1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2: %% Trim Size: 9.75in x 6.5in
3: %% Text Area: 8in (include Runningheads) x 5in
4: %% ws-ijmpa.tex : 28 July 2003
5: %% Tex file to use with ws-ijmpa.cls written in Latex2E.
6: %% The content, structure, format and layout of this style file is the
7: %% property of World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.
8: %% Copyright 1995, 2002 by World Scientific Publishing Co.
9: %% All rights are reserved.
10: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
11: %%
12: \def\be{\begin{eqnarray}}
13: \def\en{\end{eqnarray}}
14: \def\non{\nonumber}
15: \def\la{\langle}
16: \def\ra{\rangle}
17: \def\ov{\overline}
18: \def\B{{\cal B}}
19: \def\P{{\cal P}}
20: \def\CP{{\it CP}~}
21: \def\pr{{Phys. Rev.}~}
22: \def\prl{{ Phys. Rev. Lett.}~}
23: \def\pl{{ Phys. Lett.}~}
24: \def\np{{ Nucl. Phys.}~}
25: \def\zp{{ Z. Phys.}~}
26:
27:
28: \documentclass{ws-ijmpa}
29:
30: \begin{document}
31:
32: \markboth{Hai-Yang Cheng} {PARITY-EVEN AND PARITY-ODD MESONS IN
33: COVARIANT LIGHT-FRONT APPROACH}
34:
35: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Publisher's Area please ignore %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
36: %
37: \catchline{}{}{}{}{}
38: %
39: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
40:
41: \title{PARITY-EVEN AND PARITY-ODD MESONS IN COVARIANT LIGHT-FRONT APPROACH\\
42: }
43:
44: \author{\footnotesize Hai-Yang Cheng}
45:
46: \address{Institute of Physics, Academia Sinica\\
47: Taipei, Taiwan 115, ROC}
48:
49:
50: \maketitle
51:
52: %\pub{Received (Day Month Year)}{Revised (Day Month Year)}
53:
54: \begin{abstract}
55: Decay constants and form factors for parity-even ($s$-wave) and
56: parity-odd ($p$-wave) mesons are studied within a covariant
57: light-front approach. The three universal Isgur-Wise functions for
58: heavy-to-heavy meson transitions are obtained.
59:
60:
61: \end{abstract}
62:
63: \section{Introduction}
64:
65: Interest in even-parity charmed mesons has been revived by recent
66: discoveries~\cite{data} of two narrow resonances: $D_{s0}^*(2317)$
67: and $D_{s1}(2460)$, and two broad resonances, $D_0^*(2308)$ and
68: $D_1(2427)$. The unexpected and surprising disparity between
69: theory and experiment has sparked a flurry of many theory papers.
70:
71: Before our work,\cite{CCH} the Isgur-Scora-Grinstein-Wise (ISGW)
72: quark model\cite{ISGW,ISGW2} is the only model that can provide a
73: systematical estimate of the transition of a ground-state $s$-wave
74: meson to a low-lying $p$-wave meson. However, this model is based
75: on the non-relativistic constituent quark picture. Since the
76: final-state meson at the maximum recoil point $q^2=0$ or in
77: heavy-to-light transitions can be highly relativistic, it is thus
78: important to consider a relativistic approach. The covariant
79: light-front model elaborated in \cite{Jaus99} is suitable for this
80: purpose, but again it has been only applied to $s$- to $s$-wave
81: meson transitions. In \cite{CCH} we have extended the covariant LF
82: quark model to parity-even, $p$-wave mesons and studied their
83: decay constants, form factors and the corresponding Isgur-Wise
84: functions.
85:
86: \section{Decay constants and form factors}
87:
88: Consider the decay constants for mesons with the quark content
89: $q_1\bar q_2$ in the $^{2S+1} L_J= {}^1S_0$, $^3P_0$, $^3S_1$,
90: $^3P_1$, $^1P_1$ configurations. In the SU(N)-flavor limit
91: ($m_1=m_2$) the decay constants $f_{S(^3P_0)}$ and $f_{^1P_1}$
92: should vanish.\cite{Suzuki}
93: %
94: In the heavy quark limit ($m_1\to\infty$), it is more convenient
95: to use the $L^j_J=P^{3/2}_2$, $P^{3/2}_1$, $P^{1/2}_1$ and
96: $P^{1/2}_0$ basis as the heavy quark spin $s_Q$ and the total
97: angular momentum of the light antiquark $j$ are separately good
98: quantum numbers.
99: %
100: Since decay constants should be identical within each multiplet,
101: $(S^{1/2}_0,\,S^{1/2}_1),\,(P^{1/2}_0,\,P^{1/2}_1),\,(P^{3/2}_1,\,P^{3/2}_2)$,
102: heavy quark symmetry (HQS) requires~\cite{IW89,HQfrules}
103: \begin{eqnarray} \label{eq:HQSf}
104: f_V=f_P,\qquad
105: f_{A^{1/2}}=f_S,\qquad
106: f_{A^{3/2}}=0,
107: \end{eqnarray}
108: where we have denoted the $P^{1/2}_1$ and $P^{3/2}_1$ states by
109: $A^{1/2}$ and $A^{3/2}$, respectively. It is important to check if
110: the calculated decay constants satisfy the non-trivial
111: SU(N)-flavor and HQS relations. The numerical results are shown in
112: Table 1.
113:
114:
115:
116: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
117: \begin{table}[h]
118: \tbl{Mesonic decay constants (in units of MeV) obtained. Those in
119: parentheses are taken as inputs.} {\begin{tabular}{|c|ccccc|}
120: \hline
121: $^{2S+1} L_J$
122: & $f_{u\bar d}$
123: & $f_{s\bar u}$
124: & $f_{c\bar u}$
125: & $f_{c\bar s}$
126: & $f_{b\bar u}$
127: \\
128: \hline $^1S_0$
129: & $(131)$
130: & $(160)$
131: & $(200)$
132: & $(230)$
133: & $(180)$
134: \\
135: $^3P_0$
136: & $0$
137: & $22$
138: & $86$
139: & $71$
140: & $112$
141: \\
142: $^3S_1$
143: & $(216)$
144: & $(210)$
145: & $(220)$
146: & $(230)$
147: & $(180)$
148: \\
149: $^3P_1$
150: & $(-203)$
151: & $-186$
152: & $-127$
153: & $-121$
154: & $-123$
155: \\
156: $^1P_1$
157: & $0$
158: & $11$
159: & $45$
160: & $38$
161: & $68$
162: \\
163: \hline $P^{1/2}_1$
164: & --
165: & --
166: & $130$
167: & $122$
168: & $140$
169: \\
170: $P^{3/2}_1$
171: & --
172: & --
173: & $-36$
174: & $-38$
175: & $-15$
176: \\
177: \hline
178: \end{tabular}}
179: %\end{ruledtabular}
180: \end{table}
181: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
182:
183: From Table 1 we see that the decay constants of light scalar
184: resonances are suppressed relative to that of the pseudoscalar
185: mesons, while the suppression becomes less effective for heavy
186: scalar mesons. Our result of $f_{D_{s0}^*}=71$ MeV is supported by
187: the measurements of the $B\to D^{(*)}\bar D_{s0}^*$
188: decays.\cite{data}
189:
190:
191: Form factors for heavy-to-heavy and heavy-to-light transitions
192: have been computed in the covariant light-front approach. The
193: details are shown in \cite{CCH}. Our results for form factors in
194: $B\to D,D^*,D^{**}$ ($D^{**}$ denoting generic $p$-wave charmed
195: mesons) transitions agree with those in the ISGW2
196: model.\cite{ISGW2} Relativistic effects are mild in $B\to D$
197: transition, but they could be more prominent in heavy-to-light
198: transitions, especially at maximum recoil ($q^2=0$). For example,
199: we obtain $V_0^{Ba_1}(0)=0.13$,\cite{CCH} while ISGW2 gives 1.01.
200: If $a_1(1260)$ behaves as the scalar partner of the $\rho$ meson,
201: it is expected that $V_0^{Ba_1}\sim A_0^{B\rho}\sim O(0.3)$. The
202: predicted decay rates for $\overline B\to D^{**}\pi$ and
203: $\overline D_s^{**} D^{(*)}$ obtained in the CLF model agree with
204: experiment.\cite{CCH}
205:
206: It is worth mentioning that the ratio
207: $R=\B(B^-\to D_2^{*0}\pi^-)/\B(B^-\to D_1^0\pi^-)$
208: is measured to be $0.80\pm0.07\pm0.16$ by BaBar \cite{BaBarD} and
209: $0.77\pm0.15$ by Belle.\cite{BelleD} The early prediction by
210: Neubert \cite{Neubert} yields a value of 0.35, while
211: soft-collinear effective theory predicts $R=1$.\cite{Mantry} Our
212: prediction of $R=0.91$ in the covariant light-front model is in
213: accordance with the data.
214:
215: \section{Heavy quark limit and Isgur-Wise functions}
216:
217: In the heavy quark limit, heavy quark symmetry\cite{IW89} provides
218: model-independent constraints on the decay constants and form
219: factors. For example, pseudoscalar and vector mesons would have
220: the same decay constants and all the heavy-to-heavy mesonic decay
221: form factors are reduced to some universal Isgur-Wise functions.
222: Therefore, it is important to study the heavy quark limit behavior
223: of these physical quantities to check the consistency of
224: calculations.
225:
226: It is well known that the $s$-wave to $s$-wave meson transition in
227: the heavy quark limit is governed by a single universal IW
228: function $\xi(\omega)$.\cite{IW89} Likewise, there exist two
229: universal functions $\tau_{1/2}(\omega)$ and $\tau_{3/2}(\omega)$
230: describing ground-state $s$-wave to $p$-wave
231: transitions.\cite{IW91} The calculated IW functions are shown in
232: Fig. 1. It is found that at zero recoil $\omega=1$, $\xi(1)=1$,
233: $\tau_{1/2}(1)=0.61$, $\tau_{3/2}(1)=0.31$ and $\rho^2=1.22$ for
234: the slope parameter of $\xi(\omega)$. Our results for $\tau_{1/2}$
235: and $\tau_{3/2}$ agree well with the recent lattice results
236: \cite{Becirevic} $\tau_{1/2}(1)=0.38\pm0.05$ and
237: $\tau_{3/2}(1)=0.58\pm0.08$. The Bjorken \cite{Bjorken} and
238: Uraltsev \cite{Uraltsev} sum rules for the Isgur-Wise functions
239: are found to be fairly satisfied.
240:
241:
242: \begin{figure}[t]
243: %\centerline{ {\epsfxsize1.2 in \epsffile{xitau.eps}}}
244: \centerline{
245: \includegraphics[angle=-90,width=5.5cm]{xitau.eps}}
246: \caption{The Isgur-Wise functions $\xi$, $\tau_{1/2}$ and
247: $\tau_{3/2}$ as a function of $\omega$.}
248: \end{figure}
249:
250:
251: \section{Acknowledgments}
252: I am grateful to Chun-Khiang Chua and Chien-Wen Hwang for fruitful
253: collaboration.
254:
255: \begin{thebibliography}{0}
256:
257:
258: \bibitem{data}
259: BaBar Collaboration, B. Aubert {\it et al.,}
260: \prl {\bf 90}, 242001 (2003); hep-ex/0408041;
261: CLEO Collaboration, D. Besson {\it et al.,}
262: \pr D {\bf 68}, 032002 (2003);
263: Belle Collaboration, K.~Abe {\it et al.},
264: %``Study of B- $\to$ D**0 pi- (D**0 $\to$ D(*)+ pi-) decays,''
265: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 69}, 112002 (2004); %[arXiv:hep-ex/0307021].
266: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0307021;%%
267: hep-ex/0307041.
268:
269: \bibitem{CCH}
270: H.Y.~Cheng, C.K.~Chua and C.W.~Hwang,
271: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 69}, 074025 (2004). %[arXiv:hep-ph/0310359].
272: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0310359;%%
273:
274: \bibitem{ISGW}
275: N. Isgur, D. Scora, B. Grinstein, and M.B. Wise, \pr
276: D {\bf 39}, 799 (1989).
277:
278:
279: \bibitem{ISGW2}
280: D. Scora and N. Isgur, \pr D {\bf 52}, 2783 (1995).
281:
282:
283: \bibitem{Jaus99}
284: W.~Jaus,
285: %``Covariant Analysis Of The Light-Front Quark Model,''
286: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 60}, 054026 (1999).
287: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D60,054026;%%
288:
289: \bibitem{Suzuki}
290: M. Suzuki, \pr D {\bf 47}, 1252 (1993).
291:
292: \bibitem{IW89}
293: N. Isgur and M. B. Wise, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 232},
294: 113 (1989); {\bf 237}, 527 (1990).
295:
296: \bibitem{HQfrules}
297: A.~Le Yaouanc, L.~Oliver, O.~Pene, and J.~C.~Raynal,
298: %``New Heavy Quark Limit Sum Rules involving Isgur-Wise Functions and Decay Constants,''
299: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 387}, 582 (1996). %[arXiv:hep-ph/9607300];
300: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9607300;%%
301:
302: \bibitem{BaBarD} BaBar Collaboration, B. Aubert {\it et al.,} hep-ex/0308026.
303:
304: \bibitem{BelleD} Belle Collaboration, K. Abe {\it et al.,} \pr, D
305: {\bf 69}, 112002 (2004).
306:
307: \bibitem{Neubert} M. Neubert, \pl {\bf B418}, 173 (1998).
308:
309: \bibitem{Mantry} S. Mantry, hep-ph/0405290.
310:
311: \bibitem{IW91}
312: N.~Isgur and M.~B.~Wise,
313: %``Excited Charm Mesons In Semileptonic Anti-B Decay And Their Contributions To A Bjorken Sum Rule,''
314: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 43}, 819 (1991).
315: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D43,819;%%
316:
317: \bibitem{Becirevic}
318: D.~Becirevic {\it et al.},
319: %``Lattice measurement of the Isgur-Wise functions tau(1/2) and tau(3/2),''
320: hep-lat/0406031.
321: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0406031;%%
322:
323: \bibitem{Bjorken}
324: J.D. Bjorken, SLAC-PUB-5278 (1990); J.D. Bjorken, J.
325: Dunietz, and J. Taron, \np B {\bf 371}, 111 (1992).
326:
327: \bibitem{Uraltsev}
328: N. Uraltsev, \pl B {\bf 501}, 86 (2001).
329:
330:
331: \end{thebibliography}
332:
333: \end{document}
334: