1: \documentclass[10pt]{article}
2: %\documentstyle{article}
3: \usepackage{epsfig}
4:
5: \textheight 230mm
6: \textwidth 160mm
7: \hoffset -2.0cm
8: \voffset -2.0cm
9: \pagestyle{plain}
10: \pagenumbering{arabic}
11: \setcounter{page}{1}
12:
13: \begin{document}
14:
15: % Title
16: \begin{center}
17: {\Large \bf Search for new heavy resonances at the LHC} \\
18: \vspace{4mm}
19:
20: % author/address
21: I.~Golutvin, \underline{E.~Rogalev}, M.~Savina, S.~Shmatov \\
22: Jonit Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Russia \\
23: \end{center}
24:
25:
26: \begin{abstract}
27: In this article we carry out an analysis of LHC potential to
28: search for new dimuon resonance states from extended gauge models
29: and the Randall-Sundrum scenario of TeV-scale gravity.
30: \end{abstract}
31:
32: \section{Introduction}
33:
34: The Standard Model (SM) had been tested in many experiments at LEP, SLC
35: and Tevatron with a high accuracy. In particular, the yield of
36: lepton pairs produced mainly via Drell-Yan processes, i.e.
37: quark-antiquark annihilation by exchange of photons or Z bosons,
38: is predicted by the SM with a per mille precision. So far, the
39: experimental data have shown no significant deviations from SM
40: predictions for the Drell-Yan continuum up to TeV-energy-scale.
41:
42: The high-order calculations of lepton pair production cross
43: section in the mass region of $ 0.1 \div 0.8 $
44: TeV/$ c^{2} $ are in good agreement with LEP and D0 data \cite{D0,OPAL}.
45: At present, however, there are many theoretical attempts to extend
46: the bounds of the SM in order to reach unification of strong and
47: electroweak interactions or remove an arbitrariness in values of
48: coupling constants in some other way and also to pull through
49: known disadvantages of SM like the mass hierarchy problem,
50: CP-violation problem etc. Supersymmetry is the most popular
51: theoretical extension of the SM, however, some other alternatives
52: also exist. Between them one can consider extended gauge models
53: (what contain extended sector of gauge bosons in comparison with
54: the SM). Consideration of symmetry groups wider than in the SM and
55: appearance of extra gauge bosons is common feature of various
56: left-right symmetric models, all variants of Grand Unification
57: theories and models of composite gauge bosons
58: \cite{Cvetic95,Hewett89}. For all of these cases new vector
59: bosons, neutral $Z^{\prime}$ and charged $W^{\prime}$, would
60: appear at the mass scale of order of one TeV/$c^{2}$ what can be
61: observed at the LHC. Another alternative way to go beyond the SM
62: can be to consider so-called TeV-scale gravity models, as given by
63: brane world scenarios with large or compact extra spatial
64: dimensions (LED) \cite{ADD,Randall99}. These models give in
65: particular a set of new particle - massive Kaluza-Klein modes of
66: graviton what can interact with the usual matter and contribute to
67: the SM processes causing some new interesting physics at the TeV
68: energy scale (for more details and a phenomenology review see, for example
69: \cite{Rubakov01,Kazakov04}).
70:
71: In our consideration we touch on only one of the possible LED scenarios, the
72: Randall-Sundrum (RS1) approach \cite{Randall99}. The standard setup for this approach
73: contains two three-branes embedded into the external curve five-dimensional
74: space, one brane is with negative tension (our world with all
75: usual SM fields) and another one is with positive tension
76: (Planckian brane) what is needed to reproduce the SM mass
77: hierarchy. The usual assumption is that all the SM fields and
78: fields from the planckian sector are confined on corresponding
79: branes and effectively four-dimensional. Graviton is only really
80: multidimensional field what can travel freely through the whole
81: space (the bulk space). Because of nonzero curvature of the bulk
82: space (what is represented by a slice of the five-dimensional AdS
83: space bounded by two branes) and the specific space-time geometry
84: new very interesting physics can be realized at our brane. In
85: particular, in any model with compact extra spatial dimensions
86: each matter field will have an infinite tower of massive
87: excitations called Kaluza-Klein modes (four-dimensional
88: "projections" of multidimensional fields from our point of view).
89: These modes can be visible at energy above the fundamental theory
90: scale, say, from energies above one or a few TeV. Then our usual
91: massless four-dimensional graviton can be treated as the zero mode
92: from the KK-tower. But the distinctive feature of particular RS1
93: phenomenology is that excited massive graviton states are strongly
94: coupled to ordinary particles (not suppressed below the planckian
95: scale like for ordinary graviton in usual description of gravity)
96: and can contribute significantly to the SM processes above the
97: fundamental scale. Mass splitting between KK-modes of graviton is
98: of order ${\Delta}m{\sim}ke^{-kr_{c}}$ \cite{Rubakov01}, and
99: values of masses start from the TeV scale. So, at least the first
100: Kaluza-Klein mode (called RS1 graviton below) can in principle be
101: observed at the LHC as individual heavy (quite narrow or not)
102: resonance.
103:
104: At this point it is interesting to note that there exist also some realizations of
105: TeV-scale gravity models where fields other than graviton can have Kaluza-Klein modes,
106: see for example a number of papers \cite{Antoniadis90}
107: {\footnote{Authors are grateful to I.Antoniadis who has drawn our
108: attention to this issue}}.
109: In the papers interesting scenarios based on superstring theory were proposed in which
110: all gauge bosons and higgses as far as their superpartners had KK-excitations.
111: We will not touch on such scenarios in our further
112: discussion but we would stress that study of phenomenological consequences of the existence
113: of KK-modes of $Z^0$ or photon can be done exactly in the same spirit as
114: it is presented in subsections 2.1 -- 2.2 below for $Z^{\prime}$ including an asymmetry analysis.
115:
116: For both of the conceptions
117: considered, $Z^{\prime}$ and RS1 graviton, a width of predicted
118: resonances is not fixed but it can vary widely depending on the
119: model parameters. It implies that these states can appear as
120: individual resonances or can affect the high-$p_{T}$ lepton pair
121: continuum leading to an excess of Drell-Yan production. Thus, the
122: distinctive experimental signature for these processes is a pair
123: of well-isolated high-$p_{T}$ leptons with opposite charges coming
124: from the same vertex.
125:
126: Such the measurements can be performed at the both of LHC experiments, ATLAS
127: and CMS, which are expected to be able to trigger and identify
128: hard muons with a transverse momentum up to several TeV. The
129: ability of the LHC experiments to detect RS1 graviton in the
130: dielectron mode was investigated as described in
131: Ref.~\cite{RS_CMS}. In this paper, we present the analysis of the
132: LHC discovery limit on $Z^{\prime}$ and RS1 gravitons in dimuon
133: mode in assumption of the CMS acceptance.
134:
135: \section{Extra gauge bosons}
136: \subsection{Signal and background simulations}
137:
138: The signal simulation is done for the parton subprocess $q\bar{q}{\rightarrow}Z^{\prime}$ in the
139: leading order of QCD without higher order corrections. To generate
140: $Z^{\prime}$ boson and its decay to a muon pair as well as the
141: relevant background events, the PYTHIA 6.217 package \cite{PYTHIA}
142: with the CTEQ5L parton distribution function was used. There exist
143: a number of possible non Standard Model scenarios which predict
144: appearance of heavy neutral $Z^{\prime}$ and/or charged
145: $W^{\prime}$ gauge bosons (for review see \cite{Cvetic95}). But
146: only following $Z^{\prime}$ models were used in our analysis:
147:
148: \begin{enumerate}
149: \item The Left-Right model (LR) \cite{Huitu97} based on the electroweak gauge group symmetry
150: $SU(2)_{L} \times SU(2)_{R} \times U(1)_{B-L}$ with an additional
151: left-right symmetry (here, $B$ and $L$ are the baryon and lepton
152: numbers) with default PYTHIA couplings which are the same for both
153: left- and right-handed type of fermions and are set to the same
154: values as in the SM, $g_{L}$ = $g_{R}$ = 0.64. The number of extra
155: fermion generations is equal to three.
156:
157: \item $Z^{\prime}_{\chi}-$, $Z^{\prime}_{\eta}-$, and $Z^{\prime}_{\psi}$ -
158: models which naturally arise as a result of sequential
159: breaking of SO(10) or $E_6$ symmetry group in Grand Unified
160: Theories (GUT) \cite{Hewett89}: $E_6 \rightarrow SO(10) \times
161: U(1)_{\psi} \rightarrow SU(5)\times U(1)_{\chi} \times
162: U(1)_{\psi}$ $\rightarrow SM{\times}U(1)_{{\Theta}_6}$. The linear
163: combination of the hypercharges under the two groups
164: $U(1)_{\chi}{\times}U(1)_{\psi}$ gives the charge of the lightest
165: $Z^{\prime}$ at the symmetry-breaking energies $Z^{\prime}$ =
166: $Z^{\prime}_{\chi}cos({\Theta}_{E_6}) +
167: Z^{\prime}_{\psi}sin({\Theta}_{E_6})$. Numerical values of the
168: couplings for these models are taken from Ref.~\cite{Rosner87}.
169:
170: \item For Monte Carlo studies the sequential standard model (SSM)
171: \cite{Altarelli89} was also used in which heavy bosons
172: ($Z^{\prime}$ and $W^{\prime}$) are assumed to couple only to one
173: fermion type (left) with the same parameters (couplings and total
174: widths) as for ordinary $Z^{0}$ and $W^{\pm}$ in the Standard
175: Model.
176: \end{enumerate}
177:
178: \begin{figure}[thb]
179: \vspace{-2.5cm}
180: %\resizebox{17.5cm}\centerline{\psfig{figure=fig1.eps}}
181: %\hspace{1.5cm}
182: \centerline{\psfig{figure=fig1.eps,width=18cm}} \vspace{-18.cm}
183: \caption{Invariant mass distribution of dimuon pairs for extended
184: gauge models and SM (a) (from \cite{Dittmar04}). Cross section of
185: dimuon produced from $Z^{\prime}$ decay in dependence on a mass
186: scale (b). Also the SM prediction for DY is presented (the lower
187: curve)} \label{fig1}
188: \end{figure}
189:
190: The non-reducible background considered is the SM Drell-Yan process
191: $pp{\rightarrow}Z/{\gamma}{\rightarrow}{\mu}^{+}{\mu}^{-}$ which
192: gives nearly 95 $\%$ of the Standard Model muon continuum.
193: Contributions from other reaction (vector boson pair production
194: $ZZ$, $WZ$, $WW$, quark-antiquark production $t\bar{t}$ etc) are
195: very small and neglected in this study. In the SM the expected
196: number of dimuon events is not very large and the $Z^{\prime}$
197: resonance peak exceeds the background by above a factor ten
198: (Fig.~\ref{fig1}, the left plot). The mass dependence of $Z^{\prime}$
199: production cross secrion times on dimuon branching are given in
200: Fig.~\ref{fig1} (the right plot). For comparison the cross section for
201: standard Drell-Yan muon pair production as a function of their
202: invarinat masses is also presented on the same figure.
203:
204:
205: \subsection{$Z^{\prime}$ discovery limits}
206:
207: Event samples for seven mass values were generated with above-mentioned
208: model parameters. To take into account the detector response the
209: parametrization of a muon momentum ($p$) resolution,
210: 4$\%$/$\sqrt{p/TeV}$ \cite{Muon TDR}, was used. The dimuon is
211: accepted when both decay muons are within detector system covering
212: the pseudorapidity region of $|$${\eta}$$|$ ${\leq}$ 2.4. In
213: addition, the cut $p_{T}{\geq}20$ GeV/c was applied on each muon.
214: No cuts were made on isolation of muons in the tracker and the
215: calorimeter. The total efficiency dimuon selection,
216: ${\varepsilon}$, is about $83{\div}91$ $\%$.
217:
218: \begin{figure}[hbt]
219: \vspace{-1.5cm} \centerline{\psfig{figure=fig2.eps,width=13cm}}
220: \vspace{-8.5cm} \caption{Upper limit for $Z^{\prime}$ mass with
221: statistical significance of the signal of 5${\sigma}$}
222: \label{fig2}
223: \end{figure}
224:
225: To estimate the $Z^{\prime}$ discovery limit expected significance of the signal,
226: $S_{c12}$=$\sqrt{S+B}$-$\sqrt{B}$, was computed, where $S$ is the number of signal
227: events passed through all kinematics cuts and $B$ is the number of background
228: events. The discovery limits for a five ${\sigma}$ signal are
229: presented in Fig.~\ref{fig2}.
230:
231: Detection of the $Z^{\prime}$ peak itself and precise measurement of its mass
232: and width does not allow an underlying theoretical model
233: describing the $Z^{\prime}$ to be identified. To test a helicity
234: structure of the boson and discriminate between a number of
235: $Z^{\prime}$ models, a leptonic forward-backward asymmetry can be
236: used (see, for example, \cite{Langacker84}). The asymmetry is
237: defined as the ratio $A_{FB} = \frac{(F-B)}{(F+B)}$ , where $F$
238: and $B$ are the numbers of events in the forward and backward
239: directions, respectively. Forward (backward) is defined as the
240: hemisphere with $cos({\Theta}) > 0$ ($cos({\Theta}) < 0$), where
241: ${\Theta}$ is an angle between the outgoing negative lepton and
242: the quark $q$ in the $q\bar{q}$ rest frame. Such a definition
243: assumes that the original quark direction is known, but this is
244: not the case for the pp-experiment. In Ref.~\cite{Dittmar97},
245: however, it was shown that it is possible to identify the quark
246: direction with the boost direction of the dimuon system with
247: respect to the beam axis.
248:
249: \begin{figure}[hbt]
250: \vspace{-2.0cm}
251: \centerline{\psfig{figure=fig3.eps,width=18cm}} \vspace{-19.3cm}
252: \caption{Forward-backward asymmetry for different $Z^{\prime}$ models.} \label{fig3}
253: \end{figure}
254:
255: One of the features of the asymmetry, $A_{FB}$, is the distinctive rapidity-dependence
256: for different $Z^{\prime}$ models. Such a dependence is shown in
257: Fig.~\ref{fig3} for the $Z^{\prime}_{LR}$ (the left picture) and the
258: $Z^{\prime}_{\chi}$ (the right picture) under assumption of a mass
259: $M_{Z^{\prime}}$ = 2.0 TeV/$c^{2}$, for 100 $fb^{-1}$ of an
260: integrated luminosity.
261:
262: Logic of such an analysis looks quite consequent but it is not complete in general
263: as another one possibility is not accounted by it.
264: As it was yet pointed out (see comments on the theme in Introduction above)
265: one can image a situation when we will see a resonance at collider with a mass about TeV and quantum numbers
266: of gauge boson what can be in principle not $Z^{\prime}$ from the extended gauge sector but Kaluza-Klein
267: excitation $Z_{KK}$ coming from models with extra spatial dimensions. The only way to distinguish these quite
268: different cases when will be to look for other KK-excitations of other gauge bosons (photon, gluon) what must
269: exist in the presence of extra dimensions \cite{Antoniadis90}.
270:
271: \section{RS1 graviton}
272:
273: \subsection{Signal and background simulations}
274:
275: As it was mentioned above the RS1 model predicts massive KK-modes
276: of graviton ($m_{KK} \approx $ a few TeV) which can been observed
277: in experiments as heavy narrow resonance states (Fig.~\ref{fig4}). It is
278: necessary to note here that an effect from KK-gravitons can also
279: been extracted from changing of Higgs boson rates because of
280: mixing of them with radion (see Ref.~\cite{Wells02})
281:
282: \begin{figure}[htbp]
283: \vspace{-0.5cm}
284: \centerline{\psfig{figure=fig4.ps,height=11.5cm,angle=90}}
285: \vspace{-1.0cm} \caption{Invariant mass distributions for
286: Drell-Yan process for the LHC. From top to bottom, the curves are
287: for coupling values $c$ = 1, 0.5, 0.1, 0.05, 0.01 (taken from
288: \cite{Davoudiasl01})} \label{fig4}
289: \end{figure}
290:
291: The ability to test experimentally RS1 scenario predictions depends on the
292: model parameter $c = k/M_{Pl}$ which controls coupling of graviton
293: to the ordinary particles and a width of the resonance
294: ${\Gamma}$${\sim}$${\rho}m_{0}c^{2}$; where the constant ${\rho}$
295: is determined by the number of open decay channels. Results of the
296: combined analysis in the RS1 scenario \cite{Davoudiasl01} show
297: that a value of the dimensionless coupling constant $c$ and a
298: corresponding value of graviton mass is restricted due to the
299: experimental Tevatron data and theoretical constraints to assure
300: the model hierarchy (${\Lambda}_{\pi}$ $<$ 10 TeV). These
301: limitations lead, in particular, to the conclusion that the
302: constant $c$ can not be less than 0.027, for the graviton mass of
303: one TeV/$c^{2}$, and less than 0.1, for the mass of 3.7
304: TeV/$c^{2}$. We operated in our consideration the range for
305: coupling constant $0.01 {\leq} c {\leq} 0.1$. Graviton resonances
306: can be produced via quark-antiquark annihilation $q\bar{q}
307: {\rightarrow} G_{KK}$ as well as gluon-gluon fusion $gg
308: {\rightarrow} G_{KK}$. The first of these processes is identical
309: to the Standard Model s-channel exchange by an intermediate
310: $\gamma^{\star}$ or $Z$ vector boson, while the second one has no
311: SM analogue. Other partonic sub-processes are also possible,
312: $gg{\rightarrow} gG_{KK}$, $q\bar{q} {\rightarrow} gG_{KK}$,
313: $gq {\rightarrow} qG_{KK}$, which form real graviton production via the
314: $t$-channel exchange (graviton emission).
315: To simulate both real and virtual graviton production in the
316: proton-proton collisions at 14 TeV center-of-mass energy, PYTHIA
317: 6.217 was used in which the RS1 scenario was implemented with
318: CTEQ5L parton distribution functions. The graviton production
319: cross section for all five possible diagrams is presented in Table~\ref{RS1_crs}.
320: Here, two extreme possibilities for model parameter $c$ were
321: considered. The first one was the most optimistic scenario when $c$
322: is equal to 0.1. The second number in each row (in brackets)
323: corresponds to the most difficult for experimental observation
324: case when the coupling value $c$ = 0.01. The majority (at least
325: 50${\div}$60 $\%$ depending on a mass) of gravitons was produced
326: in the process of gluon-gluon fusion with real graviton emission,
327: whereas virtual graviton production added only up to 15 $\%$ of
328: the total cross-section. The Standard Model background for this
329: channel was the same as for the $Z^{\prime}$ case.
330:
331: %\vspace{-0.8cm}
332: \begin{table}[h,pt]
333: \caption{\label{RS1_crs} Leading-order cross section of
334: $\mbox{G}_{\mbox{\small KK}}$ production in fb. The CTEQ5L parton
335: distributions have been used.}
336: \vspace{-0.8cm}
337: \begin{center}
338: \item[]\begin{tabular}{@{}llll}
339: \hline
340: Mass, $\mbox{TeV}c^{-2}$ & $1.0$ & $1.5$ & $3.0$ \\
341: \hline
342: $\mbox{q} \bar{\mbox{q}} \to \mbox{G}_{\mbox{\small KK}}$ & 129 (1.34) & 23 (0.24) & 0.633 (0.006) \\
343: %\hline
344: $\mbox{gg} \to \mbox{G}_{\mbox{\small KK}}$ & 567 (5.33) & 62 (0.53) & 0.94 (0.004) \\
345: %\hline
346: $\mbox{q} \bar{\mbox{q}} \to \mbox{g} \mbox{G}_{\mbox{\small KK}}$ & 345 (3.29) & 65 (0.64) & 1.84 (0.017) \\
347: %\hline
348: $\mbox{qg} \to \mbox{q} \mbox{G}_{\mbox{\small KK}}$ & 599 (5.78) & 72 (0.64) & 1.05 (0.007) \\
349: %\hline
350: $\mbox{gg} \to \mbox{g} \mbox{G}_{\mbox{\small KK}}$ & 3350 (31.5) & 368 (3.32) & 4.98 (0.028) \\
351: %\hline
352: Total & 4990 (47.2) & 590 (5.38) & 9.45 (0.062) \\
353: \hline
354: \end{tabular}
355: \end{center}
356: \end{table}
357: %\vspace{0.5cm}
358:
359:
360: \subsection{Detection of RS1-graviton resonance and discovery limits}
361:
362: Simulation of the detector response for graviton decay into muon pair
363: is similar to the $Z^{\prime}$ case. To estimate the discovery
364: limit for RS1 graviton excitations the same procedure as for the
365: $Z^{\prime}$ case was applied. The cross section of $G_{KK}$
366: production and corresponding cross section limits to observe a
367: five ${\sigma}$ signal for various integrated luminosity cases are
368: presented in Fig.~\ref{fig5}. As shown in the figure, the LHC can test the
369: RS1 scenario in the whole range of the model parameter $c$ up to the
370: mass of 2.0 TeV/$c^{2}$ even at the low luminosity of 10
371: $fb^{-1}$. In the more favourable case with $c$ = 0.1 the
372: accessible mass region is extended up to 3.7 TeV/$c^{2}$. With 100
373: $fb^{-1}$ of integrated luminosity the reach increases up to 2.6
374: TeV/$c^{2}$ for $c$=0.01 and 4.8 TeV/$c^{2}$ for $c$=0.1.
375:
376: \begin{figure}[ht]
377: \vspace{1.9cm}
378: \begin{center}
379: \resizebox{11.5cm}{!} {\includegraphics{fig5.eps}}
380: \vspace{-3.2cm}
381: \caption{Five ${\sigma}$ discovery limits for RS1
382: graviton decayed into dimuon pair.}
383: \label{fig5}
384: \end{center}
385: \end{figure}
386: %\vspace{-0.5cm}
387:
388: The direct comparison of results on an allowed region for $c$ with the data
389: of the Fig.~\ref{fig5} shows that the whole space of the RS1-model
390: parameters is accessible at the luminosity of 100 $fb^{-1}$, and
391: RS1 graviton can be discovered with the five ${\sigma}$
392: significance. These conclusions, however, are not definitive,
393: since initial theoretical constraints are very arbitrary.
394:
395: \begin{figure}[hbt]
396: \vspace{-1.5cm} \centerline{\psfig{figure=fig6.eps,width=11.5cm}}
397: \vspace{-7.5cm} \caption{Angular distributions $cos({\Theta}*)$ of
398: muons from $G_{KK}$ (solid marker)and $Z^{\prime}$ (open box) decays}
399: \label{fig6}
400: \end{figure}
401:
402: Under the assumption that a new resonance state was observed at the LHC,
403: nature of this object should be understood in further analysis (in
404: principle, the resonance can come from the extended gauge sector
405: as well as from some version of extra dimension models). The major
406: difference between $Z^{\prime}$ and RS1 graviton should appear in
407: the $\mbox{cos}(\theta^{\star})$ distribution (where
408: $\theta^{\star}$ is the polar angle of muons in the center-of-mass
409: system of the dimuon pair) which is strongly spin dependent.
410: Course, these distributions will be distorted by acceptance cuts,
411: especially in the region of large angles, and expected theoretical
412: predictions will differ from experimental ones. Nevertheless Fig.~\ref{fig6}
413: shows the distinct difference between the spin-1 ($Z^{\prime}$)
414: and the spin-2 (RS1 graviton) curves obtained for muons after all
415: cuts. To ease the comparison, these plots were obtained for
416: resonance states with the same masses of 1.5 TeV/$c^{2}$ and
417: normalized to 6000 events that correspond to the approximate
418: integrated luminosity of 10 $fb^{-1}$ for graviton production with
419: $c$=0.1 and 100 $fb^{-1}$ for $Z^{\prime}$ boson.
420:
421: %\newpage
422:
423: \section{Summary}
424:
425: In this work we present the discovery potential of $Z^{\prime}$
426: gauge bosons as well as RS1 gravitons in the muon channel at the
427: LHC experiments. The estimated discovery limit for $Z^{\prime}$ is
428: about $ 3.5 \div 4.0 $ TeV/$c^{2}$ depending on the couplings for
429: 100 $fb^{-1}$ integrated luminosity. At the same luminosity the
430: first KK-mode of RS1 graviton can be observed up to the mass
431: values of 2.6 TeV/$ c^{2} $ and 4.8 TeV/$c^{2}$ for $c$ = 0.01 and
432: 0.1, respectively. The angular distribution of muons in the final
433: state can be used to distinguish the spin-1 and the spin-2
434: resonance states, at least in the mass region up to 2.3
435: TeV/$c^{2}$. The different $Z^{\prime}$ models can be
436: distinguished (up to the mass value of 2.5 TeV/$c^{2}$) using the
437: leptonic forward-backward asymmetry. Further detailed studies are
438: required on the theoretical side in order to identify other
439: possible physics observables. This would be helpful to better
440: understand the LHC discovery conditions and limits.
441:
442: Authors would like to thank E.~Boos, D.~Denegri, M.~Dubinin,
443: A.~Lanyov, and S.~Valuev for enlightening and helpful discussions.
444:
445: E.R. is also grateful to Organizing Committee for hospitality and
446: very interesting scientific program of the Conference.
447:
448: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
449:
450: \bibitem{D0} D0 Collaboration, B.~Abbott et al. "Measurement of
451: the high mass Drell-Yan cross-section and limits on quark
452: electron compositeness scales", Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 (1999) 4769.
453: \vspace{-2.5mm}
454:
455: \bibitem{OPAL} OPAL Collaboration, K. Ackerstaff et al., "Production of
456: fermion pair events in e+e- collision at 161-GeV center-of-mass energy",
457: Phys. Lett. B391 (1997) 221.
458: \vspace{-2.5mm}
459:
460: \bibitem{Cvetic95} M.~Cvetic and S.~Godfrey, Summary of the Working Subgroup on Extra Gauge Bosons
461: of the PDF long-range planning study to Electro-weak Symmetry
462: Breaking and Beyond Standard Model, eds. T.~Barklow et al., World
463: Scientific, 1995; hep-ph/9504216; T.G.~Rizzo, Proceedings of the
464: 1996 DPF/DPB Summer Study on New Directions for High Energy
465: Physics-Snowmass96, Snowmass, CO, 25 June - 12 July, 1996.
466: \vspace{-2.5mm}
467:
468: \bibitem{Hewett89} J.L.~Hewett and T.G.~Rizzo "Low-energy phenomenology of superstring inspired
469: E(6) models", Phys. Rept. 183 (1989) 193.
470: \vspace{-2.5mm}
471:
472: \bibitem{ADD} N.~Arkani-Hamed, S.~Dimopoulos, and G.~Dvali "The Hierarchy Problem and New Dimensions
473: at a Millimeter", Phys. Lett. B429 (1998) 263, hep-ph/9803315;
474: I.~Antoniadis, N.~Arkani-Hamed, S.~Dimopoulos, and G.~Dvali "New Dimensions at a Millimeter
475: to a Fermi and Superstrings at a TeV", Phys. Lett. B436 (1998) 257, hep-ph/9804398.\\
476: {\it Phenomenology and astrophysics limits of the model can be found in}\\
477: N.~Arkani-Hamed, S.~Dimopoulos, and G.~Dvali "Phenomenology, Astrophysics
478: and Cosmology of Theories with Sub-Millimeter Dimensions and TeV Scale Quantum Gravity",
479: Phys. Rev. D59 (1999) 086004, hep-ph/9807344.\\
480: {\it Superstring realization of the model can be found in}\\
481: D.~Cremades, L.E.~Ibanez, F.~Marchesano "Standard Model at Intersecting D5-branes:
482: Lowering the String Scale", Nucl. Phys. B643 (2002) 93, hep-th/0205074;
483: C.~Kokorelis "Exact Standard model Structures from Intersecting D5-Branes", Nucl.Phys. B677 (2004) 115,
484: hep-th/0207234.
485: \vspace{-2.5mm}
486:
487: \bibitem{Randall99} L.~Randall and R.~Sundrum "A large mass hierarchy from a small extra dimension",
488: Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 (1999) 3370, hep-ph/9905221; "An alternative to compactification",
489: Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 (1999) 4690, hep-th/9906064.
490: \vspace{-2.5mm}
491:
492: \bibitem{Antoniadis90} I.~Antoniadis "A Possible New Dimension at a few TeV", Phys. Lett. B246 (1990) 377;
493: I.~Antoniadis and K.~Benakli "Limits on Extra Dimensions in Orbifold Compactifications
494: of Superstrings", Phys. Lett. B326 (1994) 69; I.~Antoniadis, K.~Benakli and M.~Quiros
495: "Production of Kaluza-Klein States at Future Colliders", Phys. Lett. B331 (1994) 313.
496: \vspace{-2.5mm}
497:
498:
499:
500: \bibitem{Rubakov01} V.A.~Rubakov "Large and infinite extra dimensions", Uspekhi fizicheskih nauk 171 (2001) 913 (in Russian),
501: hep-ph/0104152 (English version).
502: \vspace{-2.5mm}
503:
504: \bibitem{Kazakov04} D.I.~Kazakov "Beyond the Standard Model", hep-ph/0411064.
505: \vspace{-2.5mm}
506:
507: \bibitem{RS_CMS} C.~Collard, M-C.~Lemaire, P.~Traczyk, and G.~Wrochna
508: "Prospects for Study of Randall-Sundrum Gravitons in the CMS Experiment",
509: CMS Note 2002-050.
510: \vspace{-2.5mm}
511:
512: \bibitem{PYTHIA} T.~Sjostrand et al "PYTHIA 6.2 Physics and Manual", Comp. Phys. Commun. 135 (2001) 238,
513: LUTP 01-21, hep-ph/0108264.
514: \vspace{-2.5mm}
515:
516: \bibitem{Huitu97} K.~Huitu, J.~Maalampi, A.~Pietila, M.~Raidal "Doubly charged Higgs at LHC",
517: Nucl. Phys. B487 (1997) 27, hep-ph/9606311; F.~Feruglio, L.~Maiani, and A.~Masiero
518: "Right-handed vector bosons in p anti-p collisions as a source of anomalous events",
519: Phys. Lett. B233 (1998) 512.
520: \vspace{-2.5mm}
521:
522: \bibitem{Rosner87} J.~Rosner et al. "Off peak lepton asymmetries from new Z's", Phys. Rev. D35 (1987) 2244.
523: \vspace{-2.5mm}
524:
525: \bibitem{Altarelli89} G.~Altarelli, B.~Mele, and M.~Ruiz-Altaba "Searching for new heavy vector bosons in
526: p anti-p colliders", Z. Phys. C45 (1989) 109.
527: \vspace{-2.5mm}
528:
529: \bibitem{Dittmar04} M.~Dittmar, A.~Djouadi and A.-S.~Nicollerat "Z' studies at the LHC: an update",
530: Phys. Lett. B583 (2004) 111, hep-ph/0307020.
531: \vspace{-2.5mm}
532:
533: \bibitem{Muon TDR} CMS Muon TDR, CERN/LHCC 97-32, CMS TDR 3, 15 December 1997.
534: \vspace{-2.5mm}
535:
536: \bibitem{Langacker84} P.~Langacker, R.~Robinett, and J.~Rossner "New heavy gauge bosons in
537: pp and p anti-p collisions", Phys. Rev. D30 (1984) 1470.
538: \vspace{-2.5mm}
539:
540: \bibitem{Dittmar97} M.~Dittmar "Neutral current interference in the TeV region: the experimental
541: sensitivity at the LHC", Phys. Rev. D55 (1997) 161.
542: \vspace{-2.5mm}
543:
544: \bibitem{Wells02} J.D.~Wells "Extra dimensions and the universal suppression of higgs boson observables
545: at high energy collaiders", hep-ph/0205328, to appear in the Proceedings of The 10th Intl. Conf.
546: "Supersymmetry and Unification of Fundamental Interactions (SUSY-02)", 17-23 June 2002, Hamburg, Germany.
547: \vspace{-2.5mm}
548:
549: \bibitem{Davoudiasl01} H.~Davoudiasl, J.L.~Hewett, and T.G.~Rizzo "Experimental Probes of Localized Gravity:
550: On and Off the Wall", Phys. Rev. D63 (2001) 075004, hep-ph/0006041.
551: \vspace{-2.5mm}
552:
553: \end{thebibliography}
554:
555: \end{document}
556: