1: %\documentstyle[eqsecnum,epsfig, aps,prd]{revtex}
2: \documentstyle[preprint,aps,prc,floats,epsfig]{revtex}
3: \tighten
4: \let\jnfont=\rm
5: \def\NPB#1,{{\jnfont Nucl.\ Phys.\ }{\bf B#1},}
6: \def\PLB#1,{{\jnfont Phys.\ Lett.\ B }{\bf #1},}
7: \def\PRD#1,{{\jnfont Phys.\ Rev.\ D }{\bf #1},}
8: \def\PRL#1,{{\jnfont Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ }{\bf #1},}
9:
10: \def\lsim{\mathrel{\mathpalette\oversim<}}
11: \def\gsim{\mathrel{\mathpalette\oversim>}}
12: \def\oversim#1#2{\lower0.5ex\vbox{\baselineskip0pt\lineskip0pt
13: \lineskiplimit0pt\everycr{}\tabskip0pt
14: \halign{$\mathsurround0pt #1\hfil##\hfil$\crcr #2\crcr\sim\crcr}}}
15: \begin{document}
16: \draft
17: \preprint{
18: \vbox{\hbox{\bf hep-ph/0408271} }}
19:
20:
21: \title{Late-decaying Q-ball with BBN lifetime }
22: \author{\ \\[1mm] Fei Wang, Jin Min Yang}
23: \address{ \ \\[1mm]
24: {\it Institute of Theoretical Physics, Academia Sinica,
25: Beijing 100080, China}}
26: \maketitle
27:
28: \vspace*{1cm}
29: \begin{abstract}
30: In the Affleck-Dine mechanism of baryogenesis, non-topological solitons called Q-balls can be formed.
31: In this work we propose that such Q-balls decay during the BBN era and study
32: the cosmological consequence of such late decays.
33: We find that the late-decaying baryonic Q-balls with lifetime of about $10^3 s$ can provide
34: a new developing mechanism for the BBN through a rolling baryon-to-photon ratio $\eta$, which can
35: naturally explain the discrepancy of the BBN prediction with the WMAP data on $^7Li$ abundance.
36: For the late-decaying leptonic Q-balls with lifetime of about $10^6 s$, we find that their decay
37: product, gravitinos, can serve as a dark matter candidate and
38: give an explanation for the approximate equality of dark and baryon
39: matter densities.
40: \end{abstract}
41: \vspace*{1cm}
42: \pacs{96.35.+d, 04.65.+e, 12.60.Jv}
43:
44: %% Keywords: Q-ball,rolling $\eta$ mechanism, flat directions,BBN
45:
46: \section{Introduction}
47: The nature of the matter content of the universe is one of the mysteries in today's physical science.
48: The Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) collaboration gives fairly accurate values
49: on the contents of our universe \cite{wmap}
50: \begin{eqnarray}
51: \Omega_m = 0.27_{-0.04}^{+0.04} \ , ~
52: \Omega_b = 0.044_{-0.004}^{+0.004} \ ,~
53: \Omega_{\Lambda}=0.73_{-0.04}^{+0.04} \ , ~
54: \eta=(6.14\pm0.25)\times10^{-10} \ ,
55: \end{eqnarray}
56: where $\eta$ denotes the baryon-to-photon ratio, and
57: $\Omega_m$, $\Omega_b$ and $\Omega_{\Lambda}$ denotes the density of total matter, baryonic matter
58: and dark energy, respectively.
59: One sees that, coincidentally, the dark matter density is comparable to the dark energy density
60: as well as to the baryonic matter density. Such coincidences need to be understood.
61: While an explanation for the coincidence between dark matter and dark energy can be provided in the quintessence
62: scenario, it is hard to give a natural explanation for the coincidence between dark matter and baryonic matter
63: although some efforts have been devoted \cite{wilczek}.
64: A natural explanation for such a coincidence requires some unification scenario
65: which correlates the baryongenesis with the dark matter generation.
66:
67: The Affleck-Dine (AD) mechanism \cite{affleck} is a promising scenario for baryogenesis.
68: It is based on the dynamics of a complex scalar field $\phi$ called AD field carrying baryon number.
69: In the framework of supersymmetry, AD field can be realized as a linear combination of
70: squark or slepton fields, which has a large expectation value during the
71: inflationary stage. The subsequent coherent oscillation creates a large net baryon asymmetry.
72: As the coherent oscillation of $\phi$ is generically unstable with spatial perturbation, it
73: condenses into non-topological solitons called Q-balls \cite {enqvist}.
74: Numerical estimations show that almost all the initial baryon asymmetry of $\phi$ is absorbed
75: into these Q-balls.
76: The baryonic content of the universe can arise from earlier Q-ball evaporation
77: which transforms leptonic asymmetry into baryonic asymmetry from sphaleron effects before electroweak
78: scale or from the later decay of the baryonic Q-ball.
79: At the same time, if the Q-ball is nonstable and
80: its late decay into LSP (after the freeze out of LSP) will naturally generate the dark matter content
81: of the universe \cite{fujii}.
82: Note that in the analysis of \cite{fujii}, the Q-balls are assumed to decay before BBN era in order
83: not to destruct the BBN predictions for light element abundances.
84: However, since the recent WMAP data on light element abundances show some deviation with the BBN
85: predictions (as discussed later), it is possible that the Q-balls may decay during the BBN era and
86: affect the BBN predictions for light element abundances.
87: This possibility was first noted in \cite{ichikawa}.
88: Such late decays are favorable if their effects on the BBN predictions can improve the fit
89: with the observed data. Throughout this work the {\em late-decaying Q-balls} refers to the Q-balls
90: which decay during the BBN era.
91:
92: Let us take a look at the BBN predictions for light element abundances compared with the
93: observed values. The BBN predictions are given by \cite{bbn-value}
94: \begin{eqnarray}
95: && ~~~~~~ \ {\rm D}/{\rm H} \ < \ 2.49_{-0.18}^{+0.18}\times 10^{-5} \ , \\
96: && ~~~~~~~\ Y_p \ = \ 0.249_{-0.001}^{+0.001}\ , \\
97: && ~~~~~~~\ ^7{\rm Li}/{\rm H} \ = \ 4.7_{-0.8}^{+0.9}\times 10^{-10} \ ,
98: \end{eqnarray}
99: while the observed values are given by \cite{bbn-value}
100: \begin{eqnarray}
101: && 2.40\times 10^{-5} \ < \ {\rm D}/{\rm H} \ < \ 3.22\times 10^{-5} \ , \\
102: && 0.227 \ < \ Y_p \ < \ 0.249 \ , \\
103: && 9.1\times 10^{-11} \ < \ ^7{\rm Li}/{\rm H} \ < \ 1.91 \times 10^{-10} \ ,
104: \end{eqnarray}
105: where $Y_p$ denotes $^4$He abundance.
106: We see that the $^4He$ and $^7Li$ predictions, especially $^7Li$ prediction, do not fit well with
107: the observed values\footnote{A detailed discussion on this can be found in \cite{bbn2}.}.
108:
109: In this work we try to solve the above two problems, i.e., the matter coincidence problem and
110: the $^7Li$ abundance problem, by considering the Q-balls which decay during the BBN era.
111: We show that such late-decaying baryonic Q-balls (hereafter called 'B-balls') with lifetime of
112: about $10^3 s$ can provide
113: a new developing mechanism for the BBN through a rolling $\eta$, which can
114: then naturally explain the discrepancy of the BBN prediction with the WMAP data on the light element
115: abundances. For the late-decaying leptonic Q-balls (hereafter called 'L-balls') with lifetime of
116: about $10^6 s$, we find that their decay products, gravitinos, can serve as a dark matter candidate
117: and give a possible explanation of the coincidence between baryonic matter and dark matter.
118:
119: \section{ Late-decaying B-Ball and BBN}
120: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
121: \begin{figure}[tb]
122: \centerline{\psfig{file=fig1.eps,width=14cm,height=12cm,angle=0} }
123: \vspace*{0.5cm}
124: \caption{\it The curves are the BBN predictions for light element abundances versus
125: $\eta_{10}(\equiv \eta \times 10^{10})$, taken from Ref.[6].
126: The boxes denote observed $1\sigma$ values with and without systematical errors. }
127: \label{fig1}
128: \end{figure}
129: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
130: Fig. 1 shows the BBN predictions for light element abundances versus
131: $\eta$ \cite{bbn-value}. We see that, to fit the observed values, BBN predictions
132: for $^4He$ and $^7Li$ require a $\eta$ value which is significantly lower than
133: $\eta\approx 6\times 10^{-10}$ obtained from the CMB measurement \cite{cmb}.
134:
135: In order to solve the $^7Li$ problem, we propose that
136: {\em $\eta$ is rolling and is small during the period of $^7Li$ generation; then $\eta$ rolls up to the ultimate
137: observed value after $^7Li$ generation}.
138: This mechanism can be realized in the late-decaying B-ball scenario since the decays of B-balls
139: can induce the baryonic asymmetry and lead to the rolling of $\eta$ value.
140: We propose that the BBN undergoes two stages:
141: \begin{itemize}
142: \item[(1)] The first stage is from the start of BBN till the time at which the $^7Li$ synthesis finishes
143: and thus its absolute abundance no longer changes later.
144: The baryonic asymmetry arises mainly from the lepton asymmetry through spharleon
145: effects instead of from the B-ball decay because the B-ball decay occurs throughout
146: a period which is much longer than the period of this stage.
147: This stage is similar to the standard BBN process except that the $\eta$ value is small and is rolling up.
148: \item[(2)] The second stage begins when the $^7Li$ synthesis ends while other light elements continue to be
149: synthesized \footnote{Due to the continuous injection of the baryonic matter from B-ball decays,
150: the deuterium ($D$) is not much diluted and thus continue to synthesize $^3He$ and $^4He$.}.
151: In this stage, the temperature drops so that the $^7Li$ absolute abundance no longer changes.
152: As a result, the relative abundance of $^7Li$, i.e., $^7Li/H$, is decreasing since the number
153: of protons is increasing due to the B-ball decays.
154: At the transition point between the first and the second stages, $\eta$ value is rolling up to
155: $4.21\times 10^{-10}$. We used the FastBBN code \cite{bbn} and adopted three families of neutrinos
156: in getting such a $\eta$ value which gives the best fit value of $^7Li$ abundance.
157: We assume that in this stage the ratio of the numbers of protons to neutrons produced from B-ball
158: decays is $p/n \approx 7$ because the baryonic content produced from B-balls reach approximate thermal
159: equilibrium near the surface before they spread out. Taking into account the residual protons from
160: the first stage,
161: the ratio of the total proton number to neutron number should be larger than 7.
162: So the proton consuming reaction is more efficient than in the first stage, which implies that during this
163: stage $^4He$ ($^3He$) synthesis efficiency is relatively lower (higher) than in the first stage.
164: Therefore, we predict that the overall synthesis efficiency of $^4He$ ($^3He$)
165: is lower (higher) than the value $0.245$ ($1.3\times10^{-5}$) at $\eta = 4.21\times 10^{-10}$.
166: This means that for $^3He$ our prediction is different from the standard BBN prediction shown in Fig.1.
167: \end{itemize}
168: The rolling of $\eta$ ends as the B-ball decays finish within the second stage.
169: Obviously, such a rolling-$\eta$ scenario can give a final required value for the $D$ abundance which
170: has little difference with standard BBN prediction with the ultimate $\eta$ value ($\approx 6\times 10^{-10}$).
171: Therefore, this new BBN generating mechanism through a rolling $\eta$ can not only solve the discrepancy
172: between the predicted and observed values of $^7Li$ abundance but also can qualitatively predict the
173: required values for $^4He$ and $D$ abundances.
174: For the abundance of $^3He$ our scenario predicted a higher value than the standard BBN prediction,
175: which remains to be tested by future measurements.
176:
177: In the following we show that the above scenario can indeed be realized by considering the late-decaying B-balls.
178:
179: The flat directions \cite{tony} in the Minimal Supersymmetric Model carry baryon or lepton
180: numbers, which can be identified as the AD fields $\Phi$.
181: We express the $eLL$ and $udd$ directions as $\Phi_{L}$ and $\Phi_{B}$.
182: Although the flat directions are exactly flat when supersymmetry (SUSY) is unbroken, it will be lifted by
183: SUSY breaking effects. In the gauge-mediated SUSY breaking (GMSB) scenario, SUSY breaks at low energy scales.
184: The shape of the effective potential has the curvature of the order of electroweak scale at low energy and
185: almost flat at higher scales \cite{dvali}.
186: The gauge mediation part of the potential is given by \cite{kawasaki}
187: \begin{equation}
188: V_{gauge} \sim \left \{
189: \begin{array}{ll}
190: m_{\phi}^2 {|\Phi|}^2 & ( |\Phi|\ll M_{S} ) \\
191: M_{F}^4 (\log\frac{{|\Phi|}^2}{M_{S}^2} ) & ( |\Phi|\gg M_{S} )
192: \end{array}
193: \right.
194: \end{equation}
195: where $M_{F}$ is the SUSY breaking scale, $M_{S}$ is the messenger mass scale and $m_{\phi}$ is a soft breaking
196: mass of $O$ ( $1 \sim 10$ TeV).
197:
198: The flat direction can also be lifted by the SUSY breaking mediated by gravity.
199: The gravity lifted potential is given by
200: \begin{equation}
201: V_{gravity}\simeq m_{3/2}^2 \left[ 1+ K\log \left( \frac{{|\Phi|}^2}{M_{*}^2} \right) \right] {|\Phi|}^2 \ ,
202: \end{equation}
203: where $M_{*}$ is the reduced Planck mass.
204: The $K$ term is the one-loop corrections and takes the absolute value $|K|\sim 0.01$ to $0.1$.
205: The different sign of $K$ can give different kinds of Q-balls, i.e., a positive $K$ gives
206: 'delayed type' and a negative $K$ gives 'new type'.
207: As noted in \cite{ichikawa}, the contribution to $K$ from Yukawa interactions is positive
208: while from gauge interactions is negative.
209: Since large yukawa couplings arise in the third family, we can choose $e_2L_1L_3$ flat direction
210: to give a 'delayed type' L-ball and $u_1d_2d_1$ flat direction to give a 'new type' B-ball \cite{ichikawa}.
211: This gravity-mediated Q-balls have typical values for their charge and radius \cite{fujii}
212: \begin{equation}
213: Q = Q_{max} \times \left\{
214: \begin{array}{lll}
215: ~~\epsilon/\beta & ~~~~{\rm for} & ~~~~ \epsilon_{c}\leq \epsilon \leq \beta \\
216: ~~\epsilon_{c}/\beta & ~~~~{\rm for} & ~~~~ \epsilon \leq \epsilon_{c}
217: \end{array}
218: \right.
219: \end{equation}
220: where $\epsilon_{c}\sim 0.01$ and
221: \begin{eqnarray}
222: && Q_{max}\approx 3\times 10^{-3} {\left( \frac{|\phi_{osc}|}{m_{\phi}} \right)}^2 \beta \ , \\
223: && \epsilon\equiv\frac{n_{B} (t_{osc})}{n_{\phi} (t_{osc})} .
224: \end{eqnarray}
225: Since the long-life B-ball gives very small $\epsilon$, we have the estimations
226: \begin{eqnarray}
227: Q & \sim & 3\times 10^{-5} {\left( \frac{|\phi_{osc}|}{m_{\phi}} \right)}^2 \ , \\
228: R_{Q} & \sim & {(\sqrt{|K|/2}~~ m_{3/2})}^{-1} \ , \\
229: \omega & \sim & m_{3/2} \ .
230: \end{eqnarray}
231: The $udd$ flat direction for B-ball can also be lifted by the non-renormalizable terms of the superpotential
232: given by
233: \begin{equation}
234: W_{NR}^{udd} = \frac{ 9 {(udd)}^2}{ 6 M^3 } =\frac{\Phi_{B}^6}{6 M^3} \ ,
235: \end{equation}
236: where the effective scale $M$ includes the coupling $\lambda$ and hence can be larger than the cut-off scale.
237: So $\phi_{osc}$ is given as $\phi_{osc}\sim M^{3/4} m_{3/2}^{1/4}$.
238: The Q-ball decay rate into fermions is proportional to the surface term, given by \cite{cohen}
239: \begin{equation}
240: \label{limit}
241: \left|\frac{d Q}{d t}\right|\lesssim \frac{{\omega}^3 A}{192 {\pi}^2} \ ,
242: \end{equation}
243: where $A$ is the surface of the Q-ball. Here B-balls can decay into nucleons and
244: the decay lifetime (in seconds) is given by
245: \begin{eqnarray}
246: \tau_{d}\equiv Q / ( \frac{d Q}{d t} ) = \frac{ 24 \pi \bar{\beta} |K| M^{3/2} }{ m_{3/2}^{5/2} }
247: = \frac{1.488\times10^{-15} }{ m_{3/2}~Mev} {\left(
248: \frac{M~/{\rm TeV}}{m_{3/2}/{\rm MeV}}\right)}^{3/2} \ ,
249: \end{eqnarray}
250: where $\bar{\beta}=3\times 10^{-5}$.
251: If we choose the non-renormalizable scale naturally to be reduced Planck scale, it can gives
252: a lifetime $10^3 \sim 10^4 s$ for a gravitino a little heavier than 1 GeV.
253: This means that the decay of such "new type" B-balls into nucleon can indeed occur during the BBN era.
254: Since the B-ball decays can provide baryonic content, the $\eta$ value is natually rolling up.
255: So the rolling-$\eta$ scenario can be naturally realized in such late-decaying B-ball case.
256:
257: \section{Late-decaying L-ball and dark matter}
258: The Q-balls may have very long lifetime in the pure gauge-mediated scenario
259: and rather short lifetime in the pure gravity-mediated scenario.
260: As studied in \cite{kasuya,kawasaki}, in the pure gauge-mediated scenario their lifetime
261: can be so long that they may survive decaying and evaporating and exist in today's universe
262: as the dark matter.
263: In this section we consider the late-decaying 'delayed-type' L-balls with BBN lifetime
264: in the general SUSY breaking model with both gravity and gauge effects and study the possibility
265: for their decay products to serve as the dark matter.
266: We find that this approach is feasible and
267: %, in addition,
268: % the annihilation requirement is not necessary, unlike in the short lifetime B-ball case \cite{fujii}.
269: can provide an unified scenario to give an explanation for the coincidence
270: between dark matter and baryonic matter contents.
271: Note that although such late-decaying L-ball decays occur throughout the BBN era
272: and affect the BBN predictions for light elements abundances, we find that
273: the effects can be within the allowed region.
274:
275: When the zero-temperature potential $V_{gauge}$ dominates at the onset of the coherent oscillations of AD fields,
276: the gauge-mediated type Q-balls are formed. Their mass $M_{Q}$ and size $R_{Q}$ are given by
277: \begin{eqnarray}
278: && M_{Q}\sim M_{F} Q^{3/4}\ , \\
279: && R_{Q}\sim M_{F}^{-1} Q^{1/4} \ .
280: \end{eqnarray}
281: Just as indicated in the numerical simulations \cite{kasuya}, the produced Q-ball almost absorb all the charges
282: carried by the AD field and the typical charge is estimated as
283: \begin{equation}
284: Q \approx \beta {\left( \frac{\phi_{osc}}{M_{F}} \right)}^4 \ ,
285: \end{equation}
286: where $\beta \approx 6\times 10^{-4}$.
287: When $V_{gravition}$ dominates the potential at the onset of the coherent oscillation of the AD fields,
288: the 'delayed-type' Q-ball form when the AD field leaves this region and enters the $V_{gauge}$
289: dominated region if $K$ is positive. However, if $K$ is negative, the gravity-mediated type Q-balls ('new-type')
290: are produced, as discussed in the preceding section.
291:
292: So when the AD field starts to oscillate ($H_{osc}\sim \omega \sim m_{3/2}$)
293: in the $V_{gravition}$ dominated region for positive $K$, the charge of the 'delayed-type' Q-ball
294: is given by
295: \begin{equation}
296: Q \sim \beta {\left( \frac{\phi_{eq}}{M_{F}} \right)}^4 \sim \beta {\left( \frac{M_{F}}{m_{3/2}} \right)}^4 \ .
297: \end{equation}
298: Here the gravition term domination condition gives $\phi \geq \phi_{eq} \sim M_{F}^2 / m_{3/2}$.
299: For L-ball, the upper limit of the decay rate can be estimated as in Eq.(\ref{limit}).
300: So the lower limit of the lifetime in seconds is given by
301: \begin{equation}
302: \tau_{d} \gsim \frac{48 \pi \beta^{1/2} m_{F}^4}{m_{3/2}^5}
303: \approx 2431 \times \frac{ { (M_{F}/{\rm TeV}) }^4 } { {(m_{3/2}/{\rm MeV})}^5} \ .
304: \end{equation}
305: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
306: \begin{figure}[tb]
307: \centerline{\psfig{file=fig2.eps,width=12cm,height=10cm,angle=0} }
308: \vspace*{-0.8cm}
309: \caption{\it The electromagnetic energy release versus the release time for $\eta=6\times10^{-10}$,
310: taken from Ref.[15]. The shaded regions are excluded by BBN constraints. }
311: \label{fig2}
312: \end{figure}
313: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
314: The late decay of the L-balls will release electromagnetic energy and can alter some light element abundances
315: since such electromagnetic energy injection can have dissociation effects on light elements.
316: As shown in Fig. 2 taken from \cite{cyburt}, if such electromagnetic energy release is sufficiently small,
317: it will be allowed.
318: So if we require that the L-balls keep on decaying until about $10^6 s$ with very small
319: energy release, it will not affect the success of BBN. (Note that from Fig. 2 one sees that the
320: lifetime requirement is not stringent as long as the energy release is sufficiently small. Here
321: we require a lifetime of about $10^6 s$ as an example.)
322: We found that such a lifetime requirement can be met by choosing a gravitino mass of $0.24 \sim 1.5$ MeV
323: for SUSY breaking scale of $1 \sim 10$ TeV. In the following we show that in this case
324: the energy release can be sufficiently small, and the baryonic content and the dark matter content
325: can be correctly related.
326:
327: In this case the charge of L-ball can be estimated to be $10^{24}$ and the energy per L-ball charge is
328: given by
329: \begin{equation}
330: M_{Q}/Q=M_{F}/Q^{1/4} \sim 10 {\rm ~MeV} .
331: \end{equation}
332: It is easy to see that the decay products can only inject electromagnetic energy.
333: The average electromagnetic energy release for each Q-ball is given by
334: \begin{equation}
335: \zeta_{EM}=\epsilon_{EM} n_{decay} N_{portion} / n_{\gamma}^{BG} \ ,
336: \end{equation}
337: where $n_{decay}$ denotes the decaying rate of Q-ball, $\epsilon_{EM}$ is the average electromagnetic
338: energy release per AD field decay, $N_{portion}$ is the AD field number generated per Q-charge and it is
339: unity here. Since the tree-level two-body amplitude dominates, the decay mode is $AD \to LSP + S$,
340: where $LSP$ denotes the lightest supersymmetric particle and $S$ a SM particle.
341: Since in our analysis gravitino is quite light, much lighter than neutralino, it is assumed
342: to be the LSP.
343: So the decay products of the AD fields provide a natural dark matter candidate--gravitino.
344: The energy of the nearly massless particle $S$ in the decay is given by
345: \begin{equation}
346: E_{EM}=\frac{m_{AD}^2-m_{LSP}^2}{2 m_{AD}} \ .
347: \end{equation}
348: The energy release rate is given by the decay rate times the energy release per gravitino
349: generation
350: \begin{equation}
351: \zeta_{EM}=\epsilon_{EM}Y_{d}=\epsilon_{EM} \Delta_{Q} n_{Q} / n_{\gamma}^{BG} \ ,
352: \end{equation}
353: where $\Delta_{Q}$ denotes the charge per Q-ball which decayed.
354:
355: Suppose some of the initial baryon asymmetry is induced from lepton asymmetry through L-ball evaporation
356: with sphaleron effects before the $M_{weak}$ scale, then we have
357: \begin{equation}
358: \epsilon Q_{i} n_{Q}= f n_{B} ,
359: \end{equation}
360: where $Q_{i}$ indicate initial charge per Q-ball, and $n_{Q}$ and $n_{B}$ are the number density for Q-ball
361: and baryon, respectively. $\epsilon$ denotes the changed portion of lepton asymmetry into baryon asymmetry
362: and $f$ be the baryon asymmetry contribution from L-ball to the total asymmetry.
363:
364: Finally we obtain
365: \begin{equation}
366: \zeta_{EM}=\frac{\epsilon_{EM} N_{portion} \Delta_{Q} n_{Q}}{n_{\gamma}^{BG} }
367: =\frac{\epsilon_{EM} N_{portion} \Delta_{Q} n_{B} f}{n_{\gamma}^{BG} \epsilon ~ Q_{i} }
368: =\frac{\epsilon_{EM} N_{portion} \eta_{B} f }{ \epsilon ~ \tau_{d} } \ .
369: \end{equation}
370: As noted in \cite{feng}, the daughter electron will immediately initiate an electromagnetic cascade to
371: give $\epsilon_{EM}\simeq E_{e}$. For the relativistic daughter muon, it typically
372: interacts with the background photons through Thomson scattering. As the scattering time is shorter than
373: the time-dilated muon decay time, the muon energy can safely change into electromagnetic energy.
374: For the daughter tau, the typical scattering life time is longer than the time-dilated tau decay time,
375: the electromagnetic energy change ratio is 1/3 to 1. Accounting all the branch ratio of its decay channel
376: gives the 1/2 of the
377: tau energy as electromagnetic energy release. For simplicity, we chose the release of electromagnetic
378: energy to be half of the average lepton energy.
379:
380: Sufficiently small electromagnetic energy release is possible and, for example, we require
381: $\zeta_{EM}\leq 10^{-14}$ GeV, which, combined with the lifetime requirement, is well
382: allowed by the BBN constraints shown in Fig. 2.
383: % $\epsilon_{EM}$ is approximately given by half of the particle energy of order $10$ MeV.
384: Under such requirement we get the approximate portion $\epsilon/f\sim 10^{-4}$.
385: Then we can give an estimation of the baryonic content of the universe if all the dark matter is
386: from L-ball decay
387: \begin{equation}
388: \Omega_{B} /\Omega_{CDM} \sim 10^{-4}\times 1 GeV/ (0.2 \sim 1.5 MeV) \sim O(0.1) \ .
389: \end{equation}
390: We see that this scenario can give an explanation for the matter coincidence problem.
391: %As non-renormalizable term for lepton is forbidden, the discussion for the `new type'
392: %leptonic Q-ball is similar to the 'delayed type' discussions and we will not discuss here.
393:
394: \section{conclusion}
395: We studied the possibility for the Q-balls to decay during the BBN era ( such possibility has not been studied
396: in the literature) and the cosmological consequences of such late decays.
397: Our findings are:
398: \begin{itemize}
399: \item[(1)] The late-decaying baryonic Q-balls with lifetime of about $10^3 s$ can provide
400: a new developing mechanism for the BBN through a rolling baryon-to-photon ratio $\eta$.
401: We proposed that in this scenario the BBN era undergoes two stages separated by
402: a transition point $\eta\approx 4.21 \times 10^{-10}$ and the $^7Li$ synthesis finished
403: in the first stage.
404: Such a scenario can not only solve the discrepancy between the predicted and observed
405: values of $^7Li$ abundance, but also can qualitatively predict the required values for
406: $^4He$ and $D$ abundances.
407: For the abundance of $^3He$ this scenario predicted a higher value than the standard BBN,
408: which leaves to be tested by future measurements.
409: \item[(2)] The late-decaying leptonic Q-balls with lifetime of about $10^6 s$ decay into gravitinos, which
410: can serve as a dark matter candidate and give an explanation for the approximate equality of dark
411: and baryon matter densities.
412: \end{itemize}
413:
414: \section*{Acknowlegents}
415: We are grateful to Xiaotao He for providing us some useful nuclear data and Junjie Cao for helpful discussions.
416: This work is supported in part by National Natural Science Foundation of China.
417:
418: \begin{thebibliography}{30}
419: \bibitem{wmap} WMAP Collaboration, Astrophys. J. Suppl. {\bf 148}, 1 (2003);
420: {\bf 148}, 175 (2003); {\bf 248}, 195 (2003).
421: \bibitem{wilczek} F. Wilczek, hep-ph/0408167.
422: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0408167;%%
423: \bibitem{affleck} I. Affleck and M.Dine, \NPB249, 361 (1985).
424: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B249,361;%%
425: \bibitem{enqvist} K. Enqvist, J. McDonald, \PLB425, 309 (1998);
426: K. Enqvist, A. Mazumdar, Phys. Rept. {\bf 380}, 99 (2003).
427: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B425,309;%%
428: %%CITATION = PRPLC,380,99;%%
429: \bibitem{fujii} M. Fujii, K. Hamaguchi, \PLB525, 143 (2002); \PRD66, 083501 (2002);
430: M. Fujii, M. Ibe, \PRD69, 035006 (2004).
431: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B525,143;%%
432: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D66,083501;%%
433: \bibitem{ichikawa} K. Ichikawa, M. Kawasaki, F. Takahashi, \PLB597, 1 (2004).
434: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B597,1;%%
435: \bibitem{jedamzik} K. Jedamzik, astro-ph/0402344; K. Jedamzik,\PRL84, 3248 (2000).
436: \bibitem{bbn-value} K. Hagiwara {\it et al.} [Particle Data Group Collaboration], \PRD66, 010001 (2002).
437: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D66,010001;%%
438: \bibitem{bbn2} P. D. Serpico, S. Esposito, F. Iocco, G. Mangano, G. Miele, O. Pisanti, astro-ph/0408076;
439: A. Cuoco, F. Iocco, G. Mangano, G. Miele, O. Pisanti, P.D. Serpico, astro-ph/0307213.
440: \bibitem{cmb} R. H. Cyburt, B. D. Fields and K. A. Olive, \PLB567, 227 (2003).
441: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B567,227;%%
442: \bibitem{bbn} G. Fiorentini, E. Lisi, S. Sarkar and F. L. Villante, \PRD58, 063506 (1998);
443: E. Lisi, S. Sarkar and F.L. Villante, \PRD59, 123520 (1999).
444: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D58,063506;%%
445: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D59,123520;%%
446: \bibitem{tony} T. Gherghetta, C. Kolda, S. P. Martin, \NPB468, 37 (1996).
447: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B468,37;%%
448: \bibitem{dvali} G. Dvali, A. Kusenko, M. Shaposhnikov, \PLB417, 99 (1998).
449: A. Kusenko, V. Kuzmin, M. Shaposhikov, P.G.Tinyakov, \PRL80, 3185 (1998).
450: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B417,99;%%
451: %%CITATION = PRLTA,80,3185;%%
452: \bibitem{kawasaki} M. Kawasaki, F. Takahashi, M. Yamaguchi, \PRD66, 043516 (2002).
453: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D66,043516;%%
454: \bibitem{cohen} A. Cohen, S. Coleman, H. Georgi and A. Manohar, \NPB272, 301 (1986)
455: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B272,301;%%
456: \bibitem{kasuya} S. Kasuya, M. Kawasaki, \PRL85,2677 (2000); \PRD64, 123515 (2001).
457: %%CITATION = PRLTA,85,2677;%%
458: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D64,123515;%%
459: \bibitem{cyburt} R. H. Cyburt, J. Ellis, B. D. Fields, K. A. Olive, \PRD67, 103521 (2003).
460: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D67,103521;%%
461: \bibitem{feng} J. L. Feng, A. Rajaraman, F. Takayama, \PRL91, 011302 (2003); \PRD68, 063504 (2003);
462: J. L. Feng, S. Su, F. Takayama, hep-ph/0404198; hep-ph/0404231;
463: F. Wang, J. M. Yang, hep-ph/0405186.
464: %%CITATION = PRLTA,91,011302;%%
465: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D68,063504;%%
466: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0404198;%%
467: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0404231;%%
468: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0405186;%%
469: \end{thebibliography}
470: \end{document}
471: