1: %%%%%%%%%% espcrc2.tex %%%%%%%%%%
2: %
3: % $Id: espcrc2.tex 1.2 2000/07/24 09:12:51 spepping Exp spepping $
4: %
5: \documentclass[fleqn,twoside]{article}
6: \usepackage{espcrc2}
7:
8: % change this to the following line for use with LaTeX2.09
9: % \documentstyle[twoside,fleqn,espcrc2]{article}
10:
11: % if you want to include PostScript figures
12: %\usepackage{graphicx}
13: \usepackage{epsfig}
14: % if you have landscape tables
15: \usepackage[figuresright]{rotating}
16:
17: % put your own definitions here:
18: % \newcommand{\cZ}{\cal{Z}}
19: % \newtheorem{def}{Definition}[section]
20: % ...
21:
22:
23:
24: \newcommand{\mc}{\multicolumn}
25: \newcommand{\bce}{\begin{center}}
26: \newcommand{\ece}{\end{center}}
27: \newcommand{\beq}{\begin{equation}}
28: \newcommand{\eeq}{\end{equation}}
29: \newcommand{\bea}{\vspace{0.25cm}\begin{eqnarray}}
30: \newcommand{\eea}{\end{eqnarray}}
31: \newcommand{\cont}{\nonumber\end{eqnarray}\begin{eqnarray}}
32: \newcommand{\ab}{{\alpha\beta}}
33: \newcommand{\cd}{{\gamma\delta}}
34: \newcommand{\dc}{{\delta\gamma}}
35: \newcommand{\ac}{{\alpha\gamma}}
36: \newcommand{\bd}{{\beta\delta}}
37: \newcommand{\abc}{{\alpha\beta\gamma}}
38: \newcommand{\eps}{{\epsilon}}
39: \newcommand{\lam}{{\lambda}}
40: \newcommand{\mn}{{\mu\nu}}
41: \newcommand{\mpnp}{{\mu'\nu'}}
42: \newcommand{\Amuu}{{A_{\mu}}}
43: \newcommand{\Amuo}{{A^{\mu}}}
44: \newcommand{\Vmuu}{{V_{\mu}}}
45: \newcommand{\Vmuo}{{V^{\mu}}}
46: \newcommand{\Anuu}{{A_{\nu}}}
47: \newcommand{\Anuo}{{A^{\nu}}}
48: \newcommand{\Vnuu}{{V_{\nu}}}
49: \newcommand{\Vnuo}{{V^{\nu}}}
50: \newcommand{\Fmnu}{{F_{\mu\nu}}}
51: \newcommand{\Fmno}{{F^{\mu\nu}}}
52: \newcommand{\abcd}{{\alpha\beta\gamma\delta}}
53: \newcommand{\bsigma}{\mbox{\boldmath $\sigma$}}
54: \newcommand{\btau}{\mbox{\boldmath $\tau$}}
55: \newcommand{\brho}{\mbox{\boldmath $\rho$}}
56: \newcommand{\bpipi}{\mbox{\boldmath $\pi\pi$}}
57: \newcommand{\bss}{\bsigma\!\cdot\!\bsigma}
58: \newcommand{\btt}{\btau\!\cdot\!\btau}
59: \newcommand{\bnab}{\mbox{\boldmath $\nabla$}}
60: %\newcommand{\b0}{\mbox{\boldmath $0$}}
61: %\newcommand{\b1}{\mbox{\boldmath $1$}}
62: \newcommand{\bA}{{\bf A}}
63: \newcommand{\be}{{\bf e}}
64: \newcommand{\bj}{{\bf j}}
65: \newcommand{\bk}{{\bf k}}
66: \newcommand{\bl}{{\bf l}}
67: \newcommand{\bL}{{\bf L}}
68: \newcommand{\bM}{{\bf M}}
69: \newcommand{\bp}{{\bf p}}
70: \newcommand{\bq}{{\bf q}}
71: \newcommand{\br}{{\bf r}}
72: \newcommand{\bR}{{\bf R}}
73: \newcommand{\bs}{{\bf s}}
74: \newcommand{\bS}{{\bf S}}
75: \newcommand{\bT}{{\bf T}}
76: \newcommand{\bv}{{\bf v}}
77: \newcommand{\bV}{{\bf V}}
78: \newcommand{\bx}{{\bf x}}
79: \newcommand{\fph}{${\cal F}$}
80: \newcommand{\aph}{${\cal A}$}
81: \newcommand{\dph}{${\cal D}$}
82: \newcommand{\bm}[1]{\mbox{\boldmath $#1$}}
83: \newcommand{\fpi}{f_\pi}
84: \newcommand{\mpi}{m_\pi}
85: \newcommand{\Tr}{{\mbox{\rm Tr}}}
86: \newcommand{\delu}{\partial_{\mu}}
87: \newcommand{\delo}{\partial^{\mu}}
88: \newcommand{\up}{\!\uparrow}
89: \newcommand{\do}{\!\downarrow}
90: \newcommand{\upup}{\uparrow\uparrow}
91: \newcommand{\updo}{\uparrow\downarrow}
92: \newcommand{\uu}{$\uparrow\uparrow$}
93: \newcommand{\ud}{$\uparrow\downarrow$}
94: \newcommand{\auu}{$a^{\uparrow\uparrow}$}
95: \newcommand{\aud}{$a^{\uparrow\downarrow}$}
96: \newcommand{\pu}{p\!\uparrow}
97: %\newcommand{\half}{{1\over 2}}
98: %\newcommand{\quart}{{1\over 4}}
99: \newcommand{\cl}[1]{\begin{center} {#1} \end{center}}
100: \newcommand{\ba}{\begin{array}}
101: \newcommand{\ea}{\end{array}}
102: \newcommand{\bpi}{\mbox{\boldmath $\pi$}}
103: \newcommand{\bphi}{\mbox{\boldmath $\phi$}}
104: \newcommand{\bthet}{\mbox{\boldmath $\theta$}}
105: \newcommand{\bftau}{\mbox{\boldmath $\tau$}}
106: \newcommand{\bfalpha}{\mbox{\boldmath $\alpha$}}
107: \newcommand{\bfgamma}{\mbox{\boldmath $\gamma$}}
108: \newcommand{\bfxi}{\mbox{\boldmath $\xi$}}
109: \newcommand{\bfbeta}{\mbox{\boldmath $\beta$}}
110: \newcommand{\bfeta}{\mbox{\boldmath $\eta$}}
111: \newcommand{\bfpi}{\mbox{\boldmath $\pi$}}
112: \newcommand{\bfphi}{\mbox{\boldmath $\phi$}}
113: \newcommand{\bfrho}{\mbox{\boldmath $\rho$}}
114: \newcommand{\bfR}{\mbox{\boldmath ${\cal R}$}}
115: \newcommand{\bfL}{\mbox{\boldmath ${\cal L}$}}
116: \newcommand{\bfM}{\mbox{\boldmath ${\cal M}$}}
117: \newcommand{\bkappa}{\mbox{\boldmath ${\kappa}$}}
118: \newcommand{\bPhi}{\mbox{\boldmath ${\Phi}$}}
119: \newcommand{\bDelta}{\mbox{\boldmath ${\Delta}$}}
120: \newcommand{\bb}{{\bf b}}
121: \def\lsim{\mathrel{\rlap{\lower4pt\hbox{\hskip1pt$\sim$}}
122: \raise1pt\hbox{$<$}}} %less than or approx. symbol
123: \def\gsim{\mathrel{\rlap{\lower4pt\hbox{\hskip1pt$\sim$}}
124: \raise1pt\hbox{$>$}}} %greater than or approx. symbol
125: \def\dblint{\mathop{\rlap{\hbox{$\displaystyle\!\int\!\!\!\!\!\int$}}
126: \hbox{$\bigcirc$}}}
127: \def\ut#1{$\underline{\smash{\vphantom{y}\hbox{#1}}}$}
128: \def\Pom{{\bf I\!P}}
129: \def\ni{\noindent}
130: \def\jp{$J/\Psi~$}
131: \def\z{$z~$}
132: \def\pt{$p_T^2~$}
133: \def\psip{$\psi^{\prime}~$}
134: \def\cbc{$c \bar{c}$}
135: \def\beq{\begin{equation}}
136: \def\endeq{\end{equation}}
137: \def\arr{\begin{eqnarray}}
138: \def\endarr{\end{eqnarray}}
139:
140: \newcommand{\ttbs}{\char'134}
141: \newcommand{\AmS}{{\protect\the\textfont2
142: A\kern-.1667em\lower.5ex\hbox{M}\kern-.125emS}}
143:
144: % add words to TeX's hyphenation exception list
145: %\hyphenation{author another created financial paper re-commend-ed Post-Script}
146:
147: % declarations for front matter
148: \title{Triple-pomeron dynamics: valence vs. glue}
149:
150:
151: \author{V.R.~Zoller\address {ITEP, Moscow 117218, Russia}}
152:
153:
154:
155: \begin{document}
156:
157: \begin{abstract}
158: Three pomerons are known to couple via the gluon loop and
159: interactions of this kind which are responsible for high-mass diffraction
160: are described in terms of the gluonic structure
161: function of the QCD pomeron. We show that the triple-pomeron coupling
162: via the light quark loop associated with the ``valence'' in the pomeron
163: is of the same strength as the purely gluonic coupling.
164: The large $Q^2$ behavior of this new contribution is described
165: by the DLLA evolution from the non-perturbative $f\bar f$ valence state of
166: the pomeron. Numerical estimates of the high-mass diffraction structure
167: functions based on the consistent account of both couplings
168: are in good agreement with experimental data.
169: \vspace{1pc}
170: \end{abstract}
171:
172: % typeset front matter (including abstract)
173: \maketitle
174:
175:
176: In this communication we discuss
177: the new triple-pomeron
178: {\footnote{for definitions and early analysis see \cite{KTM}}}
179: contribution to the high-mass diffractive
180: deep inelastic scattering (DIS) which
181: comes from excitation of the $(q\bar{q})(f\bar{f})$ Fock states of the photon,
182: \beq
183: \gamma^*+p \to (q\bar{q})(f\bar{f})+p
184: \label{eq:QQFF}
185: \eeq
186: where $q$ and $f$ are the light quarks \cite{NSZZ}.
187: Compared to the purely gluonic triple pomeron interactions which scale is
188: determined by the correlation radius of non-perturbative gluons, $R_c\sim 0.25$
189: fermi \cite{GNZ95DifDIS}, the $f\bar{f}$-pair in the quark loop
190: connectig pomerons has a large non-perturbative size,
191: $r_f \simeq 1/m_f\sim 1$ fermi,
192: and enters the evolution of sea of the pomeron
193: in precisely the same way as the valence quark density
194: enters the evolution of the sea of nucleons.
195: We demonstrate that
196: such a pQCD
197: evolution holds at least to the DLLA accuracy. We show that
198: although the $(q\bar{q})(f\bar{f})$ contribution is of higher order
199: in pQCD coupling $\alpha_S$ it
200: is enhanced by a potentially large numerical factor,
201: $\propto \left[\sigma(r_f)/\sigma(R_c)\right]^2$, where
202: $\sigma(r)\sim r^2$ is the color dipole cross section, and numerically
203: it is comparable to the leading order gluonic triple-pomeron term.
204:
205: The process (\ref{eq:QQFF}) represents the first step of
206: $(\beta,Q^2)$-evolution of the diffractive structure function
207: from the $f\bar f$ ``valence'' quark component of
208: the pomeron. Its space-time picture in the lab. reference frame is as follows.
209: The high-energy photon converts into the colorless $q\bar q$
210: pair at large distances upstream the target.
211: The $q\bar q$ dipole with transverse
212: separation ${\bf r}$ acts like a source of gluons.
213: Emitted gluon has
214: a transverse coordinate $\bfrho$ and the momentum fraction $z_g$
215: which are distributed in accord with the wave
216: function of the $q\bar q g$ state \cite{NZ3P}. This gluon has a virtuality
217: $\kappa^2\simeq -{\bkappa}^2$ and in its turn converts into
218: the pair of quarks $f\bar f$ of size ${\bf R}$.
219: To isolate the leading terms of the 4-parton interaction
220: cross section one has to look into the impact parameter structure
221: of the diffractive
222: $(q\bar q)(f\bar f)$ state. The analysis of ref.\cite{NZ92} shows
223: that the effective
224: size of the quark-anti-quark component of the photon is generally
225: process-dependent. In particular, the proton structure function
226: $F_{2p}(x,Q^2)$ in the scaling limit is dominated by the small-size
227: $(q\bar q)$-fluctuations,
228: $
229: r^2\sim {1/Q^2}.
230: $
231: The case of the diffraction dissociation (DD) of the photon is quite different.
232: The $q\bar q$ fluctuations of the size $1/Q^2$
233: are altogether negligible and the DD structure function
234: is dominated by the $q\bar q$ states
235: of the largest possible
236: size $R\sim 1/m_q\sim 1$ fermi.
237: Thus, there are two different scattering regimes and two very different
238: scales. Both of them are important for
239: the process (\ref{eq:QQFF}) where the two quark pairs, $q\bar q$
240: and $f\bar f$, are in the regimes of inclusive DIS and DD,
241: respectively.
242: As we are interested in the large mass excitations,
243: $M^{2} \propto Q^{2}/z_{g}$, the Sudakov variable for the gluon is
244: $z_g\ll 1$. If so, the small size $q\bar q$-dipole and
245: radiated gluon $g$ are separated from the origin
246: (which is fixed by the projectile photon) by the distances $z_g\rho$ and
247: $(1-z_g)\rho$, respectively. The $f\bar f$-pair produced by the gluon with
248: virtuality $\kappa^2\gsim R_c^{2}$ is in the DD regime and, as such,
249: is very asymmetric. Its Sudakov variable is
250: $
251: \alpha\lsim {m_f^2/\kappa^2}.
252: $
253: Two conclusions can be drawn immediately. First, the size of $f\bar f$-pair
254: is large,
255: $
256: R\sim {1/m_f},
257: $
258: and, second, the $f$-(anti)quark is separated from the origin by the
259: large distance
260: $\sim R(1-{m_f^2/\kappa^2})$,
261: while the other (anti)quark goes along the parent gluon
262: with small separation $\sim R {m_f^2/\kappa^2}$.
263: Hence, the DLLA ordering of sizes \cite{DGLAP}
264: which vary along the partonic ladder from very large
265: $R\sim 1/m_f$ in the bottom ${f\bar f}$-cell
266: of the ladder down to very small $r\sim 1/\sqrt{Q^2}$ in the top, $q\bar q$-
267: cell,
268: \beq
269: r\ll \rho \ll R.
270: \label{eq:DLLA}
271: \eeq
272: As a result the 4-parton system
273: $(q\bar q)(f\bar f)$ acts like a triplet-anti-triplet dipole of size
274: $R\sim 1/m_f\sim 1$ fermi
275: and as such has large interaction cross section
276: $
277: \sigma_{(q\bar q)(f\bar f)}\simeq \sigma(R).
278: $
279: The distribution of $f\bar{f}$ color
280: dipoles in the gluon of transverse momentum $\bkappa$ is
281: identical to that in the photon subject to the substitutions
282: $N_c\alpha_{em} e_f^2\to T_F\alpha_S(\bkappa^2)$ and $Q^2 \to \bkappa^2$,
283: so that the diffractive cross section of interest equals
284: \bea
285: (Q^{2}+M^{2})\left.{d\sigma^{D}((q\bar q)(f\bar f))
286: \over dt dM^{2}}\right|_{t=0}=
287: {1\over 16\pi}
288: \int d^2\bkappa\nonumber\\
289: \times {dg_{q\bar{q}}(Q^2,\bkappa)\over d^2\bkappa}
290: {T_F\alpha_S(\bkappa^2)\over N_c\alpha_{em} e_f^2}
291: \langle f\bar{f}|\sigma^2(x_{\Pom},\bR)|f\bar{f}\rangle\, ,
292: \label{eq:qqff}
293: \eea
294: where the flux of gluons in the parent $q\bar{q}$ state is
295: \bea
296: {dg_{q\bar{q}}(Q^2,\bkappa)\over d^2\bkappa} =
297: \int_0^1 dz_q
298: \int d^2{\bf r}\left|\Psi_{\gamma^*}(Q^2,z_q,{\bf r})\right|^2\nonumber\\
299: \times{2e_q^2C_F\alpha_S(r^2) \over \pi^2}\cdot
300: {\left[1-\exp(i\bkappa{\bf r})\right]\over
301: (\bkappa^2+\mu_G^2)^2}\bkappa^2 .
302: \label{eq:NG}
303: \eea
304: Finally, notice that
305: \bea
306: {\bkappa^2\over 4\pi^2 \alpha_{em}}
307: {1\over 16\pi e_f^2}\langle f\bar{f}|\sigma^2(x_{\Pom},\bR)|f\bar f\rangle\nonumber\\
308: ={\bkappa^2\over 4\pi^2 \alpha_{em}}
309: \left.{d\sigma(\gamma^*(\bkappa^2) \to f\bar{f}) \over dt}\right|_{t=0}
310: \nonumber\\
311: = {1\over e_f^2}
312: \int_{0}^{1} {d\beta \over \beta}
313: f^D_{f\bar{f}}(t=0,x_{\Pom},\beta,\bkappa^2)=
314: N_{f\bar{f}}^{\Pom}(x_{\Pom},\bkappa^2)
315: \label{eq:Nff}
316: \eea
317: where $N_{f\bar{f}}^{\Pom}(x_{\Pom},\bkappa^2)$ can be reinterpreted as a
318: number of charged valence partons, i.e., twice the number of $f\bar{f}$
319: dipoles,
320: in the pomeron. Upon the substitution of (\ref{eq:Nff}) and (\ref{eq:NG})
321: into (\ref{eq:qqff}) one readily recovers the dipole representation
322: \bea
323: (Q^{2}+M^{2})\left.{d\sigma_{q\bar q g}^{D}
324: \over dt dM^{2}}\right|_{t=0} =
325: \langle q\bar{q}|\sigma^{\Pom}(x_{\Pom},\br)|q\bar{q}\rangle\,,
326: \label{eq:DSDT2}
327: \eea
328: in which $\sigma^{\Pom}(x_{\Pom},\br)$ is evaluated
329: for the
330: unintegrated gluon structure function evolved from the $f\bar{f}$ state of the
331: pomeron
332: $
333: {\cal F}_{f\bar{f}}^{\Pom}(\beta,\bkappa^2)= (C_F \alpha_S/\pi)
334: N_{f\bar{f}}^{\Pom}(x_{\Pom},\bkappa^2).
335: $
336: Furthermore,
337: $N_{f\bar{f}}^{\Pom}(x_{\Pom},\bkappa^2)$ vanishes at $\bkappa^2 =0$ and,
338: according to \cite{NZ92},
339: flattens at $\bkappa^2 \gg m_f^2$.
340: The DLLA analysis of $q\bar{q}g_1...g_n$ excitation developed in \cite{NZ3P}
341: can readily be extended to the higher, $(q\bar{q})g_1..g_n(f\bar{f})$, states.
342: \begin{figure}[h]
343: \vspace{-0.9cm}
344: \hspace{-0.5cm}
345: \psfig{figure=f3dfig.ps,angle=-90,scale=0.33}
346: \vspace{-1.0cm}
347: \hspace{-0.5cm}
348: \caption{The comparison with the experimental data
349: on small-$\beta$, small-$x_{\Pom}$ diffractive structure function
350: (\protect\cite{H1}, full circles;
351: \protect\cite{ZEUS}, full triangle)
352: of the theoretical evaluation of
353: $f^{D(3)}=f_{q\bar qg}^{D(3)}+f_{(q\bar q)(f\bar f)}^{D(3)}$
354: shown by the solid line.
355: The dotted line corresponds to $f^{D(3)}_{q\bar qg}$ and the dashed line
356: represents $f_{(q\bar q)(f\bar f)}^{D(3)}$.}
357: \label{fig:F3D}
358: \end{figure}
359: The numerical results for high-mass, small-$\beta$,
360: diffraction depend on the input dipole cross section $\sigma(x,\br)$.
361: Here we evaluate the lowest order $q\bar{q}g$ \cite{GNZ95DifDIS} and
362: $(q\bar{q})(f\bar{f})$ \cite{NSZZ}
363: contributions to diffractive DIS
364: \bea
365: f^{D(4)}(t=0,x_{\Pom},\beta,Q^2)= {Q^2\over 4\pi^2\alpha_{em}}\nonumber\\
366: \times(Q^{2}+M^{2})\left.{d\sigma^{D}
367: \over dt dM^{2}}\right|_{t=0}
368: \label{eq:1.9}
369: \eea
370: in a specific color
371: dipole BFKL model \cite{CDBFKL} which gives a good description
372: of the proton structure function data. The applicability domain of
373: the small-$\beta$, small-$x_{\Pom}$ formalism is $\beta,x_{\Pom} < x_0 \ll 1$,
374: the experience with inclusive DIS suggests $x_{0}\sim 0.03$, although
375: the theoretical curves in fig.~1 are stretched up to $x_{\Pom}=0.1$.
376: This small-$\beta$, small-$x_{\Pom}$
377: domain is almost at the boundary of the HERA experiments, the
378: corresponding experimental data on the $t$-integrated diffractive structure
379: function
380: $f^{D(3)}(x_{\Pom},\beta,Q^2)$ from H1 (\cite{H1}, circles) and ZEUS
381: (\cite{ZEUS}, triangles)
382: are shown in fig.~1. We evaluate this structure function as
383: $f^{D(3)}(x_{\Pom},\beta,Q^2) = \int dt f^{D(4)}(t,x_{\Pom},\beta,Q^2) \approx
384: {1\over B_{3\Pom}} f^{D(4)}(t=0,x_{\Pom},\beta,Q^2)$ with the central value of
385: the diffraction slope $B_{\Pom} =
386: B_D=7.2\pm 1.1^{+0.7}_{-0.9}$ GeV$^{-2}$ as reported by ZEUS
387: \cite{BD}. The apparent growth of the experimentally observed
388: $f^{D(3)}(x_{\Pom},\beta,Q^2)$ towards large $x_{\Pom}\sim 0.1$ is usually
389: attributed to the non-vacuum admixture to the pomeron exchange.
390: Two features of the theoretical results for small-$\beta$
391: diffraction are noteworthy. First, the contributions from $q\bar{q}g$ and
392: higher-order $(q\bar{q})(f\bar{f})$ states are of comparable magnitude
393: because $R_c \ll r_f$ and the latter is enhanced
394: $\propto [\sigma(x_{\Pom},r_f)/\sigma(x_{\Pom},R_c)]^2$.
395: Second, because of the same inequality of the important dipole sizes,
396: $R_c \ll r_f$,
397: the $x_{\Pom}$-dependence of the $q\bar{q}g$ excitation is steeper
398: than that of the $(q\bar{q})(f\bar{f})$ excitation,
399: the numerically significant contribution
400: from the $(q\bar{q})(f\bar{f})$ excitation makes the overall
401: $x_{\Pom}$-dependence of $f^{D(3)}(x_{\Pom},\beta,Q^2)$ weaker than evaluated
402: in for the pure $q\bar{q}g$ excitation. The solid curve
403: in fig.~1 is the combined contribution from the two mechanisms. It is
404: in reasonable agreement with the HERA data.
405:
406:
407:
408: It is a pleasure to thank Roberto Fiore for his kind invitation and
409: warm hospitality at the Diffraction 2004.
410: This work has been partly supported by the INTAS grant 00-00366 and
411: the DFG grant 436RUS17/101/04.
412:
413:
414:
415: \begin{thebibliography}{9}
416: \bibitem{KTM} K.A. Ter-Martirosyan, { Phys. Lett.} B44 (1973) 179;
417: A.B.Kaidalov and K.A.Ter-Martirosyan, { Nucl. Phys.}
418: B75 (1974) 471; G.~Ingelman and P.~E.~Schlein,
419: Phys. Lett. B152 (1985) 256.
420: \bibitem{NSZZ} N.N. Nikolaev, W. Schaefer, B.G. Zakharov and V.R. Zoller,
421: JETP Letter 80 (2004) 423, hep-ph/0408113
422: \bibitem{GNZ95DifDIS}M. Genovese, N.N. Nikolaev, B.G. Zakharov
423: J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 81 (1995) 633.
424: \bibitem{NZ3P}N.N.~Nikolaev and B.G.~Zakharov,
425: J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 78 (1994) 598
426: Z. Phys. C64 (1994) 631.
427: \bibitem{NZ92}N.N.~Nikolaev and B.G.~Zakharov,
428: Z. Phys. C53 (1992) 331.
429: \bibitem{DGLAP}
430: V.~N.~Gribov and L.~N.~Lipatov,
431: Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 15 (1972) 438; Y.~L.~Dokshitzer,
432: Sov. Phys. JETP 46 (1977) 641;
433: G.~Altarelli and G.~Parisi,
434: Nucl. Phys. B126 298 (1977).
435: \bibitem{H1}H1 Collab.,
436: {\it Measurements of the Diffractive Structure Function
437: $F_2^{D(3)}$ at HERA}, submitted to XX Int. Symp. on Lepton and Photon
438: Interactions, July 23, 2001, Rome;
439: Z. Phys. C76 (1997) 613.
440: \bibitem{ZEUS}ZEUS Collab., J. Breitweg et al., Eur. Phys. J. C6 (1999) 43.
441: \bibitem{CDBFKL}N.N. Nikolaev, B.G. Zakharov and V.R. Zoller,
442: JETP Lett. 66 (1997) 138;
443: N.N.Nikolaev, J. Speth and V.R.Zoller,
444: Phys. Lett. B473 (2000) 157;
445: J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 93 (2001) 957;
446: V.R. Zoller, Phys. Lett. B509 (2001) 69.
447: \bibitem{BD}ZEUS Collab., Eur. Phys. J. C1 (1998) 81.
448:
449: \end{thebibliography}
450:
451:
452: \end{document}
453: