. To do that let us consider all possible
586: emissions of the gluon $\# 1$ in the ``dipole'' $2,2',{\tilde 0}$ as
587: shown in \fig{em1}. The transverse coordinates of gluon $\# 1$ are
588: ${\un x}_1$ and ${\un x}_{1'}$ to the left and to the right of the cut
589: correspondingly.
590:
591: To calculate all the diagrams in \fig{em1} one has to use the rules of
592: Sect. IIA. Let us illustrate the prescription for calculating these
593: graphs for the fairly general case when the gluon $\# 1$ is emitted
594: off gluon $\# 2$ on both sides of the cut. The ``dipole''
595: $2,2',{\tilde 0}$ in \fig{em1}A would then split into a ``dipole''
596: $1,1',{\tilde 0}$ and a quadrupole $2,2',1,1'$. The interactions of
597: line ${\tilde 0}$ with the target cancel via real-virtual
598: cancellations \cite{km,KMc}, thus reducing the interactions of the
599: ``dipole'' $1,1',{\tilde 0}$ to the interaction of a real dipole
600: $1,1'$ bringing in a factor of $S_0 ({\un x}_1,{\un x}_{1'} )$. The
601: interaction of the quadrupole $2,2',1,1'$ brings in a factor which we
602: will denote $Q_0 ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{2'}, {\un x}_1, {\un
603: x}_{1'})$. In the quasi-classical approximation of
604: McLerran-Venugopalan model this $S$-matrix of the quadrupole
605: interaction with the target $Q_0$ is calculated in the Appendix A
606: yielding (cf. \cite{nszz})
607: \ben
608: Q_0 ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{2'}, {\un x}_1, {\un x}_{1'}) \, = \,
609: e^{- [x_{21}^2 \ln (1/x_{21} \Lambda)+
610: x_{2'1'}^2 \ln (1/x_{2'1'} \Lambda)] Q_{s0}^2 /4}
611: \een
612: \ben
613: + \, \frac{x_{22'}^2 \ln (1/x_{22'} \Lambda)+ x_{11'}^2 \ln
614: (1/x_{11'} \Lambda) - x_{21'}^2 \ln (1/x_{21'} \Lambda) - x_{2'1}^2 \ln
615: (1/x_{2'1} \Lambda)}{x_{21}^2 \ln (1/x_{21} \Lambda)+ x_{2'1'}^2 \ln
616: (1/x_{2'1'} \Lambda) - x_{22'}^2 \ln (1/x_{22'} \Lambda) - x_{11'}^2 \ln
617: (1/x_{11'} \Lambda)}
618: \een
619: \be\label{Q0}
620: \times \, \left( e^{- [x_{21}^2 \ln (1/x_{21} \Lambda)+
621: x_{2'1'}^2 \ln (1/x_{2'1'} \Lambda)] Q_{s0}^2 /4} - e^{- [x_{11'}^2
622: \ln (1/x_{11'} \Lambda)+ x_{22'}^2 \ln (1/x_{22'} \Lambda)] Q_{s0}^2
623: /4} \right).
624: \ee
625: As once can see from \eq{Q0}, $Q_0 ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{2}, {\un x}_1,
626: {\un x}_{1}) = 1$ which is what one would expect due to real-virtual
627: cancellations \cite{km,KMc,kt}. One can also check that
628: \be\label{test0}
629: Q_0 ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{2'}, {\un x}_1, {\un x}_{1}) \, = \, e^{-
630: x_{22'}^2 \ln (1/x_{22'} \Lambda) Q_{s0}^2 /4}
631: \ee
632: corresponding to the $S$-matrix of the interaction of the dipole $22'$
633: with the target. (Interactions with line $1$ cancel again due to
634: real-virtual cancellations if we put ${\un x}_1 = {\un x}_{1'}$.)
635:
636: Now let us evaluate the graph in \fig{em1}B for the same case of gluon
637: $\# 1$ being emitted off gluon $\# 2$ on both sides of the cut. In the
638: top ``dipole'' interactions can only take place to the left of the cut
639: giving a factor of $S_0 ({\un x}_2,{\un x}_1 )$. In the bottom
640: ``dipole'' the interactions with line $\# {\tilde 0}$ cancel, leaving
641: only the dipole $12'$ to interact with the target which brings in a
642: factor of $S_0 ({\un x}_1,{\un x}_{2'} )$. The diagram in
643: \fig{em1}C is evaluated in a similar way yielding a factor of
644: $S_0 ({\un x}_{2'},{\un x}_{1'} ) \, S_0 ({\un x}_2,{\un
645: x}_{1'})$. Finally, in the diagram in \fig{em1}D only the lower dipole
646: can interact with the target giving a factor of $S_0 ({\un x}_2,{\un
647: x}_{2'})$.
648:
649: Combining the factors calculated above for the diagrams A-D in
650: \fig{em1}, putting in the contribution of gluon emission and summing over
651: all possible connections of gluon $\# 1$ to the lines $2, 2'$ and $1$
652: we obtain
653: \ben
654: M_0 ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{2'}, {\un x}_{\tilde 0} , {\un k}_1) \, = \,
655: \frac{\bas}{(2 \pi)^3} \, \int \, d^2 x_1 \, d^2
656: x_{1'} \, e^{- i {\un k}_1 \cdot {\un x}_{11'}} \, \bigg\{
657: \frac{{\un x}_{12}}{x_{12}^2} \cdot
658: \frac{{\un x}_{1'2'}}{x_{1'2'}^2} \ \bigg[ Q_0 ({\un x}_2,
659: {\un x}_{2'}, {\un x}_1, {\un x}_{1'}) \, S_0 ({\un x}_1, {\un
660: x}_{1'})
661: \een
662: \ben
663: + S_0 ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{2'}) - S_0 ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{1}) \,
664: S_0 ({\un x}_1, {\un x}_{2'}) - S_0 ({\un x}_{2'}, {\un x}_{1'}) \,
665: S_0 ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{1'}) \bigg]
666: + \frac{{\un x}_{1{\tilde 0}}}{x_{1{\tilde 0}}^2} \cdot
667: \frac{{\un x}_{1'{\tilde 0}}}{x_{1'{\tilde 0}}^2}
668: \bigg[ Q_0 ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{2'}, {\un x}_1, {\un x}_{1'})
669: \een
670: \ben
671: \times S_0 ({\un x}_1, {\un x}_{1'}) + S_0 ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{2'})
672: - Q_0 ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{2'}, {\un x}_1, {\un x}_{\tilde 0}) \,
673: S_0 ({\un x}_1, {\un x}_{\tilde 0}) - Q_0 ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{2'}, {\un
674: x}_{\tilde 0}, {\un x}_{1'}) \, S_0 ({\un x}_{\tilde 0}, {\un x}_{1'})
675: \bigg]
676: \een
677: \ben
678: - \frac{{\un x}_{12}}{x_{12}^2} \cdot
679: \frac{{\un x}_{1'{\tilde 0}}}{x_{1'{\tilde 0}}^2} \,
680: \bigg[ Q_0 ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{2'}, {\un x}_1, {\un x}_{1'}) \,
681: S_0 ({\un x}_1, {\un x}_{1'}) + S_0 ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{\tilde 0})
682: \, S_0 ({\un x}_{2'}, {\un x}_{\tilde 0})
683: - Q_0 ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{2'}, {\un x}_1, {\un x}_{\tilde 0}) \,
684: S_0 ({\un x}_1, {\un x}_{\tilde 0})
685: \een
686: \ben
687: - S_0 ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{1'}) \,
688: S_0 ({\un x}_{2'}, {\un x}_{1'}) \bigg]
689: - \frac{{\un x}_{1{\tilde 0}}}{x_{1{\tilde 0}}^2} \cdot \frac{{\un
690: x}_{1'2'}}{x_{1'2'}^2} \, \bigg[ Q_0 ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{2'}, {\un
691: x}_1, {\un x}_{1'}) \, S_0 ({\un x}_1, {\un x}_{1'}) +
692: S_0 ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{\tilde 0}) \,
693: S_0 ({\un x}_{2'}, {\un x}_{\tilde 0})
694: \een
695: \be\label{M0}
696: - S_0 ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_1) \, S_0 ({\un x}_{2'}, {\un x}_1)
697: - Q_0 ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{2'}, {\un x}_{\tilde 0}, {\un x}_{1'}) \,
698: S_0 ({\un x}_{1'}, {\un x}_{\tilde 0}) \bigg] \bigg\}
699: \ee
700: Eqs. (\ref{disincl}) and (\ref{2Gcl}), together with Eqs. (\ref{M0}),
701: (\ref{Q0}), (\ref{S0}) and (\ref{N0}) give us the two-gluon inclusive
702: production cross section for DIS on a nucleus including all the
703: quasi-classical multiple rescatterings in the large-$N_c$
704: approximation. It is the main result of this Section.
705:
706:
707:
708: \section{Two-Gluon Production Including Quantum Evolution}
709:
710: In this Section our goal is to include the effects of non-linear
711: small-$x$ quantum evolution of \cite{bk} into the quasi-classical
712: expression (\ref{2Gcl}) for inclusive two-gluon production cross
713: section. We will begin by reviewing the non-linear evolution equation
714: and its application to single inclusive gluon production. We will
715: proceed by deriving the expression generalizing \eq{2Gcl} by including
716: the non-linear evolution \cite{bk} in it. We will conclude by
717: verifying that the obtained expression matches onto the standard
718: $k_T$-factorization result \cite{lr} at the leading twist level.
719:
720:
721: \subsection{Brief Review of Small-$x$ Evolution and Single Gluon Production}
722:
723: To include the effects of small-$x$ evolution in the dipole $S$-matrix
724: one first defines the $S$ matrix for a quark dipole $0{\tilde 0}$
725: having rapidity $Y$ with respect to the target as
726: \be\label{S}
727: S ({\un x}_{0}, {\un x}_{\tilde 0}, Y) = 1 - N ({\un x}_{0}, {\un
728: x}_{\tilde 0}, Y),
729: \ee
730: where the forward scattering amplitude has to be determined from the
731: non-linear evolution equation \cite{bk}
732: \ben
733: N({\underline x}_{0}, {\un x}_{\tilde 0}, Y) = N_0 ({\underline
734: x}_{0}, {\un x}_{\tilde 0}) \, e^{- 2 \, \bas \, \ln
735: \left( \frac{x_{0{\tilde 0}}}{\rho} \right) Y} + \frac{\bas}{2 \, \pi}
736: \int_0^Y d y \ e^{ - 2\, \bas \, \ln \left(
737: \frac{x_{0{\tilde 0}}}{\rho} \right) (Y - y)}
738: \een
739: \be\label{eqN}
740: \times \int_\rho d^2 x_2 \frac{x_{0{\tilde 0}}^2}{x_{20}^2
741: x_{2{\tilde 0}}^2} \, [ N ({\underline x}_{0},{\un x}_2, y) + N
742: ({\underline x}_{2},{\un x}_{\tilde 0}, y) -
743: N ({\underline x}_{0},{\un x}_2, y) \, N
744: ({\underline x}_{2},{\un x}_{\tilde 0}, y) ] ,
745: \ee
746: with the initial condition given by \eq{N0} and $\rho$ being an
747: ultraviolet cutoff \cite{dip}. The evolution equation (\ref{eqN})
748: resums all powers of leading logarithms of center of mass energy $\as
749: Y$ and all multiple interactions with the target, which bring in
750: powers of $\as^2 A^{1/3}$ with $A$ the atomic number of the nucleus
751: \cite{kjkmw,km,KMc,yuri1}.
752:
753: \eq{eqN} is derived in \cite{bk} by resumming a cascade of gluons in
754: the incoming $q\bar q$ wave function, which in the large-$N_c$ limit
755: turns into a cascade of color dipoles. The emissions are similar to
756: the ones we considered in Sect. IIA for the early times preceding the
757: interaction. The difference is that in \cite{bk} one resums emissions
758: to all orders, without limiting oneself to just two gluons. At the
759: leading logarithmic level the contribution of this gluonic (dipole)
760: cascade to the $S$-matrix of the dipole-nucleus scattering is given by
761: the solution of \eq{eqN}. However, one can use this cascade to
762: construct other useful observables.
763:
764: In \cite{kt} it was shown that inclusive gluon production cross
765: section in a dipole-nucleus scattering is given by the following
766: formula:
767: \be\label{1Gincl}
768: \frac{d \sigma^{q {\bar q} A \rightarrow q{\bar q}GX}}{d^2 k \ dy}
769: ({\un x}_{0 {\tilde 0}})
770: \ = \ \int \, d^2 B \
771: n_1 ({\underline x}_0, {\underline x}_{\tilde 0}, Y; {\un x}_1, {\un
772: x}_2, y) \, d^2 x_1 \, d^2 x_2 \ s ({\un x}_1, {\un x}_2, {\un k},
773: y),
774: \ee
775: where we defined
776: \ben
777: s ({\un x}_1, {\un x}_2, {\un k}, y) \, \equiv \, \frac{\bas}{(2
778: \pi)^3} \, \int \, d^2 z_1 \, d^2 z_2 \,
779: e^{- i {\underline k} \cdot ({\underline z}_1 - {\underline z}_2 )} \,
780: \sum_{i,j = 1}^2 (-1)^{i+j} \,
781: \frac{{\underline z}_1 - {\underline x}_i}{|{\underline z}_1 -
782: {\underline x}_i|^2} \cdot \frac{{\underline z}_2 - {\underline
783: x}_j}{|{\underline z}_2 - {\underline x}_j|^2}
784: \een
785: \be\label{sdef}
786: \times \, \left[ N_G \left({\underline z}_1, {\underline x}_j, y \right)
787: + N_G \left({\underline z}_2 , {\underline x}_i, y \right)
788: - N_G \left({\underline z}_1 , {\underline z}_2, y \right)
789: - N_G \left({\underline x}_i , {\underline x}_j, y \right) \right]
790: \ee
791: in terms of the forward scattering amplitude of the adjoint (gluon)
792: dipole, which in the large $N_c$ limit can be easily expressed in
793: terms of the forward amplitude of the fundamental (quark) dipole
794: \be\label{ngn}
795: N_G ({\underline x}_0, {\underline x}_1, y) \, = \, 2 \, N
796: ({\underline x}_0, {\underline x}_1, y) - N^2 ({\underline x}_0,
797: {\underline x}_1, y).
798: \ee
799:
800: In \eq{1Gincl} the quantity $n_1 ({\underline x}_0, {\underline
801: x}_{\tilde 0}, Y; {\un x}_1, {\un x}_2, y)$ has the meaning of the
802: probability of finding a dipole $12$ at rapidity $y$ in the original
803: dipole $0{\tilde 0}$ having rapidity $Y$ \cite{dip}. It obeys the
804: following equation \cite{dip}
805: \ben
806: n_1 ({\underline x}_{0}, {\un x}_{\tilde 0}, Y; {\un x}_1, {\un
807: x}_{\tilde 1}, y) = \delta^2 ({\underline x}_{0} - {\un x}_1) \,
808: \delta ( {\un x}_{\tilde 0} - {\un x}_{\tilde 1}) \, e^{- 2
809: \, \bas \, \ln \left( \frac{x_{0{\tilde 0}}}{\rho} \right) (Y-y)} +
810: \frac{\bas}{2 \, \pi} \int_{y}^Y d y' \, e^{ - 2\, \bas \, \ln \left(
811: \frac{x_{0{\tilde 0}}}{\rho} \right) (Y - y')}
812: \een
813: \be\label{n1}
814: \times \int_\rho d^2 x_2 \frac{x_{0{\tilde 0}}^2}{x_{20}^2
815: x_{2{\tilde 0}}^2} \, [ n_1 ({\underline x}_{0},{\un x}_2, y'; {\un
816: x}_1, {\un x}_{\tilde 1}, y) + n_1 ({\underline x}_{2},{\un
817: x}_{\tilde 0}, y'; {\un x}_1, {\un x}_{\tilde 1}, y) ],
818: \ee
819: which is the linear part of the dipole evolution equation (\ref{eqN})
820: equivalent to the BFKL equation \cite{bfkl}.
821:
822: The quantity $s ({\un x}_1, {\un x}_2, {\un k}, y)$ in \eq{1Gincl} is
823: the cross section for single gluon production by the dipole $12$
824: scattering on a nucleus at rapidity $y$ with the emitted gluon being
825: the first (hardest) gluon in the gluonic (dipole) cascade developed by
826: the incoming dipole $12$. Than \eq{1Gincl} has a simple physical
827: meaning: it convolutes the probability of finding a dipole in the
828: initial onium wave function which would emit the gluon with the
829: probability of the gluon emission by this dipole.
830:
831: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
832: \begin{figure}
833: \begin{center}
834: \epsfxsize=8cm
835: \leavevmode
836: \hbox{\epsffile{fan1.eps}}
837: \end{center}
838: \caption{Feynman diagram corresponding to single gluon production
839: cross section given by \eq{1Gincl}. Emitted gluon is denoted by the
840: cross. }
841: \label{fan1}
842: \end{figure}
843: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
844:
845: To recover the quasi-classical result for single gluon production
846: \cite{km} one has to put $Y=y=0$ on the right hand side of \eq{1Gincl}.
847: That would effectively turn off the quantum evolution giving
848: \ben
849: \frac{d \sigma^{q {\bar q} A \rightarrow q{\bar q}GX}}{d^2 k \ dy}
850: ({\un x}_{0 {\tilde 0}})
851: \, = \, \int \, d^2 B \
852: s ({\un x}_0, {\un x}_{\tilde 0}, {\un k}, 0) \,
853: = \, \int \, d^2 B \,
854: d^2 z_1 \, d^2 z_2 \, e^{- i {\underline k} \cdot ({\underline z}_1 -
855: {\underline z}_2 )}
856: \een
857: \ben
858: \times \, \sum_{i,j = 1}^2 (-1)^{i+j} \,
859: \frac{{\underline z}_1 - {\underline x}_i}{|{\underline z}_1 -
860: {\underline x}_i|^2} \cdot \frac{{\underline z}_2 - {\underline
861: x}_j}{|{\underline z}_2 - {\underline x}_j|^2} \, \left( e^{- ({\un x}_i -
862: {\un x}_j)^2 Q_{s0}^2\ln(1/|{\un x}_i-{\un x}_j| \Lambda) /2 } - e^{-
863: ({\un z}_1 - {\un x}_j)^2 Q_{s0}^2\ln(1/|{\un z}_1 - {\un x}_j|
864: \Lambda) /2 } \right.
865: \een
866: \be
867: \left. - e^{- ({\un z}_2 - {\un x}_i)^2 Q_{s0}^2\ln(1/|{\un z}_2
868: - {\un x}_i|\Lambda) /2 } + e^{-
869: ({\un z}_1 - {\un z}_2)^2 Q_{s0}^2\ln(1/|{\un z}_1-{\un z}_2| \Lambda)
870: /2 } \right) \label{1Gcl}
871: \ee
872: which is the quasi-classical gluon production cross section found in
873: \cite{km,kst,dmc,yuri1}.
874:
875: If the evolution equation (\ref{eqN}) is pictured as resumming the
876: so-called ``fan'' diagrams in dipole-nucleus scattering \cite{glr,mq},
877: than the single inclusive gluon production cross section would
878: correspond to diagrams like the one shown in \fig{fan1}. There the
879: produced gluon, which is denoted by the cross, can be emitted only
880: from the top ladder in the diagram. As it turned out, emissions from
881: all other (lower) ladders cancel \cite{kt}, in agreement with
882: expectations of the AGK cutting rules \cite{agk} (see also
883: \cite{braun}). Thus the evolution between the projectile and the
884: produced gluon is just a linear BFKL evolution, as we can see in
885: \eq{n1}. The evolution between the produced gluon and the target is
886: the full non-linear evolution given by \eq{eqN}, as can bee seen from
887: \eq{1Gincl}.
888:
889: Before concluding the~subsection let us define another useful
890: quantity. Following \cite{dip} let
891: \ben
892: n_2 ({\un x}_0, {\un x}_{\tilde 0}, Y; {\un x}_1 , {\un x}_{\tilde 1},
893: y_1, {\un x}_2, {\un x}_{\tilde 2}, y_2)
894: \een
895: be the probability of finding dipoles $1{\tilde 1}$ and $2{\tilde 2}$
896: with rapidities $y_1$ and $y_2$ correspondingly in the original dipole
897: $0{\tilde 0}$ having rapidity $Y$. This quantity obeys the following
898: evolution equation
899: \cite{dip}
900: \ben
901: n_2 ({\un x}_0, {\un x}_{\tilde 0}, Y; {\un x}_1 , {\un x}_{\tilde 1},
902: y_1, {\un x}_2, {\un x}_{\tilde 2}, y_2) \, = \, \frac{\bas}{2 \, \pi} \,
903: \int_{\mbox{max} \{ y_1, y_2 \}}^Y d y \ e^{ - 2 \, \bas \, \ln \left(
904: \frac{x_{0{\tilde 0}}}{\rho} \right) (Y - y)} \, \int_\rho d^2 x_3
905: \frac{x_{0{\tilde 0}}^2}{x_{30}^2 x_{3{\tilde 0}}^2}
906: \een
907: \ben
908: \times \, \left[ n_1 ({\un
909: x}_0, {\un x}_3, y; {\un x}_1 , {\un x}_{\tilde 1}, y_1) \, n_1
910: ({\un x}_3, {\un x}_{\tilde 0}, y; {\un x}_2 , {\un x}_{\tilde 2},
911: y_2) + n_1 ({\un
912: x}_0, {\un x}_3, y; {\un x}_2 , {\un x}_{\tilde 2}, y_2) \, n_1
913: ({\un x}_3, {\un x}_{\tilde 0}, y; {\un x}_1 , {\un x}_{\tilde 1},
914: y_1) + \right.
915: \een
916: \be\label{n2}
917: + \left. n_2 ({\un x}_0, {\un x}_3, y; {\un x}_1 , {\un x}_{\tilde 1},
918: y_1, {\un x}_2 , {\un x}_{\tilde 2}, y_2) + n_2 ({\un x}_3, {\un
919: x}_{\tilde 0}, y; {\un x}_1 , {\un x}_{\tilde 1}, y_1, {\un x}_2 ,
920: {\un x}_{\tilde 2}, y_2)\right]
921: \ee
922: which is linear and can be solved after one finds $n_1$ from
923: \eq{n1}.
924:
925:
926:
927: \subsection{Two-Gluon Inclusive Cross Section with Quantum Evolution}
928:
929: Now we have all the essential ingredients necessary to include quantum
930: evolution effects into \eq{2Gcl}. Similar to the analysis carried out
931: in \cite{kt} we will separate all the gluons into the ones which are
932: harder (have higher rapidity with respect to the target) than the
933: harder of the two gluons with rapidities $y_1$ and $y_2$ that are
934: going to be produced and into the ones which are softer (have lower
935: rapidity) than the gluon $y_2$ ($y_2 \gg y_1$).
936:
937: Similarly to the analysis of Sect. IIIA in \cite{kt}, one can easily
938: conclude that all of the harder gluons can be emitted only at early
939: ($\tau < 0$) times both in the amplitude and in the complex conjugate
940: amplitude. Due to the ordering rule from Sect. IIA of this paper, this
941: implies that these harder gluons have to be emitted before gluons $\#
942: 2$ and $\# 1$. Therefore, we have to distinguish two important cases:
943:
944:
945: \begin{enumerate}
946:
947: \item[{\bf A.}] The gluons $\# 2$ and $\# 1$ are emitted in two
948: different dipoles created by the evolution due to emission of gluons
949: which are harder than either gluon $\# 2$ or gluon $\# 1$.
950:
951: \item[{\bf B.}] The gluon $\# 2$ is emitted in a dipole created by the
952: evolution consisting of emissions of harder gluons. The gluon $\# 1$
953: is emitted either by one of the ``dipoles'' adjacent to gluon $\# 2$
954: (as was studied in \fig{em1}) or in a dipole generated by evolution
955: inside one of these adjacent ``dipoles''.
956:
957: \end{enumerate}
958:
959: Case A is relatively straightforward. Quantum evolution creating two
960: dipoles of given sizes and rapidities at times $\tau < 0$ is included
961: in the quantity $n_2$ from \eq{n2}. Emission of each of the gluons $\#
962: 1$ and $\# 2$ in two independent dipoles is equivalent to the same
963: problem of a single inclusive gluon emission in a dipole-nucleus
964: collision as considered in Sect. IIIA and is described by the quantity
965: $s$ from \eq{sdef}, which also includes all the successive evolution
966: generated through emissions of gluons softer than either $\# 1$ or $\#
967: 2$ \cite{kt}. Therefore the contribution of case A to double gluon
968: production can be written as
969: \be\label{Apiece}
970: \int d^2 B \,
971: n_2 ({\un x}_0, {\un x}_{\tilde 0}, Y; {\un x}_1 , {\un x}_{\tilde 1},
972: y_1, {\un x}_2, {\un x}_{\tilde 2}, y_2) \, d^2 x_1 \, d^2 x_{\tilde
973: 1} \, d^2 x_2 \, d^2 x_{\tilde 2} \, s ({\un x}_1, {\un x}_{\tilde 1},
974: {\un k}_1, y_1) \, s ({\un x}_{2}, {\un x}_{\tilde 2}, {\un k}_2,
975: y_2)
976: \ee
977: with ${\un B} = ({\un x}_0 + {\un x}_{\tilde 0})/2$ as before.
978:
979: Contribution of case B is somewhat more complicated. The probability
980: of finding an early time ($\tau < 0$) dipole in the original onium in
981: which gluon $\# 2$ is emitted is described by the quantity $n_1$ from
982: \eq{n1}. Emission of gluon $\# 2$ is then described by the diagrams of
983: \fig{em2} and, equivalently, by \eq{2Gcl}. The only difference is that
984: now we have to include quantum evolution in the quantity $M_0$ and in
985: the $S$-matrix $S_0$. The inclusion of evolution into the $S$-matrix
986: $S_0$ is accomplished in Eqs. (\ref{S}) and (\ref{eqN}). The inclusion
987: of evolution into the quantity $M_0$ requires a separate diagrammatic
988: analysis, shown in \fig{mev}.
989:
990: Let us first define a quantity $M ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{2'}, {\un
991: x}_{\tilde 0}, Y; {\un k}_1, y_1)$ which by analogy with $M_0$ has a
992: physical meaning of an inclusive cross section of producing a gluon
993: with transverse momentum ${\un k}_1$ and rapidity $y_1$ in the
994: ``dipole'' $2, 2', {\tilde 0}$ having rapidity $Y$. To write down an
995: evolution equation for $M ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{2'}, {\un x}_{\tilde
996: 0}, Y; {\un k}_1, y_1)$ one has to analyze a single step of small-$x$
997: evolution for this quantity. All the important gluon emissions in the
998: ``dipole'' $2, 2', {\tilde 0}$ are shown in \fig{mev}. We start the
999: analysis with the diagram in \fig{mev}A. Emitting the gluon $\# 4$
1000: splits the original ``dipole'' $2, 2', {\tilde 0}$ into a ``dipole''
1001: $2, 2', 4$ and a dipole $4 {\tilde 0}$. Than the gluon $\# 1$ can be
1002: emitted in the ``dipole'' $2, 2', 4$, which would bring in a factor of
1003: \ben
1004: M ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{2'}, {\un x}_4, y; {\un k}_1, y_1)
1005: \een
1006: with $y$ the rapidity of gluon $\# 4$. In this case all interactions
1007: in dipole $4 {\tilde 0}$ cancel. Alternatively the gluon $\# 1$ can be
1008: emitted in the dipole $4 {\tilde 0}$, which would bring in the
1009: familiar factor of
1010: \ben
1011: \int d^2 x_a d^2 x_b \, n_1 ({\un x}_{4}, {\un x}_{\tilde 0}, y;
1012: {\un x}_a, {\un x}_b, y_1) \, s ({\un x}_a, {\un x}_b, {\un k}_1, y_1)
1013: \een
1014: from \eq{1Gincl} describing a single inclusive gluon production in a
1015: dipole-nucleus scattering. In this second case interactions of the
1016: ``dipole'' $2, 2', 4$ with the target would not completely
1017: cancel. Instead they would bring in a factor of $S ({\un x}_2, {\un
1018: x}_{2'}, y) = 1 - N ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{2'}, y)$ corresponding to
1019: interaction of dipole $22'$ with the target.
1020:
1021: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1022: \begin{figure}
1023: \begin{center}
1024: \epsfxsize=12cm
1025: \leavevmode
1026: \hbox{\epsffile{mev.eps}}
1027: \end{center}
1028: \caption{Diagrams describing one step of evolution for $M$.}
1029: \label{mev}
1030: \end{figure}
1031: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1032:
1033: In the diagram shown in \fig{mev}B the interaction of gluon $\# 4$
1034: with the line $\tilde 0$ to the right of the cut gets canceled by the
1035: diagram similar to the one in \fig{mev}E but with the gluon $\# 4$
1036: connecting to the line $\tilde 0$ instead of line $2$ to the right of
1037: the cut \cite{CM}. Therefore, gluon $\# 4$ interacts only with line
1038: $2'$ on the right hand side of \fig{mev}B and only with line $2$ on
1039: the right hand side of \fig{mev}E. Due to the inverse ordering rule
1040: for late time emissions from Sect. IIA the gluon $\# 1$ can not be
1041: emitted in the dipole $24$ in graph B of \fig{mev}. (In \fig{mev}E the
1042: dipole $24$ is not present in the final state and can not contribute
1043: to gluon production.) Therefore, in both graphs B and E the dipole
1044: $24$ brings in only a factor of $S ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_4, y) = 1 - N
1045: ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_4, y)$ into the evolution equation we are
1046: constructing. The other ``dipole'' $4, 2', {\tilde 0}$ would than
1047: bring in a factor of
1048: \ben
1049: M ({\un x}_4, {\un x}_{2'}, {\un x}_{\tilde 0}, y; {\un k}_1, y_1).
1050: \een
1051: Diagrams C and F can be obtained from B and E by interchanging $2
1052: \leftrightarrow 2'$. Finally, in the diagram D interactions of gluon
1053: $\# 4$ with the line ${\tilde 0}$ cancel due to real-virtual
1054: cancellations of \cite{CM} that we have just employed in graphs B and
1055: E. The remaining interaction with lines $2$ and $2'$ shown in
1056: \fig{mev}D does not split the ``dipole'' $2,2',{\tilde 0}$. Due to
1057: inverse ordering rule of Sect. IIA there will be no softer gluon
1058: emissions in ``dipole'' $2,2'4$, such that all subsequent evolution
1059: will take place only in ``dipole'' $2,2',{\tilde 0}$. Therefore,
1060: diagram D contributes only to virtual corrections, along with the
1061: usual virtual corrections at $\tau < 0$ in dipoles $2 {\tilde 0}$ and
1062: $2' {\tilde 0}$.
1063:
1064:
1065: Combining the contributions of all diagrams in \fig{mev} we write the
1066: following evolution equation:
1067: \ben
1068: M ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{2'}, {\un x}_{\tilde 0}, Y; {\un k}_1, y_1) \,
1069: = \, e^{- \bas \, \ln \left( \frac{x_{2{\tilde 0}} x_{2'{\tilde 0}}
1070: x_{22'}}{\rho^3} \right) \, (Y-y_1)} \, d({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{2'},
1071: {\un x}_{\tilde 0}, {\un k}_1, y_1) +
1072: \een
1073: \ben
1074: + \frac{\bas}{2 \pi} \, \int d^2 x_4 \int_{y_1}^Y dy \, e^{- \bas \,
1075: \ln \left( \frac{x_{2{\tilde 0}} x_{2'{\tilde 0}} x_{22'}}{\rho^3}
1076: \right) \, (Y-y)} \, \bigg\{
1077: \left( \frac{{\un x}_{42}}{x_{42}^2} -
1078: \frac{{\un x}_{4{\tilde 0}}}{x_{4{\tilde 0}}^2} \right) \cdot
1079: \left( \frac{{\un x}_{42'}}{x_{42'}^2} -
1080: \frac{{\un x}_{4{\tilde 0}}}{x_{4{\tilde 0}}^2} \right)
1081: \een
1082: \ben
1083: \times
1084: \bigg[ M ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{2'}, {\un x}_4, y; {\un k}_1, y_1)
1085: + \int d^2 x_a d^2 x_b \, n_1 ({\un x}_4, {\un x}_{\tilde 0}, y;
1086: {\un x}_a, {\un x}_b, y_1) \, s ({\un x}_a, {\un x}_b, {\un k}_1, y_1)
1087: \, [1 - N ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{2'}, y)] \bigg] -
1088: \een
1089: \ben
1090: - \left( \frac{{\un x}_{42}}{x_{42}^2} -
1091: \frac{{\un x}_{4{\tilde 0}}}{x_{4{\tilde 0}}^2} \right) \cdot
1092: \left( \frac{{\un x}_{42'}}{x_{42'}^2} -
1093: \frac{{\un x}_{42}}{x_{42}^2} \right) \,
1094: M ({\un x}_4, {\un x}_{2'}, {\un x}_{\tilde 0}, y; {\un k}_1, y_1)
1095: \, [1 - N ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_4, y)] -
1096: \een
1097: \be\label{Mev}
1098: - \left( \frac{{\un x}_{42}}{x_{42}^2} -
1099: \frac{{\un x}_{42'}}{x_{42'}^2} \right) \cdot
1100: \left( \frac{{\un x}_{42'}}{x_{42'}^2} -
1101: \frac{{\un x}_{4{\tilde 0}}}{x_{4{\tilde 0}}^2} \right) \,
1102: M ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_4, {\un x}_{\tilde 0}, y; {\un k}_1, y_1)
1103: \, [1 - N ({\un x}_{2'}, {\un x}_4, y)] \bigg\} .
1104: \ee
1105: The only thing left to do to complete our analysis is to determine the
1106: initial condition for the evolution equation (\ref{Mev}), which we
1107: denoted $d({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{2'}, {\un x}_{\tilde 0}, {\un k}_1,
1108: y_1)$. This quantity is the gluon production cross section in the
1109: scattering of a ``dipole'' $2,2',{\tilde 0}$ on a nucleus with the
1110: small-$x$ quantum evolution included, in which the emitted gluon
1111: (${\un k}_1, y_1$) is the first (hardest) gluon in the gluonic cascade
1112: resumming the quantum evolution of \eq{eqN}. Since the emission
1113: diagrams are the same as in \fig{em1}, the quantity $d({\un x}_2, {\un
1114: x}_{2'}, {\un x}_{\tilde 0}, {\un k}_1, y_1)$ should be given by the
1115: expression similar to \eq{M0}, where the dipole and quadrupole
1116: $S$-matrices $S_0$ and $Q_0$ have to be replaced by their evolved
1117: values. We, therefore, write
1118: \ben
1119: d ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{2'}, {\un x}_{\tilde 0} , {\un k}_1, y_1) \, = \,
1120: \frac{\bas}{(2 \pi)^3} \, \int \, d^2 x_1 \, d^2
1121: x_{1'} \, e^{- i {\un k}_1 \cdot {\un x}_{11'}} \, \bigg\{
1122: \frac{{\un x}_{12}}{x_{12}^2} \cdot
1123: \frac{{\un x}_{1'2'}}{x_{1'2'}^2} \ \bigg[ Q ({\un x}_2,
1124: {\un x}_{2'}, {\un x}_1, {\un x}_{1'}, y_1) \, S ({\un x}_1, {\un
1125: x}_{1'}, y_1)
1126: \een
1127: \ben
1128: + S ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{2'}, y_1) - S ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{1}, y_1) \,
1129: S ({\un x}_1, {\un x}_{2'}, y_1) - S ({\un x}_{2'}, {\un x}_{1'}, y_1) \,
1130: S ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{1'}, y_1) \bigg]
1131: + \frac{{\un x}_{1{\tilde 0}}}{x_{1{\tilde 0}}^2} \cdot
1132: \frac{{\un x}_{1'{\tilde 0}}}{x_{1'{\tilde 0}}^2}
1133: \bigg[ Q ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{2'}, {\un x}_1, {\un x}_{1'}, y_1)
1134: \een
1135: \ben
1136: \times S ({\un x}_1, {\un x}_{1'}, y_1) + S ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{2'}, y_1)
1137: - Q ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{2'}, {\un x}_1, {\un x}_{\tilde 0}, y_1) \, S
1138: ({\un x}_1, {\un x}_{\tilde 0}, y_1) - Q ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{2'},
1139: {\un x}_{\tilde 0}, {\un x}_{1'}, y_1) S ({\un x}_{\tilde 0}, {\un
1140: x}_{1'}, y_1)
1141: \bigg]
1142: \een
1143: \ben
1144: - \frac{{\un x}_{12}}{x_{12}^2} \cdot
1145: \frac{{\un x}_{1'{\tilde 0}}}{x_{1'{\tilde 0}}^2} \,
1146: \bigg[ Q ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{2'}, {\un x}_1, {\un x}_{1'}, y_1) \,
1147: S ({\un x}_1, {\un x}_{1'}, y_1) + S ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{\tilde 0}, y_1)
1148: \, S ({\un x}_{2'}, {\un x}_{\tilde 0}, y_1)
1149: - Q ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{2'}, {\un x}_1, {\un x}_{\tilde 0}, y_1)
1150: \een
1151: \ben
1152: \times S ({\un x}_1, {\un x}_{\tilde 0}, y_1)
1153: - S ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{1'}, y_1) \,
1154: S ({\un x}_{2'}, {\un x}_{1'}, y_1) \bigg]
1155: - \frac{{\un x}_{1{\tilde 0}}}{x_{1{\tilde 0}}^2} \cdot \frac{{\un
1156: x}_{1'2'}}{x_{1'2'}^2} \, \bigg[ Q ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{2'}, {\un
1157: x}_1, {\un x}_{1'}, y_1) \, S ({\un x}_1, {\un x}_{1'}, y_1)
1158: \een
1159: \be\label{d}
1160: + S ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{\tilde 0}, y_1) \,
1161: S ({\un x}_{2'}, {\un x}_{\tilde 0}, y_1)
1162: - S ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_1, y_1) \, S ({\un x}_{2'}, {\un x}_1, y_1)
1163: - Q ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{2'}, {\un x}_{\tilde 0}, {\un x}_{1'}, y_1) \,
1164: S ({\un x}_{1'}, {\un x}_{\tilde 0}, y_1) \bigg] \bigg\}.
1165: \ee
1166: Indeed $S ({\un x}_1, {\un x}_{1'}, y_1)$ in \eq{d} is given by
1167: Eqs. (\ref{S}) and (\ref{eqN}). The reason why inclusion of evolution
1168: just corresponds to replacing the Glauber-Mueller expression
1169: (\ref{S0}) for $S_0$ by the fully evolved \eq{S} has been discussed
1170: before in \cite{kt}. It was observed there that real-virtual
1171: cancellations for the gluon emissions contributing to the dipole
1172: evolution discussed in \cite{CM} act very much like the real-virtual
1173: cancellations for Glauber-Mueller multiple rescatterings
1174: \cite{km}. Namely, if interactions of exchanged Coulomb gluons with a
1175: given quark line cancel in the multiple rescattering (Glauber-Mueller)
1176: picture, than emissions of an $s$-channel gluon by the same quark line
1177: at early and late times on both sides of the cut would also cancel
1178: \cite{CM}. One can show that interactions with quark and gluon lines
1179: that contribute in multiple rescattering case would also contribute in
1180: the case of evolution. In the end one concludes that inclusion of
1181: quantum evolution can be accomplished by replacing $S_0$ from
1182: Eqs. (\ref{S0}) and (\ref{N0}) by $S$ from Eqs. (\ref{S}) and
1183: (\ref{eqN}) \cite{kt}.
1184:
1185: To calculate $Q ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{2'}, {\un x}_1, {\un x}_{1'},
1186: y_1)$ we have to write down an evolution equation for the $S$-matrix
1187: of the evolution of quadrupole $2,2',1,1'$. An evolution equation
1188: involving a color quadrupole was derived before in \cite{CM} to
1189: reproduce the BJKP equation \cite{BJKP} for four reggeons in the
1190: framework of the dipole model \cite{dip}. The equation derived in
1191: \cite{CM} corresponds to off-forward evolution for dipoles in the
1192: presence of a single quadrupole, with all the evolution included in
1193: the dipoles. Therefore it should not be compared to the equation we
1194: are about to write down, since we are interested in the evolution
1195: inside the quadrupole.
1196:
1197: We are going to derive an evolution equation for the quadrupole
1198: $S$-matrix $Q({\un x}_2,{\un x}_{2'},{\un x}_1,{\un x}_{1'},y_1)$
1199: including all the non-linear evolution effects. The initial condition
1200: for evolution of $Q({\un x}_2,{\un x}_{2'},{\un x}_1,{\un
1201: x}_{1'},y_1)$ is given by \eq{Q0}. To write down one step of the
1202: evolution we first redraw the quadrupole as shown in
1203: \fig{qtr}. Instead of the amplitude squared pictured on the left of
1204: \fig{qtr} we will use a form of quadrupole cross section similar to
1205: the forward amplitude shown on the right of \fig{qtr}. Obviously the
1206: diagram on the right of \fig{qtr} preserves the color structure of the
1207: quadrupole. All the interactions with the target in the graph of the
1208: left happen along the dashed lines at time $\tau = 0$. On the right of
1209: \fig{qtr} we merge two dashed lines from the graph on the left into
1210: one dashed line with interactions in it. This way, a real interaction
1211: with a nucleon where a single gluon is exchanged in each of the dashed
1212: lines in the left graph of \fig{qtr} becomes a two-gluon exchange
1213: (diffractive) interaction in the dashed line in the graph on the right
1214: of \fig{qtr}. Again the picture is similar to the forward amplitude
1215: calculation.
1216: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1217: \begin{figure}
1218: \begin{center}
1219: \epsfxsize=10cm
1220: \leavevmode
1221: \hbox{\epsffile{qtr.eps}}
1222: \end{center}
1223: \caption{Redrawing the quadrupole interaction amplitude in the form
1224: convenient for including quantum evolution (see text).}
1225: \label{qtr}
1226: \end{figure}
1227: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1228:
1229: One step of the quadrupole evolution in the representation of
1230: \fig{qtr} is shown in \fig{qev}. The step consists of an emission of a single
1231: gluon $\# 3$. For instance, in \fig{qev}A the gluon $\# 3$ splits the
1232: original quadrupole $2,2',1,1'$ into a quadrupole $3,2',1,1'$ and a
1233: dipole $23$. \fig{qev}B gives a similar contribution. In
1234: Figs. \ref{qev}C-F we drew the gluon $\# 3$ line as disconnected at
1235: dashed line: the gluon line is indeed implied to be connected and
1236: continuous. The disconnected line is just a notation which we borrowed
1237: from \cite{CM} for, say, a gluon emitted in dipole $21$ and absorbed
1238: in dipole $11'$ in \fig{qev}C. However, when connecting the two parts
1239: of the gluon $\# 3$ line in Figs. \ref{qev}C-F one has to be careful
1240: to pick up the leading large-$N_c$ contribution. For instance, in
1241: \fig{qev}C the leading term consists of gluon $\# 3$ splitting the
1242: original quadrupole $2,2',1,1'$ into a dipole $31$ and a quadrupole
1243: $2,3,1',2'$. The dominant contribution of \fig{qev}E consists of gluon
1244: $\# 3$ splitting the quadrupole $2,2',1,1'$ into "dipoles" $2,2',3$
1245: and $1,1',3$, in which interactions with line $3$ cancel due to
1246: real-virtual cancellations. Leading terms for other graphs in
1247: \fig{qev} can be obtained in similar ways. Combining them with virtual
1248: corrections yields
1249: \ben
1250: Q ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{2'}, {\un x}_1, {\un x}_{1'}, y_1) \, = \, e^{-
1251: \bas \, \ln \left( \frac{x_{21} x_{2'1'} x_{22'} x_{11'}}{\rho^4} \right) \,
1252: y_1} \, Q_0 ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{2'}, {\un x}_1, {\un x}_{1'}) +
1253: \een
1254: \ben
1255: + \frac{\bas}{2 \, \pi} \, \int_0^{y_1} \, dy \, e^{- \bas \,
1256: \ln \left( \frac{x_{21} x_{2'1'} x_{22'} x_{11'}}{\rho^4} \right) \,
1257: (y_1 - y)} \, \int d^2 x_3 \, \bigg\{
1258: \left( \frac{{\un x}_{32}}{x_{32}^2} -
1259: \frac{{\un x}_{31}}{x_{31}^2} \right) \cdot
1260: \left( \frac{{\un x}_{32}}{x_{32}^2} -
1261: \frac{{\un x}_{32'}}{x_{32'}^2} \right) \, S ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_3, y)
1262: \een
1263: \ben
1264: \times \, Q ({\un x}_3, {\un x}_{2'}, {\un x}_1, {\un x}_{1'}, y) +
1265: \left( \frac{{\un x}_{32'}}{x_{32'}^2} -
1266: \frac{{\un x}_{31'}}{x_{31'}^2} \right) \cdot
1267: \left( \frac{{\un x}_{31}}{x_{31}^2} -
1268: \frac{{\un x}_{31'}}{x_{31'}^2} \right) \, S ({\un x}_3, {\un x}_{1'}, y)
1269: \, Q ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{2'}, {\un x}_1, {\un x}_{3}, y) -
1270: \een
1271: \ben
1272: - \left( \frac{{\un x}_{32}}{x_{32}^2} -
1273: \frac{{\un x}_{31}}{x_{31}^2} \right) \cdot
1274: \left( \frac{{\un x}_{31}}{x_{31}^2} -
1275: \frac{{\un x}_{31'}}{x_{31'}^2} \right) \, S ({\un x}_3, {\un x}_{1}, y)
1276: \, Q ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{2'}, {\un x}_3, {\un x}_{1'}, y) -
1277: \left( \frac{{\un x}_{32}}{x_{32}^2} -
1278: \frac{{\un x}_{32'}}{x_{32'}^2} \right) \cdot
1279: \left( \frac{{\un x}_{32'}}{x_{32'}^2} -
1280: \frac{{\un x}_{31'}}{x_{31'}^2} \right)
1281: \een
1282: \ben
1283: \times \, S ({\un x}_3, {\un x}_{2'}, y)
1284: \, Q ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{3}, {\un x}_1, {\un x}_{1'}, y) +
1285: \left( \frac{{\un x}_{32}}{x_{32}^2} -
1286: \frac{{\un x}_{31}}{x_{31}^2} \right) \cdot
1287: \left( \frac{{\un x}_{32'}}{x_{32'}^2} -
1288: \frac{{\un x}_{31'}}{x_{31'}^2} \right) \, S ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{2'}, y)
1289: \, S ({\un x}_1, {\un x}_{1'}, y)
1290: \een
1291: \be\label{Qev}
1292: + \left( \frac{{\un x}_{32}}{x_{32}^2} -
1293: \frac{{\un x}_{32'}}{x_{32'}^2} \right) \cdot
1294: \left( \frac{{\un x}_{31}}{x_{31}^2} -
1295: \frac{{\un x}_{31'}}{x_{31'}^2} \right) \, S ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_1, y)
1296: \, S ({\un x}_{2'}, {\un x}_{1'}, y) \bigg\}.
1297: \ee
1298: Note that due to real-virtual cancellations the last two terms in
1299: \eq{Qev} corresponding to diagrams E and F in \fig{qev} contain only
1300: the dipole $S$-matrices in them. The relative signs of various terms
1301: in \eq{Qev} are easier to determine in the representation of the
1302: interaction on the left hand side of \fig{qtr} keeping in mind that
1303: gluon emissions at $\tau < 0$ and $\tau > 0$ come in with different
1304: signs.
1305:
1306:
1307: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1308: \begin{figure}
1309: \begin{center}
1310: \epsfxsize=12cm
1311: \leavevmode
1312: \hbox{\epsffile{qev.eps}}
1313: \end{center}
1314: \caption{One step of the quadrupole evolution. }
1315: \label{qev}
1316: \end{figure}
1317: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1318:
1319: As we have already mentioned the linearized version of \eq{Qev} (see
1320: \eq{Qevlin} below) should be combined with Eq. (49) in \cite{CM} to complete
1321: the description of the BJKP evolution in the framework of the dipole
1322: model. (By linearizing \eq{Qev} we mean substituting $S=1-N$ in it
1323: (see \eq{S}) while keeping only terms linear in $Q$ and in $N$, i.e.,
1324: neglecting products like $Q N$ and $N N$.) However, as was discussed
1325: in \cite{CM}, the contribution of linearized \eq{Qev} to BJKP
1326: evolution is likely to be small: as we will see in the next
1327: Subsection, the linearized version of \eq{Qev} is almost equivalent to
1328: the BFKL equation. Therefore, its solution is likely to grow with
1329: energy just like a single BFKL pomeron, which is much slower than the
1330: double BFKL pomeron exchange. On the other hand, a solution of the
1331: full BJKP evolution equation for four reggeons presented in \cite{KKM}
1332: has an intercept much smaller than that of a single BFKL pomeron
1333: exchange making the contribution of \eq{Qev} potentially important for
1334: BJKP evolution in the dipole model.
1335:
1336:
1337: Let us check \eq{Qev} for consistency with our earlier results. First
1338: note that if ${\un x}_2 = {\un x}_{2'}$ the interactions with line
1339: 2/2' would cancel and the following equality should be true
1340: \be\label{test1}
1341: Q ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{2}, {\un x}_1, {\un x}_{1'}, y_1) \, = \, S
1342: ({\un x}_1, {\un x}_{1'}, y_1) \, = \, 1 - N ({\un x}_1, {\un x}_{1'},
1343: y_1).
1344: \ee
1345: >From Eqs. (\ref{test0}) and (\ref{N0}) we can see that \eq{test1} is
1346: certainly true for the initial conditions for \eq{Qev} given by $Q_0$
1347: from \eq{Q0}. Now, as one can explicitly check, putting ${\un x}_2 =
1348: {\un x}_{2'}$ in \eq{Qev} (with $x_{22'} \rightarrow \rho$ in the
1349: exponent) and assuming that \eq{test1} is true one readily recovers
1350: \eq{eqN}. Thus \eq{Qev} consistently maps onto \eq{eqN} in the limit
1351: of \eq{test1}.
1352:
1353: Using \eq{test1} in \eq{d} and remembering that due to \eq{ngn} the
1354: $S$-matrix of a gluon dipole $S_G$ can be expressed in terms of the
1355: $S$-matrix of the quark dipole as
1356: \be\label{SG}
1357: S_G ({\un x}_0, {\un x}_1, y) \, = \, S^2 ({\un x}_0, {\un x}_1, y)
1358: \ee
1359: we observe that
1360: \be\label{test2}
1361: d ({\un x}_0, {\un x}_{0}, {\un x}_1 , {\un k}, y) \, = \, s
1362: ({\un x}_0, {\un x}_1 , {\un k}, y),
1363: \ee
1364: which verifies that \eq{d} is consistent with \eq{sdef}.
1365:
1366: \eq{Qev}, when solved to find $Q$, can be used to construct $d$ in \eq{d},
1367: which can then be used as initial condition to the evolution equation
1368: (\ref{Mev}). The quantity $M ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{2'}, {\un x}_{\tilde
1369: 0}, Y; {\un k}_1, y_1)$ obtained this way can be used in \eq{2Gcl}
1370: instead of $M_0$ along with $S$ from \eq{S} to obtain the evolved
1371: contribution of case B considered above to the two-gluon production
1372: cross section. Together with the contribution of the case A from
1373: \eq{Apiece} it gives us the following expression for the double gluon
1374: production cross section in a quark dipole--nucleus scattering [with
1375: ${\un B} = ({\un x}_0 + {\un x}_{\tilde 0})/2$]
1376: \ben
1377: \frac{d \sigma^{q {\bar q} \, A \ \rightarrow \ q {\bar q} \, G_1 G_2 X}}
1378: {d^2 k_1 \, dy_1 \, d^2 k_2 \, dy_2} ({\un x}_{0{\tilde 0}})
1379: \bigg|_{y_2 \gg y_1}\, = \,
1380: \int \ d^2 B \ \bigg\{ n_2 ({\un x}_0, {\un x}_{\tilde 0}, Y; {\un
1381: x}_1 , {\un x}_{\tilde 1}, y_1, {\un x}_2, {\un x}_{\tilde 2}, y_2)
1382: \een
1383: \ben
1384: \times \, d^2 x_1 \, d^2 x_{\tilde 1} \, d^2 x_2 \, d^2 x_{\tilde 2} \, s
1385: ({\un x}_1, {\un x}_{\tilde 1}, {\un k}_1, y_1) \, s ({\un x}_{2},
1386: {\un x}_{\tilde 2}, {\un k}_2, y_2)
1387: + n_1 ({\un x}_0, {\un x}_{\tilde 0}, Y; {\un x}_1 , {\un
1388: x}_{\tilde 1}, y_2) \, d^2 x_1 \, d^2 x_{\tilde 1}
1389: \een
1390: \ben
1391: \times \, \frac{\bas}{(2 \pi)^3}
1392: \, \int \, d^2 x_2 \, d^2 x_{2'} \,
1393: e^{- i {\underline k}_2 \cdot {\underline x}_{22'}} \,
1394: \bigg[ \left( \frac{{\un x}_{21}}{x_{21}^2} -
1395: \frac{{\un x}_{2{\tilde 1}}}{x_{2{\tilde 1}}^2} \right) \cdot
1396: \left( \frac{{\un x}_{2'1}}{x_{2'1}^2} -
1397: \frac{{\un x}_{2'{\tilde 1}}}{x_{2'{\tilde 1}}^2} \right) \,
1398: M ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{2'}, {\un x}_{\tilde 1}, y_2; {\un k}_1,
1399: y_1) \, S({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{2'}, y_2)
1400: \een
1401: \ben
1402: - \left( \frac{{\un x}_{21}}{x_{21}^2} -
1403: \frac{{\un x}_{2{\tilde 1}}}{x_{2{\tilde 1}}^2} \right) \cdot
1404: \frac{{\un x}_{2'1}}{x_{2'1}^2} \,
1405: M ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_1, {\un x}_{\tilde 1}, y_2; {\un k}_1,
1406: y_1) \, S({\un x}_2, {\un x}_1, y_2)
1407: - \left( \frac{{\un x}_{2'1}}{x_{2'1}^2} -
1408: \frac{{\un x}_{2'{\tilde 1}}}{x_{2'{\tilde 1}}^2} \right) \cdot
1409: \frac{{\un x}_{21}}{x_{21}^2}
1410: \een
1411: \be\label{2Gincl}
1412: \times \, M ({\un x}_1, {\un x}_{2'}, {\un x}_{\tilde 1}, y_2; {\un k}_1,
1413: y_1) \, S({\un x}_1, {\un x}_{2'}, y_2)
1414: + \frac{{\un x}_{21}}{x_{21}^2} \cdot \frac{{\un x}_{2'1}}{x_{2'1}^2}
1415: \, M ({\un x}_1, {\un x}_1, {\un x}_{\tilde 1}, y_2; {\un k}_1, y_1) \,
1416: + \, (1 \leftrightarrow {\tilde 1}) \bigg] \bigg\}.
1417: \ee
1418: \eq{2Gincl} is the central result of this Section. Together with Eqs.
1419: (\ref{disincl}), (\ref{Qev}), (\ref{d}), (\ref{Mev}), (\ref{n1}),
1420: (\ref{n2}) and (\ref{eqN}) it gives us the expression for the
1421: two-gluon inclusive cross section for DIS on a nucleus with the
1422: effects of nonlinear evolution (\ref{eqN}) included.
1423:
1424: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1425: \begin{figure}
1426: \begin{center}
1427: \epsfxsize=16.5cm
1428: \leavevmode
1429: \hbox{\epsffile{fan2.eps}}
1430: \end{center}
1431: \caption{Feynman diagrams corresponding to double gluon production
1432: cross section given by \eq{2Gincl}. Emitted gluons are denoted by
1433: crosses. }
1434: \label{fan2}
1435: \end{figure}
1436: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1437:
1438: The structure of \eq{2Gincl} is illustrated in \fig{fan2}, where, if
1439: one pictures the evolution of \eq{eqN} as resumming fan diagrams, the
1440: diagrams correspond to the first (case A) and the second (cases B
1441: and C) terms in \eq{2Gincl}. The first term in \eq{2Gincl}
1442: corresponds to splitting of the original linear evolution in two,
1443: which is described by \eq{n2} for $n_2$. Then each of the two ladders
1444: independently produces a gluon with all the possible splittings
1445: happening afterwards. This is illustrated in \fig{fan2}A. The
1446: second term in \eq{2Gincl} corresponds to nonlinear evolution
1447: successively producing both gluons, after which all possible
1448: splittings are allowed, as shown in Figs. \ref{fan2}B and \ref{fan2}C,
1449: where we have divided the nonlinear evolution into the linear
1450: (Fig. \ref{fan2}B) and nonlinear (Fig. \ref{fan2}C) parts. The linear
1451: evolution in this second term in \eq{2Gincl} is given by $n_1$ from
1452: \eq{n1} and by $M$ from the linear part of \eq{Mev}. This linear
1453: evolution leads to production of both gluons $\# 2$ and $\# 1$ and is
1454: illustrated in \fig{fan2}B. The initial conditions for \eq{Mev} are
1455: nonlinear, given by Eqs. (\ref{d}) and (\ref{Qev}). They include
1456: ladder splittings and are pictured by the fan diagram in the lower
1457: part of \fig{fan2}B. One should note, however, that \eq{Mev}, while
1458: being linear in $M$, has extra factors of $1-N$ on its right hand
1459: side. That means that evolution of $M$ includes ladder splittings
1460: between the gluons $\# 2$ and $\# 1$, one of which is shown in
1461: \fig{fan2}C. There the evolution leading to creation of gluon $\# 2$
1462: is still linear since it is still given by $n_1$ in the second term on
1463: the right hand side of \eq{2Gincl}. However, since the evolution in
1464: the rapidity interval between the emitted gluons (evolution of $M$) is
1465: nonlinear, splittings are allowed between the gluons $\# 2$ and $\#
1466: 1$, as depicted in \fig{fan2}C.
1467:
1468: The diagrams A and B in \fig{fan2} are the same as would have been
1469: expected from AGK cutting rules \cite{agk} (see also \cite{kt} and
1470: \cite{KL} for similar correspondence between the dipole model results
1471: and AGK rules expectations). However, the diagram C in \fig{fan2},
1472: while being included in \eq{2Gincl}, is prohibited by AGK cutting
1473: rules. Therefore, we seem to observe a direct violation of the AGK
1474: rules in QCD. Since AGK rules have never been proven for
1475: QCD, one should not be too surprised that they do not work here. It is
1476: interesting to note that AGK violation sets in at the level of the
1477: 2-gluon production: single gluon inclusive production cross section
1478: calculated in \cite{kt} adheres to AGK rules and so does the
1479: diffractive DIS cross section calculated in \cite{KL}.
1480:
1481: The violation of AGK cutting rules in \eq{2Gincl} is due to non-linear
1482: terms in \eq{Mev}, which are in turn due to late time (after the
1483: interaction) gluon emissions at light cone times $\tau > 0$. These
1484: terms were not important for the calculation of the total cross
1485: section in the dipole model \cite{dip}: there they were found to
1486: cancel \cite{CM}. Thus if one would try to construct an analogy
1487: between the fan diagrams \cite{glr} and dipole calculations \cite{bk}
1488: based on the correspondence of total cross sections, one would omit
1489: such terms. Since the fan diagrams seem to adhere to AGK rules, this
1490: omission would lead to the erroneous conclusion that AGK rules should
1491: work for the production cross section. However, as we have seen above,
1492: these late time emissions are important for single \cite{kt} and
1493: double inclusive gluon production, violating the AGK rules for the
1494: latter. What appears to fail here is the one-to-one correspondence
1495: between the fan diagrams and dipole calculations.
1496:
1497: Another difference between our result (\ref{2Gincl}) and the direct
1498: application of AGK rules to calculating inclusive cross section done
1499: in \cite{braun} is that nonlinear splittings may start exactly at the
1500: point in rapidity when the softer of the produced gluons is emitted in
1501: the diagram B or exactly at the point of emission of both gluons $\#
1502: 1$ and $\# 2$ in the diagram A. Similar discrepancy was already
1503: observed when comparing the single gluon inclusive cross section
1504: calculated in \cite{kt} to the results of \cite{braun}.
1505:
1506: In comparing our result with the formula obtained in \cite{braun} (see
1507: Eqs. (30) and (36) there) we note that in a general case we could not
1508: cast \eq{2Gincl} in the $k_T$-factorized form of \cite{braun}. Again,
1509: this distinguishes the case of two-gluon production considered here
1510: from the case of single gluon production from \cite{kt}.
1511: %It is,
1512: %therefore, unclear whether the discrepancy between our \eq{2Gincl} and
1513: %Eqs. (30) and (36) of \cite{braun} is limited to the gluon production
1514: %at the ladder splittings discussed in the previous paragraph.
1515:
1516: Indeed our result, given by \eq{2Gincl}, is rather complicated,
1517: especially keeping in mind that one has to first solve evolution
1518: equations (\ref{n1}), (\ref{n2}), (\ref{eqN}), (\ref{Qev}), and
1519: (\ref{Mev}) in order to obtain the desired two-particle production
1520: cross section. In order to make \eq{2Gincl} easier to implement, it is
1521: highly desirable to find some way of simplifying it. Unfortunately, we
1522: could not find any simplification of \eq{2Gincl} in the general
1523: case. Nevertheless, in certain kinematic regimes \eq{2Gincl} may be
1524: simplified. For instance, if the center of mass energy of the
1525: collision is not too high or if the transverse momenta of the produced
1526: gluons are sufficiently large ($|{\un k}_1|, |{\un k}_2| \gsim Q_s$),
1527: the nonlinear saturation effects, such as ladder splittings, could be
1528: neglected. This implies that the diagrams in Figs. \ref{fan2} A and C
1529: are small with the linear part of the diagram B dominating the cross
1530: section. This is the well-known leading twist result
1531: \cite{lr}, which we will derive from our \eq{2Gincl} in Sect. IIIC below.
1532:
1533: In the opposite kinematic regime of very large center of mass energy
1534: of the collision and not too high gluons' transverse momenta
1535: saturation effects become important. There one can note that in
1536: Figs. \ref{fan2} B and C the evolution between the projectile and the
1537: (harder) gluon $\# 2$ is linear and is given by a single BFKL ladder
1538: exchange. On the other hand one can show \cite{braun} that the diagram
1539: in \fig{fan2}A is dominated by the contribution where the triple
1540: pomeron vertex in the evolution between the projectile and the gluon
1541: $\# 2$ is all the way up at the projectile's rapidity. Therefore, the
1542: evolution between the projectile and the gluon $\# 2$ in \fig{fan2}A
1543: is given by a double pomeron exchange, and is thus energetically more
1544: favorable than the single pomeron exchange of Figs. \ref{fan2} B and
1545: C. Since the rest of the three diagrams is parametrically the same,
1546: one concludes that \fig{fan2}A dominates in this regime, as was
1547: originally shown in \cite{braun}. Keeping only the corresponding first
1548: term on the right hand side of \eq{2Gincl} would significantly
1549: simplify the calculation of the cross section: since an analytical
1550: solution of \eq{n2} for $n_2$ exists \cite{dip}, one would only need
1551: to find a solution of \eq{eqN}, for which there is a number of
1552: analytical and numerical results in the literature. However, one has
1553: to be careful in neglecting the diagrams in Figs. \ref{fan2} B and
1554: C. If one is interested in azimuthal two-particle correlations of the
1555: produced gluons, than the contributions of graphs in Figs. \ref{fan2}
1556: B and C might be more important than the contribution of \fig{fan2}A
1557: even deep inside the saturation region \cite{klm2}.
1558:
1559: \subsection{Recovering the Leading Twist Result}
1560:
1561:
1562: Let us show that \eq{2Gincl} reduces to the usual ``leading-twist''
1563: $k_T$-factorization result \cite{lr} in the limit of large transverse
1564: momenta of the produced gluons. Large transverse momenta correspond to
1565: small transverse distances. For short transverse distances all the
1566: evolution equations written above should be linearized since all the
1567: non-linearities would be negligibly small. Therefore we can right away
1568: neglect the first term on the right hand side of \eq{2Gincl}, which
1569: contains a splitting (which is a non-linearity) in the evolution
1570: between the target and emitted gluons as shown in \fig{fan2}A. In the
1571: remaining second term on the right of \eq{2Gincl} we can put all $S
1572: \approx 1$ to obtain the linearized expression
1573: \ben
1574: \frac{d \sigma^{q {\bar q} \, A \ \rightarrow \ q {\bar q} \, G_1 G_2 X}}
1575: {d^2 k_1 \, dy_1 \, d^2 k_2 \, dy_2} ({\un x}_{0{\tilde 0}})
1576: \bigg|_{LO} \, \approx \, \int \ d^2 B \
1577: n_1 ({\un x}_0, {\un x}_{\tilde 0}, Y; {\un x}_1 , {\un
1578: x}_{\tilde 1}, y_2) \, d^2 x_1 \, d^2 x_{\tilde 1}
1579: \een
1580: \ben
1581: \times \, \frac{\bas}{(2 \pi)^3}
1582: \, \int \, d^2 x_2 \, d^2 x_{2'} \,
1583: e^{- i {\underline k}_2 \cdot {\underline x}_{22'}} \,
1584: \bigg[ \left( \frac{{\un x}_{21}}{x_{21}^2} -
1585: \frac{{\un x}_{2{\tilde 1}}}{x_{2{\tilde 1}}^2} \right) \cdot
1586: \left( \frac{{\un x}_{2'1}}{x_{2'1}^2} -
1587: \frac{{\un x}_{2'{\tilde 1}}}{x_{2'{\tilde 1}}^2} \right) \,
1588: M ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{2'}, {\un x}_{\tilde 1}, y_2; {\un k}_1,
1589: y_1) \bigg|_{lin}
1590: \een
1591: \ben
1592: - \left( \frac{{\un x}_{21}}{x_{21}^2} -
1593: \frac{{\un x}_{2{\tilde 1}}}{x_{2{\tilde 1}}^2} \right) \cdot
1594: \frac{{\un x}_{2'1}}{x_{2'1}^2} \,
1595: M ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_1, {\un x}_{\tilde 1}, y_2; {\un k}_1,
1596: y_1) \bigg|_{lin} \,
1597: - \left( \frac{{\un x}_{2'1}}{x_{2'1}^2} -
1598: \frac{{\un x}_{2'{\tilde 1}}}{x_{2'{\tilde 1}}^2} \right) \cdot
1599: \frac{{\un x}_{21}}{x_{21}^2} \,
1600: M ({\un x}_1, {\un x}_{2'}, {\un x}_{\tilde 1}, y_2; {\un k}_1, y_1)
1601: \bigg|_{lin}
1602: \een
1603: \be\label{2Glin1}
1604: + \frac{{\un x}_{21}}{x_{21}^2} \cdot \frac{{\un x}_{2'1}}{x_{2'1}^2}
1605: \, M ({\un x}_1, {\un x}_1, {\un x}_{\tilde 1}, y_2; {\un k}_1, y_1)
1606: \bigg|_{lin}
1607: \, + \, (1 \leftrightarrow {\tilde 1}) \bigg].
1608: \ee
1609: To linearize the evolution equation for $M$ (\eq{Mev}) we start by
1610: linearizing its initial condition given by $d$. It is determined by
1611: \eq{d} with $Q$ given by \eq{Qev}. Therefore, we start with the
1612: initial conditions for \eq{Qev} given by \eq{Q0}. Expanding \eq{Q0} to
1613: the lowest order in the transverse separations (or, equivalently, in
1614: $Q_{s0}$) we obtain
1615: \be\label{Q0n0}
1616: Q_0 ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{2'}, {\un x}_1, {\un x}_{1'}) \bigg|_{LO} \,
1617: \approx \, 1 - n_0 ({\un x}_{21}) - n_0 ({\un x}_{2'1'})
1618: - n_0 ({\un x}_{22'}) - n_0 ({\un x}_{11'}) + n_0 ({\un x}_{21'}) +
1619: n_0 ({\un x}_{2'1}),
1620: \ee
1621: where the two-gluon exchange amplitude $n_0$ is given by the first term
1622: in the expansion of $N_0$ from \eq{N0}
1623: \be\label{n0}
1624: n_0 ({\un x}_{21}) \, = \, \frac{1}{4} \, x_{21}^2 \, Q_{s0}^2 \,
1625: \ln \frac{1}{x_{21} \, \Lambda}.
1626: \ee
1627: Let us assume that \eq{Qev} independently includes linear BFKL
1628: evolution in each of the $n_0$'s in \eq{Q0n0}, such that the fully
1629: evolved linearized quadrupole amplitude $Q$ is given by
1630: \ben
1631: q ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{2'}, {\un x}_1, {\un x}_{1'},Y) \, \equiv \,
1632: Q ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{2'}, {\un x}_1, {\un x}_{1'},Y) \bigg|_{lin} \,
1633: = \, 1 - n ({\un x}_{2}, {\un x}_1, Y) - n ({\un x}_{2'}, {\un x}_{1'},Y)
1634: - n ({\un x}_{2}, {\un x}_{2'}, Y)
1635: \een
1636: \be\label{Qans}
1637: - n ({\un x}_{1}, {\un x}_{1'}, Y)
1638: + n ({\un x}_{2}, {\un x}_{1'},Y) + n ({\un x}_{2'}, {\un x}_{1}, Y)
1639: \ee
1640: with $n$ determined by the linearized version of \eq{eqN}
1641: corresponding to BFKL evolution \cite{bfkl}
1642: \ben
1643: n({\underline x}_{0}, {\un x}_{\tilde 0}, Y) = n_0 ({\underline
1644: x}_{0{\tilde 0}}) \, e^{- 2 \, \bas \, \ln
1645: \left( \frac{x_{0{\tilde 0}}}{\rho} \right) Y} + \frac{\bas}{2 \, \pi}
1646: \int_0^Y d y \ e^{ - 2\, \bas \, \ln \left(
1647: \frac{x_{0{\tilde 0}}}{\rho} \right) (Y - y)}
1648: \een
1649: \be\label{bfkl}
1650: \times \int_\rho d^2 x_2 \frac{x_{0{\tilde 0}}^2}{x_{20}^2
1651: x_{2{\tilde 0}}^2} \, [ n ({\underline x}_{0},{\un x}_2, y) + n
1652: ({\underline x}_{2},{\un x}_{\tilde 0}, y)].
1653: \ee
1654: After lengthy algebra one can show that $q({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{2'},
1655: {\un x}_1, {\un x}_{1'},Y)$ from \eq{Qans} satisfies the linearized
1656: version of \eq{Qev}
1657: \ben
1658: q ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{2'}, {\un x}_1, {\un x}_{1'}, y_1) \, = \, e^{-
1659: \bas \, \ln \left( \frac{x_{21} x_{2'1'} x_{22'} x_{11'}}{\rho^4} \right) \,
1660: y_1} \, Q_0 ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{2'}, {\un x}_1, {\un x}_{1'})
1661: \bigg|_{LO} +
1662: \een
1663: \ben
1664: + \frac{\bas}{2 \, \pi} \, \int_0^{y_1} \, dy \, e^{- \bas \,
1665: \ln \left( \frac{x_{21} x_{2'1'} x_{22'} x_{11'}}{\rho^4} \right) \,
1666: (y_1 - y)} \, \int d^2 x_3 \, \bigg\{
1667: \left( \frac{{\un x}_{32}}{x_{32}^2} -
1668: \frac{{\un x}_{31}}{x_{31}^2} \right) \cdot
1669: \left( \frac{{\un x}_{32}}{x_{32}^2} -
1670: \frac{{\un x}_{32'}}{x_{32'}^2} \right)
1671: \een
1672: \ben
1673: \times \, q ({\un x}_3, {\un x}_{2'}, {\un x}_1, {\un x}_{1'}, y) +
1674: \left( \frac{{\un x}_{32'}}{x_{32'}^2} -
1675: \frac{{\un x}_{31'}}{x_{31'}^2} \right) \cdot
1676: \left( \frac{{\un x}_{31}}{x_{31}^2} -
1677: \frac{{\un x}_{31'}}{x_{31'}^2} \right)
1678: \, q ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{2'}, {\un x}_1, {\un x}_{3}, y) -
1679: \een
1680: \ben
1681: - \left( \frac{{\un x}_{32}}{x_{32}^2} -
1682: \frac{{\un x}_{31}}{x_{31}^2} \right) \cdot
1683: \left( \frac{{\un x}_{31}}{x_{31}^2} -
1684: \frac{{\un x}_{31'}}{x_{31'}^2} \right)
1685: \, q ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{2'}, {\un x}_3, {\un x}_{1'}, y) -
1686: \left( \frac{{\un x}_{32}}{x_{32}^2} -
1687: \frac{{\un x}_{32'}}{x_{32'}^2} \right) \cdot
1688: \left( \frac{{\un x}_{32'}}{x_{32'}^2} -
1689: \frac{{\un x}_{31'}}{x_{31'}^2} \right)
1690: \een
1691: \ben
1692: \times \, q ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{3}, {\un x}_1, {\un x}_{1'}, y) +
1693: \left( \frac{{\un x}_{32}}{x_{32}^2} -
1694: \frac{{\un x}_{31}}{x_{31}^2} \right) \cdot
1695: \left( \frac{{\un x}_{32'}}{x_{32'}^2} -
1696: \frac{{\un x}_{31'}}{x_{31'}^2} \right) \, [1 - n ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{2'}, y)
1697: - n ({\un x}_1, {\un x}_{1'}, y)]
1698: \een
1699: \be\label{Qevlin}
1700: + \left( \frac{{\un x}_{32}}{x_{32}^2} -
1701: \frac{{\un x}_{32'}}{x_{32'}^2} \right) \cdot
1702: \left( \frac{{\un x}_{31}}{x_{31}^2} -
1703: \frac{{\un x}_{31'}}{x_{31'}^2} \right) \, [1 - n ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_1, y)
1704: - n ({\un x}_{2'}, {\un x}_{1'}, y) ] \bigg\}.
1705: \ee
1706: This proves that the ansatz of \eq{Qans} is indeed the correct
1707: linearized quadrupole amplitude $Q$. Therefore, to construct the
1708: initial conditions for the linearized version of \eq{Mev} we should
1709: substitute $q({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{2'}, {\un x}_1, {\un x}_{1'},Y)$
1710: from \eq{Qans} into the linearized version of \eq{d} obtaining
1711: \ben
1712: d_{lin} ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{2'}, {\un x}_{\tilde 0} , {\un k}_1, y_1) \, = \,
1713: \frac{2 \, \bas}{(2 \pi)^3} \, \int \, d^2 x_1 \, d^2
1714: x_{1'} \, e^{- i {\un k}_1 \cdot {\un x}_{11'}} \, \bigg\{
1715: \frac{{\un x}_{12}}{x_{12}^2} \cdot
1716: \frac{{\un x}_{1'2'}}{x_{1'2'}^2} \ \bigg[
1717: n ( {\un x}_{2'}, {\un x}_1, y_1) + n ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{1'}, y_1)
1718: \een
1719: \ben
1720: - n ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{2'}, y_1) - n ({\un x}_1, {\un x}_{1'}, y_1) \, \bigg]
1721: + \frac{{\un x}_{1{\tilde 0}}}{x_{1{\tilde 0}}^2} \cdot
1722: \frac{{\un x}_{1'{\tilde 0}}}{x_{1'{\tilde 0}}^2}
1723: \bigg[ n ({\un x}_1, {\un x}_{\tilde 0}, y_1)
1724: + n ({\un x}_{1'}, {\un x}_{\tilde 0}, y_1) - n ({\un x}_1, {\un
1725: x}_{1'}, y_1) \bigg]
1726: \een
1727: \ben
1728: - \frac{{\un x}_{12}}{x_{12}^2} \cdot
1729: \frac{{\un x}_{1'{\tilde 0}}}{x_{1'{\tilde 0}}^2} \,
1730: \bigg[ n ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{1'}, y_1) +
1731: n ({\un x}_1, {\un x}_{\tilde 0}, y_1) - n ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{\tilde
1732: 0}, y_1) - n ({\un x}_{1}, {\un x}_{1'}, y_1) \bigg]
1733: \een
1734: \be\label{dlin1}
1735: - \frac{{\un x}_{1{\tilde 0}}}{x_{1{\tilde 0}}^2} \cdot \frac{{\un
1736: x}_{1'2'}}{x_{1'2'}^2} \, \bigg[ n ({\un x}_1, {\un x}_{2'}, y_1) + n
1737: ({\un x}_{1'}, {\un x}_{\tilde 0}, y_1) - n ({\un x}_{2'}, {\un
1738: x}_{\tilde 0}, y_1) - n ({\un x}_{1}, {\un x}_{1'}, y_1) \bigg]
1739: \bigg\}.
1740: \ee
1741: Here we consider scattering on a large nucleus. The amplitude $n ({\un
1742: x}_1, {\un x}_{1'}, y)$ depends on the transverse size of the
1743: quark-antiquark pair $x_{11'}$ as well as on the transverse position
1744: of the dipole. However, the transverse position of the dipole is given
1745: by the overall impact parameter ${\un B}$ in the scattering
1746: process. The integrals over ${\un x}_1$ and ${\un x}_{1'}$ in
1747: \eq{dlin1}, while formally going out to infinity in the transverse
1748: direction, are indeed effectively limited to the typical hadronic size
1749: on which the concept of a gluon still makes sense. The dependence of
1750: $n$ on ${\un B}$ is smooth for a large nucleus, slowly varying on
1751: transverse distances of the order of the typical hadronic
1752: size. Therefore we write (see \cite{kt} for a similar approximation)
1753: \be\label{cyl}
1754: n ({\un x}_1, {\un x}_2, y) \, \approx \, n ({\un x}_{12}, {\un B},
1755: y).
1756: \ee
1757: With the help of \eq{cyl} we rewrite \eq{dlin1} as
1758: \be\label{dlin2}
1759: d_{lin} ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{2'}, {\un x}_{\tilde 0} , {\un k}_1, y_1)
1760: \, = \,
1761: \frac{\bas}{2 \pi^2} \, \frac{1}{{\un k}_1^2} \, \int \, d^2 z \,
1762: n({\un z}, {\un B}, y_1) \,
1763: \nabla^2_z \, \left( e^{- i {\un k}_1 \cdot {\un z}} \, \ln
1764: \frac{|{\un z} - {\un x}_{2{\tilde 0}}| \, |{\un z} + {\un x}_{2'{\tilde 0}}|}
1765: {|{\un z} - {\un x}_{22'}| \, |{\un z}|} \right),
1766: \ee
1767: where $\nabla^2_z$ is the transverse coordinate gradient squared.
1768: \eq{dlin2} is the initial condition for the linearized version of
1769: \eq{Mev}. The latter can be obtained from \eq{Mev} by putting all $N=0$ in it,
1770: which yields
1771: \ben
1772: m ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{2'}, {\un x}_{\tilde 0}, Y; {\un k}_1, y_1) \,
1773: = \, e^{- \bas \, \ln \left( \frac{x_{2{\tilde 0}} x_{2'{\tilde 0}}
1774: x_{22'}}{\rho^3} \right) \, (Y-y_1)} \, d_{lin} ({\un x}_2, {\un
1775: x}_{2'}, {\un x}_{\tilde 0}, {\un k}_1, y_1) +
1776: \een
1777: \ben
1778: + \frac{\bas}{2 \pi} \, \int d^2 x_4 \int_{y_1}^Y dy \, e^{- \bas \,
1779: \ln \left( \frac{x_{2{\tilde 0}} x_{2'{\tilde 0}} x_{22'}}{\rho^3}
1780: \right) \, (Y-y)} \, \bigg\{
1781: \left( \frac{{\un x}_{42}}{x_{42}^2} -
1782: \frac{{\un x}_{4{\tilde 0}}}{x_{4{\tilde 0}}^2} \right) \cdot
1783: \left( \frac{{\un x}_{42'}}{x_{42'}^2} -
1784: \frac{{\un x}_{4{\tilde 0}}}{x_{4{\tilde 0}}^2} \right)
1785: \een
1786: \ben
1787: \times
1788: \bigg[ m ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{2'}, {\un x}_4, y; {\un k}_1, y_1)
1789: + \int d^2 x_a d^2 x_b \, n_1 ({\un x}_4, {\un x}_{\tilde 0}, y;
1790: {\un x}_a, {\un x}_b, y_1) \, s ({\un x}_a, {\un x}_b, {\un k}_1, y_1)
1791: \bigg] -
1792: \een
1793: \ben
1794: - \left( \frac{{\un x}_{42}}{x_{42}^2} -
1795: \frac{{\un x}_{4{\tilde 0}}}{x_{4{\tilde 0}}^2} \right) \cdot
1796: \left( \frac{{\un x}_{42'}}{x_{42'}^2} -
1797: \frac{{\un x}_{42}}{x_{42}^2} \right) \,
1798: m ({\un x}_4, {\un x}_{2'}, {\un x}_{\tilde 0}, y; {\un k}_1, y_1) -
1799: \een
1800: \be\label{mevl}
1801: - \left( \frac{{\un x}_{42}}{x_{42}^2} -
1802: \frac{{\un x}_{42'}}{x_{42'}^2} \right) \cdot
1803: \left( \frac{{\un x}_{42'}}{x_{42'}^2} -
1804: \frac{{\un x}_{4{\tilde 0}}}{x_{4{\tilde 0}}^2} \right) \,
1805: m ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_4, {\un x}_{\tilde 0}, y; {\un k}_1, y_1) \bigg\} ,
1806: \ee
1807: where we have introduced a linearized amplitude $M$ denoted by
1808: \be
1809: m ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{2'}, {\un x}_{\tilde 0}, Y; {\un k}_1, y_1) \,
1810: \equiv \, M ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{2'}, {\un x}_{\tilde 0}, Y; {\un
1811: k}_1, y_1) \bigg|_{lin}.
1812: \ee
1813: The form of \eq{dlin2} provides us with the following ansatz for the
1814: solution of \eq{mevl}:
1815: \be\label{msol}
1816: m ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{2'}, {\un x}_{\tilde 0}, Y; {\un k}_1, y_1) \,
1817: = \, f ({\un x}_{2{\tilde 0}}, Y; {\un k}_1, y_1) + f ({\un
1818: x}_{2'{\tilde 0}}, Y; {\un k}_1, y_1) - f ({\un x}_{22'}, Y; {\un
1819: k}_1, y_1)
1820: \ee
1821: with $f$ some unknown functions. Substituting the ansatz of \eq{msol}
1822: into \eq{mevl} one can see that it is a solution of \eq{mevl} iff
1823: \be
1824: f ({\un x}_{21}, Y; {\un k}_1, y_1) \, = \, \frac{1}{2} \, \int d^2
1825: x_a d^2 x_b \, n_1 ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{1}, Y; {\un x}_a, {\un x}_b,
1826: y_1) \, s ({\un x}_a, {\un x}_b, {\un k}_1, y_1).
1827: \ee
1828: The final answer for $m$ is
1829: \ben
1830: m ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{2'}, {\un x}_{\tilde 0}, Y; {\un k}_1, y_1) \,
1831: = \, \frac{1}{2} \, \int d^2 x_a d^2 x_b \, [n_1 ({\un x}_2, {\un
1832: x}_{\tilde 0}, Y; {\un x}_a, {\un x}_b, y_1) + n_1 ({\un x}_{2'}, {\un
1833: x}_{\tilde 0}, Y; {\un x}_a, {\un x}_b, y_1)
1834: \een
1835: \be\label{mM}
1836: - n_1 ({\un x}_{2}, {\un x}_{2'}, Y;
1837: {\un x}_a, {\un x}_b, y_1)] \, s ({\un x}_a, {\un x}_b, {\un k}_1, y_1).
1838: \ee
1839: Similar to \eq{cyl} we rewrite
1840: \be
1841: n_1 ({\un x}_{2}, {\un x}_{2'}, Y; {\un x}_a, {\un x}_b, y_1) \,
1842: \longrightarrow \, n_1 ({\un x}_{22'}, {\un B}, Y; {\un x}_a, {\un
1843: x}_b, y_1)
1844: \ee
1845: with the impact parameter ${\un B}$. Again we assume that for a large
1846: nucleus $n_1$ is a slowly varying function of ${\un B}$. Using \eq{mM}
1847: as $M$ in \eq{2Glin1} than yields
1848: \ben
1849: \frac{d \sigma^{q {\bar q} \, A \ \rightarrow \ q {\bar q} \, G_1 G_2 X}}
1850: {d^2 k_1 \, dy_1 \, d^2 k_2 \, dy_2} ({\un x}_{0{\tilde 0}})
1851: \bigg|_{LO} \, \approx \, \int \ d^2 B \
1852: n_1 ({\un x}_0, {\un x}_{\tilde 0}, Y; {\un x}_1 , {\un
1853: x}_{\tilde 1}, y_2) \, d^2 x_1 \, d^2 x_{\tilde 1} \,
1854: \frac{\bas}{2 \, (2 \pi)^2}
1855: \een
1856: \be\label{2Glin2}
1857: \times \, \frac{1}{{\un k}_2^2}
1858: \, \int \, d^2 z \,
1859: e^{- i {\un k}_2 \cdot {\un z}} \, \ln \left(
1860: \frac{|{\un z} - {\un x}_{1{\tilde 1}}| \, |{\un z} + {\un x}_{1{\tilde 1}}|}
1861: {|{\un z}|^2} \right) \, d^2 x_a d^2 x_b \, \nabla^2_z \, n_1 ({\un
1862: z}, {\un B}, y_2; {\un x}_a, {\un x}_b, y_1) \, s ({\un
1863: x}_a, {\un x}_b, {\un k}_1, y_1).
1864: \ee
1865: Similarly we rewrite \eq{sdef} as
1866: \be\label{sfact}
1867: s ({\un x}_a, {\un x}_b, {\un k}_1, y_1) \, = \, \frac{\bas}{(2 \pi)^2}
1868: \, \frac{1}{{\un k}_1^2} \, \int \, d^2 w \,
1869: e^{- i {\un k}_1 \cdot {\un w}} \, \ln \left(
1870: \frac{|{\un w} - {\un x}_{ab}| \, |{\un w} + {\un x}_{ab}|}
1871: {|{\un w}|^2} \right) \, \nabla^2_w \, N_G ({\un w}, {\un B}, y_1).
1872: \ee
1873: In the linear regime
1874: \be\label{nN}
1875: N_G ({\un w}, {\un B}, y_1) \, \approx \, 2 \, n ({\un w}, {\un B}, y_1)
1876: \ee
1877: with $n$ taken from \eq{bfkl}. Therefore, linearized $s$ can be
1878: obtained from \eq{sfact} using \eq{nN}
1879: \be\label{slin}
1880: s_{lin} ({\un x}_a, {\un x}_b, {\un k}_1, y_1) \, = \, \frac{\bas}{2 \pi^2}
1881: \, \frac{1}{{\un k}_1^2} \, \int \, d^2 w \,
1882: e^{- i {\un k}_1 \cdot {\un w}} \, \ln \left(
1883: \frac{|{\un w} - {\un x}_{ab}| \, |{\un w} + {\un x}_{ab}|}
1884: {|{\un w}|^2} \right) \, \nabla^2_w \, n ({\un w}, {\un B}, y_1).
1885: \ee
1886: Defining ${\un b}_{ab} = ({\un x}_a + {\un x}_b)/2$ we relabel the
1887: variables of $n_1$ in \eq{2Glin2} as \cite{dip,kt}
1888: \be
1889: n_1 ({\un z}, {\un B}, y_2; {\un x}_a, {\un x}_b, y_1) \, \longrightarrow \,
1890: n_1 ({\un z}, {\un x}_{ab}, {\un B}- {\un b}_{ab}, y_2 - y_1).
1891: \ee
1892: Than the integrals over ${\un x}_a$ and ${\un x}_b$ in \eq{2Glin2} can
1893: be written as
1894: \ben
1895: \int \, d^2 x_{ab} \, d^2 b_{ab} \, \nabla^2_z \,
1896: n_1 ({\un z}, {\un x}_{ab}, {\un B}- {\un b}_{ab}, y_2 - y_1) \,
1897: s_{lin} ({\un x}_a, {\un x}_b, {\un k}_1, y_1)
1898: \een
1899: \be\label{term1}
1900: \, = \, \int \, d^2
1901: x_{ab} \, d^2 b_{ab} \, \nabla^2_z \, n_1 ({\un z}, {\un x}_{ab},
1902: {\un b}_{ab}, y_2 - y_1) \, s_{lin} ({\un x}_a, {\un x}_b,
1903: {\un k}_1, y_1),
1904: \ee
1905: where we have put the index indicating that we have to use a
1906: linearized amplitude $s$ from \eq{slin} and shifted ${\un b}_{ab}$ by
1907: ${\un B}$. Using the explicit solution of \eq{n1}
1908: \cite{dip}
1909: \be
1910: \int \, d^2 b_{ab} \, n_1 ({\un z}, {\un x}_{ab},
1911: {\un b}_{ab}, y_2 - y_1) \, = \,
1912: \frac{1}{2 \pi \, {\un x}_{ab}^2} \, \int \frac{d
1913: \lambda}{2 \pi i} \, e^{2 \, \bas \, \chi(\lambda) \, (y_2-y_1)} \,
1914: \left( \frac{z}{x_{ab}} \right)^\lambda
1915: \ee
1916: with the eigenvalue of the BFKL equation \cite{bfkl,dip}
1917: \be
1918: \chi (\lambda) \, = \, \psi (1) - \frac{1}{2} \, \psi (\lambda) -
1919: \frac{1}{2} \, \psi (1-\lambda)
1920: \ee
1921: and with the help of \eq{slin} we rewrite \eq{term1} as
1922: \be\label{term2}
1923: \frac{1}{2 \pi^2} \, \nabla^2_z \, \int \, d^2 w \,
1924: \left( \int \, d^2 b_{ab} \,
1925: \frac{1}{\nabla^4_w} n_1 ({\un z}, {\un w}, {\un b}_{ab}, y_2 - y_1)
1926: \right) \, {\hat L}_{k_1} ({\un w}) \, n ({\un w}, {\un B}, y_1),
1927: \ee
1928: where we have defined the operator for Lipatov's effective vertex
1929: \cite{bfkl,braun}
1930: \be
1931: {\hat L}_{k} ({\un z}) \, \equiv \, \frac{4 \, \pi \, \bas}{{\un k}^2}
1932: \, \stackrel{\textstyle\leftarrow}{\nabla}^2_z \, e^{- i {\underline k} \cdot
1933: {\underline z}} \, \stackrel{\textstyle\rightarrow}{\nabla}^2_z .
1934: \ee
1935: Performing the integrations over ${\un x}_1$ and ${\un x}_{1'}$ in
1936: \eq{2Glin2} in a similar manner we finally obtain
1937: \ben
1938: \frac{d \sigma^{q {\bar q} \, A \ \rightarrow \ q {\bar q} \, G_1 G_2 X}}
1939: {d^2 k_1 \, dy_1 \, d^2 k_2 \, dy_2} ({\un x}_{0{\tilde 0}})
1940: \bigg|_{LO} \, \approx \, \frac{1}{(2 \pi)^4} \, \int \ d^2 B \, d^2 z \,
1941: d^2 w \, \left( \int \, d^2 b_2 \,
1942: \frac{1}{\nabla^4_z} n_1 ({\un x}_{0{\tilde 0}}, {\un z}, {\un b}_2, Y - y_2 )
1943: \right) \, {\hat L}_{k_2} ({\un z})
1944: \een
1945: \be\label{2Glin3}
1946: \, \left( \int \, d^2 b_1 \,
1947: \frac{1}{\nabla^4_w} n_1 ({\un z}, {\un w}, {\un b}_1, y_2 - y_1 )
1948: \right) \, {\hat L}_{k_1} ({\un w}) \, n ({\un w}, {\un B}, y_1).
1949: \ee
1950: \eq{2Glin3} has the structure of three BFKL ladders (two factors of
1951: $n_1$ and one factor of $n$) with two Lipatov vertices, which are
1952: responsible for production of gluons, inserted between them. It is
1953: equivalent to the $k_T$-factorization prediction for two-gluon
1954: production from a single BFKL ladder [see Eq. (30) in
1955: \cite{braun}]. We have, therefore, proven that at the leading twist
1956: (large $k_T$) level, our two-gluon inclusive production cross section
1957: (\ref{2Gincl}) reduces to the conventional $k_T$-factorized
1958: expression (\ref{2Glin3}).
1959:
1960: Two comments are in order here. First of all, it is a little worrisome
1961: that in order to recover the conventional leading twist result of
1962: \eq{2Glin3} we had to expand the initial conditions for the evolution of
1963: quadrupole amplitude $Q$ given by \eq{Q0} to the lowest order, as
1964: shown in \eq{Q0n0}. Of course, by doing so, we have shown that the
1965: leading twist formula (\ref{2Glin3}) is included in our full
1966: expression (\ref{2Gincl}). Nevertheless, taking a solution of an
1967: evolution equation at very short transverse distances, does not
1968: necessarily imply doing the same to initial conditions of
1969: evolution. For instance, if we are interested in the dipole amplitude
1970: $N ({\un x}_0, {\un x}_{\tilde 0}, Y)$ at small ${\un x}_{0{\tilde
1971: 0}}$ we have to solve the linear part of \eq{eqN} with the full
1972: initial conditions given by \eq{N0} and not with the leading order
1973: initial conditions given by \eq{n0}. The kernel of \eq{eqN} involves
1974: integration over all transverse sizes including large sizes where
1975: multiple rescatterings are important and have to be included.
1976: Multiple rescatterings become important at lower energies than the
1977: small-$x$ evolution and thus have to be included as initial condition
1978: even for linear (BFKL) evolution equation. (As one can show, multiple
1979: rescatterings in the quasi-classical limit become important at
1980: rapidity $y_{mult} \sim \ln 1/\as$, while the BFKL evolution becomes
1981: important at $y_{BFKL} \sim 1/\as$.) Thus, expanding the initial
1982: conditions of \eq{N0} would not be justified if one is interested in
1983: the small ${\un x}_{0{\tilde 0}}$ of the amplitude $N ({\un x}_0, {\un
1984: x}_{\tilde 0}, Y)$. The effects of saturation in the initial
1985: conditions on the short distance/large $k_T$ behavior of the
1986: amplitudes and gluon production cross sections have been studied
1987: before in \cite{kkt1,klm}. It is exactly these effects that bring in
1988: suppression of the nuclear modification factor $R^{pA}$ for the gluon
1989: production \cite{klm,kkt1,aaksw}. Therefore, taking the large $k_1$ and
1990: $k_2$ limit of \eq{2Gincl} more carefully may result in an expression
1991: different from the $k_T$-factorization formula of
1992: \eq{2Glin3}.
1993:
1994: The second observation one has to make is that by now the reader can
1995: appreciate the tremendous simplifications one needs to make
1996: [e.g. \eq{Q0n0}, linearization of all evolution equations, etc.] in
1997: order to recover the $k_T$-factorization formula of \eq{2Glin3}. This
1998: is strikingly different from the case of single inclusive gluon
1999: production considered in \cite{kt}. There the obtained expression for
2000: the cross section was cast in a $k_T$-factorized form without making
2001: any linearization assumptions, i.e., without taking the leading twist
2002: (high-$k_T$) limit. This $k_T$-factorization result of \cite{kt} was,
2003: indeed, unexpected and very puzzling. However it is also interesting
2004: to observe that it does not hold for the double inclusive gluon
2005: production cross section (\ref{2Gincl}). This leaves us guessing
2006: whether the preservation of $k_T$-factorization in the formula from
2007: \cite{kt} for the single gluon inclusive production cross section
2008: after multiple rescatterings and small-$x$ evolution had been included
2009: (see \eq{1Gincl} above) was just incidental. A similar breakdown of
2010: $k_T$-factorization has been observed recently for $q\bar q$
2011: production in $pA$ collisions \cite{bgv}.
2012:
2013:
2014:
2015:
2016: \section{Valence Quark-Gluon Production in Proton-Nucleus Collisions}
2017:
2018: In this section we calculate the cross section for production of a
2019: valence quark and a gluon in high energy proton nucleus collisions.
2020: Both produced quark and gluon assumed to have similar rapidity and to
2021: be in the proton (deuteron) fragmentation region. In this case, one
2022: can treat the proton (deuteron) as a dilute system of partons while
2023: the target nucleus is treated as a Color Glass Condensate. The
2024: produced quark and gluon then fragment into jets which can be
2025: measured. Previously, this approach has been used to calculate valence
2026: quark, photon and di-lepton cross sections in proton
2027: (deuteron)-nucleus collisions \cite{adjjm,jjm1}. Here, we extend this
2028: formalism to production both of a quark and a gluon. Explicitly, we
2029: calculate the differential cross section for the following process:
2030: \be
2031: q(p)\,A \rightarrow q(q)\, g(k)\, X
2032: \label{eqn:qA}
2033: \ee
2034: given by the amplitude
2035: \be
2036: {\cal M} (q,k;p) \equiv <q(q)\, g(k)_{out} | q(p)_{in}> =
2037: <0_{out}| a_{out}(k) b_{out}(q) b^{\dagger}_{in}(p) | 0_{in}>
2038: \label{eq:amp}
2039: \ee
2040: which, using the LSZ reduction formalism, can be written as (we set
2041: the renormalization factors equal to $1$ since we are working at the
2042: leading order in $\alpha_s$)
2043: \be
2044: {\cal M} & = &g \int d^4x \,d^4y \,d^4z \,d^4r \,
2045: d^4\bar{r} \,e^{i(q\cdot z + k\cdot r - p\cdot y)}
2046: \bar{u}(q) [i\stackrel{\rightarrow}{\slpartial}_z ] S_F (z,x) \gamma^{\nu}
2047: t^c S_F(x,y) [i\stackrel{\leftarrow}{\slpartial}_y ] u(p) \nonumber \\
2048: &&G_{\nu\rho}^{cb}(x,\bar{r}) D^{\rho\mu}_{ba}(\bar{r},r) \, \epsilon_{\mu}(k)
2049: \label{eq:ampexp}
2050: \ee
2051: where $S_F$, $G_{\nu\rho}$ are the quark and gluon propagators in the
2052: classical field background and $D^{\rho\mu}$ is defined such that
2053: \be
2054: \int d^4 r \,G^{0cb}_{\nu\rho} (x,r)\, D^{\rho\mu}_{ba} (r,y) \equiv
2055: \delta^c_a \, \delta_{\nu}^{\mu} \, \delta^4 (x-y)
2056: \ee
2057: where
2058: $G_{\nu\rho}^0$ is the free gluon propagator. This amplitude is shown
2059: in Fig. \ref{fig:qA-qgx} where the quark and gluon lines with a thick
2060: dot represent the propagators in the background field as illustrated
2061: in Fig. \ref{fig:mulscatt}.
2062:
2063: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2064: \begin{figure}
2065: \begin{center}
2066: \epsfxsize=5 cm
2067: \leavevmode
2068: \hbox{\epsffile{qA-qgx.eps}}
2069: \end{center}
2070: \caption{Production of a quark and a gluon including multiple scattering from
2071: the target.}
2072: \label{fig:qA-qgx}
2073: \end{figure}
2074: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2075: \vspace{0.5in}
2076: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2077: \begin{figure}
2078: \begin{center}
2079: \epsfxsize=7 cm
2080: \leavevmode
2081: \hbox{\epsffile{mulscatt.eps}}
2082: \end{center}
2083: \caption{Multiple scattering of a quark or gluon on a target.}
2084: \label{fig:mulscatt}
2085: \end{figure}
2086: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2087:
2088:
2089: To proceed further, we write the the propagators in the above amplitude
2090: in momentum space. The amplitude is
2091: \be
2092: {\cal M} = g \int {d^4k_1 \over (2\pi)^4} {d^4k_2\over (2\pi)^4}
2093: {d^4k_3\over (2\pi)^4} \bar{u}(q) \stackrel{\rightarrow}{\slq}
2094: S_F(q,k_1) \,\gamma^\nu \, t^c \, S_F(k_2,p) \stackrel{\leftarrow}{\slp}
2095: u(p) \, G_{\nu\rho}^{cb} (k_2-k_1,k_3) \,D^{\rho\mu}_{ba} (k_3,k)
2096: \,\epsilon_{\mu} (k)
2097: \ee
2098:
2099: The quark and gluon propagators in the classical background
2100: field are already known \cite{hw,ayala}. It is useful to separate the
2101: free and interacting parts of the propagator in the following. Therefore,
2102: we Define the interaction part of the propagators in momentum space as (and
2103: suppressing the color factor for the moment)
2104:
2105: \be
2106: S_F(q,p)&\equiv &(2\pi)^4 \delta^4(p-q)\, S^0_F
2107: (p) + S_F^0 (q) \,\tau_f (q,p) \, S_F^0 (p) \nonumber \\
2108: G^{\mu\nu}(q,p)&\equiv&
2109: (2\pi)^4 \delta^4(p-q)\, G^{0\mu\nu} (p) + G^{0\mu}_{\rho}(q) \,
2110: \tau_g (q,p)\, G^{0\rho\nu}(p)
2111: \label{eq:decomp}
2112: \ee
2113: where the free propagators are
2114: \be
2115: S_F^0 (p) &=& i{\slp \over p^2} \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, and \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,
2116: G^0_{\mu\nu}(k) = {i\over k} \bigg[-g_{\mu\nu} +
2117: {\eta_\mu k_\nu + \eta_\nu k_\mu \over \eta \cdot k}\bigg]
2118: \ee
2119: and $\eta_\mu$ is the light cone gauge vector so that $\eta \cdot A
2120: \equiv A^- = 0$ defines the gauge we are working in. In this gauge the interaction
2121: part of the gluon propagator in \eq{eq:decomp}, denoted here by
2122: $\tau_g (q,p)$, is diagonal in Lorentz indices, i.e., is proportional
2123: to $g_{\mu\nu}$, which allowed us to suppress the Lorentz indices and
2124: write it in the form shown in \eq{eq:decomp}. Such decomposition may
2125: not hold in other gauges. Inserting Eqs. (\ref{eq:decomp}) into the
2126: amplitude and defining
2127: \be
2128: {\cal M}(q,\lambda ,k;p)\equiv M_1 + M_2 + M_3 + M_4 =
2129: \epsilon_\mu^{(\lambda)} (k) \,[M_1^\mu + M_2^\mu + M_3^\mu + M_4^\mu]
2130: \label{eq:amp_dec}
2131: \ee
2132: where $\epsilon_\mu^{(\lambda)} (k) $ is the polarization vector of the
2133: produced gluon. we get
2134: \be
2135: M_1 &=& -g \,\bar{u}(q)\, \slepsilon \,t^a\,S_F^0(q+k)\,
2136: \tau_f(q+k,p)\,u(p) \\
2137: M_2 &=& -g\, \bar{u}(q)\, \tau_f(q,p-k)\, S_F^0(p-k)\, \slepsilon \,
2138: t^a\, u(p)\\
2139: M_3 &=& -g \,\bar{u}(q) \, \gamma_{\nu} t^b\,\tau_g^{ba}(k,p-q)\,u(p)\,
2140: G_0^{\nu\mu}(p-q)\, \epsilon_\mu (k)\\
2141: M_4 &=& -g \, \int d^4l \,\bar{u}(q) \,\tau_f(q,p-l)\,S_F^0(p-l)\,\gamma_{\nu}
2142: \,t^b\,\tau_g^{ba}(k,l)\,u(p) \, G_0^{\nu\mu}(l)\, \epsilon_\mu (k)
2143: \label{eq:amp_1234}
2144: \ee
2145: where $\tau_f$ and $\tau_g$ are given by
2146: \be
2147: \tau_f (q,p)\equiv (2\pi)\delta(p^- - q^-) \,\gamma^-\, \int d^2x_t\,
2148: e^{i (q_t - p_t)\cdot x_t}\, [V(x_t) - 1]\\
2149: \tau_g (q,p) \equiv 2p^- \, (2\pi)\delta(p^- - q^-) \, \int d^2x_t\,
2150: e^{i (q_t - p_t)\cdot x_t}\, [U(x_t) - 1].
2151: \label{eq:UVdef}
2152: \ee
2153: The matrices $V$ and $U$ include all the multiple scatterings of the
2154: quark and gluon as they propagate in the strong classical field of the
2155: target and are given by
2156: \be
2157: V(x_t) &\equiv& \hat{P} \,e^{ig\int dz^-\, A^+_a (x_t,z^-) \,t_a} \label{vdef} \\
2158: U (x_t) &\equiv& \hat{P} \, e^{ig\int dz^-\, A^+_a (x_t,z^-) \, T_a} \label{udef}.
2159: \ee
2160: Here $t_a$ and $T_a$ are matrices in the fundamental and adjoint
2161: representations of the $SU(N)$ group respectively and $A^+_a (x_t,x^-)
2162: = -g \,\delta (x^-) { \rho_a (x_t) \over \partial_t^2}$.
2163:
2164: With these definitions at hand, extracting an explicit factor of
2165: $(2\pi) \delta(p^- - q^- -k^-)$ while using the delta function $\delta
2166: (l^- - k^-)$ to do the $l^-$ integration and performing the $l^+$
2167: integration in $M_4$ via contour integration using the $(p-l)$ pole,
2168: we can write the amplitude as
2169: \be
2170: M_1 &=&- i g {1 \over 2q\cdot k} \bar{u}(q)\, \slepsilon\,
2171: (\slq + \slk)\,\gamma^-\,u(p)\,
2172: t^a\,[V(q_t + k_t) - (2\pi)^2 \delta^2(q_t + k_t)]\nonumber\\
2173: M_2 &=& i g {1 \over 2p\cdot k} \bar{u}(q)\, \gamma^- \,
2174: (\slp - \slk)\,\slepsilon \,u(p)\,
2175: [V(q_t + k_t) - (2\pi)^2 \delta^2(q_t + k_t)]\,t^a\nonumber\\
2176: M_3 &=& i g {k^- \over p\cdot q} \bar{u}(q)\, \gamma_{\nu}\,u(p)\,
2177: d^{\nu\mu} (p-q)\, \epsilon_\mu (k) \,t^b\,[
2178: U^{ba}(q_t+k_t) - \delta^{ba}\,(2\pi)^2 \delta^2(q_t + k_t)]\nonumber\\
2179: M_4 &=& i g {k^- \over p^-} \int {d^2l_t \over (2\pi)^2} \bar{u}(q)
2180: \,\gamma^-\,(\slp - \sll)\,\gamma_{\nu}\,u(p)\,
2181: {d^{\nu\mu} (l) \over l_t^2} \, \epsilon_\mu (k) \nonumber \\
2182: && [V(q_t + l_t) - (2\pi)^2 \delta^2(q_t + l_t)]
2183: t^b [U^{ba}(k_t - l_t) - \delta^{ba}\,(2\pi)^2 \delta^2(k_t - l_t)]
2184: \label{eq:amp_1234_mom}
2185: \ee
2186: where $d^{\mu\nu} (l) $ is related to the free gluon propagator via $
2187: d^{\mu\nu} (l) \equiv - i\,l^2\, G_0^{\mu\nu}(l)$ and $l^- = k^-$, $l^+
2188: = - {l_t^2 \over 2q^-}$. We have also set the transverse momentum of
2189: the incoming quark to zero without any loss of generality. We show the
2190: different diagrams contributing to the amplitude in
2191: Fig. \ref{fig:qgx_1234}. They correspond, respectively, to the quark
2192: multiply scattering from the target before or after radiating a gluon
2193: in Figs. \ref{fig:qgx_1234}-1 and \ref{fig:qgx_1234}-2 and the
2194: radiated gluon multiply scattering from the target in
2195: Fig. \ref{fig:qgx_1234}-3 while in Fig. \ref{fig:qgx_1234}-4 both the
2196: radiated gluon and the final state quark multiply scatter from the
2197: target. For the sake of clarity, momenta of the incoming quark and
2198: outgoing quark and gluon are shown explicitly in
2199: Fig. \ref{fig:qgx_1234}-1.
2200:
2201:
2202: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2203: \begin{figure}
2204: \begin{center}
2205: \epsfxsize=10cm
2206: \leavevmode
2207: \hbox{\epsffile{qgx_1234.eps}}
2208: \end{center}
2209: \caption{Diagrams corresponding to $M_1,M_2,M_3,M_4$.}
2210: \label{fig:qgx_1234}
2211: \end{figure}
2212: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2213:
2214:
2215: In Fig. \ref{fig:qgx_supp} we show one of the diagrams which are
2216: suppressed in the high energy limit and do not contribute and
2217: therefore, not included in Eqs. (\ref{eq:amp_1234_mom}). This is due
2218: to the fact that the typical time scale for gluon emission is much
2219: longer than the time between rescatterings in the target nucleus. The
2220: diagram in \fig{fig:qgx_supp} is, therefore, suppressed by a power of
2221: center of mass energy and can be safely neglected. Another diagram
2222: (not shown), which is suppressed in the high energy limit for the same
2223: reason, is when both the initial and final state quark lines as well
2224: as the radiated gluon multiply scatter from the target.
2225:
2226:
2227:
2228: To calculate the cross section, we need to square the amplitude
2229: $|{\cal M}|^2$ (\ref{eq:amp_dec}). There is a factor of $-g_{\mu\nu} +
2230: ({1\over \eta \cdot k}) [k_\mu \eta_\nu + \eta_\mu k_\nu]$ coming from
2231: squaring and summing over the polarization of the final state gluon in
2232: the light cone gauge which can be used to simplify the
2233: expressions. Furthermore, we define $z=q^-/p^-$ so that $1-z =
2234: k^-/p^-$. Below, we list the different contributions coming from
2235: squaring the amplitude. For reasons which will become clear shortly,
2236: we consider the square of $M_1 + M_2$ first. The contribution of the
2237: $-g_{\mu\nu}$ term to the squared amplitude is (extracting a factor of
2238: $g^2$ for convenience)
2239: \be
2240: -g_{\mu\nu} (M_1^\mu + M_2^\mu)^{\dagger} (M_1^\nu + M_2^\nu)
2241: &=& 16 p^-p^- \Bigg\{
2242: {z(1-z)^2 \over [zk_t - (1-z)q_t]^2}\nonumber \\
2243: Tr [V^{\dagger}(q_t &+& k_t) - (2\pi)^2 \delta^2(q_t + k_t)] t^a \, t^a
2244: [V(q_t + k_t) - (2\pi)^2 \delta^2(q_t + k_t)] \nonumber\\
2245: + {z(1 - z)^2 \over k_t^2} \
2246: Tr [V(q_t &+& k_t) - (2\pi)^2 \delta^2(q_t + k_t)] t^a \, t^a
2247: [V^{\dagger}(q_t + k_t) - (2\pi)^2 \delta^2(q_t + k_t)] \nonumber\\
2248: + \Bigg[
2249: (1-z)^2 (1 &+& z^2) {q_t^2 \over k_t^2 [zk_t - (1-z)q_t]^2} + {z^2(1-z^2)
2250: \over [zk_t - (1-z)q_t]^2}
2251: - {1-z^2 \over k_t^2}\Bigg] \nonumber\\ Tr \, t^a [V^{\dagger}(q_t &+&
2252: k_t) - (2\pi)^2 \delta^2(q_t + k_t)] t^a [V(q_t + k_t) - (2\pi)^2
2253: \delta^2(q_t + k_t)]\Bigg\}
2254: \label{eq:m_12}
2255: \ee
2256: where $Tr$ denotes trace of color matrices. This term is identical, up
2257: to color matrices, to the photon $+$ quark production calculated in
2258: \cite{jjm2}. We now consider contribution of the
2259: $[k_\mu \eta_\nu + \eta_\mu k_\nu]$ piece. Using the Dirac equation and the
2260: identity $\bar{u}(q) \gamma^- u(p) = 2 \sqrt{2p^-q^-}$
2261: (valid for on mass shell particles) simplifies the trace algebra
2262: considerably and we get
2263: \be
2264: {[k_\mu \eta_\nu + \eta_\mu k_\nu]\over \eta \cdot k}
2265: (M_1^\mu + M_2^\mu)^{\dagger} (M_1^\nu + M_2^\nu) &=&
2266: 32 \,p^- p^- z^2 \bigg[V^\dagger (q_t + k_t) t^a -
2267: t^a V^\dagger (q_t + k_t) \bigg]
2268: \nonumber\\
2269: &&\bigg[ {1 \over [zk_t -(1-z) q_t]^2} t^a V(q_t + k_t) -
2270: {1\over k_t^2} V(q_t + k_t) t^a \bigg].
2271: \ee
2272: Note that this piece has no analog in QED and would vanish in the case of
2273: photon emission.
2274:
2275:
2276:
2277: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2278: \begin{figure}
2279: \begin{center}
2280: \epsfxsize=5cm
2281: \leavevmode
2282: \hbox{\epsffile{qgx_supp.eps}}
2283: \end{center}
2284: \caption{A typical diagram which is suppressed in the high energy limit
2285: and, therefore, not included.}
2286: \label{fig:qgx_supp}
2287: \end{figure}
2288: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2289:
2290:
2291: A few remarks regarding the difference between photon and gluon
2292: radiation is in order here. In single inclusive photon production in
2293: $pA$ collisions as considered in \cite{jjm2}, the photon is emitted by
2294: a quark scattering, via multiple gluon exchanges, from a target which
2295: is treated as a classical gluon field, generated by recoilless sources
2296: of color charge. The photon current is conserved and satisfies $k_\mu
2297: \, M^\mu =0$ due to gauge invariance. It is therefore enough to work
2298: in the covariant gauge where the sum over polarization of photons is
2299: just $-g_{\mu\nu}$. There is an essential difference between photon
2300: and gluon radiation here due to the fact that in the case of gluon
2301: radiation, one also needs to consider radiation of gluons from the
2302: target and not just from the quark. This is essential for gauge
2303: invariance of the amplitude and current conservation. However, it can
2304: be shown that as long as one works in the light cone gauge, the gluon
2305: radiation from the target vanishes identically. This is the case here
2306: since we are working in the light cone gauge. However, this means that
2307: one needs to keep the full projector $-g_{\mu\nu} + ({1\over \eta
2308: \cdot k}) [k_\mu \eta_\nu + \eta_\mu k_\nu]$ rather than only the
2309: $-g_{\mu\nu}$ piece which would be the case in the covariant gauge. We
2310: now consider the rest of the diagrams:
2311: \be
2312: |M_3^{\dagger}M_1| &=& 16 \,p^-p^- \, z(1 + z^2)
2313: {q_t^2 -z q_t \cdot (q_t+k_t) \over q_t^2 [zk_t - (1-z)q_t]^2}
2314: [U^{\dagger ab}(q_t + k_t) - \delta^{ab}(2\pi)^2 \delta^2(q_t + k_t)]
2315: \nonumber\\
2316: &&Tr \, t^b\, t^a [V(q_t + k_t) - (2\pi)^2 \delta^2(q_t + k_t)] \nonumber\\
2317: |M_3^{\dagger} M_2|&=& 16 \,p^-p^- z (1 + z^2)
2318: {q_t\cdot k_t \over q_t^2 k_t^2}
2319: [U^{\dagger ab}(q_t + k_t) - \delta^{ab}(2\pi)^2 \delta^2(q_t + k_t)]
2320: Tr\,t^b [V(q_t + k_t) - (2\pi)^2 \delta^2(q_t + k_t)]\,t^a \nonumber\\
2321: |M_3|^2 &=& 16 p^- p^- {z(1+ z^2) \over q_t^2}
2322: [U^{\dagger ab}(q_t + k_t) - \delta^{ab}(2\pi)^2 \delta^2(q_t + k_t)]
2323: [U^{ca}(q_t + k_t) - \delta^{ca} (2\pi)^2 \delta^2(q_t + k_t)] \nonumber\\
2324: &&Tr\, t^b \, t^c \nonumber\\
2325: |M^{\dagger}_3 M_4| &=&- 16\, p^-p^- z (1 + z^2) \int {d^2l_t \over (2\pi)^2}
2326: {q_t\cdot l_t \over q_t^2 l_t^2} \,
2327: [U^{\dagger ab}(q_t + k_t) - \delta^{ab}(2\pi)^2 \delta^2(q_t + k_t)]
2328: \nonumber\\
2329: &&[U^{ca}(k_t - l_t) - \delta^{ca}(2\pi)^2 \delta^2(k_t - l_t)] \,
2330: Tr\,t^b [V(q_t + l_t) - (2\pi)^2 \delta^2(q_t + l_t)] t^c
2331: \nonumber\\
2332: |M_4^{\dagger} M_1| &=& - 16 p^-p^- z (1 + z^2) \int {d^2l_t \over (2\pi)^2}
2333: {(1 - z) q_t \cdot l_t - z k_t\cdot l_t \over l_t^2 [zk_t - (1-z)q_t]^2}
2334: [U^{\dagger ab}(k_t - l_t) - \delta^{ab}(2\pi)^2 \delta^2(k_t - l_t)]
2335: \nonumber\\
2336: &&Tr\, t^b [V^{\dagger }(q_t + l_t) - (2\pi)^2 \delta^2(q_t + l_t)] t^a
2337: [V(q_t + k_t) - (2\pi)^2 \delta^2(q_t + k_t)] \nonumber\\
2338: |M_4^{\dagger} M_2| &=& -16 p^-p^- z (1 + z^2) \int {d^2l_t \over (2\pi)^2}
2339: {k_t\cdot l_t \over l_t^2 k_t^2}
2340: [U^{\dagger ac}(k_t - l_t) - \delta^{ac}(2\pi)^2 \delta^2(k_t - l_t)]
2341: \nonumber\\
2342: &&Tr \,t^c [V^{\dagger }(q_t + l_t) - (2\pi)^2 \delta^2(q_t + l_t)]
2343: [V(q_t + k_t) - (2\pi)^2 \delta^2(q_t + k_t)] t^a \nonumber \\
2344: |M_4|^2 &=& 16 p^-p^- z (1 + z^2)
2345: \int {d^2l_t \over (2\pi)^2} {d^2\bar{l}_t \over (2\pi)^2}
2346: {l_t\cdot \bar{l}_t \over l_t^2 \bar{l}_t^2}
2347: [U^{\dagger ac}(k_t - \bar{l}_t) - \delta^{ac}(2\pi)^2
2348: \delta^2(k_t - \bar{l}_t)]
2349: \nonumber\\
2350: &&[U^{ab}(k_t - l_t) - \delta^{ab}(2\pi)^2 \delta^2(k_t - l_t)]
2351: Tr \, t^c t^b
2352: [V^{\dagger}(q_t + l_t) - (2\pi)^2 \delta^2(q_t + l_t)]\nonumber \\
2353: &&[V(q_t + \bar{l}_t) - (2\pi)^2 \delta^2 (q_t + \bar{l}_t)].
2354: \label{eq:m_34}
2355: \ee
2356: Note that for a given interference term such as $|M^{\dagger}_3 M_1|$,
2357: there is also the conjugate term $|M^{\dagger}_1 M_3|$ which is obtained
2358: from $|M^{\dagger}_3 M_1|$ by daggering the color matrices.
2359: Eqs. (\ref{eq:m_12}-\ref{eq:m_34}) provide
2360: the complete expression for the amplitude squared $|M|^2$. In order to
2361: get the invariant cross section, one needs to include the phase space
2362: and the flux factors given by ${d^3q \over (2\pi)^3} {1 \over 2q^-}$,
2363: ${d^3k \over (2\pi)^3} {1 \over 2k^-}$, and ${1 \over
2364: 2p^-}$. Including a factor of $1/2$ coming from averaging over the
2365: incoming quark spin and restoring the coupling constant and the
2366: overall delta function, the invariant cross section is given by
2367: \be\label{QGincl}
2368: q^-\,k^-{d\sigma^{qA\rightarrow qgX} \over d^3q\,d^3k} = {1\over 16 p^-}
2369: {1\over (2\pi)^6}
2370: (2\pi) \delta (p^- -q^- -k^-)\, g^2 \,|M|^2 .
2371: \label{eq:cs_part}
2372: \ee
2373: This is the invariant cross section for production of a quark and
2374: gluon in the scattering of a quark on a target nucleus (or a proton at
2375: small $x$) including classical multiple scattering. In order to get
2376: the invariant cross section for production of two hadrons or two jets
2377: in a proton (deuteron)-nucleus collisions, one needs to convolute the
2378: cross section given in Eq. (\ref{eq:cs_part}) with the (valence) quark
2379: distribution function of a proton or deuteron and the quark or gluon
2380: fragmentation functions
2381: \be
2382: E_{h1}E_{h2} {d\sigma^{pA\rightarrow h1\,h2\,X} \over d^3q_{h1}
2383: d^3k_{h2}} \, = \, q_p (x_q) \otimes q^-\,k^- \,
2384: {d\sigma^{qA\rightarrow qgX} \over d^3q\,d^3k} \otimes D^{q}_{h1}
2385: (z_1) \otimes D^{g}_{h2} (z_2)
2386: \label{eq:cs_2had}
2387: \ee
2388: where $q_p(x_q)$ is the quark distribution function in a proton and
2389: the quark and gluon fragmentation functions are denoted by $D^{q}_{h1}
2390: (z_1)$ and $D^{g}_{h2} (z_2)$, while $\otimes$ denotes a convolution
2391: over Bjorken $x$ for distribution function and over $z_1, z_2$ for
2392: fragmentation functions. The cross section calculated here is valid
2393: when one produces two hadrons (or jets) in the forward rapidity region
2394: of a proton (deuteron) nucleus collision. It includes the effects of
2395: quantum evolution (in $x$) in the target. To see this one has to
2396: evaluate the Wilson lines ($U$'s and $V$'s) correlators in
2397: Eqs. (\ref{eq:m_12}-\ref{eq:m_34}) using the
2398: JIMWLK evolution equation \cite{jimwlk}. One can use this cross
2399: section in order to investigate two particle correlations
2400: (back-to-back jets) in the RHIC forward rapidity region which can be
2401: measured, at RHIC for example, by the STAR detector at rapidity
2402: $y=3.8$.
2403:
2404: In order to consider the case when one of the hadrons in produced in
2405: the mid rapidity region, one needs to allow the possibility that the
2406: gluon is radiated not from the valence quark directly, but from
2407: anywhere along the (in principle, non-linear ) gluon cascade between
2408: the valence quark and the target.
2409:
2410: At this point, it is worthwhile to make a connection between the
2411: notations used in different sections since they may seem disjoint to a
2412: casual reader. The degrees of freedom are indeed the same even though
2413: they are denoted differently due to convenience. In Sections II and
2414: III the forward scattering amplitude of a quark--anti-quark dipole on
2415: the target is denoted by $N (x_t,y_t)$ and can be expressed as
2416: \be\label{nv}
2417: N (x_t,y_t) \, = \, 1 - {1\over N_c} \ Tr \left< V^{\dagger} (x_t) V(y_t) \right>,
2418: \ee
2419: where $V$ is a path-ordered integral in the fundamental
2420: representation, used in section $IV$ and defined in \eq{vdef}. Also,
2421: the adjoint dipole amplitude denoted $N_G$ in, for instance, \eq{ngn},
2422: is equal to
2423: \be\label{ngu}
2424: N_G (x_t,y_t) \, = \, 1 - {1\over N_c^2 -1} \ Tr \left< U^{\dagger} (x_t)
2425: U(y_t) \right> ,
2426: \ee
2427: where $U$ is the path-ordered integral in the adjoint representation,
2428: used in section $IV$ and defined in \eq{udef}. Furthermore, the
2429: $S$-matrix of the color quadrupole interaction with the target, which
2430: is denoted $Q_0 (x_t, y_t, z_t, r_t)$ in the classical case and
2431: calculated in \eq{Q0} and denoted $Q (x_t, y_t, z_t, r_t)$ in the case
2432: of quantum evolution included in \eq{Qev}, can be rewritten in terms
2433: of the correlator of four path-ordered exponentials
2434: \be\label{qv}
2435: Q (x_t, y_t, z_t, r_t) \, = \, \frac{1}{N_c} \ Tr \left< V^{\dagger}
2436: (x_t) V (z_t) V^{\dagger} (r_t) V (y_t) \right> .
2437: \ee
2438: The relations in Eqs. (\ref{nv}), (\ref{ngu}) and (\ref{qv}) between
2439: $N$, $N_G$, $Q$ and the correlators of $V$'s and $U$'s hold even when
2440: the quantum evolution is included.
2441:
2442:
2443: \section{Conclusions}
2444:
2445: In this paper we have calculated two cross sections for inclusive
2446: two-particle production relevant for the $dAu$ run at RHIC and for the
2447: upcoming $pA$ run at LHC. The cross section for two-gluon production
2448: at mid-rapidity for DIS is given by \eq{2Gincl}. The expression in
2449: \eq{2Gincl} includes all multiple rescatterings of the produced gluons
2450: on the target, along with the non-linear small-$x$ evolution effects
2451: \cite{bk}. Even though, unlike the single gluon inclusive production
2452: cross section of \cite{kt} [see \eq{1Gincl} above], our two-gluon
2453: cross section in \eq{2Gincl} can not be cast in $k_T$-factorized form,
2454: it can be easily generalized to the case of proton--nucleus ($pA$)
2455: scattering. Following \cite{kt} we note that the probability $n_1
2456: ({\un x}_{0{\tilde 0}}, {\un x}_{12}, {\un b}, y)$ of finding a dipole
2457: $12$ in the original dipole $0{\tilde 0}$ can be related to the
2458: unintegrated gluon distribution $\phi ({\un q}, y)$ as
2459: \be\label{phi1}
2460: \int d^2 b \, \frac{1}{\nabla_{x_{12}}^2} \, n_1 ({\un x}_{0{\tilde 0}},
2461: {\un x}_{12}, {\un b}, y) \, = \, \frac{(2 \pi)^2}{\bas} \, \int \,
2462: d^2 q \, e^{i {\un q} \cdot {\un x}_{12}} \, \phi ({\un q}, y),
2463: \ee
2464: where the coefficient on the right hand side of \eq{phi1} has been
2465: fixed in order for \eq{1Gincl} to be reducible to conventional
2466: $k_T$-factorization form of \cite{lr}. The information about the
2467: original dipole $0{\tilde 0}$ is now contained in its unintegrated
2468: gluon distribution $\phi ({\un q}, y)$. \eq{phi1} makes generalization
2469: of \eq{1Gincl} from DIS to $pA$ rather straightforward: instead of the
2470: unintegrated gluon distribution function $\phi ({\un q}, y)$ of the
2471: incoming dipole, one has to use a BFKL evolved unintegrated gluon
2472: distribution $\phi ({\un q}, y)$ of the proton in
2473: \eq{phi1}, and, consequently, in \eq{1Gincl}.
2474:
2475: To repeat the above procedure for \eq{2Gincl} we have to devise a
2476: generalization procedure for the probability of finding two dipoles
2477: $n_2$ as well. To do that, let us first clarify the physical meaning
2478: of \eq{phi1}. The $1/\nabla_{x_{12}}^2$ term in
2479: \eq{phi1} is due to $\nabla_{x_{12}}^2$, which is usual to the
2480: definition of unintegrated gluon distribution in terms of the dipole
2481: amplitude (see Eq. (2) in \cite{kkt1}), and $1/\nabla_{x_{12}}^4$,
2482: which is proportional to gluons' propagators in a two-gluon exchange
2483: amplitude. Thus, in \eq{phi1} the gluon distribution is obtained from
2484: the dipole probability $n_1$ by connecting two $t$-channel exchange
2485: gluons to the dipole $12$ in it. Now, generalization of \eq{phi1} to
2486: $n_2$ becomes manifest: one has to connect two exchange gluons to each
2487: of the two produced dipoles. The final expression reads
2488: \be\label{phi2}
2489: \int d^2 b_{1{\tilde 1}} \, d^2 b_{2{\tilde 2}} \,
2490: \frac{1}{\nabla_{x_{1{\tilde 1}}}^2 \, \nabla_{x_{2{\tilde 2}}}^2} \,
2491: n_2 ({\un x}_{0}, {\un x}_{\tilde 0}, Y; {\un x}_{1}, {\un x}_{\tilde
2492: 1}, y_1, {\un x}_{2}, {\un x}_{\tilde 2}, y_2) \, \nonumber \\ = \,
2493: \frac{(2 \pi)^4}{\bas^2} \, \int \, d^2 q \, d^2 l \, e^{i {\un q} \cdot
2494: {\un x}_{1{\tilde 1}} + i {\un l} \cdot {\un x}_{2{\tilde 2}}} \,
2495: \phi_2 ({\un q}, Y-y_1; {\un l}, Y-y_2),
2496: \ee
2497: where $b_{1{\tilde 1}} = ({\un x}_1 + {\un x}_{\tilde 1})/2$,
2498: $b_{2{\tilde 2}} = ({\un x}_2 + {\un x}_{\tilde 2})/2$, and $\phi_2
2499: ({\un q}, Y-y_1; {\un l}, Y-y_2)$ is the two-gluon distribution
2500: function in the incoming dipole $0{\tilde 0}$, with the two gluons
2501: having transverse momenta ${\un q}$ and ${\un l}$ and rapidities
2502: $Y-y_1$ and $Y-y_2$ with respect to the projectile onium.
2503:
2504: Analyzing \eq{2Gincl} one can see that for scattering on a large
2505: nucleus both $n_1$ and $n_2$ come into \eq{2Gincl} integrated over
2506: impact parameter(s), as employed in Eqs. (\ref{phi1}) and
2507: (\ref{phi2}). Therefore, using Eqs. (\ref{phi1}) and (\ref{phi2}) one
2508: can rewrite \eq{2Gincl} in terms of single and double unintegrated
2509: gluon distributions $\phi$ and $\phi_2$. Taking these distributions
2510: for a proton (deuteron) instead of the quarkonium would accomplish
2511: generalization of \eq{2Gincl} to the case of $p(d)A$ scattering.
2512:
2513: Eqs. (\ref{eq:m_12}-\ref{eq:m_34}) along with \eq{QGincl} give us a
2514: production cross section for a valence quark and a gluon in the
2515: forward rapidity direction in $p(d)A$ scattering. If the correlators
2516: of Wilson lines in Eqs. (\ref{eq:m_12}-\ref{eq:m_34}) are averaged in
2517: the Gaussian approximation \cite{kjkmw}, the obtained cross section
2518: (\ref{QGincl}) would reduce to the quasi-classical result containing
2519: multiple rescatterings only. (For an explicit evaluation of color
2520: averaging of the Wilson lines using a Gaussian weight, see
2521: \cite{kw,bgv2}.) If the Wilson lines are averaged with the weight
2522: function obtained from solving the JIMWLK evolution equation
2523: \cite{jimwlk}, than \eq{QGincl} would include the complete effects of
2524: small-$x$ evolution as well.
2525:
2526: Before we conclude we would like to make a comment about the
2527: applicability of Eqs. (\ref{eqN}), (\ref{eq:m_12}-\ref{eq:m_34}) for
2528: RHIC kinematics. Indeed, in deriving these equations, we have assumed
2529: for simplicity that the gluons are widely separated in rapidity, $y_2
2530: \gg y_1$. On the other hand we know that particle production at
2531: mid-rapidity at RHIC appears to be better described by the
2532: quasi-classical physics leading to Cronin enhancement. Therefore, if
2533: one of the produced particles is at forward rapidity with the other
2534: one being at mid-rapidity our formulas would apply, though one would
2535: not need to include the small-$x$ evolution between the target nucleus
2536: and the particle produced at mid-rapidity, since there the physics is
2537: quasi-classical. However, the suppression in $R^{dAu}$, which is most
2538: likely caused by small-$x$ evolution, sets in already at rapidity
2539: $\eta = 1$ and continues all the way up to the highest achievable
2540: rapidity at RHIC
2541: \cite{brahms-1,brahms-2,phobos}. That means quantum evolution describes
2542: physics at $\eta \ge 1$. Therefore, if both of the produced particles
2543: are at rapidity $\eta \ge 1$, say if $y_1 = 1$ and $y_2 = 3$, we can
2544: still have a large rapidity interval between them, $y_2 \gg y_1$, and
2545: have quantum evolution between the target and the gluon at $y_1$
2546: included in Eqs. (\ref{eqN}), (\ref{eq:m_12}-\ref{eq:m_34}).
2547: Indeed, the upcoming $pA$ run at the LHC would have
2548: a much wider rapidity window, where our results would be even more
2549: applicable.
2550:
2551:
2552:
2553:
2554: \section*{Acknowledgments}
2555:
2556: We are grateful to Francois Gelis, Dima Kharzeev, Genya Levin,
2557: Al Mueller and Raju Venugopalan for stimulating and informative
2558: discussions.
2559:
2560: J.J-M. is supported in part by the U.S. Department of Energy under
2561: Grant No. DE-FG02-00ER41132. The work of Yu. K. was supported in part
2562: by the U.S. Department of Energy under Grant No. DE-FG02-97ER41014.
2563:
2564: \renewcommand{\theequation}{A\arabic{equation}}
2565: \setcounter{equation}{0}
2566: \section*{Appendix A}
2567:
2568:
2569: In this Appendix we calculate the $S$-matrix of the interaction a
2570: quadrupole $2,2',1,1'$ with the target nucleus. The $S$-matrix
2571: includes the Glauber-Mueller \cite{Mueller1,mv,km,KMc} multiple
2572: rescatterings only and is denoted by $Q_0 ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{2'},
2573: {\un x}_1, {\un x}_{1'})$ in Sect. II above. The possible interactions
2574: are shown in \fig{quad}. The first term there corresponds to the case
2575: where all the interactions in the amplitude and in the complex
2576: conjugate amplitude are virtual, i.e., each nucleon exchanges two
2577: gluons with the $q\bar q$ pair and remains intact. This is the
2578: diffractive piece of the interaction \cite{KMc}. The gluons connect to
2579: both the quark and the antiquark lines. This is denoted by leaving the
2580: gluons lines disconnected at the top ends. All the virtual exchanges
2581: are leading at large $N_c$. The first diagram in \fig{quad} gives a
2582: contribution
2583: \be\label{1q}
2584: e^{- x_{21}^2 \ln (1/x_{21} \Lambda) \, Q_{s0}^2 /4} \,
2585: e^{- x_{2'1'}^2 \ln (1/x_{2'1'} \Lambda) \, Q_{s0}^2 /4}
2586: \ee
2587: which is just a product of the $S$-matrices of the dipoles $12$ and
2588: $1'2'$.
2589:
2590:
2591: The second diagram in \fig{quad} corresponds to the case of at least
2592: one {\sl real} interaction: there the nucleon at longitudinal
2593: coordinate $z$ interacts with the $q\bar q$ pair by a single gluon
2594: exchange in the amplitude and in the complex conjugate amplitude. The
2595: single gluon exchange breaks up the nucleon in the final state. We
2596: will refer to this interaction as real \cite{km,yuri1}. The
2597: interaction of the nucleon at $z$ is chosen to be the first real
2598: interaction: all prior exchanges are virtual (exchanges to the left of
2599: $z$ in the amplitude and to the right of $z$ in the complex conjugate
2600: amplitude). After the interaction of nucleon at $z$ the exchanges can
2601: be both real and virtual. However, in the large $N_c$ limit, only
2602: those real exchanges contribute where gluons connect to either lines
2603: $1$ and $1'$ or lines $2$ and $2'$. The color structure is similar to
2604: the dipole model \cite{dip}: the nucleon at $z$ splits the original
2605: single quark loop $2,2',1,1'$ into two, and the successive
2606: interactions can only take place within each of the two resulting
2607: loops.
2608:
2609: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2610: \begin{figure}
2611: \begin{center}
2612: \epsfxsize=16.5cm
2613: \leavevmode
2614: \hbox{\epsffile{quad.eps}}
2615: \end{center}
2616: \caption{Leading diagrams contributing to the interaction of a color
2617: quadrupole $2,2',1,1'$ with a nuclear target in the large-$N_c$
2618: limit.}
2619: \label{quad}
2620: \end{figure}
2621: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2622:
2623: The contribution of the second graph in \fig{quad} is therefore
2624: \ben
2625: \int_0^{L} \frac{dz}{L} \, e^{- \frac{1}{4} \,
2626: [ x_{21}^2 \ln (1/x_{21} \Lambda)
2627: + x_{2'1'}^2 \ln (1/x_{2'1'} \Lambda) ] \, Q_{s0}^2 \, \frac{z}{L}} \,
2628: \left( - \frac{1}{4} \, Q_{s0}^2 \right) \,
2629: [x_{22'}^2 \ln (1/x_{22'} \Lambda)
2630: + x_{11'}^2 \ln (1/x_{11'} \Lambda)
2631: \een
2632: \be\label{2q}
2633: + x_{21'}^2 \ln (1/x_{21'} \Lambda) + x_{2'1}^2 \ln (1/x_{2'1}
2634: \Lambda)] \, e^{- \frac{1}{4} \, [ x_{22'}^2 \ln (1/x_{22'} \Lambda) +
2635: x_{11'}^2 \ln (1/x_{11'} \Lambda) ] \, Q_{s0}^2 \, \frac{L - z}{L}}.
2636: \ee
2637: In \eq{2q} the first exponent resums all virtual interactions before
2638: the first real interaction at $z$, the second exponent resums all the
2639: real and virtual interactions with dipoles $22'$ and $11'$ following
2640: the first real interaction, and the term in between accounts for the
2641: first real interaction itself. We also average over the longitudinal
2642: coordinate $z$ which varies from $0$ to $L$, where $L$ is the
2643: longitudinal extent of the nucleus at a given impact parameter.
2644:
2645: Performing the integration over $z$ in \eq{2q} and adding to it the
2646: contribution from \eq{1q} yields \eq{Q0} in the text.
2647:
2648:
2649:
2650:
2651: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
2652:
2653:
2654: %\cite{Kharzeev:2002pc}
2655: \bibitem{klm}
2656: D.~Kharzeev, E.~Levin and L.~McLerran,
2657: %``Parton saturation and N(part) scaling of semi-hard processes in QCD,''
2658: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 561}, 93 (2003)
2659: [arXiv:hep-ph/0210332].
2660: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0210332;%%
2661:
2662: \bibitem{kkt1}
2663: D.~Kharzeev, Y.~V.~Kovchegov and K.~Tuchin,
2664: %``Cronin effect and high-p(T) suppression in p A collisions,''
2665: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 68}, 094013 (2003)
2666: [arXiv:hep-ph/0307037].
2667: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0307037;%%
2668:
2669: %\cite{Albacete:2003iq}
2670: \bibitem{aaksw}
2671: J.~L.~Albacete, N.~Armesto, A.~Kovner, C.~A.~Salgado and U.~A.~Wiedemann,
2672: %``Energy dependence of the Cronin effect from non-linear QCD evolution,''
2673: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 92}, 082001 (2004)
2674: [arXiv:hep-ph/0307179].
2675: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0307179;%%
2676:
2677:
2678: %\cite{Gribov:tu}
2679: \bibitem{glr}
2680: L.~V.~Gribov, E.~M.~Levin and M.~G.~Ryskin,
2681: %``Semihard Processes In QCD,''
2682: Phys.\ Rept.\ {\bf 100}, 1 (1983).
2683: %%CITATION = PRPLC,100,1;%%
2684:
2685: %\cite{Mueller:wy}
2686: \bibitem{mq}
2687: A.~H.~Mueller and J.~w.~Qiu,
2688: %``Gluon Recombination And Shadowing At Small Values Of X,''
2689: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 268}, 427 (1986).
2690: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B268,427;%%
2691:
2692: %\cite{Blaizot:nc}
2693: \bibitem{bm}
2694: J.~P.~Blaizot and A.~H.~Mueller,
2695: %``The Early Stage Of Ultrarelativistic Heavy Ion Collisions,''
2696: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 289}, 847 (1987).
2697: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B289,847;%%
2698:
2699: \bibitem{mv}
2700: L.~D.~McLerran and R.~Venugopalan,
2701: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 49}, 2233 (1994)
2702: [arXiv:hep-ph/9309289];
2703: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9309289;%%
2704: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 49}, 3352 (1994)
2705: [arXiv:hep-ph/9311205];
2706: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9311205;%%
2707: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 50}, 2225 (1994)
2708: [arXiv:hep-ph/9402335].
2709: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9402335;%%
2710:
2711: \bibitem{kjkmw}
2712: Y.~V.~Kovchegov,
2713: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 54}, 5463 (1996)
2714: [arXiv:hep-ph/9605446];
2715: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9605446;%%
2716: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 55}, 5445 (1997)
2717: [arXiv:hep-ph/9701229];
2718: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9701229;%%
2719: J.~Jalilian-Marian, A.~Kovner, L.~D.~McLerran and H.~Weigert,
2720: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 55}, 5414 (1997)
2721: [arXiv:hep-ph/9606337].
2722: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9606337;%%
2723:
2724: \bibitem{bk}
2725: %\cite{Balitsky:1995ub}
2726: %\bibitem{Balitsky:1995ub}
2727: I.~Balitsky,
2728: %``Operator expansion for high-energy scattering,''
2729: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 463}, 99 (1996)
2730: [arXiv:hep-ph/9509348];
2731: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9509348;%%
2732: %\cite{Kovchegov:1999yj}
2733: %\bibitem{BK}
2734: Y.~V.~Kovchegov,
2735: %``Small-x F2 structure function of a nucleus including multiple pomeron exchanges,''
2736: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 60}, 034008 (1999)
2737: [arXiv:hep-ph/9901281];
2738: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9901281;%%
2739: %\cite{Kovchegov:1999ua}
2740: %Y.~V.~Kovchegov,
2741: %``Unitarization of the BFKL pomeron on a nucleus,''
2742: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 61}, 074018 (2000)
2743: [arXiv:hep-ph/9905214].
2744: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9905214;%%
2745:
2746: \bibitem{jimwlk}
2747: %\cite{Jalilian-Marian:1997jx}
2748: %\bibitem{Jalilian-Marian:1997jx}
2749: J.~Jalilian-Marian, A.~Kovner, A.~Leonidov and H.~Weigert,
2750: %``The BFKL equation from the Wilson renormalization group,''
2751: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 504}, 415 (1997)
2752: [arXiv:hep-ph/9701284];
2753: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9701284;%%
2754: %\cite{Jalilian-Marian:1997gr}
2755: %\bibitem{Jalilian-Marian:1997gr}
2756: %J.~Jalilian-Marian, A.~Kovner, A.~Leonidov and H.~Weigert,
2757: %``The Wilson renormalization group for low x physics: Towards the high density regime,''
2758: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 59}, 014014 (1999)
2759: [arXiv:hep-ph/9706377];
2760: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9706377;%%
2761: %\cite{Jalilian-Marian:1998cb}
2762: %\bibitem{Jalilian-Marian:1998cb}
2763: %J.~Jalilian-Marian, A.~Kovner, A.~Leonidov and H.~Weigert,
2764: %``Unitarization of gluon distribution in the doubly logarithmic regime at high density,''
2765: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 59}, 034007 (1999)
2766: [Erratum-ibid.\ D {\bf 59}, 099903 (1999)]
2767: [arXiv:hep-ph/9807462];
2768: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9807462;%%
2769: %\cite{Jalilian-Marian:1997dw}
2770: %\bibitem{Jalilian-Marian:1997dw}
2771: J.~Jalilian-Marian, A.~Kovner and H.~Weigert,
2772: %``The Wilson renormalization group for low x physics: Gluon evolution at
2773: %finite parton density,''
2774: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 59}, 014015 (1999)
2775: [arXiv:hep-ph/9709432];
2776: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9709432;%%
2777: %\cite{Iancu:2001ad}
2778: %\bibitem{Iancu:2001ad}
2779: E.~Iancu, A.~Leonidov and L.~D.~McLerran,
2780: %``The renormalization group equation for the color glass condensate,''
2781: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 510}, 133 (2001)
2782: [arXiv:hep-ph/0102009];
2783: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0102009;%%
2784: %\cite{Iancu:2001md}
2785: %\bibitem{Iancu:2001md}
2786: E.~Iancu and L.~D.~McLerran,
2787: %``Saturation and universality in QCD at small x,''
2788: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 510}, 145 (2001)
2789: [arXiv:hep-ph/0103032];
2790: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0103032;%%
2791: %\cite{Ferreiro:2001qy}
2792: %\bibitem{Ferreiro:2001qy}
2793: E.~Ferreiro, E.~Iancu, A.~Leonidov and L.~McLerran,
2794: %``Nonlinear gluon evolution in the color glass condensate. II,''
2795: Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 703}, 489 (2002)
2796: [arXiv:hep-ph/0109115];
2797: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0109115;%%
2798: %\cite{Iancu:2002tr}
2799: %\bibitem{Iancu:2002tr}
2800: E.~Iancu, K.~Itakura and L.~McLerran,
2801: %``Geometric scaling above the saturation scale,''
2802: Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 708}, 327 (2002)
2803: [arXiv:hep-ph/0203137];
2804: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0203137;%%
2805: for a review see
2806: %\cite{Iancu:2003xm}
2807: %\bibitem{Iancu:2003xm}
2808: E.~Iancu and R.~Venugopalan,
2809: %``The color glass condensate and high energy scattering in QCD,''
2810: arXiv:hep-ph/0303204.
2811: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0303204;%%
2812:
2813: %\cite{Gyulassy:2004zy}
2814: \bibitem{GM}
2815: M.~Gyulassy and L.~McLerran,
2816: %``New forms of QCD matter discovered at RHIC,''
2817: arXiv:nucl-th/0405013.
2818: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0405013;%%
2819:
2820: \bibitem{brahms-1}
2821: R.~Debbe, [BRAHMS Collaboration], talk given at the APS DNP Meeting at
2822: Tucson, AZ, October, 2003;
2823: %\cite{Debbe:2004ci}
2824: %\bibitem{Debbe:2004ci}
2825: R.~Debbe [BRAHMS Collaboration],
2826: %``High p(T) hadron spectra at high rapidity,''
2827: arXiv:nucl-ex/0403052.
2828: %%CITATION = NUCL-EX 0403052;%%
2829:
2830: %\cite{Arsene:2004ux}
2831: \bibitem{brahms-2}
2832: I.~Arsene {\it et al.} [BRAHMS Collaboration],
2833: %``On the evolution of the nuclear modification factors with rapidity and
2834: %centrality in d + Au collisions at s(NN)**(1/2) = 200-GeV,''
2835: arXiv:nucl-ex/0403005.
2836: %%CITATION = NUCL-EX 0403005;%%
2837:
2838: \bibitem{phenix}
2839: M. Liu [PHENIX Collaboration], Talk at Quark Matter 2004 Conference, Oakland, California, January 2004; arXiv:nucl-ex/0403047.
2840:
2841: \bibitem{phobos}
2842: P. Steinberg [PHOBOS Collaboration], Talk at Quark Matter 2004 Conference, Oakland, California, January 2004.
2843:
2844: \bibitem{star}
2845: L. Barnby [STAR Collaboration], Talk at Quark Matter 2004 Conference, Oakland, California, January 2004; arXiv:nucl-ex/0404027.
2846: %%CITATION = NUCL-EX 0404027;%%
2847:
2848:
2849: \bibitem{km}
2850: Yu.~V.~Kovchegov and A.~H.~Mueller,
2851: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 529}, 451 (1998)
2852: [arXiv:hep-ph/9802440].
2853: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9802440;%%
2854:
2855: %\cite{Kopeliovich:1998nw}
2856: \bibitem{kst}
2857: B.~Z.~Kopeliovich, A.~V.~Tarasov and A.~Schafer,
2858: %``Bremsstrahlung of a quark propagating through a nucleus,''
2859: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 59}, 1609 (1999)
2860: [arXiv:hep-ph/9808378].
2861: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9808378;%%
2862:
2863: %\cite{Dumitru:2001ux}
2864: \bibitem{dmc}
2865: A.~Dumitru and L.~D.~McLerran,
2866: %``How protons shatter colored glass,''
2867: Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 700}, 492 (2002)
2868: [arXiv:hep-ph/0105268].
2869: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0105268;%%
2870:
2871: %\cite{Kovchegov:2001ni}
2872: \bibitem{yuri1}
2873: Y.~V.~Kovchegov,
2874: %``Diffractive gluon production in proton nucleus collisions and in DIS,''
2875: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 64}, 114016 (2001)
2876: [Erratum-ibid.\ D {\bf 68}, 039901 (2003)]
2877: [arXiv:hep-ph/0107256].
2878: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0107256;%%
2879:
2880: \bibitem{kw}
2881: A.~Kovner and U.~A.~Wiedemann,
2882: %``Eikonal evolution and gluon radiation,''
2883: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 64}, 114002 (2001)
2884: [arXiv:hep-ph/0106240].
2885: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0106240;%%
2886:
2887:
2888: %\cite{Braun:2000wr}
2889: \bibitem{Braun}
2890: M.~Braun,
2891: %``Structure function of the nucleus in the perturbative QCD with N(c) $\to$
2892: %infinity (BFKL pomeron fan diagrams),''
2893: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 16}, 337 (2000)
2894: [arXiv:hep-ph/0001268].
2895: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0001268;%%
2896:
2897:
2898:
2899: \bibitem{kt}
2900: Yu.~V.~Kovchegov and K.~Tuchin,
2901: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 65}, 074026 (2002)
2902: [arXiv:hep-ph/0111362].
2903: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0111362;%%
2904:
2905: %\cite{Braun:2000bh}
2906: \bibitem{braun}
2907: M.~A.~Braun,
2908: %``Inclusive jet production on the nucleus in the perturbative QCD with N(c)
2909: %$\to$ infinity,''
2910: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 483}, 105 (2000)
2911: [arXiv:hep-ph/0003003].
2912: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0003003;%%
2913:
2914: \bibitem{cronin}
2915: J.~W.~Cronin, H.~J.~Frisch, M.~J.~Shochet, J.~P.~Boymond, R.~Mermod,
2916: P.~A.~Piroue and R.~L.~Sumner,
2917: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 11}, 3105 (1975).
2918: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D11,3105;%%
2919:
2920: %\cite{Kopeliovich:2002yh}
2921: \bibitem{knst}
2922: B.~Z.~Kopeliovich, J.~Nemchik, A.~Schafer and A.~V.~Tarasov,
2923: %``Cronin effect in hadron production off nuclei,''
2924: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 88}, 232303 (2002)
2925: [arXiv:hep-ph/0201010].
2926: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0201010;%%
2927:
2928: %\cite{Accardi:2003jh}
2929: \bibitem{ag}
2930: A.~Accardi and M.~Gyulassy,
2931: %``Cronin effect vs. geometrical shadowing in d + Au collisions at RHIC,''
2932: arXiv:nucl-th/0308029;
2933: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0308029;%%
2934: X.~N.~Wang,
2935: %``Systematic study of high p(T) hadron spectra in p p, p A and A A collisions from SPS to RHIC energies,''
2936: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 61} (2000) 064910;
2937: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 9812021;%%
2938: %X.~N.~Wang,
2939: %``Rapidity asymmetry in high-energy d + A collisions,''
2940: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 565} (2003) 116;
2941: %[arXiv:nucl-th/0303004];
2942:
2943: G.~G.~Barnafoldi, G.~Papp, P.~Levai and G.~Fai,
2944: %``Nuclear reaction mechanisms and the Cronin effect,''
2945: arXiv:nucl-th/0307062;
2946: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0307062;%%
2947: for a review see
2948: %\cite{Gyulassy:2003mc}
2949: %\bibitem{Gyulassy:2003mc}
2950: M.~Gyulassy, I.~Vitev, X.~N.~Wang and B.~W.~Zhang,
2951: %``Jet quenching and radiative energy loss in dense nuclear matter,''
2952: arXiv:nucl-th/0302077;
2953: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0302077;%%
2954: %\cite{Kopeliovich:1998nw}
2955: %\bibitem{Kopeliovich:1998nw}
2956: B.~Z.~Kopeliovich, A.~V.~Tarasov and A.~Schafer,
2957: %``Bremsstrahlung of a quark propagating through a nucleus,''
2958: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 59}, 1609 (1999)
2959: [arXiv:hep-ph/9808378].
2960: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9808378;%%
2961:
2962: \bibitem{bkw}
2963: R.~Baier, A.~Kovner and U.~A.~Wiedemann,
2964: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 68}, 054009 (2003)
2965: [arXiv:hep-ph/0305265].
2966: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0305265;%%
2967:
2968: \bibitem{jmnv}
2969: J.~Jalilian-Marian, Y.~Nara and R.~Venugopalan,
2970: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 577}, 54 (2003)
2971: [arXiv:nucl-th/0307022].
2972: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0307022;%%
2973:
2974: \bibitem{bfkl}
2975: %\cite{Kuraev:fs}
2976: %\bibitem{Kuraev:fs}
2977: E.~A.~Kuraev, L.~N.~Lipatov and V.~S.~Fadin,
2978: %``The Pomeranchuk Singularity In Nonabelian Gauge Theories,''
2979: Sov.\ Phys.\ JETP {\bf 45}, 199 (1977)
2980: [Zh.\ Eksp.\ Teor.\ Fiz.\ {\bf 72}, 377 (1977)];
2981: %%CITATION = SPHJA,45,199;%%
2982: %\cite{Balitsky:ic}
2983: %\bibitem{Balitsky:ic}
2984: I.~I.~Balitsky and L.~N.~Lipatov,
2985: %``The Pomeranchuk Singularity In Quantum Chromodynamics,''
2986: Sov.\ J.\ Nucl.\ Phys.\ {\bf 28}, 822 (1978)
2987: [Yad.\ Fiz.\ {\bf 28}, 1597 (1978)].
2988: %%CITATION = SJNCA,28,822;%%
2989:
2990: \bibitem{adjjm}
2991: A.~Dumitru and J.~Jalilian-Marian,
2992: %``Forward quark jets from protons shattering the colored glass,''
2993: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 89}, 022301 (2002)
2994: [arXiv:hep-ph/0204028];
2995: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0204028;%%
2996: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 547}, 15 (2002)
2997: [arXiv:hep-ph/0111357].
2998: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0111357;%%
2999:
3000:
3001: %\cite{Iancu:2004bx}
3002: \bibitem{iit}
3003: E.~Iancu, K.~Itakura and D.~N.~Triantafyllopoulos,
3004: %``Cronin effect and high-p(T) suppression in the nuclear gluon distribution at
3005: %small x,''
3006: arXiv:hep-ph/0403103.
3007: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0403103;%%
3008:
3009:
3010: %\cite{Jalilian-Marian:2004er}
3011: \bibitem{jjm1}
3012: %\cite{Gelis:2002nn}
3013: %\bibitem{Gelis:2002nn}
3014: F.~Gelis and J.~Jalilian-Marian,
3015: %``From DIS to proton nucleus collisions in the color glass condensate model.
3016: %((T)),''
3017: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 67}, 074019 (2003)
3018: [arXiv:hep-ph/0211363];
3019: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0211363;%%
3020: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 66}, 094014 (2002)
3021: [arXiv:hep-ph/0208141];
3022: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0208141;%%
3023: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 66}, 014021 (2002)
3024: [arXiv:hep-ph/0205037];
3025: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0205037;%%
3026: J.~Jalilian-Marian,
3027: %``Electromagnetic signatures of the color glass condensate: Dileptons,''
3028: arXiv:nucl-th/0402014;
3029: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0402014;%%
3030: %\cite{Baier:2004tj}
3031: %\bibitem{Baier:2004tj}
3032: R.~Baier, A.~H.~Mueller and D.~Schiff,
3033: %``Saturation and shadowing in high-energy proton nucleus dilepton production,''
3034: arXiv:hep-ph/0403201.
3035: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0403201;%%
3036:
3037: \bibitem{boris}
3038: B.~Z.~Kopeliovich, J.~Raufeisen, A.~V.~Tarasov and M.~B.~Johnson,
3039: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 67}, 014903 (2003),
3040: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0110221;%%
3041: M.~B.~Johnson {\it et al.},
3042: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 65}, 025203 (2002),
3043: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0105195;%%
3044: B.~Z.~Kopeliovich, J.~Raufeisen and A.~V.~Tarasov,
3045: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 503}, 91 (2001);
3046: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0012035;%%
3047: S.~J.~Brodsky, A.~Hebecker and E.~Quack,
3048: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 55}, 2584 (1997).
3049: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9609384;%%
3050:
3051: %\cite{Jalilian-Marian:2004xm}
3052: \bibitem{jjm2}
3053: J.~Jalilian-Marian,
3054: %``Forward rapidity hadron production in deuteron gold collisions from valence
3055: %quarks,''
3056: arXiv:nucl-th/0402080.
3057: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0402080;%%
3058:
3059: \bibitem{kkt2}
3060: D.~Kharzeev, Y.~V.~Kovchegov and K.~Tuchin,
3061: %``Nuclear modification factor in d + Au collisions: Onset of suppression in the
3062: %color glass condensate,''
3063: arXiv:hep-ph/0405045.
3064: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0405045;%%
3065:
3066:
3067:
3068:
3069: %\cite{Levin:fw}
3070: \bibitem{lr}
3071: E.~M.~Levin and M.~G.~Ryskin,
3072: %``Inclusive Sections Of The Particle Production With Large Transverse Impulses
3073: %In Multiperipheral And Parton Models,''
3074: Yad.\ Fiz.\ {\bf 21}, 1072 (1975).
3075: %%CITATION = YAFIA,21,1072;%%
3076:
3077:
3078: %\cite{Kovchegov:2002nf}
3079: \bibitem{ktflow}
3080: Yu.~V.~Kovchegov and K.~L.~Tuchin,
3081: %``Elliptic flow from minijet production in heavy ion collisions,''
3082: Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 708}, 413 (2002)
3083: [arXiv:hep-ph/0203213];
3084: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0203213;%%
3085: %\cite{Kovchegov:2002cd}
3086: %\bibitem{Kovchegov:2002cd}
3087: % Y.~V.~Kovchegov and K.~L.~Tuchin,
3088: %``Correlation functions and cumulants in elliptic flow analysis,''
3089: Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 717}, 249 (2003)
3090: [arXiv:nucl-th/0207037].
3091: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0207037;%%
3092:
3093: %\cite{Kharzeev:2004bw}
3094: \bibitem{klm2}
3095: D.~Kharzeev, E.~Levin and L.~McLerran,
3096: %``Jet azimuthal correlations and parton saturation in the color glass
3097: %condensate,''
3098: arXiv:hep-ph/0403271.
3099: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0403271;%%
3100:
3101: \bibitem{star2}
3102: A. Ogawa [STAR Collaboration], talk given at DIS2004, \v{S}trbsk\'{e}
3103: Pleso, Slovakia, April 2004.
3104:
3105: %\cite{Blaizot:2004wu}
3106: \bibitem{bgv}
3107: K.~Tuchin,
3108: %``Heavy quark production by a quasi-classical color field in proton nucleus
3109: %collisions,''
3110: arXiv:hep-ph/0401022;
3111: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0401022;%%
3112: J.~P.~Blaizot, F.~Gelis and R.~Venugopalan,
3113: %``High energy p A collisions in the color glass condensate approach. I: Gluon
3114: %production and the Cronin effect,''
3115: arXiv:hep-ph/0402256.
3116: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0402256;%%
3117:
3118:
3119: %\cite{Nikolaev:2003zf}
3120: \bibitem{nszz}
3121: N.~N.~Nikolaev, W.~Schafer, B.~G.~Zakharov and V.~R.~Zoller,
3122: %``Nonlinear k(T) factorization for forward dijets in DIS off nuclei in the
3123: %saturation regime,''
3124: J.\ Exp.\ Theor.\ Phys.\ {\bf 97}, 441 (2003)
3125: [Zh.\ Eksp.\ Teor.\ Fiz.\ {\bf 124}, 491 (2003)]
3126: [arXiv:hep-ph/0303024].
3127: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0303024;%%
3128:
3129: %\cite{Abramovsky:fm}
3130: \bibitem{agk}
3131: V.~A.~Abramovsky, V.~N.~Gribov and O.~V.~Kancheli,
3132: %``Character Of Inclusive Spectra And Fluctuations Produced In Inelastic
3133: %Processes By Multi - Pomeron Exchange,''
3134: Yad.\ Fiz.\ {\bf 18} (1973) 595
3135: [Sov.\ J.\ Nucl.\ Phys.\ {\bf 18} (1974) 308].
3136: %%CITATION = YAFIA,18,595;%%
3137:
3138: %\cite{Mueller:st}
3139: \bibitem{Mueller1}
3140: A.~H.~Mueller,
3141: %``Small X Behavior And Parton Saturation: A QCD Model,''
3142: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 335}, 115 (1990).
3143: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B335,115;%%
3144:
3145: %\cite{Leonidov:1998rq}
3146: \bibitem{LO}
3147: A.~Leonidov and D.~Ostrovsky,
3148: %``Minijet transverse energy production in the next-to-leading order in hadron
3149: %and nuclear collisions,''
3150: arXiv:hep-ph/9811417;
3151: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9811417;%%
3152: %\cite{Leonidov:1998tg}
3153: %\bibitem{Leonidov:1998tg}
3154: % A.~Leonidov and D.~Ostrovsky,
3155: %``Angular pattern of minijet transverse energy flow in hadron and nuclear
3156: %collisions,''
3157: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 16}, 683 (2000)
3158: [Phys.\ Atom.\ Nucl.\ {\bf 65}, 886 (2002\ YAFIA,65,918-929.2002)]
3159: [arXiv:hep-ph/9812416];
3160: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9812416;%%
3161: %\cite{Leonidov:1999nc}
3162: %\bibitem{Leonidov:1999nc}
3163: % A.~Leonidov and D.~Ostrovsky,
3164: %``Angular and momentum asymmetry in particle production at high energies,''
3165: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 62}, 094009 (2000)
3166: [arXiv:hep-ph/9905496].
3167: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9905496;%%
3168:
3169: %\cite{Lepage:1980fj}
3170: \bibitem{BL}
3171: G.~P.~Lepage and S.~J.~Brodsky,
3172: %``Exclusive Processes In Perturbative Quantum Chromodynamics,''
3173: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 22}, 2157 (1980).
3174: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D22,2157;%%
3175:
3176: %\cite{Nikolaev:1990ja}
3177: \bibitem{NZ}
3178: N.~N.~Nikolaev and B.~G.~Zakharov,
3179: %``Colour Transparency And Scaling Properties Of Nuclear Shadowing In Deep
3180: %Inelastic Scattering,''
3181: Z.\ Phys.\ C {\bf 49}, 607 (1991).
3182: %%CITATION = ZEPYA,C49,607;%%
3183:
3184:
3185: %\cite{Kovchegov:1999kx}
3186: \bibitem{KMc}
3187: Y.~V.~Kovchegov and L.~D.~McLerran,
3188: %``Diffractive structure function in a quasi-classical approximation,''
3189: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 60}, 054025 (1999)
3190: [Erratum-ibid.\ D {\bf 62}, 019901 (2000)]
3191: [arXiv:hep-ph/9903246].
3192: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9903246;%%
3193:
3194: \bibitem{dip}
3195: %\cite{Mueller:1993rr}
3196: %\bibitem{Mueller:1993rr}
3197: A.~H.~Mueller,
3198: %``Soft gluons in the infinite momentum wave function and the BFKL pomeron,''
3199: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 415}, 373 (1994);
3200: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B415,373;%%
3201: %\cite{Mueller:1994jq}
3202: %\bibitem{Mueller:1994jq}
3203: A.~H.~Mueller and B.~Patel,
3204: %``Single and double BFKL pomeron exchange and a dipole picture of high-energy hard processes,''
3205: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 425}, 471 (1994)
3206: [arXiv:hep-ph/9403256];
3207: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9403256;%%
3208: %\cite{Mueller:gb}
3209: %\bibitem{Mueller:gb}
3210: A.~H.~Mueller,
3211: %``Unitarity And The Bfkl Pomeron,''
3212: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 437}, 107 (1995)
3213: [arXiv:hep-ph/9408245].
3214: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9408245;%%
3215:
3216: %\cite{Chen:1995pa}
3217: \bibitem{CM}
3218: Z.~Chen and A.~H.~Mueller,
3219: %``The Dipole picture of high-energy scattering, the BFKL equation and many gluon compound states,''
3220: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 451}, 579 (1995).
3221: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B451,579;%%
3222:
3223: %\cite{Baier:1998kq}
3224: \bibitem{BDMS}
3225: R.~Baier, Y.~L.~Dokshitzer, A.~H.~Mueller and D.~Schiff,
3226: %``Medium-induced radiative energy loss: Equivalence between the BDMPS and
3227: %Zakharov formalisms,''
3228: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 531}, 403 (1998)
3229: [arXiv:hep-ph/9804212].
3230: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9804212;%%
3231:
3232:
3233: \bibitem{BJKP}
3234: %\cite{Bartels:1978fc}
3235: %\bibitem{Bartels:1978fc}
3236: J.~Bartels,
3237: %``High-Energy Behavior In A Nonabelian Gauge Theory. 1. T (N--->M) In The
3238: %Leading Log Normal S Approximation,''
3239: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 151}, 293 (1979);
3240: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B151,293;%%
3241: %\cite{Bartels:1980pe}
3242: %\bibitem{Bartels:1980pe}
3243: %J.~Bartels,
3244: %``High-Energy Behavior In A Nonabelian Gauge Theory. 2. First Corrections To
3245: %T(N--->M) Beyond The Leading Lns Approximation,''
3246: %Nucl.\ Phys.\ B
3247: {\bf 175}, 365 (1980);
3248: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B175,365;%%
3249: %\cite{Jaroszewicz:1980mq}
3250: %\bibitem{Jaroszewicz:1980mq}
3251: T.~Jaroszewicz,
3252: %``Infrared Divergences And Regge Behavior In QCD,''
3253: Acta Phys.\ Polon.\ B {\bf 11}, 965 (1980);
3254: %%CITATION = APPOA,B11,965;%%
3255: %\cite{Kwiecinski:1980wb}
3256: %\bibitem{Kwiecinski:1980wb}
3257: J.~Kwiecinski and M.~Praszalowicz,
3258: %``Three Gluon Integral Equation And Odd C Singlet Regge Singularities In QCD,''
3259: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 94}, 413 (1980).
3260: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B94,413;%%
3261:
3262: %\cite{Korchemsky:2001nx}
3263: \bibitem{KKM}
3264: G.~P.~Korchemsky, J.~Kotanski and A.~N.~Manashov,
3265: %``Compound states of reggeized gluons in multi-colour QCD as ground states of
3266: %noncompact Heisenberg magnet,''
3267: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 88}, 122002 (2002)
3268: [arXiv:hep-ph/0111185].
3269: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0111185;%%
3270:
3271: %\cite{Kovchegov:1999ji}
3272: \bibitem{KL}
3273: Y.~V.~Kovchegov and E.~Levin,
3274: %``Diffractive dissociation including multiple pomeron exchanges in high parton
3275: %density QCD,''
3276: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 577}, 221 (2000)
3277: [arXiv:hep-ph/9911523].
3278: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9911523;%%
3279:
3280: \bibitem{hw}
3281: A.~Hebecker and H.~Weigert,
3282: %``Small-x parton distributions of large hadronic targets,''
3283: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 432}, 215 (1998)
3284: [arXiv:hep-ph/9804217].
3285: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9804217;%%
3286:
3287: \bibitem{ayala}
3288: A.~Ayala, J.~Jalilian-Marian, L.~D.~McLerran and R.~Venugopalan,
3289: %``The Gluon propagator in nonAbelian Weizsacker-Williams fields,''
3290: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 52}, 2935 (1995)
3291: [arXiv:hep-ph/9501324],
3292: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9501324;%%
3293: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 53}, 458 (1996)
3294: [arXiv:hep-ph/9508302];
3295: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9508302;%%
3296: E.~Iancu, A.~Leonidov and L.~D.~McLerran,
3297: %``Nonlinear gluon evolution in the color glass condensate. I,''
3298: Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 692}, 583 (2001)
3299: [arXiv:hep-ph/0011241].
3300: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0011241;%%
3301:
3302:
3303: %\cite{Blaizot:2004wv}
3304: \bibitem{bgv2}
3305: J.~P.~Blaizot, F.~Gelis and R.~Venugopalan,
3306: %``High energy p A collisions in the color glass condensate approach. II: Quark
3307: %production,''
3308: arXiv:hep-ph/0402257.
3309: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0402257;%%
3310:
3311:
3312:
3313:
3314:
3315: \end{thebibliography}
3316:
3317:
3318: \end{document}
3319: