1: \documentclass[12pt]{article}
2: \usepackage[dvips]{graphicx}
3: \usepackage{color}
4: \usepackage{amsfonts,amssymb}
5: \textheight 240mm
6: \textwidth 160mm
7: \hoffset -1.0cm
8: \voffset -2.0cm
9:
10: \pagenumbering{arabic}
11: \setcounter{page}{1}
12:
13: \begin{document}
14:
15: \vspace*{1cm}
16: \begin{center}
17: {\Large \bf The WA56 Experiment at CERN: How Does It Look\\[1ex]
18: in the Unified Picture for Hadron Spectra?}\\
19:
20: \vspace{4mm}
21:
22: {\large A. A. Arkhipov\footnote{e-mail: arkhipov@mx.ihep.su}\\
23: {\it State Research Center ``Institute for High Energy Physics" \\
24: 142281 Protvino, Moscow Region, Russia}}\\
25: \end{center}
26:
27: \vspace{2mm}
28: \begin{abstract}
29: In this note we demonstrate how the experimental material taken from
30: WA56 Experiment at CERN looks in the recently developed unified
31: picture for hadron spectra. Our analysis shows that baryonium states
32: observed in the WA56 Experiment are the states living in the
33: corresponding KK tower built in according to the earlier established
34: general, physical law.
35: \end{abstract}
36:
37: \section*{}
38:
39: There were several experiments made with the CERN OMEGA spectrometer.
40: The WA56 Experiment was one of them especially performed to study the
41: baryon exchange processes among hadronic reactions. Perhaps, it
42: should be reminded about an old and long-standing problem of narrow
43: $pp$ (dibaryon) states and $p\bar p$ (baryonium) states. In old, up
44: to the end of the eighties, issues of PDG booklets \cite{1} we can
45: find a separate parts with a compilation of these states. However,
46: that compilation has been rejected by PDG later on probably because
47: several experiments made in the beginning and the middle of the
48: eighties had failed to search for these states. That is why, it might
49: seem the interest to these states disappeared. However, this is not
50: the case. In fact, up to now, narrow dibaryon and baryonium states in
51: two-nucleon system have always attracted incessant interest from both
52: theorists and experimenters. The physical origin of such narrow
53: states is high interest because it has fundamental importance related
54: to the nature of fundamental nucleon-nucleon forces.
55:
56: We start with a short review of some known experimental studies
57: devoted entirely to search for narrow $p\bar p$ states. In paper
58: \cite{2} an evidence for two narrow $p\bar p$ resonances at 2020 MeV
59: and 2200 MeV had been reported. From the study of the reaction
60: $\pi^-p\rightarrow p_f\pi^-p\bar p$ using a fast proton trigger
61: device in the CERN OMEGA spectrometer, these two narrow $p\bar p$
62: states were observed mainly in association with a $\Delta^0$(1232)
63: and $N^*$(1520) production in top vertex of the baryon exchange
64: diagram (see Fig. 1a). The statistical significance of each peak was
65: greater than 6 standard deviations. Masses and natural widths of
66: these resonances were respectively $M_1$ = 2020 $\pm$ 3 MeV,
67: $\Gamma_1$ = 24 $\pm$ 12 MeV and $M_2$ = 2204 $\pm$ 5 MeV, $\Gamma_2$
68: = 16 $^{+20}_{-16}$ MeV. The upper limits to the production cross
69: sections were estimated about $\sim$10-30 nb. These results were part
70: of a general experiment made with the CERN OMEGA spectrometer and
71: came from a special experiment devoted to a general study of the
72: baryon exchange processes in the reaction chain
73: \begin{equation}
74: \pi^- + p \to \Delta^{0}(1232)[N^{*}(1520)] + M^0 , \quad\
75: \Delta^{0}(1232)[N^{*}(1520)]\to p\pi^- , \quad M^0\to p\bar p.
76: \label{barexch}
77: \end{equation}
78: The experiment was done with a $\pi^-$ beam at an incident momentum 9
79: and 12 GeV colliding with a hydrogen target. The trigger required a
80: fast proton emitted forward with a momentum greater than
81: 0.5$p_{\,beam}$. A complete description of this experiment and the
82: details of analysis can be found in original paper \cite{2} and
83: references therein.
84:
85: The results of a search for narrow $p\bar p$ states produced in the
86: baryon exchange reaction with a chain
87: \begin{equation}
88: \pi^+ + p \to \Delta_f^{++}(1232) + X^0 , \quad\
89: \Delta_f^{++}(1232)\to p_f\pi^+ , \quad X^0\to p\bar p
90: \label{barexchBNL}
91: \end{equation}
92: at $p_{\,beam}^{\pi^+}$ = 9.8 GeV have been reported in Ref.
93: \cite{3}. As pointed out, this channel provided an enhanced
94: sensitivity to such states compared with reaction (\ref{barexch})
95: studied in Ref. \cite{2}. The multiparticle spectrometer (MPS) at the
96: Brookhaven National Laboratory alternating-gradient synchrotron was
97: used to detect all four charged tracks from reaction
98: (\ref{barexchBNL}). No evidence for narrow $p\bar p$ states at the
99: 20--30 nb level in the mass range 1.9--2.3 GeV was found. It was also
100: emphasized that, assuming a nucleon-exchange production mechanism,
101: the states which have been reported in Ref. \cite{2} would appear as
102: $>$ 5 standard- deviation peaks in the recorded data sample with the
103: trigger required a forward particle with momentum $\geq$ 5.5 GeV.
104:
105: The $p\bar p$ mass spectrum was also measured in another experiment
106: \cite{4} at the Brookhaven National Laboratory alternating-gradient
107: synchrotron where the inclusive reaction $\pi^- + p(or\, C)\to p\bar
108: p + X^0$ had been studied. No statistically significant enhancements
109: in the data in the $p\bar p$ mass range from 2000 to 2400 MeV were
110: observed.
111:
112: A search was made for baryonium production in $p\bar p$ and $K^-p$
113: interactions at 12 GeV in the experiment \cite{5} which was performed
114: using the OMEGA spectrometer at CERN, exposed to the separated beam
115: consisting of approximately 45\% antiprotons, 15\% negative kaons and
116: 40\% negative pions. No significant structures in the mass spectra of
117: $p\bar p$, $p\bar p\pi^-$ and $\bar p\Lambda^0$ systems were seen.
118: The upper limit at the 99.5\% confidence level for production of
119: narrow states in the $p\bar p$ system in the mass range 2.0--2.2 GeV
120: was estimated about $\sim$40 nb.
121:
122: It should also be mentioned that the negative results on backward
123: production, via baryon exchange, of exotic non-strange mesons were
124: presented in article \cite{6}. The reactions $\pi^-p\to
125: p_{forward}X^-$ and $\pi^-n\to p_{forward}X^{--}$ have been studied
126: with a 12 GeV $\pi^-$ beam in the OMEGA spectrometer at CERN. No
127: resonant peak in $X\to p\bar p\pi^-,\, p\bar p\pi^-\pi^-,\, p\bar
128: p\pi^-\pi^0,\,$ $\pi^+\pi^-\pi^-\pi^-,\, \pi^+\pi^-\pi^-\pi^0$ has
129: been seen. The upper limits obtained on cross sections for exotic
130: meson production $X\to N\bar N\pi,\, N\bar N\pi\pi,\, 4\pi$ were
131: lower than the $\rho^-$ backward production cross section in the $\pi
132: p\to p\rho^-$ reaction. As pointed out, the sensitivity of this
133: experiment increased by an order of amplitude compared to earlier
134: published experiments in the search for exotics produced via baryon
135: exchange.
136:
137: The WA56 experiment at CERN \cite{7} was also one of the experiments
138: made with the OMEGA spectrometer specially designed to select the
139: baryon exchange processes. It was a long-range aim of the WA56
140: experiment to confirm the narrow $p\bar p$ states of masses 2020 MeV
141: and 2204 MeV reported in paper \cite{2}. However, the WA56 experiment
142: revealed the lack of these states at the level of production cross
143: sections smaller by an order of magnitude than those estimated in
144: Ref. \cite{2}. In fact, the results of a search for narrow $p\bar p$
145: states produced backwards in the baryon exchange reactions $\pi^-p\to
146: \Delta_f^0(1232)\bar pp$, $\pi^-p\to N_f^0(1520)\bar pp$ at 12 GeV
147: and $\pi^+p\to \Delta_f^{++}(1232)\bar pp$ at 20 GeV have been
148: reported. No structures of statistical significance exceeding three
149: standard deviations have been found in the $p\bar p$ mass spectra.
150: The cross section limits obtained were three to five times lower than
151: the cross sections of Ref. \cite{2} depending on the channel.
152:
153: Quite a new analysis of the WA56 experimental data was performed in
154: the nineties \cite{8} with a chief aim to study the channels of the
155: baryon exchange reactions which were not taken into consideration
156: before. In fact, the baryon exchange reactions have been studied
157: where one particle was either undetected or incompletely
158: reconstructed but the $p\bar p$ system was produced in central region
159: (see Fig. 1c). Namely, the following channels have been considered
160: \begin{equation}
161: \pi^+ + p \to p_f + X^0 + \pi_s^+, \quad X^0\to p\bar p,
162: \label{barexch1}
163: \end{equation}
164: \begin{equation}
165: \pi^+ + p \to p_f + \pi^+ + X^0 + \pi_s^0, \quad X^0\to p\bar p,
166: \label{barexch2}
167: \end{equation}
168: \begin{equation}
169: \pi^+ + p \to p_f + \pi^+ + \pi^+ + X^0 + \pi_s^-, \quad X^0\to p\bar
170: p, \label{barexch3}
171: \end{equation}
172: at 20 GeV and
173: \begin{equation}
174: \pi^- + p \to p_f + X^0 + \pi_s^-, \quad X^0\to p\bar p,
175: \label{barexch4}
176: \end{equation}
177: \begin{equation}
178: \pi^- + p \to p_f + \pi^- + X^0 + \pi_s^0, \quad X^0\to p\bar p,
179: \label{barexch5}
180: \end{equation}
181: at 12 GeV, where $p_f$ was an identified fast proton with the
182: momentum greater than half the beam momentum, and the slow pions
183: ($\pi_s^0,\pi_s^\pm$) went undetected by the OMEGA spectrometer but
184: were reconstructed by the corresponding kinematic fits; see, however,
185: the details in original paper \cite{8}. As pointed out, the very good
186: momentum resolution available from OMEGA tracks measurements allowed
187: a clear separation and identification of one missing pion channel in
188: the data. That investigation was motivated in the main by previous
189: analysis \cite{9} of the WA56 experimental data on the central
190: production of $\rho^0$, $f_2$ and $\rho_3^0$ mesons in the baryon
191: exchange reaction
192:
193: \begin{equation}
194: \pi^+ + p \to p_f + M^0 + \pi_s^+, \quad M^0\to \pi^+\pi^-,
195: \label{barexch6}
196: \end{equation}
197: at 20 GeV (see Fig. 1b) where the similar experimental approach was
198: used for the first time. A clear signal of a narrow $p\bar p$ state
199: with a mass of 2.02 GeV and a width less 10 MeV was seen in all of
200: the channels (\ref{barexch1}-\ref{barexch5}) in a restricted
201: kinematic region close to the central one. From the upper limits on
202: mesonic ($\pi^+\pi^-$, $\pi^+\pi^-\pi^0$, $2\pi^+2\pi^-$, $K^+K^-$)
203: decay modes of the observed state it was found that this state was
204: not noticeably coupled to mesons. That is why, it was claimed that
205: this 2.02 GeV $p\bar p$ state coupled strongly to baryons and
206: decoupled from mesons might be a baryonium candidate.
207:
208: The combined $p\bar p$ mass spectrum for the events in $\pi^+p$
209: (channels (\ref{barexch1},\ref{barexch2})) and $\pi^-p$ (channels
210: (\ref{barexch4},\ref{barexch5})) exposures, plotted with the 5 MeV
211: width bins, is shown in Figure 2 extracted from original paper
212: \cite{8}. As seen in Fig.~2, the clear signal is visible at a mass of
213: 2.02 GeV. The statistical significance of this peak was estimated to
214: be exceeded 5 standard deviations. It should also be pointed out that
215: no statistically significant peak at a mass of 2.20 GeV, reported
216: earlier in Ref. \cite{2}, was observed in the data. However, at the
217: same time, the mass fit results for the 2.02 GeV $p\bar p$ state
218: accurately collected in Table 1 of Ref. \cite{8} turned out in a good
219: agreement with the similar results of Ref. \cite{2}.
220:
221: Of course, the question arises: could the contradicted experimental
222: results on (non)ob\-servation of narrow $p\bar p$ states be really
223: compatible? In Ref. \cite{8} it has been presented a shining example
224: of that how the discrepancies could be explained. First of all, it
225: has been pointed out that all experimental results on the production
226: cross sections depend on the model which has been used for reaction
227: mechanism in order to extract the experimental acceptances. For
228: example, the experimental acceptances were calculated in Ref.
229: \cite{2}, using mechanism of backward production of the 2.02 GeV
230: $p\bar p$ state. For a proper comparison of the results the authors
231: of Ref. \cite{8} recalculated the acceptance of the experimental
232: setup \cite{2} assuming their central production mechanism. As a
233: result with the revised acceptance calculation, the production cross
234: section of the 2.02 GeV $p\bar p$ state was found to be in experiment
235: \cite{2} such as obtained in experiment \cite{8} with a good
236: agreement. The same has turned out true in a comparison of the
237: results from the experiments \cite{7} and \cite{8}. In other words,
238: the authors of Ref. \cite{8} have simply explained how to get an
239: agreement with the experimental results on the production of the 2.02
240: GeV $p\bar p$ state reported in \cite{2,7} and their own experiment
241: \cite{8}. An explanation of the absence of the 2.02 $p\bar p$ state
242: in other experiments (see e.g. \cite{3,4,5}) has also given in Ref.
243: \cite{8}, and we refer the interested reader to the original paper.
244:
245: Concerning formation experiments it was shown in Ref. \cite{8} that
246: the experimental cross section of the (formation) process $N\bar N
247: \rightarrow R \rightarrow N\bar N$ at the resonance peak crucially
248: depends on the ratio of the resonance width to the experimental
249: resolution
250: \begin{equation}
251: \sigma^{N\bar N \rightarrow N\bar
252: N}_{exp}(\sqrt{s}=\sqrt{s_R})\vert_{M_R=2.02}\simeq
253: 2.25(2J+1)\beta^2_{N\bar
254: N}\frac{\Gamma}{2\Delta}\arctan\frac{2\Delta}{\Gamma}\,\mbox{mb},
255: \label{sigmaexp}
256: \end{equation}
257: where $J$, $\beta_{N\bar N}$, $\Gamma$ are spin, elasticity
258: ($\beta_{N\bar N}=1$ for a pure baryonium decaying into $N\bar N$
259: only), width of the resonance, $\Delta$ is experimental resolution.
260: The experimental restriction on the width of the 2.02 GeV $p\bar p$
261: state obtained in Ref. \cite{8} ($\Gamma\leq 10$)MeV should be taken
262: into account to understand the discrepancies with the formation
263: experiments where no signal of the 2.02 GeV $p\bar p$ state was
264: found.
265:
266: It should also be mentioned a remark in Ref. \cite{8} on the central
267: production mechanism priority over the backward production one. In
268: fact, this peculiarity was established earlier in the study of
269: central production of ordinary mesons \cite{9} where the enhancement
270: factor did not exceed 4, but for the 2.02 GeV $p\bar p$ state
271: production this factor turned out at least 20. To explain such
272: peculiarity it may be assumed that the observed narrow $p\bar p$
273: state is coupled with the $\Delta\bar\Delta$ system much stronger
274: than with the $N\bar N$ one. In that case a process of backward
275: production, where double $\Delta$ exchange does not work, is
276: naturally suppressed, and the dominated process is given by diagram
277: 1c shown in Fig. 1. Here the narrowness of the observed $p\bar p$
278: state might also be explained as follows \cite{8}: this state being
279: produced in the collision of virtual $\Delta$ and $\bar\Delta$ cannot
280: decay into the real pair $\Delta\bar\Delta$ because this decay
281: channel is forbidden by phase space, and only suppressed $p\bar p$
282: channel is open.
283:
284: Bear all of that in mind, we would like to emphasize that careful
285: analysis performed in Ref. \cite{8} might be served as an excellent
286: introduction to the recent widely discussed question: why the
287: $\Theta$ baryon states observed in a more than 10 experiments are not
288: seen in the others?
289:
290: In Ref. \cite{10}, where some of our previous studies were partially
291: summarized, it has been claimed that existence of the extra
292: dimensions in the spirit of Kaluza and Klein together with some novel
293: dynamical ideas may provide new conceptual issues for the global
294: solution of the spectral problem in hadron physics to build up a
295: unified picture for hadron spectra. Earlier we have applied these
296: ideas to analyze the nucleon-nucleon dynamics at very low energies
297: \cite{11}. Really, we have found that simple formula for KK
298: excitations provided by Kaluza-Klein approach accurately described
299: the experimentally observed irregularities in the mass spectrum of
300: $pp$ and $p\bar p$ systems. The result of our analysis is presented
301: in Table 1 extracted from Ref. \cite{11} (see also the references
302: therein where the experimental data have been extracted from). As is
303: seen from Table 1, the nucleon-nucleon dynamics at low energies
304: reveals quite a remarkable development of Kaluza-Klein picture.
305: Moreover, $M_n^{pp}=M_n^{p\bar p}$ is predicted by Kaluza-Klein
306: scenario, and Table 1 contains an experimental confirmation of this
307: fact as well.
308:
309: Of course it was intriguing for us to perform the spectral analysis
310: of the experimental material from the WA56 Experiment at CERN in
311: order to learn how does it look in the unified picture for hadron
312: spectra. To attain this goal the calculated spectral lines taken from
313: Table 1 have been plotted in Fig.~3 together with the $p\bar p$ mass
314: spectrum presented in Ref. \cite{8}. As is seen, the experimentally
315: observed 2.02 GeV $p\bar p$ state just lives in the $M_{9}^{p\bar
316: p}$(2019.66\,MeV)-storey of KK tower for the $p\bar p$ system. What
317: is more important, a strong correlation of the spectral lines with
318: the other peaks on the histogram is also clear seen in Fig.~3. In our
319: opinion, that correlation is not an accidental coincidence, it
320: displays the existence of the states observed in other experiments.
321: In fact, the different experiments reflect only partial fragments of
322: the whole unified picture.
323:
324: Our conservative estimate for the widths of KK excitations looks like
325: \begin{equation}\label{width}
326: \Gamma_n \sim \frac{\alpha}{2}\cdot\frac{n}{R}\sim 0.4\cdot n\,
327: \mbox{MeV},
328: \end{equation}
329: where $n$ is the number of KK excitation, and $\alpha \sim 0.02$,
330: $R^{-1}=41.48\,\mbox{MeV}$ are known from our previous studies
331: \cite{11}. This gives $\Gamma_{9}\sim 3.6$ MeV which does not
332: contradict to the experimental estimate.
333:
334: At last, we also predicted the narrow charged $p\bar n$ and $\bar pn$
335: states with the similar mass: $M_9^{p\bar n}=M_9^{\bar pn}= 2020.84$
336: MeV (see Table 2 in Ref. \cite{11}). An evidence for the existence of
337: such states has been reported in Ref. \cite{12}, where the authors
338: claimed that these states were observed in the reactions $\bar
339: pp\rightarrow p_f\bar n\pi^+\pi^-\pi^-$ at 6 GeV and $\bar
340: pp\rightarrow \pi_f^+\bar pn\pi^+\pi^-$ at 9 GeV in a triggered
341: bubble chamber experiment at the SLAC Hybrid Facility. Clearly, this
342: experimental observation is an additional argument in favour of the
343: Kaluza-Klein picture.
344:
345: In summary, the results of the WA56 Experiment at CERN, with account
346: of analysis made in \cite{8}, are naturally incorporated in the
347: recently developed unified picture for hadron spectra. Our analysis
348: shows that the experimentally observed narrow baryonium states are
349: the states living in the corresponding KK tower built in according to
350: the earlier established general, physical law. We hope that new
351: experiments will appear in the near future to enrich our
352: understanding of the nucleon-nucleon dynamics. We also share that a
353: call for the future hadronic experiments with high resolution and
354: sensitivity has clearly to be supported.
355:
356: \begin{thebibliography}{**}
357: \bibitem{1}
358: Review of Particle Properties, Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 204}, 1 - 486
359: (1988).
360: \bibitem{2}
361: P.~Benkheiri {\it et al},
362: % ``Evidence for two narrow $p\bar p$ resonances at 2020 MeV and 2200 MeV''
363: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 68}, 483 (1977).
364: \bibitem{3}
365: R.~M.~Bionta {\it et al},
366: % Search for Narrow $\p\bar p$ States in the Reaction $\pi^+p\to \Delt_f^{++}\bar pp$.
367: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 44}, 909 (1980).
368: \bibitem{4}
369: A.~S.~Carroll {\it et al},
370: % Search for Narrow $\p\bar p$ States.
371: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 44}, 1572 (1980).
372: \bibitem{5}
373: A.~D.~J.~Banks {\it et al},
374: % Search for baryonium production in $\p\bar p$ and $K^-p$ interactions at 12 GeV.
375: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 100}, 191 (1981).
376: \bibitem{6}
377: J.~Boucrat {\it et al},
378: % ``Search for non-strange exotic mesons produced via baryon exchange''
379: Nucl. Phys. {\bf B121}, 251 (1977).
380: \bibitem{7}
381: Z.~Ajaltouni {\it et al},
382: % ``Search for narrow $\p\bar p$ states in baryon exchange ractions''
383: Nucl. Phys. {\bf B209}, 301 (1982).
384: \bibitem{8}
385: A.~Ferrer {\it et al},
386: % ``Comprehensive evidence about a narrow $p\bar p$ state of mass 2.02 GeV''
387: Preprint CERN/EP/98-66, May 5, 1998; see also preliminary results
388: presented in Conference Proceedings: A.~Ferrer {\it et al}, in {\it
389: Proceedings of the 2nd Biennial Conference on Low Energy Antiproton
390: Physics LEAP'92}, Courmyer, 1992, Nucl. Phys. A {\bf 558} (1993) 191;
391: A.~Ferrer {\it et al}, in {\it Proceedings of the 6th International
392: Conference on Hadron Spectroscopy HADRON'95}, Manchester, 1995,
393: edited by M.~C.~Birse, G.~D.~Lafferty and J.~A.~McGobern, World
394: Scientific, Singapore 1996, p.460.
395: \bibitem{9}
396: V.~F.~Perepelitsa {\it et al},
397: % ``Observation of meson central production in baryon exchange processes''
398: Z. Phys. C {\bf 52}, 407 (1991).
399: \bibitem{10}
400: A. A.~Arkhipov,
401: % ``Hadron Spectra and Kaluza-Klein Picture of the World''
402: in {\it Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Hadron
403: Spectroscopy}, Ashaffenburg, Germany, 31 August -- 6 September 2003,
404: edited by E.~Klempt, H.~Koch, H.~Orth, AIP (2004), vol. 717, p. 680;
405: arXiv:hep-ph/0309327 (2003); preprint IHEP 2003-37, Protvino, 2003,
406: available at http://dbserv.ihep.su/\~{}pubs/prep2003/ps/2003-37.pdf
407: \bibitem{11}
408: A. A.~Arkhipov,
409: % ``Kaluza-Klein Picture and Nucleon-Nucleon Dynamics at Low Energies''
410: arXiv:hep-ph/0302164 (2003).
411: \bibitem{12}
412: % ``Evidence for a narrow $N\bar N$ state at 2.02 GeV/c$^2$ in 6 and 9 GeV/c
413: % antiproton interactions''
414: F.~Azooz {\it et al}, Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 122}, 471 (1983).
415: \end{thebibliography}
416:
417: \newpage
418: \vspace*{2cm}
419: \begin{center}
420: Table 1. Kaluza-Klein tower of KK excitations for $pp(p\bar p)$
421: system and experimental data.
422:
423: \vspace{5mm} \hbox to \hsize {\hss
424: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|l|l||c|c|l|l|} \hline \vspace{-4.5mm}
425: & & & & & & & \\
426: n & $M_n^{pp}$\,MeV & $M_{exp}^{pp}$\,MeV &
427: $M_{exp}^{p\bar p}$\,MeV & n & $M_n^{pp}$\,MeV & $M_{exp}^{pp}$\,MeV
428: & $M_{exp}^{p\bar p}$\,MeV \\ \hline 1 & 1878.38 & 1877.5 $\pm$ 0.5 &
429: 1873 $\pm$ 2.5 & 15 & 2251.68 & 2240 $\pm$ 5 & 2250 $\pm$ 15
430: \\ \hline
431: 2 & 1883.87 & 1886 $\pm$ 1 & 1870 $\pm$ 10 & 16 & 2298.57 & 2282
432: $\pm$ 4 & 2300 $\pm$ 20 \\ \hline 3 & 1892.98 & 1898 $\pm$ 1 & 1897
433: $\pm$ 1 & 17 & 2347.45 & 2350 & 2340 $\pm$ 40
434: \\ \hline
435: 4 & 1905.66 & 1904 $\pm$ 2 & 1910 $\pm$ 30 & 18 & 2398.21 & & 2380
436: $\pm$ 10
437: \\ \hline
438: 5 & 1921.84 & 1916 $\pm$ 2 & $\sim $ 1920 & 19 & 2450.73 & & 2450
439: $\pm$ 10 \\ \cline{5-8}
440: & & 1926 $\pm$ 2 & & 20 & 2504.90 & & $\sim$
441: 2500 \\ \hline
442: & & 1937 $\pm$ 2 & 1939 $\pm$ 2 & 21 & 2560.61 &
443: & \\ \cline{5-8}
444: 6 & 1941.44 & 1942 $\pm$ 2 & 1940 $\pm$ 1 & 22 & 2617.76 & & $\sim$
445: 2620
446: \\ \cline{5-8}
447: & & $\sim$1945 & 1942 $\pm$ 5 & 23 & 2676.27 & & \\ \hline
448: 7 & 1964.35 & 1965 $\pm$ 2 & 1968 & 24 & 2736.04 & 2735 & 2710 $\pm$
449: 20 \\ \cline{5-8}
450: & & 1969 $\pm$ 2 & 1960 $\pm$ 15 & 25 & 2796.99 & &
451: \\ \hline
452: 8 & 1990.46 & 1980 $\pm$ 2 & $1990^{\,+15}_{\,-30}$ & 26 & 2859.05 &
453: & 2850 $\pm$ 5 \\ \cline{5-8}
454: & & 1999 $\pm$ 2 & & 27 & 2922.15 & &
455: \\ \hline
456: 9 & 2019.63 & 2017 $\pm$ 3 & 2020 $\pm$ 3 & 28 & 2986.22 & & $\mathbf{2984 \pm 2.1 \pm 1.0}$ \\
457: \hline 10 & 2051.75 & 2046 $\pm$ 3 & 2040 $\pm$ 40 & 29 & 3051.20 &
458: &
459: \\ \cline{5-8}
460: & & $\sim$2050 & 2060 $\pm$ 20 & 30 & 3117.04 & & \\ \hline
461: 11 & 2086.68 & 2087 $\pm$ 3 & 2080 $\pm$ 10 & 31 & 3183.67 & & \\
462: \cline{5-8}
463: & & & 2090 $\pm$ 20 & 32 & 3251.06 & & \\ \hline
464: & & $\sim$2122 & 2105 $\pm$ 15 & 33 & 3319.15 & & \\ \cline{5-8}
465: 12 & 2124.27 & 2121 $\pm$ 3 & 2110 $\pm$ 10 & 34 & 3387.90 & & 3370
466: $\pm$ 10 \\ \cline{5-8}
467: & & 2129 $\pm$ 5 & 2140 $\pm$ 30 & 35 & 3457.28
468: & & \\ \hline 13 & 2164.39 & $\sim$2150 & 2165 $\pm$ 45 & 36 &
469: 3527.25 & & $h_c(1P)(3526)$ \\ \cline{5-8}
470: & & 2172 $\pm$ 5 & 2180 $\pm$ 10 & 37 & 3597.77 &
471: & 3600
472: $\pm$ 20 \\ \hline 14 & 2206.91 & 2192 $\pm$ 3 & 2207 $\pm$
473: 13 & 38 & 3668.81 & & \\ \hline
474: \end{tabular}
475: \hss}
476:
477: \end{center}
478:
479: \newpage
480: \vspace*{6cm}
481:
482: \begin{figure}[htb]
483: \begin{center}
484: \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{fig1n.eps}\label{fig1}
485: \end{center}
486: \caption{The diagrams from Ref. \cite{8} which display: the backward
487: production of the $p\bar p$ state in $\pi^{-}p$ interactions (a),
488: the central production of a meson in $\pi^{+}p$ interactions (b), the
489: central production of the $p\bar p$ state in $\pi^{-}p$ interactions
490: via double $\Delta$ exchange (c).}
491: \end{figure}
492:
493: \newpage
494: \vspace*{6cm}
495:
496: \begin{figure}[htb]
497: \begin{center}
498: \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{Fig7.eps}\label{fig2}
499: \end{center}
500: \vspace*{-1.5cm} \caption{Combined $p\bar p$ mass spectrum for the
501: events of reactions (\ref{barexch1},\ref{barexch4}) and
502: (\ref{barexch2},\ref{barexch5}) presented in Ref. \cite{8}.}
503: \end{figure}
504:
505: \newpage
506: \vspace*{6cm}
507:
508: \begin{figure}[htb]
509: \begin{center}
510: \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{Fig7new.eps}\label{fig3}
511: \end{center}
512: \vspace*{-0.5cm}
513: \caption{The same as Fig.~2 but with the vertical
514: (spectral) lines corresponding to KK tower for $p\bar p$ system; see
515: Table 1.}
516: \end{figure}
517:
518: \end{document}
519: