1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2: %% ws-procs9x6.tex   :   2 January 2004

3: %% Text file for Proceedings Trim Size [9in x 6in] written in Latex2E.

4: %% The content, structure, format and layout of this style file is the 

5: %% property of World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd. 

6: %% Copyright 1995, 2002 by World Scientific Publishing Co. 

7: %% All rights are reserved.

8: %%

9: %% Proceedings Trim Size: 9in x 6in

10: %% Text Area: 7.35in (include runningheads) x 4.5in

11: %% Main Text is 10/13pt					  

12: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

13: 

14: %\documentclass[draft]{ws-procs9x6}  

15: \documentclass{ws-procs9x6}

16: 

17: \def\be{\begin{equation}}

18: \def\ee{\end{equation}}

19: \newcommand{\bea}{\begin{eqnarray}}

20: \newcommand{\eea}{\end{eqnarray}}

21: \def\lag{\langle}

22: \def\rag{\rangle}

23: \newcommand{\p}{{\bf p}}

24: 

25: \begin{document}

26: 

27: \title{The nature of the soft excitation at the critical end point of QCD

28: \footnote{\uppercase{T}his work is supported by 

29: the \uppercase{H}ungarian \uppercase{R}esearch \uppercase{F}und

30: (\uppercase{OTKA}) under contract numbers \uppercase{F}043465,

31: \uppercase{T}034980, \uppercase{T}037689, and \uppercase{T}046129.}}

32: 

33: \author{A. Jakov\'ac}

34: 

35: \address{

36: HAS \footnote{\uppercase{H}ungarian \uppercase{A}cademy of 

37: \uppercase{S}ciences} and Budapest Univ. of

38: Technology and Economics, Research Group ``Theory of Condensed Matter'',

39: H-1521 Budapest, Hungary

40: %E-mail: jakovac@planck.phy.bme.hu

41: }

42: 

43: \author{A. Patk{\'o}s}

44: 

45: \address{Department of Atomic Physics, E{\"o}tv{\"o}s University,

46: H-1117 Budapest

47: %E-mail: patkos@ludens.elte.hu

48: }  

49: 

50: \author{Zs. Sz{\'e}p}

51: 

52: \address{

53: Research Group for Statistical Physics, HAS, H-1117 Budapest\\

54: E-mail: szepzs@antonius.elte.hu

55: }

56: 

57: \author{P. Sz{\'e}pfalusy}

58: 

59: \address{

60: Dept. of Physics of Complex Systems,

61: E{\"o}tv{\"o}s University, H-1117 Budapest\\

62: Research Inst. for Solid State Physics and Optics,

63: HAS, H-1525 Budapest

64: %E-mail: psz@galahad.elte.hu

65: }

66: 

67: 

68: \maketitle

69: 

70: \abstracts{

71: Using a large flavor number expansion and a gap equation for the pion mass

72: the chiral quark-meson model is solved at the lowest order in the fermion

73: contributions. In the chiral limit the tricritical point (TCP) is

74: determined analytically. The softening of the sigma particle is verified 

75: at this point and is further investigated for a physical pion mass in the 

76: neighbourhood of the critical endpoint (CEP).

77: }

78: 

79: \section{Introduction}

80: 

81: Recently the location of the CEP in the $\mu-T$ phase-diagram of QCD was

82: obtained for $N_f=2+1$ dynamical staggered quarks with physical

83: masses~\cite{katz04}. One might investigate this problem using an effective

84: low energy model also, with some nonperturbative technique. Its low energy

85: nature might prevent us from giving the accurate location of the endpoint

86: and the shape of the phase boundary, but one can still obtain insights into

87: the physics near the CEP. In this contribution we focus on the nature of the

88: soft mode.

89: 

90:  

91: \section{The method for solving the model}

92: 

93: In the presence of the vacuum expectation value $\Phi$ the

94: requirement of a finite constituent quark mass

95: $m_q=g\Phi$ as $N\rightarrow \infty$ defines the Lagrangian  

96: \bea

97: L[\sigma,\pi^a,\psi]=

98: -\left[\frac{\lambda}{24}\Phi^4+\frac{1}{2}m^2\Phi^2\right]N-

99: \left[\frac{\lambda}{6}\Phi^3+m^2\Phi-h\right]\sigma\sqrt{N}

100: \nonumber\\

101: +\frac{1}{2}\bigl[(\partial\sigma)^2 + (\partial\vec\pi)^2 \bigr]

102: -\frac{1}{2}m^2_{\sigma 0}\sigma^2

103: -\frac{1}{2}m^2_{\pi 0}\vec\pi^2

104: -\frac{\lambda}{6\sqrt{N}}\Phi\sigma \rho^2-

105: \frac{\lambda}{24N}\rho^4 \nonumber\\

106: +\bar \psi\left[i\partial^\mu\gamma_\mu-m_q-\frac{g}{\sqrt{N}}

107: \left(\sigma

108: +i\sqrt{2N_f}\gamma_5T^a\pi^a\right)\right]\psi

109: %+\delta L_{ct}[\sigma,\pi^a,\psi]

110: ,

111: \eea

112: where $N=N_f^2,$ $m^2_{\sigma 0}=m^2+\frac{\lambda}{2}\Phi^2$,

113: $m^2_{\pi 0}=m^2+\frac{\lambda}{6}\Phi^2$,

114: $\rho^2=\sigma^2+\vec\pi^2$ and $h$ is the external field.

115: %and $\delta L_{ct}[\sigma,\pi^a,\psi]$ is the counterterm Lagrangian. 

116: The fermions, for which the chemical potential is introduced by the shift

117: $\partial_t\rightarrow \partial_t-i\mu$, start contributing

118: in the large N expansion at level $\mathcal{O}(1/\sqrt{N})$, 

119: which is between LO and NLO of the mesonic sector. 

120: To calculate their corrections to the LO, which has O(N) symmetry,

121: we disregarded the second independent quartic coupling of the

122: %linear $\sigma$ 

123: model, present for $N_f> 2$. 

124: 

125: Due to the proliferation of graphs a resummation is needed. The best thing

126: to do would be to use a selfconsistent pion and fermion propagator. This

127: makes renormalisation difficult, and a consistent method for it was proposed

128: only recently \cite{Reinosa}. Our method consists in taking into account the

129: $N_c$ coloured quarks to ${\mathcal O}(1/\sqrt{N})$ perturbatively at one

130: loop order and using for the propagator of the pions a simplified form,

131: parameterised by a mass M determined from the gap-equation:

132: \be

133: M^2=-iG_\pi^{-1}(p=0)=

134: m^2+\frac{\lambda}{6}\Phi^2+\frac{\lambda}{6}T_B(M)-4\frac{g^2N_c}{\sqrt{N}}

135: T_F(m_q).

136: \label{Eq:gap}

137: \ee

138: The pion and fermion tadpoles ($T_{B,F}$) determine  the equation of state (EoS)

139: \be

140: V'_\textrm{eff}=\Phi H(\Phi^2)-h=

141: \Phi\left[m^2+\frac{\lambda}{6}\left(\Phi^2+T_B(M)\right)

142: -\frac{4g^2N_c}{\sqrt{N}}T_F(m_q)\right]-h=0.

143: \label{Eq:EoS}

144: \ee  

145: The renormalisation method was presented in \cite{Toni_renorm}. 

146: The relation $M^2=H(\Phi^2)$ shows that in the symmetry broken 

147: regime defined by $H(\Phi^2)=h/\Phi$ and in the chiral limit ($h=0$) the 

148: physical pion mass $M$ is always zero, i.e. Goldstone's theorem is fulfilled 

149: in the minimum of the effective potential.

150: In what follows the number of flavors is set to two: $N_f=2$.

151: 

152: \section{Chiral case ($h=0$): analytical determination of TCP}

153: \label{sec:analysys}

154: 

155: Since in this case $M=0$, one obtains \cite{QMM03} the phase boundary by 

156: expanding the fermion tadpole in powers of $\Phi$. The 2$^{\textrm{nd}}$ 

157: order line is given by

158: \be

159: m_T^2:=m^2+\frac{g^2\mu^2}{4\pi^2}N_c+

160: \left(\frac{\lambda}{72}+\frac{g^2N_c}{12}\right)T^2=0,

161: \label{Eq:quadrat}

162: \ee

163: while the location of TCP comes from combining (\ref{Eq:quadrat}) with the 

164: condition

165: \be

166: \frac{\bar\lambda}{6}:=

167: \frac{\lambda}{6}+\frac{g^4N_c}{4\pi^2}\left[\frac{\partial}{\partial n}

168: \Big(\textrm{Li}_n(-e^{-\frac{\mu}{T}})+\textrm{Li}_n(-e^{-\frac{\mu}{T}})

169: \Big)\Big|_{n=0}- \ln\frac{c_1T}{M_{0B}}\right]=0.

170: \label{Eq:quartic}

171: \ee

172: $\ln c_1/2=1-\gamma_E+\eta$, and $\eta=\ln M_{0B}/M_{0F}$ 

173: gives a relation between $M_{0B}$ and $M_{0F}$ the renormalisation scales 

174: of the bosonic and fermionic tadpoles. The parameters 

175: %of the model 

176: are fixed at $T=\mu=0$. 

177: The choice $m_{q0}=m_N/3\approx 312.67$ MeV and $\Phi_0=f_\pi/2$ gives 

178: $g=6.72$. $\lambda=400$ is fixed by requiring the agreement between the 

179: location of the complex $\sigma$-pole on 

180: the 2$^{\textrm{nd}}$ Riemann sheet and the experimentally 

181: favoured mass and width of the $\sigma$ particle. Solving 

182: (\ref{Eq:quadrat}) and (\ref{Eq:quartic}) the 2$^{\textrm{nd}}$ order 

183: phase transition, the first

184: spinodal line and the location of TCP are found 

185: (l.h.s. of Fig.~\ref{Fig}).

186: %, the other lines are obtained numerically. 

187: \begin{figure}[ht]

188: \centerline{\epsfxsize=5.95cm\epsfbox{szep_fig1.eps}

189: \hspace*{-0.3cm}

190: \epsfxsize=5.95cm\epsfbox{szep_fig2.eps}}

191: \caption{L.h.s.: The $T-\mu$ phase diagram for $M_{0B}=886$ MeV and

192: $\eta=0$. R.h.s.  the dependence of $T_c(\mu =0)$ (upper curves) and of

193: $T_{TCP}$ (lower curves) on $M_{0B}$.

194: \label{Fig}}

195: \end{figure}

196: On the r.h.s.  we see the variation of TCP and of the critical temperature with

197: $\eta$ and $M_{0B}$. The pole structure of the $\sigma$

198: propagator restricts the allowed range of $M_{0B}$ to the right from the

199: arrow, seen on the horizontal axis, where no low scale

200: imaginary poles appear besides the well known large scale tachyon, whose

201: scale increases with decreasing values of 

202: %the coupling constant 

203: $\lambda$. 

204: Although in this region one can easily obtain $T_c(\mu=0)\in(150,170)$ MeV, 

205: the TCP stays robustly below $70$~MeV. Previous 

206: effective model studies \cite{LEeff} give similar low

207: values compared with the CEP temperature  obtained in~\cite{katz04}, 

208: which could mean that the phase transition is 

209: driven by higher excited hadronic states rather than by

210: the light d.o.f.

211: This is supported by a resonance gas model calculation \cite{Redlich}

212: used to reproduce lattice results 

213: on quark number susceptibilities and pressure.

214: %It was shown in \cite{Kaj} using 

215: %renormalisation group techniques that the inclusion of gluon degrees of 

216: %freedom is important at around 150 MeV. On the other hand we should 

217: %keep in mind that we are in the limit of infinitely 

218: %heavy strange quark, and that lattice studies revealed a very strong 

219: %dependence on the values of quark masses \cite{Philippe}.

220: 

221: An approximate effective potential is obtained by integrating the EoS 

222: away from equilibrium and subsequently Taylor expanding it around 

223: $\Phi=0$. This value becomes a minimum as $T\to T_c$ and so $M\to 0$.

224: With this, one can show the vanishing of the effective coupling in the 

225: large N limit \cite{Wetterich} at the critical point.

226: Here we just quote the result of \cite{Bp04}

227: \be

228: V_\mathrm{approx}(\Phi)= \frac{m_T^2}{4U^2W}\left[

229: \frac{m_T^2}2\Phi^2 +\frac{\bar\lambda}{12} \Phi^4+

230: \left(\frac{W\bar\lambda^2}{216m_T^2}+\frac{\kappa}{3}\right)\Phi^6

231: \right],

232: \label{eq:Veff_Tc}

233: \ee

234: where 

235: $\kappa=\frac{g^6N_c}{(4\pi T)^2\sqrt{N}}\frac{\partial}{\partial n}

236: \left[\mathrm{Li}_n(-e^{\frac{\mu}{T}})+ \mathrm{Li}_n(-e^{-\frac{\mu}{T}})

237: \right]\big|_{n=-2}$,

238: $W=1-\frac{\lambda^2}{48\pi^2}\times\ln\frac{c_2T}{M_0}$ and

239: $\ln \frac{c_2}{4\pi} = \frac{1}{2}-\gamma$. 

240: The shape of $V_\mathrm{approx}(\Phi)$

241: depends on the 

242: %actual 

243: values of the 

244: parameters. In the temperature range of a $2^{\textrm{nd}}$ order 

245: phase transition $W<0$. For increasing values of $\mu/T$, $\kappa$ 

246: changes sign at 1.91.

247: % from negative to positive values. 

248: This sign change restricts the location of the

249: TCP to the region $\mu>2T$, where $\kappa>0$.

250: In the broken symmetry phase $m_T^2<0$ and it vanishes at $T_c$

251: signalling that the coefficient of the quartic term in $\Phi$ also vanishes. 

252: Around $T_c$ from (\ref{Eq:quadrat}) one gets $m_T^2\sim T-T_c$, which 

253: through $m_\mathrm{eff}=\big|\frac{m_{T}^2}{2U W}\big|$

254: gives the correct LO critical exponent $\nu=1$ for the O(N)

255: model at large $N$. 

256: The usual Landau type analysis applies to 

257: %the expression in 

258: the square bracket in (\ref{eq:Veff_Tc}). 

259: %The location of the TCP is determined by  (\ref{Eq:quadrat}) and 

260: %(\ref{Eq:quartic}). 

261: The scaling exponent of the order parameter on the $2^{\textrm{nd}}$ order 

262: line is given by the first two terms. The minimum condition gives

263: $\Phi^2=-\frac{3m_T^2}{\bar\lambda}\,\Rightarrow

264: \Phi\sim(T-T_c)^{\beta}$, $\beta=\frac{1}{2}$. At TCP one can 

265: set $\bar\lambda=0$ in (\ref{eq:Veff_Tc}) and keep the sixth order term. The

266: minimum condition gives

267: $\Phi^4=-\frac{m_T^2}{2\kappa}\,\Rightarrow \Phi\sim(T-T_c)^{\beta}$, 

268: $\beta=\frac{1}{4}$. This mean field estimates for $\beta$ were checked numerically

269: using the exact EoS (\ref{Eq:EoS}).

270: 

271: \section{Case of the physical pion mass: the soft mode at CEP}

272: 

273: In view of the gap-equation (\ref{Eq:gap}) and EoS (\ref{Eq:EoS}) the form of 

274: the $\sigma$ propagator can be inferred from the consistency condition

275: $-G_\sigma^{-1}(p=0)=\frac{d^2 V_{eff}(\phi)}{d\Phi^2}$:

276: \be

277: G_\sigma^{-1}(p)=p^2-\frac{h}{\phi}-

278: 2\Phi^2\frac{\frac{\lambda}{6}-\frac{4g^4N_c}{\sqrt{N}} I_F(p,m_q)}

279: {1-\frac{\lambda}{6} I_B(p,M)},

280: \ee

281: where $I_{B,F}$ are the pion and fermion one-loop ``fish'' integrals. 

282: Requiring $M=140$ MeV at $T=\mu=0$ one has from (\ref{Eq:gap}) 

283: $h/f_\pi^3=1.13$. The location of CEP is determined numerically by 

284: simultaneously solving (\ref{Eq:gap}) and (\ref{Eq:EoS}): 

285: $(\mu_B,T)_\textrm{CEP}=(987,12.34)$ MeV. $T_{CEP}$ is unrealistically low, 

286: nevertheless it is of interest to study which mode becomes soft at this point.

287: Two minima meet at CEP which flattens the effective potential. This is shown 

288: also by the diverging peak of the susceptibility $d\Phi/d h$. This static 

289: information has to show up consistently when investigating 

290: %the sigma propagator 

291: $G_\sigma(p)$

292: in the static limit {\it i.e.} first taking $p_0\to 0$, then 

293: $|\p|\to 0$. The question is in which $(p_0,|\p|)$ 

294: region one has to look for  the responsible excitations. 

295: The behaviour of the spectral function 

296: $\rho(p_0,|{\bf p}|)=-\frac{1}{\pi}

297: \underset{\varepsilon\to 0}{\lim}\,\textrm{Im}\,

298: G_\sigma(p_0+i\varepsilon,|{\bf p}|)$ 

299: for fixed $|\p|$ gives a hint in this respect:

300: a peak is found in the $p_0<|\p|$ region. The location of 

301: its maximum moves toward the origin with decreasing values of $|\p|$ and 

302: at CEP eventually the peak diverges at $p_0=0$ as $|\p|\to 0$. The nature of

303: the analytical object on the second Riemann sheet which produces this

304: peak will be explored further. In the NJL model  a pole on the negative 

305: imaginary axis, approaching the origin as $|\p|\to 0$, is responsible for 

306: the peak observed in  the spectral function \cite{Fujii}.   

307: 

308:  

309: 

310: \section{Conclusions}

311: 

312: Contrary to the chiral case, where the zero temperature $\sigma$ pole

313: continuously moves to the origin of the 2$^\textrm{nd}$ Riemann sheet and

314: becomes soft at TCP, for a physical pion mass the $\sigma$ pole stays

315: massive at CEP. A space-like $(0\le p_0<|{\bf p}|)$ excitation is responsible

316: for the flattening of the effective potential at this point. Before a more

317: detailed investigation of the analytic structure at CEP we have to improve

318: our method of solving the model by dynamically generating the fermion mass

319: through a Dyson-Schwinger equation for the fermion propagator, but also one

320: has to extend our method to the physically more appealing 

321: $SU(3)_L\times SU(3)_R$ case.

322: 

323:   

324: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

325: % 

326: %Use this if your figures are put in a subdirectory having the same

327: %name as the main latex file, ie: 

328: %

329: %      ws-procs9x6/procs-fig1.eps      

330: %      ws-procs9x6/procs-fig2.eps      

331: %      ws-procs9x6/procs-fig3.eps      

332: %      ws-procs9x6/procs-fig4.eps      

333: %      etc.

334: %

335: %\begin{figure}[htbp] %ORIGINAL SIZE: width=1.4TRUEIN; height=1.5TRUEIN

336: %\figurebox{}{}{procf1} %100 percent

337: %\caption{Labeled tree {\it T}.}

338: %\end{figure}

339: %

340: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

341: 

342: 

343: \begin{thebibliography}{0}

344: 

345: \bibitem{katz04}Z. Fodor, S. D. Katz, {\it JHEP} {\bf 0404} (2004) 050

346: \bibitem{Reinosa} J.-P. Blaizot {\it et al.}, {\it Nucl. Phys.} 

347: {\bf A 736} (2004) 149, see also this  proceedings

348: \bibitem{Toni_renorm}A. Jakov\'ac, Zs. Sz{\'e}p, {\it hep-ph/0405226},

349: see also this  proceedings

350: \bibitem{QMM03} A. Jakov\'ac, A. Patk{\'o}s, Zs. Sz{\'e}p, P. Sz{\'e}pfalusy,

351: {\it Phys. Lett.} {\bf B582} (2004) 179

352: \bibitem{LEeff}J. Berges and K. Rajagopal, {\it Nucl. Phys.}

353: {\bf B538} (1999) 215; 

354: O. Scavenius {\it et al.}, {\it Phys. Rev.} {\bf C64} (2001) 045202; 

355: B.-J. Schaefer {\it et al.}, {\it nucl-th/0403039}; A.~Barducci {\it et al.},

356: {\it Phys. Rev.} {\bf D69} (2004) 096004

357: \bibitem{Redlich} F. Karsch, K. Redlich, A. Tawfik, {\it Eur. Phys. J.}

358: {\bf C29} (2003) 549

359: \bibitem{Wetterich}M. Reuter, N. Tetradis, C. Wetterich,

360: {\it Nucl. Phys.} {\bf B401} (1993) 567

361: \bibitem{Bp04}A. Jakov\'ac, A. Patk{\'o}s, Zs. Sz{\'e}p, P. Sz{\'e}pfalusy,

362: {\it hep-ph/0406122}

363: \bibitem{Fujii}H. Fujii, {\it Phys. Rev.} {\bf D67} (2003) 094018 

364: \end{thebibliography}

365: 

366: \end{document}

367: 

368: 

369:  

370: \bibitem{sign}M. Stephanov, K. Rajagopal, E. Shuryak,

371: {\it Phys. Rev.} {\bf D60} (1999) 114028;

372: Y. Hatta, M. A. Stephanov, {\it Phys. Rev. Lett.} {\bf 91} (2003) 102003;

373: Erratum-ibid. {\bf 91} (2003) 129901

374: \bibitem{Ikeda03} Y. Hatta and T. Ikeda, {\it Phys. Rev.} {\bf D67}

375: (2003) 014028

376: \bibitem{Kaj} J. Braun, K. Schwenzer, H.-J. Pirner, hep-ph/0312277

377: \bibitem{Philippe}Ph. de Forcrand, O. Philipsen,

378: {\it Nucl. Phys.} {\bf B642} (2002) 290

379: 

380: