1: \documentclass[preprint,prd,aps,showpacs,showkeys,nofootinbib]{revtex4}
2: %\documentclass[aps,prd,twocolumn,showpacs,showkeys,groupedaddress]{revtex4}
3: \usepackage{graphicx}
4: \usepackage{dcolumn}
5: \usepackage{bm}
6: %\topmargin=-0.5cm
7:
8: %\begin{document}
9: \begin{document}
10:
11:
12: %\begin{flushright}
13: %{hep-ph/0405xxx}\\
14: %\end{flushright}
15: \preprint{hep-ph/0410111}
16:
17: \title{Effective Lagrangian of the $/\!\!\!\!R$MSSM for neutrino mass generation}
18:
19: \author{Tai-Fu Feng}
20:
21: \affiliation{Department of Physics, 40014 University of Jyv\"askyl\"a,Finland}
22:
23: \author{Jukka Maalampi}
24: \affiliation{Department of Physics, 40014 University of Jyv\"askyl\"a,Finland}
25:
26: \date{\today}
27:
28: \begin{abstract}
29:
30: We derive the lepton number violating dimension-five and dimension-seven operators,
31: relevant for neutrino mass generation, in the Minimal Supersymmetry Standard Model
32: without $R$-parity (the $/\!\!\!\!R$MSSM) by using the effective Lagrangian method.
33: We keep all the possible
34: $CP$ violating phases, and we establish the general relationship between the
35: high-scale parameters and the low-energy observals associated with the Standard
36: Model particles. We study in a specific model the dependence of neutrino masses on
37: the $CP$ phases.
38: \end{abstract}
39:
40:
41: \pacs{12.60.Jv, 14.60. Pq, 14.80.Cp}
42:
43: \keywords{neutrino, R-parity violation, effective Lagrangian}
44:
45: \maketitle
46:
47:
48:
49:
50:
51: \section{Introduction}
52: \indent\indent
53:
54: Neutrino physics measurements show that neutrinos change their flavour in
55: oscillationary manner \cite{exp}, implying that neutrinos have a mass. In the
56: Standard Model (SM) of particle interactions neutrinos are strictly massless due to
57: lepton number conservation and non-existence of right-handed neutrinos. The same is
58: true for the most popular extension of the SM, the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard
59: Model (MSSM) \cite{mssm}, where the lepton number conservation follows from the
60: assumed R-parity symmetry. The R-parity of a field is defined as
61: $R=(-1)^{3B+L+2s}=(-1)^{3(B-L)+2s}$, where $B,\;L$ and $\;s$ are the baryon number,
62: lepton number and spin, respectively \cite{Rp}. The conservation of R-parity is
63: imposed in order to prohibit the proton from fast decay, which may happen if both
64: $B$ and $L$ are broken. If one abandons the R-symmetry by allowing lepton number to
65: be violated, but leaving baryon number unbroken, the MSSM can accommodate
66: $\vert\Delta L\vert=2$ Majorana masses for neutrinos \cite{rpv}.
67:
68: The superpotential of the MSSM with broken R-parity and conserved baryon number
69: (acronymed as $/\!\!\!\!R{\rm MSSM}$) is in the most general case
70: of the following form:
71: \begin{eqnarray}
72: &&W=W_{_{R_P}}+W_{_{/\!\!\!\!R_P}}
73: \label{eq1}
74: \end{eqnarray}
75: with
76: \begin{eqnarray}
77: &&W_{_{R}}=\epsilon_{_0}H_{_u}H_{_d}+h_{_{IJ}}^eH_{_d}
78: L_{_I}E_{_J}^c+h_{_{IJ}}^dH_{_d}Q_{_I}D_{_J}^c
79: \nonumber\\
80: &&\hspace{1.2cm}
81: +h_{_{IJ}}^uH_{_u}Q_{_I}U_{_J}^c
82: \;,\nonumber\\
83: &&W_{_{/\!\!\!\!R}}=\epsilon_{_I}H_{_u}L_{_I}+{1\over2}\lambda_{_{IJK}}
84: L_{_I}L_{_J}E_{_K}^c
85: \nonumber\\
86: &&\hspace{1.2cm}
87: +\lambda_{_{IJK}}^\prime L_{_I}Q_{_J}D_{_K}^c\;.
88: \label{eq2}
89: \end{eqnarray}
90: The part $W_{_{R}}$ is the superpotential of the standard R-conserving MSSM,
91: whereas $W_{_{/\!\!\!\!R}}$ consists of renormalizable bilinear and trilinear
92: couplings that violate the lepton number conservation and thereby the R-parity.
93: In (\ref{eq2}) $H_{_u},\;H_{_d}$ are Higgs doublet superfields and
94: $Q,\;L$ are left-handed quark and lepton superfields, all transforming as $SU(2)$
95: doublets, and $U,\;D,\;E$ are right-handed quark and lepton superfields
96: transforming as $SU(2)$ singlets. The flavour of the lepton and quark fields is
97: denoted by indices $I,J,K$, and the summation
98: over gauge indices is implicit. The R-parity
99: violating three-lepton coupling obeys
100: $\lambda_{_{IJK}}=-\lambda_{_{JIK}}$.
101:
102: The breaking of supersymmetry is due to interaction and mass terms of component
103: fields. In addition to the soft terms present in the MSSM, one should now include
104: also the terms that break lepton number. The most general form of the soft-term
105: Lagrangian in our case is then
106: \begin{eqnarray}
107: &&{{\cal L}_{_S}}={{\cal L}_{_S}^R}+{{\cal L}_{_S}^{/\!\!\!\!R}},
108: \label{eq3}
109: \end{eqnarray}
110: where
111: \begin{eqnarray}
112: &&-{\cal L}_{_S}^R=(m_{_{\tilde Q}}^2)_{_{IJ}}\tilde{Q}_{_I}^\dagger\tilde{Q}_{_J}
113: +(m_{_{\tilde U}}^2)_{_{IJ}}\tilde{U}_{_I}^{c\dagger}\tilde{U}_{_J}^c
114: \nonumber\\
115: &&\hspace{1.2cm}
116: +(m_{_{\tilde D}}^2)_{_{IJ}}\tilde{D}_{_I}^{c\dagger}\tilde{D}_{_J}^c
117: +(m_{_{\tilde L}}^2)_{_{IJ}}\tilde{L}_{_I}^{\dagger}\tilde{L}_{_J}
118: \nonumber\\
119: &&\hspace{1.2cm}
120: +(m_{_{\tilde E}}^2)_{_{IJ}}\tilde{E}_{_I}^{c\dagger}\tilde{E}_{_J}^c
121: +\Big[A_{_{IJ}}^eH_{_d}\tilde{L}_{_I}\tilde{E}_{_J}^c
122: \nonumber\\
123: &&\hspace{1.2cm}
124: +A_{_{IJ}}^dH_{_d}\tilde{Q}_{_I}\tilde{D}_{_J}^c
125: +A_{_{IJ}}^uH_{_u}\tilde{Q}_{_I}\tilde{U}_{_J}^c+h.c.\Big]
126: \nonumber\\
127: &&\hspace{1.2cm}
128: +m_{_{H_u}}^2H_{_u}^\dagger H_{_u}+m_{_{H_d}}^2H_{_d}^\dagger H_{_d}
129: \nonumber\\
130: &&\hspace{1.2cm}
131: +\Big(B_{_0}H_{_u}H_{_d}+h.c.\Big)
132: +\Big[{1\over2}m_{_1}\lambda_{_B}\lambda_{_B}
133: \nonumber\\
134: &&\hspace{1.2cm}
135: +{1\over2}m_{_2}\lambda_{_{A^\alpha}}\lambda_{_{A^\alpha}}+{1\over2}m_{_3
136: }
137: \lambda_{_{G^a}}\lambda_{_{G^a}}+h.c.\Big]
138: \label{eq3a}
139: \end{eqnarray}
140: and
141: \begin{eqnarray}
142: &&-{\cal L}_{_S}^{/\!\!\!\!R}=
143: +{1\over2}A_{_{IJK}}\tilde{L}_{_I}\tilde{L}_{_J}\tilde{E}_{_K}^c
144: +A_{_{IJK}}^\prime\tilde{L}_{_I}\tilde{Q}_{_J}\tilde{D}_{_K}^c
145: \nonumber\\
146: &&\hspace{1.2cm}
147: +{\bf B}_{_I}H_{_u}\tilde{L}_{_I}+({\bf m}_{_{\tilde L}}^2)_{_{0I}}H_{_d}^\dagger
148: \tilde{L}_{_I}+h.c.\;.
149: \label{eq3b}
150: \end{eqnarray}
151: Here $\lambda_{_{G^a}}\;(a=1,\;2,\;\cdots,\;8),\;\lambda_{_{A^\alpha}}
152: \;(\alpha=1,\;2,\;3),\;\lambda_{_B}$ denote the gaugino fields corresponding to the
153: gauge symmetry $SU(3)\times SU(2)\times
154: U(1)$ in an obvious manner.
155:
156: In this paper we shall study neutrino masses in the framework of the
157: $/\!\!\!\!R{\rm MSSM}$. The induction of neutrino masses by
158: R-parity violation couplings have been extensively analyzed in the
159: literature \cite{feng1}. Nevertheless, in most of these earlier studies the
160: possible $CP$-phase effects on the neutrino masses have been ignored. In our
161: analysis, we will keep all relevant $CP$ violation
162: phases of the Lagrangian as free parameters, and we shall show that they do affect
163: the neutrino masses.
164:
165: We will assume that the new physics, i.e. the physics that goes beyond the SM, is
166: associated with an energy scale that is considerably larger than the electroweak
167: scale of the SM, so that the new physics effects can be reliably analyzed by using
168: the effective theory method. In that method, one integrates heavy fields out and
169: keeps only the SM particles in the resulting effective theory \cite{Burgess}. The
170: effects of the heavy fields are parameterized in terms of high-dimensional
171: operators of the
172: light degrees of freedom. Due to the lepton number violating terms in the
173: full Lagrangian, there will appear dimension-odd operators in the
174: effective theory \cite{Weinberg}. After the electroweak symmetry breaking, these
175: operators will induce a small (Majorana) mass for neutrinos, in accordance with
176: experimental results \cite{Broncano}.
177:
178:
179: The paper is organized as follows. In Section \ref{sec2} we will present
180: preliminary considerations concerning Higgs field and fermion field doublets and
181: define the SM Higgs doublet in terms of the original doublets and their vacuum
182: expectation values.
183: In Section \ref{sec3} we derive, following the analysis of \cite{feng2},
184: the Wilson coefficients at the matching scale for the
185: operators relevant for neutrino masses by integrating out the supersymmetric
186: particles and the heavy
187: Higgs doublet fields. The connection between
188: the high-energy parameters
189: and low-energy observables are also discussed in this Section.
190: The results of numerical analysis and conclusions are presented
191: in the last Section.
192:
193:
194: \section{Preliminaries\label{sec2}}
195: \indent\indent
196: In the MSSM with no conserved lepton number there
197: is no a priori distinction between the down-type Higgs boson and slepton doublets,
198: which are assigned
199: with identical quantum numbers. One can therefore freely rotate the
200: weak eigenstate basis $(H_d,{\tilde L}_I)$ ($I=1,2,3$) by an $SU(4)$
201: transformation. The lepton number violating couplings depend on the basis one
202: chooses. Nevertheless, the couplings of the SM Higgs field that appear in the
203: low-energy theory
204: should not depend on an specific choice of the basis.
205:
206: The Higgs boson and slepton doublets can be presented as follows:
207: \begin{eqnarray}
208: &&H_{_u}=\left(\begin{array}{c}H_{_u}^+\\ \\{1\over\sqrt{2}}\Big(\upsilon_{_u}
209: +H_{_u}^0+iA_{_u}^0\Big)\end{array}\right)\;, \nonumber\\
210: &&H_{_d}=\left(\begin{array}{c}{1\over\sqrt{2}}\Big(\upsilon_{_0}
211: +H_{_d}^0+iA_{_d}^0\Big)\\ \\H_{_d}^-\end{array}\right)\;, \nonumber\\
212: &&{\tilde L}_{_I}=\left(\begin{array}{c}{1\over\sqrt{2}}\Big(\upsilon_{_I}
213: +H_{_I}^0+iA_{_I}^0\Big)\\ \\{\tilde L}_{_I}^-\end{array}\right)\;(I=1,\;2,\;3)\;.
214: \label{eq4}
215: \end{eqnarray}
216: Here $\upsilon_{_u},\;\upsilon_{0},\;\upsilon_{_I}$
217: denote the vacuum expected values (VEVs) of the neutral components of the doublets
218: $H_u,\; H_d$ and ${\tilde L}_{_I}$, respectively. One is obviously free to rotate
219: these doublets in such a way that only one doublet achieves a non-vanishing vacuum
220: expectation value.
221: Let us denote
222: \begin{eqnarray}
223: &&\upsilon_{_{d_0}}=\upsilon_{_0}\;,\nonumber\\
224: &&\upsilon_{_{d_1}}=\sqrt{\upsilon_{_0}^2+\upsilon_{_1}^2}\;,\nonumber\\
225: &&\upsilon_{_{d_2}}=\sqrt{\upsilon_{_0}^2
226: +\upsilon_{_1}^2+\upsilon_{_2}^2}\;,\nonumber\\
227: &&\upsilon_{_{d_3}}=\sqrt{\upsilon_{_0}^2
228: +\upsilon_{_1}^2+\upsilon_{_2}^2+\upsilon_{_3}^2}\equiv\upsilon_{_d}\;,
229: \label{eq5}
230: \end{eqnarray}
231: and replace the Higgs boson and slepton doublets of Eq.~(\ref{eq4}) with the set
232: $(\Phi$, $\Phi_{_{H_1}}$, $\Phi_{_{H_2}}$, $\Phi_{_{H_3}}$, $\Phi_{_{H_4}})$ defined as
233: \begin{eqnarray}
234: \left(\begin{array}{l}\Phi\\\Phi_{_{H_1}}\\\Phi_{_{H_{I+1}}}\end{array}\right)=
235: {\cal Z}_{_H}^0\left(\begin{array}{c}H_{_u}\\(i\sigma^2)H_{_d}^*
236: \\(i\sigma^2)\tilde{L}_{_I}^*\end{array}\right)\;,
237: \label{eq6}
238: \end{eqnarray}
239: where ${\cal Z}_{_H}^0$ denotes the transformation matrix
240: \begin{widetext}
241: \begin{eqnarray}
242: &&{\cal Z}_{_H}^0=\left(\begin{array}{ccccc}-s_{_\beta}
243: &c_{_\beta}{\upsilon_{_0}\over\upsilon_{_d}}&c_{_\beta}{\upsilon_{_1}
244: \over\upsilon_{_d}}&c_{_\beta}{\upsilon_{_2}\over\upsilon_{_d}}&
245: c_{_\beta}{\upsilon_{_3}\over\upsilon_{_d}}\\
246: c_{_\beta}&s_{_\beta}{\upsilon_{_0}\over\upsilon_{_d}}&s_{_\beta}{\upsilon
247: n_{_1}
248: \over\upsilon_{_d}}&s_{_\beta}{\upsilon_{_2}\over\upsilon_{_d}}&
249: s_{_\beta}{\upsilon_{_3}\over\upsilon_{_d}}\\
250: 0&-{\upsilon_{_1}\over\upsilon_{_{d_1}}}&{\upsilon_{_0}\over\upsilon_{_{d
251: _1}}}&
252: 0&0\\
253: 0&-{\upsilon_{_0}\upsilon_{_2}\over\upsilon_{_{d_1}}\upsilon_{_{d_2}}}
254: &-{\upsilon_{_1}\upsilon_{_2}\over\upsilon_{_{d_1}}\upsilon_{_{d_2}}}
255: &{\upsilon_{_{d_1}}\over\upsilon_{_{d_2}}}&0\\
256: 0&-{\upsilon_{_0}\upsilon_{_3}\over\upsilon_{_{d_2}}\upsilon_{_{d}}}&
257: -{\upsilon_{_1}\upsilon_{_3}\over\upsilon_{_{d_2}}\upsilon_{_{d}}}&
258: -{\upsilon_{_2}\upsilon_{_3}\over\upsilon_{_{d_2}}\upsilon_{_{d}}}&
259: {\upsilon_{_{d_2}}\over\upsilon_{_{d}}}
260: \end{array}\right)\;.
261: \label{eq7}
262: \end{eqnarray}
263: \end{widetext}
264: The doublets $\Phi,\Phi_{_{H_{\alpha}}},\;(\alpha=1,\;2,\;3,\;4)$ can be presented
265: in the form
266: \begin{eqnarray}
267: &&\Phi=\left(\begin{array}{c}G^+\\ \\{1\over\sqrt{2}}\Big(h+\upsilon+iG^0\Big)
268: \end{array}\right)\;,\nonumber\\
269: &&\Phi_{_{H_\alpha}}=\left(\begin{array}{c}H_\alpha^+\\
270: \\{1\over\sqrt{2}}\Big(H_\alpha^0
271: +iA_\alpha^0\Big)\end{array}\right).
272: \label{eq8}
273: \end{eqnarray}
274: The doublet $\Phi$ corresponds to the Higgs doublet of the SM, having a vacuum
275: expectation value $\upsilon=\sqrt{\upsilon_{_u}^2+\upsilon_{_d}^2}=246\;{\rm GeV}$.
276: It remains massless prior to the electroweak symmetry breaking and does not mix
277: with the other doublets. The other doublets obtain a large mass originating in the
278: soft supersymmetry breaking terms of the Lagrangian. Indeed, the masses of the
279: doublets are given by
280: \begin{eqnarray}
281: \left(\begin{array}{ccc}\Phi&\Phi_{_{H_1}}^\dagger&\Phi_{_{H_{I+1}}}^\dagger
282: \end{array}\right)
283: {\bf M}_{_H}^2
284: \left(\begin{array}{c}\Phi\\\Phi_{_{H_1}}\\\Phi_{_{H_{J+1}}}\end{array}\right)\;,
285: \label{eq9}
286: \end{eqnarray}
287: where
288: \begin{eqnarray}
289: &&{\bf M}_{_H}^2=\left(\begin{array}{ccc}0&0&0\\0&(B/s_{_\beta}c_{_\beta})
290: &(s_{_\beta}-c_{_\beta})E_{_0}E_{_I}^*\\ 0&(s_{_\beta}-c_{_\beta})E_{_0}^*E_{_J}&
291: ({\bf m}_{_H}^2)_{_{IJ}}+E_{_I}^*E_{_J}\end{array}\right).
292: \label{eq9-a}
293: \end{eqnarray}
294: We have used here the following notations:
295: \begin{eqnarray}
296: &&B=\sum\limits_{_{\rho=0}}^3{\upsilon_{_\rho}
297: \over\upsilon_{_d}}\Big({\bf B}\Big)_{_\rho}
298: \;,\nonumber\\
299: &&\Big({\bf m}_{_H}^2\Big)_{_{IJ}}={\upsilon_{_{d_{(I-1)}}}
300: \upsilon_{_{d_{(J-1)}}}\over\upsilon_{_{d_I}}\upsilon_{_{d_J}}}
301: \Big({\bf m}_{_{\tilde L}}^2\Big)_{_{IJ}}
302: \nonumber\\&&\hspace{1.2cm}
303: +{\upsilon_{_I}\upsilon_{_J}
304: \over\upsilon_{_{d_{(I-1)}}}\upsilon_{_{d_{(J-1)}}}\upsilon_{_{d_I}}
305: \upsilon_{_{d_J}}}\sum\limits_{\rho=0}^{I-1}\sum\limits_{\sigma=0}^{J-1}
306: \upsilon_{_\rho}\upsilon_{_\sigma}\Big({\bf m}_{_{\tilde L}}^2\Big)_{_{\rho\sigma}}
307: \nonumber\\&&\hspace{1.2cm}
308: -{\upsilon_{_{d_{(J-1)}}}\upsilon_{_I}\over\upsilon_{_{d_{(I-1)}}}
309: \upsilon_{_{d_I}}\upsilon_{_{d_J}}}\sum\limits_{\rho=0}^{I-1}
310: \Big({\bf m}_{_{\tilde L}}^2\Big)_{_{J\rho}}\upsilon_{_\rho}
311: \nonumber\\&&\hspace{1.2cm}
312: -{\upsilon_{_{d_{(I-1)}}}\upsilon_{_J}\over\upsilon_{_{d_{(J-1)}}}
313: \upsilon_{_{d_I}}\upsilon_{_{d_J}}}\sum\limits_{\rho=0}^{J-1}
314: \upsilon_{_\rho}\Big({\bf m}_{_{\tilde L}}^2\Big)_{_{\rho I}}\;,\nonumber\\
315: &&{\bf E}_{_0}=\sum\limits_{\rho=0}^3{\upsilon_{_\rho}\over\upsilon_{_d}}
316: \epsilon_{_\rho}\;,\nonumber\\
317: &&{\bf E}_{_I}={\upsilon_{_{d_{(I-1)}}}^2
318: \epsilon_{_I}-\upsilon_{_I}\sum\limits_{\rho=0}^{I-1}\upsilon_{_\rho}
319: \epsilon_{_\rho}\over\upsilon_{_{d_{(I-1)}}}\upsilon_{_{d_I}}}\;.
320: \label{eq10}
321: \end{eqnarray}
322: Here $I,\;J=1,\;2,\;3$ and $\rho,\sigma=0,\;1,\;2,\;3$, and we have denoted $({\bf
323: m}_{_{\tilde L}}^2)_{00}=m_{H_d}^2$ and $({\bf m}_{_{\tilde L}}^2)^*_{I0}
324: =({\bf m}_{_{\tilde L}}^2)_{0I}$.
325: In the effective theory the heavy eigenstates of this mass Lagrangian are
326: integrated out and only the fields in
327: the massless doublet $\Phi$ are considered as a physical degrees of freedom.
328:
329: The bilinear R-parity violating terms of the Lagrangian (\ref{eq3b}) lead to mixing
330: of the
331: down-type higgsino and the left-handed leptons, and some of these fields obtain a
332: large mass. The mass eigenstates are obtained by the following
333: transformation:
334: \begin{eqnarray}
335: \left(\begin{array}{c}\psi_{_{h_d}}\\\psi_{_{l_I}}\end{array}\right)
336: ={\cal Z}_{_{\tilde h}}\left(\begin{array}{c}\psi_{_{H_d}}\\\psi_{_{L_I}}
337: \end{array}\right)\;(I=1,\;2,\;3)\;,
338: \label{eq11}
339: \end{eqnarray}
340: where the transformation matrix ${\cal Z}_{_{\tilde h}}$ is given by
341: \begin{widetext}
342: \begin{eqnarray}
343: &&{\cal Z}_{_{\tilde h}}=\left(\begin{array}{cccc}{|\epsilon_{_0}|\over
344: \mu_{_H}}&{|\epsilon_{_1}|\over\mu_{_H}}e^{i\varphi_{_1}}&
345: {|\epsilon_{_2}|\over\mu_{_H}}e^{i\varphi_{_2}}&{|\epsilon_{_3}|\over\mu_
346: {_H}}
347: e^{i\varphi_{_3}}\\
348: -{|\epsilon_{_1}|\over\mu_{_{H_1}}}e^{-i\varphi_{_1}}&{|\epsilon_{_0}|\over
349: \mu_{_{H_1}}}
350: &0&0\\
351: -{|\epsilon_{_0}\epsilon_{_2}|\over\mu_{_{H_1}}\mu_{_{H_2}}}e^{-i\varphi_
352: {_2}}
353: &-{|\epsilon_{_1}\epsilon_{_2}|\over\mu_{_{H_1}}\mu_{_{H_2}}}
354: e^{-i(\varphi_{_2}-\varphi_{_1})}&{\mu_{_{H_1}}\over\mu_{_{H_2}}}&0\\
355: -{|\epsilon_{_0}\epsilon_{_3}|\over\mu_{_{H_2}}\mu_{_{H}}}e^{-i\varphi_{_
356: 3}}
357: &-{|\epsilon_{_1}\epsilon_{_3}|\over\mu_{_{H_2}}\mu_{_{H}}}
358: e^{-i(\varphi_{_3}-\varphi_{_1})}&-{|\epsilon_{_2}\epsilon_{_3}|\over\mu_
359: {_{H_2}}\mu_{_{H}}}
360: e^{-i(\varphi_{_3}-\varphi_{_2})}&{\mu_{_{H_2}}\over\mu_{_{H}}}
361: \end{array}\right)\;.
362: \label{eq12}
363: \end{eqnarray}
364: \end{widetext}
365: Here the following notation is used:
366: \begin{eqnarray}
367: &&\mu_{_{H}}=\sqrt{\sum\limits_{\rho=0}^3|\epsilon_{_\rho}|^2},\;
368: \mu_{_{H_0}}=|\epsilon_{_0}|,\nonumber\\
369: &&\mu_{_{H_1}}=\sqrt{|\epsilon_{_0}|^2
370: +|\epsilon_{_1}|^2},\nonumber\\
371: &&\mu_{_{H_2}}=\sqrt{|\epsilon_{_0}|^2+|\epsilon_{_1}|^2
372: +|\epsilon_{_3}|^2},\nonumber\\
373: &&\mu_{_{H_3}}=\mu_{_{H}}.
374: \label{eq12-a}
375: \end{eqnarray}
376: The phases $\varphi_{_I}\;(I=1,\;2,\;3)$, appearing in the transformation matrix,
377: are defined as $\varphi_{_I}=arg(\epsilon_{_I})
378: -\theta_{_\mu}$, where $\theta_{_\mu}\equiv arg(\epsilon_{_0})$. The mass terms
379: induced by the bilinear
380: terms are
381: \begin{eqnarray}
382: \mu_{_H}e^{i\theta_{_\mu}}\psi_{_{H_u}}\psi_{_{h_d}}+\mu_{_H}e^{-i\theta_{_\mu}}
383: \overline{\psi}_{_{H_u}}\overline{\psi}_{_{h_d}}
384: \label{eq13}
385: \end{eqnarray}
386: The phase $\theta_{_\mu}$ can be absorbed into the fields by the following
387: redefinitions:
388: \begin{eqnarray}
389: \psi_{_{H_u}}\rightarrow e^{-{i\over2}\theta_{_\mu}}\psi_{_{H_u}},\;
390: \psi_{_{h_d}}\rightarrow e^{-{i\over2}\theta_{_\mu}}\psi_{_{h_d}}.
391: \label{eq14}
392: \end{eqnarray}
393: One can then deduce that Eq. (\ref{eq13}) is a mass term of the Dirac field
394: $\tilde{h}^T=\left(\psi_{_{H_u}},
395: \overline{\psi}_{_{h_d}}\right)$. This heavy higgsino field, with a mass $\mu_H$,
396: is integrated out in the effective theory.
397:
398:
399:
400: \section{The effective Lagrangian with dimension-odd operators
401: \label{sec3}}
402: \indent\indent
403:
404: In the effective theory that results when the heavy fields are integrated out
405: neutrino masses are in leading order generated by the following dimension-five
406: operators consisting of the SM fields \cite{Weinberg}:
407: \begin{eqnarray}
408: &&\delta{\cal L}_{d=5}={1\over2}(C_{_1})_{_{J,I}}\Big(\overline{(e_{_L}^J)^c}
409: \;\tilde{\Phi}^*\Big)\Big(\tilde{\Phi}^\dagger\; e_{_L}^I\Big)
410: \nonumber\\&&\hspace{0.2cm}
411: +{1\over2}(C_{_2})_{_{J,I}}\Big(\overline{(e_{_L}^J)^c}\sigma^a\tilde{\Phi}^*\Big)
412: \Big(\tilde{\Phi}^\dagger\sigma^a e_{_L}^I\Big)+h.c.,
413: \label{eq17}
414: \end{eqnarray}
415: where $(C_{_1})_{_{J,I}},(C_{_2})_{_{J,I}}$ are Wilson coefficients.
416: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
417: \begin{figure}[t]
418: \setlength{\unitlength}{1mm}
419: \begin{center}
420: \begin{picture}(0,20)(-10,-5)
421: \put(-62,-100){\special{psfile=5t.ps hscale=50 vscale=50}}
422: \end{picture}
423: \caption[]{The tree level diagrams that lead to the dimension-five
424: operators.}
425: \label{fig1}
426: \end{center}
427: \end{figure}
428: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
429: The tree-level Feynman diagrams inducing the above effective
430: Lagrangian are given in Fig. \ref{fig1}. The Wilson coefficients corresponding to
431: these diagrams are
432: \begin{eqnarray}
433: &&(C_{_1})_{_{J,I}}={g_1^2c_{_\beta}^2\over|m_{_1}|}\Lambda_{_{0,I}}
434: \Lambda_{_{0,J}}e^{-i\theta_1}\;,\nonumber\\
435: &&(C_{_2})_{_{J,I}}={g_2^2c_{_\beta}^2\over|m_{_2}|}\Lambda_{_{0,I}}
436: \Lambda_{_{0,J}}e^{-i\theta_2}\;,
437: \label{eq18}
438: \end{eqnarray}
439: where $\tan\beta=\upsilon_{_u}/\upsilon_{_d},\;c_{_\beta}=\cos\beta,\;
440: s_{_\beta}=\sin\beta$, and the parameters $\Lambda_{I,J}$ are definited as
441: \begin{eqnarray}
442: &&\Lambda_{_{0,0}}={\upsilon_{_0}|\epsilon_{_0}|\over\upsilon_{_d}\mu_{_H}}
443: +\sum\limits_{I=1}^3{\upsilon_{_I}|\epsilon_{_I}|
444: \over\upsilon_{_d}\mu_{_H}}e^{-i\varphi_{_I}}\;,\nonumber\\
445: &&\Lambda_{_{I,0}}={\upsilon_{_{d_{(I-1)}}}|\epsilon_{_I}|
446: \over\upsilon_{_{d_{I}}}\mu_{_H}}e^{-i\varphi_{_I}}
447: -\sum\limits_{J=0}^{I-1}{\upsilon_{_I}\upsilon_{_J}
448: |\epsilon_{_J}|\over\upsilon_{_{d_{(I-1)}}}\upsilon_{_{d_{I}}}
449: \mu_{_H}}e^{-i\varphi_{_J}}\;,\nonumber\\
450: &&\Lambda_{_{0,I}}={\upsilon_{_I}\mu_{_{H_{(I-1)}}}
451: \over\upsilon_{_d}\mu_{_{H_I}}}-\sum\limits_{J=0}^{I-1}
452: {|\epsilon_{_I}\epsilon_{_J}|e^{i(\varphi_{_I}-\varphi_{_\beta})}
453: \upsilon_{_J}\over\upsilon_{_d}\mu_{_{H_{(I-1)}}}\mu_{_{H_I}}}
454: \label{eq19}
455: \end{eqnarray}
456: with $I,J=1,\;2,\;3$.
457: When the EW symmetry breaks down, one ends up with the following mass matrix for
458: neutrinos:
459: \begin{eqnarray}
460: &&{\bf m}_{_\nu}={1\over2}c_{_\beta}^2\upsilon^2\Big({g_1^2e^{-i\theta_1}\over|m
461: _{_1}|}
462: +{g_2^2e^{-i\theta_2}\over|m_{_2}|}\Big)
463: \nonumber\\
464: &&\hspace{1.0cm}\times
465: \left(\begin{array}{ccc}\Lambda_{_{0,1}}^2&
466: \Lambda_{_{0,1}}\Lambda_{_{0,2}}&\Lambda_{_{0,1}}\Lambda_{_{0,3}}\\ \\
467: \Lambda_{_{0,1}}\Lambda_{_{0,2}}&\Lambda_{_{0,2}}^2&\Lambda_{_{0,2}}\Lambda_{_{0,3}}\\ \\
468: \Lambda_{_{0,1}}\Lambda_{_{0,3}}&\Lambda_{_{0,2}}\Lambda_{_{0,3}}
469: &\Lambda_{_{0,3}}^2\end{array}\right)\;.
470: \label{eq20}
471: \end{eqnarray}
472: This matrix is diagonalized by the unitary matrix
473: \begin{eqnarray}
474: &&V=\left(\begin{array}{ccc}0&-{A_{_1}\over A}&{\Lambda_{_{0,1}}^*\over A}\\ \\
475: -{\Lambda_{_{0,3}}\over A}&{\Lambda_{_{0,1}}\Lambda_{_{0,2}}^*\over AA_{_1}}&
476: {\Lambda_{_{0,2}}^*\over A}\\ \\
477: {\Lambda_{_{0,2}}\over A}&{\Lambda_{_{0,1}}\Lambda_{_{0,3}}^*\over AA_{_1}}
478: &{\Lambda_{_{0,3}}^*\over A}\;,
479: \end{array}\right)
480: \label{eq21}
481: \end{eqnarray}
482: where
483: \begin{eqnarray}
484: &&A=\sqrt{|\Lambda_{_{0,1}}|^2+|\Lambda_{_{0,2}}|^2+|\Lambda_{_{0,3}}|^2}\;,
485: \nonumber\\
486: &&A_{_1}=\sqrt{|\Lambda_{_{0,1}}|^2+|\Lambda_{_{0,2}}|^2}\;,
487: \label{eq21-a}
488: \end{eqnarray}
489: giving
490: \begin{eqnarray}
491: &&V^\dagger{M}_{_\nu}V={1\over4}c_{_\beta}^2\upsilon^2
492: \Big({g_1^2e^{-i\theta_1}\over|m_{_1}|}+{g_2^2e^{-i\theta_2}\over|m_{_2}|}\Big)
493: \nonumber\\
494: &&\hspace{1.0cm}\times
495: {\rm diag}(0,\;0,\;A^2)\;.
496: \label{eq22}
497: \end{eqnarray}
498: Hence only one neutrino flavor acquires a non-vanishing mass at tree level.
499: This mass is given more explicitly by
500: \begin{eqnarray}
501: &&m_{_{\nu_3}}={1\over2\mu_{_H}^2}\Big|{g_1^2e^{-i\theta_1}\over|m_{_1}|}
502: +{g_2^2e^{-i\theta_2}\over|m_{_2}|}\Big|
503: \nonumber\\
504: &&\hspace{1.0cm}\times
505: \Big[\upsilon_{_d}^2\mu_{_H}^2
506: -\Big|\upsilon_{_0}|\epsilon_{_0}|+\sum\limits_{I=1}^3\upsilon_{_I}
507: |\epsilon_{_I}|e^{i\varphi_{_I}}\Big|^2\Big]\;.
508: \label{eq23}
509: \end{eqnarray}
510: By setting the phases zero and taking account of the approximations used, we find
511: our result coincident with that of Ref. \cite{Hempfling}.
512:
513: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
514: \begin{figure}[t]
515: \setlength{\unitlength}{1mm}
516: \begin{center}
517: \begin{picture}(0,30)(-10,-15)
518: \put(-62,-100){\special{psfile=7t.ps hscale=50 vscale=50}}
519: \end{picture}
520: \caption[]{The tree level diagrams that lead to the dimension-seven
521: operators.}
522: \label{fig2}
523: \end{center}
524: \end{figure}
525: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
526:
527: An obvious conclusion from above is that the neutrino oscillation data, which
528: indicates the existence of two distinctly different mass-difference scales, is not
529: explained in the MSSM at tree level. Therefore, a study of higher order
530: contributions to the neutrino mass Lagrangian is necessary.
531:
532: Let us first consider the corrections of dimension-seven operators to the neutrino
533: mass matrix. The tree-level Wilson coefficients of the dimension-seven operatos and
534: the Wilson coefficients of the dimension-five operators (\ref{eq17}) at one-loop
535: level belong to the same order of perturbative expansion. The dimension-seven
536: operators that give corrections to the neutrino
537: mass matrix are the following:
538: \begin{eqnarray}
539: &&\delta{\cal L}_{d=7}={1\over2}(C_{_3})_{_{J,I}}\Big(\Phi^\dagger\Phi\Big)
540: \Big(\overline{(e_{_L}^J)^c}\;\tilde{\Phi}^*\Big)
541: \Big(\tilde{\Phi}^\dagger\; e_{_L}^I\Big)
542: \nonumber\\&&\hspace{0.2cm}
543: +{1\over2}(C_{_4})_{_{J,I}}\Big(\Phi^\dagger\sigma^a\Phi\Big)
544: \Big(\overline{(e_{_L}^J)^c}\tilde{\Phi}^*\Big)
545: \Big(\tilde{\Phi}^\dagger\sigma^a e_{_L}^I\Big)
546: \nonumber\\&&\hspace{0.2cm}
547: +{1\over2}(C_{_5})_{_{J,I}}\Big(\Phi^\dagger\sigma^a\Phi\Big)
548: \Big(\overline{(e_{_L}^J)^c}\sigma^a \tilde{\Phi}^*\Big)
549: \Big(\tilde{\Phi}^\dagger e_{_L}^I\Big)
550: \nonumber\\&&\hspace{0.2cm}
551: +{1\over2}(C_{_6})_{_{J,I}}\Big(\Phi^\dagger\sigma^a\sigma^b\Phi\Big)
552: \Big(\overline{(e_{_L}^J)^c}\sigma^a \tilde{\Phi}^*\Big)
553: \Big(\tilde{\Phi}^\dagger\sigma^b e_{_L}^I\Big)
554: \nonumber\\&&\hspace{0.2cm}
555: +h.c.\;,
556: \label{eq24}
557: \end{eqnarray}
558: where the Wilson coefficients have, refering to Fig. \ref{fig2}, the expressions
559: \begin{eqnarray}
560: &&(C_{_3})_{_{J,I}}={g_1^4\over|m_{_1}|^2\mu_{_H}}s_{_\beta}c_{_\beta}^3
561: e^{-i(\theta_{_\mu}+2\theta_{_1})}
562: \nonumber\\%\nonumber\\
563: &&\hspace{1.5cm}\times
564: \Lambda_{_{0,0}}\Lambda_{_{0,I}}\Lambda_{_{0,J}}
565: \;,\nonumber\\
566: &&(C_{_4})_{_{J,I}}={g_1^2g_2^2\over|m_{_1}m_{_2}|\mu_{_H}}s_{_\beta}c_{_
567: \beta}^3
568: e^{-i(\theta_{_\mu}+\theta_{_1}+\theta_{_2})}
569: \nonumber\\%\nonumber\\
570: &&\hspace{1.5cm}\times
571: \Lambda_{_{0,0}}\Lambda_{_{0,I}}\Lambda_{_{0,J}}
572: \;,\nonumber\\
573: &&(C_{_5})_{_{J,I}}=(C_{_4})_{_{J,I}}
574: \;,\nonumber\\
575: &&(C_{_6})_{_{J,I}}={g_2^4\over|m_{_2}|^2\mu_{_H}}s_{_\beta}c_{_\beta}^3
576: e^{-i(\theta_{_\mu}+2\theta_{_2})}
577: \nonumber\\%\nonumber\\
578: &&\hspace{1.5cm}\times
579: \Lambda_{_{0,0}}\Lambda_{_{0,I}}\Lambda_{_{0,J}}\;.
580: \label{eq25}
581: \end{eqnarray}
582: After the electroweak symmetry breaking these operators yield corrections to the
583: neutrino mass matrix, which are accounted for by the following replacement in Eq.
584: (\ref{eq20}):
585: \begin{eqnarray}
586: &&\Big({g_1^2e^{-i\theta_1}\over|m_{_1}|}
587: +{g_2^2e^{-i\theta_2}\over|m_{_2}|}\Big)
588: \nonumber\\
589: &&\longrightarrow\Big({g_1^2e^{-i\theta_1}\over|m_{_1}|}
590: +{g_2^2e^{-i\theta_2}\over|m_{_2}|}\Big)\Big[1
591: -{1\over2}s_{_\beta}c_{_\beta}\Lambda_{_{0,0}}
592: \nonumber\\
593: &&\hspace{0.5cm}\times
594: {\upsilon^2\over\mu_{_H}}e^{-i\theta_{_\mu}}
595: \Big({g_1^2e^{-i\theta_1}\over|m_{_1}|}+{g_2^2e^{-i\theta_2}\over|m_{_2}|}\Big)
596: \Big]\;.
597: \label{eq26}
598: \end{eqnarray}
599: The same replacement should be done in Eq. (\ref{eq23}).
600: We realize that when the tree-level contributions of the dimension-seven operators
601: taken account, still only one neutrino flavour acquires a nonzero
602: mass.
603:
604: In Fig. \ref{fig3} and Fig. \ref{fig4} we present the one-loop diagrams that
605: contribute to the Wilson coefficients of dimension-five operator
606: after the matching procedure. In the full theory, the self-energy
607: corrections to external leg, appearing in the diagrams in Fig. \ref{fig3}, should
608: in princible include also the light-light contributions, such as
609: $e_{_L}e_{_L},\;\Phi\Phi$. However, such diagrams would not give any contribution
610: to the dimension-five operators after the matching of the full and
611: effective theory \cite{feng2}. A similar conclusion is true also for the
612: vertex correction diagrams that involve only the light degrees of freedom.
613:
614: The lengthy expressions of the ensuing Wilson coefficients are presented
615: in appendix \ref{app1}.
616:
617: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
618: \begin{figure}[t]
619: \setlength{\unitlength}{1mm}
620: \begin{center}
621: \begin{picture}(0,130)(-10,-90)
622: \put(-62,-100){\special{psfile=5o.ps hscale=50 vscale=50}}
623: \end{picture}
624: \caption[]{The one-loop diagrams that lead to the dimension-five
625: operators after the matching. The triangle, and self-energy diagrams denoted by
626: blobs are
627: presented in Figs. 5 to 8.}
628: \label{fig3}
629: \end{center}
630: \end{figure}
631: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
632: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
633: \begin{figure}[t]
634: \setlength{\unitlength}{1mm}
635: \begin{center}
636: \begin{picture}(0,30)(-10,10)
637: \put(-62,-100){\special{psfile=5box.ps hscale=50 vscale=50}}
638: \end{picture}
639: \caption[]{The box-diagrams that lead to the dimension-five
640: operators after the matching.}
641: \label{fig4}
642: \end{center}
643: \end{figure}
644: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
645: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
646: \begin{figure}[t]
647: \setlength{\unitlength}{1mm}
648: \begin{center}
649: \begin{picture}(0,130)(-10,-90)
650: \put(-62,-100){\special{psfile=5tri.ps hscale=50 vscale=50}}
651: \end{picture}
652: \caption[]{The one-loop diagrams that lead to the dimension-five
653: operators after the matching. The triangle-, and self energy-diagrams are
654: presented in Figs. 5 to 7.}
655: \label{fig5}
656: \end{center}
657: \end{figure}
658: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
659: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
660: \begin{figure}
661: \setlength{\unitlength}{1mm}
662: \begin{center}
663: \begin{picture}(0,60)(-10,-15)
664: \put(-62,-100){\special{psfile=5sg.ps hscale=50 vscale=50}}
665: \end{picture}
666: \caption[]{The gaugino self-energy diagrams that lead to the dimension-five
667: operators after the matching.}
668: \label{fig6}
669: \end{center}
670: \end{figure}
671: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
672: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
673: \begin{figure}
674: \setlength{\unitlength}{1mm}
675: \begin{center}
676: \begin{picture}(0,90)(-10,-50)
677: \put(-62,-100){\special{psfile=5shl.ps hscale=50 vscale=50}}
678: \end{picture}
679: \caption[]{The lepton higgsino self-energy diagrams that lead to the dimension-five
680: operators after the matching.}
681: \label{fig7}
682: \end{center}
683: \end{figure}
684: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
685: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
686: \begin{figure}
687: \setlength{\unitlength}{1mm}
688: \begin{center}
689: \begin{picture}(0,90)(-10,-50)
690: \put(-62,-100){\special{psfile=5shh.ps hscale=50 vscale=50}}
691: \end{picture}
692: \caption[]{The Higgs self-energy diagrams that lead to the dimension-five
693: operators after the matching.}
694: \label{fig8}
695: \end{center}
696: \end{figure}
697: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
698:
699: After the EW symmetry breaking, the neutrino
700: mass matrix with the one-loop corrections included can be written as
701: \begin{eqnarray}
702: &&{M}_{_\nu}+\delta{M}_{_\nu},
703: \label{eq27}
704: \end{eqnarray}
705: where ${M}_{_\nu}$ denotes the contribution from the tree level
706: dimension-five and dimension-seven operators and $\delta{M}_{_\nu}$ is the
707: correction
708: from the dimension-five operators at the one-loop level, given by
709: \begin{eqnarray}
710: &&\Big(\delta{M}_{_\nu}\Big)_{_{J,I}}={\upsilon^2\over2}\Big(\delta C_{_1}^{(1)}
711: +\delta C_{_2}^{(1)}+\delta C_{_1}^{(2)}
712: \nonumber\\
713: &&\hspace{2.cm}
714: +\delta C_{_2}^{(2)}\Big)_{_{J,I}}\;,
715: \label{eq28}
716: \end{eqnarray}
717: where the quantities $\delta C_{_{1,2}}^{(1,2)}$ are defined in
718: appendix \ref{app1}.
719:
720:
721: The neutrino mass matrix is diagonalized, as usual, by a unitary transformation
722: \begin{eqnarray}
723: U^\dagger\Big({M}_{_\nu}+\delta{M}_{_\nu}\Big)U
724: ={\rm diag}(m_{_{\nu_1}},\;m_{_{\nu_2}},\;m_{_{\nu_3}})\;,
725: \label{eq29}
726: \end{eqnarray}
727: where the $3\times3$ unitary matrix $U$ generally contains 3 rotation angles and
728: three physical phases ($CP$-phases), and $m_{_{\nu_i}}$ denote the real positive
729: mass eigenvalues of the
730: light Majorana neutrinos. Among the three $CP$ phases, two are so-called Majorana
731: phases associated with lepton number violating terms in the mass Lagrangian and
732: the third one is a so-called Dirac phase. One can factorize the Majorana phases by
733: defining the transformation matrix $U$ as
734: \begin{eqnarray}
735: &&U=U_{_{L}}D_{_m}\;,
736: \label{eq30}
737: \end{eqnarray}
738: where $U_{_{L}}$ is the lepton mixing matrix, a counter part of the
739: Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa mixing matrix of quarks, containing
740: the Dirac phase, and $D_{_m}$ is a diagonal matrix with two
741: Majorana phases. One can use the following parametrization:
742: \begin{eqnarray}
743: &&D_{_m}=\left(\begin{array}{ccc}e^{i\omega_{_1}}&0&0\\
744: 0&e^{i\omega_{_2}}&0\\0&0&1\end{array}\right)\;,
745: \label{eq31}
746: \end{eqnarray}
747: \begin{widetext}
748: \begin{eqnarray}
749: &&U_{_{CKM}}=\left(\begin{array}{ccc}c_{_{12}}c_{_{13}}&s_{_{12}}c_{_{13}}&
750: s_{_{13}}e^{-i\delta}\\
751: -s_{_{12}}c_{_{23}}-c_{_{12}}s_{_{23}}s_{_{13}}e^{i\delta}&
752: c_{_{12}}c_{_{23}}-s_{_{12}}s_{_{23}}s_{_{13}}e^{i\delta}&s_{_{23}}c_{_{1
753: 3}}\\
754: s_{_{12}}s_{_{23}}-c_{_{12}}c_{_{23}}s_{_{13}}e^{i\delta}&
755: -c_{_{12}}s_{_{23}}-s_{_{12}}c_{_{23}}s_{_{13}}e^{i\delta}&c_{_{23}}c_{_{13}}
756: \end{array}\right)\;,
757: \label{eq32}
758: \end{eqnarray}
759: \end{widetext}
760: with $c_{_{ij}}=\cos\theta_{_{ij}},\;s_{_{ij}}=\sin\theta_{_{ij}}$ and
761: $\theta_{_{ij}}$ denote the mixing angles.
762:
763: The rotation angles $\theta_{ij}$ and the phases $\delta$ and $\omega_i$ appearing
764: in the lepton mixing matrix $U_L$, as well as the values of neutrino masses, can be
765: expressed in terms of the parameters of the the model. In the following we will
766: study the constraints set by the atmospheric and solar neutrino oscillation data on
767: the model parameters.
768:
769: \section{Constraints from oscillation data}
770: \indent\indent
771: The neutrino oscillation data have outlined
772: the mass and mixing pattern of neutrinos. According to a global fit to the data,
773: the
774: oscillations are best explained in terms of the following set of parameters
775: \cite{Gonzalez-Garcia}
776: \begin{eqnarray}
777: &&\Delta m_{_{32}}^2=2.0\times10^{-3}\;{\rm eV}^2,\nonumber\\
778: &&\Delta m_{_{21}}^2=7.2\times10^{-5}\;{\rm eV}^2,\nonumber\\
779: &&\sin^2\theta_{_{23}}=0.5,\;\sin^2\theta_{_{12}}=0.3,\nonumber\\
780: &&\sin^2\theta_{_{13}}<0.06\;.
781: \label{eq34}
782: \end{eqnarray}
783:
784: Let us now discuss the implications of these empirical results for the parameters
785: of the $/\!\!\!\!R$MSSM.
786: Beside the parameters appearing in the MSSM, the $/\!\!\!\!R$MSSM includes
787: generally many new ones (in general complex) related to lepton number violation:
788: three bilinear ($\epsilon_{_I}$) and thirty six trilinear (nine $
789: \lambda_{_{IJK}}$, twenty seven $\lambda_{_{IJK}}^\prime$) couplings
790: in the superpotential, together with
791: the corresponding soft breaking (three $B_{_I}$) and A-terms
792: (nine $A_{_{IJK}}$, twenty seven
793: $A_{_{IJK}}^\prime$) and three additional $/\!\!\!\!R$ soft masses
794: $(m_{_{\tilde L}}^2)_{_{0I}}$. There are only six physical parameters
795: among the nine bilinear $/\!\!\!\!R$ parameters ($\epsilon_{_I},\;B_{_I}
796: ,\;(m_{_{\tilde L}}^2)_{_{0I}}$) due to the ambiguity in the choice
797: of the ($H_{_d},\;{\tilde L}$) basis. It is obvious, giving the large number of
798: parameters, the oscillation data alone would leave in the general case much free
799: space for the choice of parameters. In the following we will not consider the most
800: general situation but restrict ourselves to the case where only the bilinear
801: $/\!\!\!\!R$ couplings are present. We are particularly interested in the effects
802: of the complex phases associated with these couplings.
803:
804: Neutrino masses in the framework of $/\!\!\!\!R$MSSM are extensively discussed in
805: the literature, but the studies are usually restricted to the $CP$-conserving case
806: leaving the possible effects of $CP$ phases with less attention.
807: In the MSSM, the soft broken terms provide new sources for the $CP$
808: violation, in addition to the CKM mechanism of the Standard Model.
809: At present, the strictest constraints on the $CP$
810: phases originate from the experimental bounds on the electric dipole moments (EDM)
811: of the electron and the neutron. Nevertheless,
812: if one invokes a cancellation mechanism among different supersymmetric
813: contributions \cite{edm1} or choose the sfermions of two generations
814: heavy enough \cite{edm2}, the loop-induced EDM's yield a
815: bound only for the argument of the parameter $\mu$, implying $\mu\le
816: \pi/(5\tan\beta)$,
817: leaving the other explicit $CP$-violation phases unconstrained.
818:
819: In principle, all the parameters associated with $R$-parity violation are complex
820: in the model we are considering. For simplicity, we will now assume that all
821: parameters are real except the gaugino masses.
822: Furthermore, in order to apply the effective theory method safely,
823: we assume the new physics scale is $\mu_{_{NP}}=10\;{\rm TeV}$, in other words,
824: much higher than the electroweak scale. We choose
825: the basis $\upsilon_{_I}=0\;(I=1,\;2,\;3)$, and we set
826: \begin{eqnarray}
827: &&(m_{_{\tilde L}})_{_{IJ}}
828: ={\rm diag}(1,\;\sqrt{2},\;\sqrt{3})\times10\;{\rm TeV},\nonumber\\
829: &&(m_{_{\tilde L}})_{_{0I}}=(100,\;100,\;100)\;{\rm GeV},\nonumber\\
830: &&(m_{_{\tilde E}})_{_{IJ}}=(m_{_{\tilde U}})_{_{IJ}}
831: =(m_{_{\tilde D}})_{_{IJ}}={\rm diag}(5,\;5,\;1)\;{\rm TeV},\nonumber\\
832: &&(m_{_{\tilde Q}})_{_{IJ}}={\rm diag}(5,\;5,\;1)\;{\rm TeV},\nonumber\\
833: &&A_{_{IJ}}^u=A_{_{IJ}}^d=A_{_{IJ}}^e=0\;,
834: (I,\;J=1,\;2,\;3)
835: \;.\nonumber
836: \end{eqnarray}
837: For the bilinear couplings we use the values
838: \begin{eqnarray}
839: &&\epsilon_{_0}=5\;{\rm TeV},\;\epsilon_{_1}=0.01\;{\rm GeV},\nonumber\\
840: &&\epsilon_{_2}=0.3\;{\rm GeV},\;\epsilon_{_3}=4\;{\rm GeV},\nonumber\\
841: &&B_{_0}=100\;{\rm TeV}^2,\;B_{_1}=B_{_2}=B_{_3}=100\;{\rm GeV}^2\;.\nonumber\\
842: \end{eqnarray}
843: In order to obtain small neutrino masses, $m_{_\nu}< 0.1\;{\rm eV}$,
844: we assume the gaugino masses very large, $|m_{_1}|=|m_{_2}|=100\;{\rm TeV}$.
845: We consider the numerical values of the parameters given above to be conceivable
846: and representative for the model.
847: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
848: \begin{figure}[t]
849: \setlength{\unitlength}{1mm}
850: \begin{center}
851: \begin{picture}(0,120)(-10,-90)
852: \put(-62,-100){\special{psfile=theta1.ps hscale=50 vscale=50}}
853: \end{picture}
854: \caption[]{The neutrino mass-squared
855: differences $\Delta m_{_{32}}^2,\;\Delta m_{_{21}}^2$, and the neutrino
856: masses $m_{_{\nu_2}},\;m_{_{\nu_3}}$ versus the $CP$ phase
857: $\theta_{_1}=arg(m_{_1})$ for $\theta_{_2}=arg(m_{_2})=0$.
858: The solid lines correspond $\tan\beta=50$ and the dash lines to $\tan\beta=5$.
859: The gray bands represent the region allowed by the global fit of the solar
860: and atmospheric neutrino data at $3\sigma$ level. For the values of the
861: other parameters, see the text.}
862: \label{fig9}
863: \end{center}
864: \end{figure}
865: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
866: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
867: \begin{figure}[t]
868: \setlength{\unitlength}{1mm}
869: \begin{center}
870: \begin{picture}(0,120)(-10,-90)
871: \put(-62,-100){\special{psfile=theta2.ps hscale=50 vscale=50}}
872: \end{picture}
873: \caption[]{The neutrino mass-squared
874: differences $\Delta m_{_{32}}^2,\;\Delta m_{_{21}}^2$, and the neutrino
875: masses $m_{_{\nu_2}},\;m_{_{\nu_3}}$ versus the $CP$ phase
876: $\theta_{_2}=arg(m_{_2})$ for $\theta_{_1}=arg(m_{_1})=0$.
877: The solid lines correspond to $\tan\beta=50$, the dash lines $\tan\beta=5$.}
878: \label{fig10}
879: \end{center}
880: \end{figure}
881: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
882:
883: In order to demonstrate the effects of $CP$-phases on the masses of neutrinos we
884: plot in Fig.\ref{fig9}, in the case $\theta_{_2}=arg(m_{_2})=0$, the neutrino
885: mass-squared
886: differences $\Delta m_{_{32}}^2,\;\Delta m_{_{21}}^2$, and the neutrino
887: masses $m_{_{\nu_2}},\;m_{_{\nu_3}}$ versus the $CP$-phase
888: $\theta_{_1}=arg(m_{_1})$. We have considered the situation for both large
889: ($\tan\beta=50$, solid line) and small ($\tan\beta=5$, dashed line) values of the
890: ratio $\tan\beta=\upsilon_u/\upsilon_d$. In Fig.\ref{fig10} we present a similar
891: plot the same for $\theta_{_1}=arg(m_{_1})=0$ and a varying
892: $\theta_{_2}=arg(m_{_2})$. It is seen from these plots that the solar
893: and atmospheric neutrino data, which allow the $3\sigma$-range shown in gray in the
894: figures, sets non-trivial connstraints on the complex phases, in particular in the
895: case of a small $\tan\beta$.
896:
897: Let us finally note that we have found, by scanning the parameter space, that when
898: all the trilinear $/\!\!\!\!L$ couplings together with corresponding
899: soft terms are included, it is possible to realize in this model a situation, where
900: a large neutrino mass hierarchy is associated with a large mixing. In general, this
901: kind of situation is not so easy to achieve in a definite theoretical framework.
902:
903: \section{Summary\label{sec4}}
904: \indent\indent
905: There are many ways to generate neutrino masses in the Minimal Supersymmetric
906: Standard Model without R-parity. In this paper we have derived, using the effective
907: field theory approach, the high-dimension operators relevant for neutrino masses,
908: which the R-parity breaking couplings induce. Among these
909: high-dimension operators, the dimension-odd operators originating from
910: the lepton number violation couplings will lead to nonzero
911: Majorana masses after the EW symmetry breaking. By properly defining the
912: heavy fields, we have derived the Wilson coefficients of dimension-five operators
913: at one loop level and the those of dimension-seven operators at tree level. We have
914: demonstrated the effect of $CP$ phases on neutrino masses by looking at a specific
915: case, where the only complex $R$-parity violating couplings are the soft bilinear
916: gaugino mass terms.
917:
918:
919: \begin{acknowledgments}
920:
921: The work has been supported by the Academy of Finland under the contracts
922: no.\ 104915 and 107293.
923: \end{acknowledgments}
924:
925: \appendix
926: \section{The one-loop corrections on the Wilson coefficients of the dimension-five
927: operators\label{app1}}
928: \indent\indent
929: In this appendix, we present the one-loop corrections on the Wilson coefficients
930: of the dimension-five operators that are present in Eq. (\ref{eq17}). The triangle
931: diagram
932: corrections are
933: \begin{widetext}
934: \begin{eqnarray}
935: &&(\delta C_{_1}^{(1)})_{_{J,I}}={g_1^2\mu_{_H}\over2\mu_{_{\rm NP}}^2|m_{_1}|}
936: e^{-i(\theta_{_\mu}+\theta_{_1})}
937: c_{_\beta}^2\Big[\Lambda_{_{0,J}}({\bf Y}_{_{R_M}})_{_{0,I}}
938: +\Lambda_{_{0,I}}({\bf Y}_{_{R_M}})_{_{0,J}}\Big]
939: ({\cal Z}_{_R})_{_{M,i}}({\cal Z}_{_R}^\dagger)_{_{i,N}}
940: ({\bf A}_{_{S_N}})_{_{0,\alpha}}
941: \nonumber\\
942: &&\hspace{2.2cm}\times
943: ({\cal Z}_{_H})_{_{\alpha,1}}
944: C(x_{_{\tilde h}},x_{_{H_{\alpha}}},x_{_{R_i}})
945: \nonumber\\
946: &&\hspace{2.2cm}
947: +{g_1^4\over2|m_{_1}|}e^{-i\theta_{_1}}c_{_\beta}^2\Lambda_{_{0,I}}
948: \Lambda_{_{0,J}}\Big[s_{_\beta}^2B(x_{_{\tilde h}},x_{_{\tilde B}})
949: -s_{_\beta}c_{_\beta}\Lambda_{_{0,0}}e^{-i(\theta_{_\mu}+\theta_{_1})}
950: \sqrt{x_{_{\tilde h}}x_{_{\tilde B}}}P(x_{_{\tilde h}},x_{_{\tilde B}})\Big]
951: \nonumber\\
952: &&\hspace{2.2cm}
953: +{3g_1^2g_2^2\over2|m_{_1}|}e^{-i\theta_{_1}}c_{_\beta}^2\Lambda_{_{0,I}}
954: \Lambda_{_{0,J}}\Big[s_{_\beta}^2B(x_{_{\tilde h}},x_{_{\tilde A}})
955: -s_{_\beta}c_{_\beta}\Lambda_{_{0,0}}e^{-i(\theta_{_\mu}+\theta_{_2})}
956: \sqrt{x_{_{\tilde h}}x_{_{\tilde A}}}P(x_{_{\tilde h}},x_{_{\tilde A}})\Big]
957: \nonumber\\
958: &&\hspace{2.2cm}
959: +{g_1^4\over4|m_{_1}|}e^{-i\theta_{_1}}c_{_\beta}^2\Big[
960: 2s_{_\beta}\Lambda_{_{0,I}}\Lambda_{_{0,J}}({\cal Z}_{_H}^\dagger)_{_{1,\alpha}}
961: +\sum\limits_{i=1}^3\Big(\Lambda_{_{0,I}}\Lambda_{_{i,J}}
962: +\Lambda_{_{i,I}}\Lambda_{_{0,J}}\Big)
963: ({\cal Z}_{_H}^\dagger)_{_{i+1,\alpha}}\Big]
964: \nonumber\\
965: &&\hspace{2.2cm}\times
966: ({\cal Z}_{_H})_{_{\alpha,1}}
967: \Big[s_{_\beta}C_0(x_{_{H_{\alpha}}},x_{_{\tilde h}},x_{_{\tilde B}})
968: \nonumber\\
969: &&\hspace{2.2cm}
970: -c_{_\beta}\Lambda_{_{0,0}}\sqrt{x_{_{\tilde h}}x_{_{\tilde B}}}
971: e^{-i(\theta_{_\mu}+\theta_{_1})}C(x_{_{H_{\alpha}}},x_{_{\tilde h}},x_{_{\tilde
972: B}})\Big]
973: +{3g_1^2g_2^2\over4|m_{_1}|}e^{-i\theta_{_1}}c_{_\beta}^2\Big[
974: 2s_{_\beta}\Lambda_{_{0,I}}\Lambda_{_{0,J}}({\cal Z}_{_H}^\dagger)_{_{1,\alpha}}
975: \nonumber\\
976: &&\hspace{2.2cm}
977: +\sum\limits_{i=1}^3\Big(\Lambda_{_{0,I}}\Lambda_{_{i,J}}
978: +\Lambda_{_{i,I}}\Lambda_{_{0,J}}\Big)
979: ({\cal Z}_{_H}^\dagger)_{_{i+1,\alpha}}\Big]
980: ({\cal Z}_{_H})_{_{\alpha,1}}
981: \Big[s_{_\beta}C_0(x_{_{H_{\alpha}}},x_{_{\tilde h}},x_{_{\tilde A}})
982: \nonumber\\
983: &&\hspace{2.2cm}
984: -c_{_\beta}\Lambda_{_{0,0}}\sqrt{x_{_{\tilde h}}x_{_{\tilde A}}}
985: e^{-i(\theta_{_\mu}+\theta_{_2})}C(x_{_{H_{\alpha}}},x_{_{\tilde h}}
986: ,x_{_{\tilde A}})\Big]
987: \nonumber\\
988: &&\hspace{2.2cm}
989: +{g_1^2\over |m_{_1}|}e^{-i\theta_{_1}}c_{_\beta}^2\Big[\Lambda_{_{0,I}}
990: ({\bf Y}_{_{L_M}}^\dagger)_{_0}({\bf Y}_{_{R_N}})_{_{0,J}}
991: +\Lambda_{_{0,J}}({\bf Y}_{_{L_M}}^\dagger)_{_0}({\bf Y}_{_{R_N}})_{_{0,I}}\Big]
992: ({\cal Z}_{_R}^\dagger)_{_{M,i}}({\cal Z}_{_R})_{_{i,N}}
993: \nonumber\\
994: &&\hspace{2.2cm}\times
995: B(x_{_{\tilde h}},x_{_{R_i}})
996: \nonumber\\
997: &&\hspace{2.2cm}
998: +{g_1^2\over |m_{_1}|}e^{-i\theta_{_1}}c_{_\beta}^2\Big[\Lambda_{_{0,I}}
999: \sum\limits_{j=1}^3({\bf Y}_{_{L_M}}^\dagger)_{_j}({\bf Y}_{_{R_N}})_{_{j,J}}
1000: +\Lambda_{_{0,J}}\sum\limits_{j=1}^3({\bf Y}_{_{L_M}}^\dagger)_{_j}
1001: ({\bf Y}_{_{R_N}})_{_{j,I}}\Big]({\cal Z}_{_R}^\dagger)_{_{M,i}}
1002: \nonumber\\
1003: &&\hspace{2.2cm}\times
1004: ({\cal Z}_{_R})_{_{i,N}}A(x_{_{R_i}})
1005: \nonumber\\
1006: &&\hspace{2.2cm}
1007: +{g_1^2\over3|m_{_1}|}e^{-i\theta_{_1}}c_{_\beta}^2\Big[\Lambda_{_{0,I}}
1008: ({\bf Y}_{_{D_M}}{\bf Y}_{_{S_N}})_{_{0,J}}
1009: +\Lambda_{_{0,J}}({\bf Y}_{_{D_M}}{\bf Y}_{_{S_N}})_{_{0,I}}\Big]
1010: ({\cal Z}_{_D}^\dagger)_{_{M,i}}
1011: \nonumber\\
1012: &&\hspace{2.2cm}\times
1013: ({\cal Z}_{_D})_{_{i,N}}A(x_{_{D_i}})
1014: \nonumber\\
1015: &&\hspace{2.2cm}
1016: +{g_1^2\over6|m_{_1}|}e^{-i\theta_{_1}}c_{_\beta}^2\Big[
1017: \Lambda_{_{0,I}}({\bf Y}_{_{D_K}}^\dagger)_{_{0,M}}({\bf Y}_{_{S_K}})_{_{N,J}}
1018: +\Lambda_{_{0,J}}({\bf Y}_{_{D_K}}^\dagger)_{_{0,M}}({\bf Y}_{_{S_K}})_{_{N,I}}
1019: \Big]({\cal Z}_{_Q}^\dagger)_{_{M,i}}
1020: \nonumber\\
1021: &&\hspace{2.2cm}\times
1022: ({\cal Z}_{_Q})_{_{i,N}}A(x_{_{Q_i}})
1023: \;,\nonumber\\
1024: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1025: &&(\delta C_{_2}^{(1)})_{_{J,I}}={g_2^2\mu_{_H}\over2\mu_{_{\rm NP}}^2|m_{_2}|}
1026: e^{-i(\theta_{_\mu}+\theta_{_2})}
1027: c_{_\beta}^2\Big[\Lambda_{_{0,J}}({\bf Y}_{_{R_M}})_{_{0,I}}
1028: +\Lambda_{_{0,I}}({\bf Y}_{_{R_M}})_{_{0,J}}\Big]
1029: ({\cal Z}_{_R})_{_{M,i}}({\cal Z}_{_R}^\dagger)_{_{i,N}}
1030: ({\bf A}_{_{S_N}})_{_{0,\alpha}}
1031: \nonumber\\
1032: &&\hspace{2.2cm}\times
1033: ({\cal Z}_{_H})_{_{\alpha,1}}
1034: C(x_{_{\tilde h}},x_{_{H_{\alpha}}},x_{_{R_i}})
1035: \nonumber\\
1036: &&\hspace{2.2cm}
1037: +{g_2^4\over2|m_{_2}|}e^{-i\theta_{_2}}c_{_\beta}^2\Lambda_{_{0,I}}
1038: \Lambda_{_{0,J}}\Big[s_{_\beta}^2B(x_{_{\tilde h}},x_{_{\tilde A}})
1039: -s_{_\beta}c_{_\beta}\Lambda_{_{0,0}}e^{-i(\theta_{_\mu}+\theta_{_2})}
1040: \sqrt{x_{_{\tilde h}}x_{_{\tilde A}}}P(x_{_{\tilde h}},x_{_{\tilde A}})\Big]
1041: \nonumber\\
1042: &&\hspace{2.2cm}
1043: +{g_1^2g_2^2\over2|m_{_2}|}e^{-i\theta_{_2}}c_{_\beta}^2\Lambda_{_{0,I}}
1044: \Lambda_{_{0,J}}\Big[s_{_\beta}^2B(x_{_{\tilde h}},x_{_{\tilde B}})
1045: -s_{_\beta}c_{_\beta}\Lambda_{_{0,0}}e^{-i(\theta_{_\mu}+\theta_{_1})}
1046: \sqrt{x_{_{\tilde h}}x_{_{\tilde B}}}P(x_{_{\tilde h}},x_{_{\tilde B}})\Big]
1047: \nonumber\\
1048: &&\hspace{2.2cm}
1049: +{g_2^4\over4|m_{_2}|}e^{-i\theta_{_2}}c_{_\beta}^2\Big[
1050: 2s_{_\beta}\Lambda_{_{0,I}}\Lambda_{_{0,J}}({\cal Z}_{_H}^\dagger)_{_{1,\alpha}}
1051: +\sum\limits_{i=1}^3\Big(\Lambda_{_{0,I}}\Lambda_{_{i,J}}
1052: +\Lambda_{_{i,I}}\Lambda_{_{0,J}}\Big)
1053: ({\cal Z}_{_H}^\dagger)_{_{i+1,\alpha}}\Big]
1054: \nonumber\\
1055: &&\hspace{2.2cm}\times
1056: ({\cal Z}_{_H})_{_{\alpha,1}}
1057: \Big[s_{_\beta}C_0(x_{_{H_{\alpha}}},x_{_{\tilde h}},x_{_{\tilde A}})
1058: -c_{_\beta}\Lambda_{_{0,0}}\sqrt{x_{_{\tilde h}}x_{_{\tilde A}}}
1059: e^{-i(\theta_{_\mu}+\theta_{_2})}C(x_{_{H_{\alpha}}},x_{_{\tilde h}},x_{_{\tilde
1060: A}})\Big]
1061: \nonumber\\
1062: &&\hspace{2.2cm}
1063: +{g_1^2g_2^2\over4|m_{_2}|}e^{-i\theta_{_2}}c_{_\beta}^2\Big[
1064: 2s_{_\beta}\Lambda_{_{0,I}}\Lambda_{_{0,J}}({\cal Z}_{_H}^\dagger)_{_{1,\alpha}}
1065: +\sum\limits_{i=1}^3\Big(\Lambda_{_{0,I}}\Lambda_{_{i,J}}
1066: +\Lambda_{_{i,I}}\Lambda_{_{0,J}}\Big)
1067: ({\cal Z}_{_H}^\dagger)_{_{i+1,\alpha}}\Big]
1068: \nonumber\\
1069: &&\hspace{2.2cm}\times
1070: ({\cal Z}_{_H})_{_{\alpha,1}}
1071: \Big[s_{_\beta}C_0(x_{_{H_{\alpha}}},x_{_{\tilde h}},x_{_{\tilde B}})
1072: -c_{_\beta}\Lambda_{_{0,0}}\sqrt{x_{_{\tilde h}}x_{_{\tilde B}}}
1073: e^{-i(\theta_{_\mu}+\theta_{_1})}C(x_{_{H_{\alpha}}},x_{_{\tilde h}}
1074: ,x_{_{\tilde B}})\Big]
1075: \nonumber\\
1076: &&\hspace{2.2cm}
1077: +{g_2^2\over2|m_{_2}|}e^{-i\theta_{_2}}c_{_\beta}^2\Big[
1078: \Lambda_{_{0,I}}({\bf Y}_{_{D_K}}^\dagger)_{_{0,M}}({\bf Y}_{_{S_K}})_{_{N,J}}
1079: +\Lambda_{_{0,J}}({\bf Y}_{_{D_K}}^\dagger)_{_{0,M}}({\bf Y}_{_{S_K}})_{_{N,I}}
1080: \Big]({\cal Z}_{_Q}^\dagger)_{_{M,i}}
1081: \nonumber\\
1082: &&\hspace{2.2cm}\times
1083: ({\cal Z}_{_Q})_{_{i,N}}A(x_{_{Q_i}})
1084: \label{aeq1}
1085: \end{eqnarray}
1086: with $x_{_i}=m_{_i}^2/\mu_{_{NP}}^2$.
1087:
1088: The corrections from the self-energy diagrams
1089: \begin{eqnarray}
1090: &&(\delta C_{_1}^{(2)})_{_{J,I}}=-{g_1^4\mu_{_H}\over4|m_{_1}|^2}
1091: e^{-i(\theta_{_\mu}+2\theta_{_1})}s_{_\beta}c_{_\beta}^3\Lambda_{_{0,0}}
1092: \Lambda_{_{0,I}}\Lambda_{_{0,J}}A(x_{_{\tilde h}})
1093: \nonumber\\
1094: &&\hspace{2.2cm}
1095: -{g_1^4\mu_{_H}\over4|m_{_1}|^2}e^{-i(\theta_{_\mu}+2\theta_{_1})}c_{_\beta}^3
1096: \Big(s_{_\beta}\Lambda_{_{0,0}}({\cal Z}_{_H}^\dagger)_{_{1,\alpha}}
1097: +\sum\limits_{i=1}^3\Lambda_{_{i,0}}({\cal Z}_{_H}^\dagger)_{_{i,\alpha}}\Big)
1098: ({\cal Z}_{_H})_{_{\alpha,1}}\Lambda_{_{0,I}}\Lambda_{_{0,J}}
1099: B(x_{_{\tilde h}},x_{_{H_{\alpha}}})
1100: \nonumber\\
1101: &&\hspace{2.2cm}
1102: -{g_1^4\over4\mu_{_H}}e^{-i(\theta_{_\mu}+2\theta_{_1})}
1103: c_{_\beta}^3\Lambda_{_{0,0}}
1104: \Big\{2s_{_\beta}\Lambda_{_{0,I}}\Lambda_{_{0,J}}A(x_{_{\tilde B}})
1105: +\Big[2s_{_\beta}\Lambda_{_{0,I}}\Lambda_{_{0,J}}({\cal
1106: Z}_{_H}^\dagger)_{_{1,\alpha}}
1107: +\sum\limits_{i=1}^3\Big(\Lambda_{_{0,I}}\Lambda_{_{i,J}}
1108: \nonumber\\
1109: &&\hspace{2.2cm}
1110: +\Lambda_{_{i,I}}\Lambda_{_{0,J}}\Big)({\cal Z}_{_H}^\dagger)_{_{i,\alpha}}
1111: \Big]({\cal Z}_{_H})_{_{\alpha,1}}B(x_{_{\tilde B}},x_{_{\tilde h}})\Big\}
1112: \nonumber\\
1113: &&\hspace{2.2cm}
1114: -{3g_1^2g_2^2|m_{_2}|\over4\mu_{_H}|m_{_1}|}e^{-i(\theta_{_\mu}+\theta_{_
1115: 1}+\theta_{_2})}
1116: c_{_\beta}^3\Lambda_{_{0,0}}
1117: \Big\{2s_{_\beta}\Lambda_{_{0,I}}\Lambda_{_{0,J}}A(x_{_{\tilde A}})
1118: +\Big[2s_{_\beta}\Lambda_{_{0,I}}\Lambda_{_{0,J}}({\cal
1119: Z}_{_H}^\dagger)_{_{1,\alpha}}
1120: \nonumber\\
1121: &&\hspace{2.2cm}
1122: +\sum\limits_{i=1}^3\Big(\Lambda_{_{i,I}}\Lambda_{_{0,J}}
1123: +\Lambda_{_{0,I}}\Lambda_{_{i,J}}\Big)({\cal Z}_{_H}^\dagger)_{_{i,\alpha}}\Big]
1124: ({\cal Z}_{_H})_{_{\alpha,1}}B(x_{_{\tilde A}},x_{_{\tilde h}})\Big\}
1125: \nonumber\\
1126: &&\hspace{2.2cm}
1127: +{3g_1^2g_2^2\over2|m_{_1}|m_{_{H_\alpha}}^2}e^{-i\theta_{_1}}c_{_\beta}
1128: \Big[2s_{_\beta}\Lambda_{_{0,J}}\Lambda_{_{0,I}}({\cal
1129: Z}_{_H}^\dagger)_{_{1,\alpha}}
1130: +\sum\limits_{i=1}^3\Big(\Lambda_{_{0,I}}\Lambda_{_{i,J}}
1131: +\Lambda_{_{i,I}}\Lambda_{_{0,J}}\Big)({\cal Z}_{_H}^\dagger)_{_{i+1,\alpha}}
1132: \Big]
1133: \nonumber\\
1134: &&\hspace{2.2cm}\times
1135: \Big\{\Big[s_{_\beta}c_{_\beta}\Big(1-|\Lambda_{_{0,0}}|^2\Big)
1136: ({\cal Z}_{_H})_{_{\alpha,1}}
1137: -c_{_\beta}\Lambda_{_{0,0}}\sum\limits_{i=1}^3
1138: \Lambda_{_{\alpha,0}}^*({\cal Z}_{_H})_{_{\alpha,i+1}}\Big]
1139: B_0(x_{_{\tilde h}},x_{_{\tilde A}})
1140: \nonumber\\
1141: &&\hspace{2.2cm}
1142: -c_{_\beta}^2\mu_{_H}|m_{_2}|e^{-i(\theta_{_\mu}+\theta_{_2})}\Lambda_{_{0,0}}
1143: ({\cal Z}_{_H})_{_{\alpha,1}}B(x_{_{\tilde h}},x_{_{\tilde A}})
1144: -s_{_\beta}\mu_{_H}|m_{_2}|e^{i(\theta_{_\mu}+\theta_{_2})}
1145: \Big[s_{_\beta}\Lambda_{_{0,0}}^*({\cal Z}_{_H})_{_{\alpha,1}}
1146: \nonumber\\
1147: &&\hspace{2.2cm}
1148: +\sum\limits_{i=1}^3\Lambda_{_{i,0}}^*({\cal Z}_{_H})_{_{\alpha,i+1}}\Big]
1149: B(x_{_{\tilde h}},x_{_{\tilde A}})\Big\}
1150: \nonumber\\
1151: &&\hspace{2.2cm}
1152: +{3g_1^2g_2^2\over2|m_{_1}|m_{_{H_\alpha}}^2}e^{-i\theta_{_1}}c_{_\beta}^2
1153: \Big[2s_{_\beta}\Lambda_{_{0,J}}\Lambda_{_{0,I}}({\cal
1154: Z}_{_H}^\dagger)_{_{1,\alpha}}
1155: +\sum\limits_{i=1}^3\Big(\Lambda_{_{0,I}}\Lambda_{_{i,J}}+\Lambda_{_{i,I}}
1156: \Lambda_{_{0,J}}\Big)({\cal Z}_{_H}^\dagger)_{_{i+1,\alpha}}\Big]
1157: \nonumber\\
1158: &&\hspace{2.2cm}\times
1159: \sum\limits_{j=1}^3\Lambda_{_{0,j}}\Big[s_{_\beta}\Lambda_{_{0,j}}^*
1160: ({\cal Z}_{_H})_{_{\alpha,1}}+\sum\limits_{i=1}^3
1161: \Lambda_{_{i,j}}^*({\cal Z}_{_H})_{_{\alpha,i}}\Big]
1162: A_0(x_{_{\tilde A}})
1163: \nonumber\\
1164: &&\hspace{2.2cm}
1165: +{g_1^4\over2|m_{_1}|m_{_{H_\alpha}}^2}e^{-i\theta_{_1}}c_{_\beta}
1166: \Big[2s_{_\beta}\Lambda_{_{0,J}}\Lambda_{_{0,I}}({\cal
1167: Z}_{_H}^\dagger)_{_{1,\alpha}}
1168: +\sum\limits_{i=1}^3\Big(\Lambda_{_{0,I}}\Lambda_{_{i,J}}
1169: +\Lambda_{_{i,I}}\Lambda_{_{0,J}}\Big)({\cal Z}_{_H}^\dagger)_{_{i+1,\alpha}}
1170: \Big]
1171: \nonumber\\
1172: &&\hspace{2.2cm}\times
1173: \Big\{\Big[s_{_\beta}c_{_\beta}\Big(1-|\Lambda_{_{0,0}}|^2\Big)
1174: ({\cal Z}_{_H})_{_{\alpha,1}}
1175: -c_{_\beta}\Lambda_{_{0,0}}\sum\limits_{i=1}^3
1176: \Lambda_{_{\alpha,0}}^*({\cal Z}_{_H})_{_{\alpha,i+1}}\Big]
1177: B_0(x_{_{\tilde h}},x_{_{\tilde B}})
1178: \nonumber\\
1179: &&\hspace{2.2cm}
1180: -c_{_\beta}^2\mu_{_H}|m_{_1}|e^{-i(\theta_{_\mu}+\theta_{_1})}\Lambda_{_{0,0}}
1181: ({\cal Z}_{_H})_{_{\alpha,1}}B(x_{_{\tilde h}},x_{_{\tilde B}})
1182: -s_{_\beta}\mu_{_H}|m_{_1}|e^{i(\theta_{_\mu}+\theta_{_1})}
1183: \Big[s_{_\beta}\Lambda_{_{0,0}}^*({\cal Z}_{_H})_{_{\alpha,1}}
1184: \nonumber\\
1185: &&\hspace{2.2cm}
1186: +\sum\limits_{i=1}^3\Lambda_{_{i,0}}^*({\cal Z}_{_H})_{_{\alpha,i+1}}\Big]
1187: B(x_{_{\tilde h}},x_{_{\tilde B}})\Big\}
1188: \nonumber\\
1189: &&\hspace{2.2cm}
1190: +{g_1^4\over2|m_{_1}|m_{_{H_\alpha}}^2}e^{-i\theta_{_1}}c_{_\beta}^2
1191: \Big[2s_{_\beta}\Lambda_{_{0,J}}\Lambda_{_{0,I}}({\cal
1192: Z}_{_H}^\dagger)_{_{1,\alpha}}
1193: +\sum\limits_{i=1}^3\Big(\Lambda_{_{0,I}}\Lambda_{_{i,J}}+\Lambda_{_{i,I}}
1194: \Lambda_{_{0,J}}\Big)({\cal Z}_{_H}^\dagger)_{_{i+1,\alpha}}\Big]
1195: \nonumber\\
1196: &&\hspace{2.2cm}\times
1197: \sum\limits_{j=1}^3\Lambda_{_{0,j}}\Big[s_{_\beta}\Lambda_{_{0,j}}^*
1198: ({\cal Z}_{_H})_{_{\alpha,1}}+\sum\limits_{i=1}^3
1199: \Lambda_{_{i,j}}^*({\cal Z}_{_H})_{_{\alpha,i}}\Big]
1200: A_0(x_{_{\tilde B}})
1201: \;,\nonumber\\
1202: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1203: &&(\delta C_{_2}^{(2)})_{_{J,I}}=-{g_2^4\mu_{_H}\over4|m_{_2}|^2}
1204: e^{-i(\theta_{_\mu}+2\theta_{_2})}s_{_\beta}c_{_\beta}^3\Lambda_{_{0,0}}
1205: \Lambda_{_{0,I}}\Lambda_{_{0,J}}A(x_{_{\tilde h}})
1206: -{g_2^4\mu_{_H}\over4|m_{_2}|^2}e^{-i(\theta_{_\mu}+2\theta_{_2})}c_{_\beta}^3
1207: \nonumber\\
1208: &&\hspace{2.2cm}\times
1209: \Big(s_{_\beta}\Lambda_{_{0,0}}({\cal Z}_{_H}^\dagger)_{_{1,\alpha}}
1210: +\sum\limits_{i=1}^3\Lambda_{_{i,0}}({\cal Z}_{_H}^\dagger)_{_{i,\alpha}}
1211: \Big)({\cal Z}_{_H})_{_{\alpha,1}}\Lambda_{_{0,I}}\Lambda_{_{0,J}}
1212: B(x_{_{\tilde h}},x_{_{H_{\alpha}}})
1213: \nonumber\\
1214: &&\hspace{2.2cm}
1215: -{3g_2^4\over4\mu_{_H}}e^{-i(\theta_{_\mu}+2\theta_{_2})}
1216: c_{_\beta}^3\Lambda_{_{0,0}}
1217: \Big\{2s_{_\beta}\Lambda_{_{0,I}}\Lambda_{_{0,J}}A(x_{_{\tilde A}})
1218: +\Big[2s_{_\beta}\Lambda_{_{0,I}}\Lambda_{_{0,J}}({\cal
1219: Z}_{_H}^\dagger)_{_{1,\alpha}}
1220: +\sum\limits_{i=1}^3\Big(\Lambda_{_{0,I}}\Lambda_{_{i,J}}
1221: \nonumber\\
1222: &&\hspace{2.2cm}
1223: +\Lambda_{_{i,I}}\Lambda_{_{0,J}}\Big)({\cal Z}_{_H}^\dagger)_{_{i,\alpha}}
1224: \Big]({\cal Z}_{_H})_{_{\alpha,1}}B(x_{_{\tilde A}},x_{_{\tilde h}})\Big\}
1225: -{g_1^2g_2^2|m_{_1}|\over4\mu_{_H}|m_{_2}|}e^{-i(\theta_{_\mu}+\theta_{_1
1226: }+\theta_{_2})}
1227: c_{_\beta}^3\Lambda_{_{0,0}}
1228: \nonumber\\
1229: &&\hspace{2.2cm}\times
1230: \Big\{2s_{_\beta}\Lambda_{_{0,I}}\Lambda_{_{0,J}}A(x_{_{\tilde B}})
1231: +\Big[2s_{_\beta}\Lambda_{_{0,I}}\Lambda_{_{0,J}}({\cal
1232: Z}_{_H}^\dagger)_{_{1,\alpha}}
1233: +\sum\limits_{i=1}^3\Big(\Lambda_{_{i,I}}\Lambda_{_{0,J}}
1234: +\Lambda_{_{0,I}}\Lambda_{_{i,J}}\Big)({\cal Z}_{_H}^\dagger)_{_{i,\alpha}}\Big]
1235: \nonumber\\
1236: &&\hspace{2.2cm}\times
1237: ({\cal Z}_{_H})_{_{\alpha,1}}B(x_{_{\tilde B}},x_{_{\tilde h}})\Big\}
1238: \nonumber\\
1239: &&\hspace{2.2cm}
1240: +{3g_2^4\over2|m_{_2}|m_{_{H_\alpha}}^2}e^{-i\theta_{_2}}c_{_\beta}
1241: \Big[2s_{_\beta}\Lambda_{_{0,J}}\Lambda_{_{0,I}}({\cal
1242: Z}_{_H}^\dagger)_{_{1,\alpha}}
1243: +\sum\limits_{i=1}^3\Big(\Lambda_{_{0,I}}\Lambda_{_{i,J}}
1244: +\Lambda_{_{i,I}}\Lambda_{_{0,J}}\Big)({\cal Z}_{_H}^\dagger)_{_{i+1,\alpha}}
1245: \Big]
1246: \nonumber\\
1247: &&\hspace{2.2cm}\times
1248: \Big\{\Big[s_{_\beta}c_{_\beta}\Big(1-|\Lambda_{_{0,0}}|^2\Big)
1249: ({\cal Z}_{_H})_{_{\alpha,1}}
1250: -c_{_\beta}\Lambda_{_{0,0}}\sum\limits_{i=1}^3
1251: \Lambda_{_{\alpha,0}}^*({\cal Z}_{_H})_{_{\alpha,i+1}}\Big]
1252: B_0(x_{_{\tilde h}},x_{_{\tilde A}})
1253: \nonumber\\
1254: &&\hspace{2.2cm}
1255: -c_{_\beta}^2\mu_{_H}|m_{_2}|e^{-i(\theta_{_\mu}+\theta_{_2})}\Lambda_{_{0,0}}
1256: ({\cal Z}_{_H})_{_{\alpha,1}}B(x_{_{\tilde h}},x_{_{\tilde A}})
1257: -s_{_\beta}\mu_{_H}|m_{_2}|e^{i(\theta_{_\mu}+\theta_{_2})}
1258: \Big[s_{_\beta}\Lambda_{_{0,0}}^*({\cal Z}_{_H})_{_{\alpha,1}}
1259: \nonumber\\
1260: &&\hspace{2.2cm}
1261: +\sum\limits_{i=1}^3\Lambda_{_{i,0}}^*({\cal Z}_{_H})_{_{\alpha,i+1}}\Big]
1262: B(x_{_{\tilde h}},x_{_{\tilde A}})\Big\}
1263: \nonumber\\
1264: &&\hspace{2.2cm}
1265: +{3g_2^4\over2|m_{_2}|m_{_{H_\alpha}}^2}e^{-i\theta_{_2}}c_{_\beta}^2
1266: \Big[2s_{_\beta}\Lambda_{_{0,J}}\Lambda_{_{0,I}}({\cal
1267: Z}_{_H}^\dagger)_{_{1,\alpha}}
1268: +\sum\limits_{i=1}^3\Big(\Lambda_{_{0,I}}\Lambda_{_{i,J}}+\Lambda_{_{i,I}}
1269: \Lambda_{_{0,J}}\Big)({\cal Z}_{_H}^\dagger)_{_{i+1,\alpha}}\Big]
1270: \nonumber\\
1271: &&\hspace{2.2cm}\times
1272: \sum\limits_{j=1}^3\Lambda_{_{0,j}}\Big[s_{_\beta}\Lambda_{_{0,j}}^*
1273: ({\cal Z}_{_H})_{_{\alpha,1}}+\sum\limits_{i=1}^3
1274: \Lambda_{_{i,j}}^*({\cal Z}_{_H})_{_{\alpha,i}}\Big]
1275: A_0(x_{_{\tilde A}})
1276: \nonumber\\
1277: &&\hspace{2.2cm}
1278: +{g_1^2g_2^2\over2|m_{_2}|m_{_{H_\alpha}}^2}e^{-i\theta_{_2}}c_{_\beta}
1279: \Big[2s_{_\beta}\Lambda_{_{0,J}}\Lambda_{_{0,I}}({\cal
1280: Z}_{_H}^\dagger)_{_{1,\alpha}}
1281: +\sum\limits_{i=1}^3\Big(\Lambda_{_{0,I}}\Lambda_{_{i,J}}
1282: +\Lambda_{_{i,I}}\Lambda_{_{0,J}}\Big)({\cal Z}_{_H}^\dagger)_{_{i+1,\alpha}}
1283: \Big]
1284: \nonumber\\
1285: &&\hspace{2.2cm}\times
1286: \Big\{\Big[s_{_\beta}c_{_\beta}\Big(1-|\Lambda_{_{0,0}}|^2\Big)
1287: ({\cal Z}_{_H})_{_{\alpha,1}}
1288: -c_{_\beta}\Lambda_{_{0,0}}\sum\limits_{i=1}^3
1289: \Lambda_{_{\alpha,0}}^*({\cal Z}_{_H})_{_{\alpha,i+1}}\Big]
1290: B_0(x_{_{\tilde h}},x_{_{\tilde B}})
1291: \nonumber\\
1292: &&\hspace{2.2cm}
1293: -c_{_\beta}^2\mu_{_H}|m_{_1}|e^{-i(\theta_{_\mu}+\theta_{_1})}\Lambda_{_{0,0}}
1294: ({\cal Z}_{_H})_{_{\alpha,1}}B(x_{_{\tilde h}},x_{_{\tilde B}})
1295: -s_{_\beta}\mu_{_H}|m_{_1}|e^{i(\theta_{_\mu}+\theta_{_1})}
1296: \Big[s_{_\beta}\Lambda_{_{0,0}}^*({\cal Z}_{_H})_{_{\alpha,1}}
1297: \nonumber\\
1298: &&\hspace{2.2cm}
1299: +\sum\limits_{i=1}^3\Lambda_{_{i,0}}^*({\cal Z}_{_H})_{_{\alpha,i+1}}\Big]
1300: B(x_{_{\tilde h}},x_{_{\tilde B}})\Big\}
1301: \nonumber\\
1302: &&\hspace{2.2cm}
1303: +{g_1^2g_2^2\over2|m_{_2}|m_{_{H_\alpha}}^2}e^{-i\theta_{_2}}c_{_\beta}^2
1304: \Big[2s_{_\beta}\Lambda_{_{0,J}}\Lambda_{_{0,I}}({\cal
1305: Z}_{_H}^\dagger)_{_{1,\alpha}}
1306: +\sum\limits_{i=1}^3\Big(\Lambda_{_{0,I}}\Lambda_{_{i,J}}+\Lambda_{_{i,I}}
1307: \Lambda_{_{0,J}}\Big)({\cal Z}_{_H}^\dagger)_{_{i+1,\alpha}}\Big]
1308: \nonumber\\
1309: &&\hspace{2.2cm}\times
1310: \sum\limits_{j=1}^3\Lambda_{_{0,j}}\Big[s_{_\beta}\Lambda_{_{0,j}}^*
1311: ({\cal Z}_{_H})_{_{\alpha,1}}+\sum\limits_{i=1}^3
1312: \Lambda_{_{i,j}}^*({\cal Z}_{_H})_{_{\alpha,i}}\Big]
1313: A_0(x_{_{\tilde B}})
1314: \;,\nonumber\\
1315: \label{aeq2}
1316: \end{eqnarray}
1317: where $x_{_i}=m_{_i}^2/\mu_{_{\rm NP}}^2$, and the nonzero Yukawa couplings are
1318: \begin{eqnarray}
1319: &&({\bf Y}_{_{R_K}})_{_{0,1}}=h^e_{_{1,K}}{\mu_{_{H_1}}\over\mu_{_H}}
1320: +{\Big(h^e_{_{2,K}}|\epsilon_{_1}|e^{i\varphi_{_1}}-2\lambda_{_{12K}}|\epsilon_{_0}|\Big)
1321: |\epsilon_{_2}|e^{-i\varphi_{_2}}\over\mu_{_H}\mu_{_{H_1}}}
1322: \nonumber\\
1323: &&\hspace{2.2cm}
1324: +{\Big(h^e_{_{3,K}}|\epsilon_{_1}|e^{i\varphi_{_1}}-2\lambda_{_{13K}}|\epsilon_{_0}|\Big)
1325: |\epsilon_{_3}|e^{-i\varphi_{_3}}\over\mu_{_H}\mu_{_{H_1}}}
1326: \;,\nonumber\\
1327: &&({\bf Y}_{_{R_K}})_{_{0,2}}={\mu_{_{H_2}}\Big(h^e_{_{2,K}}|\epsilon_{_0}|
1328: -2\lambda_{_{21K}}|\epsilon_{_1}|e^{-i\varphi_{_1}}\Big)\over\mu_{_{H_1}}\mu_{_H}}
1329: +{|\epsilon_{_2}\epsilon_{_3}|e^{i(\varphi_{_2}-\varphi_{_3})}\Big(h^e_{_
1330: {3,K}}|\epsilon_{_0}|
1331: +2\lambda_{_{13K}}|\epsilon_{_1}|e^{-i\varphi_{_1}}\Big)
1332: \over\mu_{_{H_1}}\mu_{_{H_2}}\mu_{_H}}
1333: \nonumber\\
1334: &&\hspace{2.2cm}
1335: -2\lambda_{_{23K}}{\mu_{_{H_1}}|\epsilon_{_3}|\over\mu_{_{H_2}}\mu_{_H}}
1336: e^{-i\varphi_{_3}}
1337: \;,\nonumber\\
1338: &&({\bf Y}_{_{R_K}})_{_{0,3}}={1\over\mu_{_{H_2}}}\Big\{h^e_{_{3,K}}
1339: |\epsilon_{_0}|-2\Big(\lambda_{_{31K}}|\epsilon_{_1}|e^{-i\varphi_{_1}}
1340: +\lambda_{_{32K}}|\epsilon_{_2}|e^{-i\varphi_{_2}}\Big)\Big\}
1341: \;,\nonumber\\
1342: &&({\bf Y}_{_{R_K}})_{_{1,2}}={h^e_{_{1,K}}|\epsilon_{_2}|e^{i\varphi_{_2}}
1343: -h^e_{_{2,K}}|\epsilon_{_1}|e^{i\varphi_{_1}}\over\mu_{_{H_2}}}
1344: +2\lambda_{_{12K}}{|\epsilon_{_0}|\over\mu_{_{H_2}}}
1345: \;,\nonumber\\
1346: &&({\bf Y}_{_{R_K}})_{_{1,3}}=h^e_{_{1,K}}{\mu_{_{H_1}}|\epsilon_{_3}|
1347: \over\mu_{_{H_2}}\mu_{_H}}e^{i\varphi_{_3}}
1348: +{|\epsilon_{_2}\epsilon_{_3}|e^{i(\varphi_{_3}-\varphi_{_2})}
1349: \Big(h^e_{_{2,K}}|\epsilon_{_1}|e^{-i\varphi_{_1}}
1350: -2\lambda_{_{12K}}|\epsilon_{_0}|\Big)\over\mu_{_{H_1}}\mu_{_{H_2}}\mu_{_
1351: H}}
1352: \nonumber\\
1353: &&\hspace{2.2cm}
1354: -{\mu_{_{H_2}}\Big(h^e_{_{3,K}}|\epsilon_{_1}|e^{-i\varphi_{_1}}
1355: -2\lambda_{_{13K}}|\epsilon_{_0}|\Big)\over\mu_{_{H_1}}\mu_{_H}}
1356: \;,\nonumber\\
1357: &&({\bf Y}_{_{R_K}})_{_{2,3}}=2\lambda_{_{23K}}{\mu_{_{H_1}}\over\mu_{_H}}
1358: +{|\epsilon_{_3}|e^{i\varphi_{_3}}\Big(h^e_{_{2,K}}|\epsilon_{_0}|
1359: +2\lambda_{_{12K}}|\epsilon_{_1}|e^{-i\varphi_{_1}}\Big)\over\mu_{_{H_1}}\mu_{_H}}
1360: \nonumber\\
1361: &&\hspace{2.2cm}
1362: -{|\epsilon_{_2}|e^{i\varphi_{_2}}\Big(h^e_{_{3,K}}|\epsilon_{_0}|
1363: +2\lambda_{_{13K}}|\epsilon_{_1}|e^{-i\varphi_{_1}}\Big)\over\mu_{_{H_1}}\mu_{_H}}
1364: \;,\nonumber\\
1365: &&({\bf Y}_{_{L_K}})_{_0}=\sum\limits_{I=1}^3{\Big(\upsilon_{_0}|\epsilon_{_I}|
1366: e^{-i\varphi_{_I}}-\upsilon_{_I}|\epsilon_{_0}|\Big)h^e_{_{I,K}}\over
1367: \upsilon_{_d}\mu_{_H}}
1368: +\sum\limits_{I,J}^3{\Big(\upsilon_{_J}|\epsilon_{_I}|
1369: e^{-i\varphi_{_I}}-\upsilon_{_I}|\epsilon_{_J}|e^{-i\varphi_{_J}}\Big)\over
1370: \upsilon_{_d}\mu_{_H}}\lambda_{_{IJK}}
1371: \;,\nonumber\\
1372: &&({\bf Y}_{_{L_K}})_{_1}={|\epsilon_{_0}|
1373: {\cal H}^e_{_{1,K}}+\sum\limits_{I=1}^3\upsilon_{_I}h^e_{_{I,K}}
1374: |\epsilon_{_1}|e^{i\varphi_{_1}}\over\upsilon_{_d}\mu_{_{H_1}}}
1375: \;,\nonumber\\
1376: &&({\bf Y}_{_{L_K}})_{_2}={1\over\upsilon_{_d}\mu_{_{H_1}}\mu_{_{H_2}}}
1377: \Big\{\mu_{_{H_1}}^2{\cal H}^e_{_{2,K}}
1378: -{\cal H}^e_{_{1,K}}|\epsilon_{_1}\epsilon_{_2}|
1379: e^{i(\varphi_{_2}-\varphi_{_1})}
1380: +\sum\limits_{I=1}^3\upsilon_{_I}h^e_{_{I,K}}|\epsilon_{_0}\epsilon_{_2}|
1381: e^{i\varphi_{_2}}\Big\}
1382: \;,\nonumber\\
1383: &&({\bf Y}_{_{L_K}})_{_3}={1\over\upsilon_{_d}\mu_{_{H_2}}\mu_{_H}}
1384: \Big\{\mu_{_{H_2}}^2{\cal H}^e_{_{3,K}}-{\cal
1385: H}^e_{_{1,K}}|\epsilon_{_1}\epsilon_{_3}|
1386: e^{i(\varphi_{_3}-\varphi_{_1})}-{\cal H}^e_{_{2,K}}|\epsilon_{_2}\epsilon_{_3}|
1387: e^{i(\varphi_{_3}-\varphi_{_1})}
1388: \nonumber\\
1389: &&\hspace{2.2cm}
1390: +\sum\limits_{I=1}^3\upsilon_{_I}h^e_{_{I,K}}|\epsilon_{_0}\epsilon_{_3}|
1391: e^{i\varphi_{_3}}\Big\}
1392: \;,\nonumber\\
1393: &&({\bf Y}_{_{D_K}})_{_{0,I}}={\upsilon_{_0}h^d_{_{I,K}}+\sum\limits_{J=1}^3
1394: \upsilon_{_J}\lambda^\prime_{_{JIK}}\over\upsilon_{_d}}
1395: \;,\nonumber\\
1396: &&({\bf Y}_{_{S_K}})_{_{I,1}}={h^d_{_{I,K}}|\epsilon_{_1}|e^{i\varphi_{_1}}
1397: -\lambda^\prime_{_{1IK}}|\epsilon_{_0}|\over\mu_{_{H_1}}}
1398: \;,\nonumber\\
1399: &&({\bf Y}_{_{S_K}})_{_{I,2}}={h^d_{_{I,K}}|\epsilon_{_0}\epsilon_{_2}|
1400: e^{i\varphi_{_2}}+\lambda^\prime_{_{1IK}}|\epsilon_{_1}\epsilon_{_2}|
1401: e^{i(\varphi_{_2}-\varphi_{_1})}
1402: \over\mu_{_{H_1}}\mu_{_{H_2}}}
1403: -{\mu_{_{H_1}}\lambda^\prime_{_{2IK}}\over\mu_{_{H_2}}}
1404: \;,\nonumber\\
1405: &&({\bf Y}_{_{S_K}})_{_{I,3}}={1\over\mu_{_{H_2}}\mu_{_{H}}}\Big\{
1406: h^d_{_{I,K}}|\epsilon_{_0}\epsilon_{_3}e^{i\varphi_{_3}}
1407: +\lambda^\prime_{_{1IK}}|\epsilon_{_1}\epsilon_{_3}|
1408: e^{i(\varphi_{_3}-\varphi_{_1})}
1409: +\lambda^\prime_{_{2IK}}|\epsilon_{_2}\epsilon_{_3}|
1410: e^{i(\varphi_{_3}-\varphi_{_2})}
1411: \nonumber\\
1412: &&\hspace{2.2cm}
1413: -\mu_{_{H_2}}^2\lambda^\prime_{_{3IK}}\Big\}
1414: \label{aeq3}
1415: \end{eqnarray}
1416: with
1417: \begin{eqnarray}
1418: &&{\cal H}^e_{_{I,J}}=\upsilon_{_0}h^e_{_{I,J}}+2\sum\limits_{\rho\neq I}
1419: \upsilon_{_\rho}\lambda_{_{\rho IJ}}\;.
1420: \label{aeq4}
1421: \end{eqnarray}
1422: The couplings between the Higgs and right-handed slepton are
1423: given by
1424: \begin{eqnarray}
1425: &&({\bf A}_{_{S_I}})_{_{0,\alpha}}=s_{_\beta}^2\sum\limits_{\rho=1}^3
1426: {\upsilon_{_\rho}\over\upsilon_{_d}}\eta_{\rho}^I({\cal Z}_{_H})_{_{\alpha,0}}
1427: +\sum\limits_{K=1}^3\Big[s_{_\beta}{\upsilon_{_{d_{K-1}}}^2\eta_K^I
1428: -\upsilon_{_K}\sum\limits_{\beta=0}^{K-1}\upsilon_{_\beta}\eta_\alpha^I
1429: \over\upsilon_{_{d_{K-1}}}\upsilon_{_{d_K}}}
1430: +c_{_\beta}\xi_K^I\Big]({\cal Z}_{_H})_{_{\alpha,K}}
1431: \label{aeq5}
1432: \end{eqnarray}
1433: with
1434: \begin{eqnarray}
1435: &&\eta_{0}^I=\sum\limits_{K=1}^3\epsilon_{_K}^*h_{_{K,I}}^e,\;
1436: \nonumber\\
1437: &&\eta_{K}^I=-\epsilon_{_0}^*h_{_{K,I}}^e-2\sum\limits_{J=1}^3
1438: \epsilon_{_J}^*\lambda_{_{JKI}},\;
1439: \nonumber\\
1440: &&\xi_1^I={\upsilon_{_{d_1}}\over\upsilon_{_d}}A_{_{1I}}^e
1441: +{\upsilon_{_2}(\upsilon_{_1}A_{_{2I}}^e-2\upsilon_{_0}A_{_{12I}})
1442: \over\upsilon_{_{d_1}}\upsilon_{_d}}
1443: +{\upsilon_{_3}(\upsilon_{_1}A_{_{3I}}^e-2\upsilon_{_0}A_{_{13I}})
1444: \over\upsilon_{_{d_1}}\upsilon_{_d}},\;
1445: \nonumber\\
1446: &&\xi_2^I={\upsilon_{_{d_2}}(\upsilon_{_0}A_{_{2I}}^e+2\upsilon_{_1}
1447: A_{_{12I}})\over\upsilon_{_{d_1}}\upsilon_{_d}}
1448: -2{\upsilon_{_3}\upsilon_{_{d_1}}\over\upsilon_{_{d_2}}\upsilon_{_d}}
1449: A_{_{23I}}+{\upsilon_{_0}\upsilon_{_2}\upsilon_{_3}\over\upsilon_{_{d_1}}
1450: \upsilon_{_{d_2}}\upsilon_{_d}}A_{_{3I}}^e
1451: +2{\upsilon_{_1}\upsilon_{_2}
1452: \upsilon_{_3}\over\upsilon_{_{d_1}}\upsilon_{_{d_2}}\upsilon_{_d}}
1453: A_{_{13I}},\;
1454: \nonumber\\
1455: &&\xi_3^I={\upsilon_{_0}A_{_{3I}}^e+2\upsilon_{_1}A_{_{13I}}
1456: +2\upsilon_{_2}A_{_{23I}}\over\upsilon_{_{d_2}}}\;.
1457: \label{aeq6}
1458: \end{eqnarray}
1459: \end{widetext}
1460:
1461: The loop-integral functions are
1462: \begin{eqnarray}
1463: &&A(x)={1-\ln x\over(4\pi)^2}\;,\nonumber\\
1464: &&A_0(x)=x{1-\ln x\over(4\pi)^2}\;,\nonumber\\
1465: &&B(x,y)={1\over(4\pi)^2}\Big[1+{x\ln x\over y-x}+{y\ln y\over
1466: x-y}\Big]\;,\nonumber\\
1467: &&B_0(x,y)={1\over(4\pi)^2}\Big[x+y+{x^2\ln x\over y-x}+{y^2\ln y\over
1468: x-y}\Big]\;,\nonumber\\
1469: &&P(x,y)={1\over(4\pi)^2}\Big[{\ln x\over x-y}+{\ln y\over y-x}\Big]\;,\nonumber\\
1470: &&C(x,y,z)={1\over(4\pi)^2}\Big[{x\ln x\over(y-x)(z-x)}
1471: \nonumber\\&&\hspace{0.6cm}
1472: +{y\ln y\over(x-y)(z-y)}
1473: +{z\ln z\over(x-z)(y-z)}\Big]\;,\nonumber\\
1474: &&C_0(x,y,z)={1\over(4\pi)^2}\Big[{x^2\ln x\over(y-x)(z-x)}
1475: \nonumber\\&&\hspace{0.6cm}
1476: +{y^2\ln y\over(x-y)(z-y)}
1477: +{z^2\ln z\over(x-z)(y-z)}-1\Big]\;.
1478: \label{aeq7}
1479: \end{eqnarray}
1480:
1481: \begin{thebibliography}{}
1482: \bibitem{exp}S.~Fukuda {\it et al.} [Super-Kamiokande Collaboration],
1483: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 539}, 179(2002)[arXiv:hep-ex/0205075];
1484: Q.~R.~Ahmad {\it et al.} [SNO Collaboration],
1485: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 87}, 071301(2001) [arXiv:nucl-ex/0106015];
1486: Q.~R.~Ahmad {\it et al.} [SNO Collaboration],
1487: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 89}, 011301(2002)[arXiv:nucl-ex/0204008];
1488: Q.~R.~Ahmad {\it et al.} [SNO Collaboration],
1489: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 89}, 011302 (2002)
1490: [arXiv:nucl-ex/0204009];
1491: S.~N.~Ahmed {\it et al.} [SNO Collaboration],
1492: arXiv:nucl-ex/0309004; K.~Eguchi {\it et al.} [KamLAND Collaboration],
1493: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 90}, 021802 (2003)
1494: [arXiv:hep-ex/0212021]; T. Araki {\it et al.} [KamLAND Collaboration],
1495: arXiv:hep-ex/0406035;
1496: Y.~Ashie {\it et al.} [Super-Kamiokande Collaboration],
1497: arXiv:hep-ex/0404034.
1498: \bibitem{mssm}H. P. Nilles, Phys. Rept. {\bf 110}, 1(1984);
1499: H. E. Haber, G. L. Kane, Phys. Rept. {\bf 117}, 75(1985).
1500: \bibitem{Rp} G.R.~Farrar and P.~Fayet, Nucl.\ Phys.\ {\bf B76} (1978)575.
1501: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1502: %\bibitem{seesaw}M. Gell-Mann, P. Ramond, and R. Slansky, 1979, in
1503: %{\it Supergravity}, edited by P. van Nieuwenhuizen and D. Z. Freedman
1504: %(North-Holland, Amsterdam), P. 315; P. Ramond, hep-ph/9809459;
1505: %T. Yanagida, 1979, in {\it Proceedongs of Workshop on Unified Theory
1506: %and Baryon Number in the Universe}, edited by O. Sawada and A. Sugamoto,
1507: %KEK Report KEK-97-18, p.315.
1508: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1509: \bibitem{rpv}M.~Chemtob, hep-ph/0406029; R.~Barbier {\it et al.},
1510: hep-ph/0406039; M.~A.~Diaz, J.~C.~Romao, J.~W.~F.~Valle,
1511: Nucl. Phys. B {\bf 524}, 23(1998); M.~A.~Diaz, J.~Ferrandis,
1512: J.~C.~Romao, J.~W.~F.~Valle, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 453}, 263(1999);
1513: %M. Hirsch, M.A. Diaz, W. Porod, J.C. Romao, J. W. F. Valle,
1514: %Phys. Rev. D {\bf 62}, 113008(2000); J. M. Mira, E. Nardi, D. A. Restrepo,
1515: %J. W. F. Valle, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 492}, 81(2000);
1516: M.~B.~Magro, F.~de~Campos, O.~J.~P.~Eboli, W.~Porod , D.~Restrepo, J.~W.~F.~Valle,
1517: JHEP
1518: {\bf 0309}, 071(2003); A.~Bartl, M.~Hirsch, T.~Kernreiter, W.~Porod,
1519: J.~W.~F.~Valle, JHEP {\bf 0311},005(2003); M.~Hirsch, J.~W.~F.~Valle,
1520: hep-ph/0405015;
1521: %D. A. Sierra, M. Hirsch, J. W. F. Valle, A. Villanova del Moral, Phys.
1522: %Rev. D {\bf 68}, 033006(2003); M. A. Diaz, M. Hirsch, W. Porod, J. C. Romao,
1523: %J. W. F. Valle, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 68}, 013009(2003); M. A. Diaz, R. A. Lineros,
1524: %M. A. Rivera, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 67}, 115004(2003);
1525: B.~Dutta, C.~S.~Kim, S.~Oh, Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 535}, 249(2002);
1526: D.~A.~Restrepo Quintero, hep-ph/0111198;
1527: F.~De Campos, M.~A.~Diaz, O.~J.~P.~Eboli, M.~B.~Magro, P.~G.~Mercadante,
1528: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 623}, 47(2002); R.~Adhikari, E.~Ma, G.~Rajasekaran,
1529: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 65}, 077703(2002); C.~H.~Chang, T.~F.~Feng, Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\
1530: C. {\bf 12}, 137(2000); M.~Frank, K.~Huitu, Phys.\
1531: Rev.\ D {\bf 64}, 095015(2001); W.~Porod, M.~Hirsch, J.~Romao, J.~W.~F.~Valle,
1532: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 63}, 115004(2001); A.~Datta, P.~Konar, B.~Mukhopadhyaya,
1533: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 63}, 095009(2001); T.~Hambye, E.~Ma, U.~Sarkar,
1534: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 590}, 429(2000); A.~Datta, B.~Mukhopadhyaya, Phys.\ Rev.\
1535: Lett.\
1536: {\bf 85}, 248(2000);
1537: %R.~Kitano, Kin-ya Oda, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 61}, 113001(2000);
1538: A.~Datta, B.~Mukhopadhyaya, F.~Vissani, Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 492}, 324(2000);
1539: J.~L.~Chkareuli, I.~G.~Gogoladze, A.~B.~Kobakhidze, M.~G.~Green, D.~E.~Hutchcroft,
1540: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 62}, 015014(2000); B.~Mukhopadhyaya, Pramana {\bf 54},
1541: 147(2000);
1542: %A. Datta, B. Mukhopadhyaya, S. Roy, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 61}, 055006(2000);
1543: B.~Mukhopadhyaya, S.~Roy, Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 60}, 115012(1999).
1544: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1545: \bibitem{feng1}C.~S.~Aulakh and R.~N.~Mohapatra,
1546: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 119}, 136 (1982);
1547: L.~J.~Hall and M.~Suzuki, Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 231}, 419 (1984);
1548: I.~H.~Lee, Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 138}, 121 (1984);
1549: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 246}, 120 (1984);
1550: G.~G.~Ross and J.~W.~Valle, Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 151}, 375 (1985);
1551: J.~R.~Ellis, G.~Gelmini, C.~Jarlskog, G.~G.~Ross and J.~W.~Valle,
1552: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 150}, 142 (1985);
1553: S.~Dawson, Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 261}, 297 (1985);
1554: A.~Santamaria and J.~W.~Valle, Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 195}, 423 (1987);
1555: K.~S.~Babu and R.~N.~Mohapatra, Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 64}, 1705 (1990);
1556: R.~Barbieri, M.~M.~Guzzo, A.~Masiero and D.~Tommasini,
1557: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 252}, 251 (1990);
1558: E.~Roulet and D.~Tommasini, Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 256}, 218 (1991);
1559: K.~Enqvist, A.~Masiero and A.~Riotto,
1560: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 373}, 95 (1992); J.~C.~Romao and J.~W.~Valle,
1561: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 381}, 87 (1992);
1562: R.~M.~Godbole, P.~Roy and X.~Tata, Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 401}, 67 (1993)
1563: [hep-ph/9209251];
1564: A.~S.~Joshipura and M.~Nowakowski, Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 51}, 2421 (1995)
1565: [hep-ph/9408224]; Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 51}, 5271 (1995) [hep-ph/9403349];
1566: M.~Nowakowski and A.~Pilaftsis, Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 461}, 19 (1996)
1567: [hep-ph/9508271]; F.~M.~Borzumati, Y.~Grossman, E.~Nardi and Y.~Nir,
1568: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 384}, 123 (1996) [hep-ph/9606251];
1569: S.~Roy and B.~Mukhopadhyaya, Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 55}, 7020 (1997)
1570: [hep-ph/9612447]; A.~S.~Joshipura, V.~Ravindran and S.~K.~Vempati,
1571: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 451}, 98 (1999) [hep-ph/9706482];
1572: M.~Drees, S.~Pakvasa, X.~Tata and T.~ter Veldhuis, Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 57}, 5335
1573: (1998)
1574: [hep-ph/9712392]; R.~Adhikari and G.~Omanovic,
1575: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 59}, 073003 (1999); A.~S.~Joshipura and S.~K.~Vempati,
1576: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 60}, 095009 (1999) [hep-ph/9808232].
1577: B.~Mukhopadhyaya, S.~Roy and F.~Vissani, Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 443}, 191 (1998)
1578: [hep-ph/9808265];
1579: K.~Choi, K.~Hwang and E.~J.~Chun, Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 60}, 031301 (1999)
1580: [hep-ph/9811363];
1581: S.~Rakshit, G.~Bhattacharyya and A.~Raychaudhuri,
1582: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 59}, 091701 (1999) [hep-ph/9811500];
1583: D.~E.~Kaplan and A.~E.~Nelson, JHEP {\bf 0001}, 033 (2000)
1584: [hep-ph/9901254];
1585: A.~S.~Joshipura and S.~K.~Vempati, Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 60}, 111303 (1999)
1586: [hep-ph/9903435];
1587: S.~Y.~Choi, E.~J.~Chun, S.~K.~Kang and J.~S.~Lee,
1588: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 60}, 075002 (1999) [hep-ph/9903465];
1589: A.~Datta, B.~Mukhopadhyaya and S.~Roy, Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 61}, 055006 (2000)
1590: [hep-ph/9905549];
1591: G.~Bhattacharyya, H.~V.~Klapdor-Kleingrothaus and H.~Paes,
1592: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 463}, 77 (1999) [hep-ph/9907432];
1593: A.~Abada and M.~Losada, Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 585}, 45 (2000)
1594: [hep-ph/9908352];
1595: O.~Haug, J.~D.~Vergados, A.~Faessler and S.~Kovalenko,
1596: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 565}, 38 (2000) [hep-ph/9909318];
1597: E.~J.~Chun and S.~K.~Kang, Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 61}, 075012 (2000)
1598: [hep-ph/9909429];
1599: F.~Takayama and M.~Yamaguchi, Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 476}, 116 (2000)
1600: [hep-ph/9910320];
1601: R.~Kitano and K.~y.~Oda, Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 61}, 113001 (2000)
1602: [hep-ph/9911327];
1603: M.~Hirsch, M.~A.~Diaz, W.~Porod, J.~C.~Romao and J.~W.~Valle,
1604: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 62}, 113008 (2000)
1605: [Erratum-ibid.\ D {\bf 65}, 119901 (2002)] [hep-ph/0004115];
1606: A.~S.~Joshipura, R.~D.~Vaidya and S.~K.~Vempati,
1607: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 62}, 093020 (2000) [hep-ph/0006138].
1608: J.~M.~Mira, E.~Nardi, D.~A.~Restrepo and J.~W.~Valle,
1609: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 492}, 81 (2000) [hep-ph/0007266];
1610: T.~F.~Feng and X.~Q.~Li, Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 63}, 073006 (2001)
1611: [hep-ph/0012300];
1612: A.~S.~Joshipura, R.~D.~Vaidya and S.~K.~Vempati,
1613: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 65}, 053018 (2002) [hep-ph/0107204];
1614: V.~D.~Barger, T.~Han, S.~Hesselbach and D.~Marfatia,
1615: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 538}, 346 (2002) [hep-ph/0108261];
1616: A.~S.~Joshipura, R.~D.~Vaidya and S.~K.~Vempati,
1617: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 639}, 290 (2002) [hep-ph/0203182];
1618: S.~K.~Vempati, hep-ph/0203219;
1619: M.~A.~Diaz, M.~Hirsch, W.~Porod, J.~C.~Romao and J.~W.~F.~Valle,
1620: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 68}, 013009 (2003) [hep-ph/0302021];
1621: A. Abada, G. Bhattacharyya, M. Losada, Phys. Rev. D
1622: {\bf 66}, 071701(2002); M. A. Diaz, R. A. Lineros, M. A. Rivera
1623: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 67}, 115004(2003); M.A. Diaz, M. Hirsch, W. Porod,
1624: J.C. Romao, J.W.F. Valle, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 68}, 013009(2003);
1625: D. A. Sierra, M. Hirsch, J.W.F. Valle, A. Villanova del Moral,
1626: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 68}, 033006(2003); S. P. Das, A. Datta,
1627: M. Guchait, hep-ph/0309168; Y. Grossman, S. Rakshit,
1628: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 69}, 093002(2004); S. Rakshit, hep-ph/0406168.
1629: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1630: \bibitem{Burgess}C. J. C. Burgess, H. J. Schnitzer, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B228},
1631: 464(1983); C. N. Leung, S. T. Love, S. Rao, Z. Phys. {\bf C31}, 433(1986);
1632: B. Buchmuller, D. Wyler, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B268}, 621(1986);
1633: K. Hagiwara, S. Ishihara, R. Szalapski, D. Zeppenfeld,
1634: Phys. Rev.{\bf D48}, 2182(1993); B. Grzadkowski, Z. Hioki, K. Ohkuma,
1635: J. Wudka, hep-ph/0310159; V. Barger, T. Han, P. Langacker, B. McElrath, P. Zerwas,
1636: Phys. Rev. {\bf D67}, 115001(2003).
1637: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1638: \bibitem{Weinberg}S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 43}, 1566(1979);
1639: F. Wilczek, A. Zee, {\it ibid.} {\bf 43}, 1571(1979).
1640: \bibitem{Broncano}A. Broncano, M. B. Gavela and E. Jenkins, Nucl.
1641: Phys. B {\bf 672}, 163(2003).
1642: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1643: \bibitem{feng2}T.-F.~Feng, X.-Q.~Li, J. ~Maamalpi, Phys. Rev. D.
1644: {\bf 69}, 115007(2004).
1645: \bibitem{Hempfling}R.~Hempfling, Nucl. Phys. B. {\bf 478}, 3(1996);
1646: H.~P.~Nilles, and N.~Polonsky, {\it ibid.} {\bf 484}, 33(1997).
1647: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1648: \bibitem{Gonzalez-Garcia}M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, Y. Nir, Rev. Mod.
1649: Phys. {\bf 75}, 345(2003); O. Peres, A. Smirnov, Nucl.Phys. B
1650: {\bf 680}, 479(2004); G. Fogli, E. Marrone, D. Montanino, A. Palazzo,
1651: A. Rotunno, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 69}, 017301(2004); M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia,
1652: C. Pena-Garay, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 68}, 093003(2003); J. Bahcall, M. C.
1653: Gonzalez-Garcia, C. Pena-Garay, hep-ph/0406294.
1654: \bibitem{edm1}P. Nath, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 66}, 2565(1991);
1655: T. Ibrahim, P. Nath, Phys. Lett. {\bf B418}, 98; Phys. Rev.
1656: {\bf D57}, 478(1998); {\bf 58}, 111301(1998); {\bf 61}, 093004(2000);
1657: M. Brhlik, G. J. Good, G. L. Kane, {\it ibid.} {\bf 59}, 115004(1999);
1658: A. Bartl, T. Gajdosik, W. Porod, P. Stockinger and H. Stremnitzer,
1659: {\it ibid.} {\bf 60}, 073003(1999).
1660: \bibitem{edm2}D. Chang, W. Keung and A. Pilaftsis, Phys. Rev. Lett.
1661: {\bf 82}, 900(1999); A. Pilaftsis, Phys. Lett. {\bf B471}, 174(1999);
1662: D. Chang, W. Chang and W. Keung, {\it ibid.} {\bf 478}, 239(2000).
1663: \end{thebibliography}
1664: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1665: \end{document}
1666: