1: %\documentclass[prd,showpacs,amsmath,amssymb,nofootinbib]{revtex4}

2: \documentclass[prd,twocolumn,showpacs,amsmath,amssymb,footinbib]{revtex4}

3: %\documentstyle[prl,multicol,aps,epsfig]{revtex}

4: \everymath{\displaystyle}

5: \usepackage[dvips]{graphicx}

6: \usepackage{longtable}

7: \newcommand \beq{\begin{eqnarray}}

8: \newcommand \eeq{\end{eqnarray}}

9: \newcommand{\nc}{\newcommand}

10: \def\DS {D\!\!\!\!/}

11: \def\vp{{\bf p}}

12: \def\qs{q\!\!\!/}

13: %\def\pfs{p\!\!\!/}

14: %\def\pfs{{p_F}\!\!\!\!\!\!\!/}

15: \def\ms{{\mu}\!\!\!/}

16: \def\pas{{\partial}\!\!\!/}

17: \def\simge{\mathrel{%

18:        \rlap{\raise 0.511ex \hbox{$>$}}{\lower 0.511ex \hbox{$\sim$}}}}

19: \def\simle{\mathrel{

20:        \rlap{\raise 0.511ex \hbox{$<$}}{\lower 0.511ex \hbox{$\sim$}}}}

21: \begin{document}

22: 

23: \title{Thermal Phase Transitions and Gapless Quark Spectra\\

24: in Quark Matter at High Density}

25: \author{K. Iida,$^{1,2}$  T. Matsuura,$^3$  

26:  M. Tachibana,$^2$ and T. Hatsuda$^3$}

27: \affiliation{$^{1}$

28: RIKEN BNL Research Center, Brookhaven National 

29: Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973\\

30: $^{2}$

31: The Institute of Physical and Chemical Research (RIKEN),  

32:  Wako, Saitama 351-0198, Japan\\

33: $^{3}$Department of Physics, University of Tokyo,

34:   Tokyo 113-0033, Japan}

35: 

36: \begin{abstract}

37:     Thermal color superconducting phase transitions in three-flavor quark

38: matter at high baryon density are investigated in the Ginzburg-Landau (GL) 

39: approach.  We constructed the GL potential near the boundary with a normal

40: phase by taking into account nonzero quark masses, electric charge 

41: neutrality, and color charge neutrality.  We found that the density of states 

42: averaged over paired quarks plays a crucial role in determining the phases 

43: near the boundary.  By performing a weak coupling calculation of the 

44: parameters characterizing the GL potential terms of second order in the 

45: pairing gap, we show that three successive second-order phase transitions 

46: take place as the temperature increases: a modified color-flavor locked 

47: phase ($ud$, $ds$, and $us$ pairings) $\to$ a ``dSC'' phase ($ud$ and 

48: $ds$ pairings) $\to$ an isoscalar pairing phase ($ud$ pairing) $\to$ a normal 

49: phase (no pairing).  The Meissner masses of the gluons and the number of 

50: gapless quark modes are also studied analytically in each of these phases. 

51: \end{abstract}

52: \pacs{12.38.-t,12.38.Mh,26.60.+c}

53: \maketitle

54: 

55: \section{Introduction}

56: 

57:      Over the past few years, the properties of color superconducting 

58: quark matter and the phase structure at high baryon density, which were 

59: originally studied in earlier publications \cite{BL}, have been 

60: examined intensively (see, e.g., Ref.\ \cite{RWA} for reviews).

61: A color superconductor predicted to occur in weak coupling is a relativistic 

62: system in which the long-range color magnetic interaction, which is 

63: screened only dynamically by Landau-damping of exchanged gluons, is 

64: responsible for the formation of the superconducting gap.  The gap in weak

65: coupling has a non-BCS form, 

66:  $\Delta \propto \mu \exp( -3 \pi^2/\sqrt{2} g )$

67: with $g$ the strong coupling constant and $\mu$ the quark chemical potential

68: \cite{SON99}.  Furthermore, the gap has a matrix structure with 

69: $(N_c \times N_f)^2$ components due to various combinations of $N_c$ color 

70: and $N_f$ flavor degrees of freedom.

71: 

72:      There is a good deal of evidence, obtained from various weak coupling  

73: analyses \cite{Sch-NPB-575,Evans-NPB-581,IB,HH-PRD-68}, that  

74: if all the quark masses are zero ($m_u=m_d=m_s=0$) and hence the quark 

75: chemical potentials are equal ($\mu_u=\mu_d=\mu_s$), the quark matter is 

76: in a color-flavor locked (CFL) phase \cite{CFL} at low temperature. 

77: A transition from the CFL phase to the normal phase in mean-field theory is 

78: of second order.  In weak coupling, the transition temperature $T_c$ is

79: related to the zero temperature gap $\Delta_{T=0}$ as 

80: $T_c= 2^{1/3} \times 0.57 \Delta_{T=0}$

81: \cite{SWR}, which is a BCS relation 

82: except for a factor $2^{1/3}$.

83: 

84:      The massless situation thus described may be approximately realized at 

85: asymptotically high densities where the quark masses are negligible compared 

86: to the quark chemical potentials.  However, the effect of nonzero quark 

87: masses becomes important when the chemical potentials decrease.  In the 

88: presence of a quark mass difference characterized by $2m_s/(m_u+m_d) \sim 25$,

89: $\beta$ equilibrium, electric neutrality, and color neutrality combine to 

90: produce non-trivial chemical potential differences between flavors and 

91: and between colors, leading to new phases such as the gapless CFL (gCFL) 

92: phase \cite{gCFL} in which two out of nine quark quasiparticles are gapless.

93: 

94:      In our recent Letter \cite{IMTH04}, we have studied what kind of phase 

95: structure appears in $\beta$ equilibrated neutral quark matter near the 

96: super-normal phase boundary when there are quark mass differences.

97: An advantage of studying the region near the phase boundary is that 

98: in classifying the possible phase structures we can make use of the 

99: model-independent Ginzburg-Landau (GL) analysis \cite{IB,IB3} in which

100: the thermodynamic potential difference between the superfluid and normal 

101: phases is expanded in terms of the order parameter (the pairing gap). 

102: Furthermore, by calculating the parameters controlling the thermodynamic 

103: potential terms in weak coupling, one can {\rm prove} which phase is 

104: realized below the super-normal boundary in the high density regime 

105: where the weak coupling analysis is valid.

106:       

107:       A crucial observation found in Ref.\ \cite{IMTH04} is that the phase 

108: structure near the critical temperature is essentially dictated by the 

109: average density of states of different quarks.  We also found that

110: the quark mass difference and the electric charge neutrality

111: (but not the color neutrality) play key roles in determining the phase 

112: structure near the critical temperature.  In weak coupling, it was shown that

113: the following successive phase transitions occur near the super-normal

114: phase boundary: a modified color-flavor locked (mCFL) phase ($ud$, $ds$, 

115: and $us$ pairings) $\to$ a ``dSC'' phase ($ud$ and $ds$ pairings) $\to$ an 

116: isoscalar two-flavor superconducting (2SC) phase ($ud$ pairing) $\to$ a 

117: normal phase (no pairing). 

118:  

119:       The purposes of this paper are (i) to give a detailed account of the 

120: results given in Ref.\ \cite{IMTH04} and (ii) to investigate the elementary 

121: excitation modes (gluons with the Meissner mass, massless gluons, gapped 

122: quarks, and gapless quarks).

123:   

124:       The content of this paper is as follows.  In Sec. II, we start with  

125: a toy model that captures the essential features of the hierarchical 

126: structure of the phase transitions.  Then we construct a general form of the 

127: GL potential with the quark masses in such a way that it fulfills symmetry 

128: constraints.  In Sec.\ III, we evaluate the parameters characterizing the GL 

129: potential terms in the weak coupling region with unequal quark masses 

130: ($m_{i}$, $i$=$u, d, s$) and unequal quark chemical potentials ($\mu_{i}$, 

131: $i$=$u, d, s$) by utilizing the Cornwall-Jackiw-Tomboulis (CJT) effective 

132: action \cite{CJT}.  In Sec.\ IV, we consider a simplified situation 

133: ($m_{u,d}=0$ and $m_s \neq 0$) and calculate the corrections to the GL 

134: potential from nonzero $m_s$.  In Sec.\ V, we introduce a parametrization of 

135: the gap and analyze possible phases near the super-normal phase boundary at 

136: finite temperature.  For these phases, residual symmetries, the Meissner 

137: masses of gluons, and the gapped and gapless quark modes are also 

138: investigated.  Section VI is devoted to summary and concluding remarks.   

139: 

140: \section{Ginzburg-Landau potential}

141: 

142:      In this section, as an introduction to later sections, we first study a 

143: toy model that captures the essential features of such a hierarchical 

144: structure of phase transitions as encountered in dense quark matter.  Validity

145: of the various approximations adopted later will be also clarified by the 

146: analysis of the toy model.  We then construct a general form of the GL

147: potential with the quark masses such that it satisfies symmetry constraints. 

148: 

149: \subsection{A toy model}

150:       

151:       Let us assume two real order parameters, $X$ and $Y$, and consider a 

152: GL potential of the following form:

153: \beq

154: \Omega &=& \alpha (X^2+Y^2) + \delta (X^2-Y^2) \nonumber \\

155:  & & + \beta_1(X^2+Y^2)^2 + \beta_2(X^4+Y^4).

156: \label{eq:toy-GL}

157: \eeq

158: This is the most general form of the potential up to the quartic order with 

159: the ``parity" symmetry,  $X\leftrightarrow -X$ and $Y \leftrightarrow -Y$.

160: For the stability of the potential, $\beta_1+\beta_2 >0$ and 

161: $2\beta_1+\beta_2>0$  are implicitly assumed.

162: 

163:       As we will see later, the coefficient $\alpha$ corresponds to 

164: the reduced temperature in the chiral limit, while $\delta$ denotes the 

165: degree of flavor symmetry breaking (in the present context, the breaking of 

166: $X^2 \leftrightarrow Y^2$ symmetry) which is proportional to the quark mass 

167: squared.  The coefficients $\beta_1$ and $\beta_2$ are the quartic couplings 

168: that do not change sign around the critical point, but more or less receive

169: corrections from the quark mass.  Bearing in mind the results that will be

170: obtained in later sections, we parametrize these coefficients as

171:  \beq

172: \label{eq:toy-alpha}

173:  \alpha &=& \mu^2 t = \mu^2 \frac{T-T_c}{T_c}, \\

174: \label{eq:toy-delta}

175:  \delta&=& \mu^2 \sigma = \mu^2 \frac{m^2}{g\mu^2} ,\\

176: \label{eq:toy-beta}

177:  \beta_{1}=\beta_2 &\equiv& \beta= \frac{\mu^2}{T_c^2},

178:  \eeq

179: where $\mu$ and $T_c$ are the quark chemical potential and the critical 

180: temperature in the chiral limit.  $m$ and $g$ are the quark mass and the QCD 

181: coupling constant, respectively.  In the last equalities of Eqs.\ 

182: (\ref{eq:toy-alpha})--(\ref{eq:toy-beta}), we mimic the actual 

183: parametric forms of $t$, $\sigma$, and $\beta$ shown in Eqs.\ (\ref{b1b2}) and 

184: (\ref{eq:full-sigma}) except for numerical factors.  We do not have to 

185: consider the quark mass corrections to $\beta_1$ and $\beta_2$ under the 

186: condition to be shown shortly.  $\delta$ is a key parameter which governs the 

187: multiple structure of the phase transitions: Due to the presence of $\delta$, 

188: the temperatures where the coefficients affixed to $X^2$ and $Y^2$ change sign 

189: are no longer identical.

190: 

191:       The minimum of the potential can be simply obtained from

192: $\partial \Omega/\partial X=\partial \Omega/\partial Y=0$.  Then one finds 

193: three different phases:

194:  \begin{enumerate}

195:  \item  a phase where both $X$ and $Y$ have non-vanishing

196:   condensates,

197:   \beq

198: \label{eq:XY-1}

199:   X^2&=& -\frac{1}{6\beta}(\alpha+3\delta)=

200:           - \frac{T_c^2}{6} (t+ 3 \sigma), \\

201: \label{eq:XY-2}

202:   Y^2&=& -\frac{1}{6\beta}(\alpha-3\delta)=

203:          - \frac{T_c^2}{6} (t- 3 \sigma). 

204:  \eeq

205:  \item a phase where only $Y$ has non-vanishing 

206:  condensate,

207:   \beq

208:   X^2&=& 0, \\

209:   Y^2&=& -\frac{1}{4\beta}(\alpha-\delta)=

210:          - \frac{T_c^2}{4} (t-   \sigma). 

211:  \eeq

212: \item a phase where there are no condensates,

213:  \beq

214:   X^2=Y^2=0.

215:  \eeq

216: \end{enumerate}

217: 

218: \begin{figure}[t]

219: \begin{center}

220: \includegraphics[scale=0.45]{toy-model.eps}

221: \end{center}

222: \vspace{-0.5cm}

223: \caption{ Condensates $X^2$ and $Y^2$ as a function of the

224:   reduced temperature $t$ in a toy model. $\sigma$ is 

225:   the parameter that breaks ``flavor" symmetry $X^2 \rightarrow Y^2$.

226: }

227: \label{fig:toy-model}

228: \end{figure}

229: 

230:      The behavior of the condensates as a function of the reduced temperature

231: $t$ is illustrated in Fig.\ \ref{fig:toy-model}.  The multiple structure of 

232: the phase transitions induced by $\sigma$ shown in this figure is a general 

233: feature which survives in a realistic situation that will be discussed in later

234: sections.

235:    

236:      The questions to be addressed here are (i) what is the region of 

237: temperature where the GL potential Eq.\ (\ref{eq:toy-GL}) expanded up to the 

238: quartic order is valid, and (ii) what is the justification of neglecting the 

239: quark mass corrections to $\beta_1$ and $\beta_2$.  These questions can be 

240: answered if we restrict ourselves to the region

241: \beq   

242:  |t| < {\rm const} \cdot \sigma.

243: \label{eq:t-sig}

244: \eeq

245: Within this interval, both $X^2$ and $Y^2$ are of order or even smaller than

246: $\sigma T_c^2$.  Therefore, the dimensionless expansion parameters

247: of the GL potential satisfy

248: \beq

249: \frac{(X^2,Y^2)}{T_c^2}  < {\cal O}(\sigma),  

250: \label{eq:t-sig2}

251: \eeq  

252: which in turn guarantees that the higher order terms beyond the quartic order 

253: are negligible.  Furthermore, the additional quark mass corrections to 

254: $\beta_1$ and $\beta_2$ give only higher order corrections to $X^2$ and $Y^2$ 

255: as can be seen from, e.g., Eqs.\ (\ref{eq:XY-1}) and (\ref{eq:XY-2});

256: $X^2$ and $Y^2$ are already proportional to $\sigma$ if Eq.\ (\ref{eq:t-sig}) 

257: is satisfied.

258:  

259: 

260: \subsection{General form of GL potential}

261: 

262:      In this subsection, we construct a general form of the GL potential on 

263: the basis of the QCD symmetry under $G=SU(3)_C\times SU(3)_L\times SU(3)_R

264: \times U(1)_B$.

265:  

266:      For this purpose, let us first consider a basic variable, the gap 

267: function $\phi_{bcjk}$.  It is defined through the pairing gap $\Delta$ for a 

268: quark (color $b$ and flavor $j$) and another quark (color $c$ and flavor $k$) 

269: on the Fermi surface as will be shown in Sec.\ III [in particular, see 

270: Eqs.\ (\ref{eq:Del-phi}) and (\ref{G})].  Focusing our attention on 

271: spin-zero pairings of positive energy quarks in anti-symmetric combinations 

272: of colors and of flavors, we may rewrite $\phi_{bcjk}$ as \cite{IB} 

273: \begin{eqnarray}\label{phi-d}

274: [\phi_{bcjk}]_{L,R}=\epsilon_{abc} \epsilon_{ijk} [d_a^i]_{L,R} .

275: \end{eqnarray}

276: Here the 3$\times $ 3 matrix $[d_a^i]_{L}$ belongs to the 

277: {\rm fundamental} representation of $SU(3)_C  \times SU(3)_{L}$.  Similar 

278: properties hold for $[d_a^i]_{R}$ under the change $R \leftrightarrow L$.

279: In this subsection, we omit the color and flavor indices and write the gap 

280: function as ${\rm d}_{L,R}$ for simplicity.

281: 

282:      Under the operation of $G_{L,R}=SU(3)_C \times SU(3)_{L,R}\times U(1)_B$,

283: the left- and right-handed quarks and the gap ${\rm d}_{L,R}$ transform as

284: \begin{eqnarray}

285: \psi_{L,R}&\rightarrow& e^{i\varphi}U_C U_{L,R}\psi_{L,R}, \\

286: {\rm d}_{L,R}&\rightarrow& e^{-2i\varphi}U_{L,R}{\rm d}_{L,R}U_C^{\rm T},

287: \label{transform1}

288: \end{eqnarray}

289: where $U_{L,R}$'s are $3\times 3$ unitary matrices corresponding to each 

290: $SU(3)_{L,R}$ symmetry.  The phase factor is associated with the

291: $U(1)_B$ rotation.

292: 

293:      We now try to incorporate small but nonzero quark masses and write down

294: possible terms of the GL potential allowed by the QCD symmetry $G$.  In QCD 

295: with quark masses, we have such a term as 

296: \begin{equation}

297: {\cal L}=\bar{\psi}_L m \psi_R+h.c.,

298: \label{quarkmass}

299: \end{equation}

300: with $m$ being a $3\times 3$ mass matrix in flavor space.  Just like the 

301: standard procedure to construct the chiral Lagrangians, $m$ is assumed to 

302: transform in the following way \cite{Georgi},

303: \begin{equation}

304: m\rightarrow U_L m U_R^{\dagger}. 

305: \label{masstransform}

306: \end{equation}

307: 

308:      Following the transformation laws, Eqs.\ (\ref{transform1}) and

309: (\ref{masstransform}), we can write down a possible form of the GL potential 

310: as an expansion in terms of the order parameter, which is, in the

311: present context, the on-shell gap function ${\rm d}_{L,R}$.  Following the 

312: discussion in Sec.\ II.A, we take into account the quark mass terms up to 

313: ${\cal O}(m^2)$ only in the quadratic terms in ${\rm d}_{L,R}$ and obtain

314: \begin{eqnarray}\label{generalGL}

315: \Omega &=& (a_0)_L {\rm Tr} ({\rm d}_L^{\dagger}{\rm d}_L)

316: +(a_0)_R {\rm Tr} ({\rm d}_R^{\dagger}{\rm d}_R) \\ \nonumber

317: & &+a_1[{\rm Tr}  ({\rm d}_L^{\dagger}m {\rm d}_R)+ h.c.] \\ \nonumber

318: & &+(a_2)_L {\rm Tr} ({\rm d}_L^{\dagger}mm^{\dagger}{\rm d}_L)

319: +(a_2)_R {\rm Tr}  ({\rm d}_R^{\dagger}m^{\dagger}m {\rm d}_R) \\ \nonumber

320: & &+(\hat{a}_2)_L{\rm Tr}  ({\rm d}_L^{\dagger} {\rm d}_L)  

321: {\rm Tr} (m^{\dagger}m ) +(\hat{a}_2)_R 

322: {\rm Tr}  ({\rm d}_R^{\dagger} {\rm d}_R)  {\rm Tr} (m^{\dagger}m ) \\ 

323: \nonumber

324: & & +c[{\rm det} m\cdot {\rm Tr}({\rm d}_R^{\dagger}m^{-1}{\rm d}_L)+ h.c.] \\

325: \nonumber

326: & &+(b_{1})_L [ {\rm Tr}  ({\rm d}_L^{\dagger}{\rm d}_L)]^2

327: +(b_{1})_R [{\rm Tr}  ({\rm d}_R^{\dagger}{\rm d}_R)]^2 \\ \nonumber

328: & &+ (b_{2})_L {\rm Tr}  [({\rm d}_L^{\dagger}{\rm d}_L)^2]

329: +(b_{2})_R {\rm Tr}  [({\rm d}_R^{\dagger}{\rm d}_R)^2] \\ \nonumber

330: & &+b_3 {\rm Tr} [({\rm d}_L^{\dagger}{\rm d}_L)

331: ({\rm d}_R^{\dagger}{\rm d}_R)]

332: +b_4 {\rm Tr} ({\rm d}_L^{\dagger}{\rm d}_L) 

333: {\rm Tr} ({\rm d}_R^{\dagger}{\rm d}_R),

334: \end{eqnarray}

335: where the $a$'s, $b$'s, and $c$ are the expansion coefficients being

336: functions of temperature and chemical potential.

337: 

338:      Only the term proportional to $a_1$ in Eq.\ (\ref{generalGL}) breaks  

339: $U(1)_A$ symmetry and thus originates from anomaly induced interactions.

340: It does not affect the phase structure near the super-normal phase boundary 

341: at asymptotically high density as will be shown in Sec.\ IV.D.  The term 

342: proportional to $c$ also does not play an important role near the phase 

343: boundary as will be discussed at the end of Sec.\ III.B.

344: 

345:      We can further take into account the effects of electric and color 

346: neutralities and discuss possible terms to be included in 

347: Eq.\ (\ref{generalGL}).  In particular, the electric charge neutrality plays 

348: a central role in this paper.  Instead of writing down its general structure,  

349: we will show its explicit form calculated in the weak coupling regime in 

350: Sec.\ III.  The effect enters into the quadratic terms of the GL potential.

351: As for the color neutrality, its effect is subdominant in the vicinity of the 

352: phase boundary as has been already shown in Ref.\ \cite{IB}; the color 

353: neutrality affects only the quartic part of the GL potential (see Sec.\ IV.C).

354: 

355: 

356: \section{Corrections to the GL potential in weak coupling}

357:  

358:       In this section, we calculate corrections to the GL potential by 

359: unequal quark masses  ($m_{i}$, $i$=$u, d, s$) and unequal quark chemical 

360: potentials ($\mu_{i}$, $i$=$u, d, s$).  To simplify the derivation, we make 

361: several ansatze for the pairing gap:

362: \begin{enumerate}

363: \item 

364: The pairing between quarks is assumed to be in the zero total angular 

365: momentum ($J=0$) channel \cite{PR-PRD60}.  Furthermore, it is assumed to be

366: in the $LL$ and $RR$ channel as in the massless case and in the

367: positive parity channel as in the presence of $U(1)_A$ breaking \cite{RWA}.  

368: Then the gap can be written as 

369: $\Delta(k)=\gamma^5 \Delta^{(1)}+ {\bf \gamma} \cdot {\bf {\hat k}} 

370: \gamma^0 \gamma^5 \Delta^{(2)}$ \cite{BL}.

371: 

372: \item

373: The pairing is projected onto positive energy states.  In this case,

374: it is convenient to rewrite $\Delta(k)$ as  

375: \begin{eqnarray}

376: \Delta(k)=\gamma^5 \phi(k_0, {\bf k}) \Lambda^+ ({\bf k}),

377: \label{eq:Del-phi}

378: \end{eqnarray}

379: where

380: $\Lambda^+ ({\bf k})=(1+\gamma^0 {\bf \gamma} \cdot {\bf {\hat k}}) /2$

381: is a projection operator onto the positive energy states of 

382: massless quarks.

383: 

384: \item

385: The pairing is assumed to take place in the color antisymmetric and 

386: flavor antisymmetric channel.  This color channel is indeed the most 

387: attractive in weak coupling \cite{SON99,brown,PR}, while the flavor channel

388: is chosen in such a way as to satisfy the Pauli principle. 

389: Then, the pairing gap of a quark (color $b$ and flavor $j$) and another quark 

390: (color $c$ and flavor $k$) at the Fermi surface takes the form as given in 

391: Eq.\ (\ref{phi-d}).  Furthermore, the pairing in the positive parity channel

392: is represented by 

393: \begin{eqnarray}\label{parity-even}

394: {\rm d}_L={\rm d}_R\equiv d.

395: \end{eqnarray}

396: 

397: \item

398: We adopt the fact that the three-momentum dependence of the on-shell gap

399: $\Delta(q_0=\epsilon({\bf q}), {\bf q})$ or, equivalently, 

400: $\phi({\bf q};T)\equiv

401:  \phi(q_0=\epsilon({\bf q}), {\bf q})$

402: can be approximately factorized as \cite{PR}

403:  \begin{equation}

404:  \phi({\bf q};T) \simeq \phi(|{\bf q}|=\mu ; T) f({\bf q}),

405:  \label{approx1}

406: \end{equation}

407: where

408:  \begin{eqnarray}\label{f}

409:  f({\bf q})&=& \sin {{\bar g}y}|_{T=0}, \\

410: {\bar g}&=& g/ 3 \sqrt{2} \pi, \\

411: b &\equiv& 256 \pi^4 (2/3g^2)^{5/2}, \label{b} \\ 

412:  y({\bf q})&=&\ln \left[ \frac{2b \mu}{ ||{\bf q}|-\mu| + E({\bf q})} \right],

413:    \\

414:  E({\bf q})&=&\left[  ||{\bf q}|-\mu|^2+

415:  |\phi({\bf q};T)|^2 \right]^{1/2}. 

416: \end{eqnarray}

417: 

418: \item

419: We will assume later in Sec.\ V that $d_a^i$ is diagonal in color-flavor 

420: space even under the influence of nonzero quark masses and charge chemical 

421: potentials.  Then we will minimize the GL potential within the subspace.

422: 

423: \end{enumerate}

424: 

425:      In the following, we start with a known result for massless quarks 

426: (Sec.\ III.A) and then proceed to describe a more general situation with 

427: unequal quark masses  ($m_{i}$, $i$=$u, d, s$) and unequal quark chemical 

428: potentials ($\mu_{i}$, $i$=$u, d, s$) in Sec.\ III.B.

429:  

430: \subsection{Case with massless three flavors}

431:  

432:        For a homogeneous system composed of massless quarks $(m_{u,d,s}=0)$, 

433: quarks have a common chemical potential $\mu$, and the GL potential near the 

434: critical temperature $T_c$ expanded up to quartic order reads 

435: \cite{IB,PIS00}

436: \begin{eqnarray}

437: \label{GL}

438:    \Omega_0= \bar{\alpha} \sum_{a}|{\mathbf{d}_a}|^2

439:    +\beta_1(\sum_{a}|{\mathbf{d}_a}|^2)^2

440:    +\beta_2\sum_{ab}|{\mathbf{d}_a}^{\ast}

441:     \cdot {\mathbf{d}}_b|^2,  \nonumber \\

442: \end{eqnarray}

443: where $({\mathbf{d}_a})^i\equiv (d_a^u, d_a^d, d_a^s)$, and

444: the inner product is taken for flavor indices.   Using Eq.\ 

445: (\ref{parity-even}), one can relate the coefficients in Eq.\ (\ref{generalGL})

446: to those in Eq.\ (\ref{GL}) as

447: \begin{eqnarray}

448: &&\beta_1=(b_{1})_{L}+(b_{1})_{R}+b_4, \nonumber \\

449: &&\beta_2=(b_{2})_{L}+(b_{2})_{R}+b_3, \nonumber \\

450: && \bar{\alpha}=(a_0)_L+(a_0)_R .

451: \end{eqnarray}

452: This potential is manifestly invariant under $SU(3)_C \times SU(3)_{L+R} 

453: \times U(1)_{B}$ rotation.  In the weak coupling approximation where the 

454: one-gluon exchange force in the normal medium is responsible for the pairing, 

455: the coefficients have been calculated as \cite{IB}

456: \begin{eqnarray}

457: \label{b1b2}

458:  \beta_{1}=\beta_{2}

459:   =\frac{7\zeta(3)}{8(\pi T_c)^{2}}N(\mu)

460:  \equiv \beta, \ 

461:   \bar{\alpha}=4 N(\mu) t \equiv \alpha_0  t. 

462: \end{eqnarray}

463: Here $N(\mu) = \mu^2/2\pi^2$ is the density of states at the Fermi surface, 

464: and $t=(T-T_c)/T_c$ is the reduced temperature.  With the parameters 

465: in Eq.\ (\ref{b1b2}), one finds a single second-order phase transition at 

466: $T=T_c$ from the CFL phase ($ {d}_a^i \propto \delta_a^i$) to the 

467: normal phase ($ {d}_a^i = 0$) in the mean-field theory \cite{IB}.  

468: 

469: \subsection{Case with unequal quark masses and chemical potentials}

470: 

471:      For a homogeneous system composed of unequal quark masses, there arise 

472: differences in the chemical potential among flavors and among colors

473: due to charge and color neutrality conditions.  The GL potential in this case 

474: is obtained in a similar approach to that adopted in Ref.\ \cite{IB} where a 

475: correction to Eq.\ (\ref{GL}) from color neutrality is calculated.

476: 

477:      First we start with the Nambu-Gor'kov two component field

478: ($\psi_{ai}, \bar{\psi}_{ai}^{C}$), where $\psi^C=C \bar{\psi}^{\rm T}$ is

479: the charge-conjugate spinor.  The quark propagator of this field with 

480: the Hartree-Fock contributions ignored in the diagonal part reads

481: \begin{eqnarray}

482:  G(k) &\equiv&

483: \left(

484: \begin{array}{cc} 

485:    G^{(11)}(k)& G^{(12)}(k) \\

486:   G^{(21)}(k)& G^{(22)}(k) 

487:  \end{array}

488: \right) \\ 

489: & =&  \left(

490: \begin{array}{cc} 

491:   \gamma k+\gamma^{0}{\cal M} -m & {\tilde \Delta}(k) \\

492:   \Delta(k) & \gamma k-\gamma^{0}{\cal M}^{\rm T}-m 

493:   \end{array}

494: \right)^{-1} .

495:   \label{G}

496: \end{eqnarray}

497: Here ${\tilde \Delta}=\gamma^{0}\Delta^{\dagger}\gamma^{0}$, and 

498: \begin{eqnarray}

499:  {\cal M}_{abij}=\delta_{ab}\delta_{ij} \mu_{i} ,\ \ \ 

500:   m_{abij}=\delta_{ab}\delta_{ij}  m_{i}, 

501: \end{eqnarray}

502: are the quark chemical potentials and the quark masses in color ($a, b$) and 

503: flavor ($i, j$) space, respectively.  As in Sec.\ III.A, we again define 

504: $\mu$ as a quark chemical potential in the chiral limit ($m_{u,d,s}=0$).  

505: Once unequal quark masses are included under charge neutrality and $\beta$ 

506: equilibrium, $\mu_{i}$ differs from $\mu$.  We define the deviation of 

507: ${\cal M}_{abij}$ from the massless case as

508: $\delta {\cal M}_{abij}\equiv \delta_{ab}\delta_{ij} (\mu_{i}-\mu) $.

509: 

510:      The free quark propagator $G_0$ and the self-energy $\Sigma$ are defined 

511: from the diagonal and off-diagonal components of $G^{-1}$ as usual:

512: \begin{eqnarray}

513:    G^{-1}(k)=G_{0}^{-1}(k) - \Sigma(k)\ .

514:  \label{GSig}

515: \end{eqnarray}

516: 

517:       Then the GL potential, which is a difference between the superfluid and 

518: normal phases near the critical temperature, is written in the CJT form 

519: \cite{CJT}

520: \begin{eqnarray}

521: &&\Omega = \Omega_{1} + \Omega_{2} \label{omegagl} \\

522: &&\Omega_{1} = \frac{T}{2}\sum_{n}

523:  \int\frac{d^{3}q}{(2\pi)^{3}}  

524:  {\rm Tr}[-G(q)\Sigma(q)+\ln G_{0}^{-1}(q)G(q)] , \nonumber \\

525:   \label{omega1} \\ 

526: &&\Omega_{2} = g^2 \frac{T^2}{4} 

527:  \sum_{m, n} 

528: \int\frac{d^{3}k}{(2\pi)^{3}} \int\frac{d^{3}q}{(2\pi)^{3}} \nonumber \\

529: &&~~  \! \! \times {\rm Tr}\Bigl[  

530:  {\cal D}_{\mu\nu}^{\alpha\beta} (q-k) 

531: \gamma^{\mu} \frac{\lambda^{\alpha}}{2} G^{(12)}(k)

532: \gamma^{\nu} {\left( \frac{\lambda^{\beta}}{2} \right)^{\rm T}} G^{(21)}(q) 

533: \nonumber \\

534: &&\! \! +{\cal D}_{\mu\nu}^{\alpha\beta} (q-k) 

535:  \gamma^{\mu} {\left(\frac{\lambda^{\alpha}}{2}\right)^{\rm T}}G^{(21)}(k)

536: \gamma^{\nu} \frac{\lambda^{\beta}}{2}G^{(12)}(q)

537:  \Bigl] . 

538: \label{omega2}

539: \end{eqnarray}

540: Here $\Omega_2$ represents the two particle irreducible graphs in the 

541: mean-field approximation with ${\cal D}(q)$ being the gluon propagator 

542: in hard dense loop approximation, and $\lambda^{\alpha}$ the generators of 

543: color $SU(3)$.  The summations are taken over Matsubara frequencies of quarks. 

544: 

545:      In the following, we will consider the corrections from 

546: $ \delta{\cal M}_{abij}$ and $m_{abij}$ to the quadratic term in $\Delta$ 

547: assuming that the corrections are small.  The corrections to the quartic terms 

548: are negligible near the critical temperature.  Figure 2 represents the

549: ${\cal O}(\Delta ^2)$ contributions to $\Omega_{1}$ and $\Omega_{2}$. 

550: 

551:      First we consider $\Omega_{1}^{\Delta ^2}$,

552: \begin{eqnarray}

553: \Omega_{1}^{\Delta ^2}

554:  &=&-\frac{T}{2}\sum_{n~ {\rm odd}}

555:  \int\frac{d^{3}q}{(2\pi)^{3}}

556:   {\rm Tr} \Biggl[ \frac{1}{\gamma q+\gamma^{0}{\cal M}-m}

557:   {\tilde\Delta}(q) \nonumber\\

558: &&~~~~~~~~~\times \frac{1}{\gamma q-\gamma^{0}{\cal M}^{\rm T}-m}

559: \Delta(q)  \Biggl] \nonumber \\

560: &=& -\sum_{abij} \frac{i}{4} \oint \frac{d^{4}q}{(2\pi)^{4}}

561:  \tanh \left( \frac{q_0}{2T} \right)   {\rm Tr} \Biggl[   

562:  \frac{1}{\gamma q+\gamma^{0}{\mu}_{i}-m_{i}} \nonumber \\ &&~~~~~~~~  

563: \times {\tilde\Delta}(q)_{abij}    

564: \frac{1}{\gamma q-\gamma^{0}{\mu}_{j}-m_{j}}

565: \Delta(q)_{baji} \Biggl].

566: \label{eq:O-1-D}

567: \end{eqnarray}  

568: The first quark propagator in the right-hand side of Eq.\ (\ref{eq:O-1-D})

569: has particle and anti-particle poles,

570: \begin{eqnarray} \label{pp}

571: \epsilon^{p \pm}&=& \pm |{\bf q}| - p_F^{i} ,

572: \end{eqnarray}

573: while the second propagator has hole and anti-hole poles,

574: \begin{eqnarray} \label{hp}

575: \epsilon^{h \mp}&=& \mp |{\bf q}| + p_F^{j} ,

576: \end{eqnarray}

577: where $p_F^{i}=\sqrt{\mu_i^2-m_i^2}$ is the Fermi momentum of flavor $i$.

578: We define the shift of the chemical potential of flavor $i$ from $\mu$ as 

579: \begin{eqnarray}

580: \delta \mu_i = \mu_i -\mu.

581: \end{eqnarray}

582: Then, up to ${\cal O}(m^2/\mu^2, \delta \mu/\mu)$, $p_F^{i}$ can be written as 

583: \begin{eqnarray}\label{fermi-mom}

584:  p_F^{i} \simeq \mu_{i}-m_{i}^2/2\mu.

585: \end{eqnarray} 

586: 

587:      Of the poles in Eqs.\ (\ref{pp}) and (\ref{hp}), only two of them, 

588: $q_0= \epsilon^{p +}$ (particles) and $q_0= \epsilon^{h -}$ (particle holes),

589: have relevant contributions to the potential.  The other two poles contribute 

590: to the gaps on antiparticle (antiparticle hole) mass shell, which are 

591: irrelevant in our calculation.  Let us define 

592: \begin{eqnarray}

593: {\tilde q}&=&|{\bf q}|-\mu,  \\

594: {\cal F} ({\tilde q}) &=&\frac{\tanh ({\tilde q}/2T)}{{\tilde q}} .

595: \end{eqnarray}

596: Then, combining the residues of the two poles, we obtain

597:  \begin{eqnarray} \label{tree0}

598:  \Omega_{1}^{\Delta ^2}=

599: \sum_{abij}  \frac{1}{2}

600: \int \frac{d^3 q}{(2 \pi )^3}

601: \left( 

602: {\cal F} ({\tilde q}) 

603: -\frac{\partial {\cal F}  ({\tilde q}) 

604:  }{\partial{\tilde q}} \delta p_{ij} \right)  

605:  |\phi_{abij}|^2  .

606: \end{eqnarray}

607: Here, 

608: \begin{eqnarray}

609:  \delta p_{ij}  = (p_F^i + p_F^j ) /2 -\mu.

610: \end{eqnarray}

611: For later purpose, we also introduce an averaged shift of the chemical 

612: potential as

613: \begin{eqnarray}

614:  \delta \mu_{ij}  = (\delta \mu_i + \delta \mu_j )/2.

615: \end{eqnarray}

616:  

617:  

618:      In the diagrammatic language, the first term in the right-hand side of 

619: Eq.\ (\ref{tree0}) corresponds to (a0) in Fig.\ \ref{fig:graphs}.  The second 

620: term corresponds to (a1) and (a2).  (a3) vanishes because of the Lorentz 

621: structure of the gaps together with the identity, 

622: ${\rm Tr} (\Lambda^+ \Lambda^-) =0$.

623: 

624: 

625:      To perform the momentum integration in Eq.\ (\ref{tree0}), it is 

626: convenient to introduce a positive constant  $\kappa \sim {\cal O}(g^{-1})$ 

627: which cancels at the end of the calculation \cite{PR,IB}.  The cutoff of the 

628: three-momentum $\Lambda$ is taken to be $b\mu$ for the sake of consistency 

629: with the formula, Eq.\ (\ref{f}).  We divide the region of the momentum 

630: integral $-\mu < |{\bf q}|-\mu < b \mu $ into two parts, 

631: $0< ||{\bf q}|- \mu| < \kappa \phi_0$ (region I), and 

632: $-\mu < |{\bf q}|- \mu < -\kappa\phi_0$ 

633: and $\kappa\phi_0< |{\bf q}|- \mu< b\mu$ (region II) \cite{PR}.  Here we 

634: defined $\phi_0 \equiv [(1/9)\sum_{abij}|\phi_{abij}(\mu, T=0)|^2]^{1/2}$. 

635: In each region, the following approximations can be safely taken: in region I,

636: $\sin {{\bar g}y}|_{T=0} \sim 1$, and in region II, $\tanh 

637: \left[ (|{\bf q}| -\mu)/2T \right] \sim (|{\bf q}| -\mu) /||{\bf q}| -\mu|$.

638: 

639:      The first term in the right-hand side of Eq.\ (\ref{tree0}) is 

640: calculated as

641:  \begin{eqnarray} 

642: {\rm (a0)}&=& \sum_{abij}  \frac{1}{2}

643: \int \frac{d^3 q}{(2 \pi )^3}

644:  \ {\cal F} ({\tilde q}) \ 

645:  |\phi_{abij}|^2   \nonumber \\

646: &=&

647: \sum_{abij} 

648: \frac{1}{2}N(\mu) \Biggl\{

649: 2 \int_{0}^{\kappa \phi_0} 

650: \ d \tilde{q} \ {\cal F} ({\tilde q}) 

651: \nonumber\\

652: &-&

653: \Biggl( \int_{\ln(b \mu/ \kappa \phi_0)}^{\ln b}

654: +\int_{\ln(b \mu/ \kappa \phi_0)}^{0} \Biggl) 

655: dy  f^2(y)

656: \Biggl\}

657:  |\phi_{abij}|^2  \nonumber \\

658: &=&

659: \sum_{abij} 

660: N(\mu)

661: \left\{ \ln \left(\frac{T_c}{T} \right)+ \frac{\pi}{4 {\bar g}} \right\}

662:  |\phi_{abij}|^2 .  \label{omega--1}

663: \end{eqnarray}

664: In the first equality, we replaced the momentum in the measure by the density 

665: of states at the Fermi surface.  In the second equality, we used the weak 

666: coupling approximation $g \ll 1$ and expanded $f(y)$ in terms of $g$.

667: We also used the explicit $g$ dependence of $T_c$ and $\phi_0$ in weak 

668: coupling \cite{brown,PR}, 

669: $\ln(T_c/\mu) \sim \ln(\phi_0/\mu) \sim -3\pi^2/\sqrt2 g$,

670: to obtain the final form.

671: 

672:      The second term in the right-hand side of Eq.\ (\ref{tree0}) is more 

673: involved:

674: \begin{eqnarray}

675:  {\rm (a1)}&+& {\rm (a2)} \nonumber\\

676: &=& -\frac{1}{2}

677: \int \frac{d^3 q}{(2 \pi )^3}

678: \frac{\partial {\cal F}  ( {\tilde q} )}{\partial {\tilde q} } \ \delta p \  

679:  |\phi|^2  \nonumber\\

680: &=&\frac{1}{4 \pi^2}

681: \int _{-\mu}^{b\mu} \ d{\tilde q} \ ({\tilde q}+\mu)^2 

682: \{ {\cal F}({\tilde q})-{\cal F}({\tilde q}+ \delta p ) \}

683: f^2({\tilde q}) \   |\phi|^2 \ \nonumber    \\

684: &\sim& 

685: \frac{1}{4 \pi^2}

686: \Biggl[

687: \left\{  \int_{-\mu}^{b\mu}

688: -\int_{-\mu+ \delta p }^{b\mu+ \delta p } \right\}

689:   \ d{\tilde q} \ {\cal F}({\tilde q}) f^2({\tilde q}) ({\tilde q}+\mu)^2 

690: \nonumber\\

691: &&~~~~~~~~~+2 \ \delta p \  

692: \int _{-\mu}^{b\mu} \ d{\tilde q} \  {\cal F}({\tilde q}) f^2({\tilde q}) 

693: ({\tilde q}+\mu)

694: \Biggl]  \ |\phi|^2  \      \nonumber\\

695: &\sim& 

696: \frac{1}{4 \pi^2}

697: \Biggl[ 

698: - {\cal F}(b\mu) f^2(b\mu ) (b\mu+\mu)^2 \nonumber\\

699: &&~~+2 

700: \int _{-\mu}^{b\mu} \ d{\tilde q} \ {\cal F}({\tilde q}) f^2({\tilde q}) 

701: ({\tilde q}+\mu)

702: \Biggl] \ \delta p \  |\phi|^2,  \

703: \label{inte}  \

704: \end{eqnarray}

705: where we abbreviated internal indices for simplicity.  $f(b\mu)$ appearing in 

706: the first term of the last bracket in Eq.\ (\ref{inte}) is 

707: ${\cal O}(g(\phi^2/(b \mu)^2))$ and can be neglected at high densities. 

708: Then the second term leads to

709: \begin{eqnarray}

710: {\rm (a1)}&+&{\rm (a2)} \nonumber\\

711: &=&

712: \frac{1}{2 \pi^2} \mu\ \delta p \  

713: \Biggl\{

714: 2 \int_{0}^{\kappa \phi_0} 

715:  \ d {\tilde q} \ {\cal F}({\tilde q}) \nonumber\\

716: &-&

717: \Biggl( \int_{\ln(b \mu/ \kappa \phi_0)}^{\ln b}

718: +\int_{\ln(b \mu/ \kappa \phi_0)}^{0}\Biggl) 

719: dy  f^2(y)

720: \Biggl\} |\phi|^2 \nonumber\\

721: &=&

722: -N(\mu)

723: \frac{\delta p}{\mu} \ln \left( \frac{T_c}{\mu} \right)

724:  \  |\phi|^2. \label{omega--2}

725: \end{eqnarray}

726: Here we again expanded $f(y)$ in terms of $g$ and used the explicit $g$ 

727: dependence of $T_c$ in weak coupling to obtain the final form. 

728: 

729:      Then the sum of Eqs.\ (\ref{omega--1}) and (\ref{omega--2}) becomes 

730: \begin{eqnarray} \label{tree}

731: \Omega_{1}^{\Delta^2}&=& 

732: {\rm (a0)}+{\rm (a1)}+{\rm (a2)} 

733: \nonumber\\

734: &=&\sum_{abij}  

735: N(\mu)

736: \Biggl[

737: \left\{ \ln \left(\frac{T_c}{T} \right)+ \frac{\pi}{4 {\bar g}} \right\} 

738: \nonumber\\

739: &-&\frac{\delta p_{ij}}{\mu} \ln \left( \frac{T_c}{\mu} \right)\  

740: \Biggl]  |\phi_{abij}|^2 . 

741: \end{eqnarray}

742: 

743: \begin{figure}[b]

744: \begin{center}

745: \includegraphics[width=8cm,height=4.5cm]{graphs.eps}

746: \end{center}

747: \vspace{-0.5cm}

748: \caption{The quadratic terms of the GL potential.  $\times$ and $+$

749: represent $m$ and $\delta \mu$, respectively. (a0)--(a3) represent 

750: $\Omega_1^{\Delta^2}$, and (b0)--(b4) are the two particle irreducible graphs 

751: $\Omega_2^{\Delta^2}$.  (a0) and (b0) are the quadratic terms of the potential 

752: in the $m=\delta \mu=0$ case.  Among these graphs, (a3) and (b2) vanish 

753: due to the Lorentz structure of the gap.  (b3) vanishes because we consider 

754: the gaps constructed by quarks having the same chirality.  Only (a1), (a2), 

755: (b1), and (b4) give finite correction to the original GL potential 

756: [(a0) plus (b0)].}

757: \label{fig:graphs}

758: \end{figure}

759: 

760:      Let us next evaluate $\Omega_2^{\Delta ^2}$.  In the diagrammatic 

761: description, this corresponds to (b0)--(b4) in Fig.\ \ref{fig:graphs}

762: in which the quark propagator is expanded in powers of masses and 

763: chemical potential differences.  Of these graphs, (b2) vanishes because of the

764: Lorentz structure of the gaps, and (b3) vanishes because the gaps are 

765: constructed by quarks having the same chirality.  As a result, only (b0), 

766: (b1), and (b4) have a finite value.  We expand these diagrams by 

767: $t \equiv |T-T_c|/T_c$ around $T_c$ up to ${\cal O}(t)$ for (b0) and 

768: ${\cal O}(1)$ for (b1) and (b4). 

769: 

770:      We use a relation between $T_c$ and $g$ when $m_i$ and $\delta \mu_i$ 

771: in the denominator of the quark propagator are taken to be zero \cite{IB},

772: \begin{eqnarray}\label{Tcg}

773: &&f({\bf q})=

774: -g^2 \frac{1}{2}\oint \frac{d^4 k}{ (2 \pi)^4} \tanh 

775: \left( \frac{k_0}{2T_c}\right) {\rm Tr}\bigg[

776: {\cal D}_{\mu\nu}^{\alpha\beta} (q-k) 

777: \gamma^{\mu}  \nonumber \\

778: &&\times

779: {\left( \frac{\lambda^{\alpha}}{2} \right)^{\rm T}}

780:  (\gamma k-\gamma^{0}{\cal M})^{-1} 

781: (\gamma k+\gamma^{0}{\cal M})^{-1}    \gamma^{\nu}  

782:  {\left( \frac{\lambda^{\beta}}{2} \right)} f({\bf k}) \bigg].\nonumber\\

783: \end{eqnarray}

784: This equation is derived by taking $T \rightarrow T_c$ in the gap equation 

785: with the decomposition Eq.\ (\ref{approx1}).

786: 

787:      Using Eq.\ (\ref{Tcg}) which relates $T_c$ and $g$, 

788: we can evaluate (b0), (b1), and (b4) in Fig.\ \ref{fig:graphs}. We derive (b0)

789: as follows.  In leading order in $t$, (b0) becomes

790: \begin{eqnarray}

791: {\rm (b0)} & \rightarrow &

792: \frac{i}{4}  \oint\frac{d^{4}q}{(2\pi)^{4}} 

793: \tanh \left(\frac{q_0}{2T_c}\right)  \nonumber\\

794: &&\times {\rm Tr}

795: \Biggl[ 

796: \biggl(

797: -g^2 T_c

798:  \sum_{n~ {\rm odd}}

799: \int\frac{d^{3}k}{(2\pi)^{3}} 

800: {\cal D}_{\mu\nu}^{\alpha\beta} (q-k) 

801: \gamma^{\mu} {\left( \frac{\lambda^{\alpha}}{2} \right)^{\rm T}} \nonumber\\

802: &&~~~~~~~~~~~\times G^{(21)}(k) 

803: \gamma^{\nu} {\left( \frac{\lambda^{\beta}}{2} \right)}

804: \biggl)

805:  G^{(12)}(q)

806: \Biggl] \Bigg|_{T=T_c}  \nonumber\\

807: &=& 

808: \frac{i}{4}\oint \frac{d^4q}{(2\pi)^4} \tanh\left(\frac{q_0}{2T}\right)  

809: \nonumber\\

810: &&~~~~~~~~~~~

811: \times {\rm Tr}\left  [ f({\bf q}) \phi(T) G^{(12)}(q) \right]  

812: \Bigg|_{T=T_c}   \nonumber\\

813: &=& 

814: \frac{i}{4}\oint \frac{d^4q}{(2\pi)^4} \tanh\left(\frac{q_0}{2T}\right)

815: {\rm Tr} [ \Delta(q) G^{(12)}(q)] \Bigg|_{T=T_c}   \nonumber\\

816: &=&-\Omega_{1}^{\Delta^2}|_{T=T_c}.

817: \end{eqnarray}

818: 

819:      The ${\cal O}(t)$ term of (b0) becomes

820: \begin{eqnarray} 

821: &&{\rm (b0)} \rightarrow \nonumber\\

822: && (T-T_c)\frac{i}{4} \frac{d}{dT} \biggl\{

823: \oint \frac{d^4k}{(2\pi)^4} \tanh\left(\frac{k_0}{2T}\right) 

824:  {\rm Tr} [G^{(21)}(k){\tilde\Delta(k)}] \nonumber\\

825: & &+

826: \oint \frac{d^4q}{(2\pi)^4} \tanh\left(\frac{q_0}{2T}\right)

827: {\rm Tr} [ \Delta(q) G^{(12)}(q)]

828: \biggl\} \Bigg|_{T=T_c}   

829: \nonumber\\ 

830: &&=2(T-T_c)\frac{d}{dT}(-\Omega_{1}^{\Delta ^2})|_{T=T_c}.

831: \end{eqnarray}

832: 

833:      (b1) and (b4) can be calculated in a similar way, and they become

834: \begin{eqnarray} 

835: {\rm (b1)}+{\rm (b4)}= N(\mu)\frac{2\delta p_{ij} }{\mu} 

836: \ln \left( \frac{T_c}{\mu} \right)

837: \  |\phi_{abij}|^2. 

838: \end{eqnarray}

839: Adding (b1) and (b4) to (b0), we finally obtain

840: \begin{eqnarray} 

841: \Omega_{2}^{\Delta ^2}&=&{\rm (b0)}+{\rm (b1)}+{\rm (b4)} \nonumber\\

842: &=&-\Omega_{1}^{\Delta^2}|_{T=T_c}

843: +2 (T-T_c)\frac{d}{dT}(-\Omega_{1}^{\Delta ^2})|_{T=T_c} \nonumber\\

844: &&~~~+ N(\mu)\frac{2\delta p_{ij} }{\mu} \ln \left( \frac{T_c}{\mu} \right)

845: \  |\phi_{abij}|^2 \nonumber\\

846: &=&\sum_{abij} 

847: N(\mu) \left\{

848:   -\frac{\pi}{4 \bar{g}}+ 2\ln \left( \frac{T}{T_c} \right)  

849: +\frac{2\delta p_{ij} }{\mu} \ln \left( \frac{T_c}{\mu} \right)

850:  \ \right\} \nonumber\\

851: &&~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

852: \times  |\phi_{abij}|^2  .\label{correction}

853: \end{eqnarray}

854: 

855:      Combining Eqs.\ (\ref{tree}) and (\ref{correction}), we obtain the final 

856: result for the quadratic term of the GL free energy,

857: \begin{eqnarray}

858:  \Omega_{GL}^{\Delta ^2}

859: &=&\sum_{abij} N(\mu)

860:  \left\{

861: \ln \left( \frac{T}{T_c} \right)

862: -  \frac{\delta p_{ij} }{\mu} \ln \left( \frac{\mu}{T_c} \right) \right\}

863:  \nonumber \\

864: &&~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

865: \times |\phi_{abij}|^2, 

866: \label{eq:final-form-1} 

867:  \\

868: \delta p_{ij} &\simeq &

869: \delta \mu_{ij} - (m_i^2+m_j^2)/(4\mu).

870: \label{eq:final-form-2} 

871: \end{eqnarray}

872: 

873:      It can be rewritten in a clearer form,

874: \begin{eqnarray}

875:  \Omega_{GL}^{\Delta ^2}

876: &=&\sum_{abij} N(\mu)

877: \left( \frac{T- {T}_{c}^{ij}} {{T}_{c}} \right)| \phi_{abij}|^2, 

878: \label{eq:final-form-3} \\

879: \frac{{T}_{c}^{ij}}{T_c}&=&

880: 1+  \frac{\delta p_{ij} }{\mu} 

881: \ln \left( \frac{\mu}{T_c} \right).

882: \label{eq:final-form-4}

883: \end{eqnarray}

884: 

885:      Several comments are in order here.

886: \begin{itemize}

887: 

888: \item The free energy correction depends only on the average shift of the 

889: Fermi momenta of paired quarks, $\delta p_{ij}$, as can be seen from 

890: Eq.\ (\ref{eq:final-form-1}).  Furthermore, the correction may be decomposed

891: into a sum of the effects from the averaged chemical potential and the 

892: averaged mass squared when $\delta p_{ij}$ is small, as shown in 

893: Eq.\ (\ref{eq:final-form-2}).

894:   

895: \item

896: Equations (\ref{eq:final-form-3}) and (\ref{eq:final-form-4}) indicate that 

897: the shift $\delta p_{ij}$ affects the free energy correction through the 

898: critical temperature $T_c^{ij}$ for the $(i,j)$ pairing.  The larger the 

899: shift $\delta p_{ij}$ is, the higher the melting temperature ${T}_{c}^{ij}$ 

900: becomes.  In other words, one can compare the thermal stability of two 

901: different pairs only by taking note of a difference in the average density 

902: of states between them.

903: 

904: \item

905: The unlocking at $T=0$ is different in mechanism from our unlocking near 

906: $T_c$.  At $T=0$, color-flavor unlocking due to the Fermi momentum 

907: {\em mismatch} between paired quarks is expected at 

908: $\mu \sim m_s^2 / \phi_0$ \cite{unlock}.  In contrast, the Fermi momentum 

909: {\em average} is important for our unlocking near $T_c$.

910: 

911: \item

912: We can see that in the correction obtained above quark flavors do not mix

913: with each other.  As long as we consider the pairing of positive energy quarks

914: and neglect that of antiquarks, the flavor structure of a gap always enters in 

915: the form of $m_i^2$ instead of $m_i m_j (i \neq j)$.

916: \end{itemize}

917: 

918: \section{GL potential in realistic quark matter}

919: 

920:       Up to now we constructed the GL potential for general quark masses 

921: and chemical potential shifts assuming that the corrections are small.

922: In this section, we will focus on the case close to a realistic situation 

923: by taking $m_{s} \neq 0$ with $m_{u,d}=0$ and by imposing $\beta$ 

924: equilibrium and charge neutrality conditions.  This analysis clarifies the 

925: role of the strange quark mass in possible phase structures near the 

926: super-normal phase boundary at finite $T$. 

927: 

928: \subsection{Direct $m_s$ correction through the quark mass term}

929: 

930:      Let us first consider the correction directly proportional to

931: $m_s^2$ in Eqs.\ (\ref{eq:final-form-1}) and (\ref{eq:final-form-2}).

932: It is easy to see from the flavor structure of Eq.\ (\ref{eq:final-form-1}) 

933: that $m_s$ affects only $us$ and $ds$ pairings.  This is also reasonable

934: from the physical point of view as will be shown below.

935: 

936:      By inserting $m_s\neq 0$ with $m_{u,d}=0$ and using Eq.\ (\ref{phi-d}) 

937: with Eq.\ (\ref{parity-even}), the direct $m_s$ correction in Eq.\ 

938: (\ref{eq:final-form-1}) becomes

939: \begin{eqnarray}\label{epsilon}

940: \epsilon 

941: \sum_{a} ( |d_a^u|^2 + |d_a^d|^2 )

942: = \epsilon \sum_{a} (|{\mathbf{d}_a}|^2 -|d_a^s|^2).   

943: \end{eqnarray}

944: Here the coefficient $\epsilon$ reads

945:  \begin{eqnarray}

946: \label{epsilon-wc}

947: \epsilon  \simeq   

948: \alpha_0 \frac{m_s^2}{4 \mu^2}

949: \ln \left(\frac{\mu}{T_c}\right)

950: \sim 2 \alpha_0  \sigma,

951: \end{eqnarray}

952: where $\alpha_0=4N(\mu)$ is defined in Eq.\ (\ref{b1b2}), and  

953: a dimensionless parameter $\sigma$ is introduced as

954: \begin{eqnarray}

955: \label{eq:full-sigma}

956: \sigma = \left( \frac{3 \pi^2} {8 {\sqrt 2}} \right) \frac{m_s^2} {g \mu^2}.

957: \end{eqnarray} 

958: In Eq.\ (\ref{epsilon-wc}) we have used a weak coupling relation, 

959: $\ln (T_c/\mu) \sim -{3\pi^2}/(\sqrt{2} g)$, which originates from the 

960: long-range color magnetic interaction \cite{brown,PR}. 

961:  

962:      Since the finite $m_s$ decreases the Fermi momentum of $s$ quarks,

963: $\delta p_{us}$ and $\delta p_{ds}$ are smaller than $\delta p_{ud}$, and

964: thus $\epsilon$ becomes positive such that $ud$ pairing is favored over $us$ 

965: and $ds$ pairings.  Consequently, the CFL phase becomes asymmetric in flavor 

966: space and its critical temperature is lowered, leading to the appearance of 

967: the 2SC phase (${d}_a^i \propto \delta^{is}$) just below $T_c$ 

968: \cite{abuki}. 

969: 

970: \subsection{Indirect $m_s$ correction through the charge chemical potentials}

971: 

972:       We proceed to discuss the correction from the charge chemical 

973: potentials, which is proportional to $\delta \mu_{ij}$ in Eqs.\ 

974: (\ref{eq:final-form-1}) and (\ref{eq:final-form-2}).  Under $\beta$ 

975: equilibrium and charge neutrality, the electron chemical potential $\mu_e$ and

976: the shift $\delta\mu_i$ of the chemical potential of flavor $i$ are related as

977: \begin{eqnarray}\label{delmu}

978: \delta \mu_i =-q_i\mu_e 

979: \end{eqnarray}

980: with $q_i$ being the electric charges of the quarks; $q_{u}=2/3$ and 

981: $q_{d,s}=-1/3$.  In weak coupling, where one may regard normal quark matter 

982: and electrons as noninteracting Fermi gases, $\mu_e$ is related to $m_s$ as

983: \begin{eqnarray}\label{muemus}

984: \mu_e=m_s^2/4\mu .

985: \end{eqnarray}

986: This estimate is valid in the vicinity of $T_c$ where corrections to $\mu_e$ 

987: by a finite pairing gap affect only the quartic terms in the GL potential.

988:  

989:      By inserting Eqs.\ (\ref{delmu}) and (\ref{muemus}) and using 

990: Eq.\ (\ref{phi-d}) with Eq.\ (\ref{parity-even}), the indirect $m_s$ 

991: correction in Eq.\ (\ref{eq:final-form-1}) becomes

992: \begin{eqnarray}\label{eta}

993: \eta~ (\frac{1}{3}  \sum_{a}|{\mathbf{d}_a}|^2

994:  -\sum_{a} |d_a^u|^2).  

995: \end{eqnarray}

996: Here the coefficient $\eta$ reads

997:  \begin{eqnarray}

998:  \label{eta-wc}

999: \eta \simeq

1000:  \alpha_0 \frac{m_s^2}{8\mu^2}

1001: \ln \left(\frac{\mu}{T_c}\right)

1002: \sim \alpha_0 \sigma  .

1003: \end{eqnarray} 

1004: Since $\delta \mu_{ds}$ is larger than $\delta \mu_{ud}$ and $\delta \mu_{us}$

1005: and it increases the average Fermi momentum of $ds$ quarks in Eq.\ 

1006: (\ref{eq:final-form-2}), the indirect $m_s$ correction favors $ds$ pairing 

1007: than $ud$ and $us$ pairings.

1008: 

1009:      Note that we only consider the modification of $T_c$ due to nonzero

1010: $m_s$ through the properties of the superfluid phase.  Actually, $T_c$ is 

1011: modified not only by the properties of the superfluid phase but also of the 

1012: normal phase.  The modification by the normal phase enters through the Debye 

1013: mass in the gluon propagator ${\cal D}$ in the relation between $T_c$ and $g$,

1014: Eq.\ (\ref{Tcg}).  Fortunately the modification due to nonzero $m_s$ and 

1015: charge neutrality in normal quark matter is like $T_c \rightarrow 

1016: T_c (1+ {\cal O}(g \sigma))$.  This modification is of higher order than 

1017: that in superfluid quark matter, $T_c \rightarrow T_c (1+ {\cal O}(\sigma))$, 

1018: to be derived in Sec.\ V. 

1019: 

1020: \subsection{Effect of color neutrality}

1021: 

1022:     We consider color neutrality of the system as well.  In contrast to the 

1023: case at $T=0$, however, it affects only the quartic terms in the GL potential 

1024: because the possible chemical potential differences between colors are 

1025: \cite{IB,RIS}

1026: \begin{eqnarray}

1027:     \delta{\mu}_{ab}&=&

1028:   -\frac{1}{9\mu}\ln\left(\frac{T_{c}}{\mu}\right)

1029:    [3\sum_i (d_{a}^i  d_{b}^{i*}) 

1030: -  \delta_{ab} \sum_{c,i} |d_c^i|^{2}], \nonumber \\

1031:   \label{muaGL}  

1032: \end{eqnarray}

1033: which are already of quadratic order in the gap.  Here $\delta \mu_{ab}= 

1034: \mu_{ab} -\mu \delta_{ab}$, and  ${\mu}_{ab}$ is the chemical potential 

1035: conjugate to $n_{ab}=\sum_i \bar{\psi}_{bi} \gamma^0 \psi_{ai}$ \cite{IB}.

1036: In weak coupling the magnitude of the correction to the quartic terms is 

1037: suppressed by ${\cal O}((T_c/g\mu)^2)$ compared to the leading quartic terms.

1038: Thus color neutrality has no essential consequence to the phase transitions 

1039: considered in this paper.  A major difference between the corrections from the 

1040: charge neutrality and the color neutrality is that the former shifts the 

1041: quark chemical potentials even in the normal phase, while the latter works 

1042: only when the pairing occurs.  This is why the former is more important 

1043: than the latter near $T_c$.

1044:   

1045: \subsection{Effect of instantons}

1046:    

1047:     In QCD with three flavors, instantons induce chirality-flipping

1048: six-fermion interactions.  This interaction leads to a sextic term in the gap

1049: in the chiral limit, which is irrelevant near the super-normal phase boundary.

1050: If the strange quark mass enters, the direct instantons induce an effective 

1051: four-fermion interaction between $u$ and $d$ quarks \cite{Sch}.  This leads to 

1052: a quadratic term in the GL potential, $\xi~\sum_a |d_a^s|^2$, which 

1053: corresponds to the $a_1$ term in Eq.\ (\ref{generalGL}).  An explicit 

1054: calculation in weak coupling shows that $\xi\sim -\alpha_0 (m_s/\mu) 

1055: (\Lambda_{\rm QCD}/\mu)^9 (1/g)^{14}$. 

1056: The negative sign indicates that the instanton effect favors $ud$ pairing 

1057: as does one-gluon exchange [see Eq.\ (\ref{epsilon})].  However, the magnitude

1058: of $\xi$ is highly suppressed at high densities.  Therefore we will ignore 

1059: this term in the following.

1060: 

1061:      In summary of Secs.\ IV.A--D, as far as we are close to the super-normal 

1062: phase boundary at high density, we have only to consider the corrections

1063: from the strange quark mass and the electric charge neutrality, which favor 

1064: $ud$ pairing and $ds$ pairing, respectively. 

1065: 

1066: \subsection{Validity of the approximations}

1067: 

1068:      Our analysis of the GL potential near $T_c$ is valid as long as 

1069: (a) $g \ll 1$, (b) $\sigma \ll 1$, and (c) $T_c \ll g \mu $.  The condition 

1070: (a) is necessary for the dominance of the long-range magnetic interaction 

1071: acting between quarks.  The condition (b) allowed us to consider the 

1072: corrections to the GL potential by the strange quark mass and differences 

1073: in the chemical potential among flavors up to quadratic order in the gap.

1074: The condition (c) is imposed so that the correction to the quartic terms in 

1075: the GL potential from the color neutrality can be neglected.  These conditions

1076: are all satisfied at asymptotically high density.

1077:   

1078:      If we use the result for $T_c$ calculated in weak coupling 

1079: \cite{brown,PR}, one finds that (c) is a consequence of (a).  The conditions 

1080: (a) and (b) can also be combined into  

1081: \begin{eqnarray}

1082: \frac{m_s^2}{\mu^2} \ll g \ll 1.

1083: \end{eqnarray}

1084: 

1085: 

1086: \section{Melting pattern of diquark condensates}

1087: 

1088:      In this section, we clarify the phase structure near the transition

1089: temperature using the GL potential corrected by Eqs.\ (\ref{epsilon}) and 

1090: (\ref{eta}).  We start from assuming the form of the condensation and derive 

1091: the temperature dependence of the gaps that minimize the potential.  Then we 

1092: discuss the properties of quark quasiparticles and transverse gluons in

1093: each of the phases near the transition temperature.

1094: 

1095: \subsection{Phase structure with finite $m_s$ and charge neutrality}

1096: 

1097:      Since the two effects of nonzero $m_s$, characterized by Eqs.\ 

1098: (\ref{epsilon}) and (\ref{eta}), favor $ud$ pairing and $ds$ pairing, 

1099: respectively, the finite temperature transition from the CFL to 

1100: the normal phase at $m_s=0$ is significantly modified.  In fact, as we show 

1101: in detail below, successive color-flavor unlockings take place instead of a 

1102: simultaneous unlocking of all color-flavor combinations.  To describe this 

1103: {\em hierarchical thermal unlocking}, it is convenient to  

1104: introduce a parameterization

1105: \begin{eqnarray}

1106: \label{s}

1107: d_a^i

1108: =

1109:  \left(

1110:   \begin{array}{lll} 

1111:       \Delta_1&0&0    \\

1112:   0&\Delta_2&0    \\

1113:   0&0&\Delta_3    \\

1114:   \end{array}

1115:  \right).

1116:   \end{eqnarray}

1117: We assume $\Delta_{1,2,3}$ to be real.  We also name the phases for later 

1118: convenience as \cite{IMTH04}

1119:  \begin{eqnarray}

1120: \label{phase-def} 

1121:   \begin{array}{llcl} 

1122:      \Delta_{1,2,3} \neq 0 & & :  &  {\rm mCFL}, \\

1123: \Delta_1=0, & \Delta_{2,3}\neq 0   & :& {\rm uSC},      \\

1124: \Delta_2=0, &  \Delta_{1,3} \neq 0 & :& {\rm dSC},      \\

1125: \Delta_3=0, &  \Delta_{1,2} \neq 0 & :& {\rm sSC},      \\

1126: \Delta_{1,2}=0, & \Delta_3 \neq 0  &: & {\rm 2SC},                

1127:   \end{array}

1128:   \end{eqnarray} 

1129: where dSC (uSC, sSC) stands for superconductivity in which for $d$ ($u$, $s$)

1130: quarks all three colors are involved in the pairing.

1131:    

1132:      In terms of the parameterization (\ref{s}), the GL potential with 

1133: corrections of ${\cal O}(m_s^2)$ to the quadratic term, 

1134: Eqs.\ (\ref{epsilon}) and (\ref{eta}), reads

1135: \begin{eqnarray}

1136:  \label{new-GL}

1137: \Omega &=&\bar{\alpha}' (\Delta_1^2+\Delta_2^2+\Delta_3^2) 

1138: - \epsilon \Delta_3^2 - \eta \Delta_1^2\nonumber \\

1139:  &+& \beta_1 (\Delta_1^2+\Delta_2^2+\Delta_3^2)^2

1140:  + \beta_2 ( \Delta_1^4+\Delta_2^4+\Delta_3^4),

1141: \end{eqnarray}

1142: where $\bar{\alpha}' =\bar{\alpha}+\epsilon+\frac{\eta}{3}$.

1143: 

1144:      We proceed to analyze the phase structure dictated by Eq.\ 

1145: (\ref{new-GL}) with the weak coupling parameters (\ref{b1b2}), 

1146: (\ref{epsilon-wc}), and (\ref{eta-wc}) up to leading order in $g$.

1147: A stable condensation must satisfy the gap equations

1148: \begin{eqnarray} 

1149: \partial \Omega /\partial\Delta_{1,2,3}=0,

1150: \end{eqnarray}

1151: and it must minimize the potential Eq.\ (\ref{new-GL}).  We compare the 

1152: energies of all condensates in Eq.\ (\ref{phase-def}) and decide the most 

1153: stable condensation at each temperature near $T_c$.

1154: 

1155:      In Figs.\ 3 and 4 the results thus obtained for the phase structure 

1156: near $T_c$ are summarized.

1157: 

1158:      Figure 3(a) shows the second-order phase transition, CFL $\to$

1159: normal for $m_s=0$.  Figures 3(b,c) represent how the phase transitions and 

1160: their critical temperatures bifurcate as we introduce (b) effects of a nonzero 

1161: $m_s$ in the quark propagator and then (c) effects of charge neutrality.

1162: In case (b), two second-order phase transitions arise:

1163: mCFL (with $\Delta_1=\Delta_2$) $\to$ 2SC at 

1164: $T=T_c^s \equiv (1-4 \sigma)T_c$, 

1165: and 2SC $\to$ normal at $T=T_c$.  In case (c), there arise three 

1166: successive second-order phase transitions, mCFL $\to$ dSC at $T=T_c^{\rm I}$,

1167: dSC $\to$ 2SC at $T=T_c^{\rm II}$, and 2SC $\to$ normal at $T=T_c^{\rm III}$. 

1168: Shown in Fig.\ 4 is the $T$-dependence of the gaps $\Delta_{1,2,3}$ for 

1169: the case (c).  All the gaps are continuous functions of $T$, but their slopes

1170: are discontinuous at the critical points, which reflects the second order 

1171: nature of the transitions in the mean-field treatment of Eq.\ (\ref{new-GL}).

1172: 

1173: \begin{figure}[t]

1174: \begin{center}

1175: \includegraphics[width=7cm]{Tc.eps}

1176: \end{center}

1177: \vspace{-0.5cm}

1178: \caption{Transition temperatures of the 

1179: three-flavor color superconductor in weak coupling:

1180: (a) all quarks are massless;

1181: (b) nonzero $m_s$ in the quark propagator is considered;

1182: (c) electric charge neutrality is further imposed.

1183: The numbers attached to the arrows are in units of $\sigma T_c$.  From Ref.\ 

1184: \cite{IMTH04}.

1185: }

1186: \label{fig:Tc}

1187: \end{figure}

1188:      

1189: \begin{figure}[t]

1190: \begin{center}

1191: \includegraphics[width=7cm]{conden.eps}

1192: \end{center}

1193: \vspace{-0.5cm}

1194: \caption{A schematic illustration of the gaps squared

1195: as a function of $T$.  From Ref.\ \cite{IMTH04}.}

1196: \label{fig:conden}

1197: \end{figure}

1198:   

1199:      We may understand the bifurcation of the transition temperatures 

1200: as follows.  In the massless case (a), $T_c$ is degenerate 

1201: between the CFL and 2SC phases, the chemical potential is common to all

1202: three flavors and colors, and the CFL phase is more favorable than

1203: the 2SC phase below $T_c$.  As one goes from (a) to (b), the density of 

1204: states of the $s$ quarks at the Fermi surface is reduced.  Then the critical 

1205: temperature for the CFL phase is lowered, and the 2SC phase is allowed 

1206: to appear at temperatures between $T_c^s$ and $T_c$.  As one goes from (b) 

1207: to (c), the average chemical potential of $ds$ ($ud$ and $us$) quarks 

1208: increases (decreases).  Accordingly, the transition temperatures

1209: further change from $T_c$ to $T_c^{\rm III}$ and from $T_c^s$ to 

1210: $T_c^{\rm I}$ and $T_c^{\rm II}$. 

1211: 

1212:      Now we examine in more detail how the color-flavor unlocking in case 

1213: (c) proceeds with increasing $T$ from the region below $T_c^{\rm I}$.

1214: 

1215:  \noindent

1216:  (i)

1217:      Just below $T_c^{\rm I}$, we have a CFL-like phase, but the three gaps 

1218: take different values, with an order $\Delta_3 > \Delta_1 > \Delta_2 \neq 0$ 

1219: (the mCFL phase).  The reason why this order is realized can be understood 

1220: from the GL potential (\ref{new-GL}).  The $\epsilon$-term and $\eta$-term in 

1221: Eq.\ (\ref{new-GL}) tend to destabilize $us$ pairing ($\Delta_2$)

1222: relative to $ud$ pairing ($\Delta_3$) and $ds$ pairing ($\Delta_1$), and

1223: since $\epsilon > \eta (> 0)$, $ds$ pairing is destabilized more effectively 

1224: than $ud$ pairing.  The value of each gap in the mCFL phase reads

1225:     \begin{eqnarray} \label{gap1}     

1226: \Delta_i^2=\frac{\alpha_0}{8\beta} \left( 

1227:  \frac{T_c-T}{T_c} + c_i \sigma 

1228: \right) ,  

1229: \end{eqnarray}

1230: with $c_{1,2,3}=(-4/3, -16/3, 8/3)$.

1231: The mCFL phase has only a global symmetry $U(1)_{C+L+R} \times U(1)_{C+L+R}$ 

1232: in contrast to the global symmetry $SU(3)_{C+L+R}$ in the CFL phase with 

1233: $m_{u,d,s}=0$.  The remaining $U(1)$ generators are 

1234: \begin{eqnarray}

1235: {\cal Q}_1&=&T_3- S_3,  \nonumber\\

1236: {\cal Q}_2&=&T_8-S_8.   

1237: \end{eqnarray} 

1238: Here $T_{a}$ ($S_{i}$) are the part of the generators of $SU(3)_C$ 

1239: ($SU(3)_{L+R}$) with explicit forms $T_3=S_3=({1}/{2}){\rm diag}(1,-1,0)$ and 

1240: $T_8=S_8=({1}/{2 {\sqrt 3}}){\rm diag}(1,1,-2)$.  The free energy in this 

1241: phase is

1242: \begin{eqnarray}

1243: \Omega_{mCFL}=-\frac{3\alpha_0^2}{16\beta}\left\{ \left(\frac{T-T_c}{T_c}

1244: +\frac{4}{3}\eta \right)^2 

1245: +\frac{8}{3}\sigma^2 \right\}.

1246: \end{eqnarray}

1247: As $T$ increases, the first unlocking transition, the unlocking of 

1248: $\Delta_2$ (the pairing between $Bu$ and $Rs$ quarks), takes place at the 

1249: critical temperature,

1250:  \begin{eqnarray}

1251:  \label{Tc-1}

1252: T_c^{\rm I}  = \left( 1 - \frac{16}{3} \sigma \right) T_c  .

1253: \end{eqnarray}

1254: 

1255: \noindent

1256: (ii) For $T_c^{\rm I} < T < T_c^{\rm II}$, $\Delta_2=0$ and

1257: \begin{eqnarray} \label{gap2}

1258: \Delta_i^2= \frac{\alpha_0}{6 \beta} 

1259: \left(

1260:  \frac{T_c-T}{T_c} + c_i \sigma

1261: \right) ,  

1262: \end{eqnarray}

1263: with $c_{1,3}=(-7/3, 2/3)$.

1264: In this phase, we have only $ud$ and $ds$ pairings (the dSC phase), and there 

1265: is a manifest symmetry, $U(1)_{C+L+R} \times U(1)_{C+L+R} \times 

1266: U(1)_{C+V+B} \times U(1)_{C+V+B}$, where the corresponding $U(1)$ generators 

1267: are 

1268: \begin{eqnarray}

1269: {\cal Q}_1&=&T_3- S_3, \nonumber \\

1270: {\cal Q}_2&=&T_8-S_8,  \nonumber \\

1271: {\cal Q}_3&=&Q+\frac{2}{\sqrt 3} T_8- 2 S_3, \nonumber \\

1272: {\cal Q}_4&=&Q+\frac{2}{\sqrt 3} S_8- 2 S_3,  \label{qqq}

1273: \end{eqnarray} 

1274: respectively.

1275: Here $Q={2}/{3}$ is the generator of baryon charge ($Q$) and acts on the gap 

1276: as Eq.\ (\ref{transform1}).

1277: The free energy in this phase is

1278: \begin{eqnarray}

1279: \Omega_{dSC}=-\frac{\alpha_0^2}{6\beta}\left\{\left(\frac{T-T_c}{T_c}+\frac{5}{6}\eta \right)^2 

1280: +\frac{3}{4}\sigma^2 \right\}.

1281: \end{eqnarray}

1282: At $T=T_c^{\rm II}$, the second unlocking transition, the unlocking of 

1283: $\Delta_1$ (the pairing between $Gs$ and $Bd$ quarks), takes place at the 

1284: critical temperature,

1285:    \begin{eqnarray}

1286:  \label{Tc-2}

1287: T_c^{\rm II}  = \left( 1 -\frac{7}{3}\sigma \right) T_c.

1288: \end{eqnarray} 

1289: 

1290: \noindent

1291: (iii) For $T_c^{\rm II} < T < T_c^{\rm III}$, one finds the 2SC phase, which 

1292: has only $ud$ pairing with 

1293: \begin{eqnarray} \label{gap3}

1294: \Delta_3^2=\frac{\alpha_0}{4 \beta} 

1295: \left(

1296:  \frac{T_c-T}{T_c} 

1297: -\frac{1}{3}\sigma

1298: \right) .  

1299: \end{eqnarray} 

1300: The 2SC phase has a symmetry $SU(2)_C \times SU(2)_{L+R} \times U(1)_{C+B} 

1301: \times U(1)_{L+R+B}$, where the corresponding $U(1)$ generators are

1302: \begin{eqnarray}

1303: {\cal Q}_5&=&Q+{\sqrt 3} T_8, \nonumber \\

1304: {\cal Q}_6&=&Q+{\sqrt 3} S_8,  

1305: \end{eqnarray} 

1306: respectively.

1307: The free energy in this phase is

1308: \begin{eqnarray}

1309: \Omega_{2SC}=-\frac{\alpha_0^2}{8\beta}\left(\frac{T-T_c}{T_c}+\frac{1}{3}\sigma\right)^2 .

1310: \end{eqnarray}

1311: The final unlocking transition where 

1312:  $\Delta_3$ (the pairing between $Rd$ and $Gu$ quarks) vanishes occurs at 

1313: \begin{eqnarray}

1314:  \label{Tc-3}

1315: T_c^{\rm III}  = \left( 1 -\frac{1}{3}\sigma \right) T_c .

1316: \end{eqnarray}  

1317: Above $T_c^{\rm III}$, the system is in the normal phase.  Note that in the 

1318: temperature region $(T_c^{\rm I}-T)/T_c^{\rm I} < {\rm const} \cdot \sigma$, 

1319: the gaps satisfy the condition ($\ref{eq:t-sig2}$), so the GL potential 

1320: expanded up to quartic order in the gap is valid. 

1321: 

1322:      So far, we have derived the parameters $\beta_{1,2}$, $\epsilon$, and 

1323: $\eta$ in the weak coupling approximation and discussed the phase structure 

1324: expected at asymptotically high density.  Now we relax the weak coupling 

1325: constraint and study possible phase structures expected from the GL potential 

1326: of the form Eq.\ (\ref{new-GL}) with arbitrary coupling strengths.  To 

1327: simplify the argument, we assume $\beta_1=\beta_2 >0$ and draw the phase 

1328: diagram in the space of the parameters $\epsilon$ and $\eta$ in Fig.\ 

1329: \ref{fig:epsilon-eta}.

1330:   

1331:      If we consider the case where the mCFL phase appears at temperature 

1332: sufficiently below $T_c$, the relative magnitudes of the gaps behave

1333: as shown in Fig.\ \ref{fig:epsilon-eta}.  If $\Delta_{2}$ is the smallest of 

1334: the three gaps, we call the melting pattern ``dSC-type'' because the dSC phase 

1335: would appear as $T$ increases.  ``uSC-type'' and  ``sSC-type'' are defined in 

1336: a similar way.   As in Fig.\ \ref{fig:epsilon-eta}, depending on the relative 

1337: magnitude of $\epsilon$ and $\eta$, the dSC-type melting pattern is divided

1338: into two different classes in which the 2SC-type phase

1339: ($\Delta_1 \neq 0, \Delta_{2,3}=0$ or $\Delta_3 \neq 0, \Delta_{1,2}=0$) 

1340: appears just below the transition temperature to the normal phase.

1341: The uSC-type and sSC-type melting patterns also have such a two-fold

1342: structure.  The {\em hierarchical thermal unlocking} (mCFL $\rightarrow$ 

1343:   dSC  $\rightarrow$ 2SC  $\rightarrow$ normal) is realized in weak coupling 

1344: as shown by $\otimes$ in the figure.  The figure indicates that 

1345: it is a rather robust phenomenon near the super-normal phase boundary.

1346: In other words, the uSC or sSC phase appears only when $\epsilon$ or

1347: $\eta$ changes sign at least under the form of the GL potential in Eq.\ 

1348: (\ref{new-GL}) with an assumption $\beta_1=\beta_2>0$.  We mention here

1349: that a recent analysis in Ref.\ \cite{Fukushima} using the Nambu-Jona-Lasinio 

1350: (NJL) model shows that the signs and the ratios of the coupling strengths in 

1351: the GL potential take similar values with our weak coupling values:

1352: $\beta_1/\beta_2=1$ (with $\beta_1>0$ and $\beta_2>0$)

1353: and $\zeta \equiv \epsilon / \eta \cong  2$--4 (with $\epsilon >0$ and

1354: $\eta >0$). 

1355: 

1356: \begin{figure}[t]

1357: \begin{center}

1358: \includegraphics[width=7cm]{epsilon-eta.eps}

1359: \end{center}

1360: \vspace{-0.5cm}

1361: \caption{

1362: The phase structure obtained from Eq.\ (\ref{new-GL}) in ($\epsilon, \eta$) 

1363: plane for $\beta_1=\beta_2>0$.  The mCFL phase is assumed to appear at 

1364: sufficiently low temperature.  $\otimes$ indicates the point calculated  

1365: in the weak coupling approximation.

1366:  }

1367: \label{fig:epsilon-eta}

1368: \end{figure}

1369:  

1370:  \subsection{Properties of quark and gluon modes}

1371: 

1372:      Next we resume considering about the weak coupling limit and discuss the 

1373: properties of quark and gluon modes such as the excitation energies 

1374: in each of the mCFL, dSC, and 2SC phases.  The low energy excitations 

1375: of these phases are massive or massless gauge bosons, gapped or gapless 

1376: quark quasiparticles, and modes that are associated with fluctuations in

1377: the diquark fields.  Here we concentrate on the gauge bosons and gapless 

1378: fermions.  As for gauge bosons, we only consider the transverse components 

1379: of the gauge fields which, in the static limit, can become massive only 

1380: in a superconductor.  The longitudinal components are Debye screened 

1381: in the vicinity of the transition temperature.  Note that the 

1382: "gapless fermions" in our previous paper \cite{IMTH04} have been defined only 

1383: by diagonalizing the self-energy $\Sigma$ in Eq.\ (\ref{GSig}). In the 

1384: present paper, we have diagonalized the full propagator $G^{-1}(k)$ to 

1385: define the gapless fermions in a more precise manner as will be shown below.

1386: 

1387: 

1388:      In Table I, we summarize the symmetries, the number of massive gauge 

1389: bosons, and the number of gapless fermion modes in each phase.  As we will 

1390: show in detail below, the number of gapless quark modes depends not only on 

1391: which phase we consider but also on the temperature itself.  In each phase, 

1392: in addition to the unpaired quark modes whose excitation energies are 

1393: naturally zero, gapless modes appear if the temperature is in the region 

1394: where the gaps satisfy the conditions listed in Table I.

1395:  

1396:      In each phase, the gauge symmetry is broken partially or even totally.

1397: The Meissner masses for the general condensate, Eq.\ (\ref{phase-def}),

1398: and the corresponding massive (or massless) gauge fields can be calculated 

1399: using the GL theory coupled to gluon fields \cite{IB3} as

1400: \begin{eqnarray} 

1401: &&m_{A_1}^2=m_{A_2}^2= \kappa_T g^2 (\Delta_1^2 +\Delta_2^2), \nonumber\\

1402: &&m_{A_4}^2=m_{A_5}^2=\kappa_T g^2 (\Delta_1^2 +\Delta_3^2), \nonumber\\

1403: &&m_{A_6}^2=m_{A_7}^2=\kappa_T g^2 (\Delta_2^2 +\Delta_3^2), 

1404: \label{gluon-masss}\\

1405: &&m_{A_8}^2= \frac{4}{3}\kappa_T g^2 

1406: \left(

1407: \frac{ \Delta_1^2 \Delta_2^2 +\Delta_2^2 \Delta_3^2 +\Delta_3^2 \Delta_1^2 }

1408: {\Delta_1^2+ \Delta_2^2 }

1409: \right), \nonumber\\

1410: &&m_{\tilde{A}}^2=\frac{4}{3}\kappa_T g^2 

1411: \left(

1412: \frac{ \Delta_1^4 +\Delta_2^4 +\Delta_1^2 \Delta_2^2 }

1413: {\Delta_1^2+ \Delta_2^2 }

1414: \right) . \nonumber

1415: \end{eqnarray}

1416: Here $\tilde{A}$ is a mixed field of $A_3$ and $A_8$,

1417: \begin{eqnarray}

1418: \tilde{A}&=&  

1419: \frac{\sqrt 3}{2} 

1420: \frac{\Delta_1^2+ \Delta_2^2 }{\sqrt{ \Delta_1^4 +\Delta_2^4 +\Delta_1^2 

1421: \Delta_2^2 }}A_3 \nonumber\\

1422: &&~~~~~~~~~+\frac{1}{2} \frac{\Delta_1^2-\Delta_2^2 }

1423: {\sqrt{ \Delta_1^4 +\Delta_2^4 +\Delta_1^2 \Delta_2^2 }}A_8.

1424: \end{eqnarray}

1425: Here we followed the notations in Refs.\ \cite{IB, IB3}.  $\kappa_T$ is the 

1426: stiffness parameter which controls the spatial variation of the gap.  In

1427: weak coupling it is proportional to the quartic coupling $\beta$ as \cite{IB3} 

1428: \begin{eqnarray}

1429: \kappa_T=\beta/3 = \frac{7\zeta(3)}{24(\pi T_c)^{2}}N(\mu).

1430: \end{eqnarray}

1431: We can reproduce the results in Table I in Ref.\ \cite{MIHB} by taking a limit

1432: $\Delta_{1,2} \rightarrow  0$ for the isoscalar 2SC phase and 

1433: $\Delta_1=\Delta_2=\Delta_3$ for the CFL phase.  

1434: 

1435:      As given in a full description in Ref.\ \cite{gapless-AKR}, we can count 

1436: the gapless quark modes by examining the spectra of which the full propagator 

1437: diverges:

1438: \begin{eqnarray} \label{fullD}

1439: {\rm det} G^{-1}(E, {\bf q})= {\cal G} _{Rd,Gu} {\cal G} _{Rs,Bu} 

1440: {\cal G} _{Gs,Bd} {\cal G} _{Ru,Gd,Bs}= 0. \nonumber \\ 

1441: \end{eqnarray}

1442: The gap matrix $\Sigma (k)$ can be written in block-diagonal form if we 

1443: adequately take the base whereas the noninteracting quark propagator $G_0 (k)$ 

1444: is diagonal.  The determinant Eq.\ (\ref{fullD}) can be decomposed 

1445: into three 4 $\times$ 4 determinants ${\cal G}_{Rd,Gu}$, ${\cal G}_{Rs,Bu}$, 

1446: and ${\cal G}_{Gs,Bd}$, and one 6 $\times$ 6 determinant 

1447: ${\cal G}_{Ru,Gd,Bs}$, which may effectively be written as

1448: \begin{eqnarray}

1449: \label{det1}

1450: {\cal G} _{Rd,Gu}

1451: &=& \det

1452:  \left(

1453:   \begin{array}{ll} 

1454:   \qs -\hat{p}_{F}^{d}  & -\Delta_3\\

1455:  -\tilde{\Delta}_3&  ~\qs +\hat{p}_{F}^{u}

1456: \end{array}

1457:  \right)  \nonumber\\

1458:   &\times &\det

1459:  \left(

1460:   \begin{array}{ll} 

1461:   \qs -\hat{p}_{F}^{u}  & - \Delta_3 \\

1462:     -\tilde{\Delta}_3& ~\qs +\hat{p}_{F}^{d}  

1463: \end{array}

1464:  \right) ,

1465:   \end{eqnarray}

1466: \begin{eqnarray}

1467: \label{det2}

1468: {\cal G} _{Rs,Bu}

1469: &=& \det

1470:  \left(

1471:   \begin{array}{ll} 

1472:   \qs -\hat{p}_{F}^{s}  & -\Delta_2\\

1473:   -\tilde{\Delta}_2&  ~\qs +\hat{p}_{F}^{u}

1474: \end{array}

1475:  \right)  \nonumber\\

1476:   & \times &\det

1477:  \left(

1478:   \begin{array}{ll} 

1479:   \qs -\hat{p}_{F}^{u}  & -{\Delta}_2\\

1480:      -\tilde{\Delta}_2& ~\qs +\hat{p}_{F}^{s}  

1481: \end{array}

1482:  \right),

1483:   \end{eqnarray}

1484: \begin{eqnarray}

1485: \label{det3}

1486: {\cal G} _{Gs,Bd}

1487: &=& \det

1488:  \left(

1489:   \begin{array}{ll} 

1490:   \qs -\hat{p}_{F}^{s}  & -\Delta_1\\

1491:    -\tilde{\Delta}_1 &  ~\qs +\hat{p}_{F}^{d}

1492: \end{array}

1493:  \right)  \nonumber\\

1494:   & \times &\det

1495:  \left(

1496:   \begin{array}{ll} 

1497:   \qs -\hat{p}_{F}^{d}  & -\Delta_1\\

1498:     -\tilde{\Delta}_1 & ~\qs +\hat{p}_{F}^{s}  

1499: \end{array}

1500:  \right),

1501:   \end{eqnarray}

1502: \begin{eqnarray}

1503: {\cal G} _{Ru, Gd, Bs}

1504: =

1505:  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

1506: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~  &&\nonumber\\

1507:  \det

1508:  \left(

1509:  \begin{array}{llllll} 

1510: \qs -\hat{p}_{F}^{u}  & 0& 0  & 0&  \Delta_3  & \Delta_2 \\

1511: 0  & \qs -\hat{p}_{F}^{d}&0  & \Delta_3  & 0 &\Delta_1   \\

1512: 0& 0&  \qs -\hat{p}_{F}^{s} & \Delta_2  & \Delta_1&0 \\

1513: 0&  \tilde{\Delta}_3  & \tilde{\Delta}_2 & \qs +\hat{p}_{F}^{u} &0 & 0 \\

1514: \tilde{\Delta}_3  & 0 &\tilde{\Delta}_1 &0  & \qs +\hat{p}_{F}^{d}&0    \\

1515: \tilde{\Delta}_2  & \tilde{\Delta}_1&0 &0& 0&  \qs +\hat{p}_{F}^{s}  

1516:   \end{array}

1517:  \right). \nonumber \\

1518: \label{det4}

1519:   \end{eqnarray}

1520: Here $\hat{p}_{F}^{i}=p_F^{i} \gamma_0$, and $p_F^{i}$ are the Fermi momenta 

1521: of $i$ quarks.  Only in Eqs.\ (\ref{det1})--(\ref{det4}) we abbreviate 

1522: the Lorentz structure of the gap for simplicity; here $\Delta_i$ indicates 

1523: $\gamma_5 \Lambda^{+} \Delta_i$, and $\tilde{\Delta}_i$ indicates 

1524: $\gamma_0 (\gamma_5 \Lambda^{+} \Delta_i)\gamma_0$.  Moreover, we include the 

1525: effect of $m_s$ as a shift of the effective chemical potential $p_F^i$

1526: following Ref.\ \cite{gapless-AKR}.  Using Eqs.\ (\ref{fermi-mom}), 

1527: (\ref{delmu}), and (\ref{muemus}), $p_F^{i}$'s can be expressed as

1528: \begin{eqnarray}

1529: p_{F}^{u} & =&\mu -(2/3)\mu_e, \nonumber \\

1530: p_{F}^{d}&=&\mu +(1/3)\mu_e,  \\

1531: p_{F}^{s} &=&\mu -(5/3)\mu_e.  \nonumber

1532: \end{eqnarray}

1533: In the vicinity of the critical temperature, chemical potential differences 

1534: between colors $\delta \mu_{ab}$ can be ignored as stated in the previous 

1535: sections.

1536: 

1537:     As for the three 4 $\times$ 4 determinants, we can count the gapless 

1538: modes as follows.  First of all, ($Rs$,$Bu$) and ($Bu$,$Bd$,$Rs$,$Gs$)

1539: quarks are gapless in the dSC and 2SC phases, respectively, because they do 

1540: not participate in the pairing.  Even for quarks participating in the 

1541: pairing, they can produce gapless excitations near the critical point. 

1542: As an example, consider a Fermi system composed of two species having  

1543: different Fermi momenta, $p_{F}^{(1)}$ and $p_{F}^{(2)}$, and a 

1544: superconducting gap $\Delta$ of pairing with each other.  Then the 

1545: quasiparticle spectra obtained after the diagonalization of the matrix 

1546: fermion propagator can be gapless when the gap is smaller than half of the 

1547: difference of the Fermi momenta,

1548: \begin{eqnarray}  \label{criterion} 

1549:  |p_{F}^{(1)}-p_{F}^{(2)}| > 2 \Delta.

1550: \end{eqnarray}

1551: In Ref.\ \cite{gapless-MS} the detailed analysis of the gapless 

1552: superconductivity at finite temperature has been done; the chemical potentials 

1553: and gaps have been calculated self-consistently at finite temperature. 

1554: 

1555:      In our case, the difference of the chemical potentials depends on 

1556: temperature only in higher orders so that the left hand side of Eq.\ 

1557: (\ref{criterion}) can be regarded as constant in temperature. 

1558: Then, we can solve Eq.\ (\ref{criterion})

1559: analytically using Eqs.\ (\ref{gap1}), (\ref{gap2}), and (\ref{gap3}).

1560: When the conditions shown below for the mCFL, dSC and 2SC phases

1561: are satisfied, we obtain two more gapless modes in each phase. 

1562: The conditions are

1563: \begin{itemize}

1564: \item{for the mCFL phase, 

1565: $\Delta_2 < \frac{1}{2} \mu_e$. }

1566: 

1567: \item {for the dSC phase,

1568: $\Delta_1 < \mu_e$. }

1569: 

1570: \item {for the 2SC phase,

1571: $\Delta_3 < \frac{1}{2} \mu_e$}.  

1572: \end{itemize}

1573: For example, let us consider the temperature satisfying $T_c^{\rm III} < T <  

1574: T_c^{\rm II}$ (the dSC region).  We basically have two unpaired quark modes 

1575: ($Bu$ and $Rs$).  Additionally, if the temperature satisfies $\Delta_1 < 

1576: \mu_e $, then we obtain two more gapless modes.

1577: 

1578:      We move on to the 6 $\times$ 6 determinant.  In this sector, there are 

1579: basically no unpaired quark modes in the dSC and mCFL phases and one unpaired 

1580: quark mode ($Bs$) in the 2SC phase.  In order to find additional gapless modes,

1581: we examine the solutions which satisfy the equation 

1582: \begin{eqnarray}

1583: 0&=&{\cal G} _{Ru, Gd, Bs}(E=0,{\bf q})^{1/2}   \nonumber \\

1584:    &=& (|{\bf q}|+ p_{F}^{u})^2(|{\bf q}|+ p_{F}^{d})^2

1585: (|{\bf q}|+ p_{F}^{s})^2 \nonumber \\

1586: &&[\{ x (x-\mu_e) (x+\mu_e) + x \Delta_1^2 +(x- \mu_e) \Delta_2^2 \nonumber \\

1587:  &&~~~~~~~~~~+ (x+\mu_e) \Delta_3^2  \}^2 

1588: +4\Delta_1^2 \Delta_2^2 \Delta_3^2].   

1589: \end{eqnarray} 

1590: Here $x=|{\bf q}|-\bar{\mu}$, where $\bar{\mu}=\mu-2\mu_e/3$ is the chemical 

1591: potential averaged over $Ru$, $Gd$, and $Bs$ quarks.  Then we find 

1592: \begin{itemize}

1593: \item {for the mCFL phase, no more gapless modes.}

1594: 

1595: \item {for the dSC phase, one more gapless mode corresponding to the

1596: mixture of $Ru$, $Gd$, and $Bs$ quarks. }

1597: 

1598: \item{for the 2SC phase, if the gap satisfies $\Delta_3 < \frac{1}{2} \mu_e$,

1599: we obtain two more gapless modes corresponding to the mixtures of 

1600: $Ru$ and $Gd$ quarks.}

1601: 

1602: \end{itemize}

1603: 

1604: 

1605:      In Fig.\ \ref{fig:gapless2}, we show the number of gapless quark modes

1606: together with the gaps as a function of temperature.  We can see that the 

1607: gapless modes always exist just below the critical temperatures 

1608: $T^{\rm I}_c$, $T^{\rm II}_c$, and $T^{\rm III}_c$.  The number of the 

1609: gapless modes decreases as the temperature lowers at high density.  

1610: 

1611: \begin{figure}[t]

1612: \begin{center}

1613: \includegraphics[width=8.5cm]{gapless2.eps}

1614: \end{center}

1615: \vspace{-0.5cm}

1616: \caption{The number of gapless quark modes as a function of temperature,

1617: together with the gaps and the electron chemical potential.}

1618: \label{fig:gapless2}

1619: \end{figure}

1620: 

1621: \section{Summary and concluding remarks}

1622: 

1623:      In this paper, we have investigated thermal phase transitions of the 

1624: color superconducting quark matter in the presence of finite strange quark 

1625: mass and under charge neutrality.  We constructed a general form of the GL 

1626: potential in such a way that it fulfills symmetry constraints and then

1627: obtained the weak coupling expression for the GL potential including 

1628: the corrections from unequal quark masses ($m_{i}$, $i$=$u, d, s$) and 

1629: unequal quark chemical potentials ($\mu_{i}$, $i$=$u, d, s$).  The corrections

1630: to the quadratic term of the GL potential from $m_i$ and $\mu_i$ indicate 

1631: that it is the {\em average} density of states of paired quarks which 

1632: determines the critical temperatures of different pairs, as can be seen in 

1633: Eqs.\ ($\ref{eq:final-form-3}$) and ($\ref{eq:final-form-4}$). 

1634: 

1635:      We found that the effects of the strange quark mass ($m_s$) through the 

1636: mass term in the quark propagator and through the electron charge chemical 

1637: potential play a vital role near the super-normal phase boundary, while the 

1638: color neutrality plays a minor role in contrast to the case at zero 

1639: temperature.

1640:   

1641:      As shown in Figs.\ $\ref{fig:Tc}$ and $\ref{fig:conden}$, an interplay 

1642: between these two effects of $m_s$ splits the single phase transition 

1643: (CFL $\rightarrow$ normal) for the $u$-$d$-$s$ symmetric system to three 

1644: successive second-order phase transitions 

1645: (mCFL $\rightarrow$ dSC $\rightarrow$ 2SC $\rightarrow$ normal).

1646: The window of the "dSC" phase opened up between the 2SC and mCFL phases is 

1647: a new phase where only the superconducting gaps with $d$ quarks are 

1648: non-vanishing \cite{IMTH04}.

1649: 

1650:      The obtained phase structure, which is shown to be valid in the weak 

1651: coupling (high density) region, may be applicable even in the strong coupling 

1652: region as long as the successive transitions driven by the quadratic term of 

1653: the GL potential take place in a small interval of temperature near the 

1654: super-normal phase boundary.  In connection with this, it was shown recently 

1655: that the dSC phase discussed in the present paper may be replaced by the uSC 

1656: phase in the low density region through a "doubly critical" point on the basis

1657: of the  NJL model \cite{Fukushima} (see also Ref.\ \cite{uSC}).  Moreover, 

1658: if we take into account the chiral condensate at low density,  some interplay 

1659: between the broken chiral symmetry and the color superconductivity is expected

1660: \cite{Bub}.  How to incorporate these aspects in our picture based on the 

1661: GL potential is an interesting open problem.  

1662: 

1663: 

1664:       In the present paper, the properties of quark and gluon modes

1665: such as the excitation energies were also investigated.  The excitation 

1666: spectra of quarks indicate that in addition to unpaired quark modes, whose 

1667: excitation energy is naturally zero, more than one gapless mode appear just 

1668: below each critical temperature as summarized in Table I.  Effects of the 

1669: gapless modes on physical phenomena such as neutron star cooling is

1670: an interesting problem to be examined \cite{astro}.

1671: 

1672: 

1673:       Throughout this paper, we have studied the phase transitions in the 

1674: mean-field level.  In weak coupling, thermal fluctuations of the gluon fields

1675: could change the second-order transition to the first-order one as described 

1676: in Refs.\ \cite{MIHB,GH}.  As far as the order of phase transition is 

1677: concerned, the gluon fluctuations have the following effects (the detailed 

1678: account will be given in our future publication): The second order transition, 

1679: mCFL $\to$ dSC, remains second order.  This is because all eight gluons are 

1680: Meissner screened across $T=T_c^{\rm I}$ and thus cannot induce a cubic term 

1681: in the order parameter in the GL potential.  On the other hand, the 

1682: transitions, dSC $\to$ 2SC and 2SC $\to$ normal, become weak first order 

1683: since some of the gluons become massless at $T=T_c^{\rm I,II}$ (Table I).

1684: In order to obtain a final phase diagram we should study the competition 

1685: between the shift of the critical temperature discussed in the present paper 

1686: and that coming from the fluctuation effects.

1687: 

1688: \begin{table*}[hbt]

1689: \caption{The symmetry, the number of Meissner screened gluons, and the number 

1690: of gapless fermion modes in the mCFL, dSC, and 2SC phases.  The results for

1691: the Meissner masses are given in Eq.\ (\ref{gluon-masss}).  In each phase, if 

1692: the temperature is in the region where the gaps satisfy the conditions listed 

1693: in this table, more gapless modes appear in addition to unpaired quark modes. 

1694: $(\cdots)$ shows the color and flavor of unpaired quarks.  $\{ \cdots \}$ 

1695: shows which combination of quarks makes the gapless modes. }

1696: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|}

1697: \hline

1698:   & Symmetry & Number of  & \multicolumn{5}{|c|}{Number of gapless quark modes}\\

1699: \cline{4-8} 

1700:  &              & massive gluons & unpaired quarks 

1701: &\multicolumn{4}{|c|}{paired quarks}   \\

1702: \cline{5-8} 

1703:  &              & & & $\Delta_3 < \mu_e/2$

1704:  &$\Delta_1 < \mu_e$ &  $\Delta_2 < \mu_e/2$   & no condition\\

1705: 

1706: \hline \hline

1707: mCFL &$[U(1)]^2 $ &  8 & 0 & -  & -  & 2 $\{ Rs,Bu\}$   &-\\

1708: \hline

1709: dSC   &  $[U(1)]^4 $ & 8 &  2 $(Rs,Bu)$ & - & 2$\{Gs,Bd\}$& - &1$\{Ru,Gd,Bs\}$\\

1710:  \hline

1711: 2SC   & $[SU(2)]^2 \times [U(1)]^2 $ & 5 & 

1712: 5&  2 $\{ Rd, Gu\}$   & -&-  &-\\

1713:        &                &     &  ($Bu$, $Bd$, $Bs$, $Rs$, $Gs$) 

1714: &  2  $\{ Ru, Gd\}$   &  &  &\\

1715: \hline

1716: \end{tabular}

1717:  \end{table*}

1718: 

1719: \begin{acknowledgments}

1720:      We are grateful to H. Abuki, G. Baym, K. Fukushima, and M. Huang

1721: for helpful discussions.  K.I., M.T., and T.H. thank the Institute for 

1722: Nuclear Theory, Univ.\ of Washington where a part of this work has been 

1723: completed.  They also thank K. Rajagopal, I. Shovkovy, T. Sch\"{a}fer, and

1724: C. Kouvaris for discussions.  This work was supported in part by RIKEN Special

1725: Postdoctoral Researchers Grant No.\ A12-52010, and by the Grants-in-Aid of the

1726: Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology

1727: (No.~15540254).

1728: \end{acknowledgments}

1729: 

1730: %\newpage

1731: %%%%%%%%%%   REFERENCES   %%%%%%%%%%

1732: \begin{thebibliography}{99}

1733: \bibitem{BL} 

1734: D. Bailin and A. Love, Phys.\  Rep.\  {\bf 107}, 325 (1984);

1735: M. Iwasaki and T. Iwado, Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 350}, 163 (1995);

1736: M. Alford, K. Rajagopal, and F. Wilczek, Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 422}, 247 (1998);

1737: R. Rapp, T. Sch\"{a}fer, E.V. Shuryak, and M. Velkovsky,

1738:  Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 81}, 53 (1998). 

1739: 

1740: \bibitem{RWA}   For reviews, see

1741:   K. Rajagopal and F. Wilczek, in  {\em Handbook of QCD},

1742:      edited by M. Shifman  (World Scientific, Singapore, 2001);

1743:  M.G. Alford, Ann.\ Rev.\ Nucl.\ Part.\ Sci.\ {\bf 51}, 131 (2001). 

1744: 

1745: \bibitem{SON99} D. T. Son, Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 59}, 094019 (1999).

1746: 

1747: \bibitem{Sch-NPB-575} T. Sch\"{a}fer, Nucl.\ Phys.\ {\bf B575}, 269 (2000). 

1748: 

1749: \bibitem{Evans-NPB-581}

1750: N.J. Evans, J. Hormuzdiar, S.D.H. Hsu, and M. Schwetz, Nucl.\ Phys.\ 

1751: {\bf B581}, 391 (2000). 

1752: 

1753: \bibitem{IB} K. Iida and G. Baym, Phys.\  Rev.\  D {\bf 63}, 074018

1754: (2001); {\em ibid.} {\bf 66}, 059903(E) (2002).

1755: 

1756: \bibitem{HH-PRD-68}

1757: D.K. Hong and S.D.H. Hsu, Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 68}, 034011 (2003). 

1758: 

1759: \bibitem{CFL} M. Alford, K. Rajagopal, and F. Wilczek, Nucl.\ Phys.\ 

1760: {\bf B537}, 443 (1999).

1761: 

1762: \bibitem{SWR}

1763: A. Schmitt, Q. Wang, and D.H. Rischke, Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 66}, 114010 (2002). 

1764: 

1765: \bibitem{gCFL} 

1766: M. Alford, J. Berges and K. Rajagopal, Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 84},

1767: 598 (2000); M. Huang and I. Shovkovy, Nucl.\ Phys.\ {\bf A729}, 835 (2003);

1768: M. Alford, C. Kouvaris, and K. Rajagopal, Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\

1769: {\bf 92}, 222001 (2004).

1770: 

1771: \bibitem{IMTH04}

1772: K. Iida, T. Matsuura, M. Tachibana, and T. Hatsuda, Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett. 

1773: {\bf 93}, 132001 (2004). 

1774: 

1775: \bibitem{IB3} K. Iida and G. Baym, Phys.\  Rev.\  D {\bf 66}, 014015 (2002).

1776: 

1777: \bibitem{CJT}

1778: J.M. Luttinger and J.C. Ward, Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf 118}, 1417 (1960);

1779: G. Baym, Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf 127}, 1391 (1962);

1780: J.M. Cornwall, R. Jackiw, and E. Tomboulis, Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 10}, 2428 

1781: (1974). 

1782: 

1783: 

1784: \bibitem{Georgi} H. Georgi, {\em Weak Interactions and Modern Particle

1785: Theory}, (W.A.~Benjamin, Menlo Park, CA, 1984).  

1786: 

1787: \bibitem{PR-PRD60}

1788: R.D. Pisarski and D.H. Rischke, Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 60}, 094013, (1999). 

1789: 

1790:  \bibitem{brown} 

1791:  D.K. Hong, Nucl.\ Phys.\ {\bf B582}, 451 (2000);

1792:  W.E. Brown, J.T. Liu, and H.C. Ren, Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 62}, 054016 (2000).

1793: 

1794: \bibitem{PR}

1795: R.D. Pisarski and D.H. Rischke, Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 61}, 074017 (2000).

1796: 

1797: \bibitem{PIS00}    R.D. Pisarski, Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 62}, 035202 (2000).

1798: 

1799: \bibitem{unlock}

1800: M.G. Alford, J. Berges, and K. Rajagopal, Nucl.\ Phys.\ {\bf B558}, 219 (1999);

1801: T. Sch\"{a}fer and F. Wilczek, Phys.\  Rev.\ D {\bf 60}, 074014 (1999).

1802: 

1803: \bibitem{abuki} 

1804: H. Abuki, Prog.\ Theor.\ Phys.\  {\bf 110}, 937 (2003).

1805: 

1806: 

1807: \bibitem{RIS} 

1808: D.D. Dietrich and D.H. Rischke, Prog.\ Part.\ Nucl. \ Phys.\ {\bf 53}, 305 

1809: (2004).

1810: 

1811: 

1812: \bibitem{Sch} 

1813: T. Sch\"{a}fer, Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 65}, 094033 (2002). 

1814: 

1815: 

1816: \bibitem{Fukushima}

1817: K. Fukushima, C. Kouvaris, and K. Rajagopal, \protect{hep-ph/0408322}.

1818: 

1819: 

1820: \bibitem{MIHB}

1821: T. Matsuura, K. Iida, T. Hatsuda, and G. Baym, Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 69},

1822: 074012 (2004).

1823: 

1824: \bibitem{gapless-AKR}

1825: M. Alford, C. Kouvaris, and K. Rajagopal, Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 92}, 

1826: 222001 (2004); 

1827: M. Alford, C. Kouvaris, and K. Rajagopal, \protect{hep-ph/0406137}.

1828: 

1829:  \bibitem{gapless-MS}

1830: I. Shovkovy and M. Huang, Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 564}, 205 (2003);

1831: M. Huang, and I. Shovkovy, Nucl.\ Phys.\ {\bf A729}, 835 (2003).

1832: 

1833: 

1834: \bibitem{uSC}

1835: S.B. Ruster, I.A. Shovkovy, and  D.H. Rischke,

1836:  Nucl.\ Phys.\ {\bf A743}, 127 (2004). 

1837: 

1838: \bibitem{Bub} 

1839: See, e.g., M. Buballa, \protect{hep-ph/0402234} and 

1840:  references therein.

1841: 

1842: \bibitem{astro}

1843: T. Sch\"{a}fer and K. Schwenzer, \protect{astro-ph/0410395};

1844: M. Alford, P. Jotwani, C. Kouvaris, J. Kundu, and K. Rajagopal

1845: \protect{astro-ph/0411560}.

1846: 

1847: \bibitem{GH}

1848: I. Giannakis, D.f. Hou, H.c. Ren, and D.H. Rischke, \protect{hep-ph/0406031}. 

1849: 

1850: \end{thebibliography}

1851: \end{document}

1852: