1: \documentclass[12pt]{article}
2: \pagestyle{empty}
3: % \pagestyle{plain}
4:
5: \usepackage[dvips]{graphicx}
6: \usepackage{epsfig}
7:
8:
9: \setlength{\topmargin}{0mm}
10: \setlength{\headheight}{0mm}
11: \setlength{\headsep}{0mm}
12: \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-5mm}
13: \setlength{\evensidemargin}{-5mm}
14: \setlength{\textheight}{246mm}
15: \setlength{\textwidth}{169mm}
16: \setlength{\footskip}{13mm}
17:
18:
19:
20:
21: %=========================================================================
22: %Young tableaux macros
23: %=========================================================================
24:
25: %Fundamental
26: \def\fund{ \> {\vcenter {\vbox
27: {\hrule height.6pt
28: \hbox {\vrule width.6pt height5pt
29: \kern5pt
30: \vrule width.6pt height5pt}
31: \hrule height.6pt}
32: }
33: }
34: \>\> }
35:
36:
37: %Anti-fundamental
38: \def\afund{ \> \overline{ {\vcenter {\vbox
39: {\hrule height.6pt
40: \hbox {\vrule width.6pt height5pt
41: \kern5pt
42: \vrule width.6pt height5pt}
43: \hrule height.6pt}
44: }
45: } }
46: \>\> }
47:
48:
49: %Symmetric
50: \def\sym{ \> {\vcenter {\vbox
51: {\hrule height.6pt
52: \hbox {\vrule width.6pt height5pt
53: \kern5pt
54: \vrule width.6pt height5pt
55: \kern5pt
56: \vrule width.6pt height5pt}
57: \hrule height.6pt}
58: }
59: }
60: \>\> }
61:
62:
63: %Symbar
64: \def\symbar{ \> \overline{ {\vcenter {\vbox
65: {\hrule height.6pt
66: \hbox {\vrule width.6pt height5pt
67: \kern5pt
68: \vrule width.6pt height5pt
69: \kern5pt
70: \vrule width.6pt height5pt}
71: \hrule height.6pt}
72: }
73: } }
74: \>\> }
75:
76:
77: %Antisym
78: \def\asym{ \> {\vcenter {\vbox
79: {\hrule height.6pt
80: \hbox {\vrule width.6pt height5pt
81: \kern5pt
82: \vrule width.6pt height5pt}
83: \hrule height.6pt
84: \hbox {\vrule width.6pt height5pt
85: \kern5pt
86: \vrule width.6pt height5pt}
87: \hrule height.6pt}
88: }
89: }
90: \>\> }
91:
92:
93: %Antisymbar
94: \def\asymbar{ \> \overline{ {\vcenter {\vbox
95: {\hrule height.6pt
96: \hbox {\vrule width.6pt height5pt
97: \kern5pt
98: \vrule width.6pt height5pt}
99: \hrule height.6pt
100: \hbox {\vrule width.6pt height5pt
101: \kern5pt
102: \vrule width.6pt height5pt}
103: \hrule height.6pt}
104: }
105: } }
106: \>\> }
107:
108: %======================================================================
109:
110: \begin{document}
111:
112: \baselineskip 6.2mm % mark
113: \begin{center}
114: {\Large \bf
115: Color Superconductivity via Supersymmetry\footnote{Talk
116: presented by N.M. at YITP workshop on Fundamental Problems and Applications
117: of Quantum Field Theory, December 16-18, 2004,
118: Yukawa Institute for Theoretical Physics, Kyoto, Japan
119: and at 2004 International Workshop on Dynamical Symmetry Breaking,
120: December 21-22, 2004, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan.}
121: }
122: \end{center}
123: %\hfill
124: \begin{center}
125: {\large Nobuhito Maru\footnote{e-mail:
126: maru@riken.jp,} and Motoi Tachibana\footnote{e-mail: motoi@riken.jp}
127: }
128: \end{center}
129: \begin{center}
130: Theoretical Physics Laboratory, RIKEN \\
131: 2-1 Hirosawa, Wako, Saitama, 351-0198, JAPAN \\
132: \end{center}
133: \abstract{
134: In this talk,
135: a supersymmetric (SUSY) composite model of color superconductivity is discussed.
136: In this model, quark and diquark supermultiplets are dynamically generated
137: as massless composites by a newly introduced confining gauge dynamics.
138: It is analytically shown that the scalar component of diquark supermultiplets
139: develops vacuum expectation value (VEV) at a certain critical chemical potential.
140: We believe that our model well captures
141: aspects of the diquark condensate behavior
142: and helps our understanding of its dynamics in real QCD.
143: The results obtained here might be useful when we consider a theory
144: composed of quarks and diquarks.
145: }
146:
147: \normalsize\baselineskip=15pt
148:
149: \section{Introduction}
150: There has been much attention to color superconductivity conjectured
151: to appear in QCD at high baryon density \cite{CSC}.
152: Conjectured phase diagram is shown in Fig \ref{fig:phase}.
153: Previous studies of QCD with this direction
154: were limited to very high density
155: where the theory is perturbative because of the asymptotic freedom \cite{son}.
156: But our interest is the low energy physics
157: where the theory is strongly coupled.
158: Therefore, it would be interesting to find QCD-like theories
159: calculable even at lower density,
160: namely in the strong coupling regime.
161: In this viewpoint, Nambu-Jona-Lasino model has been well studied
162: by many people \cite{NJL}.
163:
164:
165: Recently, another approach using a SUSY gauge theory was proposed \cite{HLM},
166: where the breaking pattern of global symmetries in a softly broken SUSY QCD
167: at finite chemical potential was investigated
168: and compared to that obtained from the analysis via
169: nonsupersymmetric QCD \cite{schafer}.
170: In particular, the phase structure associated with
171: baryon number symmetry $U(1)_B$ was extensively studied.
172: However, the color {\it variant} quantity such as diquark
173: responsible for color superconductivity was not included
174: in the low energy effective theory.
175: Therefore, we should somehow extend their analysis
176: to have diquark degrees of freedom.
177: In the light of this fact,
178: we propose here a SUSY model of color superconductivity
179: where quarks and diquarks are dynamically generated as composites
180: by a newly introduced strong gauge dynamics \cite{MT}.
181:
182: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
183: \begin{figure}[b]
184: \begin{center}
185: \includegraphics[width=7cm,height=4cm]{paper.eps}
186: \end{center}
187: \caption{\label{fig:phase}
188: (Conjectured) phase diagram of hot and dense quark matter.}
189: \end{figure}
190: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
191:
192:
193:
194:
195: \section{Model}
196: Our model is based on an ${\cal N}=1$ SUSY $SO(N_c)$ gauge theory
197: with $N_f(=N_c-4)$ flavors \cite{IS}.
198: The flavor symmetry in the original model $SU(N_f)$ is extended
199: to $SU(3)_C \times SU(N_f)_L \times SU(N_f)_R$,
200: where $SU(3)_C$ is a usual color gauge group and is assumed to
201: be weakly gauged compared to $SO(N_c = 6N_f + 5)$ gauge group,
202: $SU(N_f)_L \times SU(N_f)_R$ is a chiral symmetry.
203: Matter content of the supermultiplets is summarized below;
204: %
205: \begin{eqnarray}
206: \label{elementary}
207: Q &=& (\fund, \fund, \fund, {\bf 1})_{1,1,1}, \\
208: \bar{Q} &=& (\fund, \afund, {\bf 1}, \afund)_{-1,1,1}, \\
209: X &=& (\fund, {\bf 1}, {\bf 1}, {\bf 1})_{0, -6 N_f, 3 - N}
210: \end{eqnarray}
211: %
212: where the representations in the parenthesis are transformation properties
213: under the group $SO(6N_f+5) \times SU(3)_C \times SU(N_f)_L \times SU(N_f)_R$.
214: The numbers in the subscripts are charges for nonanomalous $U(1)$
215: global symmetries $U(1)_B \times U(1)_A \times U(1)_R$,
216: which each $U(1)$ symmetry is linear combination of
217: the original anomalous $U(1)$ symmetries.
218:
219:
220: $SO$ gauge theory mentioned above is known to be
221: in the cofining phase \cite{IS}.
222: Massless degrees of freedom describing the low energy effective theory
223: below the dynamical scale $\Lambda_{SO}$ are given
224: by the following gauge invariant composite superfields:
225: %
226: \begin{eqnarray}
227: \label{comp1}
228: (Q^2) &=& (\afund, \asym, {\bf 1})_{2, 2, 2}, (\sym, \sym, {\bf 1})_{2,2,2}, \\
229: (\bar{Q}^2) &=& (\fund, {\bf 1}, \overline{\asym})_{-2, 2, 2},
230: (\overline{\sym}, {\bf 1}, \overline{\sym})_{-2,2,2}, \\
231: (X^2) &=& ({\bf 1}, {\bf 1}, {\bf 1})_{0, -12N_f, 6 - 2N}, \\
232: (QX) &=& (\fund, \fund, {\bf 1})_{1, 1 - 6N_f, 4 - N}, \\
233: (\bar{Q}X) &=& (\afund, {\bf 1}, \afund)_{-1, 1 - 6N_f, 4 - N}, \\
234: \label{comp2}
235: (Q\bar{Q}) &=& ({\bf 1}, \fund, \afund)_{0,2,2},
236: ({\bf 8}, \fund, \afund)_{0, 2, 2}
237: \end{eqnarray}
238: %
239: where the representations in the parenthesis are
240: those under the group $SU(3)_C \times SU(N_f)_L \times SU(N_f)_R$.
241: The numbers in the subscripts are charges for nonanomalous $U(1)$ symmetries
242: $U(1)_B \times U(1)_A \times U(1)_R$.
243: Note that $Q^2(\bar{Q}^2)$ has symmetric (its conjugate) and anti-symmetric
244: (its conjugate) representations
245: under $SU(3)_C \times SU(N_f)_L \times SU(N_f)_R$
246: because $SO(N)$ indices are contracted
247: symmetrically and the superfields are bosonic.
248: One can see from the transformation properties
249: that superfields with anti-symmetric representation
250: in $Q^2$ and $\bar{Q}^2$ correspond to ``diquark" supermultiplet and
251: $QX$ and $\bar{Q}X$ correspond to ``quark" supermultiplet.
252: Thus, quark and diquark supermultiplets are generated as composites and
253: coexist in the low energy theory.
254: What is more nontrivial is that these composites satisfy
255: t' Hooft anomaly matching conditions, which implies that
256: massless degrees of freedom are completely determined
257: despite the strong coupling in the infrared below the scale $\Lambda_{SO}$.
258:
259:
260: Incorpolating the chemical potential can be regarded
261: as the time component of a fictitious gauge field of
262: $U(1)_B$ symmetry at zero temperature.
263: For fermion field,
264: it is described as
265: \begin{eqnarray}
266: {\cal L}_{\psi} = i\bar{\psi} \partial \!\!\!/ \psi, \quad
267: \Delta{\cal L} = \mu \psi^\dag \psi = \mu \bar{\psi} \gamma^0 \psi
268: \Rightarrow {\cal L}_{\psi} + \Delta{\cal L}
269: = i\bar{\psi} (\partial \!\!\!/ -igA \!\!\!/) \psi,
270: \end{eqnarray}
271: where $A_\nu = {\rm diag}(\mu/g,0,0,0)$,
272: $g$ is the gauge coupling constant of $U(1)_B$.
273: Since we are considering a SUSY theory, the corresponding argument
274: for scalar fields is present,
275: \begin{eqnarray}
276: {\cal L}_{\phi} + \Delta{\cal L} =
277: (\partial^\nu -ig A^\nu)^\dag \phi^\dag (\partial_\nu - ig A_\nu) \phi.
278: \end{eqnarray}
279: We notice that the above scalar Lagrangian with the finite chemical potential
280: includes a SUSY breaking scalar mass term $+ \mu^2 \phi^\dag \phi$.
281: Therefore, we impose the condition $\mu < \Lambda_{SO}$
282: since we can utilize exact results in SUSY gauge theory reliably.
283: Furthermore, the SUSY breaking scalar mass squared is found to be negative,
284: namely tachyon, which implies that UV theory is unstable.
285: In order to avoid this situation, we have to add
286: both (positive) SUSY breaking mass in the potential
287: and SUSY mass in the superpotential.\footnote{The same symbols
288: for the superfields and the corresponding scalar components are used.}
289: \begin{eqnarray}
290: \Delta W_{{\rm SUSY}} &=& m_{ij} \bar{Q}_i Q_j
291: \Rightarrow \Delta V_{{\rm SUSY}} = m^2 (|Q|^2 + |\bar{Q}|^2), \\
292: \Delta V_{{\rm SUSY~breaking}} &=& m^2_{{\rm soft}} (|Q|^2 + |\bar{Q}|^2),
293: \end{eqnarray}
294: which results in the following UV potential
295: \begin{eqnarray}
296: V_{{\rm UV}} &=&
297: (m^2 + m^2_{{\rm soft}} - \mu^2)(|Q|^2 + |\bar{Q}|^2).
298: \end{eqnarray}
299: As will be shown later, the critical chemical potential
300: where the color superconductivity happens is larger
301: than the soft SUSY breaking mass.
302: Thus, we need to add SUSY masses in the superpotential and
303: have to impose the condition $m^2 + m^2_{{\rm soft}} - \mu^2 > 0$
304: to obtain the UV stable potential.
305:
306:
307: The low energy superpotential is generated by the gaugino condensation
308: in the unbroken gauge group $SO(4) \simeq SU(2)_L \times SU(2)_R$,
309: \begin{eqnarray}
310: W_{{\rm eff}}
311: = 2(\epsilon_L + \epsilon_R)
312: \left( \frac{\Lambda_{SO(N)}^{6N_f+4}}{[{\rm det}(Q\bar{Q})] X}
313: \right)
314: \end{eqnarray}
315: where $\epsilon_{L,R} = \pm 1$ are phase factors reflecting
316: the number of SUSY vacua suggested from Witten index \cite{Witten}.
317: There are two physically inequivalent branches,
318: one is $W_{{\rm eff}} = 0(\epsilon_L = -\epsilon_R)$
319: and the other is $W_{{\rm eff}} \ne 0(\epsilon_L = \epsilon_R)$.
320: Here, we focus on the former case throughout this article,
321: which is relevant for the color supercoductivity.
322:
323:
324: In order to obtain the scalar potential,
325: we need K\"ahler potential for composite fields.
326: It is impossible to determine the K\"ahler potential exactly
327: because of its nonholomorphicity,
328: but the leading term can be fixed by using the argument of
329: analytic continuation into superspace \cite{AR} in the expansion of
330: the SUSY breaking scale to $\Lambda_{SO}$.
331: The effective K\"ahler potential for composite fields
332: is fixed by symmetries
333: and the renormalization group (RG) invariance,
334: \begin{eqnarray}
335: \label{effkahler}
336: K_{{\rm eff}} &=& c_{(Q^2)} \frac{{\cal Z}_{(Q^2)}}{I} (Q^2)^\dag e^{2V_B} (Q^2)
337: + c_{(\bar{Q}^2)} \frac{{\cal Z}_{(\bar{Q}^2)}}{I}
338: (\bar{Q}^2)^\dag e^{-2V_B} (\bar{Q}^2) \nonumber \\
339: &+& c_{(X^2)} \frac{{\cal Z}_{(X^2)}}{I} (X^2)^\dag (X^2)
340: + c_{(QX)} \frac{{\cal Z}_{(QX)}}{I} (QX)^\dag e^{V_B} (QX) \nonumber \\
341: &+& c_{(\bar{Q}X)} \frac{{\cal Z}_{(\bar{Q}X)}}{I}
342: (\bar{Q}X)^\dag e^{-V_B} (\bar{Q}X)
343: + c_{(Q\bar{Q})} \frac{{\cal Z}_{(Q\bar{Q})}}{I} (Q\bar{Q})^\dag (Q\bar{Q}),
344: \end{eqnarray}
345: where overall coefficients $c$'s are
346: of order ${\cal O}(1)$ unknown constants.
347: The exponential factors for QCD are suppressed.
348: $V_B$ is a background vector superfield $U(1)_B$ with a VEV
349: $\langle V_B \rangle = \bar{\theta} \sigma^\mu \theta
350: \langle A_\mu \rangle, \quad \langle A_\mu \rangle = (\mu/g_B,0,0,0)$.
351: $g_B$ is a gauge coupling constant and
352: $\mu$ is a chemical potential.
353: Wave function renomalization constants $Z_i$ are promoted
354: to a superfield ${\cal Z}_i$
355: %
356: \begin{equation}
357: {\cal Z}_i = Z_i \left[ 1 - \theta^2 \bar{\theta}^2 m_{{\rm soft}}^2
358: \right]
359: \end{equation}
360: %
361: where $m_{{\rm soft}}$ is a soft SUSY breaking scalar mass in the UV
362: and taken to be universal.
363: The quantity $I$ is a spurious $U(1)$ symmetry and the RG invariant
364: superfield,
365: %
366: \begin{equation}
367: \label{invI}
368: I = \Lambda_h^\dag {\cal Z}^{2T/b_0} \Lambda_h
369: \end{equation}
370: where $T$ is the total Dynkin index of the matter fields,
371: $b_0$ is the 1-loop beta function coefficient and
372: $\Lambda_h = \mu_{UV} {\rm exp}[-8 \pi^2 S(\mu_{UV})/b_0],
373: S(\mu_{UV}) = \frac{1}{g^2}\left( 1+ \theta^2 \frac{m_\lambda}{2}\right)
374: (m_\lambda: {\rm gaugino~mass})$.
375: Note that a spurious $U(1)$ transformations are given by
376: \begin{eqnarray}
377: &&Q_r \to e^A Q_r, {\cal Z}_r \to e^{A+A^\dag}{\cal Z}_r, \\
378: &&S(\mu_{{\rm UV}}) \to S(\mu_{{\rm UV}})-\frac{T}{4\pi^2}A
379: \end{eqnarray}
380: %
381: where $A$ is a chiral superfield.
382:
383:
384: Now, we are ready to obtain scalar masses for composites
385: from the above K\"ahler potential,
386: \begin{eqnarray}
387: \label{scalar1}
388: \tilde{m}^2_{(Q^2)} = \tilde{m}^2_{(\bar{Q}^2)} &=& \frac{6N_f + 7}{2(3N_f + 2)}
389: m_{{\rm soft}}^2 -\mu^2, \\
390: \label{scalar2}
391: \tilde{m}^2_{(X^2)} = \tilde{m}^2_{(Q\bar{Q})} &=& \frac{6N_f + 7}{2(3N_f + 2)}
392: m^2_{{\rm soft}} > 0, \\
393: \label{scalar3}
394: \tilde{m}^2_{(QX)} = \tilde{m}^2_{(\bar{Q}X)} &=& \frac{6N_f + 7}{2(3N_f + 2)}
395: m_{{\rm soft}}^2 - \frac{1}{4} \mu^2.
396: \end{eqnarray}
397: One can see that $\tilde{m}^2_{(Q^2)} = \tilde{m}^2_{(\bar{Q}^2)} < 0$
398: if the chemical potential is larger than some critical value
399: $\mu > \mu_* \equiv \sqrt{\frac{6N_f + 7}{2(3N_f + 2)}} m_{{\rm soft}}$.
400: Thus, the diquarks condensate at the finite chemical potential,
401: but the condensate is the scalar component of the diquark supermultiplet.
402:
403:
404: The above argument for the behavior of the scalar component of
405: the diquark supermultiplet is valid for the vanishing superpotential case.
406: For the case with nonvanishing superpotetial, on the other hand,
407: it is found that the scalar potential is very complicated,
408: %
409: \begin{eqnarray}
410: \label{potential}
411: V &=& \left( \frac{\partial^2 K_{{\rm eff}}}{\partial \Phi_i \partial \Phi^*_j}
412: \right)^{-1} \left( \frac{\partial W_{{\rm eff}}}{\partial \Phi_i} \right)
413: \left( \frac{\partial W^*_{{\rm eff}}}{\partial \Phi^*_j} \right)
414: \Lambda^2_{SO(N)} \nonumber \\
415: &+& \frac{1}{\Lambda^2_{SO(N)}} \left[
416: \tilde{m}^2_{(Q^2)}|(Q^2)|^2 + \tilde{m}^2_{(\bar{Q}^2)} |(\bar{Q}^2)|^2
417: \right. \nonumber \\
418: &+& \left. \tilde{m}^2_{(X^2)} |(X^2)|^2
419: + \tilde{m}^2_{(QX)} |(QX)|^2
420: + \tilde{m}^2_{(\bar{Q}X)} |(\bar{Q}X)|^2
421: + \tilde{m}^2_{(Q\bar{Q})} |(Q\bar{Q})|^2 \right]
422: \end{eqnarray}
423: %
424: where $\Phi_i$ denote the scalar component of composite superfields.
425: $W_{{\rm eff}}$ includes SUSY mass terms.
426: Therefore, we give here a qualitative discussion
427: on the scalar potential behavior
428: instead of an explicit minimization of the scalar potential.
429: Note that F-term contributions to the scalar potential
430: in the first line have a runaway behavior,
431: which make the fields VEV away from the origin.
432: For $\mu=0$, all SUSY breaking scalar mass squareds are positive,
433: which set the fields VEV at the origin.
434: Therefore all composites are expected to develop nonvanishing VEVs
435: by balancing terms between the runaway potential
436: and the SUSY breaking scalar mass terms.
437: Even if we take into account that
438: the scalar diquark mass squareds become negative for $\mu > \mu_*$,
439: qualitative features of phase transition remains unchanged.
440: In any case, the case of nonzero superpotential
441: is irrelevant to the phase of color superconductivity of our interest.
442: Even if we compare the vacuum energy in both cases,
443: the case with vanishing superpotential seems to be energetically favored.
444:
445:
446: \section{Summary}
447: We have proposed a SUSY composite model of color superconductivity,
448: which is based on a SUSY $SO(N_f+4)$ gauge theory with $N_f$ flavors.
449: This model is in the confining phase in the infrared region and
450: qurak and diquark supermultilets are dynamically generated
451: as massless degrees of freedom by a newly introduced $SO$
452: strong gauge dynamics.
453: Remarkably, massless degrees of freedom
454: below the confining scale are completely determined
455: since all independent composites satisfy anomaly matching conditions.
456:
457:
458: We have analytically shown that the scalar component of
459: the diquark supermultiplets develop VEV at some critical chemical potential.
460: The schematic picture of phase diagram is shown in Fig \ref{fig:scale}.
461: Although the model is not fully realistic
462: in that the scalar component of diquark supermultiplet
463: (not diquarks themselves) condense,
464: we believe that it well captures some important
465: aspects of the diquark condensation behavior and helps our
466: understanding for the color superconductivity in real QCD.
467: If there is a certain intermediate region of the chemical potential
468: where quarks are deconfined but not superconducting yet,
469: owing to the strong quark-quark correlation, the system may be
470: well described by a compositon of quarks and diquarks. Then
471: the analysis performed in this paper will help us with
472: comprehending the behavior of such a system.
473:
474:
475: As future directions,
476: it is interesting to extend our analysis to different flavor cases.
477: In particular, Seiberg dual description \cite{Seiberg}
478: might give a better understanding
479: of color superconductivity.
480: In order to fully understand the phase structure of QCD,
481: it is necessary to take into account the finite temperature effects
482: and then to study the scalar component of the diquark supermultiplet
483: condensation behavior on the temperature-chemical potential plane
484: as shown in Fig \ref{fig:phase}.
485:
486: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
487: \begin{figure}
488: \begin{center}
489: \includegraphics[width=13cm,height=3cm]{scale.eps}
490: \end{center}
491: \caption{\label{fig:scale} Relation among various scales are displayed.
492: Horizontal axis means the energy scale.
493: The possible range of the chemical potential is
494: %from SUSY breaking mass scalae $m_{{\rm soft}}$
495: below $\sqrt{m^2 + m^2_{{\rm soft}}}$.
496: There is no condensation when the chemical potential is
497: between QCD scale $\Lambda_{{\rm SU(3)}}$ and
498: the critical chemical potential $\mu_*$.
499: The condensation of the scalar component of the diquark supermultiplet
500: occurs when the chemical potential is
501: between $\mu_*$ and $\sqrt{m^2 + m^2_{{\rm soft}}}$.
502: UV theory becomes unstable if the chemical potetntial
503: is beyond the scale $\sqrt{m^2 + m^2_{{\rm soft}}}$.}
504: \end{figure}
505: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
506:
507:
508: \vspace*{1cm}
509:
510: \begin{center}
511: {\bf Acknowledgments}
512: \end{center}
513: We would like to thank the organizers of the workshop for giving us
514: an opportunity to present this talk.
515: We are supported
516: by Special Postdoctoral Researchers Program at RIKEN
517: (No.~A12-52040(N.M.) and No.~A12-52010(M.T.)).
518:
519:
520:
521: \bibliographystyle{plain}
522: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
523: %
524: \bibitem{CSC}
525: D.~Bailin and A.~Love,
526: Phys. Rep. {\bf 107}, 325 (1984);
527: M.~Iwasaki and T.~Iwado,
528: Phys. Lett. B {\bf 350}, 163 (1995);
529: M.~Alford, K.~Rajagopal and F.~Wilczek,
530: Phys. Lett. B {\bf 422}, 247 (1998) [arXiv:hep-ph/9711395];
531: R.~Rapp, T.~Schafer, E.~V.~Shuryak, and M.~Velkovsky,
532: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 81}, 53 (1998) [arXiv:hep-ph/9711396].
533:
534: \bibitem{son}
535: D.~T.~Son,
536: Phys. Rev. {\bf D59}, 094019 (1999) [arXiv:hep-ph/9812287].
537:
538: \bibitem{NJL}
539: For instance, see
540: M.~Kitazawa, T.~Koide, T.~Kunihiro and Y.~Nemoto,
541: Prog. Theor. Phys. {\bf 108}, 929 (2002) [arXiv:hep-ph/0207255].
542:
543: \bibitem{HLM}
544: R. Harnik, D. Larson and H. Murayama,
545: ``Supersymmetric Color Superconductivity",
546: JHEP 0403 (2004) 049.
547:
548: \bibitem{schafer}
549: T. Schafer,
550: Nucl. Phys. B {\bf 575}, 269 (2000) [arXiv:hep-ph/9909574];
551: T. Schafer,
552: Phys. Rev. {\bf D62}, 094007 (2000) [arXiv:hep-ph/0006034].
553:
554: \bibitem{MT}
555: N. Maru and M. Tachibana,
556: ``Color Superconductivity from Supersymmetry'',
557: hep-ph/0411079.
558:
559: \bibitem{IS}
560: K.A. Intriligator and N. Seiberg,
561: ``Duality, monopoles, dyons, confinement and oblique confinement
562: in supersymmetric SO(N(c)) gauge theories,''
563: Nucl. Phys. {\bf B444} (1995) 125.
564:
565: \bibitem{Witten}
566: E.~Witten,
567: %``Constraints On Supersymmetry Breaking,''
568: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 202}, 253 (1982).
569:
570: \bibitem{AR}
571: N.~Arkani-Hamed and R.~Rattazzi,
572: %``Exact results for non-holomorphic masses in softly broken
573: %supersymmetric gauge theories,''
574: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 454}, 290 (1999) [arXiv:hep-th/9804068].
575:
576: \bibitem{Seiberg}
577: N.~Seiberg,
578: %``Electric - magnetic duality in supersymmetric nonAbelian gauge theories,''
579: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 435}, 129 (1995) [arXiv:hep-th/9411149].
580: \end{thebibliography}
581:
582:
583: \end{document}
584:
585: