1: \documentstyle[12pt]{article}
2: \textheight 8.5in \textwidth 6in
3: %\oddsidemargin -0.2in \topmargin -0.5in
4: \renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{1.5}
5: \begin{document}
6: \thispagestyle{empty}
7: \begin{flushright}
8: UA/NPPS-6-04\\
9: \end{flushright}
10:
11: \vspace{2cm}
12: \begin{center}
13: {\large{\bf
14: LOCATING THE QCD CRITICAL POINT \\
15: IN THE PHASE DIAGRAM\\}}
16: \vspace{1cm}
17: {\large N. G. Antoniou, F. K. Diakonos and A. S. Kapoyannis}\\
18: \smallskip
19: {\it Department of Physics, University of Athens, 15771 Athens, Greece}\\
20:
21: \vspace{1cm}
22:
23: Presented at the X International Workshop on Multiparticle Production\\
24: ``Correlations and Fluctuations on QCD'', \\
25: 8-15 June 2002, Istron Bay, Ag. Nikolaos, Crete, GREECE
26:
27: \end{center}
28: \vspace{0.5cm}
29: \begin{abstract}
30: It is shown that the hadronic matter formed at high temperatures, according
31: to the prescription of the statistical bootstrap principle, develops a
32: critical point at nonzero baryon chemical potential, associated with the end
33: point of a first-order, quark-hadron phase-transition line. The location of
34: the critical point is evaluated as a function of the MIT bag constant.
35: \end{abstract}
36:
37: \vspace{3cm}
38: PACS numbers: 25.75.-q, 12.40.Ee, 12.38.Mh, 05.70.Ce
39:
40: Keywords: Statistical Bootstrap Model
41:
42: \newpage
43: \setcounter{page}{1}
44:
45: {\bf 1 Introduction}
46:
47: Quantum Chromodynamics is unquestionably the microscopic theory of strong
48: interactions and offers an accurate description of quark-gluon matter. The
49: formation of hadronic matter is still an open problem in the context of QCD.
50: This theory predicts however the existence of a critical point at non zero
51: baryon chemical potential, which is the end point of a quark-hadron critical
52: line of first order [1]. This singularity is associated with the formation of
53: hadronic matter at high temperatures and its location in the QCD phase
54: diagram is of primary importance.
55:
56: On the other hand the hadronic side of matter can be treated as a thermally
57: and chemically equilibrated gas. The inclusion of {\em interactions} among
58: hadrons is crucial in order to reveal the possibility of a phase transition.
59: A model that allows for the thermodynamical description of interacting
60: hadrons is the Statistical Bootstrap Model (SBM), which was first developed
61: by Hagedorn [2-5]. In what follows we investigate the possibility of the
62: formation of a critical point within the framework of the statistical
63: bootstrap hypothesis.
64:
65: \vspace{2cm}
66: {\bf 2 The hadronic matter}
67:
68: The SBM is based on the hypothesis that the strong interactions can be
69: simulated by the presence of hadronic clusters.
70: In the context of SBM the strongly interacting hadron gas is replaced by a
71: non-interacting infinite-component cluster gas.
72: The hadronic states of clusters are listed in a mass spectrum
73: $\tilde{\rho}$, so that $\tilde{\rho}dm$ represents the number of hadronic
74: states in the mass interval $\{m,m+dm\}$. The mass spectrum can be
75: evaluated if the clusters, as well as, their constituents are treated on the
76: same footing by introducing an integral {\it bootstrap} equation (BE).
77: In the bootstrap logic clusters are composed
78: of clusters described by the same mass spectrum. This scheme proceeds until
79: clusters are reached that their constituents cannot be divided further. These
80: constituents are the {\it input} hadrons and the known hadronic particles
81: belong to this category. The BE leads to the adoption of an asymptotic mass
82: spectrum of the form [7]
83: \begin{equation}
84: \tilde{\rho}(m^2,\{\lambda\})\stackrel{m\rightarrow\infty}
85: {\longrightarrow}
86: 2C(\{\lambda\})m^{-\alpha} \exp [m\beta^*(\{\lambda\})]\;.
87: \end{equation}
88: The underlying feature of SBM is that the mass spectrum rises
89: {\it exponentially}, as m tends to infinity.
90: $\beta^*$ is the inverse maximum temperature allowed for hadronic matter
91: and depends on the existing fugacities $\{\lambda\}$. $\alpha$ is an exponent
92: which can be adjusted to different values allowing for different versions of
93: the model.
94:
95: The manipulation of the bootstrap equation can be significantly simplified
96: through suitable Laplace transformations. The Laplace transformed mass
97: spectrum leads to the introduction of the quantity $G(\beta,\{\lambda\})$.
98: The same transformation can be carried out to the input term of SBM, leading
99: to the quantity $\varphi(\beta,\{\lambda\})$. Then the BE can be expressed as
100: \begin{equation}
101: \varphi(\beta,\{\lambda\})=2G(\beta,\{\lambda\})
102: -\exp [G(\beta,\{\lambda\})]+1\;.
103: \end{equation}
104: The above BE exhibits a singularity at
105: \begin{equation}
106: \varphi(\beta,\{\lambda\})=\ln4-1\;.
107: \end{equation}
108: The last equation imposes a constraint among the thermodynamic variables
109: which represent the {\em boundaries} of the hadronic phase. Hadronic matter
110: can exist in all states represented by variables that lead to a real solution
111: of the BE or equivalently in all states for which temperatures and fugacities
112: lead to
113: \begin{equation}
114: \varphi(\beta,\{\lambda\})\le\ln4-1\;.
115: \end{equation}
116:
117: In the general form of SBM the following four improvements can be
118: made which allow for a better description of hadronic matter:
119:
120: 1) The inclusion of all the known hadrons with masses up to 2400 MeV in the
121: input term of the BE and also inclusion of strange hadrons. This leads to the
122: introduction of the strangeness fugacity $\lambda_s$ in the set of fugacities
123: [6,7]. Another fugacity which is useful for the analysis of the experimental
124: data in heavy ion collisions is $\gamma_s$. This fugacity allows for partial
125: strangeness equilibrium and can also be included in the set of fugacities of
126: SBM [8].
127:
128: 2) Different fugacities can be introduced for $u$ and $d$ quarks. In this way
129: the thermodynamic description of systems which are not isospin symmetric
130: becomes possible. Such systems can emerge from the collision of nuclei with
131: different number of protons and neutrons [9].
132:
133: 3) The choice of the exponent $\alpha$ in (1) has important consequences,
134: since every choice leads to a different physical behaviour of the system. The
135: usual SBM choice was $\alpha=2$, but more advantageous is the choice
136: $\alpha=4$. With this choice a better physical behaviour is achieved as the
137: system approaches the hadronic boundaries. Quantities like
138: pressure, baryon density and energy density, even for
139: point-like particles, no longer tend to infinity as the system
140: tends to the bootstrap singularity.
141: It also allows for the bootstrap singularity to be reached in the
142: thermodynamic limit [10], a necessity imposed by the Lee-Yang theory.
143: Another point in favour of the choice $\alpha=4$ comes from the extension of
144: SBM to include strangeness [6,7].
145: The strange chemical potential equals zero in the quark-gluon phase. With
146: this particular choice of $\alpha$, $\mu_s$ acquires smaller positive values
147: as the hadronic boundaries are approached.
148: After choosing $\alpha=4$ the partition function can be written down and
149: for point-like particles it assumes the form
150: \begin{equation}
151: \ln Z_{p\;SBM}(V,\beta,\{\lambda\})=
152: \frac{4BV}{\beta^3}\int_{\beta}^{\infty} x^3 G(x,\{\lambda\})dx \equiv
153: Vf_{SBM}(\beta,\{\lambda\})\;,
154: \end{equation}
155: where $B$ is the energy density of the vacuum (bag constant) and it is the
156: only free parameter of SBM which is left after fixing $\alpha=4$ [6,7].
157:
158: 4) The contributions due to the finite size of hadrons, accounting for the
159: repulsive interaction among hadrons, can be introduced via a Van der Waals
160: treatment of the volume. The negative contributions to the volume can be
161: avoided if the following grand canonical pressure partition function is used
162: \begin{equation}
163: \pi(\xi,\beta,\{\lambda\})=\frac{1}{\xi-f(\beta+\xi/4B,\{\lambda\})}\;,
164: \end{equation}
165: where $\xi$ is the Laplace conjugate variable of the volume.
166: All values of $\xi$ are allowed if Gaussian regularization
167: is performed [11]. The value $\xi=0$ corresponds to a system without external
168: forces [10,11] and it will be used throughout our calculations.
169: With the use of (6) and the SBM point particle partition function (5)
170: one obtains
171: \begin{equation}
172: \nu_{HG}(\xi,\beta,\{\lambda\})=\lambda
173: \frac{\frac{\partial f(\beta+\xi/4B,\{\lambda\})}{\partial \lambda}}
174: {{\scriptstyle 1-}\frac{1}{4B}
175: \frac{\partial f(\beta+\xi/4B,\{\lambda\})}{\partial \beta}}\;,
176: \end{equation}
177: where $\lambda$ is the fugacity corresponding to the particular density, and
178: \begin{equation}
179: P_{HG}(\xi,\beta,\{\lambda\})=\frac{1}{\beta}
180: \frac{{\scriptstyle f(\beta+\xi/4B,\{\lambda\})-}\frac{\xi}{4B}
181: \frac{\partial f(\beta+\xi/4B,\{\lambda\})}{\partial \beta}}
182: {{\scriptstyle 1-}\frac{1}{4B}\frac{\partial f(\beta+\xi/4B,\{\lambda\})}{\partial \beta}}\;.
183: \end{equation}
184:
185: The dependence of the pressure on the volume can be recovered if
186: for a given set of parameters $\xi$, $\beta$, $\{\lambda\}$ the density
187: $\nu_b$ of the conserved baryon number $<b>$ is calculated. Then the volume
188: would be retrieved through the relation
189: \begin{equation}
190: <V>=\frac{<b>}{\nu_b}\;.
191: \end{equation}
192:
193: By using the SBM with all the above improvements the possibility of a phase
194: transition of hadronic matter can be traced. The study of the pressure-volume
195: isotherm curve is then necessary.
196: When this curve is calculated one important feature of SBM is revealed. This
197: curve has a part (near the boundaries of the hadronic domain) where pressure
198: decreases while volume decreases also (see Fig.1). This behaviour is due to
199: the formation of bigger and bigger clusters as the system tends to its
200: boundaries. Such a behaviour is a signal of a {\em first order phase
201: transition} which in turn is connected with the need of a {\em Maxwell
202: construction}.
203:
204: If on the contrary the interaction included in SBM is not used then no such
205: behaviour is exhibited. This can be verified if the Ideal Hadron Gas model is
206: used. Then for this model the equation that corresponds to Eq. (5) is
207: \begin{equation}
208: f_{p\;IHG}(\beta,\{\lambda\}) \equiv
209: \frac{\ln Z_{p\;IHG}(V,\beta,\{\lambda\})}{V}=\frac{1}{2\pi^2\beta}
210: \sum_{\rm a} [\lambda_{\rm a}(\{\lambda\})+\lambda_{\rm a}(\{\lambda\})^{-1}]
211: \sum_i g_{{\rm a}i} m_{{\rm a}i} K_2 (\beta m_{{\rm a}i})\;,
212: \end{equation}
213: where $g_{{\rm a}i}$ are degeneracy factors due to spin and isospin and
214: {\rm a} runs to all hadronic families.
215: This function can be used in eq. (6) to calculate the Ideal Hadron Gas (IHG)
216: pressure partition function in order to include Van der Waals volume
217: corrections. The result is that the pressure is always found to increase as
218: volume decreases, for constant temperature, allowing for no possibility of a
219: phase transition.
220:
221: The comparison of SBM with the IHG (with volume corrections) is displayed in
222: Figure 1, where $\nu_0$ is the normal nuclear density $\nu_0=0.14\;fm^{-3}$.
223: In both cases (SBM or IHG) the constraints $<S>=0$ (zero strangeness)
224: and $<b>=2<Q>$ (isospin symmetric system, i.e. the net number of $u$ and $d$
225: quarks are equal) have been imposed. Also strangeness is fully equilibrated
226: which accounts to setting $\gamma_s=1$.
227:
228:
229: \vspace{2cm}
230: {\bf 3 The quark-gluon matter}
231:
232: We may now proceed to the
233: thermodynamical description of the quark-gluon phase.
234: The grand canonical partition function of a system
235: containing only $u$ and $d$ massless quarks and gluons is [13]
236: \begin{eqnarray}
237: \ln Z_{QGP}(V,\beta,\lambda_q)=&&
238: \hspace{-0.5cm}\underbrace{\frac{gV}{6\pi^2}\beta^{-3}
239: \left[\left(1-\frac{2a_s}{\pi}\right)
240: \left(\frac{1}{4}\ln^4 \lambda_q+\frac{\pi^2}{2}\ln^2 \lambda_q \right)+
241: \left(1-\frac{50a_s}{21\pi}\right)\frac{7\pi^4}{60}\right]}_
242: {\rm quark\;term} \nonumber \\
243: &&\hspace{-0.5cm}+\underbrace{V\frac{8\pi^2}{45}\beta^{-3}\left(1-\frac{15a_s}{4\pi}\right)}
244: _{\rm gluon\;term}-\underbrace{\beta BV}_{\rm vacuum\;term}\;.
245: \end{eqnarray}
246: This partition function is calculated to first order in the QCD running
247: coupling constant $a_s$. The fugacity $\lambda_q$ is related to both $u$ and
248: $d$ quarks. $B$ is again the MIT bag constant and $g$ equals to the product
249: of spin states, colours and flavours available in the system,
250: $g=N_sN_cN_f=12$. Using this partition function the QGP baryon density and
251: pressure can be calculated through the relations
252: \begin{equation}
253: \nu_{b\;QGP}(\beta,\lambda_q)=
254: \frac{2}{\pi^2}\beta^{-3}
255: \left(1-\frac{2a_s}{\pi}\right)
256: \left(\frac{1}{3}\ln^3 \lambda_q+\frac{\pi^2}{3}\ln \lambda_q \right)\;
257: \end{equation}
258:
259: \begin{eqnarray}
260: P_{QGP}(\beta,\lambda_q)=&&\hspace{-0.5cm}
261: \frac{2}{\pi^2}\beta^{-4}
262: \left[\left(1-\frac{2a_s}{\pi}\right)
263: \left(\frac{1}{4}\ln^4 \lambda_q+\frac{\pi^2}{2}\ln^2 \lambda_q \right)+
264: \left(1-\frac{50a_s}{21\pi}\right)\frac{7\pi^4}{60}\right] \nonumber \\
265: &&\hspace{-0.5cm}+\frac{8\pi^2}{45}\beta^{-4}\left(1-\frac{15a_s}{4\pi}\right)-B\;.
266: \end{eqnarray}
267:
268: If the strange quarks are also included, the quarks assume their
269: current masses and $a_s=0$, then the following partition function can be
270: used.
271: \begin{eqnarray}
272: \ln Z_{QGP}(V,\beta,\lambda_u,\lambda_d)=&&\hspace{-0.5cm}
273: \underbrace{\frac{N_s N_c V}{6\pi^2}
274: \beta\sum_i \int_0^{\infty} \frac{p^4}{\sqrt{p^2+m_i^2}}
275: \frac{1}{e^{\beta \sqrt{p^2+m_i^2}}\lambda_i^{-1}+1}dp}_{\rm quark\;term} \nonumber \\
276: &&\hspace{-0.5cm}+\underbrace{V\frac{8\pi^2}{45}\beta^{-3}}_{\rm gluon\;term}-
277: \underbrace{\beta BV}_{\rm vacuum\;term}\;.
278: \end{eqnarray}
279: The index $i$ runs to all quarks and antiquarks. The current
280: masses are taken $m_u=5.6$ MeV, $m_d=9.9$ MeV and $m_s=199$ MeV [14].
281: The fugacities are $\lambda_{\bar{u}}=\lambda_u^{-1}$,
282: $\lambda_{\bar{d}}=\lambda_d^{-1}$ and $\lambda_{\bar{s}}=\lambda_s^{-1}=1$
283: (since strangeness is set to zero). The baryon density is then
284: \begin{equation}
285: \nu_{b\;QGP}(\beta,\lambda_u,\lambda_d)=
286: \frac{N_s N_c}{2\pi^2} \sum_i N_i \int_0^{\infty}
287: \frac{p^{2}}{e^{\beta \sqrt{p^2+m_i^2}}\lambda_i^{-1}+1}dp\;,
288: \end{equation}
289: where $i$ includes only $u$, $\bar{u}$, $d$ and $\bar{d}$ quarks and $N_i=1$
290: for $u$ and $d$ quarks and $N_i=-1$ for $\bar{u}$ and $\bar{d}$ quarks. The
291: pressure is
292: \begin{equation}
293: P_{QGP}(\beta,\lambda_u,\lambda_d)=
294: \frac{1}{\beta}\frac{\ln Z_{QGP}(V,\beta,\lambda_u,\lambda_d)}{V}\;.
295: \end{equation}
296:
297: In order to study the effect of the inclusion of strange quarks we can use
298: the partition function (11) and add the part of the quark term of (14) which
299: corresponds to the strange quarks.
300:
301: \newpage
302: \vspace{2cm}
303: {\bf 4 Matching the two phases}
304:
305: After completing a thermodynamic description for the hadronic and for the
306: quark-gluon phase we can trace whether a phase transition can occur between
307: the two phases. Similar situations have been studied in [10,12,13], but here,
308: apart from the use of the SBM incorporating all four improvements, we shall
309: focus our calculations to the location of the critical point. So no value of
310: $B$ or $a_s$ will be selected a-priori.
311:
312: If $a_s$ and $\xi$ are fixed, then the only free parameter left
313: would be the MIT bag constant $B$. If a value of $B$ is chosen, also, the
314: pressure-volume isotherms of Hadron Gas and QGP can be calculated for a specific
315: temperature. Then at the point where the two isotherms meet would correspond
316: equal volumes and equal pressures for the two phases. But assuming that the
317: baryon number is a conserved quantity to both phases, the equality of volumes
318: would lead to the equality of baryon densities.
319:
320: When performing calculations about the location of the point where the two
321: phases meet, with fixed MIT bag constant, what is found is that at a low
322: temperature the QGP and SBM pressure-volume isotherms meet at a point where
323: the Hadron Gas pressure is {\em decreasing} while volume {\em decreases}.
324: This is reminiscent of the need of a Maxwell construction. So at that point
325: the phase transition between Hadron Gas and QGP must be of {\em first order}.
326: As the temperature rises, a certain temperature is found for which the QGP
327: isotherm meets the SBM isotherm at a point which corresponds to the maximum
328: Hadron Gas pressure for this temperature. So no Maxwell construction is
329: needed. It is important to notice that this point is located at {\em finite
330: volume} or {\em finite baryon density} and it can be associated with the
331: QCD critical point.
332: Then, as temperature continues to rise, the QGP isotherms meet the SBM
333: isotherms at points with even greater volume. Again no Maxwell construction is
334: needed and this region belongs to the {\em crossover} area.
335:
336: These situations can be depicted in Figure 2, where all curves have been
337: calculated for $B^{1/4}=210$ MeV. The dotted curved lines correspond to SBM,
338: while the almost straight dotted lines correspond to QGP. For the
339: calculations three quark flavours have been used with their corresponding
340: current masses and $a_s=0$. The thick lines are the resulting pressure-volume
341: curves for the Hadron Gas-QGP system. A Maxwell construction is needed for
342: the low temperature isotherm. This is depicted by the horizontal line
343: which is drawn so that the two shaded surfaces are equal and represents the
344: final pressure-volume curve after the completion of the Maxwell construction.
345: In the same figure the isotherm that leads the pressure curves of the two
346: phases to meet at the maximum hadron gas pressure, forming a critical point,
347: is drawn, also. Finally for higher temperatures the two curves meet at a
348: point so that the resulting pressure curve is always increasing as volume
349: decreases, without the need of a Maxwell construction (crossover area).
350:
351: A more detailed figure of the previous one is Figure 3, where more curves
352: that need Maxwell construction can be displayed. The coexistence region of the
353: two phases are represented by the horizontal Maxwell constructed curves. The
354: slashed line represents the boundaries of the Maxwell construction and so the
355: boundaries of the coexistence region.
356:
357: \vspace{2cm}
358: {\bf 5 Locating the Critical Point}
359:
360: To locate the critical point with the choice (14) for the QGP partition
361: function, for a given $B$, one has to determine the parameters
362: $(\beta, \lambda_u, \lambda_d, \lambda_s, \lambda_u', \lambda_d')$, which
363: solve the following set of equations.
364:
365: \[
366: \hspace{4.2cm}
367: \nu_{b\;SBM}(\beta,\lambda_u,\lambda_d,\lambda_s)=
368: \nu_{b\;QGP}(\beta,\lambda_u',\lambda_d')
369: \hspace{2.7cm}(17{\rm a})
370: \]
371: \[
372: \hspace{4.3cm}
373: P_{SBM}(\beta,\lambda_u,\lambda_d,\lambda_s)=
374: P_{QGP}(\beta,\lambda_u',\lambda_d')
375: \hspace{2.9cm}(17{\rm b})
376: \]
377: \[
378: \hspace{5.5cm}
379: \frac{\partial P_{SBM}(\beta,\lambda_u,\lambda_d,\lambda_s)}
380: {\partial \lambda_u}=0
381: \hspace{4cm}(17{\rm c})
382: \]
383: \[
384: \hspace{5.4cm}
385: \left<\;S(\beta,\lambda_u,\lambda_d,\lambda_s)\;\right>_{SBM}=0
386: \hspace{3.9cm}(17{\rm d})
387: \]
388: \[
389: \hspace{2.8cm}
390: \left<\;b(\beta,\lambda_u,\lambda_d,\lambda_s)\;\right>_{SBM}-
391: 2\;\left<\;Q(\beta,\lambda_u,\lambda_d,\lambda_s)\;\right>_{SBM}=0
392: \hspace{1.9cm}(17{\rm e})
393: \]
394: \[
395: \hspace{3.4cm}
396: \left<\;b(\beta,\lambda_u',\lambda_d')\;\right>_{QGP}-
397: 2\;\left<\;Q(\beta,\lambda_u',\lambda_d')\;\right>_{QGP}=0
398: \hspace{2.5cm}(17{\rm f})
399: \]
400: Eq. (17c) is equivalent to $P_{SBM}=P_{SBM\;max}$, when all the rest of the
401: equations are valid. Eq. (17d) imposes zero strangeness to HG phase.
402: Eqs. (17e) and (17f) account for isospin symmetry in the HG and QGP phase,
403: respectively. Also we have set $\gamma_s=1$ assuming full strangeness
404: equilibrium.
405:
406: With the choice (11) for the QGP partition function only the equations
407: (17a)-(17e) have to be solved, since only one fugacity
408: $\lambda_q=\lambda_u'=\lambda_d'$ is available in the QGP phase.
409:
410: The calculations for the position of the critical point for different values
411: of $B$ are presented in Figures 4-6. The range of values of
412: $B^{1/4}=(145-235)$ MeV [14,15] has been used for these calculations. In
413: Figure 4 we depict the critical temperature as a function of the critical
414: baryon density.
415: The dotted curves correspond to the QGP partition function with massless $u$
416: and $d$ quarks, without strange quarks and for different values of $a_s$.
417: The thick solid curve corresponds to the QGP partition function with massive
418: $u$, $d$ and $s$ quarks and $a_s=0$.
419: The slashed curve corresponds to the QGP partition function with massless $u$,
420: $d$, massive $s$ quarks and $a_s=0.1$.
421:
422: Figure 5 presents the connection of the MIT bag constant with the baryon
423: density of the critical point, divided by the normal nuclear density.
424:
425: In Figure 6 the critical temperature is plotted versus the critical
426: baryon chemical potential. The code of lines are as in Figure 4.
427: In this graph the
428: lines representing the bootstrap singularity, that is the boundaries of the
429: maximum space allowed to the hadronic phase, for the maximum and minimum
430: values of $B$, are also depicted (slashed-dotted curves). The filled circles
431: represent positions of critical point for the different choices of the QGP
432: partition functions for these maximum and minimum values of $B$.
433: As it can be seen the critical point is placed within the hadronic phase,
434: close to the bootstrap singularity. Every modification made to external
435: parameters drives the critical point in parallel to the bootstrap
436: singularity line.
437:
438: Typical values for the position of the critical point are listed in Table 1.
439:
440:
441: \vspace{2cm}
442: {\bf 6 Concluding Remarks}
443:
444: From our study we may conclude that, as $B$ increases, the critical point
445: moves to higher baryon density, smaller baryon chemical potential and higher
446: temperature until a certain value of $B$ is reached. If $B$ is increased
447: further, then the critical point moves quickly to zero baryon density and
448: zero baryon chemical potential, while temperature keeps increasing slowly.
449:
450: The inclusion of strange quarks always moves the critical point to higher
451: baryon density and higher baryon chemical potential (for fixed values of $B$
452: and $a_s$).
453:
454: As $a_s$ is increased (at the same QGP partition function), the critical point
455: moves to smaller baryon density, smaller baryon chemical potential and higher
456: temperature, while the move of the critical point towards zero chemical
457: potential takes place at smaller values of $B$.
458:
459: From the last two remarks we can infer that the calculation with massive
460: quarks and $a_s=0$ represents the {\it higher} baryon density,
461: {\it higher} baryon chemical potential and {\it smaller} temperature (for a
462: given B) that the critical point can acquire. So this particular QGP partition
463: function can give us an {\it upper} limit for the position of the critical
464: point in baryon density or baryon chemical potential.
465:
466: From Figure 6 it is evident that the critical point is positioned near the
467: bootstrap singularity curve. So this curve can represent, to a good
468: approximation, the first-order transition line between hadron and quark-gluon
469: phase.
470:
471: From Table 1 we observe that in the minimal, two flavour version of the
472: quark-gluon description ($a_s=0$) and in the chiral limit ($m_u=m_d=0$),
473: where the critical point becomes tricritical, the location of the singularity
474: may come close to the freeze-out area of the SPS experiments (typically:
475: $T_c \approx 171$ MeV, $\mu_c \approx 300$ MeV). On the contrary, the Lattice
476: QCD solution [16] with unphysically large values of the quark masses $m_u$,
477: $m_d$ drives the critical baryon chemical potential to higher values
478: ($T_c \approx 160$ MeV, $\mu_c \approx 725$ MeV). In order to bridge this
479: discrepancy one needs an improvement in both approaches. In the bootstrap
480: approach a realistic partition function of the quark-gluon matter is needed,
481: based not on perturbation theory but on the knowledge of the quark-gluon
482: pressure on the lattice for nonzero chemical potential. At present, there
483: exist lattice results for the pressure only for $\mu=0$ [17]. In the lattice
484: search for the critical point on the other hand the solution for small quark
485: masses (chiral limit) is needed before any quantitative comparison, both with
486: the bootstrap solution and the location of the freeze-out area in heavy-ion
487: collisions, could be made.
488:
489:
490:
491: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
492: \bibitem{1} F. Wilczek, hep-ph/0003183;
493: J. Berges, K. Rajagopal, Nucl. Phys. B538 (1999) 115
494: \bibitem{2} Hagedorn R 1965 Suppl. Nuovo Cimento III 147
495: \bibitem{3} Hagedorn R and Ranft J 1968 Suppl. Nuovo Cimento VI 169;
496: Hagedorn R 1968 Suppl. Nuovo Cimento VI 311
497: \bibitem{4} Hagedorn R 1968 Nuovo Cimento LVI A 1027
498: \bibitem{5} Hagedorn R and Rafelski J 1980 Phys. Lett. 97B 136
499: \bibitem{6} Kapoyannis A S, Ktorides C N and Panagiotou A D 1997
500: J. Phys. G 23 1921
501: \bibitem{7} Kapoyannis A S, Ktorides C N and Panagiotou A D 1998
502: Phys. Rev. D 58 034009
503: \bibitem{8} Kapoyannis A S, Ktorides C N and Panagiotou A D 1998
504: Phys. Rev. C 58 2879
505: \bibitem{9} Kapoyannis A S, Ktorides C N and Panagiotou A D 2000
506: Eur. Rhys. J. C 14 299
507: \bibitem{10} Letessier J and Tounsi A 1988 Nuovo Cimento 99A 521
508: \bibitem{11} Hagedorn R 1983 Z. Phys. C 17 265
509: \bibitem{12} Fiore R, Hagedorn R and d' Isep F 1985 Nuovo Cimento 88A 301
510: \bibitem{13} Rafelski J and Hagedorn R: From hadron gas to quark matter II.
511: In: Statistical mechanics of quarks and hadrons, H. Satz (Ed.), Amsterdam:
512: North Holland 1981
513: \bibitem{14} Cheuk-Yin Wong: Introduction to High-Energy Heavy-Ion Collisions,
514: World Scientific Publishing 1994
515: \bibitem{15} Haxton W C and Heller L 1980 Phys. Rev. D 22 1198;
516: Hasenfratz P, Horgan R R, Kuti J and Richard J M 1981 Phys. Lett. 95 B 199
517: \bibitem{16} Fodor Z and Katz S D, hep-lat/0106002
518: \bibitem{17} Karsch F, Laermann E and Peikert A 2000 Phys. Lett. 478 B
519: 447
520: \end{thebibliography}
521:
522:
523: {\bf Figure Captions}
524: \newtheorem{f}{Figure}
525: \begin{f}
526: \rm Isotherm pressure-volume curve for SBM and IHG (both with Van der Waals
527: volume corrections using the pressure ensemble). $B$ is constant.
528: \end{f}
529: \begin{f}
530: \rm Three isotherm pressure-volume curves for Hadron Gas (using SBM) and QGP
531: phase (using partition function including $u$, $d$ and $s$ quarks at
532: their current masses and $a_s=0$). The low temperature isotherm
533: needs Maxwell construction, the middle temperature isotherm corresponds
534: to critical point and the high temperature isotherm corresponds to
535: crossover. $B$ is constant.
536: \end{f}
537: \begin{f}
538: \rm A similar case as in Figure 2. The boundaries of Maxwell construction
539: are displayed with the slashed line.
540: \end{f}
541: \begin{f}
542: \rm The baryon density at the critical point versus the critical
543: temperature for different values of $B$ and for different types of the QGP
544: partition function.
545: \end{f}
546: \begin{f}
547: \rm The critical temperature as a function of the MIT bag constant
548: for different types of the QGP partition function.
549: \end{f}
550: \begin{f}
551: \rm Critical temperature versus critical baryon chemical
552: potential for different values of $B$ and for different types of QGP
553: partition functions. The bootstrap singularity lines for maximum and
554: minimum values of $B$, as well as, the critical points corresponding to
555: these values (filled circles) are also displayed.
556: \end{f}
557:
558:
559: \vspace{3cm}
560: \begin{center}
561: \begin{tabular}{|cccc|} \hline
562: $B^{1/4}$ (MeV) & $\nu_{b\;cr.p.}$ (fm$^{-3}$) & $T_c$ (MeV) &
563: $\mu_c$ (MeV) \\ \hline
564: \multicolumn{4}{|c|}{$a_s=0$, $m_u=m_d=0$, $s$-quarks not included} \\ \hline
565: 235 & 0.2158 & 171.2 & 299.4 \\
566: 180 & 0.1361 & 127.9 & 544.5 \\
567: 145 & 0.0690 & 102.6 & 623.4 \\ \hline
568: \multicolumn{4}{|c|}{$a_s=0$, $m_u=5.6$ MeV, $m_d=9.9$ MeV, $m_s=199$ MeV} \\ \hline
569: 235 & 0.3110 & 159.1 & 451.1 \\
570: 180 & 0.1489 & 121.2 & 598.6 \\
571: 145 & 0.0721 & 98.4 & 651.9 \\ \hline
572: \end{tabular}
573: \end{center}
574:
575: \begin{center}
576: Table 1.
577: \end{center}
578:
579:
580: {\bf Table Caption}
581: \newtheorem{g}{Table}
582: \begin{g}
583: \rm Some values for the position of the critical point for different values
584: of $B$ and different QGP partition functions.
585: \end{g}
586:
587:
588: \end{document}
589: