1: \documentclass{jpconf}
2: \usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}
3: \usepackage{graphicx}
4: \usepackage{amstext}
5: \usepackage{amssymb}
6:
7: % file: latexuseful2e.sty
8: % author: Roberto Ugoccioni
9: % last update: june 4, 2003
10: % purpose: frequently used definitions in LaTeX version 2e
11: \DeclareTextFontCommand{\zapf}{\fontencoding{U}\fontfamily{pzd}\selectfont}
12:
13: % 1. names
14: \def\jetset{\textsc{Jetset}}
15: \def\delphi{\textsc{Delphi}}
16: \def\luclus{\textsc{Luclus}}
17: \def\Tevatron{\textsc{Tevatron}}
18: \def\Hera{\textsc{Hera}}
19:
20: % 2. new definitions in TEXT mode
21: \def\ee{$e^+e^-$} % e+ e- (annihilations...)
22: \def\hh{$hh$}
23: \def\pp{$pp$}
24: \def\ppbar{$p\bar p$}
25: \def\qq{$q\bar q$}
26: \def\ljet{$l$-jet }
27: \def\hjet{$h$-jet }
28: \newcommand{\roots}[1]{$\sqrt{s} = #1$ GeV} % the well abused root s = xx GeV
29: \def\draftcitations{\def\cite##1{\texttt{[##1]}}} % useful for early drafts,
30: % gives citations as literals instead of numbers
31: % 2.1 particular definitions
32: % % to annotate a figure (put text,vectors,anything in it)
33: % usage: \figannot[unitlength]{things to put in \picture}
34: % hint: start the {} with (xpos,ypos) if you want, or a cr if you don't
35: \newcommand{\figannot}[2][1cm]{
36: \setlength{\unitlength}{#1}
37: \begin{picture}(0.1,0.1)#2
38: \end{picture}
39: }
40:
41: % 3. new definitions in MATH mode
42: % 3.1 definitions
43: \def\JPsi{J/\Psi}
44: \def\inte{\int\limits} % integr.symbol with limits on top&bottom
45: \def\GeV{\mathrm{GeV}} % GeV must be roman inside mathmode
46: \def\nbar{\bar n} % NB parameters: must be used in math mode
47: \def\Nbar{\bar N} % only, or it won't work!
48: \def\nc{{\bar n_c}} % extra {} ensure subscriting it is ok.
49: \def\as{\alpha_s}
50: \def\pt{p\kern -.2pt\lower 4pt\hbox{\tiny T}} %works?
51: \def\mt{m\kern -.2pt\lower 4pt\hbox{\tiny T}} %works?
52: \def\ycut{y_\mathrm{cut}}
53: \def\Ycut{Y_\mathrm{cut}}
54: \def\ptcut{\pt_\mathrm{cut}}
55: \def\gmax{g_\mathrm{max}}
56: \def\p0{P_0(\Delta y)}
57: \def\Dy{\Delta y}
58: \def\lw{\log W}
59: \def\la{\log 2}
60: \def\yc{y_c}
61: \def\ymin{y_{\mathrm{min}}}
62: \def\NB{{\mathrm{NBD}}}
63: \def\chiDF{$\scriptstyle \chi^2$/{\small df}}
64: \def\kt{k_{\perp}}
65: \def\ncut{n_\mathrm{cut}}
66:
67: % 3.2 constructions
68: \def\avg#1{\langle #1 \rangle} % <n>:
69:
70: % 3.3 calligraphic symbols
71: \def\NF{\mathcal{N}_{\kern -1.9pt f}}
72: \def\NC{\mathcal{N}_{\kern -1.7pt c}}
73: \def\vi{\mathcal{V}(\Dy)}
74: \def\P{\mathcal{P}(Q_0,Q_1|Q)}
75: \def\PP{\mathcal{P}}
76: \def\Y{\mathcal{Y}}
77: \def\cY{\mathcal{Y}}
78: \def\cG{\mathcal{G}}
79:
80:
81:
82: \newcommand{\st}[2]{{#1}_{\text{#2}}}
83: \newcommand{\stt}[3]{{#1}_{{#2},\text{#3}}}
84:
85:
86:
87: \begin{document}
88: \title{Clan structure analysis and new physics signals in \pp\
89: collisions at LHC}
90:
91: \author{Alberto Giovannini and Roberto Ugoccioni}
92:
93: \address{Dipartimento di Fisica Teorica, Università di Torino and
94: INFN, Sezione di Torino, via Giuria 1, 10125 Torino, Italy}
95:
96: \ead{alberto.giovannini@to.infn.it, roberto.ugoccioni@to.infn.it}
97:
98: \begin{abstract}
99: The study of possible new physics signals in global event properties
100: in \pp\ collisions in full phase space and in rapidity intervals
101: accessible at LHC is presented. The main characteristic is the presence
102: of an elbow structure in final charged particle MD's in addition to the
103: shoulder observed at lower c.m.\ energies.
104: \end{abstract}
105:
106:
107: \section{Introduction}
108:
109: The weighted superposition mechanism (WSM) of two properly defined
110: classes of events (or components) explains some experimental facts
111: which altogether characterise collective variables properties in high
112: energy \pp\ collisions and \ee\ annihilation.
113: In \pp\ collisions the two classes of events are the soft one (without
114: mini-jets) and the semi-hard one (with mini-jets); in \ee\
115: annihilation, by using a convenient jet finding algorithm, one
116: distinguishes between two-jet and three-jet samples of events.
117: Let us summarise the mentioned experimental facts \cite{ARS:report}:
118:
119: \noindent 1) shoulder structure in the intermediate $n$-multiplicity
120: range of the $n$ charged particle multiplicity distribution (MD),
121: $P_n$, at top c.m.\ energies and in pseudo-rapidity intervals
122: \cite{ARS:report,Fug,DEL:single};
123:
124: \noindent 2) quasi-oscillatory behaviour of the ratio of $n$-factorial
125: cumulants, $K_n$, to $n$-factorial moments, $F_n$, ($H_n = K_n/F_n$ in
126: the literature) after an initial sharp decrease towards a negative
127: minimum when plotted as a function of the order $n$ at different c.m.\
128: energies\cite{ARS:report,hqlett:2,hqlett,NijmegenAG};
129:
130: \noindent 3) forward (F) --- backward (B) multiplicity correlation
131: strength, $\beta_{FB}$, energy dependence, with
132: \begin{equation}
133: \beta_{FB} = \frac{ \avg{(n_F -\nbar_F) (n_B - \nbar_B)} }{
134: \left[\avg{(n_F -\nbar_F)^2} \avg{(n_B - \nbar_B)^2}
135: \right]^{1/2}} , \label{eq:FB.define}
136: \end{equation}
137: and $n_F$, $n_B$ the numbers of charged particles lying respectively
138: in the forward and backward hemispheres, and $\nbar_F$ and $\nbar_B$
139: their corresponding average charged multiplicities
140: \cite{ARS:report,RU:FB,OPAL:FB,RU:FBproblems}.
141:
142: It should be pointed out that the qualifying assumption of the WSM is
143: that $P_n$ is described for each class of events in terms of the
144: Pascal, i.e., negative binomial (NB), MD with the average charged
145: particle multiplicity, $\nbar$, and $k$ (linked to the variance $D^2
146: \equiv \avg{n^2} - \nbar^2$ by the relation $k=\nbar^2/(D^2-\nbar)$)
147: as characteristic parameters, and this fact leads to a sound
148: description of the experimental data
149: \cite{ARS:report,ISR:1+AGCim:3+AGCim:4,UA5:4}.
150: The NB (Pascal) MD is well known in high energy physics and has been
151: justified in the framework of QCD.
152: This approximate regularity has been discovered in the seventies in
153: all hadronic collisions in full phase-space in the accelerator and ISR
154: region \cite{ISR:1+AGCim:3+AGCim:4},
155: then extended by UA5 Collaboration \cite{UA5:4} at \ppbar\ collider
156: energies in the eighties to pseudo-rapidity intervals, and
157: systematically studied with success by NA22 Collaboration
158: \cite{NA22:b1} in \pp\ and
159: $\pi^{\pm} p$ collisions, by HRS \cite{HRS:1} and Tasso \cite{TASSO}
160: Collaborations in \ee\
161: annihilation, by EMC Collaboration \cite{EMC}
162: in deep inelastic scattering and by
163: EHS-RCBC Collaboration \cite{Dengler+Bailly:1988bx}
164: in proton-nucleus collisions.
165: These facts led the common wisdom to the conviction that the NB
166: (Pascal) regularity was an approximate general property of all classes
167: of collisions \cite{Singapore},
168: which could be interpreted in the framework of clan
169: structure analysis and understood as a manifestation of a two-step
170: dynamical process
171: \cite{AGLVH:0}: to an initial phase in which clan ancestors are
172: Poissonianly produced, it follows in the second step their decay
173: according to hadronic showers, each described by a logarithmic MD.
174: Each clan contains at least one particle (its ancestor) and all
175: correlations among particles belonging to the same clan are exhausted
176: within the clan itself.
177:
178: Clan structure parameters are the average number of clans, $\Nbar$,
179: and the average number of particles per clan, $\nc$; these new
180: variables are linked to the standard NB (Pascal) MD parameters,
181: $\nbar$ and $k$, by the following non-trivial relations:
182: \begin{equation}
183: \Nbar = k \ln \left( 1 + \frac{ \nbar }{ k } \right)
184: \qquad\text{and}\qquad
185: \nc = \frac{ \nbar }{ \Nbar } . \label{eq:2}
186: \end{equation}
187:
188: Suddenly at the end of the eighties it was found again by UA5
189: Collaboration that the NB (Pascal) regularity did not survive a more
190: accurate analysis at top \ppbar\ collider energies \cite{UA5:3}.
191: The violation of the regularity was confirmed at LEP energies in \ee\
192: annihilation \cite{DEL:1+DEL:2+DEL:4}.
193: Interestingly, the regularity violated in the full sample of events
194: was rediscovered at a more fundamental level of investigation \cite{Fug}, i.e.,
195: in the various classes of events contributing to the $n$ charged
196: particle MD of the total sample, $P_n^{\text{total}}$, which
197: accordingly was written as follows:
198: \begin{equation}
199: P_n^{\text{total}} = \alpha_1 P_n^{\text{(NB Pascal)}}(\nbar_1,k_1)
200: +
201: \alpha_2 P_n^{\text{(NB Pascal)}}(\nbar_2,k_2) , \label{eq:3}
202: \end{equation}
203: with $\alpha_1 + \alpha_2 = 1$.
204: 1 and 2 stand respectively for soft and semi-hard in \pp\ collisions
205: and for 2-jet and 3-jet samples of events in \ee\ annihilation;
206: $\alpha_1$ is the weight factor of the first class of events with
207: respect to the total sample.
208: Eq.~(\ref{eq:3}) is one essential ingredient of the WSM.
209: Although our attention will be focused in the following on \pp\
210: collisions, the WSM is quite general and has been applied successfully
211: also to \ee\ annihilation.
212: A remark should be added at this point.
213: For a correct description of the FB multiplicity correlation strength,
214: $\beta_{FB}$, energy dependence in \pp\ collisions, clans of the same
215: kind of those originally defined on purely statistical grounds are
216: demanded \cite{RU:FB}.
217: A result which raises intriguing questions on the real existence of
218: clans themselves as physically observable quantities \cite{RU:clanmass}.
219: In conclusion, clan concept seems more close to the real world than a
220: purely statistical concept.
221:
222: Accordingly, we decided to examine more carefully clan behaviour in
223: the possible scenarios obtained by extrapolating the weighted
224: superposition mechanism from the GeV to the TeV energy domain
225: \cite{combo:prd+combo:eta}.
226: Our search was based on the knowledge of the GeV energy region.
227: Three scenarios were discussed \cite{Ugoccioni:these}.
228: Following CDF findings at Fermilab it has been assumed that the soft
229: component satisfies KNO scaling in all scenarios, i.e., $\st{k}{soft}$
230: remains constant throughout all the explored TeV region.
231:
232: KNO scaling was also assumed for the semi-hard component in the first
233: scenario but being KNO scaling behaviour disfavoured by CDF data
234: \cite{CDF:soft-hard}
235: between 630 GeV and 1.8 TeV (and it is unlikely to be verified at
236: higher c.m.\ energies) this possibility was considered quite extreme
237: and not realistic.
238: The semi-hard component is assumed to violate strongly KNO scaling in
239: the second scenario ($\st{k}{semi-hard}^{-1}$ increases with c.m.\
240: energy almost linearly in $\ln s$.)
241: In the third scenario KNO scaling violation is a QCD inspired one,
242: i.e., $\st{k}{semi-hard}^{-1}$ increases with c.m.\ energy as
243: $a - b/\sqrt{\ln s}$.
244:
245: The interest is on the semi-hard component behaviour in the scenario
246: with strong KNO scaling violation (the second one) and in the QCD
247: inspired scenario (the third one) and in their clan structure
248: analysis.
249: The results of this search are given in Table~\ref{tab:I}.
250: Common feature of both scenarios is the decrease of the average number
251: of clans, $\st{\Nbar}{semi-hard}$, and the corresponding increase of
252: the average number of particles per clan, $\stt{\nbar}{c}{semi-hard}$
253: as the c.m.\ energy increases from 900 GeV to 14 TeV. The effect is
254: more pronounced in the second than in the third scenario.
255: It seems that Van der Waals-like cohesive forces are at works among
256: clans. Somehow, clan aggregation is occurring and accordingly particle
257: population density per clan is expected to become larger as c.m.\
258: energy increases.
259: This result leads to the following question (See Ref.~\cite{RU:NewPhysics}):
260: when will clan aggregation in the semi-hard component be maximal?
261: Of course when $\st{\Nbar}{semi-hard}$ is approximately equal to one
262: unit, i.e., when between the two parameters of the NB (Pascal) MD,
263: $\st{\nbar}{semi-hard}$ and $\st{k}{semi-hard}$, the following relation holds:
264: \begin{equation}
265: \st{\nbar}{semi-hard} = \st{k}{semi-hard}\left(
266: e^{1/\st{k}{semi-hard}} - 1 \right) . \label{eq:4}
267: \end{equation}
268: Following the natural decrease of $\st{\Nbar}{semi-hard}$ as the c.m.\
269: energy increases, relation (\ref{eq:4}) will be reached at a too high
270: energy to be significant (see Figure \ref{fig:1}).
271: Notice that $\st{\Nbar}{semi-hard}$ in the first scenario contrary to
272: the other two is growing with c.m.\ energy: a consequence of
273: $\st{k}{semi-hard} \simeq \text{constant}$ and the full control of
274: $\st{\Nbar}{semi-hard}$ by $\st{\nbar}{semi-hard}$.
275: As already stated, the study of this scenario has been neglected on
276: the basis of CDF findings.
277:
278: \newcommand{\ohmy}[2]{\hspace*{0.1cm}#1\hspace*{7cm}#2\hspace*{4.5cm}~}
279: \begin{figure}
280: \begin{center}
281: \small\ohmy{$\Nbar$}{$\nc$}\\
282: \mbox{\includegraphics[width=0.9\textwidth]{plotnnc.scen1.eps}}
283: \mbox{\includegraphics[width=0.9\textwidth]{plotnnc.scen2.eps}}
284: \mbox{\includegraphics[width=0.9\textwidth]{plotnnc.scen3.eps}}\\[-0.1cm]
285: \ohmy{}{~~~~~~~~~~~~~~\small\textsf{c.m.\ energy (GeV)}}
286: \end{center}
287: \caption[Extrapolations to TeV: clan parameters]{Clan parameters $\Nbar$
288: (panels in the left columns) and $\nc$ (panels in the right column)
289: are plotted for the scenarios described in the text vs.\ c.m.\ energy
290: (from top to bottom: first row: scenario 1; second row: scenario 2;
291: third row: scenario 3).
292: The figures shows experimental data (filled triangles) from
293: ISR and SPS colliders, the UA5 analysis with two NB(Pascal) MD's of SPS data
294: (circles: soft component; squares: semi-hard component), together with
295: our extrapolations (lines: dotted: total distribution; dashed: soft
296: component; short-dashed: semi-hard component)}\label{fig:1}
297: \end{figure}
298:
299: This remark suggests to ask a new question: under which conditions the
300: decrease of the average number of clans to one unit could be
301: extrapolated to 14 TeV?
302: Assuming that these conditions are verified at 14 TeV, are they
303: related to asymptotic properties of the semi-hard component or are
304: they the
305: benchmark of a new class of events, of an effective third component to
306: be added to the soft and semi-hard ones?
307: It should be pointed out that the onset of a third class of events in
308: terms of a second shoulder in $P_n$ vs $n$ is suggested in minimum
309: bias events in full phase-space by Monte Carlo
310: calculations with Pythia version 6.210, with default parameters but using
311: a double Gaussian matter distribution (model 4).
312:
313: \begin{table}
314: \caption{Variation of the average number of clans,
315: $\st{\Nbar}{semi-hard}$, and of the
316: average number of particles per clan,
317: $\stt{\nbar}{c}{semi-hard}$, between 900 and 14 TeV,
318: for the semi-hard component in scenarios II and III.}\label{tab:I}
319: \begin{center}
320: \lineup
321: \begin{tabular}{lllll}
322: \br
323: & \multicolumn{2}{c}{\small $\st{\Nbar}{semi-hard}$}&
324: \multicolumn{2}{c}{\small $\stt{\nbar}{c}{semi-hard}$}\\
325: & \small 900 GeV & \small 14 TeV &
326: \small 900 GeV & \small 14 TeV\\
327: \mr
328: scenario II & 23 & 11 & 2.5 & 7\\
329: scenario III & 22 & 18 & 2.6 & 5\\
330: \br
331: \end{tabular}
332: \end{center}
333: \end{table}
334:
335:
336: Coming to the first part of the above question, since one is forced to
337: exclude that a sudden decrease of the average number of clans to one
338: unit could be anticipated in the semi-hard component at 14 TeV c.m.\
339: energy (it would imply heavy discontinuities in
340: $\st{\nbar}{semi-hard}$ and $\st{k}{semi-hard}$ general behaviours, a
341: fact which is quite unlikely to occur), it is proposed to consider
342: relation (\ref{eq:4}) as the benchmark of a new class of events.
343:
344: Therefore the claim is that
345: \begin{equation}
346: \st{\nbar}{III} = \st{k}{III}\left(
347: e^{1/\st{k}{III}} - 1 \right) \label{eq:4prime}
348: \end{equation}
349: identifies a new class of events (whose onset was foreseen by the
350: aforementioned Pythia Monte Carlo calculations),
351: but with on the average only one clan.
352: Let us examine now the variation domains of the two new parameters
353: $\st{\nbar}{III}$ and $\st{k}{III}$ and their influence on the
354: structure of the MD.
355: Since $\st{k}{III}$ parameter increases quickly as the c.m.\ energy
356: increases and just the opposite happens to $\st{\nbar}{III}$, at 14
357: TeV one should expect that $\st{\nbar}{III} \gg \st{k}{III}$.
358: This condition implies that the NB (Pascal) MD of the third component
359: becomes a gamma MD.
360: In addition, being $\st{\Nbar}{III}$ reduced to one unit, one should
361: expect that single clan MD should be quite well approximated by a
362: logarithmic MD, according to the general rule of clan structure
363: analysis.
364: This requests implies that $\st{k}{III} \to 0$.
365: The gamma MD for the single clan for $\st{k}{III} < 1$ is indeed a
366: log-convex distribution, which for $\st{k}{III} \ll 1$ and close to
367: zero is well approximated by the wanted logarithmic MD.
368: Altogether, the above conditions
369: \begin{equation*}
370: \st{\nbar}{III} \gg \st{k}{III} \qquad
371: \st{k}{III} \ll 1 ~~\text{and}~~ \simeq 0
372: \end{equation*}
373: clarify in terms of standard NB (Pascal) MD parameters the deep
374: meaning of relation (\ref{eq:4prime}) for $\st{\Nbar}{III}\simeq 1$.
375:
376:
377: \begin{figure}
378: \begin{center}
379: \includegraphics[width=0.7\textwidth]{plot_mdN1_kno_III.eps}
380: \end{center}
381: \caption{Multiplicity distributions in KNO form for two values of
382: $\st{\nbar}{III}$, with the respective values of $\st{k}{III}$
383: (0.1611 for $\st{\nbar}{III}=80$
384: and 0.1128 for $\st{\nbar}{III}=800$)
385: obtained from Eq.~(\ref{eq:4prime}),
386: i.e., requiring $\st{\Nbar}{III}=1$.}\label{fig:2}
387: \end{figure}
388:
389:
390: \section{Main properties of the new class of events}
391:
392: \subsection{$P_n^{\text{(III)}}$, the $n$ charged particle MD}
393:
394: Coming to the $n$ charged particle MD of the third class of events,
395: $P_n^{\text{(III)}}$, the plot in Figure~\ref{fig:2} of
396: $\st{\nbar}{III} P_n^{\text{(III)}}$ vs $\st{n}{III}/\st{\nbar}{III}$
397: reveals for $\st{n}{III}/\st{\nbar}{III} < 1$ quite large values of
398: $\st{\nbar}{III} P_n^{\text{(III)}}$ (events with low multiplicity
399: with respect to $\st{\nbar}{III}$ are more numerous); a result which
400: should be compared with the behaviour of $\st{\nbar}{III}
401: P_n^{\text{(III)}}$ in the region $\st{n}{III}/\st{\nbar}{III} > 1$:
402: here events with high multiplicity with respect to $\st{\nbar}{III}$
403: are less probable although they extend for very large multiplicities.
404:
405:
406: \subsection{Two-particle correlations}
407:
408: Two-particle correlations of the new component,
409: \begin{equation}
410: \frac{ \st{\nbar}{III}^2}{ \st{k}{III}} =
411: \int C_2^{\text{(III)}} (\eta_1,\eta_2) d \eta_1 d \eta_2 \gg
412: \frac{ \st{\nbar}{semi-hard}^2}{ \st{k}{semi-hard}},
413: \end{equation}
414: are much larger than two-particle correlations of the semi-hard
415: component.
416:
417:
418: \subsection{$n$-factorial cumulant moments, $K_n^{\text{(III)}}$}
419:
420: Since $\st{k}{III}^{-1}$ controls $n$-factorial cumulant moments
421: behaviour at any order $n$ for the NB (Pascal) MD and for its limits
422: in $\st{\nbar}{III}$ and $\st{k}{III}$ parameters,
423: $K_n^{\text{(III)}}$ is expected to be much larger than
424: $K_n^{\text{(semi-hard)}}$.
425:
426:
427:
428: \subsection{Saturation of FB multiplicity correlation strength,
429: $\beta_{FB}$}
430:
431: In $\st{b}{III} \equiv \st{\nbar}{III}/(\st{\nbar}{III} +
432: \st{k}{III})$, being $\st{\nbar}{III} \gg \st{k}{III}$, with
433: $\st{k}{III} \to 0$ one should have $\st{b}{III} \to 1$ and since
434: for $\st{\Nbar}{III} \to 1$ the corresponding leakage
435: controlling FB multiplicity correlations close to its maximum (leakage
436: parameter close to 1/2) one gets:
437: \begin{equation}
438: \stt{\beta}{FB}{III} = \frac{ 2 \st{b}{III} \st{p}{III}
439: ( 1- \st{p}{III} ) }{ 1 - 2 \st{b}{III}
440: \st{p}{III} (1-\st{p}{III}) } \to 1,
441: \end{equation}
442: i.e., $\stt{\beta}{FB}{III}$ saturates and FB multiplicity
443: correlations in the third component are much stronger than in the
444: semi-hard class of events.
445: An indication, in view of the extremely high virtuality and hardness
446: of these events, of a huge colour exchange process at parton level of
447: which strong FB multiplicity correlations are presumably the hadronic
448: signature.
449:
450: \bigskip
451: In conclusion, in this framework one should expect to see at 14 TeV in
452: \pp\ collisions three classes of events each one described by NB
453: (Pascal) MD or by its limiting values:
454:
455: \renewcommand{\labelenumi}{\roman{enumi})}
456: \begin{enumerate}
457: \item the class of soft events with $\st{k}{soft}$ constant as the
458: c.m.\ energy increases;
459: \item the class of semi-hard events with $\st{k}{semi-hard}$ which
460: decreases as the c.m.\ energy increases (the class of events of the
461: first scenario has been excluded by CDF findings);
462: \item the class of hard events with $\st{\nbar}{III} \gg \st{k}{III}$
463: and $0 \lesssim \st{k}{III} \ll 1$, i.e., $\st{\Nbar}{III} \simeq 1$
464: \end{enumerate}
465:
466:
467: The total $n$ charged particle MD $P_n^{\text{total}}$ should
468: therefore be written as follows:
469: \begin{eqnarray}
470: P_n^{(\text{total})} &=& \st{\alpha}{soft}
471: P_n^{\text{(NB Pascal)}} (\st{\nbar}{soft},\st{k}{soft})
472: \nonumber\\ &+&
473: \st{\alpha}{semi-hard}
474: P_n^{\text{(NB Pascal)}}(\st{\nbar}{semi-hard},\st{k}{semi-hard})
475: \nonumber\\ &+&
476: \st{\alpha}{III}
477: P_n^{\text{(NB Pascal)}}(\st{\nbar}{III},\st{k}{III}) ,
478: \label{eq:6}
479: \end{eqnarray}
480: with $\st{\alpha}{soft} +\st{\alpha}{semi-hard} + \st{\alpha}{III}
481: =1$, where
482: $\st{\alpha}{soft}$, $\st{\alpha}{semi-hard}$ and $\st{\alpha}{III}$
483: are the weight factors of the three classes of events with respect to
484: the total sample of events (See Figure~\ref{fig:3}).
485:
486:
487:
488:
489: \begin{figure}
490: \begin{center}
491: \includegraphics[width=0.57\textwidth]{plot_md3-combo.eps}
492: \includegraphics[width=0.57\textwidth]{plot_md_eta1.eps}
493: \end{center}
494: \caption[MD at 14 TeV with elbow]{$n$ charged particle
495: multiplicity distribution $P_n^{(\text{total})}$
496: (solid line) expected at 14 TeV
497: in full phase-space (top panel) and in $|\eta|<0.9$
498: (bottom panel) in presence
499: of a third (maybe hard) component with
500: $\Nbar_{\text{III}}=1$, showing one
501: shoulder structure and one `elbow' structure; the three
502: components are also shown: soft (dashed line), semi-hard
503: (dash-dotted line) and the third one (dotted band).}\label{fig:3}
504: \end{figure}
505:
506: \begin{table}
507: \caption{Parameters of the three components at 14 TeV in full
508: phase-space.}\label{tab:II}
509: \begin{center}
510: \lineup
511: \begin{tabular}{llllll}
512: \br
513: FPS\vphantom{\LARGE H} & \% & $\nbar$ & $k$ & $\Nbar$ & $\nc$\\
514: \mr
515: soft & 41 & \040 & 7.0 & 13.3 &
516: \0\03.0\\
517: semi-hard & 57 & \087 & 3.7 & 11.8&
518: \0\07.4\\
519: third & \02 & 460 & 0.12 & \01 &
520: 460\\
521: \br
522: \end{tabular}
523: \end{center}
524: \end{table}
525:
526: \begin{table}
527: \caption{Parameters of the three components at 14 TeV in the
528: pseudo-rapidity interval $|\eta|<0.9$.}\label{tab:III}
529: \begin{center}
530: \lineup
531: \begin{tabular}{llllll}
532: \br
533: $|\eta|<0.9$\vphantom{\LARGE H} & \% & $\nbar$ & $k$
534: & $\Nbar$ & $\nc$\\
535: \mr
536: soft &41 & \0\04.9 & 3.4 & 3.0 & \0\01.6\\
537: semi-hard & 57 & \014 & 2.0 & 4.2 & \0\03.4\\
538: third (1) & \02 & \040 & 0.06 & 0.37 & 109\\
539: third (2) & \02 & 460 & 0.12 & 1 & 460\\
540: \br
541: \end{tabular}
542: \end{center}
543: \end{table}
544:
545:
546:
547: Assuming that at 14 TeV the third class of events is 2\% of the total
548: sample of events and that $\st{k}{III} \simeq 0.12$ and extrapolating
549: $\st{\alpha}{soft}$ and $\st{\alpha}{semi-hard}$ from their behaviour
550: in the GeV energy range \cite{Ugoccioni:these} one gets in full
551: phase-space (FPS) the numbers in Table~\ref{tab:II} (notice that
552: small variations of $\st{k}{III}$ below 0.12 in Equation
553: (\ref{eq:4prime}) give $\st{\nbar}{III} \gg 460$.)
554:
555: In the pseudo-rapidity interval $|\eta| < 0.9$, assuming (1) that the clan
556: is spread over all the phase-space or (2) concentrated in $|\eta| <
557: 0.9$ one gets the results in Table~\ref{tab:III}.
558:
559:
560:
561:
562:
563:
564:
565: \section{Conclusions}
566:
567: The reduction of $\st{\Nbar}{semi-hard}$ in \pp\ collisions with the
568: increase of the c.m.\ energy in the TeV energy region (second and
569: third scenarios discussed in \cite{Ugoccioni:these}) led us to
570: postulate a third class of hard events to be added to the soft and
571: semi-hard ones, whose benchmark is $\st{\Nbar}{III} \simeq 1$, i.e.,
572: $\st{\nbar}{III} \gg \st{k}{III}$ and
573: $\st{k}{III} \ll 1$ with $\st{k}{III} \simeq 0$.
574:
575: The main properties of this new class of events are discussed and
576: predictions at LHC are presented.
577:
578: The extension of this search to nucleus-nucleus collisions is under
579: investigation.
580:
581:
582: \newpage
583: \section*{References}
584: %%\bibliographystyle{unsrt} % new, using bibref
585: %%\bibliography{abbrevs,bibliography-std}
586:
587: \begin{thebibliography}{10}
588:
589: \bibitem{ARS:report}
590: Giovannini A and Ugoccioni R 2004
591: Clan structure analysis and qcd parton showers in multiparticle
592: dynamics. An intriguing dialog between theory and experiment
593: \textit{Preprint} DFTT 12/2004, hep-ph/0405251
594:
595: \bibitem{Fug}
596: Fuglesang C 1990
597: {\em Multiparticle Dynamics: Festschrift for L\'eon Van Hove}
598: ed A Giovannini and W Kittel
599: (Singapore: World Scientific) p 193
600:
601: \bibitem{DEL:single}
602: Abreu P \textit{et~al} 1996
603: {\em Z. Phys.} C \textbf{70} 179
604:
605: \bibitem{hqlett:2}
606: Giovannini A, Lupia S and Ugoccioni R 1996
607: {\em Phys.\ Lett. } B \textbf{374} 231
608:
609: \bibitem{hqlett}
610: Ugoccioni R, Giovannini A and Lupia S 1995
611: {\em Phys.\ Lett. } B \textbf{342} 387
612:
613: \bibitem{NijmegenAG}
614: Giovannini A, Lupia S and Ugoccioni R 1997
615: {\em 7th International Workshop ``Correlations and Fluctuations''}
616: ed R C Hwa \textit{et~al}
617: (Singapore: World Scientific) p 328
618:
619: \bibitem{RU:FB}
620: Giovannini A and Ugoccioni R 2002
621: {\em Phys.\ Rev. } D \textbf{66} 034001
622:
623: \bibitem{OPAL:FB}
624: Akers R \textit{et~al} 1994
625: {\em Phys.\ Lett.} B \textbf{320} 417
626:
627: \bibitem{RU:FBproblems}
628: Giovannini A and Ugoccioni R 2003
629: {\em Phys.\ Lett.} B \textbf{558} 59
630:
631: \bibitem{ISR:1+AGCim:3+AGCim:4}
632: Breakstone A \textit{et~al} 1989
633: {\em Il Nuovo Cimento} A \textbf{102} 1199
634:
635: \nonum
636: Giovannini A, Antich P, Calligarich E, Cecchet G, Dolfini R,
637: Impellizzeri F and Ratti S 1974
638: {\em Il Nuovo Cimento} A \textbf{24} 421
639:
640: \nonum
641: Garetto M, Giovannini A, Calligarich E, Cecchet G, Dolfini R and
642: Ratti S 1977
643: {\em Il Nuovo Cimento} A \textbf{38} 38
644:
645: \bibitem{UA5:4}
646: Alner G J \textit{et~al} 1985
647: {\em Phys.\ Lett.} B \textbf{160} 193
648:
649: \bibitem{NA22:b1}
650: Adamus M \textit{et~al} 1986
651: {\em Phys.\ Lett.} B \textbf{177} 239
652:
653: \bibitem{HRS:1}
654: Derrick M \textit{et~al} 1986
655: {\em Phys.\ Lett.} B \textbf{168} 299
656:
657: \bibitem{TASSO}
658: Braunschweig W \textit{et al} 1989
659: {\em Z. Phys.} C \textbf{45} 193
660:
661: \bibitem{EMC}
662: Arneodo M \textit{et al} 1987
663: {\em Z. Phys.} C \textbf{35} 335
664:
665: \bibitem{Dengler+Bailly:1988bx}
666: Dengler F \textit{et al} 1986
667: {\em Z. Phys.} C \textbf{33} 187
668:
669: \nonum
670: Bailly J L \textit{et al} 1988
671: {\em Z. Phys.} C \textbf{40} 215
672:
673: \bibitem{Singapore}
674: Van Hove L and Giovannini A 1991
675: {\em 25th International Conference on High Energy Physics}
676: ed {K K Phua and Y Yamaguchi} (Singapore: World
677: Scientific) p 998
678:
679: \bibitem{AGLVH:0}
680: Van Hove L and Giovannini A 1987
681: {\em XVII International Symposium on Multiparticle Dynamics}
682: ed {M Markitan et al}
683: (Singapore: World Scientific) p 561
684:
685: \bibitem{UA5:3}
686: Ansorge R E \textit{et al} 1989
687: {\em Z. Phys.} C \textbf{43} 357
688:
689: \bibitem{DEL:1+DEL:2+DEL:4}
690: Abreu P \textit{et al} 1991
691: {\em Z. Phys.} C \textbf{50} 185
692:
693: \nonum
694: Abreu P \textit{et al} 1991
695: {\em Z. Phys.} C \textbf{52} 271
696:
697: \nonum
698: Abreu P \textit{et al} 1992
699: {\em Z. Phys.} C \textbf{56} 63
700:
701: \bibitem{RU:clanmass}
702: Giovannini A and Ugoccioni R 2003
703: {\em J. Phys.\ } G \textbf{29} 777
704:
705: \bibitem{combo:prd+combo:eta}
706: Giovannini A and Ugoccioni R 1999
707: {\em Phys.\ Rev.\ } D \textbf{59} 094020
708:
709: \nonum
710: Giovannini A and Ugoccioni R 1999
711: {\em Phys.\ Rev.\ } D \textbf{60} 074027
712:
713: \bibitem{Ugoccioni:these}
714: Ugoccioni R
715: \textit{these proceedings}
716:
717: \bibitem{CDF:soft-hard}
718: Acosta D \textit{et al} 2002
719: {\em Phys.\ Rev.\ } D \textbf{65} 072005
720:
721: \bibitem{RU:NewPhysics}
722: Giovannini A and Ugoccioni R 2003
723: {\em Phys.\ Rev.\ } D \textbf{68} 034009
724:
725: \nonum
726: Giovannini A and Ugoccioni R 2004
727: {\em European Physical Journal} C \textbf{36} 309
728:
729: \end{thebibliography}
730:
731:
732:
733: \end{document}
734: