1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2: 

3: % This is a sample input file for your contribution to a

4: 

5: % multi-author book ("proceedings-like) to be published

6: 

7: % by Springer Verlag.

8: 

9: %

10: 

11: % Please use it as a template for your own input, and please

12: 

13: % follow the instructions for the formal editing of your

14: 

15: % manuscript as described in the file "1readme".

16: 

17: %

18: 

19: % Please send the Tex and figure files of your manuscript

20: 

21: % together with any additional style files as well as the

22: 

23: % PS file to the editor of your book.

24: 

25: %

26: 

27: % He or she will collect all contributions for the planned

28: 

29: % book, possibly compile them all in one go and pass the

30: 

31: % complete set of manuscripts on to Springer.

32: 

33: %

34: 

35: % Vers. 07/99

36: 

37: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

38: 

39: 

40: %%RECOMMENDED%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

41: \documentclass[runningheads]{svmult}

42: 

43: \usepackage{makeidx}   % allows index generation

44: \usepackage{graphicx}  % standard LaTeX graphics tool

45: %                       % for including eps-figure files

46: \usepackage{subeqnar}  % subnumbers individual equation

47: %                       % within an array 

48: \usepackage{multicol}  % used for the two-column index 

49: %%\usepackage{cropmark} % cropmarks for pages without 

50: %                       % pagenumbers - only needed when manuscript 

51: %                       % is printed from paper and not from data 

52: \usepackage{physprbb}  % centered layout of diverse elements, etc. 

53: \makeindex             % used for the subject index 

54: %                       % please use the style sprmidx.sty with 

55: %                       % your makeindex program 

56: % 

57: %%%upright Greek letters (example below: upright "mu") 

58: %\newcommand{\greeksym}[1]{{\usefont{U}{psy}{m}{n}#1}} 

59: %\newcommand{\umu}{\mbox{\greeksym{m}}} 

60: %\newcommand{\udelta}{\mbox{\greeksym{d}}} 

61: %\newcommand{\uDelta}{\mbox{\greeksym{D}}} 

62: %\newcommand{\uPi}{\mbox{\greeksym{P}}} 

63: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% 

64:  

65:  

66: %OPTIONAL%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% 

67: % 

68: %\usepackage{amstex}   % useful for coding complex math 

69: %\mathindent\parindent % needed in case "Amstex" is used 

70: % 

71: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% 

72:  

73: %AUTHOR_STYLES_AND_DEFINITIONS%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% 

74: % 

75: %Please reduce your own definitions and macros to an absolute 

76: %minimum since otherwise the editor will find it rather 

77: %strenuous to compile all individual contributions to a 

78: %single book file 

79: % 

80: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% 

81:  

82: \begin{document} 

83: % 

84: \title*{Heavy Mesons and Impact Ionization of Heavy Quarkonia

85: \footnote{Published in: Lect. Notes Phys. 647:366-375,2004}} 

86: % 

87: % 

88: \toctitle{Heavy Mesons and Impact Ionization of Heavy Quarkonia} 

89: % allows explicit linebreak for the table of content 

90: % 

91: % 

92: \titlerunning{Heavy Mesons and Impact Ionization} 

93: % allows abbreviation of title, if the full title is too long 

94: % to fit in the running head 

95: % 

96: \author{David Blaschke\inst{1,2}

97: \and Yuri Kalinovsky\inst{3}

98: \and Valery Yudichev\inst{2}

99: } 

100: % 

101: \authorrunning{David Blaschke et al.} 

102: % if there are more than two authors, 

103: % please abbreviate author list for running head 

104: % 

105: % 

106: \institute{Fachbereich Physik, Universit\"at Rostock, D-18051 Rostock, 

107: Germany 

108: \footnote{Presently at: Fakult\"at f\"ur Physik, Universit\"at Bielefeld,

109: D-33615 Bielefeld, Germany}

110: \and Bogoliubov Laboratory for Theoretical Physics, 

111:      Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, 

112:      141980 Dubna, Russia 

113: \and Laboratory of Information Technologies, 

114:     Joint Institute for Nuclear  Research, 

115:     141980 Dubna, Russia

116:     } 

117:  

118: \maketitle              % typesets the title of the contribution 

119:  

120: \begin{abstract} 

121: At the chiral restoration/deconfinement transition, most hadrons 

122: undergo a Mott transition from being bound states in the confined phase to 

123: resonances in the deconfined phase. We investigate the consequences of 

124: this qualitative change in the hadron spectrum on 

125: final state interactions of charmonium in hot and dense matter, and show that 

126: the Mott effect for D-mesons leads to a critical enhancement of the J/$\psi$ 

127: dissociation rate. Anomalous J/$\psi$ suppression in the NA50 experiment is 

128: discussed as well as the role of the Mott effect for the heavy flavor kinetics 

129: in future experiments at the LHC. The status of our calculations of 

130: heavy quarkonium dissociation cross sections due to quark and gluon impact 

131: is reviewed, and estimates for in-medium effects due to the lowering of the

132: ionisation threshold are given. 

133: \end{abstract}                

134: 

135: 

136: \section{Introduction}

137: Heavy quarks as constituents of heavy quarkonia and heavy mesons play a

138: decisive role in the diagnostics of hot and dense matter created in 

139: ultrarelativistic heavy-ion collisions. The most promiment example is

140: the celebrated J/$\psi$ suppression effect as a possible signal of

141: the formation of a \index{quark-gluon plasma} which was suggested by 

142: Matsui and Satz \cite{Matsui:1986dk} in 1986 and has triggered experimental 

143: programs 

144: at CERN, Brookhaven and the future GSI facility as well as a broad spectrum 

145: of theoretical work ever since.

146: In the present lecture, we will elucidate some aspects of the physics of

147: heavy quarks in a hot and dense medium which demonstrate why J/$\psi$

148: suppression is so difficult to interprete. We suggest that $\Upsilon$ may

149: be a rather clean probe of the plasma state to be produced at CERN-LHC.

150: 

151: The production of heavy quark pairs is a hard process well separated from

152: the soft physics governing the evolution of a quark gluon plasma in 

153: heavy-ion collisions. However, the formation of heavy quarkonia and heavy

154: mesons as well as their final state interactions may be well modified by 

155: a surrounding hot medium. The basic principle of their use as indicators

156: is similar to the situation in Astrophysics where information about the 

157: temperature, density, composition and other properties of stellar atmospheres

158: is obtained from an analysis of the modification of emission and absorption

159: spectra relative to terrestrial conditions \cite{Kajantie:bs}.

160:  

161: The first and widely discussed probe in this context is the J/$\psi$.

162: Contrary to naive expectations, Matsui and Satz suggested that with increasing

163: cms energy in a heavy-ion collision a suppression of the   J/$\psi$

164: production relative to the (Drell-Yan) continuum occurs due to the 

165: dissociation of the charmonium bound state in a dense medium.

166: This is in analogy to the \index{Mott transition} in semiconductor and 

167: plasma physics where under high pressure electrons become delocalized and a 

168: conduction band emerges, signaling the plasma state \cite{rr}. 

169: 

170: Correlators of quarkonia states are measured at finite temperature on the 

171: lattice \cite{asakawa99,asakawa01,umeda01,umeda02,datta02}. 

172: Using the maximum entropy method \cite{asakawa99}, spectral functions can 

173: be obtained which give

174: not only information about the mass but also about the spectral width of the 

175: states.

176: No substantial modification of J/$\psi$ spectral function is found for 

177: temperatures up to $T=1.5 T_c$.

178: The $\chi_c$ and $\psi'$ states may be dissolved at $T_c$.

179: This new lattice analysis provides results alternative to those obtained 

180: earlier by solving the bound state Schr\"odinger equation for a 

181: (temperature-dependent) screened potential \cite{karsch88}.

182: While the Mott-dissociation of   $\chi_c$ and $\psi'$ states is confirmed,

183: the observation of a nearly unchanged J/$\psi$ resonance well above the 

184: suspected Mott temperature $T^{\rm Mott}_{J/\psi}=1.1-1.3~T_c$ came as a 

185: surprise for simple potential models.

186: The existence of \index{resonances} above the Mott transition is, however, a 

187: well-known feature displayed, e.g., in analyses of exciton lines in 

188: semiconductor plasmas \cite{rr}.

189: The picture which emerges from these lattice studies seems to be consistent 

190: with a modification of the effective interaction at finite temperatures so

191: that excited states of the charmonium spectrum  ($\chi_c$ and $\psi'$) can

192: be dissolved at $T_c$ whereas the deeply bound ground states ($\eta_c$ and 

193: J/$\psi$) are observed as rather narrow resonances well above that temperature.

194: In order to interpret these findings a study of the spectral functions for

195: screened Coulomb or Cornell-type potentials should be performed.

196: 

197: \begin{figure}

198: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=2.5in,angle=0]{breakup2.eps}}

199: \caption{Transition amplitude for a quarkonium breakup process in a 

200: fully developed quark-gluon plasma.}

201: \label{breakup2}

202: \end{figure}

203: 

204: \section{Quantum kinetics for quarkonium in a plasma}

205: 

206: The {inverse lifetime} of a state with 4-momentum $p$ in a plasma is 

207: related to the imaginary part of its selfenergy by 

208: $\tau^{-1}(p) = \Gamma(p) = \Sigma^>(p) - \Sigma^{<}(p)$~,

209: where in the {Born approximation for} the quarkonium breakup

210: by quark and gluon impact holds, see also Fig. \ref{breakup2}

211: \begin{eqnarray}

212: \Sigma^{\stackrel{>}{<}}(p)&=& \int_{p'}\int_{p_1}\dots \int_{p_3} (2\pi)^4 

213: \delta_{p+p',p_1+p_2+p_3} |{\cal M}|^2

214: G^<(p') G^>(p_1) G^>(p_2) G^>(p_3)~,

215: \nonumber

216: \end{eqnarray}

217: where the nonequilibrium Green functions can be expressed via

218: distribution functions $f_i(p)$ and spectral functions $A_i(p)$

219: of the particle species $i$ as

220: $ 

221: G^>_i(p)= [1\pm f_i(p)],~G^<_i(p)= f_i(p) A_i(p)~.

222: $

223: This quantum kinetic formulation includes not only the loss but also the 

224: reverse process of $Q\bar Q$ fusion in a consistent way.

225: It can also be generalized to include strong correlations such as hadronic

226: bound states or resonances in the visinity of the hadronization transition,

227: see Fig. \ref{sigma-h}.

228: \begin{figure}

229: %\centerline{\includegraphics[width=2.5in,angle=0]{MottRatePsiPiNJL.eps}

230: \includegraphics[width=4in,angle=0]{qQex.eps}

231: %\hspace*{0.2cm}

232: %\includegraphics[width=2.5in,angle=0]{MottRatePsiRhoNJL.eps}

233: \caption{Transition amplitude for heavy quarkonium dissociation

234: in strongly correlated quark matter. The T-matrices stand for mesonic 

235: bound and/or scattering states. }

236: \label{sigma-h}

237: \end{figure}

238: First steps in this direction have been explored \cite{Burau:2000pn}.

239: 

240: \section{Quarkonium dissociation cross section in a gluon gas}

241: 

242: In this section we give benchmark results for activation of 

243: Coulombic bound states by collisions in a medium. The medium will be 

244: represented as a gluon gas with thermal distribution function,

245: $n_g(\omega)=g_g [\exp(\omega(p)/T) - 1]^{-1}$, where

246: the degeneracy factor $g_g=2 (N_c^2-1)$.

247: \begin{table}[htb]

248: \begin{tabular}{|c|cc|cc|}

249: \hline

250: &set(i)&&set(ii)&\\ 

251: \hline

252: $Q \bar{Q}$ system & $\varepsilon_0 $[GeV] & $m_Q [GeV]$ & 

253: $\varepsilon_0$ [GeV] & $m_Q$ [GeV]\\

254: \hline

255: bottomonium & 0.75 & 5.10 & 1.10 & 5.28 \\

256: charmonium & 0.78 & 1.94 & 0.62 & 1.86 \\

257: \hline

258: \end{tabular} 

259: %\vspace{0.5cm}

260: \caption{Parameters of the heavy quarkonium systems: binding energy 

261: $\varepsilon_0$ and heavy quark mass $m_Q$ from \cite{arleo}. Left two 

262: columns refer to set(i), the right two columns to set(ii).}

263: \label{tbl.hqp}

264: \end{table}

265: 

266: %\subsection{Gluon impact, $T>T_c$}

267: %\subsubsection{Ideal system}

268: The quarkonium breakup cross section by gluon impact

269: can be estimated with the Bhanot/Peskin formula \cite{bp}

270: \begin{equation}

271: \sigma_{(Q\bar Q) g} (\omega)= 

272: \frac{2^{11}}{3^4}\alpha_s \pi a_0^2

273: \frac{(\omega/\epsilon_0 - a(T))^{3/2}}{(\omega/\epsilon_0)^5} 

274: \Theta(\omega - \epsilon_0a(T))

275: \end{equation}

276: with the binding energy $\epsilon_0$ of the $1S$ 

277: quarkonium state with a Coulombic rms radius 

278: $\sqrt{\langle r^2\rangle_{1S}}=\sqrt{3} a_0=

279: 2\sqrt{3}/(\alpha_s m_Q)$, and the heavy-quark mass $m_Q$, the energy of the 

280: impacting gluon is $\omega$. 

281: With the parameter $0<a(T)<1$ we can vary the effective dissociation threshold 

282: from $\omega_{th}^{ideal}=\epsilon_0; a(T<T_c)=1$ to  

283: $\omega_{th}^{Mott}=0; a(T>T^{Mott})=0$. 

284: See Fig. \ref{sigma} for numerical examples.  

285: \begin{figure}

286: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=4in,angle=-90]{sigma_QQg_a.ps}}

287: \caption{Energy dependence of the quarkonium breakup cross section by 

288: gluon impact for different (constant) threshold depletion factors 

289: $a(T)=1, 0.75, 0.5$.}

290: \label{sigma}

291: \end{figure}

292: 

293: The dissociation rate for a heavy quarkonium $1S$

294: state at rest in a heat bath of massless gluons ($\omega=p$)

295: at temparature $T$ is

296: \begin{equation}

297: \frac{1}{\tau_{(Q\bar Q) g}(T)}=\Gamma_{(Q\bar Q) g}(T)=

298: \langle \sigma_{(Q\bar Q) g}^{ideal}(\omega)n_g(\omega)\rangle_T

299: = \frac{1}{2\pi^2}\int_0^\infty \omega^2 d \omega 

300: \sigma_{(Q\bar Q) g}^{ideal}(\omega)n_g(\omega)

301: \end{equation}

302: and is shown in Fig. \ref{gamma-tau-g}. 

303: %together with the inverse of this 

304: %quantity corresponds to the lifetime of the Quarkonium state. 

305:   

306: \begin{figure}

307: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=4in,angle=-90]{Gamma_med_T.ps}

308: %\hspace*{0.2cm}

309: %\includegraphics[width=2.5in,angle=-90]{tau_T.ps}

310: }

311: \caption{Rate coefficient $\Gamma_{(Q\bar Q)g}=\tau^{-1}$

312: for heavy quarkonium dissociation by gluon impact as a function of the

313: gluon plasma temperature (no medium, $a(T)=1$),

314: %(left panel) and the corresponding lifetime $\tau$ (right panel), 

315: parameters see Tab. \ref{tbl.hqp}.

316: For comparison, the Breit-Wigner fit of the spectral width for $^1S_0$ 

317: charmonium from lattice simulations is shown.

318: In-medium effects are estimated by a lowering of the breakup threshold,

319: see text.}

320: \label{gamma-tau-g}

321: \end{figure}

322: 

323: It is interesting to note that there is a discrepancy between the 

324: Lattice calculation of the charmonium decay with in a gluonic medium and the

325: decay width of charmonium by gluon impact due to the gluonic E1 transition. 

326: It is conceivable that the Lattice simulation overestimates the 

327: thermal width of the charmonium states, but we would rather like to suggest

328: that due to a lowering of the ionisation threshold in the 

329: gluonic medium the breakup rate will be enhanced. 

330: For an analytical estimate we adopt a temperature dependence of the strong 

331: coupling constant by using the gluon momentum scale \cite{kapusta}

332: $\langle p^2\rangle = (3.2 ~T)^2$

333: in the 1-loop $\beta$ function such that 

334: \begin{equation}

335: \label{alpha_T}

336: \frac{\varepsilon_0~a(T)}{m_Q}=

337: %\frac{9}{16}\alpha_s^2(T)=

338: \left(\frac{3\pi}{22~\ln(3.2~T/\Lambda)}\right)^2~.

339: \end{equation}

340: \vspace{-1cm}

341: 

342: \begin{figure}

343: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=4in,angle=-90]{alpha_T.ps}

344: %\hspace*{0.2cm}

345: %\includegraphics[width=2.5in,angle=-90]{tau_T.ps}

346: }

347: \caption{

348: Temperature dependence of the ionisation threshold due to the 1-loop

349: running of the strong coupling constant (\ref{alpha_T}).}

350: \label{alpha-T}

351: \end{figure}

352: 

353: %\subsection{Medium modification - screening}

354: %\subsection{Survival probability for heavy quarkonia in hot, dense matter}

355: \section{Quarkonia abundances and observable signatures}

356: 

357: In order to study observable signatures we will adopt here the Bjorken 

358: scenario \cite{Bjorken:1982qr} for the plasma evolution, i.e. longitudinal expansion with conserved entropy: $T^3~t=T_0^3~t_0={\rm const}$.

359: Parameters for the initial state are given in Tab. \ref{tbl.HIC}, where

360: RHIC and LHC values are taken from \cite{xu}, the SPS values are 

361: ''canonical''. 

362: \begin{table}[htb]

363: \begin{tabular}{cccc} 

364: \hline

365:  & LHC (3) & RHIC (3) & SPS  \\

366: \hline

367: $T_0$ [GeV] & 0.72 & 0.4 & 0.25 \\

368: $\tau_0$ [fm/c] & 0.5 & 0.7 & 1.0 \\

369: \hline

370: %\vspace{-0.5cm}

371: \end{tabular} 

372: \caption{Heavy-ion collision parameters from \cite{xu}.}

373: \label{tbl.HIC}

374: \end{table}

375: As the quantity for comparison with experimental data of quarkonium production 

376: we consider the survival probability. We neglect here the hadronic comover and 

377: the nucleonic contributions, and also the effects due to the hadronisation 

378: phase transition

379: \begin{equation}

380: S(t_f)=\exp\left(-\int_{t_0}^{t_f}~dt~\tau^{-1}(T) \right)~.

381: \end{equation}

382: At the freeze-out time $t_f$ the collisions stop to change the number of 

383: J/$\psi$ ($\Upsilon$). Using the Bjorken scaling it can be related into

384: a freeze-out temperature. In Fig. \ref{suppr} we give the survival probability

385: for J/$\psi$ (left panel) and for $\Upsilon$ (right panel) for the parameters

386: of the Tables \ref{tbl.hqp} and \ref{tbl.HIC} due to gluon impact.

387: For the LHC conditions, the simple estimates presented here don't give robust

388: predictions for J/$\psi$. The $\Upsilon$, however, shall be a good probe for

389: the lifetime of the plasma state as well as for its temperature. 

390: More details can be found in Ref.  \cite{Bedjidian:2003gd}.

391: \begin{figure}

392: %\centerline{\includegraphics[width=2.5in,angle=-90]{suppr_c.ps}

393: \includegraphics[width=4in,angle=-90]{suppr.ps}

394: %\hspace*{0.2cm}

395: \includegraphics[width=4in,angle=-90]{suppr_b.ps}

396: \caption{Survival probability for heavy quarkonia states in a 

397: longitudinally expanding gluon plasma as a function of the plasma lifetime;

398: $^1S_0$ charmonium (J/$\psi$, upper panel) and $^1S_0$ 

399: bottomonium ($\Upsilon$, lower panel), parameters see Tabs. 

400: \ref{tbl.hqp}, \ref{tbl.HIC}.}

401: \label{suppr}

402: \end{figure}

403: 

404: \section{Quarkonia dissociation by quark impact, $T>T_c$}

405: %\subsubsection{Ideal system}

406: The quarkonium breakup cross section by quark impact is estimated

407: using the Bethe formula \cite{bethe} for impact ionization of 

408: the $1S$ bound state of the Coulomb potential  

409: (the quark now plays the role of the impacting electron)

410: \begin{equation}

411: \sigma_{(Q\bar Q) q} (\omega)= 2.5 \pi a_0^2

412: \frac{\varepsilon_0}{\omega}

413: \ln\left(\frac{\omega+\Delta(T)}{\varepsilon_0}\right)

414:  \Theta\left(\frac{\omega + \Delta(T)}{\varepsilon_0}-1\right)~.

415: \end{equation}

416: Here we employ a generalization of Bethe's formula which takes into account

417: the shift of the continuum edge of scattering states by $\Delta(T)$, which

418: results in a temperature-dependent lowering of the ionisation threshold

419: \cite{schlanges}, $\varepsilon(T)=\varepsilon_0-\Delta(T)$. This is named

420: the Bethe-Born model (BBM).

421: For quark matter systems, the energy shift $\Delta(T)$ has been obtained

422: within the string-flip model (SFM), see \cite{Blaschke:1984yj,Ropke:qs}.

423: Within this model also an effective cross section for heavy quarkonium

424: breakup has been estimated \cite{rbs,rbs88}

425: \begin{equation}

426: \sigma(T)=\pi r^2_{Q\bar Q}(T)\exp(-\Delta (T)/T)

427: \end{equation}

428: It is remarkable that the enhancement of the breakup cross section due

429: to the lowering of the threshold in the BBM is comparable in magnitude 

430: to that of the SFM approach, see Fig. \ref{sigma-psi-ups}.  

431: 

432: 

433: \begin{figure}

434: \includegraphics[width=4in,angle=-90]{sigma_Psi_q_T.ps}

435: %\hspace*{0.2cm}

436: \includegraphics[width=4in,angle=-90]{sigma_Ups_q_T.ps}

437: \caption{Thermally averaged cross section for heavy quarkonium dissociation

438: by quark impact as a function of the temperature: J/$\psi$ (upper panel) 

439: and $\Upsilon$ (lower panel), parameters see Tab. \ref{tbl.hqp}.

440: BBM and SFM approach give a similar cross section enhancement due to 

441: the lowering of the breakup threshold.}

442: \label{sigma-psi-ups}

443: \end{figure}

444: 

445: 

446: \section{Conclusions}

447: In the QGP (and in the mixed phase), due to the presence of quasifree quarks

448: and gluons, new channels for charmonium formation and dissociation exist which

449: could drive chemical equilibration during the

450: existence of the fireball formed in the heavy-ion collision.

451: In this contribution we have given some benchmark estimates which have to

452: be further elaborated.

453: The role of partonic in-medium effects in the heavy quarkonium kinetics 

454: in a QGP, which has previously been discussed in the string-flip model of 

455: quark matter in the

456: form of a modified mass action law \cite{rbs} and dissociation rate

457: \cite{rbs88}, should be reconsidered by also including gluonic degrees of

458: freedom which shall become dominant at RHIc and LHC conditions.

459: We suggest that rate coefficients for the ionization and recombination

460: of charm mesons could be described using an approach similar to methods

461: used previously to study Coulomb plasmas \cite{rr,bornath,schlanges}.

462: It is suggested that the measurement of the $\Upsilon$ suppression at LHC

463: can provide rather robust informations about the initial temperature

464: (or lifetime) of the quark-gluon plasma.

465: 

466: \section*{Acknowledgement}

467: V.Yu. acknowledges support by DFG under grant No. 436 RUS 17/37/03

468: and the Russian Fund for Fundamental Research under grant No. 02-02-16194

469: as well as by the Heisenberg-Landau program.

470: D.B. is grateful to many colleagues for numerous enlightening discussions,

471: in particular to G. Burau, J. H\"ufner, P. Petreczky, A. Polleri, H. Satz 

472: and  R. Vogt.

473: 

474: \begin{thebibliography}{99}

475: 

476: %\cite{Matsui:1986dk}

477: \bibitem{Matsui:1986dk}

478: T.~Matsui and H.~Satz,

479: %``J / Psi Suppression By Quark - Gluon Plasma Formation,''

480: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 178} (1986) 416.

481: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B178,416;%%

482: %\cite{Kajantie:bs}

483: \bibitem{Kajantie:bs}

484: K.~Kajantie, Quark Matter '84. Proceedings, 4th International Conference On 

485: Ultrarelativistic Nucleus-Nucleus Collisions, Helsinki, Finland, June 17-21,

486: 1984, 

487: \bibitem{rr}

488: R. Redmer, Phys. Rep. {\bf 282} (1997) 35

489: \bibitem{asakawa99}

490: Y. Nakahara, M. Asakawa and T. Hatsuda, Phys. Rev. D60 (1999) 091503

491: \bibitem{asakawa01}

492: M. Asakawa, T. Hatsuda and Y. Nakahara, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 46 (2001) 459

493: \bibitem{umeda01}

494: T. Umeda, R. Katayama, O. Miyamura and H. Matsufuru, Int. J. Mod. Phys. 

495: A 16 (2001) 2215

496: \bibitem{umeda02}

497: T. Umeda, K. Nomura and H. Matsufuru, hep-lat/0211003

498: \bibitem{datta02}

499: S. Datta, F. Karsch, P. Petreczky and I. Wetzorke, hep-lat/0208012

500: (to be published in the proceedings of Lattice 2002)

501: \bibitem{karsch88}

502: F. Karsch, M.T. Mehr and H. Satz, Z. Phys. C (1988) 617

503: %\cite{Burau:2000pn}

504: \bibitem{Burau:2000pn}

505: G.~R.~G.~Burau, D.~B.~Blaschke and Y.~L.~Kalinovsky,

506: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 506} (2001) 297

507: [arXiv:nucl-th/0012030].

508: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0012030;%%

509: \bibitem{bp}

510: G. Bhanot and M.E. Peskin, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B 156} (1979) 391

511: \bibitem{arleo}

512: F. Arleo, P.-B. Gossiaux, T. Gousset, J. Aichelin, 

513: Phys. Rev. {\bf D 65} (2001) 014005

514: \bibitem{kapusta}

515: J.I. Kapusta, Finite-temperature field theory, Cambridge University Press,

516: Cambridge 1989

517: \bibitem{Bjorken:1982qr}

518: J.~D.~Bjorken,

519: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 27} (1983) 140

520: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D27,140;%%

521: \bibitem{xu}

522: X.-M. Xu, D. Kharzeev, H. Satz, X.-N. Wang, Phys. Rev. {\bf C 53} (1996) 3051

523: \bibitem{bethe} H. Bethe, Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) {\bf 5} (1930) 325

524: %

525: %\cite{Bedjidian:2003gd}

526: \bibitem{Bedjidian:2003gd}

527: M.~Bedjidian {\it et al.},

528: %``Hard probes in heavy ion collisions at the LHC: Heavy flavour physics,''

529: arXiv:hep-ph/0311048.

530: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0311048;%%

531: %\cite{Blaschke:1984yj}

532: \bibitem{Blaschke:1984yj}

533: D.~Blaschke, F.~Reinholz, G.~Ropke and D.~Kremp,

534: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 151} (1985) 439.

535: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B151,439;%%

536: %\cite{Ropke:qs}

537: \bibitem{Ropke:qs}

538: G.~Ropke, D.~Blaschke and H.~Schulz,

539: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 34} (1986) 3499.

540: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D34,3499;%%

541: \bibitem{rbs}

542: G.~R\"opke, D.~Blaschke, and H.~Schulz,

543: {\it Phys.\ Lett.\ B} {\bf 202} (1988) 479.

544: %

545: \bibitem{rbs88}

546: G. R\"opke, D. Blaschke and H. Schulz, Phys. Rev. {\bf D 38} (1988) 3589

547: \bibitem{bornath}

548: Th.~Bornath and M.~Schlanges

549: %``Ionization and recombination of excited atomic states in a dense nonideal

550: %hydrogen plasma''

551: {\it Physica A} {\bf 196} (1993) 427.

552: \bibitem{schlanges}

553: M. Schlanges, Th. Bornath, D. Kremp, Phys. Rev. {\bf A 38} (1988) 2174.

554: \end{thebibliography}

555: 

556: \end{document}

557: 

558: