1: \chapter{Exotic Heavy Leptons at the LHC}
2: \chaptermark{Heavy Leptons}
3: \label{leptons}
4: \section{Introduction}
5:
6: We have already seen in Chapter~\ref{introch} that supersymmetry is a popular theory for new physics beyond the Standard Model. It is seen as theoretically attractive, solves the hierarchy problem and improves the unification of the three gauge couplings at high energy scales.
7:
8: `Intermediate scale' models which can be motivated on various astrophysical and cosmological grounds (see \secref{ism}) are constructed so that the gauge couplings unify at $\sim 10^{11}$~GeV, an intermediate energy scale. This intermediate scale unification can be achieved by including new leptons as part of extra supermultiplets added to the MSSM\@. Although
9: this choice is not unique, the extra leptons in \cite{Abel:2000bj} are two left-handed SU(2) doublets and three right-handed singlets (all with vector-like copies).
10: \enlargethispage{-\baselineskip}
11:
12: By assumption there are no new Yukawa couplings for the model in
13: \cite{Abel:2000bj}. This means that the lightest heavy
14: lepton is stable and the others will decay into it. This is possible because
15: the tree-level mass degeneracy of the charged and neutral leptons will be
16: destroyed by electroweak symmetry breaking.
17:
18: As in the MSSM, the renormalization group equations can be used to determine
19: the spectrum of supersymmetric particles which will have phenomenological
20: implications for the LHC\@. A study has also been performed \cite{Allanach:2001qe} investigating how to distinguish intermediate scale models from other supersymmetric string scenarios at a future linear collider. However a characteristic feature of this model is the existence of the new leptons and so this work concentrates on the phenomenology due to the extra leptons themselves. More specifically it is considered whether it will be possible to detect the charged heavy leptons at the LHC, and for what range of masses.
21:
22: Previous limits on the masses of new quasi-stable charged leptons have
23: been limited by the energy available for particle production in lepton
24: colliders. The gauge unification arguments in intermediate scale models mean
25: that the extra leptons are expected to have masses in the TeV range. At the
26: LHC enough energy should be available to produce and detect these exotic heavy
27: charged leptons. Since the charged leptons are expected to be quasi-stable they will decay outside the detector; therefore the experimental procedure is different to that in \cite{Alexa:2001fz,CiezaMontalvo:2001cy} where limits are obtained by considering the decay products of the leptons.
28:
29: This chapter starts (\secref{litrev}) by reviewing the existing cosmological and experimental limits on heavy particles to ensure that leptons such as those incorporated in this intermediate scale model are not ruled out. In section~\ref{HERWIG} the theoretical input to the {\small HERWIG} Monte Carlo event generator to take account of new heavy leptons is described. Then, in \secref{impl}, the use of a `time-of-flight' technique to detect the leptons at the LHC is considered: heavy leptons will arrive at the detector significantly later than relativistic particles, and the prospects for using this time delay as a method of detection are studied, for a range of masses. There is also a study of how to distinguish such leptons from scalar leptons on the basis of their different angular distributions. The results and conclusions are presented in \secref{results} and \secref{conchl} respectively.
30:
31: \section{Cosmological and experimental constraints}
32: \label{litrev}
33:
34: The mass degeneracy of the charged and neutral leptons will be broken by
35: radiative corrections. The electromagnetic self-energy correction for the
36: charged lepton ensures that its mass will be greater than that of the neutral
37: lepton\cite{Sher:1995tc}. This means that the charged lepton can decay to its
38: neutral partner producing either a real or virtual W, depending on the mass
39: difference. The neutral heavy lepton can be assumed to be totally stable
40: (i.e.\ it has a lifetime orders of magnitude longer than that of the
41: universe) because of the assumption that there are no new Yukawa couplings.
42:
43: There are a number of cosmological and experimental limits on leptons
44: (particularly charged leptons) as a function of both mass and lifetime:
45:
46: \begin{itemize}
47:
48: \item
49: The relic abundance of the leptons (calculated from the self-annihilation
50: cross section) must not `over-close' the universe, i.e.\ provide more
51: than the critical energy density ($\sim 10^{-5}$ GeV cm$^{-3}$) which is
52: presumed to be accounted for by dark matter\cite{Wolfram:1979gp,Griest:1990wd}.
53:
54: \item
55: A stable, charged lepton must have a low enough relic abundance for it not to
56: have been detected in searches for exotic heavy isotopes in ordinary matter
57: (see e.g.\ \cite{Smith:1982qu}).
58:
59: \item
60: The massive lepton and any decays it may have must not significantly affect
61: nucleosynthesis or the synthesized elemental abundances \cite{Ellis:1992nb,Sarkar:1996dd}.
62:
63: \item
64: If the lepton decays before the recombination era (at $\sim 10^{12}$~s) it
65: must not distort the cosmic microwave background radiation \cite{Ellis:1992nb}.
66:
67: \item
68: If the lepton has a longer lifetime it must not contradict the limits from
69: gamma-ray and neutrino background observations \cite{Kribs:1997ac,Gondolo:1993rn}.
70:
71: \item
72: The mass and lifetime of the new leptons must not be such that they would
73: have been detected in a previous collider experiment \cite{Abbiendi:2003yd,Achard:2001qw}.
74:
75: \end{itemize}
76:
77: Most of these limits are summarized in \cite{Sher:1992yr} and no constraints on charged leptons are found for lifetimes less than $\sim 1$~s, even for
78: masses up to the TeV scale. The mass splitting between the neutral and
79: charged leptons is expected to be at least $\sim 10$~MeV \cite{Sher:1995tc} which means that the lifetime of the charged lepton is expected to be shorter than 1~s.
80:
81: This means the only relevant constraints on the mass of the heavy leptons being studied are the experimental limits. These are to some extent model-dependent, but the LEP collaborations put a lower limit (95\% confidence) on the mass of a long-lived charged lepton at around 102 GeV \cite{Abbiendi:2003yd,Achard:2001qw} (the Tevatron experiment has not improved upon the LEP limits).
82:
83: \section{Theoretical input to {\small HERWIG}}
84: \label{HERWIG}
85:
86: \enlargethispage{-\baselineskip}
87: The general-purpose Monte Carlo event generator {\small HERWIG 6.3} includes
88: subroutines for both neutral and charged Drell-Yan processes in a hadron
89: collider \cite{Marchesini:1992ch,Corcella:2000bw,Corcella:2001pi}. As described in \cite{Corcella:2000bw} the
90: initial-state parton showers in Drell-Yan processes are matched to the exact
91: $\mathcal{O}(\alpha_\text{S})$ matrix element result \cite{Corcella:1999gs}. However the
92: neutral Drell-Yan processes all use the approximation that the two fermions
93: produced can be treated as massless. It is reasonable that this is a valid
94: approximation for the SM quarks and leptons but this will not necessarily be
95: the case for the proposed new heavy leptons discussed above which may have
96: masses of order 1~TeV\@.
97:
98: For this reason, full Born-level expressions for the Drell-Yan cross sections
99: were derived, taking into account the masses of the produced leptons. The final results (for both neutral- and charged-current cases) were expressed in terms of vector and axial couplings to keep them as general as possible, although in all that follows Standard Model couplings will be assumed. The details of the derivation are in Appendix~\ref{appa}
100:
101: \begin{figure}
102: \begin{center}
103: \begin{picture} (90,60)
104: \ArrowLine(30,35)(0,60)
105: \Text(-3,60)[r]{$\bar{\text{q}}$}
106: \ArrowLine(0,10)(30,35)
107: \Text(-3,10)[r]{q}
108: \Photon(30,35)(90,35){2}{8}
109: \Text(60,46)[c]{Z$^0$/$\gamma$}
110: \ArrowLine(120,60)(90,35)
111: \Text(123,60)[l]{L$^+$}
112: \ArrowLine(90,35)(120,10)
113: \Text(123,10)[l]{L$^-$}
114: \end{picture}
115: \capbox{Feynman diagram for Drell-Yan production of heavy leptons}{Feynman diagram for Drell-Yan production of heavy leptons.\label{hlfeyn}}
116: \end{center}
117: \end{figure}
118: %
119:
120: The derived expressions for both differential and total cross sections for the
121: neutral-current Drell-Yan processes
122: ($\text{q}\bar{\text{q}}\rightarrow \text{Z}^0/\gamma\rightarrow \text{L}^-\text{L}^+$, see Figure~\ref{hlfeyn}) are shown below. The
123: notation is influenced by that already used in subroutines within
124: {\small HERWIG 6.3}.
125: \enlargethispage{-\baselineskip}
126:
127: The differential cross section is given by
128: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
129: \begin{equation}
130: \frac {d\hat{\sigma}}{d\Omega} (\text{q}\bar{\text{q}}\rightarrow \text{L}^-\text{L}^+)
131: = \frac{e^4}{48\pi^2} \frac {1} {\hat{s}^2} \frac {p_3} {E}
132: \left[ C_1 \left( E_3E_4 + p_3^2\cos^2\theta^*\right) + C_2 m_3 m_4 +
133: 2 C_3 E p_3 \cos\theta^* \right],
134: \label{dxs}
135: \end{equation}
136: %%%%%%%%%
137: where
138: %%%%%%%%%%
139: \begin{gather}
140: C_1 = \frac {\left[\left(d_\text{V}^\text{f}\right)^2 + \left(d_\text{A}^\text{f}\right)^2
141: \right] \left[ \left(d_\text{V}^\text{i}\right)^2 + \left(d_\text{A}^\text{i}\right)^2 \right]\hat{s}^2 }
142: {\left(\hat{s}-m_\text{Z}^2\right)^2 + m_\text{Z}^2\Gamma_\text{Z}^2} + \left(q^\text{f}\right)^2
143: \left(q^\text{i}\right)^2 + \frac {2 q^\text{f} q^\text{i} d_\text{V}^\text{f} d_\text{V}^\text{i}\hat{s}
144: \left(\hat{s}-m_\text{Z}^2\right)}{\left(\hat{s}-m_\text{Z}^2\right)^2 + m_\text{Z}^2\Gamma_\text{Z}^2}\,,
145: \\[3mm]
146: C_2 = \frac {\left[\left(d_\text{V}^\text{f}\right)^2 - \left(d_\text{A}^\text{f}\right)^2
147: \right] \left[ \left(d_\text{V}^\text{i}\right)^2 + \left(d_\text{A}^\text{i}\right)^2 \right]\hat{s}^2 }
148: {\left(\hat{s}-m_\text{Z}^2\right)^2 + m_\text{Z}^2\Gamma_\text{Z}^2} + \left(q^\text{f}\right)^2
149: \left(q^\text{i}\right)^2 + \frac {2 q^\text{f} q^\text{i} d_\text{V}^\text{f} d_\text{V}^\text{i}\hat{s}
150: \left(\hat{s}-m_\text{Z}^2\right)}{\left(\hat{s}-m_\text{Z}^2\right)^2 + m_\text{Z}^2\Gamma_\text{Z}^2}\,,
151: \\[3mm]
152: C_3 = 2 \left( \frac {2 d_\text{V}^\text{f} d_\text{A}^\text{f} d_\text{V}^\text{i} d_\text{A}^\text{i}\hat{s}^2}
153: {\left(\hat{s}-m_\text{Z}^2 \right)^2 + m_\text{Z}^2\Gamma_\text{Z}^2} +
154: \frac {q^\text{f} q^\text{i} d_\text{A}^\text{f} d_\text{A}^\text{i} \hat{s} \left(\hat{s}-m_\text{Z}^2\right)}
155: {\left(\hat{s}-m_\text{Z}^2\right)^2 + m_\text{Z}^2\Gamma_\text{Z}^2} \right).
156: \end{gather}
157: %%%%%%%%%%%
158: In these expressions $q^\text{i}$ and $q^\text{f}$ are the charges (in units of
159: the electron charge) of the initial- and final-state particles respectively.
160: The angle $\theta^*$ is the angle between the out-going lepton (L$^-$)
161: direction and the incoming quark direction in the centre-of-mass frame.
162: $E_3$ and $p_3$ refer to the centre-of-mass energy and momentum magnitude
163: of the produced lepton. Similarly the subscript 4 refers to the produced
164: anti-lepton. $E$ is the energy of both the colliding quarks in the
165: centre-of-mass frame (i.e.\ $\hat{s}=4E^2$).
166:
167: The couplings $d_\text{V}$ and $d_\text{A}$ are related to the normal vector and axial
168: coupling constants to the Z$^0$ ($c_\text{V}$ and $c_\text{A}$) by relations like
169: %%%%%%%%%%%%
170: \begin{equation}
171: d_\text{V} = \frac {c_\text{V} g_\text{Z}} {2e}\,.
172: \end{equation}
173: %%%%%%%%%%
174: Equation~(\ref{dxs}) is a general expression which includes the Z$^0/\gamma$ interference terms; the massless case is retrieved by
175: setting $p_3=E_3=E_4=E$ (as well as $m_3=m_4=0$). The normal charged-current Drell-Yan case ($\text{q}\bar{\text{q}}^\prime \rightarrow \text{W}^\pm\rightarrow
176: \text{L}^\pm \text{L}^0$) will not be relevant in this work but can be obtained by setting $c_\text{V}=c_\text{A}=1$ and replacing $g_\text{Z}$,
177: $m_\text{Z}$, $\Gamma_\text{Z}$ and $q^\text{i/f}$ by $g_\text{W}/\sqrt{2}$, $m_\text{W}$, $\Gamma_\text{W}$ and 0 respectively.
178:
179: Integration of eq.~(\ref{dxs}) gives the following expression for the parton-level cross section:
180: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
181: \begin{equation}
182: \hat{\sigma} (\text{q}\bar{\text{q}}\rightarrow \text{L}^-\text{L}^+)=
183: \frac {e^4} {12\pi} \frac {1} {\hat{s}^2} \frac {p_3} {E}
184: \left[ C_1 \left(E_3E_4 + \frac {p_3^2} {3}\right) + C_2 m_3 m_4 \right].
185: \label{xs}
186: \end{equation}
187: %%%%%%%%%%
188:
189: In order to distinguish these heavy leptons from heavy supersymmetric
190: partners of SM particles it would be necessary to consider the angular
191: distribution of the produced particles. For the neutral-current production of
192: left/right-handed scalars the differential cross section is also derived in Appendix~\ref{appa} and is found to be
193: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
194: \begin{equation}
195: \frac {d\hat{\sigma}}{d\Omega}(\text{q}\bar{\text{q}}\rightarrow\tilde{\text{l}}_\text{L/R}
196: \tilde{\text{l}}^*_\text{L/R})=\frac {e^4} {96\pi^2} D \frac {1}{\hat{s}^2} \frac {p_3}
197: {E} p_3^2 \sin^2\theta^*,
198: \label{sdxs}
199: \end{equation}
200: %%%%%%%%%%
201: where
202: %%%%%%%%%%
203: \begin{equation}
204: D = \frac {h_\text{L/R}^2 \left[\left(d_\text{V}^\text{i}\right)^2 +\left(d_\text{A}^\text{i}\right)^2 \right]
205: \hat{s}^2} {\left(\hat{s}-m_\text{Z}^2\right)^2 + m_\text{Z}^2\Gamma_\text{Z}^2} +
206: \left(q^\text{f}\right)^2 \left(q^\text{i}\right)^2 +
207: \frac {2 q^\text{f} q^\text{i} h_\text{L/R} d_\text{V}^\text{i} \hat{s}\left(\hat{s}-m_\text{Z}^2\right)}
208: {\left(\hat{s}-m_\text{Z}^2\right)^2 + m_\text{Z}^2\Gamma_\text{Z}^2}\,.
209: \end{equation}
210: %%%%%%%%%%%
211: The couplings $d_\text{V}$ and $d_\text{A}$ are defined as above and $h_\text{L/R}= g_\text{L/R}g_\text{Z}/2e$
212: where $g_\text{L/R}$ is the coupling to left/right-handed sleptons at the gauge
213: boson-slepton-slepton vertex.
214:
215: The $\sin^2\theta^*$ angular distribution contrasts with the asymmetric
216: distribution for the heavy leptons seen in eq.~(\ref{dxs}); this will
217: be studied in \secref{angdist}.
218:
219: \section{Implementation}
220: \label{impl}
221:
222: \subsection{Modifications to {\small HERWIG 6.3}}
223:
224: The above formulae were incorporated into a new subroutine added to
225: {\small HERWIG 6.3} together with new particle entries (for the heavy
226: leptons) and a new process code (\texttt{IPROC}) for the new process.
227:
228: Increasing the mass of the new leptons allowed the variation of cross section
229: with mass to be studied---the mass was varied over a range from of order the
230: top quark mass to a maximum of order 1~TeV\@. The lifetimes of the charged
231: leptons produced were set to 1~s so that the number of decays occurring inside
232: the detector will be negligible.
233:
234: The angular distribution of the produced leptons was studied over the same
235: mass range to investigate the possibility of distinguishing heavy leptons
236: from MSSM sleptons.
237:
238: \subsection{Time-of-flight technique}
239: \label{tof}
240:
241: The main aim was to consider the possible detection of charged heavy leptons
242: at the LHC and for what mass ranges this might be practical. This work
243: refers specifically to the technical specifications of the ATLAS detector
244: \cite{ATLASTDR1,ATLASTDR2,ATLASmTDR}; however it is believed that similar results will
245: be obtained for the {\small CMS} experiment \cite{CMS}.
246:
247: The method used was a time-of-flight technique as discussed in
248: ref.~\cite{Hinchliffe:1998ys}. This method utilizes the fact that, when compared to
249: relativistic particles, there is a considerable time delay for heavy particles
250: to reach the muon system. Heavy charged leptons like those being considered
251: in this work will be detected in both the central tracker and the muon
252: chambers, and from the measured momentum and time delay it is possible to
253: reconstruct the mass.
254:
255: Imperfections in the time and momentum resolutions will broaden the mass peak. Uncertainty over which bunch crossing a
256: particular detected particle comes from may also provide a background signal
257: (from muons produced in Drell-Yan processes or in heavy quark decays).
258: Plots from \cite{ATLASmTDR} show some differential cross sections for the processes most likely to produce muons which might be mis-identified as heavy leptons. These are reproduced in Figures~\ref{muonpT} and \ref{muonbg}.
259:
260: \begin{figure}
261: \unitlength1cm
262: \begin{minipage}[t]{3.05in}
263: \begin{center}
264: \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{muonpT.eps}
265: \capbox{Transverse momentum dependence of the inclusive muon cross section}{Transverse momentum dependence of the inclusive muon cross section
266: integrated over $|\eta|< 2.7$. The horizontal scale is the transverse
267: momentum at production. (Reproduced from \cite{ATLASmTDR}).\label{muonpT}}
268: \end{center}
269: \end{minipage}
270: \hfill
271: \begin{minipage}[t]{3.05in}
272: \begin{center}
273: \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{muonbg.eps}
274: \capbox{Rapidity-dependence of the inclusive muon cross sections}{Rapidity-dependence of the inclusive muon cross sections, integrated
275: over \mbox{3 $<p_\text{T}<$ 50~GeV}. (Reproduced from \cite{ATLASmTDR}).
276: \label{muonbg}}
277: \end{center}
278: \end{minipage}
279: \end{figure}
280:
281: The studies presented here do not attempt to model the background, which it is
282: not thought will be significant (there is no `physics' background, only
283: `detector' background as discussed above), and use a simple cut \cite{Hinchliffe:1998ys} on the range of time delays allowed.
284:
285: The calculation of a reconstructed mass $m$ from the time delay $\Delta t$ and
286: momentum is straightforward. For a lepton hitting the radial part of the
287: muon spectrometer, the time delay with respect to a relativistic
288: ($\beta=v/c=1$) particle is given by
289: %%%%%%%%
290: \begin{equation}
291: \Delta t = \frac {r} {p_\text{T}} \left(E-p\right),
292: \end{equation}
293: %%%%%%%%%%
294: where $r$ is the radius of the outer layer of the muon system,
295: $p_\text{T}$ the transverse momentum, and $E$ and $p$ the total energy and momentum
296: respectively. Substituting for $E$ in the energy-momentum invariant
297: $E^2-p^2=m^2$ gives the result
298: %%%%%%%%%
299: \begin{equation}
300: m^2 = p^2 \left( \frac {1}{\beta^2} - 1 \right)
301: = \frac {p_\text{T} \Delta t} {r} \left(2p + \frac {p_\text{T} \Delta t} {r} \right).
302: \label{masssq}
303: \end{equation}
304: %%%%%%%%%%
305: It is also necessary to check for occasions when the lepton hits the
306: end-cap of the detector by considering the magnitude of $p_\text{T}/p_z$\@.
307: The muon system is modelled approximately as a cylinder of radius 10~m and with a half-length of 20~m \cite{ATLASmTDR}. A pseudo-rapidity cut requiring that
308: $|\eta|<2.7$ was applied to take account of the region close to the beam where
309: particles cannot be detected.
310:
311: From equation~(\ref{masssq}), the time delay and measured momentum for
312: any particle detected in the muon system can be used to calculate its mass.
313: As in \cite{Hinchliffe:1998ys} the time delay was smeared with a Gaussian (although a width
314: of 0.7~ns \cite{ATLASmTDR} rather than 1~ns was used) and a cut on
315: the smeared time delay was applied such that
316: $10 \mbox{ ns} < \Delta t < 50\mbox{ ns}$. Increasing the lower limit
317: on $\Delta t$ would
318: reduce the efficiency but improve the mass resolution by removing many of the
319: high-$\beta$ leptons for which the time resolution is poor.
320: The upper limit eliminates very slow particles which lose most of their energy
321: in the calorimeter. An alternative upper limit of 25~ns, reflecting practical
322: concerns, is discussed in \secref{masspeaks}.
323:
324: The most important contribution to the momentum uncertainty $\Delta p$ is due
325: to the measurement error on the sagitta (the deviation from a straight line of
326: a charged particle in a magnetic field). $\Delta p_\text{sag}$ was taken into
327: account by using
328: %%%%%%%%%%
329: \begin{equation}
330: \frac {\Delta p_\text{sag}}{p^2} = 1.1\times10^{-4},
331: \label{sagerror}
332: \end{equation}
333: %%%%%%%%%%
334: where $p$ is the total momentum in GeV\@. The constant in
335: eq.~(\ref{sagerror}) was obtained from \cite{ATLASTDR1} as an average over the
336: different parts of the ATLAS detector. This expression should be valid near
337: the discovery limit for heavy leptons when multiple scattering is
338: insignificant---the maximum time delay cut is found to remove most of the low-$\beta$ leptons for which multiple scattering would have more effect. However
339: to allow investigations over a full mass range a multiple scattering term
340: ($\Delta p_\text{ms}$) was also incorporated with
341: %%%%%%%%
342: \begin{equation}
343: \Delta p_\text{ms} = 2\times10^{-2}\sqrt{p^2 + m^2}.
344: \label{mserror}
345: \end{equation}
346: %%%%%%%%%%
347: The constant depends on the material distribution in the
348: spectrometer---the above value is given in \cite{ATLMUON} for the ATLAS muon
349: detector.
350: \enlargethispage{-\baselineskip}
351:
352: The two errors in eqs.~(\ref{sagerror}) and (\ref{mserror}) were taken to be
353: independent and hence combined in quadrature. A third possible contribution
354: to momentum resolution---due to fluctuation in the energy loss in the
355: calorimeter---is neglected as it is always dominated by one of the other
356: terms.
357:
358: Using the momentum and time resolution as described above it was possible to
359: satisfactorily reproduce the mass resolution as a function of $\beta$ for
360: 101~GeV particles as given in \cite{ATLASTDR1}.
361:
362: The efficiency of the muon detection system is approximated to be 85\%,
363: independent of the particle momentum \cite{ATLASTDR1}.
364:
365: \section{Results}
366: \label{results}
367:
368: \subsection{Backgrounds}
369: \label{bg}
370:
371: Any `detector' background is greatly dependent on the
372: details of the muon detection system. Such a background would come from muons
373: produced either in the decays of heavy quarks or directly via the Drell-Yan process (both these processes
374: have very high cross sections compared to that for heavy lepton production).
375: If timing inadequacies mean that some of these muons are mistakenly thought
376: to have come from an earlier interaction, i.e.\ they appear to have a
377: large time delay, they could obscure the exotic lepton mass peak. For a
378: background signal to look like a heavy lepton neutral-current signal, however,
379: two opposite charge muons would have to be mis-identified at the same time
380: which makes it very unlikely that background could be significant.
381: \enlargethispage{-2\baselineskip}
382:
383: To eliminate any possible background from heavy quark decays, a cut requiring
384: the transverse momentum to be greater than 50~GeV was made to produce the
385: plots in \secref{masspeaks}. Figures~\ref{bp} and \ref{p250} show that a
386: $p_\text{T}$ cut at 50~GeV should remove most of the muons from bottom
387: quark decay without significantly reducing the exotic heavy lepton signal. It
388: can be seen that as the mass of the exotic heavy lepton increases, the peak in
389: the $p_\text{T}$ spectrum becomes less well defined and shifts to higher values. Top
390: quark decays can give rise to muons at high $p_\text{T}$ but the small top
391: cross~section, combined with the improbability of mis-identifying two muons,
392: should suffice to eliminate this source of background.
393:
394: \begin{figure}
395: \begin{center}
396: \scalebox{0.5}{\rotatebox{-90}{\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{extra.ps}}}
397: \capbox{$p_\text{T}$ spectrum for muons produced in b decays}{$p_\text{T}$ spectrum for muons produced in b decays.\label{bp}}
398: \end{center}
399: \end{figure}
400:
401: \begin{figure}
402: \unitlength1cm
403: \begin{center}
404: \begin{minipage}[t]{3.05in}
405: \scalebox{0.6}{\rotatebox{-90}{\includegraphics{pplot7.ps}}}
406: \end{minipage}
407: \hfill
408: \begin{minipage}[t]{3.05in}
409: \scalebox{0.6}{\rotatebox{-90}{\includegraphics{pplot11.ps}}}
410: \end{minipage}
411: \capbox{$p_\text{T}$ spectra for 175 and 250~GeV heavy leptons from Drell-Yan
412: processes}{$p_\text{T}$ spectra for 175 and 250~GeV heavy leptons from Drell-Yan
413: processes.
414: \label{p250}}
415: \end{center}
416: \end{figure}
417:
418: \subsection{Heavy lepton mass peaks}
419: \label{masspeaks}
420:
421: The results presented in this section show the reconstructed mass peaks for
422: an integrated luminosity of 100~fb$^{-1}$ after the cuts outlined above have
423: been applied.
424:
425: The possibility of detection at the LHC is found to be entirely cross~section
426: limited---the decrease of cross~section with increasing lepton mass is shown
427: in Figure~\ref{cross}. The fraction of leptons passing the cuts actually
428: slightly increases with mass due to the longer time delays.
429:
430: \begin{figure}
431: \begin{center}
432: \scalebox{0.48}{\rotatebox{-90}{\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]
433: {cross.ps}}}
434: \capbox{Cross~section for Drell-Yan heavy lepton production}{Cross~section for Drell-Yan heavy lepton production as a function of
435: the lepton mass.\label{cross}}
436: \end{center}
437: \end{figure}
438:
439: Figure~\ref{1000} for the neutral-current Drell-Yan process makes it
440: clear that for masses up to about 1~TeV it should be possible to detect new
441: charged heavy leptons at the LHC (particularly if a larger integrated
442: luminosity can be obtained). A discovery criterion of 10 leptons (from 5
443: events) in the mass peak is found to give a mass limit of 950~GeV for the
444: detection of such leptons using an integrated luminosity of 100~fb$^{-1}$.
445: \enlargethispage{\baselineskip}
446:
447: To reduce possible backgrounds the plots are based on events from
448: which both leptons produced passed the cuts imposed.
449:
450: \begin{figure}[t]
451: \begin{center}
452: \unitlength1cm
453: \begin{minipage}[t]{3.05in}
454: \scalebox{0.6}{\rotatebox{-90}{\includegraphics{2plot175ms.ps}}}
455: \end{minipage}
456: \hfill
457: \begin{minipage}[t]{3.05in}
458: \scalebox{0.6}{\rotatebox{-90}{\includegraphics{2plot500ms.ps}}}
459: \end{minipage}
460:
461: \unitlength1cm
462: \begin{minipage}[t]{3.05in}
463: \scalebox{0.6}{\rotatebox{-90}{\includegraphics{2plot750ms.ps}}}
464: \end{minipage}
465: \hfill
466: \begin{minipage}[t]{3.05in}
467: \scalebox{0.6}{\rotatebox{-90}{\includegraphics{2plot900ms.ps}}}
468: \end{minipage}
469: \capbox{Reconstructed mass peaks for exotic leptons}{Reconstructed mass peaks for exotic leptons with masses of
470: 175~GeV, 500~GeV, 750~GeV and 900~GeV\@.
471: \label{1000}}
472: \end{center}
473: \end{figure}
474:
475: The long drift times in the muon chambers used by ATLAS allow the recording of events with time delays at arrival much greater than the 25~ns beam crossing interval of the LHC \cite{ATLASmTDR}; following \cite{Hinchliffe:1998ys}
476: a maximum time delay of 50~ns is assumed here. However, to
477: correctly associate the delayed track in the muon system with the event
478: recorded in the other detector systems would require a specialized trigger
479: based, for example, on the presence of high-$p_\text{T}$ tracks in the inner
480: detector (these would identify the true event time). Without such a trigger, the
481: maximum allowed time delay would be 25~ns, and the discovery reach
482: would be reduced to a lepton mass of 800~GeV\@. The statistical
483: sample available for the angular distribution analysis in
484: \secref{angdist} would also be reduced by a factor of about 2, depending on the
485: lepton mass.
486:
487: \subsection{Distinguishing leptons from sleptons}
488: \label{angdist}
489:
490: As mentioned in \secref{HERWIG} it should be possible to distinguish
491: these new heavy leptons from heavy scalar leptons by studying the angular
492: distribution with which they are produced. The two different angular
493: distributions in the centre-of-mass frame are shown in eqs.~(\ref{dxs}) and
494: (\ref{sdxs}). The application of the cuts described in \secref{tof} as
495: well as the effects of the mass and momentum resolution mean that the
496: observed angular distributions are somewhat different to these.
497: \enlargethispage{-\baselineskip}
498:
499: The forward-backward asymmetry for the exotic heavy leptons was not initially considered
500: because of the difficulty in a p-p collider of distinguishing the quark and
501: anti-quark in the centre-of-mass frame. Hence only $|\cos\theta^*|$ was used
502: when the angular distributions were compared. Figure~\ref{a400} shows the angular distribution for both exotic leptons and sleptons of mass 400~GeV\@. In an experimental situation, the exact quark direction is not known and so the angle used in this plot is not exactly $\theta^*$---instead it is the angle between the out-going lepton and the incoming proton. Examining the event records before and after the initial-state parton shower (in which the quark can acquire some transverse momentum) shows that the difference between the two angular distributions is small.
503:
504: \begin{figure}
505: \begin{center}
506: \scalebox{0.48}{\rotatebox{-90}{\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]
507: {aplot400sm.ps}}}
508: \capbox{Angular distributions of detected pairs of 400 GeV particles}{Angular distributions of detected pairs of 400 GeV particles.
509: $\theta^*$ is the angle between the out-going particle and the incoming quark in the centre-of-mass frame.\label{a400}}
510: \end{center}
511: \end{figure}
512:
513: A chi-squared test was applied to find the probability that a scalar model
514: describes the heavy lepton data. The model was the angular distribution of a large Monte
515: Carlo sample of scalars, and the total number of detected scalar pairs was
516: rescaled to the expected number of detected pairs of heavy leptons. An
517: `average' data-set was obtained from a rescaled Monte Carlo sample of
518: leptons, generated according to their angular distribution. Both these
519: rescaled distributions had negligible theoretical errors compared to the
520: (Poisson distributed) statistical errors on the model for 100~fb$^{-1}$ of
521: integrated luminosity.
522:
523: Figure~\ref{prob} shows that it will be possible to rule out scalar leptons
524: at a confidence level of better than 90\% up to a mass of 580~GeV\@. The
525: angular distribution does not change significantly over the mass range of this
526: plot---the decreasing probability of ruling out the scalar hypothesis as the
527: mass increases is mainly because of the decreasing statistics.
528:
529: \begin{figure}
530: \begin{center}
531: \scalebox{0.48}{\rotatebox{-90}{\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{prob.ps}}}
532: \capbox{Probability of ruling out the scalar hypothesis}{Probability at which it will be possible to rule out the scalar
533: hypothesis by studying the angular distribution of the detected leptons.
534: \label{prob}}
535: \end{center}
536: \end{figure}
537:
538: \enlargethispage{-\baselineskip}
539: An alternative approach to ruling out the scalar hypothesis is to try to measure the forward-backward asymmetry of the lepton pair. To do this it is necessary to reliably discriminate between the quark and anti-quark directions; this is usually based (e.g.\ in \cite{Dittmar:1997my}) on the assumption that the quark is a valence quark (with relatively high momentum) whereas the anti-quark is a sea quark (with lower momentum). A method based on the boost of the lepton pair was investigated for 500~GeV leptons and although the discriminator was found to be reliable for large boosts, the original asymmetry ($\sim 0.3$) is not large enough to improve on the distinction discussed above. Cuts which remove events where the lepton pair has only a small boost (and hence the quark direction is more uncertain) provided only a modest improvement because the increase in measured asymmetry is accompanied by a significant decrease in statistics.
540:
541: \section{Conclusions}
542: \label{conchl}
543:
544: This work was motivated by some of the new models of physics beyond the
545: Standard Model in which the gauge couplings unify at an intermediate energy
546: scale ($\sim 10^{11}$~GeV)\@. These intermediate scale models can include
547: additional leptons added to the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model and
548: which are expected to have TeV scale masses.
549: \enlargethispage{-\baselineskip}
550:
551: It is concluded that, assuming Standard Model couplings and a long enough
552: lifetime, it should be possible to detect charged heavy leptons up to masses of 950~GeV with 100~fb$^{-1}$ of
553: integrated luminosity. Background from mis-identified muons should be
554: negligible and can be reduced by the application of a
555: $p_\text{T}^\text{min}$ cut at about 50~GeV\@. It will be difficult to use
556: the angular distribution of the produced particles to distinguish them from
557: scalar leptons for masses above 580~GeV because the falling cross section
558: limits the available statistics.
559:
560: The absence of a specialized trigger in the inner detector could reduce the
561: discovery limit to 800~GeV and would reduce the statistics available for the
562: angular distribution analysis.
563:
564: No present cosmological or experimental limits were found to rule out
565: additional exotic leptons at the masses considered in this work.
566: