1: \documentclass[twoside]{dis04}

2: \usepackage{amssymb,citesort,epsfig}

3: \def\runauthor{J\"{a}ger, Kretzer, Stratmann, Vogelsang}

4: \def\shorttitle{Gluon Polarization}

5: 

6: \def\Journal#1#2#3#4{{#1} {\bf #2}, #3 (#4)}

7: 

8: \def\NCA{\em Nuovo Cimento}

9: \def\NIM{\em Nucl. Instrum. Methods}

10: \def\NIMA{{\em Nucl. Instrum. Methods} A}

11: \def\NPB{{\em Nucl. Phys.} B}

12: \def\PLB{{\em Phys. Lett.}  B}

13: \def\PRL{\em Phys. Rev. Lett.}

14: \def\PRD{{\em Phys. Rev.} D}

15: \def\ZPC{{\em Z. Phys.} C}

16: \def\JHEP{\em JHEP}

17: 

18: \begin{document}

19: 

20: \title{Longitudinal Gluon Polarization in RHIC

21: Double-Spin Asymmetries}

22: 

23: \author{Barbara J\"{a}ger and Marco Stratmann}

24: \address{Institut f{\"u}r Theoretische Physik, 

25: Universit{\"a}t Regensburg, D-93040 Regensburg, Germany}

26: %

27: \author{\underline{Stefan Kretzer} and Werner Vogelsang}

28: \address{Physics Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory,

29: and 

30: RIKEN-BNL Research Center, Upton, New York 11973, USA}

31: %

32: \maketitle

33: 

34: \abstracts{

35: The longitudinally polarized gluon density 

36: is probed sensitively in hard collisions of polarized protons 

37: under the condition that the dominant dynamics are 

38: perturbative and of leading twist origin. 

39: First data have recently been presented by 

40: {\protect{{\sc{Phenix}}}} 

41: on the double-spin asymmetry $A_{\mathrm{LL}}^{\pi}$

42: for $\pi^0$ production at moderate transverse momentum 

43: $p_\perp \simeq 1 \div 4\, {\rm GeV}$ and central rapidity. By means of 

44: a systematic investigation of the relevant degrees of freedom we show 

45: that the perturbative QCD framework at leading power in $p_{\perp}$ 

46: produces an asymmetry that is basically positive definite 

47: in this kinematic range, 

48: i.e.~$A_{\rm{LL}}^{\pi}\gtrsim {\cal{O}}(-10^{-3})$.}

49: 

50: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

51: \section{Introduction}

52: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

53: The determination of the nucleon's polarized gluon density

54: is a major goal of current experiments with longitudinally

55: polarized protons at RHIC~\cite{rhicrev}.

56: It can be accessed through measurement

57: of the spin asymmetries

58: \begin{equation}\label{eq:asydef}

59: A_{\rm{LL}}=\frac{d\Delta \sigma}{d\sigma}=

60: \frac{d\sigma^{++} - d\sigma^{+-}}{d\sigma^{++} + d\sigma^{+-}}

61: \end{equation}

62: for high transverse momentum ($p_{\perp}$) reactions. 

63: In Eq.~(\ref{eq:asydef}), $\sigma^{++}$ ($\sigma^{+-}$) denotes

64: the cross section for scattering of two protons with same (opposite)

65: helicities. Such reactions can be treated in pQCD

66: via factorization into parton densities, hard scattering cross sections and,

67: eventually, fragmentation functions.

68: Hadronic reactions have

69: the advantage over DIS that the

70: partonic Born cross sections involve gluons in the initial

71: state . They may therefore serve to examine the gluon content

72: of the colliding

73: longitudinally polarized protons.

74: We will here consider \cite{prl} the spin asymmetry 

75: $A_{\rm{LL}}^{\pi}$ for high-$p_{\perp}$ $\pi^0$ production, 

76: for which very recently the {\sc{Phenix}} collaboration has presented 

77: first data~\cite{phenix} at a c.m.s.~energy 

78: $\sqrt{S}=200$~GeV and central rapidity. 

79: 

80: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

81: \section{Hard-Scattering calculation}

82: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

83: We may write the polarized high-$p_\perp$ pion

84: cross section as 

85: \begin{eqnarray} \label{eq:crosec}

86: \frac{d\Delta \sigma^{\pi}}{d p_\perp d \eta} &=&\sum_{a,b,c}\, 

87: \int dx_a \int dx_b \int dz_c \,\,

88: \Delta a (x_a,\mu) \,\Delta b (x_b,\mu) \nonumber \\ %[2mm]

89: &\times& \frac{d\Delta \hat{\sigma}_{ab}^{c}

90: (p_\perp, \eta, x_a, x_b, z_c, \mu)}

91: {d p_\perp d \eta}\, D_c^{\pi}(z_c,\mu) \,  \; ,

92: \end{eqnarray}

93: where $\eta$ is the pion's pseudorapidity. The $\Delta a,\Delta b \;(

94: a,b=q,\bar{q},g)$ are the polarized parton densities; for instance, 

95: \begin{equation}

96: \label{eq:pdf}

97: \Delta g(x,\mu) \equiv g_+(x,\mu) -

98:                        g_-(x,\mu) \; ,

99: \end{equation}

100: (the sign referring to the gluon helicity in a proton of positive

101: helicity) is the polarized gluon distribution. 

102: These parton cross sections start at ${\cal{O}}(\alpha_s^2)$ 

103: in the strong coupling with the QCD tree-level scatterings:

104: (i)~$g g \rightarrow gg$, (ii)~$g g \rightarrow q {\bar q}$, 

105: (iii)~$gq (\bar{q}) \rightarrow g q (\bar{q})$,

106: (iv)~$q {\bar q} \rightarrow q {\bar q} $, $q {\bar q} 

107: \rightarrow g g $, $qq\to qq$, $qq'\to qq'$,

108: $q\bar{q}\rightarrow q'\bar{q}'$. 

109: The transition of parton $c$ into the observed $\pi^0$

110: is described by the (spin-independent) fragmentation function

111: $D_c^{\pi}$. 

112: All next-to-leading order [NLO, ${\cal O}(\alpha_s^3)$] QCD

113: contributions to polarized parton scattering are known \cite{JSSV}. 

114: Corrections to Eq.~(\ref{eq:crosec}) itself are

115: down by inverse powers of $p_\perp$ and are thus expected 

116: to become relevant if $p_\perp$ is not much bigger than typical

117: hadronic mass scales.  

118: Fig.~\ref{fig:all} 

119: shows NLO predictions for $A_{\rm{LL}}^{\pi}$,

120: for various gluon polarizations $\Delta g$ \cite{grsv}. 

121: Despite the fact that the

122: $\Delta g$'s used in Fig.~\ref{fig:all} are all very different from 

123: one another, none of the resulting $A_{\rm{LL}}^{\pi}$ is

124: negative in the $p_{\perp}$ region we display. We find it interesting

125: to investigate the question whether this observation is accidental or

126: systematic and what one could learn from a possible violation of the

127: apparent positivity of $A_{\rm{LL}}^{\pi}$.

128: %

129: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

130: \section{Basic observations} 

131: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

132: \begin{figure}[t]

133: \begin{center}

134: \vspace*{-0.6cm}

135: \epsfig{figure=all-pi0.eps,width=0.40\textwidth}

136: \end{center}

137: \vspace*{-0.4cm}

138: \caption{NLO predictions for {\protect $A_{\rm{LL}}^{\pi}$}.\label{fig:all}}

139: \vspace*{-0.5cm}

140: \end{figure}

141: We first focus on the partonic cross sections. 

142: Among the reactions (i)-(iii) listed above that have gluons in the initial 

143: state, process (ii) has a negative {\em partonic} spin asymmetry

144: ${\hat a}_{\rm{LL}}\equiv -1$, while (i) and (iii) both have 

145: ${\hat a}_{\rm{LL}}>0$~\cite{rhicrev}. 

146: A first guess is, then, to attribute a negative

147: $A_{\rm{LL}}^{\pi}$ to the negative $gg\to q\bar{q}$ cross

148: section. However, this expectation is refuted by the numerical 

149: hierarchy in the partonic cross sections: at $\hat{\eta}=0$ in the 

150: partonic c.m.s., which is most relevant for 

151: the {\sc{Phenix}} data, channel (i) is (in absolute magnitude) 

152: larger than (ii) by a factor of about 160. 

153: We therefore exclude that the $gg\to q\bar{q}$ channel

154: is instrumental in making $A_{\rm{LL}}^{\pi}$ negative, and 

155: we thus have to investigate possibilities within $\Delta g$ itself, 

156: and its involvement in $gg\to gg$ and $qg\to qg$ scattering. 

157: 

158: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

159: \section{A lower bound on $\mathbf{A_{\rm{LL}}^{\pi}}$}

160: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

161: We consider the LO cross section integrated

162: over all rapidities $\eta$. 

163: It is then convenient to take Mel\-lin moments in $x_T^2$ of the cross section, 

164: \begin{equation} \label{doublemom}

165: \Delta\sigma^{\pi} (N) \equiv

166: \int_0^1 dx_T^2 \left( x_T^2 \right)^{N-1} 

167: \frac{p_{\perp}^3 d\Delta\sigma^{\pi}}{d p_{\perp}} \; .

168: \end{equation}

169: One obtains  (we suppress the scale $\mu$ from now on):

170: \begin{equation} \label{crosec2}

171: \Delta\sigma^{\pi} (N) = \sum_{a,b,c} \,\Delta a^{N+1}\,

172: \Delta b^{N+1}\,\Delta

173: \hat{\sigma}_{ab}^{c,N}\,D_c^{\pi,2N+3}\; ,

174: \end{equation}

175: where the $\Delta\hat{\sigma}_{ab}^{c,N}$ are the $\hat{x}_T^2$-moments 

176: of the partonic cross sections and, as usual,

177: $ f^N\equiv \int_0^1 dx\, x^{N-1} f(x)$

178: for the parton distribution and fragmentation functions. 

179: We now rewrite Eq.~(\ref{crosec2}) in a 

180: form that makes the dependence on the moments $\Delta g^N$ explicit:

181: \begin{equation} \label{quad1}

182: \Delta\sigma^{\pi} (N) =

183: \left(\Delta g^{N+1} \right)^2 {\cal A}^N + 

184: 2 \Delta g^{N+1} {\cal B}^N + {\cal C}^N \; .

185: \end{equation}

186: Here, ${\cal A}^N$ represents the contributions from $gg\to gg$ and

187: $gg\to q\bar{q}$, ${\cal B}^N$ the ones from $qg\to qg$, and

188: ${\cal C}^N$ those from the (anti)quark scatterings (iv) above; in each 

189: case, the appropriate combinations of $\Delta q$, $\Delta \bar{q}$ 

190: distributions and fragmentation functions are included.  

191: Being a quadratic form in $\Delta g^{N+1}$, $\Delta\sigma^{\pi} (N)$

192: possesses an extremum, given by the condition 

193: \begin{equation} \label{dgmin}

194: {\cal A}^N \Delta g^{N+1}  = -{\cal B}^N \; .

195: \end{equation}

196: The same equation may also be derived

197: by finding the stationarity condition along a variational approach.

198: In the following we neglect the contribution from the 

199: $gg\to q\bar{q}$ channel which, as we discussed 

200: above, is much smaller than that from $gg\to gg$

201: for the $p_{\perp}$ we are interested in. The

202: coefficient ${\cal A}^N$ is then positive, and

203: Eq. (\ref{dgmin}) describes a minimum of $\Delta\sigma^{\pi} (N)$,

204: with value

205: \begin{equation} \label{crsecmin}

206: \Delta\sigma^{\pi} (N) \Big|_{\rm{min}} =

207:  -\left({\cal B}^N \right)^2/{\cal A}^N + {\cal C}^N \; .

208: \end{equation} 

209: It is straightforward to perform a numerical Mellin

210: inversion of this minimal cross section:

211: \begin{equation} \label{inverse}

212: \frac{p_{\perp}^3 d\Delta {\sigma}^{\pi}}{\d p_{\perp}}

213: \Bigg|_{\rm{min}} = \frac{1}{2\pi i}

214: \int_{\Gamma} dN \left(x_T^2\right)^{-N} \, \Delta\sigma^{\pi} (N) 

215: \Big|_{\rm{min}}\,, 

216: \end{equation}

217: where $\Gamma$ denotes a suitable contour in complex-$N$ space.

218: For the numerical evaluation we use the LO $\Delta q$, 

219: $\Delta \bar{q}$ of GRSV~\cite{grsv}, the $D_c^{\pi}$ of~\cite{kkp},

220: and a fixed scale $\mu=2.5$~GeV. We find that the minimal 

221: asymmetry resulting from this exercise is negative indeed, 

222: but very small: in the range $p_\perp \sim 1 \div 4$~GeV

223: its absolute value does not exceed $10^{-3}$. The $\Delta g$

224: in Eq.~(\ref{dgmin}) that minimizes the asymmetry

225: is shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:dg}, compared to $\Delta g$

226: of the GRSV LO ``standard'' set \cite{grsv}. One can see that 

227: it has a node and is generally much smaller than the GRSV one, except 

228: at large $x$. The node makes it possible to probe the two gluon densities 

229: in the $gg$ term at values of $x_a$, 

230: $x_b$ where they have different sign, so that 

231: $A_{\rm{LL}}^{\pi}<0$ becomes just barely possible. 

232: \begin{figure}[t]

233: \begin{center}

234: \vspace*{-0.6cm}

235: \epsfig{figure=momanal-gluon.eps,width=0.40\textwidth}

236: \end{center}

237: \vspace*{-0.4cm}

238: \caption{$\Delta g(x,\mu=2.5\,\rm{GeV})$ resulting 

239: from Eq.~(\ref{dgmin}) (solid) compared to 

240: GRSV LO ``standard'' 

241: $\Delta g$

242: {\protect \cite{grsv}}. \label{fig:dg}}

243: \end{figure}

244: 

245: \section{Conclusions}

246: In its details, the bound in Eq.~(\ref{inverse})

247: is subject to a number of corrections, however, 

248: a global analysis \cite{prl}, taking

249: into account the results from polarized DIS as well confirms 

250: the somewhat idealized case, as summarized by

251: Eqs.~(\ref{crsecmin}) and (\ref{inverse}),

252: that $A_{\rm{LL}}^{\pi}$ is 

253: basically positive definite 

254:  $A_{\rm{LL}}^{\pi}\gtrsim {\cal{O}}(-10^{-3})$

255: in leading twist pQCD

256: and for $p_\perp$ not largely exceeding $\sim$ 4 GeV.

257: At the same time,  $A_{\rm{LL}}^{\pi}$ is trivially bounded

258: from above by saturating positivity through $\Delta g (x) = g(x)$, see the

259: corresponding curve in Fig.~\ref{fig:all}.

260: A significantly negative  $A_{\rm{LL}}^{\pi}$ would be indicative

261: of power-suppressed contributions or non-perturbative effects. 

262: One possibility might be the population of low $p_\perp$

263: bins with statistical pions that follow a quasi-thermal exponential

264: distribution. However, such random pions would have to realize the $J=1$ 

265: configuration in Eq.~(\ref{eq:asydef}) either through angular momentum

266: of (Goldstone) pions or the spin of co-produced massive baryons, 

267: leading one to expect

268: a positive ${A_{\rm{LL}}^{\pi}}_{\rm nonpert.}>0$.

269: %both of which 

270: %must be expected to be disfavoured over the $J=0$ configuration; 

271: %i.e.~one would indeed expect that  ${A_{\rm{LL}}^{\pi}}_{\rm nonpert.}<0$.

272: %A small nonperturbative asymmetry of 1\% or even below would be enough to

273: %observe a characteristic change in sign with $p_\perp$

274: %increasing into the perturbative domain. 

275: A quantitative estimate of

276: this effect will be given elsewhere.

277: 

278: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

279: \section*{Acknowledgements}

280: %We thank A.~Bazilevsky, 

281: %G.~Bunce, A.~Deshpande, E.~Leader, N.~Saito, A.~Sch\"{a}fer, 

282: %and J.~Soffer for useful discussions. 

283: This work was supported in part by BMBF and DFG, Berlin/Bonn

284: and by  RIKEN, BNL, 

285: and the U.S.\ Department of Energy (contract DE-AC02-98CH10886).

286: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

287: \begin{thebibliography}{99}

288: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

289: \bibitem{rhicrev} See, e.g.: 

290: G.~Bunce {\em et al.},

291: %, N.~Saito, J.~Soffer, and 

292: %W.~Vogelsang, 

293: Annu.~Rev.~Nucl.~Part.~Sci.~{\bf 50}, 525 (2000).

294: %

295: \bibitem{prl}

296: B.~J\"{a}ger {\em et al.},

297: %, M.~Stratmann, S.~Kretzer, W.~Vogelsang, 

298: Phys.~Rev.~Lett.~{\bf 92}, 121803 (2004).

299: %

300: \bibitem{phenix} PHENIX Collab.~(S.S.~Adler {\em et al.}), 

301: {\tt hep-ex/0404027}; and F.~Bauer's contribution to these proceedings.

302: %

303: \bibitem{JSSV} D.~de Florian, Phys. Rev. {\bf D67}, 054004 (2003);

304: B.~J\"{a}ger {\em et al.},  Phys. Rev. {\bf D67}, 054005 (2003).

305: %

306: \bibitem{grsv} M.~Gl\"{u}ck {\em et al.}, Phys. Rev. {\bf D63}, 

307: 094005 (2001). 

308: %

309: \bibitem{kkp} B.A.~Kniehl {\em et al.}, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B582}, 514 (2000).

310: %

311: \end{thebibliography}

312: \end{document}

313: