1: \documentclass{appolb}

2: \usepackage{epsfig}

3: 

4: 

5: 

6: \newcommand{\lsim}

7: {\mathrel{\raisebox{-.3em}{$\stackrel{\displaystyle <}{\sim}$}}}

8: \newcommand{\gsim}

9: {\mathrel{\raisebox{-.3em}{$\stackrel{\displaystyle >}{\sim}$}}}

10: \def\asymp#1%

11: {\mathrel{\raisebox{-.4em}{$\widetilde{\scriptstyle #1}$}}}

12: \def\Nlim#1{\mathrel{\raisebox{-.4em}

13: {$\stackrel{\disp\longrightarrow}{\scriptstyle#1}$}}}

14: \def\Nequal#1%

15: {\mathrel{\raisebox{-.5em}{$\stackrel{=}{\scriptstyle\rm#1}$}}}

16: \newcommand{\dsl}[1]{\not \hspace{-0.7mm}#1}

17: \def\dsl{\mathpalette\make@slash}

18: \def\make@slash#1#2{\setbox\z@\hbox{$#1#2$}%

19:   \hbox to 0pt{\hss$#1/$\hss\kern-\wd0}\box0}

20: 

21: % Abbreviations for environments

22: \def\beq{\begin{equation}}

23: \def\eeq{\end{equation}}

24: \def\beqar{\begin{eqnarray}}

25: \def\eeqar{\end{eqnarray}}

26: \def\barr#1{\begin{array}{#1}}

27: \def\earr{\end{array}}

28: \def\bfi{\begin{figure}}

29: \def\efi{\end{figure}}

30: \def\btab{\begin{table}}

31: \def\etab{\end{table}}

32: \def\bce{\begin{center}}

33: \def\ece{\end{center}}

34: \def\nn{\nonumber}

35: \def\disp{\displaystyle}

36: \def\text{\textstyle}

37: \def\fs{\footnotesize}

38: \def\arraystretch{1.2}

39: 

40: % shorthands for greek letters

41: \def\al{\alpha}

42: \def\be{\beta}

43: \def\Ga{\Gamma}

44: \def\ga{\gamma}

45: \def\de{\delta}

46: \def\De{\Delta}

47: \def\eps{\epsilon}

48: \def\veps{\varepsilon}

49: \def\la{\lambda}

50: \def\om{\omega}

51: \def\Om{\Omega}

52: \def\si{\sigma}

53: \def\Si{\Sigma}

54: \def\vth{\vartheta}

55: \def\ieps{\ri\epsilon}

56: 

57: % new commands for cross referencing

58: \def\refeq#1{\mbox{(\ref{#1})}}

59: \def\refeqs#1{\mbox{(\ref{#1})}}

60: \def\refeqf#1{\mbox{(\ref{#1})}}

61: \def\reffi#1{\mbox{Figure~\ref{#1}}}

62: \def\reffis#1{\mbox{Figures~\ref{#1}}}

63: \def\refta#1{\mbox{Table~\ref{#1}}}

64: \def\reftas#1{\mbox{Tables~\ref{#1}}}

65: \def\refse#1{\mbox{Section~\ref{#1}}}

66: \def\refses#1{\mbox{Sections~\ref{#1}}}

67: \def\refapp#1{\mbox{App.~\ref{#1}}}

68: \def\citere#1{\mbox{Ref.~\cite{#1}}}

69: \def\citeres#1{\mbox{Refs.~\cite{#1}}}

70: 

71: %physical units

72: \newcommand{\TeV}{\unskip\,\mathrm{TeV}}

73: \newcommand{\GeV}{\unskip\,\mathrm{GeV}}

74: \newcommand{\MeV}{\unskip\,\mathrm{MeV}}

75: \newcommand{\pba}{\unskip\,\mathrm{pb}}

76: \newcommand{\fb}{\unskip\,\mathrm{fb}}

77: 

78: % roman symbols

79: \newcommand{\ri}{{\mathrm{i}}}

80: \newcommand{\rd}{{\mathrm{d}}}

81: \newcommand{\rE}{{\mathrm{E}}}

82: \newcommand{\rU}{{\mathrm{U}}}

83: \newcommand{\rL}{{\mathrm{L}}}

84: \newcommand{\rT}{{\mathrm{T}}}

85: 

86: % calligraphic symbols

87: %\renewcommand{\O}{\mathswitch{{\cal{O}}}}

88: \newcommand{\Oa}{\mathswitch{{\cal{O}}(\alpha)}}

89: \newcommand{\Oaa}{\mathswitch{{\cal{O}}(\alpha^2)}}

90: \newcommand{\Oaaa}{\mathswitch{{\cal{O}}(\alpha^3)}}

91: \renewcommand{\L}{{\cal{L}}}

92: \newcommand{\M}{{\cal{M}}}

93: %\newcommand{\V}{{\cal{V}}}

94: %\newcommand{\B}{{\cal{B}}}

95: 

96: %physical particles

97: \def\mathswitchr#1{\relax\ifmmode{\mathrm{#1}}\else$\mathrm{#1}$\fi}

98: \newcommand{\Pf}{\mathswitch  f}

99: \newcommand{\Pfbar}{\mathswitch{\bar f}}

100: \newcommand{\PV}{\mathswitchr V}

101: \newcommand{\PW}{\mathswitchr W}

102: \newcommand{\Pw}{\mathswitchr w}

103: \newcommand{\PZ}{\mathswitchr Z}

104: \newcommand{\PA}{\mathswitchr A}

105: \newcommand{\Pg}{\mathswitchr g}

106: \newcommand{\Ph}{\mathswitchr h}

107: \newcommand{\PH}{\mathswitchr H}

108: \newcommand{\Pe}{\mathswitchr e}

109: \newcommand{\Pp}{\mathswitchr p}

110: \newcommand{\Pne}{\mathswitch \nu_{\mathrm{e}}}

111: \newcommand{\Pnebar}{\mathswitch \bar\nu_{\mathrm{e}}}

112: \newcommand{\Pd}{\mathswitchr d}

113: \newcommand{\Pdbar}{\bar{\mathswitchr d}}

114: \newcommand{\Pu}{\mathswitchr u}

115: \newcommand{\Pubar}{\bar{\mathswitchr u}}

116: \newcommand{\Ps}{\mathswitchr s}

117: \newcommand{\Psbar}{\bar{\mathswitchr s}}

118: \newcommand{\Pc}{\mathswitchr c}

119: \newcommand{\Pcbar}{\bar{\mathswitchr c}}

120: \newcommand{\Pb}{\mathswitchr b}

121: \newcommand{\Pbbar}{\mathswitchr{\bar b}}

122: \newcommand{\Pt}{\mathswitchr t}

123: \newcommand{\Ptbar}{\mathswitchr{\bar t}}

124: \newcommand{\Pep}{\mathswitchr {e^+}}

125: \newcommand{\Pem}{\mathswitchr {e^-}}

126: \newcommand{\PWp}{\mathswitchr {W^+}}

127: \newcommand{\PWm}{\mathswitchr {W^-}}

128: \newcommand{\PWpm}{\mathswitchr {W^\pm}}

129: 

130: % particle masses

131: \def\mathswitch#1{\relax\ifmmode#1\else$#1$\fi}

132: \newcommand{\Mf}{\mathswitch {m_\Pf}}

133: \newcommand{\Mff}{\mathswitch {m_{\Pf'}}}

134: \newcommand{\Ml}{\mathswitch {m_\Pl}}

135: \newcommand{\Mq}{\mathswitch {m_\Pq}}

136: \newcommand{\MV}{\mathswitch {M_\PV}}

137: \newcommand{\MW}{\mathswitch {M_\PW}}

138: \newcommand{\MA}{\mathswitch {\lambda}}

139: \newcommand{\MZ}{\mathswitch {M_\PZ}}

140: \newcommand{\MH}{\mathswitch {M_\PH}}

141: \newcommand{\Me}{\mathswitch {m_\Pe}}

142: \newcommand{\Mmy}{\mathswitch {m_\mu}}

143: \newcommand{\Mta}{\mathswitch {m_\tau}}

144: \newcommand{\Md}{\mathswitch {m_\Pd}}

145: \newcommand{\Mu}{\mathswitch {m_\Pu}}

146: \newcommand{\Ms}{\mathswitch {m_\Ps}}

147: \newcommand{\Mc}{\mathswitch {m_\Pc}}

148: \newcommand{\Mb}{\mathswitch {m_\Pb}}

149: \newcommand{\Mt}{\mathswitch {m_\Pt}}

150: \newcommand{\GW}{\Gamma_{\PW}}

151: \newcommand{\GZ}{\Gamma_{\PZ}}

152: \newcommand{\GV}{\Gamma_{\PV}}

153: 

154: % shorthands for SM parameters

155: \newcommand{\sw}{\mathswitch {s_\Pw}}

156: \newcommand{\cw}{\mathswitch {c_\Pw}}

157: \newcommand{\swbar}{\mathswitch {\bar s_\Pw}}

158: \newcommand{\cwbar}{\mathswitch {\bar c_\Pw}}

159: \newcommand{\Qf}{\mathswitch {Q_\Pf}}

160: \newcommand{\Ql}{\mathswitch {Q_\Pl}}

161: \newcommand{\Qq}{\mathswitch {Q_\Pq}}

162: \newcommand{\vf}{\mathswitch {v_\Pf}}

163: \newcommand{\af}{\mathswitch {a_\Pf}}

164: \newcommand{\gesi}{\mathswitch {g_\Pe}^{\sigma}}

165: \newcommand{\gem}{\mathswitch {g_\Pe}^-}

166: \newcommand{\gep}{\mathswitch {g_\Pe}^+}

167: \newcommand{\GF}{\mathswitch {G_\mu}}

168: \newcommand{\VA}{\mathrm{\{V,A\}}}

169: \newcommand{\V}{\mathrm{V}}

170: 

171: % line characterizations for figure captions

172: \def\solid{\raise.9mm\hbox{\protect\rule{1.1cm}{.2mm}}}

173: \def\dash{\raise.9mm\hbox{\protect\rule{2mm}{.2mm}}\hspace*{1mm}}

174: \def\dot{\rlap{$\cdot$}\hspace*{2mm}}

175: \def\dashed{\dash\dash\dash\dash}

176: \def\ddashed{\dash\hspace*{-.5mm}\dash\hspace*{1mm}\dash\hspace*{-.5mm}\dash}

177: \def\dotted{\dot\dot\dot\dot\dot\dot}

178: \def\dashdotted{\dot\dash\dot\dash\dot}

179: 

180: % various abbreviations

181: \def\ie{i.e.\ }

182: \def\eg{e.g.\ }

183: \def\cf{cf.\ }

184: \def\sub{{\mathrm{sub}}}

185: \def\gsub{g^{(\sub)}}

186: \def\Gsub{G^{(\sub)}}

187: \def\cGsub{{\cal G}^{(\sub)}}

188: \def\cGcoll{{\cal G}^{(\coll)}}

189: \def\ssub{\sigma^{(\sub)}}

190: 

191: \newcommand{\se}{self-energy}

192: \newcommand{\ses}{self-energies}

193: \newcommand{\ct}{counterterm}

194: \newcommand{\cts}{counterterms}

195: \newcommand{\cs}{cross section}

196: \newcommand{\css}{cross sections}

197: 

198: \newcommand{\br}{{\mathrm{br}}}

199: \newcommand{\QCD}{{\mathrm{QCD}}}

200: \newcommand{\QED}{{\mathrm{QED}}}

201: \newcommand{\LEP}{{\mathrm{LEP}}}

202: \newcommand{\SLD}{{\mathrm{SLD}}}

203: \newcommand{\SM}{{\mathrm{SM}}}

204: \newcommand{\Born}{{\mathrm{Born}}}

205: \newcommand{\born}{{\mathrm{Born}}}

206: \newcommand{\corr}{{\mathrm{corr}}}

207: \newcommand{\onel}{{\mathrm{1-loop}}}

208: \newcommand{\weak}{{\mathrm{weak}}}

209: \newcommand{\cut}{{\mathrm{cut}}}

210: \newcommand{\SB}{{\mathrm{SB}}}

211: \newcommand{\unpol}{\mathrm{unpol}}

212: \newcommand{\CMS}{{\mathrm{CMS}}}

213: \newcommand{\CC}{{\mathrm{CC}}}

214: \newcommand{\NC}{{\mathrm{NC}}}

215: \newcommand{\virt}{{\mathrm{virt}}}

216: \newcommand{\soft}{{\mathrm{soft}}}

217: \newcommand{\coll}{{\mathrm{coll}}}

218: \newcommand{\finite}{{\mathrm{finite}}}

219: \renewcommand{\min}{{\mathrm{min}}}

220: \renewcommand{\max}{{\mathrm{max}}}

221: \newcommand{\Ncf}{N_f^{\mathrm{c}}}

222: 

223: \newcommand{\U}{\mathrm{U}}

224: \newcommand{\SU}{\mathrm{SU}}

225: 

226: % mathematical functions

227: \def\atn{\mathop{\mathrm{arctan}}\nolimits}

228: \def\Li{\mathop{\mathrm{Li}_2}\nolimits}

229: \def\bLi{\mathop{\overline{\mathrm{Li}_2}}\nolimits}

230: \def\cLi{\mathop{{\cal L}i_2}\nolimits}

231: \def\Re{\mathop{\mathrm{Re}}\nolimits}

232: \def\Im{\mathop{\mathrm{Im}}\nolimits}

233: \def\sgn{\mathop{\mathrm{sgn}}\nolimits}

234: 

235: \hyphenation{brems-strah-lung}

236: 

237: \marginparwidth 1.2cm

238: \marginparsep 0.2cm

239: 

240: \renewcommand{\topfraction}{1.0}

241: \renewcommand{\bottomfraction}{1.0}

242: \renewcommand{\textfraction}{0.2}

243: \renewcommand{\floatpagefraction}{0.8}

244: 

245: \newcommand{\eezh}{\Pep\Pem\to\PZ\PH}

246: \newcommand{\eennh}{\Pep\Pem\to\nu\bar\nu\PH}

247: \newcommand{\eetth}{\Pep\Pem\to\Pt\bar\Pt\PH}

248: \newcommand{\eeneneh}{\Pep\Pem\to\Pne\Pnebar\PH}

249: \newcommand{\eenmnmh}{\Pep\Pem\to\nu_\mu\bar\nu_\mu\PH}

250: \newcommand{\eentnth}{\Pep\Pem\to\nu_\tau\bar\nu_\tau\PH}

251: 

252: 

253: 

254: 

255: 

256: \begin{document}

257: % \eqsec  % uncomment this line to get equations numbered by (sec.num)

258: \title{{Electroweak Physics}

259: \thanks{Presented by A. Denner at the final meeting of the European Network

260:         ``Physics at Colliders'', Montpellier, France, September 26-27, 2004.}}

261: \author{W. Hollik

262: \address{Max-Planck-Institut f\"ur Physik, D-80805 Munich}

263: \and

264: A. Accomando, F. del Aguila, M. Awramik,

265: A. Ballestrero,

266: J.~van der Bij, W. Beenakker, R. Bonciani, M. Czakon, 

267: G.~Degrassi,

268: A. Denner, K. Diener, S.~Dittmaier, A. Ferroglia,

269: J. Fleischer, A. Freitas, N. Glover, J. Gluza, T. Hahn,

270: S.~Heinemeyer, S.~Jadach, F.~Jegerlehner,

271: W.~Kilian, M.~Kr\"amer, J.~K\"uhn, 

272: E.~Maina, S.~Moretti,

273: T.~Ohl, C.G.~Papadopoulos, G.~Passarino, R.~Pittau, 

274: S.~Pozzorini, M.~Roth, T.~Riemann, J.B.~Tausk,

275: S.~Uccirati, \\

276: A.~Werthenbach, G.~Weiglein 

277: \address{NSCR Democritos Athens, CERN,

278: Univ.~Granada, Univ.~Durham, DESY, Univ.~Edinburgh,

279: Univ.~Freiburg, Univ.~Karlsruhe, Univ.~Katowice,   

280: HNINP~Krakow,

281: Max Planck Institut f\"ur Physik M\"unchen,

282: Univ.~Nijmegen, Univ.~Roma~3, Univ.~Southampton,

283: Univ.~Torino,

284: PSI~Villigen, Univ.~W\"urzburg}

285: }

286: \maketitle

287: \begin{abstract}

288: Work on electroweak precision calculations and event generators for 

289: electroweak physics studies at 

290: current and future %high-energy 

291: colliders is summarized.

292: \end{abstract}

293: \PACS{12.15.Lk, 13.66.Jn, 14.70.Fm, 14.70.Hp}

294:   

295: 

296: \section{Introduction}

297: 

298: Apart from the still missing Higgs boson, 

299: the Standard Model (SM) has been impressively confirmed

300: by successful collider experiments at the particle accelerators

301: LEP, SLC, and  Tevatron during the last decade with high precision,

302: at the level of radiative corrections.

303: Future colliders like the upcoming LHC or an 

304: $\Pep\Pem$ International Linear Collider (ILC), 

305: %\cite{Aguilar-Saavedra:2001rg}, \cite{Abe:2001wn},

306: %\cite{Abe:2001gc}, 

307: offer an even greater physics potential, 

308: and in turn represent a 

309: great challenge for theory

310: to provide even more precise calculations.

311: Accurate predictions are necessary not only to increase the level of

312: precision of SM tests, but also to study the indirect effects of

313: possible new particles.

314: 

315: With increasing energies many new processes with heavy particle production

316: will be accessible. Such 

317: heavy particles are unstable, so that their production leads

318: to many-particle final states, with e.g.\ four or six fermions.

319: Predictions for such reactions should be based

320: on full transition matrix elements, improved by radiative corrections

321: as far as possible,

322: and call for proper event generators.

323: 

324: 

325: Joint work done within the network is reviewed here; more details can be 

326: found also in previous studies for future colliders

327: \cite{LHCbook,Aguilar-Saavedra:2001rg,Baur:2001yp}.

328: 

329: 

330: \section{Precision observables and multi-loop calculations}

331: 

332: \subsection{Muon lifetime and $W$--$Z$ mass correlation }

333: 

334: The precise measurement of the muon lifetime, or equivalently of the

335: Fermi constant $\GF$, sets an important constraint on the SM parameters,

336: \beq

337: \GF = \frac{\pi\alpha(0)}{\sqrt{2}\MW^2\sw^2}\,(1+\Delta r),

338: \eeq

339: with $\sw^2=1-\cw^2=1-\MW^2/\MZ^2$, where

340: the quantity $\Delta r$ comprises the radiative corrections to 

341: muon decay (apart from the photonic corrections in the Fermi model).

342: Solving this relation

343: for the W-boson mass $\MW$ yields a precise prediction for $\MW$

344: that can be compared with the directly measured value.

345: Recently the full electroweak two-loop calculation has been completed,

346: with the contributions from closed fermion 

347: loops~\cite{Freitas:2000gg,Awramik:2003ee}, from

348: bosonic loops involving virtual Higgs-bosons~\cite{Freitas:2000gg},

349: and the complete bosonic corrections~\cite{Awramik:2002wn,Awramik:2003ee}.

350: The two-loop fermionic contributions influence the $\MW$

351: prediction at the level of $\sim 50\MeV$,

352: the two-loop bosonic corrections by $1{-}2\MeV$.

353: 

354: The predictions at the two-loop level have been 

355: further improved by universal

356: higher-order contributions to the $\rho$-parameter. The 

357: terms of the order  

358: ${\cal O}(\GF^2\Mt^4\alpha_{\mathrm{s}})$ and

359: ${\cal O}(\GF^3\Mt^6)$ have been obtained  

360: in \cite{Faisst:2003px}

361: and were found to change $\MW$ at the level

362: of $5\MeV$ and $0.5\MeV$, respectively.

363: The leading three-loop bosonic contribution to the $\rho$-parameter

364: in the large Higgs mass limit~\cite{Boughezal:2004},

365: yielding the power $M_{\rm H}^4/M_{\rm W}^4$,

366: is opposite in sign to the leading two-loop correction

367: $\sim M_{\rm H}^2/M_{\rm W}^2$. The two terms cancel each other 

368: for a Higgs boson mass around 480 GeV. This interesting new result 

369: stabilizes the perturbative expansion and 

370: makes a strongly interacting Higgs sector very unlikely in view of the

371: electroweak precision data.  

372: 

373: The prediction for $\MW$,

374: including the above-mentioned two-loop and leading three-loop effects,

375: carries, besides the parametric uncertainty,

376: an intrinsic theoretical uncertainty, which is estimated to be of

377: $3{-}4\MeV$ \cite{HollikZeuthenprocs,Gw2004}, 

378: which has to be

379: compared with the aimed precision of

380: $7\MeV$ in the $\MW$ determination at a future ILC~\cite{Baur:2001yp}.

381: 

382: 

383: \subsection{Precision observables at the Z~resonance}

384: 

385: In order to describe the Z-boson resonance at LEP1 within satisfactory

386: precision it was possible to parametrize the cross section 

387: near the resonance in such a way \cite{zresonance,Bardin:1997xq}

388: that a Born-like form with generalized

389: ``effective'' couplings is convoluted with QED structure functions

390: modeling initial-state radiation (ISR).

391: From these effective Z-boson--fermion couplings so-called 

392: ``pseudo-observables'' were derived, such as various asymmetries, the

393: hadronic Z-peak cross section, partial Z-decay widths, etc.

394: The precisely calculated  

395: pseudo-observables are implemented in the programs

396: {\sc Zfitter} and {\sc Topaz0}~\cite{Bardin:1998nm}.

397: A critical overview on high-precision physics at the Z~pole, 

398: in particular focusing on the theoretical uncertainties, can be 

399: found in \cite{zeuthenMHworkshop}.

400: The status of precision pseudo-observables 

401: in the MSSM is summarized 

402: in~\cite{Heinemeyer:2004gw}. 

403: 

404: Following the formal tree-level like parametrization of the couplings, 

405: an ``effective weak mixing angle'', 

406: $\sin^2\theta_{f}^{\rm eff}$, was derived for each fermion species.

407: Among these parameters the leptonic variable

408: $\sin^2\theta_{\ell}^{\rm eff}$ plays a particularly important role,

409: since it is measured with the high accuracy of $1.7\times 10^{-4}$

410: and is very sensitive to the Higgs-boson mass.

411: Quite recently,

412: a substantial subclass of the electroweak

413: two-loop contributions, the fermionic contributions to

414: $\sin^2\theta_{\ell}^{\rm eff}$,

415: were calculated~\cite{Awramik:2004ge}; 

416: they reduce the 

417: intrinsic theoretical uncertainty to

418: $\sim 5\times 10^{-5}$.

419: 

420: Whether the pseudo-observable

421: approach will also be sufficient for Z-boson physics

422: at the high-luminosity GigaZ option remains to be investigated

423: carefully. In any case, substantial theoretical progress will be

424: needed to match the aimed GigaZ precision on the theoretical side,

425: e.g.\ for

426: the expected experimental accuracy in 

427: $\sin^2\theta_{\ell}^{\rm eff}$ of

428: about $1.3 \times 10^{-5}$.

429: A full control of observables at the two-loop level, improved by

430: leading higher-order effects, seems indispensable.

431: 

432: 

433: An important entry for the precision observables 

434: with a large parametric uncertainty is

435: the photonic vacuum polarization at the Z scale.

436: The hadronic part is determined via a dispersion relation from the

437: cross section for $\e^+ \e^- \rightarrow {\it hadrons}$ with experimental data

438: as input in the low-energy regime. Possible scans with the radiative-return

439: method require a careful theoretical treatment to reach the required

440: precision~\cite{Czyz:2002ft}.

441: 

442: 

443: 

444: 

445: \subsection{Deep-inelastic neutrino scattering}

446: 

447: An independent precise determination of the electroweak mixing angle

448: in terms of the $M_W/M_Z$ ratio has been done in deep-inelastic 

449: neutrino scattering off an isoscalar target

450: by the NuTev Collaboration~\cite{Zeller:2001hh},

451: yielding a deviation of about 3 standard deviations from the value

452: derived from the global analysis of the other precision observables. 

453: A new calculation of the electroweak one-loop

454: corrections was performed~\cite{Diener:2003ss} to investigate the stability

455: and size of the quantum effects,

456: showing that the theoretical error of the analysis in~\cite{Zeller:2001hh}

457: was obviously underestimated. The new theoretical result

458: is now being used for a re-analysis

459: of the experimental data (see also \cite{Arbuzov:2004zr} for another

460: recent recalculation of the electroweak radiative corrections).

461: 

462: 

463: 

464: \subsection{At the 2-loop frontier}

465: 

466: Although there are no complete next-to-next-to-leading (NNLO)

467: predictions for 

468: $2\to2$ scattering reactions and $1\to3$ decays (with one truly

469: massive leg) available yet, significant progress was reached in this

470: direction in recent years. 

471: 

472: Complete virtual two-loop amplitudes for 

473: (massless) Bhabha scattering \cite{Bern:2000ie} and

474: light-by-light scattering \cite{Bern:2001dg}

475: have been worked out.

476: Also  first steps have been made towards massive Bhabha scattering

477: 

478: In Ref.~\cite{Glover:2001ev} the coefficient of the 

479: ${\cal O}(\alpha^2\log(s/m_e^2))$ 

480: fixed-order contribution to elastic large-angle Bhabha

481: scattering is derived by adapting the classification of infrared divergences

482: that was recently developed within dimensional regularization, and applying it

483: to the regularization scheme with a massive photon and electron.

484: 

485: The subset of factorizable corrections, resulting from one-loop

486: subrenormalization, is considered  

487: in~\cite{Fleischer:2002wa}. This requires the

488: evaluation of one-loop diagrams 

489: in arbitrary dimension $d=4-\varepsilon$.

490: The $\veps$-expansion

491: covering the orders $1/\veps$

492: and $\veps$,

493: in particular for the box graphs

494: needed in Bhabha scattering, was performed

495: in~\cite{Fleischer:2003bg}, based on the work of 

496: \cite{Fleischer:2003rm}~\footnote{Techniques applied 

497: in the latter work have also been used in 

498: \cite{Fleischer:2004vb}

499: for the analytic calculation of Higgs boson decay into two photons.}.

500: For the genuine two-loop QED

501: corrections to Bhabha scattering,

502: the master integrals for the box with the fermionic 

503: loop were calculated~\cite{bonciani1}, and

504: the cross section with the corrections at 

505: two loop resulting from these  diagrams~\cite{bonciani2}.

506: 

507: 

508: 

509: A complete set of master integrals for massive two-loop

510: Bhabha scattering has been derived in the 

511: meantime~\cite{czakonMI}, and for form factors with 

512: massless~\cite{Birthwright:2004kk}

513: and massive propagators~\cite{Aglietti:2004tq}.

514: Moreover, two-loop QCD corrections for the electroweak forward-backward

515: asymmetries were obtained~\cite{Bonciani:2003hc}.

516: Also two-loop master integrals and

517: form factors from virtual light fermions were

518: derived and applied to Higgs boson production and

519: decays~\cite{Aglietti:2004ki}.

520: 

521: 

522: 

523: 

524: 

525: \subsection{Electroweak radiative corrections at high energies}

526: 

527: Electroweak corrections far above the electroweak scale, e.g.\ in the

528: TeV range, are dominated by soft and collinear gauge-boson exchange,

529: leading to corrections of the form $\alpha^N\log^M(s/\MW^2)$ with

530: $M\le2N$. The leading terms ($M=2N$) are called Sudakov logarithms.

531: At the one-loop ($N=1$) and two-loop ($N=2$) level 

532: the leading and subleading corrections to a $2\to2$ process

533: at $\sqrt{s}\sim 1\TeV$ typically amount to \cite{Denner:2003wi}

534: \beqar

535: \de_{\mathrm{LL}}^{\mathrm{1-loop}} &\sim&

536: -\frac{\alpha}{\pi\sw^2}\log^2\bigl(\frac{s}{\MW^2}\bigr)  \simeq -26\%, 

537: \nn\\

538: \disp \de_{\mathrm{NLL}}^{\mathrm{1-loop}} &\sim&

539: +\frac{3\alpha}{\pi\sw^2}\log\bigl(\frac{s}{\MW^2}\bigr) \simeq 16\%,

540: \nn\\

541: \disp \de_{\mathrm{LL}}^{\mathrm{2-loop}} &\sim&

542: +\frac{\alpha^2}{2\pi^2\sw^4}\log^4\bigl(\frac{s}{\MW^2}\bigr) \simeq 3.5\%,

543: \nn\\

544: \disp \de_{\mathrm{NLL}}^{\mathrm{2-loop}} &\sim&

545: -\frac{3\alpha^2}{\pi^2\sw^4}\log^3\bigl(\frac{s}{\MW^2}\bigr) \simeq -4.2\%,

546: \eeqar

547: revealing that these corrections become significant in the high-energy phase

548: of a future ILC. In contrast to QED and QCD, where the Sudakov logarithms

549: cancel in the sum of virtual and real corrections, these terms need not

550: compensate in the electroweak SM for two reasons. 

551: The weak charges of quarks, leptons, and electroweak gauge bosons

552: are open, not confined, i.e.\ there is (in contrast to QCD) no need 

553: to average or to sum over gauge multiplets in the initial or final states

554: of processes. Even for final states that are inclusive with respect to the

555: weak charges Sudakov logarithms do not completely cancel owing to the

556: definite weak charges in the initial state~\cite{Ciafaloni:2000gm}.

557: Moreover, the large 

558: W- and Z-boson masses make an experimental discrimination of real W- or

559: Z-boson production possible, in contrast to unobservable soft-photon or

560: gluon emission.

561: 

562: In recent years several calculations of these high-energy logarithms

563: have been carried out in the Sudakov regime, where all kinematical

564: invariants $(p_i p_j)$ of different particle momenta $p_i$, $p_j$

565: are much larger than all particle masses.

566: A complete analysis of all leading and subleading logarithms at the

567: one-loop level can be found in~\cite{Denner:2000jv}.

568: Diagrammatic calculations of the leading two-loop Sudakov logarithms

569: have been carried out in \cite{Denner:2003wi,Beenakker:2000kb}.

570: Diagrammatic results on the so-called ``angular-dependent''

571: subleading logarithms have been presented in~\cite{Denner:2003wi}.

572: All these explicit results are compatible with proposed resummations

573: \cite{Fadin:1999bq,Kuhn:2001hz}

574: that are based on a symmetric SU(2)$\times$U(1) theory at high energies

575: matched with QED at the electroweak scale. In this ansatz,

576: improved matrix elements $\M$ result from lowest-order matrix elements

577: $\M_0$ upon dressing them with (operator-valued) exponentials,

578: \beq

579: \M \sim \M_0 \otimes \exp\left({\de_{\mathrm{ew}}}\right) \otimes

580: \exp\left({\de_{\mathrm{em}}}\right).

581: \eeq

582: Explicit expressions for the electroweak and electromagnetic

583: corrections $\de_{\mathrm{ew}}$ and $\de_{\mathrm{em}}$, which

584: do not commute with each other, can, for instance, be found

585: in \cite{Denner:2003wi}.

586: For $2\to2$ neutral-current processes of four massless fermions,

587: also subsubleading logarithmic corrections have been derived and

588: resummed \cite{Kuhn:2001hz}

589: using an infrared evolution equation that follows the pattern of QCD.

590: Applications to vector-boson pair production in proton--proton

591: collisions can be found in~\cite{Accomando:2001fn}.

592: 

593: 

594: In supersymmetric models the form of radiative corrections at high energies

595: has also been worked out for a broad class of processes 

596: \cite{Beccaria:2001an}. Based on 

597: one-loop results their exponentiation has been proposed.

598: 

599: \subsection{Higher-order initial-state radiation}

600: 

601: Photon radiation off initial-state electrons and positrons leads to

602: large radiative corrections of the form $\alpha^N\log^N(\Me^2/s)$.

603: These logarithmic corrections are universal and governed by the

604: DGLAP evolution equations. The solution of these equations for the

605: electron-photon system yields the structure functions, 

606: generically denoted by $\Gamma(x)$ below,

607: which can be used via convolution to improve hard scattering cross sections 

608: $\hat\sigma(p_{\Pe^+},p_{\Pe^-})$ by photon emission effects,

609: \beqar

610: \sigma(p_{\Pe^+},p_{\Pe^-}) &=& \int_0^1 \rd x_+\,\Gamma(x_+)

611: \int_0^1 \rd x_-\,\Gamma(x_-) \;

612:  \hat\sigma(x_+p_{\Pe^+},x_-p_{\Pe^-}).

613: \eeqar

614: While the soft-photon part of the structure functions 

615: \mbox{($x\to1$)} can be 

616: resummed, resulting in an exponential form, the contributions of

617: hard photons have to be calculated order by order in perturbation theory.

618: In \cite{Beenakker:1996kt} the structure functions are summarized

619: up to ${\cal O}(\alpha^3)$. 

620: \citere{Blumlein:2002bg} describes a calculation of the

621: (non-singlet) contributions up to ${\cal O}(\alpha^5)$ and

622: of the small-$x$ terms $[\alpha\log^2(x)]^N$ to all orders

623: (for previous calculations see papers cited in \citere{Blumlein:2002bg}).

624: 

625: \section{\boldmath{Radiative corrections to $2\to3,4,\dots$ processes}}

626: \subsection{Four-fermion final states and W-pair production}

627: 

628: Four-fermion final states in $e^+ e^-$ collisions, which involve electroweak

629: boson pair production, are of special interest since they

630: allow the mechanism of spontaneous symmetry 

631: breaking and the non-Abelian structure of the Standard Model  

632:  to be directly tested 

633: by the experiments. Moreover they provide a very important background to

634: most searches for new physics.

635: 

636: LEP2 has provided in this respect an ideal testing ground for the SM.

637: The W profile has been measured with great accuracy,  new bounds on 

638: anomalous trilinear gauge-boson couplings have been set, 

639: and single W, single Z, ZZ, and Z$\gamma$ cross 

640: sections have been determined for the first time.   

641: These studies will be continued with much higher statistics and

642: energy at a future $e^+e^-$ Linear Collider. 

643: 

644: In this context, the MonteCarlo four fermion generator {\tt WPHACT 2.0 } 

645: has been completed \cite{wph}, adapted to experimental requests and used for 

646: simulation of the LEP2 data  \cite{delphi}.

647: {\tt WPHACT 2.0} computes all Standard Model processes with four fermions 

648: in the final state at $e^+ e^-$ colliders, it makes use of complete,

649:  fully massive helicity amplitude calculations and includes the 

650: Imaginary Fermion Loop gauge restoring

651: scheme\footnote{In~\cite{Beenakker:2003va}

652: the incorporation of the fermion-loop corrections 

653: into $\Pep\Pem\to n\; {\rm fermions}$ is discussed 

654: in terms of an effective Lagrangian approach.}.

655: Thanks to these  features and new phase space mappings,

656: {\tt WPHACT} has been extended to all regions of phace space,

657: including kinematical configurations dominated by small momentum transfer and

658: small invariant masses

659: like single W, single Z, Z$\gamma ^*$ and $\gamma ^*\gamma ^*$

660: processes.

661: Special attention has been devoted to QED effects, which have a large

662: numerical impact, with new options for the description of Initial State 

663: Radiation (ISR) and of the scale dependence of the electromagnetic coupling.

664: Moreover, there is the possibility of including CKM mixing, and to account

665: for resonances in $q \bar q$ channels. 

666: 

667: 

668: 

669: 

670: The theoretical treatment and the presently gained level in accuracy in the 

671: description of W-pair-mediated $4f$ production were triggered by

672: LEP2, as it is reviewed in \citeres{Beenakker:1996kt,Grunewald:2000ju}. 

673: The $\PW$ bosons are treated as resonances in the full

674: $4f$ processes, $\Pe^+ \Pe^- \to 4 \Pf\, (+\,\gamma)$.

675: Radiative corrections are split into universal and non-universal corrections.  

676: The former comprise leading-logarithmic corrections from

677: ISR, higher-order corrections included by

678: using appropriate effective couplings, and the Coulomb singularity.  

679: These corrections can be combined with the full lowest-order matrix elements

680: easily.

681: The remaining corrections are called non-universal, since they depend on

682: the process under investigation.

683: For LEP2 accuracy, it was sufficient to include these corrections

684: by the leading term of an expansion about the two $\PW$ poles, defining

685: the so-called double-pole approximation (DPA). 

686: Different versions of such a DPA

687: have been used in the literature

688: \cite{DPAversions,Jadach:1998tz,Denner:2000kn}.  Although several

689: Monte Carlo programs exist that include universal corrections, only

690: two event generators, {\sc YFSWW} \cite{Jadach:1998tz}

691: and {\sc RacoonWW} \cite{Denner:2000kn,Denner:1999gp},

692: include non-universal corrections, as well as the option of anomalous

693: gauge couplings~\cite{Denner:2001bd}.  

694: 

695: In the DPA approach, the W-pair cross section can be predicted within

696: a relative accuracy of

697: $\sim0.5\% (0.7\%)$ in the energy range between $180\GeV$ ($170\GeV$)

698: and $500\GeV$, which was sufficient for the LEP2 accuracy of

699: $\sim 1\%$ for energies $170{-}209\GeV$. At threshold 

700: ($\sqrt{s}\lsim 170\GeV$), the present 

701: state-of-the-art prediction results from an improved Born approximation

702: based on leading universal corrections only, because the DPA is not

703: reliable there, and thus possesses an intrinsic uncertainty of

704: about $2\%$, which 

705: demonstrates the necessary theoretical improvements for the threshold region.

706: At energies beyond $500\GeV$, effects beyond ${\cal O}(\alpha)$,

707: such as the above-mentioned Sudakov logarithms at higher orders, 

708: become important and have to be included in predictions at

709: per-cent accuracy.

710: 

711: At LEP2, the W-boson mass has been determined by the reconstruction of 

712: W~bosons from their decay products with a final accuracy of about $30\MeV$.

713: In \cite{Jadach:2001cz} the theoretical uncertainty is estimated to be

714: of the order of $\sim 5\MeV$.

715: Theoretical improvements are, thus, desirable.

716: 

717: The above discussion illustrates the necessity of a full one-loop

718: calculation for the $\Pep\Pem\to 4f$ process

719: and of further improvements by leading higher-order corrections.

720: 

721: \subsection{Single-W production}

722: 

723: The single-W production process $\Pep\Pem\to\Pe\nu_\Pe\PW\to \Pe\nu_\Pe+2f$

724: plays a particularly important role among the $4f$ production processes

725: at high scattering energies. The process is predominantly initiated by

726: $\Pe\gamma^*$ collision,

727: where the photon is radiated off the electron

728: (or positron) by the Weizs\"acker--Williams mechanism, i.e.\ with

729: a very small off-shellness $q_\ga^2$. 

730: 

731: Consequently the cross section rises

732: logarithmically with the scattering energy and is of the same size

733: as the W-pair production cross section around $\sqrt{s}=500\GeV$;

734: for higher energies single-W dominates over W-pair production.

735: 

736: Theoretically the dominance of photon exchange at low $q_\ga^2$ poses

737: several complications. Technically, $q_\ga^2\to0$ means that the

738: electrons (or positrons) are produced in the forward direction and

739: that the electron mass has to be taken into account in order to

740: describe the cross section there. Moreover, the mere application

741: of $s$-dependent leading-logarithmic structure functions does not

742: describe the leading photon-radiation effects

743: properly, since ISR and final-state radiation (FSR)

744: show sizeable interferences for forward scattering. Thus, 

745: the improvement of lowest-order calculations by leading radiation 

746: effects is more complicated than for $s$-channel-like processes.

747: Finally, the running of the electromagnetic coupling 

748: $\alpha(q_\ga^2)$ has to be evaluated in the region of small

749: momentum transfer ($q_\ga^2<0$) where the fit for the hadronic part 

750: of the photon vacuum polarisation~\cite{Jegerlehner:2001ca}

751: should be used. 

752: 

753: The Monte Carlo generator {\sc KoralW} \cite{Jadach:1998gi}

754: has been updated to include the ISR-FSR interference effects

755: as well as the proper running of $\alpha(q_\ga^2)$.

756: Therefore, this program now has reached a level of accuracy

757: similar to the other state-of-the-art programs for single-W production:

758: {\sc Grc4f} \cite{Fujimoto:1996qg},

759: {\sc Nextcalibur} \cite{Berends:2000gj},

760: {\sc Swap} \cite{Montagna:2000ev},

761: {\sc Wphact} \cite{Accomando:1996es,wph}, and

762: {\sc Wto} \cite{Passarino:1996rc}.

763: It should be kept in mind that none

764: of these calculations includes non-universal electroweak

765: corrections, leading to a theoretical uncertainty of about

766: $\sim5\%$ in cross-section predictions. Although the final

767: solution for a high-energy Linear Collider

768: certainly requires a full

769: ${\cal O}(\alpha)$ calculation of the $4f$-production process,

770: a first step of improvement could be done by a careful

771: expansion about the propagator poles of the photon and W~boson.

772: The electroweak ${\cal O}(\alpha)$ corrections to the process

773: $\Pe\ga\to\nu_\Pe\PW$, which are known \cite{Denner:1992vg},

774: represent a basic building block in this calculation.

775: \looseness -1

776: 

777: 

778: 

779: \subsection{Progress for 

780: multi-particle production processes}

781: 

782: One-loop integrals become more and more cumbersome if the number $N$ of

783: external legs in diagrams increases. For $N>4$,

784: however, not all external momenta are linearly independent because of the

785: four-dimensionality of space-time.

786: As known for a long time \cite{Me65}, this fact opens the possibility 

787: to relate integrals with $N>4$ to integrals with $N\le4$.

788: In recent years, various techniques for actual evaluations of

789: one-loop integrals with $N=5,6$ have been worked out

790: \cite{Fleischer:1999hq,Denner:2002ii} 

791: (see also references therein for older methods and results).

792: The major complication in the treatment of $2\to3$ processes at one loop

793: concerns the numerical evaluation of tensor 5-point integrals; in particular,

794: the occurrence of inverse Gram determinants in the usual

795: Passarino--Veltman reduction to scalar integrals leads

796: to numerical instabilities at the phase-space boundary. A possible

797: solution to this problem was worked out in \cite{Denner:2002ii}

798: where the known direct reduction 

799: \cite{Me65} of scalar 5-point to 4-point integrals

800: was generalized to tensor integrals, thereby avoiding the occurrence

801: of leading Gram determinants completely.

802: More work on one-loop $N$-point integrals can be found 

803: in~\cite{Giele:2004iy}.

804: 

805: 

806: In the evaluation of real corrections, such as bremsstrahlung,

807: a proper and numerically stable separation of infrared (soft and collinear)

808: divergences represents one of the main problems.

809: In the phase-space slicing approach 

810: (see \cite{Harris:2001sx} and references therein)

811: the singular regions are excluded from the ``regular'' 

812: phase-space integration by small cuts on energies, angles, or

813: invariant masses. Using factorization properties, the integration over

814: the singular regions can be done in the limit of infinitesimally

815: small cut parameters. 

816: The necessary fine-tuning of cut parameters is avoided in so-called

817: subtraction methods 

818: (see \cite{Catani:1997vz,Dittmaier:2000mb,Phaf:2001gc} 

819: and references therein),

820: where a specially tuned auxiliary function is subtracted from the 

821: singular integrand in such a way that the resulting integral is regular.

822: The auxiliary function has to be chosen simple enough, so that the

823: singular regions can be integrated over analytically. 

824: In \cite{Catani:1997vz} the so-called ``dipole subtraction approach''

825: has been worked out for massless QCD. 

826: and subsequently extended for  photon emission off massive

827: fermions~\cite{Dittmaier:2000mb} and for QCD with massive

828: quarks~\cite{Phaf:2001gc}.

829: 

830: Applications were performed for 

831: complete one-loop calculations of electroweak radiative corrections

832: for specific $2\to3$ processes of special interest for

833: a future ILC,

834: $\Pep\Pem\to\nu\bar\nu\PH$ \cite{Belanger:2002ik,Denner:2003yg} and

835: $\Pep\Pem\to\Pt\bar\Pt\PH$ \cite{You:2003zq,Belanger:2003nm,eetth}.

836: In \cite{Denner:2003yg,You:2003zq,eetth} the 

837: technique \cite{Denner:2002ii} for treating tensor 5-point integrals

838: was employed. 

839: While \cite{Belanger:2002ik,You:2003zq,Belanger:2003nm} make

840: use of the slicing approach for treating soft-photon emission,

841: the results of \cite{Denner:2003yg,eetth} have been obtained by

842: dipole subtraction and checked by phase-space slicing

843: for soft and collinear bremsstrahlung.

844: Analytic results for the one-loop corrections to 

845: $\Pep\Pem\to\nu\bar\nu\PH$ are provided

846: in~\cite{Jegerlehner:2002es}.

847: 

848: 

849: The Yukawa coupling of the top quark could be measured at a future

850: ILC with high energy and luminosity at the level of $\sim5\%$ 

851: \cite{Aguilar-Saavedra:2001rg} by analyzing the process $\eetth$.

852: A thorough prediction for this process, thus, has to control QCD

853: and electroweak corrections. 

854: Results on the electroweak

855: $\Oa$ corrections of \citeres{Belanger:2003nm,eetth} show

856: agreement within $\sim 0.1\%$.

857: The results of the previous calculation \cite{You:2003zq}

858: roughly agree with the ones of \citeres{Belanger:2003nm,eetth} at

859: intermediate values of $\sqrt{s}$ and $\MH$, but are at variance

860: at high energies (TeV range) and close to threshold (large $\MH$).

861: 

862: \section{Event generators for multi-particle final states}

863: 

864: \subsection{Multi-purpose generators at parton level}

865: 

866: The large variety of different final states for multi-particle

867: production renders multi-purpose Monte Carlo event generators rather 

868: important, i.e.\ generators that deliver

869: an event generator for a user-specified (as much as possible)

870: general final state based on full lowest-order amplitudes.

871: As results, these tools yield lowest-order predictions for

872: observables, or more generally Monte Carlo samples of events,

873: that are improved by universal radiative corrections, such as

874: initial-state radiation at the leading-logarithmic level or 

875: beamstrahlung effects.

876: Most of the multi-purpose generators are also interfaced to parton-shower

877: and hadronization programs.

878: The generality renders these programs, however, rather complex devices

879: and, at present, they are far from representing tools for high-precision

880: physics, because non-universal radiative corrections are not taken 

881: into account in predictions.

882: 

883: The following multi-purpose generators for multi-parton production, 

884: including program packages for the matrix-element evaluation, are available:

885: \begin{itemize}

886: \item

887: {\sc Amegic} \cite{Krauss:2001iv}: 

888: Helicity amplitudes are automatically generated by the program for

889: the SM, the MSSM, and some new-physics models. Various interfaces

890: (ISR, PDFs, beam spectra, {\sc Isajet}, etc.) are supported.

891: The phase-space generation was successfully tested for up to

892: six particles in the final state.

893: \item

894: {\sc Grace} \cite{Ishikawa:1993qr}: The amplitudes are delivered

895: by a built-in package, which can also handle SUSY processes. The

896: phase-space integration is done by {\sc BASES} \cite{Kawabata:1995th}.

897: Tree-level calculations have been performed for up to 

898: (selected) six-fermion final states. The extension of the system

899: to include one-loop corrections is the {\sc Grace-Loop} \cite{Fujimoto:zx}

900: program.

901: \item

902: {\sc Madevent} \cite{Maltoni:2002qb} + {\sc Madgraph} \cite{Stelzer:1994ta}:

903: The {\sc Madgraph} algorithm can generate tree-level matrix elements

904: for any SM process (fully supporting particle masses), but a practical 

905: limitation is 9,999 diagrams.

906: In addition, {\sc Madgraph} creates {\sc Madevent}, an event generator for 

907: the requested process. 

908: \item

909: {\sc Phegas} \cite{Papadopoulos:2000tt} + {\sc Helac} \cite{Kanaki:2000ey}:

910: The {\sc Helac} program delivers amplitudes for all SM processes 

911: (including all masses). The phase-space integration done by {\sc Phegas}

912: has been tested for selected final states with up to seven particles.

913: Recent applications concern channels with six-fermion final 

914: states~\cite{Gleisberg:2003bi}.

915: \item

916: {\sc Whizard} \cite{Kilian:2001qz} 

917: + {\sc Comphep} \cite{Pukhov:1999gg} / {\sc Madgraph} \cite{Stelzer:1994ta}

918: / {\sc O'mega} \cite{Moretti:2001zz}:

919: Matrix elements are generated by an automatic interface to (older versions of)

920: {\sc Comphep}, {\sc Madgraph}, and (the up-to-date version of) {\sc O'mega}.

921: Phase-space generation has been tested for most $2\to6$ and some

922: $2\to8$ processes; unweighted events are supported, and a large variety

923: of interfaces (ISR, beamstrahlung, {\sc Pythia}, PDFs, etc.) exists.

924: The inclusion of MSSM amplitudes ({\sc O'mega}) and improved

925: phase-space generation ($2\to6$) are work in progress.

926: \item

927: {\sc Alpgen}~\cite{alpgen} is a specific code for computing

928: the perturbative part of 

929: observables in high energy hadron--hadron collisions, which 

930: require a convolution of the perturbative quantities 

931: with structure or fragmentation functions that account for 

932: non-perturbative effects.

933: \end{itemize}

934: Tuned comparisons of different generators, both at parton and 

935: detector level, are extremely important, but become more and more

936: laborious owing to the large variety of multi-particle final states.

937: Some progress to a facilitation and automization of comparisons 

938: are made by MC-tester project \cite{Golonka:2002rz} and 

939: Java interfaces \cite{Ronan:2003wq}.

940: 

941: \subsection{Event generators and results for $\Pep\Pem\to6f$}

942: 

943: Particular progress was reached in recent years in the description

944: of six-fermion production processes. Apart from the multi-purpose generators

945: listed in the previous section, also dedicated Monte Carlo programs

946: and generators have been developed for this class of processes:

947: \begin{itemize}

948: \item

949: {\sc Sixfap} \cite{Montagna:1997dc}: Matrix elements are provided

950: for all $6f$ final states (with finite fermion masses), including

951: all electroweak diagrams. The generalization to QCD diagrams and the

952: extension of the phase-space integration for all final states is in

953: progress.

954: \item

955: {\sc eett6f} \cite{Kolodziej:2001xe}: Only processes relevant for

956: $\Pt\bar\Pt$ production are supported (a new version includes

957: $\Pe^\pm$ in the

958: final state and QCD diagrams); finite fermion masses are possible. 

959: \item

960: {\sc Lusifer} \cite{Dittmaier:2002ap}: All $6f$ final states are

961: possible, including QCD diagrams with up to four quarks; 

962: representative results for all these final states have been presented.

963: External fermions are massless.

964: An unweighting algorithm and an interface to {\sc Pythia} are available.

965: \item

966: {\sc Phase} \cite{Accomando:2004my}: All Standard Model process with six fermions

967: in the final state at the LHC. It employs the full set of tree-level

968: Feynman diagrams, taking into account a finite mass for the b quark. An interface 

969: to hadronization is provided.

970: \end{itemize}

971: A comparison of results

972: for some processes $\Pep\Pem\to 6f$ relevant for $\Pt\bar\Pt$ production

973: for massless external fermions

974: reveals good agreement between the various programs~\cite{Dittmaier:2003sc},

975: where minor differences are presumably due to the different treatments of the 

976: bottom-quark Yukawa coupling, which is neglected in some cases.

977: 

978: A tuned comparison of results obtained with {\sc Lusifer} and

979: {\sc Whizard} for a large survey of $6f$ final states has been

980: presented in \citere{Dittmaier:2002ap}.

981: 

982: 

983: 

984: \section{Other developments}

985: 

986: \subsection{Automatization of loop calculations}

987: 

988: Once the necessary techniques and theoretical subtleties of a 

989: perturbative calculation are settled, to carry out the actual

990: calculation is an algorithmic matter. Thus, an automization of

991: such calculations is highly desirable, in order to facilitate

992: related calculations. Various program packages

993: have been presented in the literature for automatized tree-level,

994: one-loop, and multi-loop calculations. A comprehensive

995: overview can, e.g., be found in~\cite{Harlander:1998dq};

996: in the following we have to restrict ourselves to a selection of

997: topics, where emphasis is put on electroweak aspects.

998: 

999: The generation of Feynman

1000: graphs and amplitudes is a combinatorial problem

1001: that can be attacked with computer algebra.

1002: The program packages {\sc FeynArts}~\cite{Kublbeck:1990xc}

1003: (which has been extended in~\cite{Hahn:2001rv} for the MSSM)

1004: and {\sc Diana}~\cite{Tentyukov:1999is}

1005: (based on {\sc Qgraf}~\cite{Nogueira:1991ex}) 

1006: are specifically designed for this task; also the 

1007: {\sc Grace-Loop} \cite{Fujimoto:zx} system automatically generates

1008: Feynman diagrams and loop amplitudes. 

1009: Moreover, the task of calculating

1010: virtual one-loop and the corresponding real-emission corrections

1011: to $2\to 2$ scattering reactions is by now well understood.

1012: Such calculations are widely automated in the packages

1013: {\sc FormCalc} combined with {\sc LoopTools}~\cite{Hahn:1998yk},

1014: and {\sc Grace-Loop}~\cite{Fujimoto:zx}.

1015: 

1016: An illustrating example was provided for

1017: the differential cross section for $\Pep\Pem\to\Pt\bar\Pt$

1018: in lowest order as well as including electroweak ${\cal O}(\alpha)$

1019: corrections.

1020: A program {\sc FA}+{\sc FC}~\cite{Fleischer:2002rn} 

1021: was obtained from the output of the

1022: {\sc FeynArts} and {\sc FormCalc} packages and makes use of the

1023: {\sc LoopTools} library for the numerical evaluation.

1024: Another program,

1025: {\sc Topfit}~\cite{Fleischer:2002rn,Fleischer:2003kk},

1026: was developed from an algebraic reduction of Feynman graphs 

1027: (delivered from {\sc Diana}) within {\sc Form}; for the

1028: numerics {\sc LoopTools} is partially employed. 

1029: A completely independent approach has been made by the

1030: {\sc Sanc} project~\cite{Andonov:2002jg}. 

1031: The {\sc Sanc} program contains another 

1032: independent calculation of the ${\cal O}(\alpha)$

1033: corrections to $\Pep\Pem\to\Pt\bar\Pt$, the results of which are also

1034: included in~\cite{Fleischer:2002rn}.

1035: More details on comparisons,

1036: including also other fermion flavours, 

1037: can be found in \cite{Dittmaier:2003sc,Fleischer:2002rn,Hahn:2003ab}.

1038: The agreement between the numerical results at the level of 10 digits 

1039: reflects the enormous

1040: progress achieved in recent years in the automatization of

1041: one-loop calculations.

1042: 

1043: %********************************

1044: \def\aitalc{{\sc \textit{a}{\r{\i}}\raisebox{-0.14em}{T}alc}}

1045: %************Fleischer***********

1046: The one-loop calculation for the process 

1047: $\Pep\Pem\to\Pt\bar\Pt (\gamma)$ including

1048: hard bremsstrahlung was originally performed in~\cite{Fleischer:2003kk} 

1049: without full automatization; it was repeated in later course

1050: (apart from the hard bremsstrahlung part)

1051: as an example for automatization in~\cite{Fleischer:2004ah} .

1052: The extension of {\sc Diana} towards 

1053: full automatization in terms of the package {\aitalc} 

1054: is a new development~\cite{Fleischer:2004ah,Lorca:2004dk};

1055: automatization of the full calculation is performed

1056: including renormalization and the creation and running of a FORTRAN code. 

1057: Applications

1058: to the calculation of the processes 

1059: $\Pep\Pem\to f \bar{f} (\gamma)$ for 

1060: various final

1061: fermions: $t,b,\mu,e$ and also $s\bar{b},c\bar{t},\mu\bar{\tau}$ are 

1062: performed.

1063: For further work in automatization see \cite{Tentyukov:2003bx,ACAT03}.

1064: 

1065: 

1066: 

1067: \subsection{Numerical approaches to loop calculations}

1068: 

1069: Most of the various techniques of performing loop calculations share

1070: the common feature that the integration over the loop momenta is 

1071: performed analytically. This procedure leads to complications

1072: at one loop if five or more external legs are involved, since

1073: both speed and stability of programs become more and more 

1074: jeopardized. At the two-loop level, already the evaluation of 

1075: self-energy and vertex corrections can lead to extremely complicated

1076: higher transcendental functions that are hard to evaluate numerically.

1077: 

1078: An idea to avoid these complications is provided by a more or less

1079: purely numerical evaluation of loop corrections. There are two main

1080: difficulties in this approach. Firstly, the appearing ultraviolet and

1081: infrared divergences have to be treated and canceled carefully. 

1082: Secondly, even finite loop integrals require a singularity handling

1083: of the integrand near particle poles, where Feynman's

1084: $\ri\eps$ prescription is used as regularization.

1085: 

1086: In \cite{Passarino:2001wv}-\cite{Ferroglia:2003yj}

1087: a method for a purely numerical evaluation of

1088: loop integrals is proposed. Each integral is parametrized with 

1089: Feynman parameters and subsequently rewritten with partial

1090: integrations. The final expression consists of a quite simple part 

1091: containing the singular terms and another more complicated looking

1092: part that can be integrated numerically. 

1093: The actual application of the method to a physical process is still

1094: work in progress.

1095: 

1096: There are five papers in a series devoted to the numerical evaluation of

1097: multi-loop, multi-leg Feynman diagrams. In~\cite{Passarino:2001wv}

1098: the general strategy is outlined and

1099: in~\cite{Passarino:2001jd} a complete list of results is given

1100: for two-loop functions with two external legs, including their

1101: infrared divergent on-shell derivatives. Results for one-loop multi-leg

1102: diagrams are shown in~\cite{Ferroglia:2002mz} and additional material can

1103: be found in~\cite{Ferroglia:2002yr}. Two-loop three-point functions for

1104: infrared convergent configurations are considered in~\cite{Ferroglia:2003yj},

1105: where numerical results can be found.

1106: 

1107: \citere{Ferroglia:2002mz} 

1108: presents a detailed investigation of the algorithms, based

1109: on the Bernstein-Tkachov (BT) theorem~\cite{Tkachov:1997wh},

1110: which form the basis

1111: for a fast and reliable numerical integration of one-loop multi-leg (up to

1112: six in this paper) diagrams. The rationale for this work is represented by 

1113: the need of encompassing a number of problems that one encounters in 

1114: assembling a calculation of some complicated process, e.g.\ full one-loop 

1115: corrections to $\Pep\Pem \to 4\,$fermions. Furthermore, in any attempt to 

1116: compute physical observables at the two-loop level, we will have to include 

1117: the one-loop part, and it is rather obvious that the two pieces should be 

1118: treated on equal footing. 

1119: 

1120: All algorithms that aim to compute Feynman diagrams numerically are based on

1121: some manipulation of the original integrands that brings the final answer

1122: into something smooth. This has the consequence of bringing the original

1123: (Landau) singularity of the diagram into some overall denominator and,

1124: usually, the method overestimates the singular behavior around some

1125: threshold. In these regions an alternative derivation is needed. Instead of

1126: using the method of asymptotic expansions, a novel algorithm is introduced 

1127: based on a Mellin-Barnes decomposition of the singular integrand,

1128: followed by a sector decomposition that allows one to write the Laurent

1129: expansion around threshold. 

1130: 

1131: Particular care has been devoted to analyze those situations where a 

1132: sub-leading singularity may occur, and to properly account for those cases 

1133: where the algorithm cannot be applied because the corresponding BT factor 

1134: is zero although the singular point in parametric space does not belong to 

1135: the integration domain.

1136: 

1137: Finally, a description of infrared divergent one-loop virtual

1138: configurations is given

1139: in the framework of dimensional regularization: here both the 

1140: residue of the infrared pole and the infrared finite remainder are cast into 

1141: a form that can be safely computed numerically.

1142: The collection of formulas that cover all corners of phase space have been

1143: translated into a set of FORM codes and the output 

1144: has been used to create a FORTRAN code whose technical description will be 

1145: given elsewhere. 

1146: 

1147: \citere{Actis:2004bp} addresses the problem of deriving a judicious and 

1148: efficient way to deal with tensor Feynman integrals, namely those integrals 

1149: that occur in any field theory with spin and non trivial structures for the 

1150: numerators of Feynman propagators. This paper forms a basis for a

1151: realistic calculation of physical observables at the two-loop level.

1152: 

1153: The complexity of handling two-loop tensor integrals is reflected in the

1154: following simple consideration: the complete treatment of one-loop tensor

1155: integrals was confined to the appendices of~\cite{Passarino:1979jh}, while

1156: the reduction of general two-loop self-energies to standard scalar integrals

1157: already required a considerable fraction of~\cite{Weiglein:hd}; the

1158: inclusion of two-loop vertices requires the whole content of this paper.

1159: The past experience in the field has shown the encompassed convenience of

1160: gathering in one single place the complete collection of results needed for

1161: a broad spectrum of applications.

1162: In recent years, the most popular and quite successful tool in dealing with

1163: multi-loop Feynman diagrams in QED/QCD (or in selected problems in different

1164: models, characterized by a very small number of scales), has been the

1165: Integration-By-Parts Identities method~\cite{'tHooft:1972fi}. 

1166: However, reduction to a set of master

1167: integrals is poorly known in the enlarged scenario of multi-scale

1168: electroweak physics.

1169: 

1170: 

1171: In~\cite{delAguila:2004nf} another new method is presented in which almost

1172: all the work can be performed numerically: 

1173: one-loop tensor integrals  are

1174: numerically reduced to the standard set of one-loop scalar functions and 

1175: any amplitude is calculated simply contracting

1176: the numerically computed tensor integrals with the external 

1177: tensors.

1178: To this aim, a recursion relation is introduced 

1179: that links high-rank tensor integrals to lower-rank ones.

1180: Singular kinematical configurations give a smoother behaviour than in other 

1181: approaches because, 

1182: at each level of iteration, 

1183: only inverse square roots of Gram determinants appear. 

1184: 

1185: 

1186: 

1187: %--

1188: \section{Electroweak effects in hadronic processes}

1189: %--

1190: 

1191: In Refs.~\cite{Maina:2004ve,Maina:2004rb,Maina:2004dm,Maina:2003is,Kuhn:2004em} 

1192: (see also \cite{Dobbs:2004bu}) it was 

1193: proved the importance of electroweak one-loop 

1194: corrections to hadronic observables, such as $b\bar b$,

1195: `prompt photon + jet' and `$Z$ + jet' production at 

1196: Tevatron and LHC and jet and $b\bar b$ production in linear colliders,

1197: which can compete in size with QCD corrections.

1198: Their inclusion in

1199: experimental analyses is thus important, especially in view of 

1200: searches for new physics. In case of `$Z$ + jet' production

1201: they can rise to ${\cal O}(15-20\%)$ at large transverse momentum at

1202: the LHC, while being typically half the size in case of `photon + jet'

1203: production. As these two channels are the contributors to the Drell-Yan

1204: process, and since the latter is envisaged to be used as one of the means

1205: to measure the LHC luminosity, it is clear that neglecting them in

1206: experimental analyses would spoil the luminosity measurements. 

1207: 

1208: 

1209: Ref.~\cite{Maina:2002wz} emphasised the importance of 

1210: NLO electroweak effects

1211: in three-jet production in $\e^+\e^-$ scattering at the $Z$-pole (SLC, LEP

1212: and GigaZ), showing typical corrections of  ${\cal O}(2-4\%)$ (e.g.

1213: in jet-rates and thrust), comparable to the SLC and LEP experimental accuracy

1214: and certainly larger than the one expected at GigaZ. 

1215: They also introduce sizable parity-violating effects into the fully 

1216: differential structure of three-jet events in presence of beam polarisation,

1217: which are of relevance as background to 

1218: new physics searches in SLC and GigaZ data.

1219: 

1220: The complete set of electroweak $O(\alpha)$ corrections to the Drell--Yan-like

1221: production of $Z$ and $W$ bosons have been 

1222: studied in~\cite{Brein,Dittmaier:2001ay,Baur:2004ig}. 

1223: These corrections are phenomenologically relevant both

1224: at the Tevatron and the

1225: LHC. It is shown that the pole expansion yields a good 

1226: description of resonance

1227: observables, but it is not sufficient for the high-energy tail of

1228: transverse-momentum distributions, relevant for new-physics searches.

1229: {\sc Horace} and {\sc Winhac} are

1230: Monte Carlo event generators~\cite{CarloniCalame:2004qw}, developed 

1231: for single W production and decay, which in their current versions

1232: include higher-order QED corrections in leptonic W decays,

1233: a crucial entry for precision determination of the W mass and width

1234: at hadron colliders. 

1235: 

1236: 

1237: Production of vector-boson pairs is an important probe for potential

1238: non-standard anomalous gauge couplings.

1239: In order to identify possible deviations from the SM predictions,

1240: an accurate knowledge of the electroweak higher-order contributions

1241: is mandatory as well, in particular for large transverse momenta.

1242: A complete electroweak one-loop calculation was performed

1243: for $\gamma Z$ production~\cite{Meier}; for other processes

1244: like $\gamma W, ....$ the large logarithms in the Sudakov regime

1245: were derived~\cite{Accomando:2001fn}.

1246: 

1247: 

1248: A further aspect that should be recalled is that weak corrections naturally

1249: introduce parity-violating effects in observables, detectable through

1250: asymmetries in the cross-section.

1251: These effects are further enhanced if polarisation

1252: of the incoming beams is exploited, such as at RHIC-Spin

1253: \cite{Bourrely:1990pz,Ellis:2001ba} 

1254: and will be used to measure polarised structure functions.

1255: 

1256:  

1257: 

1258: 

1259: \section{Conclusions}

1260: 

1261: During the recent years

1262: there has been 

1263: continuous progress in the development of new techniques and in

1264: making precise predictions for electroweak physics at future colliders.

1265: However, to be prepared for the LHC and

1266: a future $\Pep\Pem$ linear collider

1267: with high energy and luminosity, an enormous

1268: amount of work is still ahead of us. 

1269: Not only technical challenges, also

1270: field-theoretical issues such as

1271: renormalization, the treatment of unstable particles, etc.,

1272: demand a higher level of understanding. 

1273: Both loop calculations as well as the descriptions

1274: of multi-particle production processes with the help of Monte Carlo

1275: techniques require and will profit from further improving

1276: computing devices.

1277: It is certainly out of question that the list of challenges 

1278: and interesting issues could be continued at will. 

1279: Electroweak physics at

1280: future colliders will be a highly exciting issue.

1281: 

1282: 

1283: %\begin{thebibliography}{9}   % Use for  1-9  references

1284: \begin{thebibliography}{999} % Use for 10-99 references

1285: 

1286: 

1287: \def\pl #1 #2 #3 {{Phys.~Lett.~B} {\bf#1} (#2) #3}   

1288: \def\jhep#1 #2 #3{ {JHEP} {\bf #1}   (#2) #3}

1289: \def\cpc #1 #2 #3 {{Comp.\ Phys.\ Comm.}~{\bf#1} (#2) #3 }   

1290: 

1291: 

1292: 

1293: \bibitem{LHCbook}

1294: G. Altarelli, M. Mangano (Eds.), 

1295: {\it Proc.\ of the CERN Workshop on

1296: Standard Model Physics (and More) at the LHC},

1297: CERN 2000-004.

1298: 

1299: %\cite{Aguilar-Saavedra:2001rg}

1300: \bibitem{Aguilar-Saavedra:2001rg}

1301: J.~A.~Aguilar-Saavedra {\it et al.},

1302: TESLA Technical Design Report Part III: {\it Physics at an $\mathrm{e^+e^-}$

1303: Linear Collider}

1304: [hep-ph/0106315]. 

1305: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0106315;%%

1306: 

1307: %\cite{Abe:2001wn}

1308: %\bibitem{Abe:2001wn}

1309: T.~Abe {\it et al.}  [American Linear Collider Working Group Collaboration],

1310: %``Linear collider physics resource book for Snowmass 2001,''

1311: in {\it Proc. of the APS/DPF/DPB Summer Study on the Future of

1312:   Particle Physics (Snowmass 2001) } ed. R.~Davidson and C.~Quigg,

1313: SLAC-R-570, {\it Resource book for Snowmass 2001}

1314: [hep-ex/0106055, hep-ex/0106056, hep-ex/0106057, hep-ex/0106058].

1315: 

1316: %\cite{Abe:2001gc}

1317: %\bibitem{Abe:2001gc}

1318: K.~Abe {\it et al.}  [ACFA Linear Collider Working Group Collaboration],

1319: %``Particle physics experiments at JLC,''

1320: ACFA Linear Collider Working Group report,

1321: [hep-ph/0109166].

1322: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0109166;%%

1323: 

1324: %\cite{Baur:2001yp}

1325: \bibitem{Baur:2001yp}

1326: %U.~Baur, R.~Clare, J.~Erler, S.~Heinemeyer, D.~Wackeroth, G.~Weiglein and D.~R.~Wood,

1327: U.~Baur {\it et al.},

1328: %``Theoretical and experimental status of the indirect Higgs boson mass  determination in the standard model,''

1329: in {\it Proc. of the APS/DPF/DPB Summer Study on the Future of Particle Physics (Snowmass 2001) } ed. N.~Graf,

1330: %eConf {\bf C010630} (2001) P122

1331: hep-ph/0111314 and

1332: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0111314;%%

1333: %

1334: %\cite{Baur:2002gp}

1335: %\bibitem{Baur:2002gp}

1336: %U.~Baur {\it et al.}  [The Snowmass Working Group on Precision Electroweak Measurements Collaboration],

1337: %``Present and future electroweak precision measurements and the indirect  determination of the mass of the Higgs boson,''

1338: %in {\it Proc. of the APS/DPF/DPB Summer Study on the Future of Particle Physics (Snowmass 2001) } ed. N.~Graf,

1339: %eConf {\bf C010630} (2001) P1WG1

1340: hep-ph/0202001.

1341: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0202001;%%

1342: 

1343: %\bibitem{theseprocs}

1344: %A.~Brandenburg, K.~Desch, J.~Kalinowski, and K.~M\"onig, these proceedings.

1345: 

1346: %\cite{Freitas:2000gg}

1347: \bibitem{Freitas:2000gg}

1348: A.~Freitas, W.~Hollik, W.~Walter and G.~Weiglein,

1349: %``Complete fermionic two-loop results for the M(W)-M(Z)  interdependence,''

1350: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 495} (2000) 338, E: ibid.\ B {\bf 570} (2003) 260

1351: [hep-ph/0007091] and

1352: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0007091;%%

1353: %

1354: %\cite{Freitas:2002ja}

1355: %\bibitem{Freitas:2002ja}

1356: %A.~Freitas, W.~Hollik, W.~Walter and G.~Weiglein,

1357: %``Electroweak two-loop corrections to the M(W) - M(Z) mass correlation in  the standard model,''

1358: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 632} (2002) 189, E: ibid.\ B {\bf 666} (2003) 305

1359: [hep-ph/0202131].

1360: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0202131;%%

1361: 

1362: %\cite{Awramik:2003ee}

1363: \bibitem{Awramik:2003ee}

1364: M.~Awramik and M.~Czakon,

1365: %``Complete two loop electroweak contributions to the muon lifetime in the

1366: %standard model,''

1367: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 568}, 48 (2003)

1368: [hep-ph/0305248].

1369: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0305248;%%

1370: 

1371: %\cite{Awramik:2002wn}

1372: \bibitem{Awramik:2002wn}

1373: M.~Awramik and M.~Czakon,

1374: %``Complete two loop bosonic contributions to the muon lifetime in the  standard model,''

1375: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 89} (2002) 241801

1376: [hep-ph/0208113].

1377: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0208113;%%

1378: 

1379: 

1380: %\cite{Onishchenko:2002ve}

1381: %\bibitem{Onishchenko:2002ve}

1382: A.~Onishchenko and O.~Veretin,

1383: %``Two-loop bosonic electroweak corrections to the muon lifetime and  M(Z) M(W) interdependence,''

1384: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 551} (2003) 111

1385: [hep-ph/0209010].

1386: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0209010;%%

1387: 

1388: %\cite{Awramik:2002vu}

1389: %\bibitem{Awramik:2002vu}

1390: M.~Awramik, M.~Czakon, A.~Onishchenko and O.~Veretin,

1391: %``Bosonic corrections to Delta(r) at the two loop level,''

1392: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 68}, 053004 (2003)

1393: [hep-ph/0209084].

1394: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0209084;%%

1395: 

1396: 

1397: %\cite{Faisst:2003px}

1398: \bibitem{Faisst:2003px}

1399: J. van der Bij, K. Chetyrkin, M. Faisst, G. Jikia and T. Seidensticker,

1400: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 498} (2001) 156 [hep-ph/0011373]. 

1401: 

1402: M.~Faisst, J.~H.~K\"uhn, T.~Seidensticker and O.~Veretin,

1403: %``Three loop top quark contributions to the rho parameter,''

1404: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 665}, 649 (2003)

1405: [hep-ph/0302275].

1406: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0302275;%%

1407: 

1408: \bibitem{Boughezal:2004}

1409: R. Boughezal, J.B. Tausk and J.J. van der Bij, hep-ph/0410216.

1410: 

1411: \bibitem{HollikZeuthenprocs}

1412: W.~Hollik, in proceedings of the Zeuthen workshop 

1413: {\it Electroweak Precision Data and the Higgs Mass},

1414: Zeuthen, 2003, eds.\ S.~Dittmaier and K.~M\"onig,

1415: DESY-PROC-2003-01 and MPP-2003-50.

1416: 

1417: \bibitem{Gw2004}

1418: M. Awramik, M. Czakon, A. Freitas and G.~Weiglein, 

1419: Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf D69} (2004) 053006

1420: [hep-ph/0311148].

1421: 

1422: \bibitem{zresonance}

1423: F.A.~Berends {\it et al.}, 

1424: in {\sl Z Physics at LEP 1}, eds.\ G.~Altarelli, R.~Kleiss and

1425: C.~Verzegnassi (CERN 89-08, Geneva, 1989), Vol.~1, p.~89;\\

1426: %

1427: %\cite{Beenakker:1989ec}

1428: %\bibitem{Beenakker:1989ec}

1429: W.~Beenakker, F.~A.~Berends and S.~C.~van der Marck,

1430: %``Rules Of Thumb For The Z Line Shape,''

1431: Z.\ Phys.\ C {\bf 46} (1990) 687;\\

1432: %%CITATION = ZEPYA,C46,687;%%

1433: %

1434: %\cite{Borrelli:1989bd}

1435: %\bibitem{Borrelli:1989bd}

1436: A.~Borrelli, M.~Consoli, L.~Maiani and R.~Sisto,

1437: %``Model Independent Analysis Of The Z Line Shape In E+ E- Annihilation,''

1438: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 333} (1990) 357.

1439: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B333,357;%%

1440: 

1441: 

1442: %\cite{Bardin:1997xq}

1443: \bibitem{Bardin:1997xq}

1444: D.~Y.~Bardin {\it et al.},

1445: hep-ph/9709229,

1446: %``Electroweak working group report,''

1447: in {\it Precision Calculations for the Z Resonance}, 

1448: D. Bardin, W. Hollik, G. Passarino (Eds.),

1449: CERN 95-03.

1450: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9709229;%%

1451: 

1452: 

1453: %\cite{Bardin:1998nm}

1454: \bibitem{Bardin:1998nm}

1455: D.~Y.~Bardin and G.~Passarino,

1456: %``Upgrading of precision calculations for electroweak observables,''

1457: hep-ph/9803425;\\

1458: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9803425;%%

1459: %

1460: %\cite{Montagna:1998kp}

1461: %\bibitem{Montagna:1998kp}

1462: G.~Montagna, O.~Nicrosini, F.~Piccinini and G.~Passarino,

1463: %``TOPAZ0 4.0: A new version of a computer program for evaluation of  de-convoluted and realistic observables at LEP 1 and LEP 2,''

1464: Comput.\ Phys.\ Commun.\  {\bf 117} (1999) 278

1465: [hep-ph/9804211];\\

1466: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9804211;%%

1467: %\cite{Montagna:1993ai}

1468: %\bibitem{Montagna:1993ai}

1469: G.~Montagna, F.~Piccinini, O.~Nicrosini, G.~Passarino and R.~Pittau,

1470: %``TOPAZ0: A Program for computing observables and for fitting cross-sections 

1471: % and forward - backward asymmetries around the Z0 peak,''

1472: Comput.\ Phys.\ Commun.\  {\bf 76} (1993) 328;\\

1473: %%CITATION = CPHCB,76,328;%%

1474: %\cite{Montagna:1993py}

1475: %\bibitem{Montagna:1993py}

1476: G.~Montagna, F.~Piccinini, O.~Nicrosini, G.~Passarino and R.~Pittau,

1477: %``On a semianalytical and realistic approach to e+ e- annihilation into 

1478: % fermion pairs and to Bhabha scattering within the minimal Standard Model

1479: % at LEP energies,''

1480: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 401} (1993) 3;\\

1481: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B401,3;%%

1482: %

1483: %\cite{Bardin:1999gt}

1484: %\bibitem{Bardin:1999gt}

1485: D.~Y.~Bardin, M.~Gr\"unewald and G.~Passarino,

1486: %``Precision calculation project report,''

1487: hep-ph/9902452;\\

1488: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9902452;%%

1489: %

1490: %\cite{Bardin:1999yd}

1491: %\bibitem{Bardin:1999yd}

1492: %D.~Y.~Bardin, P.~Christova, M.~Jack, L.~Kalinovskaya, A.~Olchevski, S.~Riemann and T.~Riemann,

1493: D.~Y.~Bardin {\it et al.},

1494: %``ZFITTER v.6.21: A semi-analytical program for fermion pair production  in e+ e- annihilation,''

1495: Comput.\ Phys.\ Commun.\  {\bf 133} (2001) 229

1496: [hep-ph/9908433].

1497: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9908433;%%

1498: 

1499: 

1500: \bibitem{zeuthenMHworkshop}

1501: Contributions of W.~Hollik, W.~van Neerven, and G.~Passarino

1502: to the proceedings of the Zeuthen workshop 

1503: {\it Electroweak Precision Data and the Higgs Mass},

1504: Zeuthen, 2003, eds.\ S.~Dittmaier and K.~M\"onig,

1505: DESY-PROC-2003-01 and MPP-2003-50.

1506: 

1507: 

1508: %\cite{Heinemeyer:2004gw}

1509: \bibitem{Heinemeyer:2004gw}

1510: S.~Heinemeyer,

1511: %``Precision SUSY physics,''

1512: hep-ph/0406245.

1513: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0406245;%%

1514: 

1515: 

1516: 

1517: %\cite{Awramik:2004ge}

1518: \bibitem{Awramik:2004ge}

1519: M.~Awramik, M.~Czakon, A.~Freitas and G.~Weiglein,

1520: %``Complete two-loop electroweak fermionic corrections to

1521: %sin**2(Theta(lept)(eff)) and indirect determination of the Higgs boson mass,''

1522: hep-ph/0407317.

1523: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0407317;%%

1524: 

1525: 

1526: %\cite{Awramik:2004qv}

1527: %\bibitem{Awramik:2004qv}

1528: M.~Awramik, M.~Czakon, A.~Freitas and G.~Weiglein,

1529: %``Two-loop fermionic electroweak corrections to the effective leptonic weak

1530: %mixing angle in the standard model,''

1531: hep-ph/0408207.

1532: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0408207;%%

1533: 

1534: 

1535: 

1536: 

1537: %\cite{Czyz:2002ft}

1538: \bibitem{Czyz:2002ft}

1539: H.~Czyz, J.~H.~K\"uhn and G.~Rodrigo,

1540: %``Radiative return at e+ e- factories,''

1541: Nucl.\ Phys.\ Proc.\ Suppl.\  {\bf 116} (2003) 249 

1542: [hep-ph/0211186].

1543: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0211186;%%

1544: 

1545: %\cite{Gluza:2002ui}

1546: %\bibitem{Gluza:2002ui}

1547: J.~Gluza, A.~Hoefer, S.~Jadach and F.~Jegerlehner,

1548: %``Measuring the FSR-inclusive pi+ pi- cross section,''

1549: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 28} (2003) 261

1550: [hep-ph/0212386].

1551: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0212386;%%

1552: 

1553: 

1554: %\cite{Czyz:2003ue}

1555: %\bibitem{Czyz:2003ue}

1556: H.~Czyz, A.~Grzelinska, J.~H.~K\"uhn and G.~Rodrigo,

1557: %``The radiative return at Phi and B-factories: FSR at next-to-leading order,''

1558: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 33} (2004) 333

1559: [hep-ph/0308312].

1560: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0308312;%%

1561: 

1562: 

1563: 

1564: %\cite{Zeller:2001hh}

1565: \bibitem{Zeller:2001hh}

1566: G.~P.~Zeller {\it et al.}  [NuTeV Collaboration],

1567: %``A precise determination of electroweak parameters in neutrino nucleon

1568: %scattering,''

1569: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 88} (2002) 091802

1570: [Erratum-ibid.\  {\bf 90} (2003) 239902]

1571: [hep-ex/0110059].

1572: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0110059;%%

1573: 

1574: %\cite{Diener:2003ss}

1575: \bibitem{Diener:2003ss}

1576: K.~P.~O.~Diener, S.~Dittmaier and W.~Hollik,

1577: %``Electroweak radiative corrections to deep-inelastic neutrino scattering:

1578: %Implications for NuTeV?,''

1579: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 69} (2004) 073005

1580: [hep-ph/0310364].

1581: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0310364;%%

1582: 

1583: 

1584: %\cite{Arbuzov:2004zr}

1585: \bibitem{Arbuzov:2004zr}

1586: A.~B.~Arbuzov, D.~Y.~Bardin and L.~V.~Kalinovskaya,

1587: %``Radiative corrections to neutrino deep inelastic scattering revisited,''

1588: hep-ph/0407203.

1589: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0407203;%%

1590: 

1591: 

1592: 

1593: %\cite{Bern:2000ie}

1594: \bibitem{Bern:2000ie}

1595: Z.~Bern, L.~J.~Dixon and A.~Ghinculov,

1596: %``Two-loop correction to Bhabha scattering,''

1597: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 63} (2001) 053007

1598: [hep-ph/0010075].

1599: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0010075;%%

1600: 

1601: %\cite{Bern:2001dg}

1602: \bibitem{Bern:2001dg}

1603: %Z.~Bern, A.~De Freitas, L.~J.~Dixon, A.~Ghinculov and H.~L.~Wong,

1604: Z.~Bern {\it et al.},

1605: %``QCD and QED corrections to light-by-light scattering,''

1606: JHEP {\bf 0111} (2001) 031

1607: [hep-ph/0109079].

1608: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0109079;%%

1609: 

1610: %\cite{Glover:2001ev}

1611: \bibitem{Glover:2001ev}

1612: E.W.N.~Glover, J.B.~Tausk and J.J.~van der Bij,

1613: %``Second order contributions to elastic large-angle Bhabha scattering,''

1614: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 516} (2001) 33

1615: [hep-ph/0106052].

1616: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0106052;%%

1617: 

1618: %\cite{Fleischer:2002wa}

1619: \bibitem{Fleischer:2002wa}

1620: J.~Fleischer, T.~Riemann, O.V.~Tarasov and A.~Werthenbach,

1621: %``Massive two-loop Bhabha scattering: The factorizable subset,''

1622: Nucl.\ Phys.\ Proc.\ Suppl.\  {\bf 116} (2003) 43

1623: [LC-TH-2003-082, hep-ph/0211167].

1624: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0211167;%%

1625: 

1626: \bibitem{Fleischer:2003bg} J. Fleischer, T. Riemann and O.V. Tarasov,

1627: %"Analytic epsilon expansion of the scalar one-loop Bhabha box function",

1628: Acta Phys.\ Polon.\  B {\bf 34} (20003) 5345.

1629: \bibitem{Fleischer:2003rm} J. Fleischer, F. Jegerlehner and O.V. Tarasov, 

1630: % "A new hypergeometric representation of one-loop scalar

1631: %                  integrals in d  dimensions",

1632: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 672} (2003) 303,

1633: [hep-ph/0307113].

1634: \bibitem{Fleischer:2004vb} 

1635: J. Fleischer, O.V. Tarasov and V.O. Tarasov,

1636: %"Analytical result for the two-loop QCD correction to the decay H $\to $ 2$\gamma$", 

1637: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 584} (2004) 294,

1638: [hep-ph/0401090].

1639: 

1640: 

1641: \bibitem{bonciani1}

1642: R.~Bonciani, A.~Ferroglia, P.~Mastrolia, E.~Remiddi 

1643: and J.~J.~van der Bij, Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 681} (2004) 261 

1644: [hep-ph/0310333].

1645: 

1646: 

1647: \bibitem{bonciani2}

1648: R.~Bonciani, A.~Ferroglia, P.~Mastrolia, E.~Remiddi 

1649: and J.~J.~van der Bij, hep-ph/0405275

1650: (to appear in Nucl.\ Phys.\ B).

1651: 

1652: 

1653: \bibitem{czakonMI}

1654: M. Czakon, J. Gluza and T. Riemann,

1655: hep-ph/0406203.

1656: 

1657: %\cite{Birthwright:2004kk}

1658: \bibitem{Birthwright:2004kk}

1659: T.G.~Birthwright, E.W.N.~Glover and P.~Marquard,

1660: %``Master integrals for massless two-loop vertex diagrams with three offshell

1661: %legs,''

1662: JHEP {\bf 0409}, 042 (2004)

1663: [hep-ph/0407343].

1664: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0407343;%%

1665: 

1666: %\cite{Aglietti:2004tq}

1667: \bibitem{Aglietti:2004tq}

1668: %\cite{Aglietti:2003yc}

1669: %\bibitem{Aglietti:2003yc}

1670: U.~Aglietti and R.~Bonciani,

1671: %``Master integrals with one massive propagator for the two-loop  electroweak

1672: %form factor,''

1673: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 668}, 3 (2003)

1674: [hep-ph/0304028].

1675: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0304028;%%

1676: 

1677: U.~Aglietti and R.~Bonciani,

1678: %``Master integrals with 2 and 3 massive propagators for the 2-loop electroweak

1679: %form factor: Planar case,''

1680: hep-ph/0401193.

1681: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0401193;%%

1682: 

1683: 

1684: %\cite{Bonciani:2003hc}

1685: \bibitem{Bonciani:2003hc}

1686: R.~Bonciani, P.~Mastrolia and E.~Remiddi,

1687: %``Master integrals for the 2-loop QCD virtual corrections to the

1688: %forward-backward asymmetry,''

1689: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 690}, 138 (2004)

1690: [hep-ph/0311145].

1691: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0311145;%%

1692: 

1693: %\cite{Aglietti:2004ki}

1694: \bibitem{Aglietti:2004ki}

1695: U.~Aglietti, R.~Bonciani, G.~Degrassi and A.~Vicini,

1696: %``Master integrals for the two-loop light fermion contributions to g g $\to$ H

1697: %and H $\to$ gamma gamma,''

1698: hep-ph/0407162. 

1699: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0407162;%%

1700: 

1701: %\cite{Aglietti:2004nj}

1702: %\bibitem{Aglietti:2004nj}

1703: U.~Aglietti, R.~Bonciani, G.~Degrassi and A.~Vicini,

1704: %``Two-loop light fermion contribution to Higgs production and decays,''

1705: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 595}, 432 (2004)

1706: hep-ph/0404071].

1707: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0404071;%%

1708: 

1709: 

1710: %\cite{Denner:2003wi}

1711: \bibitem{Denner:2003wi}

1712: A.~Denner, M.~Melles and S.~Pozzorini,

1713: %``Two-loop electroweak angular-dependent logarithms at high energies,''

1714: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 662} (2003) 299

1715: [hep-ph/0301241].

1716: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0301241;%%

1717: 

1718: %\cite{Ciafaloni:2000gm}

1719: \bibitem{Ciafaloni:2000gm}

1720: M.~Ciafaloni, P.~Ciafaloni and D.~Comelli,

1721: %``Electroweak double logarithms in inclusive observables for a generic  initial state,''

1722: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 501} (2001) 216

1723: [hep-ph/0007096].

1724: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0007096;%%

1725: 

1726: %\cite{Denner:2000jv}

1727: \bibitem{Denner:2000jv}

1728: A.~Denner and S.~Pozzorini,

1729: %``One-loop leading logarithms in electroweak radiative corrections. I:  Results,''

1730: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 18} (2001) 461

1731: [hep-ph/0010201] and

1732: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0010201;%%

1733: %\cite{Denner:2001gw}

1734: %\bibitem{Denner:2001gw}

1735: %A.~Denner and S.~Pozzorini,

1736: %``One-loop leading logarithms in electroweak radiative corrections. II:  Factorization of collinear singularities,''

1737: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 21} (2001) 63

1738: [hep-ph/0104127].

1739: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0104127;%%

1740: 

1741: %\cite{Beenakker:2000kb}

1742: \bibitem{Beenakker:2000kb}

1743: W.~Beenakker and A.~Werthenbach,

1744: %``New insights into the perturbative structure of electroweak Sudakov  logarithms: Breakdown of conventional exponentiation,''

1745: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 489} (2000) 148

1746: [hep-ph/0005316] and

1747: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0005316;%%

1748: %

1749: %\cite{Beenakker:2001kf}

1750: %\bibitem{Beenakker:2001kf}

1751: %W.~Beenakker and A.~Werthenbach,

1752: %``Electroweak two-loop Sudakov logarithms for on-shell fermions and  bosons,''

1753: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 630} (2002) 3

1754: [hep-ph/0112030];\\

1755: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0112030;%%

1756: %

1757: %\cite{Melles:2000ed}

1758: %\bibitem{Melles:2000ed}

1759: M.~Melles,

1760: %``Mass gap effects and higher order electroweak Sudakov logarithms,''

1761: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 495} (2000) 81

1762: [hep-ph/0006077];\\

1763: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0006077;%%

1764: %

1765: %\cite{Hori:2000tm}

1766: %\bibitem{Hori:2000tm}

1767: M.~Hori, H.~Kawamura and J.~Kodaira,

1768: %``Electroweak Sudakov at two loop level,''

1769: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 491} (2000) 275

1770: [hep-ph/0007329].

1771: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0007329;%%

1772: 

1773: %\cite{Fadin:1999bq}

1774: \bibitem{Fadin:1999bq}

1775: V.~S.~Fadin, L.~N.~Lipatov, A.~D.~Martin and M.~Melles,

1776: %``Resummation of double logarithms in electroweak high energy processes,''

1777: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 61} (2000) 094002

1778: [hep-ph/9910338]; \\

1779: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9910338;%%

1780: %

1781: %\cite{Kuhn:1999nn}

1782: %\bibitem{Kuhn:1999nn}

1783: J.~H.~K\"uhn, A.~A.~Penin and V.~A.~Smirnov,

1784: %``Summing up subleading Sudakov logarithms,''

1785: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 17} (2000) 97

1786: [hep-ph/9912503];\\

1787: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9912503;%%

1788: %

1789: %\cite{Melles:2001ye}

1790: %\bibitem{Melles:2001ye}

1791: M.~Melles,

1792: %``Electroweak radiative corrections in high energy processes,''

1793: Phys.\ Rept.\  {\bf 375} (2003) 219

1794: [hep-ph/0104232] and

1795: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0104232;%%

1796: %

1797: %\cite{Melles:2001dh}

1798: %\bibitem{Melles:2001dh}

1799: %M.~Melles,

1800: %``Resummation of angular dependent corrections in spontaneously broken  gauge theories,''

1801: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 24} (2002) 193

1802: [hep-ph/0108221].

1803: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0108221;%%

1804:  

1805: %\cite{Kuhn:2001hz}

1806: \bibitem{Kuhn:2001hz}

1807: J.~H.~K\"uhn, S.~Moch, A.~A.~Penin and V.~A.~Smirnov,

1808: %``Next-to-next-to-leading logarithms in four-fermion electroweak  processes at high energy,''

1809: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 616} (2001) 286

1810: [Erratum-ibid.\ B {\bf 648} (2003) 455]

1811: [hep-ph/0106298].

1812: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0106298;%%

1813: 

1814: 

1815: %\cite{Accomando:2001fn}

1816: \bibitem{Accomando:2001fn}

1817: E.~Accomando, A.~Denner and S.~Pozzorini,

1818: %``Electroweak-correction effects in gauge boson pair production at the  LHC,''

1819: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 65} (2002) 073003

1820: [hep-ph/0110114].

1821: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0110114;%%

1822: 

1823: E.~Accomando, A.~Denner and A.~Kaiser,

1824: %``Logarithmic electroweak corrections to gauge-boson pair production at the

1825: %LHC,''

1826: hep-ph/0409247.

1827: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0409247;%%

1828: 

1829: %\cite{Beccaria:2001an}

1830: \bibitem{Beccaria:2001an}

1831: %M.~Beccaria, S.~Prelovsek, F.~M.~Renard and C.~Verzegnassi,

1832: M.~Beccaria {\it et al.},

1833: %``Top quark production at TeV energies as a potential SUSY detector,''

1834: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 64} (2001) 053016

1835: [hep-ph/0104245];

1836: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0104245;%%

1837: %

1838: %\cite{Beccaria:2001fu}

1839: %\bibitem{Beccaria:2001fu}

1840: %M.~Beccaria, M.~Melles, F.~M.~Renard and C.~Verzegnassi,

1841: %``SUSY scalar production in the electroweak Sudakov regime of lepton  colliders,''

1842: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 65} (2002) 093007

1843: [hep-ph/0112273];

1844: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0112273;%%

1845: %

1846: %\cite{Beccaria:2002cf}

1847: %\bibitem{Beccaria:2002cf}

1848: %M.~Beccaria, F.~M.~Renard and C.~Verzegnassi,

1849: %``The reality of virtual supersymmetry,''

1850: LC-TH-2002-005 [hep-ph/0203254];

1851: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0203254;%%

1852: %

1853: %\cite{Beccaria:2002vd}

1854: %\bibitem{Beccaria:2002vd}

1855: %M.~Beccaria, F.~M.~Renard, S.~Trimarchi and C.~Verzegnassi,

1856: %``Charged Higgs production in the 1-TeV domain as a probe of  supersymmetric models,''

1857: hep-ph/0212167;

1858: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0212167;%%

1859: %

1860: %\cite{Beccaria:2002tz}

1861: %\bibitem{Beccaria:2002tz}

1862: %M.~Beccaria, F.~M.~Renard and C.~Verzegnassi,

1863: %``A high energy determination of Yukawa couplings in SUSY models,''

1864: LC-TH-2002-017 [hep-ph/0212247];

1865: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0212247;%%

1866: %

1867: %\cite{Beccaria:2003yn}

1868: %\bibitem{Beccaria:2003yn}

1869: %M.~Beccaria, M.~Melles, F.~M.~Renard, S.~Trimarchi and C.~Verzegnassi,

1870: %``Sudakov expansions at one loop and beyond for charged scalar and  fermion pair production in SUSY models at future linear colliders,''

1871: hep-ph/0304110 and

1872: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0304110;%%

1873: %

1874: %\cite{Beccaria:2003ct}

1875: %\bibitem{Beccaria:2003ct}

1876: %M.~Beccaria, F.~M.~Renard and C.~Verzegnassi,

1877: %``Reliability of a high energy one-loop expansion of e+ e- $\to$ W+ W- in  the SM and in the MSSM,''

1878: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 663} (2003) 394

1879: [hep-ph/0304175].

1880: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0304175;%%

1881: 

1882: %\cite{Beenakker:1996kt}

1883: \bibitem{Beenakker:1996kt}

1884: W.~Beenakker {\it et al.},

1885: %``WW Cross-sections and Distributions,''

1886: in {\sl Physics at LEP2}, eds.\ G.~Altarelli, T.~Sj\"o\-strand and

1887: F.~Zwirner (CERN 96-01, Geneva, 1996), Vol.~1, p.~79

1888: [hep-ph/9602351].

1889: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9602351;%%

1890: 

1891: %\cite{Blumlein:2002bg}

1892: \bibitem{Blumlein:2002bg}

1893: J.~Bl\"umlein and H.~Kawamura,

1894: %``Universal QED corrections to polarized electron scattering in higher orders,''

1895: Acta Phys.\ Polon.\ B {\bf 33} (2002) 3719

1896: [hep-ph/0207259].

1897: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0207259;%%

1898: 

1899: \bibitem{wph} 

1900: E.~Accomando, A.~Ballestrero and E. Maina, 

1901: \cpc 150 2003 166\

1902: [hep-ph/0204052].

1903: \bibitem {delphi}

1904: A. Ballestrero, R. Chierici, F. Cossutti, E. Migliore,

1905: \cpc 152 2003 175\

1906: [hep-ph/0210208].

1907: 

1908: %\cite{Beenakker:2003va}

1909: \bibitem{Beenakker:2003va}

1910: W.~Beenakker, A.~P.~Chapovsky, A.~Kanaki, C.~G.~Papadopoulos and R.~Pittau,

1911: %``Towards an effective-Lagrangian approach to fermion-loop corrections,''

1912: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 667}, 359 (2003)

1913: hep-ph/0303105].

1914: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0303105;%%

1915: 

1916: %\cite{Grunewald:2000ju}

1917: \bibitem{Grunewald:2000ju}

1918: M.~W.~Gr\"unewald {\it et al.},

1919: in {\it Reports of the Working Groups on Precision Calculations

1920: for LEP2 Physics}, eds.\ S.~Jadach, G.~Passarino and R.~Pittau

1921: (CERN 2000-009, Geneva, 2000), p.~1

1922: [hep-ph/0005309].

1923: 

1924: \bibitem{DPAversions}

1925: %{\bf reference for the DPA versions used in the literature (BBC, YFSWW,

1926: %DDRW, KKS)}

1927: %\cite{Beenakker:1998gr}

1928: %\bibitem{Beenakker:1998gr}

1929: W.~Beenakker, F.~A.~Berends and A.~P.~Chapovsky,

1930: %``Radiative corrections to pair production of unstable particles: Results  for e+ e- $\to$ 4fermions,''

1931: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 548}, 3 (1999)

1932: [hep-ph/9811481];\\

1933: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9811481;%%

1934: %\cite{Kurihara:1999ii}

1935: %\bibitem{Kurihara:1999ii}

1936: Y.~Kurihara, M.~Kuroda and D.~Schildknecht,

1937: %``High-energy cross section for e+ e- $\to$ W+ W- $\to$ 4 fermions (+ gamma),''

1938: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 565} (2000) 49

1939: [hep-ph/9908486] and

1940: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9908486;%%

1941: %\cite{Kurihara:2001um}

1942: %\bibitem{Kurihara:2001um}

1943: %Y.~Kurihara, M.~Kuroda and D.~Schildknecht,

1944: %``On e+ e- $\to$ W+ W- $\to$ 4f (+ gamma) at LEP2,''

1945: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 509} (2001) 87

1946: [hep-ph/0104201].

1947: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0104201;%%

1948: 

1949: %\cite{Jadach:1998tz}

1950: \bibitem{Jadach:1998tz}

1951: %S.~Jadach, W.~P\l{}aczek, M.~Skrzypek, B.~F.~Ward and Z.~W\c{a}s,

1952: S.~Jadach {\it et al.},

1953: %``Final state radiative effects for the exact O(alpha) YFS exponentiated  (un)stable W+ W- production at and beyond LEP2 energies,''

1954: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 61} (2000) 113010

1955: [hep-ph/9907436];

1956: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9907436;%%

1957: %

1958: %\cite{Jadach:2000kw}

1959: %\bibitem{Jadach:2000kw}

1960: %S.~Jadach, W.~P\l{}aczek, M.~Skrzypek, B.~F.~Ward and Z.~W\c{a}s,

1961: %``Precision predictions for (un)stable W+ W- pair production at and  beyond LEP2 energies,''

1962: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 65} (2002) 093010

1963: [hep-ph/0007012];

1964: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0007012;%%

1965: %

1966: %\cite{Jadach:2001uu}

1967: %\bibitem{Jadach:2001uu}

1968: %S.~Jadach, W.~P\l{}aczek, M.~Skrzypek, B.~F.~Ward and Z.~W\c{a}s,

1969: %S.~Jadach {\it et al.}, 

1970: %``The Monte Carlo event generator YFSWW3 version 1.16 for W pair  production and decay at LEP2/LC energies,''

1971: Comput.\ Phys.\ Commun.\  {\bf 140} (2001) 432

1972: [hep-ph/0103163] and

1973: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0103163;%%

1974: %\cite{Jadach:2001mp}

1975: %\bibitem{Jadach:2001mp}

1976: %S.~Jadach, W.~P\l{}aczek, M.~Skrzypek, B.~F.~Ward and Z.~W\c{a}s,

1977: %``The Monte Carlo program KoralW version 1.51 and the concurrent Monte  Carlo KoralW&YFSWW3 with all background graphs and first order

1978: %corrections to W pair production,''

1979: Comput.\ Phys.\ Commun.\  {\bf 140} (2001) 475

1980: [hep-ph/0104049].

1981: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0104049;%%

1982: 

1983: %\cite{Denner:2000kn}

1984: \bibitem{Denner:2000kn}

1985: A.~Denner, S.~Dittmaier, M.~Roth and D.~Wackeroth,

1986: %``O(alpha) corrections to e+ e- $\to$ W W $\to$ 4fermions(+gamma): First  numerical results from RACOONWW,''

1987: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 475} (2000) 127

1988: [hep-ph/9912261];

1989: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9912261;%%

1990: %

1991: %\cite{Denner:1999dt}

1992: %\bibitem{Denner:1999dt}

1993: %A.~Denner, S.~Dittmaier, M.~Roth and D.~Wackeroth,

1994: %``W pair production at future e+ e- colliders: Precise predictions from  RACOONWW,''

1995: LC-TH-2000-014 [hep-ph/9912447];

1996: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9912447;%%

1997: %

1998: %\cite{Denner:2000bj}

1999: %\bibitem{Denner:2000bj}

2000: %A.~Denner, S.~Dittmaier, M.~Roth and D.~Wackeroth,

2001: %``Electroweak radiative corrections to e+ e- --> W W --> 4fermions in  double-pole approximation: The RACOONWW approach,''

2002: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 587} (2000) 67

2003: [hep-ph/0006307];

2004: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0006307;%%

2005: %

2006: %\cite{Denner:2001zp}

2007: %\bibitem{Denner:2001zp}

2008: %A.~Denner, S.~Dittmaier, M.~Roth and D.~Wackeroth,

2009: %``Off-shell W pair production: Universal versus non-universal  corrections,''

2010: %in {\it Proc. of the 5th International Symposium on Radiative Corrections (RADCOR 2000)} ed. H.~E. Haber, [hep-ph/0101257].

2011: hep-ph/0101257 and 

2012: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0101257;%%

2013: %

2014: %\cite{Denner:2002cg}

2015: %\bibitem{Denner:2002cg}

2016: %A.~Denner, S.~Dittmaier, M.~Roth and D.~Wackeroth,

2017: %``RacoonWW1.3: A Monte Carlo program for four-fermion production at e^+ e^- colliders,''

2018: hep-ph/0209330.

2019: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0209330;%%

2020: 

2021: %\cite{Denner:1999gp}

2022: \bibitem{Denner:1999gp}

2023: A.~Denner, S.~Dittmaier, M.~Roth and D.~Wackeroth,

2024: %``Predictions for all processes e+ e- --> 4fermions + gamma,''

2025: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 560} (1999) 33

2026: [hep-ph/9904472] and

2027: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9904472;%%

2028: %\cite{Denner:2001vr}

2029: %\bibitem{Denner:2001vr}

2030: %A.~Denner, S.~Dittmaier, M.~Roth and D.~Wackeroth,

2031: %``Probing anomalous quartic gauge-boson couplings via e+ e- $\to$  4fermions + gamma,''

2032: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 20} (2001) 201

2033: [hep-ph/0104057].

2034: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0104057;%%

2035: 

2036: %\cite{Denner:2001bd}

2037: \bibitem{Denner:2001bd}

2038: A.~Denner, S.~Dittmaier, M.~Roth and D.~Wackeroth,

2039: %``Precise predictions for e+ e- $\to$ 4f (+gamma) with anomalous couplings,''

2040: hep-ph/0110402.

2041: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0110402;%%

2042: 

2043: %\cite{Jadach:2001cz}

2044: \bibitem{Jadach:2001cz}

2045: %S.~Jadach, W.~P\l{}aczek, M.~Skrzypek, B.~F.~Ward and Z.~W\c{a}s,

2046: S.~Jadach {\it et al.}, 

2047: %``On theoretical uncertainties of the W boson mass measurement at LEP2,''

2048: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 523} (2001) 117

2049: [hep-ph/0109072].

2050: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0109072;%%

2051: 

2052: %\cite{Jegerlehner:2001ca}

2053: \bibitem{Jegerlehner:2001ca}

2054: F.~Jegerlehner,

2055: %``The effective fine structure constant at TESLA energies,''

2056: LC-TH-2001-035 [hep-ph/0105283].

2057: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0105283;%%

2058: 

2059: %\cite{Jadach:1998gi}

2060: \bibitem{Jadach:1998gi}

2061: %S.~Jadach, W.~Placzek, M.~Skrzypek, B.~F.~Ward and Z.~Was,

2062: S.~Jadach {\it et al.},

2063: %``Monte Carlo program KoralW 1.42 for all four-fermion final states in e+  e- collisions,''

2064: Comput.\ Phys.\ Commun.\  {\bf 119} (1999) 272

2065: [hep-ph/9906277] and

2066: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9906277;%%

2067: %

2068: %\cite{Jadach:2002hh}

2069: %\bibitem{Jadach:2002hh}

2070: %S.~Jadach, W.~Placzek, M.~Skrzypek, B.~F.~Ward and Z.~Was,

2071: %``Electric charge screening effect in single W production with the KoralW Monte Carlo,''

2072: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 27} (2003) 19

2073: [hep-ph/0209268].

2074: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0209268;%%

2075: 

2076: %\cite{Fujimoto:1996qg}

2077: \bibitem{Fujimoto:1996qg}

2078: J.~Fujimoto {\it et al.},

2079: %``grc4f v1.1: A four-fermion event generator for e+ e- collisions,''

2080: hep-ph/9603394 and

2081: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9603394;%%

2082: %\cite{Fujimoto:1996wj}

2083: %\bibitem{Fujimoto:1996wj}

2084: %J.~Fujimoto {\it et al.},

2085: %``grc4f v1.1: a Four-fermion Event Generator for e+e- Collisions,''

2086: Comput.\ Phys.\ Commun.\  {\bf 100} (1997) 128

2087: [hep-ph/9605312].

2088: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9605312;%%

2089: 

2090: %\cite{Berends:2000gj}

2091: \bibitem{Berends:2000gj}

2092: F.~A.~Berends, C.~G.~Papadopoulos and R.~Pittau,

2093: %``Four-fermion production in electron positron collisions with  NEXTCALIBUR,''

2094: hep-ph/0002249 and

2095: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0002249;%%

2096: %\cite{Berends:2000fj}

2097: %\bibitem{Berends:2000fj}

2098: %F.~A.~Berends, C.~G.~Papadopoulos and R.~Pittau,

2099: %``NEXTCALIBUR: A four-fermion generator for electron positron  collisions,''

2100: Comput.\ Phys.\ Commun.\  {\bf 136} (2001) 148

2101: [hep-ph/0011031].

2102: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0011031;%%

2103: 

2104: %\cite{Montagna:2000ev}

2105: \bibitem{Montagna:2000ev}

2106: %G.~Montagna, M.~Moretti, O.~Nicrosini, A.~Pallavicini and F.~Piccinini,

2107: G.~Montagna {\it el al.},

2108: %``Higher-order QED corrections to single W production in electron  positron collisions,''

2109: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 20} (2001) 217

2110: [hep-ph/0005121].

2111: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0005121;%%

2112: 

2113: %\cite{Accomando:1996es}

2114: \bibitem{Accomando:1996es}

2115: E.~Accomando and A.~Ballestrero,

2116: %``WPHACT 1.0: A program for W W, Higgs and four-fermion physics at e+ e-  colliders,''

2117: Comput.\ Phys.\ Commun.\  {\bf 99} (1997) 270

2118: [hep-ph/9607317];\\

2119: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9607317;%%

2120: %

2121: %\cite{Accomando:1999zq}

2122: %\bibitem{Accomando:1999zq}

2123: E.~Accomando, A.~Ballestrero and E.~Maina,

2124: %``Non-conserved currents and gauge-restoring schemes in single W  production,''

2125: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 479} (2000) 209

2126: [hep-ph/9911489] and

2127: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9911489;%%

2128: %

2129: %\cite{Accomando:2002sz}

2130: %\bibitem{Accomando:2002sz}

2131: %E.~Accomando, A.~Ballestrero and E.~Maina,

2132: %``WPHACT 2.0: A fully massive Monte Carlo generator for four fermion  physics at e+ e- colliders,''

2133: Comput.\ Phys.\ Commun.\  {\bf 150} (2003) 166

2134: [hep-ph/0204052].

2135: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0204052;%%

2136: 

2137: %\cite{Passarino:1996rc}

2138: \bibitem{Passarino:1996rc}

2139: G.~Passarino,

2140: %``WTO - a deterministic approach to $4$-fermion physics,''

2141: Comput.\ Phys.\ Commun.\  {\bf 97} (1996) 261

2142: [hep-ph/9602302];

2143: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9602302;%%

2144: %

2145: %\cite{Passarino:1998ts}

2146: %\bibitem{Passarino:1998ts}

2147: %G.~Passarino,

2148: %``The single W production case,''

2149: hep-ph/9810416 and

2150: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9810416;%%

2151: %

2152: %\cite{Passarino:2000mt}

2153: %\bibitem{Passarino:2000mt}

2154: %G.~Passarino,

2155: %``Single W production and fermion-loop scheme: Numerical results,''

2156: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 578} (2000) 3

2157: [hep-ph/0001212].

2158: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0001212;%%

2159: 

2160: %\cite{Denner:1992vg}

2161: \bibitem{Denner:1992vg}

2162: A.~Denner and S.~Dittmaier,

2163: %``Electroweak radiative corrections to e- gamma $\to$ W- electron-neutrino,''

2164: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 398} (1993) 239;\\

2165: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B398,239;%%

2166: %

2167: %\cite{Bohm:1993qx}

2168: %\bibitem{Bohm:1993qx}

2169: M.~B\"ohm and S.~Dittmaier,

2170: %``The Hard bremsstrahlung process e- gamma $\to$ W- electron neutrino gamma,''

2171: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 409} (1993) 3.

2172: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B409,3;%%

2173: 

2174: \bibitem{Me65}

2175: D.~B.~Melrose, {\sl Nuovo Cimento}~{\bf XL~A} (1965) 181.

2176: 

2177: %\cite{Fleischer:1999hq}

2178: \bibitem{Fleischer:1999hq}

2179: J.~Fleischer, F.~Jegerlehner and O.~V.~Tarasov,

2180: %``Algebraic reduction of one-loop Feynman graph amplitudes,''

2181: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 566} (2000) 423

2182: [hep-ph/9907327];\\

2183: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9907327;%%

2184: %

2185: %\cite{Binoth:1999sp}

2186: %\bibitem{Binoth:1999sp}

2187: T.~Binoth, J.~P.~Guillet and G.~Heinrich,

2188: %``Reduction formalism for dimensionally regulated one-loop N-point  integrals,''

2189: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 572} (2000) 361

2190: [hep-ph/9911342];\\

2191: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9911342;%%

2192: %

2193: %\cite{Tramontano:2002xn}

2194: %\bibitem{Tramontano:2002xn}

2195: F.~Tramontano,

2196: %``Pentagon integrals for heavy quark physics,''

2197: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 67} (2003) 114005

2198: [hep-ph/0211390];\\

2199: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0211390;%%

2200: %

2201: %\cite{Binoth:2002xh}

2202: %\bibitem{Binoth:2002xh}

2203: T.~Binoth, G.~Heinrich and N.~Kauer,

2204: %``A numerical evaluation of the scalar hexagon integral in the physical  region,''

2205: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 654} (2003) 277

2206: [hep-ph/0210023].

2207: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0210023;%%

2208: 

2209: %\cite{Denner:2002ii}

2210: \bibitem{Denner:2002ii}

2211: A.~Denner and S.~Dittmaier,

2212: %``Reduction of one-loop tensor 5-point integrals,''

2213: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 658} (2003) 175

2214: [hep-ph/0212259].

2215: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0212259;%%

2216: 

2217: \cite{Giele:2004iy}

2218: \bibitem{Giele:2004iy}

2219: W.~T.~Giele and E.~W.~N.~Glover,

2220: %``A calculational formalism for one-loop integrals,''

2221: JHEP {\bf 0404}, 029 (2004)

2222: hep-ph/0402152]. \\

2223: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0402152;%%

2224: %\cite{Dittmaier:2003bc}

2225: %\bibitem{Dittmaier:2003bc}

2226: S.~Dittmaier,

2227: %``Separation of soft and collinear singularities from one-loop N-point

2228: %integrals,''

2229: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 675}, 447 (2003)

2230: [hep-ph/0308246].

2231: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0308246;%%

2232: 

2233: 

2234: %\cite{Harris:2001sx}

2235: \bibitem{Harris:2001sx}

2236: B.~W.~Harris and J.~F.~Owens,

2237: %``The two cutoff phase space slicing method,''

2238: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 65} (2002) 094032

2239: [hep-ph/0102128].

2240: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0102128;%%

2241: 

2242: \bibitem{Catani:1997vz}

2243: S.~Catani and M.~H.~Seymour,

2244: %``A general algorithm for calculating jet cross sections in NLO QCD,''

2245: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 485} (1997) 291

2246: [Erratum-ibid.\ B {\bf 510} (1997) 291]

2247: [hep-ph/9605323].

2248: 

2249: %\cite{Dittmaier:2000mb}

2250: \bibitem{Dittmaier:2000mb}

2251: S.~Dittmaier,

2252: %``A general approach to photon radiation off fermions,''

2253: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 565} (2000) 69

2254: [hep-ph/9904440].

2255: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9904440;%%

2256: 

2257: %\cite{Phaf:2001gc}

2258: \bibitem{Phaf:2001gc}

2259: L.~Phaf and S.~Weinzierl,

2260: %``Dipole formalism with heavy fermions,''

2261: JHEP {\bf 0104}, 006 (2001)

2262: [hep-ph/0102207]; \\

2263: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0102207;%%

2264: %\bibitem{Catani:2002hc}

2265: S.~Catani, S.~Dittmaier, M.~H.~Seymour and Z.~Tr\'ocs\'anyi,

2266: %``The dipole formalism for next-to-leading order QCD calculations with  massive partons,''

2267: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 627} (2002) 189

2268: [hep-ph/0201036].

2269: 

2270: 

2271: 

2272: %\cite{Belanger:2002ik}

2273: \bibitem{Belanger:2002ik}

2274: %G.~B\'elanger, F.~Boudjema, J.~Fujimoto, T.~Ishikawa, T.~Kaneko, K.~Kato and Y.~Shimizu,

2275: G.~B\'elanger {\it et al.},

2276: %``Full one-loop electroweak radiative corrections to single Higgs  production in e+ e-,''

2277: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 559} (2003) 252

2278: [hep-ph/0212261].

2279: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0212261;%%

2280: 

2281: %\cite{Denner:2003yg}

2282: \bibitem{Denner:2003yg}

2283: A.~Denner, S.~Dittmaier, M.~Roth and M.~M.~Weber,

2284: %``Electroweak radiative corrections to single Higgs-boson production in  e+ e- annihilation,''

2285: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 560} (2003) 196

2286: [LC-TH-2003-008, hep-ph/0301189] and

2287: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0301189;%%

2288: %

2289: %\cite{Denner:2003iy}

2290: %\bibitem{Denner:2003iy}

2291: %A.~Denner, S.~Dittmaier, M.~Roth and M.~M.~Weber,

2292: %``Electroweak radiative corrections to e+ e- $\to$ nu anti-nu H,''

2293: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 660} (2003) 289

2294: [LC-TH-2003-007, hep-ph/0302198].

2295: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0302198;%%

2296: 

2297: %\cite{You:2003zq}

2298: \bibitem{You:2003zq}

2299: %Y.~You, W.~G.~Ma, H.~Chen, R.~Y.~Zhang, S.~Yan-Bin and H.~S.~Hou,

2300: Y.~You {\it et al.},

2301: %``Electroweak radiative corrections to e+ e- $\to$ t anti-t h at linear  colliders,''

2302: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 571}, 85 (2003)

2303: hep-ph/0306036].

2304: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0306036;%%

2305: 

2306: 

2307: %\cite{Belanger:2003nm}

2308: \bibitem{Belanger:2003nm}

2309: G.~B\'elanger {\it et al.},

2310: %``Full O(alpha) electroweak and O(alpha(s)) corrections to  e+ e- $\to$ t anti-t H,''

2311: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 571}, 163 (2003)

2312: [hep-ph/0307029].

2313: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0307029;%%

2314: 

2315: \bibitem{eetth}

2316: A.~Denner, S.~Dittmaier, M.~Roth and M.~M.~Weber,

2317: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 575}, 290 (2003)

2318: [hep-ph/0307193].

2319: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0307193;%%

2320: 

2321: 

2322: %\cite{Jegerlehner:2002es}

2323: \bibitem{Jegerlehner:2002es}

2324: F.~Jegerlehner and O.~Tarasov,

2325: %``FIRCLA, one-loop correction to e+ e- $\to$ nu anti-nu H and basis of  Feynman integrals in higher dimensions,''

2326: Nucl.\ Phys.\ Proc.\ Suppl.\  {\bf 116}, 83 (2003)

2327: [hep-ph/0212004].

2328: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0212004;%%

2329: 

2330: 

2331: %\cite{Krauss:2001iv}

2332: \bibitem{Krauss:2001iv}

2333: F.~Krauss, R.~Kuhn and G.~Soff,

2334: %``AMEGIC++ 1.0: A matrix element generator in C++,''

2335: JHEP {\bf 0202} (2002) 044

2336: [hep-ph/0109036];\\

2337: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0109036;%%

2338: %

2339: %\cite{Schalicke:2002ck}

2340: %\bibitem{Schalicke:2002ck}

2341: A.~Schalicke, F.~Krauss, R.~Kuhn and G.~Soff,

2342: %``Implementing initial state radiation for lepton induced processes in  AMEGIC++,''

2343: JHEP {\bf 0212} (2002) 013

2344: [hep-ph/0203259].

2345: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0203259;%%

2346: 

2347: %\cite{Ishikawa:1993qr}

2348: \bibitem{Ishikawa:1993qr}

2349: %T.~Ishikawa, T.~Kaneko, K.~Kato, S.~Kawabata, Y.~Shimizu and H.~Tanaka

2350: %                  [MINAMI-TATEYA group Collaboration],

2351: T.~Ishikawa {\it et al.}, [Minami-Tateya Collaboration],

2352: %``GRACE manual: Automatic generation of tree amplitudes in Standard Models: Version 1.0,''

2353: KEK-92-19;\\

2354: %\href{http://www.slac.stanford.edu/spires/find/hep/www?r=kek-92-19}{SPIRES entry}

2355: %

2356: %\cite{Tanaka:qn}

2357: %\bibitem{Tanaka:qn}

2358: %H.~Tanaka, M.~Kuroda, T.~Kaneko, M.~Jimbo and T.~Kon  [Minami-Tateya Collaboration],

2359: H.~Tanaka {\it et al.}, [Minami-Tateya Collaboration],

2360: %``The Grace System For The Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model,''

2361: Nucl.\ Instrum.\ Meth.\ A {\bf 389} (1997) 295;\\

2362: %%CITATION = NUIMA,A389,295;%%

2363: %\cite{Yuasa:1999rg}

2364: %\bibitem{Yuasa:1999rg}

2365: F.~Yuasa {\it et al.},

2366: %``Automatic computation of cross sections in HEP: Status of GRACE system,''

2367: Prog.\ Theor.\ Phys.\ Suppl.\  {\bf 138} (2000) 18

2368: [hep-ph/0007053].

2369: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0007053;%%

2370: 

2371: %\cite{Kawabata:1995th}

2372: \bibitem{Kawabata:1995th}

2373: S.~Kawabata,

2374: %``A New version of the multidimensional integration and event generation package BASES/SPRING,''

2375: Comput.\ Phys.\ Commun.\  {\bf 88} (1995) 309.

2376: %%CITATION = CPHCB,88,309;%%

2377: 

2378: %\cite{Fujimoto:zx}

2379: \bibitem{Fujimoto:zx}

2380: %J.~Fujimoto, T.~Ishikawa, Y.~Shimizu, K.~Kato, N.~Nakazawa and T.~Kaneko,

2381: J.~Fujimoto {\it el al.},

2382: %``Automatic Computation Of Radiative Corrections,''

2383: Acta Phys.\ Polon.\ B {\bf 28} (1997) 945.

2384: %%CITATION = APPOA,B28,945;%%

2385: 

2386: 

2387: 

2388: %\cite{Maltoni:2002qb}

2389: \bibitem{Maltoni:2002qb}

2390: F.~Maltoni and T.~Stelzer,

2391: %``MadEvent: Automatic event generation with MadGraph,''

2392: JHEP {\bf 0302} (2003) 027

2393: [hep-ph/0208156].

2394: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0208156;%%

2395: 

2396: %\cite{Stelzer:1994ta}

2397: \bibitem{Stelzer:1994ta}

2398: T.~Stelzer and W.~F.~Long,

2399: %``Automatic generation of tree level helicity amplitudes,''

2400: Comput.\ Phys.\ Commun.\ {\bf 81} (1994) 357

2401: [hep-ph/9401258];\\

2402: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9401258;%%

2403: %\cite{Murayama:1992gi}

2404: %\bibitem{Murayama:1992gi}

2405: H.~Murayama, I.~Watanabe and K.~Hagiwara,

2406: %``HELAS: HELicity amplitude subroutines for Feynman diagram evaluations,''

2407: KEK-91-11.

2408: 

2409: %\cite{Papadopoulos:2000tt}

2410: \bibitem{Papadopoulos:2000tt}

2411: C.~G.~Papadopoulos,

2412: %``PHEGAS: A phase space generator for automatic cross-section  computation,''

2413: Comput.\ Phys.\ Commun.\  {\bf 137} (2001) 247

2414: [hep-ph/0007335].

2415: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0007335;%%

2416: 

2417: %\cite{Kanaki:2000ey}

2418: \bibitem{Kanaki:2000ey}

2419: A.~Kanaki and C.~G.~Papadopoulos,

2420: %``HELAC: A package to compute electroweak helicity amplitudes,''

2421: Comput.\ Phys.\ Commun.\  {\bf 132} (2000) 306

2422: [hep-ph/0002082].

2423: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0002082;%%

2424: 

2425: %\cite{Gleisberg:2003bi}

2426: \bibitem{Gleisberg:2003bi}

2427: T.~Gleisberg, F.~Krauss, C.~G.~Papadopoulos, A.~Schaelicke and S.~Schumann,

2428: %``Cross sections for multi-particle final states at a linear collider,''

2429: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 34}, 173 (2004)

2430: [hep-ph/0311273].

2431: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0311273;%%

2432: 

2433: 

2434: 

2435: %\cite{Kilian:2001qz}

2436: \bibitem{Kilian:2001qz}

2437: W.~Kilian,

2438: %``WHIZARD 1.0: A generic Monte-Carlo integration and event generation  package for multi-particle processes. Manual,''

2439: LC-TOOL-2001-039.

2440: %\href{http://www.slac.stanford.edu/spires/find/hep/www?r=lc-tool-2001-039}{SPIRES entry}

2441: 

2442: %\cite{Pukhov:1999gg}

2443: \bibitem{Pukhov:1999gg}

2444: A.~Pukhov {\it et al.},

2445: %``CompHEP: A package for evaluation of Feynman diagrams and integration  over multi-particle phase space. User's manual for version 33,''

2446: hep-ph/9908288.

2447: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9908288;%%

2448: 

2449: %\cite{Moretti:2001zz}

2450: \bibitem{Moretti:2001zz}

2451: M.~Moretti, T.~Ohl and J.~Reuter,

2452: %``O'Mega: An optimizing matrix element generator,''

2453: LC-TOOL-2001-040, hep-ph/0102195.

2454: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0102195;%%

2455: 

2456: \bibitem{alpgen} M.L. Mangano, M. Moretti, F. Piccinini, R. Pittau

2457: and A.D. Polosa, 

2458: JHEP {\bf 0307}, 001 (2003)

2459: [hep-ph/0206293]; \\

2460: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0206293;%%

2461: M.L.~Mangano, M.~Moretti and R.~Pittau, 

2462: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 632} (2002) 343;\\ 

2463: F. Caravaglios, M.L. Mangano, M. Moretti and R. Pittau, 

2464: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 539}, 215 (1999);\\

2465: F.~Caravaglios and M.~Moretti, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 358} (1995) 332. 

2466: 

2467: 

2468: %\cite{Golonka:2002rz}

2469: \bibitem{Golonka:2002rz}

2470: P.~Golonka, T.~Pierzchala and Z.~Was,

2471: %``MC-TESTER: A universal tool for comparisons of Monte Carlo predictions  for particle decays in high energy physics,''

2472: Comput.\ Phys.\ Commun.\  {\bf 157}, 39 (2004)

2473: [hep-ph/0210252].

2474: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0210252;%%

2475: 

2476: %\cite{Ronan:2003wq}

2477: \bibitem{Ronan:2003wq}

2478: M.~T.~Ronan,

2479: %``Java physics generator and analysis modules,''

2480: LC-TOOL-2003-015 [physics/0306019].

2481: %%CITATION = PHYS-ICS 0306019;%%

2482: 

2483: %\cite{Montagna:1997dc}

2484: \bibitem{Montagna:1997dc}

2485: G.~Montagna, M.~Moretti, O.~Nicrosini and F.~Piccinini,

2486: %``Six-fermion calculation of intermediate-mass Higgs boson production at  future e+ e- colliders,''

2487: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 2} (1998) 483

2488: [hep-ph/9705333]; \\

2489: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9705333;%%

2490: %\cite{Gangemi:1998vc}

2491: %\bibitem{Gangemi:1998vc}

2492: %F.~Gangemi, G.~Montagna, M.~Moretti, O.~Nicrosini and F.~Piccinini,

2493: F.~Gangemi {\it et al.},

2494: %``Six-fermion production and Higgs boson physics at future e+ e-  colliders,''

2495: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 9} (1999) 31

2496: [hep-ph/9811437] and

2497: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9811437;%%

2498: %

2499: %\cite{Gangemi:1999qb}

2500: %\bibitem{Gangemi:1999qb}

2501: %F.~Gangemi, G.~Montagna, M.~Moretti, O.~Nicrosini and F.~Piccinini,

2502: %``Top-quark physics in six-quark final states at the next linear  collider,''

2503: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 559} (1999) 3

2504: [hep-ph/9905271];\\

2505: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9905271;%%

2506: % 

2507: %\cite{Gangemi:2000sk}

2508: %\bibitem{Gangemi:2000sk}

2509: F.~Gangemi,

2510: %``Anomalous quartic couplings in six-fermion processes at the linear  collider,''

2511: hep-ph/0002142.

2512: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0002142;%%

2513: 

2514: %\cite{Kolodziej:2001xe}

2515: \bibitem{Kolodziej:2001xe}

2516: K.~Ko\l{}odziej,

2517: %``Top quark pair production and decay into 6 fermions at linear  colliders,''

2518: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 23} (2002) 471

2519: [hep-ph/0110063] and 

2520: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0110063;%%

2521: %

2522: %\cite{Kolodziej:2002ev}

2523: %\bibitem{Kolodziej:2002ev}

2524: %K.~Kolodziej,

2525: %``eett6f v. 1.0: A program for top quark pair production and decay into  6 fermions at linear colliders,''

2526: Comput.\ Phys.\ Commun.\  {\bf 151} (2003) 339

2527: [hep-ph/0210199];\\

2528: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0210199;%%

2529: %\cite{Biernacik:2002tt}

2530: %\bibitem{Biernacik:2002tt}

2531: A.~Biernacik and K.~Ko\l{}odziej,

2532: %``Top quark pair production and decay at linear colliders: Signal vs. off  resonance background,''

2533: Nucl.\ Phys.\ Proc.\ Suppl.\  {\bf 116} (2003) 33

2534: [hep-ph/0210405]. \\

2535: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0210405;%%

2536: %\cite{Biernacik:2003xv}

2537: %\bibitem{Biernacik:2003xv}

2538: A.~Biernacik, K.~Kolodziej, A.~Lorca and T.~Riemann,

2539: %``Towards high precision predictions for top quark pair production and decay

2540: %at a linear collider,''

2541: Acta Phys.\ Polon.\ B {\bf 34} (2003) 5487

2542: [hep-ph/0311097].

2543: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0311097;%%

2544: 

2545: 

2546: 

2547: %\cite{Dittmaier:2002ap}

2548: \bibitem{Dittmaier:2002ap}

2549: S.~Dittmaier and M.~Roth,

2550: %``LUSIFER: A lucid approach to six fermion production,''

2551: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 642} (2002) 307

2552: [hep-ph/0206070].

2553: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0206070;%%

2554: 

2555: 

2556: %\cite{Accomando:2004my}

2557: \bibitem{Accomando:2004my}

2558: E.~Accomando, A.~Ballestrero and E.~Maina,

2559: %``PHASE: An event generator for six fermion physics at the LHC,''

2560: hep-ph/0404236.

2561: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0404236;%%

2562: 

2563: %\cite{Dittmaier:2003sc}

2564: \bibitem{Dittmaier:2003sc}

2565: S.~Dittmaier,

2566: %``Theoretical tools for a future e+ e- linear collider,''

2567: hep-ph/0308079.

2568: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0308079;%%

2569: 

2570: 

2571: %\cite{Harlander:1998dq}

2572: \bibitem{Harlander:1998dq}

2573: R.~Harlander and M.~Steinhauser,

2574: %``Automatic computation of Feynman diagrams,''

2575: Prog.\ Part.\ Nucl.\ Phys.\  {\bf 43} (1999) 167

2576: [hep-ph/9812357].

2577: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9812357;%%

2578: 

2579: %\cite{Kublbeck:1990xc}

2580: \bibitem{Kublbeck:1990xc}

2581: J.~K\"ublbeck, M.~B\"ohm and A.~Denner,

2582: %``Feyn Arts: Computer Algebraic Generation Of Feynman Graphs And Amplitudes,''

2583: Comput.\ Phys.\ Commun.\  {\bf 60} (1990) 165;\\

2584: %%CITATION = CPHCB,60,165;%%

2585: %H.~Eck and J.~K\"ublbeck, {\it Guide to FeynArts 1.0\/},

2586: %University of W\"urzburg, 1992.

2587: %\bibitem{Hahn:2000kx}

2588: T.~Hahn,

2589: %``Generating Feynman diagrams and amplitudes with FeynArts 3,''

2590: Comput.\ Phys.\ Commun.\  {\bf 140} (2001) 418

2591: [hep-ph/0012260].

2592: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0012260;%%

2593: 

2594: 

2595: 

2596: %\cite{Hahn:2001rv}

2597: \bibitem{Hahn:2001rv}

2598: T.~Hahn and C.~Schappacher,

2599: %``The implementation of the minimal supersymmetric standard model in  FeynArts and FormCalc,''

2600: Comput.\ Phys.\ Commun.\  {\bf 143} (2002) 54

2601: [hep-ph/0105349].

2602: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0105349;%%

2603: 

2604: 

2605: %\cite{Tentyukov:1999is}

2606: \bibitem{Tentyukov:1999is}

2607: M.~Tentyukov and J.~Fleischer,

2608: %``A Feynman diagram analyser DIANA,''

2609: Comput.\ Phys.\ Commun.\  {\bf 132} (2000) 124

2610: [hep-ph/9904258].

2611: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9904258;%%

2612: 

2613: 

2614: %\cite{Nogueira:1991ex}

2615: \bibitem{Nogueira:1991ex}

2616: P.~Nogueira,

2617: %``Automatic Feynman graph generation,''

2618: J.\ Comput.\ Phys.\  {\bf 105} (1993) 279.

2619: %%CITATION = JCTPA,105,279;%%

2620: 

2621: 

2622: %\cite{Hahn:1998yk}

2623: \bibitem{Hahn:1998yk}

2624: T.~Hahn and M.~Perez-Victoria,

2625: %``Automatized one-loop calculations in four and D dimensions,''

2626: Comput.\ Phys.\ Commun.\  {\bf 118} (1999) 153

2627: [hep-ph/9807565];\\

2628: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9807565;%%

2629: %

2630: %\cite{Hahn:2000jm}

2631: %\bibitem{Hahn:2000jm}

2632: T.~Hahn,

2633: %``Automatic loop calculations with FeynArts, FormCalc, and LoopTools,''

2634: Nucl.\ Phys.\ Proc.\ Suppl.\  {\bf 89} (2000) 231

2635: [hep-ph/0005029].

2636: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0005029;%%

2637: 

2638: %\cite{Fleischer:2002rn}

2639: \bibitem{Fleischer:2002rn}

2640: J.~Fleischer, T.~Hahn, W.~Hollik, T.~Riemann, C.~Schappacher and A.~Werthenbach,

2641: %``Complete electroweak one-loop radiative corrections to top-pair  production at TESLA: A comparison,''

2642: LC-TH-2002-002 [hep-ph/0202109].

2643: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0202109;%%

2644: 

2645: %\cite{Fleischer:2003kk}

2646: \bibitem{Fleischer:2003kk}

2647: J.~Fleischer, A.~Leike, T.~Riemann and A.~Werthenbach,

2648: %``Electroweak one-loop corrections for e+ e- annihilation into t anti-t  including hard bremsstrahlung,''

2649: Eur.\ Phys.\ J. C {\bf 31} (2003) 37

2650: [hep-ph/0302259]

2651: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0302259;%%

2652: 

2653: 

2654: %\cite{Andonov:2002jg}

2655: \bibitem{Andonov:2002jg}

2656: %A.~Andonov, D.~Bardin, S.~Bondarenko, P.~Christova, L.~Kalinovskaya, G.~Nanava and G.~Passarino,

2657: A.~Andonov {\it el al.},

2658: %``Project SANC (former CalcPHEP): Support of analytic and numeric  calculations for experiments at colliders,''

2659: hep-ph/0209297;

2660: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0209297;%%

2661: 

2662: %\cite{Andonov:2002rr}

2663: %\bibitem{Andonov:2002rr}

2664: A.~Andonov {\it el al.},

2665: %A.~Andonov, D.~Bardin, S.~Bondarenko, P.~Christova, L.~Kalinovskaya and G.~Nanava,

2666: %``Further study of the e+ e- $\to$ f anti-f process with the aid of  CalcPHEP system,''

2667: hep-ph/0202112 and

2668: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0202112;%%

2669: %

2670: %\cite{Andonov:2002xc}

2671: %\bibitem{Andonov:2002xc}

2672: %A.~Andonov, D.~Bardin, S.~Bondarenko, P.~Christova, L.~Kalinovskaya and G.~Nanava,

2673: %``Update of one loop corrections for e+ e- $\to$ f anti-f, first run of  CalcPHEP system,''

2674: Phys.\ Part.\ Nucl.\  {\bf 34}, 577 (2003)

2675: [Fiz.\ Elem.\ Chast.\ Atom.\ Yadra {\bf 34}, 1125 (2003)]

2676: hep-ph/0207156].

2677: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0207156;%%

2678: 

2679: 

2680: %\cite{Hahn:2003ab}

2681: \bibitem{Hahn:2003ab}

2682: T.~Hahn, W.~Hollik, A.~Lorca, T.~Riemann and A.~Werthenbach,

2683: %``O(alpha) electroweak corrections to the processes e+ e- $\to$ tau- tau+, c anti-c, b anti-b, t anti-t: A comparison,''

2684: LC-TH-2003-083 [hep-ph/0307132].

2685: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0307132;%%

2686: 

2687: \bibitem{Fleischer:2004ah} J. Fleischer, A. Lorca and T. Riemann,

2688: %"Automatized calculation of 2-fermion production with DIANA

2689: % and {\aitalc}",

2690: hep-ph/0409034.

2691: 

2692: %\cite{Lorca:2004dk}

2693: \bibitem{Lorca:2004dk}

2694: A.~Lorca and T.~Riemann,

2695: %``Automated calculations for massive fermion production with aiTALC,''

2696: hep-ph/0407149.

2697: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0407149;%%

2698: 

2699: \bibitem{Tentyukov:2003bx} M. Tentyukov and J. Fleischer,

2700: %"Parallel computation of Feynman diagrams with DIANA",

2701: Comput.\ Phys.\ Commun.\ {\bf 160} (2004) 167, 

2702: [hep-ph/0311111].

2703: 

2704: \bibitem{ACAT03} J. Fleischer, A. Lorca and M. Tentyukov,

2705:  {\it {\sc Diana} and applications to fermion production in electron

2706:   positron annihilation}, 

2707: to appear in the proceedings of ACAT03, December 1993.

2708: 

2709: 

2710: %\cite{Passarino:2001wv}

2711: \bibitem{Passarino:2001wv}

2712: G.~Passarino,

2713: %``An approach toward the numerical evaluation of multiloop Feynman  diagrams,''

2714: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 619} (2001) 257

2715: [hep-ph/0108252].

2716: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0108252;%%

2717: %

2718: %\cite{Passarino:2001jd}

2719: %\bibitem{Passarino:2001jd}

2720: %G.~Passarino and S.~Uccirati,

2721: %``Algebraic-numerical evaluation of Feynman diagrams: Two-loop  self-energies,''

2722: %Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 629} (2002) 97

2723: %[hep-ph/0112004];\\

2724: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0112004;%%

2725: %

2726: %\cite{Ferroglia:2002mz}

2727: %\bibitem{Ferroglia:2002mz}

2728: %A.~Ferroglia, M.~Passera, G.~Passarino and S.~Uccirati,

2729: %``All-purpose numerical evaluation of one-loop multi-leg Feynman  diagrams,''

2730: %Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 650} (2003) 162

2731: %[hep-ph/0209219].

2732: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0209219;%%

2733: 

2734: 

2735: % Torino citations

2736: 

2737: 

2738: %\cite{Passarino:2001wv}

2739: %\bibitem{Passarino:2001wv}

2740: %G.~Passarino,

2741: %``An approach toward the numerical evaluation of multiloop Feynman  

2742: % diagrams,''

2743: %Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 619} (2001) 257

2744: %[hep-ph/0108252].

2745: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0108252;%%

2746: 

2747: \bibitem{Passarino:2001jd}

2748: G.~Passarino and S.~Uccirati,

2749: %``Algebraic-numerical evaluation of Feynman diagrams: Two-loop  

2750: %self-energies,''

2751: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 629} (2002) 97

2752: [hep-ph/0112004].

2753: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0112004;

2754: 

2755: %\cite{Ferroglia:2002mz}

2756: \bibitem{Ferroglia:2002mz}

2757: A.~Ferroglia, M.~Passera, G.~Passarino and S.~Uccirati,

2758: %``All-purpose numerical evaluation of one-loop multi-leg Feynman diagrams,''

2759: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 650} (2003) 162

2760: [hep-ph/0209219].

2761: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0209219;%%

2762: 

2763: %\cite{Ferroglia:2002yr}

2764: \bibitem{Ferroglia:2002yr}

2765: %A.~Ferroglia, G.~Passarino, M.~Passera and S.~Uccirati,

2766: %``The frontier of multi-loop Feynman diagrams: (Semi-) numerical techniques,''

2767: %\href{http://www.slac.stanford.edu/spires/find/hep/www?irn=5684803}

2768: % {SPIRES entry}

2769: %{\it Prepared for 31st International Conference on High Energy Physics 

2770: %(ICHEP 2002), Amsterdam, The Netherlands};\\

2771: %\cite{Ferroglia:wc}

2772: %\bibitem{Ferroglia:wc}

2773: A.~Ferroglia, G.~Passarino, S.~Uccirati and M.~Passera,

2774: %``A Frontier In Multi-Scale Multi-Loop Integrals: The Algebraic-Numerical 

2775: % Method,''

2776: Nucl.\ Instrum.\ Meth.\ A {\bf 502} (2003) 391.

2777: %%CITATION = NUIMA,A502,391;%%

2778: 

2779: %\cite{Ferroglia:2003yj}

2780: \bibitem{Ferroglia:2003yj}

2781: A.~Ferroglia, M.~Passera, G.~Passarino and S.~Uccirati,

2782: %``Two-loop vertices in quantum field theory: Infrared convergent scalar

2783: %configurations,'' 

2784: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 680} (2004) 199

2785: [hep-ph/0311186].

2786: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0311186;%%

2787: 

2788: %BT

2789: %\cite{Tkachov:1997wh}

2790: \bibitem{Tkachov:1997wh}

2791: F.~V.~Tkachov,

2792: %``Algebraic algorithms for multiloop calculations: The first 15 years.

2793: %What's next?,''

2794: Nucl.\ Instrum.\ Meth.\ A {\bf 389} (1997) 309

2795: [hep-ph/9609429];\\

2796: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9609429;%%

2797: L.~N.~Bernstein, Functional Analysis and its Applications, 

2798: {\bf 6} (1972) 66.

2799: 

2800: 

2801: %\cite{Actis:2004bp}

2802: \bibitem{Actis:2004bp}

2803: S.~Actis, A.~Ferroglia, G.~Passarino, M.~Passera and S.~Uccirati,

2804: %``Two-loop tensor integrals in quantum field theory,''

2805: hep-ph/0402132.

2806: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0402132;%%

2807: 

2808: 

2809: %\cite{Passarino:1979jh}

2810: \bibitem{Passarino:1979jh}

2811: G.~Passarino and M.~Veltman,

2812: %``One Loop Corrections For E+ E- Annihilation Into Mu+ Mu- In 

2813: % The Weinberg Model,''

2814: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 160} (1979) 151.

2815: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B160,151;%%

2816: 

2817: %\cite{Weiglein:hd}

2818: \bibitem{Weiglein:hd}

2819: G.~Weiglein, R.~Scharf and M.~B\"ohm,

2820: %``Reduction Of General Two Loop Selfenergies To Standard Scalar Integrals,''

2821: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 416} (1994) 606

2822: [hep-ph/9310358].

2823: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9310358;%%

2824: 

2825: 

2826: 

2827: %\cite{'tHooft:1972fi}

2828: \bibitem{'tHooft:1972fi}

2829: G.~'t Hooft and M.~Veltman,

2830: %``Regularization And Renormalization Of Gauge Fields,''

2831: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 44} (1972) 189;\\

2832: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B44,189;%%

2833: F.~V.~Tkachov, New methods for evaluation of multi-loop

2834: Feynman diagrams, PhD thesis, INR, Moscow, March 1984;\\

2835: %\cite{Tkachov:1981wb}

2836: %\bibitem{Tkachov:1981wb}

2837: F.~V.~Tkachov,

2838: %``A Theorem On Analytical Calculability Of Four Loop Renormalization

2839: %Group Functions,''

2840: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 100} (1981) 65;\\

2841: %%\cite{Chetyrkin:1981qh}

2842: %\bibitem{Chetyrkin:1981qh}

2843: K.~G.~Chetyrkin and F.~V.~Tkachov,

2844: %``Integration By Parts: The Algorithm To Calculate Beta Functions

2845: %In 4 Loops,''

2846: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 192} (1981) 159.

2847: 

2848: %\cite{Bauberger:1995hx}

2849: %\bibitem{Bauberger:1995hx}

2850: %S.~Bauberger and M.~B\"ohm,

2851: %``Simple one-dimensional integral representations for two loop 

2852: %selfenergies: The Master diagram,''

2853: %Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 445} (1995) 25

2854: %[hep-ph/9501201].

2855: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9501201;%%

2856: 

2857: 

2858: \bibitem{delAguila:2004nf}

2859: F.~del Aguila and R.~Pittau,

2860: JHEP {\bf 0407} (2004) 017; \\

2861: R.~Pittau, hep-ph/0404120.

2862: 

2863: 

2864: 

2865: %\cite{Maina:2004ve}

2866: \bibitem{Maina:2004ve}

2867: E.~Maina, S.~Moretti, M.~R.~Nolten and D.~A.~Ross,

2868: %``Electroweak radiative corrections to hadronic precision observables at TeV

2869: %energies,''

2870: hep-ph/0401093.

2871: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0401093;%%

2872: 

2873: %\cite{Maina:2004rb}

2874: \bibitem{Maina:2004rb}

2875: E.~Maina, S.~Moretti and D.~A.~Ross,

2876: %``One-loop weak corrections to gamma/Z hadro-production at finite

2877: %transverse momentum,''

2878: hep-ph/0403050.

2879: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0403050;%%

2880: 

2881: %\cite{Maina:2004dm}

2882: \bibitem{Maina:2004dm}

2883: E.~Maina, S.~Moretti, M.~R.~Nolten and D.~A.~Ross,

2884: %``Weak corrections to hadronic observables,''

2885: hep-ph/0407150.

2886: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0407150;%%

2887: 

2888: %\cite{Maina:2003is}

2889: \bibitem{Maina:2003is}

2890: E.~Maina, S.~Moretti, M.~R.~Nolten and D.~A.~Ross,

2891: %``One-loop weak corrections to the b anti-b cross section at TeV energy  hadron

2892: %colliders,''

2893: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 570} (2003) 205

2894: [hep-ph/0307021].

2895: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0307021;%%

2896: 

2897: 

2898: %\cite{Kuhn:2004em}

2899: \bibitem{Kuhn:2004em}

2900: J.~H.~K\"uhn, A.~Kulesza, S.~Pozzorini and M.~Schulze,

2901: %``Logarithmic electroweak corrections to hadronic Z + 1 jet production at

2902: %large transverse momentum,''

2903: hep-ph/0408308.

2904: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0408308;%%

2905: 

2906: %\cite{Dobbs:2004bu}

2907: \bibitem{Dobbs:2004bu}

2908: M.~Dobbs {\it et al.},

2909: %``The QCD/SM working group: Summary report,''

2910: hep-ph/0403100.

2911: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0403100;%%

2912: 

2913: 

2914: %\cite{Maina:2002wz}

2915: \bibitem{Maina:2002wz}

2916: E.~Maina, S.~Moretti and D.~A.~Ross,

2917: %``Weak corrections to three-jet production in electron positron

2918: %annihilations,''

2919: JHEP {\bf 0304} (2003) 056

2920: [hep-ph/0210015] and

2921: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0210015;%%

2922: %\cite{Maina:2004yc}

2923: %\bibitem{Maina:2004yc}

2924: %E.~Maina, S.~Moretti and D.~A.~Ross,

2925: %``One-loop weak corrections to three-jet observables at the Z pole,''

2926: hep-ph/0403269.

2927: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0403269;%%

2928: 

2929: \bibitem{Brein}

2930: O. Brein, U. Baur, W. Hollik, C. Schappacher, D. Wackeroth,

2931: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 65} (2002) 033007

2932: [hep-ph/0108274].

2933: 

2934: 

2935: %\cite{Dittmaier:2001ay}

2936: \bibitem{Dittmaier:2001ay}

2937: S.~Dittmaier and M.~Kr\"amer,

2938: %``Electroweak radiative corrections to W-boson production at hadron

2939: %colliders,''

2940: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 65} (2002) 073007

2941: [hep-ph/0109062].

2942: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0109062;%%

2943: 

2944: 

2945: %\cite{Baur:2004ig}

2946: \bibitem{Baur:2004ig}

2947: U.~Baur and D.~Wackeroth,

2948: %``Electroweak radiative corrections to p (anti-)p $\to$ W+- $\to$ l+- nu

2949: %beyond the pole approximation,''

2950: hep-ph/0405191.

2951: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0405191;%%

2952: 

2953: %\cite{CarloniCalame:2004qw}

2954: \bibitem{CarloniCalame:2004qw}

2955: C.~M.~Carloni Calame, S.~Jadach, G.~Montagna, O.~Nicrosini and W.~Placzek,

2956: %``Comparisons of the Monte Carlo programs HORACE and WINHAC for single W-boson

2957: %production at hadron colliders,''

2958: Acta Phys.\ Polon.\ B {\bf 35}, 1643 (2004)

2959: [hep-ph/0402235].

2960: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0402235;%%

2961: 

2962: \bibitem{Meier}

2963: W. Hollik and C. Meier, Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 590} (2004) 69

2964: [hep-ph/0402281].

2965: 

2966: 

2967: %\cite{Bourrely:1990pz}

2968: \bibitem{Bourrely:1990pz}

2969: C.~Bourrely, J.P.~Guillet and J.~Soffer,

2970: %``Spin Effects With Polarized Protons At RHIC,''

2971: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 361} (1991) 72.

2972: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B361,72;%%

2973: 

2974: %\cite{Ellis:2001ba}

2975: \bibitem{Ellis:2001ba}

2976: J.R.~Ellis, S.~Moretti and D.A.~Ross,

2977: %``Gluon contributions to parity-violating asymmetries in polarized  proton proton scattering,''

2978: JHEP {\bf 0106} (2001) 043

2979: [hep-ph/0102340].

2980: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0102340;%%

2981: 

2982: 

2983: 

2984: 

2985: 

2986: 

2987: 

2988: 

2989: \end{thebibliography}

2990: 

2991: \end{document}

2992: