1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2: %% ws-procs9x6.tex : 2 January 2004
3: %% Text file for Proceedings Trim Size [9in x 6in] written in Latex2E.
4: %% The content, structure, format and layout of this style file is the
5: %% property of World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.
6: %% Copyright 1995, 2002 by World Scientific Publishing Co.
7: %% All rights are reserved.
8: %%
9: %% Proceedings Trim Size: 9in x 6in
10: %% Text Area: 7.35in (include runningheads) x 4.5in
11: %% Main Text is 10/13pt
12: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
13:
14: %\documentclass[draft]{ws-procs9x6}
15: \documentclass{ws-procs9x6}
16: \def\beq{\begin{equation}}
17: \def\eeq{\end{equation}}
18: \def\beqn{\begin{eqnarray}}
19: \def\eeqn{\end{eqnarray}}
20:
21: \begin{document}
22:
23: \title{Analysis of SO(2N) Couplings of Spinor and Tensor
24: Representations in $SU(N)\times U(1)$ Invariant Forms}
25: %\footnote{\uppercase{T}his work is supported by etc, etc.}}
26:
27: \author{ Raza M. Syed
28: %\footnote{\uppercase{W}ork partially
29: %supported by grant PHY-0139967 of the \uppercase{S}wiss
30: %\uppercase{N}ational \uppercase{S}cience \uppercase{F}oundation.}
31: }
32:
33: \address{
34: Department of Physics, Northeastern University,
35: Boston, MA 02115-5000, USA}
36:
37:
38:
39:
40: %ccccccc
41: \maketitle
42:
43: \abstracts{
44: A review is given of a recently developed technique for
45: the analysis of $SO(2N)$ invariant couplings which allows a full
46: exhibition of the $SU(N)$ invariant content of couplings involving
47: the $SO(2N)$ semi-spinors $|\Psi_{\pm}>$ with chiralilty $\pm$
48: and tensor representations. We discuss the Basic Theorem used
49: in the analysis and then exhibit the technique by illustrative examples
50: for the computation of the trilinear and quartic
51: couplings for the $SO(10)$ case involving three generations of 16 plets of matter.}
52:
53:
54: \section{Introduction}
55: In this paper we give a brief overview of a recently developed technique for
56: the computation of $SO(2N)$ couplings of spinor and tensor representations in
57: $SU(N)\times U(1)$ invariant forms. These techniques are then specifically applied
58: in illustrative examples for the computation of $SO(10)$ invariant couplings when
59: they are decomposed in $SU(5)\times U(1)$ invariant forms.
60: The analysis presented here is of relevance in view of the
61: importance of $SO(10)$ as a grand unification group\cite{georgi} of the electroweak
62: and the strong interactions. The techniques used are based on the oscillator method\cite{ms,wz,nss}
63: and developed further in Refs \cite{ns1,ns2,ns3} while
64: some related work can be found in Ref.\cite{ab}.
65: This paper is thus essentially a brief summary of the works of Refs.\cite{ns1,ns2}.
66: The outline of the rest of the paper is as follows: In Sec.2 we give a brief discussion
67: of the $SO(2N)$ algebra, $SO(2N)$ spinor representations for $N$ odd, form of $SO(2N)$
68: invariant couplings, and specialization to the $SO(10)$ case.
69: In Sec.3 we give a brief review of the new technique for the evaluation of the
70: $SO(2N)$ invariant couplings in terms of $SU(N)\times U(1)$ invariant forms.
71: In this section we also discuss the Basic Theorem derived in Ref.\cite{ns1}.
72: In Sec.4 we specialize to the $SO(10)$ case and give illustrative examples of the
73: computation of cubic couplings in the superpotential and in the Lagrangian.
74: These involve couplings $16-16-\overline{126}$ in the superpotential, and the couplings
75: of $16$ plets with $45$ of gauge fields, i.e., the couplings $16-16-45$, in the Lagrangian.
76: . We also discuss
77: a sample of $SO(10)$ invariant quartic couplings.
78: \section{Spinor representations of $SO(2N)$; N odd}
79: In this section we will discuss
80: the embedding of $SU(N)$ in $SO(2N)$. Further, we list the general
81: expressions for the group invariants formed from different
82: combinations of $SO(2N)$ spinors. Finally, we specialize the
83: results to $SO(10)$ grand unification group.
84: \subsection{${SO(2N)}$ algebra in a basis}
85: The $2^N$ dimensional spinor, $|{{\Psi}}>$ of $SO(2N)$
86: splits into two inequivalent $2^{N-1}$ dimensional semi-spinors,
87: $|{{\Psi}}_{(\pm)}>$ under the action of the chirality$~$operator:
88: $|{{\Psi}}_{(\pm)}>=\frac{1}{2}(1 \pm {{\Gamma}}_0)|{{\Psi}}>$
89: where ${{\Gamma}}_0=i^N
90: {{\Gamma}}_1{{\Gamma}}_2...{{\Gamma}}_{2N}$ and further
91: ${{\Gamma}}_0|{{\Psi}}_{(\pm)}>=\pm|{{\Psi}}_{(\pm)}>$.
92: Here $\Gamma_{\mu}$ ($\mu=1,2,..,2N$) define a rank $2N$ Clifford algebra
93: with $\{\Gamma_{\mu},\Gamma_{\nu}\}=2\delta_{\mu\nu}$, and
94: $\Sigma_{\mu\nu}=\frac{1}{2i}[\Gamma_{\mu},\Gamma_{\nu}]$ are the $N(2N-1)$
95: generators of $SO(2N)$. Further, it is convenient to introduce operators
96: $b_i$ and $b_i^{\dagger}$ such that $\{b_i,b_j^{\dagger}\}=\delta_{ij}$,
97: $\{b_i,b_j\}=0=\{b_i^{\dagger},b_j^{\dagger}\}$.
98: The
99: semi-spinors, $|{{\Psi}}_{(\pm)}>$ of $SO(2N)$ can be expanded in
100: terms of reducible antisymmetric $SU(N)$ tensors {${ M},~N$} as follows
101: \begin{eqnarray}
102: |{{\Psi}}_{(+)}>= \sum_{p=0,2,..}^{N-1}\frac{1}{p!}{\mathcal
103: M}^{i_1...i_p}_{(p)}\prod_{q=2,4,..}^p b_{i_q}^{\dagger}|0>,\nonumber\\
104: |{{\Psi}}_{(-)}>=\sum_{p=1,3,..}^{N}\frac{1}{p!}{\mathcal
105: N}^{i_1...i_p}_{(p)}\prod_{q=1,3,..}^p b_{i_q}^{\dagger}|0>
106: \end{eqnarray}
107: where
108: the $p$-index tensors can be reduced to $(N-p)$-index tensors as
109: \begin{eqnarray}
110: {\mathcal
111: M}_{(N-p)i_N...i_{p+1}}=\frac{1}{p!}\epsilon_{i_N...i_1}{\mathcal
112: M}^{i_1...i_p}_{(p)}\nonumber\\
113: {\mathcal
114: M}^{i_1...i_p\dagger}_{(p)}={\mathcal M}_{(p)i_p...i_1}^*
115: \end{eqnarray}
116:
117: \subsection{$ SO(2N)$ invariant couplings}
118: Couplings formed from ${\Psi}^{\dagger}$ and ${\Psi}$ are given
119: by
120: \begin{eqnarray}
121: {\mathtt
122: g}_{ab}<{\Psi}_{(\pm)a}|{\Gamma}_{[\mu_1}.. {\Gamma}_{\mu_p]}
123: |{\Psi}_{(\mp)b}>{\Phi}_{\mu_1..\mu_p},~p=1,3,..,N
124: \end{eqnarray}
125: \begin{eqnarray}
126: {\mathtt g}_{ab}<{\Psi}_{(\pm)a}|{\Gamma}_{[\mu_1}..
127: {\Gamma}_{\mu_p]}|{\Psi}_{(\pm)b}>
128: {\Phi}_{\mu_1..\mu_p},~p=0,2,..,N-1
129: \end{eqnarray}
130: where ${\mathtt g}_{ab}$ is a
131: coupling constant where $a$ and $b$ are family indices.
132: ${\Phi}_{\mu_1\mu_2...\mu_p}$ is a real antisymmetric tensor of
133: $SO(2N)$ with dimensionality $2N \choose p$. For $p=N$
134: \begin{eqnarray}
135: {\Phi}_{\mu_1..\mu_N}
136: ={\overline{{\Delta}}}_{\mu_1..\mu_N}+
137: {\Delta}_{\mu_1..\mu_N},\nonumber\\
138: {{\overline
139: {\Delta}_{\mu_1..\mu_N}}\choose {\Delta}_{\mu_1..\mu_N}}=
140: \pm\frac{i}{N!}{\mathbf{\epsilon}}_{{\mu_{1}..\mu_{N}\nu_{1}..\nu_{N}}}{{\overline
141: {\Delta}_{\nu_1..\nu_N}}\choose {\Delta}_{\nu_1..\nu_N}}.
142: \end{eqnarray}
143: Both
144: ${\overline{{\Delta}}}$ and ${\Delta}$ have dimensionality
145: $\frac{1}{2}{2N \choose N}$. The symmetry factor in the exchange
146: of identical ${ \Psi}_{(.)}$ is ${\mathtt g}_{ab}=(-1)^{\frac
147: {1}{2}{p(p-1)}}{\mathtt g}_{ba}$. Couplings formed from
148: ${\Psi}^{\bf{T}}$ and ${\Psi}$ are given by
149: \begin{eqnarray}
150: {\mathtt f}_{ab}<{\Psi}_{(\pm)a}^*| B{\Gamma}_{[\mu_1}..
151: {\Gamma}_{\mu_p]} {|{\Psi}_{(\pm)b>}
152: |{\Psi}_{(\mp)b}>}{\Phi}_{\mu_1..\mu_p},~p=1,3,..,N
153: \end{eqnarray}
154: \begin{eqnarray}
155: {\mathtt f}_{ab}<{\Psi}_{(\pm)a}^*|B{\Gamma}_{[\mu_1}..
156: {\Gamma}_{\mu_p]}|{\Psi}_{(\mp)b}>{\Phi}_{\mu_1..\mu_p},~p=0,2,..,N-1
157: \end{eqnarray}
158: where
159: $B=\prod_{\mu =1}^N{\Gamma}_{2\mu -1}$ is the $SO(2N)$ charge
160: conjugation operator and satisfies the relation
161: ${\acute{\Sigma}}_{\mu\nu}^{\bf T}{\acute B}=-
162: {\acute{\Sigma}}_{\mu\nu}{\acute B}$ where $~\acute{ }~$
163: indicates a $2^N\times 2^N$ matrix representation. The symmetry
164: factor ${\mathtt f}_{ab}=(-1)^{\frac{1}{2}(N-p)(N-p-1)}{\mathtt
165: f}_{ba}$.
166: \subsection{
167: Specialization to $SO(10)$ gauge group }
168: We consider now the special case of $SO(10)$ where
169: ${\Psi}_{(+)}\sim 16
170: $,${\Psi}_{(-)}\sim\overline {16}$ under $SO(10)\supset
171: SU(5)\otimes U(1)$. Here
172: $16\supset [1]\oplus[\overline 5]\oplus [10]$,
173: $\overline {16}\supset [1]\oplus [5]\oplus[\overline{10}]$ and
174: $16\otimes 16=10_s\oplus 120_{as}\oplus 126_s$ while
175: $16\otimes\overline {16}=1\oplus 45\oplus 210$.
176: In terms of their oscillator modes
177: \begin{eqnarray}
178: |{\Psi}_{(+)a}>=|0>{\mathcal M}_a+\frac{1}{2}b_i^{\dagger}b_j^{\dagger}|0>{\mathcal M}_a^{ij}
179: +\frac{1}{24}\epsilon^{ijklm}b_j^{\dagger}
180: b_k^{\dagger}b_l^{\dagger}b_m^{\dagger}|0>{\mathcal
181: M}_{ai}\nonumber\\
182: |{\Psi}_{(-)b}>=
183: \frac{1}{12}\epsilon^{ijklm}b_k^{\dagger}b_l^{\dagger}b_m^{\dagger}|0>{\mathcal
184: N}_{bij}+b_1^{\dagger}b_2^{\dagger}
185: b_3^{\dagger}b_4^{\dagger}b_5^{\dagger}|0>{\mathcal
186: N}_b+b_i^{\dagger}|0>{\mathcal N}_b^i
187: \end{eqnarray}
188: where
189: \begin{eqnarray}
190: {\mathcal
191: M}_a=\nu_{La}^c,~{\mathcal
192: M}_{a\alpha}=D_{La\alpha}^c,~{\mathcal
193: M}_a^{\alpha\beta}=\epsilon^{\alpha\beta\gamma}U_{La\gamma}^c,~
194: {\mathcal M}_{a4}=E_{La}^{^{-}},\nonumber\\
195: {\mathcal M}_a^{4\alpha}=U_{La\alpha},~{\mathcal
196: M}_{a5}=\nu_{La},~ {\mathcal M}_a^{45}=E_{La}^{^{+}},~{\mathcal
197: M}_a^{5\alpha}=D_{La\alpha}
198: \end{eqnarray}
199: and where $\alpha,\beta,\gamma$ are the color indices. Cubic couplings
200: in the superpotential involving ${\Psi}_{(\pm)}$ are
201: \begin{eqnarray}
202: {\mathsf W}^{(1)}={
203: f}^{(1)}_{ab}<\widehat{{\Psi}}_{(\pm)a}^*|B|\widehat{{\Psi}}_{(\mp)b}>{\Phi}\nonumber\\
204: {\mathsf W}^{(45)}=\frac{1}{2!}{
205: f}^{(45)}_{ab}<\widehat{{\Psi}}_{(\pm)a}^*|B
206: {\bf{\Sigma}}_{\mu\nu}|\widehat{{\Psi}}_{(\mp)b}>{\Phi}_{\mu\nu}\nonumber\\
207: {\mathsf W}^{(210)}=\frac{1}{4!} {f}^{(210)}_{ab}<\widehat{{\Psi}}_{(\pm)a}^*|B
208: {\Gamma}_{[\mu}{\Gamma}_{\nu}{\Gamma}_{\rho} {\Gamma}_{\lambda]}
209: |\widehat{{\Psi}}_{(\mp)b}>{\Phi}_{\mu\nu\rho\lambda}\nonumber\\
210: {\mathsf W}^{(10)}={
211: f}^{(10)}_{ab}<\widehat{{\Psi}}_{(\pm)a}^*|B{\Gamma}_{\mu}|\widehat{{\Psi}}_{(\pm)b}>{\Phi}_{\mu}\nonumber\\
212: {\mathsf W}^{(120)}=\frac{1}{3!}{
213: f}^{(120)}_{ab}<\widehat{{\Psi}}_{(\pm)a}^*|B
214: {\Gamma}_{[\mu}{\Gamma}_{\nu}
215: {\Gamma}_{\lambda]}|\widehat{{\Psi}}_{(\pm)b}>{\Phi}_{\mu\nu\lambda}\nonumber\\
216: {\mathsf W}^{(126,\overline{126})}=\frac{1}{5!}{f}^{(126,\overline{126})}_{ab}<\widehat{{\Psi}}_{(\pm)a}^*|B
217: {\Gamma}_{[\mu}{\Gamma}_{\nu}{\Gamma}_{\rho}{\Gamma}_{\sigma}{\Gamma}_{\lambda]}|\widehat{{\Psi}}_{(\pm)b}>{\overline{{\bf{\Delta}}}_{\mu\nu\rho\sigma\lambda}\choose{\bf{\Delta}}_{\mu\nu\rho\sigma\lambda}}
218: \end{eqnarray}
219: The semi-spinor $\Psi_{(\pm)}$ with $~\widehat{ }~$ stands for a
220: chiral superfield and $SO(10)$ charge conjugation operator is $B=
221: -i\prod_{k=1}^5 (b_k-b_k^{\dagger})$.
222: Couplings in the Lagrangian have the form
223: \begin{eqnarray}
224: {\mathsf L}^{(1)}={
225: g}^{(1)}_{ab}<{{\Psi}}_{(\pm)a}|\gamma^0\gamma^A|{{\Psi}}_{(\pm)b}>{\Phi}_{A}\nonumber\\
226: {\mathsf L}^{(45)}=\frac{1}{2!}{
227: g}^{(45)}_{ab}<{{\Psi}}_{(\pm)a}|\gamma^0\gamma^A
228: {\bf{\Sigma}}_{\mu\nu}|{{\Psi}}_{(\pm)b}>{\Phi}_{A\mu\nu}\nonumber\\
229: {\mathsf L}^{(210)}=\frac{1}{4!} {
230: g}^{(210)}_{ab}<{{\Psi}}_{(\pm)a}|\gamma^0\gamma^A
231: {\Gamma}_{[\mu}{\Gamma}_{\nu}{\Gamma}_{\rho} {\Gamma}_{\lambda]}
232: |{{\Psi}}_{(\pm)b}>{\Phi}_{A\mu\nu\rho\lambda}
233: \end{eqnarray}
234: where $A$ stands for the Lorentz index.
235:
236: \section{Technique for Evaluation of $SO(2N)$ invariants }
237: Here we review the recently developed technique\cite{ns1,ns2}
238: for the analysis of $SO(2N)$ invariant
239: couplings which allows a full exhibition of the $SU(N)$ invariant
240: content of the spinor and tensor
241: representations. The technique utilizes a basis consisting of a
242: specific set of reducible $SU(N)$ tensors in terms of which the
243: SO(2N) invariant couplings have a simple expansion.
244:
245: \subsection{Specific set of $ SU(N)$ reducible tensors}
246: We begin with the observation that the natural basis for the
247: expansion of the $SO(2N)$ vertex is in terms of a specific set of
248: $SU(N)$ reducible tensors, ${\Phi}_{c_k}$ and ${\Phi}_{\overline
249: c_k}$ which we define as
250: $A^k\equiv{\Phi}_{c_k}\equiv{\Phi}_{2k}+i{\Phi}_{2k-1},~
251: A_k\equiv{\Phi}_{\overline c_k}\equiv{\Phi}_{2k}-i{\Phi}_{2k-1}$.
252: This can be extended immediately
253: to define the quantity $\Phi_{c_ic_j\bar c_k..}$
254: with an arbitrary number of unbarred and barred indices where each
255: $c$ index can be expanded out so that
256: $A^iA^jA_k...={\Phi}_{c_ic_j\overline
257: c_k...}={\Phi}_{2ic_j\overline c_k...}+i{\Phi}_{2i-1c_j\overline
258: c_k...}~$etc..
259: Thus, for example, the quantity $\Phi_{c_ic_j\overline c_k...c_N}$ is a sum of
260: $2^N$ terms gotten by expanding all the c indices.
261: $\Phi_{c_ic_j\overline c_k...c_n}$ is completely anti-symmetric in
262: the interchange of its c indices whether unbarred or barred:
263: ${\Phi}_{c_i\overline c_jc_k...\overline c_n}=-{\Phi}_{c_k\overline c_jc_i...\overline c_n}$.
264: Further,
265: $ {\Phi}^*_{c_i\overline c_jc_k...\overline c_n}={\Phi}_{\overline c_ic_j\overline
266: c_k...c_n}$ etc.. We now make the observation\cite{ns1} that the object
267: $\Phi_{c_ic_j\overline c_k...c_n}$ transforms like a reducible
268: representation of SU(N). Thus if we are able to compute the SO(2N)
269: invariant couplings
270: in terms of these reducible tensors of SU(N) then
271: there remains only the further step of decomposing the reducible
272: tensors into their irreducible parts.
273:
274: \subsection{Basic Theorem to evaluate an $ SO(2N)$ vertex}
275: A result essential to our analysis is the Basic Theorem\cite{ns1} which states that an
276: $SO(2N)$ vertex ${\Gamma}_{\mu}{\Gamma}_{\nu}{\Gamma}_{\lambda}...{\Gamma}_{\sigma}{\Phi}_{\mu\nu\lambda
277: ...{\bf{\sigma}}}$ can be expanded in the following fashion
278: \begin{eqnarray}
279: {\Gamma}_{\mu}{\Gamma}_{\nu}{\Gamma}_{\lambda}...{\Gamma}_{\sigma}{\Phi}_{\mu\nu\lambda
280: ...{{\sigma}}}=
281: b_i^{\dagger}b_j^{\dagger}b_k^{\dagger}...b_n^{\dagger}{\Phi}_{c_ic_jc_k...c_n}~~~~~~~~~\nonumber\\
282: +(b_i b_j^{\dagger}b_k^{\dagger}...b_n^{\dagger}{\Phi}_{\overline
283: c_ic_jc_k...c_n}+ \textnormal{perms})
284: +(b_i
285: b_jb_k^{\dagger}...b_n^{\dagger}{\Phi}_{\overline c_i\overline
286: c_jc_{k}...c_n}+~\textnormal{perms})+ ...~~~\nonumber\\
287: +(b_ib_jb_k...b_{n-1}b_n^{\dagger}{\Phi}_{\overline c_i\overline
288: c_j \overline c_k...\overline c_{n-1}c_n}+~\textnormal{perms})~~~~~~~~\nonumber\\
289: +b_ib_jb_k...b_n{\Phi}_{\overline c_i\overline c_j\overline
290: c_k...\overline c_n}~~~~~~~~
291: \end{eqnarray}
292: The result of Eq.(12) is very useful in the computation of $SO(10)$ invariant couplings.
293:
294: \section{Cubic Couplings of ${\bf SO(10)}$}
295: In this section we give illustrative examples of some
296: $SO(10)$ trilinear couplings in their $SU(5)$ decomposed form.
297: These illustrative examples consist of $16-16-45$ couplings in the Lagrangian and
298: the $16-16-\overline{126}$ coupling in the superpotential.
299:
300:
301: \subsection{$16\otimes 16\otimes 45$ coupling in the Lagrangian}
302: The interaction Lagrangian of the $45$ of gauge fields with the 16-plet of $SO(10)$ spinor
303: $|\Psi_{(+)}>$ is given by
304: \begin{eqnarray}
305: {\mathsf
306: L}^{(45)}=\frac{1}{i}\frac{1}{2!}g^{(45)}_{ab}<\Psi_{(+)a}|\gamma^0\gamma^A
307: \Sigma_{\mu\nu}|\Psi_{(+)b}>\Phi_{A\mu\nu}.
308: \end{eqnarray}
309: Expansion of the vertex gives
310: \begin{eqnarray}
311: \Sigma_{\mu\nu}\Phi_{\mu\nu}=\frac{1}{i}(b_ib_j \Phi_{\overline
312: c_i\overline c_j}+b_i^{\dagger}b_j^{\dagger}
313: \Phi_{c_ic_j}+2b_i^{\dagger}b_j\Phi_{c_i\overline c_j}-
314: \Phi_{c_n\overline c_n}).
315: \end{eqnarray}
316: The $45$ of $SO(10)$ decomposes under
317: $SU(5)$ as
318: $45 \supset 1({\mathsf g})\oplus 10({\mathsf g}^{ij})\oplus{\overline{10}}({\mathsf
319: g}_{ij})\oplus {\overline {24}}({\mathsf g}^i_{j})$ where
320: \begin{eqnarray}
321: \Phi_{c_n\overline c_n}={\mathsf g},~~\Phi_{c_i\overline
322: c_j}={\mathsf g}_{j}^i+ \frac{1}{5}\delta_j^i{\mathsf
323: g}\nonumber\\
324: \Phi_{c_ic_j}={\mathsf g}^{ij},~~\Phi_{\overline c_i\overline
325: c_j}={\mathsf g}_{ij}.
326: \end{eqnarray}
327: The normalized $SU(5)$ gauge fields are
328: \begin{eqnarray}
329: {\mathsf g}_A=2\sqrt 5 {\mathsf G}_A,~~{\mathsf g}_{Aij}=\sqrt 2
330: {\mathsf G} _{Aij}\nonumber\\
331: {\mathsf g}_A^{ij}=\sqrt 2 {\mathsf
332: G}_A^{ij},~~{\mathsf g}_{Aj}^i=\sqrt{2} {\mathsf G}_{Aj}^i
333: \end{eqnarray}
334: In terms of the redefined fields, the kinetic energy of the 45-plet
335: takes the form
336: \begin{eqnarray}
337: -\frac{1}{4}{ F}_{\mu\nu}^ {AB}{ F}_{AB\mu\nu}=-\frac{1}{2}{~
338: G}_{AB}{G}^{AB\dagger} -\frac{1}{2!} \frac{1}{2}{G}^{ABij}{
339: G}_{AB}^{ij\dagger} -\frac{1}{4}{ G}_j^{ABi}{ G}_{ABi}^{j}
340: \end{eqnarray}
341: where ${ F}_{\mu\nu}^{AB}$ is the 45 of SO(10) field strength
342: tensor
343: \begin{eqnarray}
344: {\mathsf
345: L}^{(45)}=g^{(45)}_{ab}[\sqrt 5(-\frac{3}{5}\overline {\mathcal
346: M}_a^i\gamma^A{\mathcal M}_{bi}+\frac{1}{10}\overline {\mathcal
347: M}_{aij} \gamma^A{\mathcal M}_b^{ij}+ \overline{\mathcal
348: M}_a\gamma^A{\mathcal M}_b){\mathsf G}_{A}\nonumber\\
349: +{\frac{1}
350: {\sqrt 2}}(\overline {\mathcal M}_a \gamma^{A} {\mathcal M}_b^{lm}
351: +{\frac{1}{2}}\epsilon^{ijklm}\overline {\mathcal
352: M}_{aij}\gamma^A{\mathcal M}_{bk}) {\mathsf G}_{Alm}\nonumber\\
353: -\frac{1}{\sqrt 2}(\overline {\mathcal M}_{alm}\gamma^A{\mathcal
354: M}_b+\frac{1}{2}\epsilon_{ijklm} \overline {\mathcal
355: M}_a^i\gamma^A{\mathcal M}_b^{jk}){\mathsf
356: G}_A^{lm}\nonumber\\
357: +\sqrt{2}(\overline {\mathcal M}_{aik}\gamma^A{\mathcal
358: M}_b^{kj}+\overline {\mathcal M}_a^j\gamma^A{\mathcal
359: M}_{bi}){\mathsf G}_{Aj}^i]
360: \end{eqnarray}
361: The barred matter fields are defined
362: so that $~\overline {\mathcal M}_{ij}={\mathcal
363: M}_{ij}^{\dagger}\gamma ^0$.
364: \subsection{${16}\otimes {16} \otimes$ ${\overline {126}}$ coupling in the
365: superpotential}
366: The
367: ${\overline {126}}$ of $SO(10)$ decomposes under
368: $SU(5)$ as ${\overline {126}}\supset 1({\mathsf H})\oplus
369: 5({\mathsf H}^{i})\oplus \overline{10}({\mathsf H}_{ij})\oplus
370: 15({\mathsf H}_{(S)}^{ij})\oplus \overline{45}({\mathsf
371: H}_{ij}^k)\oplus 50({\mathsf H}^{ij}_{kl})$.
372: Utilizing the Basic Theorem the
373: result for the Yukawa coupling involving ${\overline {126}}$ of
374: Higgs is as follows
375: \begin{eqnarray}
376: {\mathsf
377: W}^{(\overline{126})}=\frac{1}{5!}{f}^{(\overline{126})}_{{a}{b}}<\widehat{\Psi}^{*}_{(+){a}}|B\Gamma_{[\mu}\Gamma_{\nu}\Gamma_{\rho}
378: \Gamma_{\lambda}\Gamma_{\sigma]}
379: |\widehat{\Psi}_{(+){b}}>\overline{\Delta}_{\mu\nu\rho\lambda\sigma}\nonumber\\
380: =i\sqrt{\frac{2}{15}}{f}^{(\overline{126})(+)}_{ab}[
381: -\sqrt{2}\widehat{\mathcal M}_{a}^{\bf T}\widehat{\mathcal
382: M}_{b}{\mathsf H}+\widehat{\mathcal M}_{a}^{\bf
383: T}\widehat{\mathcal M}_{b}^{ij}{\mathsf H}_{ij}\nonumber\\
384: -\widehat{\mathcal M}_{ai}^{\bf T}\widehat{\mathcal
385: M}_{bj}{\mathsf H}_{(S)}^{ij}+\widehat{\mathcal M}_{a}^{ij\bf
386: T}\widehat{\mathcal M}_{bk}{\mathsf H}_{ij}^{k}\nonumber\\
387: -\frac{1}{12\sqrt{2}}\epsilon_{ijklm}\widehat{\mathcal
388: M}_{a}^{ij\bf
389: T}\widehat{\mathcal M}_{b}^{rs}{\mathsf H}^{klm}_{rs}\nonumber\\
390: -\sqrt{3}\left(\widehat{\mathcal M}_{a}^{\bf T}\widehat{\mathcal
391: M}_{bm} +\frac{1}{24}\epsilon_{ijklm}\widehat{\mathcal
392: M}_{a}^{ij\bf T}\widehat{\mathcal M}_{b}^{kl}\right){\mathsf H}^m]
393: \end{eqnarray}
394: where
395: $f^{({\overline {126}})(+)}_{ab}=\frac{1}{2}(f^{({\overline
396: {126}})}_{ab}+f^{({\overline {126}})}_{ba})$.
397:
398: \section{Quartic Couplings of $SO(10)$}
399: The technique discussed in Secs.3-4 can be used to compute the quartic couplings.
400: For illustrative purposes we consider the simplest example with the
401: superpotenial,
402: \begin{eqnarray}
403: {\mathsf
404: W}=\frac{1}{2}\Phi_{U}{\bf M}^{(1)}_{{U}{U}'}\Phi_{{
405: U}'}
406: +f^{(1)}_{ab}<\Psi^{*}_{(-)a}|B |\Psi_{(+)b}>l_{ U}^{(1)}\Phi_{ U} +..
407: \end{eqnarray}
408: where the indices ${U},~{ U}'$ run over several Higgs
409: representations of the same kind. ${\bf M}^{(1)}$
410: represents the mass matrices and $f^{(1)}$
411: are constants. We now eliminate $\Phi_{ U}$ using the F-flatness
412: condition: $\frac{\partial {\mathsf W}}{\partial \Phi_{U}}=0$.
413: This leads to\cite{ns2}
414: \begin{eqnarray}
415: {\mathsf
416: W}^{(16\times {\overline {16}})_{1}(16\times \overline {16})_{1}}
417: = 2\lambda_{ab,cd}^{^{(1)}}
418: <\widehat{\Psi}^*_{(-)a}|B|\widehat{\Psi}_{(+)b}><\widehat{\Psi}^*_{(-)c}|B|
419: \widehat{\Psi}_{(+)d}>\nonumber\\
420: =\frac{1}{2}\lambda_{ab,cd}^{^{(1)}} [-\widehat{\mathcal
421: N}_{aij}^{\bf{T}}\widehat {\mathcal M}^{ij}_{b}\widehat{\mathcal
422: N}_{ckl}^{\bf{T}}\widehat {\mathcal M}^{kl}_{d}+4\widehat{\mathcal
423: N}^{i\bf{T}}_{a}\widehat {\mathcal M}_{bi}\widehat{\mathcal
424: N}_{cjk}^{\bf{T}}\widehat {\mathcal M}^{jk}_{d}\nonumber\\
425: -4\widehat{\mathcal N}^{i\bf{T}}_{a}\widehat {\mathcal
426: M}_{bi}\widehat{\mathcal N}^{j\bf{T}}_{c} \widehat {\mathcal
427: M}_{dj} +4\widehat{\mathcal N}^{\bf{T}}_{a}\widehat {\mathcal
428: M}_{b}\widehat{\mathcal N}^{\bf{T}}_{cij}\widehat {\mathcal
429: M}^{ij}_{d} \nonumber\\
430: -8\widehat{\mathcal N}^{\bf{T}}_{a}\widehat
431: {\mathcal M}_{b}\widehat{\mathcal N}^{i\bf{T}}_{c}\widehat
432: {\mathcal M}_{di} -4\widehat{\mathcal N}_{a}^{\bf{T}}\widehat
433: {\mathcal M}_{b}\widehat{\mathcal N}_{c}^{\bf{T}}\widehat
434: {\mathcal M}_{d}]
435: \end{eqnarray}
436: where
437: \begin{eqnarray}
438: \lambda_{ab,cd}^{^{(1)}}=
439: f_{ab}^{(1)}f_{cd}^{(1)}l_{ U}^{(1)}\left[\widetilde{{\bf
440: M}}^{(1)}\left\{{\bf M}^{(1)}\widetilde{{\bf M}}^{(1)}
441: -\bf{1}\right\}
442: \right]_{{U}{U}'}l_{ U'}^{(1)}\nonumber\\
443: \widetilde{{\bf M}}^{(.)}=\left[{\bf M}^{(.)}+\left({\bf
444: M}^{(.)}\right)^{\bf {T}}\right]^{-1}
445: \end{eqnarray}
446: Similarly a complete determination of $(16\times {\overline {16}})_{45}
447: (16\times {\overline {16}})_{45}$ and of
448: $(16\times {\overline {16}})_{210}
449: (16\times {\overline {16}})_{210}$ can be given\cite{ns2}.
450:
451: \section{Conclusion}
452: In this paper we have given a brief overview of the $SO(2N)$ ($N$ odd) invariant
453: couplings. In Sec.2 we gave a brief summary of some of the salient features of
454: $SO(2N)$ algebra in terms of oscillator modes. We exhibited the form of $SO(2N)$
455: invariant cubic couplings and then specialized these results to the $SO(10)$ case.
456: In Sec.3 we introduced a basis involving reducible $SU(N)$ tensors in terms of which
457: $SO(2N)$ invariant couplings have a simple expansion. This result is codified in
458: the so called Basic Theorem which is stated at the end of Sec.3. In Sec.4 we used the
459: Basic Theorem to decompose $SO(10)$ invariant cubic couplings in terms of $SU(5)\times U(1)$
460: invariant forms. An application of the Basic Theorem was given through two illustrative
461: examples involving the $16$ plet spinor representations and the tensor representations,
462: 45 and $\overline{126}$. The analysis presented here should be of interest to model
463: builders using $SO(2N)$ (N odd) type gauge groups.
464:
465:
466: \section{Acknowledgments}
467: This paper is dedicated to Prof. Pran Nath on the occasion of his
468: sixty fifth birthday and for proceedings of NathFest.
469: This research was supported in part by NSF grant
470: PHY-0139967.
471:
472: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
473:
474:
475:
476: \bibitem{georgi}
477: H. Georgi, in Particles and Fields (edited by C.E. Carlson), A.I.P.,
478: 1975; H. Fritzch and P. Minkowski, Ann. Phys. {\bf 93}(1975)193.
479:
480: \bibitem{ms}
481: R.N. Mohapatra and B. Sakita, Phys. Rev.{\bf D21}(1980)1062.
482:
483: \bibitem{wz}
484: F. Wilczek and A. Zee, Phys. Rev. {\bf D25}(1982)553.
485:
486: \bibitem{nss}
487: S. Nandi, A.
488: Stern, E.C.G. Sudarshan, Phys. Rev. {\bf D26}(1982)1653
489:
490: \bibitem{ab}
491: For alternative approaches see,
492: X.~G.~He and S.~Meljanac,
493: %``Symmetry Breaking And Mass Spectra In Supersymmetric SO(10) Models,''
494: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 41} (1990) 1620.
495: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D41,1620;%%
496: ;
497: G.~W.~Anderson and T.~Blazek,
498: %``E(6) unification model building. I: Clebsch-Gordan coefficients of 27 x
499: %27-bar,''
500: J.\ Math.\ Phys.\ {\bf 41}, 4808 (2000)
501: [arXiv:hep-ph/9912365].
502: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9912365;%
503: :
504: C.~S.~Aulakh and A.~Girdhar,
505: %``SO(10) a la Pati-Salam,''
506: arXiv:hep-ph/0204097.
507: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0204097;%%
508:
509:
510: \bibitem{ns1}
511: P.~Nath and R.~M.~Syed,
512: %``Analysis of couplings with large tensor representations in SO(2N) and
513: %proton decay,''
514: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 506}, 68 (2001)
515: %[Erratum-ibid.\ B {\bf 508}, 216 (2001)]
516: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0103165].
517: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0103165;%%
518:
519:
520: \bibitem{ns2}
521: P.~Nath and R.~M.~Syed,
522: %``Complete cubic and quartic couplings of 16 and 16-bar in SO(10)
523: %unification,''
524: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 618}, 138 (2001)
525: %[arXiv:hep-th/0109116].
526: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0109116;%%
527:
528:
529: \bibitem{ns3}
530: P.~Nath and R.~M.~Syed,
531: %``Coupling the supersymmetric 210 vector multiplet to matter in SO(10),''
532: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 676}, 64 (2004)
533: %[arXiv:hep-th/0310178].
534: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0310178;%%
535:
536:
537: \end{thebibliography}
538: \end{document}
539:
540: