1:
2: \documentclass{ws-procs10x7}
3:
4:
5:
6: \begin{document}
7:
8: \title{Recent progress on Higgs physics at a $\gamma\gamma$ collider}
9:
10: \author{Stephen Godfrey$^{\lowercase{a}}$ and Shouhua Zhu$^{\lowercase{a,b,c}}$}
11:
12: \address{ $^a$Ottawa-Carleton Institute for Physics,
13: Department of Physics, Carleton University, \\
14: Ottawa, Canada K1S 5B6\\
15: $^b$Institute of Theoretical Physics,
16: %ITP,
17: School of Physics, Peking University, \\
18: Beijing 100871, P.R. China\\
19: $^c$Institute of Theoretical Physics, Academia Sinica, Beijing
20: 100080, P.R. China}
21:
22:
23: \twocolumn[\maketitle
24: \abstract{We review some recent developments in
25: Higgs physics at a $\gamma\gamma$ collider.
26: We begin with single Higgs
27: boson production in $\gamma\gamma$ collisions proceeding via the
28: hadronic content of the photon.
29: For SM Higgs masses of current theoretical interest,
30: the resolved photon contributions are non-negligible in precision
31: cross section measurements. We found that production of the
32: heavier Higgs bosons, $H^0$ and $A^0$, of the MSSM can probe regions
33: of the SUSY parameter space that will complement other
34: measurements. We showed that associated $t H^\pm$ production
35: in $\gamma\gamma$ collisions can be used to make an accurate
36: determination of $\tan\beta$ for low and high $\tan\beta$ by
37: precision measurements of the $\gamma\gamma \to H^\pm t +X $ cross
38: section. We then reviewed recent progress on Higgs physics in
39: direct photon processes in which the Higgs bosons are
40: produced via virtual loops. Precision measurements
41: of the magnitude and phase of the $H\gamma\gamma$ coupling
42: at a photon collider
43: can be used to determine Higgs parameters related to physics
44: beyond the SM.}
45: ]
46:
47: %\section{Introduction}%1
48:
49:
50: \section{Categories of Higgs physics at a $\gamma\gamma$ collider}\label{subsec:prod}%1.1
51:
52: The photon-photon ``Compton Collider'', which utilizes laser light
53: backscattered off of highly energetic and possibly polarized
54: electron beams, has been advocated as a valuable part of the LC
55: physics program \cite{telnov}. In this talk we review some recent
56: progress on Higgs physics in: (1) resolved photon processes and
57: (2) direct photon processes. Due to space limitations, some
58: important issues cannot be included, for example, Higgs pair
59: production which is crucial for the measurement of the triple Higgs
60: coupling.
61:
62: We begin by exploring various aspects of Higgs boson production
63: in resolved photon processes, i.e. via the hadronic content of the
64: photon,\cite{Doncheski:2001uh,Doncheski:2003te} which we briefly
65: describe. Details and complete references are given in Ref. 2 and
66: 3. In the resolved photon approach the quark and gluon content of
67: the photon are treated as partons described by partonic
68: distributions, $f_{q/\gamma}(x,Q^2)$, in direct analogy to partons
69: inside hadrons\cite{fph}. The parton subprocess cross sections
70: are convoluted with the parton distributions to obtain the final
71: cross sections. These have to be further convoluted with the
72: photon energy distributions obtained from either the backscattered
73: laser or the Weizs\"{a}cker Williams distributions to obtain cross
74: sections that can be compared to experiment.
75:
76: We then review recent progress on Higgs physics in direct
77: photon processes.\cite{HF1,HF2,Niezurawski:2002jx,Niezurawski:2004ui,Godbole:2004xe,NZK739}
78: It is well known that one of the strongest motivations for the
79: Compton collider is to measure Higgs boson properties via single
80: neutral Higgs production through loops. Measurement of the
81: $\gamma\gamma \to H$ cross section
82: %The $2\gamma$ production of the Higgs boson
83: is especially interesting as it proceeds via loop contributions
84: and is therefore sensitive to new particles that cannot be
85: produced directly. Based on the precise measurements of the
86: magnitude and phase of $H\gamma\gamma$ at a photon collider, Higgs
87: parameters for new physics beyond the SM can be precisely determined.
88:
89: \section{Resolved Photon processes}\label{subsec:wpp}%1.1
90:
91: \subsection{Single neutral Higgs production}
92:
93: Due to the importance of single neutral Higgs boson production via
94: $\gamma\gamma \rightarrow H$, it is important that all SM
95: contributions to this process be carefully considered. The
96: resolved photon contributions to Higgs production are shown in
97: Fig. 1 for the backscattered laser case with
98: $\sqrt{s_{ee}}=500$~GeV. We also show the $\gamma\gamma\to
99: H$ cross section which proceeds via loops and the contribution from
100: gluon fusion, $\hat{\sigma}(gg\to H)$, which arises from the gluon
101: content of the photon. A final process is $\gamma\gamma\to H
102: W^+W^-$ whose cross section is comparable to the resolved photon
103: processes. Although the loop process dominates over the resolved
104: photon processes for the full range of Higgs masses,
105: the %quark annihilation
106: latter processes contribute at the percent level for $M_H\sim
107: 150$~GeV and $\sqrt{s_{ee}}=500$~GeV increasing to several percent
108: for $\sqrt{s_{ee}}=1.5$~TeV.
109: Thus, %depending on $M_H$,
110: Higgs production via the hadronic content of the photon may not be
111: negligible for precision measurement of $\sigma(\gamma\gamma \to
112: H)$ suggesting that these contributions deserve further study.
113:
114: \begin{figure}%[t]
115: \begin{center}
116: \centerline{\epsfig{file=fig2.eps,width=7.4cm,clip=}}
117: %\begin{minipage}[h]{5.0cm}
118: %{\footnotesize Fig. 1.
119: \caption{Production cross sections for SM Higgs boson including
120: the backscattered laser spectrum. The solid line is for
121: $\gamma\gamma\to h$, the short dashed line for
122: $\hat{\sigma}(b\bar{b}\to h) +\hat{\sigma}(c\bar{c}\to h)$, the
123: dot-dot-dashed line for $\hat{\sigma}(c\bar{c}\to h)$, the
124: long-dashed line for $\hat{\sigma}(b\bar{b}\to h)$, the dotted
125: line for $\hat{\sigma}(gg\to h)$ and the dot-dashed line for
126: $\hat{\sigma}(WW\to H)$.} %\hfill
127: %\end{minipage} \
128: %\begin{minipage}{7.4cm}
129: %\centerline{\epsfig{file=fig2.eps,width=7.4cm,clip=}}
130: %\end{minipage}
131: \end{center}
132: \end{figure}
133:
134:
135: %\section{Heavy MSSM Neutral Higgs Boson Production}
136:
137: In the MSSM there exist a total of three neutral Higgs bosons
138: which can be produced in $\gamma\gamma$ collisions; $\gamma \gamma
139: \to h^0, \; H^0, \; A^0$. However, the resolved photon process has
140: different dependence on $\tan\beta$ than that of the loop
141: processes. If $H$ and $A$ were produced in sufficient quantity the
142: cross section could be used to constrain $\tan\beta$. This can be
143: seen most clearly in Fig. 2 which shows the regions of the
144: $\tan\beta - M_{A}$ plot which can be explored via $A$ production
145: for $\sqrt{s}_{ee}=500$~GeV. The regions covered would complement
146: measurements made in other processes.
147:
148: \begin{figure}
149: \begin{center}
150: \centerline{\epsfig{file=fig9a.ps,height=6.0cm,angle=-90}}
151: %\begin{minipage}[h]{6.0cm}
152: \caption{ Regions of sensitivity in $\tan\beta -M_A$ parameter
153: space to $A$ production via resolved photons with backscattered
154: laser photons for $\sqrt{s_{ee}}=500$~GeV. The region to the left
155: is accessable and the region to the right is unaccessable. The
156: dotted line gives $\sigma = 0.1$~fb contour so that at least
157: 100~events would be produced in the region to the left for
158: 1~ab$^{-1}$ integrated luminosity. Similary the dashed line gives
159: the $\sigma = 0.02$~fb contour designating the the boundary for
160: producing at least $20$~events. }
161: %\end{minipage} \
162: %\begin{minipage}{6.0cm}
163: %\centerline{\epsfig{file=fig9a.ps,height=6.0cm,angle=-90}}
164: %\end{minipage}
165: \end{center}
166: \end{figure}
167:
168:
169: \subsection{Measurement of $\tan\beta$ in associated $tH^\pm$ production}
170: The ratio of neutral Higgs field vacuum expectation values,
171: $\tan\beta$, is a key parameter needed to be determined in type-II
172: Two-Higgs Doublet Models and the MSSM. $\tan\beta$ can be measured
173: in associated $tH^\pm$ production in $\gamma\gamma$ collisions.
174: The subprocess $b\gamma \to H^- t$ utilizes the $b$-quark content
175: of the photon. $\tan\beta$ enters through the $tbH^\pm$ vertex.
176: % so that the amplitude
177: %squared for the subprocess $b\gamma\to t H^-$ is given by:
178: %\begin{equation}
179: %\sum |M(b\gamma \to t H^\pm) |^2 \propto
180: %\sqrt{2}G_F \pi\alpha (m_b^2 \tan^2\beta + m_t^2/\tan^2\beta)
181: %\end{equation}
182: In Fig. 3 we show the cross section as a function of $\tan\beta$
183: with the measurement precision superimposed. We found that
184: $\gamma\gamma\to tH^\pm +X$ can be used to make a good
185: determination of $\tan\beta$ for most of the parameter space with
186: the exception of the region around $\tan\beta\simeq 7$ where the
187: cross section is at a point of inflection. This measurement
188: provides an additional constraint on $\tan\beta$ which complements
189: other processes.
190:
191: \begin{figure}
192: \begin{center}
193: \centerline{\epsfig{file=fig4.eps,width=7.0cm,clip=}}
194: %\begin{minipage}[h]{5.0cm}
195: %{\footnotesize Fig. 3.
196: \caption{ $\sigma(\gamma\gamma\to t H^- +X)$ {\it vs.} $\tan\beta$
197: for the backscattered laser case and the sensitivities to
198: $\tan\beta$ based only on statistical errors (solid lines) for
199: $\sqrt{s}_{ee}=1$~TeV and $M_H = 200$~GeV. For the cross
200: sections, the solid line represents the expected cross section at
201: the nominal value of $\tan\beta$, while the dashed (dotted) line
202: represents the expected cross section at $\tan\beta -
203: \Delta\tan\beta$ ($\tan\beta + \Delta\tan\beta$).}
204: %\end{minipage} \
205: %\begin{minipage}[h]{7.0cm}
206: %\centerline{\epsfig{file=fig4.eps,width=7.0cm,clip=}}
207: %\end{minipage}
208: \end{center}
209: \end{figure}
210:
211:
212:
213: \subsection{Other resolved photon process}
214:
215: Choi {\it et al} \cite{Choi:2004ne} studied the
216: related process of $\tau\tau \to H$ where the $\tau$'s come from
217: the fermionic content of the photon. They show that $\Delta
218: \tan\beta \sim 0.9 \ to\ 1.3$ is uniform in $\tan\beta$ for all $M_A$
219: up to the kinematic limit, and the results are encouraging enough to
220: start real experimental simulations.
221:
222: \section{Direct photon processes}
223:
224: As discussed above, the neutral Higgs boson can be produced via
225: loops which is sensitive to new virtual particles arising in new
226: physics beyond the SM. This process can be used to measure the
227: $H\gamma\gamma$ magnitude from $\Gamma_{\gamma\gamma}$ and the phase
228: $\Phi_{\gamma\gamma}$. According to the decay products of the
229: Higgs boson, the investigations can be classified into: (1)
230: $H\rightarrow \ heavy \ fermions$ and (2) $H\rightarrow VV$ with
231: $V=W$ and $Z$.
232:
233: \subsection{ $H\rightarrow \ heavy \
234: fermions$ }
235:
236: Usually the couplings of the Higgs boson with fermions are
237: proportional to the fermion's mass, which is what makes the heavy fermion
238: decay modes interesting\cite{HF1,HF2}. For example, for $H
239: \rightarrow b \bar b$, a precision of 2-9\% can be achieved on
240: cross section measurements after one year of Photon Collider (PC)
241: running for a SM
242: Higgs mass between 120 to 160 GeV, while for MSSM Higgs
243: bosons a measurement precision of 11-23\% on the cross
244: sections can be achieved for $M_A=200\sim 350$ GeV.\cite{HF1}
245:
246: \subsection{$H\rightarrow VV$ with $V=W$ and $Z$}
247:
248: In the SM, from simultaneous fits to the $WW$ and $ZZ$ mass
249: spectra, $\Gamma_{\gamma\gamma}$ and $\Phi_{\gamma\gamma}$
250: can be measured with precision of $\sim$ 4-9\% and 40-120 mrad
251: respectively\cite{Niezurawski:2002jx}.
252:
253: In the SM-like two Higgs doublet model [2HDM(II)] there is
254: only one parameter, $\tan\beta$. But one can also
255: introduce the additional CP-violating $H-A$ mixing parameter $\Phi_{HA}$.
256: Both $\tan\beta$ and $\Phi_{HA}$ can be measured to $\sim$ 10\%
257: (for $\Phi_{HA} \sim 0$) and 0.1 rad if $\tan\beta$ is not too
258: large\cite{Niezurawski:2004ui}.
259:
260: In the general 2HDM (II) one defines
261: $$
262: \chi_x\equiv \frac{g_{Hxx}}{g_{Hxx}^{SM}}, {\rm with} \ H=H,h^0,A.
263: $$
264: LHC measurements can constrain $\chi_U$ (Higgs
265: boson production via top virtual loop where $U$ is for up-type quarks),
266: the LC can constrain $\chi_V$
267: (Higgs boson radiating off $Z$ boson) and the PC can constrain both
268: (Higgs boson production via gauge boson and quark loops). The
269: combined analysis from the LHC, LC and PC, is depicted in Fig. 4. The
270: average errors are:
271: \begin{eqnarray}
272: <\Delta \chi_V>=0.033 \\
273: <\Delta \chi_U>=0.12\\
274: <\Delta \Phi_{HA}>=150 \ mrad
275: \end{eqnarray}
276: for $\chi_V=0.7$, $\chi_U=-1$ and $m_H=250$
277: GeV\cite{Godbole:2004xe}.
278:
279: \begin{figure}
280: \begin{center}
281: \centerline{\epsfig{file=allelipses.eps,width=7.0cm,clip=}}
282: %\begin{minipage}[h]{5.0cm}
283: %{\footnotesize Fig. 3.
284: \caption{ Taken from Ref. 9. %\cite{Godbole:2004xe}.
285: Expected total
286: error contours (1$\sigma$) in the determination of the basic
287: Higgs-boson couplings to vector bosons ($\chi_V$) and up fermions
288: ($ \chi_u $) from combined fit to invariant mass distributions
289: measured at LHC, LC and Photon Collider, for the CP-conserving
290: (blue) and CP-violating (red) 2HDM~(II). Production and decays of
291: heavy Higgs boson are considered for $M_H=250$ GeV. }
292: %\end{minipage} \
293: %\begin{minipage}[h]{7.0cm}
294: %\centerline{\epsfig{file=allelipses.eps,width=7.0cm,clip=}}
295: %\end{minipage}
296: \end{center}
297: \end{figure}
298:
299:
300: In the generic model the $HVV$ couplings, $g_{HZZ}$ and $g_{HWW}$,
301: can be written as
302: \begin{eqnarray}
303: && ig \frac{m_Z}{\cos\theta_W} \left( g_{\mu\nu} \lambda_H+
304: \lambda_A \epsilon_{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}
305: \frac{P^{\rho\sigma}}{m_Z^2} \right), \\
306: && ig m_W \left( g_{\mu\nu} \lambda_H+ \lambda_A
307: \epsilon_{\mu\nu\rho\sigma} \frac{P^{\rho\sigma}}{m_W^2} \right)
308: \end{eqnarray} respectively, with $P^{\rho\sigma}=(p_1+p_2)^\rho
309: (p_1-p_2)^\sigma$, $\lambda_H=\lambda \cos\Phi_{CP}$ and
310: $\lambda_A=\lambda \sin\Phi_{CP}$. In the SM, $\lambda_H=1$ and
311: $\lambda_A=0$. Detailed simulations, especially on the angular
312: distributions, show that $\Delta \Phi_{CP}=50\ mrad$ and $\lambda$
313: can be measured to several percents \cite{NZK739}.
314:
315: %\section{Higgs boson pair production}
316:
317: \section{Summary}
318: We reviewed recent progress on Higgs physics
319: at a photon colliders, especially Higgs physics in resolved
320: photon processes. We can see that there is rich physics at the photon
321: collider and much more investigation needs to be done.
322:
323:
324: \section*{Acknowledgments}
325: This work was supported in part by the
326: Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. We
327: thank P.~Niezurawski, A.~F.~Zarnecki and M.~Krawczyk for
328: contributions to this talk and P. Kalyniak and R. Hemingway for
329: helpful comments.
330:
331:
332: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
333: \bibitem{telnov}
334: V. Telnov, Int. J. Mod. Phys. {\bf A13}, 2399 (1998)
335: hep-ex/9802003.
336: %Presented at 2nd Int. WOrkshop on Electron-Electron Interactions
337: %at TeV Energies, Santa Cruz, CA, USA, September 22-24, 1997
338:
339:
340: %\cite{Doncheski:2001uh}
341: \bibitem{Doncheski:2001uh}
342: M.~A.~Doncheski and S.~Godfrey,
343: %``Resolved photon contributions to Higgs boson production in gamma gamma
344: %collisions,''
345: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 67}, 073021 (2003).
346: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0105070].
347: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0105070;%%
348:
349: %\cite{Doncheski:2003te}
350: \bibitem{Doncheski:2003te}
351: M.~A.~Doncheski, S.~Godfrey and S.~h.~Zhu,
352: %``Measurement of tan(beta) in associated t H+- production in gamma gamma
353: %collisions,''
354: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 68}, 053001 (2003).
355: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0306126].
356: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0306126;%%
357:
358: \bibitem{fph}
359: Two recent reviews are: R. Nisius, Phys. Rept. {\bf 332}, 165
360: (2000);
361: %\cite{Krawczyk:2000mf}
362: %\bibitem{Krawczyk:2000mf}
363: M.~Krawczyk, A.~Zembrzuski and M.~Staszel,
364: %``Survey of present data on photon structure functions and resolved photon
365: %processes,''
366: Phys.\ Rept.\ {\bf 345}, 265 (2001).
367: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0011083].
368: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0011083;%%
369:
370: %\bibitem{backlaser}
371: %I.F.\ Ginzburg, {\it et al.}, Nucl.\ Instrum.\ Methods, {\bf 205}, 47
372: %(1983); {\it ibid} {\bf 219}, 5 (1984);
373: %V.I. Telnov, Nucl.\ Instrum.\ Methods, {\bf A294}, 72 (1990);
374: %C.\ Akerlof, Report No.\ UM-HE-81-59 (1981; unpublished).
375:
376: %\bibitem{HHguide}
377: %\bibitem{Gunion:1989we}
378: %J.~F.~Gunion, H.~E.~Haber, G.~L.~Kane and S.~Dawson,
379: %{\sl The Higgs Hunter's Guide},
380: %{\it Addison-Wesley, Redwood City, USA, 1990}.
381: % (1987) 592 P. (FRONTIERS IN PHYSICS, 71)}.
382: %SCIPP-89/13.
383:
384: \bibitem{HF1}
385: P.~Niezurawski, A.~F.~Zarnecki and M.~Krawczyk,
386: %``Measurement of the MSSM Higgs-bosons production in gamma gamma $\to$ A, H
387: %$\to$ b anti-b at the Photon Collider at TESLA,''
388: arXiv:hep-ph/0307180; ICHEP04/12-0754.
389:
390: \bibitem{HF2} To see e.g., E.~Asakawa and K.~Hagiwara,
391: %``Probing the CP nature of the Higgs bosons by t anti-t production at photon
392: %linear colliders,''
393: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 31}, 351 (2003); %[arXiv:hep-ph/0305323];
394: R.~M.~Godbole,
395: %``CP property of the Higgs at the gamma gamma colliders using t anti-t
396: %production,''
397: arXiv:hep-ph/0311185.
398:
399: \bibitem{Niezurawski:2002jx}
400: P.~Niezurawski, A.~F.~Zarnecki and M.~Krawczyk,
401: %``Study of the Higgs-boson decays into W+ W- and Z Z at the photon collider,''
402: JHEP {\bf 0211}, 034 (2002). % [arXiv:hep-ph/0207294].
403:
404: \bibitem{Niezurawski:2004ui}
405: P.~Niezurawski, A.~F.~Zarnecki and M.~Krawczyk,
406: %``Determination of the Higgs-boson couplings and CP properties in the SM-like
407: %two Higgs doublet model,''
408: arXiv:hep-ph/0403138; %P.~Niezurawski, A.~F.~Zarnecki and M.~Krawczyk,
409: ICHEP04/12-0738.
410:
411: \bibitem{Godbole:2004xe}
412: R.~M.~Godbole, S.~Kraml, M.~Krawczyk, D.~J.~Miller, P.~Niezurawski
413: and A.~F.~Zarnecki,
414: %``CP studies of the Higgs sector,''
415: arXiv:hep-ph/0404024; P.~Niezurawski, A.~F.~Zarnecki and
416: M.~Krawczyk, ICHEP04/12-0740.
417:
418: \bibitem{NZK739}
419: P.~Niezurawski, A.~F.~Zarnecki and M.~Krawczyk, ICHEP04/12-0739.
420:
421: %\cite{Choi:2004ne}
422: \bibitem{Choi:2004ne}
423: S.~Y.~Choi, J.~Kalinowski, J.~S.~Lee, M.~M.~Muhlleitner, M.~Spira
424: and P.~M.~Zerwas,
425: %``Determining tan(beta) in tau tau fusion to SUSY Higgs bosons at a photon
426: %collider,''
427: arXiv:hep-ph/0404119.
428: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0404119;%%
429:
430:
431:
432: \end{thebibliography}
433:
434:
435: \end{document}
436: