1: \documentstyle[twocolumn,prl,aps,epsfig,amssymb]{revtex}
2: \tighten
3: \let\jnfont=\rm
4: \def\NPB#1,{{\jnfont Nucl.\ Phys.\ B }{\bf #1},}
5: \def\PLB#1,{{\jnfont Phys.\ Lett.\ B }{\bf #1},}
6: \def\EPJC#1,{{\jnfont Eur.\ Phys.\ Jour.\ C }{\bf #1},}
7: \def\PRD#1,{{\jnfont Phys.\ Rev.\ D }{\bf #1},}
8: \def\PRL#1,{{\jnfont Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ }{\bf #1},}
9: \def\MPLA#1,{{\jnfont Mod.\ Phys.\ Lett.\ A }{\bf #1},}
10: \def\JPG#1,{{\jnfont J.\ Phys.\ G}{\bf #1},}
11: \def\CTP#1,{{\jnfont Commun.\ Theor.\ Phys.\ }{\bf #1},}
12: \def\btt#1{{tt$\backslash$#1}}
13: \def\BibTeX{\rm B{\sc ib}\TeX}
14: \begin{document}
15: \draft
16: \preprint{}
17:
18: \title{ Lightest Higgs Boson Mass in Split Supersymmetry with See-saw Mechanism}
19:
20:
21: \author{Junjie Cao$^{1,2}$, Jin Min Yang$^{3,2}$}
22:
23: \address{ \ \\[2mm]
24: {\it $^1$ Department of Physics, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang, Henan 453002, China;}\\ [2mm]
25: {\it $^2$ Institute of Theoretical Physics, Academia Sinica, Beijing 100080, China;} \\ [2mm]
26: {\it $^3$ CCAST(World Laboratory), P.O.Box 8730, Beijing 100080, China;} \ \\[6mm] }
27:
28: \date{\today}
29:
30: \maketitle
31:
32: \begin{abstract}
33: In the minimal supersymmetric standard model extended by
34: including right-handed neutrinos with see-saw mechanism,
35: the neutrino Yukaka couplings can be as large as the top-quark
36: Yukawa couplings and thus the neutrino/sneutrino may cause sizable
37: effects in Higgs boson self-energy loops. Our explicit one-loop calculations
38: show that the neutrino/sneutrino effects may have an opposite sign
39: to top/stop effects and thus lighten the lightest Higgs boson. If
40: the soft-breaking mass of the right-handed neutrino is very large
41: (at the order of Majorana mass scale), such as in the split-SUSY
42: scenario, the effects can lower the lightest Higgs boson mass by a
43: few tens of GeV. So the Higgs mass bound of about 150 GeV
44: in split-SUSY may be lowered significantly if right-handed neutrinos
45: come into play with see-saw mechanism.
46:
47:
48:
49: \end{abstract}
50:
51: \pacs{14.80.Cp, 14.80.Ly, 12.60.Jv}
52:
53: Searching for the Higgs boson is a primary goal of ongoing and
54: forthcoming high energy colliders. The verification or disproof of
55: the existence of a light Higgs boson will serve as an acid test
56: for both the Standard Model (SM) and the supersymmetry (SUSY)
57: extensions. While for the SM a light Higgs boson is favored
58: indirectly by the precision electroweak data, the Minimal
59: Supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM) predicts a Higgs boson ($h$)
60: lighter than about 130 GeV \cite{h-original,h-limit1,h-limit2}. In
61: the recently proposed split-SUSY scenario \cite{split}, where the
62: fine-tuning problem is argued not to be solved by SUSY and thus
63: the soft-breaking masses of sfermions can be very large, such a
64: bound is relaxed to about 150 GeV. It is well known that these
65: bounds, much higher than the tree-level prediction $m_h<m_Z$, are
66: obtained by considering loop effects, mainly the top/stop loop
67: effects. The underlying reason for the sizable top/stop loop
68: effects is the largeness of the top-quark Yukawa couplings. So, if
69: any other particles have large Yukawa couplings, their loop
70: effects in the Higgs boson mass should also be taken into account.
71:
72: The recent compelling evidence of neutrino oscillation indicates
73: massive neutrinos, which necessitates the introduction of right-handed
74: neutrino superfields ~\cite{Hisano} in the MSSM. If the Majorana
75: masses of the right-handed neutrinos are large enough, the tiny
76: masses of light neutrinos can be naturally obtained, which is the
77: so-called see-saw mechanism~\cite{Yanagida}. In such a
78: supersymmetric see-saw model the neutrino Yukaka couplings can be
79: as large as the top-quark Yukawa couplings \cite{Wyler}. Thus, the
80: neutrino/sneutrino may cause sizable loop effects in Higgs boson
81: masses. In this note we focus on such effects and perform an
82: explicit one-loop calculations \footnote{Note that there are two approaches
83: for calculating such leading loop effects. One is the explicit loop calculations
84: used in this work. The other is the renormalization group technique. We note that
85: in the approach of explicit loop calculations, one-loop calculations may be not
86: accurate enough and thus higher order loop effects may need to be considered.
87: But in this letter we only perform one-loop calculations in order to illustrate
88: the possible size of the effects. In our future work we will provide more
89: complete calculations, either by considering higher order loops or by the
90: renormalization group to resum the leading logs.}.
91:
92: We start our calculation from the superpotential.
93: Compared with the MSSM, the supersymmetric see-saw model contains the
94: additional right-handed neutrino superfield in the superpotential
95: \begin{eqnarray}
96: - \frac{1}{2} \nu_R^{c} M_R \nu_R^c + \nu_R^{c} {\bf Y_\nu} L\cdot H_2 \ ,
97: \end{eqnarray}
98: where $Y_{\nu}$ is the Yukawa couplings of neutrinos and $M_R$ is
99: the Majorana mass, both of which are generally $3\times 3$
100: matrices in the generation space. For simplicity and illustration, we
101: in our analysis ignore the flavor structure and consider only one
102: generation of neutrinos \footnote{The general result with the three
103: families of neutrinos is quite complicated and will be presented
104: elsewhere \cite{cao-phd}.}. Such an addition of right-handed
105: neutrino superfields will enrich the phenomenology of both
106: neutrino sector and sneutrino sector.
107:
108: First, we examine the neutrino sector. The neutrino mass term is
109: given by
110: \begin{eqnarray}
111: & &(\nu_L, \nu_R^c)
112: \left ( \begin{array}{cc} 0 & Y_\nu v_2 \\
113: Y_{\nu} v_2 & M_R\end{array} \right )
114: \left ( \begin{array}{c} \nu_L \\ \nu_R^c \end{array} \right ) + h.c. \nonumber\\
115: & &=-(\nu_1, \nu_2)
116: \left ( \begin{array}{cc} \frac{Y_\nu^2 v_2^2}{M_R} & 0 \\
117: 0 & M_R ( 1 + \frac{Y_\nu^2 v_2^2}{M_R^2} ) \end{array} \right )
118: \left ( \begin{array}{c} \nu_1 \\ \nu_2 \end{array} \right ) + h.c. \ .
119: \end{eqnarray}
120: Here $v_2$ is the vacuum expectation value of the Higgs doublet $H_2$ and
121: the mass matrix is diagonalized by an unitary rotation, which
122: rotates $\nu_L$ and $\nu_R^c$ into two mass eigenstates
123: $\nu_{1,2}$, i.e.,
124: \begin{eqnarray}
125: \left ( \begin{array}{c} \nu_1 \\ \nu_2 \end{array} \right )
126: = \left ( \begin{array}{cc} \cos\theta_\nu & \sin\theta_\nu \\
127: -i \sin\theta_\nu & i \cos\theta_\nu \end{array} \right )
128: \left ( \begin{array}{c} \nu_L \\ \nu_R^c \end{array} \right )
129: \end{eqnarray}
130: with the mixing angle $\theta_\nu$ determined by
131: \begin{eqnarray}
132: \tan(2\theta_\nu)=-\frac{2Y_\nu v_2}{M_R}\ .
133: \end{eqnarray}
134: Note that all these states are the two-component spinors.
135: We can define the four-component Majorana spinors as $\nu_1 \equiv (\nu_1, \bar\nu_1)^T$
136: and $\nu_2 \equiv (\nu_2, \bar\nu_2)^T$, which will be used in our following calculations.
137:
138: Then the neutrino Yukawa couplings with neutral Higgs bosons are given by
139: \begin{eqnarray}
140: && \frac{1}{2\sqrt{2}} \left[
141: (H \sin \alpha + h \cos \alpha ) \bar{\nu}_i ( \xi_{ij} P_L + \xi^\dag_{ij} P_R ) \nu_j
142: \right. \nonumber \\
143: &&~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ \left. +i \cos\beta A \bar{\nu}_i ( \xi_{ij}
144: P_L-\xi^\dag_{ij} P_R ) \nu_j \right ]\ ,
145: \end{eqnarray}
146: where $\alpha$ is the mixing angle between the two neutral CP-even Higgs bosons,
147: $\tan\beta=v_2/v_1$ is the ratio of the vacuum expectation values of the
148: two Higgs doublets, $P_{L,R}\equiv (1\mp \gamma_5)/2$,
149: and $\xi_{ij}$ are given by
150: \begin{eqnarray}
151: \xi= \left ( \begin{array}{cc} \sin 2 \theta_\nu Y_\nu & -i \cos 2
152: \theta_\nu Y_\nu \\ - i \cos 2 \theta_\nu Y_\nu & \sin 2
153: \theta_\nu Y_\nu \end{array} \right ) \ .
154: \end{eqnarray}
155: Now we turn to the sneutrino sector. The sneutrino mass terms arise from
156: F-terms, D-terms as well as the soft-breaking terms given by
157: \begin{eqnarray}
158: V_{soft}&= & \tilde{L}^\ast m_{\tilde{L}}^2 \tilde{L}
159: +\tilde{\nu}_R^{c \ast} m_{\tilde{\nu}_R}^2 \tilde{\nu}_R^{c} \nonumber \\
160: & & + B^\ast \tilde{\nu}_R^{c \ast} M_R^\ast
161: \tilde{\nu}_R^{c \ast} + B \tilde{\nu}_R^{c} M_R \tilde{\nu}_R^{c} \nonumber \\
162: & & - A_\nu \epsilon_{\alpha \beta} H_2^\alpha \tilde{\nu}_R^c
163: Y_\nu
164: \tilde{L}^\beta
165: - A_\nu^\ast \epsilon_{\alpha \beta} H_2^{\ast \alpha}
166: \tilde{\nu}_R^{c \ast} Y_\nu^\ast \tilde{L}^{\ast \beta}
167: \ .
168: \end{eqnarray}
169: Throughout this paper, we assume $M_R > B, A_{\nu}$ and $M_R \gg v_2, m_Z$, and treat
170: the soft terms proportional to $B$ and $A_{\nu}$ as interactions. Then the sneutrino mass terms are
171: given by \cite{Haber}
172: \begin{eqnarray}
173: && \left ( \begin{array}{cc}\tilde{\nu}_L^\ast, \tilde{\nu}_R^{c\ast}
174: \end{array} \right )
175: \left (\begin{array}{cc}
176: \tilde M_{LL}^2 & M_R Y_\nu v_2 \\
177: M_R Y_\nu v_2 & \tilde M_{RR}^2 \end{array} \right )
178: \left (\begin{array}{c} \tilde{\nu}_L \\ \tilde{\nu}_R^c \end{array} \right )
179: \nonumber \\
180: &&\approx
181: \left ( \begin{array}{cc}\tilde \nu_1^\ast, \tilde \nu_2^\ast
182: \end{array} \right )
183: \left (\begin{array}{cc}
184: m_{\tilde{L}}^2 & 0 \\
185: 0 & M_R^2 + m_{\tilde{\nu}_R}^2 \end{array} \right )
186: \left (\begin{array}{c} \tilde \nu_1 \\ \tilde \nu_2 \end{array} \right ) \ ,
187: \label{snu}
188: \end{eqnarray}
189: where
190: \begin{eqnarray}
191: \tilde M_{LL}^2 & =& m_{\tilde{L}}^2 + Y_\nu^2 v_2^2 + \frac{1}{2} m_Z^2 \cos 2 \beta \ ,\\
192: \tilde M_{RR}^2 & =& M_R^2 + Y_\nu^2 v_2^2 + m_{\tilde{\nu}_R}^2 \ .
193: \end{eqnarray}
194: The sneutrino mass matrix is diagonalized by an unitary rotation in Eq.(\ref{snu})
195: and the two mass eigenstates $\tilde \nu_{1,2}$ are given by
196: \begin{eqnarray}
197: \left (\begin{array}{c} \tilde \nu_1 \\ \tilde \nu_2 \end{array} \right )
198: = \left ( \begin{array}{cc}\cos\theta_{\tilde\nu}&\sin\theta_{\tilde\nu} \\
199: -\sin\theta_{\tilde\nu} &\cos\theta_{\tilde\nu} \end{array} \right )
200: \left (\begin{array}{c} \tilde \nu_L \\ \tilde \nu_R^c \end{array} \right )
201: \end{eqnarray}
202: with the mixing angle $\theta_{\tilde{\nu}}$ determined by
203: \begin{eqnarray}
204: \sin (2 \theta_{\tilde{\nu}}) = \frac{2 Y_\nu M_R v_2}
205: { m_{\tilde\nu_1}^2 - m_{\tilde\nu_2}^2} \ .
206: \end{eqnarray}
207: Then the sneutrino Yukawa couplings are given by
208: \begin{eqnarray}
209: -\frac{Y_\nu}{\sqrt{2}}&& \left \{ (2 Y_\nu v_2 + \sin 2
210: \theta_{\tilde{\nu}} M_R )
211: (H \sin \alpha + h \cos \alpha )\tilde{\nu}_1^\ast \tilde{\nu}_1 \right .\nonumber \\
212: && +(2 Y_\nu v_2 - \sin 2 \theta_{\tilde{\nu}} M_R )
213: (H \sin \alpha + h \cos \alpha ) \tilde{\nu}_2^\ast \tilde{\nu}_2 \nonumber \\
214: && +\cos 2 \theta_{\tilde{\nu}} M_R
215: (H \sin \alpha + h \cos \alpha )
216: (\tilde{\nu}_1^\ast \tilde{\nu}_2 +\tilde{\nu}_2^\ast \tilde{\nu}_1) \nonumber \\
217: && - i M_R \cos \beta A
218: (\tilde{\nu}_1^\ast \tilde{\nu}_2-\tilde{\nu}_2^\ast \tilde{\nu}_1) \nonumber \\
219: && + \frac{Y_\nu}{\sqrt{2}} \left [ (H \sin \alpha + h \cos \alpha
220: )^2 \right.
221: \nonumber \\
222: &&\left. \left. +A^2 \cos^2 \beta \right ]
223: (\tilde{\nu}_1^\ast \tilde{\nu}_1+ \tilde{\nu}_2^\ast \tilde{\nu}_2) \right \} \ .
224: \label{interaction}
225: \end{eqnarray}
226: In addition, the bilinear and trilinear interactions from the soft-breaking
227: terms are given by
228: \begin{eqnarray}
229: && -B (\sin \theta_{\tilde{\nu}} \tilde{\nu}_1 + \cos
230: \theta_{\tilde{\nu}} \tilde{\nu}_2 ) M_R (\sin
231: \theta_{\tilde{\nu}} \tilde{\nu}_1 + \cos \theta_{\tilde{\nu}}
232: \tilde{\nu}_2 ) \nonumber \\
233: && - A_{\nu} Y_\nu (\sin \theta_{\tilde{\nu}}
234: \tilde{\nu}_1 + \cos \theta_{\tilde{\nu}} \tilde{\nu}_2)
235: (\cos \theta_{\tilde{\nu}} \tilde{\nu}_1 - \sin\theta_{\tilde{\nu}}
236: \tilde{\nu}_2 ) \nonumber \\
237: && \times \left ( v_2 + \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} ( H \sin \alpha + h
238: \cos\alpha + i A \cos \beta ) \right ) +h.c.
239: \end{eqnarray}
240: The neutrino/sneutrino contribute to Higgs boson self-energies
241: through the diagrams shown in Fig.1. The renormalized
242: self-energies are given by
243: \begin{eqnarray}
244: \hat{\Sigma}_h&\approx& -\omega_\nu \cos^2 \alpha \ ,\\
245: \hat{\Sigma}_H&\approx & - \omega_\nu \sin^2 \alpha \ ,\\
246: \hat{\Sigma}_h H&\approx & - \omega_\nu \sin \alpha \cos \alpha \ ,
247: \end{eqnarray}
248: where $\omega_\nu$ can be decomposed as
249: \begin{eqnarray}
250: \omega_\nu = \omega_{\nu}^{SUSY} +\omega_{\nu}^{soft}
251: \end{eqnarray}
252: with $\omega_{\nu}^{SUSY}$ and $\omega_{\nu}^{soft}$ representing
253: respectively the contribution from supersymmetric part and soft-breaking part
254: given by
255: \begin{eqnarray}
256: \omega_\nu^{SUSY}&=& \frac{Y_\nu^4 v_2^2}{4 \pi^2} \left [
257: \frac{1}{2} \ln\frac{m_{\tilde{\nu}_1}^2 m_{\tilde{\nu}_2}^2}{M_R^4}
258: -1 \right . \nonumber \\
259: && + \frac{ M_R^2}{m_{\tilde{\nu}_1}^2-m_{\tilde{\nu}_2}^2}
260: \ln\frac{m_{\tilde{\nu}_1}^2}{m_{\tilde{\nu}_2}^2}
261: + \frac{M_R^4}{(m_{\tilde{\nu}_1}^2-m_{\tilde{\nu}_2}^2)^2} \nonumber \\
262: &&\left. \times \left ( 1 -\frac{m_{\tilde{\nu}_1}^2
263: +m_{\tilde{\nu}_2}^2}{2 (m_{\tilde{\nu}_1}^2 - m_{\tilde{\nu}_2}^2)}
264: \ln\frac{m_{\tilde{\nu}_1}^2}{m_{\tilde{\nu}_2}^2} \right ) \right ] \ ,\\
265: \omega^{soft}_\nu&=& -\frac{Y_\nu^2}{16 \pi^2}\frac{B^2
266: M_R^2}{m_{\tilde{\nu}_2}^2}
267: \left [ \frac{4}{3 m_{\tilde{\nu}_2}^2}
268: (2 Y_\nu v_2 - \sin 2 \theta_{\tilde{\nu}} M_R)^2
269: \right. \nonumber \\
270: && -2\sin^2 2 \theta_{\tilde\nu} \frac{M_R^2}
271: {(m_{\tilde{\nu}_2}^2-m_{\tilde{\nu}_1}^2)^3} \nonumber \\
272: &&\left. \times \left (m_{\tilde{\nu}_2}^4
273: -m_{\tilde{\nu}_1}^4 -2 m_{\tilde{\nu}_2}^2 m_{\tilde{\nu}_1}^2
274: \ln \frac{m_{\tilde{\nu}_1}^2}{m_{\tilde{\nu}_2}^2} \right ) \right ]
275: \nonumber \\
276: &&- \frac{Y_\nu^2}{16 \pi^2} \frac{ M_R^2}
277: {(m_{\tilde{\nu}_2}^2 -m_{\tilde{\nu}_1}^2)^3}
278: (2 B^2 M_R^2 \sin^2 2 \theta_{\tilde{\nu}}
279: \nonumber \\
280: && + 4 B M_R A_\nu v_2 \sin 2 \theta_{\tilde{\nu}}
281: +A_\nu^2 v_2^2) \nonumber \\
282: && \times \left[ 2 (m_{\tilde{\nu}_1}^2-m_{\tilde{\nu}_2}^2)
283: -(m_{\tilde{\nu}_1}^2+m_{\tilde{\nu}_2}^2)
284: \ln \frac{m_{\tilde{\nu}_1}^2}{m_{\tilde{\nu}_2}^2} \right]
285: \label{omega}
286: \end{eqnarray}
287: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
288: \begin{figure}[]
289: \hspace*{-1cm} \epsfig{file=fig1.ps,width=9cm, height=11cm}
290: \caption{Feynman diagrams of neutrino/sneutrino effects in Higgs
291: boson self-energies. $\phi$ denotes a neutral Higgs boson, i.e., $h$, $H$ or $A$.
292: The symbol '$\times$' means a soft-term mass insertion.}
293: \end{figure}
294: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
295: In the calculation of $\omega_{\nu}^{soft}$, we dropped the terms
296: suppressed by $v_2^2/m_{\tilde{\nu}_R}^2$. We also checked that
297: the contributions from higher order mass insertions are
298: negligible.
299:
300: The lightest Higgs boson mass with one-loop
301: neutrino/sneutrino effects is given by\cite{Dabelstein}
302: \begin{eqnarray}
303: && m^2_h = \frac{M_A^2 + M_Z^2 + \omega_\nu} {2}
304: -\left[ \frac{ (M_A^2 + M_Z^2)^2 + \omega^2_\nu}{4} \right. \nonumber \\
305: &&~~~~ \left. -M_A^2 M_Z^2 \cos^2 2\beta
306: + \frac{\omega_\nu \cos 2\beta}{2} (M_A^2 - M_Z^2)
307: \right]^{1/2}
308: \end{eqnarray}
309: From Eq.(\ref{omega}) and Eq.(\ref{snu}), we see that the relevant
310: SUSY parameters are $A_\nu$,$B$,$m_{\tilde L}$,
311: $m_{\tilde{\nu}_R}$ and $M_R$. $M_R$ must be much larger than
312: $m_Z$ in order to drive the see-saw mechanism, but the scales of
313: the soft-breaking parameters are not clear\footnote{Note that
314: $M_R$, $m_{\tilde\nu_R}$ and $B$ are associated with the $SU(2)\times U(1)$
315: singlet superfield $\nu_R$ and thus may have fundamentally different origin
316: from $A_\nu$ and $m_{\tilde L}$.}.
317: If one insists on naturalness requirement, these soft breaking parameters
318: should not be much larger than the electroweak scale \cite{B-value}.
319: In this case, since the SUSY breaking in neutrino/sneutrino sector
320: is not significant, the neutrino/sneutrino loop effects on
321: the Higgs boson mass are small, as will be shown in our numerical results.
322: In our numerical calculations we abandon the naturalness, as in the
323: split-SUSY scenario, and thus the soft-breaking masses for sneutrinos can be
324: much larger.
325:
326: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
327: \begin{figure}[]
328: \hspace*{-0.5cm} \epsfig{file=fig2.ps,width=8.7cm, height=8.7cm}
329: \caption{The neutrino/sneutrino contribution to $m_h$: the solid, dashed, dotted and
330: dash-dotted curve (from up to down) is for $m_{\tilde L}=10^3$, $10^7$, $10^{11}$, $10^{13}$ GeV,
331: respectively. $M_R=10^{14}$ GeV and other parameters are fixed in the context. }
332: \end{figure}
333: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
334:
335:
336: In Fig.~2 we show the neutrino/sneutrino contribution to $m_h$,
337: i.e., $\Delta m_h \equiv m_h -m_h^{\rm tree}$, versus $m_{\tilde
338: \nu_2}/M_R$ for $M_R=10^{14}$ GeV and different values of $m_{\tilde L}$.
339: Other parameters are fixed as
340: $m_A=200$ GeV, $\tan\beta=30$, $Y_\nu=1$ and $B=A_\nu=0$.
341: With above choice of parameters, only $\omega_{\nu}^{SUSY}$ contribute to
342: our numerical results.
343:
344: Since $m_{\tilde \nu_2}^2\approx M_R^2 + m_{\tilde \nu_R}^2$ and
345: $m_{\nu_2}\approx M_R$, we see from Fig.~2 that the effects of
346: neutrino/sneutrino are sensitive to the mass splitting of
347: $\tilde \nu_2$ (heavy sneutrino) and $\nu_2$ (heavy neutrino).
348: Obviously, such a mass splitting is determined by the right-handed
349: neutrino soft-breaking mass $m_{\tilde \nu_R}$. So the effects of
350: neutrino/sneutrino depend on the size of the soft masses $m_{\tilde \nu_R}$
351: and $m_{\tilde L}$.
352:
353: Fig.~2 shows that if $m_{\tilde \nu_R}$ is as large as $M_R$, the
354: effects can be quite significant, lowering $m_h$ by a few tens of
355: GeV. If $m_{\tilde \nu_R}$ is far smaller than $M_R$, e.g., of the
356: order of the electroweak scale, then the effects are negligibly
357: small. This can be understood from $h\tilde{\nu}_1
358: \tilde{\nu}_1^\ast $ interactions shown in Eq.(\ref{interaction}):
359: for $m_{\tilde \nu_R} \ll M_R $ we have $m_{\tilde{\nu}_2} \simeq
360: M_R$ and then the coupling tends to be zero. As a result, the first
361: term in $\omega_{\nu}^{SUSY}$ is cancelled by other terms. When $
362: m_{\tilde \nu_R} $ becomes large, such cancellation is alleviated.
363: Another way to understand the above results is that for soft-breaking
364: parameters of electroweak scale, the SUSY-breaking in neutrino/sneutrino
365: sector is not significant and thus the contributions from neutrino loops
366: tend to be cancelled out by those from sneutrino loops.
367:
368: In case of large SUSY breaking in neutrino/sneutrino sector, the neutrino/sneutrino
369: loop effects are proportional to
370: $\log(m_{\tilde \nu_1}/m_{\tilde \nu_2})
371: \approx \log(m_{\tilde L}/\sqrt{M_R^2+m_{\tilde \nu_R}^2})$. A smaller $m_{\tilde L}$
372: leads to a larger splitting between $m_{\tilde \nu_1}$ and $m_{\tilde \nu_2}$ and thus
373: gives a larger contribution.
374:
375:
376: We found that the results are not sensitive to $\tan\beta$ and $m_A$.
377: Note that we fixed $B=A_\nu=0$ and thus $\omega_{\nu}^{soft}$ vanished in Fig.~2.
378: If we choose a non-zero $B$ or $A_\nu$, we find that the contribution of
379: $\omega_{\nu}^{soft}$ to $m_h$ is also negative, whose magnitude depends on
380: the size of $B$ and $A_\nu$. For $B\ll M_R$ and $A_\nu\ll M_R$, the contribution
381: of $\omega_{\nu}^{soft}$ is negligible. But if any one, $B$ or $A_\nu$, is
382: as large as $M_R$, $\omega_{\nu}^{soft}$ can lower $m_h$ by a few tens of GeV,
383: regardless of the magnitude of $m_{\tilde \nu_R}$.
384:
385: Since the effects depend sensitively on the right-handed neutrino soft-breaking
386: masses, it is important to know how large they possibly are.
387: Unfortunately, their origin is not clear and thus their values are theroretically
388: arbitrary so far. In the split-SUSY scenario \cite{split}, the soft-breaking
389: masses of sfermions (and thus $m_{\tilde \nu_R}$) can be very large. Therefore,
390: the neutrino/sneutrino loop effects on Higgs boson mass may be sizable in split-SUSY
391: if right-handed neutrinos are introduced with see-saw mechanism.
392:
393: Including such large negative effects, the upper bound on the lightest
394: Higgs boson mass of about 150 GeV in split-SUSY \cite{split} will be
395: lowered significantly. The LEP experiment already set a lower bound of about
396: 90 GeV \cite{LEP-bound} on the SUSY Higg mass and the Fermilab Tevatron collider
397: will further push up the lower bound in case of unobservation. So the lightest
398: Higgs boson mass will be a crucial test for various SUSY models.
399:
400: We note that the large Yukawa couplings of neutrinos or large soft-masses of right-handed
401: neutrinos will not cause any problems in the precision electroweak fit of the SM,
402: such as the parameterized variables $S$, $T$ and $U$. The reason is that the right-handed
403: nuetrinos or sneutrinos have no gauge couplings. The left-handed sneutrinos contribute
404: to $S$, $T$ and $U$ in a similar way as other sfermions and their effects decouple as
405: they get heavy.
406:
407: We conclude that due to the unsuppressed neutrino Yukawa couplings
408: in SUSY see-saw model, the neutrino/sneutrino may cause sizable
409: effects in the lightest Higgs boson mass. Such effects have an
410: opposite sign to the top/stop effects and thus lighten the
411: lightest Higgs boson. If the soft-breaking mass of the
412: right-handed neutrino is sufficiently large, which can be realized
413: in the split-SUSY scenario, the effects can lower the mass bound
414: by a few tens of GeV.
415:
416: We thank Ken-ichi Hikasa for comments and Mashahiro Yamaguchi for discussions.
417: This work was supported in part by National Natural Science Foundation of China
418: (NNSFC).
419:
420: \begin{references}
421: \bibitem{h-original} H.E. Haber, R. Hempfling, \PRL66, 1815 (1991);
422: Y. Okada, M. Yamaguchi, T. Yanagida, Prog. Theor. Phys. {\bf 85}, 1 (1991);
423: \PLB262,54(1991);
424: J. Ellis, G. Ridolfi, F. Zwirner, \PLB257, 83 (1991); \PLB262, 477 (1991);
425: J.~R.~Espinosa and R.~J.~Zhang, JHEP {\bf 0003} (2000) 026.
426: \bibitem{h-limit1} M.~Carena, M.~Quiros and C.~E.~M.~Wagner, \NPB461, 407 (1996);
427: M.~Carena, {\it et. al.}, \NPB580, 29 (2000);
428: \bibitem{h-limit2} S.~Heinemeyer, W.~Hollik and G.~Weiglein, \PRD58, 091701 (1998);
429: \PLB440,296 (1998); \EPJC9, 343 (1999);
430: J.~R.~Espinosa and R.~J.~Zhang, \NPB586, 3 (2000);
431: J.~R.~Espinosa, I.~Navarro, \NPB615, 82 (2001);
432: G.~Degrassi, P.~Slavich, F.~Zwirner, \NPB611, 403 (2001);
433: A.~Brignole, G.~Degrassi, P.~Slavich, F.~Zwirner, \NPB631, 195 (2002).
434: \bibitem{split} N. Arkani-Hamed and S. Dimopoulos, hep-th/0405159;
435: G.F. Giudice, A. Romanino, \NPB699, 65 (2004).
436: N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos, G.F. Giudice, A. Romanino, \NPB709, 3 (2005).
437: \bibitem{Hisano} J. Hisano, T. Moroi, K. Tobe and M. Yamaguchi, \PLB357, 579 (1995);
438: \PLB391, 341 (1997); \PRD53, 2442 (1996);
439: J. Hisano and D.Nomura, \PRD59, 116005 (1999);
440: J. Hisano {\it et. al.}, \PRD58, 116010 (1998);
441: J. Hisano, D. Nomura, and T. Yangagida, \PLB437, 351 (1998);
442: J. A. Casas and A. Ibarra, \NPB618, 171 (2001).
443: \bibitem{Yanagida} T.~Yanagida, Prog.\ Theor.\ Phys.\ {\bf 64}, 1103 (1980);
444: R. N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanovic, \PRL44, 912 (1980).
445: \bibitem{Wyler} See, e.g., W. Buchmuller and D. Wyler, \PLB521, 291 (2001).
446: \bibitem{cao-phd} PhD thesis of Junjie Cao, to appear in the hep-ph arXive.
447: \bibitem{Haber} Y. Grossman, H. E. Haber, \PRL78, 3438 (1997).
448: \bibitem{Dabelstein} A.~Dabelstein, Z.~Phys.~C{\bf 67}, 495 (1995).
449: \bibitem{B-value} Y. Farzan, JHEP {\bf 0502},(2005), 025.
450: \bibitem{LEP-bound} The LEP collaborations (ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, OPAL),
451: hep-ex/0107030.
452: \end{references}
453: \end{document}
454:
455: \end{document}
456: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
457: