1: %
2: % REVTEX 4
3: %
4: \documentclass[aps,showpacs,showkeys,preprintnumbers]{revtex4}
5: %
6: \usepackage{graphicx}
7: \usepackage[english]{babel}
8: \usepackage[usenames]{color}
9: \usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}
10: \usepackage{bm}
11: \newcommand{\pomeron}{I\!\!P}
12: %
13: %
14: \begin{document}
15: %
16: \title{Transverse structure of strong interactions at LHC: \\
17: From diffraction to new particle production
18: \footnote{To appear in the proceedings of ``Physics at LHC'',
19: Vienna, Austria, July 13--17, 2004.}}
20: %
21: \author{L.~Frankfurt}
22: \affiliation{School of Physics and Astronomy,
23: Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, 69978, Israel}
24: %
25: \author{M.~Strikman}
26: \affiliation{Department of Physics, Pennsylvania State University,
27: University Park, PA 16802, U.S.A.}
28: %
29: \author{C.~Weiss}
30: \affiliation{Theory Group, Jefferson Lab, Newport News, VA 23606, U.S.A.}
31: %
32: \author{M.~Zhalov}
33: \affiliation{Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute, Gatchina, 188300 Russia}
34: %
35: \begin{abstract}
36: We discuss the global structure of $pp$ events at LHC with
37: hard processes (particle production in two--parton collisions)
38: on the basis of the transverse spatial characteristics of the partonic
39: initial state. Studies of hard exclusive processes in $ep$ scattering
40: have shown that the transverse area occupied by partons with $x \geq 10^{-2}$
41: is much smaller than the size of the nucleon as it appears in generic
42: inelastic $pp$ collisions at high energies (``two--scale picture'').
43: We show that this is consistent with the observation that the elastic $pp$
44: amplitude at the Tevatron energy is close to the black body limit at small
45: impact parameters. Our picture implies that inclusive heavy
46: particle production (Higgs, SUSY) happens only in central $pp$ collisions.
47: At LHC energies, the final state characteristics of such events
48: are strongly influenced by the approach to the black body limit,
49: and thus may differ substantially from what one expects based on
50: the extrapolation of Tevatron results. Our two--scale picture also
51: allows us to analyze several types of hard diffractive processes observable
52: at LHC: {\it i)}~Diffractive proton dissociation into three jets,
53: which probes small--size configurations in the proton wave function;
54: {\it ii)}~exclusive diffractive Higgs production, in which we estimate
55: the rapidity gap survival probability;
56: {\it iii)}~inclusive diffractive processes.
57: \end{abstract}
58: %
59: \pacs{12.38.-t, 13.85.-t, 14.80.Bn}
60: %
61: \keywords{diffraction, generalized parton distributions, central collisions}
62: %
63: \preprint{JLAB-THY-04-311}
64: %
65: \maketitle
66: %
67: \section{Introduction}
68: Hard processes, such as the production of high--$p_{\perp}$ dijets or heavy
69: particles, provide a chance to apply QCD to the theory of $pp/\bar p p$
70: collisions at high energies. The dominant mechanism for these processes are
71: collisions of two partons. Thanks to QCD factorization theorems,
72: the cross section for these processes can be represented as the product
73: of the hard partonic cross section, calculable in perturbative QCD,
74: and functions describing the distribution of partons in the initial state.
75: To calculate the total cross section for hard processes requires
76: knowledge only of the distributions of partons with respect to
77: longitudinal momentum, which are known from inclusive DIS
78: and related experiments. A much more challenging problem is
79: to describe the properties of the hadronic final state in
80: events with hard processes, {\it e.g.}, the average hadron multiplicities
81: in events with heavy particle production, or the probability
82: for hard diffractive events with large rapidity gaps.
83: These problems require knowledge also of the transverse
84: spatial distribution of partons in the initial state
85: (including its dependence on flavor and spin),
86: as well as parton--parton correlations.
87:
88: %
89: % FIGURE
90: %
91: \begin{figure}[t]
92: \includegraphics[width=5.5cm,height=3cm]{twoscale.eps}
93: \caption[]{The ``onion--like'' transverse structure of the nucleon
94: in high--energy $pp$ collisions.}
95: \label{fig_onion}
96: \end{figure}
97: %
98: The transverse spatial distribution of partons in the proton
99: is probed in hard exclusive electro/photoproduction processes,
100: such as the electroproduction of vector mesons ($\rho, \phi$)
101: or real photons (deeply virtual Compton scattering), or
102: the photoproduction of heavy quarkonia ($J/\psi, \psi', \Upsilon$),
103: by measuring the $t$--dependence of the differential cross sections.
104: Such measurements at FNAL and HERA have provided a rather detailed picture
105: of the transverse spatial distribution of gluons down to momentum
106: fractions of the order $x \sim 10^{-4}$. In particular, these
107: results have shown that the transverse area occupied by
108: partons with $x \geq 10^{-2}$ is {\it much smaller} than
109: the transverse size of the proton in generic inelastic
110: $pp / \bar p p$ collisions at high energies.
111: Since the latter size rises rapidly with energy, the difference
112: between the two transverse areas, which is already significant
113: at Tevatron energies, is expected to become even more pronounced
114: at LHC. One is dealing with an ``onion--like'' transverse structure
115: of the nucleon, as depicted in Fig.~\ref{fig_onion}.
116: This two--scale picture is the key to understanding the properties
117: of the hadronic final state in $pp$ events with hard processes at LHC.
118:
119: First, the two--scale picture of Fig.~\ref{fig_onion} implies a
120: classification of $pp / \bar p p$ events in ``central'' (areas of
121: large--$x$ partons overlap) and ``generic'' ones (areas of large--$x$
122: partons need not overlap). The ``generic'' collisions give the dominant
123: contribution to the overall inelastic cross section. Hard processes such
124: as heavy particle production will practically only happen in
125: ``central'' collisions \cite{Frankfurt:2003td}.
126: A new phenomenon expected at LHC is the approach to the ``black body limit''
127: of strong interactions due to the interactions of large--$x$ partons
128: with the strong small--$x$ gluon field in the other proton. This has profound
129: consequences for the pattern of hadron production, in particular in the
130: forward/backward rapidity region. These strong interaction effects need
131: to be understood in order to reliably identify signals due
132: to new particles.
133:
134: Second, the two--scale picture of the transverse structure of the
135: nucleon can be applied to diffractive processes in $pp$ scattering,
136: in which the particles produced in the hard process are separated
137: from the rest by rapidity gaps. One example is the diffractive dissociation
138: of one of the protons into three jets,
139: $p + p \rightarrow \mbox{3 jets} + \mbox{(gap)} + p$.
140: This process proceeds from small--size configurations in the
141: dissociating proton, and is the analogue of the diffractive
142: two--jet dissociation of pions in $\pi A$ collisions.
143: In particular, measurements of such processes will allow to investigate
144: whether the fast increase with energy of the gluon density in the
145: nucleon, predicted by DGLAP evolution in QCD and observed at HERA,
146: will slow down as suggested by various resummation approaches
147: \cite{Ciafaloni:2003rd}. Another example is the exclusive diffractive
148: production of heavy particles,
149: $p + p \rightarrow p + \mbox{(gap)} + H + \mbox{(gap)} + p$,
150: which is being discussed as a candidate for the Higgs search at
151: LHC \cite{Kaidalov:2003fw}. Here, the requirement that soft interactions
152: between the spectator systems preserve the rapidity gaps
153: results in a suppression of the cross section compared to the
154: non-diffractive case, which can be estimated using information
155: from $pp$ elastic scattering. The same applies to inclusive diffractive
156: processes, $p + p \rightarrow p + \mbox{(gap)} + \mbox{2 jets} + X$
157: or $p + \mbox{(gap)} + \mbox{2 jets} + X + \mbox{(gap)} + p$.
158: %
159: \section{Transverse structure of the nucleon in high--energy processes}
160: \label{sec_transverse}
161: Information about the spatial distribution of partons in the transverse
162: plane comes from studies of hard exclusive processes in $ep$ scattering,
163: in particular the electroproduction of light vector mesons
164: ($\rho,\phi$) at large $Q^2$, and the photoproduction of heavy quarkonia
165: ($J/\psi, \psi^{\prime},\Upsilon$). These processes probe
166: the generalized parton distributions in the nucleon.
167: The extensive data on vector meson production at HERA (for a review,
168: see Ref.\cite{Abramowicz:1998ii}) support the dominance of the partonic
169: mechanism. In particular, they confirm a qualitative prediction of QCD
170: factorization --- the convergence of the $t$--slope of $\rho$ meson
171: electroproduction at large $Q^2$ to the slope of $J/\psi$
172: photo/electroproduction \cite{Brodsky:1994kf}, see Fig.~\ref{fig_levy}.
173: Numerical calculations, accounting for the finite transverse size of
174: the wave function of the produced vector meson, explain the key features
175: of the high--$Q^2$ data \cite{Frankfurt:1997fj}. The $t$--dependence of
176: the cross section for $J/\psi$ photo/electroproduction is given
177: (up to small corrections) by the square of the ``two--gluon form factor''
178: of the nucleon \cite{Frankfurt:2002ka},
179: \begin{equation}
180: \frac{d\sigma^{\gamma^* p \rightarrow J/\psi p}}{dt}(t)
181: \;\; \propto \;\; \left[ F_g (x, t) \right]^2 ,
182: \hspace{4em} x \, \sim \, M_{\bar c c}^2 / W^2 .
183: \end{equation}
184: The two--dimensional Fourier transform of this function,
185: \begin{equation}
186: F_g (x, \rho ) \;\; \equiv \;\; \int \frac{d^2 \Delta_\perp}{(2\pi )^2} \;
187: e^{-i (\bm{\Delta}_\perp \bm{\rho})} \; F_g (x, t)
188: \hspace{4em}
189: (t = -\bm{\Delta}_\perp^2 ),
190: \label{impact_def}
191: \end{equation}
192: describes the spatial distribution of gluons with momentum
193: fraction $x$ in the transverse plane [the distribution is
194: normalized as $\int d^2 \rho \, F_g (x, \rho) = 1$]. Thus, one can
195: map the distribution of gluons in the transverse plane from
196: the measured $t$--dependence of the cross section.
197: %
198: % FIGURE
199: %
200: \begin{figure}[t]
201: \includegraphics[width=6.7cm,height=7cm]{levy.eps}
202: \caption[]{Convergence of the $t$--slopes of $\rho$ and $J/\psi$
203: electroproduction at large $Q^2$. The compilation of the data is from
204: Ref.~\cite{Levy:2003qz}. The solid curves are the theoretical predictions of
205: Ref.~\cite{Frankfurt:1997fj} for the $Q^2$ dependence of the $t$--slopes.}
206: \label{fig_levy}
207: \end{figure}
208: %
209:
210: A simple phenomenological parameterization of the two--gluon form
211: factor of the nucleon, including its variation with $x$,
212: is the dipole form \cite{Frankfurt:2002ka,Frankfurt:2003td}
213: \begin{equation}
214: F_g (x, t) \;\; = \;\; (1 - t/m_g^2)^{-2},
215: \hspace{4em} m_g^2 \;\; \equiv \;\; m_g^2 (x, Q^2) .
216: \label{dipole}
217: \end{equation}
218: This form is motivated by the expectation that at $x \geq 0.1$,
219: where the contribution of the nucleon's pion cloud is suppressed,
220: the two--gluon form factor should follow the axial form factor
221: of the nucleon ($m_g^2 \approx m_{A}^2 = 1.1\, {\rm GeV}^2$).
222: It describes well the $t$--slopes of $J/\psi$ photoproduction
223: measured in a number of fixed--target experiments \cite{Frankfurt:2002ka}.
224: The experimentally observed increase of the slope between
225: $x \sim 0.1$ and $x \sim 0.01$ can be explained by contributions
226: of the nucleon's pion cloud to the gluon distribution at transverse
227: distances $\rho \sim 1/(2 M_\pi)$ \cite{Strikman:2003gz}.
228: This effect, as well as the subsequent slow increase of the slope at
229: smaller $x$, and the small effects of DGLAP evolution, are incorporated
230: by way of an $x$-- and $Q^2$--dependence of the dipole mass parameter,
231: see Refs.~\cite{Frankfurt:2003td,Strikman:2004km} for details. The Fourier
232: transform of Eq.~(\ref{dipole}), {\it cf.}\ Eq.~(\ref{impact_def}), defines
233: our parametrization of the transverse spatial distribution of gluons.
234:
235: A crucial observation is that the transverse area occupied by partons
236: with significant momentum fraction, $x \geq 10^{-2}$, is much
237: smaller than the size of the nucleon as it appears in generic
238: inelastic $pp$ collisions at high energies. This can qualitatively
239: be understood in Gribov's picture of the partonic wave function
240: of the nucleon, which allows for a unified description of
241: electromagnetic and strong interactions at high energies \cite{Gribov:1973jg}.
242: In this picture, the $pp$ cross section is dominated by collisions
243: of ``soft'' partons (very small $x$), which are the result of
244: successive decays of the ``hard'' partons at large $x$.
245: This decay process has the character of a random walk in the
246: transverse plane (``Gribov diffusion''). Each decay process
247: results in a shift of the transverse position inversely proportional
248: to the transverse momentum in the decay vertex, $\sim 1/k_{\perp}$.
249: Due to the randomness of the emissions, and the constant degrading
250: of the longitudinal momentum, one finds that $n$ successive decays
251: result in an overall increase of the transverse area of
252: \begin{equation}
253: R^2(n) \;\; \propto \;\; \frac{n}{k_{\perp}^2} \;\; \propto \;\;
254: \frac{\ln (x_0/x)}{k_{\perp}^2}.
255: \end{equation}
256: The transverse area occupied by soft partons thus grows linearly with $\ln s$.
257: For hard partons the growth of the transverse area with the collision
258: energy is much weaker, due to the smaller scale of the random shifts
259: in impact parameter space. In addition, the transverse area occupied
260: by the hard partons at large $x$ is already small. This leads to the
261: appearance of two widely separated transverse area scales in $pp$
262: collisions at high energies (see Fig.~\ref{fig_onion}) --- a small
263: transverse area occupied by hard partons, and a much larger
264: area occupied by soft partons.
265:
266: %
267: %
268: \begin{figure}[t]
269: %
270: \begin{tabular}{cc}
271: \includegraphics[width=7cm,height=7cm]{gamma_abs.eps}
272: &
273: \includegraphics[width=7cm,height=7cm]{gamma_re.eps}
274: \end{tabular}
275: %
276: \caption[]{Left panel: Modulus squared of the $pp$ elastic amplitude
277: in impact parameter representation, $\Gamma^{pp}(b)$, Eq.~(\ref{Gamma}).
278: Right panel: The probability for inelastic interaction at
279: a given impact parameter, Eq.~(\ref{winel}).}
280: \label{fig_Gamma}
281: %
282: \end{figure}
283: %
284: In order to quantify the transverse size of the nucleon
285: in inelastic $pp$ collisions one can use phenomenological
286: parameterizations of the $pp$ elastic scattering
287: amplitude at high energies in the impact parameter representation,
288: \begin{equation}
289: \Gamma^{pp}(s,b) \;\; \equiv \;\; \frac{4\pi}{is} \int
290: \frac{d^2 \Delta_\perp}{(2\pi)^2} \; e^{-i (\bm{\Delta}_\perp \bm{b})}
291: A^{pp} (s,t)
292: \hspace{4em}
293: (t = -\bm{\Delta}_\perp^2 ).
294: \label{Gamma}
295: \end{equation}
296: By unitarity, the probability for an inelastic collision at a
297: given impact parameter, $b$, is related to $\Gamma^{pp} (s, b)$ as
298: \begin{equation}
299: 2\, \mbox{Re} \, \Gamma^{pp}(s,b) - |\Gamma^{pp}(s,b)|^2.
300: \label{winel}
301: \end{equation}
302: Fig.~\ref{fig_Gamma} shows $|\Gamma^{pp}(s,b)|^2$ and
303: the probability (\ref{winel}) obtained
304: from the parameterization of Ref.~\cite{Islam:2002au}. One clearly sees
305: how the radius of strong interactions increases with the collision energy.
306: In Gribov's picture, this reflects the increase of the transverse
307: area occupied by the soft partons.
308: %
309: \section{Hard interactions and the ``black body limit'' in elastic $pp$
310: scattering}
311: \label{sec_hardblack}
312: Parameterizations of the $pp$ elastic amplitude indicate
313: that at high energies the strength of the interaction
314: at small impact parameters approaches the ``black body limit'',
315: $\Gamma^{pp} \approx 1$, corresponding to unit probability for inelastic
316: interactions, see Fig.~\ref{fig_Gamma}. A rough estimate of the maximum
317: impact parameter for which the interaction remains black can be made
318: in the single Pomeron exchange model of the total cross section.
319: The minimum invariant energy for which $\Gamma^{pp} (b = 0) \approx 1$
320: is approximately the Tevatron energy, $s_T \approx (2\, \mbox{TeV})^2$.
321: For $s > s_T$, the total cross section then grows as
322: $\sigma_{\rm tot} \propto (s/s_T)^{\alpha_{\pomeron}(0)-1}$,
323: while the $t$--slope of the elastic cross section grows as
324: $B_{\pomeron} = B_T + 2 \alpha'\ln(s/s_T)$. One finds that
325: $\Gamma^{pp}$ reaches unity at
326: \begin{equation}
327: b_F^2 \;\; \approx \;\; \left[ \alpha_{\pomeron}(0)-1 \right]
328: \ln (s/s_T) \; B_{\pomeron} .
329: \label{cutoff}
330: \end{equation}
331: This corresponds to the universal Froissart limiting behavior of
332: hadronic total cross sections (same for all hadrons and nuclei).
333:
334: In QCD, the ``blackening'' of the $pp$ interaction at small impact
335: parameters could arise from hard as well as soft interactions.
336: It is interesting to estimate the role of hard interactions
337: in the approach to the black body limit within our two--scale
338: picture of the transverse partonic structure of the nucleon.
339: The analysis of Ref.~\cite{Frankfurt:2003td}
340: (see Section~\ref{sec_central} below) shows that in central
341: $pp$ collisions the leading quarks and gluons receive significant transverse
342: momenta when passing through the gluon field of the other proton.
343: For example, at Tevatron energies, quarks with $x_1 \ge 0.2$
344: get on average transverse momenta $> 1 \, {\rm GeV}/c$,
345: see Section~\ref{sec_bbl} below. When a single leading quark gets
346: a transverse momentum, $p_{\perp}$, the probability for the
347: nucleon to remain intact is approximately given by the square of the
348: nucleon form factor, $F_N^2(p_{\perp}^2)$, which is $\le 0.1 $ for
349: $p_{\perp}> 1 \, {\rm GeV}/c$, {\it i.e.}, very small. One may thus conclude
350: that the probability of the survival averaged over $p_{\perp}$
351: should be less than 1/2 (on average, half of the time the quark should
352: receive a transverse momentum larger than the average transverse momentum,
353: $p_{\perp}> 1 \, {\rm GeV}/c$). Since there are six leading quarks (plus a
354: number of leading gluons), the probability for the two protons
355: to stay intact, $|1 - \Gamma^{pp}(s, b)|^2$, should go as a high power of the
356: survival probability for the case of single parton removal,
357: and thus be very small.
358: This crude estimate shows that already at Tevatron energies
359: $|1 - \Gamma^{pp}(s, b = 0)|^2$ should be close to zero due to hard
360: interactions, which is consistent with phenomenological parameterizations
361: of the $pp$ elastic amplitude, see above. We conclude that hard interactions
362: alone are sufficient to ensure ``blackness'' of the inelastic interactions
363: at small impact parameters.
364:
365: %
366: %
367: %
368: \begin{figure}[t]
369: \includegraphics[width=8.6cm,height=6cm]{bf.eps}
370: \caption[]{Energy dependence of the maximum impact parameter for
371: ``black'' $pp$ interactions, $b_F$. Solid line: Estimate based on
372: the pomeron model, Eq.~(\ref{cutoff}). Dashed line: Estimate based
373: on hard interactions, Eq.~\ref{pwave4}.}
374: \label{fig_bf}
375: \end{figure}
376: %
377: One can estimate the maximum impact parameter up to which
378: hard interactions cause the $pp$ interaction to be ``black''.
379: The probability for a leading parton with $x_1 \sim 10^{-1}$
380: to experience a hard inelastic interaction increases with the
381: collision energy at least as fast as corresponding to the increase
382: of the gluon density in the other proton at
383: $x_2 = 4 p_\perp^2 / (s x_1)$, {\it cf.}\ Eq.~(\ref{x_resolved}) below.
384: Since $x_2 G_N(x_2,Q^2) \propto x_2^{-n_h}$
385: with $n_h\ge 0.2$, this implies that the probability should grow as
386: $s^{n_h}$ \footnote{The HERA data on dipole--nucleon scattering suggest
387: that the taming of the gluon density starts only when the probability of
388: inelastic interactions becomes large, $\ge 1/2$. However, for such
389: probabilities of single parton interactions, multiparton interactions
390: insure that the overall interaction is practically black.}.
391: Our parametrization of the transverse spatial distribution of gluons,
392: {\it cf.}\ Eq.~\ref{impact_def}, suggests
393: that the gluon density decreases with the distance from
394: the center of the nucleon approximately as
395: $\sim \exp \left[ -m_g(x_2 )\rho \right]$. If one neglects the transverse
396: spread of the large--$x_1$ partons as compared to that of the small--$x_2$
397: gluons one arrives at an estimate of the energy dependence of
398: $b_F$ as due to hard interactions \cite{Frankfurt:2004fm},
399: \begin{equation}
400: b_F \;\; \approx \;\; \frac{n_h \ln (s/s_T)}{m_g (x_2 )} ,
401: \label{pwave4}
402: \end{equation}
403: with $x_2$ as defined above. It is very encouraging that this estimate
404: agrees well with that obtained above in the pomeron model,
405: Eq.~(\ref{cutoff}), see Fig.~\ref{fig_bf}. This shows that our two--scale
406: picture of the transverse structure of the nucleon --- and the ensuing
407: picture of hard and soft interactions --- are self--consistent.
408:
409: Measurements of elastic $pp$ scattering at LHC will allow to
410: investigate the onset of the black body limit in $pp$ interactions.
411: Such studies not only probe the structure of the nucleon periphery
412: at very high energies, but also provide important constraints
413: for models of inelastic interactions at smaller impact parameters.
414: %
415: \section{New particle production in central $pp$ collisions}
416: \label{sec_central}
417: The two--scale picture of the transverse structure of the
418: nucleon, see Fig.~\ref{fig_onion} and Section~\ref{sec_transverse},
419: implies a classification of $pp / \bar p p$ events in ``central''
420: (areas of large--$x$ partons overlap) and ``generic'' ones
421: (areas of large--$x$ partons need not overlap),
422: see Fig.~\ref{fig_coll} \cite{Frankfurt:2003td}.
423: Generic collisions give the dominant contribution to
424: the overall inelastic cross section.
425: Hard processes, such as heavy particle production at central
426: rapidities, will practically only happen in central collisions.
427:
428: To quantify the distinction between generic and central collisions,
429: we estimate the distribution of both types of events over
430: the $pp$ impact parameters. For generic collisions, the distribution
431: is determined by the $b$--dependent probability of inelastic interaction,
432: Eq.~(\ref{winel}), obtained via unitarity from the elastic $pp$ amplitude
433: in the impact parameter representation. We define a normalized
434: $b$--distribution as
435: \begin{equation}
436: P_{\text{in}} (s, b) \;\; = \;\;
437: \frac{2 \text{Re}\; \Gamma^{pp} (s, b) - |\Gamma^{pp} (s, b)|^2}
438: {\sigma_{\text{in}} (s)} ,
439: \label{P_in_def}
440: \end{equation}
441: where $\sigma_{\text{in}}(s)$ is the inelastic cross section, which is
442: given by the integral $\int d^2 b$ of the expression in the numerator.
443: For collisions with a hard process, on the other hand,
444: the $b$--distribution is determined by the overlap integral of the
445: distribution of hard partons in the two colliding protons
446: (see Fig.~\ref{fig_coll}),
447: \begin{equation}
448: P_2 (b) \;\; \equiv \;\; \int d^2\rho_1 \int d^2\rho_2 \;
449: \delta^{(2)} (\bm{b} - \bm{\rho}_1 + \bm{\rho}_2 )
450: \; F_g (x_1, \rho_1 ) \; F_g (x_2, \rho_2 ) .
451: \label{P_2}
452: \end{equation}
453: Numerical estimates can be performed with our parametrization of the
454: transverse spatial distribution of hard gluons, Eq.~(\ref{dipole}),
455: which takes into account the change of the distribution with $x$
456: and the scale of the hard process. The two $b$--distributions are compared
457: in Fig.~\ref{fig_pb} for Tevatron and LHC energies. For the hard process
458: we have taken the production of a dijet with $q_\perp = 25\,{\rm GeV}$;
459: in the case of Higgs production at LHC the distribution $P_2 (b)$
460: would be even narrower. The results clearly show that events with
461: hard processes have a much narrower impact parameter distribution
462: than generic inelastic events.
463: %
464: % FIGURE
465: %
466: \begin{figure}[t]
467: \includegraphics[width=8cm,height=5.4cm]{coll.eps}
468: \caption[]{Classification of $pp$ events at high energies.}
469: \label{fig_coll}
470: \end{figure}
471: %
472: %
473: % FIGURE
474: %
475: \begin{figure}[b]
476: %
477: \begin{tabular}{cc}
478: \includegraphics[width=7cm,height=7cm]{pb_lhc.eps}
479: &
480: \includegraphics[width=7cm,height=7cm]{pb_fnal.eps}
481: \end{tabular}
482: %
483: \caption[]{\textit{Solid lines:} $b$--distributions for events
484: with hard dijet production, $P_2 (b)$, with $q_\perp = 25 \, \text{GeV}$.
485: \textit{Long--dashed line:} $b$--distribution for double dijet events,
486: $P_4 (b)$. \textit{Short--dashed line}: $b$--distribution
487: for generic inelastic collisions, obtained from the parameterization
488: of the elastic $pp$ amplitude of Islam \textit{et al.} \cite{Islam:2002au}.
489: The plots show the ``radial'' distributions in the impact parameter
490: plane, $2 \pi b \, P (b)$.}
491: \label{fig_pb}
492: %
493: \end{figure}
494: %
495: %
496:
497: One expects that at LHC energies the rate of production
498: of two pairs of jets will be very high. It is interesting to consider
499: the $b$--distribution also for the production of two dijets in two
500: binary parton--parton collisions. Neglecting possible correlations
501: between the partons in the transverse plane it is given by
502: \begin{equation}
503: P_4 (b) \;\; \equiv \;\; \frac{\left[ P_2 (b)\right]^2}
504: {\int d^2 b \; \left[ P_2 (b)\right]^2} .
505: \label{P_4}
506: \end{equation}
507: Fig.~\ref{fig_pb} shows that this distribution is significantly
508: narrower than $P_2$, {\it i.e.}, the requirement of two hard processes
509: results in a further reduction of effective impact parameters.
510: Note that there are indications of significant correlations in the
511: transverse positions of two partons, which would effectively reduce the
512: difference between the $b$--distribution in double dijet
513: and single dijet events; see Refs.~\cite{Frankfurt:2003td,Frankfurt:2004kn}
514: for details.
515: %
516: \section{Onset of the black body limit in central $pp$ collisions}
517: \label{sec_bbl}
518: A new phenomenon encountered in central $pp$ collisions
519: at LHC energies is that the interaction of leading partons
520: in one proton with the gluon field in the other proton approaches
521: the maximum strength allowed by $s$-channel unitarity
522: (``black body limit''). As a result, the structure of the
523: final state in central $pp$ collisions differs in many respects
524: --- leading particle spectra, multiplicities of soft hadrons
525: at central rapidities, long range correlations --- from that
526: of generic inelastic events.
527:
528: %
529: \begin{figure}[b]
530: %
531: \includegraphics[width=6.4cm,height=2.5cm]{bbl.eps}
532: %
533: \caption[]{The black body limit in central $pp$ collisions:
534: Leading partons in one proton, $x_1 \sim 10^{-1}$, interact
535: with a dense medium of small--$x_2$ gluons in the other proton (shaded area),
536: acquiring a large transverse momentum, $p_{\perp}$.}
537: \label{fig_bbl}
538: %
539: \end{figure}
540: %
541: Generally, in particle production in hard parton--parton collisions,
542: a parton with momentum fraction $x_1$ and transverse momentum
543: $p_{\perp}$ in one proton resolves partons in the other proton
544: with momentum fraction
545: \begin{equation}
546: x_2 \;\; = \;\; \frac{4 \, p_\perp^2}{x_1 \, s} .
547: \label{x_resolved}
548: \end{equation}
549: In leading particle production at LHC ($\sqrt{s} = 14 \,\text{TeV}$)
550: a leading parton with $x_1 \sim 10^{-1}$ and significant transverse
551: momentum, $p_\perp \sim 2\, \text{GeV}/c$, resolves partons with
552: $x_2 \sim 10^{-6}$ in the other proton. In this situation the gluon
553: density in this proton is so large that ``taming'' effects cannot
554: be neglected; for a review and references see Ref.~\cite{Frankfurt:2000ty}.
555: The leading parton can be thought of as propagating through a high--density
556: ``gluon medium'', or, equivalently, a strong gluon field, in the other proton,
557: see Fig.~\ref{fig_bbl}. The interaction of the leading parton with the
558: other proton approaches the ``black body limit'', characterized
559: by a near unity probability for inelastic scattering. In fact,
560: in $pp$ collisions at LHC the leading partons propagate through gluon
561: fields with a strength comparable to that in central $pA$ collisions
562: at similar energies.
563:
564: The ``black'' interactions are experienced by leading partons
565: with transverse momenta up to a certain critical value,
566: $p_{\perp,\text{BBL}}$ [the $x_2$ of the gluon density probed
567: is proportional to $p_{\perp}^2$, {\it cf.}\ Eq.~(\ref{x_resolved})].
568: Conversely, this means that low--$p_{\perp}$ leading partons
569: will on average acquire transverse momenta of the order
570: $p_{\perp,\text{BBL}}$ through their interactions with the
571: strong gluon field, which results in certain modifications
572: of the pattern or particle production at forward/backward rapidities,
573: see Section~\ref{sec_final} below.\footnote{The kinematics of the final
574: state produced in the interaction of the large--$x_1$ parton with
575: the small--$x_2$ gluon field resembles the backscattering of a laser beam
576: off a high--energy electron beam. The large--$x_1$ parton gets a significant
577: transverse momentum and loses a certain fraction of its longitudinal
578: momentum, accelerating at the same time a small--$x_2$ parton.}
579: We have estimated the critical transverse momentum, $p_{\perp,\text{BBL}}$,
580: using phenomenological parametrizations of the gluon density at small $x_2$,
581: and our parametrization of the transverse spatial distribution of
582: gluons, Eq.~(\ref{dipole}) \cite{Frankfurt:2003td}.
583: For simplicity, we considered the scattering of a small color--singlet
584: dipole off the ``target'' nucleon, in the spirit of the dipole picture of
585: high--energy scattering in the BFKL model \cite{Mueller:1994jq},
586: and then converted the kinematical variables to those corresponding
587: to a leading parton in proton--proton scattering.
588: Our criterion for proximity to the black body limit (BBL) was that
589: $\Gamma^{\text{dipole-proton}} (s, b) > 0.5$,
590: which corresponds to a probability for inelastic interaction of $>0.75$.
591: Fig.~\ref{fig_pt} shows an estimate of the critical transverse momentum
592: for leading partons with momentum fractions of the order $x_1 \sim 10^{-1}$,
593: as a function of the impact parameter of the $pp$
594: system \cite{Frankfurt:2003td}. Because the gluon density at
595: $x_2 \sim 10^{-6}$ is maximum in the transverse center of the proton,
596: and the distribution of leading partons is likewise concentrated
597: at small transverse distances, the chances for ``black'' interactions
598: are greatest in central $pp$ collisions (as {\it e.g.} those in
599: which heavy particles are produced). This is reflected in the rapid
600: drop of $p_{\perp,\text{BBL}}^2$ with $b$ in Fig.~\ref{fig_pt}.
601: One sees that $p_{\perp,\text{BBL}} \sim \mbox{several} \; {\rm GeV}$
602: in central collisions at LHC. Substantially smaller values are
603: obtained at the Tevatron energy.
604:
605: To determine the typical transverse momenta of leading partons
606: in events with new particle (or hard dijet) production,
607: we need to average the results for $p_{\perp,\text{BBL}}^2$,
608: Fig.~\ref{fig_pt}, over $pp$ impact parameters, with the
609: distribution implied by the hard production process, $P_2(b)$,
610: Eq.~(\ref{P_2}) [or, in the case of four jet production, with $P_4(b)$,
611: Eq.~(\ref{P_4})]. We find that the suppression of large impact parameters
612: implied by the hard process ({\it cf.}\ Fig.~\ref{fig_coll}) is
613: sufficient to keep $p_{\perp,\text{BBL}}$ above
614: $1\, {\rm GeV}/c$ in more than 99\% of events at LHC. The resulting
615: average values of $p_{\perp,\text{BBL}}^2$ are shown in
616: Fig.~\ref{fig_ptav}.
617: %
618: \begin{figure}[t]
619: %
620: \begin{tabular}{cc}
621: \includegraphics[width=7cm,height=7cm]{pt_lhc.eps}
622: &
623: \includegraphics[width=7cm,height=7cm]{pt_fnal.eps}
624: \end{tabular}
625: %
626: \caption[]{The critical transverse momentum squared,
627: $p_{\perp , \text{BBL}}^2$, below which the interaction of a
628: leading gluon (momentum fractin $x_1$) with the other
629: proton is close to the black body limit, as a function of
630: the impact parameter of the $pp$ collision, $b$. For leading
631: quarks, the values of $p_{\perp , \text{BBL}}^2$ are about
632: half of those for gluons shown here. Shown are the estimates
633: for LHC (left panel) and Tevatron energies (right panel).}
634: \label{fig_pt}
635: %
636: \end{figure}
637: %
638: %
639: \begin{figure}[t]
640: %
641: \begin{tabular}{cc}
642: \includegraphics[width=7cm,height=7cm]{ptav_lhc.eps}
643: &
644: \includegraphics[width=7cm,height=7cm]{ptav_fnal.eps}
645: \end{tabular}
646: %
647: \caption[]{The average value of $p_{\perp , \text{BBL}}^2$,
648: \textit{cf.}\ Fig.~\ref{fig_pt}, over impact parameters of the
649: $pp$ collision, as a function of the leading gluon's momentum
650: fraction, $x_1$. The averages were computed with the impact
651: parameter distribution corresponding to the hard dijet trigger,
652: $P_2$ (solid line), and the double dijet trigger, $P_4$ (dashed line),
653: {\it cf.}\ Fig.~\ref{fig_pb}. For leading quarks, the values of
654: $\langle p_{\perp , \text{BBL}}^2 \rangle$ are about half of those
655: for gluons shown here. Shown are the estimates
656: for LHC (left panel) and Tevatron energies (right panel).}
657: \label{fig_ptav}
658: %
659: \end{figure}
660: %
661:
662: Our estimates show that in $pp$ collisions at LHC the leading partons
663: acquire substantial transverse momenta due to ``black interactions''
664: with the small--$x_2$ gluons in the other proton. A much weaker effect
665: is found at the Tevatron energy. The origin of this difference is
666: the increase in the gluon density due to the decrease of $x_2$ between
667: Tevatron and LHC energies, {\it cf.}\ Eq.~(\ref{x_resolved}).
668: This indicates that the final state characteristics of central $pp$
669: collisions at LHC will be substantially different from what one
670: expects from the extrapolation of Tevatron results, see
671: Section~\ref{sec_final}.
672:
673: Finally, the large values of the critical transverse momentum for ``black
674: interactions'' of leading partons at LHC confirm our assessment
675: of Section~\ref{sec_hardblack}, that the probability for two nucleons
676: at LHC energies not to interact inelastically at small impact parameters
677: is very small.
678: %
679: \newpage
680: \section{Final state properties in central $pp$ collisions}
681: \label{sec_final}
682: In central $pp$ collisions the leading partons acquire large transverse
683: momenta, $\sim p_{\perp,\text{BBL}}$, due to the approach to the
684: black body limit. As a result, particle production at forward/backward
685: rapidities will largely be dominated by incoherent parton fragmentation.
686: One thus expects the following modifications compared to generic
687: inelastic collisions:
688: %
689: \begin{itemize}
690: %
691: \item
692: Strong suppression of leading particles, in particular nucleons
693: (for $z\ge 0.1$ the differential multiplicity of pions should exceed
694: that of nucleons)
695: %
696: \item Average transverse momenta of the leading particles
697: $\geq 1\, \text{GeV}/c$
698: %
699: \item No correlations between the transverse momenta of leading hadrons
700: (some correlations will remain, however, because two partons produced
701: in collisions of large--$x_1$ and small--$x_2$ partons may end up
702: at similar rapidities)
703: %
704: \item
705: A large fraction of events with no particles with $z\ge 0.02
706: \div 0.05$ in both fragmentation regions (emergence of long--range rapidity
707: correlations), and large energy release at rapidities $y = 4 \div 6$.
708: \end{itemize}
709:
710: Another effect of the multiple scattering of large--$x_1$ partons
711: with small--$x_2$ gluons in the other proton is the shift
712: of a large number of small--$x_2$ gluons to larger rapidities
713: (``holes''). This amounts to the creation of a substantial amount
714: of color charge, and should result in an increase of soft particle
715: multiplicities over a broad range of rapidities
716: (albeit much smaller than if the particles originated from
717: independent fragmentation). Such an increase should in fact be
718: present already at Tevatron energies, in events with a trigger on
719: two--jet or $Z^0$ production. An increase of the multiplicity at
720: rapidities $|y|\le 1.0$ was indeed observed in
721: Ref.~\cite{Field:2002vt}, which investigated the correlation of the
722: underlying event structure with the presence of such a trigger.
723: It is important to extend these studies to higher rapidities.
724:
725: To summarize, in $pp$ collisions at LHC
726: new particles will be produced in a much more ``violent''
727: strong--interaction environment than one would expect from
728: the extrapolation of the properties of minimum bias events
729: at the Tevatron. Even the extrapolation of properties of
730: hard dijet events should not be smooth, as the transverse
731: momenta acquired by leading partons are estimated to be
732: substantially larger at LHC than at Tevatron, see
733: Figs.~\ref{fig_pt} and \ref{fig_ptav}.
734: %
735: \section{Diffractive proton dissociation into three jets}
736: \label{3jetsec}
737:
738: LHC will offer an opportunity to study a variety of hard
739: diffractive processes in $pp$ and $pA$ scattering. One interesting
740: aspect of such processes is that they allow to probe rare small--size
741: configurations in the nucleon wave function.
742:
743: Recently, a color transparency phenomenon was observed in the coherent
744: dissociation of pions into two high--$p_\perp$ jets,
745: $\pi + p (A) \rightarrow \mbox{jet1} + \mbox{jet2} + p(A)$
746: \cite{Aitala:2000hc}, consistent with the predictions of
747: Refs.~\cite{Frankfurt:it,Frankfurt:2000jm}.
748: In this process the pion scatters off the target in a point--like
749: $q\bar q$ configuration. Similarly, in the proton wave function there
750: should exist configurations consisting of only valence quarks, and having a
751: small transverse size. A proton in such a configuration can scatter
752: elastically off the target and fragment into three jets, corresponding to the
753: process
754: \begin{equation}
755: p + p (A) \;\; \rightarrow \;\;
756: \mbox{jet1} + \mbox{jet2} + \mbox{jet3} + p(A).
757: \label{pp3jets}
758: \end{equation}
759:
760: The cross section for the diffractive process (\ref{pp3jets})
761: can be evaluated based on the kind of QCD factorization theorem derived in
762: Ref.~\cite{Frankfurt:2000jm}. It is proportional to the square of the
763: gluon density in the nucleon at $x\approx M^2 (\mbox{3 jets})/ s$,
764: and virtuality $Q^2 \sim (1\div 2) \, p_\perp^2$ \cite{Frankfurt:1998eu}.
765: The distribution over the fractions of the proton longitudinal momentum
766: carried by the jets is proportional to the square of the light--cone
767: wave function of the $|qqq \rangle$ configuration, which at
768: large transverse momenta behaves as
769: \begin{equation}
770: \psi_N (z_1, z_2, z_3; \, \bm{p}_{\perp 1}, \bm{p}_{\perp 2},
771: \bm{p}_{\perp 3})
772: \;\; \propto \;\;
773: \sum_{i\neq j} \frac{\Phi_N (z_1, z_2, z_3)}
774: {p_{\perp i}^2 \; p_{\perp j}^2}.
775: \end{equation}
776: Here $\Phi_N$ is the nucleon distribution amplitude, whose
777: asymptotic shape is $\Phi_N \propto z_1 z_2 z_3$.
778: The differential cross section is given by
779: \begin{eqnarray}
780: \frac{d\sigma}{dz_{1} \, dz_{2} \, dz_{3} \,
781: d^{2}p_{\perp 1} \, d^{2}p_{\perp 2} \, d^{2}p_{\perp 3}} &=&
782: c_N \, \left[ \alpha_{s} x G(x, Q^{2}) \right]^{2}
783: \frac{\Phi^2_N (z_1, z_2, z_3)}{p_{\perp 1}^{4} \,
784: p_{\perp 2}^{4} \, p_{\perp 3}^{4}} \; F^2_{g}(x, t) \nonumber \\
785: &\times& \delta^{(2)}
786: (\sum \bm{p}_{\perp i} - \bm{\Delta}_\perp ) \; \delta(\sum z_{i}-1) ,
787: \end{eqnarray}
788: where $\bm{\Delta}_\perp$ is the momentum transfer to the
789: surviving proton ($\Delta_\perp^2 = -t$). The coefficient $c_N$ is
790: calculable in QCD. $F_g (x, t)$ denotes the two--gluon form factor of
791: the nucleon, see Section~\ref{sec_transverse}. A numerical estimate
792: of the cross section for 3--jet production at the LHC energy,
793: with $p_\perp$ of one of the jets larger than a given value
794: (here: $10\, {\rm GeV}/c$) and all other variables integrated over, gives
795: \begin{equation}
796: \sigma(pp\rightarrow {\rm 3jets} + p) \;\; \approx \;\;
797: \frac{\left[ \alpha_s x G(x,Q^2) \right]^{2}}
798: {p_\perp^{8}} \;\; \approx \;\; 10^{- (6 \div 7)}
799: \left(\frac{10\, {\rm GeV}}{p_\perp}\right)^{8}
800: \; {\rm mb}.
801: \end{equation}
802: The probability of the $|qqq \rangle$ configuration was estimated
803: using a phenomenological fit to the probability of configurations of
804: different interaction strengths in a nucleon, see
805: Refs.~\cite{Frankfurt:1998eu,Frankfurt:1994hf} for details.
806: An important question is whether the cross section will grow up
807: to the LHC energy, as was assumed in this estimate, in which
808: the gluon density was extrapolated to values of $x \sim 10^{-5}$.
809:
810: Experimentally, the main difficulty will be to measure jets at
811: very high rapidities, $y_{\rm jet}(p_\perp = 10\, {\rm GeV}/c) \sim 6$,
812: and with a large background from leading--twist hard diffraction.
813: The latter will be suppressed in $pA$ collisions, since the coherent
814: 3--jet process has much stronger $A$--dependence than the background.
815:
816: Finally, we note that it would be possible to study also the process
817: $pp \rightarrow pp + \mbox{two jets}$, which is similar to pion
818: dissociation into two jets. Experimentally, this would require the
819: measurement of jets at rapidities $y\sim 4$.
820: %
821: \section{Exclusive diffractive Higgs production}
822: \label{sec_higgs}
823: %
824: \begin{figure}[b]
825: %
826: \includegraphics[width=10cm,height=7cm]{survb.eps}
827: %
828: \caption[]{The impact parameter distribution of the
829: cross section for diffractive Higgs production at LHC
830: ($s = 14\, {\rm TeV}$). Dashed line: $b$--distribution
831: of the hard process, $P_4 (b)$,
832: Eq.~(\ref{P_4}), {\it cf.}\ Fig.~\ref{fig_pb}.
833: Solid line: $b$--distribution of the
834: total process, $|1 - \Gamma^{pp} (s, b)|^2 P_4 (b)$.
835: The mass parameter in the two--gluon form factor
836: was chosen as $m_g^2 = 1 \, {\rm GeV}^2$.}
837: \label{fig_survb}
838: \end{figure}
839: %
840: Hard diffractive processes are also being considered in connection
841: with the production of new heavy particles in $pp$ collisions at LHC.
842: In particular, the exclusive diffractive production of Higgs bosons,
843: \begin{equation}
844: p + p \;\; \rightarrow \;\; p + \mbox{(gap)} + H + \mbox{(gap)} + p ,
845: \end{equation}
846: is regarded as a promising candidate for the Higgs
847: search; see Ref.~\cite{Kaidalov:2003fw} and references therein.
848: From the point of view of strong interactions, this process involves
849: a delicate interplay between ``hard'' and ``soft'' interactions,
850: which can be described within our two--scale picture of the transverse
851: structure of the nucleon \cite{Frankfurt:2004kn}.
852: The Higgs boson is produced in a hard partonic
853: process, involving the exchange of two hard gluons between the nucleons.
854: The impact parameter distribution of the cross section for this process
855: is described by the square of the convolution of the transverse spatial
856: distributions of gluons in the in and out states, $P_4 (b)$,
857: defined in Eq.~(\ref{P_4}), where the scale is of the order of the
858: gluon transverse momentum squared,
859: $\sim M_H^2 / 4$. In addition, the soft interactions between the
860: the spectator systems have to conspire in such a way as not to
861: fill the rapidity gaps left open by the hard process.
862: The probability for this to happen is approximately given by one minus
863: the probability of an inelastic $pp$ interaction at a given
864: impact parameter, Eq.~(\ref{winel}), or $|1 - \Gamma^{pp} (s, b)|^2$.
865: The product of the two probabilities, which determines the
866: $b$--distribution for the total process, is shown in Fig.~\ref{fig_survb}.
867: At small $b$ the probability for no inelastic interaction is very small
868: $|1 - \Gamma^{pp}|^2 \approx 0$, leading to a strong suppression of small
869: $b$ in the overall distribution.
870:
871: %
872: \begin{figure}[t]
873: %
874: \includegraphics[width=10cm,height=7cm]{surv.eps}
875: %
876: \caption[]{The rapidity gap survival probability, $S^2$,
877: Eq.~(\ref{surv}), as estimated in Ref.~\cite{Frankfurt:2004kn}.
878: Shown is the result as a function of $s$, for various values
879: of the mass parameter in the two--gluon form factor, $m_g^2$.
880: The Tevatron and LHC energies are marked by arrows.}
881: \label{fig_surv}
882: \end{figure}
883: %
884: The so-called rapidity gap survival probability, which measures the
885: ``price'' to be paid for leaving the protons intact, is given by
886: the integral \cite{Frankfurt:2004kn}
887: \begin{equation}
888: S^2 \;\; \equiv \;\; \int d^2 b \; |1 - \Gamma^{pp} (s, b)|^2 \; P_4 (b) ,
889: \label{surv}
890: \end{equation}
891: Fig.~\ref{fig_surv} shows our result for this quantity, with
892: $s$ ranging between Tevatron and LHC energies, for various values of the
893: dipole mass in the two--gluon form factor of the nucleon, $m_g^2$,
894: Eq.~(\ref{dipole}). The survival probability decreases with $s$ because the
895: size of the ``black'' region at small impact parameters (in which
896: inelastic interactions happen with high probability) grows with the
897: collision energy. Note that the effective $x$ values
898: in the gluon distribution decrease with the energy
899: (for fixed mass of the produced Higgs boson), resulting in smaller
900: effective values of $m_g^2$. This makes the actual drop
901: of the survival probability with energy slower than appears from
902: the fixed--$m_g^2$ curves of Fig.~\ref{fig_surv}.
903:
904: Our estimates of $S^2$ are in reasonable agreement with those obtained by
905: Khoze et al.\ \cite{Khoze:2000wk} in a multi--Pomeron model,
906: as well as with those reported by Maor et al.\ \cite{Maor}.
907: In view of the different theoretical input to these approaches
908: this is very encouraging. Note that our estimate of the survival
909: probability applies equally well to the production of two hard dijets
910: instead of a Higgs boson.
911:
912: \section{Inclusive hard diffractive processes}
913: Inclusive hard diffractive processes, such as
914: \begin{equation}
915: \begin{array}{lcll}
916: p + p &\rightarrow& p + \mbox{(gap)} + \mbox{2 jets} + X &
917: \mbox{``single diffractive''},
918: \\[1ex]
919: p + p &\rightarrow& p + \mbox{(gap)} + \mbox{2 jets} + X + \mbox{(gap)} + p
920: & \mbox{``double diffractive''},
921: \end{array}
922: \end{equation}
923: offer a possibility to probe the ``periphery'' of the proton
924: with hard scattering processes. The cross section
925: for these processes is again suppressed compared to the naive
926: estimate based on the diffractive parton densities of the proton
927: measured in $ep$ scattering at HERA.
928: As in the case of exclusive diffractive Higgs production, the
929: cause of this is the very small probability for the nucleons
930: not to interact inelastically at small impact parameters.
931: The suppression factors can be estimated by generalizing
932: the approach to the description of hard and soft interactions outlined
933: in Section~\ref{sec_higgs}. Simple estimates along the lines of
934: Eq.~(\ref{surv}) naturally reproduce the suppression factors of the
935: order $0.1 \div 0.2$ observed at Tevatron. However, the results in this
936: case are more sensitive to the details of the impact parameter dependence
937: of the hard scattering process and the soft spectator interactions.
938:
939: In particular, the study of inclusive hard diffractive processes
940: at LHC will allow to {\it i)} investigate how the overall
941: increase of the nucleon size with energy leads to a suppression of
942: hard diffraction, {\it ii)} check how the rate of suppression
943: depends on the $x$--value of the parton involved in the hard process,
944: {\it iii)} look for the breakdown of Regge factorization, that is,
945: the change of the diffractive parton distributions with
946: $x_{\pomeron}$.
947: %
948: \section{Conclusions}
949: %
950: Interactions close to the black body limit
951: play an important role in $pp$ collisions at LHC energies.
952: They largely determine the strength of the elastic $pp$ amplitude
953: at small impact parameters, and lead to a strong suppression of
954: hard and soft diffractive processes. They also determine the
955: dynamics of spectator interactions in events with new particle
956: production, and cause substantial changes in the final state
957: characteristics as compared to generic events. A systematic study of
958: these effects ({\it e.g.}\ with a trigger on hard dijet production)
959: will allow one to investigate the small--$x$ dynamics of high gluon
960: densities in $pp$ scattering, at densities comparable to those reached
961: in the heavy ion collisions at LHC energies.
962:
963: The final state characteristics of central collisions at LHC
964: are predicted to be very different from the naive extrapolation of
965: Tevatron results, where the effect of ``black interactions'' is
966: much weaker.
967:
968: Dedicated studies of hard diffraction at LHC, with a
969: large acceptance in the very forward region, can provide
970: unique information about the transverse spatial distribution of gluons
971: in the nucleon, as well as the growth of the gluon density with energy.
972: This information will be crucial for understanding QCD dynamics in
973: the regime of high gluon densities, and for observing new phenomena
974: reflecting the three--dimensional structure of the nucleon.
975: \\[1ex]
976: {\small This work is supported by U.S.\ Department of Energy Contract
977: DE-AC05-84ER40150, under which the Southeastern Universities Research
978: Association (SURA) operates the Thomas Jefferson
979: National Accelerator Facility.
980: L.~F.\ and M.~S.\ acknowledge support by the Binational Scientific
981: Foundation. The research of M.~S. was supported by DOE.}
982: \bigskip
983:
984: \begin{thebibliography}{100}
985: %
986: %
987: \bibitem{Frankfurt:2003td}
988: L.~Frankfurt, M.~Strikman and C.~Weiss,
989: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 69} (2004) 114010.
990: %
991: %
992: \bibitem{Ciafaloni:2003rd}
993: G.~Altarelli, R.~D.~Ball and S.~Forte,
994: %``An anomalous dimension for small x evolution,''
995: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 674} (2003) 459;
996: M.~Ciafaloni, D.~Colferai, G.~P.~Salam and A.~M.~Stasto,
997: %``Renormalisation group improved small-x Green's function,''
998: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 68} (2003) 114003.
999: %
1000: %
1001: \bibitem{Kaidalov:2003fw}
1002: A.~B.~Kaidalov, V.~A.~Khoze, A.~D.~Martin and M.~G.~Ryskin,
1003: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 31} (2003) 387.
1004: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0307064;%%
1005: %
1006: %
1007: \bibitem{Abramowicz:1998ii}
1008: H.~Abramowicz and A.~Caldwell,
1009: %``HERA collider physics,''
1010: Rev.\ Mod.\ Phys.\ {\bf 71} (1999) 1275.
1011: %
1012: %
1013: \bibitem{Brodsky:1994kf}
1014: S.~J.~Brodsky, L.~Frankfurt, J.~F.~Gunion, A.~H.~Mueller and M.~Strikman,
1015: %``Diffractive leptoproduction of vector mesons in QCD,''
1016: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 50} (1994) 3134.
1017: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9402283;%%
1018: %
1019: %
1020: \bibitem{Levy:2003qz}
1021: A.~Levy [H1 Collaboration],
1022: %``Measurements of diffractive processes at HERA,''
1023: arXiv:hep-ex/0301022.
1024: %
1025: %
1026: \bibitem{Frankfurt:1997fj}
1027: L.~Frankfurt, W.~Koepf and M.~Strikman,
1028: %``Diffractive heavy quarkonium photo- and electroproduction in QCD,''
1029: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 57} (1998) 512.
1030: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9702216;%%
1031: %
1032: %
1033: \bibitem{Frankfurt:2002ka}
1034: L.~Frankfurt and M.~Strikman,
1035: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 66} (2002) 031502.
1036: %
1037: %
1038: \bibitem{Strikman:2003gz}
1039: M.~Strikman and C.~Weiss,
1040: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 69} (2004) 054012.
1041: %
1042: %
1043: \bibitem{Strikman:2004km}
1044: M.~Strikman and C.~Weiss, in Proceeedings of the XII International
1045: Workshop on Deep Inelastic Scattering (DIS 2004), Strbske Pleso,
1046: Slovakia, Apr.~14-18, 2004 [arXiv:hep-ph/0408345].
1047: %
1048: %
1049: \bibitem{Gribov:1973jg}
1050: V.~N.~Gribov, In *Moscow 1 ITEP school, v.1 'Elementary particles'*, 65, 1973,
1051: %``Space-Time Description Of Hadron Interactions At High Energies,''
1052: arXiv:hep-ph/0006158.
1053: %
1054: %
1055: \bibitem{Islam:2002au}
1056: M.~M.~Islam, R.~J.~Luddy and A.~V.~Prokudin,
1057: Mod.\ Phys.\ Lett.\ A {\bf 18} (2003) 743.
1058: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0210437;%%
1059: %
1060: %
1061: \bibitem{Frankfurt:2004fm}
1062: L.~Frankfurt, M.~Strikman and M.~Zhalov,
1063: arXiv:hep-ph/0412052.
1064: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0412052;%%
1065: %
1066: %
1067: \bibitem{Frankfurt:2004kn}
1068: L.~Frankfurt, M.~Strikman, and C.~Weiss,
1069: Ann.\ Phys.\ (Leipzig) {\bf 13} (2004) 665
1070: [arXiv:hep-ph/0410307].
1071: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0410307;%%
1072: %
1073: %
1074: \bibitem{Frankfurt:2000ty}
1075: L.~Frankfurt, V.~Guzey and M.~Strikman,
1076: %``Color coherent phenomena on nuclei and the QCD evolution equation,''
1077: J.\ Phys.\ G {\bf 27} (2001) R23;
1078: L.~Frankfurt, V.~Guzey, M.~McDermott and M.~Strikman,
1079: %``Electron nucleus collisions at THERA,''
1080: arXiv:hep-ph/0104252.
1081: %
1082: %
1083: \bibitem{Mueller:1994jq}
1084: A.~H.~Mueller and B.~Patel,
1085: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 425}, 471 (1994).
1086: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9403256;%%
1087: %
1088: %
1089: \bibitem{Field:2002vt} T.~Affolder \textit{et al.} [CDF Collaboration],
1090: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 65} (2002) 092002.
1091: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D65,092002;%%
1092: %
1093: %
1094: \bibitem{Aitala:2000hc} E.~M.~Aitala {\it et al.} [E791 Collaboration],
1095: %``Observation of color-transparency in diffractive dissociation of pions,''
1096: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 86} (2001) 4773; {\it ibid.} {\bf 86} (2001) 4768.
1097: %
1098: %
1099: \bibitem{Frankfurt:it}
1100: L.~Frankfurt, G.~A.~Miller and M.~Strikman,
1101: %``Coherent Nuclear Diffractive Production Of Mini - Jets:
1102: % Illuminating Color Transparency,''
1103: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 304} (1993) 1.
1104: %
1105: %
1106: \bibitem{Frankfurt:2000jm}
1107: L.~Frankfurt, G.~A.~Miller and M.~Strikman,
1108: %``Coherent QCD phenomena in the coherent pion nucleon
1109: % and pion nucleus production of two jets at high relative momenta,''
1110: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 65} (2002) 094015.
1111: %
1112: %
1113: \bibitem{Frankfurt:1998eu}
1114: L.~Frankfurt and M.~Strikman,
1115: hep-ph/9806536, In DIS98, Deep inelastic scattering and QCD, 77-93.
1116: %
1117: %
1118: \bibitem{Frankfurt:1994hf}
1119: L.~L.~Frankfurt, G.~A.~Miller and M.~Strikman,
1120: %``The Geometrical color optics of coherent high-energy processes,''
1121: Ann.\ Rev.\ Nucl.\ Part.\ Sci.\ {\bf 44} (1994) 501.
1122: %
1123: %
1124: \bibitem{Khoze:2000wk}
1125: V.~A.~Khoze, A.~D.~Martin and M.~G.~Ryskin,
1126: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 18} (2000) 167.
1127: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0007359;%%
1128: %
1129: %
1130: \bibitem{Maor} U.~Maor, Talk presented at the Workshop ``HERA and the LHC'',
1131: CERN, Geneva, March 26--27, 2004.
1132: %
1133: %
1134: \end{thebibliography}
1135: \end{document}
1136: %
1137: %
1138: