1: 

2: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

3: %

4: % vs4.tex (paper on Shear Viscosity of Hot QCD in RealTime Formalism by Hou and Heinz)

5: %

6: % first version by Hou  on Oct. 17, 2003

7: %  

8: %

9: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

10: 

11: 

12: %\documentstyle[aps,epsf,eqsecnum]{revtex}

13: \documentstyle[preprint,aps,epsf,eqsecnum]{revtex}

14: %\documentstyle[aps]{revtex}   %prints out galley format

15: %\usepackage{epsf}

16: 

17: \begin{document}

18: \tighten

19: 

20: 

21: 

22: \newcommand{\be}{\begin{equation}} \newcommand{\ee}{\end{equation}}

23: \newcommand{\bea}{\begin{eqnarray}} \newcommand{\eea}{\end{eqnarray}}

24: \newcommand{\r}{\rangle } \newcommand{\la}{\langle }

25: 

26: \def\Re{{\rm Re}}

27: \def\Im{{\rm Im}}

28: \def\PiL{\Pi_{\rm L}}

29: \def\PiT{\Pi_{\rm T}}

30: \def\rhoT{\rho_{\rm T}}

31: \def\rhoL{\rho_{\rm L}}

32: \def\PL{P_{\rm L}}

33: \def\PT{P_{\rm T}}

34: 

35: \def\j{{\bf j}}

36: \def\x{{\bf x}}

37: \def\p{{\bf p}}

38: \def\q{{\bf q}}

39: \def\k{{\bf k}}

40: \def\v{{\bf v}}

41: \def\u{{\bf u}}

42: \def\E{{\bf E}}

43: \def\D{{\bf D}}

44: \def\magp{|{\bf p}|}

45: \def\f{{\overline{f}}}

46: 

47: \def\A{{\rm A}}

48: \def\B{{\rm B}}

49: \def\V{{\rm V}}

50: \def\T{{\rm T}}

51: \def\LHS{{\rm LHS}}

52: \def\naBla{{\bf \nabla}}

53: \def\ij{{i \cdots j}}

54: 

55: 

56: %\hoffset-1cm

57: \draft

58: 

59: 

60: %\hoffset-1cm \draft

61: 

62: %\preprint{winnipeg }

63: 

64: \title {Shear viscosity of hot  QCD from transport theory and thermal field theory in real time formalism}

65: 

66: 

67: \author{  Hou Defu}

68: 

69:  \address{  Institute of Particle Physics, Huazhong Normal University, 430079 Wuhan,

70: China \\

71:  Department of Physics, The Ohio state University,  Columbus, OH 43210,USA\\

72: Institut f\"ur Theoretische Physik,

73: J.W. Goethe-Universit\"at, D-60054 Frankfurt/Main, Germany}

74: 

75: 

76:  \date{\today}

77: \maketitle

78: 

79: 

80: 

81: 

82: \begin {abstract}

83: 

84: 

85: We study shear viscosity in weakly coupled hot pure gauge field QCD theory basing on

86: transport theory and the Kubo formula using the closed time path formalism (CTP) of real time finite

87: temperature field theory. We show that the viscosity can be obtained as the integral

88: of a  retarded three-point function. Non-perturbative corrections to the bare one

89: loop result  can be obtained by solving a Schwinger-Dyson type integral equation for

90: this vertex. This integral equation represents the resummation of an infinite 

91: series of ladder diagrams which all contribute to the leading-log order result. We

92: show that this integral equation has exactly the same form as  the

93: linearized Boltzmann equation and explain the reason behind this formal equality.

94: 

95: \end{abstract}

96: 

97: 

98: 

99: 

100: 

101: \pacs{PACS numbers: 11.10Wx, 11.15Tk, 11.55Fv}

102: 

103: 

104: 

105: \narrowtext

106: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

107: 

108: \section{Introduction}

109: 

110: 

111:     Fluctuations occur in a system slight perturbed away from equilibrium. The responses to these fluctuations are described by transport coefficients which

112:  characterize the dynamics of long wavelength, low frequency fluctuations in the medium\cite{eh,Groot}.

113: The investigation of transport coefficients in high temperature

114: gauge theories is important in cosmological applications

115: such as electroweak baryogenesis\cite{bg}, and in the context of heavy ion collisions \cite{hvi,az}.

116: 

117:  There are two basic methods to calculate transport coefficients: transport theory and  response theory\cite{gyu,kubo,MartinK,Hosoya,Horsley,hu,llog}.  Using the transport theory method one starts from a local equilbrium form for the distribution function and performs an expansion in the gradient of the four velocity field. The coefficients of this expansion are determined from the classical Boltzman equation

118: \cite{llog,jeon1}.  

119: In the response theory approach one divides the Hamiltonian into a bare piece and 

120: a perturbative piece that is linear in the gradient of the velocity field. 

121:  One uses standard perturbation theory to obtain the Kubo formula for the 

122:  viscosity in terms of retarded Green functions\cite{kubo,jeon1}.

123:    These Green functions are then evaluated using equilbrium quantum field theory. 

124:     As is typical in finite temperature field theory, it is not sufficient to 

125:     calculate perturbatively in the coupling constant even for the weak coupling case. 

126:      There are certain infinite sets of diagrams that contribute at the same order in perturbation theory and have to 

127: be resummed \cite{jeon1,pisarski,meg}.  

128: 

129: 

130: 

131: In this paper, we want to compare these two methods.  The response theory approach

132: allows us to calculate transport coefficients from first principles using the well

133: understood methods of quantum field theory. On the other hand, the transport theory

134: approach involves the use of the Boltzman equation which is itself derived from some

135: more fundamental theory using, among other things, the quasiparticle approximation. 

136: In this sense, the response theory approach is more fundamental than the transport

137: theory method. However, the response theory approach can be quite difficult to

138: implement, even for a high temperature weakly coupled scalar theory, because of the

139: need to resum infinite sets of diagrams\cite{jeon1,pisarski}.  These considerations

140: motivate us to understand more precisely the connection between the more practical

141: transport theory method, and the more fundamental response theory approach.  

142: %The first step in this direction involves the study of the connection between the importance of certain sets %of feynmann diagrams in quantum field theory and different physical scales.  This question has already %attracted a lot of interest \cite{blz,bdk,lm}. 

143: 

144: Some progress has already been made in this direction.  It has been shown that

145: keeping only terms which are linear in the gradient expansion in the transport

146: theory calculation is equivalent to using the linear response approximation to

147: obtain the usual Kubo formula for the shear viscosity in terms of a retarded

148: two-point function, and calculating that two-point function using standard

149: equilibrium quantum field theory techniques to resum an infinite set of ladder 

150: diagrams for scalar fields \cite{jeon1,meg,hz2,meg1}.  This result is not surprising since it

151: has been known for some time that ladder diagrams give large contributions to

152: $n$-point functions with ultra soft external lines \cite{bdc,ASY,lm,Blaizot,blz}.   Some

153: studies on transport coefficients and  ladder resummation for  hot gauge theory  using Kubo formule 

154: within  the imaginary time formalism  were reported in  \cite{Martinez,Basagoiti,Aarts}. 

155: Due to the need for resummation, the diagrammatic approach to transport

156: coefficients in hot field theories, based on Kubo formulae, has 

157: developed a reputation for being extremely  cumbersome.

158: This is particularly true for the ITF formalism with its need for

159: analytical continuation and the corresponding complicated cutting rules \cite{Basagoiti}

160: As a result, an alternative approach based on the 

161: Boltzmann equation in kinetic theory has recently become more popular 

162: \cite{llog}.With this appraoch, the transport cofficients  in high temperature theory has recently been studied up to

163: leading order in  \cite{llog}. But these calculations are not trivial 

164: either, and they cannot fully replace the kind of intuitive insight into 

165: the underlying physical mechanisms which is provided by a diagrammatic analysis. 

166:  Our goal is therefore to calculate the shear viscosity of hot gauge theory 

167: from both transport method and diagrammatic method in real time formalism , and thus understand 

168: the connection of these two methods.

169: 

170: 

171: This paper will be organized as follows. In section II we define shear viscosity 

172:  using a hydrodynamic expansion of the

173: energy-momentum tensor. In section III we calculate shear viscosity using the transport theory method

174: by performing a gradient expansion on the Boltzmann equation and obtaining a

175: linearized Boltzmann equation.   In section IV we  calculate the shear viscosity 

176: using the  Kubo formula which relates the shear viscosity  to the

177: two-point retarded Green function of the viscous-shear stress tensor. 

178: Starting from the Kubo formula we calculate the shear viscosity at leading-log approximation

179: using standard techniques of finite temperature quantum field theory in real time

180: formalism. We show that the shear viscosiy can be obtained as an integral over a

181: three-point vertex. This three-point vertex  satisfies an integral equation,

182:  which  represents the resummation

183: of an infinite series of ladder diagrams. We show that this

184: integral equation representating ladder resummations  has the

185: same form as the linearized Boltzmann equation and explain the reason behind this formal equality.  

186:  We discuss our results and present our conclusions section V.   

187: 

188: 

189: \section{Viscosity}

190: 

191: In a system that is out of equilibrium, the existence of gradients

192: in thermodynamic parameters like the temperature and the four dimensional velocity field give rise to thermodynamic forces.   These thermodynamic forces lead to  deviations from the equilibrium expectation value of the energy momentum tensor which are characterized by transport coefficients like the thermal conductivity and the shear and bulk viscosities.   In order to separate these different physical processes we decompose the energy-momentum tensor as,

193: \begin  {equation}

194: T^{\mu\nu}=\epsilon u^\mu u^\nu-p\Delta^{\mu\nu}+P^\mu u^\nu +P^\nu u^\mu +\pi^{\mu\nu}\,;~~~~\Delta_{\mu\nu}=g_{\mu\nu}-u_\mu u_\nu.

195: \end{equation}

196: The quantities $\epsilon$, $p$, $P_\mu$ and $\pi_{\mu\nu}$ have the physical meanings of internal energy density, pressure, heat current and viscous shear stress, respectively.  The four vector $u_\mu(x)$ is the four dimensional velocity field which satisfies $u^\mu(x) u_\mu(x)=1$.  The expansion coefficients are given by

197: \begin {eqnarray}

198: \epsilon&=&u_\alpha u_\beta T^{\alpha\beta},\nonumber\\

199: p&=&-\frac{1}{3}\Delta_{\alpha\beta}T^{\alpha\beta},\nonumber\\

200: P_\mu&=&\Delta _{\mu\alpha}u_{\beta} T^{\alpha\beta}, \label{def1}\\

201: \pi_{\mu\nu}&=&(\Delta_{\mu\alpha}\Delta_{\nu\beta}-\frac{1}{3}\Delta_{\nu\mu}

202: \Delta_{\alpha\beta})T^{\alpha\beta}.\nonumber

203: \end{eqnarray}

204: The viscosity is obtained from the expectation value of the viscous shear stress part of the energy momentum tensor.  We expand in gradients of the velocity field and write, 

205: \begin{eqnarray}

206: && \delta \langle  \pi_{\mu\nu}\rangle =\eta H_{\mu\nu} +  \cdots   \nonumber \\

207: && H_{\mu\nu} = \partial_\mu u_\nu + \partial_\nu u_\nu - \frac{2}{3} \Delta_{\mu\nu} \Delta_{\rho\sigma}

208: \partial^\rho  u^\sigma 

209: \label{DEF}

210: \end{eqnarray}

211: where $\eta$  is the coefficient of the term that is linear  in the gradient of the four velocity, defined as shear viscosity.

212: 

213: Throughout this paper we work with weak-coupled  $SU(3)$ Yang-Mills theory. 

214:  The Lagrangian for this theory is

215: \begin {eqnarray}

216: {\cal L} &=& \frac{1}{4} F_{\mu\nu}^a F^{\mu\nu}_{ a}\nonumber

217: \\

218: F_{\mu\nu}^a &=&\partial_\mu A_\nu^a - \partial_\nu A_\mu^a - ig f^{abc}A_\mu^b

219: A_\nu^c

220:  \end{eqnarray}

221: where the coupling constant $g\ll 1$. In local rest frame, the traceless spatial part of the energy-momentum tensor is

222: 

223: \begin {eqnarray} \pi_{ij} =  F_{i \mu}^a F^a _{\mu j}- \frac{1}{3} \delta_{ij} 

224: F^a_{\alpha\mu} F^a_{\alpha\mu}   \end{eqnarray}

225: 

226: 

227:    % \section{Viscosity from Transport Theory}

228:     

229:     

230:     

231:     

232: \section {Shear viscosity from kinetic theory }

233: 

234: %\section {kinetic theory and transport coefficients}

235:    

236:     Kinetic  theory and the Boltzman equation can be used to study transport

237: properties of dilute many-body systems.  One assumes that, except during brief 

238: collisions, the system can be considered as being composed of classical particles

239: with well defined position, energy and momentum.  This picture is valid when the

240: mean free path is large compared with the Compton wavelength of the particles.  At

241: high temperature, the typical mean free path of thermal excitations in hot QCD is ${\cal

242: O}(1/g^2T \ln g^{-1})$ and is always larger than the typical Compton wavelength of

243: effective thermal oscillations which is ${\cal O}(1/{gT})$ . We introduce a phase

244: space distribution function $f(x,\underline{k})$ which describes the evolution of

245: the phase space probability density for the fundamental particles comprising a

246: fluid. In this expression and in the following equations the underlined momenta  are

247: on shell.

248: 

249: The Boltzmann equation  of  pure  gauge field QCD describing the evolution of the

250: gluon distribution function $f(x,k)$  has the form:

251: 

252: \begin {equation}

253:     \left[

254: 	{\partial \over \partial t}

255: 	+

256: 	\v_\k \cdot {\partial \over \partial \x}

257: 	+

258: 	{\bf F_{\rm ext}} \cdot {\partial \over \partial \k}

259:     \right]

260:     f(\k,\x,t)

261:     =

262:     C[f] \,.

263: \label {eq:Boltz}

264: \end{equation}   

265: The external force ${\bf F}_{\rm ext}$ term will only be relevant

266: in discussing the electrical conductivity . For calculations to leading logarithmic order in $g$,

267:  and for the transport

268: coefficient under consideration, it will be sufficient to

269: include in the collision term $C[f]$ only two-body scattering processes,

270: so that

271: 

272: \begin {eqnarray}

273: {\cal C}[f] = \frac{1}{2} \int_{123} d \,\Gamma_{12\leftrightarrow 3k}[

274: f_1 f_2 (1+f_3)(1+f_k) - (1+f_1)(1+f_2) f_3 f_k ] \label{BTZE}

275: \end{eqnarray}

276: with $f_i:= f(x,\underline{p}_i)$, $f_k:=f(x,\underline{k})$.  The symbol $d \, \Gamma

277: _{12\leftrightarrow 3k}$ represents the differential transition rate for particles of

278: momentum $P_1$ and $P_2$ to scatter into momenta $P_3$ and $K$ and is given by

279: \begin {eqnarray}

280: d\,\Gamma_{12\leftrightarrow 3k} := \frac{1}{2\omega_k} |{\cal

281: T}(\underline{k},\underline{p}_3,\underline{p}_2,\underline{p}_1|^2

282: \Pi^3_{i=1} \frac{d^3  p_i}{(2\pi)^32\omega_{p_i}} (2\pi)^4

283: \delta(\underline{p}_1 + \underline{p}_2 - \underline{p}_3 - \underline{k})

284: \end{eqnarray}

285: where ${\cal T}$ is the multiparticle scattering amplitude.

286: 

287: The form for

288: $f(x,\underline{k})$ in local equilibrium is, 

289: \begin {equation}

290: f^{(0)}=\frac{1}{e^{\beta(x) u_\mu(x) \underline{k}^\mu}-1}:=n_k,;~~N_k:=1+2n_k

291: \label{fequib} 

292: \end{equation}  

293: 

294: We study the Boltzmann equation in the hydrodynamic

295: regime where we consider times which are long compared to the mean free time and

296: describe the relaxation of the system in terms of long wavelength fluctuations in

297: locally conserved quantities.  

298: For a simple fluid without any additional conserved

299: charges, the only locally conserved quantities are energy and momentum.   To solve

300: the Boltzman equation in this near equilibrium hydrodynamic regime, we expand the

301: distribution function around the local equilibrium form using a gradient expansion. 

302: We go to a local rest frame in which we can write $\vec{u}(x)=0$.  Note that this

303: does not imply that gradients of the form $\partial_i u_j$ must be zero.  In the

304: local rest frame (\ref{DEF}) becomes, 

305: 

306: \begin {eqnarray} && \delta \langle 

307: \pi_{ij}\rangle = -\eta  H_{ij}  + \cdots  \label{DEFB} \\ && H_{ij} = \partial_i

308: u_j + \partial_j u_i - \frac{2}{3} \delta_{ij} (\vec{\partial} \cdot \vec{u})

309: \nonumber \nonumber \end{eqnarray} In all of the following expressions we keep only

310: linear terms that contain one power of $H_{ij}$ and quadratic terms 

311: that contain two

312: powers of $H_{ij}$, since these are the only terms that contribute to the shear 

313: viscosity we are trying to calculate.  

314: 

315: We write,

316: \begin {equation}

317: f=f^{(0)} + f^{(1)}  + \cdots 

318: \label{expf}

319: \end{equation}   

320: with,

321: %\begin {equation}

322: $f^{(1)} \sim \underline{k}_\mu \partial^\mu f^{(0)}$.

323: %\end{equation}   

324: Using (\ref{fequib}) we obtain,

325: \begin {eqnarray}

326: &&\underline{k}_\mu \partial^\mu f^{(0)} = \beta\, n_k(1+n_k)\,\frac{1}{2} I_{ij}(k) H_{ij} \nonumber \\

327: && f^{(1)} := - n_k(1+n_k) \phi_k\,;~~ \phi_k =\beta \frac{1}{2}B_{ij}(\underline{k})H_{ij}  \label{def2}

328: \end{eqnarray}

329: where we define

330: \begin {eqnarray}

331: \label{def3}

332: && \hat I_{ij}(k) = 

333: (\hat k_i \hat k_j-\frac{1}{3}\delta_{ij})\,;~~I_{ij}(k) = k^2\hat I_{ij}(k)

334: \end{eqnarray} 

335: and write,

336: \begin {equation}

337: B(\underline{k})_{ij} = \hat I_{ij}(k) B(\underline{k})

338:  \label{def4} 

339: \end{equation}   

340: 

341: The viscous shear stress part of the energy momentum tensor is given by 

342: \begin {equation} 

343: \label{defv}

344: \langle  \pi_{ij}\rangle  = \int \frac{d^3 k}{(2\pi)^3 2\omega_k}  f(x,\underline{k}) \, (k_i k_j-\frac{1}{3}\delta_{ij} k^2)

345: \end{equation}   

346: Using the expansion (\ref{expf}) and  rotation invariance

347: \begin {eqnarray}

348: && k_i k_j B(\underline{k}) ~~ \rightarrow ~~ \frac{1}{3} \delta_{ij} k^2 B(\underline{k}) \nonumber \\

349: && k_i k_j \hat k_l \hat k_m B(\underline{k}) ~~\rightarrow~~ \frac{1}{15}(\delta_{ij}\delta_{lm}+\delta_{il}\delta_{jm}+

350: \delta_{im}\delta_{jl}) k^2 B(\underline{k}) 

351: \end{eqnarray}

352:  we obtain the linear  contribution from (\ref{def2})  

353: \begin {eqnarray}

354: && \delta\langle \pi_{ij}\rangle =  -\frac{\beta}{15} \int \frac{d^3 k}{(2\pi)^3 2\omega_k} n(1+n) k^2B(\underline{k})\,H_{ij}.   

355: \end{eqnarray}

356: The lowest order term gives zero. Comparing with (\ref{DEFB}) we have,

357: \begin{eqnarray}

358: \eta = \frac{\beta}{15} \int \frac{d^3 k}{(2\pi)^3 2\omega_k} n(1+n) k^2B(\underline{k}) \label{ttf}

359: \end{eqnarray}

360: Thus we have shown that the shear viscosity  can be obtained from the function  $B(\underline{k})$ .  This

361:  function are the coefficient of the linear  term in the gradient expansion of

362:   the distribution function.  Next  we will show that this  functions can be

363:    obtained from the  linearized  Boltzmann equation.

364: 

365: 

366: %\subsection{Expansion of the Boltzman Equation}

367: 

368: 

369: Using the expansion (\ref{expf}) and (\ref{def2}) one can linearize  Boltzmann equation

370: %\subsubsection{First Order Boltzman Equation}

371: \begin {equation}

372: \underline{k}^\mu\partial_\mu f^0 (x,\underline{k})={\cal C}[f^{(0)};f^{(1)}]

373: \end{equation}   

374: where we keep terms linear in $f^{(1)}$ on the right hand side.

375: The left hand side gives,

376:  

377: \begin {eqnarray}

378: \underline{k}^\mu\partial_\mu f^0 (x,\underline{k})

379: = - n_k(1+n_k)\beta\,\frac{1}{2} I_{ij}(k) H_{ij}

380: \end{eqnarray}

381: The right hand side is 

382: \begin {equation}

383: {\cal C}[f^{(1)}]= -\frac{1}{2} \int_{123} d \,\Gamma_{12\leftrightarrow 3k} (1+n_1)(1+n_2)n_3 n_k(\phi_k+\phi_3-\phi_1-\phi_2)

384: \end{equation}   

385: Using the definition of $\phi$ given in (\ref{def2}) and comparing the coefficients of $H_{ij}$ on both side of the Boltzman equation we obtain, 

386: 

387: 

388: \begin {eqnarray}

389: I_{ij}(k)=\frac{1}{2} \int_{123} d \,\Gamma_{12\leftrightarrow 3k}

390: \frac{(1+n_1)(1+n_2)n_3}{1+ n_k}[   B_{ij}(\underline{p}_3) 

391: + B_{ij}(\underline{k})  -B_{ij}( \underline{p}_1)

392:  - B_{ij}(\underline{p}_2) \,]

393: \label{Bint}

394: \end{eqnarray}

395: This result is an inhomogeneous linear integral equation which can be solved self-consistently to obtain the function $B_{ij}(\underline{k})$.

396: 

397: \section{Viscosity and ladder resummation  in real time formalsim  }

398: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

399: 

400: 

401:  %\subsection{Diagramatic Expansion}

402:  

403: The Kubo formulae allow us to use quantum field theory to calculate nonequilibrium transport coefficients.  The results should be the same as those obtained in the previous section using transport theory.  

404: The Kubo formula  expresses the shear viscosity in terms of a retarded

405:  two-point Green function \cite{kubo,jeon1,meg}

406: 

407: \begin {equation}

408: \eta = \frac{1}{10}\frac{d}{d q_0}{\rm Im} [ \lim_{\vec{q} \to 0}G_R(Q)]|_{q_0=0} 

409: \label{kb01}

410: \end{equation}

411: where $G_R$ is the retarded  two-point Green function of the viscous shear stress

412: 

413: \begin {equation}

414: G_R(x,t;x',t'')=-i\theta(t-t'')[\pi_{ij}(x,t),\pi_{ij}(x',t'')]

415: \end{equation}   

416: 

417: We obtain a diagramatic expansion for the viscosity from (\ref{kb01})

418:  .    We use the closed time path formulation of finite temperature field theory, and work in the Keldysh representation.  Several reviews of this technique are available in the literature \cite{keld,schw,Chou,rep-145,PeterH}.  The closed time path integration contour involves two branches, one running from minus infinity to 

419: positive infinity just above the real axis, and one running back from positive infinity to 

420: negative infinity just below the real axis\cite{Chou,PeterH}.  All fields can take values on either branch of 

421: the contour and thus there is a doubling of the number of degrees of freedom. It is straightforward to show that this doubling 

422: of degrees of freedom is necessary to obtain finite Green functions.

423: 

424: The two-point function or the propagator can be written as a $2 \times 2 $

425: matrix of the form

426:  \begin{equation}

427:  \label{2}

428:    D = \left(  \matrix {D_{11} & D_{12} \cr

429:                         D_{21} & D_{22} \cr} \right) \, ,

430:  \end{equation}

431: where $D_{11}$ is the propagator for fields moving along $C_1$,

432: $D_{12}$ is the propagator for fields moving from $C_1$ to $C_2$, etc.

433: 

434: 

435: The retarded and advanced propagators are given by the combinations,

436: \bea \label{3a}

437:    D_R &=& D_{11} - D_{12}  \nonumber\\

438:    D_A &=& D_{11} - D_{21} \, .

439: \eea

440: The 1PI part of the two-point function, or the polarization insertion, is

441: obtained by truncating legs.  The retarded and advanced parts are given by,

442: \bea

443:  \Pi_R &=& \Pi_{11} + \Pi_{12}  \nonumber\\

444:  \Pi_A &=& \Pi_{11} + \Pi_{21} \, .

445: \eea

446: 

447: The situation is similar for higher $n$-point functions.  For example, the

448: three-point function which is retarded with respect to the first leg is given

449: by

450: \bea

451: \Gamma_{R1} = \Gamma_{111} +\Gamma_{112} +\Gamma_{121} +\Gamma_{122}\,.

452: \eea

453: The other three-point vertices that we will  need are:

454: \bea

455: && \Gamma_{R2} = \Gamma_{111} +\Gamma_{112} +\Gamma_{211} +\Gamma_{212}

456: \nonumber \\

457: && \Gamma_{R3} = \Gamma_{111} +\Gamma_{121} +\Gamma_{211} +\Gamma_{221}

458: \nonumber \\

459: && \Gamma_{F} = \Gamma_{111} +\Gamma_{121} +\Gamma_{212} +\Gamma_{222}

460: \nonumber 

461: \eea

462: 

463: 

464: 

465: 

466: In our case, we want to obtain a perturbative expansion for the correlation

467:  functions of composite operators   $D_R(X,Y)$  which appear in (\ref{kb01}).  We define the vertices $\Gamma_{ij}$  as the vertice obtained by

468:  truncating external legs from the following connected vertice :

469: 

470: 

471: \begin {eqnarray}

472:  \Gamma^{C(ab)}_{ij,\mu\nu} = \langle T_c \pi_{ij}(X)  A^a_\mu(Y) A^b_\nu(Z)\rangle  

473: \end{eqnarray}

474: where $T_c$ is the operator that time orders along the closed time path contour.

475: From this definition, one can draw the skeleton diagram of  the two-point correlation 

476: function  of the  the viscous shear stress tensors with a  full vertice and full propagators as

477: 

478: 

479: 

480: 

481: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Fig. 1 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

482: \begin {eqnarray}

483: \parbox{14cm}

484: {{

485: \begin {center}

486: \parbox{10cm}

487: {

488: \epsfxsize=8cm

489: \epsfysize=5cm

490: %\epsfbox{}}\\

491: \epsfbox{fig1.eps}}\\

492: \parbox{14cm}{\small \center  Fig.~1:  Skelon diagram of the two-point correlation function

493:  for shear viscosity from linear response. The dashed external line represents the composite

494:   operator $\pi_{ij}$  }

495: \label{F01}

496: \end{center}

497: }}

498: \nonumber

499: \end{eqnarray}

500: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%                           %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

501: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

502:  

503: 

504:  

505: 

506: The coupling vertex between the operator $\pi^{ij}$ and two gluons with

507: incoming

508: momenta $P,K$ and indices $(\mu,a),(\nu,b)$ respectively can be read

509: \begin {eqnarray}

510:  &&\Gamma_{\mu\nu,ij}^{ab(0)}(P,K)=-\delta^{ab}[\delta^{\mu\nu}

511: \left(

512:  p^{i}k^{j}+k^{i}p^{j}-\frac{2}{3}\delta^{ij}\p \cdot \k

513: \right)

514: +P\cdot K\left(

515: \delta^{i\mu}\delta^{j\nu}+\delta^{i\nu}\delta^{j\mu}-\frac{2}{3}\delta^{ij}\delta^{r\mu}\delta^{r\nu}\right)

516:   \nonumber \\ 

517: &&-\left(

518: p^{i}K^{\mu}\delta^{j\nu}+p^{j}K^{\mu}\delta^{i\nu}+P^{\nu}k^{i}\delta^{j\mu}

519: +P^{\nu}k^{j}\delta^{i\mu}

520: \right)

521: -\frac{2}{3}\delta^{ij}\left(P^{\nu}k^{r}\delta^{r\mu}+K^{\mu}p^{r}\delta^{r\nu}\right)],

522: \end{eqnarray}

523: where $P=(p_{0},\p)$, $P\cdot K=p_{0} k_{0}-\p \cdot \k$ and

524: $p_{0}$

525: is the energy of the corresponding gluon.

526: 

527: For $Q=0$,$P=-K$ and on shell gluons ,$K^2=0$, $\Gamma(K,Q,P)\equiv \Gamma(K)$,

528:  we have:

529: 

530: \begin {eqnarray}

531: P_{\mu\nu}^T (K) \Gamma^{ab (0)}_{ij,\mu\nu} (K)&=&-2 \delta^{ab} I_{ij}(k),

532: \nonumber

533: \\

534: P_{\mu\alpha}^T(K) \Gamma^{ab (0)}_{ij,\alpha\beta} (K)P_{\nu\beta}^T(K) 

535:  &=&-2 \delta^{ab} I_{ij}(k)P_{\mu\nu}^T(K)

536: \label{prj1}

537: \end{eqnarray}

538: where $P_{\mu\nu}^T(K)$ is the transverse projector defined as $P_{00}^T=P_{0i}^T=0$, and

539: $P_{ij}^T(k)=\delta_{ij}-\hat \k_i\hat \k_j$. $\hat \k_i$ represents unit vector of $\k$.

540: Rotation invariance leads for the full vertice:

541: 

542: \begin {eqnarray}

543:  P_{\mu\nu}^T (K) \Gamma^{ab }_{ij,\mu\nu} (K)&=&-2 \delta^{ab}

544: \Gamma(K) \hat I_{ij}(k) ,\nonumber \\ P_{\mu\alpha}^T(K) \Gamma^{ab }_{ij,\alpha\beta}

545: (K)P_{\nu\beta}^T(K)  &=&-2 \delta^{ab} \hat I_{ij}(k)P_{\mu\nu}^T(K)\Gamma(K)

546: \label{prj2} \end{eqnarray}

547: 

548: Since for the hard gluons, only the transverse part dominates the leading-log

549: contribution, we can replace the full gluon propagtor by its transverse part. 

550: 

551: 

552: \begin {equation}

553: D^{\alpha\mu}(K)\rightarrow  P^{\alpha\mu}_T D(K)

554: \end{equation}   

555: with

556: \begin {equation}

557: D(K)=\frac{1}{K^2-\Pi_T(K)}.

558: \end{equation}   

559: where $\Pi_T(K)$ represents the transverse gluon self-energy.

560: 

561: 

562: Using  the Feynman rules of the closed time path formalism (CTP) of real time finite temperature field theory,we write the two-point correlation function of

563: the composite operators $\pi_{ij}$

564:   as

565:  

566: 

567: \begin {equation}

568:  G_{ab}(Q) = i \int dK  \Gamma^{ij,\mu\nu}_{cad}(K,Q,-K-Q) iD^{\alpha\mu}_{bc}(K) 

569:  iD^{\nu\beta}_{db}(K+Q) \Gamma^{(0){ij,\alpha\beta}}(p) \tau_b 

570: \end{equation}

571: shown diagramatically in Fig.1. Where $\int dK\equiv \int \frac{d^4k}{(2\pi)^4} $ , and 

572:    the indices $\{a,b,c,d\}$ are Keldysh indices and 

573: take values $\{1,2\}$. The gloun propagators here are full resummed propagators.  We perform the sum over Keldysh indices using the Mathematica program described in \cite{johnS}.

574: 

575: After performing the sums over Keldysh indices and  making use of Eqs (\ref{prj1}),(\ref{prj2}), we find imaginary part of the retarded two-point function

576: 

577: \begin {eqnarray}

578: {\rm Im} G_R(Q) =-\frac{4}{3} \int dK k^2 (N_{k+q} - N_k)

579:  [\Gamma_{R2}(K,Q,-K-Q) D_A(K) D_R(K+Q) +h.c ] \label{kubo1} 

580: \end{eqnarray}

581: 

582: In obtaining this result we have used the fact that we will eventually take the

583: limit $Q\rightarrow 0$ to obtain the viscosity~(\ref{kb01}). This limit gives

584: rise to what is known as the pinch effect:  using an obvious notation we  write the pairs of

585:  propagators $D_A(K) D_R(K+Q)$ 

586:  as $a_ k r_{k+q}$, terms with a product of factors

587: $a_k r_{k+q}$ and $r_k a_{k+q}$ contain an extra factor in the denominator that is proportional to the

588: imaginary part of the self-energy relative to terms with products of propagators $a_k a_{k+q}$ or $r_k r_{k+q}$. Thus terms

589: proportional to $a_k a_{k+q}$ or $r_k r_{k+q}$ can be dropped. This is the so-called pinch limit, because 

590: the large terms occur when the contour is ``pinched'' between the poles of the two propagators,

591: which gives rise to this enhencement factor in the denominator that is proportional to the

592: imaginary part of the self-enegy.  We regulate the pinching singularity with the imaginary part of the self-energy and obtain \cite{meg},

593: \begin {eqnarray}

594: r_k a_{k+q} \rightarrow  -\frac{\rho_k}{2\rm{Im} \Pi^T_k}\,;~~~~\rho_k = i(r_k-a_k) \label{pinch}

595: \end{eqnarray}

596: where $\Pi^T$ is the retarded part of the transverse  gluon self-energy.

597: 

598: Now we expand in $q_0$  and keep only the term proportional to $q_0 $ since this term is the only one that

599:  contibutes to (\ref{kb01}) .  There is  an over all thermal factor of the form $N_k-N_{k+q}$  in

600:  (\ref{kubo1}).  The expansion of this thermal factor is straightforward:

601: \begin {eqnarray}

602: N_k-  N_{k+q} = 2q_0 \beta n_k(1+n_k) + \cdots \label{nexp}

603: \end{eqnarray} 

604: Consider the behaviour of the vertices when $q_0\rightarrow 0$.  We introduce the notation

605:  $\Gamma(K,0,-K):=\Gamma(K)$ .

606:   It is straightforward to show that 

607: \begin {eqnarray}

608: \Gamma_{R2}(K,Q,-K-Q) \rightarrow  {\rm Re}\Gamma_{R2}(K) \label{re}

609: \end{eqnarray}

610: Using these results to simplify (\ref{kubo1})  and substituting into (\ref{kb01}) we

611: obtain, 

612: \begin{equation} 

613: \label{vsf}

614: \eta = \frac{\beta}{15} \int dK\, k^2 \,\rho_k n_k (1+n_k)

615: \left[\frac {\rm Re \Gamma_{R2}(K)}{\rm Im \Pi^T_k}\right] 

616: \end{equation}

617: Comparing

618: with (\ref{ttf}) we see that the results are identical if we use (\ref{def4})and 

619: identify

620: 

621:  \begin {eqnarray} 

622:  \label{compare} 

623:  &&B(\underline{k}) =

624: \frac {\rm Re \Gamma_{R2}(\underline{k})}{\rm Im \Pi^T_k}

625: \label{EQ1}

626: \end{eqnarray} 

627: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

628:  where momentum $K$ must be on new

629: mass shell: $\delta(K^2-{\rm Re} \Pi^T_K)$

630: 

631: %\subsubsection{The ladder resummation}

632: 

633: It has been known for some time that in scalar theory, the set of diagrams which give the dominate

634: contributions to the viscosity are the ladder diagrams.  These diagrams contribute to the viscosity to 

635: the same order in perturbation theory as the bare one loop graph, and thus need to be resummed 

636: \cite{jeon1,jeon2,meg}.  Following the similar power counting rule one can show that the set of

637:  ladder diagrams shown in Fig.2  give the  dominate contributions to the viscosity in pure gauge

638:  field QCD theory at high temperature.  This effect

639: occurs for the following reason. It appears that the ladder graphs are suppressed

640: relative to the bare vertex  by extra powers of the coupling, which come from the

641: extra vertex factors that one obtains when one adds rungs (vertical lines). However,

642: these extra factors of the coupling are compensated for by a kinematical factor. 

643: This factor arises through the pinch effect which is described above.  The addition

644: of an additional rung in a ladder graph always produces an extra pair of propagators

645: of the form $a_k r_{k+q}$ or $r_k a_{k+q}$. Products of this form contribute  a

646: factor which produces an enhancement.  This factor  occurs when the contour is

647: ``pinched'' between the poles of the two propagators which gives rise to a

648: contribution in the denominator that is proportional to the imaginary part of the

649: self-energy.

650: 

651: In order to include those ladder diagrams, which dominate the contribution to the viscosity,

652:  we obtain the vertex $ \Gamma_{ij}(P,Q,-P-Q)$ as the solution to the integral equation shown in Fig.2.  

653: 

654: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%FIG2 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

655: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

656: \begin {eqnarray}

657: \parbox{14cm}

658: {{

659: \begin {center}

660: \parbox{10cm}

661: {

662: \epsfxsize=10cm

663: \epsfysize=4cm

664: %\epsfbox{sqcd2.eps}}\\

665: \epsfbox{fig2.eps}}\\

666: \parbox{14cm}{\small 

667: %\center 

668:  Fig.2: Integral equation for ladder resummation, the blob stands for the

669: full vertex  $ \Gamma$ . Thick lines represent for hard transverse gluons, where a finite width is needed to regularize the pinch sigularity. While

670: thin lines represent soft gluons, where HTLs resummed propagators are required.}

671: \label{F02}

672: \end{center}

673: }}

674: \nonumber

675: \end{eqnarray}

676: 

677: Since we only calculate up to the leading-log order, in order to simplify the calculations, 

678: several points are in order:

679: 

680: 1) We consider weak coupled degrees of freedom ($g\ll 1$);

681: 

682: 2)Hard degrees of freedom with the momentum of order $T$  for the rails dominate the contribution;

683: 

684: 3)Small momentum transfer ($S\ll gT$),$t$ chanel dominates the  contribution. Namely, the momenta on the

685: rungs (vertical lines) are soft of order $gT$. 

686: 

687: In order to to get rid of color indices and Lorentz indices, We

688:  contract  $\delta^{ab} P_{\mu\nu}^T(K)$ with

689:  both sides of above equation and make use of

690: 

691: \bea

692: &&\delta^{a b}\,\delta^{a a'}\,\delta^{b b'}\, f^{a' c d}\,\delta^{c e}\,f^{e f g}\,

693: \delta^{f f'}\,\delta^{g g'}\, f^{f' e' g'}\,\delta^{e' c'}\,f^{b'd'c' }\,

694: \nonumber

695: \\

696: &&= f^{aed}f^{efg}f^{aed}f^{efg}=N_c^2

697: \eea

698: and

699: \bea

700: &&P^T_{\alpha\beta } (K)\,  \gamma_{ \rho,\tau,\alpha }\,  P^T_{\rho \sigma }(P)

701: \, \gamma_{\sigma,\tau',\beta }

702: = 8 P_\tau P_{\tau'}\,\nonumber

703: \\

704: &&P^T_{\lambda \delta } (R) \,  \gamma_{ \lambda,\kappa,\lambda' }\,  P^T_{\lambda' \delta' }

705: (R)\,  \gamma_{ \delta,\kappa',\delta' }

706: = 8 R_\kappa R_{\kappa'}

707: \eea

708: where $\gamma_{\alpha,\beta,\gamma}(P,T,K)=(P-T)_\gamma \, \delta_{\alpha\beta}

709: +(T-K)_\alpha \, \delta_{\beta\gamma}+(K-P)_\beta \, \delta_{\alpha\gamma}$ comes

710: from the triple-gluon vertex. 

711: 

712: After some algbra calculations, we obtain a matrix integral equation in

713: Keldysh space

714: 

715: \begin {eqnarray} 

716: &&  \Gamma^{lm}_{abc}(K,Q, -K-Q)=\Gamma^{(0),lm} 

717:  -64 N_c^2 \int dP\,dR\, \Gamma^{lm}_{dbe}(P,Q,-P-Q)  D_{ad}(P)

718: D_{ec}(P+Q) \nonumber \\ 

719: &&\cdot D_{ac}(R+K-P) \tau_3^c D_{ca}(R)P_{\tau}

720: R_{\kappa} D^{\tau\kappa} (T)P_{\tau'} R_{\kappa'} D^{\tau'\kappa'}(T) \tau_3^a 

721: \end{eqnarray}

722: 

723: We perform the sums over the Keldysh indices using the Mathematica program in

724: \cite{johnS}  and simplify the result by taking $Q$ to zero, keeping only the

725: pinching terms, and using (\ref{pinch}).   We obtain, 

726: 

727: \begin {eqnarray} 

728: \label{gammaintsh1}

729:  \Gamma_{R2}^{lm}(K) = &&k_m k_l

730: -\frac{1}{3} \delta_{ml} k^2 +\frac{3 N_c^2 }{2}\int dP\,dR\,dR'\,

731: (2\pi)^4 \delta^4(P+R-R'-K)\nonumber \\ &&

732:  |{\cal T}|^2 \rho_p \rho_R\rho_{R'}

733: \frac{\Gamma_{R2}^{lm}(P)}{{\rm Im}\Pi^T_R(P)} (1+n_p)(1+n_{R})n_{R'}/(1+n_k)

734: \end{eqnarray}

735: where  ${\cal T}^2\equiv  16 g^4 | P_{\tau} r_S^{\tau\kappa}R_{\kappa}|^2$, 

736: which is recognized as the matrix element squared for the collision of the hard gluon in $t$ chanel as shown 

737: in Fig. 3(a). Here

738: $r_S^{\tau\kappa}$ is the hard thermal loops resummed retarded propagator for the soft transfer momentum

739: $S$.

740: 

741: 

742: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Fig. 3 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

743: \begin {eqnarray}

744: \parbox{14cm}

745: {{

746: \begin {center}

747: \parbox{12cm}

748: {

749: \epsfxsize=10cm

750: \epsfysize=4cm

751: %\epsfbox{}}\\

752: \epsfbox{fig3.eps}}\\

753: \parbox{14cm}{\small   Fig.~3:  (a) Two-body  gluon-gluon elastic scattering in $t$ chanel. (b)

754: Self-energy describing collisions in the (resummed) Born approxximation. The thick lines refer to the

755: the hard colliding gluons. The thin lines with a blob denote soft gluon propagators 

756: dressed by the HTL}

757: \label{F03}

758: \end{center}

759: }}

760: \nonumber

761: \end{eqnarray}

762: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%                           %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

763: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

764:  

765: 

766: 

767: Note that this integral equation is decoupled: the only three point vertex that

768: appears is $\Gamma^{lm}_{R2}$. To simplify this expression further we write

769: $\Gamma_{ij} = \hat I_{ij}(p) \Gamma(P)$, use (\ref{compare}) and symmetrize the

770: integral on the right hand side over the three integration variables $P$, $R'$ and

771: $R$. We multiply and divide the left hand side by $\rm{Im} \Pi^T_R(P)$ and replace

772: this expression in the numerator by the HTL result \cite{Blaizot,dp,thoma}

773: 

774: \begin

775: {eqnarray} {\rm Im}\Pi^T_R(K) =&&\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{1}{1+n_k}\right) \int

776: dP\,dR\ dR'\, (2\pi)^4 \delta^4(P+R-R'-K) |{\cal T}|^2 \nonumber \\

777: &&\rho_p\rho_r\rho_{R'}(1+n_p)(1+n_{R'})n_R\label{pi} 

778: \end{eqnarray}

779: 

780: Rearranging we obtain \cite{meg}, \begin {eqnarray} && I(k,k)_{lm} = \frac{N^2}{2}

781: \int dP\,dR\,dR' ~(2\pi)^4 \delta({P} + {R} - {R'} - {K})|{\cal T}|^2  \frac{

782: (1+n_p)(1+n_{R'})n_R }{(1+n_k)} \label{Bint2} \\ && ~~~~~~~ \rho_p \rho_r\rho_{R'}

783: [   B_{lm}({R'}) +B_{lm}({K})-B_{lm}({P}) -B_{lm}({R}) ]  \nonumber \end{eqnarray}

784: 

785: where we have used (\ref{re}) and (\ref{EQ1}).

786:   When the delta functions are used to

787: do the frequency integrals, this equation has exactly the same form as the equation

788: obtained from the  linearized  effective Boltzman equation(\ref{Bint}), with a new

789: mass shell describing thermal excitations.   Comparing (\ref{ttf}) and (\ref{Bint})

790: with (\ref{vsf}) and (\ref{Bint2}) we conclude that calculating  shear

791: viscosity  of the hot  pure gauge field QCD using effective transport theory by keeping only first order terms

792: in the gradient expansion, is equivalent to using the Kubo formula obtained from

793: response theory, with a three point vertex obtained by resumming ladder graphs.

794: 

795: Now we have established  an interesting  connection between

796:    kinetic theory and diagrammatic linear response theory for the nonabilian gauge

797:    theory. We  obtain formally the same expressions for the viscosity  

798:    in both approaches.  It is desirable to understand the deeper reasons behind 

799:    this formal equality. 

800:    

801: The viscosity is obtained from the expectation value of the viscous 

802: shear stress tensor. There

803:  are two approaches to calculate the expectation value.   The first method is  from  kinetic 

804:  theory. With this approach, we use a distribution function $f$ to evaluate the the expectation value of

805:   the viscous shear stress tensor(see Eq.(\ref{defv})). This distribution function is expanded 

806:  around a local equlibrium function  $f^{(0)}$  up to the first order $f^{(1)}$ of the gradient expansion .

807:   The  second approach is  by linear response theory. The expectation value  is calculated from

808:  the non-equilibrium density matrix $\rho\cite{kubo,meg1}$, which can be expanded around the local

809:  equilibrium density matrix  $\rho_0$  up to the linear response order in gradient expansion , 

810:  $\rho=\rho_0+\rho_1$. The  expectation value of a physics quantity does not depend on the approaches one uses, either

811: from the kinetic theory by the distribution function , or from the linear response theory

812: by the density matrix under the same approximation in gradient expansion.

813: Therefore  $B(k)$ from (\ref{ttf}) and from (\ref{compare})should be the same although they seem to describe

814:   completely  two different things! The former one comes from the first-order distribution

815:   function $f^{(1)}$; The later,  though  related to a retarded 3-point function, is resulted from the

816:   first-order matrix density $\rho_1$.   Physicaly , they both describe how far the system is 

817:   perturbated away from the local equilibrium. In fact,  both  methods describe the first-order deviation of the system away from the local

818:       equilibrium,  one of them  using  the description of the distribution function, while the

819:       other one using the density matrix. 

820:   

821:   On the other hand,  both appraoches also contain the same physics  processes (diagramms), namely two body collisions.

822:   %due to which the system is perturbed away from the local equilbrium. 

823:   In order to understand this  point, let's recall that the Boltzmann equation can

824:   be derived from the Schwinger-Dyson equation of the full 2-point functions in real-time formalism  under certain 

825:   approximations , like Wigner transformation and truncation schemes etc \cite{Blaizot}.  Different truncation

826:   schemes (or self-energy insertions ) lead to different collision terms. The Boltzmann

827:   equation we used only contains $2\to 2$ collision terms, which come from the cut of the  self-energy diagrams

828:   containing $2\to 2 $ processes as shown in Fig.3 .  

829:    The cutting rules tell us  that  the cuts of  self-energy diagramms give  physics scattering amplitudes.

830:    The diagrammatic method from the integral equation of  the full vertex is essentially

831:    like a resummation for the full 2-point correlation diagram of the stress tensor. Again in this

832:    resummation, only the  diagramms  containing $2\to 2$  processes are included. 

833:    

834:     Because of these reasons above,  we expect  these two approaches should be able to give the same result for any

835: theories under the same approximation.

836:    

837:    

838:  

839: 

840: 

841: \section{ Summary and Conclusions} \label{V}  

842: 

843: We have studied shear viscosity  of the  nonabelian pure gauge theory  using two different methods.  The first method uses standard

844: transport theory.  We start from a local equilibrium form for the distribution function and perform a gradient expansion.  We

845: calculate the  shear viscosity by expanding the Boltzman equation and obtaining a linearized Bolzman equation

846:  that can be solved consistently. The second technique uses  the Kubo formula for linear

847: response, which allows us to calculate the  shear viscosity   from the  retarded two-point Green

848: function of the viscous shear stress tensor. The transport theory calculation  involves the use of  the Boltzman equation,

849:  which is itself obtained from some more fundamental  theory. The response theory calculation uses the well known  methods of equilibrium

850: finite temperature quantum field theory and is, in this sense, more fundamental.  However, the calculation is complicated by the

851: need to resum infinite sets of diagrams at finite temperature. 

852: At leading order, it is well known that a correct calculation of the linear response coefficient in scalar theory involves 

853: the resummation of ladder graphs. 

854: 

855:  

856: 

857:   

858: We have identified precisely which diagrams  in hot pure gauge QCD need to be 

859: resummed by studying the connection between the transport theory calculation and the response theory 

860: calculation in real time formalism.

861: We have shown that calculating  shear viscosity using transport theory by 

862: keeping terms that are linear in the gradient of the velocity field in the expansion of the Bolzman equation, 

863: is equivalent to calculating the same shear viscosity  from quantum field theory at finite temperature using 

864: the linear response Kubo formula with a vertex given by a specific integral equation.

865: This integral equation  is the same as that recently  found by Arnold, Moore and

866: Yaffe~\cite{llog}   by analyzing the infrared divergences of the linearized

867: collision integrals without screened interactions. This integral equation is also the same as the linearized

868: Bolzmann equation derived by   Blaizot and Iancu  from the Kadanof-Baym equations by using a gradient expansion and 

869: keeping only linear terms \cite{Blaizot}.  Thus, this fact constitutes a non trivial check of the formalism 

870: we have used. This integral equation shows that the complete set of diagrams that need to be resummed includes infinite

871:  ladder graphs.  We explain the reasons behind this formal equality between this two approaches. First, both approaches

872:   describe the first-order deviation of the system away from the local

873:       equilibrium,  one of them  using  the description of the distribution function, while the

874:       other one using the density matrix. Secondly both methods  involve  the same physics  processes  or diagramms

875:       ( two body collisions).

876:  Therefore, We expect this interesting  connection between   these two appraoches should exist for any other theories

877:  under the same approximations.

878: 

879: 

880:  

881:  There are several directions for future work.  The study here is only valid up 

882: to leading-log  approximation of the transport coefficients. Going beyond to this approximation,

883: one needs to include certain inelastic LPM suppressed splitting

884:  processes and thus needs to resum more complicated diagrams \cite{llog,ld}.

885:   It would be interesting to generalize  this work to the full leading order of 

886:    of  the shear viscosity with  real QCD with quark flavors in real time formalism .

887: 

888: 

889: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

890: 

891: 

892: 

893: 

894: 

895: 

896: 

897: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

898: 

899: \begin {acknowledgments}

900: 

901: We thank Gert Aarts , E. Braaten, M. Carrington, U. Heinz, R. Kobes , D. Rischke, H. C. Ren, and  J.~M.~Mart\'\i nez Resco  

902: for interesting discussions. We address special thanks to  U. Heinz for useful suggestions and a  critical reading of

903:  the original manuscript.This work was partly supported by the National Natural Science 

904: Foundation of China (NSFC) under project Nos. 10005002 and 10135030.

905: Hou is grateful to the nuclear theory

906: group in the physics department of Ohio State University for their hospitality

907: where the main part of this work was completed.   Hou\  acknowledges financial support from 

908: Alexander von Humboldt-Foundation.  He also appreciates help and support from 

909: the Institut f\"ur Theoretische Physik of the J.\ W.\ Goethe-Universit\"at.

910: 

911: 

912: 

913:  

914:  

915:  

916: 

917: 

918: \end{acknowledgments}

919: 

920: 

921: %\newpage

922: 

923: \appendix

924: 

925: %\section{integral formula}

926: 

927: 

928: \vspace*{1cm}

929: 

930: \begin {references}

931: 

932: 

933: \bibitem{eh}

934:  H.-Th. Elze and U. Heinz, Phys. Rep. {\bf 183}, 81 (1989).

935: \bibitem{Groot}

936:         S.R.~de Groot, W.A.~van Leeuwen, and Ch.G.~van Weert,

937:         {\it Relativistic Kinetic Theory}, North-Holland Publishing.

938: 

939: \bibitem {bg}

940: V.~A.~Rubakov and M.~E.~Shaposhnikov, Usp.\ Fiz.\ Nauk {\bf 166}, 493 (1996)

941: [hep-ph/ 9603208].

942: 

943: \bibitem {hvi} See, for example,

944: D.~Teaney and E.~V.~Shuryak,  Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 83}, 4951 (1999).

945: 

946: \bibitem{az} Azwinndini Muronga, Dirk H. Rischke  nucl-th/0407114;  

947:               Azwinndini Muronga,    Phys. Rev.  {\bf C69},  034903(2004).

948: 

949: \bibitem{gyu}

950:   G. Baym, H. Monien, C.J. Pethick and D.G. Ravenhall, Phy. Rev. Lett. {\bf 64}, 1867 (1990);

951: E. H. Heiselberg, {\bf D49}, 4739 (1994). 

952: 

953: %M. Gyulassy and A.V. Selikhov, Phys. Lett. {\bf 316} (1993)

954: 

955: \bibitem{kubo}

956:    D.N. Zubarev, {\it Nonequilibrium Statistical Thermodynamics},

957:    (Plenum, New York, 1974).

958: 

959: \bibitem{MartinK} L.P.~Kadanoff and P.C.~Martin,

960:         Ann.~Phys.   (NY) {\bf 24}, 419 (1963).

961:  \bibitem{Hosoya} A.~Hosoya, M.~Sakagami, and M.~Takao,

962:                    Ann.~of Phys.   (NY) {\bf 154}, 229 (1984)

963:                   and references therein.

964:  \bibitem{Horsley} R.~Horsley and W.~Schoenmaker,,

965:                    Nuc.~Phys.~B {\bf 280}, 716 (1987).

966: 

967: \bibitem{hu}

968: E.~A.~Calzetta, B.~L.~Hu and S.~A.~Ramsey,

969: %``Hydrodynamic transport functions from quantum kinetic field theory,''

970: Phys.\ Rev.\  {\bf D61}, 125013 (2000).

971: 

972: 

973: 

974: \bibitem {llog}

975:     P.~Arnold, G.~Moore, and L.~G.~Yaffe, JHEP {\bf 0011} (2000)001 

976: [hep/ph 0010177],{\it ibid}. JHEP {\bf 0305} (2003) 051

977:     

978: 

979: \bibitem{jeon1}  S.~Jeon, Phys. Rev.  {\bf D47}, 4568 (1993); {\it ibid}. {\bf D52}, 3591 (1995). 

980: 

981: \bibitem{pisarski}

982:    R.D. Pisarski, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 63}, 1129 (1989); E. Braaten

983:    and R.D. Pisarski, Nucl. Phys. B {\bf 337}, 569 (1990).

984: 

985: \bibitem{meg}

986:  M.E. Carrington, Hou Defu and R. Kobes, Phys. Rev D{\bf 62}, 025010 (2000).

987:    

988: \bibitem{hz2} E. Wang and U. Heinz, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 471}, 208 (1999)

989: 

990: \bibitem{meg1}

991:  M.E. Carrington, Hou Defu and R. Kobes, Phys. Rev D{\bf 64}, 025001 (2001);

992:  {\it ibid}. Phys. Lett. B {\bf 523}, 221 (2001)

993: 

994: 

995: \bibitem {bdc}

996: D.~Bodeker, Phys.\ Lett.\  {\bf B426}, 351 (1998).

997: 

998: 

999: \bibitem {ASY}

1000: P.~Arnold, D.~T.~Son and L.~G.~Yaffe,

1001: Phys.\ Rev.\  {\bf D59}, 105020 (1999).

1002: 

1003: \bibitem{lm}

1004: D.~F.~Litim and C.~Manuel,

1005: %``Mean field dynamics in non-Abelian plasmas from classical transport  theory,''

1006: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 82}, 4981 (1999).

1007: 

1008: %\cite{Blaizot}

1009: \bibitem{Blaizot}

1010: J.~P.~Blaizot and E.~Iancu,

1011: %``The quark-gluon plasma: Collective dynamics and hard thermal loops,''

1012: Phys.\ Rept.\  {\bf 359}, 355 (2002)

1013: [arXiv:hep-ph/0101103].

1014: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0101103;%%

1015: \bibitem{blz}

1016: J -P Blaizot and E. Iancu,  Nucl. Phys. B {\bf 570}, 326 (2000)

1017:   

1018: %\cite{Martinez}

1019: \bibitem{Martinez}

1020: J.~M.~Mart\'\i nez Resco and M.~A.~Valle Basagoiti,

1021: %``Color conductivity and ladder summation in hot QCD,''

1022: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 63}, 056008 (2001)

1023: [arXiv:hep-ph/0009331].

1024: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0009331;%%

1025: 

1026: 

1027: 		       

1028: %\cite{Basagoiti}

1029: \bibitem{Basagoiti}

1030:  Manuel~A.~Valle Basagoiti,

1031: %``transport coefficients and ladder ladder summation in hot gauge theories,''

1032: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 66}, 045005 (2002)

1033: \bibitem{Aarts}

1034: G. Aarts and  J.~M.~Mart\'\i nez Resco , JHEP {\bf 0211}, 022(2002)

1035: 

1036: 

1037: \bibitem{jeon2}  S.~Jeon and L. Yaffe, 

1038:                 Phys.~Rev.~D {\bf 53}, 5799 (1996).

1039: 

1040: \bibitem{keld} L.V. Keldysh, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. {\bf 47}, 1515 (1964).

1041: 

1042: \bibitem{schw} P.C. Martin and J. Schwinger, Phys. Rev. {\bf 115}, 1432 (1959).

1043: 

1044: \bibitem{Chou} 

1045:   K.-C. Chou, Z.-B. Su, B.-L. Hao, and L. Yu, Phys. Rep. {\bf 118}, 

1046:   1 (1985).

1047: 

1048: \bibitem{rep-145} 

1049:   N.P. Landsman and Ch.G. van Weert, Phys. Rep. {\bf 145}, 141 (1987). 

1050: %\bibitem{Hu}

1051:  % E. Calzetta and B.L. Hu, Phys. Rev. {\bf D37}, 2878 (1988).

1052: \bibitem{PeterH} 

1053:   P.A. Henning, Phys. Rep. {\bf 253}, 235 (1995). 

1054:    

1055: %\bibitem{rdcut} R.L.~Kobes and G.W.~Semenoff,

1056:  % Nuc.~Phys.~B {\bf 272}, 329, (1986); R.L. Kobes, Phys. Rev.  {\bf D43}, 1269 (1991). 

1057: 

1058: \bibitem{johnS} 

1059: 

1060:   M.E. Carrington, Hou Defu, A. Hachkowski, D. Pickering and J. C. Sowiak,  Phys. Rev.  {\bf D61}, 25011 (2000).

1061:  %\bibitem{mu} 

1062:   %M.E. Carrington and U. Heinz, Eur. Phys. J. C {\bf 1}, 619 (1998).

1063: \bibitem{dp} 

1064: J -P Blaizot and E. Iancu,  Phys. Rev.  {\bf D 55}, 973 (1997)

1065: 

1066: \bibitem{thoma}

1067: M. H. Thoma,  Phys. Rev  {\bf D51}, 862 (1995)

1068:  %\cite{ld}

1069: \bibitem{ld}

1070: P.~Arnold, G.~D.~Moore and L.~G.~Yaffe, hep-ph/0209353; {\it ibid}. JHEP {\bf 0111}, 057 (2001)[arXiv:hep-ph/0109064]

1071: 

1072: 

1073:  

1074: 

1075: 

1076: \end{references}

1077: 

1078: \end{document}

1079: 

1080: 

1081: 

1082: 

1083: 

1084: 

1085: 

1086: 

1087: 

1088: 

1089: 

1090: 

1091: 

1092: 

1093: 

1094: 

1095: 

1096: 

1097: 

1098: 

1099: 

1100: 

1101: 

1102: 

1103: 

1104: