1: \documentclass[twocolumn,superscriptaddress,showpacs,prl]{revtex4}
2: \usepackage{graphicx,epsfig,psfrag}
3:
4: \newcommand{\be}{\begin{equation}}
5: \newcommand{\ee}{\end{equation}}
6: \newcommand{\bea}{\begin{eqnarray}}
7: \newcommand{\eea}{\end{eqnarray}}
8: \newcommand{\al}{\alpha}
9: \newcommand{\bt}{\beta}
10: \newcommand{\lm}{\lambda}
11: \newcommand{\gm}{\gamma}
12: \newcommand{\Gm}{\Gamma}
13: \newcommand{\dl}{\delta}
14: \newcommand{\Dl}{\Delta}
15: \newcommand{\ep}{\epsilon}
16: \newcommand{\vep}{\varepsilon}
17: \newcommand{\kp}{\kappa}
18: \newcommand{\Lm}{\Lambda}
19: \newcommand{\om}{\omega}
20: \newcommand{\pa}{\partial}
21: \newcommand{\nn}{\nonumber}
22: \newcommand{\grtsim}{\mbox{\raisebox{-3pt}{$\stackrel{>}{\sim}$}}}
23: \newcommand{\lessim}{\mbox{\raisebox{-3pt}{$\stackrel{<}{\sim}$}}}
24:
25:
26:
27: \begin{document}
28:
29: %\noindent
30: %TTP05-02
31: %\hfill
32: \title{
33: \boldmath
34: Two-Loop Corrections to Bhabha Scattering
35: \unboldmath}
36: \author{Alexander A. Penin}
37: \affiliation{Institut f\"ur Theoretische Teilchenphysik,
38: Universit\"at Karlsruhe, 76128 Karlsruhe, Germany}
39: \affiliation{Institute for Nuclear Research,
40: Russian Academy of Sciences, 117312 Moscow, Russia}
41:
42: %\date{}
43:
44: \begin{abstract}
45: The two-loop radiative photonic corrections to Bhabha scattering are
46: computed in the leading order of the small electron mass expansion up
47: to the nonlogarithmic term. After including the soft photon
48: bremsstrahlung we obtain the infrared-finite result for the
49: differential cross section, which can directly be applied to a precise
50: luminosity determination of the present and future $e^+e^-$ colliders.
51: \end{abstract}
52: \pacs{11.15.Bt, 12.20.Ds}
53:
54: \maketitle
55:
56: Electron-positron {\it Bhabha} scattering plays a special role in
57: particle phenomenology. It is crucial for extracting physics from
58: experiments at electron-positron colliders since it provides a very
59: efficient tool for luminosity determination. The small angle Bhabha
60: scattering has been particularly effective as a luminosity monitor in
61: the LEP and SLC energy range because its cross section is large and QED
62: dominated \cite{Jad}. At a future International Linear Collider the
63: luminosity spectrum is not monochromatic due to beam-beam effects.
64: Therefore measuring the cross section of the small angle Bhabha
65: scattering alone is not sufficient, and the angular distribution of the
66: large angle Bhabha scattering has been suggested for disentangling the
67: luminosity spectrum \cite{Too}. The large angle Bhabha scattering is
68: important also at colliders operating at a center of mass energy
69: $\sqrt{s}$ of a few GeV, such as BABAR, BELLE, BEPC/BES, DA$\Phi$NE,
70: KEKB, PEP-II, and VEPP-2M, where it is used to measure the integrated
71: luminosity \cite{Car}. Since the accuracy of the theoretical evaluation
72: of the Bhabha cross section directly affects the luminosity
73: determination, remarkable efforts have been devoted to the study of the
74: radiative corrections to this process (see \cite{Jad} for an extensive
75: list of references). Pure QED contributions are particularly important
76: because they dominate the radiative corrections to the large angle
77: scattering at intermediate energies 1-10~GeV and to the small angle
78: scattering also at higher energies. The calculation of the QED
79: radiative corrections to the Bhabha cross section is among the classical
80: problems of perturbative quantum field theory with a long history. The
81: first order corrections are well known (see \cite{Boh} and references
82: therein). To match the impressive experimental accuracy the complete
83: second order QED effects have to be included on the theoretical side.
84: The evaluation of the two-loop virtual corrections constitutes the main
85: problem of the second order analysis. The complete two-loop virtual
86: corrections to the scattering amplitudes in the massless electron
87: approximation have been computed in Ref.~\cite{BDG}, where dimensional
88: regularization has been used for infrared divergences. However, this
89: approximation is not sufficient since one has to keep a nonvanishing
90: electron mass to make the result compatible with available Monte Carlo
91: event generators \cite{Jad}. Recently an important class of the
92: two-loop corrections, which include at least one closed fermion loop,
93: has been obtained for a finite electron mass \cite{BFMR} including the
94: soft photon bremsstrahlung \cite{Bon}. A similar evaluation of the
95: purely photonic two-loop corrections is a challenging problem at the
96: limit of present computational techniques \cite{HeiSmi}. On the other
97: hand in the energy range under consideration only the leading
98: contribution in the small ratio $m_e^2/s$ is of phenomenological
99: relevance and should be retained in the theoretical estimates. In this
100: approximation all the two-loop corrections enhanced by a power of the
101: large logarithm $\ln(m_e^2/s)$ are known so far for the small angle
102: \cite{Arb} and large angle \cite{AKS,GTB} Bhabha scattering while the
103: nonlogarithmic contribution is still missing.
104:
105: In this Letter we complete the calculation of the two-loop radiative
106: corrections in the leading order of the small electron mass expansion.
107: For this purpose we develop the method of {\it infrared
108: subtractions}, which simplifies the calculation by fully exploiting
109: the information on the general structure of infrared singularities in
110: QED.
111:
112: The leading asymptotics of the virtual corrections cannot be obtained
113: simply by putting $m_e=0$ because the electron mass regulates the
114: collinear divergences. In addition the virtual corrections are a subject
115: of soft divergences, which can be regulated by giving the photon a small
116: auxiliary mass $\lm$. The soft divergences are canceled out in the
117: inclusive cross section when one adds the contribution of the soft
118: photon bremsstrahlung \cite{KLN}. Here we should note that the
119: collinear divergences in the massless approximation are also canceled in
120: a cross section which is inclusive with respect to real photons
121: collinear to the initial or final state fermions \cite{SteWei}. This
122: means that if an angular cut on the collinear emission is sufficiently
123: large, $\theta_{cut}\gg \sqrt{m_e^2/s}$, the inclusive cross section is
124: insensitive to the electron mass and can in principle be computed with
125: $m_e=0$ by using dimensional regularization of the infrared divergences
126: for both virtual and real radiative corrections like it is done in the
127: theory of QCD jets. However, as it has been mentioned above, all the
128: available Monte Carlo event generators for Bhabha scattering with
129: specific cuts on the photon bremsstrahlung dictated by the experimental
130: setup employ a nonzero electron mass as an infrared regulator, which
131: therefore has to be used also in the calculation of the virtual
132: corrections. Thus we have to compute the two-loop virtual corrections to
133: the four-fermion amplitude ${\cal A}^{(2)}(m_e,\lm)$. The general
134: problem of the calculation of the small mass asymptotics of the
135: corrections including the power-suppressed terms can systematically be
136: solved within the expansion by regions approach \cite{Smi}. To get the
137: leading term in $m_e^2/s$ we develop the method applied first in
138: Ref.~\cite{FKPS} to the analysis of the two-loop corrections to the
139: fermion form factor in an Abelian gauge model with mass gap, which is
140: briefly outlined below. The main idea is to construct an auxiliary
141: amplitude $\tilde{\cal A}^{(2)}(m_e,\lm)$, which has the same structure
142: of the infrared singularities but is simpler to evaluate. Then the
143: difference ${\cal A}^{(2)}-\tilde {\cal A}^{(2)}$ has a finite limit
144: $\delta{\cal A}^{(2)}$ as $m_e,~\lm\to 0$. This quantity does not depend
145: on the regularization scheme for ${\cal A}^{(2)}$ and $\tilde{\cal
146: A}^{(2)}$ and can be evaluated in dimensional regularization in the
147: limit of four space-time dimensions. In this way we obtain ${\cal
148: A}^{(2)}(m_e,\lm)= \tilde {\cal A}^{(2)}(m_e,\lm)+\delta{\cal
149: A}^{(2)}+{\cal O}(m_e,\lm)$. The singular dependence of the virtual
150: corrections on infrared regulators obeys evolution equations, which
151: imply factorization of the infrared singularities \cite{Mue}. One can
152: use this property to construct the auxiliary amplitude $\tilde{\cal
153: A}^{(2)}(m_e,\lm)$. For example, the collinear divergences are known
154: to factorize into the external line corrections \cite{Fre}. This means
155: that the singular dependence of the corrections to the four-fermion
156: amplitude on $m_e$ is the same as of the corrections to (the square of)
157: the electromagnetic fermion form factor. The remaining singular
158: dependence of the amplitude on $\lm$ satisfies a linear differential
159: equation \cite{Mue} and the corresponding soft divergences exponentiate.
160: A careful analysis shows that for pure photonic corrections $\tilde{\cal
161: A}^{(2)}(m_e,\lm)$ can be constructed of the two-loop corrections to
162: the form factor and the products of the one-loop contributions. Note
163: that the corrections have matrix structure in the chiral amplitude basis
164: \cite{KMPS}. We have checked that in dimensional regularization the
165: structure of the infrared divergences of the auxiliary amplitude
166: obtained in this way agrees with the one given in Refs.~\cite{BDG,Cat}.
167: Thus in our method the infrared divergences, which induce the asymptotic
168: dependence of the virtual corrections on the electron and photon masses,
169: are absorbed into the auxiliary factorized amplitude while the
170: technically most nontrivial calculation of the matching term
171: $\delta{\cal A}^{(2)}$ is performed in the massless approximation. Note
172: that the method does not require a loop-by-loop subtracting of the
173: infrared divergences since only a general information on the infrared
174: structure of the total two-loop correction is necessary to construct
175: $\tilde{\cal A}^{(2)}(m_e,\lm)$. Clearly, the method can be adopted to
176: different amplitudes, mass spectra and number of loops. For the
177: calculation of the matching term $\delta{\cal A}^{(2)}$ beside the
178: one-loop result one needs the two-loop corrections to the four-fermion
179: amplitude and to the form factor in massless approximation, which are
180: available \cite{BDG,KraLam}. For the calculation of $\tilde{\cal
181: A}^{(2)}(m_e,\lm)$ one needs also the two-loop correction to the form
182: factor for $\lm\ll m_e\ll s$ which can be found in Ref.~\cite{MasRem} as
183: a specific limit of the result for an arbitrary momentum transfer. We
184: independently cross-checked it by integrating the dispersion relation
185: with the spectral density computed in Ref.~\cite{BMR}. The closed
186: fermion loop contribution, which is included into the analysis
187: \cite{MasRem,BMR}, can be separated by using the result of
188: Ref.~\cite{Bur}. Let us now present our result. We define the
189: perturbative expansion for the Bhabha cross section in the fine
190: structure constant $\al$ as follows:
191: $\sigma=\sum_{n=0}^\infty\left({\al\over\pi}\right)^n\sigma^{(n)}$. The
192: leading order differential cross section reads
193: \be
194: {{\rm d}\sigma^{(0)}\over{\rm d}\Omega}
195: ={\al^2\over s}\left({1-x+x^2\over x}\right)^2\,,
196: \label{losig}
197: \ee
198: where $x=(1-\cos\theta)/2$ and $\theta$ is the scattering angle.
199: Virtual corrections taken separately are infrared divergent. To get a
200: finite scheme independent result we include the contribution of the soft
201: photon bremsstrahlung into the cross section. Thus the second order
202: corrections can be represented as a sum of three terms
203: $\sigma^{(2)}=\sigma^{(2)}_{vv}+\sigma^{(2)}_{sv}+\sigma^{(2)}_{ss}$,
204: which correspond to the two-loop virtual correction including the
205: interference of the one-loop corrections to the amplitude, one-loop
206: virtual correction to the single soft photon emission, and the double
207: soft photon emission, respectively. When the soft photon energy cut is
208: much less than $m_e$, the result for the two last terms in the above
209: equation is known in analytical form and can be found {\it e.g.} in
210: Ref.~\cite{AKS}. The second order correction can be decomposed
211: according to the asymptotic dependence on the electron mass
212: \be
213: {{\rm d}\sigma^{(2)}\over{\rm d}\sigma^{(0)}}=
214: \delta^{(2)}_{2}\ln^2\left({s\over m_e^2}\right)
215: +\delta^{(2)}_{1}\ln\left({s\over m_e^2}\right)
216: +\delta^{(2)}_{0}+{\cal O}(m_e^2/s)\,,
217: \label{decom}
218: \ee
219: where the coefficients $\delta_i^{(j)}$ are independent on $m_e$. The
220: result for the logarithmically enhanced corrections is known (see
221: \cite{AKS} and references therein). For the nonlogarithmic term we
222: obtain
223: \begin{widetext}
224: \bea
225: \lefteqn{\delta^{(2)}_{0}=
226: 8{\cal L}_{\vep}^2
227: +\left({1-x+x^2}\right)^{-2}\bigg[\left({4\over 3}
228: -{8\over 3}x-x^2+{10\over 3}x^3-{8\over 3}x^4\right)\pi^2
229: +\left(-12+16x-18x^2+6x^3\right)\ln(x)
230: \nn }\\
231: &&
232: +\left(2x+2x^3\right)\ln(1-x)+\left(-3x+x^2+3x^3-4x^4\right)
233: \ln^2(x)+\left(-8+16x-14x^2+4x^3\right)\ln(x)\ln(1-x)
234: \nn \\
235: &&
236: +\left(4-10x+14x^2-10x^3+4x^4\right)\ln^2(1-x)
237: +\left({1-x+x^2}\right)^2(16+8{\rm Li_2}(x)-8{\rm Li_2}(1-x))
238: \bigg]{\cal L}_{\vep}+\left({1-x+x^2}\right)^{-2}
239: \nn \\
240: &&
241: \times\Bigg(\!\left(1 - x + x^2\right)^2\left(8+4f_0^{(2)}-2{f_0^{(1)}}^2\right)
242: +\left({4\over 3}-{23\over 24}x-{25\over 8}x^2+{121\over 24}x^3
243: -{19\over 6}x^4\right)\pi^2+\left({1\over 18} - {203\over 360}x +
244: {25\over 36}x^2-{41\over 180}x^3\right.
245: \nn \\
246: &&
247: \left. +
248: {109\over 1440}x^4\right)\pi^4
249: +\left({7\over 2}x-7x^2+4x^3\right)\zeta(3)
250: +\left[-{93\over 8}+{231\over 16}x-{279\over 16}x^2+{93\over 16}x^3
251: \right.+\left(-{3\over 2}+{13\over 4}x-{7\over 12}x^2
252: -{11\over 8}x^3\right)\pi^2
253: \nn \\
254: &&
255: +\left(12-12x+8x^2-x^3\right)\zeta(3)\bigg]\ln(x)
256: +\left[{9\over 2}-{43\over 8}x+{17\over 8}x^2
257: +{29\over 8}x^3-{9\over 2}x^4+\left({x\over 4}+{x^2\over 2}+{5\over 24}x^3
258: +{19\over 48}x^4\right)
259: \pi^2\right]\ln^2(x)
260: \nn \\
261: &&
262: +\left({67\over 24}x-{5\over 4}x^2-{2\over 3}x^3\right)\ln^3(x)
263: +\left({7\over 48}x+{5\over 96}x^2-{x^3\over 12}
264: +{43\over 96}x^4\right)\ln^4(x)+\bigg\{3x+3x^3+\left({7\over 6}x-{73\over 24}x^2
265: +{15\over 8}x^3\right)\pi^2
266: \nn \\
267: &&
268: +\left(-6+6x-x^2-4x^3\right)\zeta(3)
269: +\left[-8+{21\over 2}x-{45\over 4}x^2+x^4
270: +\left(1-{x\over 6}+{x^2\over 12}
271: -{x^3\over 3}
272: -{x^4\over 8}\right)\pi^2\right]\ln(x)+\bigg(6-11x
273: \nn \\
274: &&
275: \left.+{35\over 4}x^2-{15\over 8}x^3\right)\ln^2(x)
276: +\left({2\over 3}+{x\over 12}-{x^3\over 3}
277: +{5\over 24}x^4\right)\ln^3(x)\bigg\}\ln(1-x)
278: +\bigg[{7\over 2}-6x+{45\over 4}x^2-6x^3+{7\over 2}x^4
279: +\left(-{17\over 24}\right.
280: \nn \\
281: &&
282: \left.+{7\over 6}x-{25\over 24}x^2
283: -{13\over 48}x^4\right)\pi^2
284: +\left(-3+{23\over 4}x-{23\over 4}x^2
285: +{9\over 8}x^3\right)\ln(x)
286: +\left({7\over 2}-{41\over 8}x+{31\over 8}x^2+{3\over 8}x^3
287: -{13\over 16}x^4\right)\ln^2(x)\bigg]
288: \nn \\
289: &&
290: \times\ln^2(1-x)+\left[{3\over 8}x+{1\over 6}x^2+{3\over 8}x^3
291: +\left(-4+{29\over 6}x-{49\over 12}x^2+{5\over 6}x^3
292: +{7\over 8}x^4\right)\ln(x)\right]\ln^3(1-x)
293: +\left({1\over 32}-{3\over 4}x+{71\over 48}x^2\right.
294: \nn \\
295: &&
296: \left.
297: -{29\over 24}x^3+{9\over 32}x^4\right)
298: \ln^4\left(1-x\right)
299: +\bigg\{8-16x+24x^2-16x^3+8x^4
300: +\left({7\over 3}-3x+{3\over 4}x^2
301: +{5\over 6}x^3-{2\over 3}x^4\right)\pi^2
302: +\left[-6+{11\over 2}x\right.
303: \nn \\
304: &&
305: \left.-4x^2+x^3+\left(2
306: -{11\over 4}x+{7\over 4}x^2
307: +{x^3\over 4}-x^4\right)\ln(x)\right]\ln(x)
308: +\left[{3\over 2}x-{x^2\over 4}+x^3
309: +\bigg(-4+9x-{15\over 2}x^2+2x^3\right)\ln(x)
310: \nn \\
311: &&
312: +\left(-1-{7\over 2}x+{25 \over 4}x^2
313: -5x^3+2x^4\right)\ln(1-x)\bigg]\ln(1-x)
314: +\left(2-4x+6x^2-4x^3+2x^4\right){\rm Li}_2(x)\bigg\}{\rm Li}_2\left(x\right)
315: +\bigg\{-8
316: \nn \\
317: &&
318: +16x-24x^2+16x^3-8x^4
319: +\left[-{2\over 3}+{4\over 3}x+{x^2\over 2}-{5\over 3}x^3
320: +{2\over 3}x^4\right]\pi^2
321: +\bigg[6-8x+9x^2-3x^3+\left({3\over 2}x-{x^2\over 2}
322: -{3\over 2}x^3\right.
323: \nn \\
324: &&
325: \left.
326: +2x^4\bigg)\ln(x)\right]\ln(x)
327: +\left[-x-{x^2\over 4}-{x^3\over 2}+\left(10-14x+9x^2\right)\ln(x)
328: +\left(-8+11x-{31\over 4}x^2+{x^3\over 2}
329: +x^4\right)\ln(1-x)\right]
330: \nn \\
331: &&
332: \times\ln(1-x)
333: +\left(-4+8x-12x^2+8x^3
334: -4x^4\right){\rm Li}_2(x)
335: +\left(2-4x+6x^2-4x^3+2x^4\right){\rm Li}_2(1-x)\bigg\}
336: {\rm Li}_2\left(1-x\right)+
337: \left[{5\over 2}x\right.
338: \nn \\
339: &&
340: \left.-5x^2+2x^3+\left(-4-x+x^2+2x^3
341: -2x^4\right)\ln(x)+\left(6-6x+x^2+4x^3\right)\ln(1-x)\right]
342: {\rm Li}_3\left(x\right)+\left[{x\over 2}-{x^3\over 2}
343: +\big(-6+5x\right.
344: \nn \\
345: &&
346: \left.\left.+3x^2-5x^3\right)\ln(x)
347: +\left(6-10x+10x^3
348: -6x^4\right)\ln(1-x)\right]
349: {\rm Li}_3\left(1-x\right)
350: +\left(-2+{17\over 2}x-{17\over 2}x^3
351: +2x^4\right){\rm Li}_4\left(x\right)
352: \nn\\
353: &&
354: +\left(7x-{9\over 2}x^2-4x^3+6x^4\right){\rm Li}_4\left(1-x\right)
355: +\left(-6+4x+{9\over 2}x^2-7x^3\right){\rm Li}_4\left(-{x\over 1-x}\right)
356: \Bigg)\,,
357: \label{result}
358: \eea
359: \end{widetext}
360: where $\zeta(3)=1.202057\ldots$ is the value of the Riemann's
361: zeta-function, ${\rm Li}_n(z)$ is the polylogarithm,
362: ${\cal L}_{\vep}=\left[1-\ln\left(x/(1-x)\right)\right]
363: \ln\left(\vep_{cut}/\vep\right)$, $\vep=\sqrt{s}/2$,
364: and $\vep_{cut}$ is the energy cut on each emitted soft photon. In
365: Eq.(\ref{result}) $f_0^{(n)}$ stands for the $n$-loop nonlogarithmic
366: coefficient in the series for the form factor at Euclidean momentum
367: transfer
368: \bea
369: f_0^{(1)}&=&\pi^2/12-1\,,
370: \nn\\
371: f_0^{(2)}&=&{15\over 8}+{43\over 96}\pi^2-{59\over 1440}\pi^4
372: -{\pi^2\ln 2\over 2} - {9\over 4}\zeta(3)\,.
373: \label{formf}
374: \eea
375: As it follows from the generalized eikonal representation \cite{Fad},
376: in the limit of small scattering angles the two-loop corrections to
377: the cross section are completely determined by the corrections to the
378: electron and positron form factors in the $t$-channel amplitude. In
379: the limit $x\to 0$ Eq.~(\ref{result}) agrees with the
380: asymptotic small angle expression given in \cite{Arb,Fad}, which is
381: a quite nontrivial check of our result. Note that
382: Eq.~(\ref{result}) is not valid for very small scattering angles
383: corresponding to $x\lessim m_e^2/s$ and for almost backward scattering
384: corresponding to $1-x\lessim m_e^2/s$, where the power-suppressed terms
385: become important.
386:
387: \begin{figure}[t]
388: \epsfig{figure=bh1.eps,height=5cm}
389: \caption{\label{fig1}
390: Logarithmically enhanced (dashed line) and nonlogarithmic (solid line)
391: second order corrections to the differential cross section of the
392: small angle Bhabha scattering as functions of the scattering angle for
393: $\sqrt{s}=100$~GeV and $\ln(\vep_{cut}/\vep)=0$, in units of
394: $10^{-3}$. }
395: \end{figure}
396:
397:
398: The second order corrections to the differential cross section
399: $(\al/\pi)^2{\rm d}\sigma^{(2)}/{\rm d}\sigma^{(0)}$ are plotted as
400: functions of the scattering angle for the small angle Bhabha scattering
401: at $\sqrt{s}=100$~GeV on Fig.~(\ref{fig1}) and for the large angle Bhabha
402: scattering at $\sqrt{s}=1$~GeV on Fig.~(\ref{fig2}). We separate the
403: logarithmically enhanced corrections given by the first two terms of
404: Eq.~(\ref{decom}) and nonlogarithmic contribution given by the last term
405: of this equation. All the terms involving a power of the logarithm
406: $\ln(\vep_{cut}/\vep)$ are excluded from the numerical estimates because
407: the corresponding contribution critically depends on the event selection
408: algorithm and cannot be unambiguously estimated without imposing
409: specific cuts on the photon bremsstrahlung. We observe that for
410: scattering angles $\theta \lessim 18^o$ and $\theta \grtsim 166^o$ the
411: nonlogarithmic contribution exceeds $0.05\%$, and in the low energy
412: case exceeds the logarithmically enhanced contribution for $\theta
413: \lessim 8^o$.
414:
415: To conclude, we have derived the two-loop radiative photonic corrections
416: to Bhabha scattering in the leading order of the small electron mass
417: expansion up to nonlogarithmic term. The nonlogarithmic contribution
418: has been found numerically important for the practically interesting
419: range of scattering angles. Together with the result of
420: Refs.~\cite{BFMR,Bon} for the corrections with the closed fermion loop
421: insertions our result gives a complete expression for the two-loop
422: virtual corrections. It should be incorporated into the Monte
423: Carlo event generators to reduce the theoretical error in the luminosity
424: determination at present and future electron-positron colliders below
425: $0.1\%$.
426:
427:
428:
429: \begin{figure}[t]
430: \epsfig{figure=bh2.eps,height=5cm}
431: \caption{\label{fig2}
432: The same as Fig.~(\ref{fig1}) but for the large angle Bhabha
433: scattering and $\sqrt{s}=1$~GeV. }
434: \end{figure}
435:
436:
437: \begin{acknowledgments}
438: We would like to thank V.A. Smirnov for his help in the evaluation of
439: Eq.(\ref{formf}) and O.L. Veretin for pointing out that the method of
440: Ref.~\cite{FKPS} can be applied to the analysis of Bhabha scattering.
441: We are grateful to R. Bonciani and A. Ferroglia \cite{BonFer} for cross-checking a
442: large part of the result. We thank J.H. K\"uhn and M. Steinhauser for
443: carefully reading the manuscript and useful comments. The work was
444: supported in part by BMBF Grant No.\ 05HT4VKA/3 and
445: Sonderforschungsbereich Transregio 9.
446: \end{acknowledgments}
447:
448:
449:
450: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
451:
452: \bibitem{Jad} S. Jadach {\it et
453: al.} in G. Altarelli, T. Sj\"ostrand and F. Zwirner (eds.),
454: {\it Physics at LEP2}, CERN-96-01, hep-ph/9602393;
455: G. Montagna, O. Nicrosini, and F. Piccinini,
456: Riv.\ Nuovo\ Cim.\ {\bf 21N9}, 1 (1998).
457:
458: \bibitem{Too} N. Toomi, J. Fujimoto, S. Kawabata, Y. Kurihara, and
459: T. Watanabe, Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 429}, 162 (1998);
460: R.D. Heuer, D. Miller, F.Richard, and P.M. Zerwas,
461: (eds.), {\it TESLA Technical design report.
462: Pt. 3: Physics at an $e^+e^-$ linear collider},
463: DESY-01-011C.
464:
465: \bibitem{Car} C. M. Carloni Calame, C. Lunardini, G. Montagna,
466: O. Nicrosini, and F. Piccinini,
467: Nucl.\ Phys.\ {\bf B584}, 459 (2000).
468:
469: \bibitem{Boh} M. Bohm, A. Denner, and W. Hollik,
470: Nucl.\ Phys.\ {\bf B304}, 687 (1988).
471:
472: \bibitem{BDG} Z. Bern, L. Dixon, and A. Ghinculov, Phys.\ Rev.\
473: D {\bf 63}, 053007 (2001).
474:
475: \bibitem{BFMR} R. Bonciani, A. Ferroglia, P. Mastrolia, and E. Remiddi,
476: Nucl.\ Phys.\ {\bf B701}, 121 (2004).
477:
478: \bibitem{Bon} R. Bonciani, A. Ferroglia, P. Mastrolia, E. Remiddi,
479: and J.J. van der Bij, Nucl.\ Phys.\ {\bf B716}, 280 (2005).
480:
481: \bibitem{HeiSmi} V.A. Smirnov, Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 524}, 129 (2002);
482: Nucl.\ Phys.\ Proc.\ Suppl.\ {\bf 135}, 252 (2004);
483: G. Heinrich and V.A. Smirnov,
484: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 598}, 55 (2004);
485: M. Czakon, J. Gluza, and T. Riemann,
486: Nucl.\ Phys.\ Proc.\ Suppl.\ {\bf 135}, 83 (2004);
487: Report No. DESY 04-222 and hep-ph/0412164.
488:
489: \bibitem{Arb} A.B. Arbuzov, V.S. Fadin, E.A. Kuraev, L.N. Lipatov,
490: N.P. Merenkov, and L. Trentadue,
491: Nucl.\ Phys.\ {\bf B485}, 457 (1997).
492:
493: \bibitem{AKS} A.B. Arbuzov, E.A. Kuraev, and B.G. Shaikhatdenov,
494: Mod.\ Phys.\ Lett.\ A {13}, 2305 (1998)
495:
496: \bibitem{GTB} E.W. Glover, J.B. Tausk, and J.J. van der Bij,
497: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 516}, 33 (2001).
498:
499: \bibitem{KLN} T. Kinoshita, J.\ Math.\ Phys.\ {\bf 3}, 650, (1962);
500: T.D. Lee and M. Nauenberg,
501: Phys.\ Rev.\ B {\bf 133}, 1549 (1964).
502:
503: \bibitem{SteWei} G. Sterman and S. Weinberg,
504: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 39}, 1436 (1977)
505:
506: \bibitem{Smi} V.A. Smirnov, {\it Applied Asymptotic Expansions in Momenta and Masses}
507: (Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 2001).
508:
509: \bibitem{FKPS} B. Feucht, J.H. K\"uhn, A.A. Penin, and V.A. Smirnov,
510: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 93}, 101802 (2004).
511:
512: \bibitem{Mue} D.R. Yennie, S.C. Frautschi, and H. Suura, Ann. Phys.
513: {\bf 13}, 379 (1961).
514: A.H. Mueller, Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 20}, 2037 (1979);
515: J.C. Collins, Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 22} (1980) 1478;
516: A. Sen, Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 24}, 3281 (1981); {\bf 28}, 860 (1983);
517: G. Sterman, Nucl.\ Phys.\ {\bf B281}, 310 (1987);
518: V.S. Fadin, L.N. Lipatov, A.D. Martin and M. Melles,
519: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 61}, 094002 (2000);
520: J.H. K\"uhn, A.A. Penin, and V.A. Smirnov,
521: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 17}, 97 (2000);
522: Nucl.\ Phys.\ Proc.\ Suppl.\ {\bf 89}, 94 (2000).
523:
524: \bibitem{Fre} J. Frenkel and J.C. Taylor,
525: Nucl.\ Phys.\ {\bf B116}, 185 (1976).
526:
527: \bibitem{KMPS} J.H. K\"uhn, S. Moch, A.A. Penin, and V.A. Smirnov,
528: Nucl.\ Phys.\ {\bf B616}, 286 (2001);
529: {\bf B648}, 455(E) (2003).
530:
531: \bibitem{Cat} S. Catani, Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 427}, 161 (1998).
532:
533: \bibitem{KraLam} G. Kramer and B. Lampe,
534: {Z. Phys.} C {\bf 34}, 497 (1987); {\bf 42}, 504(E) (1989);
535: T. Matsuura, S.C. van der Marck and W.L. van Neerven,
536: Nucl.\ Phys.\ {\bf B 319}, 570 (1989).
537:
538: \bibitem{MasRem} P. Mastrolia and E. Remiddi, Nucl.Phys. {\bf B664}, 341 (2003).
539:
540: \bibitem{BMR} R. Barbieri, J.A. Mignaco, and E. Remiddi,
541: Nuovo\ Cim.\ A {\bf 11}, 824 (1972).
542:
543: \bibitem{Bur} G.J.H. Burgers, Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 164}, 167 (1985).
544:
545: \bibitem{Fad} V.S. Fadin, E.A. Kuraev, L.N. Lipatov,
546: N.P. Merenkov, and L. Trentadue,
547: Fhys.\ Atom.\ Nucl.\ {\bf 56}, 1537 (1993)
548: [Yad.\ Fiz.\ {\bf 56} 145 (1993)].
549:
550: \bibitem{BonFer} R. Bonciani and A. Ferroglia, Report No.
551: FREIBURG-THEP-05-06 and hep-ph/0507047.
552:
553: %\bibitem{Ber} F.A. Berends and R. Kleiss, Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 228},
554: % 573 (2000); M. Caffo, R. Gatto, and E. Remiddi, Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 252},
555: % 378 (1985).
556:
557: %\bibitem{Aub} B. Aubert {\it et al.} (BABAR Collaboration), hep-ex/0012042.
558:
559: %\bibitem{Arb1} A.B. Arbuzov, E.A. Kuraev,
560: % N.P. Merenkov, and L. Trentadue,
561: % Fhys.\ Atom.\ Nucl.\ {\bf 60}, 591 (1997)
562: % [Yad.\ Fiz.\ {\bf 60} 673 (1997)].
563: \end{thebibliography}
564:
565: \end{document}
566:
567:
568:
569:
570:
571: