1: \chapter{Finite-Temperature Effects}\label{cft}
2:
3: Lowering the temperature down from infinity also the hard modes must be included. The corresponding DSEs are derived in section \ref{sftdse}. The precise implementation of the limiting process needs some deeper analysis of the running coupling, which will be conducted in section \ref{scc}. The infrared properties of the dressing functions will be investigated in section \ref{sftir}. The truncation will be discussed in section \ref{sfttrunc}. In general, an infinite number of Matsubara frequencies contributes at finite temperatures. At sufficiently high temperatures, most of them can be neglected, however. This corresponds to a small-momentum approximation, to be defined in section \ref{ssmallpapprox}. Also the renormalization process will be discussed there. Results on the ghost-loop-only truncation and the full theory will finally be shown in sections \ref{sftgonly} and \ref{sftfull}, respectively. The chapter will be closed in section \ref{sdselowt} by presenting results for low temperatures, which have been obtained in the context of this work. There, also a comparison to the high-temperature case will be drawn.
4:
5: For convenience, the 3d-longitudinal and 3d-transverse gluons will be referred to as longitudinal and transverse gluons. In this chapter is again $p^2=p_0^2+\vec p^2\equiv p_0^2+p_3^2$. External momenta are referred to as $p$ while internal loop momenta and Matsubara summation momenta are referred to by $q$.
6:
7: \section{Finite-Temperature Dyson-Schwinger Equations}\label{sftdse}
8:
9: As described in section \ref{sdseft}, the equations are obtained from the vacuum equations \pref{vacgheq} and \pref{vacgleq} by application of the Matsubara formalism \cite{Kapusta:tk}. To obtain scalar equations for the (infinite) set of dressing functions $Z$ and $H$ of the gluon propagator \pref{gluonprop}, the gluon equation is contracted with the generalized projectors \pref{gtproj} and \pref{glproj}. Due to the kinematical singularity present, the choices \pref{d3tgenp} and \pref{d3lgenp} are extremely cumbersome. Therefore
10: \bea
11: A_{T\mu\nu}&=&\delta _{\mu \nu }-\delta _{\mu 0}\delta _{0\nu}\label{ftgenp1}\\
12: A_{L\mu\nu}&=&\delta_{\mu 0}\frac{p_0 p_\nu}{p^2}+\delta_{0\nu}\frac{p_\mu p_0}{p^2}\label{ftgenp2}
13: \eea
14: \noindent are used instead. This is a specialization of the most general projector
15: \be
16: P_{T/L\mu\nu}^\eta=\eta P_{T/L\mu\nu}+\left(1-\eta\right)\left(t_x\delta_{\mu\nu}+f\delta_{\mu 0}\delta_{0\nu}+f_t\delta_{\mu 0}\frac{p_0 p_\nu}{p^2}+c_t\delta_{0\nu}\frac{p_\mu p_0}{p^2}+t_z\frac{p_\mu p_\nu}{p^2}\right),\label{proj}
17: \ee
18: \noindent where $\eta$ can be either $\zeta$ or $\xi$. The choices of the constants $t_x$, $f$, $f_t$, $c_t$, and $t_z$ in \pref{ftgenp1} and \pref{ftgenp2} were made to obtain a well-defined 3d-limit. They are not unique, indicating a larger range of possibilities than just one parameter $\eta$ in general. Nevertheless, as the choices fulfill all requirements they are sufficient.
19:
20: Employing the projectors \pref{gtproj} and \pref{glproj} yields
21: \bea
22: \frac{1}{G(p)}&=&\widetilde{Z}_3+\frac{g_4^2TC_A}{(2\pi)^2}\sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty}\int d\theta dq \Big(A_T(p,q)G(q)Z(p-q)\nonumber\\
23: &&+A_L(p,q)G(q)H(p-q)\Big)\label{fulleqGft}\\
24: \frac{\xi}{H(p)}&=&\xi Z_{3L}+T^{HG}+T^{HH}+\frac{g_4^2C_A}{(2\pi)^2}\sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty}\int d\theta dq\Big(P(p,q)G(q)G(p+q)\nonumber\\
25: &&+N_L(p,q)Z(q)Z(p+q)+N_1(p,q)H(q)Z(p+q)+N_2(p,q)H(p+q)Z(q)\nonumber\\
26: &&+N_T(p,q)H(q)H(p+q)\Big)\label{fulleqHft}\\
27: \frac{1}{Z(p)}&=&Z_{3T}+T^{GH}+T^{GG}+\frac{g_4^2C_A}{(2\pi)^2}\sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty}\int d\theta dq\Big(R(p,q)G(q)G(p+q)\nonumber\\
28: &&+M_L(p,q)H(q)H(p+q)+M_1(p,q)H(q)Z(p+q)+M_2(p,q)H(p+q)Z(q)\nonumber\\
29: &&+M_T(p,q)Z(q)Z(p+q)\Big)+\frac{p_0^2(\zeta-1)}{2p^2}\left(Z_{3L}-\frac{1}{H(p)}\right).\label{fulleqZft}
30: \eea
31: \noindent The $\zeta$ and $\xi$ dependence is acquired by using \pref{ftgenp1} and \pref{ftgenp2}. At $\zeta=\xi=1$ the original form of the equations is recovered. For the correct solutions, the appearance of these terms would be compensated by corresponding structures in the loop contributions, and the result would be independent of $\zeta$ and $\xi$. For $p_0=0$, equation \pref{fulleqHft} is only superficially dependent on $\xi$. As all integral kernels are proportional to $\xi$, the dependence can be divided out for $\xi\neq 0$. Then, only the implicit dependence due to the interactions with the hard modes remains. The latter effect vanishes in the 3d-limit and the Higgs-equation \pref{higgsd3} is again independent of the projection and thus unique. The finite-temperature 4d-theory is no longer finite, but renormalizable. Thus explicit wave-function renormalization constants $\widetilde{Z}_3$, $Z_{3L}$, and $Z_{3T}$ have been introduced and will be discussed in section \ref{scttrunc} and \ref{srenormtrunc}.
32:
33: The summation is over all Matsubara frequencies $q_0=2\pi T n$. $\widetilde{Z}_1=1$ has been employed \cite{Taylor:ff}. $Z_1$ cannot be calculated in the present approach, but it is finite and set to 1 \cite{Fischer:2002hn,Fischer:2003zc}. The kernels $A_T$, $A_L$, $R$, $M_T$, $M_1$, $M_2$, $M_L$, $P$, $N_T$, $N_1$, $N_2$, and $N_L$ are listed in appendix \ref{sftkernels}. The tadpoles $T^{ij}$ are again used to cancel spurious divergences in much the same way as in the previous section. However, also in the soft equations, they can possess finite parts at finite temperature. In case of the longitudinal equation, these can be absorbed in the mass renormalization discussed below. In the transverse equation, these are at $\zeta=3$ completely contained in the loop terms, and their continuation away from $\zeta=3$ is thus arbitrary. Also these contributions scale at best only as $1/p^2$ and are thus irrelevant to the infrared. Therefore, they are dropped, especially as no simple prescription as \pref{finite} below can remove the related spurious divergences
34:
35: Note the considerably higher symmetry between the equations for $H$ and $Z$ than in equations \prefr{fulleqG3d}{fulleqZ3d}. Close inspection of the equations reveals further that the dressing functions can only depend on $\left|p_0\right|$ and $\left|\vec p\right|$. The corresponding symmetry, under $p_0\to -p_0$, is used to reduce the number of equations significantly.
36:
37: \section{Temperature Dependence of the Coupling}\label{scc}
38:
39: The equations \prefr{fulleqGft}{fulleqZft} depend on the coupling constant $g_4$ as the only parameter. In turn $g_4$ depends on the renormalization scale $\mu$, which can be chosen arbitrarily at any fixed temperature $T$. It directly enters into the definition of the infinite-temperature limit, as $g_3$ depends on $g_4$. In the simplest case, $g_3^2\sim g_4^2(\mu)T$. Comparing equations \prefr{fulleqG3d}{fulleqZ3d} and \prefr{fulleqGft}{fulleqZft}, the constant of proportionality has to be 1 in this truncation scheme to obtain a smooth infinite-temperature limit. Hence it only remains to choose the temperature dependence of $\mu$. There are two options to consider.
40:
41: If $\mu$ is fixed, the 3d-coupling grows without limit as $T$ grows. This does not necessarily pose a problem, as the infinite-temperature propagators are independent of $g_3$ as long as expressed as a function of $p/g_3^2$. Under such circumstances, all momenta below $T$ are effectively infrared, and the non-perturbative regime would extend to all momenta.
42:
43: Alternatively, it is possible to use the limit prescription $g_4^2(\mu(T))T=c_\infty$, where $c_\infty$ is an arbitrary constant, effectively performing a renormalization group transformation when changing the temperature. This fixes $g_3^2$ to be proportional to $\Lambda_{QCD}$, the dynamical scale of QCD \cite{Bohm:yx}, while the 4d-coupling vanishes like $1/T$. This defines a t'Hooft-like scaling in $T$. Note that $g_4\to 0$ for $T\to\infty$ corresponds to the conventional arguments of a vanishing coupling in the high-temperature phase \cite{Blaizot:2001nr}. However here, as in the large-$N$ limit, t'Hooft-scaling is performed, generating a well-defined theory. Hence this possibility defines a smooth 3d-limit with a finite 3d-coupling constant. Here $c_\infty=1$ is chosen. Nonetheless, the case of fixed $\mu$ is also of interest, as it permits to compare the results for different temperatures directly.
44:
45: These possibilities all correspond to the 4d-situation, where it is possible to shift the onset of non-perturbative physics by renormalization group transformations. Under all circumstances, for any finite temperature, there is always a non-perturbative regime at sufficiently small momenta.
46:
47: Furthermore, it would be useful to give explicit units for the temperature scale. In the vacuum the scale is fixed via a comparison of the running coupling to perturbation theory \cite{Fischer:2002hn}. This is not possible here because the Matsubara sum is truncated and the coupling cannot be calculated for momenta of the order of $2\pi NT$, where $N$ is the number of Matsubara frequencies included\footnote{Always, only the frequencies with $p_0\ge 0$ are counted.}
48:
49: The simplest procedure is to compare $g_3$ to lattice calculations. There the effective 3d-coupling is found to be $g_3^2(2T_c)/2T_c=2.83$ \cite{Cucchieri:2001tw}. The phase transition temperature is $T_c=269\pm 1$ MeV \cite{Karsch:2003jg}. Albeit this will not be exactly $g_4^2T_c$ due to the truncation, a first approximation is to require the same temperature scale at $2T_c$. Using the fixed $g_4^2T=c_\infty$ prescription, then $1=c_\infty/(2T_c2.83)$. Since here $c_\infty=1$ in internal units, internal units have to be multiplied by 1.5 GeV to yield physical units. This temperature scale will be used in sections \ref{sftgonly} and \ref{sftfull}. The ratios of temperatures are independent of this prescription.
50:
51: \section{Infrared Properties}\label{sftir}
52:
53: Regarding the infrared properties, asymptotic freedom turns out to be advantageous also for the infrared. Just at the phase transition, the $n=1$ Matsubara frequency has already an effective `mass' $p_0=2\pi T_c\approx 1.7$ GeV. By the Appelquist-Carazzone theorem \cite{Appelquist:tg} the hard modes are suppressed by powers of $|\vec p|/p_0$ in the infrared. Thus hard modes do not contribute significantly. Studying each equation in detail, it turns out that this quite general statement is implemented very differently in each equation.
54:
55: In case of the hard modes, there is no pure soft contribution due to momentum conservation at the vertices. Thus they decouple and a self-consistent solution is that all hard mode dressing functions are constant in the infrared.
56:
57: In the case of the soft ghost equation \pref{fulleqGft}, all contributions become also constant in the infrared. Thus they can be canceled by the (renormalized) tree-level value. Only the subleading behavior remains, as in the case of the 3d- and 4d-theory. As the subleading contribution of the purely soft term dominates the hard terms, the same behavior as in the infinite-temperature limit emerges.
58:
59: In case of the transverse equation \pref{fulleqZft}, the hard mode contributions give rise at best to mass-like $1/p^2$ terms. These terms are subleading compared to the soft ghost-loop. Thus the infrared is dominated by the latter and the same infrared solution as in the infinite-temperature limit is found.
60:
61: The longitudinal equation \pref{fulleqHft} is finally quite different from its equivalent in the 3d- or 4d-case. In the prior case, it was dominated by its tree-level mass, while in the latter it is identical to the transverse one. In the present case, the absence of pure soft interactions with ghosts, which could generate divergent contributions as in the transverse equation, leads to dominance of the hard modes\footnote{The pure soft interactions represented by the kernels $N_1$ and $N_2$ only generate a constant term in the infrared. Without a tree-level mass, the soft tadpoles generate a contribution which can be removed by renormalization.}. These provide mass-like contributions in the infrared. Inspecting e.g. $P$ at $\xi=1$
62: \be
63: P(0,q_0,\vec q,\vec p)=\frac{\left|\vec q\right|^2q_0^2\sin\theta}{\left|\vec p\right|^2q^2(q_0^2+(\vec p+\vec q)^2)},\label{dynmass}
64: \ee
65: \noindent and using the fact that the hard dressing functions are constant in the infrared, directly leads to a mass-like behavior due to the explicit $1/|\vec p|^2$ factor and the finiteness of the remaining expression. Thus the 3d-mass of the Higgs is generated spontaneously by the interaction with the hard modes.
66:
67: Hence, the infrared behavior of all soft mode dressing functions does not depend on the temperature, expect for changes in the infrared coefficients.
68:
69: Note that these observations imply that by using a finite number of Matsubara frequencies it will not be possible to obtain the 4d-vacuum solutions. Any finite number of such modes will not be able to generate a divergence stronger than mass-like in the longitudinal equation to compensate the missing soft interactions with ghosts. Hence, the 4d-behavior can be established only by infinite summation. In this case the generated mass has to diverge even after renormalization at $p=0$ to obtain the vacuum solution, providing over-screening instead of screening. The possibility that the ghost-gluon-vertex changes due to temperature to couple soft ghost modes to soft longitudinal gluons at low temperature and not at high temperature is unlikely, since a bare ghost-gluon vertex is already sufficient at low temperatures and in the vacuum \cite{vonSmekal:1997is,Gruter:2004kd}.
70:
71: \section{Truncation and Spurious Divergences}\label{sfttrunc}
72:
73: Also for large but still finite $T$ the 3d-limit is to be made explicit. Thus all the problems encountered in the 3d-theory persist, including the necessity of a modified soft 3-gluon vertex. Hence all modifications of the pure soft terms will be left as in the case of chapter \ref{c3d}, except for the tadpoles in the Higgs equation \pref{fulleqH3d}. Due to the spontaneously generated mass, it will be necessary to alter this behavior. There are also additional spurious divergences due to the hard mode contributions. As they occur at mid-momenta, when viewed from the 4d-perspective using $p^2=p_0^2+\vec p^2$, it is expected that due to the truncation ansatz, they are much harder to compensate. This is indeed the case.
74:
75: The spurious divergences in contributions of hard modes due to the integration are dealt with in exactly the same way as in 3d by adjusting the tadpole terms. Each integration kernel $K$ is split as
76: \be
77: K=K_0+K_D\label{isplit}
78: \ee
79: \noindent $K_0$ is finite and $K_D$ divergent upon integration. Each kernel $K_D$ will be compensated by a corresponding tadpole as for $M_{TD}$ and $M_{LD}$ in the 3d-theory in equations \pref{ggtad2} and \pref{ghtad}, respectively.
80:
81: However, a new kind of spurious divergences appear when performing the Matsubara sum. In principle this is no problem when using a finite number of Matsubara frequencies, since then all expressions are finite. However, when including more and more Matsubara frequencies, it is found that their contribution in the gluon equations \pref{fulleqHft} and \pref{fulleqZft} at $|\vec p|<\max(q_0)$ scales as $q_0$, thus behaving as a quadratic divergence. This is an artifact of using a finite number of Matsubara frequencies. It does not vanish as long as the number of frequencies is finite, no matter how large the number. This behavior is spurious and must be removed.
82:
83: The ghost equation does not contain spurious divergences\footnote{The problem is also not present in the mixed contributions $M_1$, $M_2$, $N_1$ and $N_2$ in the gluon equations. Hence these do not need to be subtracted.} and can thus serve as a starting point to trace the origin of those in the gluon equations. Analyzing the $\left|\vec p\right|=0$ limit for $p_0\neq 0$, it is directly found that if the equation looks like
84: \be
85: \frac{1}{G(p_0\neq 0,0)}=\frac{1}{A_g(p_0)}=\widetilde{Z}_3+g_4^2 T I,\label{ghosteq}
86: \ee
87: \noindent then the integral $I$ must scale like $1/p_0$ because of dimensional consistency. Here $\widetilde{Z}_3$ is the wave-function renormalization of the ghost. For any finite number of Matsubara frequencies, $\widetilde{Z}_3$ is finite. Hence the infrared behavior of the hard ghost dressing function is $1/(\widetilde{Z}_3+aT/p_0)$ with a suitable constant $a$. For sufficiently large $p_0$ this can be expanded to yield $1/\widetilde{Z}_3-aT/(p_0\widetilde{Z}_3^2)$ in leading order.
88:
89: The effect is most directly seen in the $p_0=0$ longitudinal equation in the ghost-loop. For dimensional reasons, in the infrared the terms in the Matsubara sum must scale as $Tq_0/|\vec p|^2 A_g^2(q_0)$. Hence the divergence is directly visible due to the leading constant term in $A_g(q_0)$. The situation is analogous, but not as directly visible in the remaining equations.
90:
91: This spurious divergence can be removed when removing the leading $1/\widetilde{Z}_3$ term in the ghost dressing function, i.e.\/ by the replacement
92: \bea
93: &G(q,q_0)G(p+q,q_0+p_0)\nonumber\\
94: &\to\left(G(q,q_0)-\frac{1}{\widetilde{Z}_3}\right)\left(G(q+p,q_0+p_0)-\frac{1}{\widetilde{Z}_3}\right),\label{finite}
95: \eea
96: \noindent and correspondingly for the gluon loops.
97:
98: Including a finite number $N$ of Matsubara frequencies only is equivalent to studying a 3d-theory with 1 massless particle and $2N$ massive particles for each 4d particle species. Therefore the ultraviolet asymptotic analysis of subsection \ref{ssuvanalysis} applies, and $I$ in \pref{ghosteq} will again fall off polynomially in the ultraviolet. Hence \pref{finite} amounts to subtracting the asymptotic constant to which $G$ evolves and thus corrects for $N$ being finite. $1/\widetilde{Z}_3$ must become 0 when including an infinite number of Matsubara frequencies, as this is the correct perturbative 4d behavior for $p\gg T$. Hence the spurious divergences are in this case only an artifact of the finite number of Matsubara frequencies.
99:
100: In the the longitudinal equation the Brown-Pennington value $\xi=0$ is pathologic. It removes all terms in the soft equation and so is not applicable on its own. Thus the replacement \pref{finite} has to be applied to the complete loop contributions $P$, $N_T$ and $N_L$. In the transverse equations all spurious divergences including the one of the Matsubara sum are again removed at $\zeta=3$. Therefore the replacement \pref{finite} will only be necessary in those contributions in $R$, $M_T$, and $M_L$ which are proportional to $(\zeta-3)$. Hence the integral kernels are split differently than \pref{isplit} as
101: \be
102: K(\zeta)=K_0+(\zeta-3)K_3+K_D(\zeta),\nonumber
103: \ee
104: \noindent similar to \pref{rsplit}. Here $K_0$ and $K_3$ are finite and independent of $\zeta$, and $K_D$ contains all divergences upon integration. The corresponding subtraction is then performed by the replacement
105: \be
106: KD(q)D(p+q)\to K_0D(q)D(p+q)+(\zeta-3)K_3\left(D(q)-\frac{1}{Z_3}\right)\left(D(p+q)-\frac{1}{Z_3}\right)\nonumber\\
107: \ee
108: \noindent where $D$ is a generic dressing function and $Z_3$ its wave-function renormalization.
109:
110: In the soft transverse equation it is additionally necessary to remove tadpole-like structures at $\zeta\neq 3$ in $K_3$. They contribute a logarithmically divergent mass-term, which is irrelevant in the infrared and in the ultraviolet. It cannot be renormalized, as a counter-term would be required, which is forbidden by gauge symmetry. Thus these contributions are absorbed by the tadpoles as well. Then, in the transverse equation for the soft-soft interactions, the subtractions are as in chapter \ref{c3d}. The soft-hard contributions, $R$, $M_T$, and $M_D$ are subtracted as
111: \bea
112: &KD(q)D(p+q)\to K_0D(q)D(p+q)\nonumber\\
113: &+(\zeta-3)\left(K_3-\frac{1}{p^2}\left(\lim_{p\to 0}p^2K_3\right)\right)\left(D(q)-\frac{1}{Z_3}\right)\left(D(p+q)-\frac{1}{Z_3}\right)\label{finite2}.
114: \eea
115:
116: \section{Small-Momentum Approximation and Renormalization}\label{ssmallpapprox}
117:
118: Performing the subtractions \pref{finite} and \pref{finite2}, the resulting equations are still logarithmically divergent for $N\to\infty$. This also includes the ghost equations. The integrals themselves are convergent quantities, but the Matsubara sum is not, as the terms scale like $1/q_0$. Thus, for an infinite number of Matsubara frequencies, the sum diverges. This is the 4d logarithmic divergence and thus the usual one of Yang-Mills theory \cite{Bohm:yx}.
119:
120: In the case of a finite number of Matsubara frequencies, the sum is finite. Nonetheless, there are a few aspects to be dealt with in the following subsections.
121:
122: \subsection{Small-Momentum Approximation}
123:
124: There are three regions of momentum to be distinguished:
125:
126: At $p\le 2\pi T$, all Matsubara sums behave essentially the same due to the Appelquist-Carrazone decoupling theorem. It is valid as the hard modes behave essentially tree-level-like. As the contributions of the hard modes behave as $1/q_0$, the final result will depend on the number of Matsubara frequencies included, and by adding an arbitrary number, any quantitative (but not qualitative) result can be generated. Thus, it is necessary to renormalize in order to be independent of the cutoff. The cutoff is in this case imposed by the number of Matsubara frequencies included. The renormalization procedure will be implemented in the next subsections. By this approach, the results can be made quite reliable in this regime.
127:
128: At $2\pi T\le p\le 2\pi T (N-1)$, where $N$ is the number of Matsubara frequencies included, more and more Matsubara terms depart from their $1/q_0$ behavior to a $1/p$ behavior. As the external momentum $p$ becomes large compared to the effective mass $q_0$ of a hard mode, the mode becomes dynamical and behaves like a massive 3d-particle. The results are still quite reliable in this region as also in the case $N\to\infty$, for any finite momentum $p$ only a finite number of Matsubara frequencies are dynamical. It becomes less and less reliable when approaching the upper limit $2\pi TN$.
129:
130: At $p\ge 2\pi T (N-1)$, the situation changes drastically. Opposite to the case $N=\infty$, all Matsubara modes are dynamical and their contributions will scale as $1/p$. Thus the number of Matsubara modes will now enter linearly instead of logarithmically. This is an artifact of cutting off the Matsubara sum. In this region the results are not reliable. However, as the sum is still finite and suppressed by $1/p$, the contribution is subleading with respect to the tree-level term and thus the system of equations can still be closed consistently\footnote{Otherwise the corresponding finite 3d-theory would be ill-defined, which is not the case.}.
131:
132: By renormalization, these artifacts can be reduced, if not completely removed at sufficiently small momenta. In that sense the finite Matsubara sum approximation is indeed a small-(3-)momentum approximation.
133:
134: \subsection{Renormalization of a Truncated Matsubara Sum}\label{scttrunc}
135:
136: There are a few subtleties involved concerning the renormalization of a truncated Matsubara sum. These are discussed here.
137:
138: Firstly, in the vacuum case \cite{Alkofer:2000wg,Fischer:2002hn}, renormalization was performed using a momentum subtraction scheme (MOM), i.e. by subtracting from the DSEs themselves at a fixed subtraction point $s$. This leads to a generic form of
139: \be
140: \frac{1}{D(p)}-\frac{1}{D(s)}=I(p)-I(s),\label{subrenormalization}
141: \ee
142: \noindent where $D$ is the corresponding dressing function and $I$ is the self-energy contribution. As the highest divergences encountered are logarithmic \cite{Bohm:yx}, \pref{subrenormalization} is finite and can be solved if a proper value of $D(s)$ is known. This can be achieved by choosing $s$ inside the perturbative region. This approach fails if the large momentum asymptotic value of $D$ is a constant different from 0, since \pref{subrenormalization} is ambiguous with respect to such a constant. In the case of a truncated Matsubara sum, the ultraviolet behavior is that of a massive 3d-theory. Thus the self-energy contributions vanish as $1/p$ in the ultraviolet, see subsection \ref{ssuvanalysis}. Therefore the dressing functions $D$ are dominated by the tree-level term
143: \be
144: \lim_{\left|\vec p\right|\to\infty}D(p_0,\left|\vec p\right|)\to\frac{1}{Z_3},
145: \ee
146: \noindent with $Z_3$ their wave-function renormalization. For a finite number of Matsubara frequencies $Z_3$ is finite and thus $D$ goes to a constant in the ultraviolet and \pref{subrenormalization} is not applicable. Therefore the renormalization is performed by explicit counter-terms. This is discussed in the next subsection.
147:
148: A second point is the mass and mass renormalization necessary for the soft longitudinal mode. The soft mode with frequency $p_0=0$ of the $A_0$ component of the gauge field transforms homogeneously instead of inhomogeneously under gauge transformations \pref{gtrans1}. Therefore gauge symmetry permits to add a term
149: \be
150: m^2A_0^2(0,\vec p)\label{a0mass}
151: \ee
152: \noindent to the Lagrangian. In the vacuum, however, such a term is forbidden by manifest Lorentz invariance. At finite temperature in the Matsubara formalism, this is no longer the case, and such a term could in principle be present. This term replaces the $p_0^2A_0^2$ term of the hard modes, which stems from the $A_0\pd_0^2 A_0$ term in the Lagrangian \pref{lym} for $p_0\neq 0$.
153:
154: Concerning the counter-terms, the wave-function renormalization is performed by adding the counter-term
155: \be
156: \delta Z_3(A_\mu^a\pdm\pdn A_\mu^a-A_\mu^a\pd^2 A_\mu^a)\nonumber
157: \ee
158: \noindent to the Lagrangian. In the case $p_0=0$, the first term is not present for the longitudinal mode $A_0$. Its place can be taken by a counter-term for the mass term \pref{a0mass}. This implies a relation between the wave-function counter-term $\delta Z_3$ and the mass counter-term $\delta m^2$, which cannot be exploited here due to the truncation of the Matsubara sum. Therefore an independent renormalization of the wave function and the mass of the soft longitudinal mode is necessary and will be performed in the next subsection.
159:
160: A last point concerns the implications for the counter-terms due to the truncation of the Matsubara sum. As the divergence structure must be the same as in the vacuum, the counter-terms must be the same for all frequencies. This is no longer the case when the Matsubara sum is truncated, as can be seen directly by counting. In the sum for the soft mode, $p_0=0$, contributions from $2N-1$ Matsubara modes are present for each loop. For the hard mode with $p_0=2\pi T(N-1)$, only $N$ contributions are present, as $\left|p_0+q_0\right|\le 2\pi (N-1)T$. Thus different numbers of modes contribute and the counter-terms cannot be the same. This is always the case as long as $N<\infty$. To surpass the problem in a constructive manner, each mode will be renormalized independently.
161:
162: Therefore, a counter-term Lagrangian is added, given by
163: \bea
164: {\cal L}&=&\delta m^2 A_0^a(0)^2+\sum_{q_0} \Big(\delta Z_{3T}(q_0) A^a_\mu(q_0) \Delta_{T\mu\nu}(q_0) A^a_\nu(q_0)\nonumber\\
165: &+&\delta Z_{3L}(q_0) A^a_\mu(q_0) \Delta_{L\mu\nu}(q_0) A^a_\nu(q_0)+\delta\widetilde{Z}_3(q_0) \bar c^a(q_0)\pd^2 c_a(q_0)\Big)\label{ctl}
166: \eea
167: \noindent where $A^a_\mu(q_0)$ are the modes of the gluon field and $\bar c(q_0)$ and $c(q_0)$ are the modes of the ghost and anti-ghost field, respectively. $\Delta_{T/L\mu\nu}$ are the appropriate tensor structures of derivatives. Consequently, the corresponding wave-function renormalization constants in the subtractions \pref{finite} and \pref{finite2} have to be replaced by their frequency-dependent versions.
168:
169: This shortcoming is a consequence of the small momentum approximation yielding the incorrect ultraviolet properties: The treated system is for large momenta equivalent to a 3d-theory of $2N-1$ particles per 4d particle species. In such a theory all fields can be renormalized independently. This problem has to be investigated further to obtain reliable results on the large momentum behavior of the dressing functions.
170:
171: \subsection{Implementation of Renormalization}\label{srenormtrunc}
172:
173: In all equations but the one for $H(0,\vec p)$, using the counter-terms of \pref{ctl} amounts to replacing the tree-level term $1$ by $1+\delta Z_3$. This way explicitly multiplicative renormalization is obtained. In the equation for $H(0,\vec p)$, the tree-level term is replaced\footnote{Note that when using the projector \pref{ftgenp2}, also $\delta m^2$ is multiplied by $\xi$.} by $1+\delta Z_3L+\delta m^2/p^2$. Thus, it also generates a mass-renormalization. By the arguments following equation \pref{dynmass} just a renormalization is indeed necessary, and the mass is not generated purely by this procedure.
174:
175: The last ingredient is the renormalization prescription. To investigate both cases discussed in section \ref{scc}, either a fixed subtraction point $s=s_0$ or to establish a well-defined 3d-limit $s=T$ is employed. Thus, the following prescription is applied to all dressing functions $D$, except $H(0,\vec p)$:
176: \be
177: D(s)=1.\nonumber
178: \ee
179: \noindent This also ensures $G(s)^2Z(s)=1$ as is required in the 4d-theory \cite{vonSmekal:1997is}. The soft ghost mode is not renormalized at 0 as in the vacuum calculation \cite{Fischer:2002hn}.
180:
181: In case of $H(0,\vec p)$, two prescriptions are necessary. The first is\footnote{For numerical reasons, it is actually performed at $2\delta_i$, where $\delta_i$ is the numerical IR-cutoff of the integration. This is only a marginal difference.}
182: \be
183: \lim_{|\vec p|\to 0}|\vec p|^{-2}H(0,\vec p)=\frac{1}{m_{3d}^2}=\frac{1}{r^2g_4^4T^2+g_4^2TC_A\frac{rg_4^2T}{4\pi}}\nonumber
184: \ee
185: \noindent where $m_{3d}$ is the tadpole-improved mass of the 3d-theory. It depends on $r=m_h/g_3^2$, which is again taken to be the same value as in the previous chapter. For fixed $g_3$, this mass is independent of the temperature while for fixed $\mu$ it scales with temperature as expected. This again indicates the necessity of control over the infinite-temperature limit of the theory in terms of the effective coupling constant. In addition,
186: \be
187: \frac{1}{H(0,s)}=1+\frac{m_{3d}}{s^2}\nonumber
188: \ee
189: \noindent is required to fix the mass renormalization.
190:
191: It should be noted that, by renormalizing at $T$, it is guaranteed that the correct 3d-limit is obtained. This prescription requires that at $T\to\infty$ all dressing functions approach 1 at infinity. This yields the 3d-results\footnote{This is only correct, if $g_4^2T\ll T$. This is immanent, if $g_4^2 T$ is fixed. If $\mu$ is fixed, this is only possible if $\mu$ is taken sufficiently large for a fixed temperature. Still deviations from 1 will be found for $|\vec p|\gg\mu,T$.} as in chapter \ref{c3d}. It would be easily possible to readjust the requirements on $H(0,\vec p)$ to comply with the lattice data in the infrared and ultraviolet. Here the exact correspondence to the 3d results in chapter \ref{c3d} is preferred, as this will make the 3d-limit explicit.
192:
193: Therefore the explicit implementation of the renormalization prescription for the DSE of a dressing function $D$ with self-energy contributions $I$
194: \be
195: \frac{1}{D(p)}=1+I(p)\nonumber
196: \ee
197: \noindent is then
198: \bea
199: \frac{1}{D(p)}=1+\delta Z_3+I(p)\nonumber\\
200: \delta Z_3=-I(s)\nonumber
201: \eea
202: \noindent and in the case of $H(0,\vec p)$
203: \bea
204: \frac{1}{H(0,\vec p)}=1+\delta Z_{3L}+\frac{\delta m^2}{p^2}+I(p)\nonumber\\
205: \delta m^2=m_r^2-\lim_{p\to 0}p^2I(p)\nonumber\\
206: \delta Z_{3L}=-I(s)+\frac{lim_{p\to 0}p^2I(p)}{s^2},\nonumber
207: \eea
208: \noindent where $m_r=m_{3d}$ is the renormalized mass.
209:
210: \section{Ghost-Loop-Only Truncation}\label{sftgonly}
211:
212: \begin{figure}
213: \epsfig{file=ftgonly.eps,height=1.2\linewidth,width=\linewidth}
214: \caption{The left panels show for the soft modes from top to bottom the dressing functions of the ghost and transverse gluon and the propagator of the longitudinal gluon. The right panels show the hard mode dressing functions. The less the deviation from 1, the harder the mode is. The solid lines are the $g=1/2$ solution and the dashed lines the $g\approx 0.4$ solution. Both are at $T=1.5$ GeV and $N=20$. Note the different momentum scale in the left and the right panels.}
215: \label{figftgonlystd}
216: \end{figure}
217:
218: The first step is again the calculation of the ghost-loop-only solutions. Performing the calculations turns out to be numerically more complicated than in 3d due to the recursive definition of the elimination of the spurious divergences \pref{finite} and \pref{finite2}. This is discussed in more detail in appendix \ref{anum}. Nonetheless, both solutions can be found. They are shown in figure \ref{figftgonlystd} with the largest number of Matsubara frequencies currently available\footnote{The number of frequencies included is only a matter of CPU-time.} at $\zeta=\xi=1$. In general, all hard mode dressing functions are similar, but behave more and more tree-level like with increasing frequency $p_0=2\pi nT$. The different asymptotic values of the dressing functions for each mode are a direct manifestation of the artifacts of the truncation of the Matsubara sum, as discussed in section \ref{scttrunc}.
219:
220: The small deviation from tree-level for the hard longitudinal modes is most likely due to the severe subtraction \pref{finite}. Within the current ansatz however, this is the best achievable. Note that due to $p^2=p_0^2+\vec p^2$, the infrared of the hard modes is actually mid-momenta with respect to 4d. Thus, these problems do not come unexpected, as the truncation is tailored to the infrared and thus to the soft modes. In addition, the transverse gluon wave-function renormalization is smaller than 1 for $n=0$. Thus the dressing function would diverge for large momenta in the limit $N\to\infty$. This is also an artifact of the truncation, as the ghost loops alone have the wrong sign at large momenta. This will be remedied by adding the gluon loops in the next section, and can be ignored for now.
221:
222: The dependence on the number of Matsubara frequencies is shown in figure \ref{figftgonlymstd}. As expected, in the infrared region, the soft mode dressing functions are not affected by the number of Matsubara frequencies. The onset of deviation of the hard mode dressing functions calculated with $N$ frequencies from the solutions with $M>N$ frequencies increases in 3-momenta with $N$. This is a manifestation of the small momentum approximation.
223:
224: \begin{figure}
225: \epsfig{file=ftgonlymcomp.eps,height=1.2\linewidth,width=\linewidth}
226: \caption{The dependence of the solutions on $N$ at $T=1.5$ GeV. The left panels show for the soft modes from top to bottom the dressing functions of the ghost and transverse gluon and the propagator of the longitudinal gluon. The right panels show the dressing functions for the $n=1$ hard mode. The \piclinecol lines show the solution $g=1/2$ and the black lines $g\approx 0.4$. Solid is $N=2$, dashed is $N=5$, dotted is $N=12$ and dashed-dotted is $N=20$.}
227: \label{figftgonlymstd}
228: \end{figure}
229:
230: Naturally, the dependence on the temperature is the next subject. Using the t'Hooft-like scaling, the results shown in figure \ref{figftgonlygstd} are obtained. While the soft mode dressing functions are relatively unaffected by temperature, significant changes are found for the hard mode dressing functions. These become increasingly tree-level with increasing temperature and thus the hard modes cease to interact. At low temperature they exhibit significantly more dynamics.
231:
232: \begin{figure}
233: \epsfig{file=ftgonlygcomp.eps,height=1.2\linewidth,width=\linewidth}
234: \caption{The dependence of the solutions on $T$ at fixed $g_4^2T$ and subtraction at $T$ at $N=5$. The left panels show for the soft modes from top to bottom the dressing functions of the ghost and transverse gluon and the propagator of the longitudinal gluon. The right panels show the dressing functions for the $n=1$ hard mode. The \piclinecol and black lines are the $g=1/2$ and the $g\approx 0.4$ solution, respectively. Solid is $T=0.8$ GeV, dashed is $T=1.5$ GeV, and dotted is $T=137$ GeV.}
235: \label{figftgonlygstd}
236: \end{figure}
237:
238: The case for fixed $\mu$ is shown in figure \ref{figftgonlytstd}. The soft longitudinal gluon propagator is scaled by the interaction strength, since the mass of the soft longitudinal gluon is a dynamical effect. The results represent, how the system reacts on a change of $s/T$, which are the only dimensionful quantities involved as long as $g_4$ is fixed. The changes are governed by the renormalization prescription, and are qualitatively different from the previous case. As expected, the higher the temperature, the further out in momentum the non-perturbative effects in the soft mode dressing functions extend, only limited by the requirement to obey the renormalization prescription. At the same time the dynamics of the hard modes is pushed to higher momenta, although the dressing functions do not decrease. Indeed, this scenario describes rather a change of the relevant scale for the onset of non-perturbative effects than the effects of temperature.
239:
240: At fixed $\mu$, it was possible\footnote{In the case of fixed $g_4^2T$, it is likely not yet found due to limitation in CPU time.} to follow the solution down to $T=91$ MeV. Lattice calculations find a phase transition temperature of $(269\pm 1)$ MeV \cite{Karsch:2003jg}. Thus super-cooling is possible, provided the temperature estimate of section \ref{scc} is correct within a factor of 2 and the phase transition temperature in the approximation scheme used here is not significantly lower than in lattice calculations.
241:
242: \begin{figure}
243: \epsfig{file=ftgonlytcomp.eps,height=1.2\linewidth,width=\linewidth}
244: \caption{The dependence of the solutions on $T$ at fixed $\mu$ and $s$ at $N=5$. The left panels show for the soft modes from top to bottom the dressing functions of the ghost and transverse gluon and the propagator of the longitudinal gluon. The right panels show the dressing functions for the $n=1$ hard mode. The \piclinecol and black lines are the $g=1/2$ and the $g\approx 0.4$ solution, respectively. Solid is $T=0.3$ GeV, dashed is $T=1.5$ GeV, and dotted is $T=5.0$ GeV.}
245: \label{figftgonlytstd}
246: \end{figure}
247:
248: The remaining issue is the dependence of the solutions on the projection and thus on $\zeta$ and $\xi$. It is shown in figure \ref{figftgonlyzx}. The largest effect is seen in the infrared region of the soft solutions of the alternating branch when varying $\zeta$, similar to the infinite-temperature limit. The hard modes are significantly less affected, with the largest impact on the hard longitudinal dressing functions when varying $\xi$. For the smallest $\xi$ values, the self-energy of the hard longitudinal mode seems to switch sign, generating a wave-function renormalization smaller than 1. This effect has not been observed in the full system and is thus likely an artifact of the ghost-loop-only truncation. Thus, the dependence on the projection is of similar extent as in the infinite-temperature limit.
249:
250: \begin{figure}
251: \epsfig{file=ftgonlyzxcomp.eps,height=1.2\linewidth,width=\linewidth}
252: \caption{The dependence of the solutions on $\zeta$ and $\xi$ at $N=5$. The left panels show for the soft modes from top to bottom the dressing functions of the ghost and transverse gluon and the propagator of the longitudinal gluon. The right panels show the dressing functions for the $n=1$ hard mode. The \piclinecol and black lines are the $g=1/2$ and the $g\approx 0.4$ solution, respectively. Solid is $(g,\zeta,\xi)=(1/2,7/2,9/4)$ and $(0.4,2,5/2)$, dashed is $(1/2,1,1)$ and $(0.4,1,1)$, dotted is $(1/2,0,0.1)$ and $(0.4,1/4,0.1)$.}
253: \label{figftgonlyzx}
254: \end{figure}
255:
256: \section{Full Theory}\label{sftfull}
257:
258: \begin{figure}
259: \epsfig{file=ftf.eps,height=1.2\linewidth,width=\linewidth}
260: \caption{The left panels show for the soft modes from top to bottom the dressing functions of the ghost and transverse gluon and the propagator of the longitudinal gluon. The right panels show the hard mode dressing functions. The less the deviation from 1, the harder the mode is. The solid lines are the $g=1/2$ solution and the dashed lines the $g\approx 0.4$ solution. Both are at $T=1.5$ GeV and $N=12$. Note the different momentum scale in the left and the right panels.}
261: \label{figftf}
262: \end{figure}
263:
264: Finally, the full system of equations \prefr{fulleqGft}{fulleqZft} is implemented. For the largest available number of Matsubara frequencies, the result is shown in figure \ref{figftf}. There are several observations. First of all, the soft modes are again nearly unaffected in the infrared by the presence of the hard modes. The latter show a significant modification, compared to tree-level, although still only of the order of 30\%. Also, all wave-function renormalization constants are now larger than one, as is required. The hard mode dressing functions exhibit some structure. There are maxima in all dressing functions. This is most pronounced in the case of the dressing functions of the longitudinal gluon. These structures do not translate into a corresponding structure in the propagators, which are monotonically decreasing from a constant of order $1/p_0^2$ in the infrared to 0 in the ultraviolet. It is also nearly irrelevant for the hard mode dressing functions to which soft infrared solution they are coupled to.
265:
266: \begin{figure}
267: \epsfig{file=ftfmcomp.eps,height=1.2\linewidth,width=\linewidth}
268: \caption{The dependence of the solutions on $N$ at $T=1.5$ GeV. The left panels show for the soft modes from top to bottom the dressing functions of the ghost and transverse gluon and the propagator of the longitudinal gluon. The right panels show the dressing functions for the $n=1$ hard mode. The \piclinecol lines show the solution $g=1/2$ and the black lines $g\approx 0.4$. Solid is $N=2$, dashed is $N=5$, dotted is $N=8$ and dashed-dotted is $N=12$.}
269: \label{figftfm}
270: \end{figure}
271:
272: Figure \ref{figftfm} displays the dependence of the full solutions on the number of Matsubara frequencies. While the soft mode dressing functions are nearly unaffected, apart from the value of the renormalization constants, the effect on the hard mode dressing functions is significant. The ghost is quite insensitive, except for its wave-function renormalization. This is not the case for the gluons. The peaks at mid-momentum are sensitive to the number of Matsubara frequencies included. The effect is largest for the longitudinal gluon dressing functions. From the available number of Matsubara frequencies, it is hard to estimate whether the peak grows to a finite value when $N\to\infty$ or not. It cannot be excluded that the hard longitudinal gluon dressing functions violate the Gribov condition \pref{gribov} once sufficiently many Matsubara frequencies are included. This would be very similar to the case of the transverse gluon dressing function in the infinite-temperature limit and therefore would necessitate a similar vertex construction for the longitudinal-gluon-transverse-gluon vertex as for the soft transverse gluon vertex. If such a vertex would be necessary, the result would be a finite peak, very similar to the present situation. Thus, the results would be even quantitatively quite similar.
273:
274: The disappearance of the peaks in the gluon dressing functions at $N=2$ can be directly related to the vanishing of hard-mode couplings due to the restriction $(p_0+q_0)/(2\pi T)<2$. Only hard-soft-mode couplings contribute. Thus, the peak is generated due to pure hard-hard interactions alone.
275:
276: Again here and in the following only the $n=1$ modes are presented. The $n>1$ modes essentially follow their behavior, albeit much closer at tree-level.
277:
278: \begin{figure}
279: \epsfig{file=ftfgcomp.eps,height=1.2\linewidth,width=\linewidth}
280: \caption{The dependence of the solutions on $T$ at fixed $g_4^2T$ and subtraction at $T$ at $N=5$. The left panel shows the soft modes, where apart from the longitudinal gluon the dressing functions are shown. In the latter case the propagator is shown. The right panels show the dressing functions for the $n=1$ hard mode. The \piclinecol and black lines are the $g=1/2$ and the $g\approx 0.4$ solution, respectively. Solid is $T=0.9$ GeV, dashed is $T=1.5$ GeV, and dotted is $T=9.1$ GeV.}
281: \label{figftfg}
282: \end{figure}
283:
284: The dependence on temperature when using t'Hooft-like scaling is shown in figure \ref{figftfg}. Here, a significant effect also on the soft modes can be seen. While a direct influence on the infrared coefficients for the ghost and transverse gluon dressing functions is visible, for the dressing function of the longitudinal gluon only a slight change at mid-momenta occurs. Therefore, the dressing function of the longitudinal gluon is dominated by its renormalized mass also when changing the temperature. As expected, the hard mode dressing functions become more and more tree-level like when increasing the temperature. The peaks in the hard mode dressing functions shift to higher momenta, owing to the renormalization condition, and become smaller due to the increase of the effective mass $p_0$ of the hard modes. At low temperature, the opposite effect is observed. In general, the hard mode dressing functions become more dynamical as their effective mass decreases, albeit quite slowly. The insensitivity on the infrared solution of the soft sector is not changed when reducing the temperature, and it may need a significantly lower temperature to induce a change.
285:
286: \begin{figure}
287: \epsfig{file=ftft.eps,height=1.2\linewidth,width=\linewidth}
288: \caption{The dependence of the solutions on $T$ at fixed $\mu$ and $s$ at $N=5$. The left panel shows the soft modes, where apart from the longitudinal gluon the dressing functions are shown. In the latter case the propagator is shown. The right panels show the dressing functions for the $n=1$ hard mode. The \piclinecol and black lines are the $g=1/2$ and the $g\approx 0.4$ solution, respectively. Solid is $T=0.3$ GeV, dashed is $T=1.5$ GeV, and dotted is $T=3.2$ GeV for $g=1/2$ and $T=2.3$ GeV for $g\approx 0.4$.}
289: \label{figftft}
290: \end{figure}
291:
292: Switching to a fixed renormalization scale and subtraction point, the solutions shown in figure \ref{figftft} are found. The effect is quite the same as in the ghost-loop-only truncation. Changing the temperature at fixed 4d-coupling, and thus increasing the 3d-coupling with temperature, shifts the onset of non-perturbative effects to larger momenta. Obeying the renormalization at fixed momentum then requires the changes in the dressing functions seen in the figure. In this case, it was also again possible to super-cool down to at least $T=152$ MeV.
293:
294: \begin{figure}
295: \epsfig{file=ftzxcomp.eps,height=1.2\linewidth,width=\linewidth}
296: \caption{The dependence of the solutions on $\zeta$ and $\xi$ at $N=5$. The left panel shows the soft modes, where apart from the longitudinal gluon the dressing functions are shown. In the latter case the propagator is shown. The right panels show the dressing functions for the $n=1$ hard mode. The \piclinecol and black lines are the $g=1/2$ and the $g\approx 0.4$ solution, respectively. Solid is $(g,\zeta,\xi)=(1/2,3,2)$ and $(0.4,1.7,7/4)$, dashed is $(1/2,1,1)$ and $(0.4,1,1)$, dotted is $(1/2,0,1/4)$ and $(0.4,1/4,1/2)$.}
297: \label{figftzx}
298: \end{figure}
299:
300: The dependence on $\zeta$ and $\xi$ is shown in figure \ref{figftzx}. Varying $\zeta$ leads to similar variations for the soft mode dressing functions as in the 3d-case. The largest effect is seen in the infrared. As the hard mode dressing functions are insensitive to the infrared behavior of the soft modes due to their effective mass, there are only weak variations of them with $\zeta$. Only at small $\zeta$ an additional structure appears in the transverse gluon dressing function. This is likely due to the cross-term in equation \pref{fulleqZft}. The effect of varying $\zeta$ on the longitudinal sector is negligible, as in the 3d-case. Correspondingly, the effect of varying $\xi$ is only significant for the longitudinal sector. The sensitivity is much less pronounced then in the case of varying $\zeta$. Especially the soft longitudinal dressing function is nearly unaffected by variation of $\xi$. The reason is that the soft equation does not depend explicitly on $\xi$, as it can be divided out of the equation for $\xi\neq 0$. Therefore, any $\xi$ dependence only enters indirectly by the weak dependence of the hard modes on $\xi$.
301:
302: The dependence on $\delta$ is qualitatively not different from the high temperature case for the soft modes. With decreasing temperature, the lowest attainable value of $\delta$ increases and is around $\delta\approx 0.11$ for the $g=1/2$ solution and $\delta\approx 0.15$ for the $g\approx 0.4$ solution at $T=1.5$ GeV. Surprisingly, the roles of the $g=1/2$ and $g\approx 0.4$ solutions are interchanged: At low temperatures, it is possible to reach lower values of $\delta$ in case of the half-integer solution. The hard mode dressing functions are nearly not affected by the change in $\delta$. Thus, there is no significant change concerning the dependence on $\delta$ at finite temperatures.
303:
304: At this point, a comparison can be made to a different approach to obtain the high-temperature gauge propagators. The usual continuum method is the semi-perturbative hard thermal loop (HTL) approach \cite{Blaizot:2001nr}. It is based on resumming the hard mode contributions in self-energy diagrams, hence its name. In the transverse infrared sector it is plagued by severe problems, due to its perturbative nature. The final result is a transverse gluon propagator with a particle like pole at $p=0$, thus $t=0$. This is in sharp contrast to the results found here and, as discussed in chapter \ref{c3d}, such a behavior is not likely. Also the lattice results tend to support the results found here. Concerning the soft longitudinal mode and the hard modes, HTLs and the ansatz presented here find qualitatively similar results on the level of the propagators.
305:
306: \section{Solutions at Small Temperature}\label{sdselowt}
307:
308: \begin{figure}[ht]
309: \begin{center}\epsfig{file=glowt.eps,width=0.5\linewidth}\end{center}
310: \caption{The dressing function of the soft ghost mode at zero \cite{Fischer:2002hn} and finite temperature \cite{Gruter:2004kd}.}
311: \label{figglowt}
312: \end{figure}
313:
314: As the temperature region of and above the phase transition is probed by experiments, the aim of the calculations presented here is to eventually describe the phase transition. This is not yet possible. Currently, the phase transition is approached from two sides. The first approach is from above, and is presented in this work. The second approach is from below and treated especially in \cite{Gruter:phd} and also to some extent in the context of this work \cite{Gruter:2004kd}. The main aim in these calculations is to investigate whether any qualitative changes are observed at small temperatures as compared to the vacuum solutions. Sufficient for this aim is to employ not a full continuum method but solving the DSEs approximately on a discretized space-time with a toroidal topology. This method had already been applied successfully to the vacuum \cite{Fischer:2002hn,Fischer:2003zc}.
315:
316: The results for the soft mode dressing functions are shown in figure \ref{figglowt} for the ghost propagator and in figure \ref{figzhlowt} for the two independent dressing functions of the gluon propagator \pref{gluonprop}, compared to the zero temperature solution. While the 3d-transverse part of the propagator becomes steeper in the infrared, the 3d-longitudinal part becomes more shallow. Thus, it experiences significant finite volume effects, as in the case of lattice calculations. Finite volume scaling shows that it is still confined, as in the case of the vacuum \cite{Gruter:2004kd}. Indeed it cannot be distinguished yet whether the exponents or merely the coefficients of the infrared solution change.
317:
318: \begin{figure}[t]
319: \epsfig{file=zlowt.eps,width=0.5\linewidth}\epsfig{file=hlowt.eps,width=0.5\linewidth}
320: \caption{The propagator of the soft gluon mode at zero \cite{Fischer:2002hn} and finite temperature \cite{Gruter:2004kd}. The left panel shows the 3d-transverse part $Z$ of \pref{gluonprop} and the right panel the 3d-longitudinal part $H$.}
321: \label{figzhlowt}
322: \end{figure}
323:
324: Interestingly, the 4d-transverse projection of \pref{gluonprop}, yields that the quantity $2Z+H$, is extremely temperature-independent \cite{Gruter:2004kd}. As this combination is the only one entering the thermodynamic potential to be discussed in section \ref{std}, and $G$ in itself is rather temperature independent, the corresponding thermodynamic potential is itself nearly independent of temperature and compatible with 0. This is what would be naively expected from a confined gluon system, as bound states are not included in the description here.
325:
326: In addition, it is possible to trace the solution up to temperatures of 800 MeV \cite{Gruter:2004kd}, significantly above the expected phase transition temperature of $(269\pm 1)$ MeV according to lattice results \cite{Karsch:2003jg}. Therefore it is possible to super-heat the system.
327:
328: If the temperature scale used in \cite{Gruter:2004kd} and here are compatible within a factor of 4, then within a substantial temperature range, two qualitatively different solutions exist. One solution has an over-screened and one a screened soft longitudinal gluon. Together with the observation of super-heating and super-cooling when comparing to lattice results, this implies a first order phase transition.
329:
330: Compared to the high-temperature case presented before, the sector of ghosts and transverse gluons is not changed qualitatively. Quantitatively, especially the infrared exponents changed, though. The main difference is in the longitudinal sector, where a change from over-screening to screening occurred. Comparing the hard modes in both cases, no qualitative change is found in any sector. Therefore, the main difference of the two phases is only in the longitudinal/chromoelectric sector. Therefore the nature of the phase transition will likely be chromoelectric. This implication for the phase transition and the compatibility of these observations with lattice calculations will be discussed in section \ref{ssumprop}.
331:
332: %%% Local Variables:
333: %%% mode: latex
334: %%% TeX-master: "thesis"
335: %%% End:
336: